User talk:SvonHalenbach

Welcome to the Commons, SvonHalenbach!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Mes oculaires.JPG

Hello Stefan !
I did what you've asked me ! Greetings, --Rogilbert 16:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:EyeoftheTiger-SvH1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EyeoftheTiger-SvH1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 22:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Image:F-117_Grey_Dragon.jpg

Hi, I found it from US DoD web site. If it's not in good quality, there is nothing else I could do. Sorry.--Cobrachen 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the reply. --SvonHalenbach 08:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Black-headed Gull - St James 27s Park 2C London - Nov 2006 edit2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Black-headed Gull - St James 27s Park 2C London - Nov 2006 edit2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 15:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Redrosedust wright f2000.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Redrosedust wright f2000.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Lewis Hine Power house mechanic working on steam pump.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lewis Hine Power house mechanic working on steam pump.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 16:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests

I have posted a new proposal on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates regarding the creation of FP-related contests and would like your feedback on the idea. This message is being sent to some of the regular contributors to Commons:Featured picture candidates. Alvesgaspar 15:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

:-(

Dein Kommentar hört sich ja so an, als sein die Nominierung der Euromünze nicht nur überflüssig, sondern sogar ein Ärgernis. Vielleicht solltest Du nicht vergessen, dass die Mitarbeit an diesem Projekt hier Spass machen soll, da sind Kommentare wie deiner auf FPC eher kontraproduktiv. Und das jetzt zu einer Debatte über Self-noms zu machen finde ich unfair, das war grad mal die zweite, nach langer Zeit, ausserdem nominiere ich längst nich alle meine FPs selber, und wenn, dann mit recht hoher Erfolgsquote. Na ja, entschuldige jedenfalls wenn ich Dir wichtigen screen space mit meiner dreisten Nominierung gestohlen habe. --Dschwen 20:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Lieber Daniel, ich kann verstehen, das du jetzt sauer bist, weil du die Nominierung deines Bildes persönlich nimmst. Es ist völlig normal, sein eigenes Bild für besonders gut zu halten. Selbst diejenigen, die verwackelte Bilder machen, sind teilweise sehr stolz auf ihr Werk, weil sie die Fehler einfach nicht sehen. Es kam auch schon vor, das ich ein Bild als FP vorgeschlagen habe, weil ich es für besonders toll hielt, diese Meinung aber nicht von den anderen geteilt wurde. Das bedeutet, das man es nicht persönlich nehmen sollte, wenn etwas nicht so funktioniert wie gewünscht. Ich habe den Kommentar so geschrieben, wie ich ihn gemeint habe. Das ist meine Meinung. Ich hatte bei der amerikanischen Münze bereits geschrieben, das eine gewöhnliche Münze meiner Meinung nach zu uninteressant für eine Wahl zum FP ist. Daraufhin hast du eine weitere gewöhnliche Münze vorgeschlagen. Hast du aus meinem Kommentar nichts gelernt oder hast du ihn nicht gelesen? Für mich ist das so, als ob mein Kommentar nicht gehört wurde. Ich möchte dir den Spass an den Nominierungen nicht nehmen, deshalb kannst du ruhig weitere Münzen vorschlagen, aber bitte erwarte nicht, das deine Vorschläge immer angenommen werden. Ich werde nichts mehr in Bezug auf self-noms schreiben. Ich finde es gut, wie du die hohe Auflösung und Detailschärfe hinbekommen hast. Wie gesagt, fände ich es toll, wenn du eine antike Münze so nominieren würdest. Dann hättest du meine Stimme sicher! Grüße --Stefan

Hast du aus meinem Kommentar nichts gelernt oder hast du ihn nicht gelesen?. Au weia. Na ja, zum Glück bestimmst Du ja nicht alleine was gefeatured wird und was nicht. Ich behalte mir vor Deine Kommentare zu lesen, und ggf. nicht mit ihnen übereinzustimmen. Siehe auch meine Begründung zur Euromünzen Nominierung (oder hast Du die nicht gelesen?). Aber löblich, dass Du nicht nur meckerst, sondern auch fleißig neue Bilder vorschlägst! --Dschwen 00:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, da habe ich vielleicht ein wenig dick aufgetragen. Tut mir leid. Ich bin auch nicht perfekt. Willst du jetzt noch lange herumschmollen oder kriegst du dich wieder ein? Ich werde deine Begründung gleich lesen und versuche mich zu bemühen. Grüße --SvonHalenbach 00:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Du bist ja ein ganz schön schneller Antworter. Ich schmoll doch gar nicht mehr, das hielt maximal zwei Minuten an ;-) --Dschwen 00:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Licenses

•  Comment Ok, nice photo. I have seen it right after you uploaded it. I did not nominate it because of the blurry house in the background and your wrong licensing information. Can you change at least the information to "use with attribution"? GFDL means we can use your picture for commercial things. --SvonHalenbach 12:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment Speaking about licensing informations, I haven't read them all - and I'm kinda lost in all the licenses - could you point me the right license to use ? I'm ok if images are used in wikipedia, but otherwise only for non-commercial or educational use. Thanks. --Atoma 13:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• CC-By-SA and GFDL are both licenses that allow use of your material for money earning purposes. If you don't want that, then you may not whant to upload here. If you whant to give something but don't whant to be ripped off your best pictures you can do as some of the other contributors. They upload just low resolution (downsampled) versions of their work and write on their site that when professional publisher whant to use a higher resolution version for printing purposes they can ask, make a contract and get a high res photo. That prevents nobody to use the low res version for (small) commercial prints with atribution of your name. Because attribution is here the absolute minimum when you don't use PD as license. I am no lawyer, so for specific questions you should read the license text yourself or ask (and pay) a lawyer. Greetings --SvonHalenbach 14:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Well for FP images need to be in pretty good resolution, so I'm gonna leave them anyways. I don't make a living out of my photos (not yet! hehe), and I don't think either that anyone could make a fortune by selling them :) (at least that's what I hope lol) --Atoma 15:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Notre Dame

Notre Dame

Glad you liked my pictures, I'm just moving on from amateur to serious-amateur (just got my first DSLR a couple of months ago), so hope I'll produce more great photos from now on. On what the Notre Dame picture is concerned, the published version has suffered only a tilt in Photoshop (2 degrees to the left), so this may have introduced some light blur. However, yesterday I've looked at the original version and it's not that sharp either. I think I was slightly out-of-focus... the kit lens seems ok, other photos turned out just fine... next time I'm gonna go out for night photos I'm gonna do what you said and pay some attention to the final quality of the images. Greetings ! --Atoma 15:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Mr.Svon,

Would you please tell me how to nominate pictures?!!! I tried but there is some propblem or a missing point.

My user name is Legendry 16:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Legendry

Thanks in advance,

---

Thanks too much Mr.Stefan, I finally made my first nomination because of your detailed instructions. Legendry 05:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Legendry

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Zireiner See Rofanspitze 2006 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Zireiner See Rofanspitze 2006 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 23:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Euro Construction.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Euro Construction.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 23:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Grafschaft Mark 1791 Friedrich C Mueller.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Grafschaft Mark 1791 Friedrich C Mueller.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 09:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 20:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg

File:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg

Hello, you have supported to the promotion of the image Image:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg to the Featured Picture status, and I thank you for that. Currently this image has been proposed to deletion by another user under the pretext that there is no FOP in France.

I believe that the image is not a copyright infringement; the main subject is the water from the fountain, the Grand Arche is unavoidable in the background. In what the lightning of the fountain is concerned, as user Arad mentioned in the original nomination, they are very simple and they do not have a special plan, so they cannot be copyrighted.

If you wish you can express your opinion on this issue on the deletion request page of this image, otherwise the image could disappear soon; the usage check indicates that the image is already used in around 150 pages around internation wikis (usage check), it would be a pity for the community to see a FP image disappear.

Thanks and best regards, --Atoma 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Chip Textil Rfid

You can solicitude the delete of the fail in Rfid wikipedia, is my property and you don't have permission to modify or deleted the file.

asisconsultores

Category:Liercourt

Je sais que plusieurs de ces photos sont floues. J'attendais depuis 2 ou 3 ans pour les refaire. Il faut pour cela que ce soit en hiver (pas de feuilles) et que la terre soit sèche ! C'est loin d'être toujours le cas en Picardie. Je ne voulais pas les déposer. Mais j'ai eu l'occasion de discuter de cet oppidum avec des universitaires de la section "Archéologie et Histoire" d'Amiens. Nous avons convenu il y a 1 mois que je les mettrai sur Commons. Depuis l'un des chercheurs s'est rendu sur les lieux et a fait aussi quelques photos. Il s'agit de convenir entre nous lesquelles sont utiles pour montrer par exemple l'importance de la pente, et éventuellement de localiser à défaut, pour l'instant de relevés GPS. J'ai prévenu par le titre et dans le commentaire que ces photos sont "à refaire" ! Si "on" pouvait attendre 2 mois avant de les détruire, nous aurions le temps de reprendre les mêmes sous le même angle, mais nettes, cette fois. Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry, but i understand no french. Please upload only photos, which are usable. Blurry pictures are not useable here. --SvonHalenbach (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Und mein English ist so schlecht ! Mein Deutsch ist dagegen besser ...

Ich weiss genau, dass viele meiner Fotos überhaupt nicht scharf sind. Ich soll seit Monaten wieder hin, um besser zu fotografieren. Aber es soll nur im Winter sein (keine Blätter), und ich muss warten, bis der Boden trocken genug wird. Ich habe meine so schlechten Fotos trotzdem bei Commons deponiert, weil Leute aus der Uni von Amiens sie brauchen. Bitte können wir bis März warten ? ... dann kann ich wahrscheinlich beste Fotos produzieren. Die Leute von der Uni woll(t)en alle Dokumente und Fotos (auch nicht so gut und auch "ein wenig" unscharf) um "schnell" und provisorisch diesen Ort besser zu kennen (wie schräg sind die verschiedenen Hänge, usw) ! Freundliche Grüsse ! Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 15:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Wenn es nur darum geht, dass die Leute von der Uni die Bilder so schnell wie möglich bekommen, dann kannst Du sie Ihnen entweder per email senden, upload auf deren FTP-Server, auf deinen eigenen Webserver oder per Post als CD-Rom. Wäre das Möglich? Grüße Stefan --SvonHalenbach (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Ja, wahrscheinlich ! Aber warum eine solche Eile ?... 2 "kleine" Monate höchtens ! Sowieso kein Kontakt mit ihnen bis Mitte nächste Woche, im Prinzip ! Marc - --Markus3 (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Na, mir soll es egal sein. Mach was Du willst. Kennst du eigentlich die neue Burg südlich von Paris? Warst Du dort schon mal? Hast Du vielleicht Fotos? Grüße --SvonHalenbach (talk) 15:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Was ist, wie heisst doch diese "neue Burg südlich von Paris" ? Ich habe sowieso keine Fotos davon ! Marc - --Markus3 (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Du kennst http://pbis.de/system-cgi/blog/index.php?itemid=2345 Guedelon noch nicht? :-) --SvonHalenbach (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Den Namen hatte ich vergessen, aber ich habe schon etwas darüber gelesen. Mehrere WP haben Artikel ... und Commons hat Fotos Category:Guédelon. Danke für diese Information ! - Marc - --Markus3 (talk) 17:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Moon and clouds Openfootage720x406x15fps.ogv

File:Moon and clouds Openfootage720x406x15fps.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(Not entirely certain of what you intended for this, especially as you seem to have been welcomed, involved and "rewarded" for your commons involvement.) -- Queeg (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)