Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/29
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore TheNuggeteer (talk) 00:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, low quality pet photo. Omphalographer (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
I have been asked to mark as public domain and cite source of pub domain images inside my image Dr pangloss (talk) 03:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Please delete this file, I use Special:Upload upload file, no camera location. メイド理世 (talk) 11:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no reference that proves it is a {{PD-Iran}}
{{User|POS78}} talk 18:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 22:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This service is being used to host a pornographic movie in its entirety which is not apporopriate. 51.9.238.2 10:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Debbie Does Dallas.ogv. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 12:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Presence of pornographic and inappropriate content for children Zaher6689 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as before. --Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This person is not relevant and is not relevant, keep adding and making contributions that aren't fair. Alisha Yvonne (talk) 21:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This is a disruptive and obviously baseless DR opened in response to a DR I opened (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Noah D'castellano.jpg) which this user objects to. More info at COM:AN#User persistently removing DR template Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This obviously not the work of a fandom wiki, not that I can find it under the given licence there anyway. Uploader removed dw-no-source which I added but without providing the proper source info. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 06:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Copying over uploaders comments by the uploader, Alisha Yvonne, to the talk page: This is a Own work and contribution with Tabletop Time Wiki, stop saying that we don't have the enough sources to attribute Noah D'castellano File on wikipedia Commons, it's not fair, We just helping without getting pay, thanks to everyone. Alisha Yvonne (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We don't want to hear again people like Cakelot1 talk about my work it's not contribs a derivative work and no source or permission of the original work is provided. How? Everything is there the enough information is there, people need to help instead of being rude and deleting someone work even less when it's for free. Alisha Yvonne (talk) 05:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- To the above I'll add that the image was uploaded to "Tabletop Time Wiki" by a Juanadisqueapata, who is not obviously the same person given on the watermark of the image (that seems to be "Hector Pacha photography"?). If the uploader wants to explain how they know that the original photographer is the one who uploaded it to fandom, or has released it under the given licence, that would be a good way to keep the file here. I'd also recommend you read Commons:License laundering Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader has also added Photos taken by Emily Araujo to the image description, but again that isn't the person who uploaded it to fandom, nor are they the person on the watermark, and again hasn't been shown to release the image under a free licence. If the uploader has some information about the actual original photographer (not re-uploaders) it would be much appreciated. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Licensing issues as detailed by the nominator, plus scope issues: there's no evidence of this person's notability. The only usage of the file was on a Wikidata item about someone else, which was hijacked to be about this person. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10 - The uploader's behavior in response to this DR has also warranted a block. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Is he someone in scope? 186.174.91.156 23:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10 - The uploader's behavior in response to this DR has also warranted a block. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SanderK1313 (talk · contribs)
[edit]CC BY-NC 4.0 according to Github, not allowed on Commons.
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
ru:Solpartners is twice deleted due to non-notability. Probably its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
As the original uploader of this image, since I have uploaded a higher quality file named File:شمس الدین حسینی -Shamseddin Hosseini at the opening ceremony of the 7th Stock Exchange, Bank and Insurance Exhibition in Tehran.png, I request to remove this version quickly. Alireza numberone (talk) 11:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as CSD G7 by Billinghurst. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No proof of being a work created by 90eghtesadi (no watermark, no photographer credit, no indication). HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. You have to get over the false idea that pornography cannot be hosted by Commons. Commons does not censor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
The existence of pornographic content Zaher6689 (talk) 17:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
It's my file Kratant maps (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD U1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
The person is not relevant Alisha Yvonne (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted F10 by Pi.1415926535. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This logo is not freely licensed at haliatx.com. Thuresson (talk) 23:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1, G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dqs center vn (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Nicht eigenes Werk. 186.173.39.250 14:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This photo was uploaded with permission of, and in the presence of, the copyright holder, who will be sending a statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. DrZoops (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Diese Datei wird nicht mehr benötigt, da sie von mir durch andere Dateien mit zielführenderen Ausschnitten ersetzt wurde. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 09:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Datei wurde durch bessere Dateien ersetzt Foxy5 (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no now reasons given. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Diese Datei wurde von mir auf Commons gesetzt, wird aber nicht mehr benötigt und überfrachtet unnötig die Kategorie. Foxy5 (talk) 09:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Falta permiso 186.175.93.156 16:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024052910010541 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep The permission has been received and granted, this media should not be deleted.--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Jaqen (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
duplicate Manikandan Baskaran786 (talk) 12:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Counterfeit Purses as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The Flickr account owner is "Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung".The Flickr page credits "Stephan Röhl" as the photographer.
- Keep Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, also known as the Heinrich Böll Foundation is not a person. It is a political foundation, as you can see by that link, or just by the Flickr About page, https://www.flickr.com/people/boellstiftung/. Therefore, it has to have people take pictures for it. It does not have fingers, or eyes. And yet, it can own property, including copyright to photos, Flickr accounts, all that. So what that page saying is that "Stephan Röhl" - an actual person - took the actual picture, acting for HBS. Then HBS uploaded it under a free license- again, no doubt an actual person did this! - but they were acting for HBS. That's how organizations work. There is no reason to doubt that the license is valid. GRuban (talk) 23:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Here is another HBS photo by Stephan Rohl, this time on the HBS web page: https://greencampus.boell.de/de/afar/node%3A94957 - he is apparently an HBS photographer. Here is another one https://www.boell.de/de/fachtagung-wie-geht-es-uns-morgen-uebersichtsseite. Here is one on Commons: File:Seraphina Lenz by Stephan Röhl Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung 2012.jpg --GRuban (talk) 23:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining this. How do I withdraw the deletion request? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 02:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe you "withdraw" the request simply by commenting that you would like to do so, as you have essentially just done. It can then be closed early as withdrawn as soon as someone gets round to doing so. Felix QW (talk) 10:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Felix QW Thank you. If it needs to be said, I withdraw this deletion request. I misunderstood the discrepancy between the name of the Flickr account and the photographer credit. GRuban has explained it and it is not an issue. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Felix QW Thank you. If it needs to be said, I withdraw this deletion request. I misunderstood the discrepancy between the name of the Flickr account and the photographer credit. GRuban has explained it and it is not an issue. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe you "withdraw" the request simply by commenting that you would like to do so, as you have essentially just done. It can then be closed early as withdrawn as soon as someone gets round to doing so. Felix QW (talk) 10:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 11:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Adani Milbar's Fortune Refined Soybean Oil Advertisement, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India (Ank Kumar).jpg
[edit]Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
uncertain what educative purpose this image is, or could be. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
doubftul author of themself; not certain that we have an educational value, or personal upload — billinghurst sDrewth 11:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
looks like advertising rather than fulfilling an educational purpose — billinghurst sDrewth 11:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
src = https://i0.wp.com/somanytraveltales.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/QUeens-Palace-2_edited-1-scaled.jpg Wdwd (talk) 12:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
src = https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/images.deccanchronicle.com/dc-Cover-ja4fks9bma2kk0ltqqqt79qdt6-20230731231434.Medi.jpeg Wdwd (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 14:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no reference that proves it is a {{PD-Iran}}
{{User|POS78}} talk 18:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no reference that proves it is a {{PD-Iran}}
{{User|POS78}} talk 18:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no reference that proves it is a {{PD-Iran}}
{{User|POS78}} talk 18:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
An " Unknown author" can not license his or her work with a Creative Commons license. A verifiable source is necessary to check that this is the intention of the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. (A definition of a wiki, probably written as a homework assignment.) Omphalographer (talk) 00:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by website; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Pixelated and non-standard angles. Have a bunch of alts in Category:Pyruvic acid. Also noting this file is not correctly named (it is "pyruvic acid" not the "pyruvate" conjugate base) DMacks (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete, low quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:FRANKTOOX
[edit]Unsourced and random pulled pictures from Copyrighted sources, unlikely to be the owner or post it under CC, Possible Copyvio-Hyperba21 (talk) 05:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
unused raster image (I removed all references to it); vector version exists: KB Belarusan.svg DmitTrix (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication it's freely licensed or truly bhcourier's work. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, website is copyrighted. Not suitable for Commons. --Kadı Message 06:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Google Map are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Map from timeanddate.com is copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 2014 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Art works by Willi H. Lippert
[edit]German artist de:Willi H. Lippert died in 1981, so these ca. 1921 emergency banknotes are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2052.
- File:Belgard - 2Mark ND (2).jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 1Mark (2).jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 1Mark.jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 25Pf. (2).jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 25Pf.jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 2Mark.jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 50Pf. (2).jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 50Pf.jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 75Pf. (2).jpg
- File:Belgard a.d.Persante (Białogard) - 75Pf.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IsabelleRottiers1991 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files need correct licensing or either permission from the creator.
- File:Beeld van O.-L.-Vrouw.jpg
- File:De monstrans van de Brielkerk.jpg
- File:Misviering.png
- File:Kostenraming bouw kerk van den Briel.jpg
- File:Kerkhof van den briel 1997.jpg
- File:Westgevel Brielkerk voor 1987.jpg
- File:Uitbreiding van de westgevel 1987.jpg
- File:Afgewerkte zijbeuken in de westgevel.jpg
- File:Schets Pastorij Briel.jpg
- File:Pastorij 1951, aanpalend aan de kerk van den Briel.jpg
- File:Glasraam Brielkerk.jpg
- File:Vooraanzicht afgewerkte kerk van den briel 1949.jpg
- File:Zijaanzicht afgewerkte kerk van den Briel 1949.jpg
- File:Gedenksteen tijdens de opbouw kerk den briel Juli 1949.jpg
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
and
doubtful authorship claim; looks more spamlike — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
== Reason for deletion == The residents of the house do not want a photo of their residence to be published. This is a violation of their privacy rights according to GDPR. Please consider removing this photo from Wikimedia Commons. 46.5.57.63 13:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion, see de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. --Achim55 (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: As explained by Achim55. Apart from that, the address is not linked to specific persons. Whose personal rights should therefore be affected here? --Zinnmann (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 06:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cube124875 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused notes and diagrams which appear to be some kind of personal research project, and out of COM:SCOPE for Commons.
- File:AITuringTest1.png
- File:Nothing.png
- File:Voidvoidless.png
- File:24 hour cube infinity clock.png
- File:Infinity Cube Circle.png
- File:Infinitycube.png
- File:Cube Characters.png
- File:Cubecharacters.png
- File:Genesis Chapter 1 Indexed RGB Code.png
- File:47656E736973 Chapter 3.png
- File:47656E736973 Chapter 2.png
- File:RGB Hex Code Symbolizing PNG Image to Base 64 Hex Ascii Code.png
- File:Genesis Chapter 1.png
- File:Alef Image Base64 Ascii Hex Code Stored Using RGB Code In PNG File.png
- File:Magen Cube Alphabet.png
- File:RGB Binary Block.png
- File:Derived Alphabet from a Hexagon Cube sequenced by 1 2 4 8 7 5.jpg
- File:Two Tetrahedron Light Star.jpg
Belbury (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Complete nonsense; the uploader's reply to this nomination fails to state any coherent purpose for these files. Also nominating the following similar files uploaded subsequent to this nomination:
- Omphalographer (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok you do not understand something because you don't you want to make it so someone can look at this to see what they make of it. This is somewhat of Mathematical Art. What is your education level. That matters. Cube124875 (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the purpose of this deletion request, it really doesn't. This is a place to decide whether the files should be retained or not; discussion about any participant is irrelevant. Arlo James Barnes 21:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Great News all these images can be put to github through github pages. Do what you got to do because I will take steps to put these images to github pages. Whoever the trolls are you will not stop these images which point to number line repeating sequence .... 1 2 4 8 7 5 .... Fibonacci also reduced to single digit for repeating sequence. Fibonacci sequence known back to 300 Before Jesus. It's ok trolls wikipedia will not matter once on github. 2607:FEA8:6902:D600:0:0:0:95C 18:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the purpose of this deletion request, it really doesn't. This is a place to decide whether the files should be retained or not; discussion about any participant is irrelevant. Arlo James Barnes 21:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok you do not understand something because you don't you want to make it so someone can look at this to see what they make of it. This is somewhat of Mathematical Art. What is your education level. That matters. Cube124875 (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cube124875 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two more unexplained and mysterious personal maths diagrams from this user, out of COM:SCOPE with no apparent educational use and no usage in projects.
Belbury (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fictional flag of made-up nation per its description. And note a Google search turns up apparently unrelated fictional works: <https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&hs=5M4&sca_esv=e87395d15064fe37&q=Kingdom+of+Velgoria&nfpr=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiayYrdjLOGAxVxIDQIHRENCeEQvgUoAXoECAsQAg&biw=1918&bih=914&dpr=1> Geoff Who, me? 14:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nicht eigenes Werk. 186.173.39.250 14:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyvio. --Kadı Message 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nicht eigenes Werk. 186.173.39.250 14:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyvio. --Kadı Message 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Obvious CopyViolation Ђидо (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, book cover. --Kadı Message 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nicht eigenes Werk. 186.173.39.250 15:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyvio. --Kadı Message 06:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of the video feed on the large screen. Belbury (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also File:Magyar Péter 2024-04-06.jpg (hist • logs • abuse log). Bencemac (talk) 17:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Doubtful that the YouTube channel this music video still is taken from (two videos, 12 views) is an official one. Belbury (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This is not an official channel, blatant copyvio. Michalg95 (talk) 12:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Image (or snapshot) has a watermark of RMC. I don't know if it's under copyright. Haitamhaitam0001 (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyvio. --Kadı Message 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Neither intended nor useful for educational/encyclopedic purposes. Sinigh (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Furthermore:
- Sinigh (talk) 16:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused flag maps in a category indicating they are fictional flags. Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Flag Map of Mauryan Empire.png
- File:Flag map of the Ayyubid Dynasty.png
- File:Flag map of the Ghaznavid Empire (Version 1).png
- File:Flag map of the Ghaznavid Empire (Version 2).png
- File:Flag Map of the Hafsid Dynasty.png
- File:Flag map of the Hafsid Dynasty.png
- File:Flag Map Of The Kazakh Khanate.png
- File:Flag map of the kingdom of Imereti.png
- File:Flag map of the Seljuk Empire.png
- File:Flag Map of Timurid Empire.png
- File:Flag Map Of Zirid Dynasty.svg
- File:Bukhara 1814.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused flags in a category of fictional flags to be replaced and deleted
- File:Aghlabid flag.jpg
- File:Aquitaine duke of flag.png
- File:Ardalan.png
- File:Artaxiad.jpg
- File:Avar devleti.png
- File:Beni Amer Maghreb.jpg
- File:Bitlis Flag.png
- File:Chola flag hd.png
- File:Cumania Khanate flag.jpg
- File:Drapeau Almohade.jpg
- File:Drapeau Beni Amer du Maghreb.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Beni Amer au Maroc et en Algérie.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Beni Amer du Maroc et d’Algérie.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Beni Amer d’Algérie et du Maroc.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Beni Amer d’Algérie.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Beni Amer.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Hammadides.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Zirides après 1050.jpg
- File:Drapeau des Zirides.jpg
- File:Drapeau du nationalisme Maure.jpg
- File:Drapeau du Sultanat Hammadide.jpg
- File:Drapeau d’espagne Amer.jpg
- File:Drapeau Fatimide.jpg
- File:Drapeau Hammadide.png
- File:Drapeau Kabyle.jpg
- File:Drapeau Nationalisme Maghrébin.jpg
- File:Drapeau souvent associé aux Beni Amer.jpg
- File:Drapeau Ziride.jpg
- File:Drapeau ziride.jpg
- File:Drapeau Zirides.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support this type of ahistorical nonsense should be deleted on sight. Constantine ✍ 11:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Too blurred Rathfelder (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fake trademark. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Since this is a simple typeset word, I'm not sure we need any of these, but I know we don't need 24 of them.
- File:Carrefour svg (1).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (2).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (3).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (4).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (1).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (10).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (11).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (12).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (13).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (14).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (15).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (16).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (17).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (18).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (19).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (2).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (3).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (4).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (5).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (6).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (7).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (8).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (9).svg
- File:Carrefour Negro.svg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Way more, see Category:Hipermercado Carrefour and Category:Produits Carrefour. They have at least 6 accounts. See also Special:DeletedContributions/Jesus Rojas995. --Achim55 (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 15:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Is the logo of Carrefour above or below the Threshold of Originality? There are several files with the logo on Commons, and a single DR seems to be the right solution in order to fix the matter.
- File:Carrefour 1980.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 1.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 10.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 11.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 12.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 13.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 2.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 3.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 4.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 5.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 6.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 7.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 8.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 PNG Imagen.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 svg logos 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 svg logos.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995-1997.svg
- File:Carrefour 2008.svg
- File:Carrefour 2009.svg
- File:Carrefour Argentina con la Letra C.svg
- File:Carrefour Colombia logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Páginas.png
- File:Carrefour svg (10).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (16).svg
- File:Carrefour1975.svg
- File:Carrefour1983.svg
- File:Carrefour67.svg
- File:Hipermercado Carrefour 1995 3.svg
- File:MaxiGB-Carrefour Arlon.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 09:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]I'm not sure why we need more than one of these in black. There are also 15 more in various colors.
- File:Carrefour 1995 (10).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (11).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (13).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (14).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (15).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (16).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (17).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (18).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (19).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (20).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (21).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (22).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (27).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (28).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (29).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (31).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (32).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (33).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (35).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (36).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (7).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (9).svg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]This monument is recent. There is no FoP in Cameroon.
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 01.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 02.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 03.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 04.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 05.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 06.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 07.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 08.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Out of the project scope or copyright violations (or both) (per above DRs)
- File:Carrefour Color.png
- File:Carrefour Numeros.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 1.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 2.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 3.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas.svg
Nutshinou Talk! 17:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete we should delete everything uploaded by this user. everything they uploaded was either a copyvio or a mess for us to clear up.
- All the best -- Chuck Talk 17:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group, France has a very low threshold of originality.
- File:Carrefour 1992 35.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 36.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 37.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 38.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 39.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 40.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 41.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 42.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 43.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 44.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 45.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 46.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 47.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 48.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 49.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 50.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 51.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 52.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 53.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 54.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 55.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 56.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 57.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 58.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 59.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 60.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 61.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 62.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 63.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 64.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 65.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 66.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 67.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 68.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 69.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 70.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 71.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 72.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 73.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 74.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 75.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 76.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 77.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 78.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 79.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 80.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 81.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 82.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 83.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 84.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 85.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 86.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 87.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 88.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 89.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 19.svg
Günther Frager (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a screenshot, own work claim is questionable. Google indicates that it was available on the internet as early as 2013. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
small and blurred. No explanation Rathfelder (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
blurred and no explanation Rathfelder (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The person is not relevant Alisha Yvonne (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete While this is in use (and the DR itself is spurious/retaliatory from a now-indeffed user), there's no valid source for the image and no proof it's under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The person is not relevant Alisha Yvonne (talk) 21:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Facebook file. Delete. 186.174.91.156 02:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Undeleted: per request for discussion. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing new. 186.172.201.2 23:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete I like that this is a CC0 photo that includes stretch marks, but it is probably too low quality to justify keeping. Brianjd (talk) 13:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- No meaningful description or categories. Brianjd (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Undeleted: per request for discussion. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing special. 186.172.201.2 23:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete I like that this is a CC0 photo that includes stretch marks, but it is probably too low quality to justify keeping. Brianjd (talk) 13:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- No meaningful description or categories. Brianjd (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Just a line. No explanation Rathfelder (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope as gives no context why the house would be notible. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
The file is not free, has no source and author. The user uploaded the file without the author's permission Nurtenge (talk) 09:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Providing links to posts on Instagram 1 and 2 -- Nurtenge (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) — doclys (❀) 06:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/choupigloupi
[edit]Questionable source account, a Flickr user who seems to just upload pictures of musicians and animals and cartoon characters they found and liked online (eg. The Simpsons), CC-BY licencing them as their own work.
Belbury (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Encik Tekateki (talk · contribs)
[edit]photo of photo = com:dw.--RZuo (talk) 11:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I would like to object * File:Taib Mahmud & Ragad Waleed Alkurdi portrait.jpg , I would like to object the deletion nomination as based on the official Malaysia's Government Copyright Act 1987 (Amendment 2022), clause 13 (2) (i)
(13) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the right of control under that subsection does not include the right to control— (2)any use made of a work by or under the direction or control of the Government, by the National Archives or any State Archives, by the National Library, or any State library, or by such public libraries and educational, scientific or professional institutions as the Minister may by order prescribe, where such use is in the public interest and is compatible with fair practice and the provisions of any regulations, and— (i) no profit is derived therefrom; and (ii) no admission fee is charged for the performance,showing or playing, if any, to the public of the work thus used;
Based on above Copyright Act 1987 , this work of Taib Mahmud and his wife may be under the direction or control of the state government Sarawak which led me to believe this nomination of deletion is invalid as the copyright rule does not applicable here.
- Commented by Encik Tekateki (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment If the showcasing local banner of local Malaysia business is not OK then the following picture should be deleted too for COM:DW
- E.g:
- File:Piccadilly Restaurant Malaysia Menu.jpg - Menu cover
- File:Viva,Tanjung Tokong PulauPinang.jpg - Similiar issue of food banner showing the cuisine
- E.g:
- Commented by Encik Tekateki (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete these two too.--RZuo (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence offered that the portrait was a work of the Malaysia government, the rest per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Encik Tekateki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, metadata points to Facebook, and the user uploaded plenty of obvious copyvios (source were stock images or Instagram).
- File:Striped Swimming Suit.jpg
- File:Polka dotted swimsuit.jpg
- File:Red Checkered Swimsuit.jpg
- File:Houndstooth Swimsuit.jpg
- File:Robert Kuok holding her granddaughter circa 1995.jpg
- File:Jack Ma at Singapore Marina Bay Sands (circa 2015).jpg
- File:Timah Whisky Malaysia.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 18:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Deutsche Reichsbahn N° 99 3361, ex Mecklenburg-Pommersche Schmalspurbahn N° 14², Orenstein & Koppel works N° 13200 of 1938.jpg
[edit]Engine has a last overhaul date from 1965, as can be seen in a book publication of Eisenbahn Kurier Verlag, image is not older than 70 years. [1] Photographer is most likely German photographer Hans Müller. Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
© Copyright 2024 Harian Singgalang®. All rights reserved Urang Kamang (talk) 23:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PalauanLibertarian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be a work by Mehr News Agency because the organization has no presence in East Jerusalem (where this file was created, under effective Israeli control) and this seems to be among the widely-shared videos published on social media by unknown citizen-reporters.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with you, just like what I successfully nominated https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Transfer_of_the_bodies_of_the_victims_of_the_Varzaqan_helicopter_crash.webm for deletion. So, it is copyrighted by whoever took the video. Ishagaturo (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Not own work 181.203.108.242 00:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. small, low-res no metadata. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused, exact duplicate of File:Logo Moscow 1980.png ReneeWrites (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
not an own work, probably from Facebook (reversed image search result) Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 03:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Distorted THF ring geometry. Have File:Juglanin.svg that is better in that regard and also a generally higher-quality image. DMacks (talk) 03:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The non-standard depiction of stereochemical information (half w:en:Haworth projection and half w:en:Natta projection) is confusing and ambiguous. File:Juglanin.svg should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Pixelated not-large raster image. Have File:2-Mercaptopropionsäure.svg as high quality in same orientation and detail/style. DMacks (talk) 03:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality text; have File:Lithium peroxide.svg as improved version. DMacks (talk) 03:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Pixelated raster image; have File:Melilotic acid.svg DMacks (talk) 03:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Ludwig Arnold M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Ludwig Arnold M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Ludwig Arnold M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient or doubtful author or license. It's a derivative work of a photograph that was taken by an unknown author until 1973. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrong positioned. There is already thr same foto with the right position Robertgarrigos (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 2018 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded by her Daughter, I think she just does not understand the process on how to provide the nessecery documents to wikimedia, that she is giving permission (as lone survivor) Adtonko (talk) 19:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 2018 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded by her Daughter, I think she just does not understand the process on how to provide the nessecery documents to wikimedia, that she is giving permission (as lone survivor) Adtonko (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 2018 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded by her Daughter, I think she just does not understand the process on how to provide the nessecery documents to wikimedia, that she is giving permission (as lone survivor) Adtonko (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 2018 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded by her Daughter, I think she just does not understand the process on how to provide the nessecery documents to wikimedia, that she is giving permission (as lone survivor) Adtonko (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 2018 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded by her Daughter, I think she just does not understand the process on how to provide the nessecery documents to wikimedia, that she is giving permission (as lone survivor) Adtonko (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 2018 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo,
- WARUM soll sie gelöscht werden ? Nestlerin (talk) 11:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Nestlerin: Wegen Urheberrechten. Die Künstlerin starb 2018, ihre Werke sind noch bis Ende 2088 urheberrechtlich geschützt. Und Wikimedia Commons sowie Wikipedia wollen nur urheberrechtlich freie Werke (Commons:Licensing/de). Um diese Datei (und die anderen mit Nestler-Werken) zu behalten, braucht es eine akzeptierte Genehmigung von einem/r Inhaber/in der Urheberrechte (zunächst sind das die Künstler selbst, nach deren Tod oft die Erben). Details siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 11:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 10:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Author and date corrected. --RAN (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 11:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 11:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marbletan as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; undetermined whether it is the contributor or somebody else, put before the community — billinghurst sDrewth 12:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museum Voorlinden
[edit]Anselm Kiefer is still alive and the art is exhibited in a museum in the Netherlands. In the Netherlands a standard of life + 70 years exist and interiors of Museums are explicitly excluded from FoP in the Netherlands
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 1.jpg
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 2.jpg
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 3.jpg
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 4.jpg
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 5.jpg
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 6.jpg
- File:Kunstwerk Anselm Kiefer tentoongesteld in museum Voorlinden 7.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for requesting deletion, I looked into the FOP and copyright law and it indeed indicated that I was wrong to publish these photos. Mx Lucy (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be a work by Mehr News Agency because the organization has no presence in East Jerusalem (where this file was created, under effective Israeli control) and this seems to be screenshot of a widely-shared video published on social media by an unknown citizen-reporter. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with you, just like what I successfully nominated https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Transfer_of_the_bodies_of_the_victims_of_the_Varzaqan_helicopter_crash.webm for deletion. So, it is copyrighted by whoever took the video. Ishagaturo (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Originated from AP Photo, not Flickr user's work (Flickr-washing) A1Cafel (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Can't claim author's life plus 70 years or fewer for an undated photo. No suggestion in the source of how old the subject is or was at any point. Belbury (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Nicht PD. 186.173.39.250 15:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is a KOGL file. Gksyy (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Valid KOGL license at the source. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused image tagged as {{Low quality chem}}. The chemical symbols are merged with the bonds. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete hand-drawn (and not even high-res at that). Alts include File:Pet reação.jpg, File:PBAT Synthesis Step 1.png, and File:Polyester formation via direct esterification.svg. DMacks (talk) 07:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the JPG for being of low quality as well. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
So many reverted by me. Mirditor22 (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tiisu Sharif (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of low-quality AI art (gibberish on the boards, misshapen limbs, etc). Easily replaceable by actual photographs. Out of scope.
- File:A child crying in an african home.jpg
- File:African Children going to school under the rain.jpg
- File:Going to school under a heavy rain.jpg
- File:How passionate teachers are in Africa.jpg
- File:Learning Mathematics in Africa.jpg
- File:Schools under trees in an African community.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The shell logo is the point of this image. See deletion request related to the logo and discussion over the logo on the Village Pump. SDudley (talk) 01:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't the logo of Shell; this is the logo of the former MonteShell company, an Italian joint-venture between Shell and Montedison. This is a photo of one of the pieces of the Fisogni Museum, that freely allows the diffusion of photos of its pieces. The photo correctly reports the "trademark" template. I am totally against cancellation --Moxmarco (talk) 12:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps I don’t understand, but this logo looks identical to the Shell logo to me. And while the photo might be licensed out by the museum that is for the photo. However, the underlying work in it is still copyrighted and since Shell or Montedison themselves didn’t release the work under a license then the license might not be valid enough for use on Commons. Also reporting a trademark doesn’t outweigh a copyright. I’d like to hear thoughts from others on this. SDudley (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The difference with the Shell logo lies precisely in the (substantial) presence of the MonteShell writing, which in fact disappeared in 1995 when Shell dissolved the partnership with Montedison. In case of cancellation, would it be possible to re-upload it only on Wiki it.? Moxmarco (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean by the difference being the text, but the actual design of the shell is the same and the text addition does not change that logo. Also I see that the photo is your own work, so I greatly understand your desire to keep it up. I've got nothing against you, and would just like to state that. This is merely a case of copyright at work. I'll ping @Clindberg since they work on a lot of copyright issues. The image might qualify for a fair use on Wikipedia. SDudley (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe the difference is substantial. MonteShell's logo was a composite one, which featured both elements of the Shell brand (the yellow shell) and different elements (the red writing with white background, or the white frame). And so it appeared on any every graphics of MonteShell (gadgets, cans, sponsorships...). I believe it should be treated as a whole, it's as a trademark of a separate company, even if part of the trademark contains symbols of Shell. Moxmarco (talk) 17:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even the color codes were slightly different (for petrol pumps, for example), with shades of yellow and red different (albeit slightly) between Shell and MonteShell (as demonstrated by a pantone preserved in the Museum Moxmarco (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The same can be said for Shell-Mex and BP Limited and its logo. The logo featured the symbols of Shell and BP, but it was a brand in its own right Moxmarco (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am replying to all of what you've written, but deferring to just this one comment.
- I think since the underlying element of the composite image is copyrighted then the rest of the imagery is also restricted even if the elements are changed. At the heart of this discussion is what you even mentioned, the yellow shell logo. Since that is copyrighted and included at all then the rest of the image must be restricted. The independent brands don't constitute their own rights that then supersede something else. In my view this is a case of the sign being a derivative, and by US law derivatives that are public domain have copyright restrictions until the original is free of copyright.
- After this comment I am going to wait for some other input and see what others say. SDudley (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even the color codes were slightly different (for petrol pumps, for example), with shades of yellow and red different (albeit slightly) between Shell and MonteShell (as demonstrated by a pantone preserved in the Museum Moxmarco (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe the difference is substantial. MonteShell's logo was a composite one, which featured both elements of the Shell brand (the yellow shell) and different elements (the red writing with white background, or the white frame). And so it appeared on any every graphics of MonteShell (gadgets, cans, sponsorships...). I believe it should be treated as a whole, it's as a trademark of a separate company, even if part of the trademark contains symbols of Shell. Moxmarco (talk) 17:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean by the difference being the text, but the actual design of the shell is the same and the text addition does not change that logo. Also I see that the photo is your own work, so I greatly understand your desire to keep it up. I've got nothing against you, and would just like to state that. This is merely a case of copyright at work. I'll ping @Clindberg since they work on a lot of copyright issues. The image might qualify for a fair use on Wikipedia. SDudley (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The difference with the Shell logo lies precisely in the (substantial) presence of the MonteShell writing, which in fact disappeared in 1995 when Shell dissolved the partnership with Montedison. In case of cancellation, would it be possible to re-upload it only on Wiki it.? Moxmarco (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps I don’t understand, but this logo looks identical to the Shell logo to me. And while the photo might be licensed out by the museum that is for the photo. However, the underlying work in it is still copyrighted and since Shell or Montedison themselves didn’t release the work under a license then the license might not be valid enough for use on Commons. Also reporting a trademark doesn’t outweigh a copyright. I’d like to hear thoughts from others on this. SDudley (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The addition of "MonteShell" certainly makes a difference from an educational and scope standpoint, and it's a different trademark. From a copyright standpoint though, it's just a copy of an existing logo with a non-copyrightable word added, meaning it has the same copyright status as the original logo. The photo is focusing on that logo; it's not really a wider subject, so can't argue "incidental". It appears to be pretty much the same logo as from 1971. The question is more the copyright status of the logo itself. It's copyrightable in the UK, the US is a bit more questionable but possibly. On the other hand, if it was published before 1989 in the U.S. without a copyright notice (almost certainly), it became PD there. I would have to guess there's a good chance the company used the logo in the U.S. within 30 days of it being used in the UK, in which case it would have avoided the URAA. Thus, I'm not entirely sure of the URAA status, and not sure we can delete on those grounds. The "simultaneous publication" thing even makes the country of origin of the logo a question -- if they used it in a 50-year-from publication country (say Canada), that may be the country of origin and it may be expired there. A photo like this in the UK itself would probably be fine due to FoP even if still copyrighted. In the end... this seems too edgy to me to delete. The .svg itself may have an additional copyright on the vectorization (the choice of the particular control points over and above the graphic result), so probably best to leave that as-is. But Weak keep for me on the photo. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input! I haven't done a thorough search for a copyright notice for the logo, so I can't comment on that aspect. SDudley (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The addition of "MonteShell" certainly makes a difference from an educational and scope standpoint, and it's a different trademark. From a copyright standpoint though, it's just a copy of an existing logo with a non-copyrightable word added, meaning it has the same copyright status as the original logo. The photo is focusing on that logo; it's not really a wider subject, so can't argue "incidental". It appears to be pretty much the same logo as from 1971. The question is more the copyright status of the logo itself. It's copyrightable in the UK, the US is a bit more questionable but possibly. On the other hand, if it was published before 1989 in the U.S. without a copyright notice (almost certainly), it became PD there. I would have to guess there's a good chance the company used the logo in the U.S. within 30 days of it being used in the UK, in which case it would have avoided the URAA. Thus, I'm not entirely sure of the URAA status, and not sure we can delete on those grounds. The "simultaneous publication" thing even makes the country of origin of the logo a question -- if they used it in a 50-year-from publication country (say Canada), that may be the country of origin and it may be expired there. A photo like this in the UK itself would probably be fine due to FoP even if still copyrighted. In the end... this seems too edgy to me to delete. The .svg itself may have an additional copyright on the vectorization (the choice of the particular control points over and above the graphic result), so probably best to leave that as-is. But Weak keep for me on the photo. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- So can we conclude with Keep? --Moxmarco (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Museum Label of the Louvre, with too much coyrighted content Miniwark (talk) 08:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- accord pour supprimer Ted1968 (talk) 10:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
and
- File:Robert Anwyll Gourgets.jpg
- File:Golden Medal of Carolus III of Spain c.1705.jpg
- File:Robert Anwyll Militaria.jpg
- File:Robert Anwyll Medals Gold.jpg
- File:Robert Anwyll Army Gold Medals.jpg
- File:Robert Anwyll's Medals held at Nation Museum of Wales.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Obvious copyright violation of various copyright works; put before community, no evidence presented for assertion — billinghurst sDrewth 10:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seems to me to be a museum's presentation of a set of antiquarian works, though maybe the person's personal medals as well. That the ribbons are new just says to me that they have been restored, not that they are copyright. I would love to hear more from the uploader and the nominator for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not finding other versions of these specific images elsewhere. The Exif metadata seems consistent from image to image. The decorations and miniature portrait are dated to early 1800s or earlier so there's no current artist's copyright. There're no COM:FOP UK concerns for 3D objects. On the uploader's talk page, he notes that the items are held by the National Museum of Wales, but not on public display; he stated that the items were taken out of storage so he could view (and photograph) them. I'm not seeing anything that seems inconsistent with that. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good day to you, I have been told I cannot include pictures of the subjects medals (despite me seeing them in person) because they are "held" by the National Museum of Wales. I was at the museum and the medals were taken out of storage for my benefit and I used my camera to take the pictures (I therefore own the picture). I have the permission of the Museum to display the medals as it's my ancestor and the medals are now back in storage never to be seen again. As I own the photograph and the medals do belong to my ancestor, why should they not be displayed on his bio? I have seen many portraits with no affiliation to the bio being published on other wiki pages, so I cannot see why I cannot publish a picture I own of an item that reinforces the history of the bio? It's not as if I am trying to say I won them, I am attributing them to the person in the bio. Sheckles384 (talk) 13:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pesäpallotuomari (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no evidence of being released under the stated license or published before 1929.
Antti T. Leppänen (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete both. Most likely above COM:TOO. 01miki10 (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 2018/public domain not before 2088.
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
copyrigth violation; artist died in 2018.
- File:Bubul.jpg
- File:Hieronyus-und-Gingolf.jpg
- File:Käptn-auf-Tonne-sw.jpg
- File:Gitarre-und-Leila.jpg
- File:Rinaldo-Spielfigur.jpg
- File:Käptn-auf-Tonne.jpg
- File:Irene-im-Tollerort.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- As stated in the deletion requests on the induvidual pieces:
- Uploaded by her Daughter, I think she just does not understand the process on how to provide the nessecery documents to wikimedia, that she is giving permission (as lone survivor), someone should talk her through the VRT process. Adtonko (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
плохое качество Sshut (talk) 09:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Assuming that google translate was right in translating the reason with “poor quality” -- it took 10 seconds in GIMP to improve. Should be the same for the following two requests. Given that uploader also started the request it could be considered a courtesy request. Alas after 1 1/2 years changing his mind is not on. The image was published under an IRREVOCABLE CC license, thus should be kept. (Lousy images abound on commons) --Zenwort (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- лишнее translates as “excess” -- once more: no valid reason. --Zenwort (talk) 07:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep not valid reason for deletion and COM:INUSE. Günther Frager (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 18:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Putitonamap98 as Copyvio (Copyvio); tn.gov isn't allowing non-US connections so we need to check the license at the host site — billinghurst sDrewth 11:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The only copyright notice I could find on tn.gov is for the state museum. The legislature portion of the site where this image was found does not have any visible copyright notice or statement. The image itself was extracted from a PDF showing all the members of the 111th general assembly; no copyright statement on the PDF. According to Harvard, Tennessee's attorney general has asserted that copyright on photographs taken by the State of Tennessee's Photographic Services is held by the state, but otherwise only a few other government works are under copyright by statute. Given all that, I'm not sure this isn't under copyright (or CC 2.5 licensable), but there isn't a clear copyright or license listed on tn.gov either. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with proof of PD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
That's not right at all! This is NOT the flag of Namibia. 170.235.203.18 14:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Agree Delete files uploaded by this user:
- File:Flag-of-namibia-2023.png and File:Flag-of-namibia-2023.svg clearly not Namibian flag
- File:Flag-of-Indonesia.png clearly not Indonesian flag (looks like Indian/Niger flag)
Bennylin (yes?) 15:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
The source [2] credits the file "© Jacob Appelbaum/A Creative Commons licensed photo." The phrase is not specific enough to determine whether Commons can host it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Deutsche Welle ran the same image (cropped) crediting it as "cc-by-sa/2.0/Jacob Appelbaum". Wired ran it with the credit "Jacob Appelbaum/Flickr". Neither of these instance (nor the Vanity Fair source) link to the Flickr account to confirm. Wait, here is the original posted by Appelbaum (ioerror) to Flickr {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} is confirmed. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Tcr25 Thanks for taking the time to find the original. I withdraw the nomination. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome; I've overwritten with the original and updated the file information and license. It still needs admin/reviewer check to officially confirm the license. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Tcr25 Thanks for taking the time to find the original. I withdraw the nomination. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept. Nomination withdrawn. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
There is no problem with the textlogo but some overwrittings (like this)) are clear copyvios and need to be deleted Fma12 (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
C'est la photo du ...? 186.175.93.156 19:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ce fichier représente la photo du Dr Sigame Boubacar Maiga. Foussko (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Image appears at Linked In, which is copyrighted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Wurde durch eine bessere Datei [3] ersetzt. Foxxy199 (talk) 08:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Habe beide Karten geschaffen. Die bessere ersetzt die nahezu ähnliche Vorläufer-Karte, die keine Verwendung mehr findet. Foxxy199
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Avec un copyright dans le commentaire est t'on bien dans une image librement réutilisable ? Bertrand Labévue (talk) 18:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fictional flags of Wallachia
[edit]Unused flags in a subcategory of flags fictional flags to be depreciated
- File:Flag of Wallachia.jpg (fictional)
- File:Flag of Wallachia1850.jpg (fictional)
- File:Shipping wallachian flag 1840.jpg (historic: source John B. Norie & J. S. Hobbs, Flags of all Seafaring Nations, 1848, 73 pp. with 24 plates showing 306 illustrations, later cited by Rudolf Hoffmann: Flaggen aller seefahrenden Nationen, Ed. Maritim, Hamburg, Germany 1987, ISBN 3-89225-153-3).
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The third one is not fictional but very blurry. --2A01:CB1C:821F:A400:D013:56:E71D:6793 12:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Vahid Nouri (IRI) and Hélios Latchoumanaya (FRA) at the 2020 Summer Paralympics judo semifinal.jpg
[edit]This photograph lacks any of usual indications of being a work by Tasnim (documented here), and it was taken outside Iran. Considering that this file had been available on the internet as early as 29 August 2021 (before publication by Tasnim, on 28 Spetember 2021) makes it very difficult to believe that Tasnim owns the rights. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 11:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Correction in date done. I don't think there is anything wrong with Source and author name. Looks like a random photograph with unknown author. 2405:201:6006:9A83:2CE9:4A85:B8FF:CD76 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 1937 image has URAA copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal vacation photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Given the scope of Wikimedia Commons is very broad, it’s within the COM:SCOPE and certainly has the educational value. The image shows the kayaker’s feet in leather sandals on the kayak deck, a common sight from the kayaker’s perspective when resting between paddles. The view and composition can be instructive, educational. Both the shoes and the kayak are from notable companies. Labeling this image a ‘personal vacation photo’ is a misinterpretation, there’s nothing personal or vacational about it. This is a photo from a kayak marathon in Leyte Gulf off the coast of Samar Island. It also has some historical documentary value, in part because the products depicted are probably no longer in production. --Argenberg (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
- File:Crf180x35 1.jpg
- File:Carrefour Express.png
- File:Carrefour City Café logo.png
- File:Carrefour GB logo 2009.png
- File:Carrefour Planet logo.png
- File:Carrefour Poland logo.svg
- File:Carrefour-planet 1.jpg
- File:Groupe Carrefour 2009.gif
- File:Groupe Carrefour logo.svg
- File:Logo Carrefour Express.svg
- File:Logo Carrefour Market.svg
- File:Logo carrefour planet 2.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png
- File:LogoCarrefourMóvil.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png is the right group logo. --Swaf75 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Carrefour logo is above the Threshold of originality in the US. Similar images are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Especially the Subway and Nikken logos are good examples. The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter. It's not complicated enough to be above the US standards.
Comparison This logo Logos below the Threshold of Originality in the United States -
The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter.I added description. --Rezonansowy
-
- Rezonansowy (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I updated my comment to include a comparison. --Rezonansowy (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain. So your keep rationale does not apply. Also, "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I updated my comment to include a comparison. --Rezonansowy (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- The design of all works listed above bases on File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png, which is the original logo and trademark of Carrefour. Carrefour S.A. is a company which bases in France. Country of origin of the Carrefour logo is France then.
- According to Commons:Copyright rules policy: Files uploaded to Commons should be free both in the country of origin (as defined by the Berne Convention) and in the United States of America. Other juridical territories are not involved in the creation of the work.
- According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the examples of the Threshold of originality in the United States given above are: OK to upload to Commons, because they are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection and are judged ineligible for copyright protection by a court or similar authority.
- According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the Threshold of originality in the France: asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author" and In practice, it depends on the work in question, but this has left the bar quite low for many works where an artistic intent can be shown.
- The logo of Carrefour Group presents the design of the same nature which was already judged by the United States Copyright Office as ineligible to be copyrighted. In addition, the logo of Carrefour Group does not show the personality of the author or the artistic intent as required by the French law. Therefore, the copyright for the logo of Carrefour Group does not exist.
- Your deletion rationale was a statement Not too simple for copyright. and a link reference to another Deletion Request – Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
- The contents of the above reference also consist only of votes and personal opinions without expressing any arguments of legal nature. The above Deletion Request authored by Taivo with a rationale: I think, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. and that statement on the previous similar case on Commons that in my opinion the result was incorrect. The request was closed by Natuur12 with a rationale I agree with Taivo, non basic shapes.
- As a response to the above, I posted my vote of speedy keep for this work as I did not see a right rationale to contest the copyright status of this logo just by relying on personal votes. Unlike yours unfortunately, my vote has a rationale with a legal basis.
- Regarding the legal jurisdiction of the Carrefour Group headquarters it is difficult for me to understand why you provided Spain as a country which is binding in Threshold of originality to the logo of Carrefour Group. Spain was not the source country of this work and/or the country originally involved in its initial creation or first publication.
- If believe that you should include Spain in the copyright scope of the work and did not find information you were interested then you should rather apply the rule of assuming the copyright good status of the file. You just provide as your rationale a statement that I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain.
- You responded that So your keep rationale does not apply. Regarding the above this is not right.
- Your deletion rationale does not conform to a Community standards of Wikimedia Commons which are described under Commons:Deletion policy#Reasons for deletion.
- You answered me that "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. First, as I stated above I voted speedy keep because your deletion request seems to be likely invalid as it does not contain any specific rationale. By simply stating Not too simple for copyright you do not start the discussion. Also, who is we? General statements that we do that or we do not that which lack any specific disclosure are very misleading, especially when it is written by an admin. You should not do that. Please be more specific and direct. This is also described in Commons:Deletion requests.Added a reference.--Rezonansowy (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- In addition, by saying to me that by expressing my vote you are attempting to censor the discussion is likely against my freedom of speech and expression and also against the Community standards and policies like Commons:Assume good faith which says about the assuming good faith standard. Even if you did not intend to you actually did me feel like this. I and everyone else have a right to express any vote or opinion which does not hurt anyone or is not against the law.
- @Magog the Ogre, Natuur12, and Taivo: I really appreciate your service as admins on Commons but guys, what are you doing? You seem to completely ignore any standards of merit discussion which always shall include legal and material arguments. You replaced these standards with a showcase of personal opinions and agreements. Such practice lead to performing a wrong decisions and they harm everyone at Wikimedia Commons. I am very tired of dealing with such crap. When even admins do it, it is enough. Pleas stop it and start respecting the Community standards and official policies by relying on merit arguments (like providing the legal basis).
- Again, I appreciate your work and service (all of you guys!) and know that you have your own lives but please pay attention to the above...
Yours in Community,
--Rezonansowy (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- When creating previous request, I did not realize, that this is big white C on blue and red background. Writing big white C into square in such way, that I do not understand, that this is C in square, clearly shows personality of the author and artistic intent. I agree now, that the logo is too simple for copyright in USA, but probably not in source country France. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I do not agree with your conclusion, that logos of companies of France cannot be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Again, please reread the Commons:Deletion requests#Overview on how to express an opinion on Wikimedia Commons. I can understand the need to research the case more closely, but you cannot just say that you agree or not with something. --Rezonansowy (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I do not agree with your conclusion, that logos of companies of France cannot be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all. According to com:TOO the threshold for France seems to be "imprint of the personality of the author" and one cannot deny that such a threshold is met with those logo's. Also it’s required that a work is free in the source country and the US. Therefor the US examples are irrelevant. I would also note that fonts can be copyrighted in Europe. Therefor the “it’s just a C-argument” has little merit. I would find it funny to read that company’s cannot hold a copyright over their logo’s but it’s just plain sad honestly. I would recommend that Rezonansowy takes an introduction course about copyright before they accuse others off “completely ignore any standards of merit discussion”. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo has artistic intent and therefore is copyrighted in source country France. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]The logo's of Carrefour are copyrighted. The design is above threshold of originality per COM:TOO France. Therefore these files cannot be hosted on Commons with one of the free licences.
- File:Bandera Carrefour San Pablo, Sevilla, España, 2015.gif
- File:Carrefour 1966.svg
- File:Carrefour C.svg
- File:Carrefour Douliou Store 20140726.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour 1966.svg
Ellywa (talk) 09:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group. The country of origin of the logo is France where the threshold of originality is too low.
- File:1992 10 años.svg
- File:1992 Carrefour.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 2.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 4.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 5.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 6.svg
- File:1992 EPMB.svg
- File:Carrefour (Unternehmen) 2021 logo.svg
- File:Carrefour 1984-1986.svg
- File:Carrefour 1988.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 10.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 11.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 12.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 13.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 4.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 5.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 6.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 7.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 8.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 9.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 4.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 5.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 6.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 7.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (6).svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g4938.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5900.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5927.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5954.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5980.svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (1).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (2).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (3).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (4).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (5).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (6).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (7).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (8).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (9).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte 1992.svg
- File:Carrefour bio logo.svg
- File:Carrefour city logo.svg
- File:Carrefour contact logo.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo.svg
- File:Carrefour express logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Lingostiere Logo.png
- File:Carrefour logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Market logo.svg
- File:Carrefour market logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Maxi Cacheuta 16-11-2023.svg
- File:Carrefour Sempre O Menor Preço 1.svg
- File:Carrefour Sempre O Menor Preço.svg
- File:Carrefour-Banque 2016.jpg
- File:Carrefour-express.jpg
- File:Carrefour-Logo.svg
- File:Carrefour.svg
- File:Grupo Carrefour Brasil logo.png
- File:La Letra C De Carrefour.svg
- File:Logo Fblanc Express.jpg
- File:Productos Carrefour 2023.svg
- File:Servicios Financieros Carrefour.png
- File:Su -g11107.svg
- File:Su -g11262.svg
Günther Frager (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]The country of origin of the logo is France where the threshold of originality is too low. See previous DR on these category.
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (6).svg
Günther Frager (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Per above DRs, this logo of the letter C in a rhombus with slightly rounded corners is above COM:TOO France, somehow
- File:Carrefour 09-12-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 11-06-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 15-12-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 1985-1987.svg
- File:Carrefour 1987.svg
- File:Carrefour 1988.svg
- File:Carrefour 1989-1992 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1989-1992.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (6).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (7).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (8).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (9).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1994.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995.svg-g30196-499.png
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995.svg-g30196-810.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 10.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 11.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1992 1.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1992.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 2.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 3.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 4.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 5.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 6.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 7.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 8.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 9.svg
- File:Carrefour Express logo green.svg
- File:Carrefour montagne logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 4.svg
- File:Carrefour Planet.jpg
- File:Carrefour Telecom.png
- File:CarrefourSA.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg
- File:Logo Carrefour-Bon-App.svg
- File:Logo-rueducommerce-carrefour.png
Nutshinou Talk! 17:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination (and previous ones). Threshold of originality in France is too low. Günther Frager (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This logo is also original here in Spain, although its origin is French, I understand. In all the integrated food chains of petrol stations, there are many of these logos. This is the problem. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep the file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg should not be deleted because it is placed in several articles on motorways and highways as part of a CEPSA service area or petrol station integrated with Carrefour Express. The problem is not the rights of the author, but, the problem is that the icon has to appear for the transparency to the drivers. There are several logos of other food chains that are integrated in the petrol station and for this reason, please do not delete the file.
- I hope you understand me well in English.
- Thank you very much and best regards. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Carrefour 1988.svg was previously deleted (note the blue link among the long list of red links above). I don’t know whether the file’s contents are the same as before, but the file’s log suggests that the original uploader may have returned under a different name. Brianjd (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Brianjd, this file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg does not come from this file File:Carrefour 1988.svg, it comes from another site, just so you know. I think the original may come from the Carrefour logo (red and blue color, the original, not the old). Autopistero20502020 (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and previous decisions. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
The file in this form is not suitable for presenting the history of BBS Forst. Horst Pomplun (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
"лишний" Sshut (talk) 17:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope text. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Terms of use of the source gives no permission to this upload. 186.175.93.156 18:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep: Victory Sports Wrestling magazine was part of the same family of professional wrestling magazines as Pro Wrestling Illustrated (known as "Apter Mags"). Pro Wrestling Illustrated (PWI) is still in publication as of today. PWI nor any of the other wrestling magazines published by "London Publishing Co." began printing clear-cut copyright notices until the year 2000, when PWI began attributing its copyright to "London Publishing Co. ©". The source edition of Victory Sports Wrestling, just as every other issue of Victory Sports Wrestling from this time period, does not correctly assert copyright anywhere within its pages, failing 2 of 3 requirements listed on w:Copyright notice#Form of notice for visually perceptible copies and therefore is correctly eligible for Template:PD-US-1978-89.
For further references, please follow this link to other wrestling magazines published by London Publishing Co." and see for yourself that none of them feature correct copyright statements. CeltBrowne (talk) 20:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The circumstances justifying {{PD-US-no notice}} ≠ the circumstances justifying {{PD-US-1978-89}}, something which has been conflated to a significant extent by several uploaders. Piecemeal DRs such as this aren't going to cure that problem, as there exists many hundreds of similar copyvios on the site. Per the admin's closing statement in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Sismarinho and subsequent search of the copyright database, the registrations of G.C. London / T.V. Sports were filed and recorded in 1992. Victory Sports is covered under registration V2833P041.RadioKAOS (talk) 05:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per RadioKaos. Was registered for a copyright within five years of publication so copyrighted until 2084. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
and
- File:Boy nude butt against the cloudy and blue sky.jpg
- File:Crouching and kneeling nude boy pose reference.jpg
- File:Crouching nude boy life drawing pose reference.jpg
out of scope; the title indicates a boy and as under 18 that falls well outside of scope and probably outside our legal ability to hold. Precautionary principle says to delete. Com:Nudity can be referenced though does not address the issue of age and legality. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak keepChild abuse material should be dealt with by the legal team, not here. However, whatever you might think about the term ‘boy’, the uploader specifically stated that they were aged 21 (born 2002).- It is possible that the files are out of scope for other reasons, but I will leave such discussion to other users for now. Brianjd (talk) 02:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I initially assumed the uploader was also the subject, but now I am not so sure.In any case, anyone who has genuine doubts about the subject’s age should refer this to the legal team. Brianjd (talk) 02:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)- From the uploader’s user page, we can reasonably infer that the uploader is also the subject, and therefore the subject is of age. There is also an unusual amount of information provided, especially for nude images. These are good reasons to keep these files.
- Weak delete However, we must still check whether the uploader is really both the subject and the copyright holder. That seems unlikely. Brianjd (talk) 03:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have been making that argument a lot, because it seems to be common wisdom. Now, I am not so sure. But these images (at least the first two) seem unlikely to be taken using a timer, so maybe that argument is still valid. Brianjd (talk) 00:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, COM:PENIS. 186.174.244.237 12:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would at least speak in favor of renaming the files from "boy" to "young man" to avoid misunderstandings. Nakonana (talk) 08:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danielir20. casualdejekyllcommons 20:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope photos of an adult. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Garmsar Grand Ab Anbar
[edit]There is no reference that proves it is a {{PD-Iran}}
- File:Garmsar Ab Anbar 2.jpg
- File:Garmsar Ab Anbar and Garmsar Citadel 2.jpg
- File:Garmsar Ab Anbar and Garmsar Citadel 3.jpg
- File:Garmsar Ab Anbar and Garmsar Citadel.jpg
- File:Garmsar Ab Anbar.jpg
- File:Garmsar-old pic.jpg
{{User|POS78}} talk 18:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Without a date or link no way to confirm it meets {{PD-Iran}}. Consigned (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)