Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/11/25
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this image wich I believe is not a public domain and it is definitely younger than 50 years. M J Hurter (talk) 09:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Falscher Titel zum Bild. Bitte löschen damit ich es richtig benennen kann. Blauloke (talk) 10:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Just use the template {{Rename}} to ask for a change of name. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: renamed to File:Freudenberger Märchenweg, "Der Teufel und der Besenbinder".jpg and kept. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
copyvio Arn6338 (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content. --Yann (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dasnusantara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mapbox imagery is only available for use within Mapbox services and platforms accroding to their FAQ page. That is, the satellite images cannot be reused.
- File:Muara Ci Kandang, Garut Selatan, Jawa Barat.jpg
- File:Muara Cihara, Lebak-Banten.jpg
- File:Muara-cipunagara-subang-jawa-barat.jpg
- File:Gunung Cakrabuana.jpg
- File:Mayang river (Kali Mayang).jpg
- File:Sungai Satui.jpg
- File:Sungai Kusan di Pagatan.jpg
- File:Muara sungai Kusan.jpg
- File:Krueng Jambo Aye.jpg
- File:Muara CiSeukeut - Teluk Lada, Panimbang.jpg
- File:Desa Muara Pasir di tepi sungai Kendilo, Kalimantan Timur.jpg
- File:Meander Sungai Kendilo.jpg
- File:Sungai Kendilo - TanaGrogot, Paser, Kalimantan Timur.jpg
- File:Meander sungai Kendilo, TanaGrogot - Paser, Kalimantan Timur.jpg
- File:Degradasi DAS Kendilo - Cemaran di Danau.jpg
- File:Degradasi DAS Kendilo, Paser - Kalimantan Timur.jpg
- File:Muara Way Semangka - Lampung.jpg
- File:Ci Bareo, Banten.jpg
- File:Muara Ci Langkahan - Sungai di selatan Banten.jpg
- File:Ci Madur - Sungai di Banten.jpg
- File:Ci Binuangeun, sungai di Banten.jpg
- File:Tempuran Batang Batahan - Batang Bako.jpg
- File:Danau ladam Cala, Musi Banyuasin.jpg
- File:Danau ladam (oxbow lake) Sipin, Sungai Batanghari, Jambi.jpg
- File:Danau ladam (Oxbow lake) Empangau, Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat.jpg
- File:Brang Beh - Lunyuk, Sumbawa.jpg
- File:Sungai Kemit - DAS Telomoyo.jpg
- File:Krueng Teunom, Pantai Barat Aceh.jpg
- File:Ciletuh Geopark, Sukabumi, West Java.jpg
- File:Sungai Ci Karang, Sukabumi.jpg
- File:DAS Ciwulan JawaBarat.jpg
- File:Muara sungai Cibuni di selatan pantai Jawa.jpg
- File:Cagar Alam Pegunungan Arfak - Papua ID.jpg
- File:Gunung Sanggabuana dan Waduk Jatiluhur.jpg
- File:Danau Rombebai - Mamberamo.jpg
- File:Gunung Abongabong 2985 mdpl Aceh Sumatera.jpg
- File:Sungai Cilamaya.jpg
- File:Bendungan PLTA Larona.jpg
- File:PLTA Larona.jpg
- File:Suaka Margasatwa Danau Rawa Tuakdale, Kupang Barat.jpg
- File:Pulau Kakaban, Berau, Kalimantan Timur.jpg
- File:Cagar Alam Rawa Danau.jpg
- File:Waduk Riam Kanan di Kalimantan Selatan.jpg
- File:Bendungan Logung.jpg
- File:DAS Satui - Degradasi DAS.jpg
0x0a (talk) 15:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused file, no educational value Zafer (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
need to delete becouse the same book is in djvu Nawider (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
dublicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ED4M-0455.jpg Svetlov Artem (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Butko (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
não quero Vivian morais cortes (talk) 23:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Lzylove (talk) 02:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 12:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @JosOss: COM:INUSE at nl.wp (as are the other files you nominated for deletion). --Rosenzweig τ 19:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a deletion reason, and this would appear to be a NASA image and therefore public domain. I won't repeat this argument on all the deletion requests you gave the same non-reason for, so I hope the closing admins read this remark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, this and all the others: Obviously a NASA image and therefore public domain. License should be updated, though. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The animation is credited to Dan McGlaun, but this isn't an animation. --RAN (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment @JosOss: These were uploaded by the nominator a week ago, so I'd delete them as a courtesy deletion BUT they are COM:INUSE at nl.wp. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (not in use anymore). --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed hares00 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal self promotional images that are outside our scope. Account blocked on a couple of Wikis
- File:المطرب العراقي عبدالله شعيب.jpg
- File:Nuch897.jpg
- File:Shnju76.jpg
- File:Hdhj87.jpg
- File:Hhdhh72782.png
- File:Ghgn45641.jpg
- File:AL SHAMMARI.jpg
- File:Srfrf5768.jpg
- File:Jfufj7575.jpg
- File:Hgntu8474.jpg
- File:JG7677.png
- File:DGHGH675654.png
- File:Hmed3766.jpg
- File:Ahmed321.jpg
- File:Omar yahya15482.jpg
Herby talk thyme 14:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 06:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Private porn LevandeMänniska (talk), 23:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- + possible underage so should be speedied. --Denniss (talk) 09:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Private porn LevandeMänniska (talk), 23:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- + possible underage so should be speedied. --Denniss (talk) 09:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation; reverse image search shows at [1] in 2016 Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company/site, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, appears to be a non-free book cover. I have not nominated this for speedy deletion because the uploader's user name is similar to the book's author. However, authors typically do not own the copyright on their book covers, so the licence should be confirmed by email to VRT. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, the copyright holder indicated in the metadata does not match the uploader's username. The claimed author 'Encarna Bernat soy' indicates that the uploader is the subject of the photograph. This is clearly not a sefie, and we normally assume that copyright is retained by the photographer. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Encarna Bernat escritora.jpg, for another photo from the same uploader, with a different name in the metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Rick of copyright violation, the author shown in the metadata does not match the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:A912236 corregido.jpg, for another photo from the same uploader, with a different name in the metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Bad quality of the photo, objects are not seen clearly FlorianH76 (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: yes, quality is poor, but the image shows two prominent actors and has historical value. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Misleading redirect. Target picture does not depict pop Milo Ђидо (talk) 02:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep ("Cee wun" => C1), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside spammy userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 14:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, artist Valtis Barkans is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Edita Mildažytė is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:20180712-FS-PJK-0624 TONED (42541542155).jpg Iketsi (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
nonfree: https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gisbubb&hl=en&re=df&p=AbrfA8poXY7HJG0B4JMhfz_IUjQZtXs6VeRd5WRgmwsQiiHnDSagA--tWtXgQcBU9qLvjvOW47yBSLYK8ffjUwAPCASq7lRuQ5dyTEcSZuwgX5sADysJrtlsScsi5-p6RWqvucAS7OVCyfjqi-B6BvgEbvtsubBKalxiEFsk0TnUv2bpEx16XW1RP3DxwP9HxgfwO7RmwQaZDxgvcw%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKR1F6WkRkbE9UQXhMV0UzWkdZdE5EQTFOaTA0TlRCbUxURTVZV1U1T0dRNVltUTBNaElmVFROT1JsRmxhMk5hTjFsVWEwaDRiR3BST0hJemVEaFpjSEU1UzNkQ1p3PT0iXQ== Altenmann (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Tektonson
[edit]- File:Independent Puerto Rico Sky Blue Flag.jpg
- File:U.S. Territory Puerto Rico Cobalt Blue Flag.jpg
- File:Puerto Rico Navy Blue Flag.jpg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico with Vivid Sky Blue since 1895.jpg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895-1952).jpg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (Deep Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (Light Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (Vivid Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895) (Deep Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico 1895 Blue Claro.svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895)(Deep Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895)(Light Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895)(Vivid Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico(1895)(Deep Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico(1895)(Light Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico(1895)(Vivid Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico(1895-1952).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895-Deep Sky Blue).svg
- File:Flag (Construction sheet).svg
- File:Flag Construction sheet.svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (construction).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico(construction).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico-constructionsheet.svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (Construction sheet).svg
- File:Escudo de Puerto Rico (enhanced).jpg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895~1952).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895–1952).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico(1895–1952).svg
- File:Flag of Puerto Rico (1895—1952).svg
- File:BanderaLares2.webp
Reasons for deletion request uploaded duplicates and incorrect ones--User:Tektonson (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)TektonsonUser:Tektonson (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Author requests deletion+duplicate —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 21:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep the svg ones, as they are not duplicates at all. They are just different colored variants. 2601:47:4081:50C0:382A:F63:988C:C234 02:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation Google lens: [2] Altenmann (talk) 04:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. Google lens: [3] Altenmann (talk) 04:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is an advertising poster, it is copyrighted, it is not own work.. --Ovruni (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is a clipping of an advertising poster, it is copyrighted, it is not own work. --Ovruni (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside spammy userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep (see username), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
experiments, out of scope Gampe (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Photo was previously published on facebook. Need a VRT permssion to verify copyright ownership. 0x0a (talk) 09:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CristhianLV07 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:TOYS, the toy design is copyrightable.
- File:REI CON FLOR.jpg
- File:REI CON PEPSIS.png
- File:REI BAJO LA LLUVIA.jpg
- File:REI CON FRASE.jpg
- File:REI EN EL ESPEJOA.jpg
- File:REI CON CUBREBOCA.jpg
- File:REI EN LA PLAYA.jpg
- File:REI COQUETAS.jpg
- File:REI HERIDA DE GRAVEDAD.jpg
- File:REI EN UNA BOTELLA.jpg
- File:REI ACOSTADA.jpg
- File:REI ESTUDIOSAS.jpg
0x0a (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This work of art is not by Wangechi Mutu, Derrick Tyson was inspired by her to create it. Ignoring the incorrect name, it seems that the image might be okay since Tyson (the creator) released it per the CC license on Flickr. However, I do not know if creating a collage out of possibly copyrighted material can void those copyrights and allow one to release the collage as his or her own work; so I am raising this image here for discussion. Jappalang (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. BanyanTree 11:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Achim Raschka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wangechi Mutu is a living artist so her sculptures and installations are not public domain. Yann (talk) 09:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bildersindtoll as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3 Yann (talk) 09:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- We have very few images from the Miniatur Wunderland, and I don't really know why. They explicitly allow taking pictures for private purposes, but avoid saying anything about commercial purposes. So maybe somebody should just ask? --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete @PaterMcFly: We have very few images from there because we deleted them in droves about a year ago [4]. Allowing images for private purposes isn't enough, they must be free to be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose (COM:Licensing). --Rosenzweig τ 19:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I know, but the fact that they don't explicitly say anything about comercial use doesn't say that they would generally deny such a permission. In particular because there are various (obviously commercial) TV shows reporting from within the Wunderland. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Everything from the "Miniatur Wunderland" that shows one of the models and therefore an artistic work. So it shouldn't be legal. COM:DW --Bildersindtoll (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 06:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Rocky Masum (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Rocky Masum (talk) 09:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Probably derivative works of the character.
Yann (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Violation of COM:TOYS. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States. The bison statue Monarch of the Plains dates to 1999 and authored by sculptor Darold Bailey (source). A commercial license clearance from Bailey is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for advertising, no educational use. Drakosh (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
It is from the images available on the Internet and social networks such as Instagram, and its copyright does not belong to the uploader. CaesarIran (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given photographer - clearly reads "private property" Hoyanova (talk) 13:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Is Charlotte van der Schans the same person as User:CharlotteAbigail? --RAN (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The original picture was removed from Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Jean-Denis_Bredin_photos_by_Louis_Monier_uploaded_by_Wikistayj CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
out of scope photograph of a non-contibuting user, used in fawiki draft space for self-promotion HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jadamasssotite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be advertising prostitution. Outside of COM:SCOPE regardless.
- File:Any body want to fuck my ass 01.jpg
- File:Any body want to fuck my ass 02.jpg
- File:Unclothed buttocks.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 13:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No licenses and authors of different pictures provided Hugo.arg (talk) 13:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope, probably a copyvio of some poster. —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikhalych ekb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works (COM:TOYS)
- File:"Шмель" Павлюченко.png
- File:"Маэстро".jpeg
- File:Приз для Чисамба Лунгу.jpg
- File:Шмель для Спартака Гогниева.jpg
- File:Приз для Александра Данцева.jpg
- File:Приз для Николая Заболотного.jpg
- File:Приз для Спартака Гогниева.jpg
- File:Шмель для Подберёзкина.jpg
- File:Приз "Шмель".jpg
- File:Приз ГерсонуАсеведо.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikhalych ekb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, out of scope, the logo background is probably a copyvio.
- File:Регламент голосования на приз "Лучший игрок матча".gif
- File:Регламент голосования на приз "Лучший игрок месяца(сезона)".gif
—MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Image with littleforseeable EDUSE, out of scope —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This is not a clear copyright violation, but this is a likely one. The uploader admitted on en.wiki that this is not a photograph they took, but a manipulation of one they found online. Accordingly, with no way to verify the source image's license, we cannot rely on the uploader's statement of having rights to the image. C.Fred (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This logo does not consist of "simple geometric shapes or text", it is an original drawing/design of a bird, on which the copyright does apply. 2A02:A463:296:1:F9C3:3CA1:1CF9:D4C1 15:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of File:Meeting with Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg (8640743282).jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person with no realistic educational utility.
Эlcobbola talk 15:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW of product packaging Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused image, terrible quality, no realistic educational utility Эlcobbola talk 15:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Uploader himself credits it to Singapore racing media Bremps... 17:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work. Yann (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOYS. 0x0a (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
No CC license is indicated at the source sites, some of which have clear copyright notices.
- File:Masjid Raya Siantar.jpg
- File:Ubaid Yakub - Bupati Halmahera Timur.png
- File:Hanafiah - Wakil Bupati Nunukan 2021.jpg
- File:Asmin Laura Hafid - Bupati Nunukan 2021.jpg
- File:Wempi Wellem Mawa - Bupati Malinau.jpg
- File:Wempi Wellem Mawa - Bupati Malinau.webp
- File:Danau Megoto - Nias Utara.jpg
- File:Bupati Tebo - Aspan.jpg
- File:Fahmi Fadli.jpg
- File:Sakariyas - Bupati Katingan.jpg
- File:Pudjirustaty Narang - Bupati Pulang Pisau.jpg
- File:Anthony Sinisuka Ginting.jpg
- File:Pasar Sarulla Kebakaran 2022.jpg
- File:Pintu Masuk IAKN Tarutung.jpg
- File:Gereja Katolik Santo Yoseph Merauke.jpg
- File:Pupu.jpg
- File:GPIB Immanuel Makassar.jpg
- File:Tari Taruna Jaya.jpg
0x0a (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I was used the sources of the pictures. But u can delete all. Thank u. Herryz (talk) 03:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own works: low resolution, no metadata, some of which can be found on google maps.
- File:SMA Kesuma Indah 1.jpg
- File:Kantor Bupati Morowali Utara.png ➝ google maps
- File:Patung Yesus Kristus Memberkati.jpg ➝ [5]
- File:Tugu Salib Bukit Singki.jpg
- File:Kantor Bupati Timor Tengah Selatan.jpg ➝ google maps
- File:Kantor Bupati Manggarai Timur.jpg ➝ google maps
- File:Gereja Katolik Santo Fransiskus Asisi Singkawang.jpg
- File:Gereja Toraja Malinau.jpg ➝ google maps
- File:Geraja Katolik Agats.jpg
- File:Taman Wio Silimo Wamena.jpg
- File:Kalimarau Airport Tanjung Redep.jpg
- File:Binaka Airport Nias.jpg ➝ [6]
- File:SMA Kesuma Indah.jpg
- File:SMA Unggul Del.jpg
- File:Puteri Sulawesi Utara.jpg ➝ [7]
- File:Festival Bunga Tomohon.jpg ➝ [8]
- File:Kantor Eurojust.jpg
0x0a (talk) 09:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
© 2008-2023 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. Yann (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE – non-notable person ro:Vornicu Victor Gabriel. Gikü (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This photo is my profile photo and I want it deleted. CuneytOzis (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This photo is my profile photo and I want it deleted. CuneytOzis (talk) 19:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Dubious own work photograph from 2014. Uploader has had other copyvios, and this is low resolution with no EXIF. Heavily used file. Abzeronow (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Imagen taken from Documentary about Viaux, not own work Librero2109 (talk) 20:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of File:Female_with_organs.png. Borderline COM:F8: it isn't an exact duplicate but the added elements aren't educationally useful. Genericusername57 (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by group, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by group, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wattwurm017 as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Der Inhaber des Stadions wurde nicht gefragt ob eine Veröffentlichung gestattet ist. Bitte löschen. Danke. --Wattwurm017 (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as this image had been uploaded 2.5 years ago and has a number of external reuses[9]. In case of deletion, re-users should be notified. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Other user will be notified by me, too. These are only 3. 2003:C9:2F4C:1500:D4A2:F789:2BD5:1A5A 06:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Eine Erlaubnis des Inhabers des Stadions ist nicht erforderlich, siehe de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. --Achim55 (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Ausserdem ist das kein Stadion das irgendwelche künstlerischen Ansprüche bezüglich Architektur erheben könnte. Und soviel ich weiss, gilt für Luftbilder auch die Panoramafreiheit. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Eine Erlaubnis des Inhabers des Stadions ist nicht erforderlich, siehe de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. --Achim55 (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
The description just says "photo shoot". Are either of the men in the photograph notable? Abzeronow (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a file taken from a website or a video. Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio - https://podcast.gebruedermoped.com/ M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SukunaZenin (talk · contribs)
[edit]One week ago, the user uploaded images of portugese football players, all blurred, very likey screenshots from TV. Today comes a french player, extremely sharp image. Never Exif-data. Nobody can tell me, these images are truely made by the uploader.
- File:RandalKoloMuani.jpg
- File:JoãoMárioNeto23.jpg
- File:ToteGomesPortugal.jpg
- File:DiogoJotaPortugal2023.jpg
Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Krefeld Pinguine M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Polarlys. --Didym (talk) 00:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vedat D Ozcan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files, no obvious encyclopedic use.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Personal picture, not in use. Furthermore, it is unknown if the person who appears gave consent to be photographed. It looks like an image taken from a distance and with a lot of zoom. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused, looks like a scan from a book, unclear if uploader has a copyright. Ђидо (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Crop of it is uploaded to Serbian Wikipedia, under fair use rationale for deceased people, which is in effect there. Ђидо (talk) 23:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:85.5 FM
[edit]Purported logos for a fake radio station, generally created in connection to long-since deleted articles and drafts on the English Wikipedia. As far as I know there is no station on "85.5 FM" anywhere; certainly not in the United States (these are supposedly logos for a Los Angeles radio station).
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This isn't even a valid frequency for a US radio station; the FM broadcast band is 88 - 108 MHz. Omphalographer (talk) 00:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jaylon brice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Purported logos for fake radio stations, generally created in connection to articles and drafts on the English Wikipedia that have been, or probably soon are about to be, deleted themselves.
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation and no permission from the owner who took this photo Test name please ignore24 (talk) 23:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Sculptural copyright violation. The United States does not have freedom of panorama for public art under artists' copyright. The City of Presidents began in 2000, and five South Dakotan sculptors (all named in the article) were involved in the making of the presidential statues. A commercial license clearance from the author of the Kennedy statue is required. Artwork is post-1977 so not eligible for a loophole in the U.S. law ({{PD-US-no notice}}). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
1969 composite sketch made by the Iowa Bureau of Investigation (there is a composite sketch in the August 21, 1969 Gazette on page 8). UPI photo is credited but caption mentions it was released by the Iowa bureau of criminal investigation. Possibly public domain as a pre-1978 work with no copyright notice. Abzeronow (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Found in the Korean War Veterans Memorial. We all know the sculptures there are unfree for commercial licensing, see both Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial for more info. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by El Nuevo Doge (talk · contribs)
[edit]Violations of COM:FOP US. Copyrighted 3D works, 2D works, packaging, etc. Some also featuring copyrighted characters
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639760692).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639760146).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759720).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759298).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638655343).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639758374).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638654621).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639757572).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639757088).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639756678).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638652883).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639755700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638649147).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648319).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639751128).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638647293).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639749706).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639749118).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638645065).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638644613).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639747600).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638643667).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639746590).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639746092).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639745516).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638641581).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638640977).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639743798).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639743254).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639742762).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639742284).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638638381).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639741256).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639740770).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638636965).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638636097).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639738802).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638634927).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638634403).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639737242).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639736700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639736296).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639735728).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639735046).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638630493).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638626289).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638626757).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639727328).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639724244).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639725170).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639724700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639723792).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639722928).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639723364).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639721700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639721258).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638616959).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639720854).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638616467).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638615677).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638615313).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639718492).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638614823).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638614437).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638613033).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638613615).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639713528).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638605959).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639709932).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638605411).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639708116).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638603953).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638602301).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639706746).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639707636).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639706070).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638601541).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638600523).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639704280).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638599881).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639702080).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639699974).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639702502).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638597391).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638598321).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639701086).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639698812).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639698050).jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 20:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759720).jpg Is a simple utilitarian object without any artistic merit and the head is completely de minimis, also File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg the packaging has an ivalid copyright notice due to the lack of year in the claim so it is public domain. El Nuevo Doge (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am unconvinced about the first of the two; simple design but Disney character.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- Keep File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg as {{PD-US-defective notice}}, though for safety I suggest cropping out the cardboard box (as all sides of the box are not visible, the possiblity of a valid notice on a side not seen cannot be ruled out); the toy guitar seems ok. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is still a derivative work, no matter how bad license requirements are on Ebay. This is Wikimedia Commons. A09 (talk) 22:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have Delted what I think are the obvious cases. Some of the remaining ones there might be some argument at being out of copyright for lack of compliance with the old US copyright laws - however as Disney was generally fastidious about copyright and remains litigious in protection of their properties, unless a strong case can be made about images individually, I and precaution favor Delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; kept those believed more general. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused and redundant duplicates of File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (1).jpg.
- File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (7).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (6).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (5).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (4).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (2).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mir-Salim - Expediency Discernment Council - Parliament of Iran - (3).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- These reasons you gave were more like that you had no other reason to attack hardworking users and now you are attacking with these false reasons.
- If you wanted to be useful to the wiki, you would be fixing the problems you see, not just nominating images for removal. Yaser0017 (talk) 07:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: (7) is in use, and having one crop makes sense. The other five have been deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused and redundant duplicates of File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Ali Larijani - Sadeq Larijani.jpg.
- File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ardeshir Larijani - (7).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ardeshir Larijani - (6).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ardeshir Larijani - (5).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ardeshir Larijani - (4).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ardeshir Larijani - (3).jpg
- File:Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad - Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ardeshir Larijani - (1).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: (1) is in use, and having one crop makes sense. The other five have been deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused and redundant duplicates of File:Sadeq Larijani - Ali Larijani - Expediency Discernment Council.jpg.
- File:Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ali Ardeshir Larijani - Expediency Discernment Council - (4).jpg
- File:Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ali Ardeshir Larijani - Expediency Discernment Council - (2).jpg
- File:Sadeq Larijani - Amoli Larijani - Ali Larijani - Ali Ardeshir Larijani - Expediency Discernment Council - (3).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused and redundant duplicates of File:Valiollah Seif - Central bank of Iran - (3).jpg
- File:Valiollah Seif - Central bank of Iran - (10).jpg
- File:Valiollah Seif - Central bank of Iran - (9).jpg
- File:Valiollah Seif - Central bank of Iran - (5).jpg
- File:Valiollah Seif - Central bank of Iran - (4).jpg
- File:Valiollah Seif - Central bank of Iran - (2).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: (10) is in use, and having one crop makes sense. The other four have been deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused and redundant duplicates of File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (4).jpg.
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (9).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (8).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (7).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (6).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (5).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (2).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (1).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei - Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei - 2023-11-19 - (3).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- These reasons you gave were more like that you had no other reason to attack hardworking users and now you are attacking with these false reasons.
- If you wanted to be useful to the wiki, you would be fixing the problems you see, not just nominating images for removal. Yaser0017 (talk) 06:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Yaser0017 Nominating files according to COM:Redundant is not a "false reason" nor an "attack", no one intends to question your handwork. Instead, writing something like "If you wanted to be useful to the wiki...", suggesting that a user is not useful, seems like an attack to me. You did not answer my message in July 2023 on your talkpage regarding this and continued to upload pictures that look the same until recently. Anyway, the original image is 2,499 × 1,667 (1.3 MB) and one high-quality close-up portrait cropped from that will suffice, why should we host 8 files with inferior quality that look more or less the same? Wikimedia servers are invaluable space on the internet that we, as volunteers, want to enrich with free files that have educational use. I am sure that you don't want them to suffer from hosting duplicate/redundant files. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: (1) is in use, and having one crop makes sense. The other seven have been deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Redundant crops - unused and unlikely to be used because other crops of the same image are already in use. See other deletion nominations above: Uploader has a pattern of uploading a large number of very similar crops of the same image. The ones nominated are the ones not in use.
- File:Sayyed Mahdi Khamooshi - 2 - (5).jpg
- File:Sayyed Mahdi Khamooshi - 2 - (4).jpg
- File:Sayyed Mahdi Khamooshi - 2 - (2).jpg
- File:Sayyed Mahdi Khamooshi - 1 - (4).jpg
- File:Sayyed Mahdi Khamooshi - 1 - (3).jpg
- File:Sayyed Mahdi Khamooshi - 1 - (2).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (22).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (23).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (21).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (15).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (14).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (13).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (11).jpg
- File:Hassan Khomeini - Ruhollah Khomeini - Ahmad Khomeini - 2023 (10).jpg
- File:Reza Fatemi Amin - 2021 - Iran (2).jpg
- File:Ali Shamkhani - 2022 - Iran (8).jpg
- File:Ali Shamkhani - 2022 - Iran (6).jpg
- File:Ali Shamkhani - 2022 - Iran (5).jpg
- File:Ali Shamkhani - 2022 - Iran (4).jpg
- File:Ali Shamkhani - 2022 - Iran (2).jpg
- File:Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje'i - 2021 (1) 03.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:48, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Non notable person, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Can be used to illustrate women's clothing El Nuevo Doge (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Non notable persons, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Can be used to illustrate women's clothing El Nuevo Doge (talk)
- Delete No, not effectively. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Uploads by Donkmoda
[edit]- File:Flag of Libya (1977–2011) (1-6-2019).svg
- File:Flag of the SPLAM (lighter blue).svg
- File:Flag of The SPLAM.svg
- File:Flag of Libya (2-12-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Sakha (9-20-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Sakha (1-13-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Montenegro (6-3-2008).svg
- File:Flag of Cornwall (12-26-2012).svg
- File:Flag of Corsica (3-3-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Punjab (4-14-2011).svg
- File:Flagge Khalistans (6-21-2013).svg
- File:Flagge Khalistans (2-9-2008).svg
- File:Flag of Bangsamoro (9-27-2019).svg
- File:Flag of Bangsamoro (8-29-2019).svg
- File:Flag of Bangsamoro (8-24-2019).svg
- File:Flag of Komi (6-19-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Chuvashia (2-22-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Tatarstan (2-22-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Veneto (4-18-2010).svg
- File:Flag of Sardinia (8-9-2012).svg
- File:Flag of Sardinia (6-30-2009).svg
- File:Flag of Mordovia (8-20-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Khalistan (2-19-2013).svg
- File:Flag of Mordovia (6-26-2009).svg
- File:Flag of Mordovia (1-26-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Mordovia (9-22-2009).svg
- File:Flag Of Mari El (2006).svg
- File:Flag of Padania (10-18-2008).svg
- File:Pine Ridge Flag (8-27-2006).svg
- File:Flag Of Northern Cheyenne.svg
Due to Donkmoda being yet another sock of Jurisdrew. Fry1989 eh? 18:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Donald Duck
[edit]Various derivative works of Disney characters.
- File:Advertising for Donald Duck (Anders And)on the tram in Copenhagen 1960.jpg
- File:Alaska Airlines "Were Going to Disneyland" - N318AS (8352644088).jpg
- File:Angry Donald (33069836480).jpg
- File:Angry Donald.jpg
- File:Aurora Miranda.jpg
- File:B-52 Lets Make a Deal Nose Art.jpeg
- File:Badut (4).JPG
- File:Badut (5).JPG
- File:Cartoon murial Montrèal 2017 small.jpg
- File:Cel Animation.jpg
- File:Disney characters run in front of a U.S. Air Force Honor Guard group photo (3546042).jpg
- File:Disney On Parade (2043396546).jpg
- File:Donald and pete world war 2 -1943.PNG
- File:Donald DinoLand U.S.A.JPG
- File:Donald Duck.jpg
- File:Donaldinho.JPG
- File:Dream Along With Mickey - Goofy, Minnie,Mickey, and Donald (13277459333).jpg
- File:Duck Body Missing (4895718667).jpg
- File:Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - Purim in Tel Aviv's Luna Park.jpg
- File:Friesenstraße 27 30161 Hannover, Evangelische Jugendhilfe Hermann Bödeker e.V., Donald Duck Grafitti durch Patrik Wolters alias BeneR1, Farbbonbon im Straßenbild.jpg
- File:Friesenstraße 27 30161 Hannover, Evangelische Jugendhilfe Hermann Bödeker e.V., Donald Duck Grafitti durch Patrik Wolters alias BenR1.jpg
- File:Friesenstraße 27 30161 Hannover, Evangelische Jugendhilfe Hermann Bödeker e.V., Donald Duck Grafitti von Patrik Wolters alias BeneR1, vom Hund wenig beachtet.jpg
- File:Historieta, o cómic original (CHRISTMAS ON BEAR MOUNTAIN) numero 178 de Diciembre de 1947 donde hace su primera aparición el Tio Gilito.JPG
- File:HK Disneyland parade 3 by Dave Q.jpg
- File:Mexico, Epcot.JPG
- File:Mickey mouse clubhouse birthday cake.jpg
- File:Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Bounce House - panoramio.jpg
- File:MuzeumhracekIstanbul disney.JPG
- File:Paint the Night (17956057423).jpg
- File:Rash drawing.jpg
- File:Snap from Wax Museum at Innovative Film city Bangalore 144746.jpg
- File:Snap from Wax Museum at Innovative Film city Bangalore 144815.jpg
- File:Spitfire personal marking on ‘H-53 - MH424’ (21688453426).jpg
- File:The Three Caballeros.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Cartoon murial Montrèal 2017 small.jpg is oviously not a derivative work, but an original piece of art, citing popocultural elements. a) within scope b) FOP c) ><(((> Sargoth (talk) 08:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- More Keep as it was made by the Artist Benny Wilding during the Festival Mural 2015! Sargoth (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Sargoth: and did Artist Benny Wilding release his work with a free license? You've just provided another reason for deletion. And COM:FoP#Canada doesn't cover murals. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- More Keep as it was made by the Artist Benny Wilding during the Festival Mural 2015! Sargoth (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Panoramafreiheit. Die folgende Graffiti ist lediglich eine abgeleitete Zeichnung der Comicfigur durch den Künstler Patrik Wolters alias BeneR1 (siehe die Künstlersignatur). Die Graffiti im öffentlichen Raum installiert und unterliegen damit der Panoramafreiheit:
- File:Friesenstraße 27 30161 Hannover, Evangelische Jugendhilfe Hermann Bödeker e.V., Donald Duck Grafitti durch Patrik Wolters alias BeneR1, Farbbonbon im Straßenbild.jpg
- File:Friesenstraße 27 30161 Hannover, Evangelische Jugendhilfe Hermann Bödeker e.V., Donald Duck Grafitti durch Patrik Wolters alias BenR1.jpg
- File:Friesenstraße 27 30161 Hannover, Evangelische Jugendhilfe Hermann Bödeker e.V., Donald Duck Grafitti von Patrik Wolters alias BeneR1, vom Hund wenig beachtet.jpg
- Behalten. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover:
- Go to Germany.
- Spray paint Donald Duck on the wall of a police station. (why a police station? German jails are fun I hear)
- Take photo.
- Upload photo to Commons.
- OMG I can't believe we never thought of this before! We'll never need fair use rationales on English Wikipedia again as long as we have Wikipedians with spray paint in Germany! (sorry for the sarcasm, but Panoramafreiheit really doesn't cover works that were never licensed in the first place) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover:
- I uploaded a new file if you think it's better, Keep it. The filename says Mr. D, because i'm unsure if it is lawful to name the character.--Sargoth (talk) 10:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Donald Duck 2
[edit]Dubious {{De minimis}} claim.
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124514014).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124515764).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124517564).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124518934).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124522064).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124542164).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124542944).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124629814).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124630234).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124632494).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124633074).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124736114).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124737444).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124738654).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124739794).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124741684).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27124742854).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459006430).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459009520).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459011110).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459109440).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459110310).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459111280).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27459117910).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27636491892).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662342741).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662344401).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662345741).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662347651).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662349221).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662351781).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662353491).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662554161).jpg
- File:Mickey's Royal Friendship Faire (27662555721).jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Donald Duck 3
[edit]From the description:
"The Public Domain film The Spirit of '43, which is in public domain due the fact that was created for the US Government."
But Donald Duck and probably even this exact screen were created before '43. It is dubious anyway. Sesame Street isn't public domain either as far as I know.
- File:The Spirit of 43-Donald Duck, cropped version - grayscale.jpg
- File:The Spirit of 43-Donald Duck, cropped version.jpg
- File:The Spirit of 43-Donald Duck.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Files of The Spirit of '43 has been nominated more than once for deletion, but requests had been declined, because there is no evidence of copyright renewal. See former discussions at:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spirit 43 - Scrooge - Oncle Picsou - Garrepa.JPG.
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Spirit of 43-Donald Duck, cropped version.jpg.
- See also The Spirit Of 43.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Maher27777: this isn't entirely how it works.
- User:Trycatch nailed it on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg:
- "Donald Duck is still copyrighted -- he first appeared in The Wise Little Hen (1934), which was successfully renewed in 1961. Every single appearance of Donald Duck after The Wise Little Hen would be considered a derivative work from the first cartoon, hence copyrighted. Yes, the copyright on The Spirit of '43 wasn't renewed, and a part of the cartoon fall in the public domain, but parts of it with Donald Duck are still copyrighted as a DW from the previous works. See the long discussion cited by the nominator for details."
- I can't explain it any better, so I won't. I will add this: can you prove The Spirit of '43 was the first cartoon to feature this title card? I can't say for sure because title cards may have been swapped, but Donald's Nephews from 1938 seems to have the same title card. At the same time, if title cards were swapped (like they appear to have been for Don Donald), that would also put the title card of The Spirit of '43 into question. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Discussion about the The Spirit of '43 is feared to be unfairly lost in this sea of requests. First it was made for the US Government, including its first scene. Second, there is no evidence of copyright renewal.--Maher27777 (talk) 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I was talking about the title card. Was The Spirit of '43 really the first Donald Duck cartoon to feature that title card? And even if it was (it doesn't look like it), Donald Duck wasn't created for The Spirit of '43. If I draw Donald Duck, all by myself, I still wouldn't be allowed to upload it here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Whether the title card was used before, with, of after The Spirit of '43, the cartoon as a whole is in public domain, including its title card, and it's easy to prove it is a part of The Spirit of '43. Why should we have to wait unnecessarily to 2039?--Maher27777 (talk) 15:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- I was talking about the title card. Was The Spirit of '43 really the first Donald Duck cartoon to feature that title card? And even if it was (it doesn't look like it), Donald Duck wasn't created for The Spirit of '43. If I draw Donald Duck, all by myself, I still wouldn't be allowed to upload it here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as still copyrighted per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment As Maher27777 was concerned this DR would be "lost in this sea of requests": Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Donald Duck in The Spirit of '43. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @Ruthven: Please address this section, too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Donald Duck 4
[edit]No free license from Benny Wilding. (or the creators of all the other DW for that matter)
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as still copyrighted per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Donald Duck 5
[edit]Derivative works of the character, still under a copyright.
- File:014342 - Alcalá de Henares.jpg
- File:389th Bombardment Squadron - Emblem.png
- File:442d Bombardment Squadron - Emblem.png
- File:442d Bombardment Squadron Emblem.png
- File:479th Bombardment Squadron - Emblem.png
- File:531st Bombardment Squadron - Emblem.png
- File:531stbombsquadron.jpg
- File:Disney Sights in Ice 1968.jpg
- File:Donald Duck ad on tram shelter (41963678604).jpg
Yann (talk) 11:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:CHAR. Nosferattus (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Possible derivative work of Mirai Nikki Trade (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The copyright law of Mongolia states that (1) "all types of musical works whether with or without lyrics" are protected by copyright (art. 7) and (2) has a limitative list of exceptions not protected by copyright which does not include the national anthem (art. 8). The melody of the Mongolan anthem was composed by Bilegiin Damdinsuren (1919 – 1991) and Luvsanjamts Murjorj (1915 – 1996). It is still covered by copyright until 2047 following art. 13 of the same law. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 07:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per the argument above, which I held here. — Racconish 💬 08:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
This doesn't seem OK, according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Africa#Currency. Yann (talk) 10:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
This doesn't seem OK, according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Africa#Currency. Yann (talk) 10:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Teemuy as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo|image has rationale=yes Might be too simple for copyright. Yann (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:TOO Finland. --✗plicit 14:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
The image is corrupted A. C. Tatarinov (talk) 09:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Colored version of a copyrighted B/W photo (https://fantasy-writer.com/#author), therefore cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Randykitty (talk) 11:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Inayaa shaikh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images outside the scope of this project
- File:Inayaa shaikh imlie serial.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh Imlie serial cast.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh imlie serial cast.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh in imlie serial panditji.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh with banni.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh Imlie serial.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh imlie.jpg
- File:Inayaa shaikh in imlie serial.jpg
Herby talk thyme 12:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't checked all of these, but I would think we should at least keep any with w:Seerat Kapoor. Are any of the other actors famous? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Contains erroneous information. Corrected file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RotterdamCS%2BDelftschePoort.jpg Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion: unused & replaced;. --Wdwd (talk) 10:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Because My file and I want Delete 키노돈트 (talk) 13:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused and implausible redirect/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 10:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of non-renewal, and taken from an online source. The year is not correct, this is a still for "Atom Man vs. Superman" from 1950.[10] Move to the English Wikipedia as fair use, unless evidence of PD status can be located. - Reventtalk 08:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Publicity stills were rarely copyrighted. This would have been renewed in 1978 or later. The USCO database does not show it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:CHAR. The copyright on the Superman character does not expire until 2034. Nosferattus (talk) 21:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There can't be a copyright on a picture of a man wearing a T-shirt with a S, since the logo itself is too simple to have a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann: Then how do we all recognize this image as "Superman"? Clearly it is more than a man in a T-shirt with an S. Nosferattus (talk) 22:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- What is your opinion of File:1951Superman002.jpg. Nosferattus (talk) 22:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a complex issue with competing arguments made in United States courts. Do the "character rights" allow claw back from the public domain of existing images, or do character rights prevent new media from being created that depicts aspects of the character that only appear in works that are still under an active copyright. For instance Superman has superpowers that were not written into the character until much later than the character's first publication on April 18, 1938. These issues will be more in the news in January when the first images of Mickey Mouse, from Steamboat Willie, enter the public domain. Remember that copyright was extended to 95 years in the Mickey Mouse Protection Act on 1998. --RAN (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is well-settled jurisprudence in the United States:
- Siegel v. Warner Bros (2009)
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co. (1995)
- DC Comics v. Mark Towle (2013)
- Warner Bros. v. AVELA (2011)
- If this image only depicted aspects of Superman that were public domain, it would be a public domain image, but there are no aspects of Superman that are public domain yet. Nosferattus (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is well-settled jurisprudence in the United States:
- You are mixing up several concepts. It is not allowed to create a movie or a book or a cartoon with Superman, but that's equivalent to a trademark. You can't copyright the idea of Superman, and you can't copyright simple things, like a T-shirt and File:Superman logo 1940.png. Yann (talk) 23:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann: No I'm not mixing up several concepts. This is about copyrights, not trademarks, specifically character copyrights. And I'm not talking about the "idea" of Superman, I'm talking about an actual depiction of Superman: A white, clean-cut, muscular man with black hair curling in the front, wearing tights with the Superman logo on it and a cape. That combination of characteristics constitutes a creative work that is copyrighted (even if the Superman logo itself is too simple to be copyrighted). I guarantee the Columbia Pictures film serial had to pay a copyright licensing fee (as well as trademark licensing) to whoever created Superman. If they didn't they would have been sued just like Honda Motor Company was for using a James Bond-like character in an advertisement (under copyright, not trademark). Nosferattus (talk) 06:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Below is a quick summary of the settled United States case law: --RAN (talk) 04:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann: No I'm not mixing up several concepts. This is about copyrights, not trademarks, specifically character copyrights. And I'm not talking about the "idea" of Superman, I'm talking about an actual depiction of Superman: A white, clean-cut, muscular man with black hair curling in the front, wearing tights with the Superman logo on it and a cape. That combination of characteristics constitutes a creative work that is copyrighted (even if the Superman logo itself is too simple to be copyrighted). I guarantee the Columbia Pictures film serial had to pay a copyright licensing fee (as well as trademark licensing) to whoever created Superman. If they didn't they would have been sued just like Honda Motor Company was for using a James Bond-like character in an advertisement (under copyright, not trademark). Nosferattus (talk) 06:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- You are mixing up several concepts. It is not allowed to create a movie or a book or a cartoon with Superman, but that's equivalent to a trademark. You can't copyright the idea of Superman, and you can't copyright simple things, like a T-shirt and File:Superman logo 1940.png. Yann (talk) 23:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co. involved Honda using a knock-off version of a James Bond like character in an advertisement. The James Bond movies were under an active copyright. It does not involve clawing back expired copyrights from images that have lapsed into the public domain. It is more about how close you can be to a copyrighted character without infringing that copyright. It was ruled not a parody, which would have been fair use. --RAN (talk) 04:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- This case is absolutely applicable. No depiction of Superman or James Bond has ever been public domain, as both of the characters are validly copyrighted from their initial depictions. See discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/09#Donald Duck in The Spirit of '43 for a similar situation. Nosferattus (talk) 07:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Incorrect per Warner Bros. v. AVELA "the scope of the film copyright covers all visual depictions of the characters, except for any aspects of the characters that were injected into the public domain by the publicity materials." Those publicity images released into the public domain by the studios are in fact public domain. --RAN (talk) 18:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- DC Comics v. Mark Towle involved selling an unlicensed replica of the Batmobile designed by Dean Jeffries. It does not involve clawing back expired copyrights from images that have lapsed into the public domain. It is more about selling unlicensed merchandise. --RAN (talk) 04:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. was about who owned the Superman character and is more about contract law. Siegel believed he still retained some rights to the Superman character he created and Warner Bros. argued it was a pure "work-for-hire". It does not involve clawing back expired copyrights from images that have lapsed into the public domain. --RAN (talk) 04:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Arguing that this image is public domain because no case law applies to it unless it is a case about a public domain image is a tautological argument. Nosferattus (talk) 07:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- No silly! That is exactly how United States law works. We use existing law until overturned by a higher court, or a new precedence is made in case law. We apply current copyright law concerning publicity stills that were put into the public domain by the creators by not including a copyright symbol and the year. Registration and renewal affected images, to some degree, all the way up until 1989. Film and television companies wanted the images reproduced as broadly as possible without having to pay advertising dollars, so they distributed the images without a copyright so that they would be reproduced in newspapers and magazines. If newspapers and magazines had to confirm copyright status or pay a licensing fee, they would not reproduce the images. They would expect to be paid in advertising dollars. It was a mutually beneficial relationship. --RAN (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Arguing that this image is public domain because no case law applies to it unless it is a case about a public domain image is a tautological argument. Nosferattus (talk) 07:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Warner Bros. v. AVELA is the only relevant one, it involved taking the images from the public domain publicity stills and selling t-shirts with characters cut and pasted from those public domain publicity stills. The t-shirt company combined the public domain images with the "character’s signature phrase from the [still under active copyright] movie". "the scope of the film copyright covers all visual depictions of the characters, except for any aspects of the characters that were injected into the public domain by the publicity materials." This is the exact opposite of what you are arguing. --RAN (talk) 04:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The "publicity materials" in Warner Bros. v. AVELA were all published before the first copyrighted appearances of those characters, so yes, in those cases aspects of the characters were injected into the public domain. If the first appearance of a character is in a validly copyrighted work, all subsequence appearances of that character are copyrighted until the copyright of the initial work expires, even if those works are otherwise in the public domain. There is no such thing as "clawing back" any copyrights. Either the character is validly copyrighted or it isn't. And if it is validly copyrighted, any derivatives are also subject to those copyrights even if the specific depiction would otherwise be public domain. Please read the actual court cases if you don't believe me. Nosferattus (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the references. The key word in this court case is "extracted". As I said, it is not allowed to use the representation of the character somewhere else. However the original material remains in the public domain. That's exactly what our pictures are here. Otherwise, if we follow your argument, we will need to delete images such as File:The Wizard of Oz Margaret Hamilton Judy Garland 1939.jpg. Yann (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think the key word was "combined". The extracted images were combined with active copyrighted catchphrases that only appeared in the film, and did not appear in the public domain publicity stills, like "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." Same with Superman, we can't combine the images with phrases or superpowers that only appear in the active copyrighted films and television series to create a new work,. We cannot add "Faster than a speeding bullet! More powerful than a locomotive! Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound!" to the public domain image. Also read the Sherlock Holmes versus Enola Holmes debate. The first Sherlock Holmes stories are public domain but some aspects of the character only appear in later works that are still under an active copyright. All these cases involve creating a new work that uses aspects of a character that only appear in an active copyrighted work. It does not involve clawing back expired copyrights from images that have lapsed into the public domain. We also have trademark issues that are related, Disney has trademarked Steamboat Willie as their 100th anniversary logo. You can't misrepresent a trademark. A logo may be in the public domain, but I am limited in how I reuse it, I cannot misrepresent the company, for instance by implying the company endorses or sponsors me, by adding it to my user page in a way that misrepresents the company. We also have restrictions on other images we host called "personality rights". There are also local restrictions on reuse of images of royals under Lèse-majesté laws. I see no legal reason why these public domain publicity stills need to be deleted, and those deleted in the last debate should be restored. --RAN (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Yes, but in cases such as logos and personality rights, we are talking about non-copyright restrictions. Here we are talking about copyright restrictions. In particular, the creation of derivatives is extremely restricted and legally perilous for reusers. The closest analogy is probably de minimus, but the restrictions here are more severe and more likely to result in being sued. If we are going to host such images on Commons (which I don't think is a good idea), they should at the very least carry prominent warnings. Nosferattus (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Nosferattus: There is already a warning. See {{Costume}}. Yann (talk) 07:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: I would appreciate your opinion in this discussion. Nosferattus (talk) 07:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed that the Warner vs Avela is really the only relevant case among those cited, and it has lots of guidance, though not sure there is something directly on point. They do note there is a "spectrum" of character copyrightability, and the category of cartoon characters often is cited as the paradigm of distinctiveness. Publicity materials published before the films were not enough to establish a character copyright (or their visual aspects, in the case of Gone with the Wind and The Wizard of Oz, which were films based on books). The publicity materials, which all came out before the movies, were therefore not derivative of anything and were public domain. The movies (and first short film, for Tom and Jerry) established the characters. However, with respect to Gone with the Wind, the publicity material images are far from the cartoon-character end of the spectrum of character copyrightability. There is nothing consistent and distinctive about the publicity material images of Vivian Leigh as Scarlett O’Hara and Clark Gable as Rhett Butler. They certainly lack any cartoonishly unique physical attributes, and neither one is shown in a consistent, unique outfit and hairstyle [...] As a result, the district court correctly held that the publicity material images for Gone with the Wind are no more than “pictures of the actors in costume.”. They also note The characters in The Wizard of Oz lie closer to the cartoon-character end of the spectrum. There are many stylized aspects to the visual appearances of Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Cowardly Lion, and they perhaps might be considered as live-action representations of cartoon characters. They note however that the publicity materials did not consistently show those visual aspects, so there was no visual aspect of a character copyright created, and so they did not inject the characters into the public domain. But... they also ruled that Like the juxtaposition of an image and a phrase, a composite work combining two or more separate public-domain images (such as Judy Garland as Dorothy combined with an image of the Emerald City) also adds a new increment of expression of the film character that was not present in the separate images. Accordingly, products combining extracts from the public domain materials in a new arrangement infringe the copyright in the corresponding film. So it doesn't take much to still infringe, even using a PD publicity photo. That is not directly an issue here though.
- In this case, we have a character that was previously established by a comic. In the court case, they were characters created by books, so there were no big visual aspects yet (and the Wizard of Oz book was public domain), so those aspects had not yet been created. In the court case, only the Tom and Jerry part involved material created after the visual aspects of the character was created, and all being drawings they were all derivative. The court case does not directly address when a live-action photo is derivative of a drawn character. The Gone with the Wind publicity material was not derivative of the book characters; they were just photos of actors in costume. So, this could simply be a photo of an actor in costume. It is certainly not derivative of any aspects of the character created by the film. On the other hand, the S symbol and hair styling do seem evocative of the comic book character. The S symbol by itself is probably not copyrightable, neither would be a hairstyle, but ... given the juxtaposition argument above, they are certainly two elements trying to conjure up the comic book character. On the other hand, we do allow cosplay photos -- where someone licensed the costume, and would expect people to wear it. Is this different? Certainly in any commercial setting there are obvious trademark issues, which were also part of the Warner v Avela ruling. The copyright is a closer call. Seems to me that logo became settled in 1940 or so representations, so at worst undelete in 2036, when those particular visual aspects of the character would be PD. It feels like a derivative work in some ways, but similar to cosplay. On the other hand, this is not a photo of "real life" and someone wearing an expected costume. Most of the character copyright of Superman is in the details of his story, but the trademarkable logo certainly evokes that character. Is that enough for copyright infringement too? Might be. The Gone with the Wind photos mention the lack of "cartoonishly unique physical attributes", but those may exist here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg: Thanks for the detailed explanation. I would like trying to resume and precise what you write. Since the picture itself is in the public domain, and that the details of the character can't be under a copyright (simple logo + a muscular man with a sweatshirt), how is this different than cosplay (there is already the {{Costume}} in the file description?) I agree that derivative works of this would be very restricted, but there are plenty of cases like this on Commons (copyrighted works of art in FoP countries, de minimis cases, etc.). If we can't have this on Commons, we would need to delete all of Category:Superman clothing, and many many more files with a similar issue. Yann (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't agree that everything in Category:Superman clothing would have to be deleted, but everything in Category:Files depicting Superman would have to be deleted. Although the distinction between "people wearing Superman clothing" and "people actually depicting Superman" is subtle, I think it is a meaningful difference in the case of character copyrights. It also affects the potential commercial impact of reuse and thus the likelihood of being sued. Nosferattus (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see any difference. Can you explain, preferably with legal backing? Yann (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- The WMF does not get sued for hosting copyrighted images, they get a takedown notice, and the WMF lawyers decide whether to remove or keep, and then they post their ruling. We have a list of all the images involved and the WMF ruling. --RAN (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm talking about reusers, not the WMF. Reusers don't have the benefit of the DMCA safe-harbor provisions. Nosferattus (talk) 23:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- The WMF does not get sued for hosting copyrighted images, they get a takedown notice, and the WMF lawyers decide whether to remove or keep, and then they post their ruling. We have a list of all the images involved and the WMF ruling. --RAN (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see any difference. Can you explain, preferably with legal backing? Yann (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't agree that everything in Category:Superman clothing would have to be deleted, but everything in Category:Files depicting Superman would have to be deleted. Although the distinction between "people wearing Superman clothing" and "people actually depicting Superman" is subtle, I think it is a meaningful difference in the case of character copyrights. It also affects the potential commercial impact of reuse and thus the likelihood of being sued. Nosferattus (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg: Thanks for the detailed explanation. I would like trying to resume and precise what you write. Since the picture itself is in the public domain, and that the details of the character can't be under a copyright (simple logo + a muscular man with a sweatshirt), how is this different than cosplay (there is already the {{Costume}} in the file description?) I agree that derivative works of this would be very restricted, but there are plenty of cases like this on Commons (copyrighted works of art in FoP countries, de minimis cases, etc.). If we can't have this on Commons, we would need to delete all of Category:Superman clothing, and many many more files with a similar issue. Yann (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I imagine any downstream user must be cautious about every image that they reuse. That is why the New York Times licenses image from Almy and Getty Images, even though Commons has a copy of the historic image. --RAN (talk) 18:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am not against having this decided by the WMF lawyers, however they usually only get involved once we receive a takedown notice. You can keep track of the WMF's DMCA takedown decisions here and whether they were kept or deleted, there are only six in the past two years: Commons:Office actions/DMCA notices--RAN (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion,as explained above, and as per previous DR. --Yann (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as no permission (No permission since) Ivan Vtorov (talk) 10:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wrong Deletion requests - see
Description |
Русский: Футбольная команда Инвестиционного департамента МДМ-Банка (Бронислав Эдуардович Ермак) |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Ivtorov |
- Ticket:2023112510003056 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a selfie and not the work of the Argentine government. They may have published the image in their website, but it doesn't mean they own the copyright. Günther Frager (talk) 00:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete --Zenwort (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution and wrong colors, better files see File:MB-Mon-14 Monet Strada-Romana-in-Bordighera.jpg, File:Claude Monet Strada Romana in Bordighera.jpg Oursana (talk) 04:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution better File:'Garden at Bordighera, Impression of Morning' by Claude Monet, 1884, Hermitage.JPG, File:Jardin à Bordighera, impression de matin -- Claude Monet, 1884, Hermitage.jpg Oursana (talk) 05:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: p. 2: "Todos os direitos dos autores reservados. Nenhuma parte deste livro poderá ser reproduzida..." Converting to DR, see prior discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The book is clearly licensed openly through a CC-BY license on the open books portal of Brazil's largest university, USP. Source: here. Sturm (talk) 15:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. The link says "Creative Commons License - Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." proving the CC-BY licence is in place. Mateussf (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per @Mateussf, @Sturm link to license in English = "All contents of the USP Open Book Portal are under a Creative Commons 4.0 license, except where otherwise indicated." --Ooligan (talk) 03:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. The link says "Creative Commons License - Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." proving the CC-BY licence is in place. Mateussf (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 08:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no proper source given. —holly {chat} 22:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of the copyrighted artworks, the author, Boris Pokrovsky, died after 1960. No FoP in Russia except architecture.
- File:Вестибюль. Купол.jpg
- File:Станция Московского метрополитена Горьковско-Замоскворецкой линии "Автозаводская" (до 1956 г. - "Завод им. И.В. Сталина") 01.jpg
- File:Станция Московского метрополитена Горьковско-Замоскворецкой линии "Автозаводская" (до 1956 г. - "Завод им. И.В. Сталина") 03.jpg
Komarof (talk) 09:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I’d argue for de minimis in the case of File:Станция Московского метрополитена Горьковско-Замоскворецкой линии "Автозаводская" (до 1956 г. - "Завод им. И.В. Сталина") 03.jpg. The other two definitely artwork. --Zenwort (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; too large to be de minimis in the third photo. —holly {chat} 22:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 10:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1970. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
At least two of the photos are copyrighted:
- https://wpde.com/news/local/us-intel-says-malaysian-plane-shot-down-by-missile-over-ukraine (AP photo)
- https://aviation-safety.net/photo/8387/Airbus-A321-231-EI-ETJ
(Which also means id:berkas:Puingpuingmh17.jpeg and File:Metrojet 9268 tail section wreckage.jpg should also be deleted, probably)
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I used these two images because according to their pages they fell under the Attribution 3.0 Unported license, unless they wrongly licensed to begin with? Undescribed (talk) 23:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The first image is uploaded to the Indonesian Wikipedia as a non-free image, so it can’t be used on Commons (and I’m not sure I agree with the fair use rationale though I don’t know the language or the law enough to get involved). The second image, I don’t think it meets the requirements for the Russian public domain license, since it’s not a document or law. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I just swapped out the copyright photos and added two new ones. File:Wreckage of flight GLO 1907.jpg and File:Tail section of Dana Air 0992.png, so keep? Undescribed (talk) 00:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and delete older versions. Thanks @Undescribed for your response! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I wish there was an easier way to verify if an image is copyrighted. It's so hard to locate copyright info online. Even on wikimedia commons three of those images were copyrighted but under false licenses, so how do you know? Undescribed (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and delete older versions. Thanks @Undescribed for your response! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Looks fine now, keep and delete the first two revisions. 0x0a (talk) 16:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 23:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The very title of the file gives away that this is not a real MSNBC logo, but a fictional version on DeviantArt. A real MSNBC logo would not be a CC-licensed own work, and I'm not even sure this is an "own work" in any context (that said, there does not appear to be anything above TOO either). The MSNBC website shows no trace of anything resembling this supposed version. NBC is undergoing a refresh of the peacock and the accompanying typography, but this probably won't be the legitimate end result for MSNBC. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree with a editor about keeping the logo, because this logo is a fanmade version that has uploaded by Jordanene7's sock such as DigitalVideoFAN39399395595223, and the real version was debuted on December 2 with a slightly different "MSNBC" text in NBC Tinker font than in Deviantart version (File:MSNBC 2023.svg). Also, given that fictional PNG version of the file was superseeded by it's official SVG equivalent that has public domain license rather than purported CC-licensed own work PNG file, this PNG file should be deleted. 223.255.229.2 05:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. —holly {chat} 23:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tissier-Odalisque.png with false title Phso2 (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agree, but is this really Nurbanu Sultan? According to many and many sources, It's saying this portrait of of Nurbanu Sultan. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 19:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the museum where this painting is kept makes no such claim about who is depicted. —holly {chat} 23:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Pretty much the same logo as File:97.5 R&B.png; this is a purported logo for a fake radio station, created in connection to long-since deleted articles and drafts on the English Wikipedia. These two files have different uploaders (Johnbrownthebrown (talk · contribs) here, Jaylon brice (talk · contribs) for the other/later one), but both are blocked as socks of the same master on English Wikipedia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Normally a bad name is not a reason to delete because we can just rename the file, but I'm guessing you already reuploaded it under the correct name. —holly {chat} 23:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
afwijking tussen "datum in bestandsnaam" en "datum op afbeelding" JosOss (talk) 07:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Normally a bad name is not a reason to delete because we can just rename the file, but I'm guessing you already reuploaded it under the correct name. —holly {chat} 23:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dosya:Galip-tekin.jpg Galip-Tekin (talk) 13:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: we don't delete user talk pages, and nominator didn't give a valid reason anyway. —holly {chat} 19:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Logo May be too simple for copyright. Yann (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Concerning is the ® mark in the logo, which appears to convey the originatr's intention that it be not used without permission. Please see also File:Iperius Remote logo.png 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is non copyright restriction. OK on Commons. I added a {{Trademark}} template.
- This is borderline, depending on the country, due to the stylized 4. Yann (talk) 17:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I went to their website but couldn't figure out where they are based. The only hint is that on the English site there is one line in Italian, and Italian is the first option the language selection dropdown, so Italy would seem to be a good guess. If that's the case, then it's probably below TOO Italy. —holly {chat} 17:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Holly. --Yann (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Maybe above COM:TOO Turkey. This dolphin logo is under fair use on Turkish Wikipedia. 0x0a (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Emblem of Qatar (1966-1976).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- No reason not to have two filetypes, link to each other in “other version=” --Zenwort (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- There's no reason to have an exact copy in an inferior format. Fry1989 eh? 23:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: When the raster version is created before the vector version, then we need to keep it for attribution purposes. When it's the other way around the raster version is unused, then it's pointless. —holly {chat} 17:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Emblem of Qatar.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- No reason not to have two filetypes, link to each other in “other version=” --Zenwort (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- There's no reason to have an exact copy in an inferior format. Fry1989 eh? 23:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: When the raster version is created before the vector version, then we need to keep it for attribution purposes. When it's the other way around the raster version is unused, then it's pointless. —holly {chat} 17:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Per en:Talk:Australiformis, this file is misleading and erroneous. Janhrach (talk) 20:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed the image from the Spanish Wikipedia and I will ask about its usage on the English Wikipedia there. Janhrach (talk) 09:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: The image is present on Today's Featured Article archives. A discussion is ongoing whether the image should be removed from there. In its current state, there is a consensus that the current usage of the image on the pages is not a reason against its deletion. Janhrach (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Info: this is being discussed at en:WP:HD#Misleading image formerly used for illustrating a FA and en:WT:TFA#A misleading image formerly in a FA. Janhrach (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep since it's used in the Wikipedia TFA archives, it makes sense to keep it. It can be marked as inaccurate as appropriate. Amakuru (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: Could the image be marked as inaccurate visibly enough that it won't be mistakenly used anywhere? If yes, I would also be for keeping. Janhrach (talk) 08:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Janhrach: You can add {{Inaccurate}} to the page. Another possibility would be simply to fix the map so that it's more accurate. —holly {chat} 23:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have added it and I am no longer for deletion, as I have learned that that references to deleted images are automatically removed from Wikipedia. Janhrach (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator; @Janhrach: You should probably state your concerns on the file talk page too. —holly {chat} 18:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Temple of Divine Providence. Celebration of 100th anniversary of independence of Poland.jpg
[edit]no fop of interiors in Poland The Fourth Zone (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @The Fourth Zone, Keep The photo file is VRTS tagged and in category "Items with VRTS permission confirmed."
- @A1Cafel, why did you not take time to comment about this DR, but you made time to submit a checkuser request?
- Checkuser request here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Matlin&diff=prev&oldid=826399346
- --Ooligan (talk) 16:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- VRTS is for this file - from photograph, not from architects. 77.254.106.152 15:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
This doesn't seem OK, according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Africa#Currency. Yann (talk) 10:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I created this file. It has no ties with the South African Reserve Bank, it is merely a self-created banknote design for the Cape Republic. M J Hurter (talk) 12:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- If it's a "self-created design" then I fail to see the educational value - it's effectively just fantasy artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: An unused fictional image doesn't seem like it's within scope. —holly {chat} 17:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
This doesn't seem OK, according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Africa#Currency. Yann (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I created this work by myself and it is completely fictional. It has no ties to the South African Reserve Bank, it is merely a banknote design that I made for the preposed state "Cape Republic". M J Hurter (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: An unused fictional image doesn't seem like it's within scope. —holly {chat} 17:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
We should not start to create such disclaimers for ever law in non democratic countries. Then we would end up with nearly every file having a bunch of disclaimers stating that some laws in some countries restrict the usage. GPSLeo (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Category:Chinese sensitive content was created for the similar law in China (another non democratic country). I support Israel and Palestine but there are countries that ban the usage of Israeli symbols. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think {{Chinese sensitive content}} should also not exist. Commons:General disclaimer is already linked on every page. What do you think is the scope if these additional templates? GPSLeo (talk) 16:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have the same thought, but in Vietnam. Template:SouthVietnam is also created with same reason. Kys5g (talk) 02:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment On second thought, I don't know why we need to create legal disclaimer templates for legal restrictions imposed solely by authoritarian regimes like China, Iran and Russia. --Minoa (talk) 20:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Why do we need to create legal disclaimer templates for legal restrictions imposed by free democratic countries. Trade (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- My concern is that if we create legal disclaimer templates for every legal restriction imposed solely by authoritarian regimes like China, Iran and Russia, it would create a slippery slope where there could be legal disclaimer templates for files that are perfectly harmless (for example, Russia under Putin doesn't tolerate anything that resembles the flag of Ukraine): therefore we need to be far more selective in such situations. It appears that {{Zionist symbol}} and {{Chinese sensitive content}} seem to refer to restrictions imposed solely by authoritarian regimes. I know about the heated controversy about the limits of free speech in free democratic countries, but that is irrelevant and different to countries that have a far worse reputation on freedom of expression and human rights. Regardless of the outcome of this discussion, I hope to see a refresh in the criteria for the creation of legal disclaimer templates. --Minoa (talk) 19:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment How about {{Non Falungong swastikas}} and {{Russian museum photo}}? Ox1997cow (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- And you forgot {{Teikoku symbol}}. 103.187.245.171 16:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment How about {{Non Falungong swastikas}} and {{Russian museum photo}}? Ox1997cow (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- My concern is that if we create legal disclaimer templates for every legal restriction imposed solely by authoritarian regimes like China, Iran and Russia, it would create a slippery slope where there could be legal disclaimer templates for files that are perfectly harmless (for example, Russia under Putin doesn't tolerate anything that resembles the flag of Ukraine): therefore we need to be far more selective in such situations. It appears that {{Zionist symbol}} and {{Chinese sensitive content}} seem to refer to restrictions imposed solely by authoritarian regimes. I know about the heated controversy about the limits of free speech in free democratic countries, but that is irrelevant and different to countries that have a far worse reputation on freedom of expression and human rights. Regardless of the outcome of this discussion, I hope to see a refresh in the criteria for the creation of legal disclaimer templates. --Minoa (talk) 19:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Why do we need to create legal disclaimer templates for legal restrictions imposed by free democratic countries. Trade (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment At first, I looked at this template and thought it was right to delete it because it was like creating a {{South Korean Symbol}} for North Korean users. However, unlike North Korea, where access to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons is blocked, I think that access to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons is not blocked in the countries mentioned in this template. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason --Trade (talk) 19:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- concur with @Trade --Zenwort (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Same too SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above Arianator with love (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Trade et al. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 12:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Israel has reportedly confirmed that they will weaponize certain Jewish symbols for their gain. Source 175.176.84.196 16:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Trade et al. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 12:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above Arianator with love (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Same too SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, the text is too vague and may be misleading. Also delete the corresponding Category:Zionist symbols. No evidence has been presented to support the claimed illegality, and it is unclear which symbols are covered. A close parallel is {{Nazi symbol}}, but that cites the criminal codes of some of the countries concerned. No bans are mentioned in w:en:Flag of Israel. I found a recent news report on bans on Israeli and Palestinian symbols which does not mention these bans.[11]
- The template has been applied to a range of symbols, with no clear rationale other than being a symbol of Zionism or of Israel. I removed it from File:Balfour declaration unmarked.jpg, but was re-reverted. It seems unlikely that an image of the w:en:Balfour Declaration would be banned by countries which traditionally see it evidence of a betrayal by the British Government. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
I would like to report a relevant problem that {{Chinese sensitive content}} is being misused. I am from (mainland) China and I am somewhat familiar with which being sensitive in my country. I am sure that the portrait of Tsai Ing-wen (president of ROC, Taiwan) is not sensitive or forbidden, much less the flag of the Singaporean president. That means some users who added the template to pages are not even familiar with Chinese politics. And what about those other edits they've made (example)? If we are to keep those legal disclaimers, we have to make some people patrolling those templates, otherwise they would be a bunch of trash indicating something may be sensitive or as sensitive as a Singaporean flag in China. --魔琴 (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- This is the wrong place to report this, Commons:Village pump would be better. One approach would be to improve the documentation shown in Template:Chinese sensitive content. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- I understand. But since the template is nominated for deletion I guess this issue could be put into consideration in this request. I'll wait for the result and if it is keep, I'll go to the village pump then. --魔琴 (talk) 09:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This tag is being added to images of Stars of David that are not the same color as the Israeli flag, and are a representation of Judaism rather than of Israel or Zionism (example). I don't know what the laws of Iraq etc. say, but it's not a good look for every Star of David on Commons to be tagged with a badge of shame. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Agree Zanahary (talk) 03:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This disclaimer is definitely sufficient. Commons does not have to interfere with this conflict which lasts more than 100 years. 35 of May (talk) 08:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This template makes Commons into a website that spreads hate. Every moment that the template exists is a disgrace to Commons. דוד שי (talk) 10:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As 35 of May wrote, the general disclaimer says enough: "Please note that the information found here may be in violation of the laws of the country or jurisdiction from where you are viewing this information. Wikimedia Commons does not encourage the violation of any laws," but acts under a "broad a protection of free speech". Thus, this template is redundant. -- Gabi S. (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Right - This disclaimer is definitely sufficient. רדיומן (talk) 10:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This template is based on a baseless assumption that the Star of David is a uniquely zionist symbol. Even if it was, this template and its' design are abhorrent. Oyoyoy (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Star of David is no Zionist symbol. Lilijuros (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Neriah (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete We know what marking Jews (even through the code-word "Zionist") with derogatory labels leads to... Unfortunately, it seems that we didn't learn the lesson. Perhaps it is ironic, considering the date. MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 18:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- And there are anti-Zionist Jews who are still supporting Palestine. 103.187.245.171 07:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Omri • Talk 18:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. pre num. This template is not providing any assistance in matters related to copyright issues. And its opens a window for more nonsensical templates. It's not in Commons scope. Marking Jews with the Star of David reminds me the Yellow badge. Star of David is not a Zionist symbol. -- Geagea (talk) 00:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the website have a general disclaimer, we don't need a special one for each country/ies. and if we decide to keep it, the name need to change because the symbol are not only Zionist or remove the template from Jewish symbol. Yona B. (t) 10:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The template isn't even correct. The Star of David isn't a "Zionist symbol", as it has been used centuries before the Zionism movement emerged, and continues to be used all over the world by parties with no relation to Zionism, for example to signify a building is used as a Jewish synagogue. Moreover, this is a blatant anti-Semitic template, and there is no point in warning users that an image might be illegal in a certain countries "depending on context". Just like presenting the w:Shahada might be illegal in certain contexts (for example when displayed on a black background as part of the ISIS flag), but obviously we don't want to attach a template to every image of the Shahada warning users that it might be illegal "depending on context". מיכאל.צבאן (talk) 13:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The burst of multiple contributions on one day from a similar viewpoint looks like the result of canvassing. This is not helpful in these discussions, see Commons:Canvassing and Wikipedia:Canvassing. I favour deletion of the template, for the reasons I gave above. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete obviously. The disclaimer covers this and this is being abusively applied to a wide range of Jewish symbolism. Zanahary (talk) 10:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I'll add that all similar templates put Commons in the very silly and subjective position of interpreting often obscure laws about semantics and symbols with no editorial process. There's graphics of bagels with Jewish stars marked as potentially illegal Zionist symbols. What are we talking about here? Let the law against bagel pictures spread its own word. This is absurd. Zanahary (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Shalom,
- Based on the current state of this template, it is purly anti-Semitic.
A Jewish Star of David (✡) appears in it, and not the flag of Israel or the IDF symbol.
What an unfortunate Freudian slip...- The anti-Semitism of the template remains the same even if later actions are taken or arguments are presented that try to cover up or justify the need for it.
I can already think of some fictitious statements to try to cover this. So please know in advance, it is highly recommended that you spare us the rebuttable twists. - This indicates that this contemptible template teaches more about its own creation, than about any legal situation, and therefore it is better to already designate it only for the user namespace, so we will know to beware and who hold this views.
- The anti-Semitism of the template remains the same even if later actions are taken or arguments are presented that try to cover up or justify the need for it.
- The template does not at all contain exact references to the relevant provisions of the law. The reliability, matter-of-factness and seriousness levels are low and debatable.
Even if referrals are presented, they must be considered subject to prior legal review by WMF legal teem. The WMF projects servers are not stored in (or subject to) anti-democratic or authoritarian countries and territories, while in the countries relevant to the servers (see also: COM:CENSOR), a template such as this is considered anti-Semitic, likely to spreading hate speech, and might rise to the point of and illegal content. - Whataboutism arguments about (so-called) similar cases are not valid here. They only lead us down the slippery slope of eroding the COM:SCOPE and "warning"s spam, as demonstrated by those who use this template with their great eagerness...
Delete, · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 00:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC) - Based on the current state of this template, it is purly anti-Semitic.
- Info I opened a proposal on this topic to get a general guideline how to handle such templates: Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Require community consensus for new non-copyright restriction templates GPSLeo (talk) 09:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment see also COM:Village pump/Proposals#Proposal to prohibit political restriction templates, which includes this template. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Mainly per Yona B. פעמי-עליון (talk) 11:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear consensus (more than 2 to 1) to delete. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sadko as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I and people close to me are visible in the image and would like to protect my privacy. I'm also the author of the image. In use. Yann (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed; I've given my reasons and hopefully, they will not be taken lightly. I don't think that this is a controversial deletion. 11:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Could you please remove the files from the articles where it is used? Yann (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I removed it on 1 article. I can not delete the image on 2 other pages but I will email people who can with the request. Thx. for your cmt. Yann. — Sadko (words are wind) 02:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Could you please remove the files from the articles where it is used? Yann (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep nobody recognisable people only shown from behind, thus no reason for courtesy deletion. Since you uploaded under a CC license please remember that these are irrevocable. --Zenwort (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Still in use as of today. —holly {chat} 22:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE and people in the photograph are not readily identifible. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
wrong date and coypright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Noted. I will try and fix it as soon as I possibly can. Thanks for the message. KSuffolk (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-US-not renewed, date and attribution fixed. --RAN (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Image not found at given source URL (nor at that the version of that URL in the Wayback Machine that was stored prior to the upload date), so cannot verify provenance. —holly {chat} 22:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Holly, provenance cannot be verified and thus we cannot verify if it is public domain by formalities. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
wrong date. copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Noted. I will try to fix it as soon as I possibly can. Thanks for the message. KSuffolk (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep License and date now fixed. --RAN (talk) 17:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License resolved, PD-US-not renewed. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Is it really an own work? Vcohen (talk) 13:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The work is from family archive, the photo was made in 1945, so it could not be of my own, as I've got it as legacy. But it belongs to the family of G.D.Barsukov and he is on the photo. If you are a specialist (I'm not) and know how to put the photo in the Wiki file, devoted to G.D.Barsukov, I would appreciate any your help. GeorgyBarsukov (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The archive, the legacy and who is on the photo don't matter. The only thing that matters is who made the photo. The copyright belongs to him. Vcohen (talk) 20:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright vests with the photographer, not the subject. Circa 1945 Russian photo, undelete in 2066 as PD-old-assumed. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
2000 relief. Copyright is still valid and thus out of COM:FOP Japan. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Question Are reliefs treated like sculptures or like flat art under Japanese copyright/FoP law? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: As far as I see there is no mention of reliefs in the Japanese Copyright Act. Unfortunately I don't have much knowledge if there are any court cases on that subject but, relief is in general treated as a sort of sculpture, right? Yasu (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'd tend to think of it that way, but it's all dependent on laws. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a 3D artwork, but 2D is not covered by Japanese FOP either. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Unknown provenance makes it impossible to determine copright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- also low-res and blurry. --Zenwort (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo was created between 1904 and 1914. Undelete in 2035 as PD-old-assumed-expired. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Uploader told that the image is not own work, but a print was found in his own archive. Uploader can not release the image under a free license. Photographer is still unknown. 87.212.27.72 17:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Corrected to "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is still a label that the picture can be deleted? Thieu1972 (talk) 10:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete With no date, we cannot determine if URAA applies. @Thieu1972: I see that you removed the photo from the article. Did you do that because of this deletion request, or was it not relevant to the article? —holly {chat} 18:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Both. The picture is not very relevant for the article, and there are doubts about the license. There are better and more relevant pictures for this article without the license problems. Thieu1972 (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Ph. J. van Veen was one of the founders of the Rotterdamse Vrijwillige Brigade in 1925 and this picture is also from around that time. Some 45 years later all but two of the founders were deceased, see here. Van Veen must have been in his 20s in 1925 and his looks about that age on that picture. -- Mdd (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with Holly that we don't know the date, and this could have been from 1929 or 1930. I do believe it is correct that this is an anonymous work. Undelete in 2026. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
No evidence publoshing before 2005. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Well-Informed Optimist У меня вопрос - если же человек умер в 1909 году и его произведения в ОД, то что с изображением? Многие иллюстрации на Викискладе опубликованы в современных книгах даже несмотря на то, что им более ста лет и ранее содержались в архивах. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Дата смерти изображенного человека никак не влияет на переход произведения в общественное достояние. Важны дата смерит автора произведения (если он известен) и дата первой публикации. —Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Тогда скорее всего, придётся порыться в архивах. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 22:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Дата смерти изображенного человека никак не влияет на переход произведения в общественное достояние. Важны дата смерит автора произведения (если он известен) и дата первой публикации. —Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm going to split the difference here as this was definitely published way before 2005, but since this could have been published in Congress Poland in the Russian Empire, I can't apply PD-RusEmpire. Undelete in 2030 as PD-old-assumed. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Punker1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely similar to the dolls the uploader photographed and later tagged as possible derivative work issue. The creator of the doll is unlikely to have died for more than 70 years for the dolls to be in public domain. See COM:TOYS.
- File:Baby doll with flash.jpg
- File:Baby doll in dress far away.jpg
- File:Doll close up.jpg
- File:Brown hair doll.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The dolls looks like they are from the 1920s or 1930s, do we have a named copyright holder? Copyrights lapse without registration and renewal up until 1989. --RAN (talk) 18:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of focus. File:Doll close up.jpg and File:Brown hair doll.jpg --RAN (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 2 that were out of focus and not usable. kept the other two since these are early 20th Century applied arts that would have had their copyrights expire. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
US work with no US justification; if its first publication is 1981, it will be in copyright until 2048 Prosfilaes (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2048 (photographer died in 1944). --Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Licence by Artist is missing - no freedom of panorama as only temporaly on display Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Question Is this a work of art or just shelves with pieces of the Berlin Wall on them? If the latter, there's no artistic copyright. —holly {chat} 22:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Bahnmoeller: bump. —holly {chat} 17:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Achim55 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work, even watermarked: https://orgullosamenteantioqueno.com/guia-de-los-sitios-turisticos-y-de-interes-que-debes-visitar-en-medellin/?expand_article=1 EXIF data matches username. Yann (talk) 18:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Fine, thank you. I'd like to keep, but we need COM:VRT as https://orgullosamenteantioqueno.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Edificio-coltejer.jpg.webp has been published 4 years ago. --Achim55 (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Just noting that the date in the EXIF says 2018. I can't get to the uploader's website right now, but will try and check later. —holly {chat} 18:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Rolando appears to be a website designer. His user page says "soy orgullosamente Antioqueño" ("I'm proudly Antioqueño") which happens to be the name of the website where Achim55 found the image. His own website doesn't list this particular site as one of his creations, and orgullosamenteantioqueno.com says it was created by Puntos y Linéas Publicidad. I went to their Facebook page and have contacted them to see what their relation is to Rolando, so let's give them a week or so to respond. —holly {chat} 18:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Given how long this has dragged on it's unlikely we'll get a satisfactory resolution. There's lots of other options at Category:Edificio Coltejer. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Zionist symbol, the same problem, the same reason for deletion – Doc Taxon • Talk • 19:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The disclaimer covers this. Zanahary (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The disclaimer indeed covers this. As a free content site we don't need to be so considerate of authoritarian regimes, but keep promoting free content. פעמי-עליון (talk) 11:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Half of Commons’ content as well as the site itself are illegal in the PRC. Are we going to put legal disclaimers for the DPRK next? Dronebogus (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Yes. It is like creating a {{South Korean Symbol}} for North Korean users. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'd vote Delete here per discussion, but then I'd be in search of a reason to keep Template:Nazi symbol, which is also only relevant in a few small countries. --Krd 13:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It’s relevant to a significant number of the world’s major democracies, all of which have very large populations, including Brazil, which is hardly “small”. This template is relevant to a single authoritarian state that blocks Wikimedia anyway. Dronebogus (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fair argument. I agree. --Krd 13:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- It’s relevant to a significant number of the world’s major democracies, all of which have very large populations, including Brazil, which is hardly “small”. This template is relevant to a single authoritarian state that blocks Wikimedia anyway. Dronebogus (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per clear consensus. --Krd 08:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)