User talk:Hugo.arg
Botanical duplicates
[edit]Hi, it is not necessary to have the same photo in the gallery article and the Category of the botanical plant. The article or gallery name only goesin the Category, the photo goes in the gallery. I have changed a few for you. WayneRay 10:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)WayneRay
- Ok, thank you. I don't know all rules of placing pictures in commons. I will try not to make dublicate photos in categories in the future. Hugo.arg 16:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, but as a note, if there is no gallery, please leave a copy in the category, someone else may create a page or place it somewhere appropriate.Great photos though. WayneRay 19:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)WayneRay
- Most all of the photos you are putting in Categories DO HAVE galleries. Plese only put your photos in the galleries if there is one, not the categories, Thanks you WayneRay 20:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)WayneRya
OK, no problem. Hugo.arg 20:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Agawa River
[edit]Hello. Thanks for nominating my Image:Agawa River, Ontario.jpg photo as a featured picture candidate. I am honoured; thank you! The person who said the image was not tilted but that the tree is really crooked is quite correct. If you look at my other photo of the canyon ( en:Image:Agawa Canyon, Ontario.jpg, you can see the same super-tilted tree near the centre of the image. --Kralizec! 02:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank YOU for these great photos! I like very much landscapes with rivers so I nominated this one, unfortunately some voters voted against. I wish you good luck to take such nice picture that it would be voted as featured :) Hugo.arg 08:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Hugo.arg, your above image cannot show Geranium sylvaticum but very probably Geranium sanguineum. I moved it there. My reasons for this can be found on the discussion page of the image. I did not change your personal gallery page, however. So you might do this and also check my changes because I only contribute a few changes time and again to Wikipedia or the Wikimedia pages - or complain (here or by mail, see http://www.flogaus-faust.de/bc/mail.htm) if you think that moving your images was a bad thing to do. Thank you! Robert Flogaus-Faust 62.134.80.97 21:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC).
Klaida
[edit]Sveikas. Šioje nuotraukoje pavaizduota ne Labūnavos pagrindinė mokykla, o Labūnavos ŽŪ bendrovės patalpos ir biblioteka. --Tocekas (talk) 19:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 51ffaf5acee096fb911c4bef9e8682fc
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Image:Dotnuvele003.JPG see here Image:Dotnuvele1.jpg ! --Botaurus (talk) 10:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 2fdca22981a65f0eaee4f6d686b1d25b
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
 |
File:Cepelinai3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
- Ta patį paveiksliuką ištryniau prieš 3 dienas. Kiek suprantu User:AndreasStrasbourg ir lt:naudotojas:Andreas.eu tas pats asmuo Justass (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Who is the author?
- Original uploader was Tadas12 at lt.wikipedia
- {{GFDL-self|Algirdas}}
Will you have a look and fix author or license? --MGA73 (talk) 21:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think I fixed this, Tadas12 transferred scaled down image from bat-smg to lt wiki and only then it comes to Commons. Author of the original image is Algėrds --Justass (talk) 21:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Identification of Image:Vaisgina001.JPG and Image:Veronika001.JPG
[edit]Dear Hugo.arg,
could you please check whether your image Image:Vaisgina001.JPG could actually show Ajuga genevensis instead of Ajuga reptans? I just moved your image Image:Veronika001.JPG to the Veronica filiformis gallery. Its name and its categories had been correct before. Could you please check your gallery, because the image is still misnamed there. Thanks, Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Could you please add a location. There are two Martiska Lakes in Ida-Virumaa. Coordinates for both are given here. Thanks! Pikne 07:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Redboston (talk · contribs) tagged it for speedy-deletion. Can you imagine why? -- RE rillke questions? 10:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Russian users say it may be copyvio. Hugo.arg (talk) 10:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I use one of your photos!
[edit]Hi!
I have use a photo of Mustela vison in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directy in the follow links and click over each thubnail:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/diapo.php?id=32151
I copy your information profile in your "contributor card" of Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Hugo.arg
If you wish, send me a photo for complete the profile. My email acount is fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org
This is my "contributor card" of Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando+Lis%F3n+Mart%EDn
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
- Hola Fernando! Gracias por informarme, puedes usar cualquier mi fotografía sin restricciones en donde quieres =) Saludos, Hugo.arg (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you!
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Akademijos gimnazija revert
[edit]Supainiojau dvi Akademijas, kad jas kur...--Vilensija (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Pasitaiko =)) Hugo.arg (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Narva Ida Virumaa.jpg
[edit]Where is this photo File:Narva Ida Virumaa.jpg scanned from? When was the original photo made? --WikedKentaur (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Image dates when transferring to Commons
[edit]Hi there. I am aware it's well over seven years since you transferred File:ValgaTrainStation.jpg to Wikimedia Commons, and that currently you might be more knowledgeable about the transfer process.
The issue is that the file lacks any original date information, in part because a number of cameraphones of the time were not equipped with functionality to save EXIF data.
Therefore, I'd like to remind you that in case a photo uploaded to a non-Commons Wikimedia project lacks any date information both in the EXIF field well below the file page and the image description itself, and if or when you are about to transfer pictures from other Wikimedia projects to Commons, you should then remember to include the original file upload date as the earliest possible date as reference.
The other issue is that the Valga train station was built in 1949 after a project by V.P. Tsipulin (В.П. Ципулин), known as the "Leningrad architect", and this means that the building as a work of architecture is not in the public domain. (Unfortunately, the full name of V.P. Tsipulin is not known and neither is the time of his passing).
btw, Merry Christmas. -Mardus (talk) 17:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Hugo.arg⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Hugo.arg,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Ibėnų cerkvė: revert
[edit]Apgailestauju, kad įsipainiojau su analogišku failo pavadinimu, berods, nepastebėjau perspėjimo (jei toks buvo)...--Vilensija (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Mimulus luteus
[edit]Hello Hugo,
I would like to use your Mimulus luteus image in a scientific paper. Please could you let me know your full name so I can credit it in the text? Please email me: Alex.Twyford (at) ed.ac.uk
Thanks!
|
|
File:Pietalava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
glossologist (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Eternal flame Aktobe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elisfkc (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Виндсёрфер на Донузлаве.jpg
[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Виндсёрфер на Донузлаве.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Lietuvos KK[Nr.] keliai
[edit]Category talk:Roads in Lithuania. Jūsų nuomonė? --Kusurija (talk) 04:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:MoscowChannel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2A02:2168:1237:FF00:29AB:9B42:1094:DFA3 21:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Alcantara Sicily 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Гребнер, Фриц.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Bruno Wedler su jų ūkio žirgais Krakeniškėse.jpg
[edit]|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bruno Wedler su jų ūkio žirgais Krakeniškėse.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Bruno Wedler su jų ūkio žirgais Krakeniškėse.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Mitologijos enciklopedija.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Renata3 (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Mazosios Lietuvos enciklopedija resize.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Renata3 (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Budas zemaiciu, 2006-10-17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Renata3 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Dūksto dvaro gyvenamas namas (1939) 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Dūksto dvaro rūkykla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Misidentification of File:CardamineAmara01.JPG
[edit]-
your image -
Cardamine amara -
Cardamine pratensis -
both species (illustration)
Hi Hugo.arg, I just changed the ID of your image left above in the gallery. It cannot show Cardamine amara for the following reasons: Cardamine amara has violet anthers, white flowers (not pinkish as in your photo with an obviously pink flower bud), usually so much foliage that it would be visible on your image and it grows in extremely wet places only, i.e. habitats which you usually would not want to step on because otherwise your shoes would be full of water or at least extremely muddy. Your photograph looks rather like a plant on a lawn rather than in a swamp. Therefore, your plant is almost certainly Cardamine pratensis, at least something from the aggregate, but I do not see any reason to consider anything other than ordinary Cardamine pratensis likely. Please compare the images above. Cardamine pratensis is supposed to have pink or (sometimes only almost) white flowers and light yellow anthers, which is a much better match for your photograph. Your photograph still requires renaming. With best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank You for clarification. It can be deleted as now Commons is full of various Cardamine photograhies. Hugo.arg (talk) 19:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Referring to your deletion request, I suggest that my ID is very likely good enough for Commons. Cardamine pratensis is a rather complicated aggregate of subspecies or microspecies, at least in Germany. Two taxa that have been considered species separate from Cardamine pratensis for some years in Germany, Cardamine dentata and Cardamine udicola, are rather rare species of very wet soils, a habitat which I consider to be unlilkely for your plant. I have no idea which microspecies or subspecies you have got in your place, however; you would need to look into a rather new flora of the area. Also, there might be different opinions about what constitutes a species among the experts; e.g., the Austrian flora by Adler and Fischer has a tendency to consider almost anything a species, which is just a subspecies or a variety in other books. Therefore, I am a little bit cautious about the correctness of my ID. There are lots of photographs of Cardamine pratensis, but not all of these are good, whereas your photograph looks quite good to me for the rather tricky light pink flowers on a much darker background. The photograph is as sharp as it can be for two plants of Cardamine pratensis in one photograph and there are hardly any blown lights as far as I can see. It also has almost 6 megapixels resolution. I am not even entirely sure whether this might be an acceptable quality image candidate. So, personally I see no good reason to delete the photograph. If it were one of my unpublished photgraphs I would publish it on Commons. By the way, there is also no reason to assume that the other photographs of Cardamine pratensis on Commons were identified more reliably. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I am not a biologist. Once I have made this photography, I was consulted by professional biologist User:Algirdas (now inactive as Wikipedia user). Sure, he could made mistakes as botany is not his main speciality. This plant grown in a wet meadow alongside Primula farinosa (file:PrimulaFarinosa001.JPG), Dactylorhiza baltica, Myosurus minimus, etc. This place is not a swamp or muddy Alnus coast but a wet meadow with a heavy clayish soil in suburbian area. I could try to check that place if I'll found the same Cardamine, I would make more photographies for identification. Hugo.arg (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information. Primula farinosa (which may grow in valley bogs) and Myosorus minimus (which usually grows in arable fields, though) are usually on very moist or wet soils, may be not as wet as those with Cardamine amara, but almost so. I do not know Dactylorhiza baltica yet, but it seems that it is also frequently found in valley bogs. But Glechoma hederacea, which may be the violet flowers that are out of focus in the background of the photo are more compatible to ordinary Cardamine pratensis, which likes fresh to moist soils. And mowing does not damage the Glechoma plants much. So Glechoma hederacea grows abundantly in meadows and especially on lawns. The ID of the background flowers is a bit speculative, though, because they are so much out of focus and your flora may contain some species I am not so familiar with. The microspecies that are usually excluded from Cardamine pratensis in Germany grow on extremely wet soils, just as Cardamine amara. All the best --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Robert Flogaus-Faust! Success - I have found it in the same place. See the photogaphies at https://photos.app.goo.gl/VEPeNgEbQ34HxMXe8. Looks like pratensis but give a look as a professional. Regards, Hugo.arg (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but I am not a professional, just an amateur. And as I already told you, I have not got a flora of the Baltic area, where I could look which microspecies of Cardamine pratensis should be distinguished. I am not even sure from your photos whether the leaflets of the lower stem leafs are stalked (possible Cardamine dentata) or whether they are not or just a few. The Fischer/Oswald/Adler flora of Austria even uses stuff like length of the petals and fruits, size of the pollen grains, length of hairs at the lower stem leaves and similar stuff that you can hardly see on any photo. So this is still Cardamine pratensis, at least in the larger sense. If you wish to know more, you need at least a local flora and some time to check everything the key says. By the way, here is a page that can show you how Cardamine dentata leaves are supposed to look and also those of C. pratense, even though the page is in German: [1]. Apparently other microspecies are not considered here. With best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Vaivadiskiu-dvaro-ponu-namas-2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bjh21 (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Whpq (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Hello.
If you know how to edit SVG files, can you add the border of South Sudan in File:Togoland map.png, File:German sw africa map.png and File:German east africa map.png? Unfortunately I cannot edit SVG files, that is why I asked you.
Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 12:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I eddited svg maps long time ago. Now I do not use these programs and I lost skills to use them. Maybe somebody other could help you. Regards, Hugo.arg (talk) 13:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Liivi.jpg
[edit]|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Liivi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Liivi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
rubin16 (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Монумент "Слава помидору".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
rubin16 (talk) 07:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
POTY
[edit]Ar nenorėtum persigalvoti dėl savo preferencijų? Būčiau dekingas. --Kusurija (talk) 18:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Kaip suprasti? Hugo.arg (talk) 18:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Болото-с;- --Kusurija (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Misidentification of File:CentaureaJacea001.JPG
[edit]-
your photograph
-
Centaurea jacea -
Centaurea jacea (illustration) -
Centaurea scabiosa -
Centaurea scabiosa (illustration)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
![43 File:Монумент "Слава помидору".jpg](#File:Монумент_"Слава_помидору".jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
![07:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hugo.arg#c-Rubin16-2022-04-26T07:35:00.000Z-File:Монумент_"Слава_помидору".jpg){kind=link}
Hi Hugo.arg, your image File:CentaureaJacea001.JPG was misidentified. I do not know where it is from and I am not entirely sure what it is, but it might be Centaurea scabiosa because of the green, black-tipped involucral bracts and the few leaves that do not look as if they are entire. The leaves of Centaurea scabiosa are pinnatisect. The involucral bracts of Centaurea jacea are typically more or less brown. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Robert Flogaus-Faust. Thank You for notification. Indeed, it looks like scabiosa, which is also very common here in Lithuania. But as we can not see the leaves very well and the photo is old and blurry, I guess it is better to delete it at all as there is a bunch of better photographies of any jacea's. Hugo.arg (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Hugo.arg, I am not sure whether this photo should be deleted, but the plants do not look really sharp. So you might ask for deletion. However, if there are no lookalikes in LIthuania, then this could be kept and renamed. "Flora Europaea" would be a difficult choice in this case, because there is such a huge number of Mediterranean species. However, assuming that at least the older versions of the "Schmeil-Fitschen" flora of Germany cover most of the flora of the Kaliningrad area, Lithuania is not far east of the area covered by this flora. Therefore, this is very probably Centaurea scabiosa. Best wishes --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Colombia relief location map cropped-lt.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Map of Bangladesh-lt2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Map of Bangladesh-lt.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Misidentification of File:Dagys002.JPG
[edit]
Hi Hugo.arg, your image File:Dagys002.JPG shows Cirsium vulgare instead of Carduus acanthoides. User:Teacoolish corrected the category and the Latin name a long time ago. I changed the Lithuanian name and replaced the image on lt:Dygliuotasis dagys. I do not know whether your image should be renamed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank You, Robert Flogaus-Faust. I suggested it for renaming. Also, isn't File:Dagys001.JPG also Cirsium vulgare? I do not remember exactly, as it was 15 years ago, but I think, I made this photography of the same or nearby growing plant. Hugo.arg (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Hugo.arg, File:Dagys001.JPG cannot be the same plant, because it shows Carduus acanthoides. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
OK, Thank You. Hugo.arg (talk) 11:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Locator map of Mempawah Regency in West Kalimantan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2001:448A:11A1:1FD8:419C:6181:630B:263A 10:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Lazdynų RGP ligoninė.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Onkologijos instituto poliklinika.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Vaiku ligonine2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Locator map of Mempawah Regency in West Kalimantan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Twotwofourtysix (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Nude Mexican woman of Aguascalientes
[edit]Hello. Can you please explain why are you taking File:Nude Mexican woman of Aguascalientes.svg off of the cat People of Aguascalientes? You even reverted without explanation.
I’m creating a compendium of what Mexican women’s body look by state based on my models. I’m an Anthropologist and also an Artist. And there is a wide array of diversity within Mexico.
I wouldn’t do so if their portrayal were untasteful, or without consent. In this case, she is a woman that shows what a nude woman from the state of Aguascalientes looks like.
This is why this file belongs to that cat. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 19:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Well, these pictures are of doubtful significance more than personal creation. But as You say they are based on real women then this must be clearly noted at description because for me this series looked more like imaginary creation. Anyways, this is bad idea to categorize these images with city categories - personally, I was shocked when searching for a picture of Aguascalientes city I found this thing. These are representations of anonymous women and sketched as paintings so they isn't a real representations of "people of Aguascalientes" or other places. Category:Nude women in Mexico should be enough. Saludos, Hugo.arg (talk) 19:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. The description is: “Nude Mexican woman from the state of Aguascalientes, Mexico. Digital art by Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (2024).” What would you suggest it could be changed in the description in order to be more clearly noted as to inform it is not imaginary, as you said you personally thought so? Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hola! Maybe it would be better "Digital art by Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas, based on the picture of nude Mexican woman from the state of Aguascalientes, Mexico". Hugo.arg (talk) 18:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. The description is: “Nude Mexican woman from the state of Aguascalientes, Mexico. Digital art by Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (2024).” What would you suggest it could be changed in the description in order to be more clearly noted as to inform it is not imaginary, as you said you personally thought so? Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
|
|
File:Palendres vienuolynas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ppc saules miestas2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
|
|
File:Siauliu Svc. M. Marijos Nekaltojo Prasidejimo baznycia 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)