Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/10/15
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
pornographie explicite pouvant etre vue par des mineurs sans verification d'âge 91.160.111.29 15:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept, this is not a reason to delete a file. Commons collects videos about any human behavior, including pornography. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Actors Bud Abbott, Lou Costello and Lila Dean selling war bonds at Defense House in Los Angeles, Calif., circa 1942.jpg
[edit]didn't notice first one, this is a duplicate. also delete the derivative image SDudley (talk) 13:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Howcheng please help if you can. Didn't notice you had already uploaded. SDudley (talk) 13:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Next time, use {{speedydelete|G7}}. Also, I already went through the entire Daily News collection and uploaded whatever I thought might be useful. There might be items that I missed, but more likely than not I already got it. I'm also in the process of doing the same for the LA Times collection (currently on page 1604). —holly {chat} 16:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Minor edit of an old Italian poster (https://digitalcollections.hoover.org/objects/13862/emprunt-italien-1920--banca-italiana-di-sconto--paris), copyright status unclear without a date of death for the original artist. Belbury (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
explicit pornography 91.160.111.29 19:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 11:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Порушує політику, не має жодної цінності є порнографією Yurechkonazarii (talk) 22:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Google translation: "Violates policy, has no value, is pornography"
- What policy do you think you're talking about? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Probably COM:PORN--A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, Commons is not censored. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Speedy Kept: still no valid reason for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 11:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
explicit pornography 91.160.111.29 19:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 11:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
This is straight up porn 103.156.118.5 01:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion, again Dronebogus (talk) 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BeautifulO.D (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious/hoax micronation content.
Omphalographer (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag ("of the Gradient State"). Omphalographer (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
personal image accidentally uploaded. Uomobulges18241 (talk) 07:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
I as the creator of the image wish to remove said image from public domain --Kazemaru Zen (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
I, the creator and copyright holder of this work, wish to remove this work from the public domain effective immediately Kazemaru Zen (talk) 18:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: While a PD release is not revokable, this qualifies for speedy deletion F10: Personal photos by non-contributors. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
File is a copyright violation. Davest3r08 (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 09:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 07:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Zapelatz (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Wrong license. Not compatible with commons policies. TheRichic (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Beim Hochladen gab es einen Datenbankfehler. Jetzt gibt es die Datei doppelt. Bitte diese Datei löschen Smarties (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
I'm the uploader of the image. The draft page where the image would be included was deleted. DavidLopes88 (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Not in use Bryantriplex (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
These were brought up at the copyright section of the village pump. Images are available from external sources with no evidence of permission. File:Global Overview of the Solutrean Hypothesis.jpg is available from [1] (image 7/13 of the slideshow) and is credited to "5W Infographics", so I don't believe this is {{PD-USGov-SI}}. File:Image 2 sh2.jpg is available from [2].
Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 06:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
I decided to make a seperate deletion request based on this comment by Omphalographer on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fma12. Trade (talk) 03:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Many of the remaining images of are of "stock" scenes like File:Far west town ai-generated.jpg which aren't associated with any specific source material. These may be OK from an IP perspective but their educational value seems minimal; what's the rationale for keeping them?
- As the original commenter, Delete. To expand upon my rationale a bit: media on Commons should serve some educational goal. If the goal is to depict towns in the "far West", we have numerous high-quality pictures of real ghost towns in that region, like File:Bodie ghost town.jpg. If the goal is to depict how this region is portrayed in fiction, there's Category:Westerns, including some entire movies which are in the public domain and extensive photos of movie sets, like Category:Film sets of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Omphalographer (talk) 05:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Not own works. May be in the public domain, but source, author, date, and license must be fixed.
- File:Yazdan Khan in 1913.jpg
- File:Lillias Anna Hamilton.png
- File:Major Dost Muhammad Hazara.png
- File:Abdul Khaliq Hazara with his family as prisoner.png
- File:Quetta map before 1935.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep All fixed. I am not sure if the annotations at File:Quetta map before 1935.jpg are copyrightable. --RAN (talk) 20:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, they are probably too simple to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Major Dost Muhammad Hazara.png. It is not the claiming person's own work, it was downloaded from here. Hamwal (talk) 12:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note - File:Yazdan Khan in 1913.jpg is a cropped version of the File:106th Hazara Pioneers, 1913.jpg. Hamwal (talk) 12:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Food packaging
[edit]Derivatives, COM:PACKAGING.
- File:"Moose Poop" and "Roadkill" (45542043092).jpg
- File:100g 4.jpg
- File:2020-07-19 12 21 14 A bag of Smartfood White Cheddar Popcorn in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2020-07-26 15 37 56 A packet of Grandma's Chocolate Chip cookies in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2JarsInBoxHeadon-72.jpg
- File:Baby Food - Pear, Mango, Carrots (50842020627).jpg
- File:Barilla Maccheroncini al pettine.jpg
- File:BEARNAKEDGRANOLA.JPG
- File:Biscuit Book (8680869237).jpg
- File:BUN (adelante y atras).jpg
- File:BUN hace krrrrrac.jpeg
- File:Camellia brand dried beans.jpg
- File:CASEs-mild-pork-roll-box.jpg
- File:CASEs-tangy-pork-roll-box.jpg
- File:Caviar box.jpg
- File:ChamonixLU2.jpg
- File:Chocolate .jpg
- File:Cofee-Mate French Vanilla & Hazelnut 3 packs.JPG
- File:Cumin.JPG
- File:Divinity candy.jpg
- File:Envases de Algramo.jpg
- File:Fried broad beans (china).jpg
- File:Grain Waves packaging (4).JPG
- File:Grupa x 3 konfitury Spiżarnia Dziedzictwo Kulinarne Mazowsza 1.jpg
- File:Gusset bags.jpg
- File:Helado Original La Campiña Mandarina.png
- File:Hibiscus High Tea from Mountain Rose Herbs.jpg
- File:HK ALC 鴨脷洲 Ap Lei Chau 利東邨 Lei Tung Estate 街市 Market January 2021 SS2 41.jpg
- File:HK Kraft Miracle Whip Dressing with Egg 4 Salad a.jpg
- File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng 彩明商場 Choi Ming Shopping Centre 領展 Link REIT mall shop 大家樂 Cafe de Coral Restaurant food 花生甜混醬 朱腸粉 rice noodle rolls 皮蛋肉粥 congee December 2019 SS2 03.jpg
- File:Images of products.tif
- File:Joyva Tahini.JPG
- File:Kalisz 02.JPG
- File:Kame Manju 20090731 01.jpg
- File:Karper peyniri.jpg
- File:Kem Celano Sô Cô La.jpg
- File:Kem ốc quế Merino Super teen Hương Vani Socola.jpg
- File:Kinder Pingui ak.jpg
- File:Kiyomemochi 5.jpg
- File:KonnyakuBatake (MannanLife).jpg
- File:Kräuterbutter.JPG
- File:Lebensmittelverpackungen.jpg
- File:Leerdammer kaas.jpg
- File:Leite UHT Semidesnatado Batavo.jpg
- File:Lohengrin.jpg
- File:Lospropios.jpg
- File:Miracoli-1.jpg
- File:Mocartove kugle.JPG
- File:Møllerens butik display 1965.png
- File:Namasenbei.jpg
- File:Nutella ak.jpg
- File:Obazter leicht.jpg
- File:Pack of Fox's Melts Viennese Chocolate.jpg
- File:Premier test de la crème Philadelphia. Effectivement, une tuerie. -spaghetti -carbonara (5970594380).jpg
- File:Produkte der Allgäuland-Käsereien GmbH.jpg
- File:RecipeoftheMonthNov SJ (10807566674).jpg
- File:ReeseSwoops.jpg
- File:Refreshers0001.jpg
- File:Rookkaas plakken.jpg
- File:Salad dressing (cropped).jpg
- File:Salad dressing.jpg
- File:Scottish mixed grill pudding pack.jpg
- File:Smaki Regionow 2019 in Poznan MTP (krowka opatowska) (2).jpg
- File:Sousvidekarbonade.jpg
- File:Termix dva druhy.jpg
- File:Tetilla WS.JPG
- File:Tortilla con trufa.jpg
- File:Two Degrees Bars.jpg
- File:WaferNuss.jpg
Komarof (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This seems an inappropriate catch all nomination - packaging from different countries and different circumstances. From looking at a sample, IMO these need to be evaluated and decided on individually rather than as a set. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Camellia brand dried beans.jpg - the design of a flower with leaves is the only potentially copyrightable element. A quick websearch found a 1947 ad using it (company states "since 1923", it may be even older, but this is old enough to establish status for our purposes), with no statement of copyright, so out of copyright per US law. I have added "trademark" notices, which is sufficient in this case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:BUN hace krrrrrac.jpeg and File:BUN (adelante y atras).jpg - simple text and line designs, OK -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lean keep File:Barilla Maccheroncini al pettine.jpg, looks like text and simple design, but I'll defer to those more familiar working with COM:TOO Italy material. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:2JarsInBoxHeadon-72.jpg, looks OK for US:TOO to me with text and geometric designs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lean keep File:BEARNAKEDGRANOLA.JPG, the three lines looks below COM:TOO US -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lean delete File:Caviar box.jpg - the fish logo looks a complex enough design to be copyrighted in most countries. What country is this from? How old is this logo? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment File:Envases de Algramo.jpg packaging looks simple enough to be OK in most countries, but Chile looks more strict TOO per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Chile - opinions from anyone who has worked in Chile cases? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Cumin.JPG simple text logos - looks like Ducros (France based) and Topaz (India based) brands? Should be ok for relevant TOOs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:"Moose Poop" and "Roadkill" (45542043092).jpg - modern artwork of cartoon animals, clear COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:CASEs-mild-pork-roll-box.jpg, photograph of prepared food display -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Biscuit Book (8680869237).jpg simplish but looks over TOO -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:2020-07-26_15_37_56_A_packet_of_Grandma's_Chocolate_Chip_cookies_in_the_Dulles_section_of_Sterling,_Loudoun_County,_Virginia.jpg - COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lean Keep File:Chocolate .jpg simple - what country is this from? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Images of products.tif, includes multiple substantial commercial artwork packages -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment File:Tetilla WS.JPG looks simple, opinions from those who have worked with Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain related products? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Tortilla con trufa.jpg COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:CASEs-tangy-pork-roll-box.jpg similarly -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Møllerens butik display 1965.png - NOT for stated nomination reason (looks OK in those terms) but as vague source and no proof of free license - "Unknown author - picture is from a private collection" (!) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lean keep File:Lohengrin.jpg - looks simple, in production since 1911 per [3]. Comment from those more familiar with material under Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Norway? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment File:Kalisz 02.JPG package design elements look like they might be old - when did they originate? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:ReeseSwoops.jpg, text and wavy lines -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lean keep File:Produkte der Allgäuland-Käsereien GmbH.jpg mostly text; includes small logo - OK for Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Denmark? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Refreshers0001.jpg Simple text -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Sousvidekarbonade.jpg photo artwork of prepared food display -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Mocartove kugle.JPG - this portrait of Mozart used on the candy package seems to be the work of Edvard Lehmann (d. 1892) so PD-Art. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- File:Camellia brand dried beans.jpg I believe that packaging (U.S.) has been around a long time; probably was not copyrighted, back when you had to do so explicitly do so in the U.S. So Keep for that one. - Jmabel ! talk 17:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I see above that User:Infrogmation confirms that above with a date. - Jmabel ! talk 17:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment There are way too many different cases here in one nomination, and I suggest closing this and going back and nominating these either one-by-one or in groups that would clearly stand or fall together. And I would suggest not re-nominating the ones that someone has clearly shown here are PD. - Jmabel ! talk 17:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Closed per Jmabel. Inappropriate scattershot nomination of images from many countries with different copyright and regulations, and very different circumstances from simple text packaging to packages with photos or artwork. I have Deleted the more obvious COM:DW copyright problems. Some other images clearly were included in the nomination without good reason. Others here may be renominated either individually or in smaller groups based on similar copyright cases. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Violation de copyright. Le site internet d'où vient cette image a une notice de copyright sur la page d'accueil. McSly (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:El Gráfico, 1996
[edit]Image published in Argentina in 1997. It is in the PD there, but not in the United States (at least 70 years protection).
- File:Asprilla tocando bongoes.jpg
- File:Alfredo berti boca.jpg
- File:Argentina at the podium 1996.jpg
- File:Argentina medalla plata 1996.jpg
- File:Caniggia and Maradona kiss - 1996.png
- File:Carolina Mariani 1996 (cropped).png
- File:Carolina Mariani 1996 (retouched).png
- File:Carolina Mariani 1996.png
- File:Claudio Caniggia - 1996.png
- File:Diego Maradona Estudiantes de La Plata 1996.png
- File:Eg esp104 velez.jpg
- File:Eg esp105 anuario.jpg
- File:Eg esp106 guerrero.jpg
- File:Eg especial103 carllewis.jpg
- File:Eg extra106.jpg
- File:Eg3979 maradona.jpg
- File:Eg3980 coggi.jpg
- File:Eg3981 armentano fabbri.jpg
- File:Eg3982 river.jpg
- File:Eg3984 basualdo y veron.jpg
- File:Eg3985 francescoli.jpg
- File:Eg3986 argsub23.jpg
- File:Eg3987 arg preolimpico.jpg
- File:Eg3988 caniggia.jpg
- File:Eg3989 lezcano y carrario.jpg
- File:Eg3990 caniggia.jpg
- File:Eg3991 cedres.jpg
- File:Eg3992 caniggia maradona.jpg
- File:Eg3993 caniggia.jpg
- File:Eg3994 batistuta passarella caniggia.jpg
- File:Eg3995 crespo.jpg
- File:Eg3996 bilardo caniggia.jpg
- File:Eg3997 bossio.jpg
- File:Eg3998 maradona.jpg
- File:Eg3999 francescoli crespo.jpg
- File:Eg4001 maradona kilygonzalez manteca.jpg
- File:Eg4002 macallister chilavert.jpg
- File:Eg4003 claudiolopez.jpg
- File:Eg4004 francescoli crespo.jpg
- File:Eg4005 burgos.jpg
- File:Eg4007 maradona.jpg
- File:Eg4008 morales crespo chamot.jpg
- File:Eg4009 passarella.jpg
- File:Eg4010 maradona.jpg
- File:Eg4011 chilavert.jpg
- File:Eg4012 latorre.jpg
- File:Eg4014 guerrero.jpg
- File:Eg4015 guerrero y cruz.jpg
- File:Eg4016 river.jpg
- File:Eg4017 hugoguerra.jpg
- File:Eg4019 river.jpg
- File:Eg4020 francescoli.jpg
- File:Eg4021 sorin.jpg
- File:Eg4022 guerrero y menotti.jpg
- File:Eg4024 river.jpg
- File:Eg4025 boca.jpg
- File:Eg4026 ortega.jpg
- File:Eg4026 tyson holyfield.jpg
- File:Eg4027 solari y monserrat.jpg
- File:Eg4028 selecc argentina.jpg
- File:Eg4030 anuario.jpg
- File:Eg4104 guerrero.jpg
- File:Eg4105 guerrero y cruz.jpg
- File:Francescoli copalibertadores 1996.jpg
- File:Juan Román Riquelme en partido debut con Boca Juniors (retouched).jpg
- File:Lorenzo y alegre boca.jpg
- File:Marcos milinkovic 1996.jpg
- File:Mario Pergolini 1996.png
- File:Mcallister patea v river.jpg
- File:Michaeljohnson sprinter.jpg
- File:Morales crespo chamot olympics.jpg
- File:Mutombo vs rodman.jpg
- File:Nigeria celebrating 1996 olympics.jpg
- File:Nigeria celebrating goal v argentina 1996.jpg
- File:Shaq usa basketball 1996.jpg
- File:Shaq vs divac.jpg
- File:Veron vs francescoli.jpg
- File:Victorhugo elgrafico1996.jpg
- File:Victorhugo morales 1996.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Support as the person who original proposed this deletion at COM:VPC#Mass URAA copyright violation of El Gráfico images?. –IagoQnsi (talk) 01:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 03:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
non-free contents. It's a non-free poster of drama. --용인 학생 (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Do we have any reason to believe the Flickr user owned the copyright for this image? All of her other work in her Flickr stream is photography of animals; this is the only drawing/painting. Jmabel ! talk 03:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly what I see on Google Lens, it appears that there are versions of this preceding the 2010 upload date on Flickr by several years, e.g. they date https://www.tourdebier.cz/a-jak-to-muze-vypadat-pro-externiho-pozorovatele/ as "Mar 30, 2006" (though it is lower-resolution). - Jmabel ! talk 03:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Most of the other photos in that user's Flickr account have watermarks from wallpaper gallery web sites and/or are stock photos, and this image shows signs of having been upscaled poorly; notice the blocky, jagged edges on the wheels of the bicycles and along the backs of the riders, for example. Delete; this is almost certainly a copyvio. Omphalographer (talk) 05:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: I've already identified several "own work" aircraft photos by this uploader as copyvios, and it's highly likely that many or all of these are as well.
- File:AA 5201.png
- File:AF 6935.png
- File:AF 91.png
- File:Boeing 747-400 Air France.png
- File:Korean Air Flight 015 Catching Fire on The Track.png
- File:Flight 1808.png
- File:Flight 18.png
- File:AF 72.png
- File:Pan am L-1049.png
- File:PIA flight 300 Incidente.png
- File:PIA flight 300.png
- File:China Airlines MD-10.png
- File:China Airlines DC-10 accident.png
- File:Trozos del AF 1919.png
- File:AF 1919.png
- File:Vuelo 605 de China Airlines.png
- File:VA Flight 180.png
- File:KAL 8702.png
- File:KAL 858.png
- File:KAL 015.png
- File:KAL 015.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
unlikely own work, no EXIF data, other photos of this model were taken by Adam Nicholas, see talk page of uploader Raymond (talk) 09:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comment from King of Hearts. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic person and a photo. MarinaMann (talk) 09:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, personal photo by non-contributor -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wots
[edit]Out of scope: additional fictitious emblems, maps, etc; cf. cs:Wikipedista:Kolomaznik/Pískoviště#Woti(ové) (travian).
- File:COA of Bratrske and Warriorske kingdom.PNG
- File:COA of Společenství severovýchodu.PNG
- File:COA of Wot empire.PNG
- File:Emblem-of-wot.png
- File:Family tree of kings of Wots.PNG
- File:Great coat of arms of king of Wots.jpg
- File:Map alli spol..png
- File:Order of Wot eagle.PNG
- File:Rodokmen wotskych kralu.PNG
- File:Standart of king of Wots.png
- File:Vlajka Wotského císařství.PNG
- File:Wotska koruna.PNG
- File:Wotská orlice (png).PNG
- File:Řád Meče síly-nosení.PNG
Omphalographer (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Statue is de minimis. There is no other way to take a frontal view of that building. Herbert Ortner (talk) 06:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Estonia doesn't have FoP on architecture either.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- How old is this building? Who was the architect? Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Uploader is required to provide that info. Burden on proof on them.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- How old is this building? Who was the architect? Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Estonia doesn't have FoP on architecture either.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, the building appears to be the same as File:Raekoja plats 3, Tartu 1.JPG, supported by Google Street View imagery. Per w:et:Raekoja plats (Tartu), the building was completed in 1790 and restored in 1946 after damage from World War II. The sculpture passes the Estonian version of de minimis: the work is not the main subject of the pictorial reproduction (or the image file itself). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue too new. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue too new. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue too new. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue too new. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue too new to be public domain. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
While this is public domain in Spain (it became public domain there in February 2023), this is still under copyright in the US until 2025. Abzeronow (talk) 03:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This 1930 postcard would still be under U.S. copyright until 2026. Abzeronow (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Senegal A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: advertising Uncitoyen (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: advertising Uncitoyen (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted website Uncitoyen (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This image is for a UK company, Abbey National. Per COM:TOO UK, the stylised flame would likely be sufficient to establish this as copyrightable in the UK. Whpq (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Purports to be a public domain photo, but this was taken from a yearbook in 1998, which is far too recent for this to naturally fall into the public domain in either the United States or Romania. There's no evidence that the yearbook is something special here; we lack evidence of permission for this photograph to be released under a suitable free license. As such, this should be deleted in light of COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No useful content. Possibly advertising. Uncitoyen (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo and also advertising Uncitoyen (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Investment supports craft brewery expansion Investissements pour appuyer l’agrandissement d’une brasserie artisanal (34087889362).jpg
[edit]Freely licensed photograph with a logo that seems above the Canadian ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
"own work" seems very unlikely for 1971 record jacket, and would certainly require going through COM:VRT. This may well be {{PD-US-no notice}} but we wouldn't know without seeing the back. Jmabel ! talk 18:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
We probably need the artist's permission for this. It doesn't seem to be permanently displayed in a public place. Yann (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Probably have to delete this and restore in 2034. After some sleuthing, it is from 1938, not the earlier date stated by the University of Washington Library. I'd welcome a theory under which it is currently in the public domain, but I don't know enough about its publication history to have one. Jmabel ! talk 22:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 01:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). Clearly self-photographed, converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). Clearly self-photographed, converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). Clearly self-photographed, converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW -- 17:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). Clearly self-photographed, converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asalimani.beauty (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, promotion
- File:میکاپ حرفه ای عروس با عسل ایمنی.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس دامغانی عسل ایمنی.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس دامغان.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس با عسل ایمنی در دامغان.jpg
- File:عروس با عسل ایمنی.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس عسل ایمنی دامغان.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس با عسل ایمنی دامغان.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس عسل ایمنی.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس توسط عسل ایمنی.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس به همراه عسل ایمنی.jpg
- File:میکاپ عروس با عسل ایمنی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kremalıpasta1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising
Uncitoyen (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png. File:Pioche okyn.png looks more complex than a Sundborn plate, and in a court ruling, the Supreme Court of Sweden ruled that it is likely that the plate is protected by copyright.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.
Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.
Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC) This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Various screenshots or textures from a non-free video game
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Deleted. INeverCry 02:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.
Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC) Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yet another Minecraft batch deletion request. Screenshots and assets from a non-free video game.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.
--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go. This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft[edit]These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.
IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC) |
Files in Category:Minecraft
[edit]Unused, out of scope.
- File:1-18-ore-distribution.jpg
- File:11e législature de l'Assemblée Nationale de Minecraft.jpg
- File:13e législature de l'Assemblée Nationale de Minecraft.jpg
- File:14e législature de l'Assemblée Nationale de Minecraft.jpg
- File:Arettic flag.png
- File:Barako the Sunchief.jpg
- File:Dhow Ship.png
- File:EarthMC Logo.jpg
- File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png
- File:Legotorch.png
- File:MoistMeter.pdf
- File:Гарнизон "Бабочка".jpg
Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none. Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan so this is a derivative work and NC. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Although human anatomy is in scope, this image is blurry and unused, and can be replaced by better alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete uploader could’ve tried a bit more. Dronebogus (talk) 02:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Although human anatomy is in scope, this image is in poor quality and unused, and can be replaced by better alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have 95 images of labeled male genitalia, this is no great loss. Dronebogus (talk) 02:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an artist CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. The Sentinelese are a real people, but they are not a "republic" and this is not their flag. Omphalographer (talk) 19:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: per description, "This flag is not the flag of any country, state or anything that would have a flag..." Omphalographer (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Play group flags
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious flags, cf. cs:Wikipedista:Kolomaznik/Pískoviště#Woti(ové) (travian).
Omphalographer (talk) 20:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Materialscientist from another DR. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This is a snuff film taken from reddit. It's impossible to verify that this was Hamas or that it even took place at this location. It adds absolutely nothing to either the main article about the war or the article about the location in which this allegedly occurred. The purpose of an image is to increase readers' understanding of the article's subject matter..., and this doesn't. Lethargilistic (talk) 04:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- FYI, there is a parallel discussion on the article's talk page. Lethargilistic (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep . Not from reddit. This CCTV footage was verified by Wall Street Journal News and multiple other WP:RS as authentic. See for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZBTXaclQV0&ab_channel=WSJNews Marokwitz (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Although a decision was not necessarily reached here but I think this is too graphic for Wikipedia nothing learns anything from this video.Bobbyshabangu (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep . As mentioned above, CCTV and verified. I disagree with nothing to learn, there is a lot to learn, the same way we see horrible images from the holocaust--185.118.205.174 20:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Bobbyshabangu 1) Commons is not Wikipedia; 2) Commons is not censored. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- The proposal is based on verifiability. How graphic you think it is is not really relevant. see WP:WINC; WP MOS:OMIMG -- Lenny Marks (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If the video is "too graphic", then its inclusion to any Wikipedia articles must be avoided and/or prohibited. Deleting the video from Commons would be useless. @meet_j (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- The video is sourced to this reddit post, not a news site. The YouTube link offered above does not contain the video, so it is not a verification of the contents of this video here. Lethargilistic (talk) 23:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm currently going through satellite imagery of the city this was filmed in to identify the street. The general scenary with the color of the dirt roads, shrubbery seems to match the city generally. Give me a day and I'll probably be able to identify the street. Chuckstablers (talk) 23:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Chuckstablers: I'm 99.9% sure this video was taken at 31°30′15.7″N 34°33′50.6″E / 31.504361°N 34.564056°E. FYI. -- Veggies (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm currently going through satellite imagery of the city this was filmed in to identify the street. The general scenary with the color of the dirt roads, shrubbery seems to match the city generally. Give me a day and I'll probably be able to identify the street. Chuckstablers (talk) 23:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Although a decision was not necessarily reached here but I think this is too graphic for Wikipedia nothing learns anything from this video.Bobbyshabangu (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to “Hamas members kill…”. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and Rename – "Terrorists" is very biased. FunLater (talk) 01:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I find it odd that you leave out the next part of that sentence, so I'll include it here so that it's clear. "The purpose of an image is to increase readers' understanding of the article's subject matter, usually by directly depicting people, things, activities, and concepts described in the article".
- Let's ask the question then; does this directly depict people, things, activities and concepts described in the article? It is depicting people (hamas militant), doing things (chasing down and executing israeli civilians) described in the article (the article about the war in which this occurred). Yes. It is depicting people doing things described in the article. Therefore it contributes to the readers understanding of the article's subject matter, as it shows the things being described. A picture, or video, is worth a thousand words. Chuckstablers (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't include that part because there is no evidence that this is actually depicting the event. It is cited to a post on reddit, not a verifiable RS. Lethargilistic (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Then that's a different argument. If you're arguing that because a reliable source has not confirmed it's validity, then say that. Chuckstablers (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Moreover, I don't actually see anything in the image use policy that specifically states that all images/videos must be referenced/verified by a reliable source for inclusion. If you want please refer to something in the image use policy to support your viewpoint there. We know a massacre happened there, we have reliable sources on that, the timestamp on the video lines up with what I could find for the time this massacre took place, even looking briefly at google earth I can see the general area, color, shrubbery with trees, colour of trees, colour of dirt, matches that city. Given enough time I can probably identify what street it happened on if that assuages any concerns you have over the legitimacy. Chuckstablers (talk) 03:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- On the content policy portion, I understand that Commons is not Wikipedia, but I find the idea that there is no policy about verifiability and reliable sourcing unbelievable for a site so concerned with copyright violation. Can you link me to the Commons policy document you are referencing so I can get back to you on that? On the other points, I simply won't accept anything less than a source for where this video came from. I'm sure your geolocating skills are very good, but you're not in the chain of custody on this and this is a war. We should be wary of archiving anything (as someone else said) as "important documentary evidence of a significant historical event" when we don't know where it came from. Also, I admit my initial post was not the best at explaining my full rationale, which is verifiability, offensive content, and its educational value. I underestimated how controversial this would be. If you think offensive content is irrelevant and you think that it is educational, then we simply disagree. Lethargilistic (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't include that part because there is no evidence that this is actually depicting the event. It is cited to a post on reddit, not a verifiable RS. Lethargilistic (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete wmf:Resolution:Controversial content concerns. Inclusion on the project seems intent to shock the reader by showing a loss of human life, not to educationally describe how an attack was carried out. Aasim (talk) 03:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Just wondering, what specifically from what you linked would support deletion? I just read it, couldn't really see specifically what would support it's deletion. Chuckstablers (talk) 03:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- We support the principle of least astonishment: content on Wikimedia projects should be presented to readers in such a way as to respect their expectations of what any page or feature might contain. No one is asking for traumatic real life depictions of human injury or death. We are not LiveLeak. Aasim (talk) 03:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please. -- Veggies (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Awesome Aasim This is a misapplication. The idea here is that unnecessarily vulgar content be avoided. WMF is full of graphic content where appropriate. See Abu Ghraib abuse, the Holocaust, and 9/11. Your view would have us remove a tremendous amount of material on this project that is also used effectively on sister projects. -- Lenny Marks (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- We support the principle of least astonishment: content on Wikimedia projects should be presented to readers in such a way as to respect their expectations of what any page or feature might contain. No one is asking for traumatic real life depictions of human injury or death. We are not LiveLeak. Aasim (talk) 03:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Just wondering, what specifically from what you linked would support deletion? I just read it, couldn't really see specifically what would support it's deletion. Chuckstablers (talk) 03:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This decision should be left to individual projects, not forced on them by a Commons deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Important documentary evidence of a significant historical event. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 11:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Regarding the content, it has obvious historical value. I don't see how it's any different than The Last Jew in Vinnitsa, which has been rated as a quality image on Commons. My concern is regarding the copyright. I've never been comfortable with the "CCTV has no inherent copyright" claim—in the US or elsewhere. I think this is an area where Commons needs definitive, clear legal advice. -- Veggies (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep OP's reasons for deletion were that it is 1) a "snuff film", 2) from Reddit, 3) he doesn't want it on certain Wikipedia articles. 2 and 3 and wrong prima facie; It doesn't matter where it came from so long as it is properly licensed and this is not Wikipedia. His first reason most closely falls under "Not educationally useful," which is also untrue. In Commons:
Which would of course cover this video, if only as a matter of historical record. Additionally, this file is automatically educational per COM:INUSE. --Lenny Marks (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)"educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"
— com:DP
- Comment Can anybody provide proof that CCTV videos are considered public domain in Israel? Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Hemiauchenia, I have added Category:CCTV related deletion discussions. You can check other discussions there. Basically, each administrator decides something different. As @Veggies stated, Commons needs a clear legal advice regarding this subject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is important context, and grounds for removal have not been met. CapnJackSp (talk) 11:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Illegitimate Barrister you should not have renamed the file while this DR is open. Files with copyright issues should NOT be renamed until copyright issues are resolved. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Then, why did you? TommyG (talk) 06:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- It had already been renamed once, another one would not hurt. But I made sure to fix this page with the new filename. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Then, why did you? TommyG (talk) 06:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hey everyone. I don't use Commons much, and I understand now that I made a "Commons is not Wikipedia" mistake. I do not think that the rationale I opened this thread with is appropriate for removal. Therefore, I think this thread should objectively be archived. However, I want to flag that Illegitimate Barrister has been uploading many graphic videos like this for quite some time without using them in any projects. I only noticed this because someone in the Wikipedia thread linked to a LiveLeak video of a suicide under the impression that the video was for use on Wikipedia. The uploader was the same, and I thought that was weird. I understand that the rationale for hosting on Commons is low, but (independently of their graphic content) is this a violation of COM:NOTUSED or COM:SPAM? Most recently, it seems to be mostly videos of police officers killing people and, IDK, maybe there's educational value there or maybe there isn't, but it does not seem to me like this content is intended to be used for anything. I don't know much about the norms here, but maybe someone should talk to them about it? Lethargilistic (talk) 10:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I am also not sure how that goes here/whether that's normally acceptable. Perhaps you should formally withdraw the nomination though so that it can be archived/closed? Lenny Marks (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept Nom withdrew request as it was not based on valid grounds for removal --Lenny Marks (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tutkufatih (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising
- File:Webmasterforum.png
- File:Muhafazakarvilla.png
- File:1001oyun.png
- File:Kopekegitimi.png
- File:Stentnedir.png
Uncitoyen (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tollsbided (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising
Uncitoyen (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: advertising
Uncitoyen (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Birgenkusku (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising
- File:Gursukiralikvinc.png
- File:Bayangiyimlogo.png
- File:Webmasterforumu.png
- File:Fuarrehberi.png
- File:Lojistikfirmasilogo.png
Uncitoyen (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henrique1975 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope?
Trade (talk) 01:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
no educational value, out of scope Solomon203 (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Clearly non-free image Jjj1238 (talk) 00:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused low quality watermarked image Dronebogus (talk) 01:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Het ontwerp van het pakket is auteursrechtelijk beschermd. Zie com:PACKAGE. トトト (talk) 02:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted artworks A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW by Flickr photographer -- 17:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I think with no freedom of panorama for sculpture in the United States, we can't host this. Jmabel ! talk 03:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Not a state symbol, derivative of the copyrighted 3d artwork. Komarof (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danandlokee (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope?
Trade (talk) 03:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Notable and In Scope. --Ooligan (talk) 09:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable person, at least I don't see any articles/categories created for him. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
YouTube description said "This stream is provided courtesy of Theo Boris and Christian Lockwood of the JM Pasachoff Antarctic Expedition.", which means this is not a work from NASA, and the PD licence is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations. It's not clear how these photos were originally published (in a book? some other medium?), so we don't know whether or not they were published without a copyright notice. The source website, detroitcaesars.weebly.com, does not provide any information about how they obtained these photos.
- File:Krolicki, Storm, 1977.jpg
- File:Parker, Clippers, 1977.jpg
- File:Hoffman, Jaybirds, 1977.jpg
- File:Smith, Monuments.jpg
- File:Birko, Hardhats, 1977.jpg
- File:Mike Applin, Cincinnati Suds.jpg
- File:1981 Kentucky Bourbons.jpg
- File:Phil Higgins, Milwaukee.jpg
- File:1977 Chicago Storm.jpg
- File:1977 New Jersey Statesmen.jpg
- File:1977 Goofys.jpg
- File:Jaybirds 1977.jpg
- File:1978 Detroit.jpg
- File:Boblurts.jpg
- File:Gene Hiser.jpg
- File:Bruce Miller, Giants, 1975.jpg
- File:1977 All-Americans.jpg
- File:1978 Cincinnati Suds.jpg
- File:1978 Rochester Zeniths.jpg
- File:1978 Detroit Caesars.jpg
- File:Benny Holt, Chicago, 1977.jpg
- File:Galloway, Clippers, 1977.jpg
- File:Gouin Batting.jpg
- File:Gatti, 1977, Bourbons.jpg
- File:Ford Batting.jpg
- File:Hardhats 1977.png
- File:Sessoms - Baltimore.jpg
- File:Copper Hearth 1977.jpg
- File:North-american-softball-league 1 526f7dbbd7416bdce2a0f963145da14b.jpg
IagoQnsi (talk) 04:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Incomplete watermark at the bottom left, appears to be taken from a non-free site, permission should be required A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nephilim Corporation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation. Person in the photo died in 1994.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
+ crop File:Gary Kildall cropped.png. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Rights to match footage belong to UEFA, not individual broadcasters, so the CC license at the YouTube link does not apply. Please see related discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Question about a Champions League video Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, looks like this picture is taken in live broadcast. Guyrichtheman (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: blatant copyvio. Blackcat 19:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright by Julian Beekmann. Bigbossfarin (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
"subject's personal photograph (1990 sitting)" does not usually mean ownership of the copyright - there is a photographer's stamp on the photo StarryGrandma (talk) 01:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Mantis40.9: Did the family purchase the copyrights along with the image? That was offered to me in 1987, for an extra $50 with the set of images. --RAN (talk) 02:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Features many copyrighted characters in 2D form. SDudley (talk) 02:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 07:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, completely different style. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm author of this file and I re-uploaded this picture as new version of "Dnepr_basin_Ukr.png" Trostianchanyn (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 09:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "source from a website Kalamati a Glance". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "source from a website Kalamati a Glance". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, see source and metadata Xocolatl (talk) 09:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 09:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "Source taken from rupam das". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic person and a photo. MarinaMann (talk) 09:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out pf scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MPupdate11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Upload of numerous files within a short time, missing EXIF data, low resolution, file size, numerous aerial photos, numerous uploads already deleted as proven copyright infringements → unlikely to be own work
- File:Seoni Railway Station board.jpg
- File:Monkey in Pench National Park.jpg
- File:Winter Mornings at Pench National Park.jpg
- File:Dalsagar Seoni.jpg
- File:Seoni city view.jpg
- File:Dhighori Temple Seoni.jpg
- File:Bhimgarh sanjay sarovar dam Seoni.jpg
- File:NH 44 Pench green corridor.jpg
- File:Patalkot express Seoni firozpur.jpg
- File:Seoni Railway Station platform 1.jpg
File:Navratri lights, Seoni.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 12:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think File:Navratri lights, Seoni.jpg might be the uploaders own work, since it does have full EXIF data. Agreed on the rest. Boylarva99 (talk) 12:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed! --Polarlys (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cemilarif3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising
Uncitoyen (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work, but appears at least at https://www.america-times.com/h-e-kaha-imnadze-georgia-and-his-journey/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work, but appears at least at https://www.america-times.com/h-e-kaha-imnadze-georgia-and-his-journey/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work, but appears at least at https://www.america-times.com/h-e-kaha-imnadze-georgia-and-his-journey/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
I am the author and the quality of the photo is not up to my standards. The photo is not used. --Nefronus 13:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Advertisement kartensystem.com Joschi71 (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Advertisement Joschi71 (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: advertising, first file also is copyrighted per Google search.
Uncitoyen (talk) 16:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Askinolcam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising
Uncitoyen (talk) 17:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not good veersion Pil75ou-7 (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work LevandeMänniska (talk), 17:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:VariatioDelecta (2)
[edit]- File:Durbes ezera Laivu piestātne.jpg
- File:Durbes Ezera Skatu tornis.jpg
- File:Liepajas Ezera Laipa.jpg
All are images found on internet and certainly not an own work.
- First image is found here with Ģirts Gersons listed as an author.
- Second image is found here with Artis Šukots listed as an author.
- Third image is found here (image 15 in the gallery) --DJ EV (talk) 17:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Without educational purposes, other logos of said fictitious "political party" had previously been removed. Goldsztern ✶ 17:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trkaplan55 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: advertising, second file is also screenshot of copyrighted website.
Uncitoyen (talk) 17:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: two versions of an unused fictitious map. I believe this was a proposal to divide Iran into multiple countries.
Omphalographer (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
https://general-umzug-reinigung.ch/ this company? old logo? doesnt appear to be useful.
RZuo (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by يونس عبدالحميد الشفيع محمد (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
- File:IMG يونس.jpg
- File:105750 يونس عبد الحميد.jpg
- File:يونس.jpg
- File:يونس IMG 20210723 140143.jpg
- File:يونس عبد الحميد.jpg
- File:IMG يونس20211012 122210.jpg
- File:IMيونس.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 15:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by يونس عبدالحميد الشفيع محمد (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 21:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a YouTube account that reposts Flamengo matches and not the rights owner, unintentional license laundering. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 20:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Justiyaya as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023101410001893 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Now has permission. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Cc-by-sa-3.0 at source page, but image shows packaging potential COM:DW problem -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
duplicate of file:Aklėsk.JPG Hugo.arg (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Aklėsk.JPG redirects to this image. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a crop of this image by removing the watermark of 99Images.com. Own work and what about the copyright? Wouter (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- It is a mural painting. It probably does not even exist anymore, the picture is from 15 years ago. Moreover, it is a panoramic picture, and hence the painting cannot even be taken as the subject of the picture. There is no reason to delete this image. --Dans (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
EXIF missed Kurmanbek 💬 14:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Solicitud del autor Txolo (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Currently INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Is this own work? It is a crop of a larger photo see this photo. No metadata. What about the copyright? Wouter (talk) 19:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright problem. This is obviously neither an 'own work', nor from 2023. I guess it's from some video or media article. zzuuzz (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue from 1998 so it is not public domain yet. QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- This photograph of the Tartu City Government Building in Tartu Square is the primary subject of the photograph and should not be deleted due to the necessary inclusion in the foreground of an image of a statue lacking focus, light and contrast. Also, should you still consider it necessary to progress the deletion process in this instance, can you please provide the name and preferably contact details of the artist so permission for posting on Wikimedia Commons can be requested. Thank You! SM:!) (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- The burnden of finding that information is on the uploader.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- It is relatively simple to delete the work of others that may have taken many hours to create (without any intention of infringing copyright). Technically the onus is legitimately on the photographer\poster to ensure compliance with copyright but for tourists visiting countries this is almost impossible unless the work has a plaque attached, preferably with contact details. Morally the onus is on those deleting the work of others to contact the artist\sculptor to confirm their wishes in respect of copyright enforcement as many artists, when contacted, actually welcome a larger appreciation of their work, especially in an essentially non-commercial environment such as Wikimedia Commons.
- With regard to this specific photograph\image it is questionable whether it does infringe any copyright given it is not the main subject of the photograph which is the building and the fact that this building cannot be photographed from this perspective without inclusion of the sculpture as well as the fact the sculpture in the image lacks focus\detail.
- Please address all of the points expressed above - thank you! --SM:!) (talk) 07:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't care how long it took you to make this, either prove it is a free work or say bye-bye to it. You do not deserve any special treatment exemption from copyright just because you used your precious time to make it. Morally and per rules the burden is on the uploader to prove their work is free.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- With all due respect, and regardless of your particular interpretation of what may be morally appropriate, you have still not addressed the point that I have repeated with regard to the application of non-FOP, which is the sculpture in question is NOT "the main subject" of the image presented so FOP does NOT apply in this instance. This is not a request for "special treatment" but is a request for fair and objective application of Wikimedia Copyright Rules (which do not provide for blanket deletions irrespective of the prominence in the image of the artwork concerned). For the third time, can you please address this point - thank you! --SM:!) (talk) 13:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- You don't understand. Estonia has NO Freedom of Panorama, not just for statues but for buildings too.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps English is not your first language but if you re-read my reply it should become evident that I fully understand that "Estonia has NO Freedom of Panorama". That said, and understanding that buildings in Estonia may also be subject to 'non-FOP rules', in this case the building is in the shade and partially obscured by the fountain discussed so if this building image is to be deleted then it would appear you are declaring that nearly every photograph\image taken outside in towns and cities of Estonia must now be deleted from Wikimedia Commons unless they have been granted specific authority for posting from the copyright-holder. I would respectfully suggest that you consult with higher level W-C Administrators before proceeding further in this regard. Thank you for your full consideration of this reply and perhaps your future endeavours to help persuade the pertinent authority in Estonia of the many merits in adopting FOP. --SM:!) (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- You don't understand. Estonia has NO Freedom of Panorama, not just for statues but for buildings too.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- With all due respect, and regardless of your particular interpretation of what may be morally appropriate, you have still not addressed the point that I have repeated with regard to the application of non-FOP, which is the sculpture in question is NOT "the main subject" of the image presented so FOP does NOT apply in this instance. This is not a request for "special treatment" but is a request for fair and objective application of Wikimedia Copyright Rules (which do not provide for blanket deletions irrespective of the prominence in the image of the artwork concerned). For the third time, can you please address this point - thank you! --SM:!) (talk) 13:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't care how long it took you to make this, either prove it is a free work or say bye-bye to it. You do not deserve any special treatment exemption from copyright just because you used your precious time to make it. Morally and per rules the burden is on the uploader to prove their work is free.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- The burnden of finding that information is on the uploader.--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep @Scotch Mist it is not the building of the Tartu City Government, but still acceptable here. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raeplats hansapäevadel 2014.jpg for my input about the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your objective and logical assessment and informative comment. That said, is there anything that can be done to convince the authorities in the ex-USSR Baltic States to appreciate the merits of FOP and embrace it? --SM:!) (talk) 09:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist be ready to be disappointed, the side of public art authors (architects and artists) seem to prevail in these three Baltic states as opposed to content creators and Internet users. I don't see the fruit of the efforts made by Estonia-based Wikimedians. Even if their 2014-2017 advocacy was recently listed at meta:Copyright Repository#Copyright Reform Campaign Resources (Sortable Table), there has been no success in removing non-commercial and incidental ("not the main subject") restrictions in the Estonian FoP. This article by the Estonian parliament apparently tells us that despite majority support of many stakeholders to amend Estonian FoP, there is minority but strong opposition from authors (architects and artists). So I do not see Estonia going forward to Internet era (in which public artworks can be freely distributed and shared on Wikimedia, Facebook, Instagram, and other platforms even under commercial CC licenses), and will remain in backwards just like France, Romania, and Ukraine, where architects and artists control the appearance and images of public spaces. No news from Latvia and Lithuania, but I think the Wikimedians in both countries have no intention to reform their FoP legal rights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to outline the current situation with regard to FOP in the Baltic states - at least it is encouraging to know that there are others with a wider perspective on this subject! --SM:!) (talk) 10:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist be ready to be disappointed, the side of public art authors (architects and artists) seem to prevail in these three Baltic states as opposed to content creators and Internet users. I don't see the fruit of the efforts made by Estonia-based Wikimedians. Even if their 2014-2017 advocacy was recently listed at meta:Copyright Repository#Copyright Reform Campaign Resources (Sortable Table), there has been no success in removing non-commercial and incidental ("not the main subject") restrictions in the Estonian FoP. This article by the Estonian parliament apparently tells us that despite majority support of many stakeholders to amend Estonian FoP, there is minority but strong opposition from authors (architects and artists). So I do not see Estonia going forward to Internet era (in which public artworks can be freely distributed and shared on Wikimedia, Facebook, Instagram, and other platforms even under commercial CC licenses), and will remain in backwards just like France, Romania, and Ukraine, where architects and artists control the appearance and images of public spaces. No news from Latvia and Lithuania, but I think the Wikimedians in both countries have no intention to reform their FoP legal rights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your objective and logical assessment and informative comment. That said, is there anything that can be done to convince the authorities in the ex-USSR Baltic States to appreciate the merits of FOP and embrace it? --SM:!) (talk) 09:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I disagree with the DM claim - if you view this image at the highest resolution then it is quite clear. If it was uploaded at 600x480 it would be a different story. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No commercial freedom of panorama in Estonia. Statue too new to be public domain. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- As the authors are alive, then there is possible to ask for permission. That could still take at least a week. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown copyright. Unlikely to be own work
- File:The last photo of Dacoits of Bhinmal Kanah, Veliya and Champa.jpg
File:Sir Pratap Singh and Thakur Hari Singh Visit to Britain for Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee.jpgFile:Col. Thakur Hari Singh of Deoli.jpg- File:Image of major dalpat singh.jpg
Trade (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Sir Pratap Singh and Thakur Hari Singh Visit to Britain for Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee.jpg and File:Col. Thakur Hari Singh of Deoli.jpg are PD-India and PD-UK --RAN (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Image of major dalpat singh.jpg and File:The last photo of Dacoits of Bhinmal Kanah, Veliya and Champa.jpg, no source and not dateable --RAN (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination for File:Sir Pratap Singh and Thakur Hari Singh Visit to Britain for Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee.jpg and File:Col. Thakur Hari Singh of Deoli.jpg--Trade (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Rawna Praveen singh solanki: File:The last photo of Dacoits of Bhinmal Kanah, Veliya and Champa.jpg might be PD-India, but we need a date and source. Tineye could not find a copy online. Birth and death dates for the people pictured would put the image into context. Most of your images appear to come from the Royal Archives and their Instagram and Facebook accounts. If you link to them, we can get more details there. --RAN (talk) 19:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: 2, 2 kept. --Yann (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 07:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Рыба-попугай и рыбы-чистильщики. Papageifisch und Bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus). DSCF1574.webm
[edit]Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Alle vier Videos sind von mir aufgenommen und mein Eigentum. Früher habe ich die auch bei YouTube gezeigt. Mein Name dort ist nikischina3. Ich bin GEGEN Löschung meiner Videos bei Wikimedia Commonds und bitte euch um genauere Prüfung meiner Videos. Gruß Kora27 (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Alle vier Videos sind von mir aufgenommen und mein Eigentum. Früher habe ich die auch bei YouTube gezeigt. Mein Name dort ist nikischina3. Ich bin GEGEN Löschung meiner Videos bei Wikimedia Commonds und bitte euch um genauere Prüfung meiner Videos. Gruß Kora27 (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
looks like the official professional product image instead of a photo Prototyperspective (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- bonjour, ce fichier est public open access, il n'y a pas de nom de marque Jpbrigand (talk) 07:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Cropped to the copyrighted label, so not OK for Commons. Yann (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- source en open access
- https://world-zh.openfoodfacts.org/product/3364699332604/kumquats-confits-marque-coq Jpbrigand (talk) 07:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- The picture might be free, but the content isn't, unless the producer releases it under a free license. Yann (talk) 09:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Cropped to the copyrighted label, so not OK for Commons. Yann (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- source en open access
- https://world-it.openfoodfacts.org/product/3267180390575/sorbet-plein-fruit-kalamansi-24-de-fruit-hdg Jpbrigand (talk) 07:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- The picture might be free, but the content isn't, unless the producer releases it under a free license. Yann (talk) 09:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
It might be illegal according to Explanation 4(f) under Section 2 of Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 2861969nyc (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- This does not violate Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 as this is not the Indian National Flag. It is an unofficial pride flag represeting the Indian queer movement. ElDiablo9412 (talk) 19:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Explanation 4(f) The disrespect to the Indian National Flag means and includes—putting any kind of inscription upon the Indian National Flag. 2861969nyc (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep per ElDiablo9412. --Achim55 (talk) 11:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- It also doesn't represent Indian Queer Movement. This article shows how Indian predominately use 6-colour rainbow flag. Apart from the Wikimedia and Wikipedia, this version of the file isn't used by anyone else. From my personal experience, most activists, NGOs, and CBOs show hesitation to use modified Indian Flag due to potential harassment under Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971. As far as I know, this version is the only customized Indian LGBTQ flag I have seen in Indian queer events. 2861969nyc (talk) 20:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Juliane Tasler-Ragler M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Cropped to the copyrighted label, so not OK for Commons. Komarof (talk) 11:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images from Open Food Facts
[edit]These photographs are CC licenced, but the label design they show is complex enough to fall under COM:PACKAGING.
- File:Buondì Motta – confezione.jpg
- File:Calippo Strawberry.jpg
- File:Pan Bimbo.jpg
- File:Pularda Cascarajes.jpg
- File:Tom yum pate.jpg
Belbury (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Derivative works of copyrighted content, PD-shape nor PD-simple applies. Mosbatho (talk) 16:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep – There are many photos of packaging elsewhere here and these seem to be fine. While "other stuff exists" is not a good argument, these would need to be addressed at well and that should likely be done at a broader level. Moreover, it would even be impossible to have all photographs of packaging required to be deleted since in a large fraction of photos some packaging is visible (including what could be called "complex" "label design"). Thus, it's clear that many, most or all images in that category are to be kept and that at least, you'd need to make a less indiscriminate DR.
- The issue is with digital versions of the packaging or scans or them where you can crop the label out, but not mere photos like many/most in that category.
- If you don't know of a better place or way to discuss this at a broader level, I'd suggest asking about it at Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. Whatever is decided would also apply to photographs in which product labels can be seen as well as the many other product photographs not in this cat. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thus, it's clear that many, most or all images in that category are to be kept and that at least, you'd need to make a less indiscriminate DR. This is a very specific DR of just five images from the category, the five listed above.
- Commons' broad level view on packaging design copyright is given at COM:PACKAGING. Belbury (talk) 13:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ah okay, sorry I thought you were nominating all the files in the category and these were just examples. Of these images, I think File:Pan Bimbo.jpg and File:Tom yum pate.jpg should probably be kept but a broader discussion is needed. I addressed that policy below and including "that should likely be done at a broader level". Prototyperspective (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Insufficient information about time, date and artist given on the description page and at the immediate source. If it was first published in India, its copyright would have expired only 60 years after the death of the artist. Even if we assume anonymous publication, it would still be copyrighted in the US if made after 1935. Felix QW (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The photographic image is explicitly copyrighted at the source; as explained at Commons:Currency, coins do not fall under {{PD-Art}}. Felix QW (talk) 13:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be from an unofficial YouTube channel that reposts broadcast footage, accidental license laundering Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request? Uploader overwrote original image (of an anticommunist flag) with an image of a telephone icon, using the edit summary "la bandera no es utilizable" (the flag is not usable). Omphalographer (talk) 20:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This image is erroneously listed as a portrait from the 1870s that is in public domain. It is actually a piece of copyrighted character concept art from the 2013 videogame "Call of Juarez: Gunslinger." 99.41.163.253 21:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elsa Dos Santos (talk · contribs)
[edit]oeuvres non libres
- File:Alicia Moï Orban, Soleil d'Apocalypse, 1964, Rosny.png
- File:Alicia Moï Orban, Tournesol, Salon de la jeune sculpture, Musée-Rodin, 20 avril 1961.jpg
- File:Alicia, MOÏ ORBAN, "Le bison", 1957. Sculpture en taille directe, photographie Elsa Noel-Guesnon, collection particulière..jpg
Habertix (talk) 23:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Veverve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not "simple geometric shapes or text". What is the age of the seal? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: this seems to me like a very modern, minimalistic version of the Category:Coats of arms of the Holy See. The general design of two crossed keys, a papal tiara and some ribbons is not new. What is new is this original, more minimalist and clean-cut version. Veverve (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
High Desert sculpture
[edit]Four Panoramio imports by Panoramio upload bot, categorized at Category:Public art in Albuquerque. The images show a stainless-steel sculpture found at the vicinity of the High Desert development. The area began to be developed in 1991, and the sculpture is verified to be found in the area. Assuming the sculpture dates to 1991 or later, it fails {{PD-US-no notice}} or even {{PD-US-1978-89}}. There is no complete freedom of panorama in the United States for free uses of images of public art. A commercial license permission from the artist or designer of this sculpture is required.
- File:High Desert, Albuquerque, NM, USA - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:High Desert, Albuquerque, NM, USA - panoramio.jpg
- File:Prospectors Ridge, Albuquerque, NM 87111, USA - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Prospectors Ridge, Albuquerque, NM 87111, USA - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. If from 1954, its US copyright will not expire until 2050. In the Dominican Republic, copyright will last until 50 years after the author's death, or 50 years after publication if anonymous. So even if we assume this work to have been published anonymously, it will have been copyrighted in the Dominican republic at the URAA restoration date. Felix QW (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate the source or the author of this image, so it is difficult to ascertain whether the author has died more than 70 years ago. There is also nothing to suggest anonymous publication, however, and it would still be protected in the USA until 2025 in any case. Felix QW (talk) 20:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free work. Freedom of panorama in the UK does not generally extend to 2-dimensional artworks such as murals. Mural in question is the work of artist Dan Green and the corresponding page on his website makes no indication that the work was released under a Commons-suitable license. BigDom (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
improper copyright Scu ba (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Alle vier Videos sind von mir aufgenommen und mein Eigentum. Früher habe ich die auch bei YouTube gezeigt. Mein Name dort ist nikischina3. Ich bin GEGEN Löschung meiner Videos bei Wikimedia Commonds und bitte euch um genauere Prüfung meiner Videos. Gruß Kora27 (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Alle vier Videos sind von mir aufgenommen und mein Eigentum. Früher habe ich die auch bei YouTube gezeigt. Mein Name dort ist nikischina3. Ich bin GEGEN Löschung meiner Videos bei Wikimedia Commonds und bitte euch um genauere Prüfung meiner Videos. Gruß Kora27 (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. Can be undeleted with proper info. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own wowk. Low-quality photos w/o EXIF, taken in different countries and during different times from one subject, one is evidently a photograph taken from a photograph (de minimis does not apply).
- File:HovhannisyanShirak.jpeg
- File:KasparovPyunik.jpeg
- File:Kasparovsupercup.jpeg
- File:KasparovJohnstone.jpeg
- File:KasparovPAS.jpeg
- File:KasparovDenmark.jpeg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Adding the following images of the same athlete by NelliGK, presumably the same person as NelliFAF:
- File:© Ne11i ™ - Gevorg Kasparov in FC Noah.jpg (Watermark credits Nelli, metadata credits Nelli Sargsyan)
- File:GK in GKFC by Ne11i.jpg (has EXIF data, credited to Nelli, so may be fine)
- File:Zvartnots-AAL-2001.jpg (a 2001 photo uploaded in 2017, previously published in 2015
- File:Gevorg Kasparov Nostalgy.jpg (childhood photo)
Though File:GK in GKFC by Ne11i.jpg appears at [5] and credited to NelliPhotographer, and File:© Ne11i ™ - Gevorg Kasparov in FC Noah.jpg also has metadata that seems to establish the uploader as the photographer, so I'm wondering if at least the newer photographs are properly sourced/licensed and don't have to be deleted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, I would want confirmation that uploader is who he says he is and then we can undeleted. Anyone can claim to be nelli. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jakobvibdahl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Potentially above COM:TOO Norway.
Jonteemil (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- This file as well: File:Byåsen Idrettslag.png, uploaded by the same user. EdoAug (talk) 02:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-free photo of a 3d object, photographer's permission missing. Komarof (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Not a state symbol, derivative of the copyrighted 3d artwork. Komarof (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of artwork, the author died in 1974. Komarof (talk) 07:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
At the top corners of the videos, it seems that these videos were taken from the İHA (İhlas News Agency), TRT (Turkish Radio and Television Corporation) or someone else In particular, İHA is written in the corners of all videos published by Ekspres TV. The copyright owner is someone else. So these files will be deleted.
File:Hafize-Gaye-Erkan-2023.jpg: original source by TCMB (Central Bank of Republic of Turkey)
File:Zühtü Arslan.jpg: At the bottom of the news text It is written that the video was taken from İhlas News Agency.
File:Ahmet-Demircan-2015.jpg: original source is TRT3 TBMM TV.
- File:Hafize-Gaye-Erkan-2023.jpg
- File:Yılmaz-Tunç-2023.jpg
- File:Zühtü Arslan.jpg
- File:Ahmet-Demircan-2015.jpg
- File:Yusuf-Tekin-2023.jpg
- File:Kemal-Ceber-2023.jpg
Uncitoyen (talk) 10:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with the deletion. These files most definitely breach copyright law. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 12:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete All of them were added as screenshots from the publications of media organs that do not grant free use rights, they should be deleted. MarinaMann (talk) 10:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Suffolk County, New York
[edit]Unlikely own work, and likely authored by a New York State subnational government entity. According to en:Copyright_status_of_works_by_subnational_governments_of_the_United_States#New_York, works authored by the State of New York government agencies are generally copyrighted.
- File:Original Patch of the Suffolk County Sheriff's Office.png
- File:Patches of the Suffolk County Sheriff's Office.png
- File:Suffolk County Sheriff's Office Historical Door Seals.png
Felix QW (talk) 15:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I doubt that this badge is below the threshold of originality. There does not seem to be much information on the copyright status of Delaware works, so unless this badge can be shown to have been in use since before 1989 without a copyright notice, it seems we will have to delete this file by the precautionary principle. Felix QW (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution images missing full EXIF data, plus this is the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; as neither Google Lens nor TinEye could find a copy of this photo, we AGF until uploader gives us reason not to do so. —holly {chat} 19:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution images missing full EXIF data, plus this is the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; we AGF until uploader gives us reason not to do so. —holly {chat} 19:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this image by an author who died in 1974 is undated. If it were published in 1966 or later, its copyright would have been restored by the URAA, and if it was published in 1973 it would not even be in teh public domain in Afghanistan itself. Felix QW (talk) 13:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Felix QW From what I see, I believe this is in the public domain such as shown here: [6] Noorullah21 (talk) 16:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it seems that that site itself got the file and the information from Commons, so that doesn't really help us. Felix QW (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and replaced with File:Dost Mohammad Khan, of Caubal, Emir of Afghanistan.jpg. —holly {chat} 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Skadet fil, må slettes eller rettes. TigerfraMars (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The icons on the bottom screen (especially the MLP one) might constitute a derivative work Trade (talk) 02:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Seems de minimis to me. —holly {chat} 18:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly, icons appear to be de minimis. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright protected plaque. Taken and uploaded by me. I didn't pay attention to figures in the corners. I have uploaded this file in fi-wiki. The city name Lovisa should be written with two is. Htm (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment When is the plaque from? Might be old enough to be out of copyright? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. The building in 14 Mariankatu was built in 1939 (on page 21). I found another photo with a long caption here(photo taken 2010-10-26, 22nd photo from the bottom). Last 3 rows: "P.S. Ai niin, se Mariankatu 8/16:n "seinässä jokin muistokyltti (mitähän lukee?)": Siinä lukee "Här uppstod stadens brand 1855" ja samma på finska eli suunnilleen "Täältä alkoi kaupungin palo 1855". Kyltti kiinnitettiin pienen seremonian saattamana sata vuotta myöhemmin. Tontilla ei tarvitse kaivaa kuin 10-20 cm niin vastaan tulee hiiliä, kätkettyinä muistoina tuosta surullisesta tapahtumasta. Hiilet tulivat vastaan kun kätkin talon juurella pari pientä aarretta, jotka lienevät siellä edelleen." So if that is right, this plaque was unveiled in 1955, one hundred years after fire started. -- Htm (talk) 06:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1955 plaque. Undelete in 2051 (URAA). --Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
nonfree logo/unclear status due to vague Iraqi copyright law. his+flag and others have been insta-deleted before due to copyvio and unclear status. Joaquinazo (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo of a mural, so COM:MURAL applies. The description says that XCOPY released their works under CC0, however the mural is not by XCOPY, according to https://streetartcities.com/cities/melbourne/markers/f3151e55-e920-4db5-8da2-6393d83c8dfe it is by "local artist World In Crisis" and there's no indication of what licensing applies to it. JaggedHamster (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- This link to the artist is not from a reliable source. I have reached out to building owner to determine whether this is Graffiti, whether the artist is known and whether the image is CC0. It is also not clear whether a direct copy of a CC0 artwork can be copyrighted in any way. The artist who created the original image has stated clearly the work is cc0. See here: https://xcopy.art/creative-commons Maxand98 (talk) 06:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Murals:~:text=Shortcut-,COM:GRAFFITI,-Graffiti are essentially Maxand98 (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Maxand98: Do you have any info on this yet? Any way to verify that this is by XCOPY? —holly {chat} 19:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Murals:~:text=Shortcut-,COM:GRAFFITI,-Graffiti are essentially Maxand98 (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - feel free to undelete if we can confirm the author. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The Yanny/Laurel sound effect is copyrighted (see en:w:File:YannyLaurel.ogg), and although it could be de minimis and the video is public domain, it is the central subject of the video and is played several times throughout it. Removing the sound in question would make this significantly less useful as it provides context to the majority of it. Xeroctic (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps a good approach would be to split it into each person's reaction to the question, with no need to include the sound at the beginning. Arlo James Barnes 04:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Kudiophi clopsvimbi (talk) 06:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Its not even the original text of kanada as it was borrowed from third source website, permission required.
Deleted: per nomination. In addition out of COM:SCOPE because the image consists of text only and can be converted to text to use the information in the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)