Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/08/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 22nd, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Mohamed Yayyo.jpg incorrect date, author, copyright Drakosh (talk) 06:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 10:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, no notabily UltimoGrimm (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD G1. --Achim55 (talk) 09:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just mistake Baaasstuuuan (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request shortly after upload. --Achim55 (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

will upload the fresh Mother Helpage (talk) 08:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. Is this logo in project scope?. --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Aliva Sahoo (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Aliva Sahoo (talk) 10:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded with wrong author and source Nhartono (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find a way to fix it, you can also speedy delete it under G7 instead :) Chamaemelum (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please do not generate svg signatures. It is unmeaning signature as such. --5.43.67.185 20:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Nonsense request, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Achim55. --Rosenzweig τ 06:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, likely a copyvio. Engr. Smitty (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, likely a copyvio. Uploader has history of uploading photos, that they don't own, without proper licenses Engr. Smitty (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1991 Journal by an American museum , This is to recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn by proposer. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in use. Should be discussed before speedy. I will give an example just after this. 191.126.136.117 22:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm refering to the case of File:JulieBell.jpg.191.126.136.117 22:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no free license at source. --Polarlys (talk) 17:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another "own work" by this respectable uploader... 181.43.0.231 14:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for this reminder. It is really a big mistake of me to say that the file is "my work". I need to insert a picture of a page I am editing, but the source I get is from internet. So I saved the picture and upload it to wikipedia. Okay, I need to learn more about this. And thank you for reminding. Andiazamuddin (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very good of you to accept your fault. Congratulations. 181.43.0.231 16:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support deletion, but let's be kind to one another. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. I didn't mean to be unkind, sorry. 181.43.0.231 18:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like uploader accepted it's not an own work. So? 181.43.0.231 15:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should we keep all these similar images? Why? 181.43.0.231 18:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This version is the one i think should be kept. The others nominated for deletion can be deleted in my opinion. Xәkim (talk) 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Undated British photograph, could be from the anytime from the 1920s to the 1950s as subject died in 1957 and was born in 1880. Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this 1948 photograph by Walter Stoneman https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw110441/Peter-Frederick-Blaker-Bennett-1st-Baron-Bennett-of-Edgbaston?LinkID=mp78015&role=sit&rNo=0, I think 1920s or 1930s seems more likely and that the Elliot and Fry photograph (which is a bromide print) was created before 1948 and thus would be {{PD-UK-unknown}} Abzeronow (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Work by Elliott & Fry (active 1863-1962), Photographers, from the sourcesite. To be undeleted in 2033. Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Ken Sugimori איז「Ysa」 17:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 11:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1965 British photograph by a photographer that died in 1969. Undelete in 2061 Abzeronow (talk) 18:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work from Roblox. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Out of scope regardless; profile picture of a thoroughly non-notable Youtube user. Omphalographer (talk) 03:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person in the photo withdrew permission to post the photo on Wikimedia Commons Zalasem1 (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:25th "Ambient Festival" in Gorlice (AF102).jpg. Taivo (talk) 21:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After 6 weeks uploader request speedy no por favor 181.203.33.72 00:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahora veo que el pedido anterior fue solamente 11 días después del upload. Entonces podría haber sido aceptado el pedido... 181.203.33.72 00:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agregué una foto, estaba de vacaciones, tenía tiempo e internet limitados, no pude responder en la discusión sobre la eliminación. Quiero eliminar la foto a petición de la persona que aparece en la foto. Soy el autor de la foto, pero quiero que se elimine esta foto. Por favor borrar. Saludos desde Polonia, Zalasem1 (talk) 07:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Jarekt. --Rosenzweig τ 20:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination is on scope grounds, Was this ever published in a journal, or in support of a specfic website? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as copyvio. Print version of https://www.hellosmartpaper.com/post/artificial-intelligence-might-transform-assessment-practices; no evidence of permission or free license. Omphalographer (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD G10 (files and pages created as advertisements), see their other contribs. --Wutsje 04:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: see source. Enyavar (talk) 12:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality diagram, not used, many alternatives in Category:Nitromethane. Wostr (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 12:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background, colored atom labels and too much whitespace (margins). Replaced by File:Hydroxyacetone-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector version drawn according to MOS. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background, colored atom labels and too much whitespace (margins). Replaced by File:Acetoin-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector version drawn according to MOS. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly non-free image Jjj1238 (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plus utile 77.206.201.166 05:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EPILEPSY WARNING — Rapidly-flashing animated image. Transition rate below 3 Hz which is the recommended limit. Just an animated "duplicate" of other image to demonstrate stereo effect. 47.155.41.104 06:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see why this would be a deletion reason. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, because over at English Wikipedia we still have that epileptic seizure clip from Dennō Senshi Porygon. (Incidentally, I'm immune to that sort of stuff―I was able to safely watch the whole episode on Dailymotion. Wonder what'd happen if I were wearing 3D glasses, though...) Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of the file being in a CC license, even in the oldest archived version. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of the file being under a CC license even in the oldest archived version. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of the file being under a CC license even in the oldest archived version. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of the file being under a CC license even in the oldest archived version. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of the file being in a CC license, even in the oldest archived version. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GreatPersonLikeMe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots of Wikipedia with the wrong license, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 09:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you change the license? @Yann GreatPersonLikeMe (talk) 14:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is your responsibility to provide the proper license. But if these files are not used, there are IMO out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete this user has attempted to replace other images on the English Wikipedia Wikipedia article with his own screenshots, but these new versions provide nothing of greater value. Furthermore they are incorrectly licensed. Bedivere (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This strengthens my ideas about his lack of competence.
 Delete superfluous pictures anyway. The Banner (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:SCOPE. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Blusjai (talk) 11:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so, If not why would you like to upload the image of an unknown person. Delete. 191.126.136.117 21:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 publication of an American Museum. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 publication of an American museum, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

American Journal published in 2001. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to an American Journal published in 2001. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2000 era Publication of Canadian origin. If Corwn copyright it would need to have been published prior to 1972.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2000 publication of a British msueum. This is too recent for copyright expiry.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • The copyright situation of this Bulletin may be complicated, and there does not appear to be a Web-site for any Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. BHL gives no free license for the 2000 volume. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2000 publication of a British museum.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • The copyright situation of this Bulletin may be complicated, and there does not appear to be a Web-site for any Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. BHL gives no free license for the 2000 volume. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

American journal published in 1999, This is too recent for copyright expiry.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

American Journal published in 1999. This is too recent for copyright expiry.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1998 Chinese(?) language publication. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1997 journal, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1997 publication, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1997 , Chinese language publication, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1996 publication. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1994 publication of a British museum. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1992-1994 journals of an American museum, This is to recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1990 publication by an American museum

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an arefact of the scanning process and not part of the actual document, Also a 1990 publication would not necessarily be out of copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1990 published Journal of a South African museum, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a cover image, I fail to see how it could be public domain ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is no reason for delation, book title in a category with a collections of literature of subjects areas.
 Delete {{PD-text}} clearly doesn't apply here, since there's a picture of a mouse on the cover. Without that, I would agree, but like this it's a clear copyvio. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1990 publication, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired. IA metadata for these can also be unreliable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected. See under copyright & usages for the Journal APEX here. The Link to permission should bei included in the file.-- Engeser (talk) 18:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was too fast, its CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. It must be deleted. -- Engeser (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1991 publication of a South African Museum, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to journals various published from 1989-1992, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed deletion request to duplicate request. Vysotsky (talk) 15:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed deletion request to duplicate request. Vysotsky (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate request. Vysotsky (talk) 15:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate request. Vysotsky (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate request. Vysotsky (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate request. Vysotsky (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed deletion request to duplicate removal. Vysotsky (talk) 15:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate removal. Vysotsky (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate removal. Vysotsky (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Changed deletion request to duplicate removal. Vysotsky (talk) 15:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this file, and I will deduplicate the other file, Lobbes B PM 063931.jpg. The other file is lower resolution, and was uploaded five years later than this file. Vysotsky (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Removed deletion request; added duplicate removal request to younger file. Vysotsky (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright probably not owned by uploader but rather the club. Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep this image and all similar deletion requests by Jonteemil. No genuine reason given for why these files should be deleted. These are all small, amateur sports clubs which I guarantee will be happy to have an indication of their jumper designs represented, not be worrying about bush-lawyering copyright claims. In this case, the club has not even existed for over 25 years. Seriously seems like bad faith nominations by this user. It's this sort of nonsense that largely drove me away from putting my time into the Wikimedia projects. --jjron (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Your arguments for keeping are the exact arguments listed at COM:PRP which are against Commons' aims. How didn't I give a genuine reason for deletion? It's a possible copyright violation, that's the reason. Jonteemil (talk) 03:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to change URL of this image as "Liz Kamlet - Vintage Guitar Collector" LizKamlet (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vis M (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I really took this photo. I put my phone on a wall right in front of me and took photos on a self-timer. I will appreciate either you ChangecImage iRL as I don't work for Real App or delete so that I can re-upload with revised image URL "Liz Kamlet - Vintage Guitar Collector". LizKamlet (talk) 18:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, lizkamlet.com is my official website. LizKamlet (talk) 18:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I made the filename change. Is there anything else you'd like help with? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: name changed. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Useendk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no reference to free licensing on the pages of origin

Polarlys (talk) 21:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I  Support deletion. The images are copyvios, low quality, watermarked (illustrating the copyvio), or a combination of the above. Author fields are also incorrect, like "scholar.google.com." Chamaemelum (talk) 21:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this picture doesnt represent only the illegal annexation of Crimea but also the war on the east that suggests that it is russian territory 2600:4040:297B:7700:4D28:7CAC:CE79:6795 22:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ikan. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

на даному файлі показано незаконно захоплені території АР Крим. Що являється пропагандою тероризму, а також та оправданням війни. 109.95.44.123 08:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Kirill Telegin

[edit]
The user appears to be uploading historical revisions of various files on Commons with no rhyme or reason. They don't really belong here without a clear purpose.
There are two separates accounts here, but it's clear the user is also block-evading and so I've combined them into one DR. Fry1989 eh? 23:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nomination. Additionally, most of these are duplicates of existing files, and aren't appropriately attributed to their authors; this is a licensing/attribution problem. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artworks inspired in the work of Roberto Fontanarrosa (1944-2007) and installed in Argentina where there is no freedom of panorama.

Günther Frager (talk) 00:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture makes from a tv screen. Antonius6317 (talk) 05:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 06:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not meet pd-logo as there is an unique superimposition of the heart over the hand. Also ELD nominally does not release information under CC license. Robertsky (talk) 07:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possible copyright violation. S5A-0043Talk 01:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not meet pd-logo, due to the four human-like shapes at the bottom of the image. ELD also does not release information under CC license. Robertsky (talk) 07:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing of a pineapple. Provenance unknown. ELD also does not release information under CC license. Robertsky (talk) 07:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, depicted person (en:Mohamed_M._Atalla) died 2009; Missing infos and permission for original photograph. Wdwd (talk) 09:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional info: Source from https://computerhistory.org/blog/who-invented-the-transistor/?key=who-invented-the-transistor (section "The MOS Transistor")--Wdwd (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture makes from a tv or other screen. Antonius6317 (talk) 13:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not able to find confirmation of claimed free license either on image text or source page. Front page of source site has clear notice "Copyright ©2005-2023 The Gulf Breeze News. All Rights Reserved" -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soureced to a 1990 publication of a German museum, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are the {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} templates incorrect? Jonteemil (talk) 19:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In this instance , yes. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment the book appears to be from 1971, but that's probably still not old enough. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1990 pubication of a German museum, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely attack image. -- Tuválkin 14:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Low rez, low quality photo with no usable meta data, silly description, single upload of casual contributor HansumManFan (talk · contributions · user rights management). -- Tuválkin 14:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1994 publication or journal of a German museum. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired. IA data can be unreliable.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1982 Journal of a German musuem, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, https://archive.org/details/bonnerzoologisc161982bonn/ says CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. However, https://zoologicalbulletin.de/content-policy says CC BY 4.0 but IDK if that's applicable in this case. --Achim55 (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per the CC BY 4.0 license Achim linked to, which I think applies to the back issues available on their website. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2004 journal of a German museum.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2002journal of a German museum

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2000 published journal of a German museum. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about all of these. Some of them, yes, but others look like they'd fall under PD-chart. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The museum won't own the rights to Fischer's diagram or Frank White's map. If they thought it wise to use them without their permission it could mean that there was no copyright. But I'm speculating and have to check. JMK (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2000 published journal of a German museum, this is too recent for copyrights have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photograph of what appears to be a CD. Description is only one word and google translate says it means "Proof". Abzeronow (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por equivocación de archivos Bere Cazares (talk) 01:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 百年非 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text PDF content; w:Nanjing Massacre denial material. Similar files were previously deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:南京戦に於ける上新河遭遇戦の死者に関する考察(第二版).pdf.

Omphalographer (talk) 02:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Belgian artist Emmanuel Viérin died in 1954, so these works of art are not in the public domain in Belgium yet, and contrary to other works by him, we don't have a VRT permission for them. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2025 (no URAA problem as far as I can determine).

Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

! PermissionTicket id=2017112010006181 for one of the paintings. Doesn't it possibly cover these works too? I can't check that. Else pls add these to the batch to be restored in 2025.
Peli (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. As to VRT tickets, each ticket covers a given file only. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a scam. it's fake. the phone number he mentions belongs to me and has nothing to do with Africa Slipnot1955 (talk) 11:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a phone number. Please explain. --Achim55 (talk) 12:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You see the numbers in parentheses are my phone numbers. I want this number to be deleted from wikimedia immediately. I have every right to protect my personal information. Thanks Slipnot1955 (talk) 04:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Slipnot1955, the file was transferred from flickr. The number in parentheses is the flickr ID of that image, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/73840284@N04/6971809058, so that is just a random match. --Achim55 (talk) 07:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of an old WW2 nazi propaganda newsreel series. Surely not "own work".

Seeing as pretty much all of this user's other uploads were deleted, it might be a good idea to also take a critical look at their last remaining image, File:Вид на вокзал новокузнецк.jpg. 2A02:810B:580:11D4:2F4:6FFF:FE72:D65F 15:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No evidence at all for the claims that copyright in Germany has expired and US copyright was "confiscated by the Office of Alien Property Custodian". --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SEKISUIKYDEX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional logos, no educational value, advertising, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like an official certificate, I fail to see how it can be own work ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, at least the photo on this 2018 diploma is very likely copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 06:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est un doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

C'est un doublon. Ce n'est en aucune manière un duoublon je vais d'ailleurs signaler votre action abusive à qui de droit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk • contribs) 14:49, 23. Aug. 2023 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. While File:Lobbes JPG001.jpg is similar, it's not a duplicate. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large unnecessary white borders. The uploader has already fixed the issue, except with a different file name (File:2023-06-05 Portrait CR Pallasch.jpg). This faulty superceded version should therefore be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 19:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this image is redundant and should be deleted. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il existe une autre version du fichier : File:Algeria Parliament 2002.svg Maxime legorgne (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (nominated by uploader). --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of Commons:Project scope, no permission by subjects Polarlys (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I  Support deletion as there is no educational or other purpose of this unused image. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Royal standard of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a permanent display, as with most advertizements. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 07:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I would say this is permanent enough. This appears to be a permanently located sign at the entrance of a factory (note the steel frame), and not just a temporary advertisement. These will typically stay there for years and will only be replaced when broken (or when something unexpected happens, like the company changing its name). PaterMcFly (talk) 08:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The nomination is about the advertisements themselves, not the frame around it. The advertisements are clearly not made with permanence in mind. ReneeWrites (talk) 11:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care. If there's a copyright problem with picture, it should be deleted. 08:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
It's my file, not the IP's one. But beside that, I agree with the IP's opinion. HenSti (talk) 08:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work, but appears at least at https://culturecustodian.com/interview-chips-is-igniting-a-global-afro-fusion-revolution/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Support per nominator's logic. Also, it is promotional. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 12:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/bahar. A VRT ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourced to a 1989 publication of a Canadian museum. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I support deleting the photographs of fish. I am not sure about the other files which display data. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a journal published in 2002, this is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Support deletion, per nominator. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a journal published in 2002, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2002 published report/paper. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation. See https://www.holland-onion.org/ which page has a © sign. Erik Wannee (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a Post 1972, publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 Chinese languages publication , This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 publication by an American museum.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1990 report by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1989 Journal , This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Germany. I don't think this would be below TOO anywhere. Jonteemil (talk) 18:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 18:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding File:Delay Sports Berlin Logo.svg to the request. Jonteemil (talk) 18:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo from South Africa on airplanes that were first built in the 1980s. Cheetah image appears to be above the ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree. The cheetah is skillfully and creatively drawn. Since this use as a logo is relatively recent it is likely still under copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that an open license has been granted to this image, municipal/city governments usually retain copyright by default.
Per the City of Mississauga conditions of use PascalHD (talk) 18:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be above COM:TOO Germany. Bear might be {{PD-Germany-Coa}} however the gradients to the shield are not entirely uncomplex. Jonteemil (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owing to the fact that the file name is misleading and that the file is not in use, it should be removed. The image itself is an outdated flag (used for two years during the 1860s) and is not upside down, instead the canton/union (the blue section with stars) is simply moved to the lower right and not flipped. If the flag were upside down the points of the stars would be facing down. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I'm fairly certain none of those are valid deletion reasons. ––FormalDude (talk) 21:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The image is in use. I do not support deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dev moha2507 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos are clearly not all own work as claimed. The uploader has a long history of copyright violations.

Marbletan (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the nominator's assessment that the present images are improperly tagged as Own Work. I am not sure what that means regarding potential fixes vs. deletion, though. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work of a copyrighted book cover. Di (they-them) (talk) 19:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not his/her own work. Luurankosoturi (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The picture might be cropped from this site.--Puppe100 (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — Dudek1337 (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I  Support deletion per nominator, as the image lacks potential for educational content and would certainly be unneeded given the abundance of similar higher quality images. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adamawa_Turtle_Dove,_Fulladu_West,_Gambia_05.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - similar, but not identical. Plenty of other sets of photos with multiple similar versions, not normally considered for deletion - MPF (talk) 21:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Do you think that instead of the "redundant" criteria, it may fall under the "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject" criteria? Chamaemelum (talk) 22:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That could be argued if there were 30 or 40 very similar photos of a common topic, but with just 5 that are similar to each other, and only 9 in grand total for the species, I think that's not really reasonable. Take a look at e.g. Category:Setophaga aestiva (471 files), and some of the many sets of near-duplicates there added from Flickr user lwolfartist; you could make a better case there, but even there, I doubt there'd be many would agree with deletion of photos that are decent quality. - MPF (talk) 23:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Between the following two other images, this image is redundant: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:African_Green_Bee-eater,_Fulladu_West,_Gambia_1.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:African_Green_Bee-eater,_Fulladu_West,_Gambia_3.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - similar, but not identical. Plenty of other sets of photos with multiple similar versions, not normally considered for deletion - MPF (talk) 21:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot fathom what this image is. Nor, I think, can anyone else 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the uploader selected the wrong file. I support deletion (no educational use/outside of scope). The image is not a "Portrait of an Artist." Chamaemelum (talk) 22:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as 'Do not copy to Commons' on English Wikipedia. Cloudbound (talk) 22:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is below TOO, though, even for UK. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: changed to pd-textlogo per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If these people were actually vicitms of Stalin repression they would not be alive in 2018 for Rəcəb Yaxşı to take their pictures. So either the title is wrong or the uploader is lying. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 11:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I presented myself as the author of the collage created from the pictures. Each of the photos was taken in the 1930s. And each is now in the public domain. I will correct it now. Rəcəb Yaxşı (talk) 11:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should indicate the source for each photo and not identify yourself as the sole creator.KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A collage of 16 unsourced images, each can be questioned for copyright, and proven copyrighted, if photograher is known. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only a screenshoot from youtube BWF Tv Stvbastian (talk) 00:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unable to verify the license claim. Can be undeleted with proof of free license. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Mateus2019 (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anuzvaidhya.jpg Anuzvaidhya (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1989 publication of an agency of US state, Not federal.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Would this be PD anyway given that these are not creative works and therefore unable to be copyrighted? I am not an expert on maps, though. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: all files were already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free art. Voncercue (talk) 03:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, and logo is way too detailed to be pd-logo. As such, this is a copyrighted logo, and so the owner (which is the sports club) would have to release it for us, which isn't the case here. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It's not clear what the source country is, but this is below TOO for the US. Only simple geometric shapes and text (doesn't matter that the text is arabic). PaterMcFly (talk) 08:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. False license claim; TOO:Iran is strict. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is based on the Pusheen internet meme in the regular style of the character, which is unlikely to be own work and presumably a copyright violation of a Pusheen website (a Tumblr website in mentioned in the image). The image of the original meme on the English Wikipedia is fair use therefore any derivative cannot go in Commons. Xeroctic (talk) 08:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contents of text is clearly unfree (in the same way you can't scan a book and claim it's PD just because it only has text) Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 09:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have many doubts that it is his own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 09:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; reverse image search shows online in multiple places before uploader's supposed creation of image. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, copy from newspapers. Depicted person died 2004; Missing information about the original photograph Wdwd (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. According to twitter.com/pareorogas, the image is not the uploader's own work. フランベ (talk) 11:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

虫塚虫蔵 (talk · contribs), the uploader of the image, has been indefinitely blocked from editing the Japanese Wikipedia as ケラ氏 (talk · contribs)'s sockpuppet. For more information, please see ja:Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/ケラ氏. フランベ (talk) 11:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 published Chinese Language publication. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is cover-art for a novel - I fail to see how it's own work ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear permissions; no known proof of copyright exemption Apollo489 (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo, it's from Instagram. 191.126.136.117 21:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Has the original author been contacted? What about Instagram? Please note that in the page’s history, the uploader falsely claimed it as his own work. Apollo489 (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was supporting you... 191.126.136.117 02:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Sorry if I mis-stepped. Yes, there is no licensing proof from Instagram or the author. Thank you for the support. Apollo489 (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with multiple files, for example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abandoned_Structure_in_Naguru.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 20:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with multiple files, including this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abandoned_Structure_in_Naguru.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abandoned_Structure_in_Naguru,_Kampala_by_Government.jpg, among others Chamaemelum (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant file. A similar file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abandoned_Structure_in_Naguru,_Kampala_by_Government.jpg (and also there are others besides this that are very similar). Chamaemelum (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with the following files: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detached_house_in_Naguru.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detached_house.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with these two files: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detached_house_in_Naguru.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detached_home_in_Naguru.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fetching_Water_in_a_slum.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Homes_and_Habitats_in_Naguru,_Kampala.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Weather_in_Bbamba_Kasangati_Area_-_Take_seven.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was deleted, but it seems there is a valid license. See previous DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Nvidia logos. Yann (talk) 09:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Valid license. Charcoal feather (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If you want to dispute the Apache license, don't just do it on a single file. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 15:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep I'm not really sure if the Apache license could apply to raster graphics (as opposed to SVG-like vector graphics), but, considering the previous DRs from Apache-licensed software, I guess that counts as a valid license. SergioFLS (talk) 23:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly non-free image Jjj1238 (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). American Photograph published in the 1940s (created in 1947). Could be public domain if Anderson from Kansas City didn't renew copyright on it. Abzeronow (talk) 20:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status uncertain, especially vis-à-vis public use for educational/encyclopedic purposes. Rights are managed by Kansas City Public Library. Digital copy of original photograph managed by Missouri Valley Special Collections. (url=https://kchistory.org/image/prospect-avenue-night?solr_nav%5Bid%5D=6c93b673c15829c68723&solr_nav%5Bpage%5D=0&solr_nav%5Boffset%5D=1) Have not had time to discuss use with source. DVanDeursen (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a cover sheet, unrelated to the acutal document. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work, but appears at least at https://editor.guardian.ng/life/music/chips-young-talent-setting-new-musical-standard/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator's logic. Also, it is promotional. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 16:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Till (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If not proof of {{PD-old}} can be given, this is probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep not pd-old or Pd-Australia because it was actually a monogram created by me. I took inspiratión from some Australian footy logos (such as Carlton FC) to make a versión in my own style with the only purpose of having an icon for the team.
As far as I know, icons with generic patterns and colors are commonly used on this project (see example). No copyright infringement at all. Fma12 (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please tag such files with {{Fake sports logo}} so that no one, such as myself, thinks it's an official icon of a club. Jonteemil (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fma12 (talk) 14:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{ping|jonteemil)) i added the fake logo tag as You indicated, so are You going to withdraw this DR? Fma12 (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found on the web incl https://www.bandsintown.com/de/a/3882/past-events?startDate=2023-08-14T05%3A19%3A30 - needs VTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also found at https://www.musikblog.de/2023/05/musikblog-praesentiert-justin-nozuka-2023/ (deep-link: https://i0.wp.com/www.musikblog.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Justin_Nozuka_Credit_Justin_Nozuka-2.jpg). --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 2001 publication. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Lack of copyright statement doesn't make it free or PD. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This table is taken from a copyrighted scholarly article. I don't think that can be licensed cc-by by the uploader, who does not seem to be one of the authors. Lymantria (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The table is from a scholarly article, but the image is edited to add the correct reference to that article. I thought that was correct as it is a different image with an accurate reference. MexFin (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Still needs permission from author. --P 1 9 9   03:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Only ever got slandered as mob boss in a user page, otherwise unused. Enyavar (talk) 13:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shoplink/ADVERT in description Grim (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And likely not own work but screengrab. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is book-cover art, I am not immediatly seeing why it would be own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion nomination on scope grounds, as an "unused text only extract of larger work, with no additional context provided." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is no reason for delation, title and contents, in a category with a collections of literature of subjects areas. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by N.Smykodub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by N.Smykodub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos of historical figures. Some family archive. There is no information about the initial publication. There is no certainty about the authenticity of the depicted personalities.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax image - not of Michael Collins, the Irish leader Spleodrach (talk) 15:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Not even a marginally convincing hoax; this is literally just some "blood" painted onto a young man's head with an image editor. Omphalographer (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear permissions: no proof of public domain release from the source website (mailto:reflective@reflectivedesire.com), and possible violation of website’s Terms of Use section 8.2c Apollo489 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ResoFarzaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be various official certifcates , I'm not sue I follow how these can be self or own work in respect of their designs?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, likely a copyvio. Uploader has history of uploading photos, that they don't own, without proper licenses Engr. Smitty (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with other image, here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karam_Biscuits_Factory_Omdurman_Sudan_1969-1973_Designed_by_Abdel-Moneim_Mustafa_8.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 20:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ayata3.JPG (and this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ayata2.JPG) Chamaemelum (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with multiple images, for example, this one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al-Marekh_Stadium_Omdurman_Sudan_1964_Designed_by_Abdel-Moneim_Mustafa_6.jpg. More images that it is redundant to can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sudan_photographs_taken_on_2022-02-13 Chamaemelum (talk) 20:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (blurry), redundant with this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:UPND_Suppoters_17.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Unfortunately, they probably both violate the copyright of the campaign ads, if I remember Zambian law correctly, so if I'm right, both will have to be deleted. If not, I think this one is better than the other, as we see more of the publicity. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant (but lower quality) with this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adowa_Dance_11.png Chamaemelum (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adamawa_Turtle_Dove,_Fulladu_West,_Gambia_03.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 21:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - very similar, but not identical. Plenty of other sets of photos with multiple similar versions, not normally considered for deletion - MPF (talk) 21:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Do you have any resources or guidelines I can read more about this (no problem if not, just wondering)? Chamaemelum (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: - I'd still say  Keep; it is a species with very few photos on commons at all, so the bar for any deletion should be set very high. If it had been a species with hundreds, or thousands, of photos, then yes, but it doesn't. - MPF (talk) 17:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Agree that is practically a duplicate. --P 1 9 9   03:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of https://www.annejulieproulx.com/ Habertix (talk) 22:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of https://agencelasuite.com/en/artists/anne-julie_proulx/1906 Habertix (talk) 22:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of https://www.annejulieproulx.com/l/casting-par-india-lange/ Habertix (talk) 22:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chobe_River_Front,_Botswana_(2624712419).jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 22:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Women_in_Quote_Kwara_16.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Women_in_Quote_Kwara_18.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 22:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the uploader said "I agree with the reason stated for deletion" on her talk page after receiving the two discussion notices. (Also, if one is deleted, I do not have a preference which one.) Chamaemelum (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion by request from Danait Isaak via mail. No article use of the image, only used in archived ns4 page. Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 07:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out if scope: diagram that pretends to be about Timor-Leste; User:J. Patrick Fischer says this is not the case. --> Apparently completely fictional. Enyavar (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netora as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=per COM:CB#Payment_cards. above TOO train tickets. I tend to think this is above TOO as well, but want a third opinion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Julieta Schildknecht M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julieta Schildknecht hat die Publikation ihres Bildes eingewilligt.
JeanMeaulnes Legler JeanMeaulnes (talk) 18:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JeanMeaulnes: In diesem Fall benötigen wir von ihr per E-Mail eine Freigabe, dass das Bild hier unter einer freien Lizenz verbreitet werden darf. Details und E-Mail-Adresse siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bin dran, die Lizenz von ihr gemäss Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber) einzuholen, entweder per E-Mail (die ältere Frau fremdelt etwas damit) oder mit einem Scan ihrer schriftlichen Erklärung.
JeanMeaulnes Legler JeanMeaulnes (talk) 07:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 11:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW. Jespinos (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:FOP#Spain Ezarateesteban 22:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW not covered by COM:FOP Spain since this is not a work meant to be permanently placed in the street, nor whoever placed it owns the copyrights of the EA/Xbox logos and pictures which are not COM:De minimis either. —MarcoAurelio 11:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Question Does "Temporal installation" in the file description mean "temporary installation"? In English, the opposite of temporal is spiritual, or there's the temporal lobe of the brain behind the temples. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek: Yes, temporary installation (the opposite of permanent). In Spanish temporary translates to temporal which is the same word for the brain lobe (lóbulo temporal). Temporal is also used to describe bad weather :-) Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 19:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, derivative work copyvio, as per nominator. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2023 - Kementerian Pemuda dan Olahraga https://www.kemenpora.go.id Stvbastian (talk) 00:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, copy from the web. Depicted person died 1959; Missing information about the original work (for correct licensing) Wdwd (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License fixed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Boris Vdovenko who died in 1995 owned by Центральный государственный архив города Москвы not Azerbaijan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 11:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide link? NMW03 (talk) 11:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://vistavkacgam.wixsite.com/faceofwar/lessons-and-clinics?lightbox=ct34 "Автор Б.Е. Вдовенко"

It's not hard to find the photo on English Wikipedia had all the information. Sadly its not free. I want to use in article about Muslimas of the war but I do not want to steal photos we cant use free.KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 11:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos should be uploaded locally HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1999 journal. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as declared at nl.wp ("fotograaf: Rick Keus"). Needs permission via COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   15:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas d'informations sur la source (données EXIF). Semble être une capture d'écran d'une émission TV. Fredamas (talk) 18:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

d'informations sur la source (données EXIF). Semble être une capture d'écran d'une émission TV. Fredamas (talk) 18:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. This is a lower-quality version of the image here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:020522002Botswana.JPG Chamaemelum (talk) 22:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; low quality. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Women_in_Quote_Kwara_21.jpg Chamaemelum (talk) 22:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the uploader said "I agree with the reason stated for deletion" on her talk page after receiving the two discussion notices. (Also, if one is deleted, I do not have a preference which one.) Chamaemelum (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE and this one is better quality. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1994 (American?) journal . This is too recent for copyrights have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per the link "Copyright Status: Public domain. The BHL considers that this work is no longer under copyright protection." I can't find a contesting (c) claim. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo published in Argentina in 1987. It is currently in the public domain there, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, this image is still protected by copyright in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 00:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; still copyrighted in the United States. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2016 Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI Stvbastian (talk) 00:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a photography published in Agentina in July 1997. It entered in the public domain in Argentina this year, but it is still under copyright in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 00:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Satdeep Gill as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Contains copyrighted music. Per video on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amydC6eM3Go%7Chelp=off Hannolans (talk) 08:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the video and there is only music for a few seconds, sounds de minimis to me, so not sure how this should be a speedy deletion. --Hannolans (talk) 08:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hannolans Thank you for bringing this up. Can you share any existing practice around de minimis for copyrighted music on Commons? I would like to learn more about this as I am trying to reduce the backlog on Youtube videos for review. - Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hannolans We might still need to delete this file as I couldn't find CC license, even in the [view-source:https://web.archive.org/web/20191126030535/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amydC6eM3Go source page]. - Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes we should delte this video as in the history it is not clear. I'm quite sure that this video was cc-by but Internet Archive doesnt capure the 'more...' part. --Hannolans (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
About de-minimis, I'm also not an expert. I assume it is de-minimis when music is playing in the background when recording for example during an interview, but not sure about short samples used in leaders of television programmes. --Hannolans (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to {{Talk archive}} and {{Archive}}. Jonteemil (talk) 09:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: The image subject died in 1994; this is certainly not "own work" from 2023. 2003:C0:8F16:2100:E9B3:B3E2:1242:BB8B 11:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

False accusations are punishable in Germany. I am the photographer of the images and therefore own the rights, in addition I have the rights to publish the artist's heir.
So stop false accusations immediately, correct this in your post because even Wikipedia is not a lawless space. Keheilig (talk) 13:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
in addition, the date you mention is the EXIF data of my camera when I took the picture. So think first then shoot Keheilig (talk) 13:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Zur Info, der ursprüngliche Fotograf war Carl Witschel der erste Fotograf ende des 19. Jahrhunderts und bayerischer königlicher Hoffotograf, seit über 70 Jahren tot. Und ich habe das Foto seiner Tochter der Künstlerin Helene Wolf-Witschel mit meiner Kamera 2023 abfotografiert Keheilig (talk) 14:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Fixed desc & license. Karl, in welchem Jahr starb Carl Witschel? --Achim55 (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Keheilig: Nun mach mal halblang. Dein Ton ist ausgesprochen unangemessen, und Drohungen mit rechtlichen Schritten können zur Sperre führen. Vielleicht liest Du mal den Artikel Schöpfungshöhe, bevor Du hier weiterhin behauptest "I am the photographer of the images".
Du gibst ja das Offensichtliche nun selber zu, dass Du eben nicht der Fotograf dieses Bildes bist, also von "false accusations" kann überhaupt keine Rede sein. Auch ob Du im Auftrag des "artist's heir" irgendwas machst, ist hier nicht von Belang. Es geht also, wie Achim55 schon sagt, einzig und allein nur darum, wann der Fotograf starb. --2003:C0:8F16:2100:5CF6:97DF:2E3F:5F6F 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs would be the license since we do not have a death date on the claimed photographer, but he is a family member of the scanner. I am not sure how the uplaoder is "the photographer of the images", unless they mean they scanned them. --RAN (talk) 23:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that we can keep it if we may reasonably assume that the photographer has been dead for more than 70 years, but the uploader is not a family member of the photographer. The scanner has repeatedly insisted that they are not related but only friends with the grandson, so they certainly do not have the Urheberrecht. --2003:C0:8F1F:FF00:180D:DE2:CCB9:7B02 06:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; VRT verification from the actual heirs of Carl Witschel is required. holly {chat} 19:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Artist died in 1994. 2003:C0:8F16:2100:E9B3:B3E2:1242:BB8B 11:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am the photographer and have the rights to the photo. The rights to the artwork have passed by inheritance to the grandson of the artist and from him I have permission to publish.
1. Please sign your edits --~~~~ instead of deleting the signature.
2. Photographing someone's artwork does not create a threshold of originality. This is not about your scan or photo, this is about the painting by Ms. Wolf-Witschel. You have been told that repeatedly, and in your most recent posting in the deletion discussion it appeared that you had understood this.
3. "Permission to publish" is not the same thing as "permission to publish under a Creative Commons 4.0 license". Please have the grandson read the fine print and send his consent to the VRT support.
4. Please declare your paid editing as required. --2003:C0:8F1F:FF00:40AC:AC80:D331:5346 15:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; VRT verification is required. holly {chat} 19:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous discussions 1, 2 and 3, such "nofacebook" tags are neither nessary anymore nor compatible with CC 4.0 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to case Commons:Deletion requests/User:Shakibul Alam Risvy/credits, still can keep.--Wpcpey (talk) 14:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm considering to re-nominate it since the CC 4.0 era now. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: user removed the "no Facebook" terms so this nomination is now moot. holly {chat} 19:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous discussions 1, 2 and 3, such "nofacebook" tags are neither nessary anymore nor compatible with CC 4.0 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to case Commons:Deletion requests/User:Shakibul Alam Risvy/credits, still can keep.--Wpcpey (talk) 13:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a)(4) never produces Adapted Material. --CC BY-SA 4.0 legalcode section 2.a.4.

Your restrictions specifically violated this part of CC legalcode and hence, you're probably using CC BY-NC/ND which isn't what Commons allowed. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user has removed the social media restrictions so this nomination is now moot. holly {chat} 19:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Image contains copyrighted artworks by Jeffrey Gibson (THE TREES ARE WITNESSES and SPEAKING TO THE SKY AND KISSING THE GROUND, both 2022), photographed in the United States (no Freedom of Panorama). 19h00s (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ːThis is an image of the front door of the art center, and has a sign for Gibson's work inside. It was not a painted sign, this was a giant sticker. Is a sign for an art show is now copyright? PigeonChickenFish (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The large digital prints on the front of the museum are copyrighted artworks by Jeffrey Gibson - they aren't really signs at all. That they are "stickers" really means nothing. If you navigate to the linked exhibition page, the caption for the image of the front of the museum clearly identifies the two works -- THE TREES ARE WITNESSES and SPEAKING TO THE SKY AND KISSING THE GROUND (both 2022) -- as being published on ICASF's website "courtesy of the artist." These are digital illustrations/designs that clearly pass the creativity threshold for copyrightable works, and the artist clearly views them as copyrighted works of art. 19h00s (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify THE TREES ARE WITNESSES and SPEAKING TO THE SKY AND KISSING THE GROUND (both 2022) are two installation works, displayed indoors. They do not resemble the sign. This image is not from the website. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 23:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you are not correct. Go to the linked website, click the first photograph in the image gallery. The caption for the image clearly labels the two graphic artworks on the outside of the ICA SF building as THE TREES ARE WITNESSES and SPEAKING TO THE SKY AND KISSING THE GROUND (both 2022). They are not "signs," they are copyrighted artworks that have been installed on the outside of the museum. I am not saying you took this image from the website - I am saying we cannot keep this image on Commons because it contains copyrighted art. 19h00s (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedily deleted by Didym, appealed by the uploader at COM:UNDEL. Converting to DR since I see no obvious evidence of license laundering. King of ♥ 19:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

0 views on Flickr, uploaded on the same day, multiple Google images hits. --Didym (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, it's high-resolution though, and the other photos have EXIF from the same scanner, so I find it relatively unlikely that the Flickr uploader stole it from the Internet. The only result I've found is this but it's lower-res. -- King of ♥ 20:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete As it stands its extremely suspicious - 0 followers, new account etc. Not withstanding the high res its too much like flickrwashing for me Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My friend Taylor took this photo last year. They created a Flickr account to allow me use of the shot, but still have them listed explicitly as the author of it. I couldn't figure out how to credit them if I uploaded directly in the wiki photo uploader. (New to wikicommons) AssistantMim (talk) 14:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per COM:AGF on the uploader's statement. The other photos from the Flickr account were clearly taken by the same photographer as the current one, and they do not appear anywhere else on the Internet. A new Flickr account is no more suspicious than a new Commons account, and I think these are the kind of photos we would accept with a good-faith explanation since there is not much more the claimed author can do to prove their authorship. If this were the only image and smaller copies of it appeared previously on the Internet, I might ask to see the film negatives for evidence, but the existence of other photos from the same series that have not appeared online previously is sufficient for me in this case. -- King of ♥ 15:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 20:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not necessarily own work, It's cover art for a novel and would thus be the work of the publishers or artist concerned. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am dipsuting the ineligbility of the stylized cross, as the perspective and color are artistic choices. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1995 journal, This is too recent for copyrights too have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1997 journal of an American museum. This is too recent for copyrights too have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think PD-map might apply to one or two of these? Chamaemelum (talk) 21:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1998 journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KDSells (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files appear to have been taken from a real estate listing.

Eureka Lott 17:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eureka,
all of the pics I see noted are my pictures. I’m a realtor and have the home listed for sale. Mike and Cathy, the owners/sellers appreciate they are well represented here for all to see. The home is a treasure that should be shared. Kirk kdsells 24.210.115.147 21:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion and thank you for your contributions, Kirk. holly {chat} 17:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1990 publication of an American museum - This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1991 publication, this is too recent for copyrights to have expired, IA metadata unreliable .

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 19:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1991 journal of British origin: This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1992 journal of British origins. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1994 journal of British origin. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 publication, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was produced by a United Nations agency (UNEP-WCMC and UNEP/GRID-Arendal), but I’m not sure (1) if those agencies are sufficiently connected to the U.N. to be considered like that copyright or (2) whether this report would fall under the U.N. copyright in any case. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP, copyright status is uncertain. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 publication. This is too recent for copyright expiry. However, the publication seems to be an international convention, does this qualify as an edict?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This image is pure text, and in a hypothetical transcription project of the larger would be replaced with a functioning table. Thus, it should be deleted on that ground, irrespective of the copyright question. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per TE(æ)A,ea., out of scope for Commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1994 publication of a Canadian provincial government. If crown copyright , it would have to have been publidhed prior to 1972 for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2045 when crown copyright expires. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1994 publication with clear (C) notice.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Struck first. Can you give a cite for the 1909 article? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Kept the first, deleted the second as a source mentioned for that has a NC-ND restriction and is from 1977, and Boris Fedorovitsch Belyshev died in 1993. I cannot find a death date for AY Haritonov, who may be still lving. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1994 Publication, by an agency of a US state, Not Federal govt.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, no indication of a free license in publication. Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1993 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, If crown copyright, it would have to have been published prior to 1973 to be out of copyright.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Check out the examples here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:PD_map Chamaemelum (talk) 22:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, the ToO in Canada is low so these are not PD-Map, Undelete in 2044. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1993 published journal, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP, copyright status uncertain but even if the CC-BY-NC-SA was the license, it's not acceptable for Commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1993 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government. If crown copyright it would have had to be published prior to 1972 for that copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2044. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1992 journal, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this creative enough for it to be copyrightable? Chamaemelum (talk) 22:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The open triangles are data points, but the “solid line[s]” are “arbitrary,” which I think is sufficient. As for the jounral, the Web-site for the journal and publisher (here) gives no statement as to copyright, nor do either the journal or article at issue. BHL gives CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1992 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, If crown copyright applied, the document would have had to been published prior to 1973.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2043. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1991 publication, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I support deleting the images (copyrightable creative works), but I am unsure about the maps (due to PD-map). Chamaemelum (talk) 22:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, the ToO in the UK is low so I deleted all nominated. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1991 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, would have to have been published prior to 1973 for crown copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2042. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1990 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, would have to have been published prior to 1973 for crown copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the 3D nature of the second image disqualifies it from PD-map? Chamaemelum (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2041. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1990-1994 publications of Canadian origin. This is too recent for copyrights to have xpired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2045. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1990 publication with copyright statement in the front of document. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I weak support this because it is low-quality, but I would assume copyright may not apply here (PD-map). Chamaemelum (talk) 22:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1994 publication. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The BHL record says, "Copyright owner: IMO", but this type of declaration is not mentioned in the Copyright and Reuse page, so it's unclear if this means "All rights reserved" or it's equivalent to {{Copyrighted free use}}. holly {chat} 09:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1990 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial govenrment, for crown copyright to have expired it would have to been published prior to 1973.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1990 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, for crown copyright to have expired it would have to have been published prior to 1973.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourced to a 1990 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government. For crown copyright to have expired, it would have to have been published prior to 1973.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourced to a 1990 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government. For crown copyright to have expired, it would have to have been published prior to 1973.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to an 1991 publication by an American museum, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1992 publication. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1992 journal of a South African museum. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1992 publication of American origin. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1993 publication of American origins, This is too recent for copyrights too have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1995 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial govenrment, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1993 Publication of Hungarian origin, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1993 journal of British origin. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr account is a Mexican film festival, who probably doesn't the right over the image, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 14:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1996 publication, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1995 journal of British origin, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1996 publication of Canadian origin, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced from a 1999 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1999 Publication of Columbia University

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1991 journal publication, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable…

Jonteemil (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable…

Jonteemil (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Second one seems to be an American logo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Correct.  Keep on that one. Jonteemil (talk) 10:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the US one, deleted the Australian one. holly {chat} 18:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If country of origin is deemed to be Australia, these are likely above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable…

Jonteemil (talk) 20:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Australia which is extremely low, even File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg is complex enough to be copyrightable… Jonteemil (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this is not a logo or symbol, just an icon created by me. Therefore it is a real "own" work, so why should this be deleted? Fma12 (talk) 23:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So the design isn't owned by the club? Jonteemil (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment interestingly, this seems to actually not be the Wollongong saints icon, but a similar, inspired work. I am not sure what rules apply. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment They only elements from they club were the blue and pink colors, which I used to create a personal design, inspired by some elements from a Saints shirt worn at that time. Fma12 (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should a personal design really be used on w:AFL Sydney and have a description page that would make it seem as it's an official icon of the club? Maybe it should be written out that it's not an official design and that it is your own personal design. Additionaly, would a personal design be in scope? Jonteemil (talk) 00:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A personal design which has a resemblance to a symbol of a team is IMO in scope. Why not? My intention was only to create an icon, not an exact depiction of a copyrighed logo or emblem. Fma12 (talk) 02:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2002 Publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, this is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2053. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1999 journal of a German museum, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Per [1], the Bonn zoological Bulletin (BzB), formerly "Bonner zoologische Beiträge", uses a {{CC-BY-4.0}} license. That very same web site also has the journal's archive going back to 1950 (on the left, click Articles). So this might be under an acceptable free license. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you can get a VTRS confirmation out of them, and a GLAM partnership even better :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: This is from [2], and the site licenses under a free license. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

designed by myself on behalf of the League of which I am a committee member. It's possible the league owns the copyright anyway, we would need permission. Jonteemil (talk) 18:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the designer and committee member released it, which may be sufficient. It would be good to have proof of the user's claims in some way. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image with Copyright (sport badge) --Goldorak (talk) 19:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1999 journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: BHL says "In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.". holly {chat} 17:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 American journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a depiction of data so isn't copyrightable. However, it is low quality, so it might be deleted anyway. I would double check with PD-map on some of those map images. Chamaemelum (talk) 21:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: BHL says "In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.". holly {chat} 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]