Commons:Deletion requests/User:Shakibul Alam Risvy/credits
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
We already have several consensus on deprecation of Nofacebook tags: Commons:Deletion requests/NoFacebook templates, Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Nofacebook, m:Legal/CC BY-SA licenses and social media and several dozens of VP(C)/AN(U/B)... discussions, they show solidarity of Ukraine :P untouchable panoramas where FB users may reverse-blocklist those who tag em. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226
Speedy keep This is ridiculous. Deletion of user space pages, except at the user’s request, requires an exceptional reason. And here there isn’t even a good reason. - This is a long list of legitimate credits, with a perhaps problematic ‘no Facebook’ section buried in the middle, and you simply want to delete the whole thing. Did you make any attempt to discuss this with Shakibul Alam Risvy first? Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd Don't you think that, per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:No Facebook, any re-creation of nofacebook tags are facing-to-facing COM:CSD#G4? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 There are three problems with applying COM:CSD#G4 to this page:
- G4 applies only to recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus (emphasis added). The offending content on this page was added at 14 September 2016, 05:10:49, long before any such consensus.
- Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed Arrhioui.jpg, G4 applies only to identical (not merely similar) content. Is the offending content on this page identical to content previously deleted per community consensus? It’s not identical to {{No Facebook}}, which you refer to (it is in Spanish and English, not German and English; it uses all-bold text with no underlining and it lacks a link to Facebook's licensing terms).
- G4’s description says Page or file matches content … (emphasis added). It does not say contains. As noted above, this page, taken as a whole, doesn’t even come close to matching a ‘no Facebook’ template.
- Also, the previous discussions all seem to involve templates actually transcluded in file descriptions; this page is not used in this way. Brianjd (talk) 12:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- So under your logical those Nofacebook tags should be restored? If so then why not just ask via COM:DRV or elsewhere? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 Suppose I wrote: For the record, the ‘no Facebook’ templates nominated for deletion consist of the image No Facebook.svg and the text ‘[insert text here]’ (but with the actual text inserted). Would you then ask for this page to be deleted, because I had used it to recreate content deleted per consensus? Or would you realise that context matters here?
- I said above that there is a huge difference between an actual template, used on file descriptions, and a page showing examples of such templates (without endorsing them, I might add). Again, context matters! Brianjd (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- (Not sure whether I could meet (Edit conflict)s when discussing your matters responsed, are you really having interests on editing same times of when I'm editing?)
- Actually for that file (and don't surprise the black-white png one), I'm indeed, and always yes conscientious, considering a 3rd nomination. On context matters, let's just ask Shakibul themselves. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- So under your logical those Nofacebook tags should be restored? If so then why not just ask via COM:DRV or elsewhere? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 There are three problems with applying COM:CSD#G4 to this page:
- @Brianjd Don't you think that, per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:No Facebook, any re-creation of nofacebook tags are facing-to-facing COM:CSD#G4? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 19:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
While was kept for once, there are several new concerns populated by VPC that such requirements listed under this credits subpage contain rules violate CC 4.0 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)