Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._(48487509322).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
(2)(3)(4).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recently uploaded by a disappeared person (Celbusro). 2001:448A:11A5:1C46:AC8A:FDC4:65C9:9288 06:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete Kontributor 2K (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request, uploaded 3 years ago. --Achim55 (talk) 11:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This woman is identified as German lied singer Lotte Lehmann, but it is not her, it is Lilli Lehmann (also an opera singer). Furthermore, LOTTE Lehmann never portrayed Venus in this opera. SP-lava (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: and renamed to File:Lilli Lehmann as 'Venus' in Wagner's Tannhäuser.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 21:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 00:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope. Not used for educational purposes N Panama 84534 21:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope. Not used for educational purposes N Panama 84534 21:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reverse search indicates this comes from a Flickrwashing account: https://lens.google.com/search?p=Acn1BYdjnouHfs5B6rNa-J6YGtaC1pmDnGjMeca9GGhTHRVktrDeW46Twt6TqQ8iwE19uckIB8C5AhwHIxkPcm8jqF0XR99oH8vKyUPsCkVUCoZ9eYmcYfathQEwklGK8FvsOj7ERJ5MYPK9qBqwjvPAHmLGdRH1TpU_RXVLY76vHStFE4IKU2UEne7Bb29r3dOVV5OkjuN996Qv-Q%3D%3D&plm=ChAIDxIMCIKc66UGEOChv8IBChAIFxIMCIKc66UGEKj1xcIBCg8IGBILCISc66UGEPjz3TEKDwgtEgsIhJzrpQYQmI3gMQoPCC4SCwiEnOulBhCw1vxyCg8IEBILCISc66UGENDWrXQKDwgZEgsIhJzrpQYQiN%2BydAoPCBoSCwiEnOulBhDQo750#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKRGMwTnpZd09UTTBMVEl3TlRndE5EQm1ZaTA1WWpNekxUTmhNVE0xWXprNE9EUmtaUklmVFhkVmNGcERaR1l4TVRSbFNVVXhUR3gwZUVKVlRHOVpjVEI1WW14NFp3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLDEyLFtdXV0= Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Effectively a copyvio so can be speedy. --Herby talk thyme 06:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article JustVixo (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep because the deletion request is nonsense and this is a usable photo of a bridge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Breach of personal copyright Jordvnd (talk) 08:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
{{Copyvio}} Jordvnd (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "Portrait by Avara Walker". --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=It was originally from Liu Boyang: https://weibo.com/1144755982/N9ubriLec}} Shujianyang (talk) 21:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Fabiarslan
[edit]- File:Arslan Azam Sultan seen on Sakoti road of Meerut city.jpg
- File:Dr. Arslan Azam Sultan seen on Sakoti road of Meerut city.jpg
Vanity files, the latter being a derivative of the former, of a user who has limited global contributions and has been banned from en.wikipedia.org for abusive sockpuppeting. There's been multiple attempts to use these files in attempts on autobiographies on en.wikipedia. Currently in use on two vanity opinion pieces on wikinews authored by this editor that are tagged for speedy deletion; Wikinews:Arslan Sultan about Qur'an burning in Sweden 28 June 2023 and Wikinews:Arslan Sultan commented about Uniform Civil Code. Both of those opinion pieces have been repeatedly tagged for speedy deletion on Wikinews, and the uploader here has abusively edit warred to remove the speedy deletion tags. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I've deleted the ENWN "articles", so these photos are no longer in use. [24Cr][talk] 16:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
._(48487509322).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._(48487509322).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP in Japan only covers buildings Trade (talk) 22:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
._(48487509322).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 10:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
._(48487509322).jpg){kind=link}
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article JustVixo (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The only nonsense here, is this delete request. It's obvious that a detail of the fountain just as relevant as a picture of the whole fountain. TommyG (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of El Salvador.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
fictionnal + not in use => out of com:scope 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
fictionnal + not in use => out of com:scope 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete Low quality, destructive watermarked, no practical educational use. Leangle30 (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works, not PD in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-05#File:Statue-of-Date-Masamune-in-Aobayama-Park-Sendai-2016.jpg.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The file was uploaded in 2006, {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is legally used per se. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator withdrawn. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works, not PD in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-05#File:Statue-of-Date-Masamune-in-Aobayama-Park-Sendai-2016.jpg.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The file was uploaded in 2008, {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is legally used here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator withdrawn. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works, not PD in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-05#File:Statue-of-Date-Masamune-in-Aobayama-Park-Sendai-2016.jpg.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The file was uploaded in 2010, {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is legally used. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator withdrawn. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works, not PD in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-05#File:Statue-of-Date-Masamune-in-Aobayama-Park-Sendai-2016.jpg.(added signature)--Y.haruo (talk) 15:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The file was uploaded in 2006, {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is legally used here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator withdrawn. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ivory Coast A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Not Need Asheesh Chandra Gupta (talk) 03:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Not Need Asheesh Chandra Gupta (talk) 03:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in USA, artist Anne de Villemejane is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banco de Guatemala
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Guatemala.
- File:BANCO DE GUATEMALA.jpg
- File:Banco de Guatemala.jpg
- File:Banco deGuatemala.JPG
- File:Bandera Nacional del BANGUAT.jpg
- File:Edificio del BANGUAT.jpg
- File:El Banco de Guatemala (HDR).jpg
- File:Guatemala Bank.jpg
- File:Guatemala city Central Bank.jpg
- File:Vista del edificio del Banco de Guatemala.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Crédito Hipotecario Nacional
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Guatemala.
- File:Credito Hipotecario de Guatemala.jpg
- File:Credito Hipotecario Nacional.jpg
- File:Edificio CHN.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1978 by Efraín Enrique Recinos Valenzuela (1928–2011). There is no freedom of panorama in Guatemala. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2082.
- File:Centro Cultural Miguel Ángel Asturias (Cropped).jpg
- File:Centro Cultural Miguel Ángel Asturias (Cropped)2.jpg
- File:Centro Cultural Miguel Ángel Asturias.jpg
- File:Con magia renovada, el Coro Nacional de Guatemala presentó “Un concierto de películas para príncipes y princesas”.jpg
- File:Entrada de artistas Centro Cultural Miguel Ángel Asturias.jpg
- File:Teatro Miguel Angel Asturias.jpg
- File:Teatro Nacional Guatemala.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Guatemala A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a copyrighted image from a magazine. It almost certainly is not the own work of the uploader. Notsammyray (talk) 04:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Georgia
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51156051405).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51154275712).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51156051885).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51154275987).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51155178418).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51154945071).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51154944451).jpg
- File:The City of Love Sculpture, Batumi (51154945496).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Used for self-promotion. Wolverène (talk) 04:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Courtyard by Marriott Batumi
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Georgia
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155272423).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155825939).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51154370512).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155824779).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51154370147).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155039916).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155272303).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155823939).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155271793).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155273428).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155823539).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51156145960).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51156147865).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155274283).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155823709).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51156146915).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155039776).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155824399).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155040201).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51155274098).jpg
- File:Courtyard by Marriott Batumi (51156145025).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Porta Batumi Tower
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Georgia
- File:Porta Batumi Tower, Georgia (50633859468).jpg
- File:Porta Batumi Tower, Georgia (50634690602).jpg
- File:Porta Batumi Tower, Georgia (50634691667).jpg
- File:Porta Batumi Tower, Georgia (50633859998).jpg
- File:Porta Batumi Tower, Georgia (50633859798).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Georgia
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917107053).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917802551).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917929347).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917115138).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917108128).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917932352).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917803446).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917797726).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917798106).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917108443).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917113928).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917798846).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917795776).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917797346).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917803786).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917796251).jpg
- File:Orbi Sea Towers, Batumi (50917801611).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Professional photo used as his YT pic - clearly not own work Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Catagarciav (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files related to some fictitious island nation; out of scope.
- File:Monedaaa.png
- File:Billete finak.png
- File:Jajajja.png
- File:Captura de pantalla (743).png
- File:Escudo Nacional de Hoa Koa.png
- File:Escudo de Hoa Koa.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome)
[edit]The stadium was completed in 1958 by Marcello Piacentini (1881–1960). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2031.
- File:20070611 Rome 02.jpg
- File:Pala Lottomatica.jpg
- File:PalaLottomatica (Rome, ITA).jpg
- File:PalaLottomatica 09.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.01.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.02.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.03.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.04.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.05.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.06.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.07.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.08.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.09.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.10.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.11.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.12.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.13.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.14.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.15.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2018.20.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2021.01.jpg
- File:Palazzo dello Sport (Rome) in 2021.03.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2018.20.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2021.01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2021.03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No exif, same as his insta profile pic - https://www.instagram.com/syedfardeenshakil/?hl=en - needs OTRS to keep Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused very poor quality and blurry images of unidentified locations (coordinates are wrong), unusable, out of scope.
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0490 (953225934).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0492 (953228114).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0493 (952374943).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0494 (952376973).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0495 (952379797).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0731 (953642711).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0733 (953647683).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0737 (954511312).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:2005 Tourist photos of Thunder Bay 2
[edit]Same as before: more blurry, unusable, and unidentifiable images with wrong coordinates.
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0517 (952541193).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0638 (953987192).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0648 (954003128).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0650 (953150547).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0661 (953159413).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0665 (954022754).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0673 (953182303).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0681 (953189649).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0691 (954069712).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0694 (953224147).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0695 (954081242).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0696 (954084608).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0697 (954087184).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0712 (953284906).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0715 (953293740).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0716 (953296390).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0524 (952556629).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused low quality photo without context and wrong coordinates, nothing distinguishable and unidentifiable, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by انعام کریم (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images, visual characteristics suggest screengrab.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 06:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Globally replaced by svg. Not COM:INUSE, no educational purpose. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
While this is public domain in the US, it is not public domain yet in Germany as the author died in 1976. Undelete in 2047. Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/189708855@N03
[edit]Flickrwashing. 0 followers etc and photos only of Quartzy
- File:Josephs Quartzy (2021).jpg
- File:JQ KNEW THAT.jpg
- File:Josephs Quartzy (2019).jpg
- File:Kombolela.jpg
- File:Josephs Quartzy22.jpg
- File:The Eastern Bandits.jpg
- File:THE REAL PAST WITH JOSEPHS QUARTZY.jpg
- File:MR. LOCAL MAN.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 16:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/128125259@N08
[edit]Flickrwashing. 0 followers etc and only has photos of him
Gbawden (talk) 16:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/119605205@N05
[edit]Flickrwashing. Account has 0 followers etc and seems to be dedicated to Prettos. The album covers are definitely flickrwashing
- File:Prettos Essencia da Origem 04.jpg
- File:Prettos Essencia da Origem 01.jpg
- File:Cd1-comunidade-samba-da-vela-2000.jpg
- File:Cd 2-Novo-Viver-Prettos2020.jpg
- File:Cd 2 - Comunidade Samba da Vela - 2012.jpg
- File:Cd2-Sentimento-Popular-Quinteto.jpg
- File:Capa-Prettos Quintal-Ao-Vivo.png
- File:Cd 4 - Quinteto em Branco e Preto - Quinteto - 2012.jpg
- File:Cd1-riqueza-do-brasil-quinteto-2000.jpg
- File:Cd3-patrimonio-da-humanidade-quinteto2009.jpg
- File:Samba da Vela - 2004 02.jpg
- File:Homenagem prestada a Comunidade Samba da Vela - Assembleia Legislativa - 2004.jpg
- File:Prettos Essencia da Origem 02.jpg
- File:Foto por jose de holanda @seujosedeholanda-4354.jpg
- File:Magnusousa.jpg
- File:Prettos4.jpg
- File:Maurilio-de-oliveira.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 16:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 16:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Random button, no COM:EDUSE. Not COM:INUSE. Out of scope. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Sculpture by Harold F. Clayton, died May 26, 2015. Nv8200p (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Sculpture by Harold F. Clayton, died May 26, 2015. Nv8200p (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Image contains copyrighted art by Ester Hernandez, photographed in the United States (no FoP) 19h00s (talk) 23:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, architect Giulio Minoletti died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing artistic visible in this image. It's not even clear which of the buildings should be the focus. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The Milano Porta Garibaldi station building is not the subject, but the Maire Tecnimont building behind is. (The company was established in 2005, therefore it is unlikely that the architect of the building has been dead for 70 years.) --A1Cafel (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess if it's unclear what the subject is, de minimis applies. And I still don't see anything copyrightable in that tower. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- See VP discussion about the copyright concern of modern buildings in Italy. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess if it's unclear what the subject is, de minimis applies. And I still don't see anything copyrightable in that tower. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The Milano Porta Garibaldi station building is not the subject, but the Maire Tecnimont building behind is. (The company was established in 2005, therefore it is unlikely that the architect of the building has been dead for 70 years.) --A1Cafel (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, no FOP in Italy. See also my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Torre Turati Mattioni.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pirelli Tower (Milan). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No proof that French party NUPES released the photos of its candidates under cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 09:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated. Artist Giuseppe Tonnini died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Costantine M. Makobe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal file collection, out of scope. No user contributions outside of the user namespace.
- File:MAVUMBINI page-0001(1).jpg
- File:Mwandishi (CHANGAMOTO 9).png
- File:FUNGATE page-0001.jpg
- File:Costantine makobe.jpg
- File:UONGOZI WAKO page-0001.jpg
- File:Mashairi ya changamoto .Na costantine makobe.jpg
- File:Mwandishi.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GeorgHH • talk 14:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation tagged as own work. There is a watermark of magicbricks.com.. HokuroN (talk) 03:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tamzin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The photograph may be freely licensed, but the framed work in the photo is not indicated as such. See also COM:FOP Canada.
FOP cases need to be dealt with by DR. No FoP in Canada for 2D graphical works such as this. Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Redundant and low-quality file that has been replaced with a higher quality SVG version and better color legend https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Legal_drinking_age_in_1969.svg Areatius (talk) 19:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- normally I'd plead for the original map to be kept, but it's atrocious. Good work and Delete --Enyavar (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Redundant and low-quality file that has been replaced with a higher quality SVG version and better color legend https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Legal_drinking_age_in_1983.svg Areatius (talk) 19:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- normally I'd plead for the original map to be kept, but it's atrocious. Good work and Delete --Enyavar (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Redundant and low-quality file that has been replaced with a higher quality SVG version and better color legend https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Legal_drinking_age_in_1975.svg Areatius (talk) 19:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- normally I'd plead for the original map to be kept, but it's atrocious. Good work and Delete --Enyavar (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Either complex logo or fictionnal file without educative purpose. In both case, it is out of scope 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
fictionnal + not in use = out of com:scope 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictionnal. Commons is not a depository for invented fantasies. See com:scope. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
no proof of license in listed source PizzaKing13 (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Flickr lists as All Rights Reserved, not Public Domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 07:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- You're right, my bad. That same day I got other pictures from that Flickr account and they were all public domain, so I assumed that one was too and didn't double check. It should be deleted. Oscarter13 (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
no proof of license in listed source PizzaKing13 (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Habría sido más interesante una foto de la hoja de rasurar. 186.172.201.0 19:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Photographer/ Copyright holder according to metadata: Joerg Prochnow. No indication that uploader is identical with this person. 2003:C0:8F03:4A00:ED07:3106:C0A0:402B 08:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Obviously derivative work from somewhere, "own work" very unlikely. What is the source? Who is the photographer/ copyright holder? Where is their consent? 2003:C0:8F03:4A00:ED07:3106:C0A0:402B 08:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, artist Costas Varotsos is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Just an ordinary skyscrapper, nothing special. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, I'm referring to the artwork in front of the building, though the building could be copyrighted as well. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- That is art? I thought this was a tree of sorts. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- See this website for the deatails of the sculpture. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- That is art? I thought this was a tree of sorts. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, I'm referring to the artwork in front of the building, though the building could be copyrighted as well. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for the shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image was extracted from another one that has a valid license.This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Minerva97 (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep So what's the problem? Image does (now?) have a valid license. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image was extracted from another one that has a valid license. This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Minerva97 (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Image has a valid license, and cropping simply cropping doesn't even add a new copyright. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
copyvio, per mentionned source. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
copyvio per source + duplicate of File:Par la Grâce de Dieu - Royaume de France.jpg 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 03:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The female person in front of the photograph appears to be unhappy with this publication. To my knowledge, we do not have proof of that but you can checkout the associated talk page. This continues to be a source for disruptions. As of now the image is unused and has also been removed from its original source. Hence I want to suggest that we delete this file likewise out of courtesy. AFBorchert (talk) 09:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Neutral: Of course it can be deleted out of courtesy, on the other hand is "I don't like it" no reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 10:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)- Delete I realise that this may well end up controversial and that technically this is a freely licensed image. However in this day and age I'd like to think we would be able to take people into account as well as rules. The removal of personal information from this was an excellent idea. However I would be happy with the deletion of an unused file under the circumstances Herby talk thyme 10:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- We could take a principled stance that the license is valid and we're not legally required to take anything down.
- We could oblige to delete the image out of common courtesy, as it is not currently in use. I think there might be other images of soldiers' physical training.
- We could let ourselves be bullied to take down the image because said person is making a nuisance for everyone.
- We could be legally required to still take it down because of a technicality or law that invalidates our "valid license argument" from above.
- Weighing stuff, I currently tend to go for option 1, given several convincing arguments by Tuvalkin below. Now changed from neutral to Keep. --Enyavar (talk) 10:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I was going to suggest removal of her name off the exif of this file, but that’s already done, so keep. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This is absolutely a case where any compassionate human being would see that courtesy deletion is appropriate. Hosting this file is clearly causing real world harm to an individual and Commons doesn't have a compelling need for this particular file. The harm/benefit ratio is clear. Marbletan (talk) 13:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- This image has breen hosted here since 2015, fully complying to all legal requirements. In the intervening time maybe 3rd part reusers, again in full compliance to all applicable legislation, used it to illustrate a blogpost about Soldiers doing Yoga, an article about National Guard instructors looking ultra Cool, or a widely circulated meme against lawns in the desert. Should those 3rd party users have the rug pulled from under their feet and fall victim to formerly cool minivan mom and her ambulance chaser?, or can they rely on Wikimedia Commons and its fatcat lawyers to keep doing their job and upholding a world where free media can be safely reused? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not arguing against the fact that we can host it. But under these circumstances, we shouldn't. Compassion matters. I really don't understand why you are insulting the individual depicted in this image. Marbletan (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Compassion matters, yes. Including compassion for possible reusers. No need to insult this individual — she does a great job of it herself, additionally to insulting random Commons users as the cherry on top, if you care to read her lengthy rants.
Additional question: Should she become famous (maybe as the good gal with a gun at the next Arizona mass shooting), wouldn’t her name become a significant piece of info?- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Then it should be retrieved by an administrator at that point. And her first name is probably "Karen". Useddenim (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- It’s not (though I frankly forgot what her name is, even though I read it yesterday — talk about the right to be forgotten!), but I do get your point. I still think she’s cool, though, not a Karen (with appologies to all the cool Karens out there!), and that we’re seeing in this contention is the very worst she has to give. I blame the rank mercantilism that made the internet at large a protected space for all kinds of scams, instead of a free post-scarcity digital paradise, tainting normal users’ perception and behaviour in the process, to everybody’s detriment. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Then it should be retrieved by an administrator at that point. And her first name is probably "Karen". Useddenim (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment The person complaining has not made clear how "real world harm" is coming to her, especially after her name has been removed from the file history, too. AI face recognition can be ruled straight out, too. I just can't see where this picture of her can contribute to harm. Her only claim is emotional distress over having a vague digital proof of her service time lingering on the internet. After her outrageous insults, vandalism and terror campaign this morning I don't feel overmuch compassion either. And we can't even be certain who it is that made the complaint, all we have is an IP's say-so.- We see an anonymous woman exercising as part of a group of soldiers, and we must assume that consent was given at that time for a publication including her name, like we must assume the same for other images of (still fully namedǃ) American military personnel, like here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here among a total of over 18'000 such images authorized for publication. So sure, she's the special snowflake who now raised hell to delete the image unlike all other linked examples, but if she can't even go through the proper channels that also says a lot. --Enyavar (talk) 15:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- True. And even though the Army website did apparently take out this image (after it was released into public domain, tsk tsk), a previous version of it is still available in archive.org. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- At this location, as in indicated in our filepage. Which is now also archived here, here and here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- True. And even though the Army website did apparently take out this image (after it was released into public domain, tsk tsk), a previous version of it is still available in archive.org. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: What specific duty do you believe Commons has to those downstream users? You seem to be asserting that WMF would provide some sort of legal protection to those users contingent on the image being hosted on Commons, which is a theory which the General Disclaimer comprehensively rejects ("no guarantee of validity"; "does not create or imply any contractual or extracontractual liability"; "all information seen here is without any implied warranty of fitness"; etc). Nor is there a technical duty; while Commons does technically permit hotlinking of images, it is "not generally recommended" for this exact reason. Omphalographer (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- What I’m asserting is not what you’re accusing me of, it’s a much simpler thing. I’ll let you work out what it is, if you can spare some good faith. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- For the sake of open discussion, can you explain how deleting this (or any) image would "pull the rug from under the feet" of other individuals who have already reused the image? Omphalographer (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Because if it stays in Commons, whence it was taken from by most of those putative reusers, it can be readily pointed to by anyone defending themselves from a copyvio claim (or even readily found by a 3rd party platform admin while arbitring a “flagged” reuse), as opposed to sleuthing out an obscure US military website page — let alone its archived version. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm not convinced that should be Commons' concern. Downstream users shouldn't be citing Commons as a source for the image; they should cite the image to its creator, the National Guard, just as we do. If that isn't enough for them, or if they're concerned because it's been taken offline by the Army, they probably shouldn't be using the image - again, there's that whole "no guarantee of validity" business I mentioned earlier. Omphalographer (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- That’s a way to make a mockery of the whole concept of "public domain". -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- No, it's a recognition that Commons has a finite scope. The purpose of the project is to host freely licensed educational content for Wikimedia projects - not to host all freely licensed content that has ever existed. Retaining images which don't have a clear educational purpose, against the wishes of someone connected to the image, doesn't further the goals of the project - it just makes us look like a bunch of bullies. Omphalographer (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure what’s weirder:
- You implying that this image is not in scope, or
- you reading the model’s pleas and deciding we look like bullies.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure what’s weirder:
- No, it's a recognition that Commons has a finite scope. The purpose of the project is to host freely licensed educational content for Wikimedia projects - not to host all freely licensed content that has ever existed. Retaining images which don't have a clear educational purpose, against the wishes of someone connected to the image, doesn't further the goals of the project - it just makes us look like a bunch of bullies. Omphalographer (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- That’s a way to make a mockery of the whole concept of "public domain". -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm not convinced that should be Commons' concern. Downstream users shouldn't be citing Commons as a source for the image; they should cite the image to its creator, the National Guard, just as we do. If that isn't enough for them, or if they're concerned because it's been taken offline by the Army, they probably shouldn't be using the image - again, there's that whole "no guarantee of validity" business I mentioned earlier. Omphalographer (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Because if it stays in Commons, whence it was taken from by most of those putative reusers, it can be readily pointed to by anyone defending themselves from a copyvio claim (or even readily found by a 3rd party platform admin while arbitring a “flagged” reuse), as opposed to sleuthing out an obscure US military website page — let alone its archived version. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- For the sake of open discussion, can you explain how deleting this (or any) image would "pull the rug from under the feet" of other individuals who have already reused the image? Omphalographer (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- What I’m asserting is not what you’re accusing me of, it’s a much simpler thing. I’ll let you work out what it is, if you can spare some good faith. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not arguing against the fact that we can host it. But under these circumstances, we shouldn't. Compassion matters. I really don't understand why you are insulting the individual depicted in this image. Marbletan (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I dont think any compassionate human would repeatedly threaten and harass our editors for baseless and nonsensical reasons Trade (talk) 00:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image is perfectly within scope. --Trade (talk) 00:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand why any of you think we should delete this picture because of threatening language from an IP user. There is nothing damaging about this photo, and there is no longer any personal identification of any individual pictured in it. If you serve and are photographed by military photographers while you are in the military, you should expect images of you to be used. I understand compassionate deletions, but this would be a deletion under threat that could encourage any other person from engaging in threats in order to circumvent free licenses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- And therefore, Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- And therefore,
- Comment This image also depicts that same woman. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- With her name in the filepage. And that one is in use. And the original is still up. This is getting interesting. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Because there is no good reason to pull it, and we need to defend our valid right to keep other stuff that does matter, against this sort of deletion by request. US law applies here, there is no "right to be forgotten" as the EU has.
- The author's privacy issues began when they were photographed by the US armed forces. Or arguably when they joined them. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. It is not clear that an army camp is a public place that allows photographs of identifiable people to be published per our guideline, and it doesn't seem that she consented to having images of her published and exploited commercially either by mere virtue of joining the National Guard or by signing a separate agreement, since the image has been taken down by the source as well. Also note for all those who claim "her name has been removed": you can still read her name both in the version history (none of the revisions that provided her name have been revision-deleted) and in the provided archive.org link, so that argument is incredibly weak. -- 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 02:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, your argument is argument is incredibly weak. Anyway, why are we still putting up with IPs in discussions? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- I was not clear. I think the presented argument is «incredibly weak» because:
- The name of the depicted person still in Commons being an issue, it should be fixed, as suggested, by deleting the revisions still holding it, not by deleting the file. This is akin to ask for deletion of a file because it is miscategorized or lacks a description. A weak argument indeed. (Meanwhile these revdels were done by AFBorchert.)
- The name of the depicted person being available in archived pages, both ours and the original military website’s — well, also not a reason to delete, then, as it wouldn’t accomplish the desired disappearence. Another weak argument.
- The name of the depicted person in this filepage being an issue, yet it is visible in other photos from the same source (both in Commons and in the original military website), as reported in the DR. However, nobody is asking for its removal there, too (yet). Is it beceause this is just all about acquiescing to the loud (and very rude) o.p.?, or because nobody on the deletion side even noticed? Again — weak argument.
- But could I have used a phrase milder than "put up with"? I could and I should, and I would if I were to do it again. It wouldn’t change the matter at hand, though — that the mere presence of IPs in a discussion is a source of mistrust and uneasiness, no rudeness required. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- I was not clear. I think the presented argument is «incredibly weak» because:
- Good points: I've revision deleted all versions that still contained the name of the depicted person and removed the archive link as well. --AFBorchert (talk) 04:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, your argument is argument is incredibly weak. Anyway, why are we still putting up with IPs in discussions? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Speaking as an American, and the son of a member of the National Guard, there is nothing wrong with this photograph. It depicts soldiers doing exercise to remain physically fit. It is not a creepshot and treats its subjects with dignity. We thank those in the Guard for their service, but we're not taking down this photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author see metadata "Author Maarten Camman" Hoyanova (talk) 07:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Tobias Camman 2023.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2023071910007885. --Daniuu (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:D118:E1BB:81D2:14CB 14:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023072210000198 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
poor quality Luda.slominska (talk) 21:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Such assessments of image quality as "poor quality" should not be the yardstick for deletion. On the one hand, this would open a gateway for the arbitrary exercise of discretion and, on the other, even images with minor technical characteristics can make an important contribution to documentation and illustration - you never know what might be used for what. --Anil Ö. (talk) 00:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Anil Ö. + no freedom of panorama in Ukraine - will be deleted as. --Микола Василечко (talk) 10:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Deletion policy: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. That`s the case.--Luda.slominska (talk) 20:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Anil Ö. + no freedom of panorama in Ukraine - will be deleted as. --Микола Василечко (talk) 10:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope due to poor quality making it almost unusable. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Lamasticot meme existing since at least 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio; On the internet since 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Yet another version of a file we already have a category filled of : Category:Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Empire. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
yet another version of a file we already have a category filled of : Category:Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Empire. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted media, not own work. same for File:WarmUp-Genias-DardariBros-ingame.jpg Bultro (talk) 22:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No clear subject - it doesn't have enough of any single graffiti piece to be of use Doomhope (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Disney is not in the habit of giving out their logos under Creative Commons license, so this is dubious. If its copyright has expired (highly doubtful) then it'd be public domain. So the claimed CC license must not be true. Herostratus (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
In fact now that I look at it the entire Category:Disney logos is highly suspect. File:Disney plus icon.png is "own work"... really? etc etc etc. Disney is notorious for being protective of their stuff, they will sue the Home for Dying Crippled Orphans for having a homemade poster of the mouse at Joey's Last Birthday Party and so on. There're probably more unfree works than free ones in Category:Disney logos so really better off just deleting the entire category I would say. Herostratus (talk) 05:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- This clearly goes below COM:TOO. "Own work" would be wrong here (but nobody claimed that), but {{PD-Textlogo}} very clearly applies PaterMcFly (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, obvious textlogo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
(2)(3)(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(2)(3)(4).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: ALbum cover, The background was on the internet before the upload according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Caulfield as no source (No source since) Krd 06:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We would need to check the logs on it.wiki, but when the given license is correct, that doesn't matter. I see no valid reason for deletion here. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The license is correct. --Civa61 (talk) 11:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Licensing and permission not clear. I cannot find this picture on the International Criminal Tribunale's web site. If that is the source nothing in the International Criminal Tribunale's web site's Terms and Conditions leads me to believe that this photograph is licenced under a CC by SA 4.0 licencse, Indeed quite the oppoisite. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image already exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fran%C3%A7ois_de_Troy_by_Alexis_Simon_Belle.jpg No need for duplicate. BusterTheMighty (talk) 01:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Already deleted. --Ezarateesteban 22:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
COM:DW, copyrighted logo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is from Flickr and I obtained it using the Openverse. "Xavier Buaillon Logo Ferrari" by xavier buaillon is licensed under CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/?ref=openverse. The Man Without Fear scare 20:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- @The Man Without Fear Do you think Xavier Buaillon owns the rights to the Ferrari logo? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:License laudering and COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 22:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Galleria Passarella 1–2
[edit]The building was completed in 1957 by architect Luigi Mattioni (1914–1961). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2032.
- File:Babila, Milán, Italia - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Milano - edificio galleria Passarella 1-2.JPG
- File:Milano - panoramio (33).jpg
- File:Milano, Piazza San Babila (30191230564).jpg
- File:Milano, piazza San Babila 06.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Clearly COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: a building below ToO (which is quite high in Italy). Ruthven (msg) 12:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation Goroth (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung Goroth (talk) 07:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no CC license at source. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: flag of a non-notable constructed language. (Related article was speedily deleted on eswiki.) Omphalographer (talk) 20:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unofficial, self-created flag (per description). Omphalographer (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to have originated from the US federal government. Metadata shows that this has been editing in Adobe Photoshop, most likely from an earlier photo of his that has since been deleted for copyright violations. Woko Sapien (talk) 20:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Here's the deletion log of the earlier photo as well as a link to it outside of the Commons. Woko Sapien (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://accademiadellacrusca.it/it/contenuti/paolo-dachille-nuovo-vicepresidente-dellaccademia-della-crusca/25707 . Antonio1952 (talk) 20:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hjart as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Furesøbad 2001-2.jpg
They are not exact duplicates so pls discuss it 7 days. Sanandros (talk) 21:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sanandros Where do you see a difference? Hjart (talk) 02:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, the files are probably scanned, and when you compare them you see that they have somehow a different rotation. The difference is small but with direct comparions you see it.--Sanandros (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sanandros I'd say that the differences here are so insignificant, that they should be ignored. Hjart (talk) 07:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, the files are probably scanned, and when you compare them you see that they have somehow a different rotation. The difference is small but with direct comparions you see it.--Sanandros (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I agree they are the same image just in different size. Just replace the usage and keep File:Furesøbad 2001-2.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
It's just a process that pics which are not excact or scaled down duplicates need to pass a DR. I had already cases where the community decided not to delete the first pic, instead the not nominated pic.--Sanandros (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: replaced with better image. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Geologist from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau, Philippines at work in the field in Culion, Palawan.png
[edit]
Source webpage displays: © 2023 PIA MIMAROPA. No evidence found of CC-0 licence claimed by uploader. GeoWriter (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- It should be kept uploaded. As per Philippine law, all images created by Philippine government agencies are public domain. The Philippine Information Agency is a state agency. Paul Christian B. Yang-ed (talk) 21:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with proof that this is PD. Unlikely since it is hosted on a WP site. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope 125.237.216.164 21:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Not a work from the US administration CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
useless rasterisation of File:Great_Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_Etruria.svg 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 23:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Might be above COM:TOO Switzerland. Head in the centre of the logo fits "literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character, irrespective of their value or purpose" --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The description is bad, but to my knowledge (and the practice on dewiki) TOO in Switzerland is comparably high, so this is clearly below. However, I do not know why this should be relevant here, as this event was never hold in Switzerland. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, what does Switzerland have to do with this? This is the logo of the contest. Макар Соколов (talk) 13:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of Eurovision logo which has been deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/03#Threshold of originality for logos in Switzerland. Jonteemil (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not Need Asheesh Chandra Gupta (talk) 03:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, Yes need. 186.172.248.69 11:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Seems in scope; Category:Jagannath temples in India added. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Caulfield as no source (No source since) Krd 06:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We would need to check the logs on it.wiki, but when the given license is correct, that doesn't matter. I see no valid reason for deletion here. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Better sourcing would be preferred, but license seems in order. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
unidentified, low quality picture, made by me years ago Hugo.arg (talk) 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Kept. Used and good. 186.172.248.69 11:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use, enough info to be useful, not bad quality, no reason to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maps of Bangladesh
[edit]Claimed as own work by different users. These maps are originally taken from the previous version of Banglapedia (Banglapedia.org), which are currently not available on the website, but some of their maps are archived on Wayback Machine. As these files are copyrighted by Banglapedia, they should be deleted.
— Haseeb (talk) 09:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
From a Flickr account that appears to host screenshots and other 3rd party content. Likely Flickrwashing. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adding two other images by same Flickr account. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
False claim of copyright, image is taken from internet. Available at multiple sources. Dsvyas (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: "fake map" acc. to uploader Enyavar (talk) 12:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
File claims PD-old and "unknown author", as if the photograph itself held no copyright. This argument is made explicit on it:, where the uploader basically claims that the photograph is PD-ineligible. On Commons, we tend to consider that all photographs of 3D objects are copyrighted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source page says "Images: Alamy", with no indication of free use permission PamD (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hello, I apologize, please do delete if infringing on copyright Sbad61 (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The picture is already on the internet in 2019 according to TinEye, Also it does not come from Flickr CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Book cover. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Source page says "Images:Alamy" and gives no indication of availability for use PamD (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
no proof of cc-by-sa and artist is not the uploader Culex (talk) 15:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Sankar 1995 (talk) 15:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. Could be used e.g. to illustrate an article about nude recreation. Image quality is good. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry Sankar 1995 (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Not "totally blurry"; good enough for another user to recognize species. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Flickrwashing. Account has 0 followers etc and this photo is credited to Andy Jessop Gbawden (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. No evidence in the source link that file is licensed under CC0 1.0. 水餃喵 (talk) 17:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ya e subido un archivo totalmente actualizado del mismo Josegr oficial (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The artist was dead in 2022. Not free of rights. gpesenti (talk) 17:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_RphDu RphDu (talk) 17:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The artist was dead in 2022. Not free of rights. gpesenti (talk) 17:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_RphDu RphDu (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The artist was dead in 2022. Not free of rights. gpesenti (talk) 17:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_RphDu RphDu (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
AI generated portraits of non-existent US politicians, and fake signature and campaign poster. From the sandbox articles about them on enwiki this is Grand Theft Auto fan fiction. (eg. Tim Holt is described in his infobox as U.S. House of Representatives from San Andreas' 1st district where San Andreas is a wikilink to en:GTA V; all fictional links within the article go to the GTA V page.) Even with images identified correctly, this is out of COM:SCOPE for Commons as a personal fiction project.
- File:TIm Holt Congressman.png
- File:Linda Gutirrez official portrait.png
- File:Erin A. Davis Senate Portrait.png
- File:Erin A. Davis Signature.png
- File:Jim Donovan for Governor.jpg
- File:Jim Donovan 2014.png
Belbury (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete hoax politicians Dronebogus (talk) 23:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
These are town works rather than state works, so {{PD-MAGov}} does not apply.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Low res image from a likely Flickrwashing account Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. We have better photos of reality. 186.172.248.69 11:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Johan van Gurp go around as Laura? 181.43.0.4 19:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: No evidence of free license from photographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Internet file 181.43.0.4 19:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Old picture 181.43.0.4 19:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason. How old? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; bogus license, bogus date claim. Old but not old enough to be sure to be PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1927: Could be PD but not own work. 181.43.0.4 19:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No source info, person shown lived into the 1970s, no free license established. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The Logo of Stanford University is copyrighted 80.187.106.90 18:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- When was the logo created? --99of9 (talk) 12:34, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: probably old enough Jcb (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QuickQuokka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted, highly unlikely to be own work. Seal is not in the public domain, as it meets COM:TOO and hasn't expired (it was made in 2002). More info about the seal
Previously kept at DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Per [1], this is the 2002 version. I think the critical determining factor is whether the changes since the 1920 version exceed COM:TOO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: I would argue that yes, these changes are above the ToO, because the text was changed, trees were removed and the hills in the background were quite significantly changed. --QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 22:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Hope we talk about the same logos - you mean the differences between version 4 (around 1920) and version 5 (2002). "The text was changed". Yes, from "organized 1891" to "1891". "Trees were removed". Really? Oh, these small dots are gone. "The hills in the background were quite significantly changed". That's what Stanford meant by "simplified landscaping" - and that's all there is. Main text is identical, as is the large tree (completely the same) and the layout of the picture as such. Clearly not above treshold of originality. Vysotsky (talk) 23:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts and Vysotsky: I would argue that the simplification of the landscape is above the ToO. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 12:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Couple of points to note. (a) The seal is trademarked even if it is out of copyright and (b) the seal has a wrong color (wrong shade of red). I note that Stanford claims copyright https://identity.stanford.edu/visual-identity/stanford-logos/#copyright Erp (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, three interesting remarks. (a) To my best knowledge, if one uses a trademarked out of copyright image, one only has a problem when using the trademark as a trademark. (b) If the seal has a wrong color, please upload a different image with the correct version. (c) Stanford can't claim copyright for out-of-copyright images. Vysotsky (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Couple of points to note. (a) The seal is trademarked even if it is out of copyright and (b) the seal has a wrong color (wrong shade of red). I note that Stanford claims copyright https://identity.stanford.edu/visual-identity/stanford-logos/#copyright Erp (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts and Vysotsky: I would argue that the simplification of the landscape is above the ToO. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 12:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: I would argue that yes, these changes are above the ToO, because the text was changed, trees were removed and the hills in the background were quite significantly changed. --QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 22:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion; info corrected, trademark notice seems sufficent. (Unused dupe svg with false claims deleted). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
arms granted 1985 => not in public domain + file not made by uploader => copyvio 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, artist Costas Varotsos is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- As explained by Wikimedia foundation itself, italian cultural heritage that is permanently exposed in a public location is not subject to any reproduction limit. Giuseppe Masino (talk) 16:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Additionally Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_in_Italy/MiBAC holds here. Giuseppe Masino (talk) 17:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Giuseppe Masino MiBAC authorization only covers public domain works that are subject to cultural heritage restrictions like Colosseum, Statue of David, and the old buildings of Venice. MiBAC authorization does not extend to modern sculptures; commercial license permission from Costas Varotsos is still required. See {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}}; modern sculptures are not cultural heritage objects of Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per JWilz12345. It's ridiculous that every minor modern piece of artwork is a "cultural heritage monument" or whatever. That clearly isn't the intend behind the MiBAC authorization. It's also questionable that municipalities even have the ability to allow Wiki Loves Monuments or anyone else to take pictures of the "monuments" to begin with since the copyright law about national, provincial and municipal administrations being entitled to copyright on works created and published under their name and on their behalf and expense seems to only apply with written, published works by authors. Although that could just be the wording in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy but there's zero evidence everything created on behalf of the Italian government is PD regardless. And it still doesn't address the copyright status of said work in the United States either. More then likely the statue isn't free of copyright in the United States even if it is in Italy. Although it probably isn't free of copyright there either. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
unused formula image; can better be typeset in TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same applies to:
- File:Img1negod.png
- File:Img2negod.png
- File:Img3negod.png
- File:Img4negod.png
- File:Img5negod.png
- File:Img6negod.png
- File:Img7negod.png
- File:Img8negod.png
- File:Img9negod.png
- File:Img11negod.png
- File:Img12negod.png
- File:Img13negod.png
- File:Img14negod.png
all uploaded by Soaressmatheus on 16 Dec 2019. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1960 by architect Luigi Mattioni (1914–1961). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright terms of France lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2032 A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: A building that apparently is below ToO. It doesn't appear in the list of protected buildings from the Italian Ministry [2]. Ruthven (msg) 15:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated. Artist Luigi Mattioni died in 1961 A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep See previous DR (closed as kept) PaterMcFly (talk) 11:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, the Italian copyright law protects architecture. The list of protected buildings provided by MIBACT (archived copy) does not appear to mention about rights of the architect but more of what classifies a building as a fine art that is eligible for protection by the cultural ministry: (translation of the heading paragraph) Unlike what was generally established by Law 633/41 for the protection of copyright (competence before the Presidency of the Council of Ministers and only since 1995 of the MiBACT) the recognition of the particular artistic character has always been, by explicit provision of article 15 of the R.D. 1369/42, of the authority responsible for the protection of the "Fine Arts". It was therefore possible to find the decrees issued since the entry into force of the Law by consulting the archives of the various offices of the MiBACT. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep it's a regular building, there are many like this one in Milan. Clearly below ToO.--Friniate (talk) 20:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per JWilz12345. Sure, buildings have basic shapes, but so what? This one actually has some unique architectural elements if you zoom in the image. For instance the rectangular protruding window frames on the front of the building and the third story rooftop garden on the side. It's clearly not just a regular, generic building shape. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Yesken Sergebayev
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Kazakhstan.
- File:Akhmet Zhubanov 1.jpg
- File:Al Farabi 1.jpg
- File:Al Farabi 2.jpg
- File:Al Farabi 3.jpg
- File:Nurgisa Tlendiyev 2.jpg
- File:Nurgisa Tlendiyev 3.jpg
- File:Temirbek Zhurgenov 1.jpg
- File:Памятник Аль-Фараби, скульптор Сергебаев Е.А..jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Please note that these are photos of my father's works, he is the actual author of these monuments and sculptures. Am I required to provide his consent on publishing the photos of his own works here on Wikipedia? These photographs belong to my father which is why I've uploaded them to his page.
- Thank you
- BR,
- Ayana Sergebayeva Ayana Sergebayeva (talk) 07:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Ayana Sergebayeva. Since your father is alive, he would be the one who would need to provide consent. Please read COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Unclear source; "private archive" is not acceptable, we don't know when the pic was published for the first time Carnby (talk) 05:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The image is public domain and is not copyrighted.
- Almay, a large commercial database with millions of public domain photographs (including this one), states that this photograph "is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright. Alamy charges you a fee for access to the high resolution [7.2 MB] copy of the image."
- https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-ferruccio-busoni-photographed-in-1916-139872794.html?imageid=76B63AFE-92A8-46B6-BA92-7B8231EC5900&p=699200&pn=1&searchId=6316cfe2ee00b76fc35dd102812c73ad&searchtype=0Bold 67.217.124.142 21:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- The public domain status of this picture is readily accessible. 67.217.124.142 21:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-EU-no author disclosure. —holly {chat} 01:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal"
[edit]Professional photos with no meaningful exif and the ones that do are credited to someone else. File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Cemetery-Wall 02.jpg was found here in 2015 https://parissoweto.org/2015/06/23/mr-cat-the-jackal/ - PCP
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Forest 05.jpg
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-The-Flood.jpg
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Apocalypse-Appreciation-Society 01.jpg
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Cemetery-Wall 02.jpg
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Tied-and-bound.jpg
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Apocalypse-Appreciation-Society 04.jpg
- File:Mr-Cat -and-The-Jackal-Forge-03.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted to Gerry Armstrong and Caroline Letkeman. The file was uploaded by a user called Gerry Armstrong, though it is not clear that it is the same Gerry Armstrong as the copyright holder. Caroline Letkeman took the photo, yet has not given permission for the photo to be used. SilkTork (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Low quality image anyway Feoffer (talk) 04:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
According to the source, https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/copyright (English version: https://www.government.nl/copyright), CC0 does not apply to images and it is therefor (according to the source) not permitted to reuse this photo. Mondo (talk) 11:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This image was uploaded 16 October 2012. The copyright notices of 14 October 2012 (before upload) and 15 January 2013 (after upload) indicate that CC0 applies, unless stated differently. To check that the latter did not apply, there has been License review. --Lymantria (talk) 12:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Be that as it may, the photos aren't available on the site's archive (only the article text is), so there's no way to confirm or deny whether or not the photos were freely available at the time. Even your license review page says so: “This method cannot tell if the image was ever freely available, however.”
- In fact, because the photos weren't archived at all, it does seem to be because of a copyright thing. I mean: if copyright wasn't applicable on the photos back then, they would've added them to the archive. For reference: here's the archived version of the article where the photos were initially taken from: https://archief28.sitearchief.nl/archives/sitearchief/20180227030550/https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2012/04/04/nieuwe-snelweg-tussen-venlo-en-duitsland-geopend You can clearly see the photos are unavailable for a reason. Mondo (talk) 11:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- And here are direct links to the two photos (there are actually three, but one of them is a map, and this one clearly isn't a map) that could potentially be the one in question:
- https://archief28.sitearchief.nl/archives/sitearchief/20180227030550/https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/large/content/gallery/rijksoverheid/content-afbeeldingen/ministeries/ienm/2012/03/pwij20120320-00265.jpg
- https://archief28.sitearchief.nl/archives/sitearchief/20180227030550/https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/large/content/gallery/rijksoverheid/content-afbeeldingen/ministeries/ienm/2012/03/pwij20120320-00225.jpg
- They clearly say that they aren't part of the archive. Again: if copyright wasn't an issue, they would've added them to the archive. So then we fall back to the license review that you linked that says “This method cannot tell if the image was ever freely available, however.” So at best, it's questionable whether or not these photos were ever freely available. Mondo (talk) 11:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I have contacted the Rijksoverheid to hopefully clear this up. They only answer questions Mo-Fri, though, so we may have to wait a few days. Mondo (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- UPDATE 2: They just informed me that they have forwarded the question to the backoffice, so we may have to wait a few days longer. Mondo (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- UPDATE 3: I'm still waiting for the backoffice to respond… Mondo (talk) 20:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- UPDATE 2: They just informed me that they have forwarded the question to the backoffice, so we may have to wait a few days longer. Mondo (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I have contacted the Rijksoverheid to hopefully clear this up. They only answer questions Mo-Fri, though, so we may have to wait a few days. Mondo (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The whole point of license review is that a trusted user who knows what they're doing validates that the stated license is correct. That being the case, absent any evidence to the contrary, we should trust that Armbrust got it correct. —holly {chat} 01:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Milicevic01 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Description says: Label and copyright Radio televizija Srbije Smooth O (talk) 12:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This is official Youtube chanel of RTS (Radio Televion Serbia) and video is published under Youtube Creative Commons Attribution license. --Smooth O (talk) 12:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- One contradicts the other, my gess is it was set by mistake under CC license Milićević (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also "Zabranjeno svako kopiranje video i/ili audio snimka i postavljenje na druge kanale!" translation: Its prohibited any kind of copying video or audio recording and uploading on other channels --Milićević (talk) 17:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment From the person who uploaded it: it's technically not RTS's channel, but it's the Youtube channel of the TV show that's being aired on RTS, and by transition I figured that it's allowed since RTS should probably own both channels. I don't have that much copyright experience, so due to lack of experience or knowledge I won't object in any way to the file being deleted, and I'll leave the debate to more experienced Community members. - VredanCovek (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; CC-licensed works are still copyrighted, they're just not "all rights reserved". —holly {chat} 01:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Clearly not own work. I was unable to find any clear information on whether state government works are public domain in Texas, but I suspect they aren't. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
useless rasterisation of file:Imperial Crown of Austria (Heraldry).svg 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:7C4C:5FA5:FD9B:FA1 22:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- the file was broken when I uploaded it plus it's bigger Gaius Khufus Caesar (talk) 22:06, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; SVG files are infinitely scalable. —holly {chat} 19:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
ложные сведения об авторе и лицензии https://ru.armeniasputnik.am/20181107/teni-erevanskoj-kanatnoj-dorogi-vse-kak-koshmarnyh-snah-15513093.html -- Tomasina (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of an app CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Just technical drawings, nothing copyrightable IMHO. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works, not PD in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-05#File:Statue-of-Date-Masamune-in-Aobayama-Park-Sendai-2016.jpg.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Probably a problematic case, {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} isn't a valid tag for files uploaded after 1 March 2012, its US permission would still required. Y.haruo, the case you linked isn't useful here as that file has entered PD in US during UDR discussion, but for this particular case, waiting for 1 January 2055 would be better. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Well, that's not true. In the United States, only works published after 1977 have a copyright term of 70 years after the author's death. Works published before that have a term of protection with copyright of 95 years
fromafter the publication. That file has not entered PD in US during UDR discussion. Please look at Commons:Hirtle chart for the details. And that file was uploaded in 2020 after URAA was discussed.I see your point, but that UDR discussion is different than that. Y.haruo (talk) 06:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)--Y.haruo (talk) 01:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)(corrected for the mistake)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Well, that's not true. In the United States, only works published after 1977 have a copyright term of 70 years after the author's death. Works published before that have a term of protection with copyright of 95 years
Kept: per discussion. It would probably be restored at UDR using the same arguments as the linked discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Caulfield as no source (No source since) Krd 06:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We would need to check the logs on it.wiki, but when the given license is correct, that doesn't matter. I see no valid reason for deletion here. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD in Italy and the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Caulfield as no source (No source since) Krd 06:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We would need to check the logs on it.wiki, but when the given license is correct, that doesn't matter. I see no valid reason for deletion here. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1994 photograph, this is public domain in Italy but not the US. Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This a scanned photograph. Date given is not accurate as subject died in 1980. Unlikely to be Uploader's Own Work as claimed. Could be in Public Domain if photographer is anonymous and image created before 1973 (assuming it was taken in Mali and Mali copyright laws apply.) Headlock0225 (talk) 09:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello
- this is a personal photography issued from family archive. I’ve inserted the date when I’ve uploaded the file but of course the photo has been taken in the 80th. Hubert de Vauplane (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Hubert,
- Thank you for responding. I am assuming you are not the photographer. If then you want to keep this image on Commons then the only hope is to prove that this photograph is in the Public Domain. To do this we need
- 1) confirmation that the photograph was taken in Mali (to determine applicable law)
- 2) a date even approximate when the photo was taken
- please could supply this information either by replying to this message or editing the file. Headlock0225 (talk) 06:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Headlock0225 (talk)
- Your assumption is right. I made a copy of this photo which comes from personal and family archives as said. I can confirm that the photo has been taken in Mali by one member o the family of the bishop during the 70th. I don't know precisely the date.
- regards, Hubert de Vauplane (talk) 07:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hubert,
- Unfortunately I got it wrong above. Mali copyright is 70 years after creation for anonymous works. So the photo would have to taken before 1953 to put it in the Public Domain. Apologies but it looks like the photograph is still in copyright. Headlock0225 (talk) 20:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Headlock0225 (talk)
- just one question for you : how can you assume this photo is under copyright when I tell you this is a personal and family photo ? What can i do to demonstrate this a a non copyright photo ?
- regards
- hubert 2A01:CB06:8070:A41D:E448:CF49:2ECD:67A2 19:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry Headlock0225 (talk) I forgot to log in.
- hubert Hubert de Vauplane (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just because it is a "personal and family" photo does not exempt it from Copyright. The Copyright belongs to the photographer. Under Mali law this expires 70 years after the photographer's death. If the photographer is unknown than it is 70 years after the photograph's creation. With Copyright lapsed, it falls into the Public Domain.
- So the photograph is not Public Domain. The only option is to get permission of the photographer (assuming they are still alive). There is a couple of ways of doing this but let me know if the photographer can be traced first. Headlock0225 (talk) 10:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1970s photograph from Mali. Would either need VRT permission from heir of photographer or for us to wait until it becomes public domain. Undelete in 2075. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Found here before upload - https://www.theaureview.com/music/track-of-the-day-the-teskey-brothers-hold-me-2019/ - credited to Al Parkinson - only upload of this user so unlikely this is Parkinson. Needs OTRS to keep Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the rationale for deletion flawed. I personally messaged the band's manager and had him upload the image. The "unlikely this is Parkinson" claim is not accurate and there is no evidence that it is not. The person uploaded one image because I requested. Lightburst (talk) 23:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Normally, I would say VRT is required here, but the online version is smaller than the uploaded one, and ours has full EXIF, so I think it's fair to COM:AGF in this case. —holly {chat} 01:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I agree with Holly, we can AGF. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
above COM:TOO China. Larryasou (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above the ToO in China. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Niet door de uploader gemaakt, geen vrijgave bekend. Thieu1972 (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's delivered by Patrick Boot, the owner of NNZ with the question to add it to the page. Just like the "koninklijke" notification that's been added by their request. Ivo Nijboer (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Ivo Nijboer: For such cases we should have a documented permission by the photographer/rights holder that it is ok to upload the photo here under a free license. The photographer should send an e-mail to the Commons Volunteer Response Team; see COM:VRT for the procedure. The same is true for File:Koninklijke NNZ Group.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Geen correcte vrijgave. Geen rechtenvrije foto. Thieu1972 (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's delivered by Patrick Boot by mail, with the question to add it to their NNZ page. Why a deletion? Ivo Nijboer (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: looks a lot like the miniature of this YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q-XEuBYQTs CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I've looked through the YouTube video and, while I see some photos of this individual in the same outfit, I don't see anything that could be this exact image. @CoffeeEngineer: Would you be willing to expand upon your deletion rationale a little bit? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk: it seems really suspect to me that a picture looking a bit like a picture made during a photoshoot has been uploaded by an account for which it is its only upload. For me it is a promo picture that has been found, then uploaded to Commons. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. —holly {chat} 20:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
