Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Hgujhyuj 2605:BA00:4138:155:FD66:6234:D89A:C194 01:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: test or vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 06:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shobhit Gupta Model (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal self promotional images that are outside the scope of this project
- File:Sheraton Grand Palace Indore 1.jpg
- File:Sheraton Grand Palace Indore 2.jpg
- File:Sheraton Grand Palace Indore 3.jpg
Herby talk thyme 11:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 12:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, poor lighting and composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poorly photographed penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
image posted in error - not applicable to intended contributions 2001:569:7E66:A100:DD37:527:2766:3D0A 07:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Sorry. Forgot to login prior to deletion nomination: image posted in error - not applicable to intended contributions Smexp (talk) 07:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
I have uploaded it wrongly Taurusofficial (talk) 08:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kompas.com is copyright protected content Albinfo (talk) 10:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claim, website clearly states "Copyright 2008 - 2023 PT. Kompas Cyber Media (Kompas Gramedia Digital Group). All rights reserved. kompascom ". --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
useless image with bad description, not used in any page OGNelson9 (talk) 19:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright protected content > source BBC Albinfo (talk) 10:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
not used. Methewle (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- It is used in about 30 articles. Carlos yo (Discusión) 13:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: used. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 04:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 04:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lil Mexico Lingo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal self promotional images that appear to be outside the scope of our project
- File:MEXICO.png
- File:Young Money.png
- File:Illuminati.png
- File:Day Ones.png
- File:Brother.png
- File:Brothers.png
- File:Lingo.png
- File:Artist.png
- File:Familia.png
- File:LilMexicoLingo.png
- File:Jeffery Frank Walters ll.png
- File:LIL MEXICO LINGO.png
- File:Record Làbel.jpg
- File:Sole Owner.jpg
- File:Lil Mexico Lingo.jpg
- File:Tha Lingo.png
- File:Brothers Keeper.png
- File:Mexican Mafia.png
- File:LINGO.png
- File:Jeffery Frank Walters LL.png
- File:Mexican.png
- File:LIL MEXICO.png
- File:Stay Paid.png
- File:10. Toes.png
- File:Legends.png
- File:Mi Familia.png
- File:Aka Young Money.png
- File:Ymcmb.png
- File:Money Man.png
- File:CEO Of Rap Music.jpg
Herby talk thyme 10:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, sock of User:YMCMB Young Money Records LLC. --Achim55 (talk) 08:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted work Xfansd (talk) 03:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear case, false license claim. "Free to download" does not necessarily mean free licensed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused photo of uploader himself, the user's only upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily (COM:CSD#G4). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagrams, out of project scope
- File:Bengal Parliament 2045.svg
- File:Republic of Bengal Parliament 2040.svg
- File:Republic of Bengal Parliament 2035.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-06-17-06-37-15-342033-11190600469021292848.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament 2035.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament 2030.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament 2040.svg
- File:AandN2030.svg
- File:AandN Islands.svg
- File:A.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]fake diagrams, misleading data. West Bengal assembly has 294 seats
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-02-12-36-50-396842-16212686351913243482.svg
- File:Bengal House of Representatives, Parliament Parliament 2023.svg
- File:Bengal house of representatives Parliament 2025.svg
- File:Republic of Bengal House of Representative Parliament 2025.svg
- File:Bengal House of Representative Parliament 2025.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not own works, no source, wrong license.
- File:Sukanta Majumdar.jpg
- File:Bubagra.jpg
- File:Manik Saha CM of Tripura.jpg
- File:Sudip Roy Barman INC.jpg
- File:AWg2xM1t 400x400.jpg
- File:Indian Secular Front.jpg
- File:Indian Communist.webp
- File:AbbasISF.jpg
Yann (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Meaningless and likely fictitious political diagrams – see previous mass DRs of this user's files.
- File:AIMLBENGAL.svg
- File:Bengalcongress.svg
- File:BengalKing.svg
- File:BECPIINC.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-07-07-50-53-143202-17496110479291107288.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-05-11-50-37-960757-8380466473500137627.svg
SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Also in the same vein:
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-22-02-22-39-543350-17554360943410084685.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-22-02-21-12-007245-1202180064590759093.svg
Enyavar (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright Photo Prasenjeet 333 (talk) 15:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Nourerrahmane (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)mistake upload
Kept: no reason. --Krd 11:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, permission from István Kiss is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania. Artist Bocskai Vince is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 06:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Stones poster in the window of the old Bricklayers Arms pub where they had their first rehearsal in the 1960s - 51378158964.jpg
[edit]No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Violation of artists' copyright. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine, and this commercially-licensed photo has independent economic significance that can be disadvantageous for the artists. Per this site, the artists are: I. Sonsyadlo as the sculptor and V. Babiy as the architect. The sculpture dates to 1991. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Violation of artists' copyright. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine, and this commercially-licensed photo has independent economic significance that can be disadvantageous for the artists. Per this site, the artists are: I. Sonsyadlo as the sculptor and V. Babiy as the architect. The sculpture dates to 1991. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Violation of artists' copyright. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine, and this commercially-licensed photo has independent economic significance that can be disadvantageous for the artists. The sculpture ia right at the center and the file description is clear – that the statue is the intended subject. Per this site, the artists are: I. Sonsyadlo as the sculptor and V. Babiy as the architect. The sculpture dates to 1991. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Uploader is the subject in the photo. Requires COM:VRT from the original photographer. ✗plicit 13:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Photo of photo on display, no indication original is free licensed. COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW photo of photos Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo, no educational value. Lymantria (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW photo of photos. Possibly could be cropped to just show the 2 display cases at lower left. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW, collage of unsourced photos Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
"Photography in the metro is strictly prohibited, this is a sneak shot taken by one of the members of a railway group I'm member of. (May 2009)"
Flickr Uploader is not the photographer of this image. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Circa 1950s Swiss artwork. Could be public domain in Switzerland if published before 1953 but wouldn't be public domain in the US since it wasn't public domain in 1996. Abzeronow (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Used in a 2013 New York Times article. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/science/mystery-of-the-missing-women-in-science.html Artist is credited as Serge Bloch. Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot of a Facebook post. Abzeronow (talk) 19:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete, “youth” is very suspicious name. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just noting that a file with the same name (which is not that trivial) has already been deleted not so long ago. @Explicit, can you check if this is a reupload? RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's a different photo, but it appears to be the penis of the same individual as the previous user, just uploaded with a different account. ✗plicit 07:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, poor lighting and composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete weirdly psychedelic but that’s not an excuse Dronebogus (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Théâtre national de Chaillot
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Jean Niermans died in 1989
A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania. Artist Márton Izsák died in 2004
- File:Erdély, Marosvásárhely, 17.jpg
- File:Marosvásárhely 4.jpg
- File:Marosvásárhely 6.jpg
- File:Piata Trandafirilor, Targu Mures, Romania (5681880002).jpg
- File:Targu Mures, revolution statue.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Omphalographer; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 03:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Omphalographer; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maison Louis Carré
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Alvar Aalto died in 1976
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (32224948207).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (32224948547).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (40201887213).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (40201887523).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (40201887853).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (40201888213).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (40201888603).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (46252616655).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166731961).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166732481).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166732911).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166733351).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166733881).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166734171).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166734481).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166735021).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166735421).jpg
- File:Bazoches-sur-Guyonne - Maison Louis Carré (47166735841).jpg
- File:LouisCarre3.JPG
- File:Maison Louis Carre.jpg
- File:Maison Louis Carre2.jpg
- File:Maison Louis Carre3.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 03:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: a school calendar. Omphalographer (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of Europe
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Henry Bernard died in 1994
- File:2020-01-26 Council of Europe Palais de l-Europe close.jpg
- File:2020-01-26 Council of Europe Palais de l-Europe.jpg
- File:Conseil de l'Europe (Strasbourg) (1).jpg
- File:Conseil de l'Europe (Strasbourg) (2).jpg
- File:Council of Europe building (16265582622).jpg
- File:Council of Europe Flags.jpg
- File:Council of Europe, Strasbourg.jpg
- File:Council of europe.JPG
- File:Exterior Council of Europe 20000102.jpg
- File:Institutions europeennes IMG 4346.jpg
- File:Palais de l'europe et batiment b.JPG
- File:PartOfEuropeanCouncilBuilding.JPG
- File:Strasbourg EuropeConseil n01.JPG
- File:Strasbourg EuropeConseil n09.JPG
- File:Strasbourg TodorBozhinov (39).JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster, above COM:TOO UK A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope plain text PDF. Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for artistic works in the United States. Per Atlas Obscura article, the Papuan-themed sculptures "were created by a group of 10 Papua New Guinea artists who visited the campus in 1994." The sculptors at that time were aged from 27 to 73. 1994 is too recent to be eligible for any PD license like {{PD-US-no notice}}.
- File:IMG 2789–96 New Guinea.JPG
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "Gates of Hell" 6.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "Gates of Hell" 7.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Gates of Hell" 1.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Gates of Hell" 2.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Gates of Hell" 3.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Gates of Hell" 4.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Gates of Hell" 5.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Thinker" 1.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Thinker" 2.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Thinker" 3.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Thinker" 4.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, "The Thinker" 5.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, central area 1.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, central area 2.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, central area 3.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, central area 4 cutted.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, central area 4.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, central area 5.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, close-up of carved poles.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, eagle sculpture.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, front entrance 1.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, front entrance 2.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, front side of giant stool 1.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, front side of giant stool 2.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, painted Kwoma poles.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, rear side of the giant stool.jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University, with "The Thinker" and "The Gates of Hell".jpg
- File:Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden, "Gates of Hell" 8.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Per this site, this statue of Taras Shevchenko was unveiled in 1991. No sculptor is named, but this is still under copyright as an anonymous work. Ukrainian copyright law was amended in December 2022, but unfortunately, the Ukrainian government only gave a non-commercial FOP that is not OK for Wikimedia.
- File:Моя ТернопільщинаБор76.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, с. Стрілківці.jpg
- File:ТШDSCF9339 001.JPG – violates the non-commercial FOP of Ukraine as the statue still made this image having "independent economic significance", so that re-users can use this in postcards or tourism souvenir items to the detriment of the economic rights of the anonymous artist; there is another photo featuring the same building but with no statue included that does not violate non-commercial FOP
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Per this site, this statue of Taras Shevchenko was unveiled in 1954, and the sculptor was Y. Chaika. I haven't been able to determine when the sculptor died (immediate online search only gives links to stock photo sites like Alamy), but even if the sculptor died more than 70 years ago by now (public domain in Ukraine), the statue is eligible for US copyright. This means these photos should not be undeleted/restored until the statue's US copyright expires (95 years after 1954). US copyright can be ignored if Ukraine had commercial freedom of panorama. But unfortunately, the Ukrainian government – in amending the nation's copyright law in December 2022 – only gave a non-commercial FOP that is not OK for Wikimedia.
- File:61-250-0117 DSC 9607 Terebovla.jpg
- File:61-250-0117 Terebovlia IMG 1656.jpg
- File:Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Terebovlia 01.jpg
- File:Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Terebovlia 02.jpg
- File:Моя Тернопільщина Місто712.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Sculptor Yakiv Chaika dead in 1995. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- If that is the case, then the monument is unfree in its country of origin until January 1, 2066, 70+1 years after Chaika died. US copyright no longer matters as the monument enters US public domain on January 1, 2049 (95+1 years). Undelete in 2066 (or earlier if Ukrainian law becomes favorable for Wikimedia). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
More files of the same, unfree monument in Ukraine, which does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. These three images are all submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine.
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку 1954р м. Теребовля.jpg
- File:Теребовля, пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (1).jpg
- File:Теребовля, пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (2).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
It is a copy of other photo. Blueberry onion (talk) 10:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free art in Japan. See COM:FOP Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data, historical images without proper attribution and photos/scans of existing photos (File:Hamed albahili.png is an obvious screengrab),
- File:Hamed albahili.png
- File:مجموعة من ضباط اللواء 31 قبل هجوم المحمرة 1980.jpg
- File:Asad.Sh.4.jpg
- File:Asad.Sh9A.jpg
- File:IraqiSF1968.jpg
- File:Bariq Alhajj Hontaa Death proof.png
- File:Bariq Alhajj Hontaa 1989.png
- File:Bariq Alhajj Hontaa 1989-2.png
- File:Bariq Alhajj Hontaa 1990.png
- File:Bariq Alhajj Hontaa 1988.png
- File:Ihsan Wafiq Alsamarrai 2006.png
- File:Ihsan Wafiq Alsamarrai 2011.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IVickyChoudhary (talk · contribs)
[edit]the article where the image is used is nominated for deletion in wikipedia, if it is delete when you close this then please delete the file too for being out of scope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzi_Khan
Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission either. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IVickyChoudhary (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader does not hold rights, declares downloading from the internet COM:NETCOPYVIO
- File:Dev Menaria.jpg
- File:Siddharth mohan.jpg
- File:Dr-Bhushan-Kathuria.png
- File:Rakesh-kumar—tiwary.png
- File:ChaudharyMukeshSingh.jpg
- File:Mahendra singh.jpg
- File:JaiveerSinghMainpuri.jpg
- File:Jaiveer-singh.jpg
-- DaxServer (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Circa 1940s Italian photograph. IMDB doesn't list a photographer for the photo of w:Carlo Buti. It looks too artistic to be a simple photograph. It still may be public domain in Italy, but this was not public domain in Italy in 1996 due to wartime extensions. Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:5CA:B500:88F3:AC53:8284:5404 19:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- From Which website this photo is a copyvio ? It is not enought to write "Copyright violation" if a clue is not provided. In such case model {{no permission since}} could be used. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete See the watermark "Farouk Toumi Photography". We need an authorization from this photographer to keep the picture. Furthermore, this picture is already published on multiple non free websites, like this one since October 2019 (before date of upload). --Titlutin (talk) 23:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:5CA:B500:88F3:AC53:8284:5404 19:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- From Which website these photos are copyvio ? It is not enought to write "Copyright violation" if a clue is not provided. In such case model {{no permission since}} could be used. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No true description, no detail is mentioned about all those pictures (date, place it was taken, author, etc). At least one photo is copyrighted: the one with the tram at the bottom (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rue tripoli hdey.jpg). A website's URL is visible on the B&W one, so probably not free either. I have strong doubts about all the other pics. --Titlutin (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 08:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 08:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 08:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 08:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 08:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 08:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Table of Silence
[edit]No FOP in Romania
- File:Masa tacerii , Sculptura lui Constantin Brancusi.jpg
- File:Masa tăcerii cu 12 scaune rotunde .jpg
- File:RO GJ - Masa tăcerii cu 12 scaune rotunde.jpg
- File:Targu Jiu 1.jpg
- File:TgJiuGJ (3).JPG
Lophotrochozoa (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment It has been declared Historical momunent in Romania. Does the copyright apply as the same? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:35, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: but undelete 2028. JuTa 21:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Table of Silence
[edit]Sculpture by Brancusi (d. 1957), located in Romania (see en:Sculptural Ensemble of Constantin Brâncuși at Târgu Jiu) where there is no FOP.
- File:Masa tacerii (Targu Jiu).JPG
- File:Masa Tacerii 2014-08-04-0769.jpg
- File:Masa tacerii de Constantin Brancusi.jpg
- File:Masa tacerii din Targu Jiu.jpg
- File:Masa Tacerii.jpg
- File:Masa tăcerii din Târgu Jiu img-07044.jpg
- File:Masa tăcerii din Târgu Jiu img-07045.jpg
- File:Masa tăcerii din Târgu Jiu img-07046.jpg
- File:Masa tăcerii din Târgu Jiu img-07048.jpg
- File:Masa tăcerii din Târgu Jiu img-07049.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 00:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Table of Silence
[edit]No FoP in Romania. Artist Constantin Brâncuși died in 1957
- File:Der Tisch des Schweigens von Constantin Brancusi in Targu-Jiu Rumänien.tif
- File:Masa tăcerii.JPG
- File:Monumentul "Masa Apostolilor Neamului" - Constantin Brâncuși (28720150411) (2).jpg
- File:Suspine.jpg
- File:Table of Silence in Winter, Brancusi - panoramio.jpg
- File:✵ The Last Supper ✵ (28184817524).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1938 work; the files can be restored in 2034 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content; likely self-promotion. Omphalographer (talk) 03:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Admiral Rickover descends into the nuclear reactor shell at the Shippingport Power Facility (14492227730).jpg
[edit]Source states, "Courtesy of LIFE magazine." Ooligan (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Photo is from Life Feb 18, 1957, page 23. Credited photographer is Life staffer Yale Joel (per the table of contents); since he's staff, copyright would belong to the magazine and Life would have had to reapply for copyright by 1985 (28 years later), which it looks like they did. Delete sadly. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. The file can be restored in 2053. --Rosenzweig τ 06:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
No release by the Photographer Tobias Koch. Tohma (talk) 12:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023071410007796 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 06:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Late 1930s or early 1940s photograph. More information on when and where this was first published would be needed to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" Generally images found in circulation have been made public at creation, images where we have a clear provenance that they have been unseen in an archive as a negative remain unpublished. We have several unpublished German collections from the state archive, release as CC. --RAN (talk) 23:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- If this is from a state archive that releases as CC, please provide a source. Otherwise, we need to know where and when this was first published since URAA could apply depending on where this was published. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine the copyright status of this image. The claim that it is anonymous is not supported by any evidence at all. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Nothing more than the text "Check sum 45kidh349". Useless and outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 1958, that is less then 70 years ago M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ca. 1948 work; the file can be restored in 2044 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 06:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 1958, that is less then 70 years ago M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undated work; the file can be restored in 2054 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:1,1-Dihydroxyacetone-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused media about fictional country.
- File:Consthol.png
- File:Liberalth.png
- File:Assembly1st.svg
- File:NationalAssembly.png
- File:Senate1.png
- File:Election1.png
- File:ThallandMap.png
- File:Thollandflag.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
fictitious flag. Collage with several images of unknown authorship. Problematic user
Estopedist1 (talk) 08:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
too blurry. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Nonsensical picture of a mobile phone screen, no use Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 09:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fawadnajam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused files. Promo. Out of project scope. It is also possible to delete third file (File:Structural Cross-sections - Analysis and Design.jpg)
- File:Structural Cross-sections-Analysis and Design.jpg
- File:Structural Cross-sections - Analysis and Design.png
Estopedist1 (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles Mashahary (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be personal self promotional images. I don't see where they fir into the scope of this project
- File:Swlailangbai (Acoustic Version) cover art image.jpg
- File:Swlailangbai cover art image.jpg
- File:GWJWN song cover art image.jpg
- File:SIMANG song cover art image.jpg
- File:The Bodo R&B, Pop singer Charles Mashahary.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary, Studio Shoot Pic.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary the bodo singer pics.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary album shoot BTS photos.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary with Fender Guitar pics.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary the rising star photos.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary Photo.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary Photos.jpg
- File:Charles Mashahary image.jpg
- File:Bodo singer Charle$ pic.jpg
- File:GWSW Cover Art.jpg
- File:Bodo singer Charles Mashahary.jpg
- File:Charle$ Mashahary.jpg
Herby talk thyme 10:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's not a self promotion the song is already been released on my YouTube and out on many streaming platforms too Charles Mashahary (talk) 10:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhimarao vck (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be personal images and self promotional maybe. I don't see they are within the scope of this project
- File:Bhimaraocvk.jpg
- File:Bhimaraovck.jpg
- File:Vck14.jpg
- File:Vck13.jpg
- File:Bhimarao kanmaipatti.jpg
- File:Vck10.jpg
- File:Vck9.jpg
- File:Vck7.jpg
- File:Vck6.jpg
- File:Vck4.jpg
- File:Vck1.jpg
- File:Bhimarovck.jpg
- File:Viduthalaikkalam.jpg
- File:Bhimarao vck.jpg
- File:Melavalavu murugesan-viduthalaichiruthaigal katchi.jpg
Herby talk thyme 10:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Nominated some as copyvios. A09 (talk) 11:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:شیخ شوخ سجاد کشاورز شیخ شوخ اجرای جشن.jpg
- File:شیخ شوخ . سجاد کشاورز شیخ شوخ اجرای جشن.jpg
- File:حجت السلام سجاد کشاورز شیخ شوخ.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE since it is a text that can be found in Wikipedia. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope image; promotional and not in use 20 upper 17:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE and not promotional as an image. If you'd like to tweak the file description (as long as you keep the link for attribution), you can do that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 21:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Assumed copyrighted painting by Dean Larson Ooligan (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep But this image doesn't show the painting that is being unveiled. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly, The original photo has been cropped and has now replaced the original photograph that had the artwork. The current photo is good. -- Ooligan (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The portrait is cropped away. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, @RandomUserGuy1738 The current photo is good. Please, rename your file with a meaningful name. -- Ooligan (talk) 01:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note to closing Admin. Please, rev del the original upload. Thanks, --
- Ooligan (talk) 01:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 21:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Assumed copyrighted painting by Dean Larson Ooligan (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep But this image doesn't show the painting that is being unveiled. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly, The original photo has been cropped and has now replaced the original photograph that had the artwork. The current photo is good. -- Ooligan (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The portrait is cropped away. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, @RandomUserGuy1738 The current photo is good. Please, rename your file with a meaningful name. -- Ooligan (talk) 01:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note to closing Admin. Please, rev del the original upload. Thanks, --
- Ooligan (talk) 01:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- It would still be good to know whether the portrait wouldn't be PD as well, because it's made as work-for-hire for the Senate. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:21, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 21:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Assumed copyrighted painting by Dean Larson. Ooligan (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep But this image doesn't show the painting that is being unveiled. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly, The original photo has been cropped and has now replaced the original photograph that had the artwork. The current photo is good. -- Ooligan (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The portrait is cropped away. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, @RandomUserGuy1738 The current photo is good. Please, rename your file with a meaningful name. -- Ooligan (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note to closing Admin. Please, rev del the original upload. Thanks, --
- Ooligan (talk) 01:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. +Cropped, rev deleted the old version. --Kadı Message 21:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Pareja linda 186.175.209.17 20:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete, it's a movie poster (https://onedio.com/haber/latin-amerika-da-gerceklesen-latin-yildizlari-odulleri-nde-en-iyi-yabanci-dizi-odulunu-turk-dizisi-aldi-1035976) Belbury (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
i doubt this photo is free licensed. please show us some proof that it is free licensed. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- why it is copyvio? because it is looks like "photo of paper" and low resolution(could be taken from internet). ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Extrated from Hughes's Twitter. Copyright violation. https://twitter.com/JakeHughesRace/status/1597638545057157121/photo/1 XxAlanEZExX (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sadinormatov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artwork collection, most of them may not have value for the project.
- File:Yoqa.jpg
- File:Gorillamango.jpg
- File:Abdurozik.jpg
- File:Nd8.jpg
- File:Fathulloev.jpg
- File:Allworks.jpg
- File:Snart2.jpg
- File:Snart1.jpg
- File:Sadinormatov.jpg
Zaxxon0 (talk) 22:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I didn't knew what I was doing back then. Filmman3000 (talk) 01:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
The copyrighted picture from "https://www.facebook.com/youthministryofholytrinitychurchalgiers/?locale=fr_FR ↗" was uploaded to Flickr to circumvent copyright restrictions. Riad Salih (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: the watermark on the photo is not the same as the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.senat.fr/senateur/lherbier_brigitte19581d.html Culex (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Created as an advertisement. --Karim talk to me :)..! 11:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-educational out of scope obvious vanity image, per the description. Commons is not a personalized photo album. Acabashi (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seifedin Redi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: plain text content; looks like attempts to create enwiki articles. (If you are the uploader: please read en:Help:Your first article.)
Omphalographer (talk) 03:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ppoentje013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused files. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED.
- File:SystemDMG2.png
- File:SystemDMG.png
- File:TradeTerminal.png
- File:TargettingTable.png
- File:ChunksImg1.png
- File:ChatTable2.png
- File:ChatTable.png
- File:CombatGraph1.png
Estopedist1 (talk) 08:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahboubim210 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is no private web host.
- File:Poser.png
- File:Opoo.jpg
- File:Himsha.png
- File:Hnnn.png
- File:Nevercryy.png
- File:Neverrr.png
- File:Aha.png
- File:Okk.png
- File:Reoi.png
- File:Rann.png
- File:Jhh.png
- File:Hjjj.png
Achim (talk) 19:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahboubim210 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused files. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED.
Estopedist1 (talk) 08:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adityarathore125sp (talk · contribs)
[edit]A lot of these look like video stills or photographs of photographs with no original source credited, and the first two have already appeared on social media at https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100079904665291&sk=photos
- File:Photoofshalyadeosingh.jpg
- File:Imageofshalyadeosingh.jpg
- File:Image of Shalya Deo Singh ji 07.jpg
- File:Image of Shalya Deo Singh ji.jpg
- File:Durga Puja organised by Shalya Deo Singh ji.jpg
- File:Durga Puja organised by Shalya Deo Singh Ji.jpg
- File:Shalya Deo Singh img.jpg
- File:Shalya deo singh image 06.jpg
- File:Photo of shalya deo singh ji 05.jpg
- File:Shalya deo singh ji 04.jpg
- File:Photo of shalya deo singh ji 03.jpg
- File:Photo of shalya deo singh ji.jpg
- File:Image of shalya deo singh.jpg
- File:Shalya Deo Singh.jpg
- File:Indian politician Shalya Deo Singh.jpg
Belbury (talk) 10:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rockbuzz17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of these look like video stills with no original source credited, and the final two have already appeared on social media at https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100079904665291&sk=photos
- File:Image-Shalya Deo Singh.jpg
- File:Durga Puja of Bokaro Steel City,Sec 12.jpg
- File:Durga Puja of Bokaro Steel City,Sec-12.jpg
- File:Durga Puja Visarjan.jpg
- File:Image of Durga Puja.jpg
- File:Shalya Deo Singh and his Bodyguard.jpg
- File:Image of Shalya Deo Singh and Raghunath Singh.jpg
- File:Image of Shalya Deo Singh.jpg
- File:Image of Shalyadeo Singh.jpg
- File:Img of Shalyadeo Singh.jpg
Belbury (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. ulsan23a.png Methewle (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. ulsan23a.png Methewle (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. ulsan23h.png Methewle (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. ulsan23h.pngv Methewle (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The same file exists. Methewle (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing duplicate file name). --Wdwd (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. ulsan23h.png Methewle (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. ulsan23h.png Methewle (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The same file exists.ulsan23h Methewle (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing duplicate file name). --Wdwd (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Redirects are cheap. Prevent link breakage. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- But redir still in use. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Need to go to Kit body seongnam20h 2001:2D8:EF3B:F8ED:2186:6778:951:2EA9 09:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Redirects are cheap. Prevent link breakage. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
self upload and unnecessary file Anup Sadi (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Redirects are cheap. Prevent link breakage. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Same picture exists. Methewle (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Redirects are cheap. Prevent link breakage. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
poor resolution; too large scaling caused noisy image; hardly useful Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. This is my first time uploading to wikipedia, so I need help navigating the process. The photograph I uploaded (the album cover for Positive by Tony Enos) is not the original file, but I can upload the original file, as I took and edited the photograph to help make it become the original album cover. My full name is Vienna Enos, and Tony Enos is my brother. What are the steps to verify this? Vendetta4v (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, You can ask for a VRT request to be open : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team CoffeeEngineer (talk) 07:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Greece.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Greece (1822-1978).svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Peru (1884–1950).svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Claim of own work, but its his player profile picture from other websites https://theathletic.com/football/player/franco-ibarra-5tGMq4Z7bhvyS1Vv/ https://www.futhead.com/23/players/7771/franco-ibarra/ etc RedPatch (talk) 13:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope, not for WMF purposes - While I agree with the rationale, it's not a speedy deletion candidate The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no permission (No permission since). TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DCB as no permission (No permission since). It's a textlogo (albeit one that isn't as simple as can be), so this may be below TOO and not copyrightable. Even so, I'm not sure this is in scope, so I'm bringing this to DR for further discussion rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, false license claim, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- +1, I tagged it as no permission cause of the false license claim. This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. We need a permission for usage under a free license. DCB (talk) 17:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Infrogmation. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence to suggest that this was licensed under CC 4.0. The rights are presumably owned by the University of Miami. Denniscabrams (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am supposing that the image was CC 4.0 as the Creative Commons website shows nothing about it, therefore, I cannot conclude that there is a CC on this. GreenGalaxio (talk) 03:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Why would you suppose that the image was CC 4.0? I see no indication of that at the source web page, which is clearly marked "© 2023 Opendorse, Inc." -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unless evidence of free licensed status can be shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wutsje as no permission (No permission since). Very simple logo, but COM:Azerbaijan doesn't have details on TOO. It's also questionable whether or not this is in-scope, so I'm sending this to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no source (No source since). Perhaps, but this seems like it's a very simple assembly of text in which copyright protection may not arise. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree. But why, oh why do uploaders always specify the current date in the "date" field??? Not even in the attached Wikipedia article we find a clear date of when this was published.--PaterMcFly (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The wizard for uploads made while editing an article may have a date field with a default date of today. That's not great UI design in light of the implications for Commons. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO, PD-text, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rameshe999 as no source (No source since). This has a listed source, but it's a private YouTube video. Anybody able to find an archive of it to check the licensing status? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
According to this news (published before the file was uploaded), Por Sanket Mishra. Fonte: Unsplash. Not own work; permission should be required. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- See Template:Unsplash. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Question What would be copyrightable here? It's just text and the small logo is De-minimis. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Well, it is a photograph after all. The blurred part seems significantly above the threshold of originality. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Oh, sorry, I thought the problem was the screen content, not the image itself. --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Well, it is a photograph after all. The blurred part seems significantly above the threshold of originality. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Unsplash image, see here. Template:Unsplash is not possible here. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope, not for WMF purposes. Perhaps, but the image is high quality, so this has to go to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Personal content. GeorgHH • talk 18:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DavidTDC3377 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 - No longer want on Commons. (requested by image creator). The file is presently in use on an English Wikipedia talk page, so I think we have to Keep this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of fairly recent upload. Use on talk page in incidental. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geagea as no permission (No permission since) Krd 04:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader is not the photographer. We need permission from the photographer. -- Geagea (talk) 06:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Fayninja
[edit]- File:India of 1707.png
- File:Portrait of Maharaja Sardar Singh.png
- File:Maharaja of Mysore, Krishnaraja Wadiyar IV.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Fayninja. I believe they should be deleted because [of copyright violations]. Fayninja (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Fayninja: Why do you think the files you uploaded are copyright violations? --Rosenzweig τ 06:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Portrait of Maharaja Sardar Singh.png: 1896 painting, kept in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait of Maharaja Sardar Singh.png. --Rosenzweig τ 06:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, did not know that old Museum paintings were automatically in public domain. As a rule of thumb, a century old work would most likely have expired its copyright. Fayninja (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:India of 1707.png: Copyvio from [1]. --Rosenzweig τ 06:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Maharaja of Mysore, Krishnaraja Wadiyar IV.jpg: inferior duplicate of File:Maharaja Sir Sri Krishnaraja Wodiyar 1906 by 1906 K Keshavayya.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 06:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: two and kept one as per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
File:STV - 006 bufet tv ukir, harga bufet tv minimalis , harga bufet tv, model bufet tv, design bufet, bufet tv murah, bufet tv jati, bufet tv minimalis murah, jual bufet tv minimalis.jpg
[edit]Per watermark, unlike that own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
May not be in scope of Wikipedia. Zaxxon0 (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work and likely COM:COPYVIO on this grainy black and white image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Already deleted. Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
E' un duplicato Giomarsa (talk) 07:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicate found (there is however a cropped version, which is cropped too tight IMO). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Фото несвободного произведения -- Tomasina (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Фото несвободного произведения -- Tomasina (talk) 08:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
фото несвободного произведения -- Tomasina (talk) 09:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW, need permission from original author A09 (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 12:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unneeded redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
How is this file reusable? The text is too small to read, it is unclear what it is about (this is not how an IT strategy looks like; I cannot see clues about implementation (what, where, when, with who)) and I wonder whether it is copyright violation. JopkeB (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a free logo, as too much detail to be pd-logo. And not own work, so the uploader cannot licence it under a free licence for us. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
J'ai fait une erreur, il y a une image en NC dedans. J'ai corrigé mais avec un autre fichier, je ne savais pas que l'on pouvait juste remplacer... Désolé. Graineahumus (talk) 14:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Not useful KEIDANER (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
not useful KEIDANER (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
The source is certainly not "own work". Google search shows the image in color. A link to that photo gives an extreme long page with text about her, but I could not find the photo. The picture uploaded by the user is a cropped and mirrored version without the colour. Wouter (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
EXIF credits the image to MORANDEIRA-EGEA EMMANUELLE, which does not match the uploader name Sonia Yembou or the credited author Nahia Marty. It also appears (at lower res) on old websites such as https://www.whoswho.fr/bio/sophie-elizeon_73491. Belbury (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This was classified as ineligible for copyright, but I think the cat artwork surpasses the threshold of originality. Genericusername57 (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
advertisement image; not used except at wikidata, advertisement entry there should be deleted, too Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Source website states "© Copyright 2022 ― All Rights Reserved" FotoFree (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
unused and unexplained diagram. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Unknown COM:TOO for Uganda, thus considered not okay -- DaxServer (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 18:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Is this a cinema hall? 186.175.209.17 20:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason, and Google-translate https://so.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirkad_AlAgha for your answer. It looks like a personal image in front of a storefront to me, though, so since it isn't in use, I'd support deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Tarjeta vertical? 186.175.209.17 20:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data/watermark not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
The copyrighted picture from "https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=716084143554275&set=a.606819944480696" was uploaded to Flickr to circumvent copyright restrictions Riad Salih (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free copyrighted work in Japan. See COM:FOP Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free copyrighted work in Japan. See COM:FOP Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Not under CC license. Screenshot from a podcast which is not published under Creative Commons James Tamim (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SahafatKaLover95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work. Some are clearly photos of photos and from a small sample of the restː File:SAPortrait.jpg - online here in 2022 https://thenamal.com/misc/who-is-lt-general-sarfaraz-ali/
File:SanaGeneral.jpg - 2021 https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=239942561534401&set=pb.100065559763314.-2207520000.
File:GENSARFRAZFO.jpg Own work but uploaded after his death
File:SarfrazAliCCQ.jpg - found here in may before upload - https://twitter.com/Voldemortxox/status/1661726129403703296/photo/1
All need OTRS to keep
- File:GENSARFRAZFO.jpg
- File:MMahfuz.png
- File:MuzzafarHussainUsmani.jpg
- File:GhiasPortrait.jpg
- File:OTSPassCeremony.jpg
- File:SAPortrait.jpg
- File:SarfrazAliCCQ.jpg
- File:CPECRoute.jpg
- File:ImranKAminK.jpg
- File:TombstoneOfGenSana.png
- File:SanaGeneral.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- "File:SAPortrait.jpg - online here in 2022 https://thenamal.com/misc/who-is-lt-general-sarfaraz-ali/"
- Dear wise guy, that is a completely different image. I'm a retired journalist and retired professional photographer who worked with several news channels and as a photographer for the Army. This portrait was captured at the Quetta Corps HQ when I was called in December 2021. Before my upload, this image was not available anywhere on the internet as it was only intended to be displayed at the Corps HQ.
- GhiasPortrait was for the National Assembly of Pakistan's website, when I was called there somewhere in 2011-2013. I believe it to be 2012 since Ghias sahab had been appointed a Minister in that year.
- TombstoneOfGenSana was captured on 3 May 2017, when I visited the grave to pay my respects as I passed through Daud Khel.
- ImranKAminK was captured on 23 September 2013, I remember this especially because Khan had returned from KPK to make dua at Sanaullah Sahabs grave.
- MuzaffarHussainUsmani.jpg, no image like this exists on the internet except for ones with really low quality. This is the original taken some time in 1998, he had been promoted a year prior as LTG and was either Corps Commander Bahawalpur or Corps Commander Karachi.
- The family portrait, I wonder who was the photographer? Also of course it is uploaded after his death. Page was created after he died, am I supposed to time travel and upload this before that?
- I don't need to explain the rest as I have already stated what I did prior to retirement and editing Wikipedia. SahafatKaLover18 (talk) 03:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:PRP - too many found on internet, others obviously rephotographs, etc. Sockpuppet's argument not compelling. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Files on Alexander Julien
[edit]These are uploaded from Flickr where they are CC-BY. The Flickr user, Vision Éternel, is a band, not a photographer, and while it probably has a license to use these in its promotion, it is very unlikely that the license allows the band to freely license the images as required by Commons.
- File:Vision Eternel Photo Shoot At Mortified Studios, 2018 1.png
- File:Vision Eternel Photo Shoot At Mortified Studios, 2018 7.png
- File:Vision Éternel Photo Shoot At Dominion Square, 2011.jpg
- File:Vision Éternel Photo Shoot In Montreal, 2010 3.jpg
- File:Vision Éternel Photo Shoot On Saint Helen's Island, 2012 2.jpg
- File:Vision Éternel Photo Shot at Dalhousie Station, 2011 5.jpg
- File:Vision Éternel in Notre-Dame-de-la-Merci 2017.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not convinced by the terms Jim used, like probably and unlikely. The nomination guidelines state "a deletion request that only casts a vague accusation can be considered as "incomplete"" (no offense Jim).
- I've been a fan of this band for a few years and have chatted with some of their members before. I reached out to them about this, this morning, to get their input.
- The main band member/guitarist/person in discussion, Alexander Julien, wrote back that the two photographers in question, Jeremy Roux and Rain Frances, would be happy to provide the necessary permission tickets via email if required to keep these images. The band is happy to have images on here.
- However, Julien also told me that the band personally reached out to Wikimedia Commons' legal department last year, in the hope of removing a couple of images uploaded from Flickr. He said "a couple of them were duplicates/cropped/expanded versions of the same images used as profile and header pictures", but that "whoever uploaded them added everything, even the duplicates". Julien says Wikimedia Foundation's legal council refused to remove the pictures, claiming that "the rights granted under the License are irrevocable", even though the band themselves didn't upload them on Wikimedia Commons.
- Here's the print screen he sent me of Wikimedia Foundation's legal counsel's email:
- If the band couldn't get some of these taken down legally, I doubt you'll be able to (again, no offense Jim, I'm saying that in a comical way).--Bricks&Wood (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Bricks&Wood (talk)
Kept: Per Wikimedia Foundation's legal counsel email. If they come down from Flickr, we can delete. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
this image was made with an AI image generator DNocterum (talk) 09:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that's right. That's why I can upload it. Theklan (talk) 10:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- No valid rationale for deletion. However, the image doesn't seem to be of high quality. Since this is now used in some articles, could you upload a newer improved version of it? Prototyperspective (talk) 09:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Repetitious {{User|POS78}} talk 10:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No longer in use, replaced by other image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted image, not user's own work. See https://images.foxweather.com/static.foxweather.com/www.foxweather.com/content/uploads/2023/07/1336/752/tornado.png?ve=1&tl=1 Wes sideman (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete — User who uploaded photo previously claimed to be Storm Chaser Hunter Fowler, who then stated they were not the uploader. Highly doubtful this user is the photographer given the user’s past history of claiming a tornado photo as their own. WeatherWriter (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Absolutely meets threshold of originality, contains artworks above threshold of originality. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 11:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I think I disagree. See the plenty of art works at COM:TOO US that are deemed below the TOO. Many of them are more complex than the artwork in this screenshot.Jonteemil (talk) 11:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: Even so, I think that the actual design and layout of the app may also qualify for copyright. (also please ping me when you reply) QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 22:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- In some countries this screenshot would be copyrightable, yes, but I don't think it would in the US.Jonteemil (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: Even so, I think that the actual design and layout of the app may also qualify for copyright. (also please ping me when you reply) QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 22:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete useless and out of date. I uploaded (15:42, 14 August 2015) but was Reverted to version as of 03:20, 9 June 2015.--EEIM (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
How are these files reusable? The text is too small to read, it is unclear what it is about and I wonder whether it is copyright violation.
- File:Accelo email campaign .png
- File:Accelo Client Portal.png
- File:Project collaboration Accelo .png
- File:Scheduling example Accelo.png
- File:Retainer example accelo .png
- File:Ticket example Accelo.png
- File:Accelo.sales-list.png
- File:Client page.png
JopkeB (talk) 13:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused screenshots and logo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- The first two I agree, like the other deleted ones you can have doubts whether these files are reusable and maybe they are copyright violation. But the third one: there are perhaps millions of unused files and thousands of unused logos on Commons: should they all be deleted? You might at most wonder whether it is copyright violation. JopkeB (talk) 04:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I am concerned, yes, delete all logos of non-notable companies/organizations/groups. Nothing intrinsically educational about a logo, it is just branding, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Posible copyvio / captura de pantalla recortada de video protegido por copyright. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 17:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file is of a 1942 Indian film (so presumably published in 1942). It became public domain in India in 2002, but its US copyright was restored by the COM:URAA and will expire on January 1, 2038. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- This became PD in India in 1992 (50 years after creation at that time). Yann (talk) 08:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann That appears to be true for photographs, but this is a still from a film, not a photograph. Or am I missing something (in COM:India or elsewhere)? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-India. --Yann (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since). This is a fairly simple logo; is it above or below COM:TOO Italy? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since). Very simple logo well-under COM:TOO USA that is in-use on the Italian Wikipedia at the moment. Is it under or over COM:TOO Italy? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright image Lachy70 (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
no citation for al-Muntifiq power over Baghdad wilayat Abu aamir (talk) 07:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Probably COM:DW. --Yann (talk) 21:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I own this image and it was posted here without my permission. Please look carefully at the left arm of President Numairi and you will see my watermark on this image (© Yass). 2A01:4B00:800D:7000:E046:602F:89B6:8DFA 10:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
This image is in the public domain because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Sudan, has expired according to Sudanese law. (At least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created.) Munfarid1 (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Incorrect. This image is protected by copyright in the US and the UK and it doesn't exist in the public domain. My watermark is on this image and the photographer was my father. Furthermore, you copied this image from my post on Facebook group a day after I posted it and failed to give appropriate attribution and you also failed to obtain permission before posting the image here!!!!
- https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10161268303331095&set=gm.2281043438923765&idorvanity=438357523192375 2A01:4B00:800D:7000:E046:602F:89B6:8DFA 11:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the source of the image you quoted is a magazine in the collection of someone named Ismail Abdallah Mohammed Yousif and also protected by copyright in Sudan under © 2022, Sudan Memory as can be seen on the bottom of the page : https://www.sudanmemory.org/image/ISM-0000068/1/LOG_0000/ 2A01:4B00:800D:7000:E046:602F:89B6:8DFA 11:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is actually under copyright both in the UK and the US.
- UK: Republished by AuthorHouse ISBN: 978-1-4520-2861-3 (SC) ©2011 Dr. Khogaly
- USA: published by Sterling Publishing CO INC under ISBN: 0-8069-1198-0, OAK Tree: 7061-2176-7 as well as the library of the congress under catalog card no: 76-1188 2A01:4B00:800D:7000:E046:602F:89B6:8DFA 11:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- First, UK copyright status is irrelevant to us. Our policy requires that images published here must be free in the country of origin (Sudan in this case, unless a publication elsewhere before 28 December 1971 is provided; no such evidence in your request) and in the United States, where Wikimedia Foundation is based.
- Second, the photo published in the Sudanese magazine, and the photo published in Facebook are in my opinion the same work from copyright point of view, regardless of the watermark or any © declaration.
- Third, per Sudanese copyright law the photo is definitely PD; it most likely enteres PD there on 1.1.1996. The © 2022 declaration applies in my opinion to the web service and is irrelevant for copyright status of the photo.
- Fourth, as the US had no copytight relations with Sudan before 2000, the photo was PD there unless its copyright was registered in US Copyright Office (no evidence for this). Urugway Round Agreement Act (URAA) established copyright protection in US for works initially published in Sudan before 2000 if they were copyrighted in Sudan on 28 December 2000. This one was not.
- Fifth, republishing any photo that copyright has already expired does not restore the expired copyright. So any © after 2000 are either informative only or void.
- Summarizing: I see no evidence for Sudanese or US protection, I see no evidence that the country of initial publication is not Sudan and UK copyright investigation is out of our scope for this photo (you may need to choose the legal path if you wish to exploit it - and if it still exist - what is unclear as the photographer name/death date is not provided).
- Keep per above. Ankry (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- That is incorrect. The magazine acquired permission from my father to use this work. The work was then published in 1976 in the USA under copyright with Sterling Publishing CO INC under ISBN: 0-8069-1198-0, OAK Tree: 7061-2176-7 as well as the library of the congress under catalog card no: 76-1188.
- It was then republished in the UK in 2011 by AuthorHouse ISBN: 978-1-4520-2861-3 (SC).
- Finally, the above image contains my watermark and it is clearly the image I posted and not from any public domain. 2A01:4B00:800D:7000:8509:560:79AE:B5DA 10:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment: related ticket. Bencemac (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: clear Sudan-PD. FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This image contains my Watermark and the photograph was taken by my father and I am in position of the original image. 2A01:4B00:800D:7000:8509:560:79AE:B5DA 10:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No valid deletion reasons as no copyrighted parts of this monument visible on the file. Depiction of the monument rather small Юрий Д.К 16:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, the monument is the focus of the photo. Monument is unfree as per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Monument to the Conquerors of Space. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with JWilz12345, it is prominent in the photo, also the title suggested that including the monument is the purpose of taking this photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is a clear case of copyright paranoia but I don't want to war with you. Better to Undelete this file in 2038 Юрий Д.К 05:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Юрий Д.К. kindly read this 2007 mail from Wikimedia Foundation, that explicitly discourages Wikimedia sites from accepting non-commercial content. Russian legislature should remove non-commercial restriction for monuments, and this and thousands of other monuments of Russia can now be accepted here on Commons, as well as early undeletion of thousands of previously-deleted photos. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Come on, let's not joke about the loosening of copyright as a Russian concern. We all know what their regime is currently concentrating on doing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek that's not a joke. And yes I'm aware about the events concerning the Russian government's actions with respect to the invasion of Ukraine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- What would be in it for a kleptocratic government to limit its ability to steal, let alone earn money money legally? Please. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek that's not a joke. And yes I'm aware about the events concerning the Russian government's actions with respect to the invasion of Ukraine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Come on, let's not joke about the loosening of copyright as a Russian concern. We all know what their regime is currently concentrating on doing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Юрий Д.К. kindly read this 2007 mail from Wikimedia Foundation, that explicitly discourages Wikimedia sites from accepting non-commercial content. Russian legislature should remove non-commercial restriction for monuments, and this and thousands of other monuments of Russia can now be accepted here on Commons, as well as early undeletion of thousands of previously-deleted photos. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is a clear case of copyright paranoia but I don't want to war with you. Better to Undelete this file in 2038 Юрий Д.К 05:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with JWilz12345, it is prominent in the photo, also the title suggested that including the monument is the purpose of taking this photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Consider judging via COM:TOO Russia? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WeatherWriter as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per the NWS Public Domain template, Thus, all images on NWS servers are public domain (including "Courtesy of ..." and “Photo by ...” images) unless specifically stated otherwise through a copyright watermark. This specifically has a watermark on the image, therefore it is not in the public domain and is copyrighted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is more complex than that. The image is watermarked with attribution information only, and I would say that that is not enough to claim copyright given the plain language of the disclaimer at [2] (notwithstanding the template). But that disclaimer seems to only apply to the Sioux Falls, SD office (see URL and header). The correct disclaimer is [3], and provides that "The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise", but I don't see anything telling the uploaders that they are dedicating the image to the public domain... —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is assumed through the upload process. In the first disclaimer link you sent: “By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain.” All the NWS offices speak for the NWS, as they are just location-based offices. Here was a previous discussion involving NWS webpage copyrighted images: [4]. The reason that image was deleted was due to it having a copyright watermark. It is rare to have a “unless specifically noted otherwise” instance on NWS webpages. this one for 1979 tornadoes is a rare exception. But looking at this web page for some 2014 tornadoes (deletion example from above), some of the images have a watermark. Some do not. NWS allows copyrighted and public domain images to be submitted. Any image with a watermark (or the rare “noted otherwise cases”) are not public domain, while any images without a watermark are considered public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Mdaniels5757 — You may be right. Hopefully this get’s closed soon so a verdict for these type of images. WeatherWriter (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with keeping this photo. It came directly from NWS Wichita event page, so its public domain. ChessEric (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: An attribution watermark is not an explicit claim of copyright, and per the NWS T&C, it can be reasonably assumed that the photographer understood that his work was going to become PD. —holly {chat} 00:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
This photograph was taken by Mike Umscheid in the United States in 2022. His website is currently under maintenance (scheduled to complete on August 30), but up to very recently, this image was published there and offered for sale.
Umscheid is or was an employee of NWS Dodge City,[5] but there is no claim that he took this photo while performing his official duties, and the fact that he offers the image for sale suggests that he was taking photos on his own time. There is no reason to think that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.
As a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as it was made.
This image was originally uploaded to the Commons under a CC-0 tag, although there was no evidence that this ever applied to this image. Another user then re-tagged it to keep under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that
- when the weather.gov general disclaimer says that material not in the public domain will be specifically noted, it means that it must be published with a formal copyright notice. Whereas in reality, not only has the NWS never promised any specific form of notation, there is ample evidence to demonstrate this is not their general practice. This belief also chooses to ignore the words elsewhere in the disclaimer that state that third party images are used by the NWS under license, and to contact the third-party creators for re-use.
- the words of a NWS Sioux City regional office policy that placed some public submissions in the public domain somehow applied to this image, although there is nothing to connect it with that office. (The photo was published by the Wichita office).
The image has already been through one DR, with the closing admin concluding that "it can be reasonably assumed that the photographer understood that his work was going to become PD"
Since then, we've learned that:
- the idea that the NWS labels copyright-protected images with an explicit copyright notice is almost never true A20
- the terms and conditions that place some public submissions to the Sioux City office are only one of many such conflicting terms and conditions scattered around weather.gov A3
- NWS offices solicit images that they can use by permission of the photographer. eg
Without clearer evidence that Umscheid intended to place this photo in the public domain, we need to delete this under COM:PRP. Rlandmann (talk) 07:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Keep — Per the disclaimer linked at the bottom on the NWS webpage with this image, "The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise, and may be used without charge for any lawful purpose...The information on National Weather Service Web servers and Web sites is in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public." On the Commons, the NWS disclaimer may be enough to keep the file. A recently closed deletion request for a file under the PD-NWS template was closed as keep with the main keep rational being the NWS general disclaimer. Public domain images can be used for any purpose and may be used commercially for profit, so arguments about it being sold are not valid in my view. Based on the NWS disclaimer, the recently closed DR, and the previous DR for this image, I believe it should be kept. WeatherWriter (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- And @WeatherWriter, they renominated the file. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that it’s being sold for a minimum of $50 (USD) is an even bigger indicator of its unfree status. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- It has been a week now with no one except myself commenting: I am going to ping some more people into this discussion; to hopefully get a better consensus. Pinging all or most people who have participated in these deletion requests. @Sir MemeGod @Ks0stm @Hurricanehink @Consigned @Berchanhimez @ChessEric @Jmabel @Yann Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Offering an image for sale is not evidence of unfree status. Alamy and Getty do this all the time, when they think they can get away with it. Also, I know a photographer (contractor, not government employee) who does government projects where he signs papers putting the photos in the public domain, but that doesn't mean he won't gladly making money selling excellent prints of his work, including signed prints.
- @Hurricane Clyde: is that selling about physical copies (in which case I really think it isn't evidence at all) or about rights to use the image online (in which case it might be weak evidence, per my remark about Alamy and Getty)? - Jmabel ! talk 19:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- It’s physical copies. But you’d think it would be less than $50. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Like @Jmabel said, selling photos is not evidence that it is unfree. For evidence opposite that idea, we have to turn to Commons:Deletion requests/File:A tornado funnel is shown moving through Xenia.jpg, where the AP is falsely claiming copyright over a free-to-use (CC 2.0 or PD) image and they are selling said free-to-use photograph. The big kicker is that the AP also have the wrong creation date for this photograph, which they are selling. Part of the PD (and/or Commons's allowed CC licenses) is that the photos can be used for whatever purposes you desire (if CC, as long as attribution is given). That includes reselling them for a profit. So the selling of photographs is not evidence whatsoever of a photo's copyright status, as clearly seen with the AP's fake claim on the 1974 Xenia tornado's photograph. WeatherWriter (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment -- the creation date is right; the anomaly is easily demonstatably due to automated timezone conversions. I'll come back to that one in due course.
- What the two cases do have in common is that whoever wants to keep either of these images has been unable to furnish any evidence that the copyright owner ever gave up their rights. In the case of the Xenia image, the folks who want to keep it can't even show whether it's PD or CC-BY... But anyway, that's another story. --Rlandmann (talk) 04:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @WeatherWriter; I am well aware of what copy fraud is. Thank you. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 04:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Like @Jmabel said, selling photos is not evidence that it is unfree. For evidence opposite that idea, we have to turn to Commons:Deletion requests/File:A tornado funnel is shown moving through Xenia.jpg, where the AP is falsely claiming copyright over a free-to-use (CC 2.0 or PD) image and they are selling said free-to-use photograph. The big kicker is that the AP also have the wrong creation date for this photograph, which they are selling. Part of the PD (and/or Commons's allowed CC licenses) is that the photos can be used for whatever purposes you desire (if CC, as long as attribution is given). That includes reselling them for a profit. So the selling of photographs is not evidence whatsoever of a photo's copyright status, as clearly seen with the AP's fake claim on the 1974 Xenia tornado's photograph. WeatherWriter (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just offering an explanation that when I've noted images for sale in DRs, I'm not saying this is proof against release into the PD, but when it's a pro or semi-pro photographer's image, to my mind it's strongly suggestive that the photographer had/has commercial interest in the image and is prima facie less likely to have agreed to give the image away. I think this is substantially different from a case where a photographer is working under a government contract in the first place.
- Anyway, the outreach to photographers continues, but a couple of recent angry replies tends to confirm my hunch. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have asked this person on X about whether the image is copyrighted. I will give my answer once he replies. ChessEric (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- It’s physical copies. But you’d think it would be less than $50. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that it’s being sold for a minimum of $50 (USD) is an even bigger indicator of its unfree status. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. The conversation above about whether image distributors such as Getty only sell copyrighted images or not is irrelevant. What's relevant is whether this image has sufficient proof of it's public domain (or freely licensed) status, which has not been given. Berchanhimez (talk) 03:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- And we all know how heated those discussions can get. @Rlandmann was cussed out in one email over an NWS copyright question. That image got speedily deleted. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 04:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HouseBlaster as Speedy (db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7 - while this doesn't qualify because the requester isn't the uploader, it is out of scope The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy: I tagged it as such because I transferred it to Commons – does that not count for the purposes of g7? In any event, Delete. I do not believe that it is out of scope, however. I would consider it a realistic image to include at en:Brian Klemm, especially considering we have only one other image of the guy that I could find on Commons. I put it up for speedy deletion to allow for a better move to Commons after some histmerge/histsplit stuff involving this image is sorted out at enwiki – the previous versions of this file are licensed under {{GFDL}}, but the current version is {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}}. HouseBlaster (talk) 22:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't know what the heck is going on with this file, but I'll assume that HouseBlaster knows what he's doing. —holly {chat} 00:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). May well currently lack a tag, but it's a 1963 photograph, so this may well be {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. We'd need some more info from the uploader to determine this, but I think a DR is better for this than a speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. This photo is from my late father's personal collections of private candid production shots the Guthrie PR and Promotions departments produced. This particular photograph was taken in house (by Guthrie Theatre staff) during an April 1963 rehearsal, for in house promotion. It was owned by my father, Rex Partington since it was taken. After his death, on March 17, 2006, this, and his entire collection became my legal property. I would welcome your guidance in applying the proper license. Thank you - Tony Partington Tonytenor (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. This photo is from my late father's personal collections of private candid production shots the Guthrie PR and Promotions departments produced. This particular photograph was taken in house (by Guthrie Theatre staff) during an April 1963 rehearsal, for in house promotion. It was owned by my father, Rex Partington since it was taken. After his death, on March 17, 2006, this, and his entire collection became my legal property. I would welcome your guidance in applying the proper license. Thank you - Tony Partington Tonytenor (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Tonytenor: Hi! In that case, you are the heir for this (previously unpublished) photograph. Commons has a number of licenses that you can choose from, though I would suggest something along the lines of {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}} or {{CC-BY-4.0}}. If you agree to release the photograph under either of those licenses, please just copy one of those two templates and add it to the file description page. If there's a formatting error, or there is any confusion about how to edit that page, feel free to also let me know here that you agree to release it under one of those licenses, and I can edit the file description page for you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. This photo is from my late father's personal collections of private candid production shots the Guthrie PR and Promotions departments produced. This particular photograph was taken in house (by Guthrie Theatre staff) during an April 1963 rehearsal, for in house promotion. It was owned by my father, Rex Partington since it was taken. After his death, on March 17, 2006, this, and his entire collection became my legal property. I would welcome your guidance in applying the proper license. Thank you - Tony Partington Tonytenor (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: It has been over two months since Tonytenor was requested to add a license to the file and it has not yet been done. If the user ever returns to Commons and wants this photo to be restored, they can ping me or Red-talked hawk to have it done, but we can't just let this sit here indefinitely without a proper license. —holly {chat} 00:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MrSchimpf as no permission (No permission since). This is a textlogo, but is it above or below COM:TOO Canada? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This appears to be a fairly creative font rendering, and I think it would be above TOO in the US. —holly {chat} 00:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to soldiers of Soviet war in Afghanistan (Petrovskyi square in Donetsk)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:2012-11-02 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Воинам -интернационалистам - panoramio.jpg
- File:Воинам-интернационалистам 1.jpg
- File:Воинам-интернационалистам 3.jpg
- File:Монумент афганцам - panoramio.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_4.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Midjourney_AI_bertsioa.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_4.jpg){kind=link}
_-_4.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_cover_art_image.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_di_Villabate_-_Ficarazzelli_ad_inizio_2009.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Midjourney_AI_bertsioa.png){kind=link}
_-_Midjourney_AI_bertsioa.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Midjourney_AI_bertsioa.png){kind=link}
_-_Midjourney_AI_bertsioa.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Twin_tornadoes.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Military vehicles are not sculpture --Butko (talk) 09:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep those. I agree, particularly because these are american military vehicles. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Keep the vehicles. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 07:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept the military vehicles photos, deleted the monument photos. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 001.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 002.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 003.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 004.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 005.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 006.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 007.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 010.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 011.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 013.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 014.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 016.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 017.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 018.jpg
- File:Памятник Будённому в Донецке 019.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It's an anonymous work from 1951. A detailed research (by a terrorist website but still a legitimate research) failed to find any author. As such, this monument is in public domain as an anonymous publication in Ukraine whose author did not become known within 70 years — Nick UA (talk) 15:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note that the monument could still be copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA, in which the copyright was restored in 1996. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was published obviously without a copyright notice, so as a 1951 work it can't be copyrighted in the US — Nick UA (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Nick UA no, all international works (in this context, non-U.S.) that pass the tests indicated at COM:URAA became copyrighted in the U.S. even without having to pass formalities. The copyright notice is for works domestically published on U.S. soil. The only chance that this sculpture falls PD in U.S. is if it was simultaneously published (exhibited) in the U.S., but it is very unlikely that it was simultaneously exhibited there too about the same time it was unveiled in Ukraine. Public-domain Ukrainian sculptures that are still copyrighted in the U.S. are no longer accepted here, just like the case of sculptures of other non-commercial FOP countries like Slovenia. We can ignore U.S. copyright if Ukraine had commercial FOP, in which {{Not-free-US-FOP}} may have been used. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- It was published obviously without a copyright notice, so as a 1951 work it can't be copyrighted in the US — Nick UA (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note that the monument could still be copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA, in which the copyright was restored in 1996. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: It is public domain in Ukraine, but not in the U.S. as this only became PD in Ukraine in 2022, Undelete in 2047 when U.S. copyright would expire. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fortnitegamer3432 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bogus self/cc claims - Per COM:AFGHANISTAN, term is life + 50 years, so too recent to be PD (page references no exemption for government works)--evidence of free status needed
- File:Afghan Ministry of Defense Emblem 1978-1992.png
- File:Afghan National Army Logo 1987-1992.png
- File:Afghan Army Logo 1987-1992.png
Эlcobbola talk 14:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- My friend litterly digitized the emblem himself (With the intention of adding it to Wikipedia) that's why there are different versions of the file because he had to correct some colors. That's why I self claimed it (he allowed me to and I tweaked it a bit to be more circular like the original). Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to reply stating that I made the logo myself using the app IbisPaint X on mobile. I looked at a photo from an Afghan tank and also a photo from a book displaying Afghan roundels, using it as a reference to make this emblem.
- Files “Afghan Army Logo 1987-1992” and “Afghan Army Logo 1987-1992” can be deleted but the “Afghan Ministry of Defense emblem” is the final complete version. AfghanParatrooper1989 (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I would also like to state that the government that used and designed this emblem no longer exists, collapsing in 1992 with President Najibullah being deceased in 1996. Additionally, as information on the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan is harder to obtain, we cannot find anyone who originally created the emblem all those years ago in Afghanistan. This emblem appears on tanks and vehicles of the Afghan Army, either in pictures or parade videos with no other source other than the YouTube channel that clearly doesn’t own the footage. AfghanParatrooper1989 (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Iranian Copyright Law also has a term of 50 years yet you see Pahlavi era Emblems and Insignias how is that fair? The Islamic Republic of Iran litterly inherited alot of things from Pahlavi Iran while the Republic of Afghanistan seized to exist, its military, its ministries everything seized to exist once the Mujahedeen took power. The Government of the Republic of Afghanistan is long gone
- Republic of Afghanistan (Dead in 1992) -> Islamic State of Afghanistan -> Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan -> Islamic State of Afghanistan -> Islamic Republic of Afghanistan -> Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (2021) Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo by TASS, not from Kremlin, and this does not comply with current copyright terms A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230605214834/http://en.kremlin.ru/multimedia/photo/page/3
- Keep. It states that all photos on this website are CC-BY-4.0. This photo id from The Kremlin website. I do not see any indication that this photo is by TASS. -- Ooligan (talk) 20:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- At the end, said "Photo: TASS"--A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230605214834/http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69357/photos
- and the related link above- no where on either page is the word "TASS."
- It states,
- "All content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Presidential Executive Office 2023" -- Ooligan (talk) 04:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Next paragraph: "The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author."--A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- At the end, said "Photo: TASS"--A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per this site, the Kryvche statue of Taras Shevchenko was unveiled in 1967. No sculptor is named, but this is still under copyright as an anonymous work (and at worst be eligible for US copyright which means even if it falls in public domain in Ukraine, the photos should not be restored until the statue's US copyright expires). US copyright can be ignored if Ukraine had commercial freedom of panorama. But unfortunately, the Ukrainian government only gave a non-commercial FOP that is not OK for Wikimedia, in December 2022.
- File:Пам'ятник Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, с. Кривче.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Шевченку Т.Г.., Кривче.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment. Цей пам’ятник встановлений не в 1967 році, а в 1990-х: 1992 (джерело: «У камені, бронзі, граніті», сторінка 31) або 1999 (джерело: «Тернопільщина. Історія міст і сіл», том 1, сторінка 522). А 1964 (джерело: «Тернопільським енциклопедичним словником», том 2, сторінка 238; також «У камені, бронзі, граніті», сторінка 31), чи навіть 1961 (джерело: «Тернопільщина. Історія міст і сіл», том 1, сторінка 522) встановлено бюст(!) Тараса Шевченка. В обох випадках, на жаль, мені не вдалося встановити автора. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Translation of Микола Василечко's input using Google Translate app: This monument was not erected in 1967, but in the 1990s: 1992 (source: "In Stone, Bronze, Granite", page 31) or 1999 (source: "Ternopil Region. History of Cities and Villages", volume 1, page 522). And 1964 (source: "Ternopil Encyclopedic Dictionary", volume 2, page 238; also "In Stone, Bronze, Granite", page 31), or even 1961 (source: "Ternopil region. History of cities and villages", volume 1, page 522) a bust(!) of Taras Shevchenko was installed. In both cases, unfortunately, I was unable to identify the author.
- In this case this monument is more unfree than what this site dated. The question now, which among the two years claimed by two references – 1992 or 1999 – is true for this unfree sculptural monument. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Died in 1951 - need some kind of source to see if this is PD. Own work it is not Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- This photo is taken from an original that my family has. He was my great grandfather. 203.29.152.217 08:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment If you are also the uploader, please log in when commenting. If you are direct heir and no one else has any claim of copyright, you can free license it - but please give accurate truthful information in the image description; don't claim that you are the photographer and the photo is from 2023. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-UK-unknown" the cutoff is 1953 and he died in 1951 and the image is circa 1940. --RAN (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies, Undelete in 2036. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Anthony_Poola_(Card).svg GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: They are slightly different and this is the older file. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Photos at Collecion Solo
[edit]- File:Pyramid (2019). David Altmejd. Courtesy of Colección SOLO.jpg
- File:Guernica Triology by Ron English..png
- File:DarkMousse GottfriedHelnwein.png
- File:Keiichi Tanaami The LastSupper.jpg
- File:Companion (2019), Kaws, at Espacio SOLO (Madrid).jpg
- File:Sitting on the Sun (2019), Amoako Boafo. Certeza Exhibition (Colección SOLO).jpg
- File:Certeza Exhibition at Espacio SOLO.jpg
- File:Certeza exhibition view.jpg
- File:Ulyss3s, Persistencia de la Narración, 1 (2023).jpg
- File:Persistencia de la Narración, 1 (2023)- Ulyss3s..png
- File:Sound Suit (2012). Nick Cave.jpg
- File:SPECULUM.jpg
- File:Memories of Passersby by Mario Klingemann at Espacio SOLO.jpg
- File:Memories of Passersby by Mario Klingemann..jpg
- File:Espacio SOLO. Wall by Diaz Faes.jpg
- File:Mu Pan & Dan Hernandez at Espacio SOLO.jpg
- File:Espacio SOLO Kaws.jpg
- File:EspacioSOLO.jpg
._David_Altmejd._Courtesy_of_Colecci%C3%B3n_SOLO.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaws,_at_Espacio_SOLO_(Madrid).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Amoako_Boafo._Certeza_Exhibition_(Colecci%C3%B3n_SOLO).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-_Ulyss3s..png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Nick_Cave.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Unclear sourcing/non-free content. All images have unclear sources, claimed as own work but at least two, separate images were taken directly from the Colleción Solo's website (from website front page and exhibition page). Aside from sourcing, all images also contain copyrighted painting, sculpture, or video stills by living artists, photographed in Spain at temporary exhibitions, out bounds of Freedom of Panorama. No evidence that any artists have provided acceptable free licenses for their work to be uploaded here. --19h00s (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm the photographer and I'm going to fill the all uses rights by Friday. 81.35.77.255 13:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023071910005789 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023072010006801 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP those that didn't have VRT permission. Kept the ones with VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
No proof of publication in Iran more than 30 years ago HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Freddy eduardo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author died in 1970, it is not in the public domain.
Photograph is over 100 years old, converting to DR for discussion and easier undeletion in 2041 Abzeronow (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Where was this published first? If it was in the US, it would still be PD. --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Probably 1930 image. --RAN (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ecuador appears to be the country of origin. Abzeronow (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- What was Ecuador law before? Yann (talk) 21:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Ecuador is straight pma-70. —holly {chat} 16:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Assumed copyrighted painting by Dean Larson Ooligan (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Isn't the painting also PD because it was made as work-for-hire for the senate? --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per [6], the photo was commissioned by the Ted Stevens Foundation, a private non-profit, and not the US government. —holly {chat} 16:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Could be PD for other reasons, though. The newspaper is from 1941. --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Info Poster on the left was created by Irakli Toidze, who died in 1985. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Crop the left part and keep the right part? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- That works for me. The newspaper is from June 24, 1941 and even with the 4 year extension, it could have been public domain in 1996 as an anonymous work. Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Restore the poster I've hidden in 2060. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
