Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/06/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(44566300341).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![42 File:Jumeirah Mosque by Gavinsblog.jpg (formerly at "File:Jumeirah Mosque 1.jpg")](#File:Jumeirah_Mosque_by_Gavinsblog.jpg_(formerly_at_"File:Jumeirah_Mosque_1.jpg")){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_13_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_00m_10s_010ms.jpg){kind=link}
![114 File:Wandeth "VonDechii" Gonzo.jpg](#File:Wandeth_"VonDechii"_Gonzo.jpg){kind=link}
_-_copia.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![165 File:Portrait of artist Norma De Saint Picman in front of her work, a Double portrait "To His Serene Highness (S.D.) Prince Nikolaus and his spouse Her Royal Highness (I.K.H.) Princess Margaretha von und zu Liechtenstein, I".jpg](#File:Portrait_of_artist_Norma_De_Saint_Picman_in_front_of_her_work,_a_Double_portrait_"To_His_Serene_Highness_(S.D.)_Prince_Nikolaus_and_his_spouse_Her_Royal_Highness_(I.K.H.)_Princess_Margaretha_von_und_zu_Liechtenstein,_I".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
在獲得版權者同意前，校歌可能有版權問題，故提請刪除。 Naven227 (talk) 05:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Une image double du fichier Aburahmane-mosque Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use, and actually the larger of the two. Though one could doubt the "own work" aspect. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Tanapat user (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in UAE. Both the Dubai Mall and the Burj Khalifa are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Kept: Copyrighted part cropped out. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request I am managing editor of the publication which holds the copyright to this image, I uploaded this image but this is not the final version of the image and an updated image Snuffel final has been uploaded on wikimedia commons instead. This image snuffel golden should therefore be deleted -Miruna Tiberiu (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Snuffel final.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 21:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete @Al*from*Lig: Please use {{Db-author}} next time. A09 (talk) 20:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, grazie! Al*from*Lig (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
map from Google with copyright MinervaAustral (talk) 18:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A09 (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
map from Google Maps, with copyright MinervaAustral (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A09 (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deletion request by email.
- File:Alison Richard.jpg
- File:Anne joutel Wikipedia.jpg
- File:Aysima Altinok.png
- File:By Tessot.png
- File:Cecile Charier.png
- File:Diana Beck.jpg
- File:Ingela Alger illustration by feelauri.jpg
- File:Louise Eisenhardt.jpg
- File:Margaret BURNETT.pdf
- File:Olga Uskova.jpg
- File:Portrait de Hélène Lœvenbruck.jpg
- File:Portrait of Jaime.jpg
- File:Portrait of Lily Jan.jpg
- File:Portrait of Mirella Lapata.jpg
- File:Portrait of Tatyana Dmitrieva.jpg
- File:Sonia Garel portrait.jpg
- File:TS Kanaka.jpg
Yann (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Motif de la suppression : le style des portraits était inspiré du style d'une illustratrice qui a exprimé la crainte d'une confusion avec son propre travail. Afin d'éviter toute ambiguïté, il a été décidé de retirer les portraits de Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opsylac (talk • contribs) 08:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC) (UTC)
- Clarification suite à discussion avec Opsylac : la décision de supprimer les images a été prise par l'école d'art. Léna (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Low quality blurry image Dronebogus (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Que asqueroso! Bórrenlo por favor... 191.125.169.11 10:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 02:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
logotype uploaded in copyviol: not a free-licence crest — danyele 15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be copyright laundry. The source is an image from Flickr uploaded by Henrique Binho dos Santos in 2021 and licensed as CC-BY. However, the photo appears on the web in higher and lower resolution both stating the copyright is from Retna. For the latter one can even find an archived version 3 years prior to the Flickr upload. Günther Frager (talk) 00:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a copyright laundry. The source is this Flickr photo uploaded by Henrique Binho dos Santos in 2021. However, this news article dated 2009 attributes the photo to João Miguel Júnior/TV Globo. Günther Frager (talk) 00:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
copyright promo image - https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/421/0006859975 Evaders99 (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted newspaper A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Robertsky (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Saadiyat Island - Guggenheim Museum - السعديات أيسلندا - متحف غوغنهايم - panoramio (2).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:The Gate of the Kiss
[edit]No FOP in Romania. These files are not de minimis.
- File:Poarta Sarutului - Tîrgu Jiu - 20060512 - 01.jpg
- File:Poarta Sarutului - Tîrgu Jiu - 20060512 - 02.jpg
- File:Poarta Sarutului amplasata in orasul Targu Jiu.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului 2.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-0005.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-0006.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-0007.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-0012.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-0013.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-06258.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07014.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07019.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07026.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului, Târgu Jiu în noapte de iarnă.jpg
- File:RO GJ - Poarta sărutului - fotografie nocturna.jpg
- File:RO GJ - Poarta sărutului.jpg
- File:Targu Jiu 2.jpg
Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Gate of the Kiss
[edit]Sculpture by Brancusi (d. 1957), located in Romania (see en:Sculptural Ensemble of Constantin Brâncuși at Târgu Jiu) where there is no FOP.
- File:Ansamblul sculptural Constantin Brâncuşi de la Târgu-Jiu.jpg
- File:Două bănci de piatră din Târgu Jiu img-0004.jpg
- File:Două bănci de piatră din Târgu Jiu img-01178.jpg
- File:Două bănci de piatră din Târgu Jiu img-01179.jpg
- File:Grădina Publică municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07010.jpg
- File:Grădina Publică municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07011.jpg
- File:Grădina Publică municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07020.jpg
- File:Maretia sclupturi.jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului (Targu Jiu).JPG
- File:Poarta sarutului 2014-08-04-0755(0).jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului 2014-08-04-0756.jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului august 2014.jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului detaliu.jpg
- File:Poarta Sarutului din Targu Jiu noaptea.jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului noaptea.jpg
- File:Poarta Sarutului Parcul Central din Targu Jiu.jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului.jpg
- File:Poarta Sarutului.JPG
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-0014.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-01175.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-01176.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-06074.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-06257.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07344.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07345.jpg
- File:Poarta sărutului din municipiul Târgu Jiu img-07347.jpg
- File:RO GJ - Calea Eroilor În Grădina Publică.jpg
- File:TgJiuGJ.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Gate of the Kiss
[edit]Images that represent a copyrighted sculpture in a non-FOP country.
—Andrei S. Talk 08:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Gate of the Kiss
[edit]The gate was completed in 1938 by Constantin Brâncuși (1876–1957). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2028.
- File:2019 Poarta Sarutului.jpg
- File:Das Tor des Kusses von Constantin Brancusi in Targu-Jiu Rumänien.tif
- File:Gradina Publica GJ-III-s-B-09463 (4).jpg
- File:Monumentul Întregirii Neamului - Constantin Brâncuși (28718808242).jpg
- File:Monumentul Întregirii Neamului - Constantin Brâncuși (28741883141).jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului 2.jpg
- File:Poarta sarutului 3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope Bedivere (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment I see I've come to this rather late (I haven't been able to access Wikipedia for some time). I uploaded this file (with about 50 others depicting state seals with text removed) so they could be featured in a quiz I made on JetPunk [1] (JetPunk only accepts images uploaded on Wikimedia Commons). It seems that the images are only required to be on Commons upon creation of the quiz (they may be deleted on Commons afterwards but they would still feature on the quiz). Also this state seal of Rhode Island may have become outdated (with the words 'AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS' removed), so I'll have to upload a new version of the seal with text removed for my quiz some time in the future. JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 07:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
_(44566300341).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(44566300341).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
_(44566300341).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
_(44566300341).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Likely a cropped image of a Getty Image. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/petronas-towers-kuala-lumpur-royalty-free-image/554917063. https://www.gettyimages.com/eula#RF does not seem to fit Creative Commons licensing. Robertsky (talk) 09:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Still under copyright per COM:CUR China
- File:2012 600 g silver lunar dragon 9 sons of the dragon father dragon - Obverse.jpg
- File:2012 600 g silver lunar dragon 9 sons of the dragon father dragon - Reverse.jpg
- File:Five Jiao Obverse.jpg
- File:Five Jiao Reverse.jpg
- File:Foreign Country Coin 15.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 16.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 2.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 23.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 8.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 9.JPG
- File:One Jiao Obverse.jpg
- File:One Jiao Reverse.jpg
- File:SZ 人民幣 RMB Fifty 50 cents Lotus lily flower in art Oct 2017 IX1.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China
- File:China-1-fen-2010 (1).jpg
- File:China-1-fen-2010.jpg
- File:China-2-fen-1982 (1).jpg
- File:China-2-fen-1982.jpg
- File:China-5-fen-1987 (1).jpg
- File:China-5-fen-1987.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
not asked for his personal rights, "5 years old"? wtf? Joschi71 (talk) 10:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- File:Australia-1-cent-1990 (1).jpg
- File:Australia-1-cent-1990.jpg
- File:Australia-2-cents-1979 (1).jpg
- File:Australia-2-cents-1979.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- As uploader, I think the deletion is reasonable. best wishes, Daderot (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work, book cover is copyrighted. Unfree image! — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Jumeirah Mosque by Gavinsblog.jpg (formerly at "File:Jumeirah Mosque 1.jpg")
[edit]
Violation of no COM:FOP UAE. Completed in 1979, this photo needs commercial license clearance from the mosque's architect or his heirs. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
![12:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/14#c-JWilz12345-20230614125100-File:Jumeirah_Mosque_by_Gavinsblog.jpg_(formerly_at_"File:Jumeirah_Mosque_1.jpg"){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
![04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/14#c-Krd-20230621041400-File:Jumeirah_Mosque_by_Gavinsblog.jpg_(formerly_at_"File:Jumeirah_Mosque_1.jpg"){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs -- generally low res, no EXIF, cropped photographer watermarks (e.g., File:ERS WDS6.jpg, File:CNB_WAM4.jpg, etc.), visual artifacts (e.g., File:HWH WAP4 22737.jpg), stolen from random website and exposure/contrast altered (common technique to obscure reverse image search)--e.g., File:ET WDM3A Twins.jpg is here; File:WAP-2.jpg is here; File:NKJ WAG5 Twins.jpg is here; File:KYN WCAM-3.jpg is here; File:WAG9 31623.jpg is here; etc. (Note also uploader is serial train copyvio LTA - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JND AMD, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zubakinglee69, etc.) Quack!
- File:VSKP WAP7.jpg
- File:LGD WAP7.jpg
- File:WAG9 31623.jpg
- File:ANGL WAG7.jpg
- File:BL WCAM2P.jpg
- File:KYN WCAM2.jpg
- File:KYN WCAG1.jpg
- File:KYN WCAM-3.jpg
- File:KYN WCAM3.jpg
- File:KYN WAP7.jpg
- File:KYN WCM6.jpg
- File:BSP WAG9HC.jpg
- File:KZJ WAG7 Tigerface.jpg
- File:AJJ WAG7.jpg
- File:KZJ WAG7.jpg
- File:ED WAG7.jpg
- File:NKJ WAG5 Twins.jpg
- File:LDH WDM3A.jpg
- File:NKJ WDG3A.jpg
- File:KTE WDG3A Twins.jpg
- File:KTE WDG3A.jpg
- File:SGUJ WDP4.jpg
- File:WDP4 BAAZ.jpg
- File:VSKP WDM3D.jpg
- File:HWH WDM3D.jpg
- File:BWN WDM-3A.jpg
- File:R WDG3A.jpg
- File:GD WDM3D.jpg
- File:DADN YDM4.jpg
- File:BWN WDM3A.jpg
- File:SPJ WDM3A.jpg
- File:SBI WDG4D.jpg
- File:SBI WDG4.jpg
- File:BRC WAP7.jpg
- File:GZB WAP-5.png
- File:KZJ WAG9.png
- File:LDH WAG7.png
- File:LDH WDM3A.png
- File:TNP WDM3A.png
- File:BIA WAM4.png
- File:AJJ WAM4.png
- File:AQ WAP7.png
- File:GZB WAP5.png
- File:SRC WAP4.jpg
- File:HWH WAP4.jpg
- File:HWH WAP4 22737.jpg
- File:KYN WDG4D TRICOLOR.jpg
- File:VTA WDM-3D.jpg
- File:GD WDM3A.jpg
- File:Vatva WDM3D.jpg
- File:Kalyan WDM3D twin.jpg
- File:GOC WDM3A.jpg
- File:Kalyan WDM3D twins.jpg
- File:KJM WDM3D.jpg
- File:Ernakulam WDM3D.jpg
- File:Erode WDM3D.jpg
- File:Kalyan WDM3D.jpg
- File:WAP-2.jpg
- File:GZB WAP3.jpg
- File:AJJ WAP-1 22038.jpg
- File:HWH WAP-4.jpg
- File:WDM3B.jpg
- File:KYN WDM-3D.jpg
- File:ET WDM22G.jpg
- File:WDP4 20008.jpg
- File:WDS-6AD.jpg
- File:WDG3B.jpg
- File:WDG3C.jpg
- File:WDG3D.jpg
- File:KYN WDP-3A.jpg
- File:KTE WDM3C.jpg
- File:GY WDM3F.jpg
- File:GD WDM3B.jpg
- File:ET WDM-3D.jpg
- File:DDU WAG-7.jpg
- File:MGS WAP4.jpg
- File:DDU WAG9.jpg
- File:ET WAG-5.jpg
- File:ET WAM4.jpg
- File:WDG4-4.jpg
- File:SRC WAP7 37320.jpg
- File:SRC WAP7 37324.jpg
- File:SRC WAP4 SER.jpg
- File:VSKP WAG5 Ghost.jpg
- File:RPM WAP7 Sharon Plywoods.jpg
- File:RPM WAP7 Pranav Jewellery.jpg
- File:BZA WAG-5.jpg
- File:BZA WAG-7.jpg
- File:BZA WAP-4.jpg
- File:KZJ WAG9.jpg
- File:KZJ WAG-7.jpg
- File:CNB WAM4.jpg
- File:CNB WAG9.jpg
- File:KJM WDG3A.jpg
- File:BIA WAP7 Goel TMT.jpg
- File:GY WDG3A.jpg
- File:GY WDM3D.jpg
- File:GOC WDG3A.jpg
- File:ED WDM3A.jpg
- File:HWH WDS6.jpg
- File:CLA WDS-6.jpg
- File:GOC WDS6.jpg
- File:ERS WDS6.jpg
- File:ET WDS6.jpg
- File:NGC WDS6.jpg
- File:KGP WDS6.jpg
- File:TNP WDS6.jpg
- File:BNDM WDS6.jpg
- File:KJM WDS-6.jpg
- File:VSKP WDS6.jpg
- File:CLA WDS6.jpg
- File:JHS WDG3A 13440.jpg
- File:ERS WDG3A.jpg
- File:ABR WDG4D.jpg
- File:ABR WDG3A.jpg
- File:ABR WDM2.jpg
- File:ABR WDM3A 16030.jpg
- File:ET WDM3D.jpg
- File:ET WDM3A.jpg
- File:ET WDM3D 11425.jpg
- File:PA WDM3D.jpg
- File:ET WDM3A Twins.jpg
- File:BL WAG5 Barbie.jpg
- File:RPM WAP7 City Union Bank.jpg
- File:RPM WAP-7 N.jpg
- File:KYN WAG7 Tigerface.jpg
- File:GZB WAP5 Tejas.jpg
- File:AQ WAP7.jpg
- File:Old steam shed.jpg
- File:Old railway depot.jpg
- File:Inside Kalyan ELS.jpg
- File:ED WAP4.jpg
- File:ED WAP-7 NGA TMT.jpg
- File:ED WAP7 PORNA CHICKEN.jpg
- File:ED WAP7 SKC GHEE.jpg
- File:ED WAP7 TAMIL NADU TOURISM.jpg
- File:JHS WAG7 NCR.jpg
- File:GTL WDM3D 11180.jpg
- File:JHS WAG5 24050.jpg
- File:BKSC WAG7.jpg
- File:ET WAP7 37072.jpg
- File:ET WAG5.jpg
- File:ET WAP4 22924.jpg
- File:AJJ WAP4 Rajdhani.jpg
- File:AJJ WAP4 Sapthagiri.jpg
- File:BSL WAM4.jpg
- File:HWH WAG5 OJAS.jpg
- File:AJJ WAG5.jpg
- File:ED WAP7.jpg
- File:AJJ WAP4 Shatabdi livery.jpg
- File:ASN WAG5 23212.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: historical photo without all essential info (original author, source, and permission). Also transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Historical image without all essential info (original author, source, and permission) P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Just some random photo of a no-camera icon, not used in any Wikimedia project, out of COM:SCOPE with no COM:EDUSE Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 16:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivational nonsense 190.22.24.111 17:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom, lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)- Speedy delete Joke upload. A09 (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is well over 11 words, it's facebook size. Please provide source of original JPG file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Unable to find this license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused and unusable photoshopped image, out of scope. Many better alternatives available in its categories. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Logo of Fuerza Vecinal
[edit]This logo of a political party of Venezuela (founded in 2021) was uploaded with a CC license, but without any evidence that license actually applies. It is also too complex to be below the threshold of originality, even if we had any guidance on the TOO in Venezuela (which we don't). So the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
Rosenzweig τ 03:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]- File:Eglise Saint Joseph Au Havre (180699421).jpeg
- File:Eglise Saint Joseph Le Havre (180698277).jpeg
- File:Le Havre Accumulation Of Power Chiharu Shiota (213966737).jpeg
- File:Le Havre, the City Rebuilt by Auguste Perret-113535.jpg
- File:Plage du Havre.jpg
- File:St. Josef, Le Havre.jpg
- File:Église Saint-Joseph du Havre - intérieur.jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VIGNERON (talk) 07:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]- File:A. Perret by Anhelina Livia Starkova.jpg
- File:Eglise Saint Joseph.jpg
- File:Eglise Saint-Joseph (Le Havre).jpg
- File:Eglise St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 28261987289.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 28281704439.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 39330572074.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 39330572904.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 39330573474.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph.jpg
- File:Le Havre Boulevard François 1er 1.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 10.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 11.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 12.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 13.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 14.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 15.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 16.jpg
- File:Le Havre, façade maritime entre St Joseph et le sémaphore.jpg
- File:Le Havre, France (39834773333).jpg
- File:Le Havre- Saint Joseph church tower.jpg
- File:Orgel St. Josef, Le Havre.jpg
- File:St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg
- File:St. Joseph Church Tower (Focus) in Le Havre 4.jpg
- File:St. Joseph's church, Le Havre.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Le_Havre_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VIGNERON (talk) 12:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete most except File:Eglise Saint Joseph.jpg, File:Le Havre, façade maritime entre St Joseph et le sémaphore.jpg & File:St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg which can be considered as de minimis. --Minoraxtalk 11:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]This building has been designed by Auguste Perret (1874-1954), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Auguste Perret-LE HAVRE-Eglise saint Joseph-1957.jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0054 (49001385107).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0055 (49001181666).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0056 (49000627478).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0060 (49001384847).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0061 (49001181396).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0062 (49001384772).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0064 (49001181301).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0065 (49001384682).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0066 (49001384632).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0067 (49001181211).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0069 (49001384517).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0070 (49001181086).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0071 (49001181031).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0072 (49001180981).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0073 (49001374957).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0074 (49001384307).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0075 (49001384257).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0076 (49000636548).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0077 (49001180821).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0078 (49001384112).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0079 (49001180741).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0080 (49001180701).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0082 (49001383992).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0085 (49001383827).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0086 (49000636108).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0090 (49000635908).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0094 (49000635703).jpg
- File:LeHAVRE StJoseph.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Auguste Perret died in 1954
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0059 (49000637208).jpg
- File:Le Havre 08.jpg
- File:Le Havre, France (27401583797).jpg
- File:Photo-2016-08-01-16-20-46 St josef le havre.jpg
- File:St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Singapore A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom Robertsky (talk) 07:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Kingway Brewery Holdings
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING.
- File:HK Kingway Beer 金威啤酒 Supermarket display canned product Feb-2012.jpg
- File:HK Sai Ying Pun 佳寶食品超級市場 Kai Bo Food Supermarket canned beer Kingway June-2012.jpg
- File:HK supermarket product display - 生力啤 San Miguel bottles Blue Ice 金威啤酒 Kingway 青島 Tsing Tao Beverage Feb-2012.jpg
- File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng 都會駅 MetroTown mall shop Fusion by ParknShop Supermarket Store 金威啤酒 Kingway Beer glass bottles December 2019 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng 都會駅 MetroTown mall shop Fusion by ParknShop Supermarket Store 金威啤酒 Kingway Beer glass bottles December 2019 SS2 02.jpg
- File:SZ Shenzhen Tour Lunch time 深圳遊 Aug-2010 金威啤酒 Kingway beers n Pepsi Coke.jpg
Wcam (talk) 03:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Митинг протеста против повышения пенсионного возраста (Москва, 22.09.2018) 13 (cropped).jpg
[edit]_13_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader is the subject in the photo. Requires COM:VRT permission from the original photographer. ✗plicit 07:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you want to delete this picture. Please advise Rachbad (talk) 07:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, likely to be a derivative work, thus a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Este archivo fue creado por mi, es la imágen de un trofeo muy antiguo que no tiene indicios de derechos de autor, es solo un trofeo. ForzaJuve2019 (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy + blurry image A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete The image is blurry and unusable. --Javidd (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 14:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Metadata shows this is from Facebook. Faint subtitle that may indicate this is a screenshot from a video. Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PRP. Users only contribution. A09 (talk) 20:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The photographer died in 1958. This photograph is still copyrighted in the country of origin (the UK) until 2029 (1958 + 70 + 1). 81.41.175.237 00:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The photographer died in 1958. This photograph is still copyrighted in the country of origin (the UK) until 2029 (1958 + 70 + 1). 81.41.175.237 00:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nemanjab1111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I fail to see what this set of uploads has to do with Foundation projects. They are unused and have no relevance that I can see
- File:Schedule Report.csv.pdf
- File:Raspored od 11.09.pdf
- File:A1bbjn.pdf
- File:Introduction-cyber-security.pdf
- File:Rs112310610invoicenumberpdf original.pdf
- File:DatalabDocument.pdf
- File:Cenovnik2022272.pdf
- File:Cenovnik2022271.pdf
- File:20220725 163133mn.pdf
- File:MH-2022-3600-2343-1343.pdf
- File:RS112310610 01-1051280230 (1).pdf
- File:Faktura11.pdf
- File:Email.pdf
- File:Sanhh.pdf
- File:Project 20220716 1536136-09.png
- File:Project 20220716 1530061-01.png
- File:Cenovnik1.pdf
- File:Cenovnik.pdf
- File:Prokura.pdf
- File:Predračun nacrt biljana-popovic-pr-biomedica-st-beograd 815 (2)(1).pdf
- File:Cupdf.com hr-menadzment (1).pdf
- File:AprDoc.pdf
- File:Scheduledbez3 hours All 2022-06-01 2022-06-30 (1).pdf
- File:7eshifts - Schedules.pdf
- File:Scheduled hours All 2022-05-01 2022-056-31.pdf
- File:Scheduled hours All 2022-05-01 2022-05-31.xls.pdf
- File:7shifts - Schedules.pdf
- File:Scheduled hours All 2022-06-01 2022-06-30.pdf
- File:Schedule-2022-05-30-Mozzart-BEZANIJA-3-Bez3 (1).pdf
- File:Mozzartnem - Powered By Deputy.pdf
- File:Mozzarttam - Powered By Deputy.pdf
- File:IS210-L07 (5).pdf
- File:IS210-L08 (2).pdf
- File:MozzartT- Powered By Deputy.pdf
- File:MozzartN - Powered By Deputy.pdf
- File:Mozzartqr.jpg
- File:Mozzart sbb.png
- File:Wifi qr.jpg
- File:Mozzart sbb.jpg
- File:IS210-L06 (2).pdf
Herby talk thyme 11:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nemanjab1111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents and screenshot of questionable notability.
- File:FUpl(1).pdf
- File:Tf16410110 winpppp.pdf
- File:Tf04099166 win32 2.pdf
- File:SpoljnapolitikaEUuteorijskomkonceptustrukturnespoljnepolitike.pdf
- File:Blanko-izjavaдорада.-docxx.pdf
- File:Connecteam Launch Pad.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zubakinglee69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More blatant COM:NETCOPYVIOs - by serial train copyvio LTA - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JND AMD. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ajendra69, etc. - generally lower res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:MLDT WDG3A.jpg is here; File:JHS WDG3A.jpg is here; etc.
- File:JHS WDG3A.jpg
- File:RTM WDM3A M.jpg
- File:KYN WDM3D.jpg
- File:TKD WDM3A 18734.jpg
- File:TKD WDP1.jpg
- File:TKD WDM3A 16377.jpg
- File:KYN WDM3D Tricolour.jpg
- File:LKO WDM3D 11233.jpg
- File:MLDT WDG3A.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 06:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Personal file (class essay/homework), outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if any of this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boride SLABS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded as advertisement but could be valuable content if we get COM:VRT permission confirmation.
- File:Boride1.jpg
- File:Boride3.jpg
- File:Boride5.jpg
- File:Boride6.jpg
- File:Boride.jpg
- File:Boride4.jpg
GPSLeo (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see any obvious in-scope use for these images; there's no need to go hunting for ways to use images which were obviously uploaded with a promotional intent, especially if permission isn't clear. Omphalographer (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with GPSLeo. Some of these photos show interesting interiors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 06:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily textual content (organizational documents for a church group). Omphalographer (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
{{Low resolution}}This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Robertsky (talk) 17:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, agrees. --Brainy J (talk) 21:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- It can be removed. I used it earlier on my user page but I don't need it there anymore. Stryn (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 05:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Keep Personal image of a user with tens of thousands of contributions. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work, but file EXIF shows "Author Ravi Putcha Copyright holder Ravi Putcha facebook.com/10KPortraits". VRT permission from Ravi Putcha needed. MKFI (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused unidentified person. Offensive and vulgar description. Sije (talk) 11:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Probably not own work, but copied from https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=author_red&id=4267. Wikisaurus (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Seemingly a personal file, COM:HOST. Onsilla (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In this case, the fence is sharp enough. Why would this be out of scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
personal artwork Joschi71 (talk) 14:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Ten plik jest zfałszowany . wykorzystany w sposób obraźliwy dla osób których wizerunek wykorzystano w celach politycznych. To fejk . nie przedstawia osób których opisuje. To oczernianoe osób , karygodne. 5.173.168.44 20:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Proof? --Achim55 (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. Nazis are despicable and dangerous, and that's no reason to pretend they didn't exist and not cover them. Do you want Wikipedia to also delete all its articles about Nazis and Nazism? Well, it won't happen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- It appears to me that the user didn't like the picture because the lads look too ordinary, too human. Well, that's what they were: ordinary human beings. People like to forget that, because it's the scary part really. But maybe I misinterpreted. At any rate, the discussion is over, isn't it? So the deletion tag should be removed. 90.186.72.227 21:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_00m_10s_010ms.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_00m_10s_010ms.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested deletion but this is nearly a year old, so CSD G7 does not apply. Probably out of scope though. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_00m_10s_010ms.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete out of scope --Emu (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_00m_10s_010ms.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader requested deletion but this is nearly a year old, so CSD G7 does not apply. Probably out of scope though. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator, unfortunately. It's just unnecessary. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 06:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Perigeux dog park.jpg Elgaard (talk) 12:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Is free? 191.125.14.203 23:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: licensereview passed. Ruthven (msg) 08:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
G10 Acqua di Parma 181.43.4.96 13:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep WTF? This was just kept yesterday! Jeon Won-woo is covered by Wikipedia articles in several languages, and this file passed license review. If you nominate this again when it's again kept, whatever IPs you have should be blocked for vandalism, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Parece que el músico no conoce G10. 181.43.4.96 13:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Is libre? 190.22.24.111 17:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Watermarked with (C)MrVMK. COM:VRT needed. A09 (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
not own work. This map has a trademark, which is the copyright status? MinervaAustral (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Note in bottom corner says something like "for touristical use only" hence not allowed for Wikipedia. On the other hand, showing logo of a company does not automatically assume copyright. A09 (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a photo taken of me by a photographer when I WAS UNDERAGE Vondechii (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
![18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/14#c-Vondechii-20230614182800-File:Wandeth_"VonDechii"_Gonzo.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a personal file that is outside of COM:SCOPE and the uploader doesn't want it here; it would be rude (at best) not to honor an innocuous request such as this. In addition, if Vondechii is the subject of the photo and not the photographer, then we need explicit permission from the photogrpaher/copyright holder in order to host the image on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
![14:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/14#c-Mdaniels5757-20230624145100-File:Wandeth_"VonDechii"_Gonzo.jpg){kind=link}
This photo was taken of me when I WAS UNDERAGE Vondechii (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a personal file that is outside of COM:SCOPE and the uploader doesn't want it here; it would be rude (at best) not to honor an innocuous request such as this. Marbletan (talk) 13:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablo.riosc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate collection of images with varying quality and styles, mostly looking like screenshots, missing EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:Alfredo Ríos Camarena 5.png
- File:Alfredo Ríos Camarena 4.jpg
- File:Alfredo Ríos Camarena 2.png
- File:Alfredo Ríos Camarena.png
- File:A neon-lit subway station with renaissance architecture and decoration.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
no own work, scan? Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- It's not a scan, it's a photograph and I have the usage rights. JohannaPinkFreiburg (talk) 16:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- You may have the usage rights, but unless this is a selfie, you do not have the copyright. Who is the photographer? We need their permission. --2003:C0:8F00:D400:818F:A4AD:59D0:DF0E 17:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- The photographer is Yulianingsih Riswan. She gave me her permission. What exactly do you need from her? She'll be happy to provide it. JohannaPinkFreiburg (talk) 18:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JohannaPinkFreiburg: Please ask Mr. Riswan for a permission that he will send through COM:VRT. A09 (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- The photographer is Yulianingsih Riswan. She gave me her permission. What exactly do you need from her? She'll be happy to provide it. JohannaPinkFreiburg (talk) 18:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- You may have the usage rights, but unless this is a selfie, you do not have the copyright. Who is the photographer? We need their permission. --2003:C0:8F00:D400:818F:A4AD:59D0:DF0E 17:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023061510003478 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 21:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted video clip, not uploader's own work as is claimed. Instagram logo itself may be simple enough for public domain, but I think the whole video exceeds the threshold of originality. — Yerpo Eh? 11:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Very low resolution photograph whose metadata shows this is from Facebook. Possible netcopyvio. Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Looks like COM:F10 A09 (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused, out of focus photo. IMHO, not usuable and thus out of scope. C messier (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom A09 (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
EXIF has an explicit noncommercial restriction and the author's name is different from the uploaders. Abzeronow (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Copyvio A09 (talk) 20:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution, 2 better files File:Vétheuil in Summer MET DT1898.jpg, File:Vétheuil in Summer.JPG Oursana (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
It seems to be Flickr laundry. Natashja Blomberg better known as «Lady Dahmer» has a website where she list her Instagram account, her Facebook account and her Youtube account. There is no mention of a Flickr account. Moreover, the Flickr account uses her real name instead of her pseudonym and it was opened one day before this painting was uploaded. Günther Frager (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
It seems to be Flickr laundry. Natashja Blomberg better known as «Lady Dahmer» has a website where she list her Instagram account, her Facebook account and her Youtube account. There is no mention of a Flickr account. Moreover, the Flickr account uses her real name instead of her pseudonym and it was opened one day before this painting was uploaded. Günther Frager (talk) 23:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
It seems to be Flickr laundry. Natashja Blomberg better known as «Lady Dahmer» has a website where she list her Instagram account, her Facebook account and her Youtube account. There is no mention of a Flickr account. Moreover, the Flickr account uses her real name instead of her pseudonym and it was opened two days before this photo was uploaded. Günther Frager (talk) 23:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
It seems to be Flickr laundry. Natashja Blomberg better known as «Lady Dahmer» has a website where she list her Instagram account, her Facebook account and her Youtube account. There is no mention of a Flickr account. Moreover, the Flickr account uses her real name instead of her pseudonym and it was opened the same day this photo was uploaded. Günther Frager (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
photo taken from Facebook Culex (talk) 20:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 23:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Facebook 191.126.131.181 23:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:REDUNDANT to File:AnneHathaway CUL Page4DetailB.jpg. The claim that the image was "redone in AI" seems false, it's just a cut-out of her head with some text added. Belbury (talk) 11:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Low res image; user uploaded File:Farès Chaïbi.png at the same time which was an image taken from social media, so presumably this is also. Belbury (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Captainpisslord (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, you released it into the public domain 10 months ago. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep And it's useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Artistic work in Kyrgyzstan become Public Domain after 50 years of its publishing date. This image was published in 1988 and is still copyrighted as per Kyrgyzstan's law on copyright. Bookish Worm (talk) 01:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Probably right, but the image was published on the official website in memory of A.M. and before posting, I got permission to use it. We should then change the license to a more correct one, I'm not an expert and would like to know if this is the right thing to do? Paf zet (talk) 14:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, only if you are the author of this image. This image is not free and the official website means nothing in terms of copyright law. If you don't know the rules why you upload the images here? You can be blocked forever. FlorianH76 (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to listen to another person, and you, please, stop writing about blocking my account.Paf zet (talk) 04:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Paf zet If the image was allowed to be in public domain by its copyright owner, PD-Kyrgyzstan is not the correct template to be used, as the image is still copyrighted as per Kyrgyz copyright law. You should contact the copyright owner of the website and allow him to confirm the permission to host the image in Commons through Volunteer Response Team method. Bookish Worm (talk) 03:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll try to get in touch with the owner of the site. Paf zet (talk) 08:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Paf zet: Not owner of the site but author/copyright holder of the image. Might be same person though A09 (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll try to get in touch with the owner of the site. Paf zet (talk) 08:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Paf zet If the image was allowed to be in public domain by its copyright owner, PD-Kyrgyzstan is not the correct template to be used, as the image is still copyrighted as per Kyrgyz copyright law. You should contact the copyright owner of the website and allow him to confirm the permission to host the image in Commons through Volunteer Response Team method. Bookish Worm (talk) 03:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to listen to another person, and you, please, stop writing about blocking my account.Paf zet (talk) 04:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Just a blatant fake PD rationale. --188.123.231.6 08:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
this version is being used instead of the complete one MostEpic (talk) 10:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Rosenzweig τ 21:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Added it by accident long time ago and it doesnt bring any value Widesehl (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
File is old Emihle T (talk) 15:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion; per the description the photo apparently shows the (not notable) uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Logo nicht mehr aktuell - dies ist unser altes Logo Alutik (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The logo is no longer current. Under https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%26B_Hotels you can find the current logo of us. Therefore please delete the old logo immediately, otherwise it will still be used by partners, service providers or employees by mistake. 95.91.216.36 15:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; old logos may be kept as historical records. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
ancien logo B&B HOTELS qui n'est plus utilisable par la marque 176.124.40.10 16:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep And already kept twice for the same reason. Stop asking Commons to memory-hole history! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
update logo Caroline Lengline (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is no reason for deletion, and that won't change with a 4th, 5th, 6th or 7th deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep There have already been 3 other discussions about this where all the consensus is "Keep". It is a historical logo, and is in scope and in use on Commons and other Wikimedia projects. --QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 00:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
ancien logo B&B HOTELS qui n'est plus utilisable par la marque 176.124.40.10 16:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 20:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Also COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
not the right logo anymore Caroline Lengline (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is no reason for deletion, and that won't change with a 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin-closure) That is still not a valid reason for deletion. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused. Replaced with File:B&B Hotels Logo (New).svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: historic logos are as in scope as current ones. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
scan from a book, which is the copyright status? MinervaAustral (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PRP Per file description, the book is from 1994. A09 (talk) 20:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_copia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_copia.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
map from Google Maps. Do not have any information about copyright status. MinervaAustral (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Google Maps are copyrighted by Google. A09 (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gre regiment (talk) 21:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lastpatroled (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable and this page is most likely: https://tr.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Tommy_Jonathan_Sinaga is spam. sadly, tr.wikiquote is not under moderation.
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 05:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- see:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by RuicostaFromCalifornia ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 05:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RuicostaFromCalifornia (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable out of project scope, see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lastpatroled
- File:Signature of Tommy Jonathan Sinaga.png
- File:Tommy Jonathan Sinaga (2023).jpg
- File:Signature of Tommy-Jonathan Sinaga.svg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 05:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GeorgeSmith212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagrams, out of project scope
- File:Australian Parliament.svg
- File:Australia Parliament 2042.svg
- File:Australian Parliament 2040.svg
- File:Australia Parliament 2036.svg
- File:Australia Parliament 2032.svg
- File:Australia Parliament under proportional representation 2032.svg
- File:Australia Parliament 2028.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
fantasy country & party names, out of project scope
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Myworld Nidea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution images missing EXIF data, these are the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work
A1Cafel (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
hoax image, compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Regina Roses Logo.png. Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- I made this by myself in Photoshop. It is mine. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 98.143.243.186 (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: en:Draft:Regina Roses. --Achim55 (talk) 18:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Reupload image that was deleted Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gowtham Photo.jpg ~AntanO4task (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
EXIF lists this as a screenshot, and the Flickr uploader is on the Questionable list for Flickrwashing. Tineye doesn't turn up a hit. Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hola, esta imagen fue colgada por el dueño de la fotografía en su cuenta de Flickr, con los permisos correspondientes. ¿Me puedes explicar el motivo de su solicitud de borrado? porque sinceramente se me escapa. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- The Flickr account has four files, none of them have camera EXIF, Flickr account has no followers, and we have no indication that this is a selfie since the Flickr account is supposedly that of the subject. Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hola Abzeronow, muchas gracias por tu rápida respuesta. La fotografía efectivamente es del sujeto. Pero parece lógico pensar que aunque él no haya hecho las fotos, el autor de las fotos le haya dado a él la potestad de utilizarlas como crea mas conveniente. Sinceramente, me resulta dificil comprender como se pretende borrar esta imagen, que cuenta con los permisos correspondientes. Si en esa cuenta tiene muchas o pocas fotos, me parece totalemente irrelevante para el tema que nos ocupa. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- The Flickr account has four files, none of them have camera EXIF, Flickr account has no followers, and we have no indication that this is a selfie since the Flickr account is supposedly that of the subject. Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Strakhov (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Is scope? 190.22.24.111 17:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Photoshop from file:Petroskanjerapet.jpg. A09 (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
In scope? 190.22.24.111 17:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Looks cropped and photoshopped. Draft, where picture was used, has been deleted. A09 (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankita Intellion (talk · contribs)
[edit]The one that is taken with NIKON D810 has metadata showing it is a copyright violation. The other four, are facebook or smaller sized, only one has camera type, it's a Canon EOS 750D, and none of these look like own work. They are also single topic, which may be promotional in nature.
- File:Intellion Edge.jpg
- File:Intellion Park, Navi Mumbai.png
- File:Intellion Park, Gurugram.png
- File:Intellion Park Chennai.jpg
- File:Intellion edge.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
"Unknown authors" and source websites are not able to be licensed for Wikimedia Commons. Please read COM:L.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blueberry onion (talk · contribs)
[edit]There's nothing on either file template to support the licenses given. These are older photos, not own work of uploader.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unless proven PD. A09 (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo is tilted. We have file:Bayona - panoramio (49).jpg without tilt. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete We don't need same two photos. A09 (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Google finds multiple uses of this image on Facebook, this image is facebook-sized. I would like to see a larger version with useful metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete COM:PRP. A09 (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Portrait of artist Norma De Saint Picman in front of her work, a Double portrait "To His Serene Highness (S.D.) Prince Nikolaus and his spouse Her Royal Highness (I.K.H.) Princess Margaretha von und zu Liechtenstein, I".jpg
[edit]_Prince_Nikolaus_and_his_spouse_Her_Royal_Highness_(I.K.H.)_Princess_Margaretha_von_und_zu_Liechtenstein,_I%22.jpg){kind=link}
_Prince_Nikolaus_and_his_spouse_Her_Royal_Highness_(I.K.H.)_Princess_Margaretha_von_und_zu_Liechtenstein,_I%22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission for depictured image in the nominated image. COM:VRT ticket needed. A09 (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket permission. --Krd 14:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Wrong license (the uploader can't have the rights on this file) Оранге (talk) 20:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Above COM:TOO to be PD (files can be in fact relicensed as ie. {{PD-text}}{{Trademarked}} with appropriate authorship). A09 (talk) 20:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this appears to be a photomanipulation of the original artwork, in which Ficino is not smiling. the true image can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cappella_Tornabuoni_-_Angel_Appearing_to_Zacharias#/media/File:Marsilio_Ficino_-_Angel_Appearing_to_Zacharias_(detail).jpg 60.240.12.193 20:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Sourced image is fine, uploaded version is not. A09 (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- why the long face :3 Illuminana (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 21:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artistic work in Kyrgyzstan become Public Domain after 50 years of its publishing date. This image was published in 1988 and is still copyrighted as per Kyrgyzstan's law on copyright. Bookish Worm (talk) 01:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
found elsewhere https://www.samuelmassilia.com/post/constance-labbe-emilie-est-du-cote-de-la-justice Jmax (talk) 06:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no permission from Viviana Morizet. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: too small to be useful and probably not an own work. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Record cover art from 2022 by a living artist. Certainly not Creative Commons licensed. 2003:C0:8F00:D400:818F:A4AD:59D0:DF0E 11:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I suspect that these images are not own work but video screenshots based on the file EXIF comment "Screenshot" present in two of the three files.
MKFI (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP, also considering low quality of the images and these being the only uploads of the user. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In fact, not a diagram but a blank image. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, unused Mateus2019 (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, cf. COM:F10. Also deleted the other uploads. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Old version of our logo Car (WAPerú) (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
-20230614214500-File:Logo_WikiAcción_Perú.png){kind=link}
- Comment Not a deletion reason! The only question is: is your company notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Feel free to adapt the file description and upload the new logo separately. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Old version of our logo Car (WAPerú) (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
-20230614214500-File:Logo_WikiAccion_negro_s_sombra.png){kind=link}
- Comment Not a deletion reason! The only question is: is your company notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Feel free to adapt the file description and upload the new logo separately. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Old version of our logo Car (WAPerú) (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
-20230614214500-File:Logo_WikiAcción_Perú.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Not a deletion reason! The only question is: is your company notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Feel free to adapt the file description and upload the new logo separately. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
This map was already made with the correct shadings 2600:1009:B043:7967:8CA7:DABF:ECC0:EA5F 00:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: redundant to File:Montana Presidential Election Results 1924.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Galería own work 181.203.6.210 03:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: individual images are not attributed. And no clear purpose for this montage, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Otra galería 181.203.6.210 03:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: individual images are not attributed. And no clear purpose for this montage, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This image is of low quality and has not been used anywhere so it is not educational and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed. Q28 (talk) 04:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This image is not educational and is not in use so it is outside the scope of the project and should be removed.{{Low}} Q28 (talk) 04:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'd Keep. It's not in use, but it is the personal logo of a user who contributed quite substantially. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is a watermark of the website on the photo, and the EXIF information is incomplete, which is likely to infringe. Shenzhiming88 (talk) 06:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I doubt it is not his/her own work. Luurankosoturi (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. And advertising, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
bassa risoluzione, nessun dato Exif, possibile copyviol Threecharlie (talk) 10:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
bassa risoluzione, nessun dato Exif, possibile copyviol, licenza errata Threecharlie (talk) 10:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
nessuna fonte, possibile copyviol Threecharlie (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
nessuna fonte, probabile scansione Threecharlie (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Scan without proper attribution. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
bassa risoluzione, nessun dato Exif, possibile copyviol, attribuzione dubbia Threecharlie (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
nessuna fonte, probabile scansione, attribuzione errata Threecharlie (talk) 10:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
probabile scansione, nessuna fonte, attribuzione errata Threecharlie (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
nessun dato Exif, possibile copyviol, attribuzione errata Threecharlie (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
bassa risoluzione, nessun dato Exif, possibile copyviol Threecharlie (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Uploader combined the images, but is unlikely to own the copyright to the images that are made by the police Dajasj (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate with File:Flag of Transvaal (variant).svg. Schwei2 (talk) 12:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Image has been previously published in https://www.welancoragallery.com/art-fairs/. VRT permission is needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 13:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Image by Elliott Jerome Brown, Jr; VRT permission from photographer is needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 13:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In this case, nothing is sharp, and I don't think any specific technique is being used to achieve blur, but someone should correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Screenshot from a video made by the airline, not own work by uploader. Bookish Worm (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that editor has the license for this book cover GoingBatty (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Copy Violation MNXANL (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio https://pic2.zhimg.com/80/v2-7e6eeee43d5cf671caabed1ae17c97f9_1440w.webp MNXANL (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
copyvio https://p0.itc.cn/q_70/images03/20230207/7c985a8ba8c04cdc85b3effb534cc2e7.jpeg MNXANL (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
copyvio https://dynacord.com/applications/sports-venues/ MNXANL (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.investinxishan.cn/Resource/Upload/2bc2907f-006c-4d3a-b03b-5ef43ae575a0/20210427/37056e37-dd0c-42be-bddd-be1e4cada70e.png MNXANL (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
File:XV4j04 as9avGLbac-bc5nY2xkt448i7lGpx6KTuE4EntFqX9HNiU9jDJ8t3hxAwWpJU8Y9OQ XniNnrk2ClPXfo6nDKhfBWTMuZCGvBXLiO0aioG0sUW1W9PNdfnuuSQuZifAf4zVnDQzEEUZ976Q.webp
[edit]
Duplicate of File:Arms of Michael Middleton.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Permission not given for use of bus picture. I accidentally uploaded this picture.Wikimedia Privacy emailed to ask for “nominate for deletion”. Wheatley Hill (talk) 15:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikimedia Privacy have emailed to request the deletion of this bus picture. The picture was accidentally uploaded without the permission of the photographer.They also want the picture removed.Many thanks and apologies for the error. Wheatley Hill (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Apologies for this error. Please delete following a email from Wiki Privacy.The picture had been uploaded and published without the permission of the photographer. Wheatley Hill (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Question At upload you claimed that you are the photo author (photographer). If this was not true, then who is the photographer (and how can we verify that he is not you) and how did you get access to the oririnal photo? Ankry (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This calls into question all their uploads. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
copyvio http://image.thepaper.cn/www/image/24/231/608.png MNXANL (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nahmoud reda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibile copyright violation. Possibile photoshoped.
--Karim talk to me :)..! 15:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
very bad quality and low resolution, 4 better files in Boulevard des Capucines by Claude Monet Oursana (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Presumable copyvio. Who is the photographer (= copyright holder)? This is certainly not a selfie. 2003:C0:8F00:D400:818F:A4AD:59D0:DF0E 17:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. Who is the photographer (= copyright holder)? This is certainly not a selfie. 2003:C0:8F00:D400:818F:A4AD:59D0:DF0E 17:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio: Professional promo photo, certainly not a selfie. Who is the photographer (= copyright holder)? 2003:C0:8F00:D400:818F:A4AD:59D0:DF0E 17:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Авторские права принадлежат ВГТРК MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of permission/licensing. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused, not needed Mike Peel (talk) 19:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No permission for depictured image in the nominated image. COM:VRT ticket needed. A09 (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Porque es muy pesado. 3Mb. Subí una version nueva del mismo más liviana 58 Kb Josaatwiki (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Telar decorativocon aplicación en fieltro.jpg, but more importantly, no permission from artist. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Roosevelt Boulevard Subway
[edit]Both files are credited to Twitter account @BlvdSubway (see here). Uploader may be the same person behind that account, but permission via COM:VRTS would be needed. (Note: uploader's other uploads were all copyvios falsely claimed as own work.)
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image focuses on a drawing printed in a T-Shirt. The drawing is from the Argentine cartoonist Quino who died in 2020 and depicts the character Mafalda. Both the image and the character are copyrighted. Günther Frager (talk) 22:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: deleted the first revision per request. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netora as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|2=File:オークラ プレステージタワー.jpg https://skyskysky.net/construction/201906.html Not the same as the deleted one GPSLeo (talk) 17:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Own work 191.125.14.203 23:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Not an own work although presented as such. According to its Spanish Wikipedia information box died in 1913! Born in 1914!!! 181.43.4.96 13:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously it;s not an own work. The picture was taken from http://www.journals.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/download/25195/23683 where it is signed as courtesy of the family, no authorship provided. But according to the Mexican copyright, "Anonymous works are in public domain until the author or the owner of the rights are identified". Should we treat the family as the rights owner for this case? If not, it is anonymously published work in public domain. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. False claims, actual copyright status uncertain. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a duplicate localized file with content that's already present in the main SVG file. The author has agreed to replace this with the main file. For further context, see the previous deletion discussion for the other files that were in the same situation: Commons:Deletion requests/Language-specific versions of Wikidata homepage banner. Waldyrious (talk) 09:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in France Poudou99 (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I think we have de minimi here. The pyramid is indeed centered on the image, but the view also include most of the Cour Napoléon and a part of the Place du Carrousel. Miniwark (talk) 11:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the pyramid cannot be considered de minimis in this image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Archivo personal 190.22.24.111 17:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PowerPoint from one of the local WM communities. A09 (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- But not in use. Should it be saved somewhere other than Commons? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in scope for Category:Groupe Utilisateurs Wikimedia Haiti, documenting their activities. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in UK. UK has a very low COM:TOO, even a sticker of a sumo player is complex enough to be copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep obviously graffiti, keep per COM:GRAFFITI. nominator's crusade is getting a bit obsessive Oxyman (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- This is a sticker art, not a graffiti. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Same thing, also called paste up graffiti, you're not seriously suggesting this is an officially sanctioned road sign? Oxyman (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- This is a sticker art, not a graffiti. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Sure, but the reason that COM:GRAFFITI is permitted is that the artist, in painting the graffiti, committed an illegal act. Here, with sticker art, the artist is not the person committing vandalism, but rather a separate person who could assert copyright without having done anything illegal. So I think COM:GRAFFITI's logic does not apply here. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- The sticker art has been made specifically to interact with the road sign, deliberately shaped to fit in that precise location, So I find your claim and assumption that the artist was a different person to the person who finished the product a bit of a reach. Even assuming the person who did the final touch to this was a different person. That would be like claiming the getaway driver had no part in the bank robbery because all he did was drive a car, pretty sure the law wouldn't see it like that. Oxyman (talk) 20:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Neutral In sometimes such painting to the road signages may legitimate, based on behavior backgrounds. Probably a true British lawyer shall be able to describe the likely case laws. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 03:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This location "Star Yard" was an area where Graffiti was known to be ignored or tolerated, it is still graffiti rather than an official mural so keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- There are also legally painted murals in Star Yard. I don't think we should deny the painter's copyright, even the painter(s) is/are unknown. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- That is not the same Star Yard, I was referring to the Pub Yard near Brick Lane, London Borough of Tower Hamlets not the Street in London Borough of Camden. So before you repeat your hoity-toity "deny the painter's copyright" tripe (as if anyone here can do that) make sure you know what you're talking about. Oxyman (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- There are also legally painted murals in Star Yard. I don't think we should deny the painter's copyright, even the painter(s) is/are unknown. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:GRAFFITI appears to apply here. —holly {chat} 03:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There's no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art installed in the US after January 1, 1978, per COM:FOP US. Since en:Peurto Rico is a commonwealth of the US, it is almost certainly covered under US copyright law, which means this photo needs to be treated as a COM:DW. The uploader/photographer can release their photo under a free license if they want, but the copyright status of the memorial itself also needs to be considered. Unless the memorial can be shown to be ineligible for copyright protection (i.e. COM:PD) for some reason, or the COM:CONSENT of whomever created the memorial can be verified, I don't Commons can keep this photo per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Obvious faulty climate map, Maine has no tundra climate and very little subarctic climate. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 06:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It apparently matches File:World Köppen Classification (with authors).svg, but contradicts File:Köppen Climate Types Maine.png. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Since the world map that this one is derived from cites a source for its data, the factual accuracy is not within the scope of a deletion request. This needs to be reconciled and the map can be fixed as necessary. —holly {chat} 04:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Unified resouse locator 103.75.21.249 08:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- با احترام و تشکر از ویرایش شما ولی فایل را مناسب برای حذف نمیدانم. با بهترین احترامات Mostafameraji (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. High quality file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 04:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- also file:Pitagora d'Argento di Michele Affidato.png
Maybe the trophies are protected with copyright. Who are the sculptors and when they died? Taivo (talk) 09:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 04:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unexplained image with insufficient description. Unused and uncategorized. Sije (talk) 12:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The title Google-translates to "the gunner's pin," which he is holding in his gloved hand with a desert landscape (presumably, either the Negev or the West Bank) in the background. The fact that more information should be given doesn't seem like a good deletion reason to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the explanation. Do you know if there is an appropriate category for a gunner's pin? If not, should one be created? Sije (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have no idea. If you look for one, let me know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: As this is unused and no one has made any effort to figure out what it is, I'm calling it out of scope. —holly {chat} 04:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of permission under stated terms.
- File:Neil Kinnock official portrait.jpg
- File:Official portrait of Ivor Richard, Member of the CEC (cropped).jpg
- File:Official portrait of Neil Kinnock, Member of the EC (cropped).jpg
- File:Official portrait of Neil Kinnock, Member of the EC.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This was discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/04#Stills from the European Union, has anything changed since then? If you want to reopen the discussion, the proper venue is Commons:Village pump/Copyright. If consensus changes, they can be deleted. --RAN (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- There was no consensus agreed upon at that link. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacques Chirac, 1974.jpg, Rationale for the original no-perm-tagging and for this deletion-request is a statement by an official of European Commission (EC), responsible for clearing EC material for CC-BY licensing/releasing, whereby the EC has never given general authorisation for CC-BY licensing of their images, which we as of yet assumed from this statement on their website. So, it seems that for each image on their website an individual confirmation of the CC-BY license on behalf of EC's communication dep. is necessary. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 13:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- What exactly is the reason behind the photos of Kinnock not having permission under the stated terms? The photos of Richard I understand since you explained those at their own nomination. If thr files of Kinnock are also disallowed due to the website’s copyright terms then surely this would mean that the other photos in Category:Official portrait photographs of the European Commission such as those of Ursula Von der Leyen and Carlos Moedas would also not be permitted for? And what about the countless other files which use the EC-Audiovisual Centre template? Wouldn’t they also not be permitted? I don’t really understand the issue so sorry about any inconvenience. ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've only nominated the older images because I'm not convinced the {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} licence can be retroactively applied, whereas the newer ones were first published around the same time as the laws cited by that licence, so I think those images are OK. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacques Chirac, 1974.jpg, Rationale for the original no-perm-tagging and for this deletion-request is a statement by an official of European Commission (EC), responsible for clearing EC material for CC-BY licensing/releasing, whereby the EC has never given general authorisation for CC-BY licensing of their images, which we as of yet assumed from this statement on their website. So, it seems that for each image on their website an individual confirmation of the CC-BY license on behalf of EC's communication dep. is necessary. @ThatRandomGuy1: I've found in the past that emailing them, asking them kindly to release a group of image URLs under CC-BY, they generally comply when there is a known photographer to credit personally, so I think you/we should grant them that courtesy, as indeed I have done in the past, instead of licensing the images ourselves under a disputable, made-up licence like {{EC-Audiovisual Center}}. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, that makes sense. In that case, I'll make sure to contact them and try to get permission for the Kinnock photos. As for the Richard photo, there is an issue in that there is no specific photographer credited, so I don't think the EC will release that particular image under CC-BY, especially after your previous interaction with them. Is it possible for the Kinnock images to stay up while the Richard image gets deleted as I contact the EC about the Kinnock images? At least until I get a response from them. That way, should the EC choose to release them under CC-BY in their response, those images won't have to be deleted and then reuploaded.
- And another thing. I would also suggest that someone holds a more thorough discussion on the EC Audiovisual Center template. The template mentions the "European Commission or its predecessors (such as the CEC)", yet it appears that there's no consensus as to whether the Commission's copyright law cited for the template actually applies retroactively. To clear this up in the future, I think a discussion should be held to come to a consensus and update the template. That's only a suggestion though. In the meantime, I'll be emailing the EC communication department to try and get the Kinnock images released under CC-BY. ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've only nominated the older images because I'm not convinced the {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} licence can be retroactively applied, whereas the newer ones were first published around the same time as the laws cited by that licence, so I think those images are OK. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacques Chirac, 1974.jpg, Rationale for the original no-perm-tagging and for this deletion-request is a statement by an official of European Commission (EC), responsible for clearing EC material for CC-BY licensing/releasing, whereby the EC has never given general authorisation for CC-BY licensing of their images, which we as of yet assumed from this statement on their website. So, it seems that for each image on their website an individual confirmation of the CC-BY license on behalf of EC's communication dep. is necessary. @ThatRandomGuy1: I've found in the past that emailing them, asking them kindly to release a group of image URLs under CC-BY, they generally comply when there is a known photographer to credit personally, so I think you/we should grant them that courtesy, as indeed I have done in the past, instead of licensing the images ourselves under a disputable, made-up licence like {{EC-Audiovisual Center}}. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Just an update everyone. I've emailed the Commission but still haven't had a response. Will keep you posted. ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Kinnock images but delete image of Richard. I've received a response from the Commission. They have released the Kinnock images under CC-BY 4.0 and have now updated the license on each image's source page on their website. However, as the image of Ivor Richard is not licensable under CC-BY 4.0 (see this discussion), it must be deleted.ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The Kinnock portraits have been properly released. Deleted the Richard one. —holly {chat} 04:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
License change from the the original (CC-BY 2.5 to CC-BY-SA 4.0) TheNileRex (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; just fix the licensing. —holly {chat} 04:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DaVinci Fine Arts (talk · contribs)
[edit]These claim to be "redone in AI" but just look like some kind of basic photoshop filter of the original at File:Botticelli - Vierge à l’Enfant et deux anges.jpg: the image has the same proportions and contents, just a different rendering. These are COM:REDUNDANT as lower quality versions of a historical painting.
- File:"Virgin and Child with two Angels" by Rama redone by AI in Oil Painting.png
- File:"Virgin and Child with two Angels" by Rama redone in AI in Water Painting.png
Belbury (talk) 11:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. AI-generated, not used. Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). This is an old Iranian photograph from the early 20th Century in the Qajer era. Uploader keeps removing license tag. There seem to be unrelated revisions that may need to be dealt with. Abzeronow (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Other versions deleted. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
It is extremely unlikely that this photograph from 1940 is the uploader's own work. Even if the uploader were to have taken this photo when they were 15 years old, that would indicate that they were born in 1925 and are almost 100 years old today. Since that renders the source and copyright status of the image unknown, it cannot be kept without clarification of what that actually is. Seraphimblade (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- This image is my own work. It is a digital copy of an original photograph belonging to the family of the subject and used with permission. Please ensure that it is kept for future use. Wp20151110 (talk) 08:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wp20151110, "own work" means that you were the photographer. If you received permission to license it as listed there, that should be confirmed via VRT by the family, if they currently hold the copyright. Seraphimblade (talk) 18:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Keep but fix the description. This is a "1940 unknown photographer", not "own work". But that's acceptable in the UK. Canada too, for pre-1949, use {{PD-Canada}} Andy Dingley (talk) 01:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in the UK for graphical works. This street art is by Matteo Villarosa. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely not own work: looks like screengrab or upscaled image from unknown source. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- A mon point de vue, les photos ne sont pas là que pour l' esthétique.
- Dans le cas de Trayvou, la photo est sensée évoquer la "fin de l' industrie française".
- Elle figure donc dans wikipedia pour illustrer l' histoire ...https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trayvou
- Et l' histoire, c' est aussi que le domaine Trayvou, fut une partie du lot pesage de Bernard Tapi pour 1€. Donc à la fin tout l' immobilier était en pleine décrépitude, puisque tout hypothéqué. (Après plus de 10 ans passé le lieu, est devenu le musée Confluence)
- NB: Quand je suis revenu sur le lieu dans les années 90,lorsque l' activité avait été rapatriée chez Testut à Béthune, le Chateau Trayvou n' était plus là : Il avait été démontée et vendu aux Japonais comme "oeuvre d' art" occidental . Sarnikoff (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- All comments above by the uploader are irrelevant, nothing to do with copyright, nor is (s)he claiming own work... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
unglaubwürdige Zuschreibung als eigenes Werk Bahnmoeller (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- The description page says it comes from the collection of "R. Senenko" and Niqel's user page says that is their name, so I assume "own work" here means "I took the photo of this photo." If the original creator is truly unknown, then this can be uploaded to German Wikipedia for now and in 2026 it can be restored with {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, but it can't stay now because it was not PD in Germany at the URAA date of January 1, 1996. —holly {chat} 16:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2026. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I am aware these are from Flickr. But Commons is not a personal photo album, and this looks like a personal photo album to me. I do not find any article on this person. I do not find that they are anything other than self-promotional. Suggest all images from category be examined by others and if one or two could be kept to illustrate anything educational, perhaps those could be retained. However there are screen shots, red carpet shots (obviously not selfies) and other images that call into question the "own work" label on Flickr. The entire thing requires review.
- File:Black and White portrait picture (50241219938).jpg
- File:Bored with Covid (51161228864).jpg
- File:Color pin up picture (50241934377).jpg
- File:Come join me on my social media (52386521869).jpg
- File:Do you have an Ashtray? (51846980461).jpg
- File:Enjoying the Sun Makes me happy (50014161486).jpg
- File:Face portrait (50241202183).jpg
- File:Face portrait (50241238248).jpg
- File:Face portrait (50241827841).jpg
- File:Face portrait (50242061457).jpg
- File:Feeling like a Black Queen (50926082683).jpg
- File:Follow me everywhere... Instagram @queensabinealterego Twitter @sabinealterego ... (52426102512).jpg
- File:For those who asked me for a sign picture. (52318392379).jpg
- File:Glamorous photo (50241948902).jpg
- File:I don't bite come say Hi on my social media @queensabinealterego and @sabinemondestin on Instagram ♥ (52626144721).jpg
- File:I have your souls (52309137611).jpg
- File:Kisees (50241027773).jpg
- File:Like a boss (50829525181).jpg
- File:Model Sabine Mondestin (51159832767).jpg
- File:Model Sabine Mondestin (51160435281).jpg
- File:Model Sabine Mondestin (51161546105).jpg
- File:Model Sabine Mondestin (51161566760).jpg
- File:My first -dgc party for TIFF was just great...(29644359635).jpg
- File:My most popular photo of 2022. (52693247449).png
- File:Pin Up Style (50334911841).jpg
- File:Pin-up Black and white (50241916462).jpg
- File:Pin-up shoot (50241687166).jpg
- File:Portrait shoot (50242012112).jpg
- File:Portrait side face (50242020287).jpg
- File:Powerful picture. (52500991525).jpg
- File:Queen Sabine (51283004802).jpg
- File:Queen Sabine at the Italian Party for TIFF (21565449172).jpg
- File:Queen Sabine Mondestin at TIFF (21388408110).jpg
- File:Sabine Mondestin (22212585776).jpg
- File:Show me your love! Instagram @queensabinealterego and @sabinealterego on Twitter (52651105222).jpg
- File:Show me your love! Instagram @queensabinealterego and @sabinealterego on Twitter (52651105427).jpg
- File:Show me your love! Instagram @queensabinealterego and @sabinealterego on Twitter (52651868704).jpg
- File:Show me your love! Instagram @queensabinealterego and @sabinealterego on Twitter (52652040070).jpg
- File:Show me your love! Instagram @queensabinealterego and @sabinealterego on Twitter (52652079668).jpg
- File:Show me your love! Instagram @queensabinealterego and @sabinealterego on Twitter (52652079938).jpg
- File:Summer Fun (51272964439).jpg
- File:The Vampire in the mirror (50242689111).jpg
- File:The Vampire in the mirror 2 (50242908632).jpg
- File:The Vampire in the mirror 3 (50242703741).jpg
- File:The Vampire in the mirror 4 (50242922727).jpg
- File:Thinking about something (51141896265).jpg
- File:Thinking about the future (51132912475).jpg
- File:Thinking about the future ... Follow me @sabinemondestin ( Instagram, Facebook) (50926862497).jpg
- File:Worship those boots! (51971298591).jpg
- File:You are mine now! (52017487412).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(50926862497).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of COM:SCOPE. all are personal photos, mostly selfies, some posed i.e. modelling shots. nothing educational. Robertsky (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you think the subject is notable? Trade (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- User:Robertsky, in my comment, below, I said I was unaware of a policy that barred promotional images of genuinely notable people. Are you aware of one?
- User:Trade, in my comment, below, I linked to Ms Mondestin's IMDB page, asserting that her 26 credits as an actor, producer or director, established at least A7 notability. Geo Swan (talk) 23:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan the titles on some of the images here gives the impression that these photos are promotional and advertising the subject, i.e. 'Follow me @sabinemodestin (Instagram,, Facebook)', 'Come join me on my social media', etc. which may fall under COM:ADVERT. How are these titles descriptive of the subject? Robertsky (talk) 01:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @User:Robertsky, thanks for your link to COM:ADVERT. While it says "As dictated by our scope, content which constitutes advertising or self-promotion MAY BE deleted from Wikimedia Commons..." the next paragraph says "For the policy, see COM:PS#EX_ED".
I suggest this should be interpreted as allowing images that are in scope, even if it is argued they are promotional.
Below, in your reply to Trade, you point to en:WP:GNG and en:WP:NACTOR.
- Is your reference to GNG backed up by compliance with en:WP:BEFORE? If not how do you know Ms Mondestin doesn't measure up to GNG?
Lots of people measure up to GNG, but don't (yet) have articles written about them.
In the 24 hours after Captain Sully saved all his passengers and crew, by his amazing water landing on the Hudson River, close to a dozen good faith people tried to delete or redirect the new article on him, arguing that (1) he was just a BLP1E; (2) he would be forgotten in a couple of weeks.
Yeah, I know, unbelievable.
There was so much coverage of the landing that it took all my google-fu to confirm he had already measured up to GNG, before the landing, so the BLP1E claim was nonsense. Please don't assert someone doesn't measure up to GNG just because they don't already have a standalone article written about them.
- GNG is an unnecessarily high bar. In my initial keep I asserted en:WP:CSD#A7 notability of an individual made images of them in scope. I asserted that even individuals who don't measure up the GNG notability to have a standalone article may nevertheless get some coverage in a related article - like an article about the movies they acted in, produced, or directed. That would make images of them in scope, because they might illustrate those articles.
Do you have a rebuttal?
- Are you asserting that COM:ADVERT applies to images of individuals, posted elsewhere, and then uploaded here by individuals who are unconnected to them? Should the term self-promotional be reserved only for images uploaded to the commons by the image subject, themselves?
In my keep, below, I pointed out that free images are hard to come by, which means that, since we restrict ourselves to free images, the subjects of our articles are sometimes unhappy that the (free) image we used seemed unflattering. I have told those individuals that they are free to upload an alternate image of themselves, that they considered more flattering, so long as they release it under a free license. Please clarify if you think I gave them bad advice. Geo Swan (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you realise that IMdb isn't realiable source on enwiki? See en:WP:IMDB I had done my search, and I don't see any news articles about the subject. The only few sources I see are imdb and her website. Robertsky (talk) 03:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Robertsky, did you review en:Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance that I pointed you at? Are you asserting that all individuals with images on the commons require a en:WP:RS? How many images currently supply a en:WP:RS? I'm sorry, did you say zero?
- Did you see my second and third point, above?
- Images of individuals can be in scope, even if they don't now measure up to GNG, because their images might be used to illustrate related articles. People who do not measure up to the GNG standard for a standalone article may, nevertheless, get some coverage in a section of a related article. You knew this, didn't you?
- I've encouraged people who don't like the free image(s) we found of them to upload their favourite selfie. I said I thought that was a completely reasonable thing for someone to do, and asked you if you thought this was bad advice, would claim those images were self-promotion. Geo Swan (talk) 05:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you realise that IMdb isn't realiable source on enwiki? See en:WP:IMDB I had done my search, and I don't see any news articles about the subject. The only few sources I see are imdb and her website. Robertsky (talk) 03:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @User:Robertsky, thanks for your link to COM:ADVERT. While it says "As dictated by our scope, content which constitutes advertising or self-promotion MAY BE deleted from Wikimedia Commons..." the next paragraph says "For the policy, see COM:PS#EX_ED".
- @Geo Swan the titles on some of the images here gives the impression that these photos are promotional and advertising the subject, i.e. 'Follow me @sabinemodestin (Instagram,, Facebook)', 'Come join me on my social media', etc. which may fall under COM:ADVERT. How are these titles descriptive of the subject? Robertsky (talk) 01:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Trade, not notable by enwiki's en:WP:NACTOR's and en:WP:GNG's standards. But if there's other projects that are using the photos, it can be evaluated against the notability standards there as well. Robertsky (talk) 01:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good thing Commons have it's own notability guidelines so we don't have to rely on ENWP for cases such as this Trade (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- True that. I was confused that when Geo Swan sprung A7 notability in their earlier comment. Robertsky (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good thing Commons have it's own notability guidelines so we don't have to rely on ENWP for cases such as this Trade (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you think the subject is notable? Trade (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded four of these images.
- Nomination reminds us
- "Commons is not a personal photo album";
- asserts they did "not find any article on this person.";
- asserts they did "not find that they are anything other than self-promotional";
- I agree, Commons is not a personal photo album
- However, imdb describes how Ms Mondestin has 13 actor credits, 7 producer credits, 6 directorial credits. I think this means she is a film industry professional, not a nobody. Would she measure up to en.wiki GNG? I dunno. She would measure up to CSD#A7 notability however. Even if, for the sake of argument, she did not measure up to GNG notability, pictures of her might illustrate articles on the movies she produced, directed, or acted in. I think that should be enough for her to be well within SCOPE.
- Sometimes the only free pictures we find of notable people are not that flattering.
Some subjects don't like their in scope and properly licensed free images we found. Whenever someone says this I encourage them to upload their own favourite selfie.
I am not aware of any policy that bars genuinely notable people from uploading self-promotional images.
Over a decade ago, in one of my first attempts to weigh in on a discussion over an image related to human sexuality, the nominator claimed something like, "we don't need this image, because we already have lots of similar images, and the photographer took this picture of his private parts because they wanted to show off."
The nominator's first claim was bullshit, FWIW, but the second claim is the one I want to address.
In that discussion I argued that the photographer's intent was irrelevant, if there were legitimate reasons to argue the image was in scope.
That image was a collage of five consecutive images, showing an adult male penis going from fully flaccid to fully erect. At that time commons had less than 100 penis images, and there were exactly zero similar images. Even if, for the sake of argument, the photographer's intent was to show off, they had released an image that would be highly educational to 500 million prepubescent boys, and to billions of women who had only had sex in the dark.
Photographer's intent is irrelevant when an image is in scope. Geo Swan (talk) 23:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly which COM:CSD criteria are you talking about?
- I am unable to tell which movies or shows that she produced, directed or acted in from these pictures. There are no indication of these when I reviewed the photos. Robertsky (talk) 01:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- en:WP:CSD#A7 expands to en:WP:CSD#A7._No_indication_of_importance_(people,_animals,_organizations,_web_content,_events). If someone started up a stub wikipedia article on Ms Mondestin, and a challenger called for its speedy deletion, under A7, the administrator who responded to that A7 claim should decline the speedy, because being a movie producer and movie director was a credible claim of significance.
- Are you saying you think it is important that someone challenging whether an images of a topic in scope has it spelled out for them, in the image description, that the image is in scope? How many commons images explicitly spell out why the image is in scope?
May I suggest that challengers should be willing to do a cursory web search, before asserting a topic is out of scope? Geo Swan (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- I used flinfo to find the original flickr page for File:Like_a_boss_(50829525181).jpg, the image already deleted as per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Like_a_boss_(50829525181).jpg. It's here.
.jpg){kind=link}
- I suggest if the other images are kept, as in scope, this one should be restored. Geo Swan (talk) 01:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: procedurally kept as being in scope. If there are particular files with copyright issues, feel free to nominate those in small batches (less than 10) so they can be properly dealt with. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The image is completely digital, while the source is a photo from real life where the logo is printed in an object. The photo as a whole was released as CC-BY, but it doesn't imply the logo has the same license. It is like taking a photo to an artwork: the copyright of the photo belongs to the photographer, the copyright of the artwork belong to the artist. Günther Frager (talk) 22:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; logo is above the TOO in the Andean Community. —holly {chat} 17:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, the claimed license is not shown at the source webpage.[5] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The original chart was part of an oficial resolution by the Argentinean government [6] and if I'm not mistaken it should be in public domain. The image here is a derivative work of it made by INDEC (a government agency). I don't know whether it is copyrighted or not. Günther Frager (talk) 07:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager: if the file is public domain then it should not be licensed with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. COM:Argentina does not mention any specific copyright rules for the national government of Argentine, although it appears that content from the chamber of deputies and the senate is public domain. If you think that the guidance is inaccurate or incomplete then please raise it at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Argentina. Thanks, Verbcatcher (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The org chart would appear to be {{PD-ineligible}}, so if someone is willing to remake it without the logo and social media icons, we could totally keep that. —holly {chat} 03:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
