Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/04/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 27th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Qsyllz (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - fake Wikipedia article hosted as a PDF Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 04:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Combybyrr (talk) 06:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry. This is an identical copy of File:David-Clodius.jpg NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by NearEMPTiness as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Sorry. This is an identical copy of File:David-Clodius.jpg NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep. Although both images have the same source, they are quite different in quality. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; speedy-kept per nominator's retraction. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos by non-wikipedian: out of project scope (F10) + sock puppet of User:Hossam ali gad.

--Karim talk to me :)..! 09:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to have been previously published online, as evidenced by this crop of the image around him. This is doubtful own work and I see no evidence that the copyright holder has released this file under a valid free license, so this should be deleted in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - Photo by Mohammad Karamali/DeFodi Images via Getty Images. --Эlcobbola talk 15:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixabay images published after January 2019 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedily. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello,

I, am the author of this biography of a notable person which I wrote in French, in France (all references and sources are included.) . This biography appears in Wikimedia Commons although there is no media, photo, etc. on the file. As you can see, this biography is a document in pdf. format.

I would like to correct the license to ShareAlike 3.0 instead of CC ShareAlike International 4.0 to be able to publish it in French on Wikipedia. No text has been contributed by other Wikimedians.. Since it was written and uploaded by me incorrectly, how can I delete it in my account? Where is the deletion "icon"? Thank you very much for assisting me in correcting my error.. Edouard V. Edouard Valensi (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Raw text, thus out of project scope. Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a weather service numerical models website of unknown copyright status, not uploader owned. Pierre cb (talk) 18:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only 2 KB, can't see it. 181.43.3.228 19:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Wutsje 19:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW: This is a blatant COM:NETCOPYVIO - see here. Эlcobbola talk 19:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trade as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 07:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination--Trade (talk) 12:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"this image its free to use only on wikipedia" is not an acceptable license Trade (talk) 12:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The uploader claims {{Own}}, but says "This image is given for me from Xhejson Isufi", so, the image needs a valid license from the actual photographer. Note that owning a copy of the image, as Xhejson Isufi apparently does, does not give the subject the right to freely license the image. That right remains with the photographer unless explicitly licensed in writing. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola
No tiene nada de malo esta foto.
Gracias Pedro Anchundia Roca (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Wutsje. --Rosenzweig τ 06:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missclick Kristbaum (talk) 19:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the creator shortly after creation. --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : https://www.lesoir.be/491406/article/2023-01-26/brussels2030-aura-aussi-le-visage-de-fatima-zibouh 94.109.218.88 11:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The source is https://brussels2030.be/ which has "© BRUSSELS 2030 VZW/ASBL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" and no indication of a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and EXIF. --Yann (talk) 15:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder. Likly from a website of unknown status. Pierre cb (talk) 23:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NobuttoO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader is attempting to claim these as public domain under {{PD-DenmarkGov}} (Acts, administrative orders, legal decisions and similar official documents are not subject to copyright), but I'm doubtful that social media posts and web content would fall under "similar official documents". PD-DenmarkGov isn't as broad as USGov's work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Belbury (talk) 12:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The danish arcives which these fall under as they are property of the danish state are free use for media and or private people, there is just no direct "§" in danish law that deals with pictures posted by the state due to there never having been an issue with the use, the "§" is just the closest thing that exist about it that didtn even know about untill it was pointed out
https://arkiv.dk/rettigheder NobuttoO (talk) 13:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They are also stored in: http://www.forsvarsgalleriet.dk/arkivet/#1443732861581_70 which is where "Machine gun M60E6.JPG" also comes from, which is the Danish Defence gallery that like all other state pictures are free use NobuttoO (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They can be used freely aslong as its not with the intend of profit, the sub-division/branch that took it is noted in the source and they are not manipulated in any way NobuttoO (talk) 14:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If usage is restricted to "not with the intend of profit" and "not manipulated in any way" then this does not meet Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses, and Commons cannot host these images. Belbury (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well then we have a serious issue as multiple pictures that have been ok for years are no longer ok(see Machine gun M60E6.JPG and a couple others).
Ill start taking some pictures that are my own NobuttoO (talk) 15:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See also "Mowag Piranha V Danish.jpg", "MOWAG Eagle Danish.JPG", "Wisent 1.JPG" and "PNMIRK.JPG". If these can be cleared for use for years then how come other picture from the gallery can not? NobuttoO (talk) 15:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Found another part of danish copyright law § 2. Stk 3 says 1. if the picture is put up for sale it falls in to public domain 2. If it is displayed to the public it falls into public domain 3
§ 3 States that in these cases you are required to name the creator and that you are not allowed to modify them
https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2014/1144 NobuttoO (talk) 18:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Blatant nonsense PD claim - compare also "They can be used freely as long as its not with the intend of profit" to the requirements of COM:L. --Эlcobbola talk 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NobuttoO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs with bogus self-claims - low res, no EXIF, visual characteristics suggest disparate authorship (i.e., clearly not by same author, see also lines at top of File:Kampvest M05.jpg--may be stolen from auction sites), elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:CBRN-dragt.jpg is here; etc.), uploader serial copyvio uploader and clueless regarding copyright--see also above. Duck/PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 18:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed, no incoming links - FlightTime (open channel) 00:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, the file is 1920 by 1080, and title of photograph begins with "VideoCapture", indicating this is likely a 1080P a video screengrab. As such, I am nominating this for deleiton in light of COM:PRP, as the source video that the screengrab is unclear, and we cannot host this unless there is evidence that the copyright holder has released that video under a compatible license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not claimed as own work. Source is a Mexican government website, but COM:GVT Mexico notes that Works created by the Mexican government do not default to being public domain, being protected 100 years after publication and I can't find the claimed CC-BY-SA license at the source website (the direct link is an image file that lacks the license, but I can't find such a license anywhere on the site more generally for this photo) . As such, this should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for lacking evidence that the photograph is either in the public domain or available under a suitable free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The audio does not match the description — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lejiayi (talk • contribs) 18:26, 26 April 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyvio ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, draft article uploaded as pdf. Wutsje 19:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense வள்ளிமூர்த்தி (talk) 02:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio https://www.ifpb.edu.br/noticias/2023/03/assembleia-legislativa-homenageia-reitora-do-ifpb. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Source page states "All Rights Reserved". Yngvadottir (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. DDF page states "All Rights Reserved" and did so in 2021 and 2022 asshown by Wayback archives. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC licence? DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:34, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says it has a CC license, but the source clearly bears a copyright. Onel5969 (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was my first time with this system and I don't think I did it right, chose a wrong image or didn't tag it right but I am not sure how to fix it. Its probably best if it gets deleted, so sorry, I am new to this for a school project. Sylesx (talk) 14:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:34, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Crop of the poster of the film The Marksman CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.kongehuset.no/fotoalbum_presse.html?tid=29497&sek=29496, which does not allow commercial use and is therefore incompatible with commons. DrKay (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure, replaced by File:Yellow arsenic.svg. Leyo 08:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:2H-Pyran-2-one-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Car c'est l'ancien logo 85.90.0.14 05:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Créer un nouveau fichier avec un nouveau nom pour le nouveau logo permettra de conserver l'ancien à des fins historiques (pour montrer par exemple l'évolution du logo d'une entreprise). -- Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 10:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a festival CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT permission needed from copyright owner. --Strakhov (talk) 11:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: DVD cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no reason provided why the license would apply. --Strakhov (talk) 11:07, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot own work 181.203.255.141 23:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 04:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unlikely to be own work, filename,. --Strakhov (talk) 11:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a work in progress as per w:en:Crazy Horse Memorial, yet sculptural pieces have been visible. The artist w:en:Korczak Ziolkowski died in 1982. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Crazy Horse Memorial. De minimis is not applicable for some photos, as the sculptural pieces are not trivial or unimportant. COM:DM United States is based on triviality, not incidental inclusion.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • Delete - the scupture is carved into a privately owned mountain, and was commissioned privately by a non-profit organization. See the non-commercial rights per the Crazy Horse Memorial website which states:
  • "In order to film or take photos at Crazy Horse Memorial®, both interior and exterior locations, for any commercial purposes, companies/individuals must first obtain written approval from ©Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation. As the Mountain, statues, museum items, and other exterior and interior items are copyrighted. Due to the high volume of requests for filming and photography at the Memorial, all requests must be submitted in writing at least 10 days prior to the shoot.
  • Many of us mistakenly believed it was a US govt commissioned work. According to the provisions published at the aforementioned link, any photograph of that site does not qualify under available Commons licensing." Atsme Talk 📧 12:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. This pictures is lifted from this page. Even if the uploader did create this image, it would have been a work for hire. There is nothing to corroborate the CC license alleged. Denniscabrams (talk) 01:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Waz8 (talk) 04:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not COM:INUSE and just some blue colours; no educational value. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 09:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete nothing new Dronebogus (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete mediocre framing and lighting Dronebogus (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete too dark Dronebogus (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete bad Dronebogus (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Mutharasum23 (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason for deletion, but
 Delete: not own work: https://www.instagram.com/p/CkYszupORCg/ --Achim55 (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.65 13:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio. Adem (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unexplained graph. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abolfazl1chakani

[edit]

User updating picture with watermarks from different photographers, from one artist without proven notability. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not free, it is copied from here. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyright violation. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was left out of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gjermanci, it should be deleted per same reasons of that nomination. Frodar (talk) 19:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Sorry, did not see the link by another user in that DR, proves this file is a blatant copyvio. —Frodar (talk) 19:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats - primarily textual content in PDF format with no clear educational purpose Omphalographer (talk) 19:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats - primarily textual content in PDF format with no clear educational purpose Omphalographer (talk) 19:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats - primarily textual content in PDF format with no clear educational purpose Omphalographer (talk) 19:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour Monsieur et Madame, Merci pour votre remarque. Nous nous permettons de rester en regle avec la politique et l'éthique de la Wikypedia, toujours d'apporter une thematique differente Sous un forma d'un débat d'opignon publique. C'est pourquoi, vous remarquerez que cette publication, est une pensée de la réelle et vivanciable de ma propre experiences.

Dépuis plus de 7 ans, je suis á la recherche.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats - primarily textual content in PDF format with no clear educational purpose Omphalographer (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats - primarily textual content in PDF format with no clear educational purpose Omphalographer (talk) 20:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Triple-Golden Triangle is the one and only triangle which has 3 pairs of features that are in golden ratio. My calculator tells me that the three interior angles of the triangle total "180". However, when I add the interior angle measurements manually I get the surprising result 179.999999999999999... These differing results show that electronic calculators are programmed to round-off numbers. I regard this feature as an annoyance and I wish that I could set it to "OFF". Scott Gregory Beach (talk) 00:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I put this triangle into the "Sacred geometry" category. Architects, painters, sculptors, novelists (Dan Brown; "The Da Vinci Code"), physicists (Mario Livio; "The Golden Ratio"), and others put Golden Ratio proportions and allusions into their works. In previous times, the Golden Ratio was referred to as the Divine Proportion and it was regarded as a tool that God had used to build the Universe. Scott Gregory Beach (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reported from another website. No permission ticket. MarioGom (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a festival CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a festival CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible ad for a casting CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by image uploader; better map was created by another uploader Nahabino (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a festival CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2016 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshots of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster of a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshots from different film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The name in the watermark and the name of the author are different CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio; Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster a a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Poster a a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a software CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader uploaded the same thing once more, maybe in hopes that it wouldn't be copyvio the second time around. Please delete that one too if this one is considered copyvio. --2003:C0:8F17:C900:B035:B779:75D9:3F94 12:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability, Unrecognizable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2012 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Photograph of a screen CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible ad, No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola
Solo es el afiche de uno de nuestros programas musicales homenajes.
No vemos el problema de quererlo eliminar
Gracias Radioultimitomix (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Este cartel no pertenece a Commons, como se explica en esta página: [2]. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erect penis should not be available 206.83.102.19 00:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep this might be a notable concept? It’s certainly novel I suppose Dronebogus (talk) 12:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jmabel ! talk 20:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

masterbating man! 206.83.102.19 00:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jmabel ! talk 20:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://menafn.com/1105965056/South-African-Musician-Christiaan-Kamstra-Takes-The-Music-Industry-By-Storm-With-Unique-Sound-And-Style and elsewhere, source unclear Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyrighted logo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny image that's not useful for Wikipedia and you can't make out the subject's face. And it's probably taken from social media based on the uploader's other contributions. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; personal image by non-contributor. --Wutsje 00:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel - El Flaco de Oro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 19:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google street view image 2A04:4A43:408F:C3A7:0:0:823:2230 06:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; looks like it. --Rosenzweig τ 16:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Azril Zaim Aziz 191.126.16.105 02:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work no scope no heaven for some people 186.172.85.96 03:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment You could argue that it should have gone through COM:VRT, but it has a plausible author and is COM:INUSE in a ms.wikipedia article. It looks like User:Suchet Films was still active on ms.wikipedia and en.wikipedia as of late August, 2023, but didn't get a text on their Wikipedia user talk pages about this deletion request, so I'll post one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from the Government of Las Vegas has its own copyright, PD tag only applies to works from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, nothing to indicate that it is PD nor is CC BY-4.0. reppoptalk 05:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be license laundering, I doubt that the uploader is doing so on behalf of the City of Las Vegas SecretName101 (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SecretName101 this picture is Public domain according to the City of Las Vegas I mess up can I fix it? FYE31 (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You tried to re-license it as PD-ineligible when its literally a photograph. reppoptalk 15:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the author of the work, I was informed by third parties that the object depicted is a work of architecture (Werk der Baukunst § 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 UrhG). It therefore falls within the scope of protection of the architect's copyright. As the author of the "photograph"("Lichtbild" § 72 UrhG), I was requested to revoke my licensing under the "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International", as legitimate interests of the owner of the property oppose this licensing. WArchitekt (talk) 13:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Germany has freedom of panorama, but based on the filename, this would be a view of an interior. How recent a construction was this, though? Also, why can't I see the photo? It appears to be hidden. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. @Ikan Kekek: Actually, the file talk page was technically nominated here, though obviously the file itself was meant; I have corrected that. --Rosenzweig τ 15:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de l'image Loïc432 (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. Mistakenly uploaded by me. Gderrin (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   13:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tocando na festa da escola. Carreguei por engano. 191.125.16.122 01:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. Out of scope. --P 1 9 9   13:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work. While the photo is taken from an OSHA report, the photograph itself does not appear to be the work of a U.S. federal employee. The photograph appears on page 41 of the report as Figure 16, with the caption Photo #2 in 2/28/2018 E-mail from MCM to FIGG. MCM, per page 11 of that report, is a private contracting firm named "Munilla Construction Management, Inc". While COM:USA#Works by the US Government states that works of the U.S. Federal Government are in the public domain, it also notes that this does not include works commissioned by the US Government, but produced by contractors. It's techically possible that the copyright was assigned to the United States by some contract, but we don't have evidence of this, and the business arrangement in which MCM was actually a subcontractor of FIGG (the prime contractor) in this arrangement makes me substantially doubt that the U.S. government was assigned the copyright in this case. As such, this file should be deleted in light of the COM:PRP, which notes that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted, as we have no evidence that this is either in the public domain or otherwise freely licensed. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn’t aware of this. Go ahead and delete it. Any tips on how to check if images are able to be used on this site? JacksonKQuinn (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave a message on your talk page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless redirect rolf_acker (talkcontributionslog) 06:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:34, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Removing deletion request. Creuzbourg (talk) 09:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   13:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File used for vandalism Ravave (talk) 10:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: "Me and my buddies in Paris" --Ravave (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And redundant to File:Hitler in Paris, 23 June 1940.jpg. --P 1 9 9   13:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehllizenzierung: Abgebildete Person soll auch Urheber sein , es handelt sich aber eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional, self made logo, per COM:NOTUSED and COM:HOST. Onsilla (talk) 11:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unexplained text. No use without further explanation. Malcolma (talk) 11:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text with no meaningful explanation of purpose. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work, its a crop from File:混双存图。(中国公开赛 林高远 陈幸同) (7).jpg and copy of File:Chen Xingtong on 2018 ITTF World Tour Platinum China Open (in game).jpg. Peter Porai-Koshits (talk) 11:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work or from some document? 181.43.3.228 14:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims it under CC1.0, but the source clearly bears a copyright symbol Onel5969 (talk) 14:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no free license at source. --P 1 9 9   13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who Is Miss Abbas? 181.43.3.228 14:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • She appears to be an interior decorator. This is pretty good as a portrait photo, but I could go either way on whether to keep it, except that it's doubtful that it's a selfie, so it should probably be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   13:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from the Kitakami city website, but the city website is not covered by {{GJSTU-2.0}}. The city website says "All copyrights belong to Kitakami City" [3]. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license since April 27. --P 1 9 9   13:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pugliesepugliese (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Daiki or Daiky does not exist. Fantasy diagrams or test files, out of project scope.

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore di Caricamento e di dicitura Legio99xy! (talk) 14:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--Legio99xy! (talk) 14:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC) Legio99xy![reply]

I uploaded this image, but I wasn't sure about that operation because I had to verify if I have followed the copyright rules Legio99xy! (talk) 06:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Legio99xy! Image is ok, it is in the public domain. I suggest to close this request. Marco Chemello (Unipd) (talk) 07:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Marco Chemello (Unipd). --P 1 9 9   14:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a speaker of this language, but is this an advertisment? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unusable due to massive watermark. --P 1 9 9   14:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my profile picture, I am Onychea and my name was Kelly Santos, but I am not a Brazilian nor a basketball player at all. I am also 5'5", and born in 1980. 208.82.111.120 14:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of misused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   14:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not represent the parliament of Brazil, but one of its municipalities. Duplicate of an existing file, unused file. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file replaced by higher-quality one Jan Myšák (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Třísky na duši obálka.jpg. --P 1 9 9   14:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file replaced by higher-quality one Jan Myšák (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Mezi alembikem a spilkou obálka.jpg. --P 1 9 9   14:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either Copyvio or published previously: [4], [5], [6] Achim55 (talk) 15:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Creative Commons compatible per the listed rights statement, which attributes the design to the record company's website, which is under copyright. 2601:240:8200:BFE0:E1FA:C953:67D7:9966 15:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, this image is no longer needed, I added another one with higher quality. Wiki-Harpia (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Redundant to File:2023 logo of the Liberal Party (Brazil, 2006).svg. --P 1 9 9   14:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source actually says "Map from The Routledge Atlas of Jewish History Ed. 8 by Sir Martin Gilbert. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. © 2007 Martin Gilbert." Gilbert died in 2015 so the map would not enter the public domain until 2086. Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:13, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded with YouTube license but was never confirmed; Youtube page since gone mr.choppers (talk)-en- 15:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   14:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Japanese press agency image from 1982. No indication that the original image is PD. Nthep (talk) 15:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted logo. COM:TOO? What country is this logo from? King of ♥ 15:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unlikely to be own work. Looks old, should be discussed. King of ♥ 15:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Legnar19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: (for now) insufficient reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere using TinEye and Google Images. --P 1 9 9   14:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal account, not permitted to upload here Urang Kamang (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No free license at source. --P 1 9 9   14:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por ausencia de interés para el fin que fue creada. Vjube (talk) 17:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   14:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier relatif à un article supprimé Malcom Berger (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of s cope. --P 1 9 9   14:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crosswiki spam. Not notable subject. Melquíades (talk) 18:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scobe. 59.153.127.140 18:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. We have people in national clothing, we have famous Hazaras. This is thrash. 181.43.3.228 20:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • First of all, I don't have the power to delete or undelete anything on this site. But second, this is not about you or me personally; these are just arguments for the closing admin to think about. Of course you are right that there are some huge catchall categories that include images that are deleted as personal images or of terrible quality, and therefore unusable. Whether this is one of them or not is up to the closing admin. Now run along and insult someone else, child. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proszę o usunięcie. Wgrałem drugie takie samo zdjęcie, lecz lepiej wykadrowane. Nakiel (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7 (superseded by File:Filharmonia Pomorska 2.jpg). --P 1 9 9   14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file that the uploader wishes to delete. I'm inclined towards a courtesy deletion in this case. Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: junk, unusable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a personal image and it is not COM:INUSE. Has no educational potential as a photo of this mountain since there is a human blocking the view. I think some discussion about whether this is a personal photo can occur, so I'm not speedy deleting it under the criterion for personal photos. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: just having people in the photo doesn't mean "personal photo". In this case, the person provides depth and scale to the entire view while not posing for the camera. --P 1 9 9   14:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9   14:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Upload from Facebook". No permission ticket. MarioGom (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is licensed CC BY ND 3.0 per the archived version of the source page, no indication it's ever been available under a freer license. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1978 Israeli photograph, won't be public domain in Israel until 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos Courtesy of Holly Powers at Powersful Lenses, not a work from the U.S. Embassy in South Africa, thus the license is invalid

A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent a message to Holly Powers through her website asking if she would release the photos using a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. Will provide her a VRT template if she agrees. Captain-tucker (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Captain-tucker, have they replied? RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 No she has not. Captain-tucker (talk) 00:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. DDF page states "All Rights Reserved" and did so in 2021 and 2022 as shown by Wayback archives. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license change Wikilexei7 (talk) 20:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license change Wikilexei7 (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license change Wikilexei7 (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license change Wikilexei7 (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no valid reason for deletion provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license change Wikilexei7 (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no valid reason for deletion provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license change Wikilexei7 (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no valid reason for deletion provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete as derivative work per Commons:Deletion requests/Crazy Horse Memorial. Kelly (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: what can be seen of the sculpture here is de minimis, the rest of the landscape is not copyrightable. Rosenzweig τ 14:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't feel confident that this is de minimis by U.S. standards. COM:DM United States states that U.S. courts have set de minimis standard, in a very narrow manner (triviality instead of incidental inclusion). In this photo, the intent of the photo is on the monument and despite the carving being a small element here, it is not trivial. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Crazy Horse Memorial, as well as the prohibition conducted by its management, the guardian of late sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Applying COM:DM#An example situation in this case: "So, for example, if the monument forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the monument, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the monument was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the monument was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area. If the existence of the monument makes the image more attractive, more usable, or liable to cause more than insignificant economic damage to the copyright owner, then a de minimis defence to a copyright-infringement action will probably fail." This photo will not stand in front of U.S. courts and must be removed. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment It's a very small part of the photo, and I had to look at it at full screen to even see where it was. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nomination. And fwiw I could see it on the preview (800x583). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. This is a bit of a stretch. It is true that the main object and focus of the photo is the monument, except... there is no monument yet (safe for a tiny piece of the face)! The entire deletion rationale is based on the presence of a monument. Well, there isn't one. And obviously, the rubble from the carving can hardly be copyrightable. --P 1 9 9   13:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; even though the monument is not yet completed, the face by itself can be considered a work of sculpture and therefore enjoys copyright protection, as de minimis considers the overall purpose of the work that includes the copyrighted portion as well. holly {chat} 20:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is part of a Dutch release. Also, the Pink Elephant logo literally uses... a pink elephant. No way the logo within this image is simple but rather complex enough for copyright, especially per COM:TOO Netherlands. George Ho (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a map of a phantasy world (Dragonlace), established in 1984. So this is a work of Fantasy and art and in my underatanding clearly copyrighted Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I do not know how the rules of copyright work for this situation, but I will only note that this was made by a user in 2006 using some kind of computer aided drawing program.
BOZ (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Copyright protects the expression of an idea, not the idea itself, so assuming this is an original map based on the idea of Ansalon, then it's acceptable (after all, we have Category:Maps of Middle-earth). holly {chat} 20:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work: labeled as by DDF Consultants, whose website states "All Rights Reserved". Lacks permission, falsely licensed as own work. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this is a work of the Government of India meeting the requirements for Template:GODL-India; labeled as a work of DDF Consultants, whose website states "All Rights Reserved". Yngvadottir (talk) 08:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as uploader's own work, but labeled as by DDF Consultants, whose website states "All Rights Reserved". Top left image same as File:G.B Pant College Delhi New Campus Gate.jpg, uploaded as by DDF;top right same as File:College New Campus GB Pant DSEU Okhla-1.png, uploaded as by Government. Contradictory claim of authorship, no evidence of permission. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted work of art. Per the Dia website, "Bruce Nauman, Mapping the Studio I (Fat Chance John Cage), 2001. Dia Art Foundation; Partial gift, Lannan Foundation, 2013. © Bruce Nauman/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York." [9] Found5dollar (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My focus as a photographer was the room and the experience in this part of the museum, not individual artworks, which are not clear, and largely cut out. This is not valid reasoning. ɱ (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The copyrighted artworks take up the majority of the photo. holly {chat} 21:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted work of art. Per the Dia website, "Bruce Nauman, Left or Standing, Standing or Left Standing, 1971. Dia Art Foundation; Partial gift, Lannan Foundation, 2013. © Bruce Nauman/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York."[10] Found5dollar (talk) 14:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: this is a photograph of a room and wall, not just a singular piece of art. I deliberately captured spaces in the museum, not individual works. ɱ (talk) 14:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • As the nominator, I do not believe Commons:De minimis applies here as everything in this image constitutes the copyrighted artwork. The artwork consists of the video screen in the back, but also the slanted walls this picture focus on. The medium of the piece as defined by Dia includes the wallboard.--Found5dollar (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep That blurry video screen? That can't be taken seriously. And is there really something special about the walls? I think you have a much better argument on the other photos of DIA, but I'm having trouble seeing what would constitute infringement about this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I see this as a photograph of a building interior, not a specific work of art. -Another Believer (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the thing people are missing is that this image is not taken of a sculpture from afar, it is taken from within the sculpture. The sculpture consists of several walls at strange angles. The whole image except for the floor is of the sculptural installation. You can see the Dia page for this work to see it from a wider angle to understand that these walls are the sculpture.--Found5dollar (talk) 01:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I appreciate the link, but looking back and forth between the photos, I have trouble recognizing the sculpture in this photo, and I therefore continue to see this as de minimis. We'll see what the closing admin thinks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Even though the wall takes up 50% of the photo here, we're only seeing a tiny portion of the entire artwork. holly {chat} 21:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted work of art. Per the Dia website, "Michael Heizer, North, East, South, West, 1967/2002. Dia Art Foundation; Gift of Lannan Foundation. © Michael Heizer" [11] Found5dollar (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am the photographer - the focus was on the room, and the camera's focus is on the room, not the floor. I took several photographs pointed and focused at the floor shapes; these were not uploaded. How can I photograph a room like this? How do you suggest I photograph the interior of a museum if there's some art barely or partly in view? ɱ (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Art can be in an image of a room if it just incidentally, but it can not be the focus of the image. In this picture the sculpture takes up almost half of the visual plane.--Found5dollar (talk) 01:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's at the very bottom. The camera is pointed towards the center of the room, not towards the art. ɱ (talk) 00:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The windows are where the light is, so the eyes are drawn to them and I therefore believe they are the primary focus of this image. However, I do tend to agree that this photo infringes on the copyright of the artist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; @ even though you say your intent was to shoot the entire room, it certainly looks like the artwork takes up a good proportion of the photo, and that's why de minimis doesn't work here. holly {chat} 21:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted work of art. Per the Dia website, "Robert Ryman, Vector, 1975/1997. © Robert Ryman/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York."[12] Found5dollar (talk) 14:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to use
Public domain This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.
Heptagon
Heptagon
? ɱ (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not our place to decide if the artwork is copyrightable or not. It is claimed to be under copyright by Dia with a clear notice on their site.--Found5dollar (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Museums and other institutions constantly are lazy by giving copyright claims to old paintings and photographs that are clearly in the public domain. We have to use our heads, sometimes. ɱ (talk) 00:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And again, as stated in the other deletion discussion here, we determine copyright of 'artwork' like logos all the time. Simple text logos, or simple shape logos, are constantly uploaded and kept as Public Domain images. Simple geometry here is common property. ɱ (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Sorry, the white canvases are too prominent in this photo. I don't think U.S. law would regard them as not art if they are displayed as such, but correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; given that a row of blank white canvases apparently constitutes art (see the recent "Take the Money and Run" controversy), the art is the main focus of this photo and as such, de minimis cannot apply. {{PD-geometry}} also doesn't work here – that's more for 2D graphics that are just shapes. holly {chat} 21:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted work of art. Per the Dia website, "Fred Sandback, Untitled (from Ten Vertical Constructions), 1977–79. © The Fred Sandback Archive."[13] I do not believe Commons:De minimis applies here as the central object in this image is the thin, black, acrylic yarn copyrighted sculpture. Found5dollar (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a photograph intended to cover the entire hallway. I cannot take a photo of the room without some art getting in the way. ɱ (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep the focus of the image is not the Sandback's work, and it falls under de minimis as pointed by Ikan. If the focus where the artwork, then the lighting of the scene should be at least different to properly show it. Günther Frager (talk) 11:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is a textbook example of de minimis: it is impossible to exclude the copyrighted artwork from the photo, but the artwork itself is not the focus of the photo. holly {chat} 21:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisi eu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works but historical images, missing original author, dates, and permission.

P 1 9 9   22:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept two per remarks of RAN, thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 10:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisi eu (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

No evidence of free license or incompatible license at source websites. (Several of these are from OpenEdition sources, but open publishing is not necessarily the same as free licensing - or am I missing something?)

P 1 9 9   15:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spectre de taille de la biomasse océanique (2021).png has a CCBY license, haven't checked the other ones but keep that one (English file titles would be better). --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted most, except Spectre de taille, per Prototyperspective. Japandi exemple.jpg is royalty free for use, but it does not say the photo may be editted and revised etc. So it is not "free enough" and has to be deleted as well. --Ellywa (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bedhasa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images without EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times (the images are claimed to be from Dec. 11, 2022, but the person is wearing 3 different suites!!!).

P 1 9 9   15:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/ Madam,
these pictures were taken at one place. They were taken at the office of Deputy Chief Justice in the main building of the Federal Supreme Court. The Deputy Chief Justice Solomon was wearing three suits on the same day for reason of taking these professional pictures. Please I swear or confirm that these statements are true and genuine. Please don't delete these pictures. Please please don't delete .it wouldn't raise any copy right issue. I will take full responsibility for this. Especially the first pictures is needed for the wikipedia page of Justice Solomon Areda.
Justice Solomon Areda is an internationally recognized jurist
I also confirm that I am acting in good-faith. Please please help. Don't delete these pictures Bedhasa (talk) 07:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Absent any other evidence, I am willing to accept the word of the uploader here. holly {chat} 22:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1930 Swedish photograph. It was taken by either Johan Emanuel Thorin (1862-1930) or Ingeborg Maria Thorin (1896-1979). Since it's difficult to tell which Thorin is the photographer, https://skbl.se/en/article/IngeborgThorin we should wait until 2050 to host this photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would say its Johan Emanuel Thorins photo, Ingeborg Maria Thorin did almost only portraits. If unsure, please delete and I will try to find an other image for the page. / Bruzzx Bruzzx (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 22:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NmWTfs85lXusaybq as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.eshipper.com. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 15:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, the original uploader CloudFarr3r is a sockpuppet on English Wikipedia blocked shortly after this upload, see the sockpuppet investigation. According to its contributions on English Wikipedia, I suppose it's a single-purpose account for spamming and this file is one of its spam edits on Commons. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: TOO in Canada is fairly low. holly {chat} 23:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a broadcast footage posted to YouTube, possibly copyrighted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I don't have a definitive source, but I will bet good money that this is license laundering. holly {chat} 23:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work; no source or evidence of public domain status provided Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: On Commons, we generally assume that photos are published soon after creation, absent any other evidence. That being said, we have no way of verifying that this was actually created in 1912. holly {chat} 23:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (as stated in Category:CNIT, the architects died less than 70 years ago) and no COM:FOP in France.

Maybe some files are de minimis (I excluded some obvious files), I let the community decide on that.

  •  Keep The 6 photos above show very small parts of the interior of the CNIT without showing the whole vault (or a large part of it) . The shops and offices inside the CNIT are very ordinary. --Poudou99 (talk) 17:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question I am the uploader of these 2 photos of the interior of CNIT. In my understanding, COM:FOP#France applies to the exterior of the building, not to the interior. But to say the truth, I did not find text about that. It should be interesting to precise this point (allowed or forbidden) on the pages about FOP on Commons and on French wikipédia. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. These 2 photos show very small parts of the interior of the CNIT without showing the whole vault (or a large part of it) and its remarkable architecture. The shops and offices inside the CNIT are very ordinary. --Poudou99 (talk) 17:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Many of the buildings in this photo are fully and perfectly visible and are well identifiable: SFR Tower, CNIT, AREVA tower, "Coeur Défense" towers, EDF tower. In addition, the big size of the photo (5773 × 2233) allows zooms inside the photo and allows cuts to individually isolate buildings one by one. or all these reasons we can not invoke "de minimis".--Poudou99 (talk) 17:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader. The main object of the photo are the houses and squares in Courbevoie-Puteaux that no more exists today (except CNIT). So the CNIT is Commons:De minimis. And I took this photo, there is my pseudo in the EXIF. --09:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

  •  Delete. The CNIT is entirely and perfectly visible and seen in its initial state (without any building around and without the "Parvis de la Defense" in front). The CNIT is a major archicture building built in 1958, and for all these reasons we can not invoke "de minimis".
    @Tangopaso: Are you really the author of this photo taken from a plane in the early 60's? --Poudou99 (talk) 17:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Many of the buildings in this photo are fully and perfectly visible and are well identifiable: the CNIT, AREVA tower, "Coeur Défense" towers, EDF tower. For all these reasons we can not invoke "de minimis". --Poudou99 (talk) 17:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The above photo shows very small parts of the interior of the CNIT without showing the whole vault (or a large part of it) and its remarkable architecture. The shops and offices inside the CNIT are very ordinary. --Poudou99 (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VIGNERON (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why File:Défense-parvis-pano.jpg is not obvioulsy de minimis (as it is a very large panorama not aimed at particular building) ? --Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk) 14:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I draw attention also on File:La Défense sans gratte-ciels.jpg, a very valuable picture, which is aimed at the general area "La Defense" in the 1960's, which (less obvioulsy) may be considered de minimis. --Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pour ma defense :-) j'invoquerais également de minimis en ce qui concerne File:Ladefensepartienord.jpg--Pline (talk) 14:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per nomination. For some photos it was claimed, that only small part of copyrighted building is depicted – still too much for keeping. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP France for this building.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The CNIT is not the main object of the photo. The main object is the parvis de la Défense. This is a case of Commons:De minimis exceptions. --Tangopaso (talk) 10:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: De minimis for sure for 08.jpg, borderline for the other photo because the building takes up almost 50% of it; I decided to let it go because the building does not appear to be the main focus of the photo. holly {chat} 23:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 181.43.3.228 20:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! PeJuam (talk) 08:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 23:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was not created by the FBI. It was released by the FBI while he was still at large, so it's impossible they created it. Photo is presumably a state ID or passport photo they took and released to help the public locate him. But since we don't know who the original author is, we can't say it is public domain. TarkusAB (talk) 07:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP, copyright status uncertain because the FBI didn't create this photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Benoît Prieur as no permission (No permission since)

Subject lived 1900-1935, should be discussed. King of ♥ 07:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a 1930s German photograph. We don't know when it was published, and we definitely don't actually know it was anonymous. Undelete in 2056 (120 years from 1935). --Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source from Flickr is the Prime Minister Office of Israel, not from the U.S. Department of State, thus the PD license is incorrect A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2061. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source from Flickr is the Prime Minister Office of Israel, not from the U.S. Department of State, thus the PD license is incorrect A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2061. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aerial view prominently features the w:en:Acropolis Museum, authored by w:en:Bernard Tschumi and completed in 2008. Greece does not provide freedom of panorama. Either a change of Greek copyright law or commercial license permit from Tschumi will abort this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Building is the focus of the photograph and thus not de minimis. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mary-Claire King AAAS images

[edit]

Image is asserted to be PD but there is no PD declaration at the source page. This archive shows that there is a statement of no usage restrictions but that is not a clear statement of PD, and the Terms and Condiitons from about the time of upload makes it quite clear that this is copyrighted content and not PD.

Whpq (talk) 13:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The T&C linked to by Whpq says: Images may be submitted to the EurekAlert! multimedia gallery with or without an accompanying press release, but all submissions must include an explanatory caption, as well as preferred credit line and information on terms of usage or permission requirements, if any. Also, later it says Subscribers may provide specific Usage Restrictions for a User Submission at the time it is submitted to EurekAlert! for posting. The press release that contains this image gives credit to UWE Dettmar, so while it's not explicitly PD, I think we can safely assume that UWE Dettmar set the "no restrictions on usage" statement and as such, {{Copyrighted free use}} is valid. holly {chat} 21:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly, it would have a free license. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is marked "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license." That's simply not possible since it's a 1986 image, and Creative Commons was only founded in 2001. It's also not {{PD-Australia}} since it's after 1955. GRuban (talk) 14:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It most certainly is possible—Creative Commons licenses can be retroactively applied by the author/copyright holder, which is what occurred here. However, since we did not have access to the original copies, the VRT erred on the side of caution and did not issue a permission tag (hence the deletion of the original). – Rhain 22:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhain: Is documentation of the retroactive CC license declaration logged with VRT? holly {chat} 21:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Howcheng: Yes, but I don't believe it was accepted, out of an abundance of caution with licensing. – Rhain 22:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhain: While an original copy would provide better quality, it isn't really necessary for verification. What we need is an email coming from an official domain such as lorriegrahamblog.com or lorriegrahamportfolios.com (or have some other public evidence associating the email address with her). -- King of ♥ 23:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: I understand, but that wasn't the primary issue raised by the VRT—the concern was about potentially unclear licensing. See Ticket:2022091410001094. – Rhain 00:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhain: I have read the ticket, and I am giving my opinion as a VRT agent. A clear statement of the Creative Commons license from a verified email address is all we need to clear up the licensing. -- King of ♥ 00:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough; that's a much simpler solution than what I was told a year ago. I'll reach out to the copyright owners again. – Rhain 01:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted for now. If permission is received from the copyright holder (usually the photographer) the image as well as the original version can be undeleted by request on COM:UNDELETE. --Ellywa (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted work of art. Per the Dia website, "Lawrence Weiner, 5 Figures of Structure, 1987. Dia Art Foundation; Partial gift, Lannan Foundation, 2013. © Lawrence Weiner/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York."[14] Found5dollar (talk) 14:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the room and couch are the focus. The couch is not part of the artwork, nor is the room. The fact that some of the text in this artwork is shown is not relevant. Nor is simple text copyrightable. ɱ (talk) 16:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not our place to decide if the artwork is copyrightable or not. It is claimed to be under copyright by Dia with a clear notice on their site.--Found5dollar (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, again, it is our place. This is a photograph, not a direct reproduction of an artwork. There are always elements to consider with a photograph that shows an artwork. And museums and other institutions constantly apply copyright tags to cover their bases, even for old works proven to be in the Public Domain. ɱ (talk) 00:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are many logos some people may consider artwork that we tag with
Public domain
This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.
because simple text is not copyrightable. ɱ (talk) 00:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Found5dollar and : Is the couch part of the art installation? Are there more snippets of text that are part of the artwork that are not included in the photo? holly {chat} 21:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. I'm going to assume the couch is part of the installation and the sum of everything in it would be enough to grant it a copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is clearly not own work and is missing evidence that Baku Metro has agreed to release it under a free license. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR North Korea, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banknotes of North Korea Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still under copyright. Undelete in 2043. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Restored per COM:UNDEL to discuss whether {{PD-Sweden-photo}} applies. King of ♥ 16:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Previous discussion: Special:Permalink/755086404#File:Filip Lundgren.jpg. -- King of ♥ 16:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have added some info to the file. I think the threshold of originality is significantly higher than what Jameslwoodward suggests. "Simpler portrait photography" (which is below the threshold) most probably includes professional routine photography, in a studio with studio lighting and settings by a professional photograph. To exceed the threshold the photograph needs to be of artistic value (according to the 1960 law) or showing originality such that no other person would have taken the same photograph (the modern definition; don't trust me on the exact wording). Having professional skill and equipment is not enough. –LPfi (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is a high end professional studio portrait. What you are saying, essentially, is that no portrait of a human, no matter how carefully and professionally done can qualify for the longer term. I find it difficult to believe that that is the intent of the Swedish law, but, as I said at the UnDR, I am not at all expert in it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The point is that there needs to be something that not every skilled professional photographer would do. It needs to be original. I am no expert on portrait photography, so I don't know what means there are to express originality. –LPfi (talk) 05:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think it meets the terms of PD-Sweden, just point and shoot with decent lighting, no elaborate staging, no elaborate set design, no elaborate pose, and no elaborate costume. The law does not distinguish between amateur and professional/commercial images, but between "simple photography" and "art photography". I think all would agree that this is an art photograph: File:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u.jpg, it contains all the elements missing in the one up for deletion. Just pressing the shutter, with good lighting, is something a monkey can do: File:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg. --RAN (talk) 01:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think a monkey could arrange this photo though. There was professional skill used – although that isn't what counts. The question is whether it is original. –LPfi (talk) 07:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PD-Sweden-photo says that the TOO is not normally met for "snapshots and journalistic photos", so a formal studio portrait certainly does not fall into those categories. holly {chat} 16:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Mohammad Agah ([15]]) who doesn't work for Tasnim. Hanooz 02:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free image from MODAFL (https://www.irna.ir/photo/83345459/%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D9%BE%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%86%D8%AF-%D9%87%D9%88%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%DB%B1%DB%B5-%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF). Previously restored. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: why did you restore this file? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was here. Yann (talk) 11:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Previous restoration was based on the reasonable assumption that this was a Tasnim photo, but it turns out that it's not. holly {chat} 22:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]