Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/25
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
- also file:Stony Blyden Photo.jpg
VRT-permission from photographer Lorenzo Hodges is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- that is correct... @Estopedist1 always vandalizes on wikidata, never asks for permission he also thinks he is god there just like @misterSynergy abusing their powers like BLAT"NT LTAs they are, this is coppyrighted file and it must go immediatately!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.102.157.218 (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- agreed, its universal problem there are violations across wmf, espcially on commons! also
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_by_User:JSDX_from_fr.wikipedia#mediaviewer/File:Logojsdx.png 93.15.243.242 19:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-closed as being without valid rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Essendone il proprietario ne chiedo la cancellazione grazie Alematrox (talk) 12:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%B1%84%EC%9D%80%EC%A0%95
this is me. im chae eun jung (real name is Lee eun jung i hate this photo here. please delete it
Enjel8238 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- The photo is File:이지혜, 채은정 출연 58년 전통의 양념 소갈비 중구 을지로 맛집 조선옥 (식신로드 Gourmet Road) eps 21-2 채은정.jpg and was uploaded by Puramyun31. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: nominate the picture, not the policy page. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Its a disturbing image which holds back all my work and private life. Melissa sneekes (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, page is not an image. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hybrid_image_decomposition.jpg 2601:42:702:2B5B:516F:7ED9:57D2:1CC2 20:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
cessation d'activité Sauvageot (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, it's a proposal/draft, which doesn't necessarily require "activity", but still has value per the ideas/rules drafted by its editors. Where is the need to delete it? --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded incorrect file/video and this is not my own work- ie. copyright violation Stuart Anthony Halpin (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: kept this page, but deleted File:Educational video of interracial oral sex.webm (this user's only upload), as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
cessasion d'activité total Sauvageot (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Sir its my first practice attempt Surya Narte (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: created accidentally. --Achim55 (talk) 18:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=It is an image from his Twitter.|source=https://twitter.com/dantdm/status/1092163923367915526}} Strugglehouse (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Template:Suppression image Evrard.a (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Template:Suppression image Evrard.a (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Image à supprimer. Evrard.a (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
appears to be screenshots of a youtuber who is not the uploader Geni (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Same LTA has been repeatedly uploading it for weeks.--Tiger (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
appears to be screenshots of a youtuber who is not the uploader Geni (talk) 20:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Same LTA has been repeatedly uploading it for weeks.--Tiger (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Es mi propio trabajo y lo subí a una categoría errónea, estará subido a la mayor brevedad en la categoría que le corresponde. Valengmarin (talk) 17:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Я загрузил файл на Википедию неправильно. Данила Кравец-Лопатин (talk) 19:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Я загрузил файл на Википедию неправильно. Данила Кравец-Лопатин (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Иной автор Ил Т (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
unable to prove the work is under a free license Slinkyw (talk) 12:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Achim55. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
not enough information Slinkyw (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
srd 5.1 is here under cc-by 4.0 anyways Slinkyw (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
1979 FIFA World Youth Logo, probably copyrighted. 淺藍雪❉ 04:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Shizhao. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
blatant copyvio from https://www.portsmouthfc.co.uk/news/2023/january/pompey-appoint-john-mousinho-as-head-coach/ ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 07:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Supposed photographer is in the photo nor the the photo taken before 1955. Mys_721tx (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TELUGU GAMING FF (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projets.
- File:TELUGU GAMING FF.jpg
- File:Bhukya Dhasaradh 03.jpg
- File:Bhukya Dhasaradh 04.jpg
- File:Bhukya Dhasaradh 02.jpg
- File:TELUGU GAMING FF 01.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Collages can be in Commons only with source and license for every single photo used in collage. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Looks like self-promotion material. Uploader has a similar name to Craig Proctor who does real estate coaching in Ontario. May not be notable enough for Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
I can't see how a major U.S. newspaper from 1980 could fail to be copyrighted. Jmabel ! talk 23:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:1,3-Propanediol-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 12:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Propsteikirche, Dortmund
[edit]These are all photos of stained glass windows inside the church. These are works by Joachim Klos who died in 2007. Unfortunately we have no freedom of panorama for interiors in Germany. Hence, we will need either a written permission by the heirs of Joachim Klos (to be processed through our support team) or we have to wait until the works enter the public domain in 2078.
- File:Dortmund Probsteikirche Orgel P1310974.jpg
- File:Dortmund St.Johann Baptist HDR .jpg
- File:IMG 3017-Propsteikirche-06.JPG
- File:NRW, Dortmund, Altstadt - Propsteikirche St-Johann Baptist 04.jpg
- File:Propsteikirche Dortmund 03.jpg
- File:St. Johannes Baptist (Propsteikirche Dortmund) Dortmund-1808.jpg
- File:Stained glass windows in Propsteikirche Dortmund 01.jpg
- File:Stained glass windows in Propsteikirche Dortmund 02.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2078. --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted video game, too prominent to be de minimis. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 02:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mehdi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as cc-by-nd. Non-derivative restriction is not allowed on Commons.
Converted to regular DR as the source-site carries the statement "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License", which is Commons-compliant. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Derivated work. We do not have orginal files on the wall in commons. --MehdiTalk 10:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Article/essay, 2 pages of raw text. Out of project scope. Achim55 (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- and also File:Kennslu-efni-til-jalfunar-a-gangsetningu-a-skipsvel-snu014g.pdf --Achim55 (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
wird nicht benötigt 2003:F0:D3CC:1A00:108E:761F:2BE8:78F4 07:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep multiple in use, one of the real useful pics from this genre, DR is just trolling --Stepro (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
this is pornographic material, not suitable and not necessary for education purposes like this article 37.47.131.57 16:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep File was kept by @Gbawden in 2019. File is still multiple in use. Like @Stepro this is one of the real useful pics from this genre. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep we do have something called "sex education". If you don't want people looking at sexual images, don't call attention to them. Learn about the Streisand Effect, the more you complain, the more eyes on the material. --RAN (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal picture by single-time uploader Enyavar (talk) 16:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Segunda vez 186.175.240.212 16:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete way too dark Dronebogus (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
El pene resiste... 191.125.29.192 22:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect (if the Al is 3+ and F each –, then there would be no line between them; if there is a line between them then F are neutral and Al is –. Have File:Potassium tetrafluoroaluminate.svg as chemically valid alt. DMacks (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Depicting this chemical compound with bonds that are both fully ionic and covalent at the same time is just wrong. Marbletan (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The 3D chemical structure depicted in that way is strictly incorrect (crystal-like salt structure would be correct). — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Moldova A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Moldova A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
incomprehensible scribbling pad with polynom manipulations; no educational value Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 13:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright? Is this own work of the user with only 1 contribution and no metadata. See here where is mentioned "Foto's van Colina Dreamcatcher Fashion & Beauty". See here for the photo. Wouter (talk) 14:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from Facebook. --Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal unreferenced essay. Malcolma (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Я загрузил файл на Википедию неправильно. Данила Кравец-Лопатин (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
My bad draw in 2006, not in use André Koehne TALK TO ME 23:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparently there are better alternatives available now. --Rosenzweig τ 13:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freee license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This image has no "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No Creative Commons license. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 18:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This image has no free "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under 'show more.' Leoboudv (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author Hoyanova (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- it´s a print screen from a youtube video, so the permission is CC BY 3.0, by youtube Giozinha (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This image has NO FREE "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This image has no "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No free license. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
This image has no "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 07:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person, not of use (F10) Mateus2019 (talk) 09:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Richard_dj CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing special RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we should probably just speedy delete new dick pics at this point. Dronebogus (talk) 07:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused pictures by non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 15:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Chemical mistake: agree with User:Marbletan's tagging that "there is an extra methyl group in compound 3". File:18 Annulene Synthesis.svg is the same chemical sequence but without that mistake. DMacks (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
If deleted, don't forget also the File:Acoplamento oxidativo 2.gif redirect to it. DMacks (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Likewise:
- File:Acoplamento oxidativo 3.png (with File:Acoplamento oxidativo 3.gif redirect)
- File:Síntese de -18- anulenos.gif
that are the same image just with different or no in-image captioning of each structure. DMacks (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all, due to the chemical errors. There is a high quality correct replacement that is already being used instead. Marbletan (talk) 14:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all files per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Richard_dj CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Greece. The building was completed in 1975 (https://estia-ns.gr/en/estia-neas-smyrnis/the-house) Texniths (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Greece, the construction was completed in 2016 (en:Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center) Texniths (talk) 14:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
3D geometry mistake, as tagged by User:1234qwer1234qwer4: "The xenon atom should have a seesaw geometry, as predicted by VSEPR, instead of a tetrahedral geometry like in sulfuric acid. Compare File:Xenic-acid-3D-balls.svg." We also have File:Xenic acid 3D.png that is in the vdW style. DMacks (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like the tagging was made by @LaundryPizza03. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Whoops, indeed. The {{Disputed chem}} display is misleading. Thanks for catching that. DMacks (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and replace all uses with File:Xenic acid 3D.png, per nom and as the tagger. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chemically incorrect and not-used file! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
delete duplicated upload file Mv1388 (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Please show what is a duplicate of. The other versions are different file sizes, different aspect ratios in the crop, and different color temperatures. The other version is toward the yellow end of the spectrum. This version is also in use. --RAN (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Flag-map of Algeria.svg Nedrko (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- why this flag should be deleted? Riad Salih (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate file ⵎⴰⵙⵏⵙⴰ (talk) 01:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nominated by sock, unclear what it duplicates. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Does UNICEF really have permission to post pictures of children presumably without their consent and claim free use rights? Should Commons be importing such pictures? Mztourist (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is UNICEF, the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund, i.e. the "agency of the United Nations responsible for providing humanitarian and developmental aid to children worldwide".
- May i remind you that UNICEF posts thousands of images of childrens from dozens of different countries and continents, as them being UNICEF, do you think that they dont have procedures in place to this situations, as their are not some random person on the internet to say that UNICEF "post pictures of children presumably without their consent"? Tm (talk) 12:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm well aware of who UNICEF are. I'm not aware of what "procedures they have in place" and don't believe that we can just assume that they have informed consent procedures. As you correctly note, UNICEF take images of children in numerous countries, each of those countries would have their own laws about what consent is required for personal images. Mztourist (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- So you think that UNICEF, the agency of the UN that deals with humanitarian and development help to children does not have rules, procedures and, being an UN agency and bound to be neutral and so a scrupulous follower of the hosting country law, does not follow the laws of the countries where it acts?
- You are talking of an UN agency, one that deals with this subjects for decades, in dozens of countries, so you need more than your feelings, your impressions and your opinions to substancy it, i.e. present claims that UNICEF does make wrong by publishing photo essays about children protection, early childhood development, health and education in its https://www.unicef.org/stories/photo-essays or photo stories about Children in emergencies, Fast facts: Breaking down the global issues that impact children and young people, Through the lens: Photography in https://www.unicef.org/stories#photo or videos in https://www.youtube.com/@UNICEF.
- Present proofs of what you claim. Tm (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- An organization that works, next to the UNHCR, to implement the the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, somehow does not know how to treat the subject of taking photos of children? Tm (talk) 13:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Before you speak and claim that or say that you are "not aware of what "procedures they have in place", maybe you should know that UNICEF "Guidelines for journalists reporting on children" where it says:
- 5. "Obtain permission from the child and his or her guardian for all interviews, videotaping and, when possible, for documentary photographs. When possible and appropriate, this permission should be in writing. Permission must be obtained in circumstances that ensure that the child and guardian are not coerced in any way and that they understand that they are part of a story that might be disseminated locally and globally. This is usually only ensured if the permission is obtained in the child's language and if the decision is made in consultation with an adult the child trusts.
- 6.Pay attention to where and how the child is interviewed. Limit the number of interviewers and photographers. Try to make certain that children are comfortable and able to tell their story without outside pressure, including from the interviewer. In film, video and radio interviews, consider what the choice of visual or audio background might imply about the child and her or his life and story. Ensure that the child would not be endangered or adversely affected by showing their home, community or general whereabouts."
- That they have their own "Ethical reporting guidelines" as "UNICEF has developed these principles to guide our own reporting on, and representation of, children and young people" with the same phrases as the points 5 and 6 above
- Or a flyer about guidelines to "PHOTOGRAPHING AND FILMING CHILDREN ETHICALLY" and "MEDIA COVERAGE OF CHILDREN IN AN AGE- APPROPRIATE AND SENSITIVE MANNER"
- So, yes they have special care to be ethical and have consent in photographing children. Tm (talk) 13:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- And you really think that they complied with 5 that for each and every one of those photos that you copied over? Mztourist (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, as it is stated in their own guidelines and as this was an event organized by UNICEF in Kyiv. What solid proofs, instead of uninformed opinions and feelings, you have to claim to the contrary? Tm (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's a big assumption, its very easy to have guidelines, whether they comply with them is an entirely different matter. Obviously I have no "solid proof", but my "uninformed opinion" is that mass propagation of pictures of children is unacceptable in an age of deep fakes and child pornography. Mztourist (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I provided solid proof, if not it being photographs by UNICEF and its solid credibility, the guidelines i provided and that they follow it, yet you continue to make the big assumption, without any proofs tthat they do not follow it.
- Not happy, as your first attempt did not worked, now you try to spin to an false moral panic of deep fakes and child pornography, a classic whataboutism, clearly unrelated. Or are you really claiming that UNICEF facilitates "deep fakes and child pornography"? Tm (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- You haven't provided "solid proof" of anything, just a guideline. You really assume bad faith don't you? I was surprised to find all these pictures of children that had been copied onto Commons given valid societal concerns about informed consent and potential misuse and so raised the issue for discussion. You then make these attacks on me of "Not happy, as your first attempt did not worked, now you try to spin to an false moral panic of deep fakes and child pornography, a classic whataboutism". I'm not gonna convince you, just as you haven't convinced me, so we'll see what others have to say. Mztourist (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, i have provided solid proof of UNICEF pratices, something that you could do with little more than 1 minute of research, but it is easier to smear the good name of UNICEF and its ethical pratices by accusing the same of not having "informed consent procedures". Dont try to gaslight that fact.
- You, on the contray and despite the fact that this is UNICEF and not some shady organization, not merely having an already established but uninformed opinion, even when provided the proofs of what you said was clearly wrong, maintaned the same opinion and even doubted the actions of UNICEF and, even worst, falsely accused UNICEF of being an enabler of "deep fakes and child pornography".
- You were the one, not me, not anyone else. If that is bad faith, given your unfounded accusations even when proved wrong, so be it. Tm (talk) 15:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The existence of a policy is not proof of compliance with that policy, something that you seem unable to comprehend or unwilling to accept. You haven't proven anything and your speedy resort to personal attacks just shows how weak your "argument" is. Mztourist (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- You haven't provided "solid proof" of anything, just a guideline. You really assume bad faith don't you? I was surprised to find all these pictures of children that had been copied onto Commons given valid societal concerns about informed consent and potential misuse and so raised the issue for discussion. You then make these attacks on me of "Not happy, as your first attempt did not worked, now you try to spin to an false moral panic of deep fakes and child pornography, a classic whataboutism". I'm not gonna convince you, just as you haven't convinced me, so we'll see what others have to say. Mztourist (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's a big assumption, its very easy to have guidelines, whether they comply with them is an entirely different matter. Obviously I have no "solid proof", but my "uninformed opinion" is that mass propagation of pictures of children is unacceptable in an age of deep fakes and child pornography. Mztourist (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, as it is stated in their own guidelines and as this was an event organized by UNICEF in Kyiv. What solid proofs, instead of uninformed opinions and feelings, you have to claim to the contrary? Tm (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- And you really think that they complied with 5 that for each and every one of those photos that you copied over? Mztourist (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- An organization that works, next to the UNHCR, to implement the the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, somehow does not know how to treat the subject of taking photos of children? Tm (talk) 13:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep them all, ignore the disruption. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm well aware of who UNICEF are. I'm not aware of what "procedures they have in place" and don't believe that we can just assume that they have informed consent procedures. As you correctly note, UNICEF take images of children in numerous countries, each of those countries would have their own laws about what consent is required for personal images. Mztourist (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If we can't trust UNICEF to respect the rights of children in regard to images, we should delete every photo of a child and be done with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- That would be the safest approach. Mztourist (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- How about if we delete every fucking picture and make commons.wikimedia.org an unused site? That would be even "safer," right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Calm down and watch your language. Mztourist (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. The idea that you would seriously speak positively in any way about deleting all photos of children deserves that kind of response. It's extremist, antithetical to the purpose of this site, almost nihilist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was your suggestion... Mztourist (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. The idea that you would seriously speak positively in any way about deleting all photos of children deserves that kind of response. It's extremist, antithetical to the purpose of this site, almost nihilist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Calm down and watch your language. Mztourist (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- How about if we delete every fucking picture and make commons.wikimedia.org an unused site? That would be even "safer," right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- That would be the safest approach. Mztourist (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Template:Personality rights can solve the issue. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- That could definitely help, but no mass importing of pictures of children is preferable. Mztourist (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, per discussion above. It’s Unicef. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator has presented no evidence of UNICEF doing anything illegal or unethical with this. Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't need to, the uploader needs to show that consent was obtained and the image is free use. Mztourist (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Uploader has provided evidence. UNICEF would take all necessary precautions before publishing a photograph of a child. Also, the child looks happy in the photograph and is aware of being photographed. You have not provided any evidence of impropriety. Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, the uploader has provided a policy, not evidence. Happiness and awareness doesn't mean the child or guardian consented to free use of the image. Mztourist (talk) 09:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Uploader has provided evidence. UNICEF would take all necessary precautions before publishing a photograph of a child. Also, the child looks happy in the photograph and is aware of being photographed. You have not provided any evidence of impropriety. Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't need to, the uploader needs to show that consent was obtained and the image is free use. Mztourist (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
This table is used in the Lusophone Wikipedia, however, it contains some degrees of kinship in English. Could you delete this file and redirect it to the file "File:Tabela de parentescos.png" that I sent recently with only degrees of kinship in Portuguese? Sedruqk (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Already done —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a corrupt file. Does this display an image, and if so, in what browser? Steel1943 (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info: Not corrupted but malformed and with embedded JPEG (logo seems bellow the TOO). The solution is re-exporting to pure SVG. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Pure SVG uploaded. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Delete violation manifeste de droit d'auteur Logo de marque non libre de droit KAPour les intimes 22:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep according to COM:TOO.Florentyna (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Auguel (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/All files in Category:Prehistoric Life in the National Parks Coloring Book Di (they-them) (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Subsumed into Commons:Deletion requests/All files in Category:Prehistoric Life in the National Parks Coloring Book. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope. Faisal talk 22:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope. Faisal talk 22:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Non-comercial Creative Commons license. Not accepted on Commons. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabbanaGirlQ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flickr washing. Exif of File:Capital-FEMI (photoshoot).jpg credits Kayode Ajayi as the author but the flickr account is of a different name
- File:Capital-FEMI (photoshoot).jpg
- File:Chase Forever (fotoshoot promo).JPG
- File:Chase Forever (fotoshoot).jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
All files in Category:Prehistoric Life in the National Parks Coloring Book
[edit]- File:NPS Prehistoric Life in the National Parks Coloring Book.pdf
- File:"Chesapecten jeffersonius" is an extinct scallop that lived during the Pliocene. It is the Virginia State Fossil. Fossils of (472eed9b-8d54-430c-bdfa-026653f09ef1).jpg
- File:"Collenia symmetrica" is an early fossil It shows layers of sand trapped by tiny organisms (mostly cyanobacteria) into mounds (70222e29-5028-401e-9199-c8f1b4caf34f).jpg
- File:"Daeodon hollandi" is a large pig like mammal known as an entelodont. This animal lived during the Miocene. Fossils of "Daeodon (fd852897-5a0c-4247-b7d1-9e5579e26a18).jpg
- File:"Diplomystus dentatsus" is a prehistoric herring like fish. It lived in fresh water lakes during the Eocene Fossils of (d6ada6b2-c8de-4fc3-841c-4dcafe8b4c49).jpg
- File:"Drepanosaurus unguicaudatus" is a tree-dwelling reptile, here shown in a conifer tree, that lived during the Triassic. Fossils (3897a65a-a805-4047-9ed4-d9a46a6ddb94).png
- File:"Ekgmowechashala zancanelli" is a small lemur-like adapid primate that lived during the Oligocene. It is shown in a hackberry (c597f714-cbbc-4fe7-b4c0-fb5b5462331c).png
- File:"Equus simplicidens" is an extinct species of horse known as the “Hagerman Horse”. This animal lived during the Pliocene (c4d639db-7f48-427d-913a-2d02e602fd48).jpg
- File:"Eurhinodelphis longirostrus" is a primitive long nosed dolphin. This animal lived during the Miocene. Fossils of (c1e13b57-e8db-44a5-acbc-595bc89185c1).jpg
- File:"Foerstediscus splendens" is an extinct echinoderm (a member of the group including sea stars, sea urchins, and sea lilies (195606f8-fed2-4b29-933a-1a90292d8279).png
- File:"Gymnogyps californianus" is a large bird known as a condor. This animal lived during the Pleistocene. Fossils of "Gymnogyps (40fffabd-c5bb-4973-acb5-d2c0df5323a7).jpg
- File:"Heliobatis radians" is a prehistoric stingray which lived in fresh water lakes during the Eocene. Fossils of "Heliobatis" have (c8e4a02a-3978-484e-86a6-8b3bed057a59).jpg
- File:"Hypertragulus hesperius" is a small deer like, plant eating mammal. This animal lived during the Oligocene Fossils of (216a585e-6539-4851-b16e-84471347d17d).jpg
- File:"Icaronycterix index" is a very early bat that lived during the Eocene. Fossils of "Icaronycterix" have been found near Fossil (f44fbdf5-f382-41ef-bb02-f1ddb42be516).png
- File:"Mammuthus columbi" is a large elephant like mammal that lived during the Pleistocene. Fossils of "Mammuthus" are known from (8880e112-d628-4265-ab2a-0f6a6625028a).jpg
- File:"Mcqueenoceras cariniferum" is an extinct cephalopod (a member of the group including squids and octopi) that lived during the (12feda3c-f838-4f3e-984c-eadb8cb13e7f).png
- File:"Megacerops coloradensis" is a large rhino like mammal known as a brontothere. This animal lived during the Eocene. Fossils of (8e7b9fae-472c-42c5-99f8-ac38092e2f0e).jpg
- File:"Miniochoerus gracilis" is a small plant eating mammal known as an oreodont. This animal lived during the Late Eocene and Early (aa29f08a-f3ec-4434-9ab5-90da58efff0c).jpg
- File:"Miracinonyx trumani" is known as the American Cheetah that lived during the Pleistocene Fossils of "Miracinonyx" have been (923d5c1a-c1b3-4347-8cd1-54d86554f9e1).jpg
- File:"Moropus elatus" is a large plant-eating mammal known as a chalicothere. This animal lived during the Miocene. Fossils of (71a97bcf-721b-4331-a3e5-f78e30ea389c).png
- File:"Nothrotheriops shastensis" is known as the Shasta Ground Sloth This large animal lived during the Pleistocene. Fossils of (bb7021b3-6d99-4778-92b3-708f6a3a5c6f).jpg
- File:"Plesiadapis gidleyi" is an early primate that lived during the Paleocene. Fossils of "Plesiadapis" have been found at Big Bend (b8f2a383-37e6-4ab0-b238-18e928297a83).jpg
- File:"Proganthodon overtoni" is a marine reptile known as a mosasaur. It lived during the Cretaceous. Fossils of "Proganthodon" have (978900b3-4401-42a6-acf4-17792ce7e131).png
- File:"Protoceras celer" is a small deer-like plant-eating mammal with horns. This animal lived during the Oligocene. Fossils of (4325407a-92ba-4a75-a34f-5fa40a6bfe8e).png
- File:Agujaceratops mariscalensis life restoration National Park Service.png
- File:Archimedes species life restoration National Park Service.png
- File:Bison latifrons life restoration National Park Service.jpg
- File:Champsosaurus gigas life restoration National Park Service (cropped).jpg
- File:Champsosaurus gigas life restoration National Park Service.jpg
- File:File--i-Alamosaurus sanjuanensis-i- is a sauropod dinosaur. It lived during the Cretaceous. Fossil bones of Alamosaurus have been (75e657e5-155c-4594-9e28-bd9a183d724d).png
- File:File--i-Anchisaurus polyzelus-i- is an early herbivorous dinosaur related to sauropods. It lived during the Jurassic. Fossil bones (4d02e7bf-ac55-46f2-8d02-69e379794aba).png
- File:File--i-Ankylosaurus magniventris-i- is an armored dinosaur. It lived during the Cretaceous. Fossil bones of Ankylosaurus have been (5f4107eb-9f40-430c-bbb4-95d19a1d19d0).png
- File:File--i-Chindesaurus bryansmalli-i- is a small meat eating dinosaur. It lived during the Triassic. Fossil bones of Chindesaurus have (53942a53-593a-48b9-95b3-81aec5cce45f).png
- File:File--i-Hadrosaurus foulkii-i- is a duck-billed dinosaur. It lived during the Cretaceous. Fossil bones of Hadrosaurus have been (7c93f7bd-4180-4dfe-a9fa-db4bbdf08786).png
- File:Hughmilleria shawangunk National Parks Coloring Book.jpg
- File:Hughmilleria shawangunk.jpg
- File:Miracinonyx trumani 2.jpg
- File:Nanuqsaurus National Parks Coloring Book.jpg
- File:Palaeovespa florissantia life restoration - National Park service.jpg
- File:Prognathodon overtoni restoration.jpg
- File:Smilodon gracilis life restoration - National Park service.jpg
- File:Smilodon gracilis National Park service.jpg
These files were created by Benji Paysnoe, an artist who was commissioned by the US National Parks Service. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States states that "works commissioned by the US Government, but produced by contractors" are not in the public domain. Benji can be found on Twitter here, and you can see that his signature on the images is identical to his profile picture, in case there's any doubt about it really being him. --Di (they-them) (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps they could be contacted and asked what the licence is for them? FunkMonk (talk) 16:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, but I think it's unnecessary. Unless there's any indication otherwise, we should assume they're under copyright. There's really not any reason to believe that they're under any CC license, since it was indicated nowhere in the book itself. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Flickr washing
- File:粉红理论 GAP THE SERIES.jpg
- File:Freen-Sarocha-Chankimha.jpg
- File:Pink theory.jpg
- File:文咏珊.jpg
- File:Xulu徐璐.jpg
- File:Janice man.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all and blacklist, per nom. --2001:FB1:38:B809:11FD:728C:6418:DEB 13:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all - very obvious flickrwashing -- Whpq (talk) 15:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Likely flickrwashing for the first four images (uploaded on Flickr the same day it was uploaded, pictures return images online). The last one seems to be from Instagram.
- File:00798bUXgy1hjlcw4b0nqj30u011ik0b.jpg
- File:Xulu徐璐.jpg
- File:Janiceman.jpg
- File:Freen.jpg
- File:Melanie.jpg
Spinixster (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 07:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Probably not own work by two separate uploaders. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHODRRO8xtsUYa67VTt5M6Q CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Sonja Dräger) M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 10:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 11:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 11:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Mitte27 (talk) 11:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 11:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- مساء الخير دكتور Michel Bakni
- ممكن ان تشرح سبب ترشيحك للصورة اعلاه للحذف؟
- تحياتي Agiri mohammad (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name on the watermark is different from the one in the watermark CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Richard_dj CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Richard_dj CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 12:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: non-notable group, webhost, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The designer of this image (and composer) has given permission for the use of this image
- https://twitter.com/DanielLiamGlyncan be contacted to verify that this image belongs to him and has released it for Commons Use. Daibh (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer. The Twitter profile you are referring to does not exist. Also, I am not sure to understand, did the author give clear permission? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs permission via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover, The artist is not the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tiwtas2550 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Their uploads are claimed as "own work" (which means the uploader is claiming to be the photographer and owner of the copyright), but seem to be copied from other sites.
DECK_AND_CRANE.jpg is available at Pixabay, as is Hamburg_port.jpg here, by different Pixabay authors. The Pixabay license is no longer "free", so we can't import photos from there anymore without an independent license. See {{Pixabay}}. Both of these photos were uploaded to Pixabay after the cutoff date.
The third image is named as if it comes from unsplash, and indeed it does. Unsplash had a license change even earlier than Pixabay (see {{Unsplash}}) and this one was also uploaded there after the cutoff date, so it is not under a free license.
"Own work" is only for when you are the photographer. Anything else needs to be shown has become public domain, otherwise a license from the photographer be sent (from them directly) via the COM:VRT process.
Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Found elsewhere ([1]). RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Found elsewhere ([2]). Doesn’t seem to be own work. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please check Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mrspace23 RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No Exif in any of the images, to begin with. All of them have watermarks that make the claim of being own work suspicious. Poor quality due to compression, I suppose. Some of them can be found on the Internet through Google.
- File:Ariana Carswell4.jpg
- File:Ariana Carswell 3.jpg
- File:Ariana Carswell.jpg
- File:Ariana Carswell1.jpg
RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please check Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ariana Carswell 2.jpg RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Google gives no results when I search for someone called Yurimé Puente. Seems to be a hoax. RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
The panoramic nature of this file detracts from any educational value in my opinion. Perpective is distorted and the location would be far better represented by multiple well framed pictures 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use, and it's a valid image even if it's not to your taste. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, COM:INUSE. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. Sedruqk (talk) 16:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. Sedruqk (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ADominguezRD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused photos of self-promoter; one-time uploader
Enyavar (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
This is absolutely not own work; most of it is a screen grab from the opening titles used between 1987 and 1993, the copyright for which rests with the BBC. Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 19:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sad Person
[edit]Cross-wiki spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines_again.
- File:Anna Photo Music.jpg
- File:Logo Sad Person Prod.png
- File:Sad Person (Photo).jpg
- File:Автограф Kholmat.png
- Category:Sad Person
MER-C 19:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
At least
- File:Anna Photo Music.jpg can easily remain in
Category:Teenagers in Uzbekistan,
arguebly also
And the other files can only be removed when really no more needed in any wikipedia branch. That can soon be the case, but till now they still are in use. ThomasPusch (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete these are eithetr reposted pictures that were once deleted or new ones from the same spammer Renvoy (talk) 13:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope (not used in meaningful way). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability, Usage of Commons as personal storage CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad, No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/user/rodpiva CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability, Possible ad https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albeiro_Rincon CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the photographer, as per the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No meaningful contributions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is the subject of the photograph CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
{{ Superseded | File:Dates of deaths of participants of Napoleonic wars.png | better PNG version available }} Иван Севастьянов (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Dates of deaths of participants of Napoleonic wars.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Two different authors are credited in the title and the author section, Watermark from Kiwi CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Japan. the statue established in 1983 ( http://www.kanagawa-park.or.jp/ooisojoyama/yoshidashigeruteichiku.html ). eien20 (talk) 18:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe de minimis? Nah… :/ RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think so. the material concerns COM:DM#Guidelines 6. --eien20 (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abu Faisal Sergio Tapia
[edit]The artist is still alive, so COM:VRT procedure required.
- File:Abu Faisal Sergio Tapia Contemporary Argentinian Painter Artist.jpg
- File:Alger Resistance.jpg
- File:Cafe Alger.jpg
- File:GUERRA A LA HUMANIDAD.jpg
- File:MUSCAT.jpg
- File:Obra de Arte Sahara.jpg
- File:Pescadores.png
Achim55 (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
unfortunately no proper license; free access, but rights reserved as mentioned at http://www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/obj/90085683. Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Info There is an additional discussion of local wikipedians at uploader's user page. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Info There's something going on in the background, the file won't get deleted. I'll remove the DR as soon as I know if the current CC-by-SA 4.0 will be the license of choice. -- regards, 32X (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023042010004541 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- 32X (talk) 13:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Tantos penes! Para qué? Borrar. 186.175.240.212 16:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing new Dronebogus (talk) 02:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 01:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Not simple enough, especially considering that in Chile the TOO is very low. I would support keeping a simpler version without the shading et al. Bedivere (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Let me take you down, (be)cause… (talk · contribs)
[edit]Exact duplicates of photos already uploaded and properly categorized at Category:Ivana Čermáková.
- File:-i---i- (50940180473).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50941045947).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50944330042).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50947376543).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50948105446).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50950686068).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50951531382).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50951474196).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50954821256).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50954839061).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50960639292).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50960708717).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50960754642).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50964291801).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50964321651).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50964469082).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50967531596).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50966826538).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50966924493).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50977951067).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50977837621).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50980882567).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50980838281).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50980864021).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50993459138).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50994341792).jpg
- File:-i---i- (50998060272).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51001277761).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51003738013).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51006920378).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51009404683).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51012055433).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51013740996).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51013019088).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51017593796).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51016999483).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51023955201).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51023424828).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51032239248).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51037576642).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51037504386).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51037586151).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51036861503).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51041746212).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51041777782).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51040955268).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51047857541).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51048741577).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51057369662).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51056562923).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51059102158).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51059559243).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51061057917).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51064462286).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51064462096).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51067548471).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51074718441).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51077719432).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51079606787).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51078814398).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51000147474).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51000163809).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51083553753).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51017823985).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51002106019).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51089321680).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51088595162).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51090006933).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51089537194).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51090160118).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51089705622).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51091480025).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51090747979).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51092317186).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51092419419).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51092455477).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51092399161).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51095193671).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51097659242).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51097659157).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51098132583).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51100563500).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51099838069).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51102034768).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51101891312).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51102055333).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51104946530).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51104076073).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51104699977).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51104683299).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51109615987).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51110483006).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51112368544).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51112368439).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51113417507).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51114799675).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51116539921).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51116455083).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51120866940).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51118045509).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51120866800).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51124456230).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51121498373).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51124247943).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51124507685).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51128200741).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51126503303).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51130866729).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51128180702).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51131802427).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51136521018).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51134547093).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51137392885).jpg
- File:-i---i- (51136993894).jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Let me take you down, (be)cause… (talk · contribs)
[edit]Accepting that these files are freely licensed it does appear that these are actually advertising to me. The description being
Become our Patreon member to access full sized photo and Behind-The-Scene footage of all our shoots www.patreon.com/captain_crunch
makes this rather obvious to me. I have deleted a batch and then realised there are rather a lot of them. If I am wrong the others should be undeleted. Thanks
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 1 Black and White BW4.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 1 Black and White BW2.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 1 Black and White BW3.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 1 Black and White BW1.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662727257.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661905498.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662727382.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661905348.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662727067.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661905203.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661905618.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662638861.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662727692.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661905818.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661905883.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662727872.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661906168.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662639256.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662728162.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661906453.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661906553.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662639666.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50661906698.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662728792.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3 - 50662728767.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 3.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714408307.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713589568.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714408482.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714408852.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714408982.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714409392.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713590288.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713589943.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714327596.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714328061.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714409507.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714409572.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713590748.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714410102.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714410182.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714328246.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714328631.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713591898.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713591403.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714329006.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714329186.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714411237.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714410957.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714329756.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714411422.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714411677.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714411562.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714330441.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713593043.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714330651.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713593503.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714330841.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713593958.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713594028.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713593573.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713594143.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50713594498.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 - 50714331901.jpg
- File:Ashley and Janade Lingerie Shoots Part 4 (50714331326).jpg
Herby talk thyme 15:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I can remove the advertising description if necessary. Sorry for not doing that while uploading the images. Let me take you down, (be)cause… (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think we should hide photos that are freely licensed and in scope, just because the description at the link and not on Commons is promotional. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Improper description isn't a valid deletion reason. No copyright issues here also. Юрий Д.К 16:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Cometi um erro, carreguei o arquivo errado Cadcalcule (talk) 11:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
The supposed photographer is in the photo, nor is he dead for 50 years. Mys_721tx (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright status is uncertain for this 1960 photograph. Would have been restored by URAA regardless. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Australianblackbelt
[edit]Australianblackbelt (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:2017 Australian GP security team.jpg <- OTRS permission processed, but there is a map of the circuit that is de minimis, but it's my opinion. --Ruthven (msg) 12:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- File:Felix Leong Rebirth celebration 1.jpg
- File:Felix Leong Rebirth celebration 2.jpg
- File:Kali seminar 1.jpg
- File:Kali seminar 2.jpg
- File:Kali seminar drills.jpg
- File:Terry Lim anniversary 1.jpg
- File:Terry Lim anniversary 2.jpg
- File:Terry Lim anniversary 3.jpg
- File:Terry lim demonstration.jpg
- File:Terry Lim tournament.jpg
The photos are taken from newspaper and so copyrighted. If OTRS-permission will arrive, then the photos can be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Taivo The only reason you know they were in a newspaper is cause I wrote it into the description, the journalist not only sent the OTRS but also attached copies of the newspaper articles. Your deleting just to make it difficult or what? don't really understand the point here sorry (Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- The photos have now been 2 months in Commons without OTRS-permission. If the permission is processed, then the files can be restored, but they cannot be forever in Commons without processed OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- There is nothing suspicious here take a look at this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Georgette_Psarreas.jpg the OTRS is from the Jurnalist at Latin Australian Times it's no coincidence(Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- Your reason was suspected copyright now your reason is they have not been approved for 2 months?(Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- [Ticket#2016122610002138] [Ticket#2017032910003414] [Ticket#2017033110004025] [Ticket#2017033110004025] [Ticket#2017050610001081] [Ticket#2017050910007169] (Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- @Australianblackbelt: The current backlog is around 71 days. 2 months is the minimum for a ticket to be processed. --Ruthven (msg) 12:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Ruthven FYI the OTRS for File:2017 Australian GP security team.jpg was send 30/3/2017 and the OTRS for all the other images stated above were sent 28/3/2017. Cheers.(Australianblackbelt (talk) 03:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC))
- @Australianblackbelt: The current backlog is around 71 days. 2 months is the minimum for a ticket to be processed. --Ruthven (msg) 12:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- [Ticket#2016122610002138] [Ticket#2017032910003414] [Ticket#2017033110004025] [Ticket#2017033110004025] [Ticket#2017050610001081] [Ticket#2017050910007169] (Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- Your reason was suspected copyright now your reason is they have not been approved for 2 months?(Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- There is nothing suspicious here take a look at this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Georgette_Psarreas.jpg the OTRS is from the Jurnalist at Latin Australian Times it's no coincidence(Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC))
- The photos have now been 2 months in Commons without OTRS-permission. If the permission is processed, then the files can be restored, but they cannot be forever in Commons without processed OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: mostly by colleagues. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Australianblackbelt (talk · contribs)
[edit]ticket:2021011510006068 does not mention these files nor have the copyright holders listed in the source.
- File:Eric Oram profile.jpg
- File:Arnett and Inosanto.jpg
- File:Arnett at Naval Air Station.jpg
- File:Anthony Arnett NKKU Olympia Games.jpg
- File:Arnett Fighting Dragons.jpg
- File:Anthony Arnett and Eric Oram.jpg
- File:William Cheung and Bob Hawke.jpg
- File:Ip Man and William Cheung.jpg
- File:Wong Shun Leung and William Cheung.jpg
Mys_721tx (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Pretty sure the one with Ip Man and William Cheung is touched/manipulated photograph. -- TrickShotFinn (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- File:Eric Oram profile.jpg does have a
validpermission per Ticket:2023010110004387. --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC) - Concerning the other files, I have checked ticket:2021011510006068 now. The only plausible explanation I can give is that I made a mistake, probably by erroneous handling of the batch task or misunderstanding one of the client's messages. Please pardon my mistake. The last three, however, bear a claim that that are in the public domain which should be checked before deleting them. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hm, the first one is an extract from File:Anthony Arnett and Eric Oram.jpg, for which the permission is an error. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ip Man and William Cheung photograph matches other hits on TinEye and seems authentic, 1958 according to file, can be undeleted in 2054. The last file is from 1975, would enter public domain in China and Hong Kong in a few years, undelete in 2071. The William Cheung and Bob Hawke one is from 1980, undelete in 2076. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-trivial logo, can be found here, no evidence of free license WindEwriX (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete.Jonteemil (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia, these two people did not meet at the supposed date of creation. Mys_721tx (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. circa 1965 photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
La fuente de esta foto tiene derechos de autor. © 186.173.119.14 09:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Meaninless DR. According to nominator's IP 186.173.119.14, "the source has copyright". In fact the photo has copyright but it has expired according to Argentine Law 11,723 for what the {{PD-AR-Photo}} license is used.
- Moreover the source clearly says that the photo is dated 1984 (released to PD in Jan 2010) and previously published on the printed edition of El Gráfico, as the total amount of photos from that magazine that I've been uploading to Commons. Fma12 (talk) 10:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Had already deleted this. The photograph is indeed public domain in Argentina, but is not in the US since it only became public domain in Argentina in 2010. Undelete in 2080 when U.S. copyright expires. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teatrfreedom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 10:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teatrfreedom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable persons, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Работа с качеством мастер класс.jpg
- File:Запись мастер класса.jpg
- File:Мастер класс Светы Кузнецовой 2.jpg
- File:Мастер класс Светы Кузнецовой.jpg
- File:Света Кузнецова портрет цвет.jpg
- File:Света Кузнецова портрет.jpg
- File:Света Кузнецова.jpg
- File:Тотальное погружение 2020.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment IMO, some are nice photos to illustrate gymnastic (or whatever that’s called in English). File:Света Кузнецова портрет цвет.jpg is a good portrait. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept 3 that could be useful as demonstrations of gymnastics or stretching. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, the photo is derived from the official website of Zdravko Ponoš (https://zdravkoponos.rs/) and is not in the ownership of Al Jazeera. The video is only a reupload of an interview that was conducted by Al Jazeera. This is the original video. Vacant0 (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Original video doesn't have a Creative Commons license, the CC one is only a reupload. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
删除重复图片,重复图片 File:PLANS Guangzhou (DDG-168) 20120506.jpg 颐园居 (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate now a redirect. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
删除完全重复图片,重复图片 File:Guangzhou 168.jpg 颐园居 (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: A crop is not a duplicate, plus the crop is In Use. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ernst Kretschmann
[edit]While these two 1940 and 1942 illustrations by German artist Ernst Kretschmann are in the public domain in Germany now, they are still protected by copyright in the US and should therefore be deleted. The files can be restored in 2036 and 2038 respectively.
- File:Der Ubermensch.webp
- File:NS Frauen-Warte 13 1942 Kameraden Aquarell von PK-Zeichner Ernst Kretschmann Nazi propganda No known copyright restriction.ScanFraktur 0000.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 13:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I am adding
- (a different version of File:Der Ubermensch.webp) to this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 13:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Rosenzweig, Ernst Ludwig Kretschmann died in 1941. i.e. the copyright term of 70 years after the author's death (which applies to all European Union countries) has expired. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 14:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but works published in 1940 and 1942 are still protected in the USA because of a law called the URAA (Commons:URAA). All files at Wikimedia Commons need to be free in both their source country and the USA (Commons:Licensing). --Rosenzweig τ 14:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright was not automatic on publication in 1940 or 1942, as it is now, they had to be published with a claim for copyright. If there any evidence that these were copyrighted at the time? What evidence shows their year of publicationin the US? Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- All that does not matter, they were originally published outside the US, and their copyright in the US was restored by the URAA without the need to observe any of these formalities. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Per Commons:URAA: "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." (emphasis added) Please present definitive evidence that the images were copyrighted in Germany at the time that URAA went into effect, taking into account Allied actions at the end of WWII. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's not a "mere allegation". The author died in 1941, Germany has a term of protection of 70 years after the death of the author, therefore the works were still protected in Germany on the URAA date of January 1, 1996. I don't know what you mean by "Allied actions at the end of WWII". --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Per Commons:URAA: "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." (emphasis added) Please present definitive evidence that the images were copyrighted in Germany at the time that URAA went into effect, taking into account Allied actions at the end of WWII. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- All that does not matter, they were originally published outside the US, and their copyright in the US was restored by the URAA without the need to observe any of these formalities. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies, Undelete in 2036 and 2038. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Single page pdf, superseded by File:Gary MacDougal.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep for Gary MacDougal.jpg's licence history --Ras67 (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ras67. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
duplicated image Mv1388 (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Please show what is a duplicate of. The other versions are different file sizes, different aspect ratios in the crop, and different color temperatures. --RAN (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. No need to delete this version. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Cross-wiki spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines_again. MER-C 19:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Improperly licensed; logos are not free images 331dot (talk) 09:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Minorax: is this above the ToO in Singapore? Abzeronow (talk) 19:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- There's no clear rule on this as far as I know. So I'd align this with COM:TOO UK as the laws are probably inherited. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears to be above the ToO in country of origin. This would likely be below the ToO in the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
No borrar sin discutir, buen ejemplo de la amistad entre humanos y animales silvestres. 186.175.240.212 18:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, I cannot seem to find out the deletion rationale. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Fixed the information on it as this was a circa 1985 Romanian photograph (subject was born around 1975). --Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
doublon de https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paris_-_Retromobile_2012_-_Bugatti_type_55_-_002.jpg Finoskov (talk) 19:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Duplicate already handled. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Seems like a selfie CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, @CoffeeEngineer, It is in use. Also, that person has a Wikipedia page. The uploader has a few edits. This upload is likely their photo with a license. -- Ooligan (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye and I think we can AGF that the uploader is the photographer here. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name of the uploader is not the name of the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, has camera EXIF and author's name would link to the uploader's page. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous deletion request thread. Will you request deletion again the same day this deletion request is denied? Please quit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I saw another discrepancy between the description and the uploader's name. That is why I opened a new one. I think it is legitimate. I am not agreeing with quitting. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Your deletion reason is exactly the same as last time. Do you think you'll get a different result with a different admin? Let's ping Abzeronow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Author field is
[[User:Vaxtus|Shantidas Riedacker]]
. CoffeeEngineer, please share what evidence you have that the uploader isn't the photographer, because as explained I don't see anything that indicates uploader isn't the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)- I did the mistake to raise another deletion request. Sorry for the confusion. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Author field is
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
uploaded from pinterest with contradictory author information 웃OO 21:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. 1979 British photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Lining out and specimen stock - retail price list fall 1973 - spring 1974 (IA liningoutspecime1974ting).pdf
[edit]Not a work of US Gov... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Also -
These are clearly NOT works of the US government, (and as no-one has attempted to resolve this issue in at least 2 years), the simple but brutal answer is to just delete eveything in the list on the basis that it is unreasonable to expect a single contributor to go through every single file looking for the absence of copyright notices.
I am willing to withdraw this Deletion request if someone actually starts evaluating these and updating the licenses appropriately, but based on past requests to curate bulk uploads, I am not holding my breath. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I am now finding a LOT of items in - Category:FEDLINK - Henry G. Gilbert Nursery and Seed Trade Catalog Collection that are mislicensed..
- There's NO way someone can sensibly audit 2500 files, So I will be nominating the ENTIRE category and it's parent for deletion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep all without prejudice to renominating ones that have actually been checked. Many have "No copyright page found" or are pre-1928. I'll get started on a bot to get rid of those. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Procedurally closing as keep. I would consider new individual DRs if any of these files are still in copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Own work! Qué significa eso? 186.172.204.83 22:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. Looks like a 1940s photograph, we have no information on where and when it was really first published. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete Violation des droits d'auteurs Logo de fédération très usité et non libre de droit KAPour les intimes 22:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep In my opinion logo falls under PD-textlogo and is not eligible for copyright. Auguel (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be below the ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Files from bollywoodhungama.com
[edit]No indication of free license
DatGuy (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Images don't seem to meet the requirements of the BH license. Mainly, they need to be from a BH party or event, and those have a specific path in the url which these images do not have. Ravensfire (talk) 02:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, the image of medlar bodies shown was apparently taken from Medscape which does not appear to allow for Commons compatible reuse of its images. The image specifically appears on the Medscape article on Chromoblastomycosis (free account creation is required to view it) and can be viewed directly by following this link. Evidence that the medlar bodies image originates from Medscape include the Medscape image's size (1800 x 1255) compared to this files total size (1080 x 1350) as well as the fact that Medscape is a commonly used source for independent medical information. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 23:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
it is a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Чернівці_(177)_Університетська,_23.jpg Bestalex (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, not exactly the same. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RodRabelo7. They are similar but not duplicates. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Audio collage of unsourced speeches and music COM:DW, questionable claims; does not seem in scope. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's just an audio without swearing without copyright without offencive elements Adi0138 (talk) 05:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
logo non libre de droit d'auteur violation des droits. KAPour les intimes 14:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion the logo is too simple to be protected by copyright, and falls under PD-textlogo. Auguel (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete ;Clear violation of copyright, logo issue and property of the World Triathlon has been the subject of an intellectual property deposit. See the following warning on the federation website "The World Triathlon logo may not be used on any product without express permission. Contact us for enquiries."--KAPour les intimes 14:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The logo is certainly trademarked, but not copyrighted since it does not meet the threshold of originality (COM:TOO). Auguel (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment operating local law is COM:TOO Switzerland. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:TOO Switzerland the following works are protected “literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character”. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. In this case I decided to keep this image, because I think it is a more complex design then simple geometric shapes. --Ellywa (talk) 17:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurmanbek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request. Too old for G7, converting.
And also:
- File:Altınordu Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Aziziye Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Battalgazi Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Belen Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Bodrum Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Bulancak Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Erenler Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Fatsa Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Gaziemir Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Giresun Belediyesi logo.svg
- File:Havsa Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Kelkit Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Menderes Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Narlıdere Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Sarıçam Belediyesi logo.jpg
- File:Savur Belediyesi logo.png
- File:Selçuklu Belediyesi logo.svg
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, all appear copyrighted logo's, perhaps user came to the conclusion he should not have uploaded these images. --Ellywa (talk) 17:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Originally marked as "copyvio" by User:K.A under the statemente "Federation logo, is not free of rights"
- Keep as a PD-textlogo, as I tagged the file when I uploaded it. Fma12 (talk) 15:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Auguel (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete violation de copyright le logo n'est pas dans le domaine public. --KAPour les intimes 22:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment @Kagaoua: 1) As the nominator your vote is pretty known so you don't need to vote for "delete". 2) I strongly recommend you to take a look at Commons:Threshold of originality. Fma12 (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm inclined towards Keep myself, but I don't know the ToO in Switzerland. This would be below the ToO in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Imho this is a very smart design, with the hockeystick in silhouette. It is much more then the letters FIH. So I think it is above COM:TOO Switzerland where the following works are protected “literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character”. Ellywa (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. There are other logos with this kind of swoop or curve which have been considered below TOO. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)