Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 21st, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jim Gordon Sudbury 2014 (15790880629).jpg

[edit]

Photo apparently added in error. There's been an editwar at en:Jim Gordon (politician) over the inclusion of this photo in the infobox, but I personally grew up in the city that Jim Gordon was mayor of, and can definitively confirm this is not him (see also image here for further proof, because again I can attest from personal knowledge, that's Jim Gordon.) Although this came from the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario's Flickr photostream, that stream does not identify the subject as Jim Gordon (or anybody else) either (and thus I have no idea where anybody ever got the idea that it was Jim Gordon.) The related File:Elizabeth Dowdeswell and Jim Gordon 2014 (15790880629).jpg, from which this was extracted, has been submitted by me for renaming on the same basis; the other image is fine for retention since Elizabeth Dowdeswell (who has an article) is also in it, but this extraction should just be deleted as a misidentification. If we can ever figure out who it actually is and he has a Wikipedia article to use it in, then we can always just re-extract it at a later date. Bearcat (talk) 00:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I checked the Flicker metadata to figure out when the photo was posted, ran a search to see what happened on Dowdeswell's visit to Sudbury on that date, and nailed it: en:Gaétan Gervais. Consider this withdrawn, I'll submit a renaming request for it instead. Bearcat (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn as I successfully located who it actually is. Bearcat (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jim Gordon Sudbury 2014 (15790880629).jpg

[edit]

No need for a wrong redirection 181.43.5.243 20:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Copy of AE1A8397.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted (Published by mistake) Killim (talk) 12:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MrFahim0001 OC.jpg

[edit]

I realized it is bad for my privacy MrFahim0001 (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty file page, was already deleted in February. --Rosenzweig τ 21:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elizabeth Dowdeswell and Jim Gordon 2014 (15790880629).jpg

[edit]

Rename this and delete the wrong redirect titles with Gordon. 181.43.5.243 14:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, renamed to File:Elizabeth Dowdeswell and Gaétan Gervais 2014 (15790880629).jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:U+2319 -- error.gif

[edit]

The image is flipped left-to-right. 68.16.11.2 18:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The depiction is correct. --Achim55 (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abriss Siemenswerke Obersendling (Munich) 21.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Wikitarisch (talk) 08:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Venezia 5 febbraio 2023, il corteo acqueo mascherato del Coordinamento delle Associazioni Remiere di Voga alla Veneta.jpg

[edit]

ho erroneamente inserito foto con firma Photo Toni (talk) 13:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paul McGuirk, Author.pdf

[edit]

Brief autobiography outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obviously out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 23:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Montagu Square, Marylebone, February 2023 10.jpg

[edit]

Copy of 1-5 Montagu Square, Marylebone, February 2023.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M 7.5 - 4 km SSE of Ekinözü, Turkey.pdf

[edit]

I uploaded this image as a PDF just now. SVG seems like a better option and therefore I will upload a new version in SVG. Axadem (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The ambassador of Shah Abbas & Jahangir.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Abbas on the throne.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Abbas in Khorasan.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Ismail II on the throne.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Tahmasp I & Homayun.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Mohammad khodabandeh & Hamzeh mirza.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ismail mirza in Nowruz.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battle of Shah Tahmasp & Uzbeks.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battle of Hamzeh Mirza.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Accession of the Shah Tahmasp.tif

[edit]

Wrong format Mv1388 (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Sulayman.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Revista La Ciudad y Los Perros.pdf

[edit]

Unused personal file. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F3. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Koroyawin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional map, flag, coa - Looks nice but its out of scope

Enyavar (talk) 10:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Koroyawin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictitious Minecraft micronation with a population of "100 villagers in Minecraft" per w:en:Draft:Republic of Koro. Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Republic of Koro.png.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to spell it out: out of COM:SCOPE. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 02:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PikiWiki Israel 56075 the edge of the breakwater jaffa port.jpg

[edit]

no source Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 17:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File page without file, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roosevelt1924.svgpng.png

[edit]

Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 07:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Obsolete Quebec Autoroute shields

[edit]

Unnecessary alternate versions of files in Category:Quebec Autoroute shields created by a user blocked for socking on enwiki and frwiki.

Rschen7754 02:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Imzadi 1979 → 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete useless png. RZuo (talk) 17:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Purnea Purnia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal photo album from a mobile phone, mostly selfies or filter-use, lacking descriptions. Uploader left after two days. None seem to be used, or usable within scope.

Enyavar (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Selfies. COM:CSD#F10 Andy Dingley (talk) 00:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:World Peace Pagoda Pokhara.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Nepal and the photo violates architect's copyright. Per en:Shanti Stupa, Pokhara, the building was completed in 1999. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:אסף ויזר.png

[edit]

Not notable person from Israel. out of COM:PS -- Geagea (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"owned by Digital Rail Artist"

[edit]

Accidental flickrwashing - the physical copies are owner by the flickr user, but there is no evidence they own the copyright. (For a number of the files, the photographer is not even known.)

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"owned by Digital Rail Artist"

[edit]

The flickr uploader only owns the physical copy of these photos; there is no evidence that he owns the copyright. The images are from a variety of photographers, some of them unknown.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220817 152220jpn.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AMAZON MUSIC 20220715 095536 copy 3000x3000.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FB IMG 1670554860107-1.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20221208 072735jpg.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ab6761670000ecd48b6da1d18070ced951df9309 copy 384x512.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All of these as selfies, but they really should have been listed as a batch. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Andy Dingley How do you do it ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it's a bit more work than just one press. But not too bad, if you are doing a bunch. See COM:MASSDEL Andy Dingley (talk) 22:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Andy Dingley Thank you for the link. I will use it in the future. I saw it on some pages, but did not know how to do it. I also see that my question was a bit dry. It was not my intention. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220817 152325jpn.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220817 152334jpg.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Google copy 1200x1200.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:004~2jpn.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220817 152217 copy 1366x2048.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220817 152250jpg.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mike Junior 1444 IMG-20220902-WA0003~5.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mike Junior 1444 IMG-20220902-WA0003~5.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mike Junior 1444 Lumii 20190214 181624011jpg.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mike Junior 1444 20220806 072048jpn.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MikeJúnior1444 DSC06220jpg.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Constant New Babylon.jpg

[edit]

I cannot find this at either source listed and therefore I cannot see why this previously published work is given a Creative Commons license. Abzeronow (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did however find it here: https://www.museoreinasofia.es/en/collection/artwork/new-babylon-1 1963 lithograph by an artist who died in 2005. Abzeronow (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AGShirshov.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. It would be much better to put a better quality fair use photo in the article instead of this low-quality copyvio. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, at least look what you're nominating. This film was released in 1945, and in 1946 participated in the Cannes Film Festival. "Произведение представляет собой фильм (видеофрагмент или кадр из него)... созданный юридическим лицом <Мосфильм> в период с 1 января 1929 года до 1 января 1946 года". Lesless (talk) 07:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Film created by a legal entity within the time period and shown during the time period required. It probably could use an English-language description though. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahhr photo 1926 (cropped-Katsman).jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. It would be much better to put a better quality fair use photo in the article instead of this low-quality copyvio. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AI Eremenko 01.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. Low quality too. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. Low quality too
А резве качество является поводом к удалению? VladimirPF (talk) 06:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AI Cherepanov.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. 1984 is not early enough! PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akaki Giorgadze.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. 1965 book is not early enough source for PD-Russia status under current Russian copyright law PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akaki Giorgadze 1930s.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. 1965 book is not early enough! It would be much better to put a better quality fair use photo in the article instead of this low-quality copyvio. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexey Uktomski.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD-Russia. It would be much better to put a better quality fair use photo in the article instead of this low-quality copyvio. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Nomination by globally banned sockpupet who demands appearing in a book or magazine as proof of an image being "made public". His anti-Russian behavior was the reason for the ban. He has nominated over 1,000 Russian images for deletion. --RAN (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rollfeld Fliegerhorst Wesendorf.jpg

[edit]

URV, Urheber ist der WDR, Bildschirmfoto AxelHH (talk) 13:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Fotos vom Flugplatz/Rollfeld sind von "WDR digital" veröffentlicht worden und werden von mir verwendet. Der Fliegerhorst/Flugplatz Wesendorf wird u.a. von WDR digital (siehe Linkadresse bei Wikipedia Wesendorf/Nds.) vorgestellt. Die Heimatforscher Celle widmen sich auch ausführlich dem Flugplatz Wesendorf mit einer eigenen Vorstellung auf ihren Webseiten. Der "Heimatforscher" Hendrik Altmann veröffentlicht sogar ein Buch über den Fliegerhorst/Flugplatz Wesendorf "Hendrik Altmann: Der Fliegerhorst Wesendorf - zwischen Zwangsarbeit und Wunderwaffe". Thomas Frankewitsch (talk) 07:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bitte lesen: Commons:Bildschirmfotos.
Bildschirmfotos von audio-visuellen Werken (wie Filmen, Fernsehsendungen, Videoclips etc.) sind in der Regel Eigentum der Produzenten bzw. Erschaffer und können daher nicht auf Wikimedia-Commons hochgeladen werden. Es sei denn, das Werk ist bereits gemeinfrei oder wurde unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht oder der Rechteinhaber hat das konkrete Bildschirmfoto freigegeben und unter eine freie Lizenz gestellt.
Bei dem Bild ist nicht erkennbar, dass es der WDR gemeinfrei erklärt hat. Was der "Heimatforscher" Hendrik Altmann veröffentlicht interessiert hier nicht.--AxelHH (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the precautionary principle. Ausweislich der Hakenkreuze auf den Flugzeugen ist das wohl ein Foto aus Nazizeiten, das vom WDR verwendet wurde. Urheber dürfte daher kaum der WDR sein. Da es aber keinerlei Angaben zum eigentlichen Urheber gibt, könnte es noch urheberrechtlich geschützt sein. Ohne jegliche Angaben zum Urheber können wir i. d. R. Bilder behalten, die mindestens 120 Jahre alt sind, und so alt ist das Photo nicht. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KZX Engine Official Logo.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by EdTre as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploads are a mix of copyvio screenshots from video games and logos that are above TOO. Is this indeed above COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination. i agree that this logo is not above COM:TOO. --EdTre (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not above TOO. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Obsolete Quebec Highway shields

[edit]

Unnecessary alternate versions of files in Category:Quebec Highway shields created by a user blocked for socking on enwiki and frwiki.

Rschen7754 02:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Imzadi 1979 → 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Adil Shamji.jpg

[edit]

Questionable rights, found: https://www.ola.org/en/members/all/adil-shamji and https://ontarioliberal.ca/mpp/dr-adil-shamji/ WildComet (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NothingOS Logo.png

[edit]

Unused, superseded by File:Nothing OS wordmark.svg Bassie f (talk) 07:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ISLAMIC EMPIRE.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: Fantasy conquest Enyavar (talk) 08:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Csak bejött.jpg

[edit]

It is only a test, according uploader. -- ato (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SHARMAPUSHPENDRAVATS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:D-Pad Buzul személyessen.png

[edit]

Out of scope. -- ato (talk) 10:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nuno Louro.png

[edit]

Possible opyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Radmila Popovici (Fotografie de Igor Schimbător).jpg

[edit]

From the title itself we learn that the author was Igor Schimbător; there is no proof of permission from the author. Gikü (talk) 11:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ХОРОШАЯ Девушка (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Model foto suspected CopyVio; the other two pictures are fantasy symbols out of scope

Enyavar (talk) 11:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahershahab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal images by uploader

Enyavar (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B-2510.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from https://aviation-safety.net/photo/1363/Boeing-737-247-B-2510. If the uploader can prove otherwise that this is their own work I'll be happy to withdraw this nomination. SBS6577P (talk) 12:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muhammad fahad ali.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: Single unused personal image by non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 12:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Syndicalist Union of California.png

[edit]

Out of scope: fictional party logo Enyavar (talk) 12:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okisyahputrajaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused account profile images by non-contributing uploader. (One used file remains as User page image.)

Enyavar (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flacid Penis of Eurpoean decent.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erect European Penis (Unshaved).jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paula Viana.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal image by uploader Enyavar (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YeadHosen1.jpg

[edit]

deleted YeadHosen1 (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet, but It should be. F10 181.43.5.243 14:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Канат Раймбеков.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Қанат Раймбеков.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Казахский Титан.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Қанат Раймбек.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Раймбеков Канат в акимом Жетысай Нурлыбек Бахтияров.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 13:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Akilbek Allan

[edit]

Either not there own work, or their attempt to promote themselves crosswiki. Since they claim a selfie as their own work, I suspect the latter. Anyways, not educational, just promotional, probably doesn't belong on commons.

BRP ever 13:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:0 Éventail chinois - Musée de la Compagnies des Indes (6).JPG

[edit]

A la demande du propriétaire de l'objet. - At the request of the owner of the object. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE, commons licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 13:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sindhan kalan jila banda uttar predesh .jpg

[edit]

out of scope: unused personal image by non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 14:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YeadHosen.jpg

[edit]

deleted YeadHosen (talk) 03:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Selfie F10, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YeadHosen.jpg

[edit]

Delete again, unnecessary. 181.43.5.243 14:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tan fabric.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Alma.lib (talk) 14:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eagletech.jpg

[edit]

No obvious use Dronebogus (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BOTA KINGDOM.gif

[edit]

Nonsense/useless Dronebogus (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Broke Zachary Becker in the flesh.jpg

[edit]

Obvious vandalism Dronebogus (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carmela Clutch.jpg

[edit]

Low quality copyvio or spam Dronebogus (talk) 15:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raymond Gomez Garcia.jpg

[edit]

Spam [blah lah character req.] Dronebogus (talk) 15:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joshua Bernardino fontanilla at five years old in his house in California on July third 1997 on a hot day.jpg

[edit]

Huh? What? Dronebogus (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skeletophilia.png

[edit]

I have no idea what this is supposed to be. (Obligatory bone joke) Dronebogus (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andrea Catsimatidis and Curtis Sliwa.jpg and derivatives

[edit]

Source does not state that the image is CC-BY-4.0, only saying that "pictures are free to download and repost" without an indicated license. The Google Drive folder that contains the images says it was taken by Denice Flores Almendares. --reppoptalk 15:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete no valid licence. RZuo (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BIRUDEV ANANDA KATHARE.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo by single-contribution self-promoter Enyavar (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Əli bəy Azəri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no metadata, possible not own work 

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 15:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1188x250.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted image: https://www.reisenwolke.com/ Yabancım 16:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Daniel Andrade S.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal image by one-time contributor Enyavar (talk) 16:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Damián Arabia.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal photo by one-time contributor Enyavar (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User talk:Mamebart

[edit]

no longer in use Mamebart (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fm2007cover5.jpg

[edit]

Appears to be a user-created logo. If it's not user-created, it's copyrighted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nathananas.png

[edit]

I uploaded this 2 years ago as a joke and this file is not educationally useful and will never be used. It has my face on it and I think it would be better to delete it. NathiNoon (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kevinramirez.jpg

[edit]

Unrelated to the train station Tet (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brendan.Platypus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made these literally this week, before these images weren't even internet available. The Ozzard photo was digitally re-imaged based on his campaign literature and Senator Dick LaRossa allowed to use this photo for digital reimaging as well for his page. I can provide a written note from him allowing the photo to be used. Brendan.Platypus (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DW, we need OTRS from the person who created the original image. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FOFANA-AMARAL210223.jpg

[edit]

No indication of own work 181.203.238.127 22:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бошко Николић у свом пчелињаку.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бошко Николић - библиотека 2.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бошко Николић - библиотека.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бошко Николић.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Књига Бошка Николића.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Лабудов друг.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Засунче.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Прозрака.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Сан.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Живојин Николић.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation from http://bibliotekajefimija.rs/digital-library/biographical-lexicon/n.html Ђидо (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Astrid Proll.jpg

[edit]

Low quality Hasenläufer 22:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Really low quality. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per COM:INUSE. I also think that the image is blurry, but it was being used in 10+ Wikipedia site. Should be deleted after replacement. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE, find a better replacement first. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:スターしるこサンド抹茶 - 1.jpg

[edit]

Het ontwerp van het pakket is auteursrechtelijk beschermd. Zie com:PACKAGE. トトト (talk) 00:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:年賀状詫び文.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of non-free photography. 61.120.241.1 00:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo de l'union des sociaux-démocrates.png

[edit]

non free logo (uploaded from english wikipedia) Habertix (talk) 00:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1984 Sears Tower Brochure (52621386228).jpg

[edit]

uploader does not own copyright of brochure SecretName101 (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, interior has a Rand McNally copyright notice. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dl FLCZR970.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chireclogo.jpg

[edit]

replaced with new logo RTNS2016 (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:51, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baidra.png

[edit]

ordinary person (F10) Mateus2019 (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street art (26602899542).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poerkoelt dec 2008 budapest benecke PC235435.JPG

[edit]

Pointless partial picture of menu page. 82.135.82.34 13:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Gbawden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BIGVOX.png

[edit]

No obvious use Dronebogus (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zordània nemzeti zàszlaja.png

[edit]

A fake flag of a fake nation or country: Zordània. Not in scope. -- ato (talk) 14:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jorge Rodriguez a Proud, Happy and now openly Bisexual Bottom male from Northridge CA 91325. 11-01-2022 Finally and Happily gaetting out of the closet as Bi-Bottom after many years hidden my real sexual orientation. Proud LGBTQ man.jpg

[edit]

Lovely but educationally useless Dronebogus (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

COM:PORN

—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 23:45, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files after the first one were already DR'ed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Everauau‎ — regards, Revi 12:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, I forgot to check if they already were nom'd. Make sure to delete File:Erect_Penis_with_full_foreskin.jpg, theres only my nomination there. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I have to disagree, judging that the portion of the image containing the genitalia is very small. Category:Close-up photographs of human penises has many superior head-on photos of penises, such as File:Frontal_view_of_penis.jpg, File:Close-up glans penis.jpg, File:Glans Penis of A Human.jpg, File:Vorhaut des Penis.jpg, etc.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

COM:PENIS, more boring pictures of wieners that don’t improve our already giant “hot dog stand”

Dronebogus (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

Commons is not an exhibitionist platform

Dronebogus (talk) 13:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia and Yann. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

As extremely rare as the human penis is, we’ve nevertheless found many photos of it already.

Dronebogus (talk) 20:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

COM:PENIS/COM:PORN

Dronebogus (talk) 06:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

Low quality COM:PENISes

Dronebogus (talk) 07:37, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

Assorted low-quality, redundant, or non-educational COM:PENISes

Dronebogus (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

COM:PENIS

Dronebogus (talk) 02:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

Commons is not an amateur porn site

Dronebogus (talk) 06:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Penis

[edit]

Absolutely nothing to add to this category of images, COM:PENIS spam.

Dronebogus (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Penis

COM:PENIS

Dronebogus (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Penis

[edit]

com:penis

Dronebogus (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Penis

[edit]

Unremarkable WP:PENIS pics

Dronebogus (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by User:Gbawden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Penis

[edit]

Low quality penis images

Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the benchmark for "low quality". It demonstrates exactly what it stated. I believe in regards to both empirical characteristics (resolution, clarity, etc) and usefulness, it surpasses many other images left under this category. Rafe101 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The world makes a little more sense. Thanks Rafe101 (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the rest. 186.175.219.84 22:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Penis

[edit]

SERIOUSLY WE DO NOT NEED MORE DICK PICS

Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Penis

[edit]

COM:PENIS

Dronebogus (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F10 - also CSD U3 of their userpage and a block. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dustin.Gtt.png

[edit]

unused self-presentation Bigbossfarin (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guterdateiname.jpg

[edit]

unused self-presentation Bigbossfarin (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:姉崎東中校歌碑.jpg

[edit]

COM:FOP. the stele written on school anthem. the school established in 1983. eien20 (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FiftyAge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Nonsense logos, a school(?) hallway; no suitable description

Enyavar (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lovebite.jpg

[edit]

Is just a screenshot of Instagram, probably by someone else thibaultmol (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SUJAN SINGH.jpg

[edit]

self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 21:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Singer Dounia.png

[edit]

The depicted subject has uploaded her own photo without crediting the original author. Mhhossein talk 05:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scottish Angus cow and calf.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted 3D work of art displayed at Denver in the United States where there is no FOP. Bri (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Abbas in Khorasan.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mayorsofkillarney.jpg

[edit]

Photo taken from Sudbury news site here, with no indication of a free license. PascalHD (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Article1628.png

[edit]

Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it's actually a scanned clipping of a previously published news article that has preexisting copyrights on it. Bearcat (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Metogreen Fotograf.jpg

[edit]

Fotoğraf benim ve burada durması onayım ve bilgim dahilinde değil, kaldırılmasını talep ediyorum. 78.173.135.225 01:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope personal image, CSD F10. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PLAKTIVAT - Prešeren.jpg

[edit]

Above COM:TOO, no COM:VRT A09 (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plaktivat Migranti.jpg

[edit]

Above COM:TOO, no COM:VRT A09 (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EmilyCampell.png

[edit]

Copyright. A much higher resolution image can be found here. It is the only contribution of the user. No metadata. Wouter (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:روزنامه زن زندگی آزادی.jpg

[edit]

File obtained from the internet without proof of release under the Creative Commons HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALTin39 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from the 1950s-1970s uploaded with an 'own work' tag; license is provably wrong for at least some files (compare 1 and File:Советск. 1975.png).

Underlying lk (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Badgelyislandquarry-killarney..jpg

[edit]

Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it was taken from a Flickr stream (https://www.flickr.com/photos/blueheronco/48767251896) where it is not indicated as being under CC-compatible copyright, and there's no indication that the uploader (username Logan Stitt) is the same person as the Flickr photographer (username Jack Salen) for the purposes of being able to re-release it CC. Bearcat (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Killarneychannel.jpg

[edit]

Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it was ganked from the Facebook page of a restaurant (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=508098517787106&set=pb.100057608852538.-2207520000.&type=3) with absolutely no discernible verification that the uploader was the rightful holder of any copyrights on it for the purposes of being able to release it CC. If he is the photographer, he would have to file proof of that with us for verification -- but it can't be kept if there's no way to verify that he didn't just grab a photo from a Google search that he had no rights to grab. Bearcat (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RemoteMediaFile 6553821 0 2022 05 06 20 12 08.jpg

[edit]

Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it was actually ganked from a Facebook post by the town's municipal government (https://www.facebook.com/Killarney200/photos/pb.100068771213362.-2207520000./1164820451026046/?type=3) with absolutely no evidence that the uploader was the rightful holder of any preexisting copyrights on it. Bearcat (talk) 01:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nihao brother.jpg

[edit]

Incomprehensible what this is and what purpose it’s supposed to have Dronebogus (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ingush dance in Gveleti (Gelate). 1880's.jpg

[edit]

{{Duplicate|File:Ingush dance in Gveleti (Gelate). 19th century.jpg}} (Template doesn't work, anyway, it's File:Ingush dance in Gveleti (Gelate). 19th century.jpg ) Enyavar (talk) 12:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Muqale (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure of the licensing of the other file, although PD-old should apply with it being from 1880 Enyavar (talk) 12:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've uploaded it twice. The website on mentioned on this one (top-left corner) is not the original source, hence the request for deletion. Muqale (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Abkhazia (18th century).svg

[edit]

Unsourced, this flag isn't mentioned in any sources. Maybe this is fictional flag, and then should be marked and renamed. Kaganer (talk) 09:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This flag was restored according to the reports of the Russian captain Aleksandrovich De-Dot, who participated in the assault on Sukhum-kale in 1810, this flag is not fictional, it is used in processions and hangs with us in New Athos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Џьыџь (talk • contribs) 06:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    reports of the Russian captain Aleksandrovich De-Dot
    Any historical reconstructions should be named and marked by relevance manner. And also their should be based on trusted sources (and these sources should be referenced in the file description). --Kaganer (talk) 08:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Some flags related to the history of Abkhazia are the essence of reconstruction, even the flag with a goat, as far as I know, it was not originally green in the original image of Vakhushti Bagrationi, but as for this particular flag, so, i can just assume that reconstruction was made from this site - https://sputnik -abkhazia.ru/20220723/Otkrytaya-miru-ladon-istoriya-abkhazskogo-flaga-1032891054.html.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Џьыџь (talk • contribs) 13:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Џьыџь (talk • contribs) 10:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Abbas on the throne.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battle between Shah Tahmasp I and Uzbeks.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Accession of the Shah Tahmasp I.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battle of Hamzeh Mirza.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The ambassador of Shah Abbas & Jahangir.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Ismail II, Nowruz.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Mohammad khodabandeh & Hamzeh mirza.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Tahmasp I & Homayun.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P-steric.jpg

[edit]

Small jpeg with poor legibility; replaced by File:RP3 complex with AlCl.png DMacks (talk) 04:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FreedomComin.S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The source is "Society" and the author is "Avenue". No indication of release under the stated license.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Der Sonntag Beilage Der Wiener Tag 6 Dezember 1936 2.jpg

[edit]

de:Ernst Angel, who wrote this text published in Austria in 1936, died in 1986. So the text is still protected in Austria until the end of 2056. Both the text and the accompanying photos are still protected in the US until the end of 2031. So the file should be deleted; it can be restored in 2057. Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This DR affects the first file version with the text from Ernst Angel only. de:Otto Skall, who made the photos, died in 1942.  Delete first file version,  Keep second file version.--Wdwd (talk) 09:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That there is now a new version without the text does not affect the URAA problem though. The photos are still protected in the US. --Rosenzweig τ 10:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, impact of URAA.  Delete--Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:F. Tales Massei.jpg

[edit]

VTR is needed. 181.203.238.127 09:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nuked already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:F.T.A.L.E.S. .M.A.SS.EI.png

[edit]

VTR is needed. 181.203.238.127 09:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nuked already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Editora Império Cristão.png

[edit]

Logo rights 181.203.238.127 09:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nuked already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Товстеньке, Меморіальна дошка о. Іванові Блавацькому на фасаді церкви, 1632.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Dw no source since (dw no source since), but it is actually about NoFOP in Ukraine, and NoFOP cases are not supposed to go through a speedy deletion process. The Uploader uploaded a blurred version, where potentially copyrightable elements are blurred. So it is enough to delete only the original version アンタナナ 11:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the original (non-blurred) version, and, in principle, we could close the request, but I think it is safer to wait a week and then get it formally closed, just in case.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter And also delete original version next file File:Товстеньке, Меморіальна дошка о. Іванові Блавацькому на фасаді церкви, 1633.jpg. --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, ✓ Done Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: see the discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ekran görüntüsü 2023-01-10 144431.png

[edit]

File name writing screenshot in Turkish No metadata Zafer (talk) 12:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebthis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal picture of lawyer "Miguel Angel Ferreyra Sanchez"; one-time contributing uploader, name has no coverage outside social media?

Enyavar (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blackkyoung.jpg

[edit]

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JimmyC Street art @ Shoreditch London. (37765962656).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Street Art or Graffiti  Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know this is illegal graffiti rather than a mural? It is painted by James Cochran, a notable artist in London, and I don't think we can deny his copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per A1Cafel. The fact that we know the artist means this is certainly not in some legal limbo as graffiti. It also would have taken a decent amount of time to paint and the property owner would have likely known that this was being painted. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ladywell street art London.. (49871230591).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Street Art or Graffiti  Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know this is illegal graffiti rather than a mural? It is painted by Lionel Stanhope, a notable artist, and I don't think we can deny his copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Oxyman. Probably it was illegal graffiti. Lionel Stanhope is a "street artist" after all and unless I missed it there doesn't seem to be a credit line on the mural itself. My guess is that he created it anonymously due to the legality issues and then someone credited it to him after the fact. If that's the case, then I think COM:GRAFFITI would apply. Otherwise essentially every image of graffiti on here could be deleted the second some internet rando decides to say who they think it was created by. If he was credited on the actual mural itself then I'd be on the side of deleting it though. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Woskerski Street art London.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Street Art or Graffiti  Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know this is illegal graffiti rather than a mural? I don't think we can deny the artist's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. We know who the artist is and it's arguably not even a permanent display (painted on boards which were then attached to a building). It seems clear that this was erected for a purpose (the street party) and so it likely had tacit approval from the owner. COM:PRP applies here. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street Art in Stockwell Lane London 2022.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Street Art or Graffiti  Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know this is illegal graffiti rather than a mural? The worked is signed and similar case was deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:“Burned” By Irony Street Art - Camden London. (39533649332).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Street Art or Graffiti  Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know this is illegal graffiti rather than a mural?This said it was a mural painted by Whoam Irony, and I don't think we can deny his copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Religious statues in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 14:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:25, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Phra Phrom in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Komainu in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep except for the noticeably new ones, these traditional Komainu statues should be in pd. RZuo (talk) 17:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All these statues are completed before 1945.--迴廊彼端 (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in Hsinchu County

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in New Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Confucius Statue in 228 Peace Memorial Park

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Confucius Statue in 228 Peace Memorial Park

[edit]

The statue was completed in 1975 by Pu Tien-sheng (1912–1996). There is no freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2047.

A1Cafel (talk) 10:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in Taoyuan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in Taichung

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in Nantou

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Confucius in Keelung

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Saint Dominic in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 15:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Christian statues in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Jesus in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Virgin Mary in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Dalukuan lions

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Wind Lion God in Kinmen County

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Qingshui

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Qingshan King

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Baosheng in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Fu Lu Shou in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Shennong in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Shennong in Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Zhenwu in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Changhua

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

many of these statues of Matsu should have been created decades or even more than a century ago, which would be in pd. RZuo (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Chiayi County

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Hsinchu City

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Hualien

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Keelung

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Kaohsiung

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 16:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Nantou

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Miaoli

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in New Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Penghu

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Taichung

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Tainan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Taoyuan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Yilan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Mazu in Yunlin

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Hsinchu County

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Hsinchu City

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Changhua

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in New Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 17:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elephant's face.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:桃園文昌宮至聖先師像與供桌.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Probably set up in 1968 ("1968年，時任桃園縣縣長的陳長壽贈寫有「孔子廟」的木匾。該年原祀文昌帝君的桃園文昌廟，正式改祀孔子。改為孔廟時，文昌帝君的神像移奉二樓，正廳即奉祀孔子神位及神像。⋯⋯"), thus should be already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Confucius statue TKJH 土庫國中孔子像 20161030.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:卓溪國民小學 (2).jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:陶瓷藝術園區風獅爺.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kaohsiungtemple.JPG

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Is probably in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2017-10-29 statues of Chinese deities at Wanhe Temple.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Is probably in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:電母 (臺南風神廟).JPG

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Is probably in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:媽祖娘娘002.JPG

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Probably set up before 1906 ("明治三十九年（1906年）三月時發生了丙午大地震，不幸震垮了當時嘉義市區以及大天后宮，大地震過後為了重整嘉義市區和開闢新道路（今忠孝路、光彩街）而將震垮的大天后宮拆除並未重建。當時信眾將媽祖娘娘的神尊和其它宮內神尊移駕到城隍廟後殿供奉⋯⋯"), thus should be already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Confessionals St. John Cathedral Chiayi.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Probably set up in 1958 ("1958年年初開工，同年11月23日舉行落成典禮，得田樞機命名為「聖若望堂」⋯⋯"), thus should be already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nativity scene at Ren-Ai Baptist Church 20221218.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Campus in Viator High School 01.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fortune Poster in Taiwan.jpg

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fortune Poster in Taiwan.jpg

[edit]

This is not architecture, does not qualify for COM:FOP Taiwan King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Standing statues of Confucius in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Penghu

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 13:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Taichung

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Tainan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Taipei

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Taoyuan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Yilan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statues of Tudigong in Yunlin

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Sculptures of Mazu in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Religious sculptures in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 19:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Religious reliefs in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 20:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Religious paintings in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 20:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Paintings in the Museum of World Religions

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 20:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Temple paintings in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 21:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Killarneyontario.jpg

[edit]

Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it's actually a filtered derivative of another image (https://www.flickr.com/photos/lac-bac/31142654400/in/photostream/) by a 19th-century Canadian artist. While the original work is from the 1850s and thus is almost certainly already out of copyright, that would mean we could just upload the original here with proper attribution to the real creator anyway, so there's no need to hold on to an instafiltered rip with a false credit on it as a substitute. Bearcat (talk) 02:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because this isn't the PD image, this is an altered and incorrectly attributed derivative of a PD image. Bearcat (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment We do have the original on Commons as File:Killarney or Shebahonaning, located north of the Huron - John Herbert Caddy.jpg Abzeronow (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Killarney or Shebahonaning, located north of the Huron - John Herbert Caddy.jpg. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escritorio Max11.5.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Mdaniels5757 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Now a source, but unclear to me whether the background is freely licensed. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email to the team asking if it's free licensed and the name of the creator, but the wallpaper is available at their Github repository and the OS it's supposed to be completely free-licensed so i will wait for their answer. Again thank you to understand. DisketteFox (talk) 14:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I got a response to the mail from a coordinator of the MaX team. In the mail he says that the wallpaper is licensed with CC BY SA NC and was created by Ana Belén Simón Méndez. Again, sorry for the inconveniences and thank you. If you need any more information to end the deletion, please, let me know. DisketteFox (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CC BY-SA-NC is not a free license; see COM:L. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Incompatible license. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Killarneyfishermen.jpg

[edit]

Image of questionable copyright status. It's claimed as CC/own work, but the file description clearly identifies it as being from the 1920s (i.e. a full century ago), meaning it's clearly either a straight rip or a filtered derivative of somebody else's preexisting work. And while a photo that old would almost certainly be out of copyright, we would still have to correctly attribute it to the real creator regardless, rather than letting it stand attributed to the uploader. Bearcat (talk) 02:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any photograph taken before 1949 is public domain in Canada. I could fix the description so they are no longer claiming a scan or a filtered version that wouldn't give it a new copyright anyway as an own work. Abzeronow (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep So fix the description / licence, rather than deleting it. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We would still have to know the original provenance of the photo, and the identity of its original creator. Even PD content still has to be attributed accordingly. Bearcat (talk) 22:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, it doesn't. Our requirement is to prove that it's PD. Beyond that, anything else is a bonus. We should credit it when we can, but all that we must do is to demonstrate that it's PD. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Description and licensing fixed. Also added a few categories. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poundnetsbeingusedinkillarneyontario.jpg

[edit]

Image of questionable copyright status. It's claimed as CC/own work, but the file description clearly identifies it as being from the 1930s/40s (i.e. nearly a full century ago), meaning it's clearly either a straight rip or a filtered derivative of somebody else's preexisting work. And while a photo that old would almost certainly be out of copyright, we would still have to correctly attribute it to the real creator regardless, rather than letting it stand attributed to the uploader. Bearcat (talk) 02:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo without essential info - copyright status indeterminable. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo transparent-gold.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non free logos and disk covers (see https://www.discogs.com/fr/master/1478301-Warkings-Reborn or https://datapremiery.pl/warkings-morgana-premiera-plyty-41346/). COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ,je vous envoie ce message afin de vous prévenir que j'ai bien évidemment demander l'accord au groupe Warkings (via instagram) pour utiliser leurs images pour mon article
Preuve à l'appui: https://imgur.com/3XQrcXD
c'est pourquoi il n'est pas nécessaire de supprimer les images que j'utilise pou mon article.
Merci de votre compréhension et bonne journée! Motorh3ad22 (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Killarneymountainlodgeinthesummerof2022.jpg

[edit]

Image of suspicious copyright status. Literally every single other image the user who uploaded this has ever added to Commons at all has been either already deleted, or is currently up for deletion, as a copyright violation -- and while a Google image search didn't locate prior usages of this particular file on other websites, the likelihood that this is somehow the sole legitimate CC/own work contribution by a user whose edit history has otherwise consisted entirely of copyright violations with false claims of CC/own work on them is vanishingly low. So there's sufficient doubt here that we would have to place the onus on the uploader to prove that it is genuinely his own work, rather than just giving him the benefit of the doubt. Bearcat (talk) 02:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader with proven copyvios. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cyclone Freddy on February 19, 2023.jpg

[edit]

There is no indication that the satellite image is from the US Government, i.e. obtain from the US-owned satellite such as NASA Worldview and NOAA GOES A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brandon Presley Portrait.jpg

[edit]

This is an official portrait from the Missisippi Public Service Commission. There is absolutely no evidence that the MPSC has released this file under a creative commons license. Indy beetle (talk) 05:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Dolmayan (right) with a Russian drummer Ruslan Saberov.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo. Used by spammer / pr (in global block). Used only in drafts (declined). No educational use. Maybe someone can cut Dolmayan from this photo, but we already have a lot of photos of him. Drakosh (talk) 05:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. But I have my doubts if this is indeed own work as stated, considering that the other version was a screenshot. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Dolmayan (right) with a Russian drummer Ruslan Saberov 2.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo. Used by spammer / pr (in global block). No educational use. Maybe someone can cut Dolmayan from this photo, but we already have a lot of photos of him. Drakosh (talk) 05:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work, screenshot (judging by bar across the bottom of the image). --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leda2(moon).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio
Converted to regular DR as no evidence was provided. At the source, the image is credited to "NASA/JPL". -- Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leda2(moon).jpg

[edit]

Nominating this for deletion again. It was taken from w:File:Leda2(moon).jpg where it clearly lays out that this was not created by NASA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Noi evidence that it is in the public domain. Following COM:PCP, a deletion is required. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Politica exterior.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal picture by uploader; no description Enyavar (talk) 13:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And likely not own work: FB code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:0 Éventail chinois - Musée de la Compagnies des Indes (2).JPG

[edit]

A la demande du propriétaire de l'objet. - At the request of the owner of the object. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Photo d'un vieil objet dans le domaine public, exposé dans un musée. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The object is from the 18th century and clearly in the public domain. The museum that owns the object cannot control images of the objects after they are taken. File is also in use and clearly in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:0 Éventail chinois - Musée de la Compagnies des Indes (3).JPG

[edit]

A la demande du propriétaire de l'objet. - At the request of the owner of the object. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. The object is from the 18th century and clearly in the public domain. The museum that owns the object cannot control images of the objects after they are taken. File is also in use and clearly in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alapainui (anachronistic drawing by Gospodar svemira).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope of the project Lycoris (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter obi dan takaran shugaban kasa Nigeria 2023.jpg

[edit]

Not own content. Can be found in atticles in better quality. Likely copyrighted https://www.sunnewsonline.com/road-to-2023-ill-use-public-funds-to-better-living-conditions-of-nigerians-peter-obi/ Aréat (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jake Ryder.jpg

[edit]

Spam [random text to reach character requirement] Dronebogus (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Beauty

[edit]

copyvios of different kinds.

RZuo (talk) 16:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, 1st is a selfie but out of scope, In 2nd the subject is the uploader so not an own work and is also an advertisement, 3rd was speedy deleted by Infrogmation. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Beauty

[edit]

Low-quality photos of exceedingly common subjects

Dronebogus (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Beauty

[edit]

Spam garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and mostly screengrabs anyway. Kept two as in scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Beauty

[edit]

Useless spam and personal junk

Dronebogus (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Beauty

[edit]

Out of scope and spam

Dronebogus (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and User:Marbletan. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Beauty

[edit]

Spam, OOS (keystrokes)

Dronebogus (talk) 10:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Verdee.jpg

[edit]

Es mi fotografia, no quiero que aparezca en este sitio 189.202.29.37 19:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never when the requestis an anonymous Ip user. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Verdee.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image 181.43.5.243 17:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is the only picture of a boy wearing mascara. --Trade (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


You like boys with mascara? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Very poor example of mascara, unusable. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:-Cloud -Sky -Evening Vibes -Pink Sky -Purple Sky -Blissful -Bliss (cropped).jpg

[edit]

@Krd: This file is a crop from File:-Cloud -Sky -Evening Vibes -Pink Sky -Purple Sky -Blissful -Bliss.jpg. Can you recheck original file to make sure? Else, I'm searching for consensus whether this file is OOS or advertisment. A09 (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Page dependent on deleted or non-existent content (G8). Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr.HPW.jpg

[edit]

While [2] does assert CC-BY, it is not the image's original source and does not present any evidence of free licensing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 19:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nazanin Boniadi 2022 08.jpg

[edit]

No indication that this youtube channel owns the right to this video HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shah Ismail II on the throne.png

[edit]

Low image quality and replace Mv1388 (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Shah Ismail II on the throne.jpg. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RudolfPolt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is a whole bunch of photographs, posters, drawings, a 2020 Austrian stamp etc. featuring various, often German and Austrian, film stars and singers. They were all uploaded as "own work" with CC licenses (and the upload date as the creation date), but I think it's rather doubtful that any of these are actually the uploader's own work beyond perhaps scanning something in. For some a year is given in the file name or description, but none of them are so old that the files simply must be in the PD. So these files should be deleted unless given proper sources and dates and satisfactory rationales why they are in the public domain (both in their source country and in the US) or under a free license.

Rosenzweig τ 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photos, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Japan - Tokyo (9982776406).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 13:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ardit Bido.jpg

[edit]

I don't think the official portrait of an Albanian politician fulfills any criteria of PD-Albania-exempt A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:یوسف ایمانی.jpg

[edit]

In this thread on enwiki, the author has acknowledged that the file is not their own work, and was copied from an website. Girth Summit (blether) 00:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:56e bestuur der PKvV.jpg

[edit]

no author no permission no metadata - privacy non encyclopedically relevant persons damaged Hoyanova (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giovannino Guareschi e Fernandel sul set a Brescello.jpg

[edit]

The image is a photo montage so does not appear to fall under the definition of "simple photograph" from Italian law. Yellow Horror (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • The original photo can be seen here. Considering the original a "simple photograph" is also questionable, because the people in the photograph do not participate in any aspect of "natural or social life", but specifically pose for the photographer. Also a common problem with the original and photo montage is the lack of evidence of their publication before 1978, which is a necessary condition for their inclusion in the public domain in the United States, even if we consider one or both of them "simple photographs".--Yellow Horror (talk) 13:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alessandro Minardi, author of the original photo, died in 1988. If the photo is "intellectual work with creative characteristics", it is copyright-protected in Italy until 2059.--Yellow Horror (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Banned user socking. --Yann (talk) 07:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giovannino Guareschi e Fernandel sul set a Brescello.jpg

[edit]

The image is a photo montage so does not appear to fall under the definition of "simple photograph" from Italian law. Yellow Horror (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. The file can be restored in 2059. --Rosenzweig τ 09:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:World Sailing logo.svg

[edit]

World Sailing, by headquarter, is located in London, which is governed by the very-low COM:TOO UK, probably a text-only "logo" may be happened when carefully considered. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пчелињак Бошка Николића.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - this appears to be a recent painting. We need to know more to keep it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:36 06blackholehorizontotale4.jpg

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Radiosands

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rescuers search for survivors at the site of a collapsed building in Hama, Syria.jpg

[edit]

Copy vio: Yamam al Shaar/Reuters Adem (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okey SwissDinar (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and do it quickly. Considering that the article this is used in consistently gets over 50,000 views per day, I think this should be deleted ASAP. Renerpho (talk) 03:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the image from the article, for the moment. This should make it a bit less urgent. Renerpho (talk) 03:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ShkoDevAct Shadow4dark (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zarah Leander & E. Taube.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. This photograph is from a publication of some sort and is clearly not the "own work" of RudolfPolt. Jeremy Butler (talk) 12:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I nominated this image for deletion by mistake. --Jeremy Butler (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zarah Leander & E. Taube.jpg

[edit]

I very much doubt that this is the uploader's own work from 1935 as claimed. To be able to (perhaps) keep this, we'd need a clear description of the source and the author and also some evidence that the date isn't just made up. If we don't get that, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 22:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Montpelier, Vermont - Women's march! (source Putneypics).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by FlickreviewR 2 as no license (No license since). This is tagged Public Domain Mark but the Flickr uploader is the mother of the photographer. It's possible the photographer intended a public domain release but we shouldn't assume so. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I've changed my mind on this. Permission seems acceptable. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cesta do praveku.jpg

[edit]

There is no evidence that the movie poster (country of origin of the movie: Czechoslovakia, 1955) was published in the USA, so the template {{PD-US-no notice}} is highly doubtful. Harold (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Greenwich Village Street Art.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep While true that there is normally no FOP for 2D artworks in the United States, an expectation is usually made for graffiti since there's no way to know who the artist is and no way for the artist to prove it's their work due to the nature of the thing. Unless it can be shown who the artist of this is, but I don't see any evidence that we know who it is. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Adamant1. --Yann (talk) 20:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ziva Dynamics Logo.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by EdTre as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploads are a mix of copyvio screenshots from video games and logos that are above TOO. Is this indeed above COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Appears to be above the ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019 OWL Weekly Concurrent Viewership.svg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Pbrks as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Converting to DR (too old for G7), but  Delete as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for converting the request. Image has never been used and is OR anyways. – Pbrks (t • c) 02:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. OR likely means original research. Deleted as courtesy, graph only has the 1st quarter of 2019. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ram 1500 truck with Buffalo Bills wrapping.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Andre Carrotflower as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright-protected logo of professional sports team. Logo is clearly intended as subject given photo composition, filename and caption so de minimis does not apply. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per King of Hearts and the court case cited by them. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei at CWT41 20151212a.jpg

[edit]

法律之知识 (talk) 04:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No evdidence shows the author didn't licensed. Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 11:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
momoko 本人要求你删除 如果你不删除接下来 我不知道会有什么事情 法律之知识 (talk) 13:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You'd better give evidence shows you are the copyright holder or the coser herself denies CC licensing rather than giving legal threat. Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Cosplay allows this. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei at CWT41 20151212b.jpg

[edit]
法律之知识 (talk) 04:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. No evdidence shows the author didn't licensed. Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 11:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Cosplay. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei, Touhou Project at CWT41 20151212.jpg

[edit]

{{Delete |reason= |subpage=File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei, Touhou Project at CWT41 20151212.jpg |day=21 |month=February |year=2023 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 法律之知识 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

118.100.204.172 13:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Cosplay. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei at CWT41 20151212c.jpg

[edit]
法律之知识 (talk) 04:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM: Cosplay. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei at CWT41 20151212d.jpg

[edit]
法律之知识 (talk) 04:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Cosplay. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Reimu Hakurei at CWT41 20151212e.jpg

[edit]
法律之知识 (talk) 04:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Cosplay. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bromberger Kreisbahn, 600 mm Spurweite, Repro, leicht retuschiert.jpg

[edit]

The range of years is invalid. The silhouette of the locomotive clearly indicates that it is a Polish locomotive produced in the interwar period. It is difficult to determine when exactly this photo was taken. It is not even known whether it was taken before or after World War II. No evidence that the photo was published before 1992 in Poland. It probably comes from a private collection. There is no information about the author of the picture. Uoijm77 (talk) 04:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these very helpful comments. As a consequence I modified the licence to {{PD-Poland}}. On the back of the photo, a handwritten note shows "Repro", i.e. it is a reproduction of an older photo, a postard or a book. Therefore, I recommend to keep this file, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no unequivocal evidence that they were actually made by a Polish photographer. There is no evidence that the photo was published in Poland. The date the photo was taken is unknown. Much information is unknown. Copyright is difficult to ascertain. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP since we don't know where and when this was first published or by who. Undelete in 2060 (120 years after 1939). --Abzeronow (talk) 17:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Mack Bulldog Magazine

[edit]

1990 to 2019 magazine covers. Derivative works, no evidence of a free license, or public domain.

Yann (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Was copyright in the magazine owned (or transferred to) the "Mack Trucks Historical Museum" ? If so, we would need COM:VRT communication to document that. Otherwise, these look to be PD-Art copies of copyrighted magazine covers. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Clindberg: This is the 2015 Vol.1 issue of the magazine. There appears to be some contact info on the last page that might be for the publisher. I didn't see any copyright notices on any of the inner pages, but one wouldn't have been required after March 1, 1989. I'm almost certain that the uploader isn't the copyright holder of any of these. In the case of other photos they've uploaded, they claimed they asked for permission to take the photos. Perhaps they did the same for these, but I don't see how that wouldn't make VRT verification unnecessary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • Agreed, sorry if my comment came across a different way. These are copyrighted covers. Lack of copyright notice does not matter since these are 1990 and later. We need COM:VRT verification of the license (if it is indeed valid, as opposed to just being a license for the photos), otherwise  Delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Mack Bulldog Magazine

[edit]
  1. File:1967 - Mack Trucks - Monthly Magazine - May - Allentown PA.jpg
  2. File:1970 - Mack Trucks - Monthly Magazine - Sep - Allentown PA.jpg
  3. File:1972 - Mack Bulldog - Dec - Allentown PA.jpg
  4. File:1980 - Mack Bulldog - Jan - Allentown PA.jpg
  5. File:1980 - Mack Bulldog - May - Allentown PA.jpg
  6. File:1981 - Mack Bulldog - Feb - Allentown PA.jpg
  7. File:1982- Mack Bulldog - Jan - Allentown PA.jpg
  8. File:1983 - Mack Bulldog - Winter - Allentown PA.jpg
  9. File:1984 - Mack Bulldog - Feb - Allentown PA.jpg
  10. File:1984 - Mack Bulldog - Spring - Allentown PA.jpg
  11. File:1985 - Mack Bulldog - Jan - Allentown PA.jpg
  12. File:1986 - Mack Bulldog - May - Allentown PA.jpg
  13. File:1987 - Mack Bulldog - Mar - Allentown PA.jpg
  14. File:1988 - Mack Bulldog - Feb - Allentown PA.jpg
  15. File:1988 - Mack Bulldog - Jan - Allentown PA.jpg
  16. File:1988 - Mack Bulldog - Mar - Allentown PA.jpg

These are all photos of the covers of Mach Bulldog magazine issues published between 1967 and 1988. All of the files are licensed as {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but such claims seem questionable at best since it appears to assume that no visible copyright notices on the covers of the magazines means there also was no copyright notices on any of the inner pages or back covers of the magazines. The files was originally discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/02#Category:Mack Bulldog Magazine where it was pointed out that a 1986 issue of the magazine found for sale on Ebay does clearly show a visible copyright notice on the back cover. So, it would seem to be more than a reasonable assumption that similar copyright notices can be found on the back covers of the other issues from 1967-1988 time period. There are sixteen files being nominated for deletion and they're numbered in chronological order to make them easier to discuss. The cover of the issue found on Ebay is #12. I can't see any way of keeping these files without VRT verification from "Mack Trucks, Inc." that it's releasing these old issues under licenses accepted by Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Since we don't have the entire magazine to look at, it's impossible to know if any of them are missing the required copyright notice. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rio Grande Southern Railway Company Locomotive No 461 with a goods train (photo by Philip Ronfor, printed and distributed by John Krause).jpg

[edit]

The photo probably comes from a private collection. It was published many years later. The publisher was born in 1929 [3]. There is no information about the date of the author's death. Uoijm77 (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per IronGargoyle, photograph is public domain. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masgatotkaca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

song may be pd, but the performance is not.

RZuo (talk) 10:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Negaraku (the anthem of Malaysia) is in public domain and available for public download and use by the government of Malaysia. 203.80.22.66 00:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Besides, the current file version is the correct Negaraku arrangement. Reverting back to the original arrangement by the US Army Band is an insult to Malaysia as the arrangement does not at all follow the Negaraku arrangement. FoxtrotMikeNovember (talk) 00:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • sorry not arrangement, but rendition.
FoxtrotMikeNovember (talk) 00:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No evidence the performance of these songs are public domain, I reverted to the US Army Band version since that is out of copyright while the Malaysian government version is not. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@RZuo and Abzeronow: The "national anthem" is not copyrighted based on current Indonesian law (see point (a) at Template:PD-IDGov). Does the performance still copyrighted? Hddty (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, first file restored. Abzeronow (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Abzeronow: as i said, the song may be pd, but there is no info about the performers, who certainly own rights to the recording of their performances.--RZuo (talk) 21:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
yes, I double checked and the source is Soundcloud and the performance is presumed to be copyrighted. I had been under the impression it was a government performance and I apologize for my error in restoring the file, Hddty. Thank you, RZuo for bringing this to my attention.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pseudogobius flavicauda.jpg

[edit]

The watermark on this image includes the text "©AravindManoj..." suggesting that, well you tell me. Someone uploading a pic from somewhere else and re-branding it as their own? A pic intended to be freely licenced but with the watermark inadvertently included? Some other thing? Shirt58 (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No hits on TinEye and watermark does not invalidate a CC license. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Md.Abu Bakar.jpg

[edit]

Borrar esta imagen innecesaria. 201.238.243.178 12:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very low resolution image, and only used on a talk page. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colorful street art (New York) (43427834380).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep While true that there is normally no FOP for 2D artworks in the United States, an expectation is usually made for graffiti since there's no way to know who the artist is and no way for the artist to prove it's their work due to the nature of the thing. Unless it can be shown who the artist of this is, but I don't see any evidence that we know who it is. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Anonymous works are still protected by copyright in the United States. The way this is carefully painted around windows and over trash bins suggests that this took considerable time and care to paint. This is not just a tag-and-leave job in the middle of the night. The property owner would have almost certainly been aware this was being done. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is not grafitti and as Iron Gargoyle says it was carefully painted. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sunrise at West Pier.jpg

[edit]

Stated author is not the copyright holder. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the following, copied from the English wikipedia Talk Page at Talk:West Pier#Photo

Photo

[edit]

The attribution to the photo has been stolen by Christerajet. The photo is actually my own: Thomas Knowles. I have the original RAW image data, EXIF data and edited EXIF data to prove this if necessary. You can contact me through my website if you wish to challenge this in any way. Please immediately attribute the photo to myself, but I would prefer this photo is removed and another used in place. Christerajet... this is theft. Do not claim other people's art is your own. tomknowlesphotography.com 80.94.196.2 (talk) 08:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, I've noticed that the resolution appears high and request that the image is removed in its entirety. It does not fall under Wikipedia's Image Use Policy guidelines with regards to copyright and licensing. Please consider this a cease and desist for use of such intellectual property. 80.94.196.2 (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please confirm which photo you are referring to. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It will be File:Sunrise at West Pier.jpg, which appears to be the only contribution on any Wikipedia project by User:Christerajet. DuncanHill (talk) 12:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I had assumed so but this IP address has a couple of vandalism warnings so I was cautious about assuming the complaint was valid without some form of confirmation. The image was uploaded about 4 years ago. According to the EXIF data the photo was taken with a Canon EOS 77D and Mr Knowles website says he uses Sony cameras and lenses. See [4]. Entirely possible that he has changed his camera set-up in the intervening period.
Having looked through the galleries on his website I can quite believe this photo is in his style. The IP address Geolocates to Helston and there is an extensive gallery of Cornish photos. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have contacted both Tom Knowles and Chisterajet privately, and will report back here once I have responses. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contacting them, hopefully that might help clarify the situation. Richard Nevell (talk) 12:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've also tried to contact Tom Knowles but have had no response. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Thomas Knowles says above "You can contact me through my website", but his site has no contact details on it. I have had no response from either him (via Flickr) or Chisterajet (via Wikimedia email). Unless anyone else can get responses, I think this will have to be resolved on the basis of the information we have so far. In the absence of confirmation that the IP complainant actually is Thomas Knowles, and in the absence of evidence that the image is in fact 'stolen', I think we should keep this. Anybody alleging that an image is stolen should be prepared to provide evidence backing that up. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I left a message via the form on his website but have still had no acknowledgement. If he was that bothered I would have thought some sort of response was forthcoming. So agree that we should keep it without further evidence. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well done. There is no form when I look. Maybe my Firefox security settings suppress it. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not obvious, there is a tiny envelope icon at the foot of the home page! Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. Not in Firefox, but I do see it if I switch to Chrome. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per MichaelMaggs. We don't have evidence that this is a stolen photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cratosguy69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no metadata, possible not own work 

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 15:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: First file is out of scope, second one was already deleted, and third one has very low resolution for a 2016 photograph plus author credits are different from uploader. A COM:PCP delete. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AleksoMartulkov.jpg

[edit]

This photo is not work of the uploader. It is from the book published in 1954: "My Participation of the Macedonian Revolutionary battle" (Моето учество во револуционерните борби на Македонија) Check here: [5] and the uploader has confirmed that. 

Jingiby (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe uploader can confirm if Template:PD/mk applies. Local hero (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not public domain in North Macedonia or the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:100A9121 mm.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep de minimis Andy Dingley (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From depicted persons? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Why wouldn’t de minimis cover copyrighted photographs of people? RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In this particular case poster occupies much more space than people and poster is not necessary if people are main subject. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • Are the people in front of the poster connected to the subject matter of the poster? Are they the people on the poster?
I'm happy to delete this on the basis of SCOPE. I have no idea what educational value it has, within the goals of Commons. But that said, I'm also happy to accept that it does have, if anyone wants to claim so – I have a knowledge and language shortage here.
As a photograph of some people in front of a blank wall, I would have no problem keeping it. The photo does not appear to have been taken surreptitiously, so I don't see any problem for the privacy of those featured.
As a photo including the banner, then there is an argument to deleted on the basis of DW. But I don't see it as strong one: the reproduction of the banner is minimal and low in quality, the focus of the photo is the people in front of it. So I'm happy to reject this rationale as de minimis. Nor would I even crop it.
So that's three rationales, two of them given by the nominator (just what is your reason to delete it? Will you be giving more rationales in the future?) I see neither as convincing. Overall, I'm pretty neutral, but my reason to delete (if any) would be SCOPE, not either of those given here. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Cropped and now focus on the people rather than poster. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Revdelled the original, the crop I think makes the background de minimis, but if someone wants to blur out the background, that would be helpful. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kj1595 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Golemi FC Logo.svg. We are talking about logo's off sport clubs, mostly football clubs and the uploader claimed that they are public domain according to {{PD-Albania-exempt}}. The template was recently modified too include logo's off sport clubs but this was reverted by my because there is no evidence nor proof that those logo's are indeed in the public domain in Albania. Please also see the relevant debate in com:VP/C and the discussion at my talk page.

Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kj1595 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I don't think the official portrait of Albanian politicians fulfills (b) inventions, legal, administrative and judicial acts, as well as other official creations and their collections, presented in order to inform the public

A1Cafel (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The portarits are indeed published by official instutions (Council of Ministers, Assembly and Office of Presidnet; i.e. highest institutions in Albania) to inform the public. These are offcial creations, mostly published as part of the offical bibliographies of the said persons. AT44 (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. See also part "e" of "PD-Albania-exempt" : "(e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information;"
Photographs have been used to inform people, the news and press, since photographs were invented. Photographs are a "simple nature of information." These photographs "inform" the identities of current government officials and those in the past.
-- Ooligan (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@AT44. Pinging to notify of my comments here. -- Ooligan (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, official portrait of the politicians has a nature of more than providing information. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As "(e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information;" ("d) lajmet dhe informacioni i shtypit, i cili ka karakter të thjeshtë informimi;") isn't reduced to news and press releases of the government, I would be very careful here. I can't imagine that it was the wish of the lawmakers that any picture once published as part of a press release by any company, organisation or state body loses its copyright.
Regarding "(b) inventions, legal, administrative and judicial acts, as well as other official creations and their collections, presented in order to inform the public;" ("b) shpikjet, aktet ligjore, administrative dhe gjyqësore, si dhe krijime të tjera zyrtare dhe koleksionet e tyre, të paraqitura me qëllim që të informohet zyrtarisht publiku;") I would also suggest to be rather conservative. To upload pictures published in a Facebook post: no way! Pictures taken from the "Assembly manual" as official creation/collection: maybe. Again, we have to see the context: they first talk about "legal, administrative and judicial acts" and then add "other official creations and their collections". I don't think we should add anything we can imagine under "other" - it should be something similar to "legal, administrative and judicial acts". And in this context, also the Assembly manual seems to be out of scope of article 12.
That's my oppinion. I haven't read any juridical books about Albanian copyright law. But I'm sure they would have worded it differently if they thought a very liberal handling/big scope of whatever falls under article 12. Albinfo (talk) 08:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I believe that only applies to laws and official documents, not photographs. COM:PCP would have us delete since the language of it discusess documents and inventions. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bajram Begaj (para betimit) (cropped).jpg

[edit]

I don't think the official portrait of Albanian President fulfills (b) inventions, legal, administrative and judicial acts, as well as other official creations and their collections, presented in order to inform the public A1Cafel (talk) 17:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The main discussion is conducted here. It is preferable to summarize here after that closed discussion. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. See also part "e" of "PD-Albania-exempt" : "(e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information;"
Photographs have been used to inform people, the news and press, since photographs were invented. Photographs are a "simple nature of information." These photographs "inform" the identities of current government officials and those in the past.
Ooligan (talk) 17:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, official portrait of the President has a nature of more than providing information. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I believe Albanian law only means to exempt laws and other official documents, not photographs. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ojos verde avellana.jpg

[edit]

Es mi fotografia, no quiero aparezca aqui 189.202.29.37 19:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great picture. I think this should stay. Elfrio2023 (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never when the requestis an anonymous Ip user. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ojos verde avellana.jpg

[edit]

Speedy deletion requested, due to the F10 rule. 181.43.5.243 17:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the F10 rule is not valid anymore undelete many pictures that depict people with green, blue, black or brown eyes (like me). My picture depicted very well beautiful brown eyes... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to get other people's pictures deleted out of spite? Hazel eyes are unusual; brown eyes are common. That matters when considering whether a photo has value and likely usefulness. Anyway, this appears to be a bad-faith deletion request, so maybe post your photos on Instagram or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Hazel eyes are less common than brown eyes and this is a photograph of good quality. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Religious art in Taiwan

[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.

--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 20:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Most of the files are already in the public domain. Consider that this IP account create a lot of deletion requests without confirmation, I suggest all files be kept unless there are hard evidences for deletion. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept the ones that looked public domain to me. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dunia Engine logo.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by EdTre as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploads are a mix of copyvio screenshots from video games and logos that are above TOO.. Close enough call on COM:TOO that I'm converting to a DR. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, on second look,  Keep. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 20:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atelier Logo.gif

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Zxcvbnm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploaded as "own work" but is copyrighted logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree this logo is simple text or is beneath the threshold of originality. It is clearly a custom designed cursive font used solely for the title and nothing else. As an entirely hand drawn logo it qualifies as artwork. Zxcvbnm (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's probably borderline but I think the unique styling probably puts it above the threshold of originality. Especially the shading and whatever the object at the top of the I is. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Japan's TOO is fairly low. —holly {chat} 20:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bottle of Watermelon Tymbark.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING, VRT-permission from producing company is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recall another case in which it was asserted that photos of bottles can be hosted here and that the label is considered incidental. I'm sorry; I forgot who said that, perhaps User:King of Hearts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are speaking about de minimis. Here the label is not DM. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Viracocha.jpg

[edit]

I believe that this image is actually scanned from the Tintin comic Prisoners of the Sun. The exact same drawing appears on the very last page of the comic. Subsequently, the image source, as listed on the image page, is most likely incorrect. Amr Bekhit (talk) 22:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Viracocha.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by BrightRaven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image is copied from a drawing by Hergé, last page of the french edition of Prisoners of the Sun. The provided link shows in the bottom a scan of the original drawing.|source=http://jpdubs.hautetfort.com/tag/incas
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A drawing of a 3D-object generates new copyright. {{PD-Art}} is not applicable. See also Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Drawings based on photographs: "The artist of the drawing also has a copyright on all aspects original to his or her drawing." BrightRaven (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment See File:2Wiener-Tintin-Dieu_Soleil.jpg (version published in 1880, a quarter century before Hergé was born) and other versions at Category:Gate of the Sun. This is one of the most famous pieces of pre-Columbian sculpture in the Andes (I enjoy Tintin, but am rather shocked that apparently more than one person would think this long famous iconic image was invented by Hergé). Note that original uploader did not attribute it to Hergé; that claim was only added to the image page 13 years after original upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Infrogmation and Groupir !: nobody has claimed that it was invented by Hergé. See Brightraven's first sentence. (Except it was based on Wiener's drawing rather than on the Gate of the Sun directly, which does not change the fact that the drawing generates its own copyright.) Just like Hergé's drawings of Moulinsart being precisely based on Cheverny does not remove their copyright. GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    So if I understand correctly, the famous artwork is PD, but this copy is by Hergé, and Hergé's copy of public domain publication is original enough to generate a fresh copyright? (I argue neither for nor against this, just trying to clarify.) I note that this image is widely used in multiple projects. If decision is to delete, I strongly recommend that usage be replaced before deletion; I suggest either File:2Wiener-Tintin-Dieu Soleil.jpg or File:Wiracocha bn.svg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, this is my understanding as well. I agree that usage should be replaced, although I do not want to start this while the debate is still open here. I think if the file is to be deleted, then an admin should first close the request as deleted, and then allow some time to do the replacements before deleting. GrandEscogriffe (talk) 23:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and ordered a universal replacement with File:2Wiener-Tintin-Dieu_Soleil.jpg. —holly {chat} 20:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aula del senato reale durante il regno di umberto I.jpg

[edit]

file duplicato 2.36.105.230 17:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VoictSOS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Video obtained from social media

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swehlam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

free licenses declared without any proof. Some images could be PD-Old but most of them should just be deleted

rubin16 (talk) 08:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs of two-dimensional works of art are generally not copyrightable, if the artwork's own copyright has expired. Many of these are in the public domain by virtue of the artwork's age.--Srleffler (talk) 07:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as many are in the public domain Atlantic306 (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • they could be in PD but for most of the source is required to prove it. For example, File:Serapion of Thmuis the Scholastic icon.jpg has no source to prove the date of work/publication, I wasn't able to find it myself via Tineye, Google Lens, Google, and it could be not an ancient work based on how the image looks. File:Serapion of Thmuis.jpg - no good source, looks old but is interesting. I was able to find pages from "Nuremberg Chronicle" published by Hartmann Schedel in the year 1493 (it would be PD-Old) but the page with the image looks different (link). It is a non-coloured version of the same image and as I understand, the person is named differently there. So, again, the coloured version could get its colours later and could be non-PD. File:PetrDamaskin.jpg states CC-license but the source names Киев : Тип. Киево-Печерской Успенской Лавры, 1905. , so, it is PD-RusEmpire. File:Panagia Ierosolymitissa 2.jpg obviously doesn't look old enough to assume PD-Old, the source is also bad. Summarising, all the images have bad sources, incorrect CC-licenses and the percentage of image where we can safely assume PD-Old is not high enough. rubin16 (talk) 05:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. There is no way to determine the age of these icons without a proper source, and regarding the map, table, etc the uploader - who was blocked in February 2023 for continuing uploading copyrighted material - did not reply on this DR, even now the block is over now. Hopefully they will provide better sources in future uploads. Kept the single file mentioned by rubin16, because this is in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 10:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/02/21&oldid=797077788"