Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 19th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy map, out of scope N Panama 84534 00:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Geagea as no permission (No permission since). Per request by the uploader via VRT (Ticket:2023021810008171). According to uploader, there is no copyright problem in this file.
This is photo of an ad taken in Morocco. No Freedom of panorama in Morocco. -- Geagea (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Ticket#2023021810008171. -- Geagea (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Airear (talk) 12:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Σπάρτακος (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy delete|G7}} I hereby withdraw this deletion request as a snow keep. Elizium23 (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Elizium23 (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want to participate in this competition and for privacy reasons I want this deleted Choskit (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want to participate in this competition and for privacy reasons I want this deleted Choskit (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this painting by Adrien-Jean Le Mayeur de Merpres (d. 1958) will only be PD as of 2029. Converting to DR for categorization. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this painting by Adrien-Jean Le Mayeur de Merpres (d. 1958) will only be PD as of 2029. Converting for categorization. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this paniting by Henri Matisse (d. 1954) will not be public domain until 2025. Converting to DR for categorization. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monastery door handle of monastry Leh UT Ladakh India Choskit (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with File:PikiWiki Israel 79661 the voice of israel in sarona.jpg Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was uploaded for use on an attack page on en.wiki. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 16:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload Prosperosity (talk) 00:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gougle LLC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: I could not find any evidence that these "Gougle" logos have an educational purpose.

TilmannR (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Account blocked on fr wp for false info, simply a joke and certainly out of scope. --Herby talk thyme 08:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless, seems to be a test of sorts Poliocretes (talk) 21:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees with deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless map, because the name of a locality is spelled wrong. It's Beblenheim, not "Bebelnheim". Edelseider (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling is a very strange quibble for Alsace, where multiple spellings are common, thanks to the intersection of several dialects.
Misspelling doesn't invalidate the map, nor the scholarly work that went into it. CarefulCarl (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Licence CC0 1.0 Universal" CarefulCarl (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The fact that it's in use makes inaccuracy not a deletion reason. However, the modern map is probably copyrighted. Moreover, it comes from a link that states the following: "All content copyright © 1995–2023 Livius.org. All rights reserved."

Deleted: Copyvio: "All content copyright © 1995–2023 Livius.org. All rights reserved.". --Achim55 (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing, uploader and author stated in EXIF is different. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per location code in metadata, the file is from Facebook. So it is presumably a copyvio and should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio but at the very least the artwork is copyvio and would need permission to keep Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of buildings / FOP Iran MehdiTalk 10:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: seems to be some personal collage. Lymantria (talk) 12:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random upload. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random upload. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: No educational value (weird categorization). Lymantria (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Painting [...] by Dan Hughes" implies that this is most likely not the own work of the uploader, User:Wendypetersen. We'd need a COM:VRT permission to host this file. Rosenzweig τ 15:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted text on museum sign. FunkMonk (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted text on museum sign. FunkMonk (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsplash sourced file, uploaded to Unsplash after 5 June 2017, see Template:Unsplash Lymantria (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS 61.120.241.1 01:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am only using this image to introduce myself and have no idea why it should be removed. 61.120. 241.1 has a past of persistently demanding the removal of other images I've uploaded, making it look like a stalker and very creepy. It is true, I used to upload images that were in breach of copyright, but they have all been deleted. I would be very sad and unable to recover if this image of my introduction was deleted. And I'll be disappointed in Wikipedia. Also, my anger at 61.120.241.1 is growing. 61.120. 241.1 has no profile of himself, which is extremely unfair. I'm prepared to complain that 61.120.241.1 is stalking me.
Please deal with 61.120.241.1 is stalking me ASAP!
I am trembling with anger and fear against 61.120.241.1. Briefs4reskin (talk) 03:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this image is removed, please also remove all other images I have uploaded, as I will never use wikimedia commons again. Briefs4reskin (talk) 06:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is not in line with wikimedia commons policy, please remove my other images too. I don't want to contribute to a medium that doesn't match my values. Briefs4reskin (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user does not try to follow the rules. He has also deleted previous deletion requests on the conversation page. --61.120.241.1 00:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS 61.120.241.1 01:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour !
Décidément, l'épidémie de suppressionnite aigüe fait encore des ravages sur les neurones de certains contributeurs de Wikipedia !
Pour ce qui concerne la poupée/peluche "Kiki" ou "Moncchichi", il s'agit d'un jouet. Hors, ce jouet a été créé par Yoshiaru Washino, comme indiqué dans l'article Wikipedia, un Japonais. Et au Japon, les jouets ne sont pas considérés comme des oeuvres d'art et n'ont absolument pas de propriété intellectuelle. Dans le paragraphe "I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!" de la page "Commons:Derivative works", il est essentiellement fait mention des États-Unis. Hors, j'ai uploadé cette image pour le Wikipedia français. Les lois françaises, notamment celles concernant la "liberté de panorama" et les "droits à l'image", sont déjà bien assez ubuesques et grotesques pour aller, de surcroît, se faire chier avec celles des Américains. Je ne sais pas ce qu'il en est exactement du droit des jouets en France en ce qui concerne les personnages comme Kiki, mais si rien n'est précisé, alors il y a un vide juridique. Dans ce cas, le bon sens pragmatique veut que l'on ait le droit de charger une photo comme la mienne sur le WP français. Si vous ne voulez pas qu'elle apparaisse sur le WP d'une langue de pays tatillons tels les US, faites en sorte que sa diffusion soit restreinte en dehors de la France. Pour ma part, je ne sais pas faire et à vrai dire je m'en tamponne les bouliches ! Démerden-Sie sich !
Bien à vous... Rundvald (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Haibao design is copyrighted. Therefore, all the pictures are clear examples of derivative works. None of the images seems to be a permanent installation, therefore, no freedom of panorama can be claimed. Finally, in all the photographs, Haibao is the main and relevant element, so that de minimis cannot be claimed.

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Photos of Copyrighted Characters are OK as Long as Artist Gets Attribution

Under Chinese copyright law, as long as the creator of the Haibao character is attributed in each photo's data file, these photos are legal.

To remove the photos would be in overcautious error.

Please see the update attribution for File:ShanghaiMascot2010.jpg

Warm regards, Johndhackensacker3d (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Good point. I've got two additional questions:
  • Is the "provided that the name of the author and the title of the work are mentioned" clause fulfilled just by including the attribution in the file or in any use of the image?
At the moment, none of the pictures (but the one you've mentioned) is attributed.
Best regards --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very brilliant exemple of a contributor seeking reconnaissance of his expertise in copyright law. Five years after the event, this destruction of a collection of popular art in China seems out of the scope of Wikimedia Commons rules protecting the authors. So, all of the "authors", see on the header of Category:Haibao the magical formula to be copied on each item, provided by Johndhackensacker3d. --Wuyouyuan (talk) 02:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 09:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See the revised COM:FOP China. A legal reply from the Chinese Supreme Court states that public space works meant to be temporarily exhibited are not "artistic works located or on display in a public place." Since the Haibao is meant to be temporal, it fails to be eligible for court-dependent Chinese freedom of panorama.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More photos

Forgot to include these. Same nomination (2nd nom), see the nomination for details.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. The commercial permission of KPF is needed.

I don't understand why this photo is associated to my account. That's not a photo I have uploaded. No objection for its deletion. — [[Utilisateur:Oziris|o]] [[Discussion Utilisateur:Oziris|✉]] (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded someone else's photo to Wikimedia Commons. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, so you cannot upload stand-alone photos of buildings in South Korea. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ox1997cow (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. The commercial permission of Nikken Sekkei is needed.

Ox1997cow (talk) 03:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.

Ox1997cow (talk) 04:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not CC, not simple enough John123521 (talk) 04:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy map, out of scope N Panama 84534 04:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Kyrgyzstan. The memorial is inaugurated in 2000, the copyright holder is unlikely to be dead for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Turkmenistan. The memorial was inaugurated in 2014, the copyright holder is unlikely to be dead for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Street Art or Graffiti  Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know this is illegal graffiti but not mural? Title said mural painted by Dan Kitchener, a notable street artist, and we cannot deny his copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh spare us the sanctimonious tripe "we cannot deny his copyright". It either legal to be here or not, it not even our decision but a matter of law, please ensure your contributions here reflect this Oxyman (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please read COM:MURAL. If they are legally painted murals, then they should be protected by copyright, even the artist is unknown. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andre Giesecke never agreed for making and publishing this picture 95.90.144.45 09:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, Andre Giesecke neither agreed for taking picture nor for publishing 95.90.144.45 09:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) - by uploader. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2020; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Cover art of the March 2023 issue of the magazine Ultra Jump, which is owned and published by Shueisha. Alexandra IDV (talk) 00:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture in 2016 by Jan Fabre, no FoP in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 05:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 14:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted: per nomination. No need to go through the whole DR process on recreation of a deleted file. - Jmabel ! talk 03:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Würtem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very unlikely to be own work. Some can be found online, such as:

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, source webpage is copyrighted Gampe (talk) 07:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, source web page is copyrighted Gampe (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission for release under a free license, possible copyvio (photo of a photo on a screen?) DCB (talk) 08:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silvano Giganti12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused personal pictures, doubtful own work, weird categorization, user has been blocked for socking @wikidata.

Lymantria (talk) 10:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear image. Some sort of personal file with no indication pf why it should be of general interest. Malcolma (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear image. Some sort of personal file with no indication pf why it should be of general interest Malcolma (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mystification and fake license EROY (talk) 11:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aavaniafzz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only promotional content. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 12:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2020, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es necesario? 181.203.251.53 22:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mel Edwards sculpture

[edit]

Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Images contain copyrighted sculpture by Melvin Edwards, photographed in the United States (no freedom of panorama) --19h00s (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LikamboisaacK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LikamboisaacK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user has uploaded a whole bunch of clear copyvios from Facebook, see his talk page, and looking at the rest of his contributions, I don't think the ones I'm nominating are his own work either. So they should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to actually be either own work or under a free license / in the public domain.

Rosenzweig τ 15:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is important that LikamboisaacK uses COM:VRT to regularise the licencing of each of these. Delete unless correct licencing details are received. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LikamboisaacK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos not in use. Out of COM:scope.

Jonteemil (talk) 15:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F3 ThePinkFireman (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by F.hilbert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This uploader seems to be confused about copyrights. You can't just take a picture from the internet or scan it from a book, upload it here with a CC license and think it's ok if you just properly credit the real creator or say that the author is unknown. No, there are terms to be observed, usually 70 years after the death of the author; only then does the work enter the public domain and it is (usually) ok to upload it here. Please read Commons:Licensing for more details.

Rosenzweig τ 16:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to https://www.lieder.net/lieder/get_author_texts.html?AuthorId=22644 Ingeborg Björk died in 1960. (Lundahl died in 1951 so that's not an issue), Undelete in 2031 when this becomes public domain in Sweden. This was copyrighted in 1928 so it could be hosted on English Wikipedia next year. Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright was given to NK (Nordiska Kompaniet) by Björk and Lundahl. NK has approved a CC BY-SA license which I will make sure they send to OTRS. SebastianHL (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if they do send what would be required, then it becomes a matter for COM:VRT to resolve. Abzeronow (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong ratio 120.29.107.122 17:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 07:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion Andysmith248 (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Xtrls (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dezolezo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author František Gross died in 1985, unfree until 2056 or permission of heirs via VTRS needed.

Gumruch (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor geometry and pixelated not-large raster image. Have File:Cyclobutylnitrile.svg as high-quality replacement. DMacks (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneven orientation and pixelated not-large raster image. Have File:Cyclopentylnitrile.svg as high-quality replacement. DMacks (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneven orientation and pixelated not-large raster image. Have File:4-(1-pyrrolidinyl)piperidine.svg as high-quality replacement. DMacks (talk) 21:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

William Kentridge sculpture

[edit]

Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Images contain copyrighted sculpture by William Kentridge, photographed in Italy (no freedom of panorama). --19h00s (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Richmond Practice no longer exists, it closed in 2019. The original Flickr Source no longer exists. Under GDPR 2018 rules you have no longer consent to keep my private photo on your website 86.13.123.80 23:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of it being PD. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 06:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) - by uploader. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by another sysop. --Kadı Message 09:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) - by uploader. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by another sysop. --Kadı Message 09:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 13:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination:F10. --Kadı Message 09:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake diagram, misleading information. In 1938 Metaxas was in power Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy party names, does not match with the current Bundestag. Fake diagram Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frenchpolit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams, do not match with the actual French parliament

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph taken by me. But the subject wants to make it down. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Jameslwoodward, the person who depicted in this image wants to make it down. And as a creator of the file, I don't have any problem with this. ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand that, but, as a general rule we do not take down images of people at the request of the subject and we never take them down at the request of third parties, even if the third party is the photographer. If the subject wants the image taken down, have them send a request using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Uploaded in 2017. --Kadı Message 09:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of the project. Mychele Trempetich (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. --Kadı Message 09:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement, out of project scope. Till (talk) 17:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NahidHossain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata has copyright notice by Sultan Mahmud Mukut who is a photojournalist and does not appear to be a employee of the U.S. federal government.

Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by another sysop. --Kadı Message 09:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 09:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Xtrls (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 09:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greco Roberts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these are redundant to files of better quality, and were uploaded with erroneous file names.

Elli (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 03:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greco Roberts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: maps showing fictional election results, unsourced

Enyavar (talk) 05:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greco Roberts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more fictional election maps by same uploader; see previous deletions.

Enyavar (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In this image, "All rights reserved" is marked Ox1997cow (talk) 03:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Website is copyrighted. --Kadı Message 10:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's from the NEOS party website, and free-to-use. Glasperlenspieler (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Website is copyrighted. --Kadı Message 10:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for promotional use, cf. de:LOVT Fitness Schniggendiller (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Uhooep (talk) 00:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:TOO UK. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This belongs to manga artist Hirohiko Araki and publisher Shueisha. Alexandra IDV (talk) 00:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was uploaded to use in uk:Яна Пахолкова which was deleted for an obvious lack of notability. Lacks educational value as per COM:SCOPE here. Base (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unreliable 'own work' claim, metadata includes 'Copyright holder: martynturnerphotography.co.uk'. No free licenses at https://martynturnerphotography.com/. Appears to be a professional showbiz photo, taken at a concert from a position not accessible to audience members. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1933 from a published newspaper, presumably it had a copyright notice as typical at the time. Converting to DR to check for renewal. King of ♥ 04:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok to delete. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-US-not renewed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1942 from a published newspaper, presumably it had a copyright notice as typical at the time. Converting to DR to check for renewal. King of ♥ 04:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harris-Ewing on photo without the copyright marking. Unsure what to do. Delete if you like. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 06:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Washington Star did not renew copyright on issues https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/cinfo/washingtonstar This Harris and Ewing photograph is not part of the LOC Collection as far as I can see. @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I doubt copyright was renewed. Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Abzeronow is again correct, the image is not in the LOC Collection (but not all are scanned yet, 28,000 film negatives in the collection have not been digitized) where it would have been released into the public domain. The Washington Star did not renew copyright, but that would only apply to images that were attributed to "staff photo" or something similar. It is up to the copyright holder to renew, not the entity that licensed the image for publication. H&E did not renew either so "PD-US-not renewed", I changed the license. You can read here, that all H&E images are no longer under an active copyright. I also started an entry on Diana Rowland. --RAN (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-US-not renewed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Facebook; no reason to believe it’s freely licensed. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability, I cannot find her through a research through search engine CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's from the NEOS party website, and free-to-use. Glasperlenspieler (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, may be a press image but not free enough for Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's from the BZÖ party website, and free-to-use. Glasperlenspieler (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, may be a press image but not free enough for Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's from the BZÖ party website, and free-to-use. Glasperlenspieler (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, may be a press image but not free enough for Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 14:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, low quality Lotje (talk) 16:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely derivative work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this painting by Adrien-Jean Le Mayeur de Merpres (d. 1958) will only be PD as of 2029 DS (talk) 17:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Australian football logos

[edit]

Per Comm:Australia - TOO is too low in that country.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 19:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this painting by Izumi Kato (living artist as of 2023) is still under copyright DS (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe the portrait is copyright-free. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is taken from the publicly displayed image in the Hospital run by his son Dr. Prakash in Guntur. I was invited for a conference along with. Dr. Surya prakash. I was informed that Dr. K. Satyanarayana died about 8 years back.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 07:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: An uncropped version of the picture is available on the website of the label since at least 2022 https://web.archive.org/web/20221010152657/https://www.bernamegeh.com/ruken-yilmaz-kimdir/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improperly licensed, seems to be professionally taken, User claims is from social media 2603:7080:913D:D82E:BCFD:5576:C436:9072 13:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting the IPv6 editor's observation, see this statement by the uploader. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that these are own works DCB (talk) 17:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Bother. I uploaded a bunch of photos under the incorrect impression that all of the New Zealand Defence Force's photo come under a free licence. But that's not so; a user pointed out to me that they are only free when it explicitly says so in the EXIF data. Hence, 8 photos will have to be nuked. Sorry for that! Schwede66 07:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate; worse image than File:2004-Bremgarten.jpg Muvon53 (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's smaller in size and dimensions than the other file, but it's available under different licenses and was uploaded earlier. I think that justifies keeping it. --Rosenzweig τ 10:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Xtrls (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the badge designed by sv:Eric Vasström in 1922 who died in 1958. I filed a DR already for a similar file Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lotta Svärd.svg. This site also describes the design by Vasström http://www.alternativefinland.com/lotta-svard-yhdistys/ Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as it exceeds COM:TOO China (c.f. the Gang Heng logo and LY logo examples which are even more simple yet still are protected). The current logo contains irregular curves showing originality whereas the simpler protected logos are merely simple letters and ovals. A court of law is very likely to rule such a logo to be protected by copyright. Wcam (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Above COM:TOO China apparently.--Larryasou (talk) 05:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) - by uploader. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) - by uploader. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of license (NonCommercial) - by uploader. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, as it’s found here (Commons photo seems to have been cropped a little bit for the watermark not to appear). RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image notes it can be used only with the express consent of its copyright holder. It links to the copyright statement on the owner's website which lays out the same information. This file is not under any sort of free license and has been on commons since 2007 it appears. 127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 12:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Directly copied from the file page: Copyright by Alexander Baretich and the Cascadia Flag Cooperative, Inc. A link to the Flag Creator and image owners statement of copyright can be found here. Permission should be received before using. --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 12:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is mislabelled as own work, and was previously deleted. Copyright statement for the flag is available at https://cascadianflag.com/statement-of-copyright/ and is not freely licensed. 50.234.188.27 13:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination -Pete Forsyth (talk) 06:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. FOTW has this flag. Please don't say that FOTW is an unreliable source.


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G7 VadErs88 (talk) 20:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete not in use.VadErs88 (talk)
It absolutely is. You can see that at it:Infostrada or at the bottom of the file description. It is also well below the threshold of originality in Italy (see COM:TOO Italy). IronGargoyle (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was re-entered by a user on it.wiki, but it's an irrelevant logo. Furthermore, another similar file (File:3Fiber Infostrada.png), which I uploaded together with this one because I needed them to deal with those two specific brands used by Infostrada, has been deleted. At this point I ask for this to be deleted as well. VadErs88 (talk) 16:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That example is considerably more complex. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
in what way? VadErs88 (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing in the present image that deviates from simple text is a caret symbol used to represent a roof. The deleted one you point to has many more complex elements (though I still suspect that even it might pass COM:TOO Italy, which is rather high). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 158.148.138.219

Why? Do you have a reason? IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm @158.148.138.219: , sorry for the different IP but my ISP chenges my IP every night (idk why). I agree with @VadErs88: , I think is a copyright violation and in my opinion should be deleted. 2.199.11.250

Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from www.mondomobileweb.it; not in use. MAxSper5 (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted charge, it has the CC-BY-SA-NC license 𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐨. (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination does not make sense that I can see. Uploader own work still under free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted charge, it has the CC-BY-SA-NC license 𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐨. (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted charge, it has the CC-BY-SA-NC license 𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐨. (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outdated; and better versions are available (in svg; and updated) L.tak (talk) 16:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please link to those better versions. otherwise,  Keep. RZuo (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OUT OF DATE ELAMAIPESEULB (talk) 18:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOT WATERMARKED ELAMAIPESEULB (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOT WATERMARKED ELAMAIPESEULB (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nominator's reasons make no sense, but fairly prompt request by uploader; unused low quality photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Jumbotron is the focus of the image and Union College was probably not the author of the broadcast shown on Jumbotron. Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Denniscabrams (talk) 22:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Redundant, this file is redundant to and lower quality than File:Setting the Table by Joseph Bail.jpg. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 01:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i wanted to say that SETTING THE TABLE.PNG should have been overwritten, but then i see the file type is different.
i'm not sure whether it's appropriate to replace a PNG replica of a painting with JPG though. the original from the website seems to be jpg. RZuo (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

design involves complex patterns rather than simple basic geometric shapes. over COM:TOO Canada. not old enough to be pd.

RZuo (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I wouldn't agree that these are all complex enough to pass the TOO. The Kawartha Lakes one in particular is very simple. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Vancouver says that it is from Open Clip Art. Flagvisioner (talk) 00:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    unless legal precedents are found, i dont think it's a good idea to assume diagrams, which are composed of several not so simple shapes, to be too simple.
    Flag of Vancouver has a shield (consisting of three not so simple objects) and white and blue wavy stripes.
    Flag of Kawartha Lakes has a circle in gradient colours, two trees, and two wave shapes of two colours.
    Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) allowed Flag of Calgary to be registered as a trademark... RZuo (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete These are pretty borderline, but a few of them involve gradient colors, which can sometimes kick the work up to being copyrightable. Although I'm not super educated on how the law works in Canada, but it seems like they have a pretty low bar going by the fact that the flag of Calgary was trademarked. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Trademarked" is not the same as copyrighted. For example this image is trademarked, but is too simple to be protected by copyright. If you can dig up a citation that gradient colouring is sufficient to warrant copyright protection I'd be interested in seeing it, but the trademark status of the Calgary flag isn't relevant. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
usa is not canada.
so far commons has no records of precedents in canadian law. without precedents it's not safe to assume "gradient colouring is not sufficient to warrant copyright". RZuo (talk) 02:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware that the US is not Canada. But their respective thresholds of originality are comparable. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada explicitly rejected the "sweat of the brow" doctrine for being too low of a standard, but at the same time, stated that the creativity standards for originality were too high..."
it's stricter than usa, so you cannot assume non copyrightable things in usa will be the same in canada. RZuo (talk) 07:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Trademarked" is not the same as copyrighted. Sure, but if something is trademarked there's an increased chance that the person who owns the trademark will sue over a copyright claim. Does that mean they would win? Not necessarily, but we are here to keep Wikimedia from getting taken to court. Trying to hedge DRs on whatever outcome might happen is out of our job description. Anyway, like RZuo says, there is no precedents to assume gradient coloring is not sufficient to warrant copyright in Canada and in the meantime that has been the standard in similar law countries. So trademark/copyright/whatever, the images should still be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In what similar law countries has that been the standard?
We regularly host trademarked images, because whether something is trademarked is irrelevant to whether something is copyrightable, and whether someone is likely to sue or not is not the basis for a decision here. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all over TOO Canada. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Moisey Nappelbaum. Credited in postcard. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is in the Public Domain in Russia and in the United Staters -- see Licensing section of this photo description at [File:Krenkel ET.jpg]. That is why using this photo in Wikipedia is in accordance with the rules and should be saved as is. Георгий Елизаров (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The claimed license does not apply. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 19:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Moisey Nappelbaum. Credited in postcard. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See copyright warning at Category:Tour de la Part-Dieu Wouter (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete No FOP in France and not de minimis. Miniwark (talk) 12:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this license tag is invalid - the "official document" status seems to apply to government documents like laws. There's no indication that it automatically makes all photos that include Egyptian passports uncopyrightable. (Plus, there's a huge watermark right in the middle of the photo, so it's not great for our purposes anyway). Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Premeditated Chaos: it's an official photo made by the Police of Egypt (published by Minister of Interior of Egypt) concerning the w:Murder of Giulio Regeni. Then, it's an italian passport, since Giulio Regeni was an italian student murdered in Egypt.--Holapaco77 (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
About the watermark: this image is an official photo used in the investigation and the trial of the murder, so it's ok for our purposes and for wikipedia project.--Holapaco77 (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfree photograph from Facebook. Passports are also not laws, which is what is meant by official documents. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Skimel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Edmond Jamoulle is still alive, the drawing is under copyright. Not own work. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 04:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found on https://cinepainters.com/ (deeplink: https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/617bb3722035577fa19aaa6c/be583181-c0e1-43e6-ba56-31af7eeb4605/IMG_8478-2.jpg). --Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no this picture was found in a book (Jimmy Pantera, Cinéma ABC : La nécropole du porno, Bruxelles, Maison CFC, septembre 2020, (ISBN 978-2-87572-058-0) . I am currently proofreading a draft on fr:wp. This contributor is taking ownership by declaring all photos uploaded to Commons as personal work when it is not. He is currently trying to get the rights holders to agree to give up the photos through the republishing process. But nothing says that he will get it... Matpib (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW of a living author and not an own photograph of the author. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Skimel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Edmond Jamoulle is still alive, file under copyright. Not own work. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 04:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this photo is not a "personal work". the photo is not the work of the contributor who imported it into Commons, but a copy of a published work >> Jimmy Pantera, Cinéma ABC : La nécropole du porno, Bruxelles, Maison CFC, septembre 2020. Matpib (talk) 09:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW of a living author and not an own photograph of uploader. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1933 from a published newspaper, presumably it had a copyright notice as typical at the time. Converting to DR to check for renewal. King of ♥ 04:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I was able to credit this one. In 5 years, it will not matter. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Matthew C Wallace: by what rationale would you be able to declare "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license."? DMacks (talk) 08:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The Chicago Tribune did not renew copyright on issues until 1946. Photograph is by Underwood and Underwood. It's possible they did not renew copyright on the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 05:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I've checked 1960 and 1961 renewal of an Underwood and Underwood photograph, and didn't find any. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1952 from a published newspaper, presumably it had a copyright notice as typical at the time. Converting to DR to check for renewal. King of ♥ 04:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright. No by=line. Not sure how to credit. Delete if it pleases. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 06:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Newspaper never renewed copyrights. Public domain due to formalities. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better version at File:Select fables of Esop and other fabulists. In three books. By R. Dodsley. Fleuron N021699-13.png F (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German photographer Max Schirner died in 1952. So while his works are in the public domain in Germany now, these photographs were all published after 1927. They are therefore still protected in the US because of the URAA law and should be deleted. The files can be restored 95 + 1 years after (first) publication (for the images from the Um den Sportrekord book, that would be 1936 because the first edition was published in that year).

Rosenzweig τ 16:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: File:Photo - Berlin - Olympiade - Leni Riefenstahl mit Kameramännnern - Max Schirner - 1936.jpg is actually said to show Max Schirner and is credited to Gerhard von Rosen. I don't know if that is true, the source page [3] does not mention this person and names Max Schirner as the author. The one person named Gerhard von Rosen de.wp has an article about, de:Gerhard von Rosen, was a painter who died in 1927, 9 years before the photo was taken. If the photo is from 1936, it's still protected in the US until the end of 2031 all the same though. If the photographer's name is corroborated and that person died not later that 1961, the file can be restored in 2032; else it should be restored in 2057 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 17:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently Gerhard von Rosen was a mistake by the uploader which was now corrected. So this file is a photo by Schirner like the others. --Rosenzweig τ 08:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. URAA applies. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a copyrighted illustration from the book Inside Dinosaurs, as seen here: [4]. Slate Weasel (talk) 21:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 178.155.4.159 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|License is fake: photo from © website since 1999 Polarlys (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. Undelete in 2066. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"1982. Автор неизвестен. " Orphan. Not free license Lesless (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"27.09.2011. Автор неизвестен. " Orphan. Not free license Lesless (talk) 14:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"1981. Автор неизвестен. " Orphan. Not free license Lesless (talk) 14:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same applies to these as to the image under discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:III. Viktor Emánuel tiszteletére rendezett dísszemle - 1937.jpg, azaz  Delete. (Deepl translation) Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+

  • I've notified all the uploaders of this images you added to this DR and I also manually added the DR link to the files added. Concerning File:Münnich Ferenc 1921.jpg, it's a completely different photograph from the listed Bojár Sándor photograph and he became a photojournalist in 1932 so if this was taken in 1921, it could be from an unknown photographer and likely public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep last three photographs, which do not part of Fortepan photo collection, so the above-mentioned discussion (?) in partly Hungarian-language is not valid here. Keep or start another deletion request regarding these three images. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the last three  Keep since no evidence has been shown that Bojár Sándor is the photographer of them. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep So the implication here is "Delete all content from Fortepan, because two amateur editors on Commons have decided that an entire library is incompetent to issue licences" ?
The claim "If a photographer dies before a library acquires their collection, then it cannot be licensed in the future." is baseless. Even if the photographer is deceased, they will still have an estate, executors and agents who can agree such accession agreements to a library. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's a relevent VPC thread relating to Fortepan: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2022/01#Carl_Lutz,_Fortepan_and_Archiv_f%C3%BCr_Zeitgeschichte I'd definitely feel a lot better about first three files if we got VRT confirmation that the photographer's estate did transfer copyright. There is a DR from 2017 that says that uploads from Fortepan as a source have to judged separately. Commons:Deletion requests/Photos by Ernő Kovács Márton And if evidence shows that they are the copyright holder, I'll immediately file an UDR for the other deleted file. (EDIT: There is also a warning at Category:Images from Fortepan so at best, the Fortepan images should be verified as being able to be licensed by Fortepan) Abzeronow (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mivel a Fortepan nagyon lazán kezeli a szerzői jogokat (lásd Commons:Deletion requests/Photos from Magyar Rendőr, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nagy László fortepan 107214.jpg) ezért az ott lévő képeket nagyon erős kritikával kell kezelni és a kétséges esetekről szükséges megbeszélést kezdeni és folytatni, mert nem egyeset volt, hogy olyan képeket tettek szabad licenc alá, amelyeket nem tehettek volna. Viszont most utána néztem Bojár Sándor képeinek, és úgy tűnik, az ő esetében rendben vannak a dolgok, itt ugyanis azt írja, hogy a képeket a fia, Bojár Gábor adta a Fortepannak.

Deepl translete: Since Fortepan is very lax about copyright (see Commons:Deletion requests/Photos from Magyar Rendőr, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nagy László fortepan 107214.jpg), the images there should be treated with very strong criticism and the discussion about doubtful cases should be started and continued, because there have been more than a few cases where images have been put under free license that should not have been. However, I have now looked into the images of Sándor Bojár and it seems that in his case things are in order, says here that the images were given to Fortepan by his son Gábor Bojár. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yup,  Keep all. "Nagyon megtisztelő, hogy mondjuk Urbán vagy Szalay nekünk adta a képeit. vagy Bojár Gábor, aki az édesapja hagyatékát osztotta meg." which translates through Google Translate as "It is a great honor that Urbán or Szalay, for example, gave us their pictures. or Gábor Bojár, who shared his father's inheritance." As I told Andy, I will file an undeletion request for that other photograph now that it's established that Fortepan did get the copyright transfered. Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Thanks for all the great research!. holly {chat} 19:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad resolution WikipSQ (talk) 14:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False licensing. The source given [5] says the image is from Youtube, and links to this Youtube video, [6]. That video is from local sports team the Utica Comets, and there is no indication they put it under public domain. Apocheir (talk) 21:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Baxter Ward 9 News

[edit]

Doubt that it's their own work. Ward had a career at 9 News from about the late 50's to 1969, and I don't think the uploader (Alexbarbershop) would be alive back then to take that photo. It also seems that it's a professional shot that was scanned, but I could not find the source online to help determine when it was taken and where it truly comes from. --reppoptalk 21:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I suspect the uploader may have scanned the photo himself. holly {chat} 19:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Likely above TOO on behalf of Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Doraemon_logohalf_classic.png. It certainly more complex and artistic than the Cup Noodles logo Bsslover371 (talk) 05:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think this is a clear example of a simple text logo. The bell could possibly be considered de minimis since it is not the focus of the logo. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete COM:TOO Japan says a text logo needs to have artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation. This is not a simple font rendering, so I think this goes above it. holly {chat} 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per holly. --Ellywa (talk) 22:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]