User talk:Rundvald
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 00:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-teras4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-piliers.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-teras3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Cecil (talk) 13:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-escalier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Cecil (talk) 16:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-terras1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 13:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-teras2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 13:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Villa-Savoye-piliers.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 13:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Tripiere-Logo-2.jpg is uncategorized since 4 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Port-de-Ouistreham-ecluse.JPG is uncategorized since 12 June 2009.
- Image:Port-de-Ouistreham-casiers-Gendarmerie-Maritime.JPG is uncategorized since 12 June 2009.
- Image:Phare-Ouistreham-Car-Ferry.JPG is uncategorized since 12 June 2009.
- Image:Cardonnet-Navire-de-travaux-Ouistreham.JPG is uncategorized since 12 June 2009.
- Image:Benouville-Pegasus-Bridge-ouverture.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Chapelle-chateau-Benouville-Canal.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Chateau-Benouville-Canal.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Phare-Ouistreham-verdure1.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Grues-Canal-Caen-mer2.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Pegasus-Bridge-ouvert1.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Pegasus-Bridge-ouvert2.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Ouistreham-cabine-isolee.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Grues-Canal-Caen-mer1.JPG is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Benouville-Le-Port.JPG is uncategorized since 14 June 2009.
- Image:Cuves-carburants-ZA-Maresquier.JPG is uncategorized since 21 June 2009.
- Image:Maison-Aristide-Briand-Canal-Caen-mer.JPG is uncategorized since 21 June 2009.
- Image:Quai-Blainville-grues-silos-blé-Agrial.JPG is uncategorized since 21 June 2009.
- Image:Jules-Cornu.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Classification des fichiers / Catégorie
[edit]Bonjour Rundvald,
j'ai remarqué que les fichiers que vous importez pourraient être mieux classés dans la base de données de commons. Je vous invite à ce propos à lire Commons:Catégories#Sur-catégorisation. Par exemple, pour l'image File:Aiguines83-clocher.jpg, une bonne catégorisation serait Category:Churches in Var et Category:Aiguines en supprimant toutes celles que vous avez mises. Il est souvent possible d'encore mieux catégoriser les fichiers.
Cordialement
Benchaum (talk) 07:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Bis repetita : vous avez encore catégorisé dans Category:France vos fichiers. Merci d'apprendre à catégoriser les fichiers que vous importez. Benchaum (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ter repetita : vous avez encore catégorisé dans Category:France un de vos fichiers. Merci d'apprendre à catégoriser les fichiers que vous importez. Benchaum (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour. J'ai vu que vous avez importe une belle image de parapente que j'ai ajouté a la galerie Paraglider. Avec cette galerie j'essaye de créer une base de photos libres de tous les modeles sur lesquelles j'arrive a mettre la main. Mais malheureusement sur votre photo je n'arrive pas bien a determiner s'il s'agit d'une Epsilon 5 ou d'une Epsilon 6. Pouvez vous m'éclairer sur ce point ? En tout cas, merci de votre participation. PiRK (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Rundvald!
Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of "Rundvald".
Thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
File:John-Stith-Pemberton-Atlanta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Camera-reflex.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Gerard-Saint-Cyclisme-Argentan.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gerard-Saint-Cyclisme-Argentan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Gerard-Saint-Cyclisme-Argentan.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
- I have tagged this file either because it has no source whatsoever, or because the given source does not give enough information about its author or its date, making the copyright status of the file incertain, or maybe because the uploaded image is a derivative of one or several unsourced works. In any case, please don't ignore this message, contact me instead if you have more information or if you want to discuss the issue. Eusebius (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Breel61-eglise.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Breel61-eglise.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Breel61-eglise.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
- I have tagged this file either because it has no source whatsoever, or because the given source does not give enough information about its author or its date, making the copyright status of the file incertain, or maybe because the uploaded image is a derivative of one or several unsourced works. In any case, please don't ignore this message, contact me instead if you have more information or if you want to discuss the issue. Eusebius (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Gérard-Saint-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Meuh-Cola-Jlabé.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Appareil-Photo-Digital.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 19:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Rundvald.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Eusebius (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Jeep-Disneyland-Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Pays de Brest
[edit]Bonjour,
Je suis l'animatrice du projet Wiki-Brest et je me demandais si vous habitiez ou étiez fortement attaché au Finistère. Je vous pose cette question car nous sommes en train de créer une communauté de wikipédiens liés au Pays de Brest.
Cordialement.
Gaëlle FILY (talk) 09:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Mont-Ventoux-Memorial-Tom-Simpson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.137.220 18:35, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
File:ND-des-Hautes-Lumieres-Les-Saisies73.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--MGuf (d) 16:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Pointe-Kerpenhir-entree-Golfe-Morbihan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.124.116.62 20:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Pierre-de-Coubertin-Atlanta.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
George Ho (talk) 07:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Rundvald,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Lisieux-Theatre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 06:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Corseul-DomusClosMulon-panneau-relief-byRundvald.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Corseul-DomusClosMulon-panneau-relief-byRundvald.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
- File:MrHulot-Saint-Marc-sur-Mer-by-Rundvald.JPG
- File:LaBaule-StatueAnnedeBretagne-dYves Le Corre-photo-by-Rundvald.jpg
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 19:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre12.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre11-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre10-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre9-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre8-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre7-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre6-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre5-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre4-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre3-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre2-byRundvald.jpg
- File:LFM-MarcelPierre1-byRundvald.jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Plaque-Poilu-MarcelPierre-byRundvald.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.249.103.145 22:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Sur-les-pas-de-MarcelPierre-byRundvald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.249.103.145 22:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Merci de ne pas sur-catégoriser
[edit]Bonjour, merci de ne pas sur-catégoriser vos images. Il ne sert à rien d'ajouter les catégories France, Europe, etc.
Pour plus de détail, voir Sur-catégorisation. Pmau (talk) 07:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Gerard-Filipelli-SanRemo-1974-cropped.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Gerard-Filipelli-SanRemo-1974-cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gerard-Filipelli-SanRemo-1974-cropped.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Afeef (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Plaque-Empreintes-des-vainqueurs-LeMans-Tribute-Jean-Pierre-Jaussaud-CC-BY-NC-SA.jpg
[edit]
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Sur-catégorisation !!!
[edit]Bonjour.
Tu n'as pas l'air nouveau dans Commons, donc je pense que tu dois savoir qu'il ne faut pas sur-catégoriser les fichiers comme tu le fais.
Les Citroën 2CV, ou Dyane, par exemple, sont déjà dans une sous-catégorie Citroën, il n'est donc pas utile du tout d'y ajouter cette catégorie Citroën !
Citroën est "Made in France", il n'est donc pas nécessaire de mettre cette catégorie à chaque fichier ! Mettre la catégorie-mère "Citroën" dans la catégorie "Made in France, ça va, mais pas chaque fichier, sinon, on va se retrouver avec une catégorie submergée de millions de fichiers inutiles.
Renseigne-toi au Bistro, histoire de savoir si tu n'es pas en train de vandaliser la chose...
Bonnes annulations. LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 00:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Merci de ne pas sur-catégoriser vos images
[edit]Bonjour,
Merci de ne pas ajouter des catégories inutiles à vos images. Les catégories comme "France", "Europe", etc sont inutiles.
Cette remarque vous a déjà été faite en 2019 mais vous continuez...
Cela rajoute du travail inutile à d'autres contributeurs pour "nettoyer" les catégories.
Salutations,
Pmau (talk) 09:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Timbres-Saint-Pierre-Chanel-Wallis-et-Futuna-France-byRundvald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Skimel (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Chatel-74-La-Vieille-Douane-Douanes-francaises-D22-Route-des-Frasses-Dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg
[edit]File:Chatel-74-La-Vieille-Douane-Douanes-francaises-D22-Route-des-Frasses-Dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Chatel-74-La-Vieille-Douane-Douanes-francaises-D22-Route-des-Frasses-Dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg
[edit]File:Chatel-74-La-Vieille-Douane-Douanes-francaises-D22-Route-des-Frasses-Dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Affiche-Abondance-dAir-pur-Circuits-de-Sentiers-dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg
[edit]File:Affiche-Abondance-dAir-pur-Circuits-de-Sentiers-dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Affiche-Abondance-de-Nature-Lac-des-Plagnes-dessin-de-Jerome-Phalippou-byRundvald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Coq-Cocorico-Bleu-Blanc-Lait.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Thibaut (talk) 15:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour/Bonsoir ! Juste une remarque : le fichier Coq-Cocorico-Bleu-Blanc-Lait.jpg que j'avais téléversé et que vous avez supprimé (ou fait supprimer) n'était pas issu d'Internet. J'avais photographié la brique de lait de mon petit déjeuner, puis retouché et détouré le coq avec mon petit logiciel gratuit. Peut-être qu'en cela je commettais une infraction. Toujours est-il que le dessin ne venait pas de l'Internet du Web mondial !
- Par ailleurs, quand j'enfreins le règlement, ce n'est jamais intentionnel, même si je trouve la loi française sur la liberté de panorama, en général, bien trop restrictive, stupide et hypocrite, à l'instar des logos floutés à la télévision mais qu'on reconnais quand même, surtout quand le logo en question est celui de l'entreprise qui fait l'objet d'un reportage (sans parler des images retournées pour nous empêcher, croient-ils, de lire des noms, marques ou slogans... à mourir de rire !). De même quand on cache le logo d'une bagnole alors même que sa ligne, son design fait l'identité du modèle et donc de son constructeur ! Et puis, les logos, les marques, les dessins figurant sur des affiches placardées en lieux publiques font partie de notre environnement quotidien, de nos paysages, de notre vie tout simplement, alors merde, arrêtons de nous prendre le choux à tout flouter, cacher et interdire d'extraire une partie d'une fresque murale comme je l'ai fait pour Wikimedia/Wikipedia. De deux choses l'une : soit on respecte strictement les règles et les droits des uns et des autres, à la lettre, aveuglément, dans ce cas, les auteurs et ayants droit peuvent se garder leurs œuvres dans leur petit atelier et archives perso, en oubliant d'en tirer bénéfices, soit on lâche du mou et les "ââârtistes", auteurs et ayants droit diffusent, montrent, vendent ce qu'ils pondent contre rémunérations diverses et variées, mais jusqu'à une certaine limite décente au-delà de laquelle l'oeuvre intègre le bien commun. Je dit ça alors que je suis moi-même illustrateur dans la vraie vie, et si untel utilise tout ou partie d'un de mes dessins en enfreignant mes propres droits d'auteur, je ne trépignerais pas comme un Américain procédurier. J'accepte le revers de la médaille et ne m'engage pas sur le chemin de la veuve d'Hergé. Voilà, ça c'est dit, c'est mon avis ! Si vous n'êtes pas d'accord, c'est votre droit. Peu me chaut ! Bien à vous tous...
- Rundvald
- La loi est faite pour l'interprétation des sages et le respect des fous Rundvald (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Casque-Integral-GPA-Jacques-Laffite-byRundvald.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cjp24 (talk) 08:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah oui ????!!!! Tiens donc ? Et pourquoi, je vous prie ? Rundvald (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Monchhichi-Kiki-packaging-byYRundvald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
61.120.241.1 01:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not overwrite files
[edit]
And also:
- File:Pope John Paul II.jpg
- File:Pope John Paul II (cropped).jpg
- File:Peugeot-204-Cabrio.jpg
- File:JPII 29 09 2004 1.JPG
- File:Gendarmerie Vatican City July 2011.jpg
- File:Pope Benedict XVI -Italy-19December2005.jpg
Yours sincerely Stv26 (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not overwrite files
[edit]
Your picture was moved here: File:Saint-Brieuc (22) Cathédrale 17 FXD.jpeg
Yours sincerely Stv26 (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Rugby-England-Montage.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rugby-England-Montage.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rundvald, you need to provide author and source information for each of the images in this collage. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Túrelio, OK, I will do it as soon as possible ! Rundvald (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- I did it! Is it good like that? Did I forget something? Best wishes, Túrelio ;) Rundvald (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Michelin-logo-map-1940.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Michelin-logo-map-1940.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Kiki-Musee-du-Jouet-Moirans39-byRundvald-cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Belbury (talk) 09:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Cat-Sanctuary-Largo-di-Torre-Argentina-Rome-bySonse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
File:2011-Singer-Porsche-911.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:2015-Singer-Porsche911-Targa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Heather-Thomas-as-Jody-Banks-1981-1986-byBlakePatterson.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Heather-Thomas-as-Jody-Banks-1981-1986-byBlakePatterson.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Plaque-Empreintes-des-vainqueurs-LeMans-Tribute-Jean-Pierre-Jaussaud-CC-BY-SA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Why do you want to delete this picture ? Rundvald (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Asterix-en-Marche.png
- File:Asterix&Obelix Brussels-cropped2.png
- File:Asterix&Obelix Brussels-cropped1.png
- File:Charleroi - station Janson - Spirou et Fantasio - 01-Cropped-Spip.gif
- File:Charleroi - station Janson - Spirou et Fantasio - 01-Cropped-Spip2.jpg
- File:Charleroi - station Janson - Spirou et Fantasio - 01-Cropped-Spip.jpg
Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Je ne vois pas pourquoi ces fichiers devraient être supprimés puisqu’ils sont tous issus de fichiers déjà existant dans Wikimedia, autorisés et validés. Je n’ai fait que détourer les personnages et reconstitué les parties manquantes pour ce qui concerne Obélix. Si vous voulez les supprimer, alors ils faut également supprimer les fichier desquels ils sont issus, qui sont des photos de fresques réalisées sur des murs dans des espaces publiques. Il faut être cohérent : soit on autorise les photos de fresques murales reproduisant des personnages de BD, dans ce cas on autorise aussi les versions détourées de ces mêmes photos, soit on interdit tout. Et pourquoi pas interdir tout Wikipedia et Wikimedia, puisque tout est problématiques avec les gens tatillons !
- Cordialement, Rundvald (talk) 12:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I don't see why these files should be deleted because they all come from files already existing in Wikimedia, authorized and validated. I only cut out the characters and reconstructed the missing parts regarding Obélix. If you want to delete them, then you must also delete the files they came from, which are photos of murals made on walls in public spaces. We must be consistent: either we authorize photos of murals reproducing comic book characters, in this case we also authorize cut-out versions of these same photos, or we prohibit everything. And why not ban all Wikipedia and Wikimedia, because everything is problematic with finicky people!
- Sincerely, Rundvald (talk) 12:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ploubalay-24Heures-de-Bretagne-1982-autocollant.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ploubalay-24Heures-de-Bretagne-1982-autocollant.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ploubalay-24Heures-de-Bretagne-1982-autocollant.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |