Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/12/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 28th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RTmunz (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Josh r06 (talk) 02:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Josh r06 (talk) 02:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: A simple sine tone is not copyrightable. --Achim55 (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Loaded mistakenly. The file is duplicating an existing file Professor Lubomyr Luciuk.jpg Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 22:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RTmunz (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reason for the nomination: The sound isn't free because of https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-19-758A1.pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B4531826 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@B4531826: This is a very long document. Can you provide a particular passage which suggests that this is not PD-USGov as stated? -- King of ♥ 23:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts:

EAS. Section 11.45(a) of the Commission’s rules (Rules) states that “[n]o person may transmit or cause to transmit the EAS codes or Attention Signal, or a recording or simulation thereof, in any circumstance other than in an actual National, State or Local Area emergency or authorized test of the EAS; or as specified in [sections] 10.520(d), 11.46 [for EAS public service announcements], and 11.61 of this chapter [authorized tests].”10 A “simulation” of the EAS codes or Attention Signals includes not only recordings of actual EAS codes or Attention Signals,11 but also sounds that mimic or are substantially similar to them, such that an average listener could reasonably mistake the sounds for actual EAS codes or Attention Signals. By contrast, general alarms or other loud noises, including bells; klaxons; and police, fire, or civil defense sirens, are not considered “simulations” of the EAS codes or Attention Signals, and therefore are not prohibited under sections 11.45(a) or 10.520(d) of the Rules. Thus, content such as advertisements, entertainment programming, promotional announcements, and other programming that includes the EAS codes or Attention Signals (or simulations thereof), is illegal if it is not employed in connection with an actual emergency, authorized EAS test, or as specified in sections 10.520(d), 11.46, and 11.61 of the Rules. 12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by B4531826 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@B4531826: These are non-copyright restrictions, which do not affect the public domain status of a government work. For example, we host images of swastikas even though they are illegal to use for many purposes in Germany. -- King of ♥ 00:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: But the restrictions make it illegal to have a file of the sound here. B4531826 (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Notice the word "transmit". In the context of the FCC, I don't think making an audio file available for on-demand access on a website counts as transmission. Under your logic, a Youtube video of an emergency which happens to have the EAS code playing in the background would be illegal. -- King of ♥ 01:41, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: Okay, I think the file should be kept. I added a notice regarding the restrictions at https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/720716857. B4531826 (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --King of ♥ 06:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 21:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, from Facebook[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Luria12 (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not educational Lemonaka (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 00:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://narrow.one/ AviaWiki (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio "Uploaded a work by Justine Skye. from Instagram." >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Luuuuan Mateus2019 (talk) 02:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are non-permanent display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are non-permanent display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are non-permanent display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of company. Dinamik (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Tom Write (talk) 05:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: De minimis. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, not in use Bilderling (talk) 06:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 20alosina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio, random uploaded files, in the description he wrote (ارشيف الشيخ الدكتور صادق الجبران = From Dr.Sadek Aljobran Archive), so it's not his own works, also the photos from different 14 countries! and from different historical eras (like this file from 1960s) and that doesn't make sense, no EXIF and different size, all files also (Cross-wiki upload from ar.wikipedia.org) = Many users from our Wikipedia misuse this tools, also the account is new and the files haven't enough information and no category, I am absolutely sure that this user does not know anything about commons and free license policies.

Also, 99.9% of this files are not used in any project and no educational purpose, that another reason for the deletion. --Ibrahim.ID 06:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross-wiki spam. SCP-2000 08:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georgia does not have Freedom of Panorama. The copyright of the architect is likely violated (also horrible resolution) 2001:A61:1066:3001:FDC9:673E:80DB:F7A8 08:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, netcopyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-wikipedian: Out of scope. --Karim talk to me :)..! 09:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not the work of the user(would need to be a selfie and it clearly isn't. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

books are in copyright Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright on a book applies to the text and its artwork. As this picture is a shot of three books as a whole in their surrounding, not "merely or even mainly" of the artwork, wouldn't Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc. be applicable? --MarcoSwart (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted artwork on spine, not de minimis. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete filtered, possibly AI-generated imagery. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 03:42, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, self-promotion Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, self-promotion Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Partykng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

spam, possibly copyvio derivative

TFerenczy (talk) 10:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyrighted postcard, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyrighted postcard, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drinian Ordanel2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused fictional logo and flag, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity photo, only used for en:User:RJ.Prakash1510 Fayenatic london (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted that user page as en:WP:NOTWEBHOST. Fayenatic london (talk) 10:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheOleRazzleDazzle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are educational data created by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California. (These files will need a little work to clean up.) Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, within scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ABHINAVKUMARSAHAI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikl64 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work, but 2 have no exif and the one that does says (c) Lisa Businovski - we need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: It seems a copyright is in the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality nudity picture. Unlikely educational Lemonaka (talk) 17:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pristine example of real life dick pic. 2603:7000:C901:F87E:8C10:AB83:7824:858F 19:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Random low-quality penis picture, no educational value. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No need for this explicit content to stay hosted here. There's no educational value in having it here and it isn't used on any site and is extremely unlikely to be used in the future due to it's explicit nature. Philipnelson99 (talk) 13:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Out of scope. --Harobouri (talk) 01:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per above. Also, has been used for trolling and disruptive editing on the English Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 02:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the biographee's personal instagram. Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 17:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Themrajpal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPA indefinitely blocked on enwiki. Two photos two camera models. Professional headshots

Vera (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from https://pavilionmontkiara.com/, probably copyrighted Crannofonix (talk) 18:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity image only used at en: User:TheBengaliWriter Fayenatic london (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the only page having used this image has been deleted by Fayenatic london on grounds of en:WP:NOTHOST. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 03:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: Nonsense map, accurately pinpointing the location of sfergergerg Enyavar (talk) 21:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: nonsense Enyavar (talk) 21:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in Iran Mostafameraji (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in Iran Mostafameraji (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in Iran Mostafameraji (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1991. No Permission. See same reguest. Микола Василечко (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work or free work. No exif or high-res image either. ɱ (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of Agência Brasil published after February 2017 fails COM:L requirement A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 fails COM:L requirement A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Agência Brasil published after February 2017 fails COM:L requirement A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is of British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 03:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 04:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Krd 05:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Paul 012 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G6|Inferior and misidentified duplicate of File:Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston.jpg. Do not leave a redirect. This is maybe true, but the file was kept after regular deletion request and so is ineligible for speedy deletion. I allow regular deletion. Taivo (talk) 18:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This is absurdly becoming just process for process's sake. The consensus at the previous DR was unanimously to delete the file, but was kept in a supervote by the closer due to a technicality which has since been resolved. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of Agência Brasil published in February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nothing copyrightable there, just the usual glass curtain wall. Darwin Ahoy! 01:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: Why have you ignored the reasoning I presented, and deleted the file anyway without addressing it? I don't think that's correct.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Neman (talk • contribs) 08:36, 28 December 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file shows a 1967 Cuban stamp featuring a Picasso painting from the 1960s. The painting is the only thing copyrightable in this stamp IMO, so we should be safe to say that the stamp is a derivative of the painting. Even in 50 years pma Cuba, Picasso's works are still protected until the end of 2023; in France (where the painting was most likely created and which should be the country of origin for our purposes) until the end of 2043. In the US probably still longer, depending on the year of the painting. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2063 (assuming a 95 year URAA term from 1967). Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

h Md Muttakin Hossain Niloy (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author requested deletion, advertising anyway. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 22:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has nothing to do with deep learning. It is just a completely naked women with some drawings on her. 73.228.114.21 00:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Besides this dozens of dr all closed has kept, has been discussed to death in Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/03/Category:Photographs by Exey Panteleev and there is even more as this was also debated to death in Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2019/11#Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology after some users hijacked the 2019 WikiConference North America to push and from that discussion ot was again established that this image are in clear scope. As was before debated n 2013 when an administrator run amok with the deletions out of process and this images were undeleted and scope was debated in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_36#Why_does_EVula_still_have_admin_privileges?.
Ignoring willfully all this previous discussions, when they are well marked, to open another dr with the same old tired arguments is, at the simplest level, just plain wrong. Tm (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Family vacation photos uploaded via bulk transfer from Flickr.

Senator2029 08:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Family vacation photos uploaded via bulk transfer from Flickr.

Senator2029 08:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this photo contains a copyrighted poster. COM:FOP Japan Syunsyunminmin (talk) 08:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DM. --King of ♥ 10:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is a non-permanent work, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 10:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --King of ♥ 10:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not redirect of given file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arqamkhawaja (talk • contribs) 07:21, 28 December 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep per COM:FR#Leaving redirects.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per Jeff G. and COM:FR#Leaving redirects. Krok6kola (talk) 14:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 10:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence prove MTR (Shenzhen) releases this map with CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. 46.232.120.226 11:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 10:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is from MTR (Shenzhen), not own work. 46.232.120.226 11:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 10:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rstalwar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems like book covers(?) and if so CSD:F2 applies

-- DaxServer (talk) 14:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 10:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tejas mondeeri s (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Bear in wild.jpg uploaded by this user turned out to be a webcopyvio. All their other uploads are similarly of very low resolution and lack any EXIF data. A true wildlife photographer would not copy a small photo from the web having an own collection of photographs and would be able to probide files with metadata as well. Since I have significant doubts about all own work statements from that user per COM:PRP.

~Cybularny Speak? 23:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 10:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This should be removed because it violates a neutral point of view - it’s Putin’s propaganda. The territories aren’t and they’ve never been disputed by anybody. They are only temporary occupied — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.204.72.244 (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason. Here on Commons there is no NPOV policy and the file name says clearly what is depicted. If you don't like this one use File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection).svg instead. --Achim55 (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Agreed. There is no valid reason for deletion. The file is labeled accurately, and the contents of the file are also clear. ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 17:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If they put all claimed territory as solid green and said in the article that the 4 oblasts were Russia's sovereign territory, then that would be a valid argument. But that is not the case. DinoSoupCanada (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Achim, Nihonjoe, and DinoSoup.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the Kuril Islands dispute should not include to be light green as internationally recognized as part of it, despite that Ukraine recognized as part of Japan - Jjpachano (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep They are disputed territories, per the definition of the word "disputed". It doesn't matter whether they are recognized as Russian, Russia claims them as theirs, and the map clearly shows the distinction between "claimed by Russia" and "actually Russia". DecafPotato (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Per Achim55. Legoless (talk) 09:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:NPOV. --King of ♥ 10:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perdón, pero realmente no sé quien es Eugene Zelenko y no tengo claro que es lo que desea.
Es mi primer ingreso una página de esta envergadura y tal vez no cumplí con todos los reqauisitos requeridos. 181.31.3.55 11:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright missing Deerstarlings (talk) 22:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable license status of image. Photo can be found, for example, at https://facebook.com/shownewstv/ Dinamik (talk) 04:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. This is a screenshot from TV-series Helt Perfekt, as written in the file's description. JonasTisell (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

この画像の人物は3代目鈴木三郎助(1890年生・1973年没)であって1931年没の2代目鈴木三郎助ではありません。従って「1956年までに公表・発行された」か「1946年以前に撮影された」かは不明です。 継之助 (talk) 02:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changed credit. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fixed. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/acknowledging.html Lithopsian (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has credit and it does not say that it is any user's own work. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the licensing SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Unless otherwise specifically stated, no claim to copyright is being asserted by STScI and material on this site may be freely used as in the public domain in accordance with NASA's contract. [2]. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DSS images are copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Despite the claim this is an ESO image, there is no link, I can't find any trace of it at their website, and the page today and in the past claims that the image weas created using Aladin lite Lithopsian (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Third time lucky. To be perfectly frank, I don't believe the claim that this is an image originating at ESO. There is no link given here, I can't find any trace of it at eso.org, the image was initially uploaded with the claim that it was an Aladin Lite image and it still makes that claim today. If the creator removes the nomination tag again, I will consider this evidence of bad faith and escalate it for administrator action. Nomination discussions are closed by an administrator, occasionally another third party, once arguments have been presented. Lithopsian (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see above. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given permissions link does not apply to this image. DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: see above. No further information given which would justify a deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-Pakistan. The painter is a Bangladeshi died in 2012, there is still copyright in Bangladesh until 2073 and in the US until 2056. Billytanghh (talk) 01:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-- The painter made this art in 1960 when Bangladesh had not been born yet. Bangladesh was a part of Pakistan until 1971. So the painter was a Pakistani in 1960. Would PD-Pakistan not be applicable here? Dead.rabbit (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is still copyrightable in Bangladesh in 2000, when the new copyright law implemented. Also, the painter of the painting is identificable.--Billytanghh (talk) 02:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-Pakistan. East Pakistan is today's Bangladesh, Bangladeshi law applies, the work is still in copyright in Bangladesh until 2032 and in the US until 2067. Billytanghh (talk) 01:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of Agência Brasil published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As seen on the original webpage, on the bottom right, it's said "reprodução autorizada mediante indicação da fonte", which means reproduction is allowed as long as the source is indicated. Paladinum2 (talk) 03:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover, very probably copyright violation, especially with a typo in the file name WereSpielChequers (talk) 07:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission from Shelly Rastin Herself! KingShawn1987 (talk) 21:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Album covers require a free license from the publisher via VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

En bättre version av samma foto har laddats upp. Den gamla bilden används ej och har fototekniska problem. SiberianJay (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - where is the new version?. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamada12 medo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio, taken from non free source (youtube channel), also no educational purpose. --Ibrahim.ID 07:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georgia does not have Freedom of Panorama. This image shows too much detail of the copyrighted terminal architecture. 2001:A61:1066:3001:FDC9:673E:80DB:F7A8 08:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a personal photo; out of scope Syrio posso aiutare? 12:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source says "Copyright material on the Governor-General/Government House website is protected by copyright owned by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet on behalf of the Crown. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items or collections of content (either below or within specific items or collections), this copyright material is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence." (underline added) Image's metadata say "Copyright holder 2018 Mark Tantrum" which seems to be the "indicated otherwise." Alternatively stated, the CC-by 4.0 license applies only to "copyright owned by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet on behalf of the Crown" which this image explicitly does not. COM:OTRS from Mark Tantrum needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not educational Lemonaka (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruddd2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all three. The metadata is not relevant. The licensing isn't really an issue. The problem is that the only use is at en:User:Ruddd2000/sandbox which is basically a vanity draft. It is possible to argue that we require the vanity draft be deleted first before deleting the "in use" image but I don't see the need for that work. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 12:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The first appears all overe the web, the second is a screenshot, only the third appears to be OK. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this even a free image? 208.127.190.114 16:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, taken from facebook or other location on the web, copyrighted. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=604501028345515&set=a.524181243044161. --Ellywa (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DERIV of a photo by Alberto Andrich (https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/birds/facts/parrots, second image of second slideshow) put through an image filter. Original copyright holder must also license the underlying work for reuse. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: unable to find the mentioned source. please nominate again with exact source. --Krd 09:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Direct COM:DERIVed work of https://i.natgeofe.com/n/e3ae5fbf-ddc9-4b18-8c75-81d2daf962c1/3948225_3x4.jpg, with some kind of filter applied to it. (I was unable to extract a URL of the image for the previous request, but have been able to now.) Belbury (talk) 12:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

should better be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete LaTeX rendering, possibly downloaded from WolframAlpha or similar. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 03:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work by uploader, per upload-history. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 01:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag image is an almost duplicate version of File:Flag of Hong Kong (1871–1876).svg: same name, same purpose. The differences are a lighter shade of blue in the background, a different (and worse) crown icon and the initials H K have been drawn with another font and without dots. ZandDev (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsure if this is {{PD-Indonesia}} as this might not be an actual government work but this is definitely not under a cc license.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the uploader definitely put wrong license... it should be {{PD-IDGov}}. Ckfasdf (talk) 03:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There shall be no infringement of Copyright for: Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature;

.
Some of listed file above already use {{PD-IDGov}} license. So I don't think there is any issue. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just a question though, are the squadron logos the work of the government or the work of a personnel who did not release the rights to the government? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IMO squadron logo must be discussed at least internally within its squadron, so it also may fall to {{PD-IDNoCopyright}}. Ckfasdf (talk) 04:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is my concern, we can't keep files that may be PD. It must be PD or an own work with a CC license. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless squadron logo still constitute as state emblems so it's still fall s under {{PD-IDGov}}. {{PD-IDNoCopyright}} can also applies if the discussion result or regulation can be found. 05:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckfasdf (talk • contribs) 05:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to this link, it was mentioned that Chief of Staff of the Air Force authorized logo of new air force unit (including squadron) to be used, similar case can be found on Army unit. If it was naval unit, there is the regulation that explicitly mentioned naval unit logo should be authorized to be used by Chief of Staff of the Navy Decree. So, as I mentioned earlier, Indonesian armed forces logos is falls under {{PD-IDGov}}. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Atara123: I believe that understand commons licensing policy by now, so... kindly please replace author and license of all the image above. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Atara123: Still waiting for you to change the author and licensing of the above images. Please add the source as well, thanks. holly {chat} 22:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and further remark by Minorax: “we can't keep files that may be PD. It must be PD or an own work with a CC license.” None of the files I checked provided a link to the source. Uploader did not respond to requests to add sources and correct the licensing. So there is no evidence per COM:EVID these images can be licensed with one of the licenses acceptable on Commons. Therefore, all images must be deleted, including those which were crossed out from the list, as these were originally also uploaded by the same uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 09:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See above. Not CC license and even if PD, a source should be provided.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See above. While uploads made on 31 Dec has a source, the license is still inaccurate.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not found at source

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: I disagree, the uploaded has learned his lesson and now he put source on all his recently uploaded image. Although all his image source is from official Instagram account of each respective unit.
to @Atara123: . Although official Instagram account maybe acceptable, it would be better if the source comes from official website. For example for Skadik 201,202,203 and 204, source from https://simandik.id/ would be better. Ckfasdf (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ckfasdf: Wings and Squadrons do not have their own websites. And Kodiklatau also doesn't upload the subordinate units logo on its website. So I thought the instagram profile link was enough. Atara123 (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Atara123: It may be difficult to show that the image is {{PD-IDGov}} if you take it from Instagram. Kindly please replace the source if possible.Ckfasdf (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, although a link to Instagram has been provided, this does not show per COM:EVID that these logo's are available with a free license. Therefore the images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source or proof that it's self made and unable to find original to clarify. Jamesofur (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamesofur: No claim of it being "self made" is made on the image description page. Rather, the copyright is owned by the heirs who hve released it into the public domain. The original publication is here https://www.contourbottle.com/birth-of-a-bottle and I guess you could argue this requires OTRS since there is no proof that the original uploader on Wikipedia, Gavinmacqueen, is the same person who owns that websites. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 09:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am the heir of this picture. My name is Jeff Dean, Earl R. Dean is my grandfather. Not sure why this picture would be up for deletion. I do have the original picture hanging on a wall in my home. GavinMacqueen is my username for many platforms...this I can prove. My very first email address is gavinmacqueen@yahoo.com. If you're not convinced, please let me know how I can confirm this for you. Gavinmacqueen (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks both, yeah it was unclear what you were related to Earl or where the copyright lied, so not intending this as an accusation just to make sure we have all of our facts straight. @Gavinmacqueen: do you know when the photo was taken? It is very possible that the photo is out of copyright already, especially if not ever officially registered. Jamesofur (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep @Gavinmacqueen: Please take a 600dpi or higher scan so this amazing image can be preserved. --RAN (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No worries. Not sure what you mean with regards to the 600dpi or higher scan. Are you suggesting that I replace the Earl R. Dean pic with a higher res pic? The current pic is of ERD circa 1915 and is his head cropped from a pic of him standing next to a mold machine. I've been contemplating replacing it with a pic of him when he was much older. I would value your suggestion on this. Gavinmacqueen (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; @Gavinmacqueen: Please add more detail about the provenance of the image and upload a higher resolution version, if possible. Thanks for your contributions!. holly {chat} 20:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by sock puppet (of en:User:Fox53) who has been known to upload many unfree photos in the past. Not able to find any existing evidence that image was properly licensed by creator and no longer in use on any content pages. Jamesofur (talk) 05:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; the source site (via Internet Archive) does not have any indication of free licensing. This image was not being used, but it had two cropped versions that were (File:Eduard Geyer crop.jpg and File:Eduard Geyer (cropped2).png). I ordered a universal replace with File:Eduard Geyer 1989.jpg. holly {chat} 20:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted by the Assemblée nationale Kadı Message 07:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, no permissions from it.wiki VadErs88 (talk) 10:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment is misleading because there was much more than that added to the deleted logo. The one that was deleted was borderline case and this is considerably simpler. The examples at COM:TOO Italy need to be considered in comparison only to this image. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
it doesn't seem to me that this has much more than that, and also I repeat that "3" is an international brand, and I don't think it follows the rules of COM:TOO Italy VadErs88 (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. Wind Tre is an Italian company, so Italian law does apply. As for the 3Fiber file, if you want to bring it up for deletion review, please do so. holly {chat} 20:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free license https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:3_Italia_logo_(2016-2020).svg 2A01:E11:1A:990:21EA:FE2E:987:EAA3 17:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

parce que je m'en fou 87.66.147.161 14:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not a deletion reason. However, it is a small file without EXIF, so that's problematic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello Ikan Kekek, the statement is indeed vandalism. Being the photographer behind the image, I can assure you that there are no copyright concerns. Some of the images I have imported indeed do not have EXIF. But, despite the deletion of some of my imports (unjustified because I was the author) and being a professional photographer, I can assure you that I only import files of which I am the author. --Martin-78 (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Martin-78, it's great that you are contributing to Commons as a professional, but please go through the COM:VRT process, because assuring me won't change the decision of the closing admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello,
    I'm sysop on the French version I am well aware of the problems of Copyvio. And I don't see where is the problem with this file.
    I am the author, no one has disputed his paternity as far as I know (and that will not happen being the photographer). Martin-78 (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not the first time that I do not understand certain deletions on Commons... If it turns out that this photo should be deleted, I would like to know the process to have the photos that I have deleted from Commons. uploaded, this will close the issue defined. Martin-78 (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Have you read COM:VRT? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, when I had the same problem in 2017 I had done it. Without any response. Martin-78 (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Despite this OTRS ticket, the images had been deleted. And personally when a Copyvio is proven, I understand that this poses a problem. But when no evidence is provided to prove that an image is stolen, I admit that I do not understand the process and understand photographers who may be unmotivated to contribute. The present case, for example, remains visibly unanswered. A vandal from Wikipedia-FR launches a deletion request for a really futile reason, and the latter would have a chance of succeeding? Martin-78 (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I now understand from a discussion at Commons talk:Deletion requests that small but usable files with no EXIF are not thereby deletable without any other reason, so I think we should assume good faith on the part of the uploader, because Google Images found no matches and TinEye found only this photo itself on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 20:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from the source website. No indication of CC licensing. 87.150.7.38 16:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is no simple Copyright violation (فارسی), because the resolution is higher than in the www.sarpoosh.com article. Deeplink: jpg 600x350px. --Alex42 (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; even if the image is smaller than the one in the article, the uploader claims the photo comes from that website, and there is no CC license declaration there. holly {chat} 20:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't like this particular photo Bjsammusic (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I'm treating this as an extended G7. holly {chat} 20:47, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this isn't the original photo, reverse image search shows that this could be copyrighted Crannofonix (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all three per nomination. holly {chat} 20:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source unknown, consent unknown 2A02:810D:1600:838:98D5:48A7:FBAE:F984 19:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; TinEye found several instances of this image that existed before the Commons upload. holly {chat} 20:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without metadata. File:Market Lane Euro 2020.jpg (similar image) was deleted as metadata shows it is a screenshot. If you are the photographer, upload the original image with full EXIF data. Yann (talk) 19:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; the other file was reuploaded after original deletion, so it's been re-deleted as well. holly {chat} 20:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded file twice, Isabel II - Municipal Building and Plaza.jpg P. Hughes (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by StomboyCarGeek as Logo (above threshold of originality) Yann (talk) 21:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-textlogo. holly {chat} 20:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maria Buchinger died 2010, so how can this picture of unknown source be taken years after her death? Julius Senegal (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It could have been scanned and uploaded after her death. --2003:E0:F70F:B700:5DAC:F67F:FD17:9FEB 03:59, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but then I doubt that the uploader is the creator. What is the source of this photo? --Julius Senegal (talk) 08:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; first published on Facebook in 2016, three years before the upload here. @Buchinger Wilhelmi: if you are an official representative of Ms Buchinger's estate, then please see COM:VRT for instructions on how to verify your identity and to properly release this photo under a free license. Thanks. holly {chat} 16:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by its author as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Gamla svängbron Södertälje kanal öppning med båtar.jpg. Not an exact duplicate, and too old for G7, but  Delete anyways. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is this below the threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I think this would be above TOO even for the US. holly {chat} 21:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

under the description section of the video there is no Creative Commons license to allow use Diddykong1130 (talk) 23:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diddykong1130 It's licensed under Creative Commons. Search the video "Pat McAfee Announces New FanDuel Deal!" on YouTube and filter under Creative Commons. This video comes up. Do the research before nominating for deletion. Very frustrating. Pennsylvania2 (talk) 02:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're doing it based off the Youtube search function. Usually screen grabs from Youtube videos need to have the license information in the description of video itself where License is an actual section. In this case, your source URL is a link to Youtube short where it links itself to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHY99OOtqiI&t=0s&ab_channel=ThePatMcAfeeShow the actual full video which does not have the CC license. If it passes the review then cool and it's something good to know in the future using the search/filter function. Also, you're classifying it as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International when it should be categorized under youtube and undergo YouTubeReview. Diddykong1130 (talk) 03:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; the license has to be on the video page for us to verify it. Ordered a universal replace with File:Pat McAfee on The Pat McAfee Show 8.31.2022 (cropped).png. holly {chat} 21:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Italy has no FoP. This image may not constitute de minimis, as the statue is the main subject of the picture. I'm not sure whether this statue is PD. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 23:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Info, this appears to be it:Stele della Madonna della Lettera, finished in 1934. Designed by Francesco Barbaro, an engineer that I don't have a death date on and sculpted by it:Tore Edmondo Calabrò who died in 1964. Abzeronow (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Info I have created a seperate DR here for all the images in that category. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://web.archive.org/web/20160715201637/http://www.tre.it/