Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/11/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Duplicate of File:Hurricane Michael (30294529587).jpg StellarHalo (talk) 06:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Removing to rename a better file to this name TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 14:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @TheHaloVeteran2
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7. But it would be nice if you told us which better file you want to move here. Brianjd (talk) 14:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded By Mistake Jhun5486 (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Nudity . Not need in Wikipedia . Seengogo3 (talk) 06:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused censored image 103.31.154.245 17:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Thumb image without META data, likely a website capture. Pierre cb (talk) 04:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
empty kategory — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZellmerLP (talk • contribs) 16:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
cover books in copyright: https://www.planetadelibros.com/libro-preguntale-a-francisco-que-es-el-cambio-climatico/350883 Docosong (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:¿Qué es el cambio climático?.jpg” under ticket:2022111610013242. --Mussklprozz (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- The license came from the publishing house. Mussklprozz (talk) 22:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2023 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded by since-blocked sockpuppet of blocked user User:Yuiyui2001, a user with a history of problematic hoax/speculative content.
- File:Ph fil Maguindanao del Sur.png
- File:Ph fil Maguindanao del Norte.png
- File:PH Police Map.png
- File:Ph seal lanao del sur (1959).png
- File:Ph seal maguindanao (1973).png
Belbury (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
This is troll picture. This is not even Abdul Hamid II, but taken from a tv series. Also cropped from a meme video. Beshogur (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matr1x-101 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: The screenshot says "All rights reserved" —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Keep per VRT permission. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't see that. Thanks. If there's VRT it's a keep then. {userpage! | talk!} 18:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_endemic_to_Sulawesi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_у_Переславля-Залесского.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 04:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
COIN/Promotional. Possible copyvio. Too many related uploads recently from two accounts, possible publicity campaign. MexTDT (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright image - album art Evaders99 (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 03:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-free image and copyright violation. Legal notices: "The Website and each of its components (including text, comments, illustrations, images and trademarks) are protected by copyright, intellectual property or other applicable law." Mann Mann (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 04:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 04:38, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 04:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Obviously not the own work. Kursant504 (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Image of a living person from a copyrighted web site Leokand (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files come from bad Flickr user, questionable copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Delete I don't have any problem with the deletion for the reason given above. Fma12 (talk) 20:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files come from bad Flickr user, questionable copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I don't have any problem with the deletion for the reason given above. Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau, 26 October 2022
[edit]Self nomination. Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. Sorry for any inconvenience.
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (1).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (10).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (11).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (12).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (13).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (14).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (15).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (16).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (17).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (18).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (19).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (2).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (20).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (21).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (22).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (3).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (4).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (5).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (6).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (7).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (8).jpg
- File:Meeting of the President of Ukraine with the President of Guinea-Bissau in Kyiv 2022-10-26 (9).jpg
- File:Umaro Sissoco Embaló in Kyiv - 2022 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement.
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 01.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 02.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 03.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 04.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 05.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 06.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 07.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 08.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 09.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 10.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 11.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 12.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 13.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 14.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 15.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 16.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 17.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 18.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 19.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 20.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 21.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 22.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 23.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 24.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 25.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 26.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 27.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 28.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 29.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 30.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 31.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 32.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 33.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 34.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 35.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 36.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 37.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 38.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 39.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 40.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 41.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 42.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 43.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 44.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 45.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 46.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 47.jpg
- File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 48.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajitjadhav14 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Highly unlikely to be own work as claimed. Needs source etc to see if they could be PD. Not sure if all of them are in scope either
- File:Jadhav and son.jpg
- File:Vishwanathbuwa and son.jpg
- File:B v jadhav and v.jpg
- File:Jadhav f marrreg.jpg
- File:Vishwanath j.jpg
- File:V jadhav.jpg
- File:Untitled-copy.jpg
- File:Tomb rabdul.jpg
- File:Satkar j.jpg
- File:Pograms jadhav - Copy.jpg
- File:Mehfil v.jpg
- File:Jadhav v b.jpg
- File:Jadhav sangli.jpg
- File:Jadhav pograms j.jpg
- File:Jadhav mehfil.jpg
- File:Jadhav f.jpg
- File:Jadhav abdul.jpg
- File:Guru jadhav.jpg
- File:Bv pograms.jpg
- File:Bithak jadhav - Copy.jpg
- File:Bithak constet.jpg
- File:B v jadhav.jpg
- File:Abdul v jadhav.jpg
- File:Vishwanathbuwa.jpg
- File:Jadhav Vishwanathbuwa Famaliy - Copy.jpg
- File:Rv jadhavp.jpg
- File:Rvs jadhav - Copy.jpg
- File:Pandit rv v. b..jpg
- File:R v jadhav discipal.jpg
- File:Rv profael.jpg
- File:Performing jadhav.jpg
- File:Rv wife son.jpg
- File:Rv karyakarm.jpg
- File:Rv events.jpg
- File:Rv cast.jpg
- File:Rv and mefils.jpg
- File:Rv and fathaer.jpg
- File:Ramesh rv.jpg
- File:Ramesh prem rv.jpg
- File:Pogramas jadhav.jpg
- File:Odians rv.jpg
- File:Mefil pograms.jpg
- File:Jadhav pogram.jpg
- File:Jadhav events.jpg
- File:Discapal rav.jpg
- File:Discaipl jadhav.jpg
- File:Cast jadhav.jpg
- File:Bithak rv.jpg
- File:Bithak jadhav.jpg
- File:Rv prfomans.jpg
- File:Rv mefil.jpg
- File:Rv friends.jpg
- File:Rv dicapal.jpg
- File:Redios orkista.jpg
- File:Rajkot pograms.jpg
- File:Pograms jadhav.jpg
- File:Jadhav Vishwanathbuwa Famaliy.jpg
- File:Rv riyaz.jpg
- File:Jadhav family.jpg
- File:SwarMandir.jpg
- File:SWAR MANDIR.jpg
- File:Redio progmarms mumbai.jpg
- File:R. V. Jadhavi & his wife.jpg
- File:R.V.Jadhav & Smt. S.R. Jadhav.jpg
- File:Pandit Rajaram Jadhav.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files come from bad Flickr user, questionable copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Meaningless tropical cyclone track, unlikely to be in COM:SCOPE A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
L'article concernant M. Gäumann n'a pas été accepté sur Wikipedia. Cette photo doit être supprimée Laure Sonata (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
L'article concernant M. Gäumann n'a pas été accepté sur Wikipedia. Cette photo doit être supprimée. Laure Sonata (talk) 10:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Work under copyright by Renato Carvillani (died 1972) Culex (talk) 11:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Work under copyright by Renato Carvillani (died 1972) Culex (talk) 11:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. OOS
--Alaa :)..! 12:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Fred Lynch". VRT permission from Fred Lynch needed. MKFI (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder Little But Fierce Photography, LLC". VRT permission from photography studio needed. MKFI (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author jennymoloney.com". VRT permission from Jenny Moloney needed. MKFI (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution file missing adequate EXIF data, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 12:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing EXIF data, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope. cross wiki spam. previously deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
File from globally locked cross-wiki spammer. Previously deleted under this file name and multiple others (see for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pecy L.jpg). Marbletan (talk) 12:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, no description, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal file from globally locked cross-wiki spammer. Previously deleted many times under this file name and multiple others (see for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pecy L.jpg). Marbletan (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope. You can instead link to the website with these data. In addition, here is no source link. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot from the game https://store.steampowered.com/app/769950/Panzer_Strategy/, no permission. Belbury (talk) 15:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Work of Miró can't be uploaded to Commons: Miró died in 1983
- File:PM 147457 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147458 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147459 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147460 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147461 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147462 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147463 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147464 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147466 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147467 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147469 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147471 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147472 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147473 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147474 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147475 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147476 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147477 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147478 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147479 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147480 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147481 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147482 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147484 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147485 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147486 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147487 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147488 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147489 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147490 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147491 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147492 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147493 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147494 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147495 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147496 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147497 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147498 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147499 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147500 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147501 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147502 B Mons.jpg
Vysotsky (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Works by Joris Ghekiere
[edit]Works by Joris Ghekiere (1955-2016) are still under copyright.
- File:PM 147102 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147116 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147100 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147114 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147098 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147113 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147128 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147124 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147118 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147087 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147105 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147119 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147101 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147121 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147110 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147125 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147096 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147115 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147092 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147106 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147112 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147097 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147122 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147086 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147111 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147130 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147109 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147123 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147127 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147104 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147090 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147089 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147126 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147108 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147099 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147107 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147129 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147095 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147103 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147117 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147094 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147120 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147093 B Oostende.jpg
- File:PM 147453 B Mons.jpg
- File:PM 147451 B Mons.jpg
Vysotsky (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative of product package with probably unfree images, no permission. A.Savin 18:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused artwork of non-notable band (article deleted on cz.wp), no educational value, out of scope. And likely DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
The main subject is a photo, which is presumably copyrighted - I don't think this counts as de minimis or FOP. Mike Peel (talk) 20:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Does not look like own work, seems like old postcard. How old is it? What is source country – Italy or Germany? Is it anonymous work, maybe photographer's name is on backside? Taivo (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
_endemic_to_Sulawesi.jpg){kind=link}
_endemic_to_Sulawesi.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
don't want to publish it Raynton Rare'a (talk) 09:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
_endemic_to_Sulawesi.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Then why did you upload the photo here and put it under a Creative Commons license? Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
_endemic_to_Sulawesi.jpg){kind=link}
_endemic_to_Sulawesi.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
ingin menghapus file ini Raynton Rare'a (talk) 23:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep No new reason given for deletion. Past the window where G7 (uploader request to delete) would apply. —Tcr25 (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason for deletion; @Raynton Rare'a: please take a look at COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
do not want to be published on the internet Raynton Rare'a (talk) 09:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Then why did you upload the photo here and put it under a Creative Commons license? Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
do not want to be published on the internet Raynton Rare'a (talk) 23:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No new reason. Don't waste time requesting deletion again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 11:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Weil es sich um das alte Logo der Universität Salzburg handelt (Verwendung endete 2020). PLUS 2021 (talk) 15:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: old logos of notable institutions are kept for historical reasons. And still in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hierbei handelt es sich um das nicht mehr aktuelle, alte Logo der Universität Salzburg. PLUS Desk (talk) 12:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Krd 05:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Person died in 1995, cannot be own work of 2022 Drakosh (talk) 13:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
no evidence to be own work Каракорум (talk) 13:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Too little scale photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, tiny and useless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HanYuanTsao as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7, but unused. Delete. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, not a great photo, and these kids are presumably not notable (though if they are, someone should please speak up). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a precaution. Uploader’s only global contribution. Low resolution (960 × 1 280) and no camera metadata.
- Also, no useful filename, description or categories. Brianjd (talk) 02:18, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- And not used or linked from anywhere. Brianjd (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Warhammer 40,000
[edit]Per COM:TOYS, photographs of 3D models are considered recreations of copyrighted works of Games Workshop Group, PLC.
I've listed files where the focus was on figures and did not list photographs of dioramas or people working with models for the most part, but your judgement on what's covered and not covered may vary.
- File:Eldar Farseer.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 10.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 111.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 113.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 117.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 29.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 30.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 31.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 4.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 69.jpg
- File:Genestealer magus.jpg
- File:Igromir 2016 (29944325951).jpg
- File:Igromir 2016 (30016575446).jpg
- File:Iron Warrior Pascal.jpg
- File:Leman Russ by VirtualWof.jpg
- File:Necron Lord Tobias Bomm.jpg
- File:Space Marine Pat David.jpg
- File:Tau cadre fireblade beardilocks.jpg
- File:Tau cadre fireblade Dario Colasanti.jpg
- File:Tau Fire Warrior Paul Hood.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 11.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 12.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 13.jpg
- File:WH40K Blood Angels Tactical Marines.jpg
- File:Wh40k ork mekboy.jpg
- File:WH40K Space Wolf Intercessor.jpg
- File:WH40K Tyranid Carnifex.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
@Ytoyoda: Please refer to OTRS Ticket:2019082110004933 and Ticket:2019090410007569, which concerned a photograph of the same kind of a different Games Workshop game. Games Workshop does not consider that photographs taken by members of the public, hobbyists and customers constitute intellectual property owned by Games Workshop. See also a discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Warhammer AoS Lind.jpg. I believe the same legal reasoning can apply to this image. Kurzon (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Kurzon: Thanks for your response, and I agree that Games Workshop's IP policy should apply to all of the above photographs. Looks like I should withdraw my nomination then. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
I think someone should create a template for a copyright explanation that we can post in every image page of a Games Workshop image. Kurzon (talk) 09:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete Kurzon, Ytoyoda, it says above, "Games Workshop does not consider that photographs taken by members of the public, hobbyists and customers constitute intellectual property owned by Games Workshop". That doesn't speak to the point. The question here is not whether the copyright for the photographs belongs to the workshop but the copyright for the works which are shown in the photographs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Jesus Fucking Christ, what else could that Games Workshop lawyer have been talking about? Kurzon (talk) 04:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: These are not valid tickets, including for reasons described per Jim.
- These images are derivative works and there are two copyrights to consider: 1) the photograph itself and 2) the depicted toys. The quote "Games Workshop does not consider that photographs taken by members of the public, hobbyists and customers constitute intellectual property owned by Games Workshop" (emphasis added) speaks only to the photographs. It does not reference the depicted toys.
- Even if the tickets referenced the depicted toys, a mere policy position is neither a specific free license nor is it irrevocable. Per COM:L: "All copyrighted material on Commons (not in the public domain) must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose.". --Эlcobbola talk 18:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Warhammer 40,000
[edit]COM:TOYS and COM:DW. The Warhammer 40,000 miniatures, sets, and component designs are all copyrighted. I've tried to find evidence otherwise, but the closest I could find is Commons:Deletion requests/Template:GamesWorkshop (and the nomination above), where Jameslwoodward points out that Games Workshop hasn't released the copyrights (and the copyright of the photos isn't the issue). If there was some other discussion that accounts for so many straight-on, detailed photos of these figurines, I apologize for the mess, but I did not find it. I've tried to omit those with reasonable claims to de minimis (where the focus is on people playing the game, not the elements of the game themselves), and a few designs that are under COM:TOO. There are a few diagrams I was unsure about, and erred on the side of omission. There are a few drawings of masks, armor, etc., but all clearly derivative of the items themselves.
- File:An orc stands guard at the castle door.jpg
- File:Bjorn the fellhanded.jpg
- File:Death Mask of Sanguinius.jpg
- File:DeathGuardMarine.jpg
- File:E3 2011 - Space Marines (5834389075).jpg
- File:EldarFarseerVirtualWolf.jpg
- File:Eldarguardian.jpg
- File:Epicast Ork Stompa (50503250263).jpg
- File:Farseer Macha by Yeongho Kim.jpg
- File:Fuseur Modéle Cadien.JPG
- File:Fusil radian laser.JPG
- File:Fusil à pompe Mars.JPG
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 39.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 40.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 41.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 77.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 82.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 83.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 84.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 90.jpg
- File:Gamescom 2011 (6053438116).jpg
- File:ImperialFist2ndEd.jpg
- File:ImperialGuardsmanWH40KVirtualWolf.jpg
- File:Kanaev imperial fist cptn.jpg
- File:Keno mini wargame.jpg
- File:Kitbash Bloodthirster left (16098029388).jpg
- File:Model Expo Italy 2015 024.JPG
- File:Nathanial Garro.jpg
- File:Necron force deployment (8152672508).jpg
- File:Necron Immortal Eric Savage.jpg
- File:Ork Stormboyz Squad (18298740893).jpg
- File:Pistolet Laser Cadien.JPG
- File:Space Wolves Hellblaster VirtualWolf.jpg
- File:SpaceHulkTerminator1989.jpg
- File:Tau Cadre Fireblade Dario Colasanti.jpg
- File:Topaketa errunikoak 2011 0009.jpg
- File:Topaketa errunikoak 2011 0010 (cropped).jpg
- File:Topaketa errunikoak 2012 02 (cropped).jpg
- File:Two orcs.jpg
- File:Tyranid Warrior ric k.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 15.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 3.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 6.jpg
- File:Vienna, Games Workshop 9.jpg
- File:Vostroyen.jpg
- File:Wh40k.JPG
- File:Wikia-Gamescom-2017-Tuesday-126 (36340990020).jpg
- File:Армия гоат черных орков.jpg
- File:Армия орков и тао стрелков солдатики.jpg
- File:Армия тао солдатики.jpg
- File:Боевой орк солдатик.jpg
- File:Бойцы тао стрелки солдатики.jpg
- File:Капитан орк и стрелок тао.jpg
- File:Орк стрелок солдатик 2.jpg
- File:Орк стрелок солдатик.jpg
- File:Робот тао солдатики.jpg
- File:Хаосит солдатик.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Rhododendrites talk | 17:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- A few more which embedded the {{GamesWorkshop}} template but which weren't in the Warhammer 40,000 category (some of them my own uploads, having taken the template at face value):
- File:WH-AoS-lonnquist.jpg
- File:Games Day 2010 sh.jpg
- File:Wh40k painting miniature cropped.jpg
- File:River Troll (30411049453).jpg
- File:Hellhound (3227007554).jpg
- File:Red Scorpions Fellblade super-heavy tank (9622559109).jpg
- File:Deathwing Terminator w Assault Cannon, Stripped (8116680447).jpg
- File:Baseline gray (5651415259).jpg
- File:AoS Stormcast Eternal cropped.jpg
- File:AoS Stormcast Eternal.jpg
- File:Battlefleet gothic vongetunboom.jpg
- File:Operation Sci-Fi Con 2015 WH40K.jpg
- --Belbury (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Delete I looked at about ten of these, randomly selected, and they all are clearly derivative works of copyrighted toys. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Topaketa errunikoak 2011 0010 (cropped).jpg should not be deleted because none of the toys are shown in focus, in high resolution. They're barely recognizable at all. I think this image is passable under DE MINIMIS. Kurzon (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope 178.175.141.208 18:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS - unused, poor quality, no realistic educational utility or contribution above existing.
Эlcobbola talk 19:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I went looking for other photos of hairy buttocks, as I had not seen any before. I found Male Buttocks and Penis.JPG, Male Buttocks In Its Natural State.jpg, Back bend.jpg and Hairy Male Buttocks.jpg (which should be nominated for deletion too). These can be contrasted with, for example, the widely used A nude boy butt pic.jpg, where no hair is apparent.
- It was harder to find those images than it should have been, but now that I have found them, I agree that the images nominated here don’t add anything. Brianjd (talk) 14:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
This file still hasn’t been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Inkedman Dronebogus (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Krd Brianjd (talk) 15:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Under the Curse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are related to apparently non-notable band and appear to have been uploaded for promotional purposes.
Ixfd64 (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 66 followers on YouTube. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cretzulescu Palace
[edit]The architect Petre Antonescu died in 1965. At the time of his death the copyright term in Romania was 50 years pma, and during this term a copyright extension to 70 years was introduced in 1996. Therefore his works are still copyrighted and non-free until 2035. There is no real freedom of panorama in Romania either, since images of architecture may only be published for non-commercial purposes, so we can't use these photos.
- File:2017 Palatul Cretulescu fatada Cismigiu (1).jpg
- File:2017 Palatul Cretulescu fatada Cismigiu (2).jpg
- File:2017 Palatul Cretulescu fatada Cismigiu (3).jpg
- File:2017 Palatul Cretulescu fatada Cismigiu (4).jpg
- File:2017 Palatul Cretulescu fatada Cismigiu (5).jpg
- File:2017 Palatul Cretulescu fatada Cismigiu (6).jpg
- File:Bucharest - Kretzulescu Palace (19671317804).jpg
- File:Centru European pentru Invatamantul Superior (Palatul Kretzulescu); Str. Stirbei Voda nr. 39, Bucuresti sect 1.JPG
- File:Centru European pentru Invatamantul Superior, (2); (Palatul Kretzulescu) Str. Stirbei Voda nr. 39, Bucuresti sect. 1.JPG
- File:Centrul European pentru Invatamantul Superior (detaliu) (Palatul Kretzulescu) Str. Stirbei Voda nr. 39, Bucuresti sect. 1.JPG
- File:Palatul Kretulescu de pe Strada Stirbei Voda nr. 39, Bucuresti, sect. 1.jpg
- File:Palatul Kretulescu, Str. Stirbei Voda nr. 39, Bucuresti Sect. 1.jpg
- File:Palatul Kretzulescu 01.jpg
- File:Palatul Kretzulescu 02.jpg
- File:Palatul Kretzulescu 03.jpg
- File:Palatul Kretzulescu 04.jpg
- File:Palatul Kretzulescu.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_Str._Stirbei_Voda_nr._39,_Bucuresti_sect_1.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_(Palatul_Kretzulescu)_Str._Stirbei_Voda_nr._39,_Bucuresti_sect._1.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Palatul_Kretzulescu)_Str._Stirbei_Voda_nr._39,_Bucuresti_sect._1.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
De728631 (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cretzulescu Palace
[edit]Romania does not allow commercial freedom of panorama, and all these "safe images" – under free culture licenses – violate the copyright of the deceased architect w:en:Petre Antonescu. Since he is not yet dead for more than 70 years, this publicly-visible building is unfree. Included in the nomination are three old photos that do not show the building as the "accessory" or "not the main subject" manner.
- File:39, Strada Știrbei Vodă, Bucharest (Romania).jpg
- File:Bucarest, centro europeo di alta educazione.JPG
- File:Kretzulescu -Crețulescu- Palota. Fortepan 73420.jpg
- File:Helena Cretzulescu House, on Știrbei Vodă Street - architect P. Antonescu.jpg
- File:Helena Cretzulescu House, on Știrbei Vodă Street - view from the Cișmigiu Park.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dolj County Prefecture 1
[edit]The architect Petre Antonescu died in 1965. At the time of his death the copyright term in Romania was 50 years pma, and during this term a copyright extension to 70 years was introduced in 1996. Therefore his works are still copyrighted and non-free until 2035 2036 ("...shall be calculated from the first of January of the year following the author’s death" [1]). There is no real freedom of panorama in Romania either, since images of architecture may only be published for non-commercial purposes, so we can't use these photos.
- File:Centru, Craiova, Romania - panoramio.jpg
- File:Craiova - Prefectura judetului Dolj01.jpg
- File:Craiova - Prefectura judetului Dolj02.jpg
- File:Craiova-Prefectura - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Craiova-Prefectura - panoramio.jpg
- File:Prefectura 1.jpg
- File:RO DJ Prefectura (2006) DJ-II-m-A-08140.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_DJ-II-m-A-08140.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
De728631 (talk) 16:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
More files with buildings by the same architect:
From Category:Sinaia Casino:
- File:Casino (952192251).jpg
- File:Casino Sinaia (35571532673).jpg
- File:Casino Sinaia - Petre Antonescu.JPG
- File:Cazino parc.jpg
- File:Centrul International de Conferinte Casino - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Centrul International de Conferinte Casino - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
From Category:Dinu Lipatti House, Bucharest
- File:Casa dinu lipatii bd lascar catargiu.jpg
- File:Casa Dinu Lipatti - Vedere Laterala.jpg
- File:Casa Dinu Lipatti.jpg
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bucharest City Hall and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Accademia di Romania (Rome). De728631 (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
File:RO DJ Prefectura (2006) DJ-II-m-A-08140.jpg THe file is not within the copyright law because, there is an exception see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Romania: [The following are permitted] "(h) the reproduction, to the exclusion of any means involving direct contact with the work, circulation or communication to the public of the image of an architectural work, work of three-dimensional art, photographic work or work of applied art permanently located in a public place, except where the image of the work is the principal subject of such reproduction, circulation or communication, and if it is used for commercial purposes;" 1. The main subject of the picture is the the digging made by the mayor of Craivoa and a Komatsu hydraulic excavator. 2. The picture document the work taken place in 2005. The dig is not the work of the mentioned arhitect. And in no way the picture has as main subject the arhitectural work.
To whom it may concern: https://legeaz.net/spete-civil-iccj-2013/fotografii-drept-autor-folosire-ilegala-651-2013 http://www.euroavocatura.ro/jurisprudenta/3230/Imagini_preluate_de_pe_un_site_de_internet___Utilizarea_imaginilor_in_scop_comercial,_fara_acordul_autorului_si_fara_indicarea_sursei_de_unde_au_fost_preluate In the 2013 decision of ICCJ High Court of Cassation and Justice, the article 33 was not about the arhitectural work but about the photographic work. "ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE SECŢIA A I A CIVILĂ Decizia nr. 651/2013 Dosar nr. 7326/2011" https://legeaz.net/spete-civil-iccj-2013/fotografii-drept-autor-folosire-ilegala-651-2013
- Legestart nr. 2/2015
Studiu de caz: Condițiile în care se poate reține încălcarea dreptului de autor asupra unei fotografii de Mădălina Moceanu 26 februarie 2015
https://www.juridice.ro/410835/consideratii-cu-privire-la-dreptul-de-autor-in-cazul-operelor-de-arhitectura.html drept de autor de natură nepatrimonială, care înseamnă drepturile morale aferente calității sale de autor, respectiv: (i) dreptul de a decide dacă, în ce mod și când va fi adusă opera la cunoștință publică; (ii) dreptul de a pretinde recunoașterea calității de autor al operei; (iii) dreptul de a decide sub ce nume va fi adusă opera la cunoștința publică; (iv) dreptul de a pretinde respectarea integrității operei și de a se opune oricărei modificări, precum și oricărei atingeri aduse operei, dacă prejudiciază onoarea sau reputația sa; (v) dreptul de a retracta opera, despăgubind, dacă este cazul, pe titularii drepturilor de utilizare, prejudiciați prin exercitarea retractări (art. 10 din Legea nr. 8/1996). Aceste drepturi morale nu se pot transmite de către autor și autorul nu poate renunța la ele. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CristianChirita (talk • contribs) 07:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- @CristianChirita: I have to disagree with you. In this case, the image is obviously dominated by the building in the background whereas the digging only makes up for a minor part of the photograph. Therefore the de minimis exception you cited cannot be invoked. Moreover, the Romanian law prohibits any commercial use of architectural images, which is why can't keep them either. All uploads at Commons must be free to us for any purpose. De728631 (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dolj County Prefecture 2
[edit]Unfree building as its author, w:en:Petre Antonescu, is not yet dead for more than 70 years. Since Romania does not allow commercial COM:Freedom of panorama, all these freely-licensed photos are copyright violations. No indication of photographer-uploaders having secured licensing permits from the heirs of the architect. Nominated images show the building in a substantial or intentional manner.
- File:1976 City of Brasow, Romania.jpg
- File:Craiova 2017 (1).jpg
- File:Easter, Craiova, România, Prefectură, 2011 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Easter, Craiova, România, Prefectură, 2011 - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Easter, Craiova, România, Prefectură, 2011 - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Navigation Palace, Galați
[edit]All of these photos only show the unfree architectural work authored by w:en:Petre Antonescu, its architect who is not yet dead for more than 70 years. Romania does not permit commercial freedom of panorama; thus all of these commercially-licensed photos are copyright violations. The building is the only main subject of these nominated photos.
- File:Administratia Fluviala Galati - panoramio.jpg
- File:Gara fluviala Galati - panoramio.jpg
- File:Navigation Palace in Galați.jpg
- File:Navigationpalace1.jpg
- File:Palatul Navigatiei.JPG
- File:Palatul Navigatiei2.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
not free book cover Hladnikm (talk) 21:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TWISTERiON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Either copyright violations or out of scope, or both.
Yann (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://fennecfootball.com/equipe-dalgerie-la-valeur-marchande-du-tres-prometteur-fares-chaibi-explose/ Gaillac (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, no exif, same as his linkedin photo - https://uk.linkedin.com/in/ryan-ackroyd-510683173 - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted Christmas cards A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The image was available before 4 October 2022: archive copy at the Wayback Machine. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree that image was archived at The Internet Archive on 23 September 2022 with the CC-BY-4.0 license and is available as a alternative photo source. Ooligan (talk) 07:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Proof of upload before change to new license. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful: personal photo Uncitoyen (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:41, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:41, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo of non-contributor bdijkstra (overleg) 17:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DDL Advertising (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST/COM:ADVERT - apparently uploaded to promote non-notable firm (see also uploader name), no realistic educational value. May also be COM:DW of poster/ad.
Эlcobbola talk 17:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Not in use (personal image) Maltelunden (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request. File appears to be, and is described as, a personal image; it is unused and unlinked. Brianjd (talk) 02:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Seems well above the threshold of originality. The FC was founded in 2003, so the logo is far too recent to be in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment Yeah, if that logo is not above TOO, I doubt anything would be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
copyvio: https://twitter.com/franciscoactiv2/status/1527254255412862976 Docosong (talk) 22:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
copyvio: https://twitter.com/franciscoactiv2/status/1455268906818576386 Docosong (talk) 22:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio - low res, no EXIF, variants elsewhere before upload (here, here, etc.), other uploader copyvio (e.g., File:Durancantante.jpg), etc. Эlcobbola talk 22:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal drawing. No educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:41, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
requested by author Troutfarm27 (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request within 7 days. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
there ks a copyright watermark on the picture in the lower right corner, and in https://idrottsfoto.com/kontakt/ no Gregg is mentioned. most probably not own picture Albinfo (talk) 23:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The image was available before 4 October 2022: archive copy at the Wayback Machine. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Proof of upload before change to new license. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The image was available before 4 October 2022: archive copy at the Wayback Machine. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Proof of upload before change to new license. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, Source: https://www.blick.ch/people-tv/trotz-schwerer-erkrankung-kann-entwicklungshelferin-lotti-latrous-66-nicht-hier-leben-in-der-schweiz-starren-alle-nur-noch-auf-ihr-handy-id15678416.html Alpöhi (talk) 12:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the copyrighted sleeve of a 7-inch single but with inverted colours. See Discogs for original: https://www.discogs.com/master/286615-Ann-Wilson-Robin-Zander-Surrender-To-Me Ajsmith141 (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
It referenced from my Twitter account. I don't allow. Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 14:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If you host a public domain photo on your Twitter account, it doesn't become not public domain. That means you have no rights over the image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek I think the nominator simply objects to the Twitter link. Do we need a source link for a PD file? Can we just get rid of it? (The post that it links to is in Japanese; the translation provided there just says that it came from a book, which is not even identified.) Brianjd (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Historical image, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical image, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This drawing is a derivative work of a non-free photograph. The original may be seen here: https://terremoto.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Grant-Harman-Meillassoux-Brassier-700x461.jpg .
I am also nominating these cropped versions:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Genericusername57 (talk) 18:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:13, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of a photograph by Steve Pyke. The original may be seen here: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/american-moral-philosopher-judith-jarvis-thomson-news-photo/1271820079
Genericusername57 (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Can i do something more to get the logo accepted? it belongs to the company i work for and i wanted to place it at the lemma that i made for the company. thank you in advance Σοφία Τσιάμη (talk) 10:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Σοφία, you can upload https://discountmarkt.gr/wp-content/themes/sw-discount/assets/images/logo.svg which can be kept here using {{PD-textlogo}}. --Achim55 (talk) 10:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Question Did you do a web search on "Art Festival International in Riyadh"? I did, and it sure looks notable to me. Here are some examples of news coverage: Forbes, Yahoo Finance, and there are several results from Arab News and Gulf News. My only question would be whether the logo can be used under a CC license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Beats me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
サイズが大き過ぎる Whitemusk no1 (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand the deletion reason, which Google-translates as "too big." My questions would be: (1) Who is the subject, and is he notable? (2) Who took the photo, and is it really under a Creative Commons license? I also notice that the one category on this photo redirects to Category:Japan, which is way too general to be useful for any photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek The filename translates (via DuckDuckGo) as Promotional photos. The description is タレント宣材写真, which translates as Talent Promotional Photo. This is not promising. Brianjd (talk) 02:25, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Right. But I doubt the uploader took the photo in the first place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Low resolution (898 × 1,280) and no camera metadata. The uploader’s only other global contribution, 風葵.jpg (Windflower), is no better (resolution 595 × 595). Both files are unused and unlinked; the latter file has the same description and category as this one; it is not clear what either file is supposed to show. Brianjd (talk) 14:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Right. But I doubt the uploader took the photo in the first place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious licensing. --✗plicit 14:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
is exchanged against better quality image Jantryb (talk) 10:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
There is a similar and better version of this photo on Wikimedia. Nellaireb (talk) 09:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Most credited to patti miller. Unlikely to be own work as claimed
- File:Toronto Nights.jpg
- File:Wole Field.jpg
- File:Toronto 1.jpg
- File:New Size.jpg
- File:Wole Oguntokun.png
Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
It includes copyrighted artwork. This artwork likely is not de minimis, because the artwork represents a medium, but crucial part of the image. {userpage! | talk!} 19:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Based on how it is used, it appears that this photograph is merely intended to represent the interior design of the building. The paintings in the background are important to the image only insofar as they show how paintings are displayed; they are not large enough to allow for reduplication, as you can see by viewing the image (even at the greatest resolution) and looking to the paintings. For that reason, I would consider the paintings to be de minimis within this image, especially (as I have said) given the purpose of this photograph to depict the interior of the museum itself. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:TE(æ)A,ea. and COM:DM. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Не используется Kanekosasan (talk) 19:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't think this diagram is accurate. In this sequence, each tree must not be inf-embeddable in a later tree. The 13th tree is identical to the 14th one, so this image is incorrect and not educationally useful. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Incorrect licence (cc-by-sa). Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW, missing permission for original work. --Wdwd (talk) 10:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Source website does not seem to indicate a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
copyvio: https://www.eltiempo.com/politica/congreso/francisco-javier-vera-el-nino-que-hablo-en-el-congreso-445218 Docosong (talk) 22:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022111810008361 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio: https://www.instagram.com/p/CktwEs7LC9B/ Docosong (talk) 22:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ticket:2022111810008361 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence found at the source webpages for the CC-BY-SA copyright licence claimed by the uploader GeoWriter (talk) 23:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like most of uploaded images by this user have copyright problems. (For example source of this image[2] clearly shows NC licence) Have to tackle them later. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bilinichnus_simplex.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status is not found at first cited source webpage (trilobyte.ucr.edu). Copyright status at second cited source (www.researchgate.net) is "Copyright 2018 Geological Society of Australia". GeoWriter (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio. Low resolution (529 × 387) and no camera metadata. Uploader’s claims are not credible per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MagnusFIDEProfile.png. Brianjd (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: this picture was literally taken by me. Here is the literal proof of me snapping the picture (with faces covered). I am the literal copyright holder as there is pictorial and video evidence of me snapping the picture/s --NyMetsForever (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever Well, I guess that’s (sort of) proof of someone snapping the picture. So what? Of course someone snapped the picture (I don’t think it was generated by an AI or some super-realistic painter).
- Why is the file such a low resolution? Why is it in PNG format (which, of course, is why it has no camera metadata)? Why is there no information about the circumstances under which it was taken (not even a date)? Brianjd (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I do not understand the concerns. I took the picture on my phone when the event was happening this year, couple of weeks ago. I then sent it on discord to myself. I CROPPED IT, to exclude GM Hikaru Nakamura from it, and leave only Shawn, downloaded the picture on my desktop, uploaded it to Wikimedia commons. --NyMetsForever (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever In cases of doubt, we require evidence that the file is freely licensed. We prefer to have the original, uncropped image (which can then be cropped on Commons using CropTool) with camera metadata. If this is not possible for some reason, you may be able to provide evidence via VRT. Brianjd (talk) 13:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I do not understand the concerns. I took the picture on my phone when the event was happening this year, couple of weeks ago. I then sent it on discord to myself. I CROPPED IT, to exclude GM Hikaru Nakamura from it, and leave only Shawn, downloaded the picture on my desktop, uploaded it to Wikimedia commons. --NyMetsForever (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: What should I do? Where do you want me to upload the whole picture I shot from my phone. I still have it on my phone. --NyMetsForever (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever I now realise that Rodrigue-Lemieux’s opponent is notable in their own right, and that is even more of a reason to upload the original photo.
- Where should you upload it? Right here on Commons! You should not overwrite this file, but otherwise, it is basically up to you how you name it (as long as the name is meaningful). Brianjd (talk) 08:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: What should I do? Where do you want me to upload the whole picture I shot from my phone. I still have it on my phone. --NyMetsForever (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Here you can see the full picture. Please, close the deletion page, as I did nothing other than upload the picture I took myself. --NyMetsForever (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Convenience link: Rodrigue-Lemieux vs Nakamura.jpg
- @NyMetsForever This is better. But there are still two issues:
- It is only licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, not released into the public domain like the crop was. There is nothing wrong with that, but it is a bit odd. Was that intentional?
- It still lacks camera metadata. This might be a problem. We have to wait for an admin to close this discussion and see what they think of it.
- Brianjd (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- (The file descriptions need updating, but that is not relevant to this discussion.) Brianjd (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I uploaded it on my phone, and not on my desktop. That's why it might be different. Not sure what camera meta data looks like or how I can include it... I just snapped a pic on my phone and uploaded it. It's not anything unusual. --NyMetsForever (talk) 16:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Here you can see the full picture. Please, close the deletion page, as I did nothing other than upload the picture I took myself. --NyMetsForever (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
@NyMetsForever When I say camera metadata, I am referring to, for example, this data from Hikaru Nakamura Civitanova Marche Italy 2015.jpg:
| Camera manufacturer | Canon |
|---|---|
| Camera model | Canon EOS 70D |
| Author | GIORDANO MACELLARI |
| Copyright holder |
|
| Exposure time | 1/50 sec (0.02) |
etc. (scroll down to the bottom and look at the ‘Metadata’ section) Brianjd (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Camera metadata is not strictly required, but files without it are often seen as suspicious. It’s not up to me to make that decision; it’s up to an admin, when they get around to this deletion request. Brianjd (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: it was taken on a phone. I have no idea how to get my iPhone's meta data. --NyMetsForever (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever The metadata should be included automatically, unless you took specific steps to remove it. But some apps automatically remove this metadata, supposedly to protect the users’ privacy (ignoring the fact that some users want to retain the metadata). Brianjd (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: As of now, are you still in favour of having the image removed? --NyMetsForever (talk) 03:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever The metadata should be included automatically, unless you took specific steps to remove it. But some apps automatically remove this metadata, supposedly to protect the users’ privacy (ignoring the fact that some users want to retain the metadata). Brianjd (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. @NyMetsForever: Please follow Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_VRT?. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
It's said that it's an own work of the uploader, but also that the author is UOL, a private internet portal. So it doesn't seem to be under a CC license Paladinum2 (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation - Permission of photographer is missing Barbasca (talk) 16:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_%D1%83_%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D1%8F-%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D1%83_%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D1%8F-%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copy of File:Barschevsky-0451.jpg with incorrect licensing Drakosh (talk) 16:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Not a bad portrait, but I know from experience that portraits of non-notable people have to be better than this to be kept, regardless of what I think about that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Percentage of Wins.png
- File:2nd Starting 11, Players not mentioned are subs..png
- File:1st Line-Up Combinasion.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 17:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 screenshot, inelegible undet the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 17:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is an image of a poster of Luisa Toledo, temporarily on display in a public place in Chile. As such, it is not subject to Chilean law on freedom of panorama. No provenance given for the image on the poster; my guess is that it postdates Toledo's death in 2021, but in any case it can't pre-date Toledo's time as a public opponent of Pinochet, which was less than 70 years ago, so it's still under copyright in Chile. DS (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Also applies to the uncropped version (and yes, I know I should have done the DR on the uncropped original, oops). DS (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
This is not "own work", but a screenshot. It contains copyrighted photo of Magnus Carlsen. It has not been released under any free license. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as copyright violation.
- The file is correctly described as Magnus Carlsen page from FIDE online website, but also claimed to be the uploader’s own work. It contains the nonsensical tag
{{Free screenshot|{{AGPL}}}}(as far as I can tell, no part of the FIDE site is released under any free license). This gives me no faith in any other uploads by this uploader; I will nominate their other upload for deletion too. Brianjd (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: hi. This is a witch-hunt and forgets to assume good faith. Other wikimedia files contain similar tags, and I thought screenshotting it made it partially my work. If I was wrong, I apologize. --NyMetsForever (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever I didn’t nominate your other upload for deletion just because of what I wrote above. I gave specific reasons for that other nomination too. I would have nominated that other upload anyway, even if this discussion did not exist.
- Other Wikimedia files contain similar tags where they actually apply. This tag clearly does not apply here.
- Claiming that a screenshot is (partially?) your own work is an understandable mistake, but doesn’t explain all the other issues. Brianjd (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: hi. This is a witch-hunt and forgets to assume good faith. Other wikimedia files contain similar tags, and I thought screenshotting it made it partially my work. If I was wrong, I apologize. --NyMetsForever (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I did not know the correct etiquette. I initially thought that I could ascribe the thing as my own work. Then I was warned that it wasn't, so I went to other wikimedia files that are screenshots, and copied their permission tags, thinking that that would solve the problem. I do not understand why bad faith is being assumed right away, when there are simple explanations. --NyMetsForever (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @NyMetsForever I didn’t actually say that you were acting in bad faith (and I don’t think you are after seeing your Wikipedia contributions), but it is very difficult to understand how your contributions to Commons could be made in good faith. I can only assume you are copying tags from one file to another without actually reading them. Can you see how that, taken in isolation, looks like you are acting in bad faith?
- As stated in the warnings you have received, Commons takes copyright very seriously. Next time, please ask for help before uploading. Brianjd (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I did not know the correct etiquette. I initially thought that I could ascribe the thing as my own work. Then I was warned that it wasn't, so I went to other wikimedia files that are screenshots, and copied their permission tags, thinking that that would solve the problem. I do not understand why bad faith is being assumed right away, when there are simple explanations. --NyMetsForever (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- It lacks a license, but the uploader can provide it, no need of speedy deletion.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 11:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @TaronjaSatsuma If the uploader adds a suitable public domain or license tag within 7 days of the ‘no license’ tag being added, then the file will not be deleted. Otherwise, it is correct to delete the file.
- The ‘no license’ tag was working exactly as intended. Why did you challenge it? Brianjd (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- It was a speedy deletion template.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 15:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- @TaronjaSatsuma Yes, it is a speedy deletion template. It is supposed to be, per COM:CSD#F5. I still don’t see the problem. Brianjd (talk) 08:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- It was a speedy deletion template.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 15:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing license. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 11:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- It lacks a license, but the uploader can provide it, no need of speedy deletion--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 11:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: still missing license. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Photo of non-free 2D work. Not OK per COM:FOP Hong Kong. Wcam (talk) 11:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- you doesn't go to hong kong disneyland to see it, the real evidence in there : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhpvPFx6VuU 任晏延 (talk) 11:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mdaniels5757 as no permission (No permission since) Mussklprozz (talk) 12:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- We do have a valid permission now, per Ticket:2022111610000032, but I doubt whether this specific image is within Commons:Project scope. Mussklprozz (talk) 12:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Mussklprozz Is it the same Mason Ewing as in fr:Mason Ewing, which seems to have been significantly edited by users other than the uploader and lacks a deletion tag?
- I picked that article because I saw that the uploader had contributed to it, but it is also available at the English Wikipedia, among others. A quick glance at the English Wikipedia’s reference list suggests that the subject easily meets the Wikipedia notability standard.
- On a completely separate note, the only other braille book I found in my quick search was Рельефно-графический альбом по истории архитектуры Санкт-Петербурга.jpg, which is a different kind of image to the one nominated here; this image might be within scope for that reason alone. Brianjd (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Someone will probably point out that this is not a braille book, but an audiobook with braille on the cover. Whatever. The point is that I haven’t see any similar images. Brianjd (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm reply as the one who uploaded this image. The cover contains only the Braille lettering with black ink. These ones are not printed in real Braille. I mean that a blind person cannot feel the volume of the letters. That's only here to show the Braille to the sighted persons, that's a not a Braille book. This version is for paper, not audio. The cover of the audio version is different. Ewingmason (talk) 15:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ewingmason Then perhaps it shouldn’t be in the category Audiobooks? Brianjd (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think so because this cover is especially for the paper version. The audio version has another cover page. Ewingmason (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ewingmason This is useful information that should be added to the file description. The file should also be categorised correctly.
- Regardless of whether it’s real braille or not, I think it is interesting and the file is worth keeping for that reason. Brianjd (talk) 01:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ewingmason Then perhaps it shouldn’t be in the category Audiobooks? Brianjd (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per discussion and w:Mason Ewing, though the autobiography should probably be mentioned there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 01:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I see a reasonable educational purpose in illustrating the cover of the autobiography of the person described at the English Wikipedia's Mason Ewing article. The autobiography should probably be at least mentioned in there, so I think it's reasonable given that we have permission for it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: now with valid permission; In my opinion in scope too. --Wdwd (talk) 12:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Skyroot is private company, so the images are not your property Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Chinakpradhan COM:TOO India is similar to COM:TOO US. {{PD-textlogo}}? Brianjd (talk) 12:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Huntster @Ohsin may help Chinakpradhan (talk) 11:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Logos tend to get removed from Commons. Perhaps uploading a low resolution version of it on Wikipedia is better idea. Ohsin (talk) 12:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohsin What do you mean by logos tend to get removed? As far as I can tell, Commons is happy to host logos provided that they are free (see above) and of notable subjects (this one is, being in use at en:Skyroot Aerospace, whose reference list suggests that the subject is indeed notable even by Wikipedia standards). Brianjd (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I was referring to general guideline here. I see many Logos fail the TOO but I am not aware of how it is accessed, so I'll leave it to others to figure that out. Ohsin (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohsin It is true that copyrighted logos tend to get removed, as they tend to not be freely licensed. But that doesn’t apply to public domain logos. Brianjd (talk) 13:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- i would advise something like File:Polaris Dawn logo.png if allowed under {{PD-textlogo}} @Brianjd Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohsin It is true that copyrighted logos tend to get removed, as they tend to not be freely licensed. But that doesn’t apply to public domain logos. Brianjd (talk) 13:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I was referring to general guideline here. I see many Logos fail the TOO but I am not aware of how it is accessed, so I'll leave it to others to figure that out. Ohsin (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohsin What do you mean by logos tend to get removed? As far as I can tell, Commons is happy to host logos provided that they are free (see above) and of notable subjects (this one is, being in use at en:Skyroot Aerospace, whose reference list suggests that the subject is indeed notable even by Wikipedia standards). Brianjd (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Logos tend to get removed from Commons. Perhaps uploading a low resolution version of it on Wikipedia is better idea. Ohsin (talk) 12:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Huntster @Ohsin may help Chinakpradhan (talk) 11:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as PD-Textlogo. --Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
COPYVIO https://www.gubkin.ru/general/rukovodstvo/rectorat/Lobusev.php Bilderling (talk) 08:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Didn't you see VRT permission on the page? Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bilderling When a file is also found elsewhere on the web, it suggests that the uploader just copied it from there, violating copyright.
- But what if the file is not copyrighted at all, or the uploader is actually the copyright owner, or someone else is the copyright owner but they actually gave permission? You need to check these things. You need to read the file description. Brianjd (talk) 12:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 12:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: , can I ask to close this speedly? Don't see a subject for discussion, it's a simple mistake because of this ticket wasn't published in ruwiki. Thought to do it myself, but Brianjd wants do everything by the rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lvova (talk • contribs) 12:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Lvova: It is not just me. An admin opened Commons:Deletion requests/File:System interface.jpg to challenge a speedy copyvio nomination, even though that file also has a VRT tag. Brianjd (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, permission via VRT/ticket. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
is exchanged against better quality image Jantryb (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing also the file name for the "better quality image"). --Wdwd (talk) 13:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This instrumental version is copyrighted by the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra. It should be reverted to the previous file in all articles. Tidjani Saleh (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- The source was not downloaded and uploaded from Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra.
- The sound source is from LordDaine.
- * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wqk475JIaeM&ab_channel=LordDaine
- * Western Sahara * / Sahara Occidental* (HD)
- And I uploaded it by referring to Western Sahara WTM.
- * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdzge-0FAjs&ab_channel=WesternSaharaWTM
- * Western Sahara National Anthem
- I did not extract and upload from Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra, so this work has no copyright issue.
- This raises an objection to the request for deletion. --Benohight214 (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Rosenzweig. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
A formal PR picture clearly taken by a photographer. This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (such as this one, where the name of the photographer is clearly mentioned). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- I UPLOADED THE PIC AND HAVE A SIGNED RELEASE DOC FROM THE PERSON WHO TOOK THE PIC. HOW SHOULD I UPLOAD IT?
- THANKS Tofach1990 (talk) 09:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:מאיה קוסובר.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022112310004382. — Tulsi 24x7 09:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused, flipped from the original.
- File:Rishi Sunak official portrait as MP for Richmond (Yorks) (cropped).png
- File:Rishi Sunak official portrait as MP for Richmond (Yorks).png
- File:Rishi Sunak official portrait - flipped (cropped).png
- File:Rishi Sunak official portrait - flipped.png
_(cropped).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Neveselbert (talk) 06:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bauakademie (Berlin)
[edit]In Germany, freedom of panorama is only valid for works permanently installed in one place.
- File:2013-07-30-bauakademie-berlin-musterfassade.jpg
- File:Bauakademie 1466.JPG
- File:Bauakademie.jpg
- File:Bauakademie2.JPG
- File:Berlin 2016-04 Bauakademie 01.JPG
- File:Berlin 2016-04 Bauakademie 02.JPG
- File:Berlin Friedrichswerdersche Kirche Bauakademie.jpg
- File:Berlin, Bauakademie, Demonstration NIK 7665.jpg
- File:Berlin, Mitte, Schinkelplatz, Bronzestandbilder Beuth, Schinkel, Thaer 02.jpg
- File:Berlin, Mitte, Schinkelplatz, Bronzestandbilder Beuth, Schinkel, Thaer.jpg
- File:Schinkelplatz.JPG
- File:Berlin 2012 (080).jpg
- File:Mitte Schinkelplatz.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Lukas Beck (talk) 06:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose with regard to my picture "Bauakademie 1466.JPG". I have added PD-old as license for the reproductions. Alle reproductions are public domain. Therefore Keep. Pictures like this are important documents to the archtectural newer history of Berlin.--Kresspahl (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- According to de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium „bleibend“ this was probably "permanently" installed in one place. It was installed 2004 and remained many years. --2003:E4:5F23:7400:42B0:76FF:FE7B:15B2 09:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I just looked up the section of FOP... in my (German) understanding, the shroud over the building was as permanently used as it is the nature of such a shroud. Also, the shroud showed a replica of a public domain appearance of the building. Ziko van Dijk (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In its verdict on the publication of photos of the "Wrapped Reichstag", the Bundesgerichtshof ruled in 2002 that the limitation of freedom of panorama in Germany in relation to non-permanent works of art in the public sphere "mainly relates to fixed-term exhibitions and similar presentations" ("geht es [...] vor allem um zeitlich befristete Ausstellungen und Präsentationen"). The Wrapped Reichstag had such a time limit (two weeks), therefore it was not legitimate to publish photos of that piece of art without a license. In comparison, the "Imitated Bauakademie" had no such time limit, at least not that I'm aware of. As someone pointed out above, this wrapping was in place for many years. In my reading of the Bundesgerichtshof ruling, requesting the deletion of photos of the "Imitated Bauakdemie" is absurd. Jörg Zägel (talk) 16:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also to consider: The photos I created (those with "Beuth, Schinkel, Thaer" in the title) are not even focused on the Bauakademie but on the statues in the foreground. The Imitated Bauakademie is merely "background noise" ("Beiwerk"). A request for deleting them is the attempt to enforce an extremely expansive reading of the relevant limitation of freedom of panorama in Germany, one that is, as far as I am aware, unsupported by the courts in our country. Jörg Zägel (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a packaged object, but a document of great historical importance, fixing the process and one of the stages of recreating the most important architectural monument --Capitolium4025 (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. There are two main arguments for keeping these images: First, if we think that the wrapping depicting a historical appearance of this building is copyrightable at all, we can assume a "permanent" installation for the duration of the wrapping's existence; it was not a fixed-term installation such as Christo's Wrapped Reichstag. Second, if the wrapping is just depicting the original, public domain design of the building by Schinkel, it seems highly likely that it should be considered a public domain reproduction anyway, not an original, copyrighted work of art. The posters also don't seem to contain any copyrightable elements (an old, public domain portrait of Schinkel, and simple text). So, as I see it, even if the installation wouldn't be considered "permanent", there would be nothing copyrighted in it. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Overview is incorrect! Christian Historical Union got not 6 but 8 seats, and total was not 98 but 100. The uploader (Elector Factor) is globally locked so that user can not fix it anymore. Robotje (talk) 18:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I'll accept the nominator's assertion that this unused file is factually wrong. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Not free image. Not shown any confirmation that this foto was published anywhere more that 70 year ago and it was made anonymously. Kursant504 (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Cat image of unknown source sloppily cut and pasted onto poor quality background. Low encyclopedic value, doesn't even depict the correct habitat for this species. Boylarva99 (talk) 15:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Unused map created and maintained by various sockpuppets of blocked user User:Yuiyui2001, a user with a history of problematic hoax/speculative content. Belbury (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Error en imagen, falta el texto 'Gáldar Ayuntamiento' puede verlo en http://galdar.es/imagencorporativa Olivertacoronte (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Low quality photo with no exif, unlikely to be own work, PCP Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Trivially different from fourth image on http://lordludd.com/editions/hanky-code Umimmak (talk) 07:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Also cf. File:Official Modern Hanky Code.jpg and File:Modern Hanky Codes.jpg Umimmak (talk) 09:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a copyvio to me (mainly in terms of the text; I don't think putting the colors in the same order is a copyright issue, but copying this much text more or less verbatim is). - Jmabel ! talk 00:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 04:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Although this file qualifies for speedy deletion under COM:CSD#G7, perhaps it should be kept because it explains where 111-SC-24320 - NARA - 55208247 (cropped) (cropped).jpg came from (the latter file is in use at en:Lawrence Tyson).
- @Berserker276 It would have been better to overwrite the file when doing the second crop. Brianjd (talk) 12:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- But that isn't what someone did. So, under the circumstances Keep. - Jmabel ! talk 00:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- But that isn't what someone did. So, under the circumstances
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Neutral but leaning towards delete. It's still technically true that the cropped cropped image was from this image, and this was a PD image so it's not like a CC one where the actual attribution is required to be there but it's minor. We could move the cropped cropped image to this cropped one but that's probably a bad file rename reason. Do it for the sake of being courteous to the uploader. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn’t help that all three files display {{Please-do-not-overwrite-original-files}} (via {{NARA-image-full}}). I have fixed this by adding the parameter
Derivative=yesto the crops. Brianjd (talk) 06:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per uploader request, who perhaps was not aware at the time it is possible to upload a cropped version with the same title. --Ellywa (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded .svg version Jugoton logo.svg EmiliaITČA (talk) 06:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use on the projects and therefore COM:Redundant. --Ellywa (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Creative Commons on EXIF.
- File:AASB Staff 17.jpg
- File:Carl Rose AASB 02.jpg
- File:Alaska Pipeline 47.jpg
- File:Alaska Pipeline 36.jpg
- File:Alaska Pipeline 29.jpg
- File:Alaska Pipeline 22.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Why would you make a nomination like this for an uploader's own work? He has re-uploaded versions which fixed that problem, if there ever really was a problem in the first place. While I've found it difficult to communicate with him, I'm wondering if you even bothered to take that approach first.RadioKAOS (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- @RadioKAOS: Before accusing people you should verify that there has been no "communication", which is untrue. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept, new versions are uploaded. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello I'm not sure if this is the correct place to respond so please forgive me if that is the case. Immediately after being notified of this minor editing error on my part I addressed it. Since I work both on Flickr and Wikimedia and sometimes concurrently, and have different 'Copyright' production imprint for both, this is how it happenened. Gillfoto 17:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
These are good photos that I would really like to keep; I just closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:O Earth Day Protest.jpg. Unfortunately, they might be copyright violations.
The photos all show high school students holding posters at climate protests. When I closed the other DR, I thought that the posters shown in O Earth Day Protest.jpg (which are mainly text) were PD or at least de minimis, so no problem. But now I realise that decorated poster on the left might be a problem. In the other files, the copyrighted elements are even more prominent. There is no freedom of panorama for posters in the US.
I hope that the uploader can somehow get permission from the authors of the posters, but otherwise, these files probably need to be deleted.
Brianjd (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- O Earth Day Protest.jpg contains only three posters, which fill the image, which is why I am not sure about de minimis. And I just noticed that its caption, We're on Thin Ice - Fight For Our Future, specifically draws attention to that decorated poster on the left, which further weakens any de minimis argument. Brianjd (talk) 11:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Now it also occurs to me that the first two files can be saved by cropping out the posters with copyrighted decorations. But the last file, which focuses on just one poster, probably can’t be saved unless the copyrighted decoration is de minimis. Brianjd (talk) 11:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Well I must say I'm shocked and somewhat disturbed, at this late date I will endeavor in contacting the High School to seek their permission. How to do you suggest I submit transmission of their approval? Is there Politics at play here on Wikimedia? Gillfoto (talk) 07:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Gillfoto I don’t like this any more than you do; I am simply applying copyright law (which I have no control over) as I understand it. I am no expert on copyright, and would be happy to have my understanding corrected. But I find the idea that I am playing politics here offensive.
- Who is/are the copyright owner(s)? I assume that protestors usually make their own posters (which would normally make them the copyright owners), but apparently the US has funny ideas about school students being forced to assign their copyrights to their schools. I don’t know whether that applies here.
- Commons generally expects the copyright owner (not you) to submit permission to VRT. Brianjd (talk) 07:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission received, regrettably. Perhaps the protesters might see the deletion and sent their permission. Please follow in that case the procedure described in VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Photograph by JEAN-CLAUDE DELMAS, AFP. Does PD-Iraq apply? HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: It is not known whether the photo has been published in Iraq and on which date. Therefore it is not shown per COM:EVID this photo is in PD, and therefore the photo must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 23:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
missing evidence of permission. There's a copy + pasted email on the file description page, but this needs to be emailed to VRT for it to be valid. FASTILY 22:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- the uploader says that he is the author, there is no indication that that suggests otherwise. The pasted email on the file description page also suggests that. We usually don't require an VRT email for "own work" of good faith contributors. Therefore keep --Isderion (talk) 23:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This file was tagged with {{Npd}} by VRT member Fastily twice and subsequently removed each time by Isderion. There is some relevant discussion related to it at User talk:Fastily#File:Siglind Bruhn.jpg and this DR was started based on that discussion. Consent/Permission emails copied and pasted into file descriptions on file pages used to be allowed before VRT was established for third-party verification purposes, but such a thing no longer seems to be acceptable except in the case of COM:GRANDFATHERed files. This file was uploaded well after the GFF cutoff date, any consent verification is going to need to be done by COM:RELGEN or by sending a COM:CONSENT email to VRT. The uploader of the file still seems to be active on German Wikipedia (at least as of October 14, 2022); so, I don't think it's unreasonable to ask them to more formally verify their consent assuming that they are the copyright holder of the file. However, I don't think the "own work" claim is as clear as Isederion does, and feel this is something that should be discussed. I don't understand German, but Google Translate translates the email on the file's page into English as follows:
Assuming that "siglind" is the subject of the photo en:Siglind Bruhn (see also de:Siglind Bruhn) and "Meinolf" is the uploader of the photo Meinolf Wewel, it's not clear why Bruhn's consent would even be needed unless she's is somehow claiming to copyright ownership over the photo. Copyright ownership over the photo typically belongs to the person taking the photo and not the subject of the photo. If the the uploader is the copyright holder, this email seems meaningless for Commons purposes. If the email was uploaded as proof of the uploader taking the photo, on the other hand, the same thing could be done in a much better way per RELGEN or CONSENT. Another thing that is of a concern, at least to me, is that there appears to be some discrepencies in the EXIF between the date the file was created (December 4, 2008), and the dates of the email from Bruhn to the uploader and the date the file was uploaded (both are May 8, 2010). The resolution is also pretty low which might also indicate it was modified in some way prior to upload or taken from some other source. Perhaps this not such a big deal, but it is another things that could be easily resolved through VRT verification. If the consensus, is to assume good faith here，then that's fine. It seems to me though that there should be some way of verifying the email exchange between subject and copyright holder other than simply going by what's written on the file's page, particularly since the file appears to have been used at least once outside of Wikimedia here. It's attributed so it's clear YouTube got the photo from Commons, but there are other different apparently copyrighted photos of Bruhn that can also be found being used online; so, it seems that if Commons has the only free one, every effort should be made to verify its licensing -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Dear Meinolf, I consent to the photo you recently took of me being published on Wikipedia Commons "under the GNU Free Documentation License". siglind
Kept: per remarks of Marchjuly. Actually no reason to think this photo was not made by the uploader (not active on Commons since 2021). The camera used is a consumer model. The email is possibly meant to avoid problems with personality rights. --Ellywa (talk) 23:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
