Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![191 File:Кімнати в гуртожитку Люботинської школи "Дивосвіт".jpg](#File:Кімнати_в_гуртожитку_Люботинської_школи_"Дивосвіт".jpg){kind=link}
![192 File:Їдальня Люботинської школи "Дивосвіт".jpg](#File:Їдальня_Люботинської_школи_"Дивосвіт".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
This photo's license is bogus and is not mentioned on the source page whatsoever. Seeing as this photo is from this century, it is not in the public domain. As such, this file should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Given source reads Bell Media grants you a limited non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use and display on your computer or other electronic access device, the Content and Services for your own personal and non-commercial use only, provided that you do not modify the Content and that you maintain all copyright and other proprietary notices. which means NC ND.--Achim55 (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Achim55 (talk) 07:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AHeistwithEgeSamil (talk · contribs)
[edit]A kid's signature, a fictional logo and a fictional flag. Out of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has a sockfarm blocked at enwiki.
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PrincipalityofGalland (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AHeistwithEgeSamil by the sockmaster: a kid's signature and a couple of fake images. The United States of Mihadia does not exist. User is blocked as a sock on enwiki.
- File:United States of Mihadia flag.jpg
- File:United States of Mihadia coat of arms.png
- File:Ege Şamil signature.svg
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CartoonNetworkUS, fictional logos by a user already blocked for socking on enwiki. The modified Tesla logo here appears to be the uploader's own design.
- File:Tesla Industries.png
- File:Kayo Landscape billboard.jpg
- File:Kayo Automotive.png
- File:Kayo Automotive logo.png
- File:Ladlecoin.png
- File:Hometown Party.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
uploaded by accident Avinash V. Pandey (talk) 18:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
uploaded by accident Avinash V. Pandey (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. Leonaardog (talk) 00:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Leonaardog
Keep Exif says author is US Embassy Kyiv, a part of US State Department, part of US Federal Government, so public domain. Flickr account is the official account of US Embassy in Kyiv.Copyvio, why? Tm (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Porque o licenciamento no Flickr é uma licença que não é compatível com o Commons, você não acha? Eu pensei que era Copyvio de alguma forma. -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Next time, instead of opening another (good faith) deletion request, just because of what it might say, see what the license template says, instead of wasting the time of other people. Tm (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Porque o licenciamento no Flickr é uma licença que não é compatível com o Commons, você não acha? Eu pensei que era Copyvio de alguma forma. -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Publicity or website capture without META. Likely copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Or COM:DW of unsourced astronomy photo at best. DMacks (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
publicity photo taken from social media https://twitter.com/ericnamofficial/status/1482780033093488641 Evaders99 (talk) 20:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The chemical structure has errors. There is a methyl group and a double bond missing on the side chain and all the stereochemical information is missing. I have creeated a replacement based on CAS# 115-61-7, File:Tachysterol.svg. Innerstream (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oliviamaintec (talk · contribs)
[edit]Multiple logos of a non notable company
- File:Maintec Technologies Raleigh NC USA.png
- File:Maintec Technologies 2021.png
- File:Maintec Technologies Inc.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag for sandbox project. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag for sandbox project. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag for sandbox project. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag for sandbox project. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag for sandbox project. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CartoonNetworkUS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE as logos of fictional companies apparently invented by the uploader, who has been blocked for socking on enwiki for making articles about Ege Şamil. Google mostly turns up other open wikis (Comician Studios is a film studio and a subsidiary of Comician. The company was founded by Ege Şamil., Ege Şamil is the creator of many important productions such as Far Enough, Miracle Friends and The Samsonadzes. And currently working with Mundonika)
The Tesla and Discovery Channel logos do not seem to be ones that those companies have ever used.
- File:Pitt Cola.png
- File:Marmellow.png
- File:Tesla.png
- File:McMoreno's.png
- File:Far Enough.png
- File:Animation Planet.png
- File:Mundonika.png
- File:Laager Roader.png
- File:Discovery logo.png
- File:MacLaren's Pub.png
- File:Comician Studios.png
- File:Forelsket.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarianoVaccari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarianoVaccari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
- File:Telefono v2.png
- File:Mail v2.png
- File:Graphic designer v2.png
- File:Mariano v2.png
- File:X background.png
- File:Numero telefono.png
- File:Mariano vaccari.png
- File:Indirizzo mail.png
- File:Graphic designer.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, promotional SPAM. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarianoVaccari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial designs. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cirilo Sanchez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional and obnoxiously watermarked images outside of COM:SCOPE.
Marbletan (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
unused,no description : out of scope advertising for a non notable society Ske (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality diagram, not used, not acceptable serif font, SVG and PNG alternatives available in Category:Formamide. Wostr (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality JPG, wide margins, proper SVG and PNG alternatives in Category:Formamide, file not in use. Wostr (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal userbox image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused signature of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram with little context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot of text, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional poster and DW, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused collage without clear purpose, COM:WEBHOST, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, illegible, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kiro Hanna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.
- File:Differences in Diseases.pnj.png
- File:Differences in Diseases .png
- File:Differences in Diseases.png
- File:Source- Adapted from (Wu & Wu, 2012).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulrich Lieber (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional product images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res icon without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional product image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional product image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional marketing images and infographics, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:Fig.1 Epos IP functional architecture vert.png
- File:Fig.5 EPOS IP concept.jpg
- File:EPOS timeline tot 800.png
- File:EPOS ERIC.png
- File:INGV.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Quality is too low to be useful. Also not really in scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Quality is too low to be useful. I could see almost nothing in the photo. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused logo of non-notable company. Only two Google hits. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Alvaro Romano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos.
Ixfd64 (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be a personal photo. Not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low quality image. I could barely tell what it is supposed to show. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded as a joke per this edit. It also appears to satisfy COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Greco Roberts
[edit]- File:Electoral College 2020(Mock).svg
- File:ElectoralCollege(mock).svg
- File:Electoral College 2016-3.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege(Alternate).svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2016(Mock B).svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2016(MOCK).png
- File:2016 Electoral College Map (Mock Election).png
- File:Electoral College 2016 (a).svg
- File:Electoral College 2016.png
- File:Electoral College 2016.jpg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files by User:Greco Roberts. Fictional "alternate History" maps an private photos. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 22:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" flag. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST: Low quality out of scope photos.
- File:Asian feet.jpg
- File:洗手台的水.jpg
- File:男性的乳頭.jpg
- File:Bathroom floor.jpg
- File:A man's buttocks.jpg
- File:一位勃起的男性陰莖.jpg
Mys_721tx (talk) 03:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Libdolittle (talk · contribs)
[edit]All claimed as own work but none have exif. Looks like promo shots - needs OTRS
- File:Oduma E.JPG
- File:BROWN BERRY.jpg
- File:ODUMA ESSAN.jpg
- File:FLEXY DA DON.jpeg
- File:Flexy Da Don.jpg
- File:Kolw.jpg
- File:BOBBY CRAIG.jpg
- File:Slayone.jpg
- File:Elisha boie.jpg
- File:Wayo pic.jpg
- File:Slay.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:19, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ShimSuryeon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not own works, no evidence of public domain or a free license.
- File:Meenakshisundaram Kalyanasundaram.jpg
- File:Maya Thevar.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 2000s.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 2014.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 1999.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 2011.jpg
- File:Jayalalithaa in 2006.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 2001.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 1994.jpg
- File:Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu J Jayalalithaa in 1991.jpg
- File:J Jayalalithaa in later 1980s.jpg
- File:Jayalalithaa standing by the mortal remains of MGR at Rajaji hall on 24 December 1987.jpg
- File:Jayalalithaa at the funeral procession of MGR on 25 December 1987.jpg
- File:V. P. B. Paramasivam.jpg
- File:V. K. Sasikala with Jayalalithaa in 1980s.jpg
- File:S. Ramassamy.jpg
- File:Kadambur R. Janarthanan.jpg
- File:P. Dhanapal.jpg
- File:D. Jayakumar.jpg
- File:P.H. Pandian.jpg
- File:K. Kalimuthu.jpg
- File:Munu Adhi.jpg
- File:Actress Vindhyaa.jpg
- File:V. K. Sasikala Natarajan.jpg
- File:R. B. Udhayakumar.jpg
- File:S. Gokula Indira.jpg
- File:B Valarmathi.jpg
- File:V. R. Nedunchezhiyan, Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.jpg
- File:V. R. Nedunchezhiyan.jpg
- File:V. N. Janaki Ramachandran.jpg
- File:A. Tamil Magan Hussain.jpg
- File:Actress Vindhya.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
-- Add two more
- File:Jayalalithaa in Raman Thediya Seethai Movie 1972.jpg
- File:Actress Jayalalithaa in Raman Thediya Seethai Movie 1972.jpg
VRT ticket received but not own work as described. Ww2censor (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
-- All are my own work
Hi all, I would like to ask for the proof of exif meta or other data to show that images like File:B Valarmathi.jpg are all not my own work. These images are created and enhanced by me. You can check the most with google image search. ShimSuryeon (talk) 16:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- On Wikimedia Commons, the charge of the proof is on the uploader. These are official pictures of various dates and places, so you have to show that you are the photographer. Yann (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}} license. The horn-like structures on either side of the image are clearly complex graphics that go beyond the threshold of originality ✗plicit 01:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Press shot, similar angle images online all credited to Laurent Gillieron (http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/Switzerland-Soccer-UEFA-Youth-League-Final/66fda20d7b47437bad4b68936bccfcec/3/0, https://www.rfi.fr/pt/mundo/20220426-futebol-benfica-arrecadou-uefa-youth-league) Lord Belbury (talk) 08:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality gif file, not used, plus with this style the charge should be outside the brackets. In de.wiki it is now properly depicted with '2' before the anion. Wostr (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. File:Permanganat-Ion2.svg should be used instead. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 23:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
want to change new photo 58.127.101.116 03:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. If you want to change the photo, then upload a new one. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as explained by SHB2000. --Platonides (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be copyvio, uploaded as own work but appears on this page [1] with attribution to Getty Crowsus (talk) 04:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Original found at https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/scotland-striker-steve-archibald-pictured-in-his-umbro-news-photo/1064170430 "Photo by Allsport/Getty Images" with a source of "Hulton Archive". Platonides (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Platonides (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copy of File:Japan Colours of Japan (12001098323).jpg Le Loy (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete You're right, Thanks. I'm sorry I didn't notice. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Platonides (talk) 00:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Katharinaiv (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete: {{PD-Japan-exempt}} does not apply to Japanese stamps but {{PD-Japan}} is the correct tag per Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Japan, so being 1972 stamps they are copyright until 2023. This uploader needs to be much more careful when choosing the copyright tags because many stamps have been deleted as copyright violation by using incorrect tags.
- File:JAP 1972 MiNr1140 pm B002.jpg
- File:JAP 1972 MiNr1138 pm B002a.jpg
- File:JAP 1972 MiNr1139 pm B002.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katharinaiv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted: Not a mean of payment. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Liechtenstein#Stamps and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/11#Stamps of Liechtenstein.
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1712 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNrBl0023 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1710 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1709 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1708 mt B002.jpg
- File:FRA KT 1937 MiNrB0129 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1707 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1705-1706 ST mt B005.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1703-1704 ST mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2014 MiNr1702 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1931KB mt B002b.jpg
- File:FRA 1932 MiNr0276 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1932 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1941 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1940 Mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNrBl0033 mt B003.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1946-1949 ZD mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1950SD mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1950 mt B003.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1958 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1957 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1955 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1954 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1956 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1926 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1925 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1924 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1896 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1895 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2016 MiNr1823SD mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2016 MiNr1823 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1930 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1929 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1928 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNrBl0034 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2018 MiNr1927 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2017 MiNr1885 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2017 MiNr1884 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2017 MiNr1874 mt B002.jpg
- File:BDI 1967 MiNr0383A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1939 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1938 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1937 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1936 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2004 MiNr1357 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1997 MiNr1154 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2004 MiNr1362 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1233 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1231 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1230 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1232 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1229 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1996 MiNr1136 pm B002.jpg
- File:YAR 1969 MiNr0998A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNrBl0032 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1935 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1934 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2019 MiNr1933 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1244 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1243 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1242 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1241 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1228 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1227 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1234 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1123 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2001 MiNr1282 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2001 MiNr1281 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1122 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1121 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 2000 MiNr1224 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1120 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1119 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1118 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1117 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1116 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1115 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1114 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1113 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1112 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1111 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1110 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1109 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1108 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1107 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1106 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1105 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1104 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1995 MiNr1103 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1102 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1101 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1100 mt B002.jpg
- File:SWA 1973 MiNr0371 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1099 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1098 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1097 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1096 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1095 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1094 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1093 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1092 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1091 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1090 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1089 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1088 Mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1087 Mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1086 Mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1085 Mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1084 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1083 mi B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1082 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1081 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1080 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1994 MiNr1079 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1078 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1077 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1076 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1075 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1074 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1073 mt B002.jpg
- File:QSH 1967 MiNr0111A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1072 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1071 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1070 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1069 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1068 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1067 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1066 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNrBl0015 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1064 mt B001.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1063 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1062 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1061 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1060 mt B002.jpg
- File:SWA 1973 MiNr0370 pm B002.jpg
- File:UYA 1967 MiNr0087A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1059 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1058 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1057 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1056 mt B002.jpg
- File:QSH 1967 MiNr0114A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1055 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1993 MiNr1054 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1053 mt B002.jpg
- File:QSH 1967 MiNr0112A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1052 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1051 mt B002.jpg
- File:QSH 1967 MiNr0113A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1050 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1049 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1048 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1047 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1046 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1045 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1044 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1043 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1042 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1041 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNrBl0014 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1038 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1037 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1036 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1035 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1034 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1992 MiNr1033 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1032 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1031 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1030 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1029 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1028 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1027 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1026 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1025 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1024 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1023 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1022 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1021 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1020 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1019 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1018 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1017 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1016 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1015 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1014 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1013 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1012 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1991 MiNr1011 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1010 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1009 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1008 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1007 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1006 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1005 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1004 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1003 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1002 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1001 mt B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2708-2709 pm B002.jpg
- This one should be labeled {{PD-old-100}} (see Category:Recibimiento de los Reyes Católicos a Colón). Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr1000 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0999 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0998 mt B002.jpg
- File:PGY 1979 MiNr3145-3147 pm B002.jpg
- This one should be labeled {{PD-old-100}}. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0997 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0996 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0995 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0994 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0993 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0992 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0991 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0990 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0989 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0988 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0987 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0985 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1990 MiNr0984 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0983 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0982 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0981 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0980 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0979 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0977 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0976 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0975 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0974 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0973 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0972 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0971 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0970 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0969 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0968 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0967 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0966 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0965 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0964 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr963 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0962 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0961 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0960 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0943 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0959 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0958 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0957 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0956 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0955 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0954 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0953 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1989 MiNr0978 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0952 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0951 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0950 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0949 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0948 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0947 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0946 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0945 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0941 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0940 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNr0939 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1988 MiNrBl0013 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0936 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0935 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0934 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0933 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0932 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0931 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0930 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0929 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0928 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0927 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0926 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0925 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0924 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0923 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0922 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1987 MiNr0921 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1912 OSDdesigns II mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1912 OSDdesigns Mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1951 MiNr0300 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1951 MiNr0292I pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1951 MiNr0290a pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1951 MiNr0289 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1948 MiNr0264 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1948 MiNr0260 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1948 MiNr0257 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1946 MiNr0250 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1930 MiNr0099A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1930 MiNr0097A pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1930 MiNr0095B pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1920 MiNr0011 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1920 MiNr0042 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1920 MiNr0040 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1921 MiNr0053A pm B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1925 MiNr0064 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1927 MiNr0067 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1939 MiNr0174 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0215 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1934 MiNr0127y pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0211 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1941 MiNr0201 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1941 MiNr0200 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0222 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0154 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0152 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1934 MiNr0135 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0161 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0160 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0158 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0157 pm B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0156 mt B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1937 MiNr0163 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0221 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0219 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0220 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1943 MiNr0218 mt B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0237 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0236 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0235 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0234 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0233 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0232 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0230 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0229 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0228 pm B002.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0227 pm B002a.jpg
- File:LIE 1944 MiNr0244 pm B002a.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete most: I always been concerned by the "means of payment" claim for these and some other stamps uploaded by the same editor. Some of these stamps may well be PD being old paintings with a simple frame and text, such as File:BDI 1967 MiNr0383A pm B002.jpg, File:PGY 1979 MiNr3145-3147 pm B002.jpg, File:YAR 1969 MiNr0998A pm B002.jpg and File:NIC 1986 MiNr2708-2709 pm B002.jpg. However, File:FRA 1932 MiNr0276 pm B002.jpg should not even be included in the nomination as it is definitely PD. The designer and engraver, fr:Paul-Albert Laurens (1870-1934) and fr:Jean Antonin Delzers (1878-1943) are dead long enough and it's licensed as PD. Ww2censor (talk) 16:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Not all stamps are from Liechtenstein. This deletion request should be limited to Liechtenstein stamps, as the rationale is about Liechtenstein law. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Some of the older Liechtenstein stamps are out of copyright, for example all stamps in Category:Stamps by Matthäus Schiestl. All stamps older than 70 years should be excluded from this deletion request. They must be handled on a one-by-one basis. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I have examined all of these by category and a few more individually. Note that in a few cases, the stamp showed a PD-Old sculpture which was out of copyright, but the photo is still under copyright. I kept those where the designer has been dead since before 1949.
- Stamps by Stephanie Keiser
- Stamps by Cornelia Eberle
- Stamps by Hans Peter Gassner
- Stamps by Bruno Knöpfli
- Stamps by Armin Hoop
- Stamps by Stefan Erne
- Stamps by Peter Vogel
- Stamps by Rene Wolfinger
- Stamps by Sereina Giger
- Stamps by Karin Beck
- Stamps by Silvia Ruppen
- Stamps by Peter Vetsch
- Stamps by Manfred Näscher
- Stamps by Bruno Kaufmann
- Stamps by Iris Heeb
- Stamps by Marianne Siegl
- Stamps by Otto Zeiller
- Stamps by Walter Strebel
- Stamps by Nico Cadsky
- Stamps by Ernst Steiner
- Stamps by Ursula Kühne
- Stamps by Martha Griebler
- Stamps by Walter Oehry
- Stamps by Hansjörg Anderegg
- Stamps by Martin Frommelt
- Stamps by Louis Jaeger
- Stamps by Sojung Kim McCarthy
- Stamps by Regina Marxer
- Stamps by Ewald Frick
- Stamps by Gerhard Gloser
- Stamps by Paul Flora
- 1992 Stamps of Liechtenstein
- Stamps by Josef Schaedler
- Stamps by Georg Malin
- Stamps by Martin Häusle
- Stamps by Johannes Troyer
- Stamps by Josef Seger
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katharinaiv (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete :There is no evidence the license {{PD-NI-exempt}} applied to these stamps is valid for Nicaraguan stamps per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Nicaragua#Stamps or that they even comply with the terms of the license. As signatories to the Berne Convention probably 70 years pma is the term, possibly from creation as we don't have any records of the designers of these stamps.
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2725 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2724 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1981 MiNr2188 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1981 MiNr2186 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1981 MiNr2185 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1981 MiNr2184 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1981 MiNr2183 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1981 MiNr2182 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2649 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2648 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2647 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2646 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1986 MiNr2645 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1086 MiNr2644 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2940 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2939 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2934 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr2990 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr2989 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr2988 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr2987 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr2986 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr2985 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1985 MiNr2558 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1985 MiNr2557 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1985 MiNr2556 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1985 MiNr2555 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1985 MiNr2553 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1985 MiNr2554 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2865 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2864 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2863 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2811 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2810 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2809 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2808 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2807 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1983 MiNr2404 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1983 MiNr2405 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1983 MiNr2402 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1983 MiNr2401 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1983 MiNr2400 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1982 MiNr2277 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1982 MiNr2276 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1982 MiNr2275 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1982 MiNr2274 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1982 MiNr2272 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1982 MiNr2273 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2787 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2784 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3009 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3014 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3013 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3011 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3010 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3012 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1990 MiNr3008 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2848 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2844 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2849 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2847 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2846 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2845 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIN 1988 MiNr2843 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2744 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2742 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2741 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2740 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2738 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1987 MiNr2739 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1977 MiNr1977 mt B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNr2478 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNr2477 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNr2472 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNr2476 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNr2475 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNr2473 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2965 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2964 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2963 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2962 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2961 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2960 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1989 MiNr2959 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2858 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2857 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2856 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2855 pm B002a.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2854 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1988 MiNr2853 pm B001.jpg
- File:NIC 1983 MiNr2350 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1984 MiNrBl0159 pm B002.jpg
- Manually added
- File:NIC 1964 MiNr1368 pm B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1975 MiNr1840 mt B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1976 MiNr1950 mt B002.jpg
- File:NIC 1976 MiNr1948 mt B002.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katharinaiv (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete these stamps were designed by Georges Hourriez (1878–c1952) (his name is at the bottom middle of the stamp) and according to this website, that lists many of the French stamp designers and engravers, https://www.phil-ouest.com/Timbres.php?Cas=Artiste&ListeMots=Hourriez&Ordre=DateVente he died in 1953, so his works are copyright until 2024. Also see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France#Stamps.
- File:Stamp 1928 France New Caledonia MiNr0137 mt B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1930 France Wallis&Futuna MiNr0043 mt B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1928 France New Caledonia MiNr0136 mt B002.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 09:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2024. --Rosenzweig τ 07:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katharinaiv (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete According to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Spain#Stamps Spanish stamps are copyright to the designers and are copyright for a minimum of 70 years pma, some even 80. I have not nominated stamps issued in the 1930s or 1840s but these to may still be in copyright. Some stamps may reproduce specific public domain painting and these might not be copyright violations.
- File:Stamp 1976 Spain MiNr2247 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 Spain MiNr2748 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1951 Spain MiNrZC56 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1951 Spain MiNrZC55 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1973 Australia MiNr531I pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1978 Spain MiNr2396 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1990 Spain MiNr2519y pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1990 Spain MiNr2518y pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 Spain MiNr2517y pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain MiNr2309x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1981 Spain MiNr2490x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1980 Spain MiNr2450x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1982 Spain MiNr2305y pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 Spain MiNe2659 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain MiNr2307x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain MiNr2306x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain MiNr2282x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain MiNr2280x mt B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1977 Spain MiNr2279x mt B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1976 Spain MiNr2241a pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1976 Spain MiNr2239x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1976 Spain MiNr2238x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1976 Spain MiNr2237x pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1975 Spain MiNr2195 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1975 Spain MiNr2197 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1956 Spain MiNr1083 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1055 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1053a pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1052 pm B002.jpg
- File:StamP 1956 Spain MiNr1082 pm B002.jpg
- File:StamP 1956 Spain MiNr1081 pm B002.jpg
- File:StamP 1956 Spain MiNr1080 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1050a pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1049 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1048 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1047 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1045 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1044 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1043 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1042 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1041aI pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1040 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1974 Spain MiNr2120 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1969 Spain MiNr0850C pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1949 Spain MiNr0869Ca pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1939 Spain MiNr0831 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1952 Spain MiNr0848C mt B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1955 Spain MiNr1046 pm besch B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1968 Spain MiNr1744 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1975 SpainValencia MiNr0ZD7 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1973 SpainValencia MiNr0ZD6 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1971 SpainValencia MiNr0ZD5 mt B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1968 Spain MiNr1741 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1969 Spain MiNr1796 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1968 Spain MiNr1743 pm b002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1966 Spain MiNr1600 pm B002b.jpg
- File:Stamp 1968 Spain MiNr1740 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1968 SpainValencia MiNr0ZD4 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1964 SpainValencia MiNr0ZD2 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1963 SpainValencia MiNr0ZD1 pm B002.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Isn't the stamp from this public domain image of Franco: File:Retrato Francisco Franco 1964 (cropped).jpg? If the image is public domain, so would the image on a stamp. --RAN (talk) 05:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) You may well be correct. Perhaps I should have included or photograph in the statement Some stamps may reproduce specific public domain painting and these might not be copyright violations. Ww2censor (talk) 05:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted License {{PD-SpanishGov}} is completely wrong for stamps. These designs are copyrighted 80 years pma. Of the above I left only File:Stamp 1969 Spain MiNr1796 pm B002.jpg, File:Stamp_1968_Spain_MiNr1743_pm_b002.jpg, File:Stamp 1966 Spain MiNr1600 pm B002b.jpg and File:Stamp 1968 Spain MiNr1740 pm B002a.jpg (plus the Australian one), as they are the only ones clearly based on PD paintings. Platonides (talk) 00:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
CC BY-NC-ND License according to PDF. FunkMonk (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Gone unnoticed by me. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 06:54, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
CC BY-NC-ND License according to PDF. FunkMonk (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unnoticed by me. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 06:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This file contains explicit content in the form of a male human genital. Previously this file was used as image for former Chilean president Sebastián Piñera only. As far as I can tell, this file has no educational purpose, but used as trolling tool only. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Collage of unsourced photos combined for apparent personal joke/troll/insult. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
I did confuse a background source as the planet Meli thev (talk) 00:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. Leonaardog (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Leonaardog Keep Exif says author is US Embassy Kyiv, a part of US State Department, part of US Federal Government, so public domain. Flickr account is the official account of US Embassy in Kyiv.Copyvio, why? Tm (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete@Tm: PD-USGov don't exempt its copyright status in Ukraine, so as a FOP Not OK country, you have to demonstrate that why it's also public domain in Ukraine. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- What FOP? Since when persons are covered by FOP? Tm (talk) 11:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Tm; no evident problem. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
unused logo copied from internet without permission https://www.facebook.com/lafabriqueducomedienstagestheatre/ Ske (talk) 02:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false claims, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Spelling mistake: missing acute on Cádiz. The category with the correct spelling has been created, see Category:Pseudobasilicas in the province of Cádiz.--Ulamm (talk) 23:09, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and redirect per COM:CATRED. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- As you can see from my plea above, the correctly spelled category already exists.
- If we should have redirects from simplyfied spelling (without accent signs) to all categories containing names with accent signs, there were thousands of such categories, and they would spoil the survey.--Ulamm (talk) 09:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ulamm: What survey? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- The content of each category is displayed as a list. Reading such a list can give us some information. That is, what I have called "survey".--Ulamm (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ulamm: What survey? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Kept as redirect (to ease usage for those using accentless keyboards etc) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
The rope is flying in the air, so this can't be a selfportrait. "Own work" is uncorrect, could be a Copyvio 79.192.229.77 06:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep They could have given their camera to someone else to take a photo, and it's COM:INUSE so it's in scope. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- If they gave their camera to someone else, the author would be the someone else Platonides (talk) 01:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image in use in multiple projects. Timers on cameras are common and easy to use; allegation that this can't be "own work" not supported. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio unlicensed content Leonaardog (talk) 00:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- I received written permission from the creator to post it, not sure how to indicate that. Can you advise?-Evansknight (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- All rights reserved this type of licensing is incompatible for use on the Commons you have to be careful not to send Copyrights when searching Flickr for images with free license use the Use the Commercial use images option to find a free license image. Also read about the rules Commons: License -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Evansknight: The person that upload the image to Flickr can change the license at Flickr or they can fill out an OTRS/VTS form declaring the change in license. Best to change at Flickr. --RAN (talk) 02:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Evansknight (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/33784579@N05/39027623280 is licensed under All Rights Reserved. --Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
May I request to please delete my uploaded image of Rhenz Abando, a basketball player from the Philippines. HelloWorldNavigator (talk) 02:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; not clear that uploader had right to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Penis photos by Anppp
[edit]- File:勃起始めの男性器の様子.jpg
- File:男性器（横写真）.jpg
- File:男性器（正面図）.jpg
- File:包茎.jpg
- File:勃起している男性器の横写真.jpg
- File:男性器の背面図.jpg
- File:男性のオナニー.jpg
Random penis photo, out of project scope 219.78.190.46 04:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and same with others, I am not sure why this one is random, that would mean that our other penis images are "targeted"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs)
- see COM:PENIS for a detailed description of what is meant by "random" here. These images simply described as "Erecting male genitalia" don't provide additional value to the ones we already have.
- 包茎 is being translated by Google as "phimosis", which might provide additional value to File:包茎.jpg, but it's probably either a mistranslation or a misnaming, since it's the same subject as File:勃起している男性器の正面図.jpg
- so Delete
- Platonides (talk) 00:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree, we need a wide variety of ethnicities to avoid racial bias in the category. I am not sure what more you are looking for in a description, we probably have 10x the number of images of cats and dogs to penises. --RAN (talk) 04:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete all. (Does not prejudge relisiing individual images for reason of quality). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Found on the web incl https://www.servidoresdecristo.org/sobre-nosotros/ - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Артём 13327 (talk) 10:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
non-free logo but maybe below TOO rubin16 (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. In addition, Celepker's is not mentioned in en.wiki, so the logo can be out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope. The uploader's blocked as a sock now and this seems to be a personal hoax image, going by the their SPI history on enwiki: Creating drafts with unattributed copying from other articles, then immediately reducing them into nonsense stubs about "Ege Şamil". The only Google result for "Celepker's" is a blogspot blog claiming that "Celepker's is an American fast food chain founded by Ege Şamil."
- Other uploads from this user also look a little off. File:Tesla.png doesn't seem to be a real Tesla logo, and a lot of the other uploads seem to be logos for non-existent brands, all "own work". Perhaps these should all be nuked. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Now put up for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CartoonNetworkUS. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This 42 second .gif video I uploaded is not necessary anymore, because I just uploaded a .webm version of it (higher quality & smaller file size) at "File:C. elegans with pencil for scale.webm". Also re-linked it to any articles that contained the .gif. Thank you, jonsta247 Jonsta247 (talk) 13:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
orphaned talk page. Larryasou (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate, redundant, artists decision Croppy Peace Sign (talk) 15:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry I uploaded a duplicate of File:Fluent_Emoji_color_1f947.svg (
). I didn't know it was already uploaded QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 17:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
My mistake, should have been SVG version, which I can't create. If another user could, that's fine, but till then, don't need this. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no license. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio unlicensed content Leonaardog (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete, no free license at the declared source. No indication that this is a Scottish Government work or that {{OGL3}} applies. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Speedy delete This page submitted was a copy of another file with the same name but under a jpg format. I made this page due to the initial confusion between the two formats, as i thought it was only one page. It would be better to use the JPG file. Kaliper1 (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be a hoax image, no such artist on Amazon Music. Uploader looks to be part of a sockfarm of User:AHeistwithEgeSamil. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HolmesBrowser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Redrawing logos and characters from TV doesn't make them free. Please see COM:DW.
- File:The Blacksmith Logo.jpg
- File:Superboy Poster.jpg
- File:Luluwa Clothing Logo V3.jpg
- File:Luluwa Clothing Version 2.jpg
- File:Luluwa Clothing.jpg
- File:DeploKid Logo.jpg
- File:DeploKid.jpg
- File:Honeyblood Logo.jpg
- File:MUGO Logo.jpg
- File:KademeInfinite.png
- File:Brave Bear.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HolmesBrowser (talk · contribs)
[edit]As with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DMAXTV and others, these are unused fictional logos from a sockpuppet of User:AHeistwithEgeSamil.
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
inappropriate content Maudev1 (talk) 15:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
File:5lcc26a7grlodjigrdf7g2l456 2022-04-10 1523190 us-sassuolo-vs-atalanta-bc-2469-1024x683.webp
[edit]
copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 16:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Nehme1499 (talk) 18:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 16:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source picture has been deleted Gag0409 (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW of painting; evidence of permission from artist needed. No FoP for paintings in India. Эlcobbola talk 18:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a video--see visual characteristics (including bar at top), low res, no EXIF, user has history of screenshot copyvios (e.g., File:Sagar Karande.jpg), etc. Duck/PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Bogus self/cc claim - football club logo appears well above TOO; further, source provided by uploader is the local en.wiki version, where it is claiming fair use. Эlcobbola talk 18:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: promotional photo with credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. And also included:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have express permission from the photographer to use these two photographs. He has released them under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Mrgorsky (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:PDH2022.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022090510005688. --Ww2censor (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)- There is an VRTS email received for “File:PDH 268.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022090510005688. --Ww2censor (talk) 10:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:PDH2022.jpg” under ticket:2022090510005688. --Ww2censor (talk) 14:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:PDH 268.jpg” under ticket:2022090510005688. --Ww2censor (talk) 14:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Williamferreiraam (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Maps marked with CC-BY-NC (non commercial). Incompatible license.
- File:PIB per capita Poder de Compra América Latina 2021.png
- File:Homicide rate in Brazil.png
- File:Taxa de homicídio Brasil.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Williamferreiraam (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Not own works but taken from the internet.
- File:Aeroporto de Coari.png -- seen in this Nov. 2021 video at 1'22"
- File:Festival de Parintins.jpg
- File:Vista aérea da cidade de Parintins.jpg -- published here in Nov. 2019
- File:Catedral Nossa Senhora das Mercês, Porto Nacional.jpg -- found here in larger resolution
- File:Catedral de Coari, AM.jpg -- twittered here back in 2018
- File:Praça do Cristo de Coari.jpg -- uncropped version credited to Antonio Iaccovazo
Couldn't conclusively find File:Festival de Parintins.jpg, but clearly, this is an unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
yeniden düzenleyeceğim Lazım47500 (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 21:24, 16 September 2022 UTC: Media without a license as of 11 August 2022 --Krdbot 00:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Children drawing. Out of SCOPE. We have a lot nice pictures of subject here. Shakko (talk) 20:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE, it's in use in German Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Miniwark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of an architectural monument not yet in the public domain, & no Freedom of panorama in France. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete no FOP in France, this building is still under copyright, see Category:Centre Georges-Pompidou PierreSelim (talk) 20:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
delete, wrong person, name is not used. Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soporte Ameritec (talk · contribs)
[edit]Provided by author - needs OTRS. And scope?
- File:Obra 3.jpg
- File:Victor Adolfo Dardon.jpg
- File:Obra 2.png
- File:Obra 1 “ Las estaciones “.jpg
- File:Victor Adolfo Dardon.png
Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Same as their twitter pic, no meaningful exif, i think we need OTRS. PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder Valery Tenevoy as per metadata, permission required. Xunks (talk) 08:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Metadata says: Copyright holder Valery Tenevoy. CC-BY 4.0. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Имею письменное разрешение от правообладателя работы. Но удаляйте бех лишних обсуждений, коль это принесёт вам счастье :) GMStudio (talk) 06:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022081310003523 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear source and licensing & doesn't look like the uploader's self published work. The uploader had uploaded multiple non-free files from other sources to Commons. Pphongpan355 (talk) 06:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:31, 12 October 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 12:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Government logos in the U.S. state of West Virginia are copyrighted and are not presumed available under a free license. This file is a vectorization of a raster logo that is above the COM:TOO in the United States (c.f. Car Credit City logo variant). I see no evidence of permission from the copyright holder of the original raster work, so the derivative work that is a faithful copy of the original work cannot be hosted on Commons for reasons of copyright. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. And not notable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: found here uploaded in 2017. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This is my work and the site is so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amr vignesh (talk • contribs) 19:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
The image is uploaded under CC-BY-SA 4.0 international, but the source for the page does not appear to contain that license. I cannot easily find the copyright card for this specific issue of Captain America, but I have found registrations and renewal records for Captain America comics first published in the 1940s. As such, I believe that this comic book cover is copyrighted in the United States and unavailable under a free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
the pic is copyrighted https://www.businessinsider.com/flores-joins-greene-and-boebert-in-having-referenced-qanon-2022-6?r=US&IR=T AwkwardChester (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Children drawing. Out of SCOPE. We have a lot nice pictures of subject here. Shakko (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: In use. --Kadı Message 17:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Tahsin Kuzu, Umut Özgün Ergün & Cemil Uygül Fenerbahçe women's basketball vs Samsun Canik Belediyespor TWBL 20181216.jpg
[edit]
I request that the person with the shirt on the left hand be deleted here without my visual permission and knowledge. Umutozguner (talk) 23:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete: Per request Zafer (talk) 23:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: User:Umutozguner, You need to contact with Commons:VRT. The explanation which is placed here is not adequate for deleting. --Kadı Message 17:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, proof of date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
These all look like press/publicity shots of football matches, File:João Félix ergue o troféu da Liga NOS.jpg being credited to slbenfica.pt (which does not release the image under any such licence) and all others claimed as own work. File:Petar Musa.jpg is from https://twitter.com/transfernewscen/status/1430647671568617479.
- File:Troféu do Algarve.jpg
- File:Benfica Troféu do Algarve 2022.jpg
- File:Gonçalo Ramos Troféu do Algarve.jpg
- File:Petar Musa.jpg
- File:Benfica campeão 1993-94.png
- File:Sousa Cintra.jpg
- File:João Félix ergue o troféu da Liga NOS.jpg
- File:Nélson Veríssimo Benfica.webp
Lord Belbury (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello can you please tell me what to do in each of the images, I have already edited Petar Musa file, however, I don't know what to do on the rest of the files. Damorim21 (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Damorim21: If all you can do is confirm that you copied the images from football websites around the internet, they will still have to be deleted. Wikimedia Commons can only host public domain and similarly free images, per Commons:Licensing. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Damorim removed several entries from this DR list after attributing their source in the file description. There's no suggestion that these sources have freely licenced them. I've put them back in the list. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:PunishedKonami
[edit]- File:1972 US presidential election results fakeandgay.svg
- File:Fake 2020 US presidential election results.svg
- File:MU2017elex.png
- File:Gopmiss.png
- File:Flmissoula.png
- File:Farmerlabormu.png
- File:Pcbref.png
Files by User:PunishedKonami. Fictional "alternate History" files. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. I think "1972 US presidential election results fakeandgay" speaks for itself. --Jahobr (talk) 10:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. I oppose complying with absurd copyright laws. T8612 (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
I am not qualified to judge these matters but I am abided by the rules of the community. George E. Koronaios (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
I am not qualified to judge these matters but I am abided by the rules of the community. George E. Koronaios (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
I am not qualified to judge these matters but I am abided by the rules of the community. George E. Koronaios (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
_on_July_27,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The church building as well as the whole monastery complex were built in their current form during the period between 1973-1994. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted, at least, for now. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cher Scarlett
[edit]Flickrwashing - all taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/193973865@N02/ - 0 followers etc. Category can also be deleted as its empty after this
- File:Cher Scarlett (cropped).jpg
- File:Cher Scarlett Headshot 2021.jpg
- File:Cher Scarlett in 2016.jpg
- File:Cher Scarlett.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- They're not Flickrwashed, I confirmed that the Flickr account belongs to Cher Scarlett. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- The issue here is that the Flickr account belongs to same person who is in the photo - which can't be right. The license belongs to the person who took the photo, not the person in it. We need OTRS for each photo. Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- How come it can’t be right? These pretty much look like selfies. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- These are photos I took of myself and put them on Flickr myself. @GorillaWarfare verified it was me via Twitter DMs. CodeHitchhiker (talk) 04:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- User:Gbawden: It is possible for the photographer and the subject to be the same person, as in the case of these photos (and many others on Commons—for example, File:GorillaWarfare 2022.jpg). Hopefully now that she has come and verified that she was the one who uploaded the photos to Flickr, and that she owns the copyright, this can be considered settled. You can check her enwiki userpage to verify. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong image, not Biblioteca Popular Belgrano Madamebiblio (talk) 21:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Misidentified, but has a historical plaque on it. Just change the file description and request a filename change. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've another pic to upload with the plaque detail. Madamebiblio (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Great, but why is it important to delete this photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- It's a private family house, the historical fact is mentioned on the plaque. The image was taken to my private use, to identify the location on a trip with a lot of pics. Madamebiblio (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Great, but why is it important to delete this photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, uploader request. --Ezarateesteban 19:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong image, not Biblioteca Popular Belgrano Madamebiblio (talk) 04:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Ezarateesteban 19:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eunavformedia 2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All likely from https://eunavfor.eu/ based on user name. No meaningful exif and eunavfor is (C) - needs OTRS as these are not own work
- File:FCDR FABRIZIO BONDI PHOTO.jpg
- File:Deputy Operation Commander.jpg
- File:Img aboutus.png
- File:OpCdr2Flags.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HorsePower68 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from various websites, needs OTRS
- File:Object 726.jpg
- File:T-22 (medium tank).jpg
- File:Object 907.jpg
- File:Object 907 8.jpg
- File:Object 907 7.jpg
- File:Object 907 6.jpg
- File:Object 907 5.jpg
- File:Object 907 3.jpg
- File:Object 907 2.jpg
- File:Object 907 1.jpg
- File:T-100 project VNII-100 loader drafts.jpg
- File:Drafts of T-100 project VNII-100.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung durch ein geschütztes Verlagscover, bitte um Schnelllöschung Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 08:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Ich sehe keinen Löschgrund. Im Zweifel kann das Bild an der Stelle verpixelt werden. --Krd 14:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich selbst bin auf diesem Bild zu sehen. Es handelt sich hierbei um ein privates Foto, welches bitte aus Wikipedia gelöscht werden soll. 2A02:8071:2282:FAC0:0:0:0:282D 09:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ich selbst bin auf diesem Bild zu sehen. Es handelt sich hierbei um ein privates Foto, welches bitte aus Wikipedia gelöscht werden soll. 2A02:8071:2282:FAC0:0:0:0:282D 09:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Worse-quality copy of File:Storo - Château de Lodrone.jpg Syrio posso aiutare? 11:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Very low quality --Javidd (talk) 16:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/880858852249542657/kmAD76a9.jpg.
- File:Geovanny Vicente Romero in 2017.jpg
- File:Geovanny Vicente Romero MAP-SPM 01-08-2014.jpg
- File:Geovanny Vicente Romero en D.C.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi EugeneZelenko, hope you are well. Those images I uploaded are indeed my own work no doubt about it. Please let me know how I can help prove it! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ComPol#Advertencia_de_borrado_de_imagen --ComPol (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Obviously not own works, no evidence of public domain or a free license.
- File:Betilde Muñoz-Pogossian.jpg
- File:Geovanny Vicente Romero en la Conferencia de la Escuela del Sur de Gobernanza de Internet en Washington.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Obviously not own works, no evidence of public domain or a free license.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-free photo from the school's site. Copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Non-free photo from the school's site. Copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/08/11#c-Kharkivian-20220811134700-File:Їдальня_Люботинської_школи_"Дивосвіт".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
![10:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/08/11#c-Well-Informed_Optimist-20221209105000-File:Їдальня_Люботинської_школи_"Дивосвіт".jpg){kind=link}
This is not a orginal flag of gmina Lidzbark. That flag it's a fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JakaśKreatywnaNazwa123 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Контент телеграм-канала Владимира Зеленского не подпадает под свободную лицензию. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicate of File:Зустріч Президента України з президентами Франції та Румунії, а також головами урядів Німеччини та Італії 30.jpg that is licensed per "The Presidential Office of Ukraine. All materials featured on this site are is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" at the bottom of the www.president.gov.ua. Tm (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: as duplicate. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rationcultec'estsa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not own works, no evidence of public domain or a free license.
- File:Visite de Louis Borno chez Horacio Vazquez.png
- File:Marie Hélène Borno avec ses enfants.png
- File:President Louis Borno et sa famille.png
- File:Funérailles du président Borno haiti.png
- File:Louis Borno et son épouse Marie-Hélène haiti.png
- File:Dartiguenave and haitian army president.png
- File:PRESIDENT PHILIPPE SUDRE DARTIGUENAVE Haïti.png
- File:Maison de Dartiguenave haiti.png
- File:Haiti occupation president Dartiguenave haiti.png
- File:Cabinet ministériel de Dartiguenave president.png
- File:Vilbrun Guillaume Sam president haiti.png
- File:President Davilmar Théodore haiti.png
Yann (talk) 11:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.karate-oostende.be/ Hoyanova (talk) 11:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Update: This is the logo of the club for which the Wiki page exists. So you find the logo as well on the website https://www.karate-oostende.be (it's not copied from the site). I'm the owner of the club, and developed the logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izzythor (talk • contribs) 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PantheraLeo1359531 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Video probably unfree despite free license. (There are discussions about a similar topic) Thanks! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC) Yann (talk) 21:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Unless there’s any reason to doubt the validity of the license, it is probably free, and should be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Upload from user with 1 edit, not in use. Out of SCOPE. Wikipedia isn't a photohosting for own drawings, like DeviantArt. Shakko (talk) 20:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind, I just realized that the uploader doesn't seem to actually be the artist, and there is no evidence that the artist released this under a free license. It should be deleted as a copyright violation. Chiolite (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind, I just realized that the uploader doesn't seem to actually be the artist, and there is no evidence that the artist released this under a free license. It should be
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SVTCobra as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:BOOK and https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content/images/frontcover/2AtvEAAAQBAJ?fife=w480-h690 PD-ineligible, but may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Cover of a non-notable 20-page self-published book (ahem, pamphlet) by a teenager. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dr.Rezowan. --SVTCobra 17:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This is a later re-uploading of File:Bird jj.jpg, and is an exact duplicate MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Unknown source, see TinEye GeorgHH • talk 09:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mr Tortue as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, first time here. Can I put {{PD-textlogo}} on the file?
- 🐢 Monsieur Tortue (💬) 17:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 05:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Children drawing. Out of SCOPE. Wikipedia isn't a photohosting for artworks like DeviantArt. We have a lot nice pictures of subject here. Shakko (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- 👍 14 years ago there weren't any. -Ignacio Rodríguez (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Not own work. Copied from here: https://www.qub.ca/musique/album/alexandru-macedon-v9a6uz2g0wvlb (larger resolution). Vanjagenije (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 06:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. This photograph was taken by Gilbert Roscoe in August 1961, so the claim that this is a public domain image is not correct. 157.131.122.202 22:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- If the photo was taken by Gilbert Roscoe in August 1961, as shown here, it should indeed be deleted please. Sorry, for having not checked this before uploading it from another site. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 01:51, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
suspicious picture that without exif data, maybe copy from copyright source *angys* (talk) 05:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Це фото є російською пропагандою. Розпалювання ворожнечі. Неправдива інформація. Зупиніть тероризм росії! 81.162.246.201 09:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep. It's not a propaganda, it's reality. Since March 2014 Crimea is under Russian control. Republic of Crimea is a de facto federal subject (republic) of Russia along with Simferopol. It's a legal file like File:Krim ce Ukrayna.png - a Crimea with colors of Ukraine. --Brateevsky {talk} 16:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete sure does look like nazi propaganda to me. EnTerbury (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- It only seems to you. There is no swastika on the image, no calls to exterminate the Jews. 95.52.98.244 11:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Firstly, this is not "propaganda" at all, but an objective reality that no one can get away from, no matter how some individuals would like the opposite. Since 2014, Crimea has not been controlled by anyone except Russia, and it is pointless to dispute this fact. Secondly, even if it was "Russian propaganda", so what? Nowhere in the Commons rules is it written that "posting Russian propaganda is prohibited". As for the anonymous person who submitted the file for deletion, this, apparently, is a typical Ukrainian vandal and troll, who is driven only by hatred of Russia and the desire to clean up all references to it from everywhere (note that he even writes the word "Russia" with a small letters, which is utterly base; I can't imagine that even during the Second World War, anyone would begin to write "Germany" with a small letter). 95.52.98.244 11:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think either this image, or the version of this image with Ukraine’s flag, has a valid scope (beyond one side accusing the of supporting terrorism or Nazis). No article neutrally describing Crimea would use an image of it with the flag of either of the countries vying for its control; and I think it generally unwise to have these files where they serve only to continue political strife on Commons. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Low quality, unclear what it shows. The description claims it is " An example of a user protesting a work", while the category, "self-censorship", but fails to elaborate on either. Not used anywhere. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment appears to currently be used on zh:w -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- The caption at zh page for en:Zhihu is a bit more useful, "An example of an avatar for protest, similar to the attack on Fu Guohao.". I wonder if this is supposed to be a protest image, using allegory/metaphor such to avoid obvious critique. The problem is that neither caption explains things properly, although perhaps a Chinese speaker could help. I've added Category:Demonstrations and protests in China to the image; if this is kept the self-censorship category should be removed as neither description properly explains why it is applicable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: File is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The photographer is not specified, so the claim that they died more than 70 years ago is baseless. INS Pirat (talk) 18:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" for an anonymous image taken in 1937. --RAN (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per/ RAN. JukoFF (talk) 20:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Артём 13327 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Image is not simple Yann (talk) 21:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Looks like we need an expert on COM:TOO US, hard to say if this particular one is beyond it or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Compare this with this file, which was kept pursuant to this discussion. This file is basically the same, the only difference being the addition of some color, so it should also be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Per TE(æ)A,ea. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unused book cover, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It's from the game.Avron (talk) 00:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It is the cover art of a companion book for the video game Revolution 60. Because the video game in question is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, I believe that tie-in material for the game should be in scope as well. Chiolite (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:37, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Fake map made by a non-native. Umbria and Marche have never been considered part of Padania. 37.161.63.79 23:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
The photo is taken from so far that we can hardly see the said subject. It is way out of COM:SCOPE as it has no educational value. Myloufa (talk) 03:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. In use on Wikidata and project-space pages of a number of other projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Per the previous nomination. The reason to keep was that it was in use at that time. Removed from Wikidata a year ago. Not in use anymore, except in a discussion complaining about it. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Andy Dingley (talk) 13:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and very wide metadata. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not remotely usable for any realistic purpose; out of scope. --Webfil (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is licensed under a creative commons license Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. Leonaardog (talk) 00:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Leonaardog Keep Exif says author is US Embassy Kyiv, a part of US State Department, part of US Federal Government, so public domain. Flickr account is the official account of US Embassy in Kyiv.Copyvio, why? Tm (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: , Not OK: {{NoFoP-Ukraine}} -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- What is protected? Gutted and bombed civilian buildings? Tm (talk) 01:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: , Yes, but I talked about the bust not about the buildings do you understand? -- Leonaardog (talk) 03:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- In this photo there is no identifiable and perceptible elements of this bust, aka not a "substantial reproduction" or proeminent one. Tm (talk) 03:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: , Você fala português? Por que as pessoas de língua portuguesa se comunicariam em português, você não acha? :) -- Leonaardog (talk) 04:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, i´am portuguese, so much that i wrote in portuguese in your talkpage, but this is not yours or my talkpage, but a deletion request were several people that do not speak portuguese can participate. Tm (talk) 04:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: , Você fala português? Por que as pessoas de língua portuguesa se comunicariam em português, você não acha? :) -- Leonaardog (talk) 04:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- In this photo there is no identifiable and perceptible elements of this bust, aka not a "substantial reproduction" or proeminent one. Tm (talk) 03:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: , Yes, but I talked about the bust not about the buildings do you understand? -- Leonaardog (talk) 03:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- What is protected? Gutted and bombed civilian buildings? Tm (talk) 01:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: , Not OK: {{NoFoP-Ukraine}} -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete@Tm: PD-USGov don't exempt its copyright status in Ukraine, so as a FOP Not OK country, you have to demonstrate that why it's also public domain in Ukraine. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Any possible FoP element is not not a "substantial reproduction" or proeminent one as sculpture is barely visible and buildings are unremarkable and destroyed by bombing losing any (nonexistent) individual character. But then again, you known nothing of FoP, as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ambassador Brink visited Borodyanka, Ukraine, June 4, 2022 (52135974634).jpg it seems that for you FoP also covers images of people. Tm (talk) 11:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: You mean, a building can be simply exempted from copyright protections just because of destroyed? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I´ve already answered above and if that above answer does not respond to you, someone thinks that FOP applied to people, there is nothing more that i can do. Tm (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tm: You mean, a building can be simply exempted from copyright protections just because of destroyed? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Any possible FoP element is not not a "substantial reproduction" or proeminent one as sculpture is barely visible and buildings are unremarkable and destroyed by bombing losing any (nonexistent) individual character. But then again, you known nothing of FoP, as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ambassador Brink visited Borodyanka, Ukraine, June 4, 2022 (52135974634).jpg it seems that for you FoP also covers images of people. Tm (talk) 11:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is of people and damage, not of copyrighted building. Bust is immaterial. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Cropped the bust, even categorized in Category:Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Borodianka from the image, per COM:FOP Ukraine. Kept the rest of the image with people and damaged buildings. --Ellywa (talk) 22:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Files from User:Hsch31 round 5
[edit]- File:In the footsteps of Gell-Mann with construction.pdf
- File:Vom Standard Modell zu den Elementarteilchen-Daten des Higgsfelds.pdf
- File:Protokol from Gell-Mann's Quarks to the Higgs field.pdf
- File:Konstruktions-Protokoll & Data beim GeoGebra Programm.pdf
- File:In the footsteps of Gell-Mann 3 as update to the older file with easy klicking protokol and Data.pdf
Annual clean-up I guess. Same reason again: No educational value, zero chance that any of these will ever appear in an article. Most or all of them are re-uploads or nearly identical with earlier deleted uploads. Three are attempts to write articles here. Previous deletion rounds of uploads of this user:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Hsch31
- Commons:Deletion requests/More files of User:Hsch31
- Commons:Deletion requests/Even more files from User:Hsch31
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files from User:Hsch31 round 4
Can an admin talk to him please? What he does is clearly not productive in any way. We already had long discussions on the German Wikipedia where the user got banned permanently for persistently ignoring what Wikipedia is about. His talk page here is just him rambling in German and English, too. --mfb (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Mfb: If you think necessary you can warn the user, or you can ask for guidance at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. --Ellywa (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Steve from Minecraft is a copyrighted character. This is a costume that faithfully depicts Steve as he is artistically portrayed in Minecraft and is a faithful representation of a three-dimensional copyrighted digital artwork in the form of a costume. Additionally, the United States lacks FoP for three-dimensional (and two-dimensional) artwork. As such, the costume depicted by the photograph (the head with distinctive pixel pattern especially) is non-free. Since there is no FoP exception for 3D artwork in the United States, our hosting of this image is a copyright violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Cosplay. Why is this more problematic than other images in Category:Cosplay of Minecraft? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Per National Theme Productions v. Jerry B. Beck, Ianc., 696 F. Supp. 1348 (S.D. Cal. 1988), The costumes are copyrightable, if at all, to the extent that they have features which can be identified separately and are capable of existing independently as a work of art and granted a copyright claim after finding that the costumes' artistic features simply do not advance their utilitarian purpose as clothing or accessories. Here, we have a costume that is a derivative work of a three-dimensional copyrighted object that is substantially similar. The costume's artistic features (such as the color scheme and pixel pattern on the face) do not serve to advance their utilitarian purpose, but instead are to mimic the artwork present in the original design of Steve. This differs from other images in that category, such as File:Otakuthon 2014- Gravity Gun vs. Portal Gun (15029325532).jpg, in that the depiction of Steve is not de minimus. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. No evidence the costume is in PD. Other image of Steve on en:WP are fair use. --Ellywa (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not sure if there is enough evidence that the photo is really free: the description says about the scan of the negative found in the house of the neview rubin16 (talk) 06:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-US-unpublished}}. I did a bit of genealogical research and I guess there was a long line of people in this family named Edward Rowell. Edward Frater Rowell died in the 1930s (you can find his obituary on Newspapers.com) and is the likely photographer (there is no reason to disbelieve the information from the family). IronGargoyle (talk) 15:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 22:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader has taken a photograph but who owns the copyright of the original work? Copyright is owned by the original creator not the person who photographs it. DrKay (talk) 16:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Are you asking who owns the copyright for a medal? --Miesianiacal (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. Are they like coins or stamps: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Canada? DrKay (talk) 07:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not sure, off the top of my head. However, looking at other images of insignia and medals, they're under free licence:
- File:Order of Merit in Westminster Cathedral (cropped).jpg
- File:Replica Order of Canada member medal.jpg
- File:Commander of the Order of Military Merit, Canada.JPG
- File:Stervan de Koninklijke Orde van Victoria.jpg
- File:Star - Venerable Order of St John.jpg
- File:Order of Ontario.jpg
- File:Order of Nova Scotia Insignia on a bow.jpg
- File:S.M.V.JPG
- File:Star of Courage (Canada).png
- File:MSC-cut.png
- File:M.M.V.JPG
- File:Medal of Bravery.gif
- File:MSM-cut.png
- File:Medal, campaign (AM 1996.185.10-8).jpg
- File:Canada Gulf and Kuwait Medal.jpg
- File:Operational Service Medal Haiti.jpg
- File:United Nations Service Medal (Korea), Reverse.jpg
- File:Jubilee 2002 Medal Canada reverse.jpg
- These are not free. However, it appears to be so because the images themselves are someone else's work. (I don't know why the links don't link):
- The medals are produced by the Royal Canadian Mint. Its website isn't clear on whether physical coins and medals are the RCM's intellectual property or not. It certainly seems impossible to prevent photographing of coins and free distribution of those photographs. --Miesianiacal (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Anything created after 1972 should be deleted then per Commons:Deletion requests/File:125th Anniversary of Confederation Medal.jpg and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Canada#Currency. DrKay (talk) 08:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- All I wrote was that the RCM website isn't clear, not that there's no answer out there anywhere. --Miesianiacal (talk) 15:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Anything created after 1972 should be deleted then per Commons:Deletion requests/File:125th Anniversary of Confederation Medal.jpg and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Canada#Currency. DrKay (talk) 08:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not sure, off the top of my head. However, looking at other images of insignia and medals, they're under free licence:
- Yes. Are they like coins or stamps: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Canada? DrKay (talk) 07:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Reverse.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. There is no evidence these designs fall in PD. To the contrary when official coins of Canada are copyrighted, I do not see a motivation why these medals would not be copyrighted as well. Therefore the images must be deleted. Perhaps the other medals have to be deleted as well, that has to be discussed one by one. --Ellywa (talk) 12:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gouwenaar as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see Limburger koerier d.d. 17-03-1928 Information about the article: It is possible that copyright still rests on (parts of) this object. This means that it may only be used for private purposes or to quote a short piece (with reference to the source). For other re-use, you should further investigate the copyright status of this object King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" published in newspaper in 1928 and no photographer credit. --RAN (talk) 19:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Photographers did not work anonymously for the Limburger Koerier. What efforts have been made to ascertain the identity of the photographer to assess whether copyrights still exist? Gouwenaar (talk) 08:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as far as I am aware, if a photo is published more then 70 years ago without mentioning the name of the photographer, we generally assume the photo can be maintained with {{PD-anon-70-EU}}. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nominated due to the original picture has not been reviewed properly for the its license Gag0409 (talk) 17:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, I did the review, and the source file, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hr6co7_UqI&ab_channel=N%C3%A9storReverol is licenced with CCBYSA. So image (and the uncropped version as well) can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by user:JRozalski
[edit]
These files was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (since upload). I felt they deserved a discussion at DR. (By the way, I have notified Mr. Różalski of this discussion via the email on his website.) -- Arlo James Barnes 18:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Please see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:1920_-_before_the_storm.jpg. I have no idea why Masur is making trouble here. I personally have corresponded to the artist back in 2018 and he agreed to personally upload several images to Wikipedia, using a free license. The artist wiki account is User:JRozalski. He uploaded the image himself, correctly described it as his, correctly released the rights (used the free license), and in the description noted it's his artwork: "Before the storm is one on the most characteristic painting in the style and aesthetic of my 1920+ world.". No additional permission is needed given that the artist uploaded the pictures he created (artwork and what looks like two selfies) himself, properly licensed. I request that Masur now apologizes for his mistake by reverting Commons Delinker which has removed those pictures from a number of Wikipedias articles in various languages. Please fix your mess, User:Masur. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just adding to the consensus here-- by any reasonable evidentiary standard this has sufficient permission from the artist. Keep it. Chiaro Oscuro (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Just adding to the consensus here-- by any reasonable evidentiary standard this has sufficient permission from the artist.
- P.S. I'd like to make it clear I respect Masur for his cleanup efforts, he usually does a good job. But here a mistake was made and it needs fixing, and I am disappointed that User:Masur keeps ignoring this and previous discussion (at undeletion requests). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:41, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It might be good to attach a VRT ticket to this anyway so it's over and done with? Arlo James Barnes 20:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- VRT ticket doesn't exist for this case, AFAIK. And there's no need to it. The uploader claimed this is their own work, why doubt them? I've uploaded zillion of images to Wikipedia myself. Should I start VRT ticket for my uploads? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Generally speaking I agree (still salty about commons:deletion requests/File:Figwit Lives.JPG). But if these files keep coming up for deletion then it seems like a pain to have to marshal the same arguments over and over again. Arlo James Barnes 19:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- The thing is the original nominator, User:Masur, did not explain the reason he nominated this, despite several pings since. And as for "coming up for deletion", the second nomination is by you, and you cite as your reason the original nomination, which I already explained seems to be a mistake. So... is there really any problem, outside Masur not noticing / caring to investigate the fact that the original uploader is the artist in question/copyright owner? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 06:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I suppose not (I only converted it to a DR to avoid it getting speedied). We'll see what the closing admin thinks but it seems like an open-and-shut case to retain, to my mind. Arlo James Barnes 09:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No additional permission is needed given that the artist uploaded the pictures he created (artwork and what looks like two selfies) himself - given is the key word here. And the artwork in question was distributed elsewhere [2] , [3], [4] - where no free license was applied. I acted per Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_VRT?, seeing too many fake accounts that make a dubious "favour" for artists to make "ther wiki article" nicer. Masur (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Masur Well, I did talk to the artist through Facebook ~2 years ago and I can confirm it's them. Well, or at least it was "them" as in a person operating what seems then and still today as their official Facebook account (https://www.facebook.com/jrozalski/), who in said conversation did say they are the artist in question. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- I suppose not (I only converted it to a DR to avoid it getting speedied). We'll see what the closing admin thinks but it seems like an open-and-shut case to
- The thing is the original nominator, User:Masur, did not explain the reason he nominated this, despite several pings since. And as for "coming up for deletion", the second nomination is by you, and you cite as your reason the original nomination, which I already explained seems to be a mistake. So... is there really any problem, outside Masur not noticing / caring to investigate the fact that the original uploader is the artist in question/copyright owner? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 06:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Generally speaking I agree (still salty about commons:deletion requests/File:Figwit Lives.JPG). But if these files keep coming up for deletion then it seems like a pain to have to marshal the same arguments over and over again. Arlo James Barnes 19:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- VRT ticket doesn't exist for this case, AFAIK. And there's no need to it. The uploader claimed this is their own work, why doubt them? I've uploaded zillion of images to Wikipedia myself. Should I start VRT ticket for my uploads? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There is no reason to doubt the artist uploaded own artwork. So that can be kept. However, the two photographic portraits are not selfies. One is taken from Instagram, the other has full EXIF data, but does not show a selftimer has been used. Therefore I decided to keep the artwork but to delete the two portraits. In the undeletion request this was not discussed in detail. @Jakub Różalski and JRozalski: , hoping you will read this, please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the portraits of yourself on Commons with a free license. If successful, one or both images can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Image uploaded under a free license despite the author and source being unknown, as stated in the file description. This crop of a photograph is therefore most likely not available under the free license given, especially since the author cannot be attributed. Yue🌙 20:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Image taken from facebook without evidence of a free license. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
