User talk:T8612

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, T8612!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CNG pictures

[edit]

CNG published the pics under a Creative Commons license. It means you may upload the pics under the same license. Remember to indicate the url where you got the pic (the whole Url).

for instance:
{{Information
|Description = 
{{Multilingual description
   |la= Denarius 
   |fr= Denier
}}
|Source= https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=143679
|Author= CNG
|Permission= {{CNG}}
}}
[[Category:Gens Cornelia]]
 

Write me if you need more help. There is also a project about numismatics here in Commons (Commons:WikiProject Numismatics (as in many languages: italian, french, russian ...). I'm from Rome.

--Carlomorino (talk) 14:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!T8612 (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you write in your own User talk it is difficult that the message will be read. Or you write something as {{ping|Carlomorino}} or you will be unread. Ciao. --Carlomorino (talk) 13:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! @Carlomorino: T8612 (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
I see your uploads pop up in the WikiProject Numismatics daily uploads gallery a lot, thanks for contributing so much in the field of numismatics for Wikimedia Commons. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi T8612. Theyr names as Roman moneyers are here. In Roman period the moneyers magistrati was always three, called Tres viri Auro Argento Aere Flando Feriundo (III VIR. A.A.A. F.F.). --DenghiùComm (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The table does say that only Nerius minted the coin (under "moneyer" at number 441), as well as Michael Crawford (Roman Republican Coinage, p. 460). The references to "Cornelia" and "Claudia" in the table come from Babelon, a numismatist of the 19th century who misinterpreted the inscriptions on the coin, and thought Cornelius and Claudius were also moneyers (they were consuls).

Moneyers were three per year under the Republic, but they rarely minted coins together (each minted their own coins). I think it is misleading to keep their name in categories here (I would neverhteless agree to keep Cornelia and Claudia as Babelon used them, but certainly not "Coins by C. Claudius Marcellus" and "Coins by L. Cornelius Lentulus Crus"). T8612 (talk) 11:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But at number 445 you have the two consuls as moneyers in year 49 BC. --DenghiùComm (talk) 12:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but it is a denarius minted during the civil war between Pompey and Caesar, and Crawford notes (p. 462) that "The issue should be regarded as military and irregular". The coin I uploaded is a "regular" issue. T8612 (talk) 12:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thank you. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 13:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear T8612,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Areus I, tetradrachm, 265 BC, HGC-606.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Areus I, tetradrachm, 265 BC, HGC-606.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Diadumenian, denarius, 218, RIC 4b 118.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Diadumenian, denarius, 218, RIC 4b 118.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]