User talk:GMStudio
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Pramoksha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Иваньковский могильник.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:Armiyovo 2.jpg
- File:Fyodorovskoye gorodische.jpg
- File:Sendimirkinskij mogilnik.webp
- File:Shalinskiy mogilnik.jpg
- File:Razhki.jpg
- File:Ражкинский и Старший Селиксенский могильники.jpg
- File:Seliksa.jpg
- File:Moksha costume.jpg
- File:Веда Славян.jpg
- File:Kalendarz imion słowiańskich.jpg
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 08:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Вижу тут объяснять таким, как вы - бесполезно, не хватит времени и сил (см. обсужденме файла Pramoksha), действия по удалению всех сразу фото за короткий срок со склада без предварительного разбирательства расцениваю, как глупость и вредительство! Удачи!GMStudio (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Please be civil
[edit]
--Sealle (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Я бы рекомендовал вам самому на вашей странице обсуждений обратить внимание на язвительные и неоправданные выпады в адрес других участников, вносящих свой вклад в Википедию, как это было с Takhirgeran Umar. Ваши выпады могут считаться более оскорбительными, нежели мои, которые были направленны на ваши действия и не считаются таки прямолинейными. К тому же, насколько я понял, глядя на ваши заявления, которые вы себе позволили, типа «крайне сомнительное заявление», «Какие у Вас основания считать эти карты собственными работами?”, «Вы взяли цветные карандаши, и зарисовали местность с борта космического корабля?» дают мне право полагать, что основания на удаление на скорую руку всех моих медиаматериалов, - просто никакие. Да и на примере Богомолова с его картой нахожу факт либо незнания правил самими админами, либо еще что-то. А если так (и еще много другого), тут и речи не может идти о какой-то истине, правах автора и прочее, то есть получается, что одним можно, другим нет: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Feodosia_city_(Crimea)_urban_okrug_divisions.png Привык всегда считать, что работая в коллективе, люди друг друга как-то поддерживают, здесь же – совершенно иная картина прослеживается – вставить палки в колеса, удалить все без предварительного разбирательства! GMStudio (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Tell me
[edit]From COM:AN: "I have to talk about the same thing many times, but to no avail, because I see that some administrators absolutely do not understand all the subtleties of copyright. I can prove it."
I'm curious, tell me. One file originated from [1] according to your upload log. I don't see any obvious reason why this would be public domain or freely licensed, so I wonder. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, one of the media that deleted by the administrator was taken from this book, but this screenshot was edited by me using a visual software with very light edition (colour+size edition). As you can see, the graphic media in this book are not photographs, but drawn reconstructions. Please tell me, for example, if I were to redraw these architectural items with a physical pencil and upload media to Wikipedia then, would it be a violation of the rules? I think not. What if I redraw these items with a virtual pencil in a visual editor(software)? What if I use a screenshot, then retouch it and make color correction, as well as rotation of the image with a 3d effect + adding some filters...? I'm just interested in your opinion. In order not to take up your time, I would be glad to get a link from you where I can get information regarding my questions and I'll come back to explain it more fully. GMStudio (talk) 08:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- I also want to ask (since this will be related to my subsequent answer). What are the reasons might be for deleting a geographical map drawn by the author himself (link below). Can you delete this media based only on your doubts, like "It seems to Me that you are not able to draw such a map"? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Feodosia_city_(Crimea)_urban_okrug_divisions.png ThanksGMStudio (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Drawings are generally eligible for copyright. If you made your own original drawing of the same object, you would own the copyright for that drawing. (and you could publish it here) If you trace the original drawing (no matter if you use a physical or virtual pencil), you're violating copyright. As long as you are basing your work off of someone else's drawing or photo, you are almost always violating the copyright of the illustrator of photographer.
- In all my time here, I have seen one exception, and you'll rarely be able to benefit from that. A photograph of an ancient statue, no surroundings. Someone traced the statue from the photo. The only creative choice from the photograph that survived in the traced image is the angle, and purely the angle is not sufficient for copyright protection. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sumerian figurine.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sumerian figurine.pdf. Again, you will rarely if ever be able to benefit from this.
- Your second question: this depends. We know Bogomolov.PL and we know they are capable of drawing/altering maps. If a newcomer uploads a map that looks professional, it could be deleted in some cases per COM:PRP. But if a newcomer uploads several iterations of the same map, adding/removing regions and so on it would be clear that the user is the author, even if it looks professional. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer. I made a draft with the answer for you, and I will publish it here as soon as I finish, because the text is large and takes time. I still need to make some additions, translations, refinements GMStudio (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello again. I'm still trying to finish a discussion with Your colleague already ...11 days :), where there are the similar answers to your question (but in Russian) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:Pramoksha.jpg. I hope that I will soon have the opportunity to respond to your topic. Sorry.GMStudio (talk) 18:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- I don't speak Russian, I'm not sure I can participate in a useful way in that discussion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:13, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- I know, I want also to say that I ll try to translate the main points of the discussion into English and provide them to you as soon as I can. It will take a time a bit. GMStudio (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Дендрограмма мтДнк Европы.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Дендрограмма мтДнк Европы.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Дендрограмма мтДнк Европы.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Veda slavjan.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Veda slavjan.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Veda slavjan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Дендрограмма мтДнк Европы.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |