Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_ESH_-_UNOCHA.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_—_Estonia_NFT_Goalkeeper.jpg){kind=link}
![98 File:"Pioneers and schoolchildren! Help plant new gardens in cities and villages. Guys, follow me!".jpg](#File:"Pioneers_and_schoolchildren!_Help_plant_new_gardens_in_cities_and_villages._Guys,_follow_me!".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Luckygadwalss (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Accidental Upload / Wrong File Campbell1515 (talk) 03:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & out of scope. --Achim55 (talk) 08:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
According to copyright page, all the data from this website is licensed under KOGL-Type4 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives), which is unacceptable on Commons. Larryasou (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- I changed former file to file which has published under KOGL-Type1 (Attribution-Commercial-Derivatives), from Ministry of Interior and Safety. (https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/sub/a08/copyrightPolicy/screen.do) Migupla (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: A better source was found.--Larryasou (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate image, my mistake Docosong (talk) 07:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, non notable Trade (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy, per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, non notable Trade (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy, per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication as to how a screenshot from a youtube video that is not explicitly licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0 is itself licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0. TartarTorte (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caleb Glymph (Jared Bentley) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Caleb Glymph (Jared Bentley) 4.jpg
- File:Caleb Glymph (Jared Bentley) 2.jpg
- File:Jared Bentley (Caleb Glymph) 1.jpg
- File:Caleb Glymph (Jared Bentley) 3.jpg
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim55 (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gs Sani YT (talk) 15:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Codc (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
{{delete |reason=REASON (mandatory) |subpage=Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jensinger Schmensinger in voller Blüte.jpg |day=7 |month=July |year=2022 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udmood (talk • contribs) 22:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Tiene algo chueco, nada más. Deleting F10. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.167.155 (talk) 01:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees. --Achim55 (talk) 08:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
No reason BSR991 (talk) 04:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete per NOTPORN or whatever the guideline is. Commons isn't a porn site. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry,i want to deleted for personal reason. BSR991 (talk) 17:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- PUEDE SER POR COM:PENIS TAMBIEN. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.20.182 (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete per NOTPORN or whatever the guideline is. Commons isn't a porn host. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry,i want to deleted for personal reason. BSR991 (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- PUEDE SER POR COM:PENIS TAMBIEN. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.20.182 (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
No reason BSR991 (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete per NOTPORN or whatever the guideline is. Commons isn't a porn host. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry,i want to deleted for personal reason. BSR991 (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- PUEDE SER POR COM:PENIS TAMBIEN. 181.203.20.182 23:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
unused, unidentified peoples without description Ske (talk) 05:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
unused, unidentified peoples without description. Ske (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
unused, unidentified peoples without description Ske (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
unused, unidentified peoples without description Ske (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use. Non notable enterpreneur. Drakosh (talk) 05:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
A selfie Nutshinou Talk! 10:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused Creator template. Not a creator of artwork or literature. Achim55 (talk) 10:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're probably correct. My mistake. --Woko Sapien (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marmaladeislet (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagrams, out of project scope
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of scope Trade (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, non notable Trade (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, non notable Trade (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, non notable Trade (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo Lymantria (talk) 14:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Nied with Loyola.jpg
- File:Bathroom Protest.jpg
- File:The first "Neptune Prince" posing next to the Neptune Statue.webp
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
self-advertisement; no educational value Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, non notable Trade (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo of not editor, article about the game designer is deleted Ignatus (talk) 18:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haydenevans11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission from all the persons in this photo to post on Wikimedia. A Qayyoom (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I just realised I do not have a permission from all the persons in this photo to post on Wikimedia. A Qayyoom (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Fantasy map for Category:NationStates
Enyavar (talk) 09:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
English: Susana Costales, fachada Restaurante El Patrimonio (from Facebook) 181.203.48.239 00:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- This image is not offensive, the purpose is to share a historical part of Riobamba city with a poet and writer contributing to the culture of the city and the world. 2800:370:137:7DE0:487B:38A2:8046:82DD 01:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Question What's the deletion rationale? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Metadata shows stolen from facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 181.203.48.239 00:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Probably also OOS. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- This picture is not offensive, it is for educational purposes and free to download and use does not cause any harm 2800:370:137:7DE0:487B:38A2:8046:82DD 02:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment Certainly in scope, but if it's not really Creative Commons Copyleft, we can't host it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, stolen from facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Facebook artwork 181.203.48.239 00:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- this picture is not offensive and does not cause any harm, it is for educational purposes and free to use and download. 2800:370:137:7DE0:487B:38A2:8046:82DD 02:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Vandalism 190.17.53.106 00:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Very bad quality, dubious. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused, see COMMONS:PENIS. Because of its title, and not being on the bad image list, it is likely to be used for vandalism, and has been: see https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chenzw&diff=prev&oldid=8321090 Lights and freedom (talk) 01:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unremarkable penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
This page using my name and picture without my permission. I'll be glad if you can delete it 197.247.253.42 02:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please delete this page as soon as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ouddajou (talk • contribs) 02:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
-PUEDE SER, ES DE FACEBOOK. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.20.182 (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Whether or not the anon nominator is the actual original photographer, Metadata shows taken from facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
This is wrong file Abdullateef030 (talk) 04:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Almost certainly not "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 05:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Sumanuil (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Dubious authorship claim, probably copyvio. Sumanuil (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Sumanuil (talk) 05:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
_-_ESH_-_UNOCHA.svg){kind=link}
_-_ESH_-_UNOCHA.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mauritania is apparently a lake. Heraldrist (talk) 07:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
_-_ESH_-_UNOCHA.svg){kind=link}
- Comment Reverted the file to an earlier version that does not have this issue. --Nutshinou Talk! 10:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep per above. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)- Keep, and obviously a deletion nomination was never appropriate if the only issue was a bad version that could be reverted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
_-_ESH_-_UNOCHA.svg){kind=link}
Copyright infringements. I lied about the source. Enteryourusername2020 (talk) 10:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
The copyright of this image is owned by Fotografie Ron Koffeman Nutshinou Talk! 10:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
The copyright of this image is owned by Fotografie Ron Koffeman Nutshinou Talk! 10:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
The copyright of this image is owned by Fotografie Ron Koffeman Nutshinou Talk! 10:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
The copyright of this image is owned by Fotografie Ron Koffeman Nutshinou Talk! 10:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work from a book, no indication of a CC licensing. 91.34.39.222 10:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Previously published at https://mihael-uwoo.livejournal.com/251604.html, watermark at bottom suggests this is now own work Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
meaningless name RyanCray (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirect deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Still copyrighted by Microsoft. We host many versions of the stylized flag (e.g., File:Windows logo - 2012 (dark blue).svg, File:Windows logo - 2012 (dark blue, lines thinner).svg, File:Windows logo - 2012.svg, etc.) including with text for various windows versions (e.g., File:Windows Embedded 8 Logo.png, File:Windows 10 Logo.svg, etc.) and indeed they have been kept in previous DRs (e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows logo and wordmark - 2012.svg). This thus appears safely PD-Shape/PD-simple, but the question is whether this inappropriately licensed and attributed .webp should be kept when we have the proper .svg File:Windows 8 logo and wordmark.svg. Does the .1 matter? If so, it should be kept. Эlcobbola talk 15:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F5. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Baruah ranuj (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per uploader request; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No reason. BSR991 (talk) 04:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Precisely, no reason given to deletion. Tm (talk) 05:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry,i want to deleted for personal reason. BSR991 (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- PUEDE SER POR COM:PORNO TAMBIEN. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.20.182 (talk) 23:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Is this PD in the US? I would think this got URAA'd. PseudoSkull (talk) 19:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep All non-artistic imagery prior to 1972 is PD. It would only be susceptible to the URAA loophole if it was artistic, that is, domiciled in an art museum, or staged so creatively, it was considered art, even though not domiciled in an art museum. --RAN (talk) 05:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep! PD-Sweden-photo, taken by swedish press. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and Holger.Ellgaard: "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States." Which PD-US template would apply to this photo? PseudoSkull (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- PD-1996 is the tag to show compliance with USA copyright under URAA. --RAN (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above, thanks all. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadkurdi44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
_front.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadkurdi44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, appear stolen from random product blogs (e.g., File:Huawei nova 8.jpg from here)--note also that visible photographer hands include clearly different races and thus clearly different authors. User also serial copyvio uploader--see talk/deleted contribs. Duck/PRP issue.
- File:Huawei Nova 7i Unboxing.jpg
- File:Restarting huawei nova 3i.jpg
- File:Huawei Nova 3i Black.jpg
- File:Samsung galaxy a20.jpg
- File:IPhone 7 Plus in black.jpg
- File:Samsung galaxy Note9.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nomination. --Hajoon0102 💬 04:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete These images are clearly copied from blogs or something and are therefore copyvio. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Captain-tucker (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Captain-tucker (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment @Captain-tucker: Sorry, I'm seeing the file wasn't deleted yet? Frodar (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Frodar: Oops, fixed Captain-tucker (talk) 13:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- That was quick! Thanks —Frodar (talk) 13:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - Uploaded to Flickr 7 July 2022 and uploaded to Commons 7 July 2022--what serendipity. More complete version here (and many other places) 30 March 2021. Эlcobbola talk 15:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hey I can tell you now I am the author of this photo. I took this photo. I took this photo directly after she won the fight. It was taken at the Takapuna Rugby club in North Shore Auckland New Zealand on the 26 of March 2021. The photo is even on my phone. I can even give you the coordinates of the photo -36.7927197,174.750086. I took this photo for everyone free to use so that not only it can be put onto Wikipedia but all media outlooks can use it freely. If You google it you can probably see it in multiple aritcles. Even with articles with my name in it like here [1] and here [2]. I dont know if I can do any more to prove this is my photo and I give it up freely to use. Bennyaha (talk) 22:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Infact there are more ways to prove it. If your gonna use Facebook as a reference here is me publishing the photo on facebook [3] and here is a photo of me next to her at the event [4]. Bennyaha (talk) 23:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- In fact you can compare dates between your link of her Facebook and my link of my Facebook, you can see me posting it 4 days before her posting it. Bennyaha (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola I would appreciate if you could remove this deletion nomination as this is enough evidence to suggest otherwise. Bennyaha (talk) 10:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- In fact you can compare dates between your link of her Facebook and my link of my Facebook, you can see me posting it 4 days before her posting it. Bennyaha (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Infact there are more ways to prove it. If your gonna use Facebook as a reference here is me publishing the photo on facebook [3] and here is a photo of me next to her at the event [4]. Bennyaha (talk) 23:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hey I can tell you now I am the author of this photo. I took this photo. I took this photo directly after she won the fight. It was taken at the Takapuna Rugby club in North Shore Auckland New Zealand on the 26 of March 2021. The photo is even on my phone. I can even give you the coordinates of the photo -36.7927197,174.750086. I took this photo for everyone free to use so that not only it can be put onto Wikipedia but all media outlooks can use it freely. If You google it you can probably see it in multiple aritcles. Even with articles with my name in it like here [1] and here [2]. I dont know if I can do any more to prove this is my photo and I give it up freely to use. Bennyaha (talk) 22:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The file is missing meta data. This will happen when you download it from Facebook and then upload that version instead of directly from your device. Guido den Broeder (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Still missing after your new upload. The good news is, that the person you say your are points to your Wikipedia contributions on his Facebook page, so we know that he is indeed you. Guido den Broeder (talk) 23:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Your problem after the new upload is a lack of proof that you are in fact the photographer. Someone could have sent the photo to your phone, e.g. with bluetooth which equally removes the meta data. The articles don't help you because you're crediting yourself. Guido den Broeder (talk) 00:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Still missing after your new upload. The good news is, that the person you say your are points to your Wikipedia contributions on his Facebook page, so we know that he is indeed you. Guido den Broeder (talk) 23:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Bennyaha: Can you please insert a reference to your Wikimedia account (User:Bennyaha) at https://www.facebook.com/bennyaha/about_details to prove that the Facebook account belongs to you? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Done Bennyaha (talk) 01:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts let me know if there is anything else I can help with that. Bennyaha (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Side not I generally use the same username Bennyaha for everything, so you can see my wiki handle Bennyaha, my facebook bennyaha in the URL, and everything else on top of that. Bennyaha (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- I found a full version of it in my emails and uploaded it separately as a full version. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mea_Motu_Title_full_version.jpg Bennyaha (talk) 01:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Side not I generally use the same username Bennyaha for everything, so you can see my wiki handle Bennyaha, my facebook bennyaha in the URL, and everything else on top of that. Bennyaha (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts let me know if there is anything else I can help with that. Bennyaha (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Done Bennyaha (talk) 01:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Keeping - File:Mea Motu Title full version.jpg demuestra que el usuario es honesto sobre su trabajo. 186.174.73.213 01:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep User has now uploaded a version with meta data. Guido den Broeder (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Full metadata version now available, never before seen online at this resolution. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Not Flickrwashing, see File:Mea Motu Title full version.jpg. --4nn1l2 (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MandavasaiKumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT
- File:Mandava Sai Kumar youtuber.jpg
- File:Mandava Sai Kumar New look.jpg
- File:Mandava Sai Kumar.jpg
- File:Mandava Sai Kumar 2022.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tamada media (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of unused personal images and promotional images related to a non-notable film director. Out of project scope. It also seems unlikely that the uploader is the photographer for all (any?) of these images.
- File:Remini20210824004730322.jpg
- File:Remini20210824004847459.jpg
- File:Mandava Sai Kumar.jpg
- File:Sai Kumar Mandava.jpg
- File:Mandava Sai.jpg
- File:Pavan.kumar.jpg
- File:Padala pavan Kumar.jpg
- File:Pavan Kumar Padala.jpg
- File:Remini20210819211252989.jpg
- File:Ratri 12.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tamada media (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata displays too much, please delete asap Sugus38 (talk) 11:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy as image somewhat blurry and unused. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly older image, but not old enough to be demonstrably PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Questionable, blurry, uncat, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, uncat, very poor quality - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Almost certainly not "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Not "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Almost certainly not "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 05:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Almost certainly not "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 05:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyrighted work of I.M. Pei, Louvre Pyramid, is too large here to be claimed as de minimis. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. This image can be undeleted/restored 70+1 years after Pei's death, the time his work falls in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, previous similar listing decisions. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unknown source, it looks like a video screenshot. Thyj (talk) 08:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
_%E2%80%94_Estonia_NFT_Goalkeeper.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Estonia_NFT_Goalkeeper.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Some doubts about "own work"-claim, as an uncropped version of this shot is credited to Nippon News at Alamy. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
_—_Estonia_NFT_Goalkeeper.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
_—_Estonia_NFT_Goalkeeper.jpg){kind=link}
Cloud Gate here is NOT trivial. It is easily noticeable and takes around half of the image. The copyrighted work is made by Anish Kapoor. Since there is no freedom of panorama for non-architecture in the United States, this image must be deleted to prevent Commons being the source of risk for reusers and content creators. There was also a case against National Rifle Association over their use of this public art in their video. ([5]) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, previous similar cases. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
False claim of own work and thus likely copyright violation: .png format indicates this is probably a screenshot; reverse image search turns up a number of hits, including this one from 2014 (a year before our file's upload date). HyperGaruda (talk) 15:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Posible violación de derechos de autor Mweper (talk) 16:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution file missing complete Metadata, needs permission to see if this is a US Government work 220.246.145.204 16:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unless specific source link is given showing PD-US-Gov status; claimed license is certainly false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
no permission recorded for this magazine cover Ske (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
This is a practice slide Robert Neustadter (talk) 21:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a practice slide. Robert Neustadter (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a practice slide. Robert Neustadter (talk) 21:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a practice slide. Robert Neustadter (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. (Listing once is generally sufficient; repeat duplicate listings are not helpful.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
metadata displays too much, please delete asap Sugus38 (talk) 11:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, but metadata removed from image, as requested by uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
metadata displays too much, please delete asap Sugus38 (talk) 11:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, but metadata removed from image, as requested by uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
metadata displays too much, please delete asap Sugus38 (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- What information, other than a creator, that has a name that doesn't match the uploader, does it show? --RAN (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Look at the metadata ! Some of the data should NOT be included ! (and under the GDPR I would like it removed) Sugus38 (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, but metadata removed from image, as requrested by uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
File:"Pioneers and schoolchildren! Help plant new gardens in cities and villages. Guys, follow me!".jpg
[edit]
Author died in 1993 [6], not PD. Retired electrician (talk) 08:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Small duplicate of File:GRE Order of the Phoenix - Grand Commander BAR.png Nutshinou Talk! 10:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 12:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jjulianhernandezh (talk · contribs)
[edit]APpears to be an unfree logo
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free logo. Taichi (talk) 07:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
promotional logo, no source and nu permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Not an own work. (https://www.tanyerihaber.com/ali-babacanin-18-yillik-siyaset-hayati.html) Expert73 (talk) 09:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution images watermarked to https://pfl.uz
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete clearly visible watermark in both images; surely not the uploader's own work. --Mosbatho (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claims. No EXIF and uploader has a long history of copyright violations, including three separate blocks for uploading unfree files. COM:PCP applies.
✗plicit 00:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not sure There is FOP for these photos. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Aspudden Flygfoto. ArkDes ARKM.1962-101-2192.jpg (which has more detailed metadata) Ambrosiani (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy delete as per F8 at COM:CSD.
- Contributers2020Talk to me here! 18:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
appears to be flickrwashed, photo was uploaded to flickr minutes before it was uploaded here with no evidence that the uploader has permission, no exif etc... Praxidicae (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
appears to be flickrwashed, photo was uploaded to flickr minutes before it was uploaded here with no evidence that the uploader has permission, no exif etc... Praxidicae (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Source android gallery. Venkat TL (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Blatant COM:LL - source is a car blog that has merely taken manufacturer/promotional images--all are low res, no camera EXIF, elsewhere prior to source (e.g., File:Tesla-Model-S-Plaid-Price-Canada.jpg at source 5 July 2022, but here 11 February 2022; File:Rolls-Royce-Wraith-Canada.jpg at source 16 June 2022, but here (and much more complete) 24 Jul 2021; etc.) File:Bugatti-Centodieci-price-Canada.jpg appears part of this set from February 2022; etc. Duck/PRP issue.
- File:Audi-A3-Canada.jpg
- File:Polestar-2-Canada.jpg
- File:Bugatti-Centodieci-price-Canada.jpg
- File:Tesla-Model-S-Plaid-Price-Canada.jpg
- File:McLaren-765LT-price-in-Canada.png
- File:KTM-390-Canada.jpg
- File:Rolls-Royce-Wraith-Canada.jpg
- File:Tesla Model S Plaid Australia.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Possibly copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- The colored version of picture was published by Gholam-Hossein Farnoud's son-in-law's instagram and facebook page after his death and it has been colored by him personally. In addition, the picture was published in two books, both of which were published in memory of Gholam-Hossein Farnoud after his death in Iran and were cited in the reference part of article:
- 1. Farnoud, Gholam-Hossein and others. (2020). "Gholam-Hossein Farnoud: A thoughtful seeker, in the ways of knowledge", in Azeri: International Turkish - Persian, Cultural, Social, Literary and Art Quarterly, numbers 43&44: pg. 17
- 2. (On the cover of the book): Torkan, Qasem and others. (2020). "Andishevarze Rahnoma: in memory of Gholam-Hossein Farnoud". Tabriz: Mahdeh Azadi Press.
- 3. His son-in-laws instagram and facebook page (colored version):
- https://www.instagram.com/p/CL9jaEigTXD/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
- https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/156406547_3767309953363593_6071460599007829294_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=2zuAJXZxVXcAX8Mw77r&_nc_ht=scontent-vie1-1.xx&oh=00_AT_5yX527bxR6YJ5BGWSMTnvV-6lViUCHcVsQNtVTFHrFg&oe=62EB51AC
- 4. ON Ishiq.net https://ishiq.net/yaddast/23861/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%BA%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%86%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D9%82%D9%84.html Uzeyir Kemal (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo d'un article de Médiapart https://blogs.mediapart.fr/thierry-paul-valette/blog/041217/bertrand-besancenot-present-un-important-colloque-sur-la-crise-du-golfe CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yug
[edit]- File:LL-Q112913603-Yug-alma.webm
- File:LL-Q112913603-Yug-sözdık.webm
- File:LL-Q112913603-Yug-düisenbı.webm
- File:LL-Q112913603-Yug-jūma.webm
These files present a bug, it may be in the files or in the Commons' software, causing that they be displayed as audio only files. I hope this bug to be fixed. Meanwhile if they are audio only, then they make no sense and they are out of scope, with no educational purpose. --FanNihongo (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - The files work for me when I open them directly, so this seems to be a bug in Commons, not an issue with the files themselves. - Nikki (talk) 09:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - request by creator. Those were tests to investigate the bug. I have one other single file which i keep to demonstrate the bug, so those 4 files above can be deleted. Yug (talk) 08:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment, I see... that explains a lot of things. FanNihongo (talk) 06:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Sheyla Sandra Tello Rojas (talk) 02:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; g7. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
setpniecatiecatie 46.253.188.14 15:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
File:DEVA Partisi Genel Başkanı Ali Babacan, partisinin 'Kadın İçin Adalet Eylem Planı'nın kamuoyuna duyurulduğu toplantıda.png
[edit]
Not an own work. (https://t24.com.tr/haber/ali-babacan-ulkemizdeki-mevcut-yonetim-krizinin-en-agir-maliyetini-kadinlar-oduyor,996348) Expert73 (talk) 09:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
painting after 1917, author died 1972 『白猫』Обг. 04:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster, no FOP in Slovenia, not de minimis 220.246.145.204 04:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Creator templates are intended for creators. I didn't find any creation like artwork or books. Achim55 (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Images such as her congressional portrait were created via her U.S. House office, therefore I believed she was eligible to be a creator. --Woko Sapien (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - inappropriate use of template, not used. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work from a book, no indication of a CC licensing. 91.34.39.222 10:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: also out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work from a book, no indication of a CC licensing. 91.34.39.222 10:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
It's too private. The public should not be informed so precisely about former places of residence. Heartrock0 (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- So he no longer lives there, but because he used to live there, we shouldn't host a photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Cloud Gate here is NOT trivial. It takes more than half of the image. The copyrighted work is made by Anish Kapoor. Since there is no freedom of panorama for non-architecture in the United States, this image must be deleted to prevent Commons being the source of risk for reusers and content creators. There was also a case against National Rifle Association over their use of this public art in their video. ([7]) Cropping this would make the image a mere out-of-scope image of a group pictorial of non-notable persons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Cloud Gate is copyrighted (see registration VA0001983425) and too recent to be in public domain due to age. No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States. Sculptor Anish Kapoor is known to be litigious, so it is reasonable to assume that no permission to release images under a free license would be granted.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ixfd64 (talk) 00:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Procedural close: Oops, didn't see that the files are already covered at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate#Files in Category:Cloud Gate 12. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Interior of a copyrighted artwork. The copyrighted Cloud Gate is made by Anish Kapoor. Since there is no freedom of panorama for non-architecture in the United States, this image must be deleted to prevent Commons being the source of risk for reusers and content creators. There was also a case against National Rifle Association over their use of this public art in their video. ([8])
- File:Cloud Gate- interior reflection (9691432579).jpg
- File:Cloud Gate- interior reflection (9691433289).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, from https://www.simonchatterley.com/post/in-the-beginning Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
This article has an incorrect or misleading description - I'm all for freely uploaded imagery, but this simply does not show a castle of any kind, or even the ruins of one. If it depicts a pass that leads up to the ruins of a castle, it should say as much and clearly state the location, but it doesn't - as such it is simply poorly explained or described. The author should describe it properly, or it should go. Aetius (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Have you had a look at w:Atashgah Castle? At least look at that before you nominate for deletion. If the image is deleted, there will be a big hole in that article and many others. I don't think the lack of a thorough description is a good reason to delete this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - A possibly poor name is not a reason to delete. Fix the name with {{Rename}} if you wish. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia
- File:The first monument to Viktor Tsoi at the place of his death in Latvia.jpg
- File:Памятник Виктору Цою в Латвии на месте гибели.jpg
rubin16 (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- I was the photographer, files released into public domain.GrIgMaNN (talk) 05:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sometimes when you make photos of architectural objects, own permission from the photographer isn't enough: COM:FOP rubin16 (talk) 05:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- I was the photographer, files released into public domain.GrIgMaNN (talk) 05:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The images infringe on the copyrights for the art works shown. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Image of three books on a shelf, the covers of which are likely in copyright. Generally, the photo does not convey any encyclopedic information beyond the books' titles, which can just as easily be represented in list form. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete No freedom of panorama exists in the United State for 3D works of art, per this. As a protected work, images of this work where the work is not deminimis to the whole attract copyright from the original artwork. There is no indication anywhere that the original artist has released their rights to this artwork. Incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license, several copyright marks at the bottom (bing, microsoft) GeorgHH • talk 22:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license, several copyright marks at the bottom (bing, microsoft) GeorgHH • talk 22:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:Rudolf Kirchschläger autriche.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted both as copyvios, compare [9] from 2015. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
„Bildquelle KD Busch“ (= image source KD Busch), presumably not an own work DCB (talk) 18:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No metadata, weird framing. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No metadata, weird framing (surveillance camera?). Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Own work? 181.203.48.239 00:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope anyways. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Not an own work. (https://www.dunya.com/gundem/babacan-koskoca-ulke-survivor-seti-gibi-haberi-637112) Expert73 (talk) 09:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Suite à la réussite de la création du djvu pour le livre entier (File:Codes et lois pour la France, l'Algérie et les colonies, 1912.djvu), l'extrait (File:Codes et lois pour la France, l'Algérie et les colonies, 1912 (extrait).djvu) est devenu inutile. Merci de bien vouloir supprimer l'extrait. Cunegonde1 (talk) 10:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Original image is by Mystery Lover (https://twitter.com/39MysteryLover/status/1533452439642603522/photo/3). Uploaded image seems to have been purposefully modified with the watermark removed. Lullabying (talk) 10:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please withdraw your nomination. This is the actual source of the image: https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/1533796602380292096 A simple look at their account and you'll see their other images. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- The date stamp of that post is June 6, which is after June 5. How do you explain that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- They were simply posted a day later. Actually, here is a tweet https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/1533436211141849088 from June 5, and you'll see the third image (https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/1533436211141849088/photo/3) is the same as one of the images posted a day later. On those pictures, you can even see where he took it on his camera. Ka Ming is an idol photographer who attends concerts and fansign events of many K-pop idols. Here's a photo he took of Korean soloist Taeyeon in 2017: https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/874238335593586688 and you'll see his watermark on the right-hand bottom corner. Just have a look through his account. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 03:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Seems like a good argument. The only thing is, though, are these free images, and is he OK with removing his watermark and having his images reused, even for commercial purposes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- He uploaded the image himself. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 04:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Cool. So Keep, and let's be glad we have this image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- I will withdraw the nomination based on the statements Btspurplegalaxy provided. @Btspurplegalaxy: in the future, please make your statements on the deletion request as you have done so here instead of undoing my nomination. Lullabying (talk) 01:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'll keep that noted. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 07:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- First, this is the fansign event, every one can take photo, and every one will take the same pose on the idol, so post it the same pose photo it doesn't mean steal and removing watermark and reused. I have already give you the original photo directly from my camera to prove it, is seem you don't understand the kpop culture, so please reunderstanding this situation again ok. Kaming309 (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'll keep that noted. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 07:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Cool. So
- He uploaded the image himself. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 04:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Seems like a good argument. The only thing is, though, are these free images, and is he OK with removing his watermark and having his images reused, even for commercial purposes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- They were simply posted a day later. Actually, here is a tweet https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/1533436211141849088 from June 5, and you'll see the third image (https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/1533436211141849088/photo/3) is the same as one of the images posted a day later. On those pictures, you can even see where he took it on his camera. Ka Ming is an idol photographer who attends concerts and fansign events of many K-pop idols. Here's a photo he took of Korean soloist Taeyeon in 2017: https://twitter.com/davidss309/status/874238335593586688 and you'll see his watermark on the right-hand bottom corner. Just have a look through his account. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 03:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- The date stamp of that post is June 6, which is after June 5. How do you explain that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: there is a VRT permission. Ruthven (msg) 08:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work, no CC licensing 91.34.39.222 11:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below the threshold of originality. Ruthven (msg) 08:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Biografen Saga Interiör. ArkDes ARKM.1962-101-1276a.jpg (which has better metadata) Ambrosiani (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: it's a redirect to the same file. Ruthven (msg) 08:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Probably fake license, many old uses in Russian media, see https://iz.ru/832251/dmitrii-iurov/oblik-altaira-kakim-budet-novyi-rossiiskii-udarnyi-bespilotnik from 2019 for example. Wikisaurus (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dmitrij.Dahno (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permission to use these images as freely licensed
- File:Sobor Svyatyh mychenikov Cholmskich i Podlyashskich.png
- File:Prepodobnomuchenik vasilij mazurenko 1938.jpg
- File:Sv-sobor-brjanskih-svjatyh.png
- File:Sv-sobor-rjazanskih-svjatyh.jpg
- File:Sv-fedor-ostrojskiy orlenov artur.jpg
- File:Протоиерей Алексий Воробьев Москва. Тюрьма НКВД. 1937.jpg
- File:Прмч. Евтихий (Качур). Тюрьма НКВД. 1937 г.jpg
- File:Sobor Vinnickih Sviatyh.jpg
- File:Sobor Galickih Svyatyah.jpg
- File:Sobor Volynskih Svyatyah.png
- File:Svmch Ioann Melnichenko 1889 - 1937.png
- File:Savva Bogougodnik.png
- File:Прп. Алексий Печерский.jpg
- File:Svmch. Dimitrii Smirnov.jpg
- File:Священномученик Димитрий Воскресенский.jpg
._%D0%A2%D1%8E%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B0_%D0%9D%D0%9A%D0%92%D0%94._1937_%D0%B3.jpg){kind=link}
rubin16 (talk) 11:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Russia for the images of people, I have no opinion on the age of the icons. Images created prior to 1938 in Russia, where the creator is anonymous, are in the public domain. All the images of people are prior to 1938 according to the website. The cutoff for PD-Russia is January 1, 1943. --RAN (talk) 12:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Literally the first file linked is of an icon from 2003. It needs a permission from the body that approved it for liturgical use, ie. the Holy Synod of the Polish Orthodox Church. Dankowski (talk) 12:45, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination the recent icons. Kept the photographs in {{PD-Russia}}+{{PD-1996}}. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
watermark Almaz Zhezovsky (talk) 12:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo does not depict the supposed subject CzarJobKhaya (talk) 13:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It's used in a bunch of articles. Why do you want to delete it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I added disputed fact in the description. Ruthven (msg) 08:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit Fehllizenzierung als Eigens Werk des Hochladers. Der Dateititel spricht aber für eine Urheberschaft des Fotografen Max Sonnenschein. Lutheraner (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ziemlich klarer Fall von Copyvio, eigentlich schnelllöschfähig. In der Galerie dort Bild Nr. 8: "© Max Sonnenschein". --91.34.39.222 21:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, see also de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/7. Juli 2022#Sarah_von_Chamier. --Achim55 (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Achim. Ruthven (msg) 08:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
low-res image, unused, replaced by File:Sinai map.PNG Enyavar (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Black bordering at top and bottom make own work really doubtful and a reproduction more likely. Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This is not exempt work. This is not en:postal card (not sign of postal payment). This is ordinary en:postcard (front/back side). Alex Spade (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Maometto97 as Dw no source since (dw no source since) HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The portrait in right is in public domain (File:Portrait of Ruhollah Khomeini By Mohammad Sayyad.jpg). I am not sure about the source of left portrait. Does Commons:De minimis apply? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, the main reason for me was the left portrait, and I don't know if it will be included in De minimis or not; It is better to wait for the opinion of other editors and administrators. And I think it is better to mention the license of the right portrait in this file. --Maometto97 (talk) 18:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: both the left portrait and the composition of both are copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author is not "Herrera Casado" (Antonio), since he was born (1947) after the person depicted died (Francisco Goñi, 1873-1936). Source is not CC BY-SA 4.0 licensed, either. Data about original publication needed in order to determine copyright status (maybe public domain, maybe not, depending on author, publishing date, possible anonymous publishing, etc). Strakhov (talk) 17:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Spain-photo, Spain uses 25 years. --RAN (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless there is no much Spanish case law that deems which photographs are simple enough, it's arguable this is clearly not a "mera fotografía". Because that exception doest not apply to "every" photograph. COM:PRP applies. Strakhov (talk) 04:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- To meet the requirements of the Commons:Precautionary Principle you must present "significant doubt", not just your opinion that this is not a "simple photograph" but perhaps show an expert opinion that this represents a "complex photograph" beyond just pressing the button to activate the shutter on the camera. See for example: File:Salvador_Dali_A_(Dali_Atomicus)_09633u.jpg, for a complex photograph requiring unique set dressing and multiple attempts. --RAN (talk) 13:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Mimicking you; "to meet the requirements of Spanish copyright regarding meras fotografías you must present evidence of why this is a mera fotografía, not just your opinion". Spoiler -> you haven't. Strakhov (talk) 16:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Anyway: underwater photography -> not mera photography in Spain, 500 000 pesetas of penalty fee. Now surely you can provide proof of what a mera fotografía is and why would that exception apply to studio photography. Strakhov (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- To meet the requirements of the Commons:Precautionary Principle you must present "significant doubt", not just your opinion that this is not a "simple photograph" but perhaps show an expert opinion that this represents a "complex photograph" beyond just pressing the button to activate the shutter on the camera. See for example: File:Salvador_Dali_A_(Dali_Atomicus)_09633u.jpg, for a complex photograph requiring unique set dressing and multiple attempts. --RAN (talk) 13:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
_09633u.jpg){kind=link}
- Sorry, I have no clue to what "underwater photography" has to do with this particular image of Francisco Goñi. The image doesn't meet the complexity of this known image of Salvador Dali: File:Salvador_Dali_A_(Dali_Atomicus)_09633u.jpg, the standard for complex art photography worthy of more protection. Pressing the shutter button, even at a commercial studio, does not raise the image to an art form. If the law was meant to protect specifically commercial photographs, it would have mentioned commercial photography in the law. --RAN (talk) 02:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have no clue to what that photo of Dalí has to do with Spanish case law regarding simple photographs (sources, please??). In the other hand, "underwater photography" is one of the few examples you will be able to find on Spanish judges determining what a mera fotografía is. And that example is one pretty much lowering the originality bar at what you contemptuously call "pressing the shutter button". Cheers. Strakhov (talk) 18:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- It looks like that the subject posed for this photo. So, it is may not be just a simple photo - it is looks like that the photo was staged. Ruslik (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- In other countries, photographs where the photographer had control over the entire scene -- such as studio photographs -- were often full works, and not simple photographs. In those situations, the pictured content can also be part of the photographer's expression, as opposed to simple snapshots. I have not looked at Spain's specific wording or cases, though. Another source for the photo is here, where they credit it to Agrupación Fotográfica de Guadalajara, and also Archivo Histórico Provincial de Guadalajara, which holds Goñi's archives. It could be a self-portrait, I suppose, but it doesn't say that so maybe it's anonymous and it could be PD that way. Sounds like Goñi's archives were not found until 1980. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. The surroundings and the level of detail of the photo do not allow to evaluate the composiiton or a made-up set. Must be "simple photo". Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of Saint Michel girouette HV.jpg Geert Van Pamel (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Almost identical to the image found here that is credited as "Courtesy image" meaning it likely came from the subject's campaign or office and would be subject to copyright. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: screenshot. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from https://www.buenavistadelnorte.es/sin-categoria/2019/acto-de-reconocimiento-para-luisma-hernandez-tras-la-publicacion-de-su-libro-crea-tu-modelo-de-juego/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
clearly a copyviol — danyele 22:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Thierry Paul Valette et Emmanuelle Wargon,Ministre déléguée au logement, lors du grand débat d'Emmanuel MACRON ( Mairie du 15ème ).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Les métadonnées indiquent une capture d'écran CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Thierry Paul Valette aux côtés d'Anne Hidalgo pour la campagne aux élections législatives e Ryadh Sallem.jpg
[edit]
Possible copyvio : Photo d'un article de Médiapart https://blogs.mediapart.fr/630871/blog/190517/en-campagne-avec-anne-hidalgo-thierry-paul-valette-pour-ryadh-sallem CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Thierry-Paul Valette aux côtés d'Alexandre Malafaye, co-anime le grand débat à la mairie du 15ième à Paris en présence de la secrétaire d'État Emmanuelle Wargon.png
[edit]
Possible copyvio : Margoulinage d'une capture d'écran de CNews téléversée plus tôt : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thierry_Paul_Valette_aux_c%C3%B4t%C3%A9s_d%27Alexandre_Malfaye,_co-anime_le_grand_d%C3%A9bat_%C3%A0_la_mairie_du_15i%C3%A8me_%C3%A0_Paris_en_pr%C3%A9sence_de_la_secr%C3%A9taire_d%27%C3%89tat_Emmanuelle_Wargon_(capture_Cnews).png CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Thierry-Paul Valette organisateur des marches de Paris et de Valence concernant l'affaire Noémie Musenga.jpg
[edit]
Possible copyvio : La date de la photo ne correspond pas à la date de l'événement (en 2018) et la photo apparaît dans cette vidéo [10] CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:War crimes during 2022 invasion through 12 March according to Prosecutor General of Ukraine.jpg
[edit]
Do not fall under article 10. This is doc of information nature. Alex Spade (talk) 14:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
supposed to be a screenshot of a video, sequences of this video are already used in various ways (e.g. at https://makeagif.com/gif/axel-stoll-nsl-forum-berlin-vom-13-dezember-2013-film-0007-8SjwVx as GIF), this is an own work DCB (talk) 18:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- You can see in the picture, that no one is behind Dr. Axel Stoll, but in the gif someone is sitting behind Dr. Axel Stoll. So, everyone can retrace, that is no screenshot of this. Additional, Dipl. Ing. Dennis Ingo Schulz didn't make the same facial expression. Xecuter (talk) 09:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: The source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz6Qu6Ze1WI has been deleted and isn't available at archive.org. So there is no way to check the validity of the license. --Achim55 (talk) 10:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- What was "the source"? A random unavailable YT-link without validity of content. Whatever, this photo of tta3 is from 22.february 2023. Why 13.december? The request is a non-sense hoax...
- If you are very annoyed, than change the filename to stoll, axel. 2A01:C22:BD3B:2C42:9327:C869:539E:973C 12:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- A lower quality (360p) version is still available (or reuploaded) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-kmf5aGBM4. --Achim55 (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Likely above the threshold of originality in the Czech Republic/Czechia, although COM:TOO Czech Republic is a little vague, so COM:PRP probably applies. It can probably be uploaded locally to enwiki. Ovinus (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Does it mean that the geographical location is important here? Actually anyone can get the logo from the official JetBrains brand assets page: https://www.jetbrains.com/company/brand/#brand-guidelines. Please download a file if needed. JB2020M (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- JB2020M: Because JetBrains is Czech company, Czech copyright law applies to this image. It is likely below the threshold of originality in the US, though, and therefore can be uploaded to the English Wikipedia without problems and used there. It just can't (in my opinion) be used on Commons. The threshold of originality ia a standard of whether a given image/design is simple enough to be uncopyrightable; for example, a plain piece of text is below the threshold of originality and is therefore in the public domain and usable everywhere. The JetBrains logo is sufficiently complicated that I cannot be sure whether it is copyrightable in the Czech Republic. Ovinus (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ovinus, if it is free in the US but not in its home country, it's uploaded as NFC on en.wiki. Sennecaster (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Under NFC? Doesn't it just say "don't transfer to Commons" (e.g. en:File:EDGE_magazine_(logo).svg Ovinus (talk) 03:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I might be mistaken, it's advice that I heard when I started doing image things. Sennecaster (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Under NFC? Doesn't it just say "don't transfer to Commons" (e.g. en:File:EDGE_magazine_(logo).svg Ovinus (talk) 03:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete This is likely above the threshold of originality in the country of origin, but as Ovinus says, there probably won't be a problem with hosting on Wikipedia if it's being used an in article. So I think that's the best option. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Above COM:TOO Andean Community. Jonteemil (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Hay muchos logos en Commons y no les marcan borrado y a este sí, me gustaría saber qué se debe hacer para que pueda mantenerse. Un saludo. Futbolero (talk) 22:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Futbolero: A file on Commons is judged by the laws of the country where the file was created. This logo is from Colombia and is hence judged by COM:TOO Andean Community whereas a logo from the United States is judged by COM:TOO United States. Given that different countries have different thresholds of originality, files from Colombia that are less complex than files from the United States might still be deleted eventhough the more complex file, from the United States, is kept. All because the United States has a higher threshold of originality than Colombia, according to my interpretation at least.Jonteemil (talk) 02:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}