Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_as.jpg){kind=link}
(Solario,_Andrea)(San_Valdarmo,_Giovanni)_(15._Jhrdt.)_-_Madonna_mit_Kind_-_2141_-_Führermuseum.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![85 File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Ica.jpg](#File:Ceremonia_Conmemorativa_"Unidos_por_el_Bicentenario"_-_Ica.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597762.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597781.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Facebook resolutions, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Niñas Tacneñas 02.jpg
- File:Niñas Tacneñas.jpg
- File:Bandera en la Plaza 28 de agosto.jpg
- File:Procesión de la Bandera en las calles de Tacna.jpg
- File:Tacneños en la Procesión a la Bandera.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Not fouind at URL, invalid date of shooting.
Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao
[edit]Copyright infringement of the album https://www.flickr.com/photos/gregionaldelcallao/albums/72157719628272064
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao.jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (1).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (2).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (3).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (4).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (5).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (6).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (7).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (8).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (9).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (10).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (11).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (12).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (13).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (14).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (15).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (16).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (17).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (18).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (19).jpg
- File:Ceremonia Conmemorativa "Unidos por el Bicentenario" - Callao (20).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
190.237.19.249 05:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 06:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa
[edit]Copyright infringement of the album https://www.flickr.com/photos/bicentenariope/albums/72177720295691853
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa.jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (1).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (2).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (3).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (4).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (5).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (6).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (7).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (8).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (9).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (10).jpg
- File:Bicentenario de la Batalla de Secchapampa (11).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
190.237.19.249 05:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 06:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by World Sex King (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal spam, COM:PENISes and nonsense.
Dronebogus (talk) 05:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; f10. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Obviously stolen Dronebogus (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F7|2=broken svg only the preview is broken, the file looks fine in my browser GPSLeo (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Can you please explain what is broken? Andrej Shadura (talk) 11:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Right, I see what you mean — only the preview is broken, I don’t know why. When I upload a new version, the preview is briefly okay, but as soon as I upload it it becomes broken again. Andrej Shadura (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yay, I managed to get it fixed. Andrej Shadura (talk) 12:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file fixed; no need for revision deletion. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Child porn Dronebogus (talk) 06:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Needs OTRS from Nguyen A photo per watermark Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete Agreed. THe photographer must provide a free license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Loga56 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Bastianseho (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Test, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Bastianseho (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Test, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Vandalismo y no own work 191.125.27.152 23:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
F10 and vandal 191.125.27.152 23:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
F10 F10 and F10 191.125.27.152 23:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA794770 Culex (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pyb at 17:44, 23 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA793964 Culex (talk) 10:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pyb at 17:45, 23 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA795540 Culex (talk) 10:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pyb at 17:44, 23 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA794082 Culex (talk) 10:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pyb at 17:44, 23 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
_as.jpg){kind=link}
_as.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
肖像権の侵害。主催者の記録には同意しましたが、CC-BYで全世界に公開されることには同意していません。 126.194.14.106 13:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
_as.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 18:14, 23 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 01:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
_as.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 20:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=673533572#File:WikipediaTown_Sumida_2022-06-18(2)_as.jpg){kind=link}
OOS Crap Dronebogus (talk) 06:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Facebook file and F10, speedly — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.27.152 (talk) 01:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleting F10 191.125.27.152 23:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:5FA:6024:AF41:7267 09:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: permission needed from "waheedphotography" per watermark in botom right. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 03:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
No license 103.255.7.55 09:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:17, 25 June 2022 UTC: No permission since 17 June 2022 --Krdbot 01:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]
Dronebogus (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Unremarkable WP:PENIS pics
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Gbawden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Low quality penis images
File:Enlarge 2425408393.png- File:Erect circumcised penis.jpg
- File:Male anus, perineum, scrotum and penis II.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand the benchmark for "low quality". It demonstrates exactly what it stated. I believe in regards to both empirical characteristics (resolution, clarity, etc) and usefulness, it surpasses many other images left under this category. Rafe101 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The world makes a little more sense. Thanks Rafe101 (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the rest. 186.175.219.84 22:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]SERIOUSLY WE DO NOT NEED MORE DICK PICS
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (1).gif
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (2).gif
- File:Human Penis (1).jpg
- File:Human Penis (10).jpg
- File:Human Penis (11).jpg
- File:Human Penis (4).jpg
- File:Human Penis (5).jpg
- File:Human Penis (6).jpg
- File:Human Penis (7).jpg
- File:Human Penis (8).jpg
- File:Human Penis (9).jpg
- File:Human Penis+.jpg
- File:Human Penis-.png
- File:Low and tight circumcision.jpg
- File:Male penis flaccid to erect.jpg
- File:My dick.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:2
[edit]More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 05:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:2
[edit]OOS crap junk
- File:Diyar tami.jpg
- File:Laith hitem334.jpg
- File:Mohamed masor ab.jpg
- File:Mohamed0155.jpg
- File:صورةوليد شلال.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 10:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:2
[edit]Stupid OOS selfies
Dronebogus (talk) 00:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. Selfie SPA crap that's out of scope. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:2
[edit]More OOS junk
- File:ABDULKERİM DIRBAS.jpg
- File:Amaarqwerdjx24.jpg
- File:Amin salam4445.jpg
- File:Mohamed gomaa111.jpg
- File:الفنان رضا.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope. Llwyld (talk) 13:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:2
[edit]Oos crap junk
Dronebogus (talk) 11:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete on both as OOS. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:2
[edit]No evidence of permission.
- File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه سروش معاون اقتصادی.jpg
- File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه سروش معاون هماهنگی امور اقتصادی استانداری سیستان و بلوچستان.jpg
- File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه سروش.jpg
- File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه.jpg
- File:ماندانا زنگنه در نشست توسعه سواحل مکران.jpg
- File:ماندانا زنگنه سروش معاون اقتصادی استانداری سیستان و بلوچستان.jpg
- File:ماندانا زنگنه.jpg
- File:مزیت شهرستانی روستایی کتاب.pdf
- File:مزیت ها، قابلیت ها و مشوق های سرمایه گذاری.pdf
- File:نشست اقتصادی ماندانا زنگنه سروش و هیئت اقتصادی میز ایران در پاکستان.jpg
- File:کتابچه فرصتهای متقابل سرمایه گذاری با افغانستان.pdf
Dronebogus (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IrbIrb5032 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without metadata, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Kuleshwari Mata Temple Kulgam.jpg
- File:Katyani Temple Kakran Kulgam.jpg
- File:Ziayarat Kulgam.jpg
- File:Trout Fish Laisoo Kulgam.jpg
- File:Laisoo DH Pora Bridge.jpg
- File:Chiranbal Kulgam winter.jpg
- File:Arrigutnoo Kulgam Park.jpg
- File:Kulgam town mosque.jpg
- File:DISTRICT Hospital Kulgam.jpg
- File:Chiranbal Kulgam snow.jpg
- File:Chiranbal Kulgam fourth.jpg
- File:Chiranbal third pic.jpg
- File:District Hospital Kulgam.jpg
- File:Kulgam Town Drone.jpg
- File:District Public Park Kulgam.webp
- File:Kausir Nag.jpg
- File:Chiranbal Meadow.jpg
Yann (talk) 18:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Very likely copyvio: same photoshoot at https://www.indiancinemagallery.net/photos/navya-nair/view/image/navya-nair-in-saree-stills-16-12-2021-6, uploader also added a lot of copyrighted text from somewhere else to the subject's English Wikipedia article at the same time as adding this image. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- (The next day the user uploaded an out-and-out watermarked copyvio of the same actress from another website.) --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Another user uploaded File:Navya Nair 2022 - Latest - Kerala Costume.jpg from the same photoshoot today, watermarked "© vivek menon photographia". User:Abufazil then uploaded File:Navya Nair Oruthee 2022 times of india - Oruthee Promotion.jpg a couple of times, a promotional photo taken from Times of India without permission. --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, also I blocked the user for a week as copyviolator. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Meine Eichel.jpg deleted for low quality photo of very common object. Is File:Hornzipfel.jpg in scope for medical condition? No opinion on others. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Unremarkable COM:PENIS (well, sometimes butthole/cum) selfies, nothing we don’t already have.
- File:01 MyPee-hole.jpg
- File:01 MyLongForeskin.jpg
- File:01 MyMasturbation.jpg
- File:01 MyAnus.jpg
- File:01 MyDamm.jpg
- File:Dorsale Venen des Penis.jpg
- File:01 Rasiertes Schamhaar.jpg
- File:1 Rasiertes Schamhaar.jpg
- File:1 Penis mit zurückgezogener Vorhaut.jpg
- File:1 Vorhaut-Penis.jpg
- File:1 Auf den Bauch gespritzt.jpg
- File:Mann beim Onanieren.ogg
- File:1 Mann beim Pinkeln.jpg
- File:Penis-Eichel.jpg
- File:Nicht sonderlich ausgeprägtes Frenulum.jpg
- File:Before-and-after-shave.jpg
- File:Mein unrasierter Penis.jpg
- File:Unrasierter Penis.jpg
- File:Eichel mit Vorsaft.jpg
- File:Meine Hoden.jpg
- File:Schlaffer Hodensack.jpg
- File:Hodensack mit Naht.jpg
- File:Sperm-puddle.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete since Commons isn't a porn host and these images have zero educational value. At least I assume they don't since I didn't look at them, but I think the titles alone are enough to determine they aren't educational. It's not like similar images aren't extremely easy to find in other places either. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
i believe user has good nudity images, im writing that because they are educational.
but that image is really out of project scope.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Only that one? Delete. 186.172.6.153 22:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep Decent quality image, decent description and categories. If it’s part of a set of good images, then surely we should keep it. Brianjd (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 15:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a low-quality PDF of a Wikipedia article, why is this useful? Dronebogus (talk) 22:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:22, 1 July 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by USA 339.66.4416 --Krdbot 13:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept per the argument made by Multichill and the fact that this comes off like a bad faithed nomination. Just as a side to that, I don't think the inclusion of a frame makes it not PD because in most cases there's zero way to know who created the frame, when it was made, or anything else that would help us determine copyright. Also, frames are usually pretty basic and there's thousands of images hosted on Commons with frames already. That said, I encourage Oursana to discuss this somewhere if they think the status quo needs changing. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Anonym (italienisch)(Solario, Andrea)(San Valdarmo, Giovanni) (15. Jhrdt.) - Madonna mit Kind - 2141 - Führermuseum.jpg
[edit](Solario,_Andrea)(San_Valdarmo,_Giovanni)_(15._Jhrdt.)_-_Madonna_mit_Kind_-_2141_-_F%C3%BChrermuseum.jpg){kind=link}
(Solario,_Andrea)(San_Valdarmo,_Giovanni)_(15._Jhrdt.)_-_Madonna_mit_Kind_-_2141_-_F%C3%BChrermuseum.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, no valid copyright licence. The PD-art tag only applies for 2D-art works, which a framed artwork is not. Hence copyvio with no valid license for photo of three-dimensional artwork not taken by the uploader. Oursana (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-art also covers framed works like this one. Even if it won't, this photo is from the Munich Central Collecting Point which was operated by people employed by the US federal government (Monuments Men) so no new copyright was added anyway. Just before you nominated this file you left me an angry message on Wikidata and removed an old related topic from your talk page. I get the feeling this deletion nomination is a revenge nomination. Multichill (talk) 09:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Image of a child wearing underpants. The focus of the image is the boy's crotch. Used only in one place, which is a recently created article by User:Addeodatus, a user who has been globally locked by the WMF ("WMFOFFICE: CPP"). Addeodatus's only upload was file:A penis of a 14 years old teenager with penile synechiae.jpg. B. disruptus (talk) 04:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It is a needless image. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 00:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yasu at 15:38, 2 July 2022 UTC: No license since 22 June 2022 (F5) --Krdbot 19:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A0422421287 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PENIS: Unremarkable.
Mys_721tx (talk) 15:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A0422421287 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PENIS: unremarkable.
Mys_721tx (talk) 11:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete since Commons isn't a porn host and these are clearly OOS. Not that I looked, but such images are pretty easily found online. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Formula with no explanatory description, used only on the user page. The draft article has not been edited since May 1, 2016. No other user contributions to any Wikipedia's sister projects. No educational value, out of scope. Feyth (talk) 23:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Formulas with no explanatory description, used only on the user page. The draft article has not been edited since May 1, 2016. No other user contributions to any Wikipedia's sister projects. No educational value, out of scope. Feyth (talk) 23:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Formulas with no explanatory description, used only on the user page. The draft article has not been edited since May 1, 2016. No other user contributions to any Wikipedia's sister projects. No educational value, out of scope. Feyth (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Formula with no explanatory description, used only on the user page. The draft article has not been edited since May 1, 2016. No other user contributions to any Wikipedia's sister projects. No educational value, out of scope. Feyth (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Formulas with no explanatory description, used only on the user page. The draft article has not been edited since May 1, 2016. No other user contributions to any Wikipedia's sister projects. No educational value, out of scope. Feyth (talk) 23:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
file in copyviol: photo by Paolo Bruno/Getty Images, cf. gettyimages.it — danyele 23:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Fred Oyetayo (born August 8, 1993) is a Nigerian technology entrepreneur and lawyer. He is known for co-founding and leading Fresible as its chief executive officer. 191.125.27.152 23:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Permiso? 191.125.27.152 23:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Botufamily (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted book covers.
- File:Bastină de Pavel Boțu.jpg
- File:Casă în Bugeac de Pavel Boțu.jpg
- File:Coperta la carede si zbor.jpg
- File:Coperta la lemn ceresc.jpg
Gikü (talk) 15:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete as clearly copyvio. BTW, I was actually going to nominate these for deletion myself but Gikü beat me to it. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Botufamily (talk · contribs)
[edit]Family photos with no clear authorship or proof of permission.
Gikü (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Josef Seger (graphic designer)
[edit]per Commons:Currency#Austria, missing permission for original work. Designs by Josef Seger (1908-1998), österreichischer Grafiker. Could be restored as PD in 2069
- File:10 Schilling 1946 back.png
- File:10 Schilling 1946 front.png
- File:Austria 10 S 1946 - 25.8.49-30.4.52.jpg
- File:Austria 100 S 1936 - planned 1.7.38 never issued.jpg
- File:Austria 100 S 1947 - 28.1.48-27.2.54.jpg
- File:Austria 20 S 1946 - 12.4.48-30.6.51.jpg
- File:Austria 50 S 1935 - 8.6.36-15.5.38.jpg
- File:Austria 50 S 1945 - 11.12.47-14.2.53.jpg
Wdwd (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete since bank notes of Austria are not PD and the artist hasn't been dead long enough for the copyright to lapse either. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erhard Amadeus-Dier
[edit]per Commons:Currency#Austria, missing permission for original work. Designs by Erhard Amadeus-Dier (1893-1969), österreichischer Grafiker. Could be restored as PD in 2040
- File:10 Schilling Lipizzaner obverse.jpg
- File:10 Schilling Lipizzaner reverse.jpg
- File:20 Schilling Joseph Haydn obverse.JPG
- File:20 Schilling Joseph Haydn reverse.JPG
Wdwd (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. Currency in Austria isn't PD and enough time hasn't passed since the artist died for the copyright to lapse either. So these images are clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erhard Amadeus-Dier
[edit]These photos of 1949 Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designer of these, de:Erhard Amadeus Dier, died in 1969, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2039, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2045 when their US copyrights that were restored bythe URAA will also have expired.
- File:Austria 100 S 1949 1.Aufl. - 3.11.49-15.4.59.jpg
- File:Austria 100 S 1949 2.Aufl. - 3.11.49-15.4.59.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Userpage of inactive SPA; only content is “yeh” Dronebogus (talk) 05:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: User page created by different account. --Achim55 (talk) 13:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen? Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope garbage Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope junk
Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope
Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS junk files Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS crap junk Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info + OOS Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Load of OOS crap This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oos garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That was fast. More junk as usual Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Garbagé de OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
_2.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_posted_on_Instagram_CPvlHbYFa7t(JPG).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:1
[edit]Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual collection of Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Oos garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual oos crap
Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
There is a typo in the caption. The uploader has already made the correction, but uploaded it as a separate file, File:Pretenellin A Biosynthesis Scheme Pretenellin A.1.gif. This unused incorrect file is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 13:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both, as they have an in-image caption. File:Pretenellin A.gif by same uploader is just the structure (though it, as with the others, drawn with unusual bold bolds in a poor file-format). DMacks (talk) 13:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Going one step further: All three files (File:Pretenellin A Biosynthesis Scheme Pretenellin A.gif + File:Pretenellin A Biosynthesis Scheme Pretenellin A.1.gif + File:Pretenellin A.gif) should get deleted. I have uploaded File:Pretenellin-A-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. In addition, the unused redirect File:Pretenellin A Biosynthesis Scheme Pretenellin A -D.gif should also get deleted. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Nanahuatl. Kadı Message 12:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko, hi! Could you close the discussion? Best, Kadı Message 17:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Used by a sockpuppet in a hoax article. I'm not sure who this is an image of. Liz (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Product of a serial sockpuppeteer and hoaxer. Marbletan (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Used by a sockpuppet in a hoax article. I'm not sure whose signature this is. Liz (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Product of a serial sockpuppeteer and hoaxer. Marbletan (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
low quality and unused Ske (talk) 04:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
useless screen capture Ske (talk) 04:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
useless photomontage Ske (talk) 04:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Unencyclopedic and possibly violation of personality rights. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Terrible quality COM:PORN Dronebogus (talk) 05:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per nom. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal spam Dronebogus (talk) 06:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aardvark909 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Amateurish and prurient photos of subjects we already have good photos of, uploaded by single-purpose COM:PORN account, also COM:PERSONALITY and consent concerns.
- File:Wife creampie at new years eve party 01.JPG
- File:Wife creampie at new years eve party 02.JPG
- File:Facial Cumshot.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 05:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete Per the nominator. Totally worthless to the project. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope GY Fan★ 08:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope GY Fan★ 08:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, low quality and unremarkable Dronebogus (talk) 10:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Test file Enyavar (talk) 16:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo for non-wikipedian: out of Scope --Karim talk me :)..! 06:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
رفعته عن طريق الخطأ KhaledYasser.Y (talk) 19:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot 191.126.141.133 00:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The TV featured here contains copyrighted material. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 181.203.101.141 01:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 21:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? Quién es? 181.203.101.141 01:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ezarateesteban 21:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
copyright on watermark and no permission Ske (talk) 03:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/omarmd/51338879862/in/album-72157719598894299/ 190.237.19.249 03:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
![03:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/23#c-190.237.19.249-2022-06-23T03:52:00.000Z-File:Ceremonia_Conmemorativa_"Unidos_por_el_Bicentenario"_-_Ica.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: speedy deletion. --Ezarateesteban 21:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
![21:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/23#c-Ezarate-20220806213000-File:Ceremonia_Conmemorativa_"Unidos_por_el_Bicentenario"_-_Ica.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted picture from internet Shadow4dark (talk) 07:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:37, 8 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo/press photo --Krdbot 06:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation but I may have missed something so not requesting a speedy delete Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- The photographer has licensed this image for use in the public domain, as long as he is credited on Wikimedia. I can provide evidence if needed Annoyed-Briefs-in-Jenkins (talk) 10:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Annoyed-Briefs-in-Jenkins: Thankyou for responding. My understannding is per CommmonS:FAQ:If you are not the author but you have their permission to distribute under a free license (COM:L) please see Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT?". If anyone has different or better thoughts / suggestions please feel free to help. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) & Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, unless permission is sent to and accepted by VRT. No free license at the declared source, which is the webpage of a professional photographer. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA793182 Culex (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- En effet, les photos de l'Assemblée Nationale ne sont pas libres de droits
- A supprimer donc. Teewull (talk) 11:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Pyb. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that we have a license to use this image, or that this is a free use image SSSB (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok yeah it can be deleted I had been taught that anything without anything saying it needs to be licensed can be used Vifvuv (talk) 02:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Following your comment, I have transformed the deletion request in speedy deletion. Nicolas22g (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
PDF of Wikipedia article, out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 22:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete as out of scope. More generally speaking hosting PDFs of Wikipedia articles is a completely useless Pandora's box that wouldn't be worth opening even if there was a scope argument to be made. Although I don't think there is one anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
File:File Weights and measures division quality manual for proficiency testing and interlaboratory comparison (IA weightsmeasuresd7214gust).pdf - Wikipedia.pdf
[edit]What the hell is this? A PDF of a picture of a PDF? Dronebogus (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete PDF inception? Either way, it should be deleted as totally useless. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
no permission from living artist https://www.facebook.com/carolynsshows/ Ske (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jaqen (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of free rights Shadow4dark (talk) 07:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:18, 16 October 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 06:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted internet picture Shadow4dark (talk) 07:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:18, 16 October 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 06:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted picture from internet Shadow4dark (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:18, 16 October 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 06:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted picture from internet Shadow4dark (talk) 07:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:18, 16 October 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 06:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a photograph of a stock photo which is at least a decade old and was uploaded only for vandalism purposes. Denniscabrams (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Might be copyvio and might be de-minimis as cant really take a photo of the chapel without this Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think this is a tapestry, which is a work of artistic craftsmanship. Such works are subject to FOP in the UK if they're permanently displayed in premises open to the public. The University Web site isn't entirely clear whether the chapel is open to those not associated with the University[2], but the fact that the photographer was there suggests it is in practice. I'm not sure about permanency: there are photos of the chapel showing a different tapestry[3] but it may still be that this one is intended to be permanent. Overall, I think Keep. --bjh21 (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- @
I withdraw my nomination: A couple of months ago I thought I was clear in my mind what is and is not OK, I'm now less certain so I'll withdrawn on the basis of some uncertainty. Thankyou. -- 15:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- @
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
İnternet picture and copyrighted Shadow4dark (talk) 07:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete see [4] Sennecaster (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Not used, duplicate of 
Nokia621 (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; tagged vva. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Screenshots by PantheraLeo1359531
[edit]- File:Screenshot 20201204-154919 Android System.png
- File:Screenshot 20201204-154931 Android System klein.png
They are of no use and there is a better file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Android_11.PNG) --Артём 13327 (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Files with different cycle sizes indicate that this easter egg is animated, could be useful for people who are looking for a slightly different expression --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree that these are useful because of the different sizes. Obviously there is no standard rendition of this particular Android feature which is documented by the screenshots. De728631 (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not at all the same image, people might find different variants useful. Quality is very high and the same as the other file. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
I had already taken the same image recently. The other version is better than this one. It is almost a duplicate. I think it should be deleted. This is the other file I think it should be kept instead of the one I nominated for deletion. My sincere apologies for the inconvenience. File:A Corinthian and an Ionic capital at the Academy of Athens on May 22, 2022.jpg George E. Koronaios (talk) 23:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Falta edição final JOAO DE SOUSA LUZ (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
falta edição final JOAO DE SOUSA LUZ (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload; also out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 191.126.141.133 00:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- В таком случае Вы можете обратиться к Николе Мадзанти (Nicola Mazzanti) на Facebook и спросить его об этом. Если Вы увидели на FB фото, то это не значит, что я его украла. Я рада, что знакома с этим превосходным музыкантом, моим коллегой, и не раз бывала в Италии. Вы считаете, что все фотографии на Facebook краденные или их нельзя нигде больше публиковать??? Marina Vologdina (talk) 00:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Marina dice sacar fotos own work de diferente gente en 70s y 80s del siglo pasado. Lo siento, tengo mis dudas 191.126.141.133 00:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Уважаемый! Вероятно, Вы очень молоды, если вас это удивляет... А мне почти 63 года. Аугустинас Армонас (Augustinas Armonas) - мой незабвенный учитель, у которого я училась в 1978-1981 и впоследствии встречалась с ним многократно вплоть до его смерти!!! Так почему я не могла его фотографировать??? У меня есть много его снимков, а также сделанное за год до смерти. Я могу Вам указать имена его детей - известных литовских музыкантов, а Вы сможете найти их на FB и спросить об этом! Marina Vologdina (talk) 01:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
From Google Translator: Dear! You are probably very young if it surprises you ... And I am almost 63 years old. Augustinas Armonas (Augustinas Armonas) is my unforgettable teacher, from whom I studied in 1978-1981 and later met him many times until his death !!! So why couldn't I take pictures of him ??? I have many of his pictures, as well as taken a year before death. I can tell you the names of his children - famous Lithuanian musicians, and you can find them on FB and ask about it! --Ezarateesteban 21:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Marina Vologdina: We can assume good faith but you could send a email to COM:VRT with more info, you take the original photo? Ezarateesteban 21:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
A NSFW photo which is not used by any project, of a poor quality, and has many analogues. It doesn't look useful for educational or informational purpose. --Wolverène (talk) 09:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:PENIS. Low quality and also unused. --SCP-2000 16:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 11:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMap CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 12:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 12:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not in use, low quality version of File:NikkiedeJager2020-2.jpg Nokia621 (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Is 'not in use' a deletion reason? Ymnes (talk) 14:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, that is not a reason for deletion. Nor is low quality (here meaning: lowres). Vysotsky (talk) 10:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Speedy keep. I do not understand the nomination. --SVTCobra 02:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Blurry, we have better photos about the lake. I suspect copyright violation, educational value is quite small. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Seems like all the people are non-notable. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW, no FOP in Ontario for 2D works. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author Klaus Ulrich Werner? 191.126.141.133 00:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Author Photo - Chamila Karunarathne Copyright holder Photo - Chamila Karunarathne 191.126.141.133 00:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Author Viktoria Steiner Author Klaus Ulrich Werner. Cual es el usuario? O la usuaria? Vea todas sus fotos por favor, algo huele a comida quemada... 191.126.141.133 00:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
com:porn 181.203.101.141 01:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Todas las contribuciones a Wikipedia de este vandalo han sido revertidas: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribui%C3%A7%C3%B5es/Ronaldo6666 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.101.141 (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Video footnotes "China Central Television (CCTV)", not from the China News Service (CNS) 219.79.113.207 03:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Some wrong information has been written by mistake Spgconsumer (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Wrong information is given Spgconsumer (talk) 04:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Very likely stolen Dronebogus (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Keine Freigabe durch den Fotografen ersichtlich, also wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 16:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Die Fotos sind als Auftragsarbeiten entstanden. Beleg und zum wiederholten mal die Freigabe für Wikipedia folgt Volker Rahn (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Apparently no COM:VRT permission was received. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Low quality selfie by globally blocked user; formerly used in deleted troll article. OOS. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Eigenes Werk? Gemeinfreiheit? Und dabei geht es nicht nur um das Wappen, sondern um die kunstvolle Urkunde insgesamt. GerritR (talk) 12:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the artist is said to be de:Philipp Baum (1849–1886). --Rosenzweig τ 15:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be purely self-promotional Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Not used, duplicate of File:Prime Air.png Nokia621 (talk) 15:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Cropped from https://politiq2mada.skyrock.com/8.html. No permission. GeorgHH • talk 16:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author died in 1958, so not PMA+70 until 2029. PD-US in use on enwiki, allowing time for transfer to local copy. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:UK#Known author (Walter Stoneman). ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Nintendo content CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Misael Cerrato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history. See also COM:ANU#User:Misael Cerrato.
- File:Canal 13 (Argentina) - 1994.png
- File:Animal Planet logo 1996.png
- File:Animal Planet logo 2006.png
- File:Discovery Home & Health logo.png
- File:Discovery Travel & Living logo.png
- File:Discovery Turbo logo.png
- File:Logotipo de Argentina Televisora Color (1998-2000).png
- File:Discovery Channel logo 2009.png
- File:MC logo 2022.png
- File:Canal 5 HN logo.png
- File:Caracol TV logo 2003.png
- File:Logotipo de Televisa (1981-1990).png
- File:Teletica 1982.png
- File:Telecadena 7y4 logo.png
- File:Disney Junior logo.png -- deleted as copyvio 08/01/22 Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- File:CNN Plus logo.png
- File:CNN International logo 1995.png
- File:TV Azteca Honduras logo.png
- File:Univision Communications logo.png
- File:RCN Novelas logo 2019.png
- File:MGM Channel logo.png
- File:Canal 12 Nicaragua logo.webp
- File:Max Prime logo 2010.webp
- File:Maxprime logo.png
- File:Azteca América logo.png
- File:Universal Reality logo.png
- File:Universal Crime logo.png
- File:Universal Comedy logo.png
- File:Azteca América logo 2015.png
- File:Universal Plus logo.png
- File:Maya TV logo.png
- File:Cholusat Sur logo.png
- File:CampusTv logo.png
- File:Canal 2 (Nicaragua) logo.png
- File:Abriendo Brecha logo.png
- File:Antena 3 logo (1997-2004).png
- File:Logotipo de TV Azteca (1996-2011).png
- File:Univisión Deportes logo 2012.png
- File:Logotipo de Telefe (1990-2000).png
- File:Azteca logo.png
- File:TV Azteca logo (1994-1996).png
- File:TV Azteca logo (1993-1994).png
- File:Telemundo logo (1992-1997).png
- File:Canal 11 HN logo 2010.png
- File:American Network logo.png
- File:Telehit logo 2020.png
- File:Teletón Honduras logo.png
- File:ECO logo.png
- File:HBO Ole logo.png
- File:Teletica Canal 7 logo.png
- File:VTV HN logo 2019.png
- File:Cable Color HN logo.png
- File:Telesistema HN logo (2005-2016).png
- File:Canal 5 HN logo 2019.png
- File:Canal 5 HN logo (2004-2016).png
- File:Televicentro HN logo 2020.png
- File:TSi logo.png
- File:Cl@se logo.png
- File:CBS Telenoticias logo.png
_-_1994.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all but: File:MC logo 2022.png (simple text), File:CNN Plus logo.png (simple text), File:RCN Novelas logo 2019.png (st), File:Canal 12 Nicaragua logo.webp (st), File:Canal 12 Nicaragua logo.webp (st), File:Maxprime logo.png (st), File:Universal Reality logo.png (st), File:Universal Crime logo.png (st), File:Universal Comedy logo.png (st), File:Universal Plus logo.png (st), File:Maya TV logo.png (st), File:Antena 3 logo (1997-2004).png (st), File:Logotipo de Telefe (1990-2000).png (st), File:HBO Ole logo.png (st), File:Cl@se logo.png (st) and File:Univision Communications logo.png (Category:Univision logos). Their real authors should be credited and they should be tagged as trademarked. Tbhotch™ 23:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all except all of listed above per TBhotch A09090091 (talk) 12:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep all procedurally. Some of these logos have already been nominated for deletion multiple times and were kept because they were either clearly below the threshold of originality, or the country of origin doesn't have copyright laws for logos. For instance Logotipo de Televisa (1981-1990).png has been nominated for deletion like three times and was created in Mexico where symbols of organizations are public domain. The country also has an extremely high threshold of originality and there's literally nothing original about the logos design. Really, it's kind of ridiculous that the files keep being re-nominated. How many times through the process will it take before things are just kept and it is that hard to read the copyright laws for a country before mass nominating images from there? I don't think prior issues with the uploader is a good reason to delete the files either. We could "probably" justify deleting 99% of the files on here if it was. I definitely don't think it should justify mass nominating their uploads without doing the proper research first to see if the files are actually copyright violations or not. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Adamant. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Muchas fotos subidas por este usuario tienen el autor como la persona fotografiada. O sea de repente todos estos personajes buscaron un tripode y sacaron su propio foto! Quién controla estos mails? Asi funciona OTRS? Bravo... 191.125.27.152 22:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep VRT agent (verify): In this particular case, permission came from the copyright holder, not the uploader, so this DR is pointless. If there are other cases, we should see them one by one. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: verified ticket. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
copy vio, originally an advertisement (AAAAEL), not own work Mateus2019 (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nominee. A free image of Diana Grigoryan is already in use in the English Wiki. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
low resolution we have better pictures in Category:Porta Capuana (Naples) Ske (talk) 03:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. The resolution is way to bad for the image to be at all useful. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
photograph says it is copyrighted? 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:5FA:6024:AF41:7267 09:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: It is @ not ©. --Kadı Message 20:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work of architecture without commercial license permission from the architect, as we do not have freedom of panorama in our copyright law right now, that removes the need to ask for permissions from architects and artists for commercial publications of photos of copyrighted works of architecture, sculptures, and public art. Some older images were deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM City Taytay. This and the older photos can be restored/undeleted if freedom of panorama is now introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597762.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597762.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation by the bot Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597762.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597762.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597781.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597781.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Djm-leighpark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Possible copyright violation by the bot Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597781.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3597781.jpg){kind=link}
COM:Derivative work copyright violation. The intended subject of the nominated photos is the informational material of the Philippines Department of Public Works and Highways, but the material uses Google Maps, which by itself is unfree. Cannot benefit from {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} as the law clearly states the copyright of a third party work is not invalidated by its publication in a government material, see COM:Philippines#Government works.
- File:Alaminos, Laguna Highway 03.jpg
- File:Alaminos, Laguna Highway 04.jpg
- File:Alaminos, Laguna Highway 06.jpg
- File:Alaminos, Laguna Highway 27.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sarraei Team (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo pictures unlikely to be own work as they are lacking exif data and have visible watermarks. Uploader has a history of uploading copyvios and cannot be trusted.
Njd-de (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- also file:KAFVKA by Astrid Helmer.jpg
The license was never reviewed and now source site has disappeared. Probably we must now delete the photos. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no CC license at https://web.archive.org/web/20170420121000/http://www.kkt.berlin/bands/artist-details/artist/kafvka.html. --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
photo says it is copyrighted 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:5FA:6024:AF41:7267 09:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploader's user name is Mutahir Showkat, photo says (c) Mutahirshowkat - seems to be the same person. So unless and until there is evidence that this is not the case, I'll assume it is own work. --Rosenzweig τ 15:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Vector version avaiable File:Coat of arms of Grocka.svg No.cilepogača (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we don't delete raster images just because there's now also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 15:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Keine Freigabe durch den Fotografen ersichtlich, also wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Das Foto stammt von der offiziellen Presseseite des Kirchenpräsidenten der Evngelischen Kirche in Hessen und Nassau, Dr. Volker Jung und ist für alle publizistischen Wege freigegeben: Es ist für wiki nur seitlich beschnitten worden. Quelle: https://www.ekhn.de/ueber-uns/presse/mediathek/fotos-von-leitungspersoenlichkeiten.html Volker Rahn (talk) 20:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: "für alle publizistischen Wege freigegeben" reicht nicht, Wikimedia Commons verlangt eine Freigabe für jedermann für jegliche Zwecke, inkl. kommerzielle. Siehe Commons:Licensing, zur Genehmigungserteilung per E-Mail siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 12:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
official picture from Renault Monettt (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found it multiple times on the web, including here. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot 191.126.141.133 00:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment More info is needed, where is the original source? --Ezarateesteban 21:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. --Krd 16:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
No own work. 1985 o 2014? 191.126.141.133 00:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Question How do you know it's not her own work? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Я была знакома с композитором с 1983 года. Тогда я была студенткой консерватории. Он приезжал в нашу страну в качестве туриста многократно. А также знакома до сих пор с его семьёй, бывала у них в гостях в Баварии. Я также исполняла его музыкальные произведения, так как я музыкант. Фото 1985 года. Композитор умер в 2012 году ( https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%80,_%D0%92%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80 ), поэтому в 2014 году его уже никто не мог фотографировать. Фото отсканировано, поскольку в те годы были плёночные фотоаппараты. Фотоплёнки иногда терялись или портились от времени. Я Вам могу прислать e-mail вдовы Вернера Роттлера и Вы можете её об этом спросить! По этой ссылке есть информация о концертах 2019 года, где я исполняла произведения, которые композитор посвятил и подарил мне. Там я указана как Marina Wologdina. Это свидетельствует о нашем многолетнем знакомстве. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/erding/er-lebte-mehr-als-30-jahre-in-buch-in-memoriam-1.4405035 Marina Vologdina (talk) 01:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Keine Freigabe durch den Fotografen ersichtlich, also wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 16:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Die Fotos sind als Auftragsarbeiten entstanden. Beleg und zum wiederholten mal die Freigabe für Wikipedia folgt Volker Rahn (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: "Freigabe für Wikipedia" ist anscheinend nicht erfolgt und reicht auch nicht, Wikimedia Commons verlangt eine Freigabe für jedermann für jegliche Zwecke, inkl. kommerzielle. Siehe Commons:Licensing, zur Genehmigungserteilung per E-Mail siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 17:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 181.203.101.141 01:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I couldn't find a copy of this file on the web before it was uploaded here in 2008 (and after 14 years it's basically pointless to try and find netcopyvios). So unless and until there is some concrete evidence saying otherwise, I'll assume this is an own work of the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 181.203.101.141 01:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I couldn't find a copy of this file on the web before it was uploaded here in 2008 (and after 14 years it's basically pointless to try and find netcopyvios). So unless and until there is some concrete evidence saying otherwise, I'll assume this is an own work of the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 18:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Urheberrecht fraglich Jaster0401 (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Das finde ich ja jetzt mal eine mutige und ehrenwerte Aktion, das selber hier zur Diskussion zu stellen! Respekt!
- Ich fürchte leider, nach der Antwort auf meine Frage, die ich hier bekommen habe, ist das Bild leider tatsächlich zur Löschung verurteilt. Gruß, --217.239.1.129 23:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" is the correct license. --RAN (talk) 04:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello RAN, please help me get this right: This would mean the information I got at the village pump ("unpublished photos by unknown authors are still protected by copyright up 120 years after creation") was either incorrect or does not apply in this case? --217.239.5.220 10:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- That only applies to unpublished images that originate in the United States. This image comes from the EU and the USA respects their rules for when an image becomes public domain, except images that enter the public domain after 1996 (the URAA loophole). An image is made public (published in legal terms) when it moves from the photographer to the person being photographed. Some images remain with the photographer, for instance the Library of Congress in the United States acquires images from photo studios as they permanently close and has the original glass negatives, most of them never seen by the public. --RAN (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Given the general lack of information about this photo (who took it where and when? And was it really published at some point or not?), we don't even know if this image is really "anonymous" (which is not the same as "we don't know"), so there is no way of knowing if any license tag based on anonymous publication does really apply. The definition of "publication" offered above, btw, may be true for some older US photographs, but even for more recent (post 1977) US images it was abolished in favor of another definition, and I don't think you can apply it to images from Austria, Hungary or other EU countries. We do have the license tag {{PD-old-assumed}} for images that were created at least 120 years ago, but that is obviously not the case here. Assuming the 1918 date given is correct, the file can be restored with PD-old-assumed in 2039. --Rosenzweig τ 17:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JonasBR as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO Brazil. --Rosenzweig τ 17:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by user:JonasBR as Logo, but there has already been a discussion and it was kept as too simple. --C messier (talk) 20:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Brazil has a high threshold of originality for logos per COM:TOO Brazil. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussions. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JonasBR as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO Brazil. --Rosenzweig τ 18:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
The photograph is actually copyrighted. On the Vinyl with the exact same photograph, there is a message - "Sleeve design: Atomic Rooster/Robert Stigwood Group Ltd." The album and all of its artwork is copyrighted. https://www.discogs.com/release/5759361-Atomic-Rooster-Death-Walks-Behind-You Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Also see DR for extracted image Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vincent Crane 1970 (cropped).jpg. --Harold (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The file was taken from page 34 of a 1971 US magazine and uploaded with {{PD-US-no-notice}}, but page 3 from the same magazine shows a clear copyright notice, so that can't be true. Plus Atomic Rooster were a British band, so it's not even certain that this is a "US image" that was first published in the US. And a 1971 photo would definitively still be protected in the UK. --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Extracted image of a copyrighted image: https://www.discogs.com/release/5759361-Atomic-Rooster-Death-Walks-Behind-You Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Also see DR for original image Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atomic Rooster 1970.jpg. --Harold (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per rationale in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atomic Rooster 1970.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 17:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non-croppable advertisement logo makes photo out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep That's pretty easy to remove with the clone tool. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- And what about the copyright?--GerritR (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Couldn't find the image elsewhere on the web, the uploader is verified at de.wp, so this seems legit. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Alguién importante en la foto? 191.125.27.152 23:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Dudosa necesidad por este logo... 191.125.27.152 23:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 19:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Quienes son? 191.125.27.152 23:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 19:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Fan art, out of scope. C messier (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep There's zero evidence that fan art is out of scope. Otherwise, things like Commons:Fan art, Category:Fan art, and Template:Fan art probably wouldn't exist. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: so you believe that this particular image is realistically useful for an educational purpose? Because IMO this falls in the category Artwork without obvious educational use. --C messier (talk) 06:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not to deflect from the question, but I'm not here to wax philosophically about what "educational use" might mean when it comes to something that there's a broad community consensus is OK to be hosted on Commons. There would really have to be a wider discussion somewhere outside of a few people in a DR about whether or not fan art is in scope or not and what the exceptions if it is for to say the file should be deleted. Although, I could argue it serves an educational purpose in the same way say folk art does. I.E. Sponge Bob is a culturally/anthropologically important character to working class young adults in America during the early 2000s the same way something like this was to Chinese people at the time Etc. Etc. But that's out of my peer view and I honestly think something like "fan art is out of scope" should really be determined somewhere else then this deletion discussion. I will say though that "educational purpose" is extremely subjective. For instance I get absolutely nothing of educational value from the image of the Chinese baby hat, because I'm not Chinese. I'd imagine the same could said for most American's if they were looking at the image. That doesn't make it not educational though. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- So, you see this particular image as being a useful illustration for a wikipedia article about Sponge Bob? C messier (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not to deflect from the question, but I'm not here to wax philosophically about what "educational use" might mean when it comes to something that there's a broad community consensus is OK to be hosted on Commons. There would really have to be a wider discussion somewhere outside of a few people in a DR about whether or not fan art is in scope or not and what the exceptions if it is for to say the file should be deleted. Although, I could argue it serves an educational purpose in the same way say folk art does. I.E. Sponge Bob is a culturally/anthropologically important character to working class young adults in America during the early 2000s the same way something like this was to Chinese people at the time Etc. Etc. But that's out of my peer view and I honestly think something like "fan art is out of scope" should really be determined somewhere else then this deletion discussion. I will say though that "educational purpose" is extremely subjective. For instance I get absolutely nothing of educational value from the image of the Chinese baby hat, because I'm not Chinese. I'd imagine the same could said for most American's if they were looking at the image. That doesn't make it not educational though. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This file serves no educational purpose. Marbletan (talk) 20:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Possibly banner is copyright but is it a 3D artwork? Not sure. Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- (previously posted, entirely erroneously, on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chichester University Chapel, artwork beneath the organ - geograph.org.uk - 3597738.jpg) I think this is a tapestry, which is a work of artistic craftsmanship. Such works are subject to FOP in the UK if they're permanently displayed in premises open to the public. The University Web site isn't entirely clear whether the chapel is open to those not associated with the University[5], but the fact that the photographer was there suggests it is in practice. I'm not sure about permanency: there are photos of the chapel showing a different tapestry[6] but it may still be that this one is intended to be permanent. Overall, I think Keep. --bjh21 (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Imho this is a work of "artistic craftmenship" and can be maintainted according to [[COM:FOP UK}}. --Ellywa (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate file will not need two files in one category. LeonaardoG (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, it isn't an exact duplicated. Compare here and here both files.
- 83.61.237.190 09:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - Is the IP Address Opinion valid here? But I think it's the same file I leave the decision to administrators. -- LeonaardoG (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very likely not an image of the person it's claimed to be an image of. This ANU page contains a photograph that it credibly states is of Brand. The person depicted there looks unlike the person in this photograph. Saying that the source of the photo is "State Library of Queensland" may sound vaguely impressive, but it doesn't specify any specific source that somebody at the library could check. Hoary (talk) 06:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- This page [7] seems to say that the "good" Brand is from 1956, so it may be to young to upload on Commons. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Gråbergs Gråa Sång, I am not suggesting that the photo that is dubiously claimed to be of Brand should be replaced by this more authoritative photo. I merely linked to the latter as evidence that our current photo isn't what it's claimed to be. I hope you'll agree that no photo is better than a questionable photo. -- Hoary (talk) 08:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I was hoping that it could be, if possible it would be a good solution. However, if the current pic is deleted, we can use the other as non-free on WP, but I suppose we should wait for the deletion to happen. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Same glasses and same chin. --RAN (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per word of IP at WP:[8]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and discussion. And https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1156#How_to_Report_an_Incorrect_Photo_of_a_Person_on_a_Page. --Ellywa (talk) 13:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Redundant with File:New ProSport.svg. ApophisJJ (talk) 07:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
entirely empty picture Enyavar (talk) 08:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Technical problem. The pictures could be displayed well https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/26/Mapa_Campo_Grande_2008.svg. --SCP-2000 16:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- In that case, fix, categorize correctly as a "(Election?) map of <wherever>", then keep. --Enyavar (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark Dieguinhoguinho1000 can you please solve the technical problem?. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Blank map file Enyavar (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nothing has changed since the last time this was nominated for deletion. Can the technical problem be solved? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Judging from the code, this is a fake SVG and should be converted to PNG if needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- For my edification, what makes it fake? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Judging from the code, this is a fake SVG and should be converted to PNG if needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no reaction of uploader after more than a year. Of no educational use in the current state. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
User:OberRanks is site-banned at wikipedia for fabrication of sources. Investigation has shown[9] that his claims that files are from archival sources are false. Therefore, the claim that these files are from a US archive is almost certainly false and without knowing the true origin, it is not possible to know whether any of the file information or the license is correct. DrKay (talk) 08:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Not "own work" from 2007 but apparently derivative work (scan) from somewhere from 1987. 217.239.1.129 09:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Vielen Danke für Deine Frage.
- Richtig, das Bild wurde aus einem ganzen Foto ausgeschnitten. Das ist ein Privatbesetze von Herrn Hurcabaatur seit 1987, als Prof. W. Heissig ihn zweite Mal privat besucht hat. Beweise Personen: Dr. Dominique Even und Dr. Stefen Müller. Das Bild im Jahr 2007 im Buch 欧罗巴蒙古奇人veröffentlicht. SR. Scharfheld Regenbogen (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Danke für die Bestätigung, dass es sich um eine Urheberrechtsverletzung handelt.
- Thanks for openly admitting the copyvio. --217.239.1.129 23:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Questionable origin, probably derivative work like most other uploads by this user. Certainly not "own work". 217.239.1.129 09:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in analogy of COM:SIG Germany handwriting will also not be protected by copyrighted, and such a short sentence can be kept imho. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
same as this https://royfeinson.com/about/ - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @SnipySnob: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Daniel.9 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F7 only the preview is broken, the file looks fine in my browser GPSLeo (talk) 09:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per GPSLeo. In my browser the original file looks fine as well. --Ellywa (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
No own . 181.203.101.141 11:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
worse copy of File:Malga colbricon - panoramio.jpg, with some kind of filter Syrio posso aiutare? 11:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, shows the result of AndreaMosaic software. I added this to the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ilovebeans1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, missing permission: File:Gabrielle Sofia.jpg by craig beckta, File:Gabrielle Sofia red.jpg by robynfentyy.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Exif data show the names of the photographers als listed by P199. --Ellywa (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Yo soy el que yo soy... (F10) 191.125.27.152 23:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 10:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sengoku2501 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Tagged by Netora as copyvio. Based on User talk:Sengoku2501, I see that the website at some point had a license (in Japanese) at https://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/owsaa/kiyaku.html, but this link no longer works. Can we find evidence that this website is under the GJSTU?
- File:JS”Asayuki”(DD-132)retirement ceremony.jpg
- File:JS”Asayuki”(DD-132)Returning the warship flag at the retirement ceremony.jpg
- File:JS”Asayuki”(DD-132)Ship number to be filled in after retirement ceremony.jpg
- File:JS”Asayuki”(DD-132)Lowering of the warship flag at the retirement ceremony.jpg
retirement_ceremony.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Returning_the_warship_flag_at_the_retirement_ceremony.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ship_number_to_be_filled_in_after_retirement_ceremony.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lowering_of_the_warship_flag_at_the_retirement_ceremony.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete by the same reason of this DR. If these files are found in MSDF's website, Keep because most of contents are licensed by GJSTU. I tried to find these file's source by Google Image search, but I couldn't find in MSDF websites. --Netora (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep これらは、提示した海上自衛隊サイトからリンクしているtwitterからダウンロードし投稿したものです。twitterの著作権情報は、海上自衛隊サイトに記載されているために海上自衛隊サイトへリンクを張ったものです。日本語も読めない者がこのようなことをするのは非常に遺憾です。これについても全く同様の経緯です。それについては勝手に削除されたため、再投稿します。--Sengoku2501 (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- 「twitterの著作権情報は、海上自衛隊サイトに記載されているため」とありますがどのページですか？ 海上自衛隊のウェブサイトの利用規約([10] [11] )は冒頭に「海上自衛隊ホームページで公開している情報」とあるように、海上自衛隊のアドレスで配信されているコンテンツの著作権について言及しており、海上自衛隊のTwitterなどSNSについては言及がありません。
- 利用規約ページの２）のウについても海上自衛隊のサイト上に組み込まれているTwitterやYoutubeコンテンツの取り扱いを示しており、その逆(海上自衛隊がTwitter上で公開しているコンテンツ)についてはGJSTUが適用できると確認できる根拠が見つかりません。もし明白に記されているウェブページなどあればお示しください。 Netora (talk) 09:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sengoku2501: コモンズの方針上、削除依頼を経て削除されたファイルの再投稿はできません。該当するファイルが再投稿された場合は即時削除の対象となります。再投稿が繰り返されると投稿ブロックを受ける可能性もありますので、くれぐれもご注意ください。詳しくはリンク先の方針文章をご確認ください。Yasu (talk) 14:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasu: 海上自衛隊への問い合わせの結果、ホームページとはリンクが貼られているSNSにも適用されるとの回答を得ています。その際、ウィキペディアの四角四面な連中が納得しないので、ホームページの著作権情報にも記載してくれと依頼しましたが、未だ反映されていません。--Sengoku2501 (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- それでは、Twitter に投稿された画像についても GJSTU が適用される旨、防衛省ないし海自のウェブサイトに掲載されるまでお待ちください。掲載がなされて第三者が確認できるようになれば、削除されたファイルの復帰も可能になります。Yasu (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasu: 海上自衛隊への問い合わせの結果、ホームページとはリンクが貼られているSNSにも適用されるとの回答を得ています。その際、ウィキペディアの四角四面な連中が納得しないので、ホームページの著作権情報にも記載してくれと依頼しましたが、未だ反映されていません。--Sengoku2501 (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Netora: ToU of the Ministry of Defence website states that users must comply with terms and conditions of source providers (eg Twitter, Instagram etc) for contents posted on such external sources, meaning that the GJSTU doesn't apply to files originating from Twitter. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:56, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sengoku2501 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images posted on twitter are not subject to the {{GJSTU-2.0}}. See previous DR.
- File:Joint Task Force (6th Air Self-Defense Force, 6th Wing) providing school lunch support at Nakajima Elementary School in Nanao City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan.jpg
- File:Air Self-Defense Force disaster rescue dogs and handlers searching for missing persons.jpg
- File:Disaster rescue dogs of the Air Self-Defense Force deployed to the Noto Peninsula earthquake-stricken area in 2024.jpg
- File:Troops from the 10th Division rescue a victim trapped under a collapsed house.jpg
- File:Unloading a Type 73 small truck from a CH-47.jpg
- File:Troops of the 10th Division deploying from a CH-47.jpg
- File:"Hiuchi" carrying relief supplies.jpg
_providing_school_lunch_support_at_Nakajima_Elementary_School_in_Nanao_City,_Ishikawa_Prefecture,_Japan.jpg){kind=link}
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep→File:Joint Task Force (6th Air Self-Defense Force, 6th Wing) providing school lunch support at Nakajima Elementary School in Nanao City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan.jpg
- I found the same image on Japan Self-Defense Forces website (https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/defense/saigai/pdf/haken_r060105a.pdf). Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use apply to this image. Taro2968332 (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've found the pictures linked below, in this turkish news article, sadly without any image attribution.
- Kakan spelar (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep自衛隊側から4.0国際が適用されるとの回答を得ています。問題があるなら自衛隊に問い合わせてください
- Sengoku2501 (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Sengoku2501: コモンズのルール上、削除依頼の対象となったファイルに問題がないことを証明する義務は存続を希望する側にありますので、「自衛隊に問い合わせてください」ではなく、「自衛隊側から4.0国際が適用されるとの回答を得てい」ることを Sengoku2501 さんご自身が第三者にも確認できる形で提示する必要があります。Yasu (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, except File:Joint Task Force (6th Air Self-Defense Force, 6th Wing) providing school lunch support at Nakajima Elementary School in Nanao City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan.jpg Yasu (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: most, kept 1 that shows it was also posted on the website so the license applies. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
as per [12].
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (1).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (10).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (11).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (12).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (13).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (14).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (15).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (16).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (17).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (18).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (19).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (2).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (20).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (21).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (22).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (23).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (24).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (25).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (3).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 21:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (4).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (5).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (6).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (7).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (8).jpg
- File:پیوستن ناوشکن جماران به ناوگان دریایی ارتش (9).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete wrong license reviews. The source explicitly says these are not their own works, for example see "عکس/ www.khamenei.ir" below the pictures at here. If you can't read Persian, just use Ctrl+F. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep like Mehr News, khamenei.ir is also a website that publishes works under cc-by-4.0 (see Template:Khamenei), so files from it are free. And looks like Heidar Rezaei (name appears in the page, search for "حیدر رضایی") was a photographer for khamenei.ir at that time (other example: [13]). Also, khamenei.ir hosts many images from this event ([14], [15], [16]). HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think license of these files should be changed from {{Mehr}} to {{Khamenei}}. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Then you should provide the link to the original source, if available. We can't just assume; you need to show us. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- My opinion is that if Mehr is credible to say it is not copyright holder of file X (your point), then we can say it is also credible in introducing copyright holder of same file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Then you should provide the link to the original source, if available. We can't just assume; you need to show us. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think license of these files should be changed from {{Mehr}} to {{Khamenei}}. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I uploaded all files on khamenei.ir and linked all Mehr files to them. Someone please review files on Category:Khamenei.ir review needed to confirm. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: "All Content by Khamenei.ir is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.". —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
رفعته عن طريق الخطأ Steven Amgad (talk) 21:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
