Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2022.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_in_Fall_River_Massachusetts.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:PENIS spam
- File:Testicle masturbation.jpg
- File:Penis masturbation photo.jpg
- File:Masturbation orgasm.gif
- File:Man masturbating orgasm.gif
- File:Male masturbation to orgasm.gif
- File:Male enjoying masturbation.gif
- File:Typical male masturbation.gif
- File:Nude male starting to masturbate.gif
- File:Masturbating naked.gif
- File:Male masturbation orgasm.gif
- File:Male masturbation in slow motion.gif
- File:Penis masturbation in slow motion.jpg
- File:Masturbation in the bathroom.gif
- File:Male masturbating pre orgasm.gif
- File:Male masturbating during orgasm.gif
- File:Male masturbation in bathroom.jpg
- File:Male masturbation orgasm.jpg
- File:Ejaculating on boots.jpg
- File:Masturbating in bathroom.jpg
- File:Masturbation before ejaculation.jpg
- File:Penis masturbation.jpg
- File:Penis pic.jpg
- File:Masturbating.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
personal photo for non-wikipedian Faisal talk 00:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
No es Wikipediana verdadera 191.126.15.105 01:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. Yann (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Purani Raghavan (talk) 08:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Oursana as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.wga.hu/support/viewer/z.html Yann (talk) 09:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, not own work but https://www.wga.hu/support/viewer/z.html Oursana (talk) 09:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- There is no such image at that URL. Yann (talk) 10:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ah yes, that's the source. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 11:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Rey del Youtube 191.126.15.105 00:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Rey del Fasebook 191.126.15.105 00:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 00:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 00:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Azmain Hossen; azmain; azmain hossen; azmainhossen; azma1n; azma1nhossen; CRYPTO TRADER; investor; investor azmain hossen; investor azma1nhossen; azmain crypto; azmaincrypto; crypto; bitcoin; CRYPTO TRADER AZMAIN; CRYPTO T.jpg
[edit]
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 01:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 01:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 01:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 01:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:29, 3 June 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality image w/o exif data is suspect. Exif data contains Facebook metadata. Uploader has a history of uploading copyvios. Image should be deleted under PCP unless permission via VRT is received. Njd-de (talk) 14:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
lo subi con muchos errores, lo corregire para subirlo nuevamente Atencionrymer (talk) 16:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & F10. --Achim55 (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
{{speedy| Artist's request, making an error correction}} Croppy Peace Sign (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Car je ne suis pas le droit d’auteur apparement merci de la sup Msmitraillette (talk) 10:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Suprimer le svp je ne veux plus le m’être sur Wikipedia Msmitraillette (talk) 19:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:Personal files for speedy deletion 191.126.15.105 11:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 12:49, 3 June 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Freelancers --Krdbot 19:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fasebook 191.126.15.105 11:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by NahidSultan at 11:33, 3 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
I need to delete the original uncropped version of the file. I uploaded it by mistake. Please delete the image uploaded at 2022-06-03 T16:38:26 Weadock313 (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Done revdel --Achim55 (talk) 21:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
_2022.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2022.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not the free image Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
_2022.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy delete: Source site reads "All editorial content, graphics, video and soundbites on The Star Online, The Star Mobile Application and other subsites (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Sites”) under Star Media Group Berhad (Company No.: 10894-D) (hereinafter referred to as “The Company”) are protected by Malaysian copyright law and international treaties and may not be copied or re-used without the express permission of The Company, which reserves all rights. Re-use of any of such content online for any purpose is strictly prohibited." --Achim55 (talk) 14:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
_2022.jpg){kind=link}
This photograph is from the DFDS company website https://www.dfds.com/en/passenger-ferries/aura-luna. It appears to be a copyright violation. Motacilla (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- well if its not enough to give the source of it, remove it. RoxyDzey (talk) 03:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
This photograph is from the DFDS company website https://www.dfds.com/en/passenger-ferries/aura-luna. It appears to be a copyright violation. Motacilla (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- well if its not enough to give the source of it, remove it. RoxyDzey (talk) 03:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Obra de arte, necesita OTRS 191.126.15.105 01:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4): File:Nga cikli Midis Realitetit dhe Abstrakcionit (105x70 cm) 2008.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 13:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
_2008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obra de arte, necesita OTRS 191.126.15.105 01:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4): File:Portreti i Heshtur Forgotten Portrait (100x70 cm).jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 13:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Obra de arte, necesita OTRS 191.126.15.105 01:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4): File:Shqiponja , Eagle (74x94 cm) (2003).jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 13:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
_(2003).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Obra de arte, necesita OTRS 191.126.15.105 01:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4): File:Portret Kohe Time Portrait (105x78 cm), 1968.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
,_1968.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Obra de arte, necesita OTRS 191.126.15.105 01:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4): File:Ëndra Futuriste, Futuristic Dreams.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 17:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
File is not user's own work. Has been stolen from "https://www.metrocptm.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/frota-f-sst.jpg". Pedro Nardi (talk) 22:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Doubt about claimed ownership by uploader, as file carries Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata and image was published earlier on Facebook. Unicotic (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by GPSLeo at 19:24, 6 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): Copyright violation: The uploader is not the real owner of the file, it clearly violates copyright violation. As file carries Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata and image was published earlier on Facebook. Facebook --Krdbot 01:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Doubt about claimed ownership by uploader, as file carries Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata and image was published earlier on Facebook. Unicotic (talk) 10:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by GPSLeo at 19:24, 6 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): Copyright violation: The uploader is not the real owner of the file, it clearly violates copyright violation. As file carries Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata and image was published earlier on Facebook. Facebook --Krdbot 01:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fasebook F1 191.126.15.105 00:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022060810002565 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 10:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Due to Facebook-code in metadata suspected to be copied from Facebook or Instagram. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Roman2021b.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022060710008829. --Polimerek (talk) 12:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Roman2021b.jpg” under ticket:2022060710008829. --Polimerek (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, keep-closed after permission accepted at VRTS. --Túrelio (talk) 10:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Obviously spam Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
A low-res, nondescript image of a forest path in an indeterminate location with a huge watermark is unlikely to be used educationally Dronebogus (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete. I agree. The watermark clearly detracts from the usability of the image, which isn't great to begin with because it's not a particularly good photo of a forest path. Marbletan (talk) 19:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope. The user is trying to make a tribute page for her father. Also, this seems to be copyvio. MexTDT (talk) 04:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 17:44, 9 June 2022 UTC: No permission since 1 June 2022 --Krdbot 01:19, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leonardo Green (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused logos. Suspicious stuff, seems to be advertisement
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of the project scope? Commons is not a private photo album Estopedist1 (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FlagNerdGreen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-educational and out of scope: Fictional map of an Italian-occupied southern France and assorted flags and CoAs.
- File:EU-Valentia.png
- File:ValentianCoatOfArms.png
- File:FlagOfValentia.png
- File:FlagOfHradina.png
- File:VodstriaFlag.png
- File:CarstvotoCOA.png
- File:Carstvoto Flag.png
Enyavar (talk) 00:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FlagNerdGreen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Media related to fictional country with no educational value; unused.
- File:SerbstanFlag.png
- File:VenerisAlt3.png
- File:VenerisAlternate2Flag.png
- File:VenerisAlternateFlag.png
- File:Map of federal subjects of Veneris 2022.png
- File:FlagOfTheUEC.png
- File:FictionalFlagOFTheUAL.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
agreed: Delete --Enyavar (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image. Cjp24 (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Justin Wade Moody
[edit]- File:Kinds got set up. Earth trying to be wiped out distsnt behind 1.jpg
- File:Kinds got set up. Earth trying to be wiped out distsnt behind 2.jpg
- File:Kinds got set up. Earth trying to be wiped out distsnt behind 3.jpg
- File:Kinds got set up. Earth trying to be wiped out distsnt behind 4.jpg
- File:Kinds got set up. Earth trying to be wiped out distsnt behind 5.jpg
Outside Commons:Project scope, no obvious educational purpose. Appears to be just somebody's personal thoughts and notes, difficult to even make any sense of. --Calistemon (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo of some sort Lymantria (talk) 11:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal picture Lymantria (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
draft versions of File:La Revolución Industrial.svg; all unused
Enyavar (talk) 14:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:Pigment Red 49.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
per Commons:Out of scope. Gazal world (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
SVG of the file is available for use at File:Likee.svg DownTownRich (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reviewing Footballers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope/ promotional only (see also en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reviewing Footballers).
- File:Rohan Training in sai.jpg
- File:Rohan Prasad Training in sai.jpg
- File:Shubham jpg.jpg
- File:Northeast United Youth Training.jpg
- File:Northeast United Youth training.jpg
Hoo man (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reviewing footballer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope/ promotional only (see also en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reviewing Footballers).
- File:Rohan Prasad training.jpg
- File:Rohan prasad.jpg
- File:Rohan Prasad.jpg
- File:Rohan Prasad beach training.jpg
Hoo man (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo uploaded by me, I uploaded it for use at my Wikipedia user page, I would hereby request the image removed if possible. P.marg83 (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
personal photo for non wikipedian. Faisal talk 22:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Mapa subjetivo sin ningún fundamento ni explicación lógica. Ruditaly (talk) 22:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added and the uploader was notified on 2 May 2022. 191.126.15.105 00:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added and the uploader was notified on 2 May 2022. 191.126.15.105 00:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. --Yann (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Author Yana Stancheva Copyright holder Actiongraphers 191.126.15.105 00:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Fasebook 191.126.15.105 00:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted DOTA 2 character, probably stolen art considering this is the sole edit of this user and the description is just “heroe” Dronebogus (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover from Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Unclear what this represents or if it’s at all factually accurate (ex. Pornography is legal in Turkey but on this map its red, same as countries where it’s illegal; Philippines should probably be red since pornography is officially illegal even if the law is in practice lightly enforced; Iceland should be red; grey usually means “unknown” but here it’s seemingly “uncensored/very lightly censored”; etc.) Dronebogus (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use, map can be fixed if needed. --Yann (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Uneven bond-angles; have a ton of SVG and high-quality PNG in Category:Resorcinol DMacks (talk) 02:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Bond lengths and angles should be consistent. No need to keep this one when there are superior options. Innerstream (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Bad GIF, recently uploaded and redundant to File:Severstal Avia logo.png --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Uneven bond-lengths and angles. Have a ton of SVG and high-quality PNG in Category:Resorcinol DMacks (talk) 02:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Bond lengths and angles should be consistent. No need to keep this one when there are superior options. Innerstream (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect (should be "+CaCO3" not "+CaCO2" over fourth arrow; chould be "(CH3-" not "(CH-" on left of last structure). This is all best expressed in TeX anyway. DMacks (talk) 02:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The file has chemistry errors and it can be replaced with text where needed. Marbletan (talk) 13:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag)
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)- Keep PD-textlogo. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 20:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Chemical mistake (missing OH on right chromophore; noted by en:User:130.195.253.48 at en:Thiocoraline). It also has different geometric forms for pieces that are actually the same (confusing layout). I redrew it from scratch at File:Thiocoraline.png in a way that visually has the correct symmetry. DMacks (talk) 02:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There is an error in the chemical structure and there is now a good replacement. Marbletan (talk) 12:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Bestanden in Categorie:Tokyo
[edit]Privé-foto's van niet-opvallende personen.
トトト (talk) 03:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted software, therefore rendering it as a copyright violation. ShadowCyclone (talk) 03:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This is non-free Microsoft screenshot. --Hajoon0102 💬 08:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted software, therefore rendering it as a copyright violation. ShadowCyclone (talk) 03:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted software, therefore rendering it as a copyright violation. ShadowCyclone (talk) 03:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This is non-free Microsoft screenshot. --Hajoon0102 💬 08:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bagusadi s (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of the user's uploads appear to be screen grabs or photos of magazines.
- File:Dinna Olivia 2004.jpg
- File:Abimana Aryasatya Actor.jpg
- File:Oka Antara Best Asian Actor Winner.jpg
- File:Kevin Sanjaya Badminton.jpg
- File:Nicholas Saputra 2021.jpg
- File:Ladya Cheryl AADC2014.jpg
- File:Laudya Cynthia Bella SYTD2.jpg
- File:Fedi Nuril SYTD1.jpg
- File:Laudya Cynthia Bella SYTD1.jpg
- File:Laudya HijUp 2.jpg
- File:Laudya HijUp 3.jpg
- File:Laudya HijUp 1.jpg
- File:Laudya C Bella NET.jpg
Paul_012 (talk) 04:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bagusadi s (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio-only account. Extremely questionable own-work claims.
- File:Miller Khan 2021.jpg
- File:Arya Vasco 2019.jpg
- File:Titi Kamal AADC2014.jpg
- File:Tulus Album Manusia.jpg
- File:Atthaphan Phunsawat gmmtv.jpg
- File:Laudya Cynthia Bella Ambu.jpg
Paul_012 (talk) 22:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Original research. The author took a random flag from the illustration and stated that it is the flag of Mohammed Sheibani, and this file is used in the article of the Khanate of Bukhara, when Sheibani was dead for several centuries. It's misleading. Kazman322 (talk) 05:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission, all are protected images Hoyanova (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. Yann (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 09:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, it stated that the author is the person pictured on the photo, that is impossible and probited in Wikipedia Monerigo (talk) 09:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Clear false Exif data. Copyright violation. Needs more details to prove it's not stolen/dowloaded from an official website photo. Monerigo (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 09:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 10:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 10:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 10:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, foto from gardnermuseum, see source, no PD-art, three-dimensional artwork, without license Oursana (talk) 10:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No FOP in France. The sculpture was made in the 1960s, so the artist cannot be dead for 70+ years. JopkeB (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Illegible mess. Have File:TC ligand.png by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This file is simply unusable and there is a good replacement. Marbletan (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nguyen Nam Binh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Licensing laundering - appear to be pre-existing photograph used in YouTube video. No evidence YouTube uploaders are photographers.
Эlcobbola talk 13:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
screenshot no permission no source Hoyanova (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio (veuillez-utiliser une carte non-proprietaire, comme OSM, sivp) Enyavar (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
There is no need for this brief bit of text to be a PDF file. Anywhere this is needed, simple text should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of book cover Эlcobbola talk 15:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
See EXIF: author (Steven M. Leonard) and Copyright holder (© 2020 Steve Leonard) ≠ uploader Jhansen23 Эlcobbola talk 16:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of permission Dronebogus (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Archive (band)
[edit]No evidence of permission
- File:Archive - Axiom Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - Controlling Crowds Part IV Cover.png
- File:Archive - Lights Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - Londinium Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - Noise Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - Restriction Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - Super8 Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - Take My Head Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - The False Foundation Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - With Us Until You're Dead Cover.jpg
- File:Archive - You All Look The Same To Me Cover.png
Dronebogus (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author's request. No uses. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Poor quality, possible personality rights violation, not used. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copied from internet page, unknown author, copyright unclear Joostik (talk) 17:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no EXIF, appears part of this set, all other user uploads copyvios, etc. Duck/PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope anyway. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:كأس الأمم الأفريقية 1998.png
- File:كأس الملك فهد 1995.jpg
- File:Guli arabia 2021 logo.jpg
- File:CANAL SAT.jpg
- File:كأس العلم للأندية 2000.png
- File:Cristiano junior.jpg
- File:Algeria cup.jpg
- File:Copa America 2004.jpg
- File:FIFA Confederations Cup 2005.jpg
- File:Nesma Elgdida.jpg
- File:التونسية تي في.jpg
- File:Cartoon Network Too 2012.svg
- File:Big Ten Network Logo.svg
- File:Fox Sports Racing (television channel) logo.png
- File:Fox Soccer Plus logo.svg
- File:تردد-قناة-فوكس-روايات-Fox-Rewayat.webp
- File:ناشيونال جيوغرافيك العربية.jpg
- File:JSC SPORTS LOGO 2009.jpg
- File:JSC SPORTS NEWS.jpg
- File:Extreme Sports Channel..png
- File:Star World 2016 logo.png
- File:Bein 4K logo png..png
- File:Osn orbit news1.png
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 20:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Per nomination.--Karim talk me :)..! 22:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal image of no eductaional value (good-faith upload in a batch from Flickr) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Orphaned file; advert uploaded by sockpuppeteer indef-blocked for COI editing and socking on en-wiki. CorbieVreccan (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
'Someone WhatsApps me' It does not sound to me like the uploader is the author of the image Trade (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a movie can't be persoanl work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 23:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a movie can't be persoanl work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 23:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a movie can't be persoanl work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 23:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a movie can't be persoanl work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 23:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Is this a basic shape logo? Jelican9 (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Helen May in 2015 191.126.15.105 00:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- No reason has been given for deletion. It is hard to reply.
- If the problem is that it is not used, that will soon be remedies. Aramoana-Otumaetai-01 (talk) 00:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Work is own? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.15.105 (talk) 00:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- I pwn this photo 122.57.223.251 04:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Work is own? 191.126.15.105 00:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
David Hellens picture 191.126.15.105 00:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Work is own? 191.126.15.105 00:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Work is own? 1954! 191.126.15.105 00:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- This is a scan that I have made of a photo that I own 122.57.223.251 04:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Author 1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All right 191.126.15.105 00:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- No reason is give. Please explain. Carid23846 (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work: 1999-2022? 191.126.15.105 00:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- No reason is given. Please explain Carid23846 (talk) 00:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work: 1982-2022? Qué significa 1982s? Cuantos 1982s hay? 191.126.15.105 00:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please explain in English. Carid23846 (talk) 00:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- This is a scan that I have made of a photo that I own 122.57.223.251 04:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original work. --Wdwd (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality unused logo, probably PD-simple but you never know Dronebogus (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a picture from a book is not "own work". There is no indication that this book is copyright-free Yinweiaiqing (talk) 03:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope. The user is trying to make a tribute page for her father. MexTDT (talk) 04:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I doubt that this image was taken by the uploader. It can be found here and seems to be an album cover. The user only has uploaded one image (this one) which usually is a strong indicator that it's a copyvio. Since neither Wikipedia nor Wikidata seem to know the man this could also very well be self promotion D-Kuru (talk) 05:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- I doubt that we will getan answer here, but maybe @Ethelhilario: can help us out here. --D-Kuru (talk) 05:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Mårtensås as duplicate (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F8|Vendel XII Bridle-fitting (339860).png
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The .jpg file is not used anywhere and I am the only (human) editor. Thus I request it to be deleted. Mårtensås (talk) 12:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 15:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Insektenatlas 2020- WELTWEITER NUTZEN Wert der Agrarproduktion, die durch Bestäuber ermöglicht wird, in US-Dollar pro Hektar*.jpg
[edit]
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Insektenatlas2020 Grafik Insekten als Bestäuber.png, vector data would be available in https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2020-02/insektenatlas_2020_II.pdf. Leyo 07:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uncontroversial maintenance/G6. --Wdwd (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Insektenatlas 2020- WELT VOLLER INSEKTEN Geschätzte Zahl von Spezies nach biogeografi schen Regionen und Verteilung der benannten Insekten auf wichtigen Ordnungen.jpg
[edit]
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Insektenatlas2020 Grafik Welt voller Insekten.png, vector data would be available in https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2020-02/insektenatlas_2020_II.pdf. Leyo 07:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uncontroversial maintenance/G6. --Wdwd (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Insektenatlas 2020- DER STOFF, AUS DEM DAS WISSEN IST Aussagen über den Insektenrückgang in 73 Studien (Stand 2019).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Insektenatlas2020 Grafik Insektensterben Studien im Vergleich.png, vector data would be available in https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2020-02/insektenatlas_2020_II.pdf. Leyo 07:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uncontroversial maintenance/G6. --Wdwd (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I doubt that charts set up with this website software are CC licensed. 91.34.47.35 08:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Original uploader request. Slightly offensive and crude in hindsight, do not want this associated with my uploads any more. Elshad (talk) 09:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for a deletion (not a recent upload, categories and in my opinion in scope. Please see also COM:LRV ). --Wdwd (talk) 15:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Karim185.3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). elsewhere on the web I don't see this image there, wildly used. Yann (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment @Yann: plz, see Tineye results and this. The photo has been uploaded in many sites before that date.--Karim talk me :)..! 10:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- OK, but none of these is the source, as they are smaller. It is still suspicious, but it doesn't warrant a speedy deletion. Yann (talk) 10:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: no Meta Data. See this photo also similar to the nominated photo which is published before that date as well. What about now?--Karim talk me :)..! 10:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio (e.g. https://www.thenationalnews.com/arts-culture/television/egyptian-palestinian-actress-may-calamawy-joins-cast-of-marvel-s-moon-knight-1.1146114 ). --Wdwd (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Delete – Copyright violation. Found elsewhere on the web – e.g. [1] + [2]. Unlikely to be own work, no free license in source. Kacir (talk) 09:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This mural is clearly above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable. Regrettably, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception for artworks in public space. So, a permission by the artist is required or the image needs to be deleted.-- Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Tenay street art9.jpg
- File:Tenay street art3.jpg
- File:Tenay street art8.jpg
- File:Tenay street art7.jpg
- File:Tenay street art6.jpg
- File:Tenay street art2.jpg
- File:Tenay street art4.jpg
- File:Tenay street art1.jpg <- here it might be discussed whether de minimis is applicable
Deleted: per nomination (also for the last one, because the street art is the central element of the picture, no de minimis). --Wdwd (talk) 16:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Pixelated and un-necessarily odd angles. Have File:Spiruchostatin A.svg as high-quality replacement DMacks (talk) 12:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G6. --Wdwd (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from photo. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- photo de Vesper Lynd (EvaGreen) de Wikimedia < libre de droit > commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eva_Green_(Headshot).jpg. Arnaud 25. 9/6/2022
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, source for derivative work provided and ok. --Wdwd (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot of a smartphone screen with photos not distributed under a free licence Werter1995 (talk) 22:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
"Own work" can't be right. The depicted person died in 1915. Per description, the photo was taken shortly before his death ("nahe an seinem Lebensende"). So, it's possible that the photo is already in the public domain, but we would need more information (name of the photographer, year of photographer's death - we also can't simply assume that it's an anonymous work just because the uploader didn't mention the photographer). The CC license certainly isn't applicable. And if the photo was taken shortly before 1915, it's also not old enough for PD-old-assumed. Gestumblindi (talk) 07:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" When you scan, or even crop an existing image, you create a derivative copy, that is your own work. Commons only leaves room for one set of information, so people choose either info on the original or the derivative. As to whether it is truly anonymous, our Precautionary Principle demands "significant doubt" before deletion, so perhaps finding a version online attributed to a photographer would be sufficient for deletion. Almost all images from this era are anonymous. --RAN (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, by merely scanning an image, no new work and no derivative work is created, that's pretty standard copyright knowledge. Not only has Commons this longstanding policy based on US law, it's also clearly stated in EU law since 2021. It's all about the copyright protection of the original work - the uploader doesn't have a legal base to add a CC-BY-SA license; if it's PD, then it remains PD. But the question in this case is whether it is PD. And I strongly disagree with your assumption that "almost all images from this era are anonymous" because, in fact, the photographer was very often known in their time, and the original photographs often bear the name of the studio/photographer - it's just that this information often gets lost when reprinting or scanning an image, but that doesn't make the original work positively anonymous. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- PS: With your edit, you claim that the author is anonymous, and by inserting {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, you declare that "it was published more than 70 years ago without a public claim of authorship". But you don't know that. The original uploader has not provided any such information. No information on original publication, authorship claim, or lack thereof. This is just a baseless assumption. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Gestumblindi. The image is claimed to be from a family album btw. --Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Luzerner Kantonsspital Standort Sursee.jpg
VRT-permission from author and copyright holder Severin Ettlin is needed. No evidence, that uploader Luzerner Kantonsspital is the same person, so own work is under doubt. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The mention photographer shot the Photo, that is correct. Luzerner Kantonsspital AG has all the rights for commercial use of the picture (See also officially Website luks.ch where the picture is published).
The user LuzernerKantonsspital on Wikipedia is a verified user considered as officially representative of the Luzerner Kantonsspital AG. For further questions please contact cms@luks.ch — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuzernerKantonsspital (talk • contribs) 18:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Official site says "© 2022 Luzerner Kantonsspital" and https://www.luks.ch/disclaimer explains: "Für die Reproduktion jeglicher Elemente ist die schriftliche Zustimmung der Urheberrechtsträger im Voraus einzuholen." (The written permission of the copyright holders must be obtained in advance for the reproduction of any elements.) We have no such permission. Please open COM:VRT page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Info VRT pending in ticket:2022060710008267.--Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
The legal status of this image is contentious. Both Ukraine and the US are signatories to the Geneva Conventions. This binds them voluntarily by their own laws. A captive with prisoner of war status should not be humiliated or exposed to the public.
Therefore, according to both US and Ukraine law, the Ukraine government do not have the legal right to release this photo under any sort of license as long as this person has prisoner of war status.
This may qualify for speedy deletion as another version appears to have been deleted before Commons:Deletion requests/File:CapturedWagnerfighter2.png(apparently not)
Here are relevant links
- The text of the relevant Geneva Convention Third Geneva Convention, Part II: General Protection of Prisoners of War, Article 13
- The US code affirming adherence to the Conventions Executive Documents Ex. Ord. No. 13491. Ensuring Lawful Interrogations
- "The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work. For kinds of works where it is relevant, this freedom should include all derived uses ("related rights") such as performing or interpreting the work. There must be no exception regarding, for example, political or religious considerations." Freedom Defined (as referred to by Commons:Licensing, second paragraph, "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed")
There doesn't seem to be any room for opinion of preference.
~ R.T.G 16:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- This another photo was deleted for copyright violation, so it has nothing to do with this case. It was entirely different photo. Borysk5 (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am surprised this exact type of issue hasn't been covered in the deletion policies before. I believe it should be deleted at least until such time as it is historical, i.e. the POW status no longer applies. I will add a link above to the convention and a link to the US order confirming the status of the Geneva Convention (the law of the US state Virginia as followed by WMF projects) ~ R.T.G 22:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Because Geneva Convention only applies to parties of the conflict. It doesn't bound Wikimedia Commons. Borysk5 (talk) 05:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but the state does not have the authority to release that images license to the public as long as the man is a POW. It doesn't mean Wikipedia cannot use it or it cannot be shown to people, under "fair use", I suppose, but it does not belong here on Commons. Makes sense doesn't it? ~ R.T.G 08:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Because Geneva Convention only applies to parties of the conflict. It doesn't bound Wikimedia Commons. Borysk5 (talk) 05:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am surprised this exact type of issue hasn't been covered in the deletion policies before. I believe it should be deleted at least until such time as it is historical, i.e. the POW status no longer applies. I will add a link above to the convention and a link to the US order confirming the status of the Geneva Convention (the law of the US state Virginia as followed by WMF projects) ~ R.T.G 22:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Under the laws of the EU this would definitely be a personality rights violation and I think the rules in the Ukraine and the US are not totally different. The Geneva Conventions does not matter if the national law forbids this, they are just fallback rules where national regulations would allow something. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- These are non-copyright restrictions. It's like the house rule example. They probably shouldn't have taken the photo, but they did and they shared it under a free license. And just like the house rule example, we don't delete it because someone else broke a rule. Copyright status looks legit. Multichill (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- In German law (Kunsturhebergesetz) and the European GDPR there is no difference in sharing something the first time or redistributing it. (Of course there are exceptions but they do not apply here.) I can not imagine that this is different in US personality rights laws. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- USA do not have any personality laws. Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not consensual sex videos or child abuse photos are definitely forbidden in the US. So there must be some personality rights regulation. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Your attempt at en:straw man is acknowledged. If there is such a law, please, provide a link to its text. Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- In Germany and the EU the personality rights and data protection regulations are the same for children getting harassed or a person in custody. In both situations for the person it is not possible to do something against the creation and publishing of the photo. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I still do not understand what this photo has to do with EU? Ruslik (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I just want to explain that in many regions it is illegal to share this photo. And we still do not have a statement on the status of this photo in the Ukraine. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- The {{Personality rights}} handles the former issue: anybody who wants to reuse the image is reminded to check their legal responsibilities in this regard. The statement on the status (a copyright licence) is there through the SSU template. If you want to argue that the Geneva Convention makes the licence statement invalid, then do that; the connection has been disputed, and no real arguments on the connection have been presented. I don't think the convention has any language invalidating copyright claims or licences. –LPfi (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I just want to explain that in many regions it is illegal to share this photo. And we still do not have a statement on the status of this photo in the Ukraine. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I still do not understand what this photo has to do with EU? Ruslik (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- In Germany and the EU the personality rights and data protection regulations are the same for children getting harassed or a person in custody. In both situations for the person it is not possible to do something against the creation and publishing of the photo. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Your attempt at en:straw man is acknowledged. If there is such a law, please, provide a link to its text. Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not consensual sex videos or child abuse photos are definitely forbidden in the US. So there must be some personality rights regulation. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- USA do not have any personality laws. Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- The Geneva Conventions are not their house rules, and one of the conditions of the conventions is that the rights cannot be signed away in any shape or form. If a person qualifies for those rights, they have them no matter what is said and done, either by them or their captors. They can't release the images publically, at all, so how do they have the right to give them a public license? ~ R.T.G 14:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm leaning towards Keep per Multichill's POV. — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:43, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The argument is entirely made up. The Geneva Conventions are not binding on private parties and the Wikimedia projects are under no obligation to follow them. Ruslik (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Notice: I have updated the request with Commons guidelines specific to this issue, 3rd bullet point. There doesn't seem to be any room for preference. I have requested advice on speedy deletion of an open request item on the deletion requests talk page. ~ R.T.G 21:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- You seems not to understand of what Commons:Non-copyright restrictions mean. Ruslik (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- It does not support this license. I will quote the relevant passage: "...some materials may be subject to additional legal restrictions when they are used in particular circumstances or in particular ways. These limitations may arise from laws related to trademarks, patents, personality rights, authors' moral rights, political censorship, or any of many other legal causes which are entirely independent from the copyright status of the work." ~ R.T.G 22:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- This only confirms that you do not understand what are you talking about. Ruslik (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- It does not support this license. I will quote the relevant passage: "...some materials may be subject to additional legal restrictions when they are used in particular circumstances or in particular ways. These limitations may arise from laws related to trademarks, patents, personality rights, authors' moral rights, political censorship, or any of many other legal causes which are entirely independent from the copyright status of the work." ~ R.T.G 22:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- You seems not to understand of what Commons:Non-copyright restrictions mean. Ruslik (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. As Rslik and Borysk5 pointed out, the Geneva Convention is not binding to Wikimedia, and it was published by an official organ of the Ukrainian government. If you want to insist on the POW argument, be aware that Article 47 of the Geneva Convetion states that mercenaries aren't considered lawful combatants and thus have no rights as POWs and are to be treated as common criminals. Unless you find something officially stating this man is considered a POW by the Ukranian government, we keep it. LordLoko (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Simply saying someone is a mercenary, even if they say it themselves, does not revoke the rights of the convention. Only a complete foreigner who is paid more than soldiers of the same rank may be considered a mercenary. That is what the Conventions say.
- Ukraine declaring that man to be a POW does not give him the rights. He just has them. There is no way to revoke those rights unless and until he is convicted of a war crime or released. That is what the conventions say. Ukraine does not have the right to license a POWs exposure to the public, no matter what anybody says, not them, not him, I'm not even sure that Russia could find a way to have those rights revoked.
- And face something, it is up to Russia how much he gets paid. The conventions do not say, "Don't pay your soldiers too much and revoke their citizenship if they have ever been a mercenary." They just don't say anything even like that. ~ R.T.G 02:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Even if the war ends tomorrow, he will have to be released or convicted before he is no longer a POW. ~ R.T.G 18:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please, stop this lawyering here. Your arguments make absolutely no sense. There is no law in the USA or anywhere in the world which says that such image is illegal to publish. Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per arguments above. --Yann (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Image is copyright and attributed to a 3rd party upload. Original video is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEuKcohGHx4 and does not show CC licensing Lullabying (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yonda qwathekana (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files are all self-promotional and fall outside Commons scope (COM:SCOPE). Uploader has no contributions across Wikimedia projects that are not self-promotional.
- File:Untold truth about wealth by Yonda Qwathekana.pdf
- File:Yonda Qwathekana.jpg
- File:Yonda luyanda Qwathekana.jpg
- File:Yonda Qwathekana CEO and founder of Yeucat.jpg
- File:Yonda Qwathekana, money.png
- File:Untold truth about wealth, Yonda Qwathekana.png
- File:Yonda Qwathekana.png
- File:Yonda Qwathekana, bizana.png
- File:Untold truth about wealth.png
- File:Temp profile image5827734208231001566.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 19:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Not only simple geometric shapes it's copyrigit logo. Willy1018(talk) 01:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted Microsoft software, therefore rendering it as a copyright violation. ShadowCyclone (talk) 03:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This is non-free Microsoft screenshot. --Hajoon0102 💬 08:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Артём 13327 (talk) 15:06, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept, so simple screen does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission protected logo Hoyanova (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logo. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Begründung'' }} Scribere2020 (talk) 08:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: No reason given & in use. --Achim55 (talk) 08:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Tiny for 2020, no EXIF, probably not own work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, tiny photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Joofjoof as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo is credited to Crown Studios of Wellington, whose proprietors died after 1972 [3]. The source link also does not permit commercial usage. |source=
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per protest by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Employees of photo studios do not own copyrights. The latest owner of Crown Studios died in 2001. Joofjoof (talk) 10:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - as mentioned, they fall under "PD-New Zealand" Licence as they qualify on all the relevant ground such as
- photo taken or work published prior to 1 January 1972 (50 years ago) [ Image was taken sometime in the year 1960]
- Released before 1 January 1972 (50 years ago) [It was released in 1960]
Also the images's copyright status on natlib is listed as Unknown which is a clear indication that its not copyrighted or it would have been listed as such. If you search Crown Studios Wellington, we have a few hundred images of them on commons, majority were uploaded by admins over the span of 15 years, including Materialscientist who is also an admin, i just took cue from him on what is allowed here or else i rarely bother with old images...--Stemoc 10:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos taken prior to 1918 (for example, File:Henry Butland 1893.jpg) were under a different ownership. Joofjoof (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- nope, a majority of photos on commons from Crown Studios Wellington were taken between 1950-1965.. Stemoc 11:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos taken prior to 1918 (for example, File:Henry Butland 1893.jpg) were under a different ownership. Joofjoof (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
I had nominated this for deletion a few days ago due to potential copyright issues, but it was erroneously closed by an administrator as keep. So I'm re-nominating it for deletion. What this comes down to is that the source website says the copyright status is unknown. Although the photograph was taken by an employee of the New Zealand based photography studio Crown Studios. According to this document in Australia "a work created in the context of employment is owned by the employer." In fact most, if not all, modern western countries follow the same standard. So I assume it also apply to New Zealand they have extremely similar laws due being members of the Berne Convention. The only instance where the copyright is not owned by the employer is when it's explicitly stated by an agreement, which there isn't evidence of in this case. There is also zero evidence that there is an exception for employees of photography studios. Therefore, the employer of Crown Studios and copyright holder would be Frank Thompson, and he died in 2001. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2071. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 01:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the previous assessment, and our long standing policy on images from that studio. --RAN (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton: Can you link to where the long standing policy on images from this studio is? Because I've done a lot of research about it and I couldn't find one. Hell, even if you look through the deletion request archive for "Crown Studios" mine are the only ones that exist. I'm not sure how there can be a long standing policy about something that hasn't been discussed and has no images related to it nominated for deletion before. Another thing is that the whole "a work created in the context of employment is owned by the employer" is directly from a Commons legal packet. I doubt there would be a long standing policy that directly goes against Commons' own legal documents. Otherwise, we have to believe Commons' own documents can't be trusted or followed, which just seems weird. That said, I'd be happy to withdraw this if you can show me where the longstanding policy about it is. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In NZ, copyright is usually owned by the employer default ([4]), but this arrangement doesn't seem to affect the duration of the copyright, so I assume copyright duration follows the existing rules. Since we can't identify the author, I think it's reasonable to follow the "unknown author" duration of Publish+50 years ({{PD-New Zealand}}#A) which would result in this file being PD. -M.nelson (talk) 22:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC) Oops, mistakenly voted delete initially -M.nelson (talk) 17:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- @M.nelson: I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here or anything, but if the employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work then wouldn't the copyright term be their life plus 70+ years since they own the copyright? Otherwise it seems like you'd have to treat the copyright like it would expire 50 years after date of publication even in cases where the owner/copyright holder is still alive, which just seems weird. Like say the owner/copyright holder owns the copyright when they are 20 but lives to be 90. Do they just magically lose ownership of the copyright when they turn 70 or something? Personally I'd need some evidence to believe the law worked that way. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: As far as I know (from a lot of Googling), only the ownership of the copyright is transferred to the employer, without affecting duration. All commentary around copyright duration seems to refer strictly about the author of the work, not the owner of the copyright.
It seems like if the author becomes unknown, they do indeed magically lose copyright. I'm sure most works have a known author when they're created, so ought to be copyrighted for that creator's lifetime and then 50 years more, but if someone later investigates and "it is not possible for a person who wishes to ascertain the author’s identity by reasonable inquiry"[1], the work does indeed magically fall into the public doman. Though odd, through a lot of Googling I haven't encountered anything that suggests that that isn't how the law works. -M.nelson (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: As far as I know (from a lot of Googling), only the ownership of the copyright is transferred to the employer, without affecting duration. All commentary around copyright duration seems to refer strictly about the author of the work, not the owner of the copyright.
- @M.nelson: I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here or anything, but if the employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work then wouldn't the copyright term be their life plus 70+ years since they own the copyright? Otherwise it seems like you'd have to treat the copyright like it would expire 50 years after date of publication even in cases where the owner/copyright holder is still alive, which just seems weird. Like say the owner/copyright holder owns the copyright when they are 20 but lives to be 90. Do they just magically lose ownership of the copyright when they turn 70 or something? Personally I'd need some evidence to believe the law worked that way. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hhhhmmm OK. That's kind of odd, but thanks for looking into it at least if nothing else. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Per prior consensus stamps (or other payment documents) in Russia are non-eligible for copyright but only as a whole subject. When they are cropped, they become covered by copyright protection. In this case the image is cropped from an otherwise PD postal cover. To quote the law in Russia, "“This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign." So the image is covered by copyrighted since it is separated from the original document. Adamant1 (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Probably not public domain; no source attribution. Gets flagged on Youtube as copyrighted content "Rule Britannia, by The Band of H M Royal Marines." Listed as owned by The Orchard Music On behalf of: Music Masters. Provenance needs to be specified or it should be deleted. Kahnwiley (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not against the deletion. I must apologize for sending these files. I sent them at a time when I knew nothing about copyrights, I just wanted to help.G.J.S. (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded by me, when I was a bit new Wikimedian. I myself is there in the photograph. Obvious copyright violation. Please delete it. Gazal world (talk) 17:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The sculpture was in Paris, but there is no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. The sculptor Paul Jouve died in 1973 and his works are protected with copyright until 2044 (70+1 years from death). If this is 1937 photo, then it is not own work. Real photographer and his/her death year are unknown, so we have no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
How can a 1909 photo be an "own work"? Yanguas (talk) 19:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is apparently a photo of an engineer by the name of Yu.M. Kulikov. There's no further description, there's no category, and it's not in use. The only somewhat notable person with the name of Yu(ri) Kulikov I could find was a soccer player, so apparently not him. So apparently this is a photo showing a person that is not notable, plus the photo looks badly manipulated somehow. So I think we should delete it. Rosenzweig τ 20:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
File:Copy of Marine Corps War Memorial (Iwo Jima flag raising) in Fall River Massachusetts.jpg
[edit]_in_Fall_River_Massachusetts.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Fall_River_Massachusetts.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Would people please stop marking photos for speedy deletion based solely on FoP problems? These kinds of deletions are supposed to be handled with regular deletion nominations, as other wikis can upload the photos locally as fair use. Please don't do this again. Thanks. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- For the record, I don't contest the nomination; I just object to tagging it as speedy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The original is PD-no renewal, but this copy has its own copyright which is in force. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Felix de Weldon died in 2003 and holds copyright of the sculpture. The photo might be PD but the sculpture is not per FOP-US Brad101 (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It is a photograph of the sculpture, not a copy of it. There are other elements, the lighting, the sky, the trees, etc. This is the photographer's artistic interpretation. There are many photographs of copyrighted sculptures in commons, see Category:Love by Robert Indiana, do you think all of those should be deleted? --rogerd (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's not a valid argument. See Commons:Derivative works. Luckily, Robert Indiana failed to put copyright notices on most of his LOVE sculptures (with the exception of one at Wichita State University), so most of those photos are OK. howcheng {chat} 23:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Is there any reason to think that this memorial, which seems to be on federal land and government-owned, wasn't commissioned by the US Marine Corps and therefore in the public domain? Dominic (talk) 21:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- sadly, after the Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial lawsuit, it's clear that commissioned art is copyright artist. however, if the artist was a government employee, then PD. if we want FOP like UK, we need to lobby congress. easy non free rationale though. Slowking4 (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The SIRIS record does indeed state that Felix de Weldon owns the copyright and that the copyright statement is on the sculpture itself. Being copyrighted in 1954, the copyright would have expired in 1983 it would have required renewal at that time. In the Library of Congress copyright records for de Weldon, there are two entries for "Marines raising flag on IWO-JIMA", but neither of them were created 1982 or 1983 (one is in 1986 and the other is 1993), so {{PD-US-not renewed}} is probably applicable. howcheng {chat} 23:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- migrate to en:wikipedia with Non free 3D art. (hmm - what is the status of a renewal too late, but registered? is that the copy published date, not unveiling?) Slowking4 (talk) 00:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hard to say if those renewals apply to this specific statue—de Weldon made a bunch of these over the years. howcheng {chat} 05:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I updated the licensing per Howcheng's instructions. Brad (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Category:USMC War Memorial, in which the entire category of photos of the monument was kept. howcheng {chat} 18:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's all good. The article en:United States Marine Corps is up for featured article review and the photo licensing needs to be top notch. Thanks for your help. Brad (talk) 10:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Listing as PD-US-not renewed James F. (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not tag photos for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. This image is visible on a Wikivoyage page, where we have a free use policy that allows us to upload photos locally for fair use, but we can't upload a speedily deleted file that no longer exists, so we (and any other wikis using this image) need time to take care of this. Thanks for your future cooperation with existing Commons guidelines. Also note the thread above about the non-renewal of the copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- The record that you found is not for a renewal: all renewal copyright numbers start with "RE", and the record will actually say "Renewal registration for" (example). So the record you found is for another version of the statue. —howcheng {chat} 07:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Howcheng: , The artist may have registered the sculpture in 1977. Then in 1993 he apparently registered VAu000265428- (Title: Marines raising flag on IWO-JIMA). In any event I do not think we can assume that the copyright was not renewed. Seems he was active in copyrights and this sculpture was his pièce de résistance. Bruxton (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- That article only states that he visited the office in 1977, but for the sake of due diligence, I searched the 1977 records for "Felix Weldon" and found no results. I also tried "Iwo Jima" and there were no relevant results (besides, the statue wasn't even eligible for renewal yet). I get what you're saying about him being attentive to copyrights (here is the original 1954 registration), and if you find the evidence that he renewed it, I will 100% support deletion. —howcheng {chat} 17:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Howcheng: , The artist may have registered the sculpture in 1977. Then in 1993 he apparently registered VAu000265428- (Title: Marines raising flag on IWO-JIMA). In any event I do not think we can assume that the copyright was not renewed. Seems he was active in copyrights and this sculpture was his pièce de résistance. Bruxton (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not eligible for speedy deletion per F3. Derivative work of non-free content at Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. Note:
- "Given the complexity of copyright rules like freedom of panorama and de minimis, it is best for such issues to be resolved in a formal deletion request." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos with FoP problems and no other issues are not eligible for speedy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based only on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based only on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. There might also be a de minimis argument in this case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This 1954 sculpture is the work of Felix de Weldon, erected with a copyright notice burnished in gold. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Freedom_of_panorama, the US does not allow public sculptures from this date unless there is a specific release from the artist. This a privately funded sculpture, using private money, not a work of the US government. The Smithsonian confirms the information about sculpture but give no mention of the artist releasing the work of art into the public domain. Binksternet (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:USMC War Memorial. Although a copyright notice is present on the sculpture, the copyright was not renewed. The original photo is PD due to lack of renewal as well. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per King of Hearts. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. Also note the discussion above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
File:2018-10-31 15 25 21 The west side of the Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- I will simply point out that if this deserves deletion, then there's a bunch more which should be eligible for the same in Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial. Lets be fair, now. Famartin (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 04:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
File:2018-10-31 15 24 27 The east side of the Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- I will simply point out that if this deserves deletion, then there's a bunch more which should be eligible for the same in Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial. Lets be fair, now. Famartin (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 04:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- To be fair, Famartin, a whole bunch of photos in this category were nominated for deletion. My objection was that they are ineligible for speedy deletion, not that they can't be deleted after a discussion if the sculpture in question is indeed under an active copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. Also, check the copyright on this. Other threads that kept similar files stated that the copyright on this photo was not renewed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama for 3d sculptures in the United States, the sculpture is was dedicated in 1954. Felix de Weldon (the sculptor) died in 2003 Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photos are not eligible for speedy deletion based solely on FoP issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Marine_Corps_War_Memorial Famartin (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The United States does not have FOP for sculpture especially when the sculpture is copyrighted. I believe that the copyright was renewed several times including in the year 2000: Document Number: V3456D053 Date of Recordation: 2000-08-11 Entire Copyright Document: V3456 D53 P1-3 Date of Execution: 23Apr98; date of cert.; 7Aug00 Title: Head of David & 6 other titles; sculptures / By Felix DeWeldon, artist. Notes: Agreement. Party 1: Charles Huller & Felix DeWeldon. Links: List of titles: 001 Head of David. 002 Discus thrower. 003 Bust of Kennedy. 004 Iwo Jima war memorial. 005 Pieta. 006 Brudus. 007 Colossus of Rhodes. Names: Huller, Charles DeWeldon, Felix. The rest of my rationale has been copied into the nomination above. Bruxton (talk) 04:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
I don't see this picture at https://web.archive.org/web/20120617145446/http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/45/788/10114.pdf .In any case, if this is a 1930 photo, this became PD in Turkey after the 1996 URAA restoration for anonymous works (1930+70=2000). If this work was solely published in Turkey in 1930, and since it didnt become PD before URAA, then it'd be 95 years of copyright. This makes it 2026 to become PD in the USA per Commons:Hirtle_chart. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Atatürk, Stojadinović, Metaxas, Comnen. Ankara, March 1938 (Koncern Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not sure why this is tagged as PD-Poland when it was taken in Ankara, Turkey. While this is PD in Turkey for anonymous works (1938+70=2008), this is after the 1996 URAA year Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Turkey. If this 1938 picture was solely published in Turkey, and since it was not PD before URAA, this wont be PD in the USA until 2034 per Commons:Hirtle_chart. This is because the USA copyright would be for 95 years. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: Before starting this nomination, did you at any point bother to check the link for the image source, which indicates where the image was published and under what copyright law? Presumably not, since you wouldn't have begun this nomination with "Not sure why this is tagged as PD-Poland". Dahn (talk) 01:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- I did click on that link before checking the nomination. It confuses me since Miejsce:Ankara in the file description translates to Place: Ankara. Though Koncern Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny is a Polish publishing house, the photo was taken in Ankara, Turkey. Therefore, that's why I said "Not sure why this is tagged as PD-Poland when it was taken in Ankara, Turkey". If we are supposed to use Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland instead, the same issue applies as Poland also has 70 years of copyright for anonymous works. Also, Poland has 1996 as the URAA year as well. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: It does not matter where the image was taken, but where it was first published. As indicated already (again, you really should check the descriptions before making blanket nominations), the image is anonymous and was published in/by Koncern Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny in 1938. As per the rules applicable in Poland: "For anonymous or pseudonymous works copyright expires 70 years from date of first being made public". Unless I am mistaken, US copyright does not at all offer protection works with their copyright expired in their country of publication before 1996, and this appears to be the case of this particular item. Are we done here? Dahn (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- I did click on that link before checking the nomination. It confuses me since Miejsce:Ankara in the file description translates to Place: Ankara. Though Koncern Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny is a Polish publishing house, the photo was taken in Ankara, Turkey. Therefore, that's why I said "Not sure why this is tagged as PD-Poland when it was taken in Ankara, Turkey". If we are supposed to use Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland instead, the same issue applies as Poland also has 70 years of copyright for anonymous works. Also, Poland has 1996 as the URAA year as well. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: If you should still find the concept of "country of publication as country of origin" elusive, please consider having a look over the images that have been uploaded on Commons by way of Gallica.fr: images that are taken in Romania, in Ireland, in Uganda, in Norway etc. by a French agency such as Agence Rol or Agence Meurisse are currently in the public domain by virtue of their copyright having expired in France. For instance here. That would spare us all a lot of time. Dahn (talk) 01:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- In my nomination, I also mentioned that this photo has a USA copyright as well per URAA. This is explained more at Commons:URAA-restored copyrights. Per Commons:Licensing, the photo must be "public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." This photo is currently not public domain in the United States per the Commons:Hirtle_chart. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: Okay, let's go deeper: specifically which part of the Hirtle chart explains this? I'm looking under "Works Published Abroad Before 1978" -- which part of that section you argue applies here, for a photograph that is PD in Poland and was never registered as copyrighted in the US? Dahn (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Specifically, point number 3 under that section "Solely published abroad, without compliance with US formalities or republication in the US, and not in the public domain in its home country as of URAA date". This work became Public Domain in Poland in 2009. This is after the URAA year for Poland in 1996. Meaning, an additional copyright was added for the USA. COM:URAA says "restored copyrights in the United States on foreign works if those works were still copyrighted in the foreign source country on the URAA date" MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: Okay, let's go deeper: specifically which part of the Hirtle chart explains this? I'm looking under "Works Published Abroad Before 1978" -- which part of that section you argue applies here, for a photograph that is PD in Poland and was never registered as copyrighted in the US? Dahn (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- In my nomination, I also mentioned that this photo has a USA copyright as well per URAA. This is explained more at Commons:URAA-restored copyrights. Per Commons:Licensing, the photo must be "public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." This photo is currently not public domain in the United States per the Commons:Hirtle_chart. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PD in Poland or Turkey, whichever actually applies, after the URAA date, therefore still under copyright in the USA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Fasebook F1 191.126.15.105 00:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022060810002565 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for >30 days. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
no permission copyvio Hoyanova (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. In my opinion this is complex logo, but I'd like to have another opinion as well. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
no permission copyvio Hoyanova (talk) 06:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. In my opinion this is complex logo, but I'd like to have another opinion as well. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Ce blason n'appartient pas aux Gasnier du Maine mais au Seigneur GASNAY de la Goumardière. C'est une erreur venant de ce lien : http://boutique.genealogie.com/blasons/armoiries-famille-gasnier-49810 , la PREUVE : https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1111424/f311.image VVarnarivs (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
There is no proof of license for this image, but this isn't work by the Florida government. However, that redirects to 404 error. In present time, the site copyright says "© Copyright 2022 © Copyright 2018 Florida Department of Environmental Protection". 178.137.8.193 21:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RaFaDa20631 as Logo (above threshold of originality). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- ...and additionally, this logo was uploaded as an Indonesian Wikipedia conflict of interest. Use of logos with no educational purposes at all. Used in article id:99.co Indonesia which was written as a promotional material (deleted as CSD A7). RaFaDa20631 (talk) 00:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Produced by Pennsylvania State College, not a Federal Agency [5]
- File:Fifteen frames from Symptoms in schizophrenia..JPG
- File:Four frames from Symptoms in schizophrenia..JPG
— Racconish 💬 09:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
No indication the artist created these works as an official duty
- File:Dog with a toothache..JPG
- File:Cat, as dentist, holding dog’s tooth..JPG
- File:Dog with toothache..JPG
- File:Dentist giving patient his bill..JPG
- File:Dentist showing patient extracted tooth..JPG
- File:Dentist extracting patient’s tooth..JPG
- File:Dentist extracting tooth..JPG
- File:Man with toothache talking to the dentist..JPG
- File:Va donc chez le dentiste, nigaud! (Well then go to the dentist, fool!).JPG
- File:Fallen man trying to extract tooth..JPG
- File:Man trying to extract tooth..JPG
- File:Man with a toothache..JPG
- File:Appliquez l’anesthésie spéciale!! (Apply the special anesthesia!!).JPG
- File:Pour un nerf, c’est un nerf!! (For a nerve ... it’s a nerve!!).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 09:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
"We don’t know for sure, but it seems likely that the man who made them was the Hungarian artist Otto Elkan, who was born in Budapest in 1884 and immigrated to France in December 1935. In 1943 Elkan (recorded as “Catholique—r. juive”) was detained in a Nazi war camp in Chateau Tombebouc." https://circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov/2020/08/06/dental-cartoons-ca-1945/
"ELKAN Otto [AMB074] fils d’Oskar et de Thérèse Bouchan, né le 27/08/1884 à Budapest, Hongrie, de nationalité hongroise, artiste peintre, entré en France le 13/12/1935, au camp le 15/03/1943, transféré le 14/09/1943 à Tombebouc (Lot-et-Garonne). ("Catholique r(ace) juive")." http://e.de-luget.pagesperso-orange.fr/Tables/Heberges_%20non-iberiques.htm
it seems there was no more info about this artist after ww2, so i guess it's safe to assume these images can be undeleted before 1884+90+70+1=2045.--RZuo (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be covered by PD-USGov
File:If you don't give a darn about yourself do it for her..JPGwithdrawn- File:Gong gong wei sheng huan deng pian, 1950s-1970s = Chinese public health slides (1950s-70s).JPG
- File:Ren yuan tong zu yan hua tu = Human evolution from apes..JPG
- File:Gong gong wei sheng yu jian kang pin tu ji mu = Health and Hygiene puzzle blocks..JPG
- File:Experiments in cross circulation using two canines..JPG
- File:Surgical procedure for exposing the carotid artery and third nerve in the cranial cavity of a monkey..JPG
File:George Mayerle test chart (1)..JPGwithdrawnFile:George Mayerle test chart..JPGwithdrawn- File:De notis in manu..JPG
- File:Ai zi bu yao hai zi Zhongguo fang lao xie hui = Love your child, don’t harm your child..JPG
- File:Da po hui ji ji yi de xin li Zhongguo fang lao xie hui = Breaking the psychological barrier of not seeing the doctor..JPG
- File:Bu ke rao shu de cuo wu Zhongguo fang lao xie hui = Unforgivable mistake..JPG
- File:Xian dan mi fang bu neng zhi lao bing Zhongguo fang lao xie hui = Nostrums and superstition cannot cure tuberculosis..JPG
- File:Zhi ren zhi mian bu zhi fei Zhongguo fang lao xie hui = Knowing people’s faces but not their lungs..JPG<
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..JPG){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 09:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- many are out of copyright. i will process those in a few weeks when i have time. RZuo (talk) 09:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- kept last five were created by 中國防癆協會 and they are PD-China and PD-1996. sixth last by "Bethesda, MD : U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Health & Human Services, [2010]" https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101595881-img .
- undelete File:Experiments in cross circulation using two canines..JPG File:Surgical procedure for exposing the carotid artery and third nerve in the cranial cavity of a monkey..JPG in 2027 because one was published in 1929 and another in 1931.--RZuo (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I renamed files with = in the title, as this is a problem. Yann (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: thanks for the renaming but why did you remove these [renamed] files from the list above and why is there no teplate on the [renamed] file pages? — Racconish 💬 15:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't remove the files from the list, but RZuo did it. Yann (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- {{ping|Yann} apologies. @RZuo: comments welcome here but once again plese refrain from removing the deletion templates. — Racconish 💬 15:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC) @Yann: just noticed the typo. 16:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't remove the files from the list, but RZuo did it. Yann (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: thanks for the renaming but why did you remove these [renamed] files from the list above and why is there no teplate on the [renamed] file pages? — Racconish 💬 15:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Per Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag PD-old is not applicable to File:De notis in manu..JPG since it is not a mechanical reproduction of a 2D page but a 3D representation of the book with an unfolded page. — Racconish 💬 08:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment There is no evidence why {{PD-China}}{{PD-1996}} would apply to File:Ai zi bu yao hai zi Zhongguo fang lao xie hui, Love your child, don’t harm your child..jpg which is currently described as created in 2013. — Racconish 💬 08:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Presumably an incorrect date, it looks old enough Dronebogus (talk) 08:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:If you don't give a darn about yourself do it for her..JPG I don’t see any evidence this wasn’t produced by the US military based on the info printed at the bottom. The date is very likely incorrect. Dronebogus (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination of File:If you don't give a darn about yourself do it for her..JPGbased on this. — Racconish 💬 10:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: two illustrations by William P. Didusch as {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Deleted the rest: File:De notis in manu..JPG because (while the book shown is in the PD) it is unclear who made the photograph and why it would be in the PD as claimed; the five flyers by the Chinese Anti-Tuberculosis Association because I'm missing a date (at least a year) to confirm if they're really {{PD-China}} and {{PD-1996}} as claimed, and the other three "Chinese" files because they seem clearly not old enough to fit {{PD-1996}}, possibly also not old enough for {{PD-China}}. --Rosenzweig τ 01:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
No reason to assume these are PD-USgov
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Dominican Republic..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Colombia..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Nepal..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Kenya..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Medeira..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Hong Kong..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from British Honduras..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Denmark..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Philippines..JPG
- File:Nurse wearing uniform from Germany..JPG
— Racconish 💬 10:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These images do not come from these countries. They are US people wearing uniforms from these countries. So the license is plausible. Yann (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No reason to assume these are PD-USgov -- also appeared in a 20212 book. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Not covered by PDgov (toys)
— Racconish 💬 11:42, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Not covered by PDgov (derivative of newspaper)
— Racconish 💬 11:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
3D artwork not covered by PDgov
— Racconish 💬 11:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
No reason to assume these are covered by PDgov if the author is unknown
- File:National Library of Medicine at night, 1972..JPG
- File:National Library of Medicine’s main reading room, ca. 1962..JPG
- File:History of Medicine Division, new reading room, ca. 1963..JPG
- File:Binding section, National Library of Medicine, ca. 1963..JPG
- File:Acquisition division, serials section..JPG
- File:Medical men use the library reading room, ca. 1940..JPG
— Racconish 💬 11:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be covered by PDgov
- File:Public health and germ warfare during the Korean War..JPG
- File:Xi jun zhan = Public health and germ warfare during the Korean War..JPG
- File:Killing pests prevents the spread of diseases; germs rely on pests to spread diseases, to eradicate pests is to defeat the American imperialists..JPG
- File:Cang ying chuan bing = Public health and germ warfare during the Korean War..JPG
— Racconish 💬 11:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Photos in Category:Freelancers
[edit]All of these photos qualify for CSD G10 (files created as advertisements) or CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors). See also this edit.
- File:Amrita Das Freelancer.jpg
- File:Elvira Lobato (41518064290).jpg
- File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien @ NVJ Grote Freelancersdag.jpg
- File:Kasia5pawlak2010.jpg
- File:Katia Brasil (Amazônia Real) (43327643591).jpg
- File:MD. Mizanur Rahman Mia.jpg
- File:Michael G. Fritz Photo by Frze Q50.jpg
- File:Michael G. Fritz Photo by Frze wa crop.jpg
- File:Michael G. Fritz Photo by Frze wa.jpg
- File:Mizan.jpg
- File:Mohamed Reda El-Naggar.jpg
- File:Nima Shahmoradi.jpg
- File:Pranishan Rajbhandari .jpg
- File:Protyoy Habib Aurko.jpg
- File:QuiteNancy2000.jpg
- File:Rahulydv.jpg
- File:Rajan Chaudhary Freelancer Journalist.jpg
- File:Rakibul Islam Rifat.jpg
- File:Ravi Kant Sharma (Pokhriyal).jpg
- File:Sajan Judo.png
- File:Sajan Subba.png
- File:Sarit Rai.jpg
- File:Shahin Alam.jpg
- File:Shahin Mollah SM.png
- File:Shawon Chowdhury.jpg
- File:Shovo sd shovo.jpg
- File:Snezic.jpg
- File:Sowgato Bhowmik.jpg
- File:Syed Mahmudur Rahman.jpg
- File:Vivek Agrawal.jpg
- File:Xaolah.jpg
- File:Yamada Ichiro-Journalist.jpg
- File:ZaheerAhmad.png
- File:عبد الرحمن.png
.jpg){kind=link}
_(43327643591).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand this nomination. File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien @ NVJ Grote Freelancersdag.jpg is used in https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilvy_Njiokiktjien and on the Wikipedia article of the national Photographer of the Netherlands. Photo was published on Flickr with the right license to transfer to Wikimedia Commons. --Hannolans (talk) 11:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Next picture I checked File:Elvira Lobato (41518064290).jpg is also in use on several wikipedia pages and has the right license. Jeff G. is this nomination a mistake? A bit unneccessary time consuming to discuss images that are in use and have the right license. --Hannolans (talk) 12:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep this mass nomination is seriously a mistake. Sturm (talk) 14:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion of remaining files; re-nominate individually/in smaller groups if you disagree. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-photo images in Category:Freelancers
[edit]All of these non-photo images qualify for CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). See also this edit.
- File:Freelance-team.jpg - Likely copyvio/G10
- File:Freelancer Illustration.png - Likely copyvio/G10
- File:Mistakes-to-avoid-when-hiring-freelancers.jpg - Copyvio - found online in 2015
- File:We Work Group.png - Likely copyvio/G10
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I checked several photographs, and they were in use in Wiki, see Michael G. Fritz and Saoroibrí. I guess this deletion request is too general. Vysotsky (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept those in scope, rest deleted as F10. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Mistakes-to-avoid-when-hiring-freelancers.jpg was used on a wiki page as well https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saoroibr%C3%AD and now deleted. Please undo this deletions or explain what is happening here. --Hannolans (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Seconded. User:Gbawden, please attend to this ASAP. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted as a copyvio - credited to (TCmake_photo/iStock) here in 2015 - https://www.theepochtimes.com/stressed-at-work-how-to-beat-common-traps-in-the-rat-race_1746432.html - I have updated the DR to reflect this Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good catch. But could you also update the reasons for the other deletions you did? --Hannolans (talk) 06:29, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted as a copyvio - credited to (TCmake_photo/iStock) here in 2015 - https://www.theepochtimes.com/stressed-at-work-how-to-beat-common-traps-in-the-rat-race_1746432.html - I have updated the DR to reflect this Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Seconded. User:Gbawden, please attend to this ASAP. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Mistakes-to-avoid-when-hiring-freelancers.jpg was used on a wiki page as well https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saoroibr%C3%AD and now deleted. Please undo this deletions or explain what is happening here. --Hannolans (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by User:Gbawden, all rationales were updated. --Rosenzweig τ 02:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
also almost-copy File:日本タングステン.jpg
In my opinion this is complex logo, surpasses threshold of originality of Japan. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I am requestion the deletion of File:Shestani.svg to open place for a new map. Requested by author.--AT44 (talk) 18:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per sostituirlo con un'altra foto. Giuseppe Guida (talk) 13:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- La sostituisco con un'altra che si presenta meglio. Le foto sono entrambe mie. Cordiali saluti. Giuseppe Guida (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ho reso orfano il file. Per me si può procedere.--o'Sistemonetell me 14:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no need to delete, there are several versions in the category, I cannot asses why this one (with the highest resolution but perhaps not the best colors) should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Logos of companies of Hong Kong
[edit]- File:759 Store logo.svg
- File:ACSlogo.jpg
- File:APM official logo.jpg
- File:AsiaPay logo.svg
- File:CASH Group Company Logo.jpg
- File:Ccb02 02.jpg
- File:Chengdu PlazaCentral 04.jpg
- File:City'super logo.svg
File:Concord Production Logo.svg- File:CRcare logo.svg
- File:D100 New logo.png
- File:Easyship vector logo.svg
- File:Genting Hong Kong.svg
- File:Great logo.svg
- File:HK CWB 柏寧酒店 The Park Lane Hong Kong Hotel Pullman name sign Logo Dec-2015 DSC.JPG
- File:Ji logo.jpg
- File:Metro Broadcast.svg
- File:Modern Education logo.svg
- File:Modern Terminals logo.svg
- File:OneDegree Hong Kong Ltd.png
- File:PacificPlaceLogo.svg
- File:PPL Logo.jpg
- File:Taste supermarket logo.svg
- File:THE LOEL CO LOGO.jpg
- File:Ytflogo.png
沈澄心✉ 14:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- File:Concord Production Logo.svg Keep Already discussed on 05 mar 2015. -- Fulvio 314 16:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:Concord Production Logo.svg only, the uploader is also the author and the CEO of logo's target entity and hence TOO doesn't matter here, Delete all others. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of companies of Hong Kong
[edit]Complex logos exceeding COM:TOO Hong Kong which is similarly low to that of the UK.
File:050324yahoologo.jpgkept by Ellywa, is of US origin- File:BuyHive Logo.png
- File:ESR Cayman.png
- File:Genting Hong Kong logo.svg
- File:Gigasports logo.png
- File:GJ LOGO.jpg
- File:Hk Logo 180 x 180.jpg
- File:Lateshowlogo.png
- File:Now TV logo.svg
- File:Sapphirelogodark.png
- File:SPI Logo PNG.png
- File:Sun-Tech Logo.jpg
- File:TVB Music Group Logo.jpg
- File:Voiceentgp Logo.jpg
File:Yahoo! HK Logo 2009-2013.jpgkept by Ellywa, is of US originFile:Yahoo! HK Logo 2013-2019.pngkept by Ellywa, is of US originFile:Yahoo-HK-desktop-FP@2x.pngkept by Ellywa, is of US origin
Wcam (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep at least for File:Gigasports logo.png because it is a basic image of an orange globe. So I highly doubt it's copyrightable, whatever the threshold of originality is. I don't have an opinion on the other files outside of that except that a few of them probably aren't above the threshold of originality either, but I don't really care enough about it to go beyond that. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Even File:Gigasports logo.png should not be kept as it is more complex than the copyright-protected EDGE magazine logo listed in COM:TOO UK. Wcam (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- some of these are no more complex than lines of basic computer fonts. Keep
- File:Lateshowlogo.png should be a taiwan logo so should be ok.--RZuo (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Hong Kong. The level of originality required for copyright protection is low in this country, and it is not OK to publish logo’s assuming they are in PD. “The level of originality required for copyright protection is presumably very low. ” Also deleted the Taiwan logo, as the level required for copyright is low according to COM:TOO Taiwan Kept the Yahoo logos. --Ellywa (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the coat of arms of a municipality in Colombia, taken from [6]. Could be old, could be new, I don't know. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Colombia does not really say anything about coats of arms. There is a clause that "In all cases where a literary, scientific or artistic work has as its owner a legal entity or an official body or any institution under government public law, the term of protection shall be deemed to be 70 years as from the date of publication." But we don't know when this was first published. Could it be in the PD for another reason? If it can't be determined that it is in the PD or under a free license, the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
Rosenzweig τ 17:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netora as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=source is not the Japanese Government website. And from the agency's policy[7], the logo of organization isn't licensed under CC-BY. See at chapter 3. See my talk page. Yann (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Hello, the source website says its a faithful version of the Special Boarding Unit Insignia "a special finish that faithfully reproduces the "new emblem" of the Special Boarding Unit on the back." Secondly, wiki commons has many insignia of the Japan Self-Defense Forces. So if all those other insignia and badges are allowed then this one should be: licensed under the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.2.0). The Terms of Use are compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International. -Artanisen (talk) 19:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No evidence per COM:EVID that this image is published with a free licence. It is taken from a clothing advertisement. Please provide a link to a Japanese government website for this image. If this succeeds, the image can be undeleted with mentioning the PD source. --Ellywa (talk) 22:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
