Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/05/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(13483720034).jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
{{duplicate|File:Metro B Colosseo.jpg}} Vcohen (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
fashion supposed to be honest, final so heightened abstract modular Birch prestige of Apparate album prestige of Anaconda. Thomas would act as well Chau. Tariq to Nap Ish nominee. Yeah, then push Bunny. Thank you much appreciated this is V shape. People and kill score. You don't know. Attack prestige over. And not authorized. So Pickleboy Gemini let's all hate you. Prestige offers. I would talk about Yukino permission. Becky dubs a partner Susan OG packed with the key outstanding shares, Logi. OK, Umm. 95.160.157.36 17:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
fashion supposed to be honest, final so heightened abstract modular Birch prestige of Apparate album prestige of Anaconda. Thomas would act as well Chau. Tariq to Nap Ish nominee. Yeah, then push Bunny. Thank you much appreciated this is V shape. People and kill score. You don't know. Attack prestige over. And not authorized. So Pickleboy Gemini let's all hate you. Prestige offers. I would talk about Yukino permission. Becky dubs a partner Susan OG packed with the key outstanding shares, Logi. OK, Umm. 95.160.157.36 17:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
fashion supposed to be honest, final so heightened abstract modular Birch prestige of Apparate album prestige of Anaconda. Thomas would act as well Chau. Tariq to Nap Ish nominee. Yeah, then push Bunny. Thank you much appreciated this is V shape. People and kill score. You don't know. Attack prestige over. And not authorized. So Pickleboy Gemini let's all hate you. Prestige offers. I would talk about Yukino permission. Becky dubs a partner Susan OG packed with the key outstanding shares, Logi. OK, Umm. 95.160.157.36 17:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The participants depicted here are underage. The only other thing this account has uploaded are images of a young girl in boyshorts. Seems pretty fucking creepy to me. Screwunethicalpornography (talk) 22:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete ASAP per nom, and someone who knows more about Commons should look more into the uploader. -Crossroads- (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work but grabbed from the web. --Achim55 (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
indésirable par le sujet Can10v (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, the photo cannot be deleted on that reason. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file is to old and not relevant any more. 79.179.237.219 18:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I am represent Nora and this image is not up to date. She will very happy if you can remove this photo. Thank you Galmesika (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Being old and out of date isn't a sufficient justification for deletion. There is no reason that Commons shouldn't host images of an individual at different times in their life. If the nominator would like to upload a properly licensed photo that is more up to date, that would give Wikipedia editors options to choose from. PCock (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: in project scope and France exception to consent (public figures performing their public functions or activities). AntonierCH (d) 08:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
le sujet ne désire pas que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Can10v (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- "I don't like it" is no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to deleted the file. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
For VRTS traceability purpose
[edit]
Ticket#2022060810003439. No action. JohnNewton8 (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: in project scope and France exception to consent (public figures performing their public functions or activities). AntonierCH (d) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
l'actrice ne souhaite pas que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Can10v (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to deleted a file. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
For VRTS traceability purpose
[edit]
Ticket#2022060810003439 . No action JohnNewton8 (talk) 10:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
l'actrice ne désire pas que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Can10v (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, the photo cannot be deleted on that reason. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio, photo from https://www.vitalproductions.ca/equipe/sandrine-bechade/ Culex (talk) 22:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Da es nach dem Impressum vom Urheberrecht geschützt ist. https://www.hartha.de/portal/seiten/Seite-900000001-26170.html?naviID=reset1 Daniel Maak (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Underlined in red, replaced by File:Structures of Acetylcholine, Tubocurarine, and Toxiferine.png. Leyo 00:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful M.M (talk) 01:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused image, politically charged upload. See no purpose other than to put a slogan on the commons page. FJones2123 (talk) 01:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hoax logo DigitalIceAge (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Superceded by File:Hewlett-Packard old.svg, incomplete (cropped off bottom), JPEG artifacts DigitalIceAge (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality, personal image of no educational value. — regards, Revi 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality, personal image of no educational value. — regards, Revi 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal low quality out-of-scope image. — regards, Revi 06:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by אליאס דיין (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only edits on his own biography. Out of scope.
Yann (talk) 08:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- If they are in use, aren't they required to be kept? --RAN (talk) 05:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I doubt his biography is in scope. In addition, there is a clear conflict of interest here. Yann (talk) 08:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable individual, self-promo attempt at ro:Piru Alexandru JR., no valid user contribs (m:Special:CentralAuth/Piru Alexandru) Gikü (talk) 08:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope. Larryasou (talk) 09:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational value. An user (the person in the picture?) has also left a message that they don't want that image is online. Velma (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused selfie, out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 11:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial fictitious flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Self-promotional, out of scope Trade (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RafidSaifullah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused poor and random picture of nondescript living room, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
watermark “photo by adslnih23”, not uploader
- File:欣欣客運249路 586-FL.JPG
- File:欣欣客運254路.jpg
- File:Taipei Bus 235-FQ 20091115.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 386-FN 20091025.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 113-AC 20091128.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 AG-557 20090905.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 622-AC 20091122.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 160-AD 20091025.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 AG-920 20091025.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 133-AD 20091025.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 228-FN 20091025.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 246-FN 20091122.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 570-AB 20091129.jpg
shizhao (talk) 03:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malcolm7529 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 07:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Image taken from https://www.a24.com/primicias/milton-re-el-imitador-que-homenajea-diego-maradona-el-juego-carlos-paz-es-mucho-respeto-n989574 Alejan98 (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Also, possible promotion. The user has recreated three times the article for this person in a few days. MexTDT (talk) 05:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Suspected not own work (which it becomes doubtful). COM:Derivative works of internet images. These reasons are according to COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
- File:Julie Clash 2020.jpg
- File:Julie Clash 2020 (cropped).jpg
- File:JULIE SELF.jpg
- File:Julie Anne San Jose PH 2021.jpg
- File:Julie Anne SJ.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Chompy Ace (talk) 01:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --Wdwd (talk) 19:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, taken from official Instagram account M.M (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, source: Instagram M.M (talk) 01:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
[[Not free based on [[Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mauritania Michel Bakni (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 11:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The uploader doesn't have the copyright. The artist died in 2005. Cédric Boissière (talk) 13:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Amazon books 108.184.8.239 16:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep obvious nonsense nomination. Loafiewa (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep I agree ̴̴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjensen (talk • contribs) 19:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, I agree too. No doubt, the picture has a valid License. W.wolny (talk) W.wolny (talk) 06:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- SNOW Keep - no valid reason given for deletion. - wolf 13:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused, no obvious educational use, out of COM:SCOPE, appears to be COM:VAND. This is a very poorly drawn ms paint version of File:GWBush Thanksgiving 2006.jpg. The account that uploaded this has made a grand total of 2 edits, one uploading this file, and 1 vandalising the czech wikipedia with it. 192.76.8.78 18:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Paintings by Nina Petrovna Valetova, a living artist, no permission.
- File:Nina Tokhtaman Valetova. Scorpion Sting, oil painting, 2017, 22 x 24.jpg
- File:Nina Valetova, Creator of Changes, oil painting, 56 x 71, 2015.jpg
- File:Nina Valetova, Insight, oil on canvas, 18 x 24 inches,.jpg
- File:Mysterious Garden, oil on canvas, 2020.jpg
- File:Nina Valetova - Futuristic Homotopy, oil on canvas 30 x 24 inches, 2020.jpg
- File:Made from Rectangles.jpg
Yann (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright. There is a logo of APA.az (check it from https://apa.az/en/foto/foto-albom?page=1) Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Synthesis levulinic acid.svg. Leyo 14:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom as we have a high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Levulinic acid family.svg. Leyo 17:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as we have a high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 219.78.190.35 as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: ABBA Schiphol 1976.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- @Túrelio: Support to Delete as the uploader. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Flickrwashing with false claims of authorship and licensing.
- The original source for this is Bert Verhoeff at Anefo: http://hdl.handle.net/10648/ac9052d6-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84
- We have that here as: File:Zweedse popgroep Abba in Nederland v.l.n.r. Benny, Frida, Anna en Björn op Schi, Bestanddeelnr 928-8964.jpg
- and a slightly cropped version from 2013 (as re-appeared on Flickr in 2014): File:ABBA Schiphol 1976.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 09:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Verrechnet, Autor ist erst ab 2023 70 Jahre tot. Plagman (talk) 07:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2024 (copyright term runs to the of the year 2023). --Rosenzweig τ 11:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
There's no evidence of the work being released under a cc license from the source Putitonamap98 (talk) 22:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
no evidence of the work being released under a cc license from the source 47.223.90.202 22:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
no evidence of the work being released under a cc license from the source 47.223.90.202 22:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Photo of copyrighted painting. Rights either held by the artist (George Mandus) or the state of Georgia (per https://web.archive.org/web/20040208093206/http://www.sos.state.ga.us/onlinetour/2ndfloor/portarits/ellis_gibbs_arnall.html) Mcrsftdog (talk) 23:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This poster is not "anonymous" as claimed; it's a work of de:Hans Herbert Schweitzer (also known as Mjölnir, see the signature in the upper right corner), who died in 1980. So this work is still protected by copyright, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2051. Rosenzweig τ 23:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This work is not "anonymous" as claimed; it's a work of sv:Rudi Tupy, who died in 1973. So the work is still protected by copyright, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2044. Rosenzweig τ 23:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a very poorly edited version of File:BarlowGirlWithFan12052005.jpg. A person has been edited out of the original image. I have no objection to cropping or making adjustments in contrast, saturation, etc, but I do not believe that images should be doctored in this way. Regardless of that, the editing on this image is so poor that it is not acceptable for Wikipedia use. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a very poorly edited version of File:Barlow Girl.jpg. A person has been edited out of the original image. I have no objection to cropping or making adjustments in contrast, saturation, etc, but I do not believe that images should be doctored in this way. Regardless of that, the editing on this image is so poor that it is not acceptable for Wikipedia use. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Image (albeit slightly lower resolution) appears here with a credit of "Courtesy of Scandlines". So, would not appear to be own work, thus an invalid license, and we would need permission via the COM:VRT process from Scandlines in order to keep this. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli politician. There's no EXIF and it clearly seems to be cropped (look at the top-left side for the white space). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: =In the US no FOP for 2 dimensional copyrighted works
- File:Juneteenth Flag Variation.jpg
- File:American Flags of Freedom.png
- File:Juneteenth flag without date.jpg
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: This is the result of posts at DYK. Editors agree this is a copyrighted image and it should not be on commons. discussion Bruxton (talk) 00:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: Can you ask theleekycauldron to supply a link to the copyright registration for this flag? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Will do! Bruxton (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hey, King of Hearts! I got it from here. Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Will do! Bruxton (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: Can you ask theleekycauldron to supply a link to the copyright registration for this flag? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted work; no release. Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
There is no proof that the image's status is {{PD-old-70}}. The source is Naver, a search engine. It doesn't identify the author, nor specify the year the item was created. It could have been drawn at a later date - therefore its status as a public domain is questionable. — regards, Revi 05:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I know about it. Trainholic explained it in my user talk in kowiki. You cn delete it. Thanks Trusovafan (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @-revi: , it is a drawing by Tak Heesung(1915-1992), from Urimunhwa, Dec 2020, page 20.--110.70.57.54 14:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- So, it isn't a public domain. Trusovafan (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. This user uploads files that do not belong him/her. All files must be checked that uploaded by this user. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 11:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: [1] CopyVio. Kadı Message 18:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Ferdi tayfur turanbayburt.jpg and file:Koltuk köyü.jpg as copyright violations: small photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
It is certainly not Dennis Eisenhut who uploaded the file. See [2]. RAL1028 (talk) 16:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Die Fotos wurden mir von Herrn Stephan Graf, auf meine Bitte hin, persönlich zugestellt. Dessen Genehmigung, das ich diese Fotos bei Wikipedia veröffentlichen darf, liegt mir vor. Wenn Ihnen das noch nicht reichen sollte, was Bedarf es dann noch um diese Fotos zu veröffentlichen? PS: Ich hatte die Fotos absichtlich mit der Unterschrift der Fotographin eingestellt um deren eventuellen Rechte zu waren. MfG Lostbastard (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Only the owner of the copyright can set his work under copy left conditions. It is he who loses all rights to his work. RAL1028 (talk) 06:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Die Fotografin hat mir telefonisch mitgeteilt, dass Ihre Fotos, zumindest solange ihr Name als Urheber darauf vermerkt ist, zur Veröffentlichung freigegeben sind. Sie verweist explizit darauf, dass Ihr Name auf den Fotos das Copyright aufhebt. Zumindest kennt sie es persönlich auch nicht anders. Insofern dürfen die Fotos von mir weiterverwendet und bei Wikipedia veröffentlicht werden. Leider hatte ich Ihnen das alles aber schon beim ersten mal mitgeteilt. MfG Lostbastard Lostbastard (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Only the owner of the copyright can set his work under copy left conditions. It is he who loses all rights to his work. RAL1028 (talk) 06:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Origin of the picture & related copyright conditions ("Urheberrecht"): Written permission required. RAL1028 (talk) 15:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Frau Eisenhut hat am 10.06.22 die Genehmigung bzw. Einverständniserklärung an Wiki Commons gesendet. Diese betrifft alle Fotos von "Stephan Graf's Double Vision" die mit ihrer Signatur gekennzeichnet sind. Lostbastard (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 16:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
It is certainly not Dennis Eisenhut who uploaded the file. See [3]. RAL1028 (talk) 16:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wie ich Ihnen schon mitteilte liegt mir das Einverständnis bzw. die Genehmigung des Künstlers vor. Er hat mir die Fotos persönlich zur Verfügung gestellt um meinen Wikipedia Artikel über seine Band zu vervollständigen. Wenn das nicht reichen sollte wäre ich Ihnen sehr verbunden wenn Sie mir die Vorgehensweise zur Veröffentlichung erläutern könnten. Auf den von mir genutzten Fotos habe ich absichtlich den Namen der Fotographin beibehalten um auf sie explizit aufmerksam zu machen. MfG Lostbastard (talk) 16:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Only the owner of the copyright can set his work under copy left conditions. It is he who loses all rights to his work. RAL1028 (talk) 06:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Warum sind die Fotos noch immer nicht verfügbar? Lostbastard (talk) 16:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Only the owner of the copyright can set his work under copy left conditions. It is he who loses all rights to his work. RAL1028 (talk) 06:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Origin of the picture & related copyright conditions ("Urheberrecht"): Written permission required. RAL1028 (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Frau Eisenhut hat am 10.06.22 die Genehmigung bzw. Einverständniserklärung an Wiki Commons gesendet. Diese betrifft alle Fotos von "Stephan Graf's Double Vision" die mit ihrer Signatur gekennzeichnet sind. Lostbastard (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 16:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
A photo collage (a derivative work) with no sources given for the photos in it. Photos in this image may be copyrighted, especially if they were taken by professional photographers and/or journalists. CentreLeftRight ✉ 02:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be either a press picture or a still from a video of the grand opening celebration. COM:PRP says it should be deleted Elisfkc (talk) 02:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Blurry picture - other ones already uploaded are better Remi Mathis (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:London Hughes
[edit]Hanna Hillier is the photographer, so not own work of uploader. Needs OTRS
- File:London Hughes -Photographer - Hanna Hillier 2013-11-04 12-22 (cropped).jpg
- File:London Hughes -Photographer - Hanna Hillier 2013-11-04 12-22.jpg
- Category:London Hughes which will be empty when these files are deleted
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Bilorv (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as File:Ero furcata male.jpg --Abalg (talk) 11:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- delete (uploader) Uploaded accidentally, sorry. Both are same files from same page on Flickr —Vis M (talk) 10:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The uploader stated on their en.wiki user talk page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alisha3107 , that they had found the photo online, but can't recall exactly where. It's extremely likely that it is copyrighted. Bonadea (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
This is my file and as the author, I would like to have it deleted. A person in Georgia (talk) 01:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Author is Sagar Kanojia, not uploader. See EXIF shizhao (talk) 02:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Also this foto was many times published in web (as unfree) before being uploaded here. For example: [4]--Kursant504 (talk) 04:59, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete unfree --Микола Василечко (talk) 08:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:ABBA1974TopPop.jpg 219.78.190.35 03:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Existence of PNG and JPG version is no redundancy. Vysotsky (talk) 07:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It's a massive scale-down: 4k5 pixels to 500.
- There are also some small individual thumbnails. They should probably be re-cropped from the bigger one too, as they're poor quality at present. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The other one should be deleted. This one is used in much more places. Maybe we should update it with a JPEG version of the bigger one before. --Bachsau (talk) 05:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Jest napisane w opisie że wolno tworzyć z niego utwory zależne czyli są fotografie pojedynczych osób Rafalwit (talk) 18:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The article is for Ceratostylis rubra. The plant pictured is a type of Delosperma cooperi or Hardy Ice Plant. HappyDancingFlowers (talk) 06:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}} or Template:TlFact disputed instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Molly Lasic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected not own work (which it becomes doubtful). COM:Derivative works of internet images. These reasons are according to COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle. See also: en:Special:Diff/1075157603.
- File:MavLine.jpg
- File:Kyline 3.jpg
- File:Kyline Nicole Alcantara.jpg
- File:Mavy and Kyline.jpg
- File:Kyline 1.jpg
Chompy Ace (talk) 06:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Suspected not own work (which it becomes doubtful). COM:Derivative works of copyrighted title cards of news programs from TV5, which especially owns Frontline Pilipinas and its morning and late-night editions. These reasons are according to COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle and COM:Fair use; it is not allowed on Commons for such title cards, instead upload it locally in some Wikimedia projects, such as the English Wikipedia (which is responsible merely for the United States law).
- File:FRONTLINE PILIPINAS TITLE CARD 2022.jpg
- File:Untitled design (20).png
- File:Frontline Tonight.jpg
- File:ONE BALITA NGAYON TITLE CARD.png
- File:One Balita Pilipinas Titile Card.jpg
- File:One Balita Pilipinas logo.webp
- File:One Balita Pilot Episode logo.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Chompy Ace (talk) 07:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a COM:screenshot. Uploader claims CC BY-SA 4.0; the main subject is copyrighted (which is owned by en:The Walt Disney Company). Hence, this YouTube video does not have a CC BY license. Per COM:PRP and COM:FU, this image must be deleted. Chompy Ace (talk) 07:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation Veracious (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work, photograph-of-photograph. Original date and source unknown, subject died in 1998, likely still copyrighted. MKFI (talk) 08:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- That is like 50-60 years old picture, the source is my family photo album :D Vasilev.r.s. (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Vasilev.r.s.: photographs are copyrighted for 70 years after the death of the photographer: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bulgaria. A sixty year old picture is still copyrighted. MKFI (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader is apparently the subject, photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Andre Jagt Copyright holder Het Antoni van Leeuwenhoek,Nederlands Kanker Instituut". MKFI (talk) 08:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yogeshb246 (talk · contribs)
[edit]apparently failed attempts to produce/upload File:Ramapuram Village..png
Enyavar (talk) 08:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Image appears here, and likely other places, without evidence of a license. Furthermore, the photo appears to be a photoshopped version (you can seen cloning artifacts on the left side) of an image on this page, which itself appears to be a screen capture from a movie. If so, the movie also must have expired. Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
This picture included my personal information, like my true name and phone number, please delet it quickly. Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 08:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted Veracious (talk) 09:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio; and also hideous Enyavar (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
=
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Apparent License laundering - source YouTube videos are news programs that seem to be showing pre-existing images under fair use. For example, File:Prim Prima @ Rivalry 3Plus.png is here in a more complete version and before the upload of the YouTube video.
Эlcobbola talk 10:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Previously published in http://www.niliart.org/new-page-5, VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Li Ni, Chinese contemporary artist performing at Pinacoteca di Brera at 2018. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a02:9b0:13:72ad:4c38:d73e:b534:8ab2 (talk) 10:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vardan SHahbazyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW - photos/scans of various works
- File:Official page - Martine Vassal.jpg
- File:Rassemblement national.jpg
- File:Consil art exposition des oeuvres dse consulats de Marseille 8 juin - 21 juillet.jpg
- File:Consil art exposition des oeuvres dse consulats de Marseille 8 juin.jpg
- File:Journées de la Culture Arménienne.jpg
- File:Consil art exposition des oeuvres dse consulats de Marseille 7 juin.jpg
- File:Consil art exposition des oeuvres dse consulats de Marseille 7 juin - 20 juillet.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 11:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- hello, thanks for responding to my suggestion,
- firstly I want to say that I added these files as evidence of one of the pages that you or your colleagues deleted - https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiza_Gragati. now I am creating this page and these files will be added to the content as evidence,
- Thank you for your understanding Vardan SHahbazyan (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
uploader request Jelican9 (talk) 12:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Jelican9: Would you consider keeping the file since it renders correctly now? TilmannR (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Alright! Jelican9 (talk) 12:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Jelican9 (talk) 12:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, failed image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
See File:@lennyrothenberg.jpg Codc (talk) 12:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Map forgery. Full reasoning can be seen in the closely connected Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HistoricGeek2345. Tacking this onto the other deletion request, if possible. Enyavar (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Map forgery. Full reasoning can be seen in the closely connected Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HistoricGeek2345. Tacking this onto the other deletion request, if possible. Enyavar (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
_(13483720034).jpg){kind=link}
_(13483720034).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of focus, unidentifiable, watermark, will probably never be used. Mhohner (talk) 13:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
_(13483720034).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Given that the image has geographic coordinates, I suspect that someone who was an expert on spiders might very well be able to identify the species here. The watermark is not relevant and could easily be cropped out. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:IronGargoyle, but borderline. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
_(13483720034).jpg){kind=link}
doppione OppidumNissenae (talk) 14:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, duplicate of File:Pietre d'inciampo a Caltanissetta b 02 ritaglio.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Urheber ist nicht die Fotografin Dirk Lenke (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Pas de photo liée Sotos (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
no source no permission, depicted people are not encyclopedically relevant, do not know they are online either (privacy) Hoyanova (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте,
- логотип научного института ФГБУН ЮУрИБФ, использованный, например, на https://vk.com/uuribf был переработан мной и из надписи по кругу "ФГУП Южно-уральский институт биофизики" оставлено историческое наименование "Южно-уральский институт биофизики" в связи с преобразованием института из ФГУП в ФГБУН. Других правок нет.
- Можно убрать пометку на удаление? Klaus ff (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Bariton Harald Jürgen Weiler ja pianist Anneli Merelaid heategevuskontserdil Suurgildi hoones 2. detsembril 2018. aastal.jpg
[edit]
Not own work. OTRS-permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a physical photo. No proof of permission. Gikü (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- File:Stiri fresh.jpg is in the exact same situation. Gikü (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this file for the Phoenician colonies template in Hebrew Wikipedia. I want to update it because the current mup doesn't contain all of the articles in the Hebrew template --פעמי-עליון (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC) I uploaded this file for the Phoenician colonies template in Hebrew Wikipedia. I want to update it because the current mup doesn't contain all of the articles in the Hebrew template פעמי-עליון (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Question What's stopping you from updating it? Can't you just edit the map and upload the new version without going through deletion requests? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; no use of this image on any Wikimedia project. And, personality issues. Consent given that this boy's photo was published on Commons? Mosbatho (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
جارێ پێویستم پێ نییە Regaazad (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I don't need it yet Regaazad (talk) 16:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Not a selfie, so permission from photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 16:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
complex logo, no permission Krd 16:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: does not fulfil the requirement for complex logos in the Unites States. See samples here. Pechristener (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The train drawing looks more complex than the samples shown. I'd say it's above the threshold of originality.-- Aimarekin (talk) 20:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Still voting for keeping, because the statement above is not true and also does not contain a debatable argument.--Pechristener (talk) 12:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, certainly above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Pointless blank map; and this type of election map is done with SVGs nowadays, so this will never be used. Elli (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Honestly, I would agree with you. I don't know what on earth was going through my brain to just smack a blank map on the commons. I'll repeat: I 100% agree, and it should be deleted. JustDan7178 (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Pointless blank map; and this type of election map is done with SVGs nowadays, so this will never be used. Elli (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. I don't know why I felt the need to post a blank map to the Commons, but I did. JustDan7178 (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There are person on the photo. Mihaela Ostojić (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
_06.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep What's the issue? A museum is a public place. I don't even know whether a personality rights template is needed, as the presence of the person is incidental. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
_06.jpg){kind=link}
incorrect license, probably not a photograph from the uploader https://memoriaesquerra.cat/biografies/sauret-garcia-joan Docosong (talk) 17:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Quite incorrect to say this is a depiction of HMS Enterprise (1705). Appears to be confused hearsay. It is a nondescript French frigate circa 1670s, see sourcing on this (exact same, higher-quality, correctly sourced) image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frc3a9gate-c3a0-la-voile1.jpg Qwo (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate to File:Fregate-a-la-voile.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, (cropped and edited photo of [5]) Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 17:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Looks like video screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUYbUmQ3_KE this interview Drakosh (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
File is a copy of File:Katarina Ivanović - Aautoportret, 1836.jpg No.cilepogača (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Considering the upload dates of both (2009 vs. 2021) it could be the other way around. And even so, color scheme slightly differs. Against deletion. --romanm (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)- Oppose agree with opposition reasons noted above --keithh
- Oppose There's a lot of color difference, not a duplicate, and not a valid reason for deletion. -Vipz (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
copyvio manifeste 90.43.95.49 19:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The word Google indicates that the image has been taken from Google Street View. Using Google earth shows that it is so. I checked a few others and they all come from Google. So this image as well as File:Veldweg 10.png, File:Veldweg 12.png, File:Veldweg 14.png, File:Veldweg 16.png, File:Veldweg 18.png, File:Veldweg 2.png, File:Veldweg 20.png, File:Veldweg 3.png, File:Veldweg 4.png, File:Veldweg 6.png, File:Veldweg 8.png. Wouter (talk) 19:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
wrong graph, correct: File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1928 (Corregido).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is in COM:SCOPE, IMO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: good quality, in scope. Just need to know where it is. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
fake/fanon WolfmanFP (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fake/fanon WolfmanFP (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Uploader did not provide a source with prove of a CC license, looks to be an official portrait prepared by the NYC government which are normally neither pd or cc Putitonamap98 (talk) 22:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Altered version of a 3D model subject to copyright from here; as a derivative work of a copyrighted object this is not suitable for Commons. Part of an enwiki copyright cleanup Hog Farm (talk) 22:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/hastemplate:disputed_chem hastemplate:vector_version_available 14 February 2022
[edit]All of these files meet three criteria:
1) File has chemistry errors (tagged with template {{Disputed chem}})
2) File is unused (except a few cases where they appear on non-mainspace maintenance pages)
3) There is a suitable replacement file (has template {{Vector version available}})
Clearly files that meet these criteria are unneeded. It is best to remove these files to prevent them from being accidentally used by Wikipedia editors (or other off-site users searching for chemistry images) that don't realize that they have been identified as having chemistry errors.
- File:Levopimaric acid (terpenoid).png
- File:3strucfinal.jpg
- File:Sterpuric acid-2D-by-AHRLS-2012.png
- File:Dalbergichromene.PNG
- File:Sandracopimaric acid (terpenoid).png
- File:Іпідакрин.png
- File:3structures.jpg
- File:Androstenedione.svg
- File:Focalin.svg
- File:Lyotrope.png
- File:Pyridoxal phosphate.gif
- File:Hoiamide C.png
- File:Іпікадрин. Хімічна будова.png
- File:Synathesis of metriol from propanal.jpg
- File:Potassium abietate.png
- File:Stemofoline.jpg
- File:Lasri condensation reaction.jpg
- File:Hoiamide D.png
- File:Cedrenol3.png
- File:Chemical structure of the Metonitazene (EA-4835).png
- File:Lortalamine.png
- File:Azilazioa.jpg
- File:Fertaric acid.PNG
- File:Vomilenine.png
- File:Chiral center.PNG
- File:Lambertianic acid (terpenoid).png
- File:Cadinene (sesquiterpene).tif
- File:Furostan .png
- File:MolView (structural formula).png
- File:Aplasmomycin.png
- File:Dehydroabietic acid (terpenoid).png
- File:Dihydroabietic acid (terpenoid).png
- File:IUPAC diazenediyl.png
- File:Sodium phenoxide sodium hydroxide.png
- File:Aspidospermina.png
- File:Palustric acid (terpenoid).png
- File:Carbaselato de calcio.png
- File:Structurestyrplphdp.jpeg
- File:Phenglutarimide.png
- File:Pimaric acid (tepenoid).png
- File:Hoiamide A and B.png
- File:MIBK synthesis.png
- File:Plicatin A.PNG
- File:Cadinol (sesquiterpenoid).tif
- File:Α-cedrene.png
- File:Molecule222.png
- File:Abietic acid (terpenoid).png
- File:Dioxiranes.png
- File:Methyl abietate.png
- File:Premarin.png
- File:Liquiritin.png
- File:Biotin sulfoxide.png
- File:Oxazolone.tif
- File:JACARICACID.jpg
- File:PUNICICACID.jpg
- File:Dactylifric acid.PNG
- File:Cedryl acetate.png
- File:Gwegweewcec13231.tif
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Marbletan (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete JackPotte (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, with special thanks to Marbletan for doing such a careful analysis of each file. DMacks (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/hastemplate:disputed_chem hastemplate:vector_version_available 30 May 2022
[edit]Since the last nomination, many more files of this type have accumulated.
All of these files meet three criteria:
1) The file has chemistry errors (it is tagged with template {{Disputed chem}})
2) The file is unused (except some cases where they appear on non-mainspace maintenance pages, old user sandboxes, etc.)
3) There is a suitable replacement (the file has template {{Vector version available}})
Clearly files that meet these criteria are unneeded. It is best to remove these files to prevent them from being accidentally used by Wikipedia editors (or other off-site users searching for chemistry images) that don't realize that they have been identified as having chemistry errors.
- File:Pancratistatin.2.gif
- File:Myrcenal terpenoid.png
- File:PhThCA syntesis.jpg
- File:Hydro2.GIF
- File:L threonine.png
- File:Hoechst 33342 Structure.gif
- File:Isopimaric acid (terpenoid).png
- File:Phenothiasine 3 7 oxidation.jpg
- File:Oreuropein.jpg
- File:Cholekalciferol.svg
- File:Wikibookpic3.jpg
- File:Gregecew23f32.tif
- File:Fosfopantotenato-cisteína.jpg
- File:Phenyl Hydrazine Structural Formula V.1.svg
- File:Dimethyl-glucosylamine miguelferig.jpg
- File:Cleavage of sulfur.jpg
- File:Multi-stap reaksie furfanaal tot oktaan.png
- File:Cocaine 2D.png
- File:NitrileTrimerization.jpg
- File:Jasmolone.gif
- File:Aglepriston.png
- File:Geranin A.png
- File:Wikibookpic2.jpg
- File:Flavonoide-flavanona-isomerasa.gif
- File:Pann1.gif
- File:L isoleucine.png
- File:Tetrahydrofolian.png
- File:Enone-2D-skeletal.png
- File:Hidrazina-hydrazine.png
- File:NADplus.jpg
- File:Phenothiazine nitration1.jpg
- File:Coenzyme-A.png
- File:Macelignan.png
- File:N-acyl amide 2.tif
- File:Pyruvate to oxa.gif
- File:Hoechst 33258 Structure.gif
- File:Fisetin (flavonoide).svg
- File:Tryptophan tryptophylquinone.png
- File:Kyselina cholová.svg
- File:CoenzymeA structure.png
- File:Macrocarpamine.png
- File:Tellimagrandin II.PNG
- File:Moroniisdo.jpg
- File:Povarov example.gif
- File:N(4)-Hydroxycytidine.svg
- File:Sulfide oxidase drawings ligand.jpg
- File:Overall Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase Reaction Mechanism.jpg
- File:Anthramycin.png
- File:PH-Wert-Anthocyane.png
- File:Neoabietic acid (terpenoid).png
- File:NADPH Structure.png
- File:Leuco-fisetinidin.PNG
- File:L-threonine-2D-skeletal.png
- File:Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate.PNG
- File:Vincamajine.png
- File:Estructura química del glutatió.png
- File:IMG04n.jpg
- File:Steroid hormones, cortisol and Vitamin D3.png
- File:Rotenone.PNG
- File:NAD.svg
- File:N-alkylation of phenothiazine.jpg
- File:Semikarbasiid.png
- File:Threonine wpmp.png
- File:Sodium Diethylenetriamine Pentamethylene Phosphonate.gif
- File:Indolicidin.png
- File:Дифеноксин.png
- File:Fibrolina.svg
- File:Isorhapontin.png
- File:Tensão estérica da conformação de barco do ciclo-hexano..jpg
- File:Myricetin (flavonoide).gif
- File:Polycyanurate.jpg
- File:Phenothiazine syntesis2.jpg
- File:Phenothiazine nitration2.jpg
- File:Harfordinal.jpg
- File:Malabaricane Structure 2D.svg
- File:Nicotinamide Spotlight.png
- File:O-nitrosobenzylidine imine.jpg
- File:S-Adenosylmethioninamine.svg
- File:Phenothiazine syntesis.jpg
- File:Chelidonine.png
- File:Anti.GIF
- File:Nitracia.png
- File:Reduced Glutathione.jpg
- File:Cholic acid.png
- File:Galactooligosaccharide.PNG
- File:The alkaloid Hamayne.png
- File:Farnesyl acetate Bedoukian.png
- File:Propene-polymerisation.png
File:Ölsäuremethylester.svgWithdrawn; renamed instead- File:Etilmorfin.gif
- File:Géranine B.jpg
- File:FADH.gif
- File:Estriol synthesis.gif
- File:Adenosine 3',5'-bisphosphate.PNG
- File:Phenothiazine alkylation.jpg
- File:EDETATO CALCICO.png
- File:Hregerg4f2.tif
- File:Metionina 2D.png
- File:Spegatrine.png
- File:BOLD-100.tif
- File:PEP carboxykinase.gif
- File:Phenothiazine chlorination.jpg
- File:REACTION OF FFA’s AND THE CATALYST NAOH.jpg
- File:Octachlorphenothiazine free radical.jpg
- File:Aplysioviolin Structure.png
- File:Slaframine.png
- File:Mesembrine2DACS2.svg
- File:Isopeptide.tif
- File:Phenothiazine acylation.jpg
- File:Reação 3.png
- File:6,7-dimethyl-8-(1-D-ribityl)lumazine.png
- File:N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamin.png
- File:L-isoleucine-2D-skeletal.png
- File:CoenzymeA.png
- File:Riboflavin adenin dinucleotide.gif
- File:E2 Elimination Reaction.png
- File:Phenothiazine oxidation.jpg
- File:Citronellyl Acetate Neobits.png
- File:Xenon fluoride nitrate.png
- File:1,3-Dichloro-1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane.png
- File:MCPA Formation as a Toxic Metabolite of Hypoglycin A.png
- File:Phenyl Hydrazine Structural Formula V.2.svg
- File:E7389.jpg
- File:Dialquilhidroxilamina.png
- File:Структурная формула Митрагинина.png
- File:Fisetin (flavonoide).gif
- File:Myricetin 3-O-rutinoside.PNG
- File:EDETATO CALCICO.jpg
- File:Barbatic acid.png
- File:Paspalikacido.jpg
- File:Tensão estérica da conformação de barco do ciclo-hexano..png
- File:3-Androstanol.svg
- File:Sonlicromanol2.svg
- File:Amide.png
- File:FADH2.gif
- File:Edelfosine structure.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Hydroxycytidine.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
lumazine.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Marbletan (talk) 18:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete JackPotte (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Where the SVG version is a derived work, we must ensure correct attribution, which often is via the original work. Here most SVGs seem to be independent works, is that correct use of the SVG version template? Anyway, "what links here" need to be checked to avoid breaking attributions. –LPfi (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Spot-checking, I have found none that are actually protectible content, but instead are simple facts of nature represented in a fairly mechanical way and should be tagged {{Pd-chem}}. @LPfi: you said "most SVGs seem to be independent works", emphasis mine; have you found any that are actually DW? DMacks (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, I haven't. I just think that the "has SVG version" template should be used for more or less identical versions, that for more complicated schemas would imply derived work. –LPfi (talk) 06:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Spot-checking, I have found none that are actually protectible content, but instead are simple facts of nature represented in a fairly mechanical way and should be tagged {{Pd-chem}}. @LPfi: you said "most SVGs seem to be independent works", emphasis mine; have you found any that are actually DW? DMacks (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- I’m not an expert in chem stuff I just moved a file from en.wiki and got a notice. File:Threonine wpmp.png is marked as disputed but there is no arguments why as far as I can tell. Also the disputed tag was added by nomination and the edit summary is something like removed category x, added category y, using HotCat. So if someone monitor the file they have no chance to see that someone dispute the file.
- I would prefer that at least 2 users confirm that the file is incorrect before we delete and I think it is hard in this case where there is a mass dr.
- Also should an svg is available not only be used if the svg is the same as the original? And if the original is incorrect then the svg is incorrect too? --MGA73 (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- For the file File:Threonine wpmp.png, the {{Disputed chem}} template gives the reason as "Ambiguous stereochemistry". This comment applies to the image because, according to internationally accepted guidelines for drawing chemical compounds, "stereobonds between stereocenters should be avoided at all costs" because of their ambiguity. By contrast, File:L-Threonin - L-Threonine.svg for example is drawn correctly and is helpfully listed in the {{Vector version available}} template as an alternative that can be used in place of the incorrect one. Marbletan (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete in general. I checked each of these manually: none are used anywhere ("File usage" blocks on the image page) and there are no backlinks ("What links here") other than discussions/notices related to the images or personal-upload galleries/abandoned sandboxes, except the following:
- Redirects:
- I spot-checked some for the types of mistakes, and they all seem legitimate reasons for deletion (such as missing bonds or atoms, incorrect charges, or incorrect geometric details). A factual mistake in an image whose content is the conveyance of facts puts it outside COM:EDUSE even if there weren't an alt available. Two caught my eye:
- File:Ölsäuremethylester.svg This is a real chemical with the trans double bond, just not the chemical given in the title+description. Keep rename to File:Methyl elaidate.svg but Delete the nominated incorrect-name (do not retain as redirect).
- File:Steroid hormones, cortisol and Vitamin D3.png is identified as the replacement for File:Steroid hormones, cortisol and Vitamin D3.jpg. These are same visual content just different formats, so Delete also that .jpg because it has the same factual problems. Both unused (we have .svg of each constituent structure).
- I'm taking no position on the properness of the SVG-available tagging. Seems like that would merit a more centralized discussion rather than a niche-topic DR. But I think it's irrelevant to this DR also, since all it did was lead the nominator to uncover a bunch of files that are each problematic. DMacks (talk) 02:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- I like your suggestion for Ölsäuremethylester.svg, so I have renamed the file, changed its description to match the depicted chemical structure, and withdrawn it from this deletion discussion. Marbletan (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:CoenzymeA structure.png Delete - As pointed out, an unnecessary methyl group has been added. I also checked the reference book I was using at that time, but the correct structural formula was described. I uploaded the one that caused an error when drawing. Please delete it. 儀藤 陽 (talk) 05:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, i.e. all except of the renamed chemical structure. --Leyo 16:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cambridge by Lamplight
[edit]British works by P. B. Redmayne = Paul Brewis Redmayne (1900-1975). Already transwikied to English Wikisource.
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - 9 woodcuts.djvu
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 1.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 2.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 3.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 4.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 5.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 6.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 7.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut 8.png
- File:Cambridge by lamplight - Redmayne woodcut at title.png
Prosfilaes (talk) 19:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2046. --Rosenzweig τ 12:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Willi Engelhardt
[edit]These are works of German artist Willi Engelhardt, who died in 1983. So they are still protected by copyright, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2054.
- File:Das Volk wählt Liste 1 Nationalsozialisten Reichstagswahl 6.11.32 - WEM. LCCN2008678845.jpg
- File:Das Volk wählt Liste 1 Nationalsozialisten Reichstagswahl 6.11.32 - WEM. LCCN2008678845.tif
- File:Deutsche Kinderschar NS-Frauenschaft Ansichtskarte Künstlerkarte Third Reich Nazi Propaganda Postcard Signature WEM Boy in uniform Wolfsangel emblem Swastika flag Verlag Zeitschrift MAR Historical No known copyright restrictions 15244.jpg
- File:Deutsche Kinderschar NS-Frauenschaft Ansichtskarte Künstlerkarte Third Reich Nazi Propaganda Postcard Signature WEM Girl and boy in uniform Wolfsangel emblem Swastika flag Verlag Zeitschrift MAR Historical No known copyright restricti.jpg
- File:Deutsche Kinderschar NS-Frauenschaft Ansichtskarte Third Reich Nazi Propaganda Postcard Signature WEM Blonde girl in uniform Wolfsangel emblem philasearch.com Pinterest No known copyright restrictions.jpg
- File:Family swimming - Freudenberg Schliersee (1924) (4447080611).jpg
- File:Nazi Germany children's books. Morgenroth, Schmidt - Kinder, was wisst Ihr vom Fuhrer?; Karl Köster - Die Fahnen wehen!; Helga Knoepke-Joest - Ulla, ein Hitlermädel. Lofoten Krigsminnemuseumn, Norway 2019-05-08 DSC00332.jpg
_(4447080611).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 15:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete all per Copyright rules by territory/Germany, which stipulates copyright expires 70 years after the death of the artist (in this case 2054). --Adamant1 (talk) 10:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
new file File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1912 (Actualización).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: cited file redirects to nominated file. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
No source given. Artwork is old - but we don't know about the photographer. There's not even one usefull information given. The only information - what is depictet - seems to be hirribly wrong, according to the Louvre Museum (the owner of this artefact?): https://twitter.com/MuseeLouvre/status/1007306715107381249 - so this is not only unlikely a free image, we also provide false informations abut it. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not a 2D work, so license tag used does not apply. --Rosenzweig τ 11:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
probably copyviol: obviously an artistic photo, probably part of a professional set (cf. similar), without any indication of a release under a free or Creative Commons licence — danyele 15:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Unfortunately, there's no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia and copyright for this sculpture has not yet expired - the authors are Frančišek Smerdu (d. 1964) and Peter Loboda (d. 1952). — Yerpo Eh? 15:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 07:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement--samral talk 21:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Complex logo exceeding COM:TOO Hong Kong which is very low, similar to that of the UK. Also government works are subject to copyright protection in Hong Kong unlike many other countries.
- File:Audit Commission HK.svg
- File:HKBD logo.svg
- File:Hong Kong District Council Election Logo.svg
- File:Hong Kong Legislative Council Election Logo 2012.png
- File:Hong Kong Science & Technology Parks Corporation.jpg
- File:LLB logo.svg
- File:Office of the Communications Authority logo.svg
- File:OFTA.svg
- File:SFC logo.svg
- File:Trade and Industry Department.svg
- File:University Grants Committee.svg
Wcam (talk) 04:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. One of them was kept after a DR in 2010, but I still think it is above COM:TOO Hong Kong as we interpret it now. --Rosenzweig τ 19:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet any criteria to be exempted from having copyright in Romania 219.78.190.35 14:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The picture is exempted from having a copyright under Romanian Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights Law no. 8/1996 of March 14, 1996 - (e) news and press information. The source of the news article is given on the page in discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotys ek Beos (talk • contribs) 17:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I don't see photographs covered by said exemption. --Rosenzweig τ 19:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused small PNG image, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Apparently taken from [6] ([7]), photo from 2011 per Exif there. --Rosenzweig τ 19:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
![[7]](http://iso.sharif.ir/Images/Sharif/%D8%B9%DA%A9%D8%B3%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%20%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1/%D9%85%D9%87%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%B3%DB%8C%20%D9%88%20%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%20%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF/IMG_7850.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP Slovenia, derivative work of probably non-free architecture. A.Savin 20:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment It's not clear to me from the link exactly what Slovenian rules are regarding architecture. "Threshold of originality" states: "only the works that constitute an original artwork are copyrighted", which is clear, but otherwise, is architecture considered an applied art, and if so, what are the rules about photographs of applied art? I will note that if the date of 1969 is relevant, https://perla-novagorica.com/en/events/26-years-of-happy-stories would be clear enough in showing that the resort dates from 2019-26=1993, well after that year. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The TOO on architecture is very low and architecture is treated separately from applied art in Slovenian law. --TadejM (t/p) 10:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope.
- File:Anthony LeRoy Winblad (1912-1970) at the wedding of Paul John Schwendel I (1941-1996) and Joan Elizabeth Van Deusen (1941- ) on 27 May 1961 in New Jersey.png
- File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) and family on Easter Sunday, 1960.jpg
- File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) on Easter Sunday in 1960 in Jersey City, New Jersey.jpg
File:Janice Nicolich on May 27, 1961.jpgwithdrawn- File:Paul John Schwendel I (1941-1996) at 268 Gorden Drive in Paramus, New Jersey for Christmas, 1960.png
- File:Thomas Patrick Norton II (1920-2011) and family on September 28, 1958 at 268 Gordon Drive in Paramus, New Jersey for Lutheran baptism of their child.jpg
- File:Thomas Patrick Norton II (1920-2011) and James Joseph Norton II (1929-2011) and Judith Elizabeth Norton in 1953.jpg
_at_the_wedding_of_Paul_John_Schwendel_I_(1941-1996)_and_Joan_Elizabeth_Van_Deusen_(1941-_)_on_27_May_1961_in_New_Jersey.png){kind=link}
_and_family_on_Easter_Sunday,_1960.jpg){kind=link}
_on_Easter_Sunday_in_1960_in_Jersey_City,_New_Jersey.jpg){kind=link}
_at_268_Gorden_Drive_in_Paramus,_New_Jersey_for_Christmas,_1960.png){kind=link}
_and_family_on_September_28,_1958_at_268_Gordon_Drive_in_Paramus,_New_Jersey_for_Lutheran_baptism_of_their_child.jpg){kind=link}
_and_James_Joseph_Norton_II_(1929-2011)_and_Judith_Elizabeth_Norton_in_1953.jpg){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 05:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Most are used, sujects have their own category. Yann (talk) 07:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: which encyclopedic use are you referrring to? — Racconish 💬 09:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- i'll pick File:Thomas Patrick Norton II (1920-2011) and family on September 28, 1958 at 268 Gordon Drive in Paramus, New Jersey for Lutheran baptism of their child.jpg as an example.
- how many "coloured photos of a family in new jersey in 1950s" are there on commons? is this user gonna upload his "in scope" photos of the same topic if these are deleted? RZuo (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- in fact, right now there're <200 photos of nj in 1950s, and all are black and white and very few are of humans: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=1000&ns6=1&sort=create_timestamp_desc&search=insource%3Acategory+deepcat%3A%22New_Jersey_in_the_1950s%22+-insource%3Acensus . i'm looking forward to this user's contribution of his encyclopedic photos. RZuo (talk) 10:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep All files are well described and therefore can definitely be useful. Three of the files are in use. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as uploader, the images I uploaded are no different than the image recently uploaded by the nominator himself. See: File:Patrons dancing inside Spider's Kelly.jpg where we have an ordinary image of ordinary people at a particular time in a particular place. These images capture fashion and interior design, which changes from decade to decade, and more recently changes even faster. It is rare to have a set of images that can be tied to a particular location and a specific date. Dated images are used by researches to aid in attributing a date to images which have no dates associated with them. See for instance the Flickr Commons project to add context and dates and locations to images from the Bain Collection here and here. --RAN (talk) 16:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comments.
- I withdraw my nomination of File:Janice Nicolich on May 27, 1961.jpg : Janice Nicolich seems to be above the threshold of notability. But I maintain the other nominations.
- File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) and family on Easter Sunday, 1960.jpg, File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) on Easter Sunday in 1960 in Jersey City, New Jersey.jpg, File:Paul John Schwendel I (1941-1996) at 268 Gorden Drive in Paramus, New Jersey for Christmas, 1960.png, and File:Thomas Patrick Norton II (1920-2011) and James Joseph Norton II (1929-2011) and Judith Elizabeth Norton in 1953.jpg do not meet the two criteria of Commons:Project scope. They are family pictures of non notable people and they are not in use in any other Wikimedia project.
- File:Anthony LeRoy Winblad (1912-1970) at the wedding of Paul John Schwendel I (1941-1996) and Joan Elizabeth Van Deusen (1941- ) on 27 May 1961 in New Jersey.png is in use in Anthony LeRoy Winblad (Q65187741), but the Wikidata page does not respect Wikidata's notability policy, and the circular justification between Commons and Wikidata comes very close to "gaming the system".
- Same concern for File:Paul John Schwendel I (1941-1996) at 268 Gorden Drive in Paramus, New Jersey for Christmas, 1960.png. The fact Paul John Schwendel II (Q76448183) has the property of birth in Weehawken leads to the absurd consequence this image has been picked by a bot to illustrate a WPcy article on this city, while this person is clearly not one of its notable children.
- If the closing admin decides to delete File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) and family on Easter Sunday, 1960.jpg, the derivative version File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) and family on Easter Sunday 1960 (enhanced).jpg should also be deleted.
- I will be very happy to discuss the encyclopedic value of File:Patrons dancing inside Spider's Kelly.jpg since I am currently working on the subject, on the file's talk page or my own talk page, but I don't think it is appropriate to discuss it here. — Racconish 💬 17:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to point out rule 2 of Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references. " Those identifiers at the bottom of the Wikidata entry are serious and publicly available references. There currently is no active project to have a bot load every entry in Findagrave or Familysearch, because of the Herculean task of disambiguating and matching to existing entries. It took a year to clear out the backload of entries for The Peerage, which was a fraction of the size of other two databases. --RAN (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The content of Find a Grave is user-generated and therefore considered ureliable. — Racconish 💬 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Crowdsourced info, but under the editorial control of Ancestry.com, that makes corrections. For instance, our two most used Identifiers, LCCN and VIAF have over 500 identified errors that may never be corrected. See: Wikidata:VIAF/cluster/conflating_entities just for the tiny portion that are conflation errors. --RAN (talk) 00:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) @Racconish I don't understand the argument "[list of images] do not meet the two criteria of Commons:Project scope. They are family pictures of non notable people and they are not in use in any other Wikimedia project." There are no numbered criteria in the policy, and I cannot see anything resembling the notion of "the two criteria". There is no mention of "(non) notable people" on the page. There only needs to be a realistic educational use, and as we don't have many similar images, already being examples of family photos of the time is a realistic educational use – hardly in Wikipedia, but in other contexts. –LPfi (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The content of Find a Grave is user-generated and therefore considered ureliable. — Racconish 💬 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- You know full well that images used on Wikidata are in scope here. If you think there is "gaming the system", then nominate the items concerned for deletion at Wikidata. Otherwise, it is you who is "gaming the system". As an admin, you should know - and do - better. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Can you explain how the Wikidata entry for Anthony LeRoy Winblad (1912-1970) violates Wikidata:Notability, you have a habit of making claims by pointing to our guidelines but never providing an explanation. It is like telling people the answer is in the Bible, but refusing to tell them the chapter and verse. Is Anthony LeRoy Winblad (1912-1970) using Wikidata for self-promotion? Is their no structural need for him among the other family members in Wikidata? Can he not be described using serious and publicly available references? Tell us your rationale, rather than just saying "not notable". --RAN (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to point out rule 2 of Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references. " Those identifiers at the bottom of the Wikidata entry are serious and publicly available references. There currently is no active project to have a bot load every entry in Findagrave or Familysearch, because of the Herculean task of disambiguating and matching to existing entries. It took a year to clear out the backload of entries for The Peerage, which was a fraction of the size of other two databases. --RAN (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep, mainly because we don't have a lot of similar images. I wouldn't want hundreds of these. - Jmabel ! talk 17:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep, per Jmabel. However I note that File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) on Easter Sunday 1960 at her home at 112 Grace Street in Jersey City, New Jersey.png [SIC] is not nominated for deletion. As such, File:Arthur Oscar Freudenberg (1891-1968) and family on Easter Sunday, 1960.jpg is a strong keep as the former is a derivative of the latter. Nominating the parenet for deletion on scope basis does not give a free pass to deleting the derrivative. (and this would apply to any such original-derrivatve pair). Also strong keep File:Paul John Schwendel I (1941-1996) at 268 Gorden Drive in Paramus, New Jersey for Christmas, 1960.png, and any others which are in use. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Strong delete: support DR and additional rationale under "comments", not even close to being notable. This user is clearly using Commons (and Wikidata and Wikisource as well) as a personal memorial site for his family. Nothing particular noteworthy otherwise to these photos to render them educational. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
_and_family_on_Easter_Sunday_1960_(enhanced).jpg){kind=link}
_on_Easter_Sunday_1960_at_her_home_at_112_Grace_Street_in_Jersey_City,_New_Jersey.png){kind=link}
General issues on scope and notability
[edit]"Out of scope."
Commons:Project scope has the following requirements: --RAN (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Must be a media file.
Done - Must be of an allowable free file format. Done
- Must be freely licensed or public domain. Done
- Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Done visual identification of a person with a valid wikidata entry.
- Must not contain only excluded educational content. (this is very poorly worded with a double negative to the point of being incomprehensible) Done it appears to exclude images of text only documents, yet we have over 10,000 books in pdf or djvu file formats.
- "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose". Done
"non notable people"
You cannot apply English Wikipedia notability rules at Wikidata and at Commons. Currently we have over 5,000 images in the various categories marked as "unidentified people". See: Category:Unidentified people with a severe undercount, we have over 100,000 images with no category at all. Also note that stock image companies have none of the people identified in their images. See Shutterstock.com for just a single company with over 100,000 images of people doing ordinary things. If those images are useful at Shutterstock, they are just as useful here, for the same purpose. Every educational PowerPoint presentation I have been forced to watch at a corporate meeting or trade show is stuffed with stock photos of nameless people doing ordinary things. --RAN (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- visual identification of a person with a valid wikidata entry. This is exactly where these images are out of scope. I know you like to keep every photo of every person ever uploaded, but it has been well established that it is NOT in Commons scope to identify every person that ever lived. And making categories and WD items and interlinking them doesn't make someone notable; that is just gaming the system. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- You wrote: "This is exactly where these images are out of scope", can you quote an actual Wikilaw? We tend not to keep images and Wikidata entries of living people that are involved in "self promotion". One reason is that we can't tell if they are real or not, they may be creating entries for fake bot accounts, to make them look like real people. Dead people rarely promote themselves, because they are dead. Commons scope is to support other projects in the WikiUniverse without prejudice or bias. If a person is Wikidata notable, Commons should not be objecting based on the English Wikipedia standard of notability. We should also not be objecting to the quantity of images of a person, until they exceed the number of images we domicile for penises and cats and dogs (over 5,000 for each category). If your worry is that we are running out of storage space and we need to delete old images to make room for new images, we actually don't delete the images, they are just hidden from view, so no space is saved by deleting-from-view. -RAN (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Jmabel. I don't think these people as such are notable, the photo quality is not great, but acceptable for the time. An argument can be made that such images are in scope because they show life, clothes fashions, furniture etc. at a certain place and point in time. If we had thousands or even hundreds of these showing New Jersey at the end of the 1950s / early 1960s we would probably need to be a bit more selective. --Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
It is a duplicate, see File:Dawns.png, which is the only copy required for use. This image also identifies the individual in the image when it may be best to avoid identifying this individual. Titus Gold (talk) 12:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 21:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_resized.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Good-faith claim of free license at source, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment I add alternative versions uploaded by another user. His permanence was based on the current web description, same where the image folder was obtained. This description has now been changed about the day the image was uploaded, which can be seen in this 25 March archive. Fuger Talk 00:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I don't think the sentence "Aquí puedes descargar diferentes imágenes para… Lo que quieras. Esta campaña también es tuya; aprópiate de nuestra imagen, del mensaje que queremos llevarle a Colombia, y de este sueño de país que construiremos juntos." suffices as a PD rationale. --Rosenzweig τ 10:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bruxton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: =Juneteenth flag is copyrighted and in the US there is no FOP for 2 dimensional copyrighted works. PD-old, COM:TOO, and/or COM:DM? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juneteenth Flag.svg for discussion of the Juneteenth Flag specifically. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please see discussion. Bruxton (talk) 00:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per de minimis: the Juneteenth flag isn't the focus of the image and the way that it's bent actually means that it is not a faithful reproduction of all the elements of the flag, as the text is obscured. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep very obviously com:de minimis, this is getting tiresome. Maybe consider the village pump before knee-jerk nominating anything with a copyrighted element in it as a copyvio? Dronebogus (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This logo exceeds COM:TOO, making it copyrighted and complex. Also, uploader claims their own work to such logo as per COM:PRP. Chompy Ace (talk) 08:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - exceeds COM:TOO. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This logo exceeds COM:TOO, making it copyrighted and complex. Also, uploader claims their own work to such logo as per COM:PRP. Chompy Ace (talk) 08:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This logo exceeds COM:TOO, making it copyrighted and complex. Also, uploader claims their own work to such logo as per COM:PRP. Chompy Ace (talk) 08:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Not an own work. Logo belongs to PSG. Strepulah (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
a trademarked football logo, not released under a free or Creative Commons licence and (probably) not under the threshold of originality — danyele 15:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
a trademarked football logo, not released under a free or Creative Commons licence and (probably) not under the threshold of originality; also, very worst quality — danyele 16:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
a trademarked football logo, not released under a free or Creative Commons licence and (probably) not under the threshold of originality; also, bad quality — danyele 16:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Korea.net's CC license only applies on the Flickr image 219.78.190.35 16:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
new file File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1916 (Actualizado).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
new file File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 2013 (Corregido).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
new file File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1989 (Corregido).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
new file File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1987 (Corregido).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
new file File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1965 (Corregido).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
duplicated File:Cámara de Diputados Argentina 1958.svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
new file: File:Elecciones legislativas de Argentina de 1942 (Corregido).svg Yilku1 (talk) 20:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this photo is from prime minister of Canada's office (per caption), not embassy SecretName101 (talk) 11:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Question OK, so if it is, can't you just change the description and links? Why would that necessitate deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Ikan Kekek: Because if it's not from the US embassy in Canada, but from Canada's PMO, {{PD-USGov-DOS}} does not apply. --Rosenzweig τ 20:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Understood. Thanks for the explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
The signature of mayor Eckart Würzner can be used for fraudulent actions. Stadt Heidelberg (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1938 postcards of Germany
[edit]Accd. to [8], this is a work by de:Richard Klein (Künstler), who died in 1967. So the work ist still protected by copyright, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2038.
- File:Ein Volk Ein Reich Ein Führer 13. März 1938 Anschluss Wiedervereinigung Österreichs mit Deutschen Reich Hitler Reichsadler Postkarte Nazi propaganda postcard eagle-and-swastika Annexation Austria German Reich HL-senteret Oslo 02.jpg
- File:Ein Volk Ein Reich Ein Führer 13. März 1938 Anschluss Wiedervereinigung Österreichs mit Deutschen Reich Hitler Reichsadler Postkarte Nazi propaganda postcard eagle-and-swastika Annexation Austria German Reich HL-senteret Oslo 01.jpg
- File:P 268 1938-1h.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 14:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture is obviously not of december 2011 as Hamilton died in september 2011, also the other uploaded pics of the same (tv?-)interview Goesseln (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files in Category:Richard Klein
[edit]These photos show works by de:Richard Klein (Künstler), who died in 1967. So the works are still protected by copyright, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2038.
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.390-1).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.390-4).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.299-1).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.321).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.330-1).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.330-2).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.330-3).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.387).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.388-1).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.388-4).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.389).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.391-1).jpg
- File:Badge (AM 1996.71.391-4).jpg
- File:Die Reden Hitlers am Parteitag der Freiheit 1935 Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., München + Reichsparteitag 1935 Plakette medallion badge RK Richard Klein NSDAP Nazi propaganda Holocaust exhibition HL-senteret Norway 03.jpg
- File:Die Reden Hitlers am Parteitag der Freiheit 1935 Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., München + Reichsparteitag 1935 Plakette medallion badge RK Richard Klein NSDAP Nazi propaganda Holocaust exhibition HL-senteret Norway 02.jpg
- File:Die Reden Hitlers am Parteitag der Freiheit 1935 Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., München + Reichsparteitag 1935 Plakette medallion badge RK Richard Klein NSDAP Nazi propaganda Holocaust exhibition HL-senteret Norway 01.jpg
- File:Die Reden Hitlers am Parteitag der Freiheit 1935 Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., München + Reichsparteitag 1935 Plakette medallion badge RK Richard Klein NSDAP Nazi propaganda Holocaust exhibition HL-senteret Norway 04.jpg
- File:Eintrittskarte zum Reichsparteitag 1936.jpg
- File:Flickr - DVIDSHUB - Camp Atterbury Native Remembers 70 Years of Post History.jpg
- File:FPK-RPT-1939.jpg
- File:Führer zum Reichsparteitag Nürnberg 5.-10. september 1934 NSDAP Nazi Rally guide booklet RK Richard Klein propaganda drawing swastika armour (Holocaust exhibition HL-senteret Oslo Norway 2021) 9715.jpg
- File:Reichsparteitag 1935 (HL-senteret, 2016-10-06).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9715.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Richard Klein
[edit]The creator of these badges from Germany, German artist Richard Klein, died in 1967, so they are not in the public domain in Germany yet. The files can be restored in 2038.
- File:Badge, commemorative (AM 1996.71.78).jpg
- File:Insigne de journée 1. Mai 1936 Tag der Arbeit (Deutsche Arbeitsfront), 2018.9.89.jpg
- File:Insigne de journée Tag der Arbeit 1935 (jour du travail), 2018.9.88.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_2018.9.89.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_2018.9.88.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 18:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Anthony Albanese portraits
[edit]
.jpg){kind=link}
The portrait is not made by the Australian government. The portrait is featured prominently on [9], and its copyright policy states "With the exception of the Coat of Arms and all photos and graphics, this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence." (emphasis mine). The picture existed on May 11, 2022, before Albanese even won the election and became prime minister: [10] --FunnyMath (talk) 18:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The copyright status is unclear. We need a specific license rather than a blanket "all images on this website" thing. The image is used in other places on the web, including the ALP, none of whom give any attribution or sourcing. We cannot use an image that just "falls out of the sky" like this. As an aside, I don't believe that just because the Commonwealth owns an image it is automatically free to distribute. The US federal government has that policy, but Australia does not. --Skyring (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- we should keep it 2600:1700:8C37:D830:150D:26F0:61B5:64BA 21:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Per the web page's copyright information:
Wherever a third party holds copyright in material presented on this website, the copyright remains with that party. Their permission may be required to use the material. This department has made all reasonable efforts to:
- clearly label material where the copyright is owned by a third party
- ensure that the copyright owner has consented to this material being presented on this website.
There is no indication on the website that the supplied photograph is under copyright by a third party. The photo was likely taken by a third party photographer/photography studio, and licensed by the government. This is common, for instance this photo of Albanese, which was taken by Lightbulb Studio, but licensed by the Labor Party under a Creative Commons 4.0 licence. I imagine that this is a similar situation. Most photographs of Australian politicians are taken by a third party photographer, but held under licence by the Commonwealth Government, such as this photo of Scott Morrison, which comes from the same webpage. I am currently seeking more information about this photograph of Albanese, and will provide it once I find more. However, I do not believe that this image should be deleted. -- DTH89 (talk page) 9:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - per above rationale, that image of morrison was released under the same licence in 2014 but he was the PM of australia in 2018. I also looked these up before updating the current image of Albanese. His team have also released another image with the same licence and both can be used on wikipedia IMO, but i personally prefer this image because he is wearing glasses in them and Albanese just like Morrrison is bespectacled and is more recognized that way--Stemoc 04:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The Labor Party photo is a different situation entirely. Their copyright policy [11] explicitly only allows that one picture to be licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0, and not just any photo of Albanese. We shouldn't keep a photo just because it looks better than other photos on Commons. We need proof that the photo is freely licensed. I will be OK with keeping the photo if we get VTRS confirmation from the Australian government, the Labor Party or whoever the copyright holder is. FunnyMath (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep - as stated in the licensing info provided by the uploader, the photograph was published on a website where all material (including images) is published under CC 4.0 except for content supplied by third parties. It is not unreasonable to assume the Australian government owns the licence to a portrait of the prime minister that they are using on their own websites. Further, the copyright disclaimer of the department website states the department has made "all reasonable efforts" to label material where copyright is owned by a third party. Is the deletion request asserting that the department has made an error and has failed to label a third-party work in this way? In any case, the arguments made by the original deletion request appear to be be 1) this was not made by the Australian government (but whether the Australian government created the work is not the question, the uploader is not relying on this in the licence, indeed a work being made by the Australian government does not give it any sort of special status) 2) this was published on pm.gov.au which does not license images under CC (but this is not relevant, as the photo was also published on pmc.gov.au where images are licensed under CC). Liguer (talk) 17:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Chalicarne
[edit]These two 1913 French posters are signed, so they are not "anonymous" as claimed. They are apparently the work of an artist named François Chalicarne, apparently from the "Atelier Chalicarne" in Paris. I could not find out when he died, but he could have lived beyond 1951, which would mean his works are still protected by copyright. The files should be deleted unless conclusively shown to be either in the public domain or under a free license. If no death date of the artist is named, the files can be restored in 2034 with {{PD-old-assumed}}.
- File:Les Misérables - affiche du film d'Albert Capellani - Victor Hugo par Chalicarne.jpg
- File:Démonios, le génie du mal.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 23:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Update (see below): It's actually Louis Ferdinand Chalicarne, 1879–1971, and the files can be restored in 2042. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Rosenzweig,
- En l'absence de sources, je trouve ta réflexion assez hasardeuse. En effet, au motif qu' "he could have lived beyond 1951", ses œuvres pourraient encore être protégés. Tout ça reste très hypothétique...
- Le modèle {{PD-old-assumed}} est approprié quand l'auteur est identifié mais dont on ne connaît pas sa date de mort ; au cas particulier, sauf avec présentation de sources mais on ne sait rien de ce "F. Chalicarne". C'est peut-être même un pseudonyme... Bref pour moi en l'absence d'un minimum d'information, les œuvres qu'il a dessiné sont bien anonymes...
- Cordialement, Kasskass (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- If they are signed, they are definitely not anonymous. And this even is a case where the author is identified (it's François Chalicarne), but we don't know the year when he died. Please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle if you're not already familiar with that Commons policy. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. Je reformule. D'où tiens-tu l'information selon laquelle ces œuvres seraient celles de François Chalicarne ?
- Tout ce que je trouve, c'est un Atelier Mesté et Chalicarne : « Atelier d'affichistes en activité au début du siècle » [12]. Je dis simplement que je trouve ton raisonnement tiré par les cheveux et qu'il ne colle pas comme avec le principe de précaution dont tu fais référence. Je ne dis pas que l'ayant-droit ne s'en rendra pas compte, je dis que sauf preuve du contraire, l’œuvre est dans le domaine public.--Kasskass (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Some weblinks for François Chalicarne, F. Chalicarne or Atelier Chalicarne: [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] (p. 78) --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Here's a weblink for a film poster by Atelier Meste et Chalicarne from 1912: [19] The Atelier part is written in a very similar way, so Mr Chalicarne probably worked at Atelier Meste et Chalicarne before turning into just Atelier Chalicarne in 1913. And here's a weblink for a 1936 French tourism poster by L. F. Chalicarne: [20] ([21], also at Pinterest). The "L. F. Chalicarne" signature is very similar, almost identical, to the "F. Chalicarne" signature, so this is probably the same person, still active two decades later. --Rosenzweig τ 21:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- "je dis que sauf preuve du contraire, l’œuvre est dans le domaine public" wich means "I say that unless proven otherwise, the work is in the public domain": No. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: “In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: * the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed, and * that any required consent has been obtained.” The bottom line is: This artist is not anonymous, we do not know when he died, and in that case, the only license tag in our rules that allows us to host such files is PD-old-assumed for works that are over 120 years old. And these works are not yet over 120 years old. --Rosenzweig τ 21:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)--Rosenzweig τ 19:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Some weblinks for François Chalicarne, F. Chalicarne or Atelier Chalicarne: [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] (p. 78) --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- If they are signed, they are definitely not anonymous. And this even is a case where the author is identified (it's François Chalicarne), but we don't know the year when he died. Please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle if you're not already familiar with that Commons policy. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
![[21]](http://www.french-vintage-posters.fr/WebRoot/ce_fr2/Shops/980373666/53AB/027D/EDC3/F2F4/9A3F/C0A8/8008/C2DE/14046.jpg){kind=link}
- OK, I think I've found him in the Grand Mémorial: Louis Ferdinand Chalicarne (so the François various websites write about is probably wrong after all), born October 21, 1879 in Soulaines, département Aube, first drafted into the military in 1899, profession dessinateur lithographique, living in Paris, served in the First World War, relieved of military service (libéré du service militaire) on November 10, 1928. There's no date of death there either. MyHeritage says he was baptized on October 25, 1879 in Soulaines, Ancestry says he was a registered voter in Paris in 1909, nothing more about him there. He was a freemason in the Grand Orient de France in the 1930s: Journal officiel de l’Etat Français, September 2, 1942, p. 2996. If he was born in 1879, definitely alive in 1928 and apparently still alive in 1936, he could have died aged 60 in 1939, but he also could have died aged 80 in 1959. So unless someone finds a definitive date of death, PD-old-assumed 120 years after publication still seems the best option. --Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Found him in this Geneanet family tree. It says there that he died July 20, 1971 in Chelles, département Seine-et-Marne, aged 91 years old (though the date of birth is given as October 24, 1879 instead of October 21, but this must be the same person; the list of freemasons also gives Chelles as his then latest place of activity). This means the files can be restored in 2042. --Rosenzweig τ 10:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Je ne reviens pas sur les règles de commons, nous ne sommes pas d'accord, mais ce n'est plus le sujet à présent.
- Merci pour ces recherches. Il semblerait en effet qu'il s'agisse de Louis-Ferdinand Chalicarne. J'allais dire qu'il est inutile de faire des extrapolations sur sa date de décès, car la politique de commons est claire sur ce point et le modèle {{PD-old-assumed}} semble tout indiqué, mais l'info sur Geneanet change (peut-être) encore la donne.
- À titre personnel, je ne prendrais pas en compte la date de 1971, car pour avoir pratiqué pas mal Geneanet, j'ai eu maintes fois l'occasion de relever de nombreuses erreurs sur ce site. Mais à moins de se déplacer dans la mairie de Chelles, c'est difficile à confirmer. Finalement peu importe et peut-être que d'ici 2034, on aura la confirmation de sa date de décès...
- Bonne continuation, Kasskass (talk) 19:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Found him in this Geneanet family tree. It says there that he died July 20, 1971 in Chelles, département Seine-et-Marne, aged 91 years old (though the date of birth is given as October 24, 1879 instead of October 21, but this must be the same person; the list of freemasons also gives Chelles as his then latest place of activity). This means the files can be restored in 2042. --Rosenzweig τ 10:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)