Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 28th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture by mistake, it isn't my own work. Aleksandaris3920 (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio & uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private snapshot of a minor and completely out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:35, 28 April 2022 UTC: Private snapshot of a minor and completely out of project scope. --Krdbot 01:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the uploader's work. It's a painting by Munch. Commons has well structured versions - Category:The Scream by Edvard Munch - and does not need this test upload Tagishsimon (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, not free content. Publisher is owner of the graphic Heikocvijic (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itsalisabri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images that are outside our scope. Commons is not a web hosting platform

Herby talk thyme 11:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per above. SCP-2000 03:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Cross wiki puppet uploads. --Herby talk thyme 11:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission received. --Yann (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission received. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission received. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wu Bai X Tong Nian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Potential copyright violation. Low image resolution and missing EXIF data. The uploader has uploaded copyvio images before per their user talk page User_talk:Wu_Bai_X_Tong_Nian.

SCP-2000 23:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web (e.g., File:Yang Zi 2017.02.26.jpg is here and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've opened this DR to discuss the tagging of this image by the photographer as Noncommercial [1] nearly 10 years after upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:License_revocation. matanya talk 10:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS made without my permission and I hold all the rights. you cannot tell me what you did was not revocable, b/c I am the owner and not you, matanya. Nehemia G (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As the OTRS ticket mensions permission was granted by IDF new media speaker. If this image was taken by you when you served there, the rights belong to IDF. If not, I wonder why the IDF speaker sent us permission to something they don't own. In any case, removing the permission and license tag instead of opening this discussion was not the right move. matanya talk 10:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was not an IDF photographer and image was not taken as a soldier, image removed from flickr after I noticed them - and in flickr it was with CC-BY-NC. Nehemia G (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This archived snapshot from 2014 confirms a non-commercial licence at Flickr, and as of today the original link is no longer online. So Nehemia G's claim of authorship seems credible to me. De728631 (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
please include in this discussion these 3 files as well:
File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Iron Dome Intercepts Rockets From The Gaza Strip.jpg
File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Iron Dome Intercepts Rockets From The Gaza Strip 1.jpg
File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Iron Dome Intercepts Rockets From The Gaza Strip (1).jpg
All are in the same status: shot together, original CC-BY-NC at flickr, I'm the owner, all OTRS made without asking me. Nehemia G (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am really concerned IDF gave permission to an image they don't own. In the case - Delete. Nehemia G, Would you consider leaving your photos under permissive licenese for the common good? matanya talk 18:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
matanya I'm sorry but no. Please speedy delete the images. Nehemia G (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Túrelio can we close this discussion? as you can see there are 4 photos uploaded with wrong OTRS and license.... thanks! Nehemia G (talk) 17:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --matanya talk 09:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial fictitious flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 07:34, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 06:36, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 06:36, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to not containing enough information about its license Azemic64 (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 07:21, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Somsinsrp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of personalities, of various sizes and dates, many small without metadata, some showing different camera types and brands, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Droravrami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: alternate history fiction Enyavar (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unnecessary TheAmeliaMay (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knowingstream (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C2. Unuseful empty category — Baidax 💬 19:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low value selfie. --Strakhov (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=Copyvio from webpage https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg}} Steph55337 (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the file mentioned is not a Wikimedia Commons file. --Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg Steph55337 (talk) 09:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg Steph55337 (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file to test SVG textPath: it is unused Carnby (talk) 03:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:GCSD (G7). HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom by uploader and HapHaxion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file to test SVG textPath: it is unused Carnby (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom by uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, this is my own work to illustrate the topic. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yasminkaa: Bonjour, L'écran prend une part importante de la photo. Il faudrait soit l'autorisation du détenteur des droits, ou découper la photo pour enlever l'écran. Voyez COM:DW/fr pour une explication détaillée en français. Aussi pourquoi utiliser le format PNG ? Le format JPEG est plus approprié pour les photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann OK je comprends mieux. Je vais donc demander une autorisation à l'architecte détenteur des droits de ce visuel qui illustre ta conception. Je vous reviens au plus vite. Yasminkaa (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission OK. --Yann (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative, no FoP in Russia, except architecture. Xunks (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jmabel ! talk 02:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by a globally banned user Emolga826 (talk) 13:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file Sortilegus (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot own work 191.126.36.153 00:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot F10 191.126.36.153 00:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No necesitamos contribuciones exhibicionistas de maridos que necesitan ver un sicologo. 191.126.36.153 00:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PORN BouncyCactus (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nombre del archivo es razon suficiente para borrar (ver la intencion nefasta de la persona que lo subio) 191.126.36.153 00:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PORN BouncyCactus (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear, unambiguous copyright violation. Image was previously published https://3xnhi43vikn244hoyg160zl4-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/17857227_web1_181122-SNW-M-McCALLUM-Doug-2018.jpg https://www.surreynowleader.com/news/web-poll-what-do-you-think-of-tonights-election-result-in-surrey/ and dozens of other locations. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the source itself cites copyright protection BouncyCactus (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es usuario, no es trabajo propio 191.126.36.153 00:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, out of scope, possibly copyvio BouncyCactus (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Estos payasos no estan en "scope" 191.126.36.153 00:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder © Cat Thomson Photography 2018 191.126.36.153 00:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source fotografia 191.126.36.153 00:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope  ? 191.126.36.153 00:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; g7. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of release under CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a likely copyright violation. It looks like the user that uploaded this image took a picture of the poster in picture with a cellphone, laptop or other electronic device. This is evident as when I did a reverse image search of this image, I was able to find a website where a higher resolution version of this exact image is being sold along with several other publicity images of Dana Plato. https://idposter.com/Dana_Plato/655304_Dana_Plato_poster.html SomeBodyAnyBody05 (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? Higher resolution can be found here, which is a cropped version of the image on this page. It is the only contribution of the user and no metadata. Wouter (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped and reversed version of a bigger picture visible on this website. It is used by this politician's official communication as soon as July 2020 [2] (see also this poster [3]). He also uses this particular cropped version as his profile pic on Twitter [4] and Facebook [5].

Considering the Flickr account used as source isn't a professional account and has 0 followers, I highly doubt the person behind it owns the rights to this picture. Titlutin (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Website says "All Rights Reserved" HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://netblocks.org/ NETBLOCKS®, The Internet Observatory™, Cost of Shutdown Tool™, and associated slogans, source identifiers, logos and features are trademarks of Netblocks Ltd. Copyright © All rights reserved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The incorrect sourcing is fixed and the creator of the image offers CC-BY-style usage rights on its website. Keep. 82.43.78.152 06:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://netblocks.org/ NETBLOCKS®, The Internet Observatory™, Cost of Shutdown Tool™, and associated slogans, source identifiers, logos and features are trademarks of Netblocks Ltd. Copyright © All rights reserved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The incorrect sourcing has been fixed and the image creator offers CC-BY-style usage rights on its website. Keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://netblocks.org/ NETBLOCKS®, The Internet Observatory™, Cost of Shutdown Tool™, and associated slogans, source identifiers, logos and features are trademarks of Netblocks Ltd. Copyright © All rights reserved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The incorrect sourcing has been fixed and the image creator offers CC-BY-style usage rights on its website. Keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The usage terms for graphics are higher up, alongside the report. It's equivalent to CC-BY-ND with a moral clause (which CC doesn't preclude): "Graphics and visualizations are provided for fair use in unaltered form reflecting the meaning and intent in which they were published, with clear credit and source attribution to NetBlocks." The images are widely used in the media and have become iconic and the licensing is liberal enough, hence keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not explicit (It also says "Intellectual property rights are protected"). Moreover CC-BY-ND is not OK here. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is not David Kalbaugh. It's a cropped portion of a larger photo, Kalbaugh is in the larger photo but you can only see his back. This cropped photo shows John Kelly. Asdasdasdff (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-illustration/silhouette-concrete-wall-barbed-wire-against-1695138913 HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyright violation. Appeared all over the web well before this was uploaded. Origins are probably a promotional picture for the actress Paoli Dam. Copyright owner unclear but no evidence that it is the Uploader. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing - image subject is purported Flickr account owner and image is not a selfie. As copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject, the PD claim at the Flickr site is not adequate--see also here. Note also that image is clearly a derivative work (see camera flash reflection on glossy physical photo). COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 21:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is sourced from his flickr account since 2019 and is used in many websites and social networks. That is why I used the flickr source. He was a government official, so it is obvious his files are public. Gudisoc (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bijoyko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this redirect because with error. RetroRave (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file. Pekhawar1 (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/RP-F-F00030 does not show the image anymore due to copyright issues Peli (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image of a sculpture does not appear to be free under freedom of panorama in the United States. See COM:FOP US Ezlev (talk) 03:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have not received confirmation that this file is free of use. AttelMalagate (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ni yo. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.36.153 (talk) 01:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sweetato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CP2000A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SouNZTV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 219.78.190.98 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|Copyrighted poster
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. However, deletion-rationale seems to be justified, as Argentina has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Argentina for billboards. --Wdwd (talk) 13:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F1 F1 F1 191.126.36.153 01:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no proper authorship provided. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage ... 191.126.36.153 01:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no proper authorship is provided. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is a cropped version of a photo of Raen Badua see here. It is the only contribution of the user and no metadata. Wouter (talk) 07:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

even more unreadable copy of File:Teacon1.png Enyavar (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Nobody with the name seems to satisfy WP:N KittenKlub (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo of non-contributor. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image should be merged to File:Angelica Kauffmann, Portrait of a Woman, 1795.jpg, since it is an exact copy of it Ecummenic (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since) and the source is copyrighted. To delete. --Abalg (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi ne pas avoir laissé faire la suppression rapide ? -- Asclepias (talk) 15:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Désolé Asclepias, j'ai pensé qu'une justification était une bonne idée. Je retiens pour plus tard. ----Abalg (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want this picture to be released Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >2 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[6] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE and in use.--Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer want this published ISR2003 (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, this is my own work to illustrate the topic. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yasminkaa: Bonjour, Le plan prend une part importante de la photo. Il faudrait soit l'autorisation du détenteur des droits, ou découper la photo pour enlever le plan. Voyez COM:DW/fr pour une explication détaillée en français. Aussi pourquoi utiliser le format PNG ? Le format JPEG est plus approprié pour les photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Je ne sais pas pourquoi certains de mes fichiers sont en PNG. Idem, je vais voir avec la propriétaire de cet auditorium? ou vous préférez celle de l'architecte? Yasminkaa (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yasminkaa: Plutot demander à l'architecte. Yann (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@YannOk, je m'y attèle. Yasminkaa (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission now OK. --Yann (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published previously @ https://www.rianaarendse.com/contact, so COM:VRT required. Achim55 (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable claim of authorship. Appears to be an official map by the park. Paul_012 (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page seems to be from a copyrighted book, but I cannot find which one. — Baidax 💬 19:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Book is "History of Art" by H. W. Janson (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._W._Janson). Sixteenth printing, 1971.
Referencing https://www.ala.org/aboutala/sites/ala.org.aboutala/files/content/publishing/editions/samplers/wherryt_IP.pdf
Argue fair use based on:
The purpose and character of the use: Noncommercial use that serves a different purpose other than educating about art history.
The nature of the copyrighted work: Non-fiction book already widely used for educational purposes related to art, having a tiny sample used as a reference for how books are designed.
The amount and substantiality of the portion used : The book is 616 pages long and I have used the bottom half of a single page without any of the "art".
The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: No economic gain is realized from publishing a corner of a page and the impact on sales of "History of Art" is negligible.
If it is removed, it is removed. Obviously Wikipedia's very careful about copyright violations. Araesmojo (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Fair use is not allowed in Wikimedia Commons. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted music TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 22:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TSGxMari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Cristine Brache's photo series, "The Lost Hollywood Darling." Does not appear to be own work and no evidence of permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Указал неправильную лицензию. Как изменить не знаю. Перезалью фото. Deepsiberia (talk) 17:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque he detectado una serie de errores que debo subsanar. Juanfranvn (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - furthermore not sure it is within our scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contains an intricate logo which is more than "simply geometric shapes", and exceeds the threshold of originality -- DaxServer (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Slovenia. Local upload is prefered. A09090091 (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard Youtube license 188.123.231.23 18:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted publications. No OTRS. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 14:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accoding to the file description page, this is from a book published in 1960, so the original illustration is almost certainly not licensed CC-BY-SA. Given the late publishing date, it is also unlikely to be out of copyright due to age. El Grafo (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like COM:ADVERT/Out sof scope El Grafo (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the logo for fr:Entente sportive du Bafing. A bigger version of this is marked as not commons-compatible at fr:Fichier:ES Bafing.png. No permission from the copyright holder, and feels too complex to assume PD due to simplicity. What's the COM:TOO situation in Côte d'Ivoire? El Grafo (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These were taken from TDL's photostream but not taken by TDL - eg File:Chris TDL and Shelley Lee Horizontal.jpg is credited to Crédit: Julie-Anne Poulin at source. Needs OTRS. Unitentional Flickrwashing?

Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 16:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard Branford Lee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files uploaded by a serial copyright sockfarm. (See here for some older examples, more recent ones like this one have simply been deleted outside of deletion requests.) In the past most seem to be taken from flickr or twitter. This batch have the usual dubious exif. Some from this account have already been deleted, so grouping the remainder here to reduce admin burden.

Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F10F10F10 191.126.36.153 01:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kartaz ? 191.126.36.153 01:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work 191.126.36.153 01:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   19:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo de Alfa 191.126.36.153 01:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded here by mistake, wanted to upload to English Wikipedia. The file is not free, please delete. Таллархо (talk) 01:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borrar este archivo pf. 191.126.36.153 01:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uselessly small, low resolution, subject nearly completely obscured, dozens of better pics of these are available mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I would also like to put out: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2020_Smart_EQ_Fortwo.jpg#mw-jump-to-license https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Smart_Fortwo_Electric_Drive.jpg#mw-jump-to-license https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2022_Ford_Maverick.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

I guess I got a little to eager.DestinationFearFan (talk) 14:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Also: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2022_Hyundai_Santa_Cruz.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

DestinationFearFan (talk) 00:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no Exif data, looks much like it was taken in a studio, uploaded by someone whose uploads are all copyright violations of comercial logos. Stego (talk) 02:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9   19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted banners 219.78.190.98 02:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Khinkali as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free commercial logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious. This is a screenshot of copyrighted Twitter app. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sottas who designed this died in 2007, needs permission from their estate Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-15.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-17.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-19.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorised 49.185.128.76 08:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


We agree with the deletion - this is an redundant file, not linked to any content anywhere and unauthorised portrait. Thank you. AtelierJL (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AtelierJL (talk • contribs) 08:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free internet meme. Ostrzyciel (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: image has been previously published in https://electjudithgarcia.com/ with no indication of a free license. MKFI (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a computer screen, ie. a photograph-of-photograph: Commons:Derivative work. Original source unknown. MKFI (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto de un menor de edad, dudo que tengan autorización para subir la foto a commons Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 08:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: missing essential info and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon erreur de ma part François Malo-Renault (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impossible map. Outdated date. 180.214.233.72 11:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   19:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ukraine borders are outside borders of the russian federation, so this map is inconsistent and does not correspond to reality Darrrynka (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this is a map of 1912. BouncyCactus (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Андрей Романенко, useless. --P 1 9 9   19:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a non-notable organization; promo attempt at ro:Utilizator:Paștiu Mario. Gikü (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Candid photo of a Russian billionaire in a cafe, uploaded and supposedly taken by a user who's been banned for sockpuppetry on the English Wikipedia, most of their edits being negative statements about Vitaly Malkin either unsourced or sourced to unreliable blogs. This may not be their own photograph, it may even be of someone else, or a photoshop. It was originally uploaded to Commons with a questionable and unsubstantiated claim about the other people in the photo in its description. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Support As per COM:D. File was uploaded by blocked user Vitalymalkinrussia. As a photo of an identifiable individual, it was also uploaded without consent from the concerned individual (COM:PEOPLE) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 18:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   19:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from Youtube, not CC-By-SA Video, not free Skimel (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as her twitter pic - https://twitter.com/maryashakil/photo - no exif, think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I honestly doubt that this photograph, that was taken from the top of the Arc de Triomphe, is uploader's work. The lack of exif data may indicate that image is a screenshot from a video. Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edited picture for own use in his own article. SNN95 (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Tymothy34334072

[edit]

All images were uploaded by User:Tymothy34334072

Reasons for deletion request: clear copyright violations, often sources are listed but all clearly missing any evidence of license.The user has a history of consistent policy violations --BouncyCactus (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: closing DR, all were already deleted. --P 1 9 9   19:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since) Richard Coté (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

La partie de l'image est tirée de [10].
Voici quelque détails de la licence:
Détails de la licence
Conditions d’utilisation des contenus de Gallica 1/ Les contenus accessibles sur le site Gallica sont pour la plupart des reproductions numériques d'œuvres tombées dans le domaine public provenant des collections de la BnF. Ces contenus sont considérés, en vertu du code des relations entre le public et l’administration, comme étant des informations publiques et leur réutilisation s'inscrit dans le cadre des dispositions prévues aux articles L. 321-1 à L. 327-1 de ce code.
Dès lors : - La réutilisation non commerciale de ces contenus est libre et gratuite dans le respect de la législation en vigueur et notamment du maintien de la mention de source des contenus telle que précisée ci-après : « Source gallica.bnf.fr / Bibliothèque nationale de France » ou « Source gallica.bnf.fr / BnF ». Richard Coté (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Il faut fournir une licence pour tous les fichiers importés. Elle est manquante ici. Vu la date du document, la licence {{PD-old-100-expired}} convient. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merci; je ne suis pas familier avec les différents types de droits d'auteur et je trouvais cette partie de carte intéressante et utile.
Richard Coté Richard Coté (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resovled: old enough. --P 1 9 9   19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, see https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/use-this-image/?mkey=mw203861 and https://www.npg.org.uk/business/images JopkeB (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

St MICHEL croix herbaville

[edit]

File:St MICHEL croix herbaville chemin des sources 05 01.jpg shows a Google watermark. This image was copied from Google Streetview and therefore the author and license information are wrong. The 2 other images are of the same subject, uploaded the same day and show similar Exif data. There is a reasonable suspicion that these images would also be not free. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unclear what date this photograph was taken. The information section and exif data disagree. Also the quality of the picture makes it seem like it could be coming from a similar source as File:St michel vue aérienne 1950 02.jpg. The uploader did tag a lot of pictures as own work when they clearly aren't. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. And redirected for incoming links. --P 1 9 9   19:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This photo is on many websites, for instance: https://www.badminton.nl/nieuws/nieuwe-flagship-gbc-poona-van-start. So not "own work". I see no VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 13:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Henri Michaux died in 1984. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 14:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Emmanuel Mané-Katz died in 1962. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 14:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? I do not see any clue about licence for this photograph on Dropbox. Anyway, the uploader is not the same person as the photographer and I do not see a VRT ticket either. JopkeB (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blockchainus Maximus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart and trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Would agree with your nomination of shadowstats as this is currently not in use however I disagree with the Cardano logo nomination. Since I currently do not have the edit number required to make changes to the
Cardano page I am unable to propose a change to the Cardano logo currently being used. My intention was to use this specific logo as the main upper right logo for the Cardano Cryptocurrency page.
In this manner it would be in line with many of the other cryptocurrency wiki pages. If you take a look at bitcoin or ethereum pages for instance you will see they use only the symbol, this
is different for the ADA / Cardano page currently. So, I must disagree wholeheartedly with the nomination of the latter logo (File: ADA Cardano Logo). Blockchainus Maximus (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, the image is not much older than 40 years, photographer could still be alive. probably a Rijksmuseum error to have this as Public Domain Peli (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment You might be surprised: Rijksmuseum is regularly approached by artists who also want their work (owned by Rijksmuseum) to be featured on the Rijksstudio website. These artists are sometimes surprisingly generous in choosing free licenses. I will send an e-mail to Rijkmuseum to ask about this particular case. Vysotsky (talk) 10:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You were right. Message from Rijksmuseum: "Ik zie dat dit werk inderdaad nog auteursrechtelijk beschermd is en dat de rechten foutief geregistreerd staan in ons systeem. Ik heb dit direct aanpast." (In short: "indeed, copyright restrictions"). Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you. So it would actually qualify for a speedy deletion now the mistake in permissions is confirmed. Peli (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   19:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hand-drawn diagram of chemical structure. Replaced by File:Paraloid B-72.png or File:Paraloid B-72 monomer-IDs.png (via en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals#Paraloid B-72) DMacks (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should then be renamed to File:Example of a structural formula drawn on a blackboard or something like this. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting idea! We already have a bunch of Category:People writing on blackboard and Category:Scientists at blackboards. I'm not sure this one is novel enough. File:Robert Burns Woodward in 1965.jpg is certainly comparable and involves a notable person and the chemical Chlorophyll is more known than a niche-use polymer. So I think extracting the File:Woodward chlorophyll chalkboard.jpg diagram would be a better example for this EDUSE. DMacks (talk) 03:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We could have both of them. --Leyo 13:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   19:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >2 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[11] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[12] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted ISR2003 (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[13] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE and in use.--Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[14] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[15] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[16] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[17] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[18] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[19] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE and in use.--Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[20] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[21] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[22] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[23] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[24] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[25] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[26] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[27] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[28] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[29] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not your own work, but by JaQuan Allen. So you cannot revoke anything. In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo de Facebook. En la pagina Facebook no se ve el permiso (?) 181.203.4.97 22:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB per EXIF data (I should have seen that when closing it the 1st time). --P 1 9 9   15:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Although original image can be applied de minimis, main object of this cropped image is Lotte World Tower, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 14:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previuosly published here: https://www.facebook.com/335895176504135/photos/pb.100063535353615.-2207520000../3630726173687669/?type=3 Bradipo Lento (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Wider version of the photo was published on Facebook in 2021, while the cropped Commons version was uploaded in 2022. Therefore, this is a copyvio as it's from a copyrighted website and does not have a matching CC license. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Her nipples are erected/enlarged which makes it child pornography 165.228.153.152 02:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Although original image can be applied de minimis, main object of this cropped image is Haeundae LCT The Sharp, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 01:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in UAE. Although original image can be applied de minimis, Burj Khalifa is main object in this cropped image, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Burj Khalifa's author, architect Adrian Smith, is still alive. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted postage stamp: Commons:Stamps#United Kingdom. MKFI (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per the above link, any UK stamps from 1970 onwards are copyrighted. The species was discovered in 2007 and the given date in the description says 2013. Therefore, this UK stamp is copyrighted. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching uploader. P 1 9 9   02:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously published here: https://www.radiopotenzacentrale.info/shows/dj-albert-3/ (and also not own work) Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Info required, the photographed person appears to be the user which may hold the rights to the photograph. BouncyCactus (talk) 13:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still copyrighted (published after 1926) PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per [30], The Saturday Evening Post actively renewed issues starting with those from 1927, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2039. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Life+70 does not apply for works published before 1978, so this is still copyrighted PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per [31], The New Yorker actively renewed issues starting with those from 1927, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Life+70 does not apply for works published before 1978, so this is still copyrighted PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per [32], The New Yorker actively renewed issues starting with those from 1927, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2036. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in Hong Kong, the AA was founded in 2005, and the threshold of originality in Hong Kong is very low. Billytanghh (talk) 11:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in Hong Kong, the PTA was founded in 2001, and the threshold of originality in Hong Kong is very low. Billytanghh (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Nennung des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. That this scan of a photograph was uploaded here without naming an author does not mean that there was "no author disclosure" or that this photograph is anonymous in a legal sense. --Rosenzweig τ 19:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aus Publikation herauskopiertes Foto ohne Nennung der Provenienz und des Fotografen Jbergner (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2074 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Nennung des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. That this scan of a photograph was uploaded here without naming an author does not mean that there was "no author disclosure" or that this photograph is anonymous in a legal sense. --Rosenzweig τ 19:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2074 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission (No permission since). Though the uploader claims on their talk page there is a CC-BY license on YouTube, it does not seem to have been granted by the author of the video. — Racconish💬 05:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That may be my mistake as this footage is from the Congress of Colombia which also use the same license, however is not posted direct on their channel, so I'd say delete. - Regards, -Chien (talk)

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Roberts Johansons died in 1959. While these are PD in Latvia, they were not PD there on the URAA date, so they will be under copyright in the USA until 95 years after creation.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vermane Garden kiosk, Riga, Latvia.jpg is not protected by copyright at all. Here it is on National Latvian archive catalog (NMKK) a.k.a The Joint Catalogue of the National Holdings of Museums (JCNHM).
"Copyright: Nē (No)", next line says: "not an object of copyright". Yerachmiel C (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As the author died in 1959, they're not even in the public domain in Latvia. They won't enter the PD there until 1959 + 70 + 1 = 2030. File:Vermane Garden kiosk, Riga, Latvia.jpg can be restored then, the other two in 2035 (because of URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free logo Skimel (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:TOO UK and COM:SIG United Kingdom. --Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Si una persona solamente sube esta foto (o la foto de su pene, poto, etc) eso es vandalismo, nada de "contribucion" 191.126.36.153 01:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE, not in use. We have enough of such images. --Ellywa (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo, non trivial. Not own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Russia; even simple creative works have copyright protection in this country. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 22:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a video game. No indication that the video game was ever published under a free licence or has allowed to publish screenshots under a free licence Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Also to delete:[reply]
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Island Screenshot (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Island Screenshot (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Island Screenshot (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - UI Screenshot.png
- File:Survival Games (25n71w.com).png
- File:Bermuda Triangle (25n71w.com).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (1).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (1).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (1).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (5).png
--Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Licence added. (https://www.25n71w.com/p/media.html) --25n71w (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Or see here: https://www.25n71w.com/2022/04/25n-71ws-donation-to-wikimedia-commons.html --25n71w (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural closure: no notice was given at each file above (except one). Nominated again, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 25n71w. --P 1 9 9   14:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the Phils. Copyright Dissing-Weitling architect firm 120.29.106.98 13:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no one made a counter-argument to User:JWilz12345's point. Moreover, seems like a generic cable-stayed bridge; I can't see what special architectural element could be copyrighted. --P 1 9 9   15:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Kuwait. Although original image can be applied de minimis, Al Hamra Tower is main object in this cropped image, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[33] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.
However, it should be discussed whether the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO and possibly copyrighted, whereby the image might be a derivative requiring permission, if not considered de minimis.--Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:FOP US is only for buildings, and the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO US and not a case of de minimis in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[34] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.
However, it should be discussed whether the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO and possibly copyrighted, whereby the image might be a derivative requiring permission, if not considered de minimis.--Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:FOP US is only for buildings, and the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO US and not a case of de minimis in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[35] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.
However, it should be discussed whether the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO and possibly copyrighted, whereby the image might be a derivative requiring permission, if not considered de minimis.--Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:FOP US is only for buildings, and the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO US and not a case of de minimis in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unrealistic non educational doesnt better understanding Baratiiman (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 01:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Image available on many websites, Uploader has uploaded many problematic files. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though the YouTube uploader has granted a CC-BY license, there is no evidence they are the author. — Racconish💬 06:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is the author, who speaks is Jaime Caycedo Turriago who is the Director of the Colombian Communist Party, and the author is Voz Digital which is the digital version of Semanario Voz who is funded by that party. Caycedo is giving a New Year's wishes message to the VOZ Digital audience and the Communist Party. Regards, -Chien (talk) 06:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remark of Chien. --Ellywa (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo from a film, which according to the Copyright Ordinance in Hong Kong, was based on the death of the director, screenwriter and composer. The director of the film, who was the last surviving among three, died in 1997. Hence, the photo was still copyright in Hong Kong until 2047 and in the US until 2052. Billytanghh (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-HK. The work was published in Japan in 1967, which the copyright expired in 2037 in Japan and 2062 in the US. Billytanghh (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

author was ja:陳荊和.--RZuo (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-HK. The work was published in Japan in 1967, which the copyright expired in 2037 in Japan and 2062 in the US. Billytanghh (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]