Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/28
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I uploaded this picture by mistake, it isn't my own work. Aleksandaris3920 (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio & uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Private snapshot of a minor and completely out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:35, 28 April 2022 UTC: Private snapshot of a minor and completely out of project scope. --Krdbot 01:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
This is not the uploader's work. It's a painting by Munch. Commons has well structured versions - Category:The Scream by Edvard Munch - and does not need this test upload Tagishsimon (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, not free content. Publisher is owner of the graphic Heikocvijic (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itsalisabri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images that are outside our scope. Commons is not a web hosting platform
Herby talk thyme 11:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. SCP-2000 03:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Cross wiki puppet uploads. --Herby talk thyme 11:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- @YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022043010001876 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I just accepted permission per Ticket:2022043010001876. --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Yann (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- @YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022043010001876 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I just accepted permission per Ticket:2022043010001876. --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- @YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I just accepted permission per Ticket:2022043010001876. --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wu Bai X Tong Nian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Potential copyright violation. Low image resolution and missing EXIF data. The uploader has uploaded copyvio images before per their user talk page User_talk:Wu_Bai_X_Tong_Nian.
SCP-2000 23:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web (e.g., File:Yang Zi 2017.02.26.jpg is here and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
I've opened this DR to discuss the tagging of this image by the photographer as Noncommercial [1] nearly 10 years after upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:License_revocation. matanya • talk 10:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- OTRS made without my permission and I hold all the rights. you cannot tell me what you did was not revocable, b/c I am the owner and not you, matanya. Nehemia G (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- As the OTRS ticket mensions permission was granted by IDF new media speaker. If this image was taken by you when you served there, the rights belong to IDF. If not, I wonder why the IDF speaker sent us permission to something they don't own. In any case, removing the permission and license tag instead of opening this discussion was not the right move. matanya • talk 10:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I was not an IDF photographer and image was not taken as a soldier, image removed from flickr after I noticed them - and in flickr it was with CC-BY-NC. Nehemia G (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This archived snapshot from 2014 confirms a non-commercial licence at Flickr, and as of today the original link is no longer online. So Nehemia G's claim of authorship seems credible to me. De728631 (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- please include in this discussion these 3 files as well:
- File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Iron Dome Intercepts Rockets From The Gaza Strip.jpg
- File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Iron Dome Intercepts Rockets From The Gaza Strip 1.jpg
- File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Iron Dome Intercepts Rockets From The Gaza Strip (1).jpg
- All are in the same status: shot together, original CC-BY-NC at flickr, I'm the owner, all OTRS made without asking me. Nehemia G (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I am really concerned IDF gave permission to an image they don't own. In the case - Delete. Nehemia G, Would you consider leaving your photos under permissive licenese for the common good? matanya • talk 18:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- matanya I'm sorry but no. Please speedy delete the images. Nehemia G (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- I am really concerned IDF gave permission to an image they don't own. In the case - Delete. Nehemia G, Would you consider leaving your photos under permissive licenese for the common good? matanya • talk 18:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This archived snapshot from 2014 confirms a non-commercial licence at Flickr, and as of today the original link is no longer online. So Nehemia G's claim of authorship seems credible to me. De728631 (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I was not an IDF photographer and image was not taken as a soldier, image removed from flickr after I noticed them - and in flickr it was with CC-BY-NC. Nehemia G (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Túrelio can we close this discussion? as you can see there are 4 photos uploaded with wrong OTRS and license.... thanks! Nehemia G (talk) 17:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --matanya • talk 09:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial fictitious flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 07:34, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:36, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:36, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:54, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Due to not containing enough information about its license Azemic64 (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 07:21, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Images of personalities, of various sizes and dates, many small without metadata, some showing different camera types and brands, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Her Majesty Queen Suthida Bajrasudhabimalalakshana.jpg
- File:Asst.Prof.Dr. Krisana Kitcharoen.jpg
- File:Dr. Soonthorn Pibulcharoensit.jpg
- File:Assoc.Prof.Dr. Pratit Santiprabhob.jpg
- File:Dr. Vindhai Cocracul.jpg
- File:Rev.Bro.Dr. Verayuth Boonpram.jpg
- File:Rev.Bro.Dr. Achin Tengtrakul.jpg
- File:Rev.Bro.Dr. Amnuay Yoonprayong.jpg
- File:Rev.Bro.Dr. Bancha Saenghiran.jpg
- File:Rev.Bro.Dr. Prathip M. Komolmas.jpg
- File:Asst.Prof.Dr. Kitti Phothikitti.jpg
- File:2013-Jose Ramos-Horta.jpg
- File:2012-Archbishop Salvatore Pennacchio.jpg
- File:2009-Archbishop Luigi Bressan.jpg
- File:2008-Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino.jpg
- File:2004-Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe.jpg
- File:2001-Rev. Fr. Harold Ridley.jpg
- File:2000-Madame Chen Zhili.jpg
- File:1998-His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn.jpg
- File:1998-Gerald Bernbaum.jpg
- File:1998-Ioan Voicu.jpg
- File:1997-Oscar Maurtua de Romana.jpg
- File:1995-King Baudouin I.jpg
- File:Dr.sureepong-2.jpg
- File:Dr.SongsakCh-2.jpg
- File:DrPannawitd.jpg
- File:Suparathdean.png
- File:DrPatchaneed.jpg
- File:DrSthianrapabNaluangLaw.jpg
- File:Dr Marissa C.jpg
- File:ANarongeng.png
- File:Pimsiri.png
- File:Druree2020.jpg
- File:Dr-suwattana2020.jpg
- File:8-A-Sompol.jpg
- File:Mr-sompol.jpg
- File:Mr-werasak.jpg
- File:Mr-somchai.jpg
- File:Ms-nualphan.jpg
- File:Dr-prabhas.jpg
- File:Dr-thanu.jpg
- File:Bro-surakit.jpg
- File:Bro-sakda1.jpg
- File:Bro-monthol.jpg
- File:Bro-pisutr.jpg
- File:Bro-chamnan.jpg
- File:Bro-thinaratana.jpg
- File:Bro-verayuth.jpg
- File:Bro-amnual.jpg
- File:Bro-achin.jpg
- File:Bro-bancha.jpg
- File:Bro-sirichai.jpg
- File:Bro-dachachai chairman (1).jpg
- File:ดร.ธนู กุลชล.jpg
- File:ดร.มัทนา สานติวัตร.jpg
- File:ภราดา ดร.บัญชา แสงหิรัญ.jpg
- File:ภราดา ดร. ประทีป ม. โกมลมาศ.jpg
- File:ศาสตราจารย์ ดร.ชุบ กาญจนประกร.jpg
- File:อ.วันเพ็ญ นพเกตุ.jpg
- File:อาจารย์วันเพ็ญ นพเกตุ.jpg
- File:ภราดา สมพงษ์ ชีรานนท์.jpg
- File:MSME.png
- File:ม้า.jpg
- File:The Seat of Wisdom.jpg
- File:ต้นอโศก.jpg
- File:Divinity & Science.png
- File:ดวงดาวกับเรือพาย.png
- File:เรือใบ.png
- File:ช่อดอกลิลลี่.png
- File:St. Louis Marie de Montfort Chapel (2).jpg
- File:Aquatic center.jpg
- File:Suvarnabhumi Campus.jpg
- File:อุโมงค์ต้นไม้ วิทยาเขตสุวรรณภูมิ.jpg
- File:รถราง.jpg
- File:ศาลาจตุรมุขไพจิตร.jpg
- File:วิทยาเขตหัวหมาก.jpg
- File:ก้อนหินทองคำ.jpg
Yann (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Droravrami (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: alternate history fiction Enyavar (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
It's unnecessary TheAmeliaMay (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knowingstream (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
C2. Unuseful empty category — Baidax 💬 19:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Book cover copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: low value selfie. --Strakhov (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Copyvio from webpage https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg}} Steph55337 (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the file mentioned is not a Wikimedia Commons file. --Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg Steph55337 (talk) 09:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg Steph55337 (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded the file to test SVG textPath: it is unused Carnby (talk) 03:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:GCSD (G7). HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom by uploader and HapHaxion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded the file to test SVG textPath: it is unused Carnby (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom by uploader. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Yann, this is my own work to illustrate the topic. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasminkaa: Bonjour, L'écran prend une part importante de la photo. Il faudrait soit l'autorisation du détenteur des droits, ou découper la photo pour enlever l'écran. Voyez COM:DW/fr pour une explication détaillée en français. Aussi pourquoi utiliser le format PNG ? Le format JPEG est plus approprié pour les photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann OK je comprends mieux. Je vais donc demander une autorisation à l'architecte détenteur des droits de ce visuel qui illustre ta conception. Je vous reviens au plus vite. Yasminkaa (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasminkaa: Bonjour, L'écran prend une part importante de la photo. Il faudrait soit l'autorisation du détenteur des droits, ou découper la photo pour enlever l'écran. Voyez COM:DW/fr pour une explication détaillée en français. Aussi pourquoi utiliser le format PNG ? Le format JPEG est plus approprié pour les photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Marie Schweitzer Bois Luxe.png” under ticket:2022050110002811. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Permission OK. --Yann (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Derivative, no FoP in Russia, except architecture. Xunks (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jmabel ! talk 02:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
uploaded by a globally banned user Emolga826 (talk) 13:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
unused file Sortilegus (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot own work 191.126.36.153 00:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot F10 191.126.36.153 00:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
No necesitamos contribuciones exhibicionistas de maridos que necesitan ver un sicologo. 191.126.36.153 00:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PORN BouncyCactus (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Nombre del archivo es razon suficiente para borrar (ver la intencion nefasta de la persona que lo subio) 191.126.36.153 00:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PORN BouncyCactus (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Clear, unambiguous copyright violation. Image was previously published https://3xnhi43vikn244hoyg160zl4-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/17857227_web1_181122-SNW-M-McCALLUM-Doug-2018.jpg https://www.surreynowleader.com/news/web-poll-what-do-you-think-of-tonights-election-result-in-surrey/ and dozens of other locations. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, the source itself cites copyright protection BouncyCactus (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
No es usuario, no es trabajo propio 191.126.36.153 00:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope, possibly copyvio BouncyCactus (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Estos payasos no estan en "scope" 191.126.36.153 00:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder © Cat Thomson Photography 2018 191.126.36.153 00:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Source fotografia 191.126.36.153 00:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Scope ? 191.126.36.153 00:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; g7. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
No indication of release under CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
This image is a likely copyright violation. It looks like the user that uploaded this image took a picture of the poster in picture with a cellphone, laptop or other electronic device. This is evident as when I did a reverse image search of this image, I was able to find a website where a higher resolution version of this exact image is being sold along with several other publicity images of Dana Plato. https://idposter.com/Dana_Plato/655304_Dana_Plato_poster.html SomeBodyAnyBody05 (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Own work? Higher resolution can be found here, which is a cropped version of the image on this page. It is the only contribution of the user and no metadata. Wouter (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Cropped and reversed version of a bigger picture visible on this website. It is used by this politician's official communication as soon as July 2020 [2] (see also this poster [3]). He also uses this particular cropped version as his profile pic on Twitter [4] and Facebook [5].
Considering the Flickr account used as source isn't a professional account and has 0 followers, I highly doubt the person behind it owns the rights to this picture. Titlutin (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Website says "All Rights Reserved" HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Book cover copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (4).jpg
[edit]Copyright violation: https://netblocks.org/ NETBLOCKS®, The Internet Observatory™, Cost of Shutdown Tool™, and associated slogans, source identifiers, logos and features are trademarks of Netblocks Ltd. Copyright © All rights reserved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- The incorrect sourcing is fixed and the creator of the image offers CC-BY-style usage rights on its website. Keep. 82.43.78.152 06:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (3).jpg
[edit]Copyright violation: https://netblocks.org/ NETBLOCKS®, The Internet Observatory™, Cost of Shutdown Tool™, and associated slogans, source identifiers, logos and features are trademarks of Netblocks Ltd. Copyright © All rights reserved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- The incorrect sourcing has been fixed and the image creator offers CC-BY-style usage rights on its website. Keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (2).png
[edit]Copyright violation: https://netblocks.org/ NETBLOCKS®, The Internet Observatory™, Cost of Shutdown Tool™, and associated slogans, source identifiers, logos and features are trademarks of Netblocks Ltd. Copyright © All rights reserved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- The incorrect sourcing has been fixed and the image creator offers CC-BY-style usage rights on its website. Keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- The usage terms for graphics are higher up, alongside the report. It's equivalent to CC-BY-ND with a moral clause (which CC doesn't preclude): "Graphics and visualizations are provided for fair use in unaltered form reflecting the meaning and intent in which they were published, with clear credit and source attribution to NetBlocks." The images are widely used in the media and have become iconic and the licensing is liberal enough, hence keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is not explicit (It also says "Intellectual property rights are protected"). Moreover CC-BY-ND is not OK here. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- The usage terms for graphics are higher up, alongside the report. It's equivalent to CC-BY-ND with a moral clause (which CC doesn't preclude): "Graphics and visualizations are provided for fair use in unaltered form reflecting the meaning and intent in which they were published, with clear credit and source attribution to NetBlocks." The images are widely used in the media and have become iconic and the licensing is liberal enough, hence keep. OliverHargreaves (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please show where the creator says the image is CC? Website footer says "All rights reserved". HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
The photo is not David Kalbaugh. It's a cropped portion of a larger photo, Kalbaugh is in the larger photo but you can only see his back. This cropped photo shows John Kelly. Asdasdasdff (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-illustration/silhouette-concrete-wall-barbed-wire-against-1695138913 HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
probable copyright violation. Appeared all over the web well before this was uploaded. Origins are probably a promotional picture for the actress Paoli Dam. Copyright owner unclear but no evidence that it is the Uploader. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - image subject is purported Flickr account owner and image is not a selfie. As copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject, the PD claim at the Flickr site is not adequate--see also here. Note also that image is clearly a derivative work (see camera flash reflection on glossy physical photo). COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 21:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- The image is sourced from his flickr account since 2019 and is used in many websites and social networks. That is why I used the flickr source. He was a government official, so it is obvious his files are public. Gudisoc (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo
- File:Mentalist Artist Nubson Thottathil kerala india.jpg
- File:Mentalist Nubson top 10 mentalist illusionist show kerala.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete this redirect because with error. RetroRave (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete – Copyright violation. The cover of 1965 is not a free work. Kacir (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Dobrý den, pochopil jsem autorský zákon v tom smyslu, že vytvořím-li koláž (v tomto případě ze 4 obrázků), vzniká nové dílo, které není pod stejnou ochranou jako samotný původní obal LP desky (kvůli čemuž předpokládám byl obrázek smazán). Pokud jsem to však pochopil špatně, samozřejmě akceptuji a další obdobně vytvořené koláže nahrávat nebudu... Díky.... huttershofen Huttershofen (talk) 23:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- It would be appropriate to discuss here in English. The closing administrator will not be a Czech speaker. I'll file section for that on the Czech version. Kacir (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Dobrý den, pochopil jsem autorský zákon v tom smyslu, že vytvořím-li koláž (v tomto případě ze 4 obrázků), vzniká nové dílo, které není pod stejnou ochranou jako samotný původní obal LP desky (kvůli čemuž předpokládám byl obrázek smazán). Pokud jsem to však pochopil špatně, samozřejmě akceptuji a další obdobně vytvořené koláže nahrávat nebudu... Díky.... huttershofen Huttershofen (talk) 23:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete – Derivative work --Mormegil (talk) 06:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file. Pekhawar1 (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: G7. Author or uploader request deletion. TilmannR (talk) 01:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/RP-F-F00030 does not show the image anymore due to copyright issues Peli (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
This image of a sculpture does not appear to be free under freedom of panorama in the United States. See COM:FOP US Ezlev (talk) 03:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
I have not received confirmation that this file is free of use. AttelMalagate (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Ni yo. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.36.153 (talk) 01:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Stock Heat Map.png
- File:Stock-index-heatmap.webp
- File:Manufactureing Heatmap.png
- File:Heat Map for Business Process Management.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 219.78.190.98 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|Copyrighted poster
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. However, deletion-rationale seems to be justified, as Argentina has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Argentina for billboards. --Wdwd (talk) 13:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
F1 F1 F1 191.126.36.153 01:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no proper authorship provided. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Collage ... 191.126.36.153 01:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no proper authorship is provided. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
This is not own work. It is a cropped version of a photo of Raen Badua see here. It is the only contribution of the user and no metadata. Wouter (talk) 07:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
even more unreadable copy of File:Teacon1.png Enyavar (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo. Nobody with the name seems to satisfy WP:N KittenKlub (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo of non-contributor. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
this image should be merged to File:Angelica Kauffmann, Portrait of a Woman, 1795.jpg, since it is an exact copy of it Ecummenic (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since) and the source is copyrighted. To delete. --Abalg (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Pourquoi ne pas avoir laissé faire la suppression rapide ? -- Asclepias (talk) 15:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Désolé Asclepias, j'ai pensé qu'une justification était une bonne idée. Je retiens pour plus tard. ----Abalg (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this picture to be released Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >2 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[6] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE and in use.--Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this published ISR2003 (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Yann, this is my own work to illustrate the topic. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasminkaa: Bonjour, Le plan prend une part importante de la photo. Il faudrait soit l'autorisation du détenteur des droits, ou découper la photo pour enlever le plan. Voyez COM:DW/fr pour une explication détaillée en français. Aussi pourquoi utiliser le format PNG ? Le format JPEG est plus approprié pour les photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann Je ne sais pas pourquoi certains de mes fichiers sont en PNG. Idem, je vais voir avec la propriétaire de cet auditorium? ou vous préférez celle de l'architecte? Yasminkaa (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasminkaa: Plutot demander à l'architecte. Yann (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @YannOk, je m'y attèle. Yasminkaa (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yasminkaa: Plutot demander à l'architecte. Yann (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann Je ne sais pas pourquoi certains de mes fichiers sont en PNG. Idem, je vais voir avec la propriétaire de cet auditorium? ou vous préférez celle de l'architecte? Yasminkaa (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Steven Ware Auditorium Ephémère.png” under ticket:2022050210005655. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep La permission vient de l'architecte. Mussklprozz (talk) 20:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Permission now OK. --Yann (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Published previously @ https://www.rianaarendse.com/contact, so COM:VRT required. Achim55 (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Questionable claim of authorship. Appears to be an official map by the park. Paul_012 (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This page seems to be from a copyrighted book, but I cannot find which one. — Baidax 💬 19:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Book is "History of Art" by H. W. Janson (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._W._Janson). Sixteenth printing, 1971.
- Referencing https://www.ala.org/aboutala/sites/ala.org.aboutala/files/content/publishing/editions/samplers/wherryt_IP.pdf
- Argue fair use based on:
- The purpose and character of the use: Noncommercial use that serves a different purpose other than educating about art history.
- The nature of the copyrighted work: Non-fiction book already widely used for educational purposes related to art, having a tiny sample used as a reference for how books are designed.
- The amount and substantiality of the portion used : The book is 616 pages long and I have used the bottom half of a single page without any of the "art".
- The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: No economic gain is realized from publishing a corner of a page and the impact on sales of "History of Art" is negligible.
- If it is removed, it is removed. Obviously Wikipedia's very careful about copyright violations. Araesmojo (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use is not allowed in Wikimedia Commons. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted music TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 22:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
From Cristine Brache's photo series, "The Lost Hollywood Darling." Does not appear to be own work and no evidence of permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Указал неправильную лицензию. Как изменить не знаю. Перезалью фото. Deepsiberia (talk) 17:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Porque he detectado una serie de errores que debo subsanar. Juanfranvn (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - furthermore not sure it is within our scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This image contains an intricate logo which is more than "simply geometric shapes", and exceeds the threshold of originality -- DaxServer (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Probably above COM:TOO Slovenia. Local upload is prefered. A09090091 (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Standard Youtube license 188.123.231.23 18:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted publications. No OTRS. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 14:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Accoding to the file description page, this is from a book published in 1960, so the original illustration is almost certainly not licensed CC-BY-SA. Given the late publishing date, it is also unlikely to be out of copyright due to age. El Grafo (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks like COM:ADVERT/Out sof scope El Grafo (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This is the logo for fr:Entente sportive du Bafing. A bigger version of this is marked as not commons-compatible at fr:Fichier:ES Bafing.png. No permission from the copyright holder, and feels too complex to assume PD due to simplicity. What's the COM:TOO situation in Côte d'Ivoire? El Grafo (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/189569141@N04
[edit]These were taken from TDL's photostream but not taken by TDL - eg File:Chris TDL and Shelley Lee Horizontal.jpg is credited to Crédit: Julie-Anne Poulin at source. Needs OTRS. Unitentional Flickrwashing?
- File:Chris TDL Face Picture.jpg
- File:Chris TDL and Shelley Lee vertical.jpg
- File:Chris TDL and Shelley Lee Horizontal.jpg
- File:Christopher Alexandre Taylor, Ottawa, Canada.jpg
- File:Christopher Alexandre Taylor, Ottawa, Canada - 51172602652.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Info A VRT ticket is in process for these images on ticket: 2022042810004369 Captain-tucker (talk) 16:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 16:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
From the angle of the photographer, all these images are still images from official videos of various Bastille Day parades. It is probably not the uploader's own work.
- File:A-L-M 14 juillet.png
- File:Général division et ses troupes le 14 juillet 2015.png
- File:GB le 14 juillet.png
- File:M-L PRT 14 juillet.png
- File:Fourragère ordre libération.png
- File:M-B 14 juillet.png
- File:Colonel 14 juillet.png
- File:Pompier 14 juillet.png
- File:Général brigade pompier.png
- File:Général Gontier.png
- File:Général brigade commandeur mérite.png
- File:Général-de-division-14 juillet 2017.png
- File:Général de division 14 juillet.png
- File:Général de brigade--14 juillet.png
- File:GB 14 juillet.png
- File:General de corp d'armée.png
- File:Général de brigade.png
Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richard Branford Lee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded by a serial copyright sockfarm. (See here for some older examples, more recent ones like this one have simply been deleted outside of deletion requests.) In the past most seem to be taken from flickr or twitter. This batch have the usual dubious exif. Some from this account have already been deleted, so grouping the remainder here to reduce admin burden.
- File:YaKunSGTokyo1.jpg
- File:YaKunSGTokyo.jpg
- File:YaKunMuralTokyo2.jpg
- File:YaKunMuralTokyo.jpg
- File:THGOrchardSGP.jpg
- File:THGSingaporeOrchard.jpg
- File:YaKunKayaToast.jpg
- File:THGSGTokyo.jpg
- File:SingaporeKayaToast.jpg
- File:SingaporeChickenRiceandKayaToast.jpg
- File:KillneyKopitiamOG.jpg
- File:KoufuOutletSG.jpg
- File:Charles&KeithSGP.jpg
- File:BeeChiangHiangSGP.jpg
- File:AyamBrandSGP.jpg
- File:AwfullyChocolateSGP.jpg
- File:AyamBrandTunaCan.jpg
Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Bell Beaker stone wristguards. Greenstone wristguards with gold studs. From Yorkshie, England, c. 2300 BC-2000 BC. British Museum.jpg
[edit]copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Copper dagger, axe and ornament, gold disc and jewellery, from Britain, c. 2500 BC-2000 BC. British Museum.jpg
[edit]copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Gold strip ornament (diadem), from Chilcomb, England, c. 2500-2000 BC. British Museum.jpg
[edit]copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
F10F10F10 191.126.36.153 01:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:CSD#F10. – Pbrks (t • c) 19:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kartaz ? 191.126.36.153 01:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Bell Beaker, stone wristguard with gold studs, copper dagger and toggle, from Barnack in England. British Museum.jpg
[edit]copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, uploaded by mistake Ario1234 (talk) 01:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work 191.126.36.153 01:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo de Alfa 191.126.36.153 01:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
uploaded here by mistake, wanted to upload to English Wikipedia. The file is not free, please delete. Таллархо (talk) 01:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Borrar este archivo pf. 191.126.36.153 01:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Uselessly small, low resolution, subject nearly completely obscured, dozens of better pics of these are available mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I would also like to put out:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2020_Smart_EQ_Fortwo.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Smart_Fortwo_Electric_Drive.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2022_Ford_Maverick.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
I guess I got a little to eager.DestinationFearFan (talk) 14:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Also: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2022_Hyundai_Santa_Cruz.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
DestinationFearFan (talk) 00:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, no Exif data, looks much like it was taken in a studio, uploaded by someone whose uploads are all copyright violations of comercial logos. Stego (talk) 02:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted banners 219.78.190.98 02:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Khinkali as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free commercial logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Obvious. This is a screenshot of copyrighted Twitter app. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Sottas who designed this died in 2007, needs permission from their estate Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-15.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-17.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-19.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Unauthorised 49.185.128.76 08:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
We agree with the deletion - this is an redundant file, not linked to any content anywhere and unauthorised portrait. Thank you. AtelierJL (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AtelierJL (talk • contribs) 08:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-free internet meme. Ostrzyciel (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: image has been previously published in https://electjudithgarcia.com/ with no indication of a free license. MKFI (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of a computer screen, ie. a photograph-of-photograph: Commons:Derivative work. Original source unknown. MKFI (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Foto de un menor de edad, dudo que tengan autorización para subir la foto a commons Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 08:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing essential info and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Doublon erreur de ma part François Malo-Renault (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Impossible map. Outdated date. 180.214.233.72 11:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Ukraine borders are outside borders of the russian federation, so this map is inconsistent and does not correspond to reality Darrrynka (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep this is a map of 1912. BouncyCactus (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is historically correct but rather senseless: why any publication about Russian-Mexican relationship might be illustrated with their borders in 1912? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Андрей Романенко, useless. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a non-notable organization; promo attempt at ro:Utilizator:Paștiu Mario. Gikü (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Candid photo of a Russian billionaire in a cafe, uploaded and supposedly taken by a user who's been banned for sockpuppetry on the English Wikipedia, most of their edits being negative statements about Vitaly Malkin either unsourced or sourced to unreliable blogs. This may not be their own photograph, it may even be of someone else, or a photoshop. It was originally uploaded to Commons with a questionable and unsubstantiated claim about the other people in the photo in its description. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Support As per COM:D. File was uploaded by blocked user Vitalymalkinrussia. As a photo of an identifiable individual, it was also uploaded without consent from the concerned individual (COM:PEOPLE) —CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 18:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot from Youtube, not CC-By-SA Video, not free Skimel (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Same as her twitter pic - https://twitter.com/maryashakil/photo - no exif, think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I honestly doubt that this photograph, that was taken from the top of the Arc de Triomphe, is uploader's work. The lack of exif data may indicate that image is a screenshot from a video. Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Edited picture for own use in his own article. SNN95 (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Tymothy34334072
[edit]All images were uploaded by User:Tymothy34334072
- File:Alpine A522 (1).jpg
- File:Ferrari F1-75.jpg
- File:Sao Paolo sprint 2021.jpg
- File:Alfa Romeo C42.jpg
- File:Mykola Alekseev as a coach.jpg
- File:Ternopil TNEU basketball team.jpg
- File:Kyiv-Basket team.jpg
- File:Antanas Udras during a game.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: clear copyright violations, often sources are listed but all clearly missing any evidence of license.The user has a history of consistent policy violations --BouncyCactus (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete speedly for big copyright violation File:Alpine A522 (1).jpg from this [7], File:Sao Paolo sprint 2021.jpg from [8], File:Alfa Romeo C42.jpg from [9] 5.90.189.131 08:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: closing DR, all were already deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since) Richard Coté (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- La partie de l'image est tirée de [10].
- Voici quelque détails de la licence:
- Détails de la licence
- Conditions d’utilisation des contenus de Gallica 1/ Les contenus accessibles sur le site Gallica sont pour la plupart des reproductions numériques d'œuvres tombées dans le domaine public provenant des collections de la BnF. Ces contenus sont considérés, en vertu du code des relations entre le public et l’administration, comme étant des informations publiques et leur réutilisation s'inscrit dans le cadre des dispositions prévues aux articles L. 321-1 à L. 327-1 de ce code.
- Dès lors : - La réutilisation non commerciale de ces contenus est libre et gratuite dans le respect de la législation en vigueur et notamment du maintien de la mention de source des contenus telle que précisée ci-après : « Source gallica.bnf.fr / Bibliothèque nationale de France » ou « Source gallica.bnf.fr / BnF ». Richard Coté (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Il faut fournir une licence pour tous les fichiers importés. Elle est manquante ici. Vu la date du document, la licence {{PD-old-100-expired}} convient. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Merci; je ne suis pas familier avec les différents types de droits d'auteur et je trouvais cette partie de carte intéressante et utile.
- Richard Coté Richard Coté (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Il faut fournir une licence pour tous les fichiers importés. Elle est manquante ici. Vu la date du document, la licence {{PD-old-100-expired}} convient. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: resovled: old enough. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/use-this-image/?mkey=mw203861 and https://www.npg.org.uk/business/images JopkeB (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
St MICHEL croix herbaville
[edit]- File:St MICHEL croix herbaville chemin des sources 02 02.jpg
- File:St MICHEL croix herbaville chemin des sources 03 02.jpg
- File:St MICHEL croix herbaville chemin des sources 05 01.jpg
File:St MICHEL croix herbaville chemin des sources 05 01.jpg shows a Google watermark. This image was copied from Google Streetview and therefore the author and license information are wrong. The 2 other images are of the same subject, uploaded the same day and show similar Exif data. There is a reasonable suspicion that these images would also be not free. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
It's unclear what date this photograph was taken. The information section and exif data disagree. Also the quality of the picture makes it seem like it could be coming from a similar source as File:St michel vue aérienne 1950 02.jpg. The uploader did tag a lot of pictures as own work when they clearly aren't. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. And redirected for incoming links. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo is on many websites, for instance: https://www.badminton.nl/nieuws/nieuwe-flagship-gbc-poona-van-start. So not "own work". I see no VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 13:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Henri Michaux died in 1984. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 14:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Emmanuel Mané-Katz died in 1962. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 14:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? I do not see any clue about licence for this photograph on Dropbox. Anyway, the uploader is not the same person as the photographer and I do not see a VRT ticket either. JopkeB (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blockchainus Maximus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart and trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I Would agree with your nomination of shadowstats as this is currently not in use however I disagree with the Cardano logo nomination. Since I currently do not have the edit number required to make changes to the
- Cardano page I am unable to propose a change to the Cardano logo currently being used. My intention was to use this specific logo as the main upper right logo for the Cardano Cryptocurrency page.
- In this manner it would be in line with many of the other cryptocurrency wiki pages. If you take a look at bitcoin or ethereum pages for instance you will see they use only the symbol, this
- is different for the ADA / Cardano page currently. So, I must disagree wholeheartedly with the nomination of the latter logo (File: ADA Cardano Logo). Blockchainus Maximus (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, the image is not much older than 40 years, photographer could still be alive. probably a Rijksmuseum error to have this as Public Domain Peli (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment You might be surprised: Rijksmuseum is regularly approached by artists who also want their work (owned by Rijksmuseum) to be featured on the Rijksstudio website. These artists are sometimes surprisingly generous in choosing free licenses. I will send an e-mail to Rijkmuseum to ask about this particular case. Vysotsky (talk) 10:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- You were right. Message from Rijksmuseum: "Ik zie dat dit werk inderdaad nog auteursrechtelijk beschermd is en dat de rechten foutief geregistreerd staan in ons systeem. Ik heb dit direct aanpast." (In short: "indeed, copyright restrictions"). Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you. So it would actually qualify for a speedy deletion now the mistake in permissions is confirmed. Peli (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- You were right. Message from Rijksmuseum: "Ik zie dat dit werk inderdaad nog auteursrechtelijk beschermd is en dat de rechten foutief geregistreerd staan in ons systeem. Ik heb dit direct aanpast." (In short: "indeed, copyright restrictions"). Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Hand-drawn diagram of chemical structure. Replaced by File:Paraloid B-72.png or File:Paraloid B-72 monomer-IDs.png (via en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals#Paraloid B-72) DMacks (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Extremely poor-quality chemical diagram. Replaced by high-quality alternatives. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This picture could be used as an example of a structural formula drawn on a blackboard. To emphasize this, it might be renamed. --Leyo 07:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Perhaps it should then be renamed to File:Example of a structural formula drawn on a blackboard or something like this. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting idea! We already have a bunch of Category:People writing on blackboard and Category:Scientists at blackboards. I'm not sure this one is novel enough. File:Robert Burns Woodward in 1965.jpg is certainly comparable and involves a notable person and the chemical Chlorophyll is more known than a niche-use polymer. So I think extracting the File:Woodward chlorophyll chalkboard.jpg diagram would be a better example for this EDUSE. DMacks (talk) 03:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- We could have both of them. --Leyo 13:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >2 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[11] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[12] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted ISR2003 (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[13] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE and in use.--Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Interstate Railfan - A Shore Line East set accelerates East after a stop in Old Saybrook.jpg
[edit]I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[14] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[15] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work >3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[16] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[17] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[18] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[19] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE and in use.--Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[20] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[21] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[22] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[23] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[24] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[25] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[26] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[27] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[28] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[29] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's not your own work, but by JaQuan Allen. So you cannot revoke anything. In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Archivo de Facebook. En la pagina Facebook no se ve el permiso (?) 181.203.4.97 22:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB per EXIF data (I should have seen that when closing it the 1st time). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Although original image can be applied de minimis, main object of this cropped image is Lotte World Tower, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
previuosly published here: https://www.facebook.com/335895176504135/photos/pb.100063535353615.-2207520000../3630726173687669/?type=3 Bradipo Lento (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Wider version of the photo was published on Facebook in 2021, while the cropped Commons version was uploaded in 2022. Therefore, this is a copyvio as it's from a copyrighted website and does not have a matching CC license. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Portret van een meisje voor de poort van de Pura Goa Lawa of Vleermuizengrot TMnr 10029745.jpg
[edit]Her nipples are erected/enlarged which makes it child pornography 165.228.153.152 02:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Although original image can be applied de minimis, main object of this cropped image is Haeundae LCT The Sharp, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in UAE. Although original image can be applied de minimis, Burj Khalifa is main object in this cropped image, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Burj Khalifa's author, architect Adrian Smith, is still alive. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted postage stamp: Commons:Stamps#United Kingdom. MKFI (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per the above link, any UK stamps from 1970 onwards are copyrighted. The species was discovered in 2007 and the given date in the description says 2013. Therefore, this UK stamp is copyrighted. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
previously published here: https://www.radiopotenzacentrale.info/shows/dj-albert-3/ (and also not own work) Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Info required, the photographed person appears to be the user which may hold the rights to the photograph. BouncyCactus (talk) 13:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Still copyrighted (published after 1926) PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per [30], The Saturday Evening Post actively renewed issues starting with those from 1927, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2039. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Life+70 does not apply for works published before 1978, so this is still copyrighted PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per [31], The New Yorker actively renewed issues starting with those from 1927, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Life+70 does not apply for works published before 1978, so this is still copyrighted PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per [32], The New Yorker actively renewed issues starting with those from 1927, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2036. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Not PD in Hong Kong, the AA was founded in 2005, and the threshold of originality in Hong Kong is very low. Billytanghh (talk) 11:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Not PD in Hong Kong, the PTA was founded in 2001, and the threshold of originality in Hong Kong is very low. Billytanghh (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Nennung des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 13:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. That this scan of a photograph was uploaded here without naming an author does not mean that there was "no author disclosure" or that this photograph is anonymous in a legal sense. --Rosenzweig τ 19:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Aus Publikation herauskopiertes Foto ohne Nennung der Provenienz und des Fotografen Jbergner (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2074 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Nennung des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 13:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. That this scan of a photograph was uploaded here without naming an author does not mean that there was "no author disclosure" or that this photograph is anonymous in a legal sense. --Rosenzweig τ 19:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2074 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Altes Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Foto ohne Angabe des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 05:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission (No permission since). Though the uploader claims on their talk page there is a CC-BY license on YouTube, it does not seem to have been granted by the author of the video. — Racconish 💬 05:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- That may be my mistake as this footage is from the Congress of Colombia which also use the same license, however is not posted direct on their channel, so I'd say delete. - Regards, -Chien (talk)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Roberts Johansons
[edit]Roberts Johansons died in 1959. While these are PD in Latvia, they were not PD there on the URAA date, so they will be under copyright in the USA until 95 years after creation.
- File:Albert street, Riga, Latvia, 1939.jpg
- File:St. Peter's Church West Facade, Riga, Latvia.jpg
- File:Vermane Garden kiosk, Riga, Latvia.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Vermane Garden kiosk, Riga, Latvia.jpg is not protected by copyright at all. Here it is on National Latvian archive catalog (NMKK) a.k.a The Joint Catalogue of the National Holdings of Museums (JCNHM).
- "Copyright: Nē (No)", next line says: "not an object of copyright". Yerachmiel C (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As the author died in 1959, they're not even in the public domain in Latvia. They won't enter the PD there until 1959 + 70 + 1 = 2030. File:Vermane Garden kiosk, Riga, Latvia.jpg can be restored then, the other two in 2035 (because of URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
non free logo Skimel (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO UK and COM:SIG United Kingdom. --Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Si una persona solamente sube esta foto (o la foto de su pene, poto, etc) eso es vandalismo, nada de "contribucion" 191.126.36.153 01:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 13:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE, not in use. We have enough of such images. --Ellywa (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo, non trivial. Not own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Russia; even simple creative works have copyright protection in this country. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 22:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a video game. No indication that the video game was ever published under a free licence or has allowed to publish screenshots under a free licence Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Also to delete:
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Island Screenshot (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Island Screenshot (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Island Screenshot (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - UI Screenshot.png
- File:Survival Games (25n71w.com).png
- File:Bermuda Triangle (25n71w.com).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (1).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Weather Screenshot (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (1).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (1).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (2).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (3).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (4).png
- File:25°N 71°W - Survival Game - Feature Screenshot II (5).png
--Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Licence added. (https://www.25n71w.com/p/media.html) --25n71w (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Procedural closure: no notice was given at each file above (except one). Nominated again, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 25n71w. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Phils. Copyright Dissing-Weitling architect firm 120.29.106.98 13:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep the architectural work takes about a
quadrantfourth of the image, but maybe fulfills COM:De minimis? The image can be dismissed as focusing on the general vicinity of the bridge, though the title seems to speak otherwise. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no one made a counter-argument to User:JWilz12345's point. Moreover, seems like a generic cable-stayed bridge; I can't see what special architectural element could be copyrighted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Kuwait. Although original image can be applied de minimis, Al Hamra Tower is main object in this cropped image, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[33] In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.
However, it should be discussed whether the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO and possibly copyrighted, whereby the image might be a derivative requiring permission, if not considered de minimis.--Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP US is only for buildings, and the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO US and not a case of de minimis in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work nearly 3 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[34] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.
However, it should be discussed whether the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO and possibly copyrighted, whereby the image might be a derivative requiring permission, if not considered de minimis.--Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP US is only for buildings, and the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO US and not a case of de minimis in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image had been uploaded as own work full 4 years ago under a CC license, which cannot be revoked.[35] In addition, image seems to be in COM:SCOPE.
However, it should be discussed whether the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO and possibly copyrighted, whereby the image might be a derivative requiring permission, if not considered de minimis.--Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP US is only for buildings, and the graphic design of the bus is above COM:TOO US and not a case of de minimis in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (3).png
[edit]unrealistic non educational doesnt better understanding Baratiiman (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Currently in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 01:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (3).png
[edit]Possible copyright violation. Image available on many websites, Uploader has uploaded many problematic files. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also please consider deleting this file for same reason: File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (2).jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Though the YouTube uploader has granted a CC-BY license, there is no evidence they are the author. — Racconish 💬 06:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- It is the author, who speaks is Jaime Caycedo Turriago who is the Director of the Colombian Communist Party, and the author is Voz Digital which is the digital version of Semanario Voz who is funded by that party. Caycedo is giving a New Year's wishes message to the VOZ Digital audience and the Communist Party. Regards, -Chien (talk) 06:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Chien. --Ellywa (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a photo from a film, which according to the Copyright Ordinance in Hong Kong, was based on the death of the director, screenwriter and composer. The director of the film, who was the last surviving among three, died in 1997. Hence, the photo was still copyright in Hong Kong until 2047 and in the US until 2052. Billytanghh (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Not PD-HK. The work was published in Japan in 1967, which the copyright expired in 2037 in Japan and 2062 in the US. Billytanghh (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment, I tagged it for (future) undeletion, thank you for not speedy deleting this file so I had the chance to categorise it. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
author was ja:陳荊和.--RZuo (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Not PD-HK. The work was published in Japan in 1967, which the copyright expired in 2037 in Japan and 2062 in the US. Billytanghh (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment, I tagged it for (future) undeletion, thank you for not speedy deleting this file so I had the chance to categorise it. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)