Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/03/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 31st, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image that should be uploaded in fair use and not commons FiveXdollars (talk) 04:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 08:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since), but it would appear that the image is old enough to be kept, the only question is if the restoration is/was sufficient to gain copyright or not, but it doesn't appear to be significantly modified. Asking for help with this one since it has the additional complication of restoration. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The photographer is listed as "Paul de Robert (1866-1898)" who died 124 years ago. Am I missing something else? The "restoration" is of the 1575 niche in the year 1860, and the photo must have been taken around 1890 if Paul de Robert died in 1898. --RAN (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The false license statement was removed and factual license and information added to photo page. Thanks to RAN and A1Cafel for their work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education use for this flag, no actual state uses this flag. Uploadedfor vandalism in ruwiki Drakosh (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Kiche existiert in Neu Arad (Ardul Nou) Rumänien nicht. 81.196.95.70 07:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, sie liegt in Grădiște. Ich benenne die Datei um. --Achim55 (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of architect's copyright. There is no freedom of panorama in Spain, so this image violate the copyrights of Norman Foster who designed Torre Cepsa, César Pelli who designed Torre de Cristal, Pei Cobb Freed & Partners who designed Torre Espacio. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Sorry. Spain has freedom of panorama. (COM:FOP Spain and {{FoP-Spain}}).


Withdrawn by the nominator himself (non-admin closure) Ox1997cow (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 一只星步甲 (talk) 03:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text". Lord Belbury (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 12:31, 31 March 2022 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Radhika4435 --Krdbot 19:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is 24 years old and does not depict the current company. 207.71.136.190 21:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This doesn't look like the author's own work - it has a watermark from racefans.net which is copyrighted and not released under any appropriate license. Readro (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:47, 1 April 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: https://mobile.twitter.com/racefansdotnet/status/1509488683707162627 --Krdbot 12:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof this sound recording is in the public domain in the United States. Source shows an Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license, which is not valid for the Commons. Hekerui (talk) 09:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think verified date of death of the conductor is a valid proof. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately it is very common that museums and archives saying they own the copyright of old works. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The death year is not relevant concerning the copyright status in the United States for a sound recording published in 1931 per the Music Modernization Act. The relevant part that went into force this year regulates that recordings that were first published between 1923 and 1946 are protected for a period of 100 years after first publication. See COM:HIRTLE for sound recordings. Undeletion in 2031. Hekerui (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Does this law restore the copyright of a work became public domain in 2013? GPSLeo (talk) 13:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, copyright issues surrounding sound recordings were unclear before and depended on state law. The federal law made it uniform. Hekerui (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now I see the problem. The problem is not the copyright, original and this recording are public domain, but there is an ancillary copyright(Leistungsschutzrecht) in the USA til 2032. GPSLeo (talk) 06:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Undelete in 2032. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=Reason}} Wspokoju (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As painter died in 1962, it's protected til end of 2032;  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lego minifigures. per COM:TOYS. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of complex designs by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheMrBurntToast (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader only provided flags, election maps and election apportionment diagrams of fictional countries, with no context given that those fictions are notable: "Glorious America" (alternate timeline?); "Dixie Forever" (ATL for sure), "Galcea" (???) and "Kortaine" (???). Three election maps of Maine are probably also fake/ATL.

Enyavar (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All designs copyrighted by Lego; non-free COM:DW per COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 333sangeetameht (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of grammar advice rotated and with a personal logo image superimposed. Text appears to be taken from https://ischoolconnect.com/blog/important-tenses-rules-with-examples, which is "© iSchoolConnect. All rights reserved."

Lord Belbury (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the general statement on the info-page of this Flickr-account says: "These official photographs taken by the Office of the President of Ukraine may be made available for publication by media and news organizations and/or for personal printing by the subject(s) of the photographs. Official photographs may not be used for promotional purposes including on merchandise, or for commercial use including business materials."[1], which translates into NC-restriction. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo set is published through the official account of the President of Ukraine. The copyright holder should know which license they are choosing and the terms related to it. IMO the license on the individual file overrides what the info-page said. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The CC0 on this specific image at Flickr would overrule a general statement for the account. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per all comments; every indication of free license and no support for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bide Böyle Düşün. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, DW, missing EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   18:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamnvna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, no EXIFs, the uploader already uploaded copyright violations. Two has a watermark "A.Bills photography", therefore A.Bills should send a permission to OTRS

Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamnvna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all four of these are clearly flickrwashed from this SPA flickr account, used to upload as public domain for 4 different subjects/photos with no other photos and no exif data and all created just before upload to commons. see here

Praxidicae (talk) 20:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 14:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope! Sankoswal (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EV - hako9 09:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is really own work, then unused personal file, out of project scope. But if this is not own work, then probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Leonel Sohns 12:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MCSLH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects but self-promotion

Achim55 (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MCSLH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong photo name Khairyl Kush (talk) 09:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --plicit 14:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license proof. QuickQuokka [talk] 12:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor camera from iPhone. Wrugtrab (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright image Evaders99 (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a post-1976 photo, cannot be covered by the PD-Italy licence — danyele 23:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image have copyvio Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:41, 17 April 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: anime/manga/comics --Krdbot 07:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 11:04, 21 April 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable team, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   17:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doc, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radhika4435 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text". Possible advertising, also.

Lord Belbury (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already done by Ruthven. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One person's imagined alternative election results, uploaded to Commons to add to a Wikipedia sandbox to (I assume) screenshot for Reddit. This is out of COM:SCOPE for Commons. Please use another wiki for this kind of thing. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / advertisement Nutshinou Talk! 17:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / advertisement Nutshinou Talk! 17:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   17:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 09:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license proof. QuickQuokka [talk] 12:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license proof. QuickQuokka [talk] 12:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license proof. QuickQuokka [talk] 12:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license proof. QuickQuokka [talk] 12:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license proof. QuickQuokka [talk] 12:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused copyrighted image inappropriately upload to Commons 204.128.192.32 17:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 21:24, 25 April 2022 UTC: Media uploaded without a license. --Krdbot 01:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be a screen gab, not an image, no metadata Ravensfire (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free image Wiki Farazi (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio Wiki Farazi (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free image, copyvio Wiki Farazi (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free image, copyvio Wiki Farazi (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free image, copyvio Wiki Farazi (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Karim185.3 (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the uploader alleged that he is the creator, but there is 24 results confirming that it is not an own work. Regards. Karim185.3 (talk) 08:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Please note that Tineye results expire after a few days.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted by Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ʽCOM:SELFIEʼ Nutshinou Talk! 17:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 15:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stagerlee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be a promotional gallery for Sirena Marine. The two factory images from the air, the boats from the air, all suggest not own work (only one has camera data). And all of them together looks promotional.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong credit given and wrong link to original work Lasiegfried (talk) 03:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope.--Jahobr (talk) 12:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any wiki pages Aethelyon (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.stereogum.com/2056934/100-percent-electronicon-george-clanton-vaporwave-review/reviews/concert-review/OO 07:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Callenmacphee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I have concerns about this set of files. As an example, in File:Jet Engine PAGE Output.jpg the left hand image appears to be from Shutterstock, with the right hand image a derivative work. I believe that full, formal attribution for each of these pictures shoudkl be sent to COM:VRT, without which COM:PCP applies and they shoudl be deleted.

While I recognise that these will have been used and uploaded in good faith, correct attribution and licencing is essential.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timtrent, thank you for the notes. I am new to the process, do you mind describing how I can go about sending an attribution notice to COM:VRT? Thanks. Callenmacphee (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Callenmacphee Go to COM:VRT and it tells you how 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a post-1976 photo, cannot be covered by the PD-Italy licence — danyele 23:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a post-1976 photo, cannot be covered by the PD-Italy licence — danyele 23:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a post-1976 photo, cannot be covered by the PD-Italy licence — danyele 23:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kadı as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: personal photos by non-contributors  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems it is a duplicate of the file: 0AC99CF1-4696-435C-9C7F-ainkaze.jpg (BTW, that file I have also ask for renaming as well.) --Foamposite (talk) 02:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Processed as a dup. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any wiki pages Aethelyon (talk) 06:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G7. Author or uploader request deletion JrawX (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion;. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure what's happening here, face photo was previously deleted as a personal photo at File:なまうつぢつぢ2.jpg in 2020. If this is the same user again then the same applies, if it's a different user then there's no permission. Text seems to be some warning about hiding your face, user's other upload was a face photo taken from the internet. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse image searching another upload from this user turned up a source for this one, https://w.atwiki.jp/jijituwiki/pages/28.html, so this was likely uploaded without permission. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly blurred, no use - thus out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 08:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arian Ahmadvand.9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

image used for promotion at Wikidata; questionable copyright status

Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as "files that contain nothing educational other than raw text". Policy says that "Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource." Lord Belbury (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Dw no source since (dw no source since)

While this is a derivative work in that it has been cropped from "somewhere" and has no camera (etc) details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikonde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free image Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work doesn't fall under any of the provisions for {{PD-Ethiopia}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. IMO, this image is well suitable as a stockimage of a little girl with her dog. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from FB per MD, likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; image is from Caryn Levy/PGA TOUR: https://www.gettyimages.ae/detail/news-photo/graham-marsh-current-official-pga-tour-headshot-news-photo/868581144 Endwise (talk) 12:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image is copyrighted by Paul Smith Photography: https://m.imdb.com/name/nm1890963/mediaviewer/rm1498803969/ Endwise (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; comes from the subjects instagram rather than being the "own work" of the uploader: https://www.instagram.com/p/BeEPGOvFxan/ Endwise (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image is from SGranitz/WireImage: https://atlantablackstar.com/2020/04/15/called-aunt-jemima-on-set-boy-meets-world-actress-trina-mcgee-accuses-her-former-cast-mates-of-being-racist/ Endwise (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image is from Louis Grasse/PxImages/Icon Sportswire: https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2021/12/7/22821488/ufc-ciryl-gane-shrugs-off-francis-ngannous-power-eyes-jon-jones-fight-in-2022-mma-news Endwise (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image is from Aric Crabb / Bay Area News Group: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-denies-bail-ufc-champion-cain-velasquez-charged-fatal-shooting-rcna19055 Endwise (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image is from PA images: https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/boxing/tyson-fury-vs-deontay-wilder-2-rematch-heavyweight-when-date-rematch-fight-a9343526.html Endwise (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the "own work". Higher resolution can be found here. Also no meta data. Wouter (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=Reason}} Wspokoju (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As painter died in 1980, it's protected til end of 2050;  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=Reason}} Wspokoju (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=Reason}} Wspokoju (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As painter died only in 1996, it's protected til end of 2066;  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text". Lord Belbury (talk) 16:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

il tuo pensiero è grezzo, questa è la mia versione, il mio prodotto, l'inerenza c'è tutta, si tratta della mia parola, come ti permetti di contrariarmi? chiedo l'immediato reintegro, sarete responsabili di violazione di divulgazione di denunce che hanno come oggetto l'aver condannato la popolazione illegalmente. Leonardo Fedrigucci (talk) 18:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of freely-available license, shared on social media - likely owned by ray.magazine Japan https://ray-web.jp/168650 Evaders99 (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Lumiere Gallery (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No meaningful usage possible due to very low quality. A.Savin 17:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly out of scope. Blurry and unused photograph of people; no indication as to who they are and why they're notable. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable event, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of free license on source website. [2] If the uploader owns the website in question, then VRT permission is needed. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Philippe, though they seem to be inactive. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Animalista123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with transmission code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   17:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:K.Ullmann Eggishorn (CH).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:K.Ullmann Eggishorn (CH).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without context/description, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moneytalkteam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality images of non-notable musician; article about subject on English Wikipedia was deleted.

Ixfd64 (talk) 18:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio from https://vk.com/moisture?w=wall-32961164_138171 95.31.188.32 18:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has no encyclopedic value, and its sole purpose with its current title is vandalism of Wikipedia, where it was inserted into the article named Apex predator. It is doubtful whether the young person's consent was obtained for the taking or publication of the photograph. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consent was absolutely received and I am sorry for disrupting the wikipedia article, my intention was never to leave the article with out correcting it but I understand that I still should not have made the edit to the page. Buddyboy529158u201 (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You mean it was a joke/test edit which you had intended to revert, but forgot. OK, thanks for the apology. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. Not own work. The right part at least in not free. Wouter (talk) 18:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The left image could be found all over the Internet in a higher resolution. So yeah,  Delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the own work. Here is given that it is not free. Wouter (talk) 18:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value, joke about John Cena CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional looking photo, no evidence they actually took it. If they did, this should be verified by OTRS Joseph2302 (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Joseph, thank you for your message but jack is 70 years old now - your pic is 20 years old. it would be good to refresh his picture.
I disclosed I work for Jack, I do not see the issue here but I can assure you there is no conflict of interest or copyright issue
Jack just got the equivalent of the Nobel prize for computing (the Turing award) - FYI Jack is a pioneer in open source softwares for over 40 years ;-) .
We just wanted to update his picture.
The pic is on netlib.org our 80's open source system (still running strong!): http://www.netlib.org/utk/people/JackDongarra/index.html
Let mw know if you need anything else or have any questions
Julie Jlangou (talk) 23:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS from Tara Keiner (see exif). --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the author of this subject, Architect I.M. Pei, died in 2019. This architectural work won't be in public domain until January 1, 2090, 70+1 years after the author's death. The architectural work is too large and prominent to be classed as "accessory" or "incidental."

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the illustrator of this work? Felix Salten is the author of the book, not the illustrator. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly Hans Bertle who, according to German Wikipedia, illustrated Bambi. If it was Bertle, it would be in the public domain, as he died in 1943. But of course the cover could be by a different artist. Without more information, we probably have to delete that image per COM:PRP. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
He drew the one in 1940. What about the first edition? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
True, apparently Bertle's illustrations were made for the 1940 edition. Per some catalogues, the 1923 first edition has rather illustrated initials than full illustrations. No idea who drew these initials or the cover (I've now checked some library and bookseller catalogues, found no name).  Delete if no additional information is provided. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No reason to delete. An anonymous image, created some 95 years ago. Also useful and educational. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 17:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you assume that the publication was anonymous? Do you have the book? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't. German copyright law is very clear that a work must be actually anonymous to the world, not "we couldn't figure it out" anonymous. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One might go to a library and examine a copy to see whether a cover illustrator’s name is mentioned there. In the photographs of this edition available on-line, no mentions are in place, and it is fair to presume that the illustration is anonymous. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: first edition illustrated by Hans Bertle[1], now in the public domain. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Post mortem note: after double checking this and some other online references, it appears that Hans Bertle was the illustrator of 1940 reprint. The 1923 edition has no illustrator credited in the book. The correct license template is then {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

[edit]
  1. Markus Lång. Salten’s Illustrators.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author named in the picture itself. not an anonymous work. sугсго 08:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep Did you see the previous deletion request, discussion and Ruthven's post mortem note? The author of the book is, of course, Felix Salten, but that doesn't say anything about the illustration of the cover which is most likely not by Salten, who isn't known as an illustrator. If the illustrator of the 1923 edition's cover is not mentioned anywhere, the currently used template {{PD-anon-expired}} seems to fit; for the EU, {{PD-anon-70-EU}} could be added as well - my vote is a "weak keep" only, however, as in Germany, that template in theory is only allowed "if the author never claimed authorship or their authorship never became public in any other way" which is nearly impossible to prove. That restriction is routinely ignored here, however... Gestumblindi (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, even if Salten himself were the illustrator of the cover - which is highly unlikely - it would be in the public domain in Europe by now (since 2016), as Salten died in 1945, and, as a 1923 publication, anyway in the US (PD-US is currently applicable for works published before January 1, 1926, as it's now a moving wall). Gestumblindi (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep and add additional PD template per Gestumblindi -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright attribution per se is correct, the photo is focused on the emergency passport which is not de minimis and which is covered by crown copyright (and otherwise not licensed under any OGL licence). 2001:4453:58A:FA00:3965:A6CC:487E:1EAD 08:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Andy, license should be updated. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not free screenshot Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file does not need to be deleted. Reason: This file already had permission both GRS leadership and Regsirar of Societies (RoS). This file also already been paid by GRS leadership and wiki editor - user xXBossDiamondzXx. for proof, please refer to https://www.ros.gov.my/ and call directly to the HQ of Regisrar of Societies. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 113.210.101.89 (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Source is (C), send permission via OTRS. Any way should be in text format. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image have copyvio Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Looks too simple. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, redundant to File:Latin letter sharp S.svg Leonel Sohns 09:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an original uploader, I agree. — Person or Persons Unknown (talk)
(contrib.)
09:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Only different in spacing; redundant. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previusly published here: http://www.tiamodamorireonlus.it/il-volo-di-emma/cast-tecnico/ (see this file) Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. see here Karim185.3 (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Likely a personal photo. Hulged (talk) 10:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hulged, No it is not a personal picture, it was a photo-shoot because the person whose Biography I am writing is Social Media Influencer Amasu9991 (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Boylarva99 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0|source=https://www.fotocommunity.de/photo/scrub-jay-aphelocoma-coerulescens-florida--b-walker/8581664. A regular DR is more suitable is this case. On the source website, the photo is published under a NC-ND licence which is not compatible with Commons, but it was uploaded on Commons in 2008, so it is not impossible that the source website has changed since then. BrightRaven (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: AGF that the license was free when uploaded. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work doesn't fall under any of the provisions for {{PD-Ethiopia}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work doesn't fall under any of the provisions for {{PD-Ethiopia}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work doesn't fall under any of the provisions for {{PD-Ethiopia}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work, it was cropped from here https://twitter.com/brankastamenkov/status/1274625345350705152 Vacant0 (talk) 11:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Military order, probably fake, has no good source to verify. Drakosh (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal blog logo with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, no FoP in Russia, don't think it could be considered de-minimis rubin16 (talk) 14:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the author of this subject, Architect I.M. Pei, died in 2019. This artwork won't be in public domain until January 1, 2090, 70+1 years after the author's death. Note that the architectural work is intentional and not accessory here (hence not COM:DM France). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


@JWilz12345:  Comment I think dancers are main object in this image. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: no, the image is framed intentionally so that the pyramid becomes their backdrop, which in turn undermines its eigibility for DM France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Ok.  Delete per nomination. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philippe BELLARD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work copyright violation! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the author of this subject, Architect I.M. Pei, died in 2019. This artwork won't be in public domain until January 1, 2090, 70+1 years after the author's death.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material with sole purpose of promo @ ro:Amera Tower and ro:Amera tower. Gikü (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned old photo, not own work Xunks (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Need info on original photographer, date etc. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleEarth CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thingofme (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Don't think these are flickr uploader's own work. Probably derived from some game/software.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thingofme (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thingofme (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Don't think these are flickr uploader's own work. Probably derived from some game/software.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thingofme (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thingofme (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Derivative work copyright violation! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the author of this subject, Architect I.M. Pei, died in 2019. This architectural work won't be in public domain until January 1, 2090, 70+1 years after the author's death.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mylo pinto rizvi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep at least the first one; logo of Category:Autodesk Maya and PD-simple. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: probably taken from https://sudharakolwe.com/ekjut.html. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the author of this subject, Architect I.M. Pei, died in 2019. This artwork won't be in public domain until January 1, 2090, 70+1 years after the author's death. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot form newpaper web site; likely to be copyrighted Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with error (see Discussion:Décarboxylation/À faire). Replaced by File:Beta-ketocarbonzuur dercarboxylering.svg. Cjp24 (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Lumiere Gallery (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no scientific significance 95.31.188.32 17:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no scientific significance 95.31.188.32 17:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Разрешение от football.ua предполагает использование фото только с галереи https://football.ua/galleries/ Mitte27 (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Max Ernst died in 1976, the copyright of his artwork thus didn't expire yet. Julius1990 (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 09:04, 7 May 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego Modular - Set 10260 Downtown Diner --Krdbot 13:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any pages, is a brand logo Aethelyon (talk) 06:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any wiki pages Aethelyon (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any wiki pages Aethelyon (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any wiki pages Aethelyon (talk) 06:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used on any wiki pages Aethelyon (talk) 06:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work as claimed and part of a photoshoot posted to https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=5144330825581125&set=pb.100050425452909.-2207520000.. PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" unlikely; undocumented base map: Likely a copyright violation Enyavar (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only file included by it has deleted Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of author's permission. Example of utilisation before the upload [3] tyseria (d) 10:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of author's permission. Example of utilisation before the upload [4] tyseria (d) 10:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Np evidence to be PD Ориенталист (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be PD Ориенталист (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, no FoP in Russia, don't think it could be considered de-minimis rubin16 (talk) 14:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleEarth CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a google earth screenshot, the object in the image is not yet constructed so there is an overlay on the image. Xoocit (talk) 10:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Overlay or not, the satellite image is not own work. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever it shows, this is not the skull of the en:kennewick man. The remains of the kennewick man were never in Karlsruhe, Germany, but stayed under lock at the en:Burke Museum in Seattle until they were reburried on 2017-02-17. A picture taken at a later date can't show them. h-stt !? 15:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be a cast or replica? Sumanuil (talk) 20:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt it, as far as I know, access was very restricted and no such replica was made. I can't find any information on a replica in Karlsruhe or elsewhere beside this file. --h-stt !? 18:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9   01:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Murat.sahin1072 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos/paintings/drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Murat.sahin1072 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: Hello, File:Prière de Tarawih dans la Grande Mosquée de Kairouan. Ramadan 2012.jpg has not been uploaded by this user, is not small and has EXIF data. Are you sure it should be on this list? Moumou82 (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow VisualFilesChange listed it as this user contributions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work of an old map. Geographia Maps (website) appears to be a U.S. mapmaking company, and this is stated to be from 1950. More documentation is required if the underlying map passes either {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je suis Claire Fercak et je veux retirer cette photo que je n'ai pas validée 217.108.226.131 16:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
D'un point de vu légal, la photo ne soulève pas de problème, puisque vous étiez de votre plein gré dans un espace public, dans l'exercice d'une activité publique. C'est la même chose pour un homme politique dans un meeting ou un chanteur lors d'un concert. Une autorisation personnelle n'est pas requise. Seules les images dites "dégradantes" peuvent être retirées, et ce n'est pas le cas ici.
D'un point de vue personnel, je peux comprendre qu'on n'aime pas telle ou telle photo de soi. Auquel cas vous pouvez nous proposer une autre photo, forcément libre de droits, n'ayant jamais été utilisée ailleurs (site, ouvrage), voire un selfie.
Nous pouvons communiquer à ce sujet par courriel : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Ji-Elle
Bien cordialement,
Ji-Elle (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Ji-Elle. In use and no alternative provided. --P 1 9 9   01:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio 95.31.188.32 18:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission --Drakosh (talk) 06:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the license applies only for text-only material, not for logos. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the license applies only for text-only material, not for logos. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the license applies only for text-only material, not for logos. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the license applies only for text-only material, not for logos. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the license applies only for text-only material, not for logos. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: no mention of Creative Commons in Deviant Art CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete GeorgHHtalk   08:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 19:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружено по ошибке Arman Militosyan (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rubin16 at 07:07, 8 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1) --Krdbot 12:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louvre Pyramid Flickr images imported by Ham II (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work copyright violations! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the author of this subject, Architect I.M. Pei, died in 2019. This artwork won't be in public domain until January 1, 2090, 70+1 years after the author's death.

These images do not show the copyrighted architectural work in an accessory way that would have made them eligible for French de minimis standard. Some interior views are also included: interior architecture is still architecture and subject to architect's rights to enjoy these for profit.

Worse, a couple of photos show a temporary artwork by JR. As their Flickr description reads: Street artist JR created a temporary eye-tricking installation - monumental photographic collages - May-June 2016. Such image names are marked with (*) by me.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Also adding: File:Paris - Pyramide du Louvre (32663745555).jpg, which is imported by the same importer (Ham II) and shows interior architecture of the pyramid. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Panorama art installation by Eva Jospin

[edit]

Derivative work copyright violation! There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The principal/integral subject of these images is the 2016 art installation Panorama by Eva Jospin (source). This installation is temporary, according to a description of a Getty image. Needs commercial license permission from Jospin, via COM:VRTS correspondence.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Freigabe durch Fotograf: Paul Zimmer ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 10:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT permission needed to host this file. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence this painting is in the public domain in the US Hekerui (talk) 11:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2049. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence this painting is in the public domain in the US Hekerui (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The Yugoslavia licensing isn't accurate here. This painting was created by Petar Lubarda, who died in 1974. This makes this not pass any of the 3 criteria listed. Yugoslavia's copyright length was 50 years pma, making it past the 1996 URAA date per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Yugoslavia. With Commons:Hirtle chart, this means it has 95 years of copyright as it was a 1942 overseas publication that was not PD on the URAA date. Therefore, this is not PD in the USA until 2038. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. The file can be restored in 2045. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Primary Author is Frederick Levi Attenborough (4 April 1887 – 20 March 1973), and this would appear to be a UK published edition. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Note the colophon opposing the title page: this work was published simultaneously in the United States, making it a U.S. work; and it is in the public domain in the U.S. If the above rationale is ignored, please export the file for use at English Wikisource, where it is in use. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. It's still a UK work (Cambridge University Press) even if it was it was simultaneously published in the USA. I have not yet deleted the file and notified en.wikisource (see [5]) to give them an opportunity to transfer the file. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: After some input from User:Xover over at Wikisource and the link to Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/12#Source country vs simultaneous publication, I let myself be convinced that the "country of origin" of this work, per the Berne Convention, is in fact the US because of the Convention's rule that “The country of origin shall be considered to be [...] in the case of works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection, the country whose legislation grants the shortest term of protection; [...]”. So in this case – early work of someone who was long-lived – the US definitely has the shorter term than the UK, even if it had been the full 95 year term. Effectively, the term was 0 years in this case because of the missing copyright notice. So because of the strange interaction of the Berne Convention and peculiarities in US copyright law, a book published by the Cambridge University Press in England is considered to have the US as its country of origin. Which was probably not something that the creators of the Berne Convention had in mind, because the US chose to stay out of the Convention for such a long time before finally joining a century later. But it is what it is. --Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PODZO DI BORGO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All delcared as CC-BY-SA self but like File:L'Arroseur_arrosé,_film_de_Louis_Lumière_(1895).jpg is old and not uploaders work or File:Curtis Choy with a CP-15 16mm camera (cropped).jpg which is maybe cropped File:Tireuse 35 mm Debrie Tipro.jpg which may be scanned by the uploader but not made the photo. So I don't think we can trust the uploader on all his other upload claiming he is the author.

Avron (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Je ne comprends absolument pas le sens de votre démarche. Une grande partie des documents que vous proposez à la suppression ont été photographiés par mes soins et beaucoup d'autres aussi proviennent directement de Wiki Commons. Quelques-uns (photogrammes de films) ont été capturés par mes soins pour illustrer des films qui ne diraient rien aux lecteurs sans ces documents. Je suis en effet collectionneur de caméras argentiques (j'en possède 139 exactement) et d'une trentaine d'appareils de projection. Que faut-il que je fasse pour empêcher cette destruction de masse et d'information ?
Good evening,
I absolutely do not understand the meaning of your approach. Many of the documents you propose for deletion have been photographed by me and many others also come directly from Wiki Commons. Some (stills of films) were captured by me to illustrate films which would mean nothing to readers without these documents. I am indeed a collector of film cameras (I own 139 exactly) and about thirty projection devices. What should I do to prevent this mass and information destruction? PODZO DI BORGO (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello PODZO DI BORGO, I would like to have all the photos but you have used "own work" on many files where you are not the author like File:L'Arroseur_arrosé,_film_de_Louis_Lumière_(1895).jpg. It is important to know where you are the real photographer and where not. Scanning or photogphing a photo doesn't make you the author.Avron (talk) 10:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The principle adopted by you : he makes a mistake, therefore everything is wrong in his contributions, is a rather revolting aberration. Yes, I scanned a frame from Louis Lumière's film; the scan being made by me, I correctly marked that this document had been made by me. Retorting that it was Louis Lumière who shot the film is an aberration and very shocking. On Wikipedia France, I am the only one who knows early cinema well and it was I in particular who specified that Louis Lumière was the only inventor of the Cinematograph camera, and not "the Lumière brothers". To pretend that I wanted to steal this image from Louis Lumière's film is cruel, to say the least! Presenting this element to me as proof that everything else is false, I can't believe my eyes! My personal portraits (PODZO DI BORGO is my nickname, my name is Jean-Claude Morin) ar false ? The photos of my wife Marie-France Briselance were taken by me, they ar false also ? Cinema accessories (cameras, projector, etc) are parts of my collection and they are on photos taken by me, false ? I also took pictures of equipment at the permanent exhibition of the Cinémathèque française, false of course ǃ If you delete everything, I will put them back (big work, thank youǃ), this time using my real name. Recommendation: read a few articles from Wikipedia France before brandishing the axe! PODZO DI BORGO (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please, no offense to you, we can clarify this. But we have a Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. And on commons we get every day tons of images with from people they have just taken from the internet but claim they are the author. And if we find photo with are clearly false claim, so how can we trust the uploader for other photos? So please change the images where you aren't the copyrightholder to the correct information. For File:L'Arroseur arrosé, film de Louis Lumière (1895).jpg the author is Louis Lumière and the license is pd-old. I've done this for this file and File:Les Kiriki, acrobates japonais, film réalisé par Segundo de Chomón (1907).jpg as an example.Avron (talk) 17:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: In File:Jean-Claude Morin sur le tournage du téléfilm "La Tisane de sarments" (1979).jpg Jean-Claude Morin is shown, but also it is said that he is the author. That is physically not possible. Maybe you are somehow the copyright-owner but not the author.Avron (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What a pity to read something like this ǃ Yes, it is impossible to take a photo of I, but it is with my camera that my friend, Philippe Théaudière (director of photography of the film) took this picture during a rehearsal. He did not claim to be the author of the picture I keep in my personnal photo-library. Copyright-owner, yes I am. It is the same thing, the same rights... Other pictures show me (Jean-Claude Morin) or my wife Marie-France Briselance. Made with my camera. I have at home a collection of 155 old film camera and other cine-tools. I took pictures of them for enhancing many Wikipedia articles. Majority of them are proposed to be erased. It is absurdǃ PODZO DI BORGO (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But your claim is: "own work", which you admit is not true, Why don't you write author: "Philippe Théaudière" and change the licence accordingly? You claim also "own work" for images like File:Conducteur de bruitage du film "Victory" (1913).jpg or File:Acte_de_naissance_au_Minihic-sur-Rance_(France)_de_William_Kennedy_Laurie_Dickson_(1860-8-3).jpg and many others. Instead of clarifying, where are you real author, where you might have copyrights or where the license may be pd-old or whatever all you do is lamenting how bad the world is. Avron (talk) 07:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: most of them, deleted some as noted above. Some of the deleted files can perhaps be restored with a COM:VRT permission if noted, or when more information is given about the actual source (like the publication something was taken from), year and place of creation/publication. Or at least a year for the restoration can be set, like I already have done for a few files where I felt there was enough information. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PODZO DI BORGO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not PD yet and not CC0.

— Racconish💬 13:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since), but I am making the assumption that the " Paul Lehugeur " listed is the same one who died in 1933 - a French historian with multiple publications. Seeking additional information on this image as it is possible/likely old enough to be kept if we only knew enough about it! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: taken from a web site (see upper left of the image), but originally published ca. 1880 in "Histoire De France En Cent Tableaux" [6]. No illustrators are named in this volume, and the drawing is not signed, but {{PD-old-assumed}} fits. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file that I took from NASA's website. Because it from SOHO, I am no longer sure about its copyright status (it might be public domain or it might not be; I'm not sure). I don't want to put in the effort to find out its copyright status so I'm requesting that this file be deleted. Mgkrupa (talk) 20:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file that I took from NASA's website. Because it from SOHO, I am no longer sure about its copyright status (it might be public domain or it might not be; I'm not sure). I don't want to put in the effort to find out its copyright status so I'm requesting that this file be deleted. Mgkrupa (talk) 20:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of design by Lego; see COM:TOYS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be PD Ориенталист (talk) 15:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this photo is then until 1882. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This seems to be a photograph showing a man who died in 1882, so {{PD-old-assumed}} fits. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Number 57 as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader claims to be copyright holder, but source is listed as unknown.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. As depicted person died already in 1910, this image should be in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"As depicted person died already in 1910, this image should be in the PD."

The same should apply to the image of Marco Antonio Cabral that I uploaded, since he died in 1903, but since it has already been deleted it doesn't matter, does it?--OliverDF (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Though that doesn't belong here, the difference is that File:Marcos Antonio Cabral.jpg seems to be a painting, not a photography. While a photography originally is shot during the filetime of the depicted, a painting may be created at a later point of time. --Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"the difference is that File:Marcos Antonio Cabral.jpg seems to be a painting, not a photography. While a photography originally is shot during the filetime of the depicted, a painting may be created at a later point of time."

Following your logic, then the same applies to File:Manuel Altagracia Cáceres.jpg & File:Jacinto De Castro.jpg, but it's not the same thing, is it?--OliverDF (talk) 23:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept with {{PD-old-assumed}} (adjusted to 100 years to accomodate the Dominican Republic's 50 years pma term). --Rosenzweig τ 13:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted star wars vehicles Clodion (talk) 08:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. See here Karim185.3 (talk) 10:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found several times on the web predating this upload here. --Rosenzweig τ 17:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of early enough publication to meet COM:Russia Xunks (talk) 14:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC) {{Pd-old}} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.252.176.137 (talk) 17:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2060 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 20:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be PD Ориенталист (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per File:Наибы Шамиля.jpg, the author is Giorgio Corradini, who died in 1891, and this was published in 1895, perhaps already earlier elsewhere. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be PD Ориенталист (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The actual author here seems to be Vasily Stepanovich Shlepnev (1893–1975). If we factor in the 4-year Russian WW II extension that is almost guaranteed for someone with these years of birth and death, the image will enter the PD in Russia in 2050. The file can be restored then. --Rosenzweig τ 20:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These text is made by Indigensus People Commission of Taichung City Government(臺中市政府原住民族事務委員會) and belongs to public domain in Taiwan law. Outlookxp (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Outlookxp: That's not one of the situations listed in Article 9 of the Copyright Act of the Republic of China, so {{PD-ROC-official}} is not proper. Government publications are not equal to official documents (「政府出版品」不等於「公文」). Lt2818 (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
According to Taiwan's law, this text is not 政府出版品(Government publications). Please see 政府出版品管理要點[https://www.moc.gov.tw/information_320_21139.html for "各機關應依相關國際標準編號規定及出版品統一編號作業規定,編印出版品" . In Taiwan law, 政府出版品(Government publications) must has 出版品國際標準編號(International Standard Book Number), 統一編號作業規定(Government Publications Number), and 免徵營業稅認可(Exemption certificates for sales tax).
Please also see智慧財產局著作權主題網-認識著作權-資料檢索-解釋資料檢索-電子郵件1071101"而其中的所指公文(official document),包括公務員於職務上草擬之文告、講稿、新聞稿及其他文書(other documents)均包括在內。鄭保雄展覽說明.jpg has no Government Publications Number, ISBN, or Exemption certificates for sales tax, is not Government publications and just 說明文(illustrate) in Taichung Aboriginal Peoples Service Center .
Like other picture having text[7][8] in ​Taichung Aboriginal Peoples Service Center, 鄭保雄展覽說明.jpg belongs to 其他文書(other documents) of 公文(official document) made by Taichung City Government for public domain in Taiwan law.--Outlookxp (talk) 14:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Outlookxp: 您好,以下為使表意清晰就用中文講了。
上面引述「政府出版品不等於公文」一語,本想表達其推論⸺政府作品并不全在公有領域。展覽確實不是出版品,這是我表述不當。
照片從坐標看攝於臺中市原住民綜合服務中心,但該段文字是否為「公務員於職務上草擬」是未被證實的。如智著字第10300061970號提到「出資聘人完成」的可能性,此時以受聘人為著作人及著作財產權人。
我以同樣理由提刪了另外七張圖片,見User talk:Priscilla9877。未提刪的是考慮到Commons:De minimis可給留情之處,但以版權内容作為畫面主體就不行了。Lt2818 (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your link[智著字第10300061970號 is about 今日海關期刊雜誌. See[https://www.books.com.tw/products/0010743757], 今日海關期刊雜誌 has ISBN and is really 政府出版品(Government publications). Ans the title (有關 貴署函詢相關出版品是否取得著作權一案)just for 政府出版品(Government publications). So,「公務員於職務上草擬」of law is not applied for Text of 鄭保雄展覽說明.jpg for not 政府出版品.
Please also see this evidence[9], this exhibition was hold by 台中市原住民族事務委員會(Indigensus People Commission of Taichung City Government), not by private organization. 台中市原住民族事務委員會 is government organization and this work of exhibition is government employee’s 職務(job).—Outlookxp (talk) 17:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the latter paragraph, but it can't prove that the text was written by a government employee. --Lt2818 (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
我只是舉了智著字第10300061970號提到的可能性,不是拿它審此案;「公務員於職務上草擬」為著作權法第九條原話,應該是不分出版品與否的。一個類似的情況是這樣的,比如漁業署雖為政府機構,但其網站上的内容可能各有著作人,而且聲明受著作權法保護。政府主辦的展覽也可能如此。 Lt2818 (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
O.K. Your question for exhibition of government is very good. I never think it.
Let us come back to copyright in Taiwan law . 著作權法所稱之著作,係指屬於文學、科學、藝術或其他學術範圍之創作,凡符合一定程度之創作性及原創性 , copyright must have has 原創性(original) and 創作性(creative). Text of 鄭保雄展覽說明.jpg really has original and creative. I took this text just for wanting to provide the birthday of 鄭保雄. So, now I agree this picture has suspect of copyright. Please let it delete. I will upload one picture only including his birthday. Information of birthday has no original or creative, and is not copyright(著作). Thank you for your remind.—Outlookxp (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 22:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of architect's copyright. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, so these images violate the copyrights of Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates who designed this building.

Ox1997cow (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In File:Convensia Building at Night, Songdo IBD.jpg, File:갯벌로 - panoramio.jpg, File:송도컨벤시아 Convensia Songdo - panoramio.jpg, Posco Tower-Songdo is main object. Although Posco Tower-Songdo is incidental in File:Parsehseoul2.jpg, copyrighted two Jangseung are main object. (Although Jangseung is a traditional Korean totem, recently created Jangseung are protected by copyright.) Although Posco Tower-Songdo is incidental in File:Songdo.JPG, Songdo The Sharp Central Park apartments are copyrighted and main object in this image. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Since I don't know the actual architects who have planned this building, the files can be restored in 2131, 120 years after the completion of the building in 2010, with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 14:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Alarmy states that this picture is in Public Domain. Stock photo https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-brett6-172178431.html?irclickid=UKxxAzUyCxyIT5L3A2TloyoAUkGQcsxlnzycUM0&irgwc=1 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Alarmy states it is PD, uploader tagged it with a PD license. Unless there is reason to think it is not actually free licensed, not a copyright violation. I see no reason to delete. I suggest just edit the source with a link to the Alarmy website. Any counterargument? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, compare [10] from 2012, photographer given there as Mike Quain. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es útil, es una imagen que creé en su día para desarrollar una sección que no tenía mucho sentido. Rhyloo (talk) 20:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Was still in use at es.wikiversity, but only in a kind of draft created by the uploader, who also requested deletion of the file. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date on the pic was 1978, meaning it falls outside of stated "between 1927 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice" rule. 75.133.35.100 20:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with {{PD-US-1978-89}}; no registration found in the Copyright Catalog (1978 to present). --Rosenzweig τ 12:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date of publication is unclear, and thus may not be PD in the US. According to Template:PD-Italy/US, the image has to be published in Italy before 1989 without a copyright notice for it to be PD in US, or published before 1978 without renewal, etc.

I have found some limited information on this image so far, hoping this DR can shed more light on the file. A full version of this image is featured on Page 16 of GUCCI: The Making Of, where it is dated "1970s". This page features the photo, attributing it to "Fotostudio-Caggi", which, as far as I know, is an Italian photo studio. This website says the Zegna Archives holds Fotostudio-Caggi's works, so it might be worth contacting them.

From the information here though, we cannot guarantee the image is in the public domain in the US. Yeeno (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A photo by a studio, taken from an art web site and published in a book like this is most likely not a "simple" photograph as defined per COM:Italy. So it's not even in the PD in Italy, because then a term of 70 years pma applies, which clearly cannot have expired for a 1970s photo. The file can be restored in 2100 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a non-graffiti 2D graphic work whose artists are likely to be still alive. Flickr tags include "donostia" and "san sebastian," meaning this artwork is in Spain. While Spain has adequate freedom of panorama for outdoor works, this artwork appears to be indoors, and therefore fails eligibility for Spanish FOP. The brightness seems to come from the flash of the camera, not outdoor light source.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slashed my suspicion as the metadata indicates flash did not fire. However, the existence of the roof made me doubt of its eligibility for Spanish FOP. If this is at the entrance area or a roofed side of a building, this may be OK. But if indoors and the light source is thanks to a window, then this fails Spanish FOP eligibility. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: it is outside, compare [11]. --Rosenzweig τ 20:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Rajyasabha.svg

The image needs to clearly demonstrate that it is based on public domain image and the components on the left are not simple geometric. The source annotated needs to have an appropriate licence to retain this work.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

>File:Emblem of India.svg</nowiki> is already a Public Domain Artwork. You can see more at source info of file. On right side typography are just simple fonts. Swapnil1101 (talk) 23:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Swapnil1101: Then it needs to be licensed according to its derivation, your licensing is incorrect. The simple geometric is irrelevant when it is trumped by a larger license.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unlike Corporate and Brand Logo, Indian Emblem is Public Domain Artwork and was never copyrighted. It has equivalency to Indian Flag which can be used freely in govt related derivatives expect using it in unlawful or criminal manner. Swapnil1101 (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: licensing issues were apparently fixed. --Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement: It is a fotograph of a drawing which is a copy of a fotograph (cf. here). Copyright holder of the latter: French Interior Ministry/Reuters. --Jamiri 09:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

It concerns a photo of a painting that is publicly and freely accessible in the Abode of Chaos, which defines as a public space. Whether the painting infringes the copyrights associated with the photo seems to me to be a matter between the artist and the copyright owner of the photo. Incidentally, the 'photo' appears to be a frozen image of a television recording. StuivertjeWisselen (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's almost three months ago this deletion request was raised. Can somebody give clarity? StuivertjeWisselen (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I'm not sure if that painting is a derivative of said photograph/TV still, there are differences. But even if it is not, the file is still not ok, because the painting itself is also protected by copyright, and per COM:FOP France, there is no sufficient freedom of panorama in France. Also including the extracted image File:Yvan Colonna painted portrait DDC7903 (cropped).jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NFT art. The end result is apparently algorithmically generated and may be ineligible for copyright, but the source assets might have copyright. I did not see any indication of the claimed CC0 license on source website. MKFI (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, its written in the first bullet point in Summary on the main page (nouns.wtf, if you scroll down, youll be able to see it). 46.253.101.39 15:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, CC0 license confirmed. In use at en:Draft:NounsDAO, doubtful if it's notable beyond that. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map provider unknown, map copyright status uncertain. MKFI (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting ridiculous.
Its a graphic material released in the scientific paper which was publishes under the license I provided, its unclear to me, why anything I upload is marked for deletion without proper due diligence. I uploaded all the files with their true licenses. Its funny that similar map image in Hyalinobatrachium yaku, which was taken from a scientific paper made by the same scientists and was uploaded to wikimedia as "my own works" by some user, which clearly violates the license of the image, yet noone is bothered by that while this file is marked for deletion for "uncertain copyright status"? I filled out the copyright status and provided a source. by that while this file is marked for deletion for "uncertain copyright status"? I filled out the copyright status and provided a source. Maty.eth (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Maty.eth: yes, you did provide a source and the research paper has a CC license, thank you for that. I suspect however that the paper authors might not actually have the copyright for the map base (only for the dots showing the distribution) and have thus unintentionally engaged in COM:License laundering. Most maps are copyrighted. I do apologize if the above sounded harsh. I stumbled on this image when looking for recent drafts but did not notice the other. MKFI (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I searched for a while and found maps of this type, using the same base map, in various journal articles etc. about frogs and reptiles of Ecuador, but not elsewhere. In the absence of some concrete evidence for copyvio, I'll assume that the CC license is valid. --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyright violation. Original artist Zdeněk Miler died in 2011. 88.134.5.96 10:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to log in, this deletion request was filed by me. Also affected is this cropped version: File:Wuppertal_Langerfeld_Krtek.jpg -- Discostu (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FoP-Germany, befindet sich im öffentlichen Raum. behalten --Atamari (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FoP does only count for original works, not for copyright violations. Otherwise, license laundering would be possible by putting copyrighted works in public places on purpose to then be able to upload them to Commons. -- Discostu (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record: this is (a version of) the original drawing by Miler - Discostu (talk) 20:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out what the original painting of Krtek looks like. Now it's obvious, that the painting in Wuppertal isn't a copy of the original but only another painting of cute cartoon mole with a shovel. On the one hand the Wuppertal mole somewhat resembles Krtek, on the other hand it differs in many ways, particularly in the grass, the size of the molehill, the eyebrows and whiskers and the different colors of forehead, face, nose, mouth, hands and feet. -- Ies (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the painting is not an exact copy, but it is obviously a derivative work, the posture and expression are the same. This still makes it probably a copyright violation. Therefore the photo should be deleted according to Commons:Precautionary principle Discostu (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyvio, no further discussion necessary. This is not a painting that looks coincidentally similar to an other without the painter knowing about the original, but a clear copy so copyright applies. Maybe you can lie to yourself about it, but not to a judge. --178.1.43.164 10:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree: This is not a painting that looks coincidentally similar to an other without the painter knowing about the original. It however differs in so many ways (particularly in the grass, the size of the molehill, the eyebrows and whiskers and the different colors of forehead, face, nose, mouth, hands and feet) that it's certainly not a plain copy but a painting for its own. Compare to the paintings of File:IKB 191.jpg, File:Christiane Conrad Ins Freie 150-x140 Öl auf Leinwand.jpg, File:RitaRohlfing red panting 1998.jpg and File:The Dylan Painting.jpg that differ way less without causing a copyright problem. -- Ies (talk) 08:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now. I'm not so sure that German freedom of panorama does apply as it is claimed. This image, as do all others in Category:Wandbemalung Katholische Grundschule Windthorststraße, shows a mural on the side of a school building in Germany. The photos were taken from inside a schoolyard. If this schoolyard is "public" as far as FoP is concerned is questionable. It's not like a public park or cemetery that is intended for everyone, it's intended for the use of the schoolchildren, even if the school (like in this case) is run by the city. There's a German legal phrase, “dem Gemeingebrauch gewidmet”, and apparently that would need to be the case for FoP to apply. This concerns not only this file, but all files in the category, plus, there's another file in there showing this Krtek mole creature. So I've created a new DR for the whole category, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wandbemalung Katholische Grundschule Windthorststraße. --Rosenzweig τ 09:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Низкое качество Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of commercial software. Larryasou (talk) 08:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. No permission. SCP-2000 13:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above. HouseBlaster (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation, screeshot of a software. --Ezarateesteban 21:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://grommus.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7825&page=3
  2. https://www.kavkazr.com/a/naiby-imama-shamil-/28452364.html