Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_15.24.39.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_00.23.35.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Not own work by uploader, as file's copyright belongs to Tolkachev family ( https://historyofyesterday.com/adolf-tolkachev-spy-5f85e000a063 ) Vaishakh1234 (talk) 06:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Created for attack/harassment. Yann (talk) 10:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
file foto ini adalah karya cipta saya yang tidak saya izinkan lagi untuk di publikasikan saat ini. Adi Culture (talk) 12:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 4ing as no source (No source since) but the source is printed on the image it's from an archive. The question is, dated at 1922 and from this archive, can we get a correct license on it and keep it or not? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep I've corrected the date, source, author and license. I've also included the URL to the source page. Please note that the source specifies CC-BY-NC-ND, but this photo is PD in Norway, which I have specified with the apprpriate PD license template. - 4ing (talk) 07:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The media file is fine, but this redirect should be deleted - speediably G6, G7, in fact. Mea culpa. Realised as soon as I'd moved the photo that it was of a different mountain to the one I'd titled the file. The title of this redirect is therefore wrong and should never be used. Grutness (talk) 10:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Speedy close. Next time, just use {{SD|G6}} for such uncontroversial maintenance issues. — Huntster (t @ c) 16:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
chartthaipattana Fewspeed555 (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Personality rights Lotje (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete Clearly someone doxing another person. --RAN (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This is my photo, taken in 2002, used without permission. See https://octopup.org/baja20012002/sanignacio This photo was NOT taken by user Az81964444. Furthermore this is not a photo of "San Jose del cabo church"!!! Bigboojum (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per above, thank you. (Note: User:Az81964444 at en:W has been indefinitely blocked since 2014 for copyright violations. I suggest looking for any remaining supposed "own work" by uploader still on Commons for possible deletion) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I personally uploaded this photo by error. I will re-upload a cropped version of it AllispossibleTech (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as G7. But don't reupload unless you correct the description and license!. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
O arquivo é Copyright da Faro Editorial, conforme o link https://faroeditorial.com.br/produto/os-erros-fatais-do-socialismo/ Porantim (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted COM:CV, unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Leotheis as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: per previous DR Yann (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files in Category:Jefftemp (Camila Merino)
[edit]Two nearly identical smaller photos of Camila Merino, both claiming to be own work by different people, neither with camera metadata, neither to be believed.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - New user upload, no metadata available, both file have similar resolution. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jefftemp ("tourist snaps" or personal pictures)
[edit]'"tourist snaps" or personal pictures' uploaded by Matlin per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&diff=566818733&oldid=566765145
- File:2003 03 28 Szentgotthárd DSCF0002 (51025373677).jpg
- File:2003 03 31 Berlin DSCF0003 (51024543468).jpg
- File:2003 03 31 Berlin DSCF0008 (51025279781).jpg
- File:2003 03 31 Berlin DSCF0087 (51025373897).jpg
- File:2003 03 31 Berlin DSCF0088 (51025373832).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0019 (51025279741).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0024 (51025374227).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0025 (51025374192).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0033 (51024543763).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0034 (51025279601).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0035 (51024543713).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0036 (51025374017).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0081 (51025373987).jpg
- File:2003 04 01 Berlin DSCF0082 (51025373947).jpg
- File:2003 04 18 Robert 009 (51002931976).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jefftemp (TUGAS POSTER KELOMPOK 6)
[edit]Both files are identical, were uploaded by different users as own work, and probably are copyvios as posters uploaded as part of an assignment named "Digital Literation Mid-Term Test".
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jefftemp (Adminpedia files)
[edit]Created for attack/harassment. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adminpedia-image.svg.
- File:Adminpedia-de.svg
- File:Adminpedia-en-2.png
- File:Adminpedia-en.png
- File:Adminpedia-en.svg
- File:Adminpedia-fa-2.svg
- File:Adminpedia-fa.svg
- File:Adminpedia-fi.svg
- File:Adminpedia-image.png
- File:Adminpedia-it.png
- File:Adminpedia.png
- File:Adminpedia-image.svg Added per restoration of this file at COM:UNDEL; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adminpedia-image.svg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and restore the deleted one. This is not attack, but smart criticism. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see the point to have these files here, except for annoying people. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, Also not the first attempt. This isn't an attack it's a form of criticism and admins delete images for myriads of reasons like copyright laws and privacy protection, so pointing out that they delete images isn't an attack, it's literally what we expect of our volunteers with the tools to do so and this might mean that valuable images that are used in high visibility pages also get deleted. You've been trying for around 4 (four) years to get these deleted. Also it's never a good face for any establishment to deny any satire, a realistic way that these images could be used is in an article critical of admin action on Wikimedia websites, something which plenty of articles have been written about (see necessary websites like Wikopediocracy, numerous others like it, Reddit's WikiInAction, among others, as well as a number of Signpost articles about deletion debates, or just in general bad calls by admins when they are being discussed). Any image could be used as an attack image, a Vietnamese-Gernan user I know was constantly attacked with an in scope pornographic image by Musée Annam who was sexually harassing her, but that doesn't make that image less useful for educational purposes, it just means that he is a [insert explicitive here] (not meant as an actual attack, more like a joke, I don't hate him). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: That attempt was just for File:Adminpedia-image.png, and I have precedent this time. The non-svg versions are still low quality, and all are still in poor taste. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Low quality images usually only get deleted if a better quality image of that same image exists, as far as I can find there are no high quality versions of all images and SVG files shouldn't automatically lead to the deletion of non-SVG files, simply because in many cases many websites only allow the usage of JPEG and PNG images. I never said that they weren't in poor taste, but satire almost always is. In fact it's extremely rare to find satire that isn't in poor taste, but I don't think that this should be a reason for deletion onto itself, these images are simply critical of admin action and were used by "anti-establishment" users to express this. Again, I would not prefer to have an establishment that wouldn't tolerate satire of itself, especially mild satire like this. With "mild" I mean that much more condemning images (which could be seen as attack pages) could have been used. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: That attempt was just for File:Adminpedia-image.png, and I have precedent this time. The non-svg versions are still low quality, and all are still in poor taste. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep If one could argue that it was created only to attack/harass and also can only be used for that, then we might have a reason for deletion. As to the first I am not a mind reader, so I will admit that it's possible that they were created only for that purpose, but they can be used to show the power disparity in the project which hosts the website with the number of visitors per day being overshadowed only by Google (I am talking about the project we are on right now). So the question is: "Is criticism of the second most popular project on the web notable enough to have a few files?" I believe that the answer is: "We probably don't have enough". ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete I'm all for intelligent, constructive, criticism -- we could use more of it. But these are not constructive. Simply saying that we delete things does nothing to improve the project -- of course we delete things -- well more than a thousand per day. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Do you know the concept of satire? -- Chaddy (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Isn't all of this falling under Satire? Fleshgrinder (talk) 17:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep For me as a longtime administrator on de-WP this sign is an important part of the daily work and characterizes in an excellent way the sense of administration. The deletion request is ridiculously humorless in the highest way. --He3nry (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep und verbessern statt löschen!!!! --Gardini (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Harharhar, suffering of boredom, lately? Those files exist for some 15 years, and here you come... --Amga (talk) 18:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Simply no -- Chaddy (talk) 19:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Well... Fulfilling a self-fulfilling prophecy? --Björn 19:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Preventing criticism has always been a good idea, right? Halbschwabe (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep irony, sarcasm... are important parts of critics and life --Über-Blick (talk) 19:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Info for transparency: These "keep" votes from people active in German Wikipedia are now coming in because He3nry alerted the administrator's noticeboard there. Well, like He3nry, I'm an admin in German-language Wikipedia, and not only there, but here on Commons too, and I don't feel offended at all by these satirical "anti-admin" banners. This is a way for people who think that admins delete too much to let off some steam, it's entirely harmless. The basic variant File:Adminpedia.png is widely in use on user pages in German-language Wikipedia (per GlobalUsageCount 238 times!), for many years (it was created in 2006 and is basically part of de-WP's folklore, I'd say) and I never heard of an admin there who would have felt harassed by this. So, I'm joining the Keep votes, of course. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)- Keep Nü, es sollte schon bleiben. Etwas Humor und Selbstironie schadet definitiv nicht. Humor ist der Kitt, der Welten verbindet. Viele Grüße --Itti (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with 4nn1l2 - these images are not attack/harassment, although the irony they contain may not sit well with some people. A little off-topic, Debate between deletionism and inclusionism has been going on for over 10 years (even longer) in various projects, which reasonably explains why such images exist - and will also exist in the future. Stang★ 23:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Pages in Category:Jefftemp (Commons ban pages)
[edit]- Category:Banned Commons users
- Commons:BAN
- Template:Banned user
- Template:Banned user/doc
- Template:Db-g5
- Template:Db-meta
These pages were created by Gwilliams124 by fiat against policy, as attempts to change COM:BP without consensus by importing concepts from enwiki. Banning has been considered here for many years to be too bureaucratic, and process creep. See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Gwilliams124. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, no idea why this was allowed in the first place. The English-language Wikipedia's banning policy basically allows any individual admin to ban a user while it requires wide community consensus to unban a user, this basically means that once a user is banned (s)he's banned for life unless they managed to have made enough friends before the ban to vouch for them. Importing these templates and categories legitimises these user-unfriendly processes, though I do think that a number of these templates and categories for globally banned users would be useful, even though I'm personally against the concept of banning a user here locally because of conduct on another website. That aside, there are simply no good reasons to have a template that explicitly links to The English-language Wikipedia's banning policy to be used here, that simply doesn't make sense under any circumstances. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment, I'd like to try to assume good faith here, but I find is awfully suspicious that an account registered only 5 (five) days ago suddenly creates policy pages and imports the English-language Wikipedia's G5 speedy deletion policy and general banning policy without ever engaging any content or policy discussions here. My guess is that this might be trolling. Interestingly enough, at the Wikinews (where they have registered only 8 (eight) days ago they made a number of import sockpuppet templates). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Content intended as vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 16:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jefftemp (oficinadopaisagista)
[edit]These files contain spam for oficinadopaisagista.com.br in their structured data. See also COM:ANU#Spamming using multiple accounts.
- File:Alinhamento e disposição das árvores. Projetos paisagísticos Transplante de árvores.jpg
- File:Projetos paisagísticos Alinhamento e disposição das árvores. Palmeira.jpg
- File:Viveiro de árvores, plantas para paisagismo.jpg
- File:Árvores para paisagismo Palmeira Imperial para paisagismo. Oficina do Paisagista.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Isn't this stretching the definition of "spam" here? Let's say that there's a photographer who own a business and wants that business to be attributed, if we get OTRS / VRT permission and link to their business in the attribution we'd consider that "a donation" and such content is welcomed. Yet if such photographers upload these high quality images themselves here wishing for the same attribution it somehow becomes "spam"?! The Wikimedia Commons contains a lot of images from commercial websites, as long as these images are realistically educationally valuable. Why delete the image when you can simply remove the links? That is even if links for attribution are considered unwanted. If these images were imported from Flickr with the same description nobody would complain. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung These are not links on Flickr that we have merely copied. This is part of a concerted effort directly on Commons to promote that website and sell more trees that has already seen deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. These files are part of a larger group of files (mostly already deleted) that were uploaded in a multi-user effort that is clearly for the purpose of advertising. The links to a commercial website are not part of the file sourcing. They are embedded as part of descriptive text such as "Plant nursery specializing in large trees, buy trees". File names in some cases are promotional text plus the company name. I don't think the nominator is stretching the definition of spam at all here. In addition, some of the deleted uploads from this group were identical to images found on other websites and mostly likely falsely claimed as own work. Under these circumstances, Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle may apply with regard to sourcing/attribution. If these images are kept, at minimum the promotional links should be removed from the structured data. Marbletan (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
The video is not released under CC-BY. Billytanghh (talk) 21:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I made the mistake so I have requested to speedy delete it under COM:CSD#G7. Sun8908 (talk) 03:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
old logo which has been replaced by a new one https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bionade#/media/Datei:BN_2018.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by RitaRikscha (talk • contribs) 07:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 08:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Old logos are useful for describing the history of a brand, a we generally keep them if there are no other reasons to delete. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Dieses Logo ist nicht mehr aktuell und wird von BIONADE auch nicht mehr genutzt. Eine weitere Verbreitung soll daher verhindert werden. Balli91 (talk) 11:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Noch immer kein valider Grund angegeben. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep: Not in use. --Achim55 (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. We keep older versions of Logos to see / show the development of the brand. --Emha (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 02:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faranhasani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:SCOPE, personal photos not used on Wikipedia
- File:My life is very good.jpg
- File:Life is nice.jpg
- File:( born 26-04-2000) is an Iranian Actor and Singer..jpg
- File:Faranhasani, a Young Iranian Actor, Entrepreneur and Digital Influencer---- ( born 26-04-2000) is an Iranian Actor and Singer.--.webp
- File:Faranhasani in motel gho city.webp
- File:Make your voice heard by the people of the world, you are the best Faran Hassani.jpg
- File:Be your own best faranhasan.jpg
- File:Faran Hasani is one of the most prominent artists and singers in Iran who has made a lot of noise.---.jpg
- File:Join of life.jpg
_is_an_Iranian_Actor_and_Singer..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_is_an_Iranian_Actor_and_Singer.--.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 21:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Agree Delete --JopkeB (talk) 16:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faranhasani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to any wm project.
- File:Faranhasani17.jpg
- File:Faranhasanii21.jpg
- File:Faranhasani16.jpg
- File:Faranhasani15.jpg
- File:Faranhasani14.jpg
- File:Faranhasani123.jpg
- File:Faranhasani13.jpg
- File:Faranhasani11.jpg
- File:Faranhasanix.jpg
- File:Faranhasani22.jpg
- File:Faranhasanic.jpg
- File:Faranhasaniv.jpg
- File:Faranhasanib.jpg
- File:Faranhasanin.jpg
- File:Faranhasanim.jpg
- File:Faranhasani9.jpg
- File:Faranhasani8.jpg
- File:Faranhasani7.jpg
- File:Faranhasani6.jpg
- File:Faranhasani5.jpg
- File:Faranhasani4.jpg
- File:Faranhasani3.jpg
- File:Faranhasani12.jpg
- File:Faranhasanisinger.jpg
- File:Faranhasanimusic.jpg
- File:Faranhasani.webp
- File:Faranhasaniii.jpg
- File:Faranhasanii.jpg
- File:Faranhasani.jpg
- File:My life is very good.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 10:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Agree Delete --JopkeB (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, it's not (own work) and the uploader says he take this photo from another person. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 16:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022011610003031 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 17:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:حضرة الشيخ شمس الدين محمد نهرو الكسنزان.jpg” under ticket:2022011610003031. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Permission recieved. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Erroneous first step. Vortioxetine (talk) 16:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader. --Leyo 20:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nitinkamble786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted film posters, all need permission
- File:Sattya2.jpg
- File:Sattya1.jpg
- File:Sattya.jpg
- File:Prem yogayog1.jpg
- File:Prem yogayog 2.jpg
- File:Ladtar.jpg
- File:Coffee7.jpg
- File:Dho Dho Pawsatli One day Match.jpg
- File:BAILA HO BAYKOLA KHO.jpg
- File:Chandrakala.jpg
- File:Prem yogayog.jpg
- File:Chandrakala Marathi Film.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thewarrior1974 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All credited to Isle of Man Green Party but by a variety of photographers. We need OTRS
- File:Lamara Craine St Marks.jpg
- File:Falk Horning balls.jpg
- File:Falk Horning recycling.jpg
- File:Tynwald Climate Presentation.jpg
- File:Andrew Langan Newton Tynwald Day.jpg
- File:Phil Matthews polar bear.jpg
- File:Lamara Craine Die In Tynwald.jpg
- File:Falk Horning Bristol.jpg
- File:Daniel Webb Election.jpg
- File:Falk Horning Election.jpg
- File:Andrew Langan Newton with Green Leaders.jpg
- File:Bob Comish Manx Hemp.jpg
- File:Andrew Langan Newton Protest Tynwald.jpg
- File:Polar Phil.jpg
- File:PAG presentation.jpg
- File:Green Leaders.jpg
- File:Caroline Lucas bristol.jpg
- File:Daniel Webb.jpg
- File:2020 11 suit election campaign 3.jpg
- File:Recycling iom.jpg
- File:Tynwald Day.jpg
- File:Franco election.jpg
- File:Leo Cussons.jpg
- File:Falk Horning.jpg
- File:Phil Matthews 2.jpg
- File:Andrew Bentley 2.jpg
- File:Lamara Craine.jpg
- File:Andrew+Jessop+Profile+2021.jpg
- File:Andrew Langan Newton.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarcIbañez04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:Captura 1.24.png
- File:Captura 1.23.png
- File:Captura 1.22.png
- File:Captura 1.21.png
- File:Captura 1.20.png
- File:Captura 1.19.png
- File:Captura 1.18.jpg
- File:Captura 1.17.jpg
- File:Captura 1.16.jpg
- File:Captura 1.15.jpg
- File:Captura1.14.png
- File:Captura1.13.png
- File:Captura1.12.png
- File:Captura1.11.png
- File:Captura1.10.png
- File:Captura1.9.png
- File:Captura1.8.png
- File:Captura1.7.png
- File:Captura1.6.png
- File:Captura1.5.png
- File:Captura1.4.png
- File:Captura1.3.png
- File:Captura2.png
- File:1captura.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
See EXIF: Author joelle gauvreau; Copyright holder joelle@jgphoto.ca ≠ uploader Zulipatatsqui. Also COM:NOTHOST - personal image of non-contributor. Эlcobbola talk 20:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality orphaned structural formulas in Category:Files uploaded by あら金
[edit]These structural formulas are all of poor quality. Moreover, they are orphaned, i.e. replaced by better alternatives.
- File:代置命名法例.jpg
- File:幾何異性体 単環cis-trans.jpg
- File:幾何異性体 縮合環cis-trans.jpg
- File:幾何異性体cis-trans.jpg
- File:幾何異性体syn-anti.jpg
- File:接合命名法例.jpg
- File:構造 Uretane構造.png
- File:構造式 2-butene.png
- File:構造式 aceticanhydride.png
- File:構造式 Acyclovir.png
- File:構造式 Allethrin.png
- File:構造式 allocinnamic acid.png
- File:構造式 alpha-carotene.png
- File:構造式 Archidonic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Aspartame.png
- File:構造式 Atropine.png
- File:構造式 beta thujone.png
- File:構造式 Canthaxanthin.png
- File:構造式 Capsaicin.png
- File:構造式 Carvone.png
- File:構造式 Ceftazidime.png
- File:構造式 Chlorpromazine.PNG
- File:構造式 Ciguatoxin.PNG
- File:構造式 Cinnamic acid.png
- File:構造式 Clupanodonic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Crotonic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 cyclobutane.PNG
- File:構造式 Cyclopentane.png
- File:構造式 Cyclophosphamide.png
- File:構造式 d-borneol.PNG
- File:構造式 Dimethylformamide.png
- File:構造式 Dioxin化合物.PNG
- File:構造式 Dioxin化合物V2.PNG
- File:構造式 Docosahexaenoic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Eicosapentaenoic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Elaidic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 epoxy resin prepolymer.png
- File:構造式 Epsilon-carotene.png
- File:構造式 Erucic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Ethanol.png
- File:構造式 Fucoxanthin.png
- File:構造式 Gadoleic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Geraniol.png
- File:構造式 iso-butene.png
- File:構造式 Juvenile hormone.png
- File:構造式 Kainic Acid.png
- File:構造式 Kojic acid.PNG
- File:構造式 L-carnitine.png
- File:構造式 Linoleic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Linolenic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Lutein.png
- File:構造式 lycopene.png
- File:構造式 Methocathinone.png
- File:構造式 Methotrexate.png
- File:構造式 Muscone.PNG
- File:構造式 Myristoleic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Nervonic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Oleic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Orotic acid.png
- File:構造式 Oxytocin.PNG
- File:構造式 Palmitoleic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Phthalimide.png
- File:構造式 polypropylene.png
- File:構造式 Pseudoephedrine.png
- File:構造式 Pyrethrin.png
- File:構造式 Quinic acid.PNG
- File:構造式 S8硫黄V2.PNG
- File:構造式 Saxitoxin.PNG
- File:構造式 Sucralose.png
- File:構造式 tetraphosphorus decaoxide.png
- File:構造式 Thionyl chloride.png
- File:構造式 Thiopental sodium.png
- File:構造式 Vaccenic Acid.PNG
- File:構造式 Vindesine.png
- File:構造式 Zanamivir.png
- File:構造式 アクリロニトリル.PNG
- File:構造式 ジチオン酸.PNG
- File:構造式 ソルビン酸.png
- File:構造式 チクロ.PNG
- File:構造式 ニ硫酸.PNG
- File:構造式 ペルオキソ一硫酸.PNG
- File:構造式 ペルオキソ二硫酸.PNG
- File:構造式 ポリチオン酸.PNG
- File:構造式 亜ジチオン酸.PNG
- File:構造式 亜硫酸.PNG
- File:構造式gamma-carotene.png
- File:説明 ベンゼン図1.PNG
- File:説明 化学式1.png
- File:説明図 エチゾラム構造相関.png
- File:説明図 カロテノイド生合成経路.png
- File:説明図 シクロヘキサン1.png
- File:遷移状態SN1.jpg
- File:遷移状態SN2.jpg
Leyo 20:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. Indeed, we don't need unused poor things when we have better things. DMacks (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete All those files are low-quality version of simple chemical structures or equations. Most of them are unused or replaced by better versions. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trilochan Netralaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. Likely many are not own works (subject in some is same as uploader. and inconsistent styles and EXIF data) and uploaded for promotional purposes.
- File:Remote Camp Program by Trillochan Netralaya1.JPG
- File:Remote Camp Program by Trillochan Netralaya.JPG
- File:Program by Trillochan Netralaya.JPG
- File:Program by Trillochan Netralaya 1.JPG
- File:ASHA training by Trillochan Netralaya 1.JPG
- File:ASHA training by Trillochan Netralaya.JPG
- File:ASHA training by Trillochan Netralaya 3.JPG
- File:Eye Camp Nuapada by Trillochan Netralaya.jpg
- File:Trillochan Netralaya Program.jpg
- File:Opening Ceremony by Gracious Doners & Contributers at Trillochan Netralaya.JPG
- File:Eye Operation at Trilochan Netralaya.JPG
- File:Dr. Shiva Prasad Sahoo doing eye operation.JPG
- File:Dr. Shiva Prasad Sahoo Receiving Award.JPG
- File:Dr. Shiva Prasad Sahoo.JPG
- File:Dr. Shiva Prasad Sahoo in a photo session at K S Sanjeevi Award by Ekam Foundation.JPG
- File:Dr. Shiva Prasad Sahoo receiving K S Sanjeevi Award by Ekam Foundation.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yojosealejandro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: web-size images with transmission code or inconsistent EXIF data. Unreliable uploader.
- File:Ovación del Congreso en Pleno 20 julio 2016.jpg
- File:Senado convenio Universidad Nacional.jpg
- File:Velasco Presidente Senado 2015.jpg
- File:Ley actores.jpg
- File:Minutos celular.jpg
- File:Reunión de resguardos indígenas.jpg
- File:Velasco tablets.jpg
- File:Cierre de legislatura 20 julio 2016.jpg
- File:Estudiantes de CAEL .jpg
- File:Plenaria de Senado.jpg
- File:Senador Velasco, Minjusticia y Minsalud.jpg
- File:Pavimentación Silvia Totoró.jpg
- File:Comisión de Senadores.jpg
- File:Capacitación Fonpet en Minhacienda.jpg
- File:Pueblo Misak en Bogotá .jpg
- File:Asoinca.jpg
- File:Ley de Próceres (Popayán).jpg
- File:Comisión Segunda de Senado.jpg
- File:Callcenter Millenium en Popayán.jpg
- File:Centro textil en Popayán.jpg
- File:Velasco transparencia.jpg
- File:Luis Fernando Velasco Chaves.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Salima-t29 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Cfg bank valeurs.png
- File:Cfg group -.png
- File:CFG Group.png
- File:CFG Group first logo.png
- File:Valeurs.png
- File:Logo CFGBank.png
- File:Logo CFG Bank.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
This user has uploaded numerous photos of French nobles that were proven to be from various professional photographers and have already been deleted (there is a strong overlap in content with User:DyNosTooo, who also uploaded images of the House of Orleans from Getty Images and the like). The attached images, without meaningful Exif data, of different, partly very low resolution, and from different decades are in all probability not the work of the uploader.
- File:Jean III d'Orléans.png
- File:Jean d'Orléans duc de Guise et son fils.png
- File:Jean d'Orléans duc de Guise jeune.png
- File:François d'Orléans (1961-2017).png
- File:Thibaut d'orléans.png
- File:François duc d'Orléans.jpg
- File:Isabelle d'Orléans (1932).jpg
- File:Jean IV d'Orléans comte de Paris.png
- File:Le comte de Paris avec deux de ses petits-enfants.png
- File:Mariage du comte et de la comtesse de Paris.png
- File:La famille du comte de Paris.png
- File:Le comte de Paris et ses enfants.png
- File:Henri d'Orléans jeune.png
- File:La famille d'Orléans (1998).png
- File:Jean duc de Guise, Henri comte de Paris, Henri comte de Clermont.png
- File:Henri VI d'Orléans comte de Paris.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Polarlys (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Not own work: [1] Gyrostat (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:08, 19 January 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Leanizis --Krdbot 08:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim: [2] Gyrostat (talk) 20:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:08, 19 January 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Leanizis --Krdbot 08:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious ownership claim: [3] Gyrostat (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:08, 19 January 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Leanizis --Krdbot 08:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Dubious ownership claim: http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/y-a-85-ans-mariage-comte-de-comtesse-de-paris-a-palerme/ Gyrostat (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:08, 19 January 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Leanizis --Krdbot 08:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright 2804:3434:C015:135D:75CB:91E9:86C3:7FD5 02:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
"jean" ? 191.119.31.217 02:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self-portrait of a Remitbuber sock-puppet. MexTDT (talk) 06:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 12:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE pic of a non-notable individual (ro:Mihaela Mitroi) Gikü (talk) 12:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE pic of a non-notable individual (ro:Igor Dublenco) Gikü (talk) 12:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope, poor quality Jan Myšák (talk) 14:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Claudia Santos Castro (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). Out of scope.
JopkeB (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 14:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused bitmap image with vector version available. Leonel Sohns 15:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ColonelSands4742 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to any wm projects.
- File:Joseph Reaves Gaming in Car.jpg
- File:Joseph Reaves Gaming with Hoodie.jpg
- File:Joseph Reaves Gaming on a Dryer.jpg
- File:Joseph Reaves Gaming with Headset.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 15:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Per COM:F10. 19:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC) Yeeno (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
_15.24.39.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_15.24.39.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
_15.24.39.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
_15.24.39.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Yunussanli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images by non contributor, out of scope.
- File:YuNusşanlı.jpg
- File:Yunusşanlı (2).jpg
- File:Yunus--şanlı.jpg
- File:Yunus-şanlı-yazar.jpg
- File:Yunus-şanlı.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, no description, no categorization. Xocolatl (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Venant Mwavucha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons isn't social media, small images (all same) of person not notable.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Commons is not photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image containing derivative work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Srinibash123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook or smaller images of non-notable individuals, may be copyvios and likely out of scope.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event/people, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, and low-res diagram without context, out of scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused text images, should be in wiki-markup if needed, and low-res diagram without context, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anarchyvarius (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 20:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab thumbnail from an unknown source, missing essential source info. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Previously published, needs COM:VRT. And tiny/burry, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FEDERACIONASPA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Corporate logo, no educational value, out of scope. One is used on userpage of user without any meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.
- File:Astm D6286 Well-Drilling Selection Guide.jpg
- File:Astm D6286 ; table Well-Drilling Selection Guide.jpg
- File:ASTM D6169 table (1) Soil and Rock ; General Sample-Type Requirements for Measurement of phyiscal and chemical properties.jpg
_Soil_and_Rock_;_General_Sample-Type_Requirements_for_Measurement_of_phyiscal_and_chemical_properties.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused text image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram with little context, little educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EL INICIO DE 1 NEW ERA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mashasexplique
[edit]Personal photos uploaded by nonuser
Krok6kola (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused user logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo and corporate promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:ASTPP Official.png
- File:ASTPP Detailed features.png
- File:ASTPP Components.png
- File:ASTPP Architecture.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michaelhedelund (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:IRP Logo black no line.png
- File:IRP Logo black no line 75x120px.png
- File:IRP Logo black web.png
mattbr 21:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused self-made logo. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing permission ManuRoquette (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Copyright violation : [4] (extrait instagram de l'intéressée) repris sur [5] (image 10/12). --Lagribouille (talk) 02:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ayan184 (talk) 04:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader's request within 7 days of upload. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Cropped version of a copyrighted image found here. Highly unlikely that it is the uploader's own work, so the licensing tag is invalid and misleading. The uploader has conveniently cropped the image to remove the copyright marking. FyzixFighter (talk) 06:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Billinghurst at 01:19, 23 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: --Krdbot 07:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdul Rivai Ras (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official photos, unlikely to be own work
Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nindya Ayu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Offical photos, not own work as claimed
- File:Laksma TNI Dr. Ir. Abdul Rivai Ras, M.M., M.S., M.S.i.jpg
- File:Laksma TNI Abdul Rivai Ras.jpg
- File:Commodore Abdul Rivai Ras.jpg
- File:Laksma TNI Dr. Ir. Abdul Rivai Ras, M.M., M.S., M.Si.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Diagrama de Nyquist del circuito.png
- File:Diagrama de Bode.png
- File:Carta de Nichols.png
- File:Respuesta escalón.png
- File:Grafica de polos y ceros.png
- File:Circuito-RLC.jpg
- File:Captura de Pantalla 2020-07-22 a la(s) 10.12.55 a.m.png
_10.12.55_a.m.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
File contains violation of en:Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons - has a text "A person ditches friends and relatives for money."
Photo has no use in Wikimedia projects or any educational value. ·Carn 09:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Low quality Xocolatl (talk) 17:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio as the file has no sufficient proof of its license. 121.155.145.26 06:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rohalamin as Dw no source since (dw no source since) - although the file is sourced to Panoramio and confirmed license check was done. Please explain why this image was nominated? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz, Morning, It's not the image. The problem is the sculpture. If you take a look here, You can see this paragraph "In either case, unless the underlying work is in the public domain or there is evidence that the underlying work has been freely licensed for reuse (for example, under an appropriate Creative Commons license), the original creator of the work must explicitly authorize the copy/ derivative work before it can be uploaded to Commons.
- In summary: you cannot trace someone else's copyrighted creative drawing and upload that tracing to Commons under a new, free license because a tracing is a copy without new creative content; likewise, you cannot make a movie version of a book you just read without the permission of the author, even if you added substantial creative new material to the storyline, because the movie requires the original book author's permission— if such permission were obtained, however, the movie would likely then be considered a derivative work entitled to its own novel copyright protection. "Derivative", in this sense, does not simply mean "derived from", it means, "derived from and including new creative content which is entitled to a new copyright."''". And also if you again take a look here, You can see this paragraph "According to article 2 of copyright law of Iran (passed on January 1, 1970) architectural works, designs, sketches and buildings and sculptures of all types are protected by copyright law.". Thus it doesn't matter that the file is sourced to Panoramio and confirmed license check was done. This file should be deleted. Rohalamin (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Rohalamin: thank you for the clarity. This is a situation where sending it to deletion with an explanation would have gotten faster service! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no FOP in Iran. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
The file is not lower than threshold of originality. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 00:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- COM:TOO Laos is unknown but I think that it can be assumed that this logo is above it.Jonteemil (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Very small, low quality, probably not an own work, the subject of the photo is unclear. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Recently published book's cover, probably copyrighted. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Flag of supposed micronation inside Denmark, "smallest souvereign state in the world" having six inhabitants Enyavar (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map of supposed micronation inside Denmark, "smallest souvereign state in the world" having six inhabitants Enyavar (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Flag of supposed micronation. Author also "founded" the micronations of Slettebakken and Shark Enyavar (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
If the date (2008) is correct, there is no way the license is also correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We fix noob mistakes PD-Hungary. --RAN (talk) 06:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and RAN: Please be sure to fix category, author and description while you are at it, because right now we have a halftoned image dated 2008 and it can't be PD-Hungary with that information. Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- If you have the time and ability to recognize that a man who died in 1947 could not have a photo taken in 2008, you could have used the time and ability to fix the date yourself. --RAN (talk) 19:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and RAN: There is insufficient information for me to proceed and much else for me to do here. You seem to know more about it, please add the data. The game here is to try to keep the images, not score points. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry! I just see so many deletions that could be fixed with simple changes. Every new person uploading chooses the default settings, because our instructions are ambiguous. Are you asking for the date the original image was taken, the date it was published in the newspaper, or the date the image was scanned creating the derivative work. Most people choose the default settings. --RAN (talk) 20:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and RAN: We need who took the photo and/or where was the photo published, the real date of original publication. If that's all ok, the current scan date and uploader can get credit too, but the first thing that has to be right is the original copyright supporting data. Thank you for staying on top of it! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: There is still insufficient information to know if the conditions set in the PD-Hungary license are met. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
The source PDF is CC BY-NC-ND, which is not acceptable on commons, and moreover this is a derived work when the source license is ND. Fukumoto (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp).
Obviously it's doubtful that OP painted this image. It appears to be PD-old/PD-art, but I can't find any details about any source image - a title, a painter, a date, an era even. I cannot for the life of me find an original source for the digital image, and I have tried every reverse image search technique that I can. At this point I consider it impossible to verify if it actually is PD-old - for all we know this is a detailed replica-in-style created in the modern era. Since background detail is unavailable, the only option is to delete as unverifiable. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
No, this is not the uploader's own work. This is a photograph from the Philadelphia Museum of Art. (see original here.) It is copyvio. Mabalu (talk) 02:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Almost certainly not "own work" - looks like the first image to this article with the pink background knocked out. It is not free-use. Mabalu (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - Uploader also claims that this is taken from the Met exhibition. They also uploaded another file showing this dress actually on display in the Met exhibition, File:Swan_Dress.jpg which is clearly on a different mannequin to that in the "edited" photo. It's not implausible that File:Swan_Dress.jpg was taken by the uploader (as there are quite a lot of similar photos taken by different visitors floating around out there, some VERY similar but with the text behind the mannequin differently aligned) but it is disingenuous to claim that File:Swan Dress Edited.jpg is also from the exhibition when it is clearly on a different mannequin. Mabalu (talk) 02:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted screenshot of a video game Adamant1 (talk) 02:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Came from film maker 191.119.31.217 02:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 191.119.31.217 02:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Description Azərbaycanca: 18 September 2020 191.119.31.217 02:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Previously published: a man in nangli wazidpur in tradinal dress 191.119.31.217 02:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Own work no 191.119.31.217 02:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 191.119.31.217 03:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Own work 191.119.31.217 03:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://www.masteranimator.com/bio.html. Aesthetic Writer (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: this website is not the source, but the image was published online as early as 2008 (per TinEye). Certainly not own work, missing original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Not likely to be own work. Remitbuber sock-puppet. MexTDT (talk) 06:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: https://cadenaser.com/emisora/2019/06/11/ser_ciudad_real/1560252818_019136.html. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Prayer plaques showing probably recently-composed prayers
[edit]Images show two subjects, which are plaques showing recent Tagalog prayers, one from 1999 and one from 2012. Prayers are free to use for non-commercial uses by the church and their parishioners, but these are not free to be sold commercially, against COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses and the rule at COM:Derivative works. Commons requires underlying works to be freely-usable even for commercial purposes. Prayers are copyrightable by virtue of civil laws, which Commons adheres (canon law is irrelevant as we are concerned on free distribution in commercial media outside the church realm). This is a form of literary work, but there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Needs commercial license from the authors of these prayers, for the 2012 one likely alive, for the 1999 one if already dead, heirs of the author of the prayer.
- File:4471Immaculate Conception Parish Church Santa Maria 29.jpg
- File:8234Immaculate Conception Parish Church Santa Maria, Bulacan 27.jpg
- File:9884Immaculate Conception Parish Church Santa Maria Bulacan 08.jpg
- File:9884Immaculate Conception Parish Church Santa Maria Bulacan 09.jpg
- File:JfImmaculateConceptionChurch9111SantaMariaBulacanfvf 01.JPG
- File:Porta Sancta of the Minor Basilica of La Purísima Concepción 09.jpg
- File:Porta Sancta of the Minor Basilica of La Purísima Concepción 10.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- There are over 500 Jubilee Churches and in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Malolos Bulacan Malolos, 30 Churches]: all of these churches, upon opening of the Porta Sancta, are issued and exhibited the a) Decretum and placed permanently are the b) Church commemmorative plaque and Church historical markers; in these subject a) Porta Sancta of the Minor Basilica of La Purísima Concepción 09.jpg and b) Porta Sancta of the Minor Basilica of La Purísima Concepción 10.jpg they were solemnly placed thereat like or similarly in the 30 Bulacan Porta Sancta; a cursory perusal or even close examination of the wordings, one cannot see any prayer to any saint or God therein, but just the historical compositions, dates, place, and of course the Bishop, liturgist and Vicar general's signatures. sincerelyFBenjr123 (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC). FBenjr123 (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @FBenjr123 if it isn't a prayer, how come there is "Sa Ngalan ng Ama, ng Anak, at ng Espirito Santo" ("In the Name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit") as introductory passage? But whether if the two plaques show prayer or not, the written prose is copyrightable. As long as the authors put sufficient effort, whether the indicated prose is flowery or not. And you cannot use the logical fallacy of "OTHER STUFF EXISTS"; the English article you pointed out contains images of clearly public domain literary works. But these two plaques show recent literary works from 1999 and 2012. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- There are over 500 Jubilee Churches and in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Malolos Bulacan Malolos, 30 Churches]: all of these churches, upon opening of the Porta Sancta, are issued and exhibited the a) Decretum and placed permanently are the b) Church commemmorative plaque and Church historical markers; in these subject a) Porta Sancta of the Minor Basilica of La Purísima Concepción 09.jpg and b) Porta Sancta of the Minor Basilica of La Purísima Concepción 10.jpg they were solemnly placed thereat like or similarly in the 30 Bulacan Porta Sancta; a cursory perusal or even close examination of the wordings, one cannot see any prayer to any saint or God therein, but just the historical compositions, dates, place, and of course the Bishop, liturgist and Vicar general's signatures. sincerelyFBenjr123 (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC). FBenjr123 (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted banner
[edit]
This one is a suspected recent banner. Needs COM:VRTS permission of commercial license from the graphics artists who created this. Derivative work copyright violation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 07:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. One is clearly a professional photo with no exif, other is from a news conference, also with no exif. PCP. Only uploads by this new user
Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, the wreck of en:USS Johnston (DD-557) is 6 km below surface. This might actually be a work of User:Vlvescovo. MKFI (talk) 09:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This is apparently a scan of a 1970 German postcard. It is claimed to be {{Copyrighted free use}}, but I don't see any rationale at all why that should be the case, and I doubt that it is true. The file should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle unless conclusively shown to be under a free license (or in the PD, but that seems rather unlikely for a 1970 German work). Rosenzweig τ 09:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photos of a photos. No original authors or permission.
- File:Hidrocentrali I Dikances – Dragash Kosove 2.jpg
- File:Hidrocentrali I Dikances – Dragash Kosove.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by B.Lukashyk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Коновальця рудницького львів.jpg
- File:Брістоль7.jpg
- File:Брістьоль 2.jpg
- File:Готель центральний.jpg
- File:Гранд готель.jpg
- File:Готель вікторія.jpg
- File:Савой2.jpg
- File:Контіненталь та грюнберг.jpg
- File:Plac7.jpg
- File:Народна гостинниця львів.jpg
- File:Narodna hostynnycia.jpg
- File:George restaurant.jpg
- File:Kawiarnia centralna.jpg
- File:De-la-paix.jpg
- File:Lwow57.jpg
- File:Жорж готель львів.jpg
- File:Готель жорж.jpg
- File:Готель жорж вхід7.jpg
- File:Готель краківський.jpg
- File:Cbcd08e9063e4d6f0b6729e91c26f9143febd142a77f6d6de7b63965775ead80 mid.jpg
- File:Juliusz meinl.jpg
- File:Пивна пл.осмомисла.jpg
- File:Готель еліт.jpg
- File:Готель асторія.jpg
- This one is in PD according to the source: https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/jednostka/-/jednostka/5966922/obiekty/245034#opis_obiektu Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Starka-lwow.jpg
- File:6317fb57285706fd46a90adb4ac4c0ed6172b55f8065353918920008218bb65f mid.jpg
- File:Готель Австрія (Львів), 1911 рік.jpg
- File:Готель Європейський, Львів.png
- File:Grand hotel Lviv.png
- File:Готель ЖОРЖ Львів.png
,_1911_%D1%80%D1%96%D0%BA.jpg){kind=link}
- This one is in PD according to the source: https://polona.pl/item/lwow-hotel-georega,NTkwMDI1NA/0/#info:metadata Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- This one is in PD according to the source: https://polona.pl/item/lwow-hotel-george-lemberg,MTE3NDgwNQ/0/#info:metadata Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Готель англійський, до 1889 року.png
- File:Готель Метрополь львів 1894.jpg
- File:Hotel Krakowski Lwow.jpg
- File:54 full cut.jpg
- File:Готель Англійський (Львів).jpg
- File:Готель Імперіал, Львів.jpg
- File:Sstrilciv 8.jpg
- File:Новояворівськ польська карта.jpg
- File:Рішення перейменування вулиці Бандери Львів.pg.jpg
- File:Рішення перейменування вулиць1.jpg
- File:Бірки1910.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- In general: all the pictures were made in Lviv. This city belonged to Poland from 1918 to 1939. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland, all Polish photographs of undisclosed authorship made before 1952 are in public domain since 10 years after they are taken (tag {{PD-Polish}}). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Polish or PD-UA-exempt. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by B.Lukashyk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from the web, not own works, unclear copyright status
- File:Пасажири рейсу Львів-Варшава.jpg
- File:Saksaganskogo.jpg
- File:Іван Франко у поважному віці.jpg
- File:Січові стрільці.jpg
- File:39997 430-Colorized.jpg
- File:39997 26-Colorized.jpg
- File:39997 696-Colorized.jpg
- File:29702976-Colorized (2).jpg
- File:39997 481-Colorized.jpg
- File:Введений в експлуатацію будинок.jpg
- File:Знесений будинок.jpg
- File:Ліворуч будинок, що знесли для спорудження нового.jpg
- File:Будівельні роботи призупинені через вторгнення російських військ.jpg
- File:Початковий ескіз планування типового поверху.jpg
- File:Ситуативний план забудови.jpg
- File:1920 карта вірменська.jpg
- File:Театральна, 1802.jpg
- File:Ланге штрассе (вул. Театральна) 1777 рік.jpg
- File:Міст хабарище3.jpg
- File:Міст хабарище.jpg
- File:Хабарище міст.jpg
- File:Костивята на карті фон міга.jpg
- File:Мостиська на карті фон міга.jpg
- File:Хабарище на карті Генштабу СРСР.jpg
- File:Хабарище на американській карті.jpg
- File:Хабарище на німецькій військовій карті 1941 року.jpg
- File:Хабарище на адміністративній карті Польщі 1937 року.jpg
- File:Хабарище на карті Червоної армії 1935 року (2 км).jpg
- File:Хабарище на польській тактичній карті західної України 1933 року.jpg
- File:Двохверсітвка півночі України 1930.jpg
- File:Teatralna str Lviv.jpg
- File:Дубно 1943 2.jpg
- File:Нотаріус К.Сокіл Львів 1938 рік.jpg
- File:Площа Міцкевича2.jpg
- File:Площа Міцкевича22.jpg
- File:Площа Марійська (Міцкевича).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1777_%D1%80%D1%96%D0%BA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Xunks (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have kept the last 3 in the list according to {{PD-Polish}}. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 3 kept per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by B.Lukashyk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works as claimed, copyright status to be clarified.
- File:1920 карта театральна.jpg
- File:1920 карта вірменська1.jpg
- File:Банк ZIBA.jpg
- File:Народна гостиниця.jpg
- File:Оголошення Діло.jpg
Xunks (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Russia or PD-Ukraine, all images are 1920 or prior. --RAN (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and partly RAN: The first two are drawings of city plans, with colors in pencil. Usually such drawings mention an author at the bottom left side of the drawing, but these image are a cut-out of the original. So per COM:PRP we must assume the drawings are not anonymous and possibly still copyrighted. When more than 120 years old (including the colored sections, which are made at an unknown date) the images can be undeleted.
File:Банк ZIBA.jpg is showing a contact print of a photo of 1926. It is not shown if this has been published anonymously. So possibly still copyrighted.
File:Народна гостиниця.jpg and File:Оголошення Діло.jpg are showing anonymous newspaper prints from 1917. These are per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ukraine now in PD and can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Het is niet eigen werk Zennalorenzo (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per EXIF data: Author Amsterdam Museum; Monique Vermeulen. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Niet eigen werk Zennalorenzo (talk) 10:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per EXIF data: Author Amsterdam Museum; Monique Vermeulen. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This was intended as a preview in the original image's talk page. Given that no one has complained, I plan to merge this image with the original. Parodper (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Incorrect pronunciation, so not reasonably useful for any project. Replaceable by File:LL-Q1860 (eng)-Back ache-whilst.wav. — SGconlaw (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use at pl.wiktionary (probably the correct pronunciation for Polish). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @P199: I had removed it from pl.wiktionary but it was wrongly added back by a bot. The pl.wiktionary entry is of the English and not a Polish word, so it is an incorrect pronunciation. As long as the file remains undeleted, bots will keep adding them to entries. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Reopening this deletion request. The file contains an incorrect pronunciation and is thus not reasonably useful for any project. I have removed it from places where it is used, but so long as the file remains undeleted it seems that bots keep re-adding it to entries. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- After this edition the bot will no longer add it. Olaf (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Olaf: ah, thanks! — SGconlaw (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @SGconlaw now that the bot issue is resolved, do you still think this file should be deleted? Does it have any potential educational purpose? -M.nelson (talk) 21:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- @M.nelson: yes, the file should still be deleted. It is a completely incorrect pronunciation that no one uses. — SGconlaw (talk) 21:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I agree with Deletion as out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I agree with
- @M.nelson: yes, the file should still be deleted. It is a completely incorrect pronunciation that no one uses. — SGconlaw (talk) 21:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope, not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Better version exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Giuse_Tr%E1%BB%8Bnh_Ch%C3%ADnh_Tr%E1%BB%B1c.svg Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 11:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
As the uploader mentioned (in Hebrew), the picture was taken from this singer's YouTube channel. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note.. Ldorfman (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:600px White diagonal divided right HEX-E60607 Black.svg Threecharlie (talk) 11:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Better version exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Anton_Stres.svg Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 12:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
obviously a scan or a photo of a physical photo. No proof of permission was presented. Gikü (talk) 12:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, not 2021. Image is widely published, I couldn't find original source. One example: http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=503083 MKFI (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Uploader is globally locked as spam-only account. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a modified version of https://unsplash.com/photos/apcUIqOPEIo, the original is published in Unsplash after the licensing change (see {{Unsplash}}). MKFI (talk) 12:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Since 2020 Martin Friedrich is no longer member of the executive board Sabine Siegert (talk) 12:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 14:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Achim55: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Empty gallery. The category Category:Paintings of Lierna Lake Como holds only 10 files, for me not enough to keep this gallery page. See also discussion on the Talk page of this gallery page and it's sequel on Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2021/11#What_to_do_whith_a_gallery_page_that_looks_good_but_is_made_by_a_sock_master? JopkeB (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, sockpuppetry by nuisance/hoax editor Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson. Same sock also created Natural parks in Lake Como. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Per EXIF, this image comes from Facebook. Better sourcing and proof of permission are needed. Gikü (talk) 13:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a banner containing a photograph. There is no freedom of panorama for such artworks in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Md shakil ahmed rakib vp (talk) 13:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy. Achim55 (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Misleading/deceptive licensing tag. Image is a cropped version of this image, no indication that it is a free image. FyzixFighter (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, image is a version of the artwork dated January 13, 2018 in a public post by a certain "Jun Impas Art" on Facebook.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Per uploader, the photo is previously published. All previously published photos must have evidence of free license, for example VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: not useful. This is image is used on page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Zbouf/Brouillon which contains a nonsensical tale about the annexation of Belgium and Swiss by France, back in 2042. Henxter (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
no evidence the painting is in the public domain in the United States, which is required per COM:PD Hekerui (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
I doubt the own work claim on this. I am also suspicious if the image is real, as a reverse image search takes me to only to reddit. MKFI (talk) 14:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Not enough information is provided to assert PD-Iran. Both author and year of publication are needed and missing. Huji (talk) 14:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC) this is a work had published befor in wikipedi commons this version is only correcting a wrong alphabet (ع) in persian.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elam-map-fa.svg .
- https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85_(%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%86)#/media/%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87:Elam_Map-en.svg
#/media/%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87:Elam_Map-en.svg){kind=link}
Homaaaa (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: source: File:Elam-map-fa.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a poster designed ten years ago, artwork is presumably under copyright. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Obvious copyright violation. --bjh21 (talk) 15:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cherukumudi prabhakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]I believe these documents are out of COM:Scope: the profile seems to an attempt to create a Wikipedia page by uploading a PDF, and the published papers list is text only.
- File:Air Cmde R. Gopalaswami (Retd) profile.pdf
- File:Air Cmde R.Gopalaswami's (Retd) categorised List of Papers Published in Journals and Online's.pdf
MKFI (talk) 14:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Australia --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:Redundant. Please use SVG version File:Yoyogi seminar.svg. Yuasan (talk) 15:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Browser screenshot of a map for sale in an online shop: Probably not free license, certainly not OWN work Enyavar (talk) 15:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
It appears that this map is copyrighted. there is a copyright notice in the map itself. furthermore, the source provided does not help verifying that this map was published under a free license. Mosbatho (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a PNG version of the image found at https://www.goalzz.com/?stadium=1206 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: this website is not the source (too small and newer), not found published online prior to upload here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: it is the source file for a used crop. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
_00.23.35.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_00.23.35.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
_00.23.35.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
_00.23.35.png){kind=link}
Per EXIF, author in '@samuelcik'. No proof of permission from the author / copyright holder. No proof uploader has any rights over the photo. Gikü (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mariaromnav (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Captura de pantalla 2020-10-26 a las 20.53.29.png
- File:Captura de pantalla 2020-10-26 a las 19.57.06.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
For some of my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The image may be copyrighted by the original author, Pak. Linux rules, Windows drools (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there, Pak has given permission for any and all of his artwork to be posted on WikiMedia Commons. See:
- https://twitter.com/muratpak/status/1465342092457164803 Pmmccurdy (talk) 17:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not quite, the question being answered there is "are we ok to right-click save some work for @Wikimedia to feature on your @Wikipedia page?" rather than Pak explicitly releasing their work as CC-Attribution for commercial reuse outside of that one Wikipedia page.
- File:The Node.png has the same problem. --Lord Belbury (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- So [User:Lord Belbury|Lord Belbury]] what would Pak have to explicitly say for us to then use his artwork here? I am sure we could contact Pak and ask them to add more context to the twitter thread to ensure we have proper permissions. --Pmmccurdy (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, insufficient permission, see COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality rather generic beach scene, categorized only as "unidentified locations in Mexico". Geo tag places location in the center of Mexico City, which it certainly is not. Commons has many good quality illustrative images of identified beaches of Mexico. I can see no in-scope usefulness for this image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Fichier jpg converti en svg, c'est désormais le fichier svg qui sert sur Wikimedia, celui-ci n'est plus utilisé. 2A04:CEC0:11B6:D9B7:A055:167B:63AD:D95A 17:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Je ne m'étais pas connecté mais je suis l'auteur de ce dernier message et des fichiers jpg et svg. Paulin de Rosny (talk) 11:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Re-uploading a previously deleted photo, which is a violation Osama Eid (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Re-uploading a previously deleted photo, which is a violation Osama Eid (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 21:04, 13 January 2022, by Magog the Ogre (Personal photo by non-contributors (F10)). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Fichier jpg converti en svg, c'est désormais le fichier svg qui sert sur Wikimedia, celui-ci n'est plus utilisé. 2A04:CEC0:11B6:D9B7:A055:167B:63AD:D95A 17:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Je ne m'étais pas connecté mais je suis l'auteur de ce dernier message et des fichiers jpg et svg. Paulin de Rosny (talk) 11:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
photo credited by Remo di Gennaro but no indication about a free release — danyele 17:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Danyele, I received this photo from matteo marani, who asked me to use it to replace the one on his Wikipedia page. I uploaded the photo to commons as indicated, and also added the permissions. What did I do wrong? L.ceccon (talk) 17:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Matteo-marani.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022011310008335. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Matteo-marani.jpg” under ticket:2022011510002784. --Ww2censor (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Danyele,
- Is it now possibile to close the deletion request?
- Luigi L.ceccon (talk) 06:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep The VTRS check is over — danyele 02:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Danyelle, forgive me, what does this mean? L.ceccon (talk) 08:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- May i use this pic now, in the Matteo Marani page on wikipedia (as his request)? L.ceccon (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per VRTS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PDD will be in 2036 Goesseln (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted Album cover, not own work Stang★ 17:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Seems to be an image by Arnaud Godin. Xocolatl (talk) 17:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
The focus of the image is the text, which is above the TOO for copyright protection. This looks like part of a more recent exhibit and if I read de minimis correctly, then this is copyrighted. Sennecaster (talk) 17:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I think the letters/text are {{PD-text}}. I doubt there is any creative authorship in this short text. It think it is fcts, data, and unoriginal information. --MGA73 (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The threshold of originality for text isn't particularly high in the US. See this case where the US Copyright Office registered a two sentence joke, finding that it had a "modicum of intellectual labor". The text on the sign isn't formulaic enough that it couldn't have been written in any other way. Barring some other reason why the text could be PD (if there was some evidence it was posted before 1989), this looks copyrighted. Vahurzpu (talk) 04:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I'm going to have to disagree with MGA73 here. While the text may be written in simple language, it is not below the threshold of originality. The creativity required under Feist is quite low, especially for text. This work is not "devoid of even the slightest traces of creativity", and phrasing like "stuck with him for the rest of his life" or "Cowboys swore by his saddles" are copyrightable expression, not the uncopyrightable facts the work is based on. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi AntiCompositeNumber! Thank you for your input. According to this book "each man swore by his own saddle". That is very similar to "Cowboys swore by his saddles" so you could argue that the copyright the phrasing of "swore to a saddle" belongs to the author this book. If from 1922 and author died in 1950 then there is a good chance it is out of copyright.
- According to Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle there have to be a significant doubt. We do not delete everything just because the may be a risk. We delete if the risk is significant. So do we see ghosts or is there a real risk here? In my understanding "significant" means there have to be more than a 0.2% risk or 5% risk. We are talking a higher risk and since it was uploaded in 2009 and there is still no lawsuits then I think it confirms that there is not a significant risk here.
- Off topic: If the term really is copyrighted do we have to delete this DR too? The license terms say "all unstructured text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License" and that would not be correct if the term is copyrighted? --MGA73 (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The requirement is not that a work be novel, but original. To quote from Feist again, Originality does not signify novelty; a work may be original even though it closely resembles other works, so long as the similarity is fortuitous, not the result of copying. The terms themselves are not important, but the inclusion of figurative language above and beyond the "bare historical facts" indicates copyrightable authorship. ...If the compilation author clothes facts with an original collocation of words, he or she may be able to claim a copyright in this written expression. Others may copy the underlying facts from the publication, but not the precise words used to present them. Id.I can also quote from COM:PCP, namely the part that "nobody has complained" about copyright problems is not a reason to keep a file. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I know that it also say "nobody has complained" and that is not my main argument. The reason I use it is to illustrate that there is no significant risk because the creative work in that sign is low. There are plenty of examples of copyright claims related to Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen) and many copyright claims related to music and litterature. But are there any related to en:National Ranching Heritage Center or en:Texas Tech University and info signs?
- Feist state that facts can't be protectet only originality can. If i type "maks.ævtbhiop iy" it is probably original but I think the originality is below COM:TOO. The originality above is to change a few words from "each man swore to his own saddle" to "Cowboys swore by his saddles" and I also believe that "stuck with him for the rest of his life" was invented by the creator of the sign. I have heard many talking about being "stuck with someeone for the rest of their life" (just google it ans see how many hits there are).
- Anyway someone asked if it was before 1989. The en:National Ranching Heritage Center was founded in 1969 so there is a good chance that it was. --MGA73 (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Normally I don't scrutinize this closely, but I am reviewing Billy Hathorn images as part of an investigation on all of their edits and image uploads, most of which have now been transferred to commons. Almost any non-building/landscape image violates FOP in some way from this person and I've found multiple instances of straight up lying about what is depicted. Sennecaster (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Sennecaster: I have probably moved many files from Billy Hathorn to Commons with my bot and I have never seen cases where he lied. I have tried to avoid statues because they can violate FOP. But as you know I have not seen simple text as a big problem. In case you want to read it I started a discussion at Commons talk:Project scope/Precautionary principle about how big a risk we can accept. --MGA73 (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Normally I don't scrutinize this closely, but I am reviewing Billy Hathorn images as part of an investigation on all of their edits and image uploads, most of which have now been transferred to commons. Almost any non-building/landscape image violates FOP in some way from this person and I've found multiple instances of straight up lying about what is depicted. Sennecaster (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- The requirement is not that a work be novel, but original. To quote from Feist again, Originality does not signify novelty; a work may be original even though it closely resembles other works, so long as the similarity is fortuitous, not the result of copying. The terms themselves are not important, but the inclusion of figurative language above and beyond the "bare historical facts" indicates copyrightable authorship. ...If the compilation author clothes facts with an original collocation of words, he or she may be able to claim a copyright in this written expression. Others may copy the underlying facts from the publication, but not the precise words used to present them. Id.I can also quote from COM:PCP, namely the part that "nobody has complained" about copyright problems is not a reason to keep a file. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Museum caption text. It's substantial, it's recently written, it's clearly covered by copyright. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Source is marked copyright/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- This picture is from govermenal source which was under free license. And free license is mentioned. --Visem (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Visem. Passed COM:LR, see https://web.archive.org/web/20191126150023/https://kazatin-rda.gov.ua/novyny-ta-oholoshennya/novosti/u-makharyncyakh-vidbuvsya-mitynhrekviyem-z-metoyu-vshanuvannya-pamyati-zhertv-holodomoru/. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paras luhera27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work on FB-IMG photos.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Gallery of personality collected from facebook and other sources, not own work.
- File:ปกครู-1.jpg
- File:ปู่เย็น.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1574697671149~1.jpg
- File:พระเกจิ.jpg
- File:ใบสุทธิ.jpg
- File:หลวงปู่เย็น.jpg
- File:หลวงปู่เย็น-๒.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:ใบสุทธิ.jpg, his internal passport, would be PD-Thailand. --RAN (talk) 07:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (and File:ใบสุทธิ.jpg is a photo of a much larger composition that includes a passport photo - that doesn't make the entire image PD). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
From Facebook (metadata) not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Roleytherockstar (talk · contribs)
[edit]FB-IMG is the file name from Facebook, and these are both smaller than Facebook sizes, leading to the conclusion that they were harvested from that site.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Image of user in 2012 when 7 years old is not own photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a poster in Budapest. COM:CRT/Hungary indicates there is freedom of panorama for art that is "erected with a permanent character outdoors in a public place", but this is just a portable sandwich bboard and not a permanent fiixture. Whpq (talk) 19:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I created this file and my opinion about this fact that I want to keep it at Wikipedia and Wikimedia. Thanks Paintgol (talk) 19:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a monitor playing back a video. Although the photograph may be freely licensed, this incorporates a frame from the video without any indication the video is also freely licensed. Whpq (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I created this file and my opinion about this fact that I want to keep it at Wikipedia and Wikimedia. Thanks Paintgol (talk) 19:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
map doesn't display properly; use File:Cherry Grove map.jpg instead or/and upload a fixed svg version (in the latter case, the file can be overridden rather than deleted) Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted poster NANöR (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This creative work is identified as Egyptian from 1978, tagged {{PD-Egypt}}. But it fails both requirements there (the Egypt PD and the US PD). User:Masry684 has uploaded a whole slew of such images on commons (and citing as source their own Flickr stream). DMacks (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 22:30, 30 January 2022, by EugeneZelenko (Commons:Licensing: poster). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - K-20 (Temporary).svg - SVG file uploaded Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 19:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploader has uploaded other images which are clear copyright violations, all on the same day. No camera EXIF. Likely taken from some web site and then cropped as was done with the copyvio images. Whpq (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright. Higher resolution for example here and the description that the copyright is of AFP. Wouter (talk) 21:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
small size, noEXIFs, other uploads from the uploader already deleted. Unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of The War of the Worlds – A Martian fighting machine lands in the O2.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cucatrap
[edit]False statement of "own work"; all the photos (not PD in Argentina so they are less than 25 years old) are from El Acople, a rock website with its contents copyrighted (as noticed at bottom).
Files affected:
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 07.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 08.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 04.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 06.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 05.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 02.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 03.jpg
- File:Cuentos Borgeanos y Sancamaleon En Madero 2003 01.jpg
- File:Animal3 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal6 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal7 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 10 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 7 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 9 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 8 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 5 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 6 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 4 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 3 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 1 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Los Piojos 2 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal6 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal7 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal8 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal4 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal3 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal2 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Animal1 - ElAcople.jpg
- File:Tavo Kupinski.jpg
Fma12 (talk) 22:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farasat anees jam (talk · contribs)
[edit]missing EXIF, low resolution, certainly copyright violation
- File:Anwar maqsood.jpg
- File:Khalil ur rehman qamar.jpg
- File:Zafar iqbal.jpg
- File:Aftab Iqbal.jpg
- File:Don berna.jpg
- File:Gustavo gaviria.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Content of image is copyrighted material from 2014. Nthep (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality issue - pls delete Ordercrazy (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1950s - 1960s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in 1973. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
False date, false authorship. The man in the photo died in 1979, the photo depicts him in the 1960s - 1970s. It is doubtful that the Wikipedia contributor who uploaded the photos is its author. GAndy (talk) 23:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
File:King Khaled of Saudi Arabia chairing the Third Islamic Summit 1981-1401 that announced the creation of the Fiqh Academy.jpg
[edit]
No information about the license or the creator. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo is uploaded and licensed as "own work"; however, there is no indication that the uploader is identical with either of the photographers whose photos they uploaded (Helge Gerischer, Marco M¸ller). 2003:C0:8F03:D300:28E9:B1E:BFA8:21ED 23:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Angaben zum Author konkretisiert WHZ1 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo is uploaded and licensed as "own work"; however, there is no indication that the uploader is identical with either of the photographers whose photos they uploaded (Helge Gerischer, Marco M¸ller). 2003:C0:8F03:D300:28E9:B1E:BFA8:21ED 23:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Angaben zum Author konkretisiert WHZ1 (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo is uploaded and licensed as "own work"; however, there is no indication that the uploader is identical with either of the photographers whose photos they uploaded (Helge Gerischer, Marco M¸ller). 2003:C0:8F03:D300:28E9:B1E:BFA8:21ED 23:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Angaben zum Author konkretisiert WHZ1 (talk) 09:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo is uploaded and licensed as "own work"; however, there is no indication that the uploader is identical with either of the photographers whose photos they uploaded (Helge Gerischer, Marco M¸ller). 2003:C0:8F03:D300:28E9:B1E:BFA8:21ED 23:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Angaben zum Author konkretisiert WHZ1 (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Photo is uploaded and licensed as "own work"; however, there is no indication that the uploader is identical with either of the photographers whose photos they uploaded (Helge Gerischer, Marco M¸ller). 2003:C0:8F03:D300:28E9:B1E:BFA8:21ED 23:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Quelle ergänzt/konkretisiert WHZ1 (talk) 09:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
The fact that Ali Pasha had a medallion with this design does not give us the license to create a 'representative banner' that is completely ahistorical. The fact that this is already in use in WP projects to symbolize Ali Pasha's state shows how quickly such invented symbols can proliferate. Constantine ✍ 15:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: you are totally right. It should be deleted as a personal fantasy. But it should first be removed from each WP. In the meantime, I have marked it with {{Factual accuracy}}. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi P 1 9 9, it has now been removed from all articles in WP. --Constantine ✍ 17:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
The claim that this logo is under a CC license is simply not true. Uploader appears to have applied this license to everything uploaded regardless of actual copyright status. The only question is if this is too simple for copyright. COM:CRT/Belgium provides no guidance on the threshold of originality for Belgium. Whpq (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1998 statue by living sculptor Brian Donahue, in Tucson Arizona USA, no FOP. (Additional comment: I do NOT recommend copying this to en:w, as the original uploader has been indefinitely blocked for copyvios, and many of their supposed "own works" have been identified as stolen from blogs and websites. This is one of the blocked user's few remaining claimed "own work" images not yet deleted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Images related to an individual person without educational use, so not in scope according to COM:SCOPE. The images are used on a user page, which is not relocated at the article namespace in fr:WP until today. Please also note Commons:Deletion requests/File:Professeur François Chenet.jpg
- File:Signature du professeur François Chenet.jpg
- File:Professeur François Chenet - Cours Sorbonne.jpg
- File:François Chenet-2.jpg
Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use at Wikidata and a draft article. There is a project at Wikidata to create an entry for all published authors who have articles in scholarly publications and to index those articles. --RAN (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep are in use on Wikidata. As long as it is in use there, it is automatically in scope here. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The author information here is fake. There is now way this photo was taken by Mehrotra herself. It isn't a selfie. It is a photograph by someone else. It also isn't from 2017 as stated in the description, it is from 2012, you can see Mehrotra wearing the same outfit, same hairdo, and same sign in the background in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HemntYPy9o from minute 07:11. Seggallion (talk) 11:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Has OTRS, no reason to doubt that permission. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eng. Itamar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eng. Itamar (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Per previous DR, this is an unreliable uploader. These 3 remaining uploads are also likely not own works: 3 low-res web sized diagrams with 3 very disparate styles and format.
- File:Esfera Rolante.png
- File:Gaiola de Faraday.png
- File:Sistema de Proteção contra Descargas Atmosféricas (SPDA).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
No FOP for statures in the US, so sadly this is a derivative work of a copyrighted work of art 88.217.44.217 18:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with FB and transmission code in EXIF data. And not notable, out of scope.
- File:Pablo Albornoz y el director de cine independiente Marco Berger durante el curso intensivo de verano en actuación orientado a cine..jpg
- File:Foto de la fotonovela "El Tunel" de Ernesto Sábato, interpretando a Juan Pablo Castel.jpg
- File:Pablo Albornoz, San Telmo, B.A..jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jakefalcon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Variations of a logo for the youth section of a British political party. {{PD-textlogo}} applied. No usage on Wikimedia projects. The threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The logo contains a graphic element (a bird cut from a circle), used in place of the letter 'O'. Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.
mattbr 19:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Not own work but satellite view, likely taken from Google Maps or Earth, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Relatively small and low quality image with a lovely dust speck on it that seems - from location at the finish line of race - to be a commercial image and not one created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Badge is copyrighted per w:File:Police_Service_of_Northern_Ireland_badge.svg, and unlikely to be PD as the Police Service was formed in 2001. Yeeno (talk) 19:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 20:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- The logo consists of letters in various shapes and handwriting (i.e. „general typeface or basic handwriting“). It is not an original text protected by copyright laws. The only non-letter content is a partially blue background. I doubt that this detail hauls it over the threshold of originality. Willi P (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Complicated textures, including text inside the block letters and uneven shapes. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Percy-Liza.jpg MrKDunleavy (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn per nominator's comment in the DR's history: "No longer need to be deleted since the LTA has been approved by copyright owner". The file now has VRT permission. -M.nelson (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Bogus VRT ticket - uploader and ticket sender is LTA/vandal (see Awindy1712 and Agustin03072005) from an address with a generic host and a name that a) does not even match who they purport to be in the body and b) does not match any known nickname(s) used by the actual author, Alex Melgarejo (Instragram, Facebook, Twitter). VRT agent made no effort whatsoever to establish connection between sender and known author. By way of analogy, this is like accepting an email from bobsmith@hotmail.com that says "I am the Queen of England and I am the copyright holder". Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Percy Liza. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -M.nelson (talk) 08:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Not own work but historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. Might be old enough, but uploader needs to provide the correct details and license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
PDD will be in 2036 Goesseln (talk) 17:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No "PDD" is required since there is no piece of art. There is some text and a very simple graphic (three crowns) only. -- Ies (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Lustig, Diskussion auf Englisch, damit sich die ganze internationale Gemeinschaft der Wikipedianer beteiligen kann, aber Abkürzungen, die der nicht Eingeweihte nicht versteht: PPD? Die Wikipedia-Begriffsklärungsseite "PPD" listet sage und schreibe dreizehn Möglichkeiten der Auflösung auf, von denen mir keine plausibel erscheint (und sowieso nur zwei ein Lemma haben).
- Das Problem sehe ich sowieso nicht, falls es um Urheberrechte gehen sollte. Nach 108 Jahren ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass der Urheber schon 70 Jahre tot ist, nicht gerade klein. Die Schaffenstiefe ist auch nicht gerade riesig. Die letzten elfeinhalb Jahre scheint auch niemand Unterlassungsansprüche angemeldet zu haben, denn immerhin wurde das Foto schon 2010 hochgeladen. Falls, lieber User Goesseln, also niemand gerade aus dem Unterholz gesprungen kam, um vehementest Forderungen zu stellen, sehe ich keinerlei Bedarf, hier prophylaktisch tätig zu werden. Da wären andere Aufräumarbeiten (z.B. bei der Kategorisierung) weit dringlicher. Deshalb: behalten.
- --Im Fokus (talk) 19:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wer soll jetzt "lustig" finden, dass du PDD siehst und dann behauptest, da würde PPD stehen?
- Der Schöpfer des Plakats ist de:Fritz Helmuth Ehmcke, dessen PDD (en:Public Domain Day) ist der 1.1.2036. Also bräuchte es schon ein paar intelligente Kniffe, um diesen rechtlichen Sachverhalt zu umgehen. Zum Beispiel könnte man ja behaupten, das Werk habe keine Schöpfungshöhe. Oder in den USA sei sowieso alles ganz anders. Oder der User:Frank Vincentz habe als Fotograf des gerahmten Plakats die Rechte. Ich bin da mal gespannt. --Goesseln (talk) 12:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Das klingt jetzt nicht unbedingt sachlich, sondern eher angepisst. "Oder in den USA sei sowieso alles ganz anders. Oder der User:Frank Vincentz habe als Fotograf des gerahmten Plakats die Rechte." war nie Teil der Diskussion, schon weil das völliger Unsinn wäre, wie du sehr wohl weißt. Was mit PDD gemeint war, konnte auch ich nur raten. Eine Google-Suche brachte da jedenfalls keinen Hinweis. User:Im Fokus anzugehen, weil er statt PDD versehentlich PPD geschrieben hat, ist leider sehr unfreundlich.
- Schöpfungshöhe bei einem Plakat mit wenig und keinesfalls künstlerisch wertvollem Text und drei Krönchen, noch einfacher als bei File:Icon crown.png, zu behaupten, ist sehr gewagt. Nicht alles, was ein Künstler macht, ist schützenswerte Kunst. -- Ies (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Mein Fehler, versehentlich PPD statt PDD zu schreiben und das gleich zwei Mal. Nachgeschaut und dreizehn Optionen, fast alles englische Begriffe, gefunden habe ich aber unter PDD, ohne dass der von Dir (User:Goesseln) gemeinte dabei wäre. Ich hoffe, wir sind uns einig, dass unter diesen Umständen die Verwendung einer Abkürzung, die dem größten Teil der User völlig unbekannt sein dürfte, wenig sinnvoll ist.
- Was genau Dich antreibt, die Eliminierung eines Fotos zu fordern, das jedenfalls den Betrachter keineswegs als Urheberrechtsverletzung anspringt und schon über elf Jahre unbehelligt hier zu sehen ist, würde mich schon interessieren. Wenn Du so überzeugt bist, dass eine Rechtsverletzung vorliegt, solltest Du doch eher versuchen, eine Nutzungslizenz für dieses Foto zum Vorteil der Wikipedia zu erlangen, als zu ihrem Nachteil eine Löschung in vorauseilendem Gehorsam zu betreiben. --Im Fokus (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Work by de:Fritz Helmuth Ehmcke, who died in 1965. The file can be restored in 2036. --Rosenzweig τ 20:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Main subject of these two images are recent architectural works involved in two DRs at: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Philippine Sports Stadium and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Philippine Arena.
- File:Ciudad de Victoria Interchange Bypass Road Bocaue Santa Maria Bypass 02.jpg
- File:Ciudad de Victoria Interchange Bypass Road Bocaue Santa Maria Bypass 03.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- These 2 photos are just 2 of the 46 total of Category:Ciudad de Victoria Interchange ; I am not sure if they fail, but in my stand, since there are 46 photos already of the Interchange, these 2 photos may at the discretion of the Commons community be taken off, sincerely FBenjr123 (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC).
Violation of architect's copyright. As per [6], majority of recent buildings were variations of Architect Carlos A. Santos-Viola's designs on the Central Temple. According to the source also, "prominent architects, such as Juan Nakpil and Carlos Raúl Villanueva, had been involved in designing INC churches while the Engineering and Construction Department of INC, established in 1971, oversees the uniformity in design of church buildings. Without evidence to prove that this church building dates to pre-December 1972, {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}} cannot be invoked and images must be deleted unless a commercial license from INC's Engineering Department is secured.
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 35.jpg
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 31.jpg
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 30.jpg
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 29.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Personally (my stance may be a mistake ... I was told and lectured by learned INC Ministers at a McDonald's resto, when I asked them permission to take wedding or interiors of INC chapel not a big one; they sadly stated that even they themselves are advised not to take photos inside since it is sacrilegious, but exteriors, no problem (Vide: Category:Iglesia Ni Cristo Church (Pulilan, Bulacan) they are very near where you stay ... and lots of them all over Commons) ... very sincerely FBenjr123 (talk) 08:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC).
- @FBenjr123: permission from the church is irrelevant; what matters is commerci license permission from the entity who holds the architectural designs of the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Personally (my stance may be a mistake ... I was told and lectured by learned INC Ministers at a McDonald's resto, when I asked them permission to take wedding or interiors of INC chapel not a big one; they sadly stated that even they themselves are advised not to take photos inside since it is sacrilegious, but exteriors, no problem (Vide: Category:Iglesia Ni Cristo Church (Pulilan, Bulacan) they are very near where you stay ... and lots of them all over Commons) ... very sincerely FBenjr123 (talk) 08:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:WEBHOSTing by a now-blocked uploader. There are already tons of images by a similar uploader (Judgefloro (talk · contribs)) in places like Category:Cycling men in the Philippines, Category:School children in Bulacan, and many more. FBenjr123 seems to treat Commons as a Facebook or Instagram site, where it is much more permissible to upload zillions of "redundant and near-duplicate images made to showcase the country to the world, without regard to their quality or usefulness."
- File:Standing cyclists giving thumbs up at Barasoain Church.jpg
- File:Standing Maloleños barefoot slippers abandoned street children eating food Paseo del Congreso.jpg
- File:Standing Maloleños barefoot slippers abandoned street children eating food Paseo del Congreso New Normal.jpg
- File:Standing Baliwageños ballons peddlers Sunday morning New Normal.jpg
- File:Poblacion Centero Baliuag 03.jpg
- File:Sleeping Bulaqueña senior citizen Sampaguita garland street vendor lying park bench Sunday.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Bridge is poorly-depicted in these two photos. Lots of better photos at Category:Old Plaridel-Pulilan Bridge. Still more COM:WEBHOST/Facebook/Instagram-type content by a sock of now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs).
- File:Remnants Ruins of the Abandoned Balagtas-Cabanatuan line Old Plaridel-Pulilan railway bridge 10.jpg
- File:Remnants Ruins of the Abandoned Balagtas-Cabanatuan line Old Plaridel-Pulilan railway bridge 09.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Better version exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Xavier_Novell_i_Gom%C3%A0.jpg Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 12:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Perfect! For me, go on!--Ignasi (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- it is not the same, but in link? I don't see the need to delete the file. Marium Alberto (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Marium Alberto: error in link, the SVG version is here File:Coat of arms of Xavier Novell i Gomà.svg. @Ignasi: do you still agree for deletion? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Absolutly. The .svg version is so better! @VIGNERON: --Ignasi (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsure if this image of Monument to Lesya Ukrainka (1965) had COM:VRTS authorization from the heirs of its artist, w:en:Vasyl Borodai (died 2010), given the fact that Ukraine does not have freedom of panorama. Borodai, when he was still alive, was a litigious sculptor who successfully filed lawsuits against four Ukrainian users exploiting another work of his for commercial purposes, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to the Founders of Kyiv (Navodnytskyi Park) for details. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:A mother is waiting...
[edit]Unsure if these had COM:VRTS authorizations from the heirs of its artist, w:en:Vasyl Borodai (died 2010), given the fact that Ukraine does not have freedom of panorama. Borodai, when he was still alive, was a litigious sculptor who successfully filed lawsuits against four Ukrainian users exploiting another work of his for commercial purposes, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to the Founders of Kyiv (Navodnytskyi Park) for details.
- File:Wikiexpedition-mykolaivka-mother-is-waiting-01.jpg
- File:Wikiexpedition-mykolaivka-mother-is-waiting-02.jpg
- File:Wikiexpedition-mykolaivka-mother-is-waiting-03.jpg
- File:Wikiexpedition-mykolaivka-mother-is-waiting-05.jpg
- File:Wikiexpedition-mykolaivka-mother-is-waiting-06.jpg
- File:Братська могила 17 воїнів Миколаївка 1.jpg
- File:Братська могила 17 воїнів Миколаївка 4.jpg
- File:Братська могила 17 воїнів Миколаївка.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 13:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P199 as no source (No source since) which is utterly correct, source is given as Serbian Wikipedia which has no further information. But, it would appear that Mr. Brlic is from the period of time between 1800 and 1899 from his outfit and hairstyle, which means that perhaps this image is correctly licensed, even if the author is given as unknown and no source. Comments? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep He died in 1868. --RAN (talk) 06:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: existing license (PD-Art) is incorrect. If it can be established that this is indeed a photograph from before 1899, then the correct license would be {{PD-old-assumed}}. It is up to the uploader to provide all the details. As admins, we don't have the duty or time to chase this... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Infobox updated. External source also found at SRWP. [24Cr][talk] 23:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete the stamps is engraved and designed by Albert Decaris (1901–1988), so his work is copyright until 2059 per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#Stamps. The stamps being prominent, is not de minimis, even though the other illustrations may be older but we have no details. Ww2censor (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- The same copyright issue applies to File:François Oudot 03.jpg, a virtually identical image. Ww2censor (talk) 14:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The drawing on the card is said to be by "Josette Bérard, professeur émérite d'art plastique d'après vue ancienne du village", "professeur émérite" indicating that she was still alive in 1989. I don't know when she died or if she is perhaps still alive 33 years later, so I'll put this DR up for restoration at an unknown date. Hopefully not in 2110 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a clear copyright violation. Creator of the artwork, Shajarian, only died a few years ago. See Template:PD-Iran for Iran's copyright laws. This work is subject to copyright. Huji (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- this work has no copy right, because the owner himself has gave it as a present to people . any body have the right to publish it . it has been published numerous time in public domain in iran. and I myself have the special right to publish it from the current owner. Homaaaa (talk) 05:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I don't see any evidence for "this work has no copy right" and so on. The creator is apparently en:Mohammad-Reza Shajarian, who died in 2020. Iran has 50 years pma, so his works would be free in 2071. Because Iran uses a different calendar (still a solar calendar, but different), I'll add another year to be sure and put it up for restoration in 2072. --Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Renommage oeuvre et fichier PDeschodt (talk) 14:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently this is a work of French painter Pierre Deschodt, who died in 2003. I don't see why this should be in the PD as claimed, nor do I see any permission to put it under a free license or similar. --Rosenzweig τ 17:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of France
[edit] Delete: I've been able to date the authors and none are dead long enough, or are still alive, for us to keep them so PCP probably applies. The list of French stamp designers and engravers are found at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France#Stamps, a list I have expended over several years.
- File:Calame - Timbre-poste français.pdf
- File:EsnaultPelterieTimbre.png
- File:Timbre Conseil de l'Europe 1965 gravé par Decaris.jpg
- File:Timbre Villefranche-sur-Mer.JPG
Ww2censor (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete: OK for the reasons mentionned above by Ww2censor Cquoi (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of France
[edit] Delete: The two maximum card images are old enough but the stamp were designed by people who are not dead long enough for the copyright to have run out. The Concorde card source page gives no verification it is copyright free and the stamps are still copyright. Their death dates have been updated and are on the list of French stamp designers and engravers found at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France#Stamps, a list I have expended over several years. I doubt they can be kept as de minimis as the stamps are one of the main features of the whole image.
Ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete: OK for the reasons mentionned above by Ww2censor Cquoi (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of France
[edit]- Delete All French stamps are copyright to the engraver and designer whose name are usually on the stamps but these are all modern stamps to which I have added the date of issue and artists details where known. The uploader of 4 of them put them on their Flickr pages under a public domain licence and attributed themselves as the author. I have yet to find the designer of the atomic energy stamp but 1965+70 comes to at least 2035. PCP applies to all.
- File:Jean Collot 11e Chasseurs timbre oblitéré Vesoul 13 juillet 2017.jpg – from 2017, by unknown
- File:Timbre Anniversaire CEA.jpg – from 1963, by Jacques Combet (1920–1993) and Alberto Baldaccini (life unknown)
- File:Timbre Centre atomique de Marcoule.jpg – from 1959, by Jacques Combet (1920–1993)
- File:Timbre Le Redoutable.jpg – from 1969, by Robert Cami (1900–1973)
- File:Timbre Surrégénérateur Phenix.jpg – from 1974, by by Jacque Gauthier (1931-still alive in 1997)
Ww2censor (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I'll annotate the DR and add restoration categories based on your research about the designers. --Rosenzweig τ 17:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Stamp of Belarus - 2018 - Colnect 780590 - Centenary of the Belarus Telegraph Agency.jpeg
[edit]
Файл имеет дубликат - File:100 лет со дня основания БЕЛТА.jpg. Дубликаты на Викискладе недопустимы, поскольку худшие по качеству материалы удаляются. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I have a problem with calling it a duplicate. There is a difference between a scan of a stamp and a design of the stamp. Of course, the scan will have things that some may call imperfections, but they are exactly what makes them useful. Secondly, we are not talking about an upscaled image here, but about the image that is actually of a higher resolution. Thirdly the nominator says "Дубликаты на Викискладе недопустимы" (Duplicates are disallowed on Commons), and I believe this is a gross oversimplification of the policy. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not a duplicate. Better quality image. --Ooligan (talk) 08:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This file is not in use on the project, the other version (smaller resolution, but smaller in size) is used. Therefore I consider this image COM:REDUNDANT and it should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dasmariñas
[edit]Dasmariñas city seal fails {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. The designer is not a government employee, but Ryan Suarez, an alumnus of University of Santo Tomas – College of Fine Arts and Design (as per w:en:Dasmariñas#City Seal). He made this as part of a design competition conducted by the city government. Needs commercial license permission from him.
- File:Dasmariñas jf9441 07.JPG
- File:Dasmariñasjf9217 11.JPG
- File:Dasmariñasjf9230 09.JPG
- File:Dasmariñasjf9230 10.JPG
- File:Dasmariñasjf9242 06.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Some of these were photos of buildings with the logo on a shield, but per COM:FOP Philippines, there is no Freedom of Panorama for such a design, so also these images had to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
There is no complete freedom of panorama in Congo-Brazzaville. Incidental inclusion is only permitted for photos of copyrighted works. The building is a significant subject here, too big and prominent to be considered "incidental". It was designed by Jean Marie Legrand and completed in 1986. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nabemba Tower. The image is used on an article about the building: w:en:Nabemba Tower. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
There is no complete freedom of panorama in Congo-Brazzaville. Photos are only legal to be reused commercially if the artistic work/s is/are incidental. The building in question was designed by w:en:Roger Erell who died in 1986. Since the country has a p.m.a. of 50 years, undelete on January 1, 2037 (1986+50+1 years).
- File:Basilique - façade principale 2.jpg
- File:Basilique - façade principale.jpg
- File:Basilique Sainte-Anne du Congo, Brazzaville.jpg
- File:Basilique- Le Clocher.JPG
- File:L'eglise de Brazzaville.jpg
- File:Église saint Anne.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade Municipal de Kintélé
[edit]Per w:en:Stade Municipal de Kintélé, the stadium was built in 2013 and opened in 2015. There is no complete freedom of panorama in Congo-Brazzaville. Photos are only legal to be reused commercially if the artistic work/s is/are incidental. Nominated images do not show the architecture in an incidental way.
- File:Brazzaville kintele.gif
- File:Stade Municipal de Kintélé.jpg
- File:Stade olympique de Brazzaville.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted first two. Kept File:Stade olympique de Brazzaville.jpg as it does not show much of the design of the stadium. --Ellywa (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RizkyJogja (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per FOP Indonesia, there is no freedom of panorama under the Indonesian Copyright Act No. 28, 2014 (Chapter VI Copyright Limitations, Articles 43-51).
- File:WR Soepratman Statue at WR Soepratman Museum Surabaya.jpg
- File:WR Soepratman Museum Surabaya inauguration inscription.jpg
- File:Kantor Kalurahan Banguntapan.jpg
- File:PT PLN (Persero) Area Pelayanan dan Jaringan Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Kejaksaan Tinggi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Masjid Al-Ittihaad Banguntapan Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Gaia Cosmo Hotel Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Hotel Mutiara Malioboro Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Ditlantas Polda DIY.jpg
- File:Gedung Olahraga Among Rogo 02.jpg
- File:Gedung Olahraga Among Rogo 01.jpg
- File:Gedung Bekas Bank Harapan Sentosa Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Masjid Quwwatul Islam.jpg
- File:Kantor Bupati Klaten.jpg
- File:Pasar Beringharjo Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Grha Pradipta (Jogja Expo Center).jpg
- File:RSPAU Dr. S. Hardjolukito.jpg
- File:Yogyakarta International Airport 02.jpg
- File:Yogyakarta International Airport 07.jpg
- File:Yogyakarta International Airport 03.jpg
- File:Yogyakarta International Airport 04.jpg
- File:Yogyakarta International Airport 05.jpg
- File:Yogyakarta International Airport 06.jpg
- File:Stadion Maguwoharjo Sleman.jpg
- File:Grand Inna Malioboro.jpg
_Area_Pelayanan_dan_Jaringan_Yogyakarta.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stang★ 17:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- What is the copyrightable element in e.g. File:Yogyakarta International Airport 06.jpg which is not de minimis? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Josve05a The pedestrian bridge? As it has some colorful design which, as I'm afraid that, beyonds TOO in many countries. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Defiantly looks to be de minimus if anything and purely incidental and utilitarian if not. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Josve05a The pedestrian bridge? As it has some colorful design which, as I'm afraid that, beyonds TOO in many countries. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Imho also the photo of the bridge contains relevant design elements, e.g. the roof. --Ellywa (talk) 16:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AllispossibleTech (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Likely not own works: inconsistent sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data.
- File:Foto d'epoca di Villa Vescovi.png
- File:Cancello di Villa Vescovi.jpg
- File:Villa Berlese.jpg
- File:Villa Vescovi.png
- File:Facciata Villa Vescovi.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Good morning,
- these are all photos I personally took except for "Foto d'epoca di Villa Vescovi.png" which is a photo took from a vintage postcard of the 1970s (with no reference to the author) and "Villa Berlese.jpg" which was found on the internet.
- Because of this, I believe that "Villa Vescovi.png" and "Facciata Villa Vescovi.jpg" should not be deleted.
- On the other hand, if you think that "Cancello di Villa Vescovi.jpg" has a disparate quality and style, then you may delete it. AllispossibleTech (talk) 10:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: own work images per COM:AGF. Deleted: images which are not own work. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AllispossibleTech (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Not own work but historical photo and paintings, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. Might be old enough, but uploader needs to provide the correct details and license.
- File:Laguna di Venezia di Camillo Bortoluzzi.png
- File:Lago Alpestre.png
- File:Il Canal Grande di Venezia.png
- File:Bortoluzzi Millo.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The images of the artist and his works are all PD-Italy. Italy gives 20 years of copyright for anonymous images and 70 years to the works of an artist. The artist died in 1933. You can fix noob mistakes yourself. --RAN (talk) 05:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment We're not given years for the three paintings, and they're not dated in it:Millo Bortoluzzi either. If the painter died in 1933, his works were still protected in Italy on the URAA restoration date in 1996, so any post-1926 works of his would still be protected in the US. --Rosenzweig τ 15:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: It is not clear whether this image/these images have been published in the USA, so according to Commons:Hirtle chart these images might very well be licensed with Template:PD-old-70, because the author died more then 70 years ago.. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The guideline of Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” In this case, the file/files are clearing in PD in Italy, so they can be maintained on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 14:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Files associated with Jean Lajoie uploaded by David Ll L (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of paintings and photographs by painter Jean Lajoie, who died 1968. These works are still copyrighted untill 2039, so these files must imho be deleted. In addition this lists includes old photos or other works associated with Jean Lajoie of unclear origin, claimed to be CC-BY-SA, but probablby copyrighted as well. Perhaps I did not nominate all images, so please check Category:Jean Lajoie and subcategories.
- File:Boda Jean y Jane.png – 1921 French photo, PD-old-assumed in 2042
- File:Foto de recién casados Jean Lajoie y Jane Hénault.png – 1921 French photo, PD-old-assumed in 2042
- File:La plage de Raguenès. P. Salvan, 1934.jpg – artist is Paul Louis Salvan (1877–1962), can be restored in 2033
- File:Sin título. Jean Lajoie.jpg – has VRT permission
- File:The houses of Parliament. Jean Lajoie, 1910.jpg – has VRT permission
- File:Sin título. Simone Teste.jpg – Simone Teste (1905–1990), can be restored in 2061
- File:Sin título 3. Simone Teste.jpg – Simone Teste (1905–1990), can be restored in 2061
- File:Sin título 2. Simone Teste.jpg – Simone Teste (1905–1990), can be restored in 2061
- File:Sin título. Simone Teste, 1975.jpg – Simone Teste (1905–1990), can be restored in 2061
- File:Sin título. Sin autor.jpg - watercolor drawing by unknown artist, dated 1946 in the lower right corner, there's a signature too but I cannot decipher it – PD-old-assumed in 2067
- File:Sin título. Jean Lajoie, 1913.jpg – has VRT permission
- File:Sin título. A. Gauthier, 1918.jpg – dated 1918, artist is possibly Alfred Gauthier, architectural painter mentioned 1920s and 1930s, died ? – PD-old-assumed in 2039
- File:Sin título. S. Colange.jpg – not dated, artist is Gustave Colange (1886–1973), can be restored in 2044
- File:Soir sur l'inaccesible Etang. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Sin título 5. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Sin título 3. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Perspective. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Retrato de Jean Lajoie.png – drawing by "M. Tetty" (maybe misread), possibly a fellow POW, dated 23-IX-40 Westfalenhof) – PD-old-assumed in 2061
- File:Petite ferme à Gross Born. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Les Feux. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png – has VRT permission
- File:Notre Îlot. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Pensées-fumées! Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Le Couloir. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Le Mirador. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png – has VRT permission
- File:Le Comuniqué. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png – has VRT permission
- File:La Porte... Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Intérieur. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png – has VRT permission
- File:Horizont... Jean Lajoie, 1940.png – has VRT permission
- File:Barraque XIX! Jean Lajoie, 1940.png – has VRT permission
- File:Cuisine. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png – has VRT permission
- File:Jean Lajoie en su luna de miel.png – 1921 French photo, PD-old-assumed in 2042
- File:Jean y su hermano.png – undated photo, presumably French ca. 1910, let's say 1912 so we're not too early, PD-old-assumed in 2033
- File:Jean pintando (2).png – 1946 photo, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2067
- File:Capitan Jean-Gaston Lajoie.png – undated WW II photo, presumably French 1939 or 1940, PD-old-assumed in 2061
- File:Gaston Eugène Lajoie.png – undated photo, presumably French and several years before 1919 – probably ca. 1912 like File:Jean fecha desconocida.png (same studio setting), PD-old-assumed in 2033
- File:Marie Alix Martin.png – undated photo, presumably French and several years before 1919 – probably ca. 1912 like File:Jean fecha desconocida.png (same studio setting), PD-old-assumed in 2033
- File:Jean Lajoie en Amberes.png – 1940 photo, French/Belgian, PD-old-assumed in 2061
- File:Jean Lajoie (2).png – undated photo, Jean Lajoie as a younger man, around the same time as File:Jean Lajoie con Jane Hénault y su hija Éliane.png (1928), so PD-old-assumed in 2049
- File:Sieste à l'étage supérieur.png – has VRT permission
- File:Rêve et bricolage.png - has VRT permission
- File:La Couchette telle qu'elle est.png - has VRT permission
- File:La Couchette telle qu'elle devrait être.png - has VRT permission
- File:Entrée de Baraque.png - has VRT permission
- File:Couchette à trois.png - has VRT permission
- File:Baraque-réfectoire transformée.png - has VRT permission
- File:À l'étage supérieur (Le Capharnaüm).png - has VRT permission
- File:Couchette à deux.png – has VRT permission
- File:Sin título. Jean Lajoie.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin título 4. Jean Lajoie.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin título 1. Jean Lajoie, 1946.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin título 2. Jean Lajoie.png - has VRT permission
- File:Cestona. Jean Lajoie, 1958.png - has VRT permission
- File:La Fontaine Espagnole. Jean Lajoie, 1959.png - has VRT permission
- File:Villacontilde août. Jean Lajoie, 1958.png - has VRT permission
- File:Dans l'île des Pêcheurs. Jean Lajoie.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin nombre. Jean Lajoie, 1956.png - has VRT permission
- File:Dans le SAS, Ouistreham. Jean Lajoie, 1949.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin título. León. Jean Lajoie, 1958.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin título. Ibiza. Jean Lajoie.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin nombre. Mujer con flores. E. Fougerat, ca. 1943.png – Emmanuel Fougerat (1869–1958), can be restored in 2029
- File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Cyprès. Jean Lajoie.png - has VRT permission
- File:Sin nombre. Timón de un Lockheed Constellation. Jean Lajoie, 1951.png - has VRT permission
- File:Jean Villacontilde.png - undated photo, presumably post-WW II, Spanish? – {{PD-Spain-photo}} and {{PD-1996}}
- File:Jean pintando.png - undated photo, presumably post-WW II, Spanish? – {{PD-Spain-photo}} and {{PD-1996}}
- File:J. Lajoie modelando.png - undated photo, presumably post-WW II, French or Spanish? I can't place or date this at all (other than that it is no later than 1968), PD-old-assumed in 2089
- File:Jean Lajoie con Jane Hénault y su hija Éliane.png - 1928 French photo, PD-old-assumed in 2049
- File:Jean fecha desconocida.png - photo, dated ca. 1912, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2033
- File:Jean Lajoie comunión.png - photo, dated ca. 1907, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2028
- File:Jean Lajoie traje (2).png – undated photo, Jean Lajoie as a younger man, around the same time as File:Jean Lajoie con Jane Hénault y su hija Éliane.png (1928), so PD-old-assumed in 2049
- File:Jean Lajoie en 1918.png - photo dated 1918, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2039
- File:J. Lajoie en 1919.png - photo dated 1919, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2040
- File:Carte à Noël.png - has VRT permission
- File:Tintorería Hénault-Morel de Alençon en 1898.png - engraving or similar dated 1898 (not dated in the image), not by Jean Lajoie, no source, unsigned – could possibly be PD-old-assumed if we had a somewhat solid source for the year, but I can't really date this. Presumably no later than 1968 (Lajoie's death), PD-old-assumed in 2089
- File:Tintorería Hénault-Morel de Alençon en 1862.png - drawing dated 1862 (not dated in the drawing), artist is Albert Robida (1848–1926) – PD-old-auto-expired
- File:Los "diez" pintores de la Mesa Cuadrada, exposición de París.png - drawn advertisement, French, not dated, signed "Gagez" – from the 1940s, the place is the Hôtel Anglo-Américain which existed until ca. 1949, so PD-old-assumed in 2070
- File:Étang de Thau en Bouzigues.png - has VRT permission
- File:La péniche blessée. Jean Lajoie, 1947.png - has VRT permission
- File:Jean Lajoie en el laboratorio.png - photo dated 1913, French, PD-old-assumed in 2034
- File:Jean Lajoie con la primera condecoración de guerra.png - undated photo (ca. World War I, let's say it's 1919 just after the war), presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2040
- File:Jean Lajoie.png – undated photo, Jean Lajoie as a younger man, around the same time as File:Jean Lajoie con Jane Hénault y su hija Éliane.png (1928), so PD-old-assumed in 2049
- File:Jean Lajoie con el traje negro.png– undated photo, Jean Lajoie as a younger man in uniform, presumably French and ca. WW I, let's say it's 1919 just after the war, PD-old-assumed in 2040
- File:Jean Lajoie traje.png – undated photo, Jean Lajoie as a younger man, around the same time as File:Jean Lajoie con Jane Hénault y su hija Éliane.png (1928), so PD-old-assumed in 2049
- File:Jean hors concours.png - photo dated 1915, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2036
- File:Jean Lajoie ca. 1915.png - photo dated 1915, presumably French, PD-old-assumed in 2036
- File:Jean Gaston Edouard Lajoie.png - probably not a photo but some kind of drawing, dated ca. 1915 (not in the image), let's say it's 1919 just after the war, not by Jean Lajoie, signed but cannot decipher the signature, PD-old-assumed in 2040
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- comment of uploader on Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by David Ll L. Ellywa (talk) 22:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for the images of the artist prior to 1952 with no photographer named, they would be "PD-EU-no author disclosure". EU law allows them to be clawed back if the author becomes known. We also have to determine if the uploader is a family member who inherited the copyrights of the artworks and they can be released under "Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs". The images appear to be from a personal collection of the family. --RAN (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure is applicable for images who have been published more than 70 years ago. The uploader did not give evidence that the images have been published and when. They might come from an archive. As can be read on the talk page, the uploader is having contact with the daughter of the painter, who might give permission for publication of the paintings on Commons. We should wait a bit until she does, but she first has to be aware of the content of the licenses used at Commons. Ellywa (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Published for copyright purposes, means making a copy available to the public, not just appearing in a magazine or newspaper. The original creation by a commercial photographer is the original camera negative (OCN) and positive copies sold to the person posing for the image, starts the copyright clock. If the image stayed with the creator, it would remain unpublished. --RAN (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have not seen you interpretation of publishing before. It would mean all photos older then 70 years would be in PD. Alas, this is not the case. In addition, per ref template, the publication should be anonymous. I do not think handing the print of the photo to the client can be seen as anonymous publishing. But we will see what decision an admin will make based on our arguments. Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not all photos, Corbis and Getty Images would buy historic photo studios negatives most never turned into prints, so still under copyright as unpublished. We have over 10,000 Hollywood publicity images in Commons that were never published, just distributed to a member of the public. It varies from country to country, for Sweden portrait photos were not afforded a copyright until 1977. --RAN (talk) 06:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- BTW, the stamp of the photographer might be present on the backside of the original prints, who knows.... The uploader did not check anything, please read the talk page. Ellywa (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have seen all the mesages and I'm actually carryng out the process about the publication of the images whith the Wikipedia VRT and the heir to publish it to public domain. Also I have seen that you have not read any date because there are works that are obviusly not from the autor as the charcoal drawings from the bussines (from 1862 and 1898) that it is imposible that he made with 1 or with -35 years old, or the photographs of his parents, who died in 1931 and 1944 or another works that are not from anyone as the invitation to a exhibition (the table carée paintings).
- As I said, I'm carryng out the process about the publication and the heir is at the same time preparing the questionnaire.
- I apologise because is my first time upolading this kind of images. Have a precious weekend. David Ll L (talk) 20:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- BTW, the stamp of the photographer might be present on the backside of the original prints, who knows.... The uploader did not check anything, please read the talk page. Ellywa (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
VRT agent: Sorry about this. I've accepted some permissions, but then I've notice there are a lot of different painters. We can't accept a permission from the owner of the paintings. I've told them we need permission from the artist themselves or their inheritans and the photographers. That applies for all files made for other than J. Lajoie. I'll withdrawn the permissions wrong accepted and come back over this later. Sorry about the inconvenient. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título. Jean Lajoie, 1913.jpg” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título 2. Jean Lajoie.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Cestona. Jean Lajoie, 1958.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:La Fontaine Espagnole. Jean Lajoie, 1959.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título. León. Jean Lajoie, 1958.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Dans le SAS, Ouistreham. Jean Lajoie, 1949.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin nombre. Jean Lajoie, 1956.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título. Ibiza. Jean Lajoie.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Cyprès. Jean Lajoie.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin nombre. Timón de un Lockheed Constellation. Jean Lajoie, 1951.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:La péniche blessée. Jean Lajoie, 1947.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Carte à Noël.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Dans l'île des Pêcheurs. Jean Lajoie.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título 1. Jean Lajoie, 1946.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título 4. Jean Lajoie.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título. Jean Lajoie.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:The houses of Parliament. Jean Lajoie, 1910.jpg” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Villacontilde août. Jean Lajoie, 1958.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Étang de Thau en Bouzigues.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- VRT agent: I've accepted ONLY the works by J. Lajoie. The copyright status of all the rest of files remains unclear, including File:J. Lajoie modelando.png. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment I have added annotations to each of the files to facilitate the closing of the DR. Those with VRT permissions can be kept of course, most others will probably have to be deleted and and can be restored in various years. There is a claim that the photos are "anonymous", but is that really the case? Several seem to be studio portraits by professional photographers, those usually came (in those days) with some kind of print on the back or below the actual photo which named the studio/photographer. None of them seem to be yet old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}.
@Ganímedes: There is still a rather large number of works by Lajoie that were not marked as having a VRT permission (I have marked them as "no VRT permission" above). Is that intentional? --Rosenzweig τ 15:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título 5. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Soir sur l'inaccesible Etang. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sin título 3. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Perspective. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Petite ferme à Gross Born. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Les Feux. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Notre Îlot. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Le Comuniqué. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Le Mirador. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Pensées-fumées! Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Le Couloir. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Intérieur. Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Horizont... Jean Lajoie, 1940.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Barraque XIX! Jean Lajoie, 1940.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:La Porte... Jean Lajoie, 1941.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Cuisine. Jean Lajoie, 1940.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sieste à l'étage supérieur.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Rêve et bricolage.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:La Couchette telle qu'elle est.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:La Couchette telle qu'elle devrait être.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Entrée de Baraque.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Couchette à trois.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Baraque-réfectoire transformée.png” under ticket:2022012910005611. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Not intentional at all. Very sorry. There are 91 photos in the ticket and I didn't notice there was a second category with JL artworks. I think I've tagged them all now. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've updated the annotations accordingly. --Rosenzweig τ 23:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- It's not French, but Spanish almost all. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- He was a Frenchman who was born in France and died in France. He spent some time in Spain after World War II because one of his daughters (presumably the one giving the permissions?) had married a Spaniard. So copyright-wise, I guess we should treat his works as French (does not really matter with the permissions though), and also most of the photographs here are clearly French. --Rosenzweig τ 01:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ahh... So "French" means "French photo" and not "writen in French". Ok, I understand now. Sorry for my confusion. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- He was a Frenchman who was born in France and died in France. He spent some time in Spain after World War II because one of his daughters (presumably the one giving the permissions?) had married a Spaniard. So copyright-wise, I guess we should treat his works as French (does not really matter with the permissions though), and also most of the photographs here are clearly French. --Rosenzweig τ 01:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Not intentional at all. Very sorry. There are 91 photos in the ticket and I didn't notice there was a second category with JL artworks. I think I've tagged them all now. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the Lajoie works, all with a VRT permission now, also a drawing by Albert Robida and two simple, presumably Spanish photographs (with {{PD-Spain-photo}} and {{PD-1996}}). Deleted all of the other artwork by other artist, including one unsigned engraving without a source that is said to show something in 1898, which does not necessarily mean it's from 1898 (the other, "1862" drawing by Albert Robida was presumably also done later than 1862 because Robida would have been only 14, and I recently deleted a 1989 French postcard with the drawing of an 18th century town on it that was done by a modern artist "after an old view of the town"). I also deleted most of the photographs, except the two that were definitely taken in Spain. There was a demand to label them as "anonymous" and then say "Oops" and "claw them back" if the author becomes known and turns out to have died less than 70 years ago. That's not how it works, all I've seen is scans etc., I don't know the proper sources and can't tell if they're really "anonymous" in a legal sense. If they're over 120 years old, I can use {{PD-old-assumed}}, but they're not yet old enough. Many of them were given a date, helping to fill in the gaps for the rest mainly from the appearance of people or circumstances like military garb. I've added undeletion categories for all deleted files, based on 70 years pma if the author's year of death is known, based on PD-old-assumed if it is not known. If new facts about the dating of some of these files or the place they were taken (Spain instead of France?) turn up, please let me know, they might enable earlier undeletions. --Rosenzweig τ 15:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- One file restored as per [7]. Yann (talk) 08:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)