Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Philippine Sports Stadium
Files in Category:Philippine Sports Stadium
[edit]2014 bldg. no freedom of pano in the copyright law of the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the architects, sculptors, designers, archi firms, or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period. see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama
- File:0104jfIgulot Roads Sports Hall Arena Plants Bocauefvf 27.JPG Weak delete while a wide view, the three elements here are copyrighted: the sports stadium, the Arena (also completed in 2014), and tje billboard. Following polls made by me JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:0104jfIgulot Roads Sports Hall Arena Plants Bocauefvf 29.JPG Delete focus is on the stadium
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 01.JPG Delete stadium is the important focus here. Cropping it down, then the file is useless (fails COM:DM test)
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 03.JPG Delete same as above case
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 04.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 06.JPG Delete same as "File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 01.JPG"
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 07.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 08.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 09.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9907IglesiaStadiumfvf 11.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9956NewEraStadiumfvf 13.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9956NewEraStadiumfvf 14.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9956NewEraStadiumfvf 15.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9956NewEraStadiumfvf 16.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9956NewEraStadiumfvf 17.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfBulacanPhilArena9956NewEraStadiumfvf 21.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfCiudadINC28PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG Delete interior architectural elements
- File:JfCiudadINC28PhilStadiumfvf.JPG Delete interior architectural elements
- File:JfCiudadINC32PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfCiudadINC33PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG Delete stadium's architectural elements
- File:JfCiudadINC9814PhilArenafvf 07.JPG Keep general view
- File:JfCiudadVictoria9816PhilArenaStadiumINCfvf 02.JPG Weak delete cannot benefit from DM: cropping the image will leave it useless
- File:JfCiudadVictoria9816PhilArenaStadiumINCfvf 13.JPG Weak delete cannot benefit from DM: cropping the image will leave it useless
- File:JfCiudadVictoria9816PhilArenaStadiumINCfvf 14.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfCiudadVictoria9816PhilArenaStadiumINCfvf 15.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfCiudadVictoria9816PhilArenaStadiumINCfvf 16.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfCiudadVictoria9816PhilArenaStadiumINCfvf 18.JPG Delete stadium is in focus
- File:JfIgulotBocaue9371Bulacanfvf 01.JPG Keep general view
- File:JfIgulotBocaue9371Bulacanfvf 02.JPG Weak keep Weak keep stadium/arena in background, but seems borderline case
- File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 30.JPG Weak delete cannot benefit from incidental or accessory (and both concepts are absent in copyright law of the Philippines)
- File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 31.JPG Weak keep stadium/arena in background, but seems borderline case
- File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 32.JPG Delete stadium is in central focus
- File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 33.JPG Weak keep stadium/arena in background, but seems borderline case JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 11:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs my a) Consolidated Reply, Rejoinder and Noting of Suggestions by -Ianlopez1115 (talk) b) Sources and evidence and c) I Stay Neutral on the FOP Nominations: The Opinion of Department of Justice when rendered on FOP upon filing of Request for DOJ Opinon on FOP is superior to the IPO Director's Circulars and Rulings on FOP: the Deletion or Undeletion will be thus settled vis-a-vis the unsolved issues of Commons FOP New "Copyright Rules for the Government" released by IPOPHIL Memorandum Circular 2020-024 July 3 2020 By IPO Director Rowel S. Barba - Sec. 3 a on Fair Use, and 4 which clearly states that NO PRIOR Approval is needed for use or photography of statues and all Government whether local or national works like Town City Halls facades etc.
- I respectfully reproduce herein as part hereof my my reply and inputs as Regional Trial Court Judge of Malabon and Ateneo Law Alumni, Reply, Rejoinder: Roman Catholic Churches, statues and accessories are outside the scope of the prohibitions of Philippine Copyright Laws by virtue of Settle Jurisprudence and Case laws of Canon Law and International Law Judgefloro (talk) 08:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete most and Keep some per no COM:FOP Philippines, as per my review of the above mentioned files (made easier via looking at "d" marked files via VFC). Perhaps undelete when FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except two. ƏXPLICIT 11:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)