Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 8th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission info + pretty much useless as it’s just text with unrelated barely visible stock background Dronebogus (talk) 07:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom, DW CV, spam -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like NOT to make the photo available anymore! So delete the photo. I've noticed that this photo is being used by other people and I don't want that anymore Changed Insights. I hope you respect my wish. It's my own photo after all! 2001:1C00:A0E:6F00:48E7:93EE:C014:BDDE 09:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep "I no longer want to make the photo publicly available"
Sorry, but uploads and correct licensing here (GFDL / CC-by 3.0) are irrevocable. The project would be unworkable if we didn't require that.
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Railway Station Thusis.jpg
Also if you want to claim "this is my photo", then please log into your account, rather than editing as an IP. As an IP we just can't see that this is you, the original uploader. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Kept per Andy Dingley; no reason for deletion. Released under irrevocable free license more than 10 years ago; anon nomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright info, and also probably falls under “WTF even is this and why is it useful?” Dronebogus (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Free license claim unsupported by source (also OOS, possible spam) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source and licensing information are missing. {{No source since|month=December|day=8|year=2021}} (no/missing source, tagged by date) Malayalee0121 (talk) 11:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Info was missing because a vandal removed it; since reverted and all proper again now. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source and copy right information are missing. 50.65.104.10 14:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept Source and copyright info are clearly present. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, weird picture of child used in privacy violating article on non notable subject on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; private joke or troll/prank image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlternDamVek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy diagram, out of project scope (date in the future, main SA parties (ANC, EFF, DA...) not present

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses bitte löschen. Campus321 (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses bitte löschen. Campus321 (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses bitte löschen. Campus321 (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses ältere Bild, das ich vorher hochgeladen hatte, bitte löschen Campus321 (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses ältere Bild, das ich vorher hochgeladen hatte, bitte löschen. Campus321 (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses ältere Bild, das ich vorher hochgeladen hatte, bitte löschen Campus321 (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses ältere Bild, das ich vorher hochgeladen hatte, bitte löschen Campus321 (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe neues, leicht besseres Bild desselben Dokuments hochgeladen. Dieses ältere Bild, das ich vorher hochgeladen hatte, bitte löschen Campus321 (talk) 17:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copy of "File: Works of Plato, vol. 1 (Dacier,1701).pdf", which was mistakenly uploaded as the 2nd volume Oryang7 (talk) 02:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=620658697#File:The_works_of_Plato,_vol_2_(Dacier,_1701).pdf]. Yann (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Stang 17:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Text makes plain intent as personal insult/troll image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a web photo: https://twitter.com/SimplyAlgeria/status/1442787028660334593/photo/1 Ytoyoda (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot of a television serie can only be released under a CC licence by the makers of that program. Robotje (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Except where otherwise noted, all photos and videos by Vitaly Kuzmin are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License." Incompatible with Commons. Perfektsionist (talk) 21:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, withdrawn by nominator; mistake noting change of license date. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : [1] Supertoff (talk) 18:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:27, 8 December 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.leprogres.fr/sport/2021/12/02/dimitri-lipoff-repart-de-chine-avec-un-cinquieme-titre-de-champion --Krdbot 02:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

worthless attempt at meme Orizan (talk) 22:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted OOS, DW of usourced, prank/troll image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not cropped properly Rainbowgirl01 (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anpang01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Do not believe these are self created

Orizan (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why you just suddenly mark all (yes, ALL the 206 files I uploaded) my images as not self work? Proof? The only one that's not created by me using paint.net is Hamburger_Sanok-removebg-preview.png (which is remove.bg) which I marked as self work because the zoom was broken and the not self work button didn't appear. Anpang01 (talk) 08:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There may be legitimate issues on some of these, but there is no imaginable copyright issue with images such as the following: they are below the threshold of originality for copyright.

These are the first five I happened to look at. Again, there may be some images in this long list that have a copyright problem, but if so those should be singled out. Clearly we should not delete these wholesale based on a copyright issue that does not apply to a large number of them. @Orizan: can you give some examples of specific images that you think have an actual issue? Jmabel ! talk 21:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please withdraw this DR request. I am sorry. Orizan (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's reasonable to close this as kept. The original nominator wants to withdraw the request. While there may be some reason to delete some of these (e.g. scope, or some might even violate copyrights), the bulk of them are probably fine and this mass deletion is only going to lead to confusion. If any are actually issues, let's see them nominated either individually or in small, coherent groups with a clear rationale for deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 00:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, out of scope promotional material for Korean ginseng nutritional supplement. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete The underlying image is probably PD and even if this image was lifted from someplace else it looks like it might be a non-creative copy of the original object. Still, unlikely to be own work and the web resolution is automatically suspect. 69.174.144.79 03:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph; depicted person does not claim notability. WIkidata item where this is used only exists for structural purposes due to the Commons category. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-notable organisation though probably below TOO; no educational use. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-notable company; only used for promotion on Wikidata. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo digitally made up by user. It's not the original printed symbol and signature of Kipling. 37.160.57.230 00:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete  Delete (see below) The description says it appears in the 1911 edition of Puck of Pook's Hill. I haven't verified that this is not the case, but looking at the uploader's history at DR, there are numerous made-up or fantasy logos or flags. So for now, I'm going to say weak delete. 69.174.144.79 03:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Update to delete per the observation below. This is an unacceptably poor attempt at a SVG conversion. See File:Kipling swastika.png for what it is supposed to look like (and what the uploader says is the source). It appears that the creator of this SVG merely took File:Rudyard Kipling signature.svg (without crediting it as a source) and pasted it in the middle of a circle with a generic left-facing swastika, with incorrect line thickness. This is so poorly executed that it is out of COM:SCOPE. 69.174.144.79 16:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete- I agree that this work is not a swastika from one of the several Kipling books that had this image. Also, the signature is different than the original as well. See an original "Kipling Swastika" in the 1899 book, "The Works of Rudyard Kipling" published by Doubleday & McClure Company, New York. [2] ----Ooligan (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate upload of File:Hiromichi Tanaka and Tomoya Asano.jpg. – Rhain 02:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope. No conceivable educational purpose. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete I would've been weak keep since this could be used like other smileys or emoji, but in light of the uploader's other contributions and the fact that this is not in use, this is probably best deleted as well. 69.174.144.79 03:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Such a vote would have been an File:I AM EVIL.png Evil keep (please, for the love of God, ignore this "in use" when deleting the image). IronGargoyle (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eventualno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional photographs of non-notable actor and out of Commons project scope. Commons is not a free webhost. Images also seem to have been uploaded by subject but were not taken by the subject. No evidence of free licensing by the photographer.

IronGargoyle (talk) 02:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Dispositions as follows:
69.174.144.79 03:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say that File:Веселин Анчев;.jpg is an obvious selfie. Is it closer up? Yes, but you'll notice the subject's shoulder is not bent in the way you'd expect if a selfie was being taken. It's also the same camera as many of the other images (suggesting the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You convinced me. The EXIF issue shifts File:Веселин Анчев;.jpg as a  Weak delete for me. COM:PRP controls here. Also, even if VRTS were forthcoming, I would still support deletion for the first group of images due to their number and needless artistic B&W effect (which I believe presents COM:EDUSE issues), but would probably shift to weak keep on this particular image unless article at bgwiki were deleted. 69.174.144.79 17:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a non-notable online literary magazine. Out of Commons project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is unclear. Possibly still copyrighted. Veracious (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Indonesia Veracious (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Base map is from Apple Maps, making this a derivative work of that copyrighted map imagery. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used for any educational purpose Yeeno (talk) 04:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Presumably was in use when an enwiki article on this individual was created. Said article was deleted very soon after creation in 2014, and this image has apparently been orphaned since then. Delete as out of scope, no realistic educational use. 69.174.144.79 00:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magaramosdonis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Images not used on any projects, likely promotional.

Yeeno (talk) 05:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Images not used on any projects.

Yeeno (talk) 05:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability: out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree logo, unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BenitoINDO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unfree soccer logos. Unlikely to be own work.

IronGargoyle (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BenitoINDO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted sports logos, unlikely to be own work.

IronGargoyle (talk) 07:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is a derivative work of a copyrighted sign. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted certificate graphics. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soroushtaghat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope - not educationally useful

1989 (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing and (c) per description. Flickr account has 3 photos Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Classe2cPandino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality images, not educationally useful

1989 (talk) 08:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lesser-quality version of File:Georg Picard in Produktionsstätte in Obertshausen..jpg, redundant AlanyaSeeburg (talk) 09:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, no educational use, bad source, may be copyrighted. Drakosh (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IamPatriciaRosario (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, advertising, copyvio issues (photo subject is not copyright holder)

Spicy (talk) 09:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noblegram (talk · contribs)

[edit]
= Noblegram2

Commons is not your personal free web host.

Achim55 (talk) 10:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this logo does not exist... it is a *translation* in French of NFT - since when logos are translated ? Hsarrazin (talk) 10:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmoud Ali bblawy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope

Estopedist1 (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused diagram without explanation. Unlikely to be own work. Malcolma (talk) 10:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

resume in PDF, of non-notable person, without educational use. Drakosh (talk) 12:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She is international human rights defender MeeraTerada (talk) 12:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & no permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il s'agit d'une photo de moi dont je ne souhaite pas la diffusion. 89.3.1.164 18:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne souhaite pas la diffusion de cette image qui me représente. Laclédusonge (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{delete}} Laclédusonge (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Speedydelete droit à l'image}} Laclédusonge (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Speedydelete / violation du droit à l'image}} Laclédusonge (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The subject is notable, the image is properly licensed, the image does not seem to be made in private context; I see no valid reason for deletion. Ankry (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Ankry. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am Laura Alcoba and I oppose the publication of this image. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 13:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis Laura Alcoba et je m'OPPOSE à la publication de cette image qui est une atteinte à ma personne. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 14:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo diffusée sans accord de Laura Alcoba 80.13.50.138 14:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't like it" has never been a valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette image a été prise à mon insu. Je m'oppose à sa diffusion. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:56E:7844:E040:565A 20:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Je m'oppose à la publication de cette photo qui me représente. Je l'ai déjà fait savoir au photographe qui ignore mes demandes. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:6119:C0CA:70B5:F8FD 17:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per VRTS Ticket:2021101410006838. - FitIndia Talk 10:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je demande la suppression de cette photo qui a été prise à mon insu. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:8525:F767:211B:5B94 17:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per VRTS Ticket:2021101410006838. - FitIndia Talk 19:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publication faite en total désaccord avec la personne représentée. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:D567:7D17:F309:D64 14:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 14:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded with blatant COM:NETCOPYVIO of similar subject (File:TRO036 02.jpg), uploader sock of serial vandal/copyvio uploader, etc. PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1saadatian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signatures in Taiwan are considered as calligraphic work and copyright protected. There has been a court ruling that handwriting showing unique characteristics and the creator's creativity is subject to copyright protection.

This government regulation lists handwriting and calligraphy as examples of artistic works that are subject to copyright protection.

Wcam (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcam: Are these all recent? No expired copyright? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Yes these are all recent living people (no more than life+50 years which is copyright duration in Taiwan). --Wcam (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep
properly released by the people who signed.--Roy17 (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My bad. Scratched. --Wcam (talk) 22:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- all but the two. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TeodeGob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: inconsistent EXIF data or watermark crediting someone else.

P 1 9 9   17:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source Youtube channel seems rather questionable. Its uploads include captured TV streams and videos from Tiktok and other websites. Paul_012 (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only for promotion. ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Very unlikely to be own work. Vaishakh1234 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo was taken by a photographer who perished in the explosion. Not own work by uploader. Vaishakh1234 (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Very unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Vaishakh1234 (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Very unlikely to be own work of the uploader Vaishakh1234 (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Very unlikely to be own work of the uploader Vaishakh1234 (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 19:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Very unlikely to be own work of the uploader Vaishakh1234 (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

may be copyrighted as derivated work Queryzo (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:FOP (There is FOP in the UK for works like this). --Natuur12 (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concerted to a DR for tracking purposes.  Delete as per here. Previous closure is an error on my part. 2D graphic works aren't covered by FOP-UK. Natuur12 (talk) 19:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  • Delete: I came across this file being used in en:Rik Mayall and actually had tagged it with {{Dw-nsd}} before noticing that it actually had been discussed and kept per the above DR. Murals seems to be one of the things specifically referred to as a "2D graphic work of art" in COM:FOP United Kingdom which means Commons most likely can't keep it without the COM:CONSENT of the artist or artists who painted it. There's no reason to believe the the photo of the mural isn't the uploader's "own work", but more formal COM:VRT verification is going to be needed if the "own work" is going to be extended to the mural itself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of nondescript dog, no educational value over the numerous alternatives already on Commons, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Nemyra Volodymyr, Ukrainian artist. No evidence that uploader is the same as the artist, especially see EXIF data. Needs COM:VRT at a minimum. P 1 9 9   19:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image and COM:DW, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M00sickath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size promo images with transmission code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   20:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. Uncertain copyright status. P 1 9 9   20:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, little educational value, unusable. out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, little educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused silly low-res diagram, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: credit in summary not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9   20:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JeanetteW407 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mherz257 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and text diagram, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res photo of nondescript object, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eilcorecherche (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of text diagrams that should be in wiki-markup if needed, derivative works, and low-res diagrams without context. All out of scope and only used on sandbox page of user without any meaningful edits.

P 1 9 9   20:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   20:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused dummy election diagram, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: small crop from an unknown source, missing essential source info. P 1 9 9   20:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dvwefaw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size images with FB code in EXIF data, photoshopped image from unknown source. P 1 9 9   20:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of nondescript object with unrelated watermark, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myinfo asia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with transmission code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   20:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable group, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: low-res/web-size image with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sailohith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size image with FB code in EXIF data and poster.

P 1 9 9   20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: credit at bottom of image not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9   20:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unidentified signature, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liamthornhill1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works but historical photos, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   20:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Politiclatin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing or FB code EXIF data. File:Tomadeposecion.jpg looks like a scanned image.

P 1 9 9   20:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   20:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. And not own work as per watermark. P 1 9 9   20:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asadul6259 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: not educationnaly useful/ (self?)promotion of a youtube channel.

Henxter (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zenonek2345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Edited photos that serve no educational purpose.

1989 (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dadada12131 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Orizan (talk) 22:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jyaugust. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jyaugust (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photo

Orizan (talk) 22:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo of non-contributor. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 22:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Orizan (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Orizan (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glenkwhite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

content probably taken from somewhere else.

Orizan (talk) 22:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abubakari Khadijah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images, no EXIF raises considerable doubt whether these are actually own work as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kslmed3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Worthless content not suitable for commons.

Orizan (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no useful EXIF. Is this actually own work as claimed? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 04:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Branton26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. Unlikely to be own work.

IronGargoyle (talk) 07:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Display picture for person? 191.119.88.122 12:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: source = "i just downloaded it from internet". --Strakhov (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error LG UltraLink (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CIAO IO SONO ANDRI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos with bogus CC claims.

Эlcobbola talk 15:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Buddyemus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own works, wrong license, no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. These are very likely uploads by a sock of banned user Vishaal Elias Manesh. The user often works in tandem by creating hoax and/or copyvio images on Commons (example accounts: Lopesriven and Lislecowls) and then adding them to articles in other projects. The images uploaded by this account are very similar or duplicates of those uploaded by the other banned accounts.Citing (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Yann and also agree to Citing. Contributers2020Talk to me here 08:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BollyNewslocal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional / Not-notable. Also see, Category:Sockpuppets of Anuragjha17. @Krd: Are we accepting photo's permission from Non-notable persons?

Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 10:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conterquestion: Is it the duty of the VRT member to determine notability of the subject, and do they / should they have discretion to refuse permission in non-obvious cases of notability? I don't think so. --Krd 11:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just to clarify, we are no sockpuppet of anyone, please stop assuming things Mr. Tulsi Bhagat and the pictures in no way intends to promote anything or anyone as it is just a public event held in the city and the person you’re speaking about was eligible to attend it, therefore being photographed in it. As for the notability the person is notable and has been covered in articles by reputed publications and is a well known actor/director from Nagpur. As far as we are aware there is no notability criteria for Commons as compared to Wikipedia and alike. And even if there is the subject is much qualified for the same. Going through the deleted archive history of the category it looks like you’ve got a personal problem from the subject, you’re trying rigorously to announce him non notable. BollyNewslocal (talk)

Kept: While the individual images may be borderline promotional, I still think they are within the project scope of Commons since they illustrate the events at a film screening. Moreover, there are various actors depicted instead of focusing on Anurag Jha only. Add to that that Commons does not have a notability requirement like Wikipedia, but media here need to have an educational context. The latter can be found here in my opinion. --De728631 (talk) 19:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Methyl-methoxyacetate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 08:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've found this image in three places: The claimed source on the Goa Directorate of Civil Aviation website, which has a license that restricts the freedom to make derivative works, a page on the Goa Department of Finance public-private partnerships division site, which claims ARR, and on the website of the private owner, which is also ARR. I don't think {{GODL-India}} applies because the State of Goa is not a ministry, department, organization, or agency of the Government of India. Because this is a rendering, it's likely it was produced by the designer, architect, or developer, not the government. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've found this image in three places: The claimed source on the Goa Directorate of Civil Aviation website, which has a license that restricts the freedom to make derivative works, a page on the Goa Department of Finance public-private partnerships division site, which claims ARR, and on the website of the private owner, which is also ARR. I don't think {{GODL-India}} applies because the State of Goa is not a ministry, department, organization, or agency of the Government of India. Because this is a rendering, it's likely it was produced by the designer, architect, or developer, not the government. Alotorus (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 14:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Unable to find evidence in the source website that the image is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Vaishakh1234 (talk) 23:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by King of Hearts at 08:15, 19 December 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://m.terms.naver.com/entry.naver?docId=556135&cid=46626&categoryId=46626 --Krdbot 14:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fairly recent photo (see cars) can't be PD-Russia. Also found at alamy.com [3] where it's dated 3 August 2016 and labeled "This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright." You decide. Retired electrician (talk) 00:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Better safe than sorry. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work photographs of text and 2D art. Photo quality is so poor that these images would be unusable even if they were not derivative works.

IronGargoyle (talk) 03:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Disposition as follows:
69.174.144.79 17:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{FoP-China}} didn't apply to indoor artworks in 2015. 03:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Unsure This depends entirely on whether the amendment to Chinese copyright law applies to derivative works created prior to the amendment's entry into force. I don't see any indication either way at COM:FOP China, which I suppose might counsel a delete on COM:PRP grounds. Still, the legal issue with FOP shouldn't be the state of the law when the derivative work was created, but what the current state of the law is. As such I am unsure. (see below) 69.174.144.79 17:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete per JWilz12345. There is insufficient compliance with the requirements for FOP in China. We needn't reach the issue of retroactive application of the new Chinese FOP standards. To the extent it matters, it's worth noting that this image is pretty blurry at maximum zoom, to the point that much of the text is unreadable. I think this should be taken as an additional factor counseling deletion. 69.174.144.79 13:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per renewed COM:FOP China which included indoor works. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, no attribution to artists. While COM:FOP China now covers indoor works and the graphic work there is inside a museum (which is normally publicly-accessible premises), Chinese FOP requires attribution. Who were the artists of the graphic work? The law seems silent on copyrighted anonymous works in public places. Already-deleted images of similar cases were recently denied restoration notwithstanding broader Chinese FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Keep I found out the artist is named Wang Qingrui. His name was actually shown on the far right of the photo, though the resolution was awful. Two additional sources are available to verify his authorship, including a newspaper interview[1] and a blogpost written by his studio.[2] Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 14:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. 苏日娜. "故土牵情 有一种情愫叫方言". 北方新报. Archived from the original on 2021-12-26.
  2. 王清锐. 难活、麻求烦,呼市方言漫画全集. 清锐出品.

Kept: Keep per User:Lovewhatyoudo - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominate again. {{FoP-China}} didn't include indoor works before 2021. 02:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards  Keep this time. Notwithstanding the issue of retroactivity (which must be sent to COM:VP/C or Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/China), there is already proper attribution to the author who created the 2D graphic works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ibrahim.ID as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: a copyrighted logo for Alahad cannel. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Unsure The relevant TOO would appear to be Iraq. We have no information about the TOO in Iraq on COM:Iraq, unfortunately. My gut instinct is that this might hit the US TOO though. The colors, reflections, shading, and the swirl itself all seem reasonably creative to me. But I don't pretend to fully understand Commons' interpretation of the factually messy concept of TOO. So I'm unsure. 69.174.144.79 17:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: TOO creative for my tastes regarding COM:TOO - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DHN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: historical image of unknown origin, not created by uploader [4]. Should be evaluated for possible PD status. King of ♥ 04:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: , it is the colorised version of Deer Team's members supervise grenade training in Tan Trao, August 1945. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the file's license allows colorisation. Solavirum (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak delete The issue isn't that it's a colorized version of another image (the other was uploaded by this same uploader just a few days earlier). Both images are suspect because they're historical, low resolution, have suspicious EXIF data, and are marked as own work. The image that is the subject of this DR is also suspect because the file description translation states that the colorization work was done by someone called Nguyễn Hải Nam. It is not known if this is the same person as the uploader, and in any case, the presence of a transmission code in the EXIF suggests it was taken from a different website. I do believe, however, that it's possible this image is PD, per the copyvio claim made by DHN which refers to a U.S. Army history website—while that is not an automatic indication of PD-USGov or similar, it provides a route of research to vet the origin and copyright status of this and related images. 69.174.144.79 23:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DHN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unknown origin, not created by uploader, [5]. Should be evaluated for possible PD status. King of ♥ 04:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete Not own work just based on the file description, which states it originally appeared in a Vietnamese newspaper called "Việt Nam độc lập". It is possible that a different copyright status applies based on the status of the newspaper or the organization that published it, but I do not have enough information to go on. Unless such a status is proved, this image should be deleted per COM:PRP. 69.174.144.79 00:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. Pretty sure that’s not Shane Dawson 2. Pretty sure this doesn’t illustrate the topic of pornography 3. No meaningful copyright or source info 4. Just WTF Dronebogus (talk) 07:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5. No es trabajo propio.

Si :) Dronebogus (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Church destroyed in 1937 , cannot be own work of 2021. No source, incorect author. Drakosh (talk) 08:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:L’Aclot.pdf, not used anymore on wa.wikisource Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:L’Aclot.pdf, not used anymore on wa.wikisource Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 10:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file can be found on the Internet at least from 2021-08-28 23:05 https://vk.com/photo132328956_457257424. The uploaded file is the same size. Probably this file is from the Internet, and not "self/own work". Sunpriat (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free screenshot from a copyrighted game Nthep (talk) 11:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content from the depicted person's Website. Additional question: Is the uploader identical with the photographer? 91.34.37.14 11:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything copyrightable here? --212.174.190.23 17:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The display, the name of the editor, the images, the typography at least.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, what makes you think that?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:L’Aclot.pdf, not used anymore on wa.wikisource Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 12:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover, wrong license. May be simple enough, but it depends of the country. Yann (talk) 12:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and non-notable self-promotion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo doesn't reflect the work of Melody's Echo Chamber, it's a poor quality fan photo and causes more arms than good. As management for Melody's Echo Chamber we politely request it's removal. Walterretlaw (talk) 12:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's in use, sourced for documenting one of the members. If you want to supply photographs, feel free to upload some with COM:VRT, but at this moment, I am not convinced the file needs deletion. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Плохая копия File:Kira Death Note.png Fluttershytalk 12:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo NANöR (talk) 12:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was captured at his office, Sabon titin Mandawari Date 8 July 2020 191.119.88.122 12:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo of non-notable subject - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:L’Aclot.pdf, not used anymore on wa.wikisource Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 12:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Swahili: Akiwa kwenye maandalizi ya Tamthilia Ya Saviora 191.119.88.122 12:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hii sio sababu halali ya kufuta. However, CSD#F10 would fit. --Achim55 (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Promotional personal photo - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't tell whether the photo is created by the uploader. I also can't tell whether the photo is a screenshot of a music video or was taken at a music video production set. The photo looks also professional, especially in high quality. George Ho (talk) 13:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Very well could be taken by them. Doesn't have a troublesome upload history and also didn't find another version online. Feel free to renominate if you find that otherwise - or contact the uploader regarding if it is theirs or not (or ask for COM:VRT). Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicado indevidamente. 177.87.0.128 13:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused promotional image that fails COM:TOO - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently a WIP version of File:Pahang carte des districts en 2010.png (they left an island uncolored) Enyavar (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently a WIP version of File:Pahang carte des districts en 2010.png (they left an island uncolored, otherwise identical) Enyavar (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either it should be PD-shape, not GPL or it is a derivative work of Flickr logo and therefore copyright vioation (note to self: is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Flickr-logo.jpg something qualifying for PD-shape? Would it be OK to upload it to commons?) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I think it's OK - lots are here: Category:Flickr logos and I think we'd have the entire category deleted if it was troublesome. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation , no indication on source website that the image is available under the Free Art Licence or any other Commons-compatible licence. Webpage: http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/helicopters-in-special-operations/ Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy violation. The source says that the image is from Wickey (talk) 13:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added forgotten file: File:GenIVRoadmap-en.svg, Ellywa (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building appears recent. There is no freedom of panorama in Iran, and architect's COM:VRTS permission for photographer/Wikipedian's use of commercial license is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: Hello, this building is in Karaj (Iran) and it is different from Milad Tower in Tehran, only the names of these two are the same; And your argument is wrong. --Parsa 2au (talk) 14:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Parsa 2au: when was the building completed (if the architect is unknown)? I may withdraw this DR if the building is old enough (more than 30 years old). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: This building has been built for about 10 years. But I still do not agree with you, Because you confused this building with another building. there are other photos of this building like this. --Parsa 2au (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Parsa 2au: I am not confused. I said (with added emphasis): "Note that the file name is occupied by old deleted files that previously depict Milad Tower of Tehran (also off-limits on Commons). This one is different, but I suspect the building is recent enough." I mentioned that the file name was used by some deleted files of a different structure in the past, and one is of a different building, but I also suspect that it is too recent to be more than 30 years (for it to be in public domain). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Now your problem is the file name? If the problem is the name to change the file name! --Parsa 2au (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Parsa 2au: since the building is less than 30 years old (about 10 years as you said), then there is no point in renaming the file. A recent architecture – copyrighted – in a country with no freedom of panorama for free uses of images of copyrighted architecture and public art. Therefore, permission from the architect is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Fails COM:FOP for IRan - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is File:Coat of arms of Romania (1952–1965).svg which I believe represents an actual coat of arms from that period. User is known for uploading duplicats, and tweaking existing files. Aʀvєδuι + 14:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit] uploader has been blocked as a puppet. Aʀvєδuι + 12:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image may be licensed freely, but the tower here is unfree. There is no freedom of panorama in Iran, and COM:VRTS permission from architect Mohammad Reza Hafezi for authorization of the use of commercial Creative Commons license is required. This fails COM:De minimis as the tower is the intended focus (cropping it out or blurring it makes the file useless). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image may be licensed freely, but the tower here is unfree. There is no freedom of panorama in Iran, and COM:VRTS permission from architect Mohammad Reza Hafezi for authorization of the use of commercial Creative Commons license is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While night time view, important details of the tower are still visible. There is no freedom of panorama in Iran, and COM:VRTS permission from architect Mohammad Reza Hafezi for authorization of the use of commercial Creative Commons license is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not worried about permission - it's public domain artwork most likely, but, it's clearly not "own work" of uploader and without context it's useless. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As of 1 October 2021, former Beuth Hochschule/Beuth University of Applied Sciences is called Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT). The file "Logo BHT Berlin.svg" shows the old Logo which is no longer used but the file name suggests that it is the current official logo of the BHT. 2001:638:812:5:0:0:0:71 14:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dies ist das Logo der Beuth Hochschule für Technik. Seit 1. Oktober 2021 heißt die Hochschule "Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT)". Da der Dateiname des Logos "Logo BHT Berlin.svg" lautet, wird es fälschliche als das Logo der BHT angezeigt. Z.B. wird es von Google als Logo der Einrichtung verwendet. 2001:638:812:5:0:0:0:71 15:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file name could just be changed to make this clear. --Leyo 20:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We keep historical logos of notable organizations. Feel free to request a file name via the process at COM:RENAME. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free work as Signatures in Taiwan are copyrightable. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Signatures of people from Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1962 photograph is highly unlikely to be own work as claimed. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: first published in 2018, see TinEye search. Needs COM:VRT at a minimum. P 1 9 9   16:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author unknown, date unknown, source gives zero copyright information, and the claim that the image comes from the Ars Goetia (a 19th century grimoire) is patently false. This is a modern drawing by a modern artist, and we need that artist's permission to host it here on Commons or else it must be deleted. A loose necktie (talk) 16:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, speedy delete then? I asked someone if that was from Ars Goetia and they said it was, but if it is not I have no reason to defend this. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have read the Ars Goetia-- this image is not in there. I do not know how to change this deletion nomination to a speedy deletion nomination. Do you? A loose necktie (talk) 02:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I ignore how to do so unfortunately, I don't open AfDs frequently and the last one I had opened was months ago. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 13:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I contradict the PD claim: this is recognizable as an early-stage GMap from 2007, with some stuff put on top. Hence CopyVio; as a replacement an OSM.org map should be created Enyavar (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be COM:FLICKRWASH. The Flickr account was created in December 2021 but the film poster is from 2016. If the uploader owns the rights to the image, they should follow the steps described at COM:VRT to verify the license. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it looks like a re-upload of a previously deleted file, per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-07#File:Promotional Poster for The Bastard word.jpg. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The user "JezMichaels" is our group wikipedia account for us the company that creatd the picture.
We have changed the licence for the image to "Public Domain" for it to be accepted here on Wikipedia.
Is this ok? JezMichaels (talk) 01:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JezMichaels The issue isn’t the license on Flickr. It’s fine the way it is, but because the Flickr account was created years after the image was published, it’s not particularly useful for determining its license. After all, anyone can create a Flickr account and claim to represent a company. My recommendation remains following the steps described at COM:VRT. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of non-existing movement invented by user. 37.162.162.28 17:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:L’Aclot.pdf, not used anymore on wa.wikisource Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was the uploader and there is a licensing issue 63.157.245.74 17:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license, unreliable source. Source link goes to alternative history fan website, which labels it as as official portrait of Mitt Romney "King of America". I doubt that website is the actual license holder. (Meanwhile the uploader has listed themselves as the author - I am skeptical that they are the actual photographer, but am willing to be convinced if they present evidence.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination- Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is a derivative of the advertising. There is COM:FOP in India for 2D works per COM:FOP India. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ben Schumin seems to post photos in Wikimedia with the intent to bait unsuspecting people into using them, then he has Pixsy harass them constantly for copyright infringement even when the image has been removed. I don't think his work should be displayed anywhere on Wikimedia servers. He just uses these posts to make money. 2600:8806:6100:39:ED04:E57C:17ED:813B 18:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep  Comment Welcome, "random" IP to Wikimedia Commons. You make several serious claims that are unsubstantiated. First is the one that this file was not, as you seem to claim, to be uploaded by him, but by me. Unless you claim that i´m Ben Schumin and so changed country, nationality and continent this does not hold water.
Also Ben Schumin was pretty clear, as can still be seen in this original flickr page, that "Ben Schumin is a professional photographer who captures the intricacies of daily life. This image may be used under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0. Please provide artist attribution, as well as a link to the original photo and to the license terms.".
If someone takes his images without any attribution and without referring the license, it is merely someone steals other people´s work and should not complain of being "harass (...) constantly for copyright infringement" when the author and copyright holder defends his rights that he not given up or licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0 or similar licenses. Tm (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural keep due to trollish nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work". Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Работа была сделана по договору оказания услуг (в данном случае услуг фотографа) с передачей авторских прав заказчику (заказчик - человек изображенный на фото) SBelyavsky (talk) 23:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Advertising. Out of scope. - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per https://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/copyright, the contents of the website are CC0, but this "does not apply to photos, videos, infographics, and other forms of pictures" (translated from Dutch). I can see no evidence that matches this particular image up with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence as claimed by the uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 2021? No... Xocolatl (talk) 19:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Clean up please! - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even though the cover it's not entirely viewable, this picture clearly depicts a book cover, which is a copyrighted work of art and it can't be on Commons Mannivu · 19:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You really can only see the font. To me, de minimus - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 2021? No... Xocolatl (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lino37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and artwork, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   20:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2012 (pd in 2082); no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2012 (pd in 2082); no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr gehrter Martin S., ich habe Karl Matthäus Winter persönlich gekannt, der mir - drei Monate vor seinem Tod im Jahre 2012 - die Erlaubnis für die Abbildungen gegeben hat.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dr. Conrad-Peter Joist
Schubertstr.10
53881 Euskirchen
Tel. 02251-778888
cpjoist@t-online.de 2003:E8:CF2A:1300:1579:31CF:4DB3:20E4 11:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Howdy.carabao as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Tenuidactylus caspius.png|user=Howdy.carabao
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG).-- Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dup - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2012 (pd in 2082); no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo was already uploaded by another user (s. File:BMWi Logo 2021.svg) Narnaudov1 (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dup - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2000 (public domain in 2071); no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2000 (public domain in 2071); no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2000 (public domain in 2071); no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2000 (public domain in 2071); no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misleading title. There is no source to attest that it is specifically a "Christian" swastika. Swastikas like this may have been used in Christianity but are used in other religious cultures as well. 2001:B07:A2A:1884:492:43BE:3CC3:EA6E 21:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused vanity logo - doesn't align with the categories, etc. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo digitally made up by user. Not the original guise of the Ahnenerbe Irminsul. 37.162.162.28 21:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Symbol invented by RootOfAllLight without historical attestation. 37.162.162.28 21:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: At 21:24 on 8 December 2021, after the deletion nomination, the original invented "Buddhist swastika" guise was overwritten with a standard swastika (not specifically Buddhist) of which there are already many versions on Commons.--37.162.162.28 21:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful and normally unseeable white-on-white symbol. Also, apparently symbol invented for a movie. 37.162.162.28 21:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fan art - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful. Logo of a fictional brotherhood from a videogame. 37.162.162.28 21:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derived work - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Symbolism invented by user. 37.162.162.28 21:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal art , out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Symbol invented by user. 37.162.162.28 21:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag without meaning invented by user. 37.162.162.28 21:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a standard version of the Hindu swastika attested in Hindu culture. Invented by user. 37.162.162.28 21:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The captions of the images are not understandable. The image should be remade in a more precise form. 37.162.162.28 21:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the original author of this image. I would like to request its removal due to conflicts of interest (this image might indirectly promote my product). Huanggab (talk) 21:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mid res, no EXIF, clearly from this set which is attributed to Samantha Santana. Evidence of permission needed. Эlcobbola talk 22:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by XenonX3 as no source (No source since) Ke4roh (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The caption provided with the image attributes it to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, which is a U.S. Government operation, in accordance with the existing license information that it is a work of the U.S. government. I found and supplied a dead PNNL link with the photo ID from https://picturethis.pnnl.gov/picturet.nsf/by+id/SMAA-496PGG . Perhaps you know an archive that would serve it? The image itself is not in the PNNL Flickr account, which seems to have superseded the old web site. I'm certain it is PD-USGov. -- Ke4roh (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Trusting the commentor - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the description, this is a studio photo, so the copyright is owned by the photographer. It is far too recent to assume that they have been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Sorry ,what exactly did you mean "so the copyright is owned by the photographer" ?
For example,if i go to studio where i can take photo for ID card ,then my photo will be belonged to the photographer?
The man in the photo is my grandfather,who has passed away. My aunt asked me ,to publish information about him and his works ,as he is Honored Art Worker of Azerbaijan.
It was standard thing , to visit photo studio to take photo, as only few people had camera at that time,Soviet Union time. Till now,in Azerbaijan people visit photo studios to take photo,it does not mean that their's photo automatically will be owned by the photographer :)
At what age exactly the photo was taken ,we don't know,there is no information about it.
P.s please assist me ,to shred light on my grandfather's works ,as his works still on the buildings of the city Baku,Azerbaijan. Sshafibeyli (talk) 15:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

worthless content Orizan (talk) 22:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://digitaltmuseum.no/011085442990/kystfortet-ved-belteviga. Not released with a free license. 4ing (talk) 22:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:NOPENIS Di (they-them) (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged for speedy deletion by Nanahuatl with the rationale "there is a better version and this one is not being used". De728631 (talk) 23:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Technically, these are not duplicates but the other file is much clearer and the boundary around the proper image is not needed anyway. De728631 (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a better version and this one is not being used. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]