Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Dollfus,_aéronaute_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png){kind=link}
_Mengelberg,_Mme_Loudon,_général_Lasson_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Image_16.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Image_17.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Bild_010.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Spiegelung_Plakat_und_Stadtmuseum_-_Bild_001.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Oefenbestand. Museum van Bommel van Dam (talk) 09:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Clearly trolling in intent (account was created, photo was uploaded, and the single edit was to upload at the unrelated "Urethral Sounding " en.wiki article. Photo is uninstructive for any use. BirdValiant (talk) 16:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have additionally added the speedy delete tag to the file. BirdValiant (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploading error, uploaded the wrong resolution and used the wrong licensing. MikiSollo (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded unofficial emblem design by mistake. Uploader requesting deletion? MikiSollo (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploading error, uploaded the wrong resolution and used the wrong licensing. MikiSollo (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded unofficial flag design by mistake. Uploader requesting deletion? MikiSollo (talk) 13:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
no permission given Hoyanova (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Textures are certainly nonfree. File itself also is not freely licensed. Copyright violation. Leijurv (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- For more clarity, zooming into the textures shows that these are Vanilla Minecraft block textures which are copyrighted by Mojang/Microsoft. Additionally, the person that created this image (downloaded the terrain from 2b2t, then created this render in an external program) may not have released their work under a free license (there is no license). Leijurv (talk) 23:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy flags and symbols ("proposed" and "unofficial" mean simply "made-up"); violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep, per "COM:INUSE" (at a user page, where also selfies are allowed), the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Brick House (no FoP for sculptures in the United States) Filetime (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This chemical structure is described as bromine trifluoride, but it actually depicts boron trifluoride. The uploader has already made the needed correction, but uploaded it to a different filename (File:BrF3noLPsCorrected.png). This file can't be used to illustrate boron trifluoride because it has the wrong geometry for that (boron trifluoride is trigonal planar). This file is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 12:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- I created it. Its a mistake. Please delete.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom & in agreement with the uploader. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and request by uploader. --Leyo 23:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Sigil of Camael.jpg
- File:Sigil of Raphael.jpg
- File:Sigil of Haniel.jpg
- File:Archangel Michael Sigil.jpg
- File:Zadkiel's Sigil.jpg
- File:Zaphkiel Sigil.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Low-res images with "FBMD" in the metadata = Facebook downloads.
- File:Michał Jakóbowski.jpg
- File:Mateusz Kuzimski.jpg
- File:Adrian Lis.jpg
- File:Joel V. Pereira.jpg
- File:Michał Skóraś.jpg
- File:Kuba Moder.png
- File:Puchacz2.png
- File:Spychala.png
- File:Tymoteusz Puchacz.png
- File:Moder.png
- File:Dani Ramirez.png
- File:Czerwinski.png
- File:Mateusz Kupczak.png
- File:Jan Grzesik.png
- File:Kamil Jozwiak.jpg
- File:Jakub Kaminski.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Files with bad file names
[edit]- File:Capturaa1.png
- File:Capturaa10.png
- File:Capturaa11.png
- File:Capturaa12.png
- File:Capturaa13.png
- File:Capturaa14.png
- File:Capturaa15.png
- File:Capturaa16.png
- File:Capturaa17.png
- File:Capturaa18.png
- File:Capturaa19.png
- File:Capturaa2.png
- File:Capturaa20.png
- File:Capturaa21.png
- File:Capturaa22.png
- File:Capturaa23.png
- File:Capturaa24.png
- File:Capturaa25.png
- File:Capturaa26.png
- File:Capturaa27.png
- File:Capturaa3.png
- File:Capturaa4.png
- File:Capturaa5.png
- File:Capturaa6.png
- File:Capturaa7.png
- File:Capturaa8.png
- File:Capturaa9.png
Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism - cf. Wikipedia in French. tyseria (d) 00:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- delete, vandalism. --LD (talk) 01:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Image created only for promotional purposes. Associated article at enwiki already speedy deleted for their promotional and significance criterion. JalenFolf (talk) 02:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - seems to be a design for social media with business's contact info; promotional and has no realistic educational use. - Whisperjanes (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Common's project scope - not realistically useful for an educational purpose ( low resolution family photo ), and not in use - Whisperjanes (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: believed to be a screen shot of some sort of DNA tracing ancestry software. No educational value. Unused. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranjith Rooker (talk • contribs) 16:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 16:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. Should be converted to a wikitable if the information is useful. Stefan2 (talk) 18:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
著作権侵害のため Copyright violation（link）[[user:（あ）]] ([[w:ja:user:（あ）|jawp]] / [[w:ja:user talk:（あ）|talk]]) (talk) 18:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 190.224.149.68 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Spam image Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Question What does it mean to call this a "spam image"? User:HeinrichStuerzl appears to be a longtime user in good standing, and there's nothing obviously spammy about this photo to me, so please discuss. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)- Keep This deletion request was created as vandalism. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 15:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope - personal selfie. - Whisperjanes (talk) 05:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't have any educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 07:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright, unless it has been validated 50.232.175.122 15:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:22, 3 October 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Non-free album cover; see http://www.rogertaylorofficial.com/ --Krdbot 01:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Pahunkat as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1495010/M25-insulate-Britain-protest-injunction-home-office-priti-patel-latest HR image with EXIF, this link is not the source (lower resolution). Yann (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is a re-upload of File:Insulate Britain hold a press conference out the Home London, London (22.9.2021).jpg, which was also found to be a copyvio. Pahunkat (talk) 12:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- This deletion is IMO an error. Like the one mentioned above, our image is bigger and has EXIF data. This link is not the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Yann. The Express' photo is credited to Insulate Britain, and a Jamie Low has taken photos for this group and Extinction Rebellion. Fences and windows (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- This deletion is IMO an error. Like the one mentioned above, our image is bigger and has EXIF data. This link is not the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: as per comments above. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The license of TouchWiz on this picture, does not allow use on Wikimedia Commons. Hajoon0102 (talk) 23:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand this objection. This is literally a photo of the device I own - David Gerard (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- @David Gerard: You have the right to use the software, but you do not have the right to share the software, see Commons:Screenshots for details.
- @Hajoon0102: I blurred the copyright-protected w:TouchWiz, is a version-deletion of the first image ok? — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: Okay. - Hajoon0102 Talk 12:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Hajoon0102 and David Gerard: first version deleted, blurred version not affected by TouchWiz-copyright. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 15:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: Okay. - Hajoon0102 Talk 12:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: valid reason for deletion, however blurred file not affected, therfore just version-deletion. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 15:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Badge of the House of Windsor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 15:14, 22 October 2021 UTC: No license since 2021-09-22. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 19:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Empty sound file. At first I thought it might be my browser or something (even though the page itself reports "length 0.0 s, 0 bps"), but then I downloaded it and ran it through ogginfo with the following results:
New logical stream (#1, serial: 0000715a): type vorbis
Vorbis headers parsed for stream 1, information follows...
Version: 0
Vendor: Xiph.Org libVorbis I 20070622 (1.2.0)
Channels: 1
Rate: 44100
Nominal bitrate: 96.000000 kb/s
Upper bitrate not set
Lower bitrate not set
Negative or zero granulepos (0) on Vorbis stream outside of headers. This file was created by a buggy encoder
Vorbis stream 1:
Total data length: 29 bytes
Playback length: 0m:00.000s
Average bitrate: 1.#INF00 kb/s
Logical stream 1 ended
-- Perey (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Derivative of a file at https://www.centraldance.com.br/produtos/macacao-masculino-regata-capezio/?variant=341182854 with no indication of that being free. There's also no indication that the users owns the original picture, and no link to it as provided. YuriNikolai (talk) 04:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Problematic licensing. Likely not own work, already present in several shop websites as a reverse image search shows, with no indication of it being under a free license on any of them. If uploader is indeed the original photographer, OTRS might be needed YuriNikolai (talk) 04:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muijul Hoque Azad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. also see enwp discussion
—MdsShakil (talk) 04:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erik.security (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history (many copvios), user is an undisclosed paid editor according to fawiki
4nn1l2 (talk) 06:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
is not the size i want DeogratiusMutoka (talk) 09:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Lucasraven12
[edit]- File:Danish Maniyar.jpg
- File:Juned King.jpg
- File:Danish interview with toi.jpg
- File:IMG-20210607-WA0006.jpg
User uploaded pictures of 3 people, suggests s/he is all 3 people and is also all 3 photographers; unclear authorship but more likely a couple of personal files and a couple of celebrity pix, being out of scope personal photos and copyright violations respectively. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer Hyméros-(talk) 10:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer Hyméros-(talk) 10:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer Hyméros-(talk) 10:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer Hyméros-(talk) 10:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet (also blocked) of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer Hyméros-(talk) 10:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support : long term abuse without disclosure. --LD (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Small images without metadata (EXIF), last remaining files after many copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Chhamb Bhimber AJK.jpg
- File:Chhamb Bhimber District Azad Kashmir..jpg
- File:Chhamb Sector Bhimber District AJK.png
- File:Memorial of Maj. General Iftikhar Khan Janjua in Chhamb.png
- File:Chhamb Bhimber District AJK.png
Yann (talk) 11:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Mohammad Shahid Ahmed Khan
[edit]- File:Opposing Manipur people's bill 1951 Mohammad Shahid Ahmed Khan Jiribam manipur.jpg
- File:Mohammad Shahid Ahmed Khan .. Jiribam manipur.jpg
Screenshots, need to know where they came from to determine the license. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Jackie Robinson
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the United States. The statue is from 1998, see w:Jackie Robinson (statue).
- File:Statue of Jack Roosevelt Robinson (1919-1972), Journal Square, Jersey City.jpg
- File:Statue of Jackie Robinson - Jersey City - New Jersey - USA.jpg
,_Journal_Square,_Jersey_City.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan2 (talk) 12:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. No evidence of COM:VRT licensing permission from the artist, Susan Wagner. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of a free license for the toy. Yann (talk) 12:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete This mural are not the work of the uploader, so their licence is only valid for the photo but for 2D artistic works in the US we require the copyright status of the work, so this image are not necessarily freely licensed. We need to know the artist and date of installation to accurately determine the copyright status of the image, otherwise PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
_SAAM-1974.28.16_1.jpg)
Comment: I found this study for the mural but we need to determine if it was executed under the Works Progress Administration program. If so full details need to be added to the file and probably should be renamed. Ww2censor (talk) 13:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Harry Louis Freund, Arrival of First Train in Herrington--1885 (mural study, Herrington, Kansas Post Office), ca. 1937, oil and tempera on paperboard, Smithsonian American Art Museum https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/arrival-first-train-herrington-1885-mural-study-herrington-kansas-post-office-8648
- Most of the Post Office works of art were funded through commissions under the Treasury Department's Section of Painting and Sculpture (later known as The Section of Fine Arts) and not the WPA.
- "Often mistaken for WPA art, post office murals were actually executed by artists working for the Section of Fine Arts. Commonly known as "the Section," it was established in 1934 and administered by the Procurement Division of the Treasury Department. Headed by Edward Bruce, a former lawyer, businessman, and artist, the Section's main function was to select art of high quality to decorate public buildings if the funding was available. By providing decoration in public buildings, the art was made accessible to all people." from "Articles from EnRoute : Off The Wall: New Deal Post Office Murals" by Patricia Raynor http://wpamurals.org/kansas.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by SharonPapierdreams (talk • contribs) 23:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- SharonPapierdreams: Please sign your posts by adding 4 tildes after you remarks. Thanks for the link which is in the file I linked to and displayed. So, who was the artist of the work at the post office and what was their death date, also were they, an employee of the Treasury Department's Painting and Sculpture, other federal employee, freelance contracted artist, or work-for-hire contractor. It makes a difference and unfortunately no information you have given speaks to the actual copyright status of the work that we really need to keep such an image. With correct details we can hopefully keep the image. Ww2censor (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Often mistaken for WPA art, post office murals were actually executed by artists working for the Section of Fine Arts. Commonly known as "the Section," it was established in 1934 and administered by the Procurement Division of the Treasury Department. Headed by Edward Bruce, a former lawyer, businessman, and artist, the Section's main function was to select art of high quality to decorate public buildings if the funding was available. By providing decoration in public buildings, the art was made accessible to all people." from "Articles from EnRoute : Off The Wall: New Deal Post Office Murals" by Patricia Raynor http://wpamurals.org/kansas.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by SharonPapierdreams (talk • contribs) 23:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- This site says Harry Louis Freund "found work with the federally supported fine arts section of the Works Progress Administration (WPA) and began competing for mural commissions." https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/harry-louis-freund-459/
- Looks like he was probably not an employee but was commissioned. He died in 1999.
SharonPapierdreams (talk) 01:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I don't see any notice, which would be required in the 1930s. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:14, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete This mural are not the work of the uploader, so their licence is only valid for the photo but for 2D artistic works in the US we require the copyright status of the work, so this image are not necessarily freely licensed. We need to know the artist and date of installation to accurately determine the copyright status of the image, otherwise PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- The artist is Joe Jones and the date of installation is 1940. https://www.kshs.org/resource/national_register/MPS/Kansas_Post_Offices_Artwork_mps.pdf
- SharonPapierdreams (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Joe Jones died in 1963 so his work would be copyright until 2034. If he was commissioned as a work-for-hire, or was a federal employee at the time of the work then it will be fine. Ww2censor (talk) 10:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation, since it doesn't seem like uploader's own work.
It's a low resolution image, that was printed as a higher resolution, cropped image in this news article, and exists on the subject's website at a higher resolution here. If the uploader was the photographer, as is claimed, I assume they would have used their original image, not a lower resolution one. - Whisperjanes (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his stained glass works (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his stained glass works (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Benin. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikiMacaroons (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Archive Library 1-4.png
- File:Archive Library 1-5.png
- File:Archive Library 1-2.png
- File:Archive Library 1-3.png
- File:MENACE Variation 1.png
- File:MENACE Variation 2.png
- File:MENACE Variation 4.png
- File:MENACE Variation 3.png
- File:MENACE Variation 5.png
- File:Potential Middle Menace Game.png
- File:Potential Early Menace Game.png
- File:Menace Matchbox Front 2.png
- File:Menace Matchbox Front 1.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Impossible Creative Commons licence for a 1969-dated photo; no indication about the shooting site for an eventual public domain — danyele 16:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviol (impossible Creative Commons licence for a ca. late 70s-early 80s-dated photo; no indication about the shooting site for an eventual public domain) — danyele 16:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Woher soll man wissen, ob der Urheber schon 70 Jahre tot ist, wenn er unbekannt ist? Xocolatl (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC) - Übrigens ist auch die Versionsgeschichte interessant. Weder die erste noch die zweite Quellenangabe ist korrekt. --Xocolatl (talk) 12:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader changed the license from {{PD-old}} to {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} which seems to be applicable if this is from the US Navy Bureau of Ships. The source seems now also correct. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Photo taken at unknown time and place. Ship had many owners, including USN, but this is not a Navy paint job. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover, OTRS permission from Lucy Bullivant needed. MKFI (talk) 17:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
A photograph of a non-free work of art: there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. Yellow Horror (talk) 19:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.facebook.com/MatchTVChannel/photos/a.921258107911917/3070279816343058/?type=3 and image metadata indicates this is a Facebook download. Previously published photos require license verification via COM:VRT. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
File:+Schiffspost - Maritime Mail - US Navy - United States Ship - Forster - DER 334 - AGANA - GUAM - JUL 28 1971 - Bild 001.jpg
[edit]
USA Stamp - not allowed in Wiki Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - stamps before 1978 are OK -- this is 1971 per the postmark. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The picture shows a private house, including its owners car(s) and license plate(s). The owner feels uncomfortable knowing that there is a picture of the home he lives in on the internet and never gave consent to take nor to publish this photo, including all the given personal details. Wasserturm0603 (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo Wasserturm0603, das Foto zeigt in erster Linie ein Baudenkmal. Über den Eigentümer/Bewohner werden keine Angaben gemacht. Im Gegenteil, ohne deinen obigen Hinweis gäbe es auch keinen offensichtlichen Bezug zum abgebildeten Fahrzeug. Kurz, die Aufnahme ist von der Panoramafreiheit gedeckt, und das Kfz-Kennzeichen sollte nachträglich in der Bilderwerkstatt unkenntlich gemacht werden. Einen Löschgrund oder verletzte Persönlichkeitsrechte sehe ich hier nicht. Giorgio Michele (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We do not generally respond to third party requests for takedowns -- we do not know who aseertturm0603 is or why they made this request. The owner may write a requesrt using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
F1. Violation manifeste du droit d'auteur Rayquachu (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio artist Vivian Maeir -- 115.84.96.234 23:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer aka Journalistdavidoff Hyméros-(talk) 23:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer aka Journalistdavidoff Hyméros-(talk) 23:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Posted by a puppet of the multi-blocked Behrouz.lawyer aka Journalistdavidoff Hyméros-(talk) 23:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
it's a poor-quality photo of what appears to be a glossy book page/pamphlet/etc. (given the reflections), in which case it's potentially a copyright violation. I'm guessing the (misidentified) file name and description were mistakenly copied from an adjacent photo in whatever the source was. (the other photos uploaded by this user also appear to me to be photos of a photo, maybe from the same informational pamphlet or something, but they're a bit less obvious) Spizaetus (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
The uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder noted in the metadata; need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 16:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copy https://www.vitamedic.ind.br/politica-de-privacidade/ J De cinema (talk) 16:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Photograph from Briquet Nicolas/ABACA as seen in this press article https://www.lefigaro.fr/culture/2018/04/07/03004-20180407ARTFIG00010-l-ancien-boxeur-farid-khider-est-il-le-mauvais-genie-de-thomas-langmann.php CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: on Getty Images https://www.gettyimages.fr/detail/photo-d%27actualit%C3%A9/emmanuelle-rybojad-attends-the-amfar-gala-at-the-photo-dactualit%C3%A9/1159263284 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Clearly taken from social networks as per the arobase CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
According to the Metadata, this photo was taken from Facebook, unlike your own work. 42.98.188.116 05:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
It has been updated with an original version of the picture, which is shot by myself with my digital camera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makethisin10y (talk • contribs) 06:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: appears to be resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Derivate work of copyrighted posters, see Commons:POSTER Discostu (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
_Dollfus,_a%C3%A9ronaute_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png){kind=link}
_Dollfus,_a%C3%A9ronaute_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution png duplicate of File:(Charles) Dollfus, aéronaute - (photographie de presse) - (Agence Rol).jpg. This png version is probably print screens of Gallica website since it is not easy to download high resolution versions of Gallica images. The best version of a photograph is located at a hidden url (for instance https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53080559p/f1 corresponds to https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b53080559p/f1/full/full/0/native.jpg). There is no need to keep lower resolution png versions of photographs, except if the png had been modified, which is not the case here.
_Dollfus,_a%C3%A9ronaute_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).jpg){kind=link}
Please notice that I uploaded the jpg file yesterday, the uploader did not make an error and was right to upload their png version. Le Petit Chat (talk) 06:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
_Dollfus,_aéronaute_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and redirected to JPG version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
_Dollfus,_aéronaute_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png){kind=link}
File:21-5-24, à l'Elysée, (de gauche à droite, Willem) Mengelberg, Mme Loudon, général Lasson - (photographie de presse) - (Agence Rol).png
[edit]_Mengelberg,_Mme_Loudon,_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral_Lasson_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mengelberg,_Mme_Loudon,_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral_Lasson_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution png duplicate of File:21-5-24, à l'Elysée, (de gauche à droite, Willem) Mengelberg, Mme Loudon, général Lasson - (photographie de presse) - Agence Rol.jpg. This png version is probably print screens of Gallica website since it is not easy to download high resolution versions of Gallica images. The best version of a photograph is located at a hidden url (for instance https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b531305545/f1 corresponds to https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b531305545/f1/full/full/0/native.jpg). There is no need to keep lower resolution png versions of photographs, except if the png had been modified, which is not the case here. Please notice that I uploaded the jpg file yesterday, the uploader did not make an error and was right to upload their png version. Le Petit Chat (talk) 06:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
_Mengelberg,_Mme_Loudon,_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral_Lasson_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_Agence_Rol.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Derivate work of copyrighted posters, see Commons:POSTER Discostu (talk) 06:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. The depicted person cannot take the photograph. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation Theklan (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Theklan (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality duplicate of File:Price Daniel (TX).png. Yann (talk) 12:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused duplicate of File:Artificial Intelligence.svg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
I want to publish this image once again (with blurred car plates). Logi Aer (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: commons is not a webspace provider like DeviantArt Enyavar (talk) 15:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
This image not belong to User:Zul Alfarisi. Per: badminton.skor.id , this image belong to ©Badminton Indonesia. (see image source: Melati Daeva Oktavianti). Stvbastian (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Bad quality, no description, unused. Zinnmann (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (2).jpg ?
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (12).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (15).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (18).jpg ?
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (19).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (21).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (22).jpg ?
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (23).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (24).jpg
- File:Pirassununga - São Paulo, Brasil - panoramio (25).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The whole sequence was taken on the road. Bad overall quality and hardly useful. Maybe spare only #18 (toll station), and #2 and #22 (good view of the Anhanguera highway). —capmo (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept the doubtful ones. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Buchcover, offenbar KEIN eigenes Werk! Xocolatl (talk) 18:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Test que j'avais fait pour me pratiquer avec l'outil de téléversement Nathvail (talk) 18:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete because the uploader requests it and the photo can probably not be expected to be useful to anyone. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal imagery GPinkerton (talk) 19:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
File:+ Der Drecksche Löffel is a building of the Eastern Modernism of the GDR. Its location is Straßburger Platz in Dresden. (In the immediate vicinity of the VW Gläserne Manufaktur and the Dynamo Dresden Stadium) - Image 16.jpg
[edit]_-_Image_16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Image_16.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
File:+ Der Drecksche Löffel is a building of the Eastern Modernism of the GDR. Its location is Straßburger Platz in Dresden. (In the immediate vicinity of the VW Gläserne Manufaktur and the Dynamo Dresden Stadium) - Image 17.jpg
[edit]_-_Image_17.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Image_17.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Bild_010.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Bild_010.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Bild_010.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Bild_010.jpg){kind=link}
File:+Dresden (Pirnaischer Platz) - DVB Haltestelle - Spiegelung Plakat und Stadtmuseum - Bild 001.jpg
[edit]_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Spiegelung_Plakat_und_Stadtmuseum_-_Bild_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DVB_Haltestelle_-_Spiegelung_Plakat_und_Stadtmuseum_-_Bild_001.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this merits a discussion. It looks to me like a group portrait of workers at this clinic, rather than an advertisement. We may want to delete that, anyway, but I think the rationale would be different. So does this violate any Commons policies on group portraits? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this merits a discussion. It looks to me like a group portrait of workers at this clinic, rather than an advertisement. We may want to delete that, anyway, but I think the rationale would be different. So does this violate any Commons policies on group portraits? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this merits discussion. If this is an ad, it doesn't seem like a very slick or effective one. I'm not really sure what the point of the photo is, in fact, but it doesn't have to be a good photo not to be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Question I'm just seeing this. I don't care greatly that it was deleted, but it would be nice to know what the reasoning was. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Logos above COM:TOO, not own works.
- File:Peñafrancia 2021 Logo.png
- File:Naga Parochial School at 75 Logo.png
- File:Seal of the Naga Parochial School.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @P199: Could have been speedied with {{Logo}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Buchcover - URV Xocolatl (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Wenn der Urheber unbekannt ist, wissen wir auch nicht, ob er schon 70 Jahre tot ist. Xocolatl (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC) - Ich bemerke übrigens auch gerade, dass die Quellenangabe nicht korrekt ist. --Xocolatl (talk) 11:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, insufficient information to determine copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 01:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
unsinnige Urheberangabe, so kann man das doch nicht lizensieren Xocolatl (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not enough information to determine the copyright status of this image. "Source: General Electric", "Author: from the internet" is not enough for a 1932 photo. --Rosenzweig τ 01:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In einem Museum fotografiert, möglicherweise doch eher KEIN eigenes Werk. Beschreibung fehlt. Xocolatl (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Seemingly a misunderstanding of "own work". Likely the uploader's own photograph taken in a museum ("fotografiert im Tamm Museum") of a painting that is, however, probably not his own work. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Gestumblindi. --Rosenzweig τ 01:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
widersprüchliche Angaben zum Urheber, der garantiert noch nicht 70 Jahre tot ist. Xocolatl (talk) 18:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, insufficient information to determine copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 01:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF, uploaded by sock of serial copyvio uploader who generally takes images from social media, etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beauty
[edit]copyvios of different kinds.
RZuo (talk) 16:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, 1st is a selfie but out of scope, In 2nd the subject is the uploader so not an own work and is also an advertisement, 3rd was speedy deleted by Infrogmation. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beauty
[edit]Low-quality photos of exceedingly common subjects
- File:Grassland 3.jpg
- File:Group.jpg
- File:Laterite soil.jpg
- File:Leaf in zoom.jpg
- File:Long road.jpg
- File:Outcrop 2.jpg
- File:Plant 35.jpg
- File:Plant 37.jpg
- File:Plant garden.jpg
- File:Sharp edged plant.jpg
- File:Sharp plant.jpg
- File:Soil 2.jpg
- File:White and yellow flower.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beauty
[edit]Spam garbage
- File:Agatha Ferreira Model USA.jpg
- File:Cerave Skincare Vietnam Logo.png
- File:FD Factory.jpg
- File:Fiona Backstage.webp
- File:Fiona Franchimon.jpg
- File:Ma'am & Sir's Image with Boman Irani 2.jpg
- File:Photo représente des bijoux en or.jpg
- File:Range SHot.jpg
- File:SJL7300.jpg
- File:Un ensemble des bijoux traditionnelles en or.jpg
- File:Un modèle des bagues en or blanc.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Either File:Photo représente des bijoux en or.jpg or File:Un ensemble des bijoux traditionnelles en or.jpg (they are identical) and File:Un modèle des bagues en or blanc.jpg look usable and probably fine in terms of copyright, though the description needs to be cleaned up in the latter and the categories need to be fixed in both. Why is there a Category:Beauty? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- A legitimate, but ultimately terrible, container category. I was planning on cracking it into like five separate cats Dronebogus (talk) 07:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- I find it hard to understand why it's a more reasonable category than Truth. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've cleaned up File:Un modèle des bagues en or blanc.jpg a bit. --El Grafo (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and mostly screengrabs anyway. Kept two as in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beauty
[edit]Useless spam and personal junk
Dronebogus (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beauty
[edit]Out of scope and spam
- File:188beautycom.jpg
- File:Celeste Octavia For PUMP Magazine Photo By Barry Druxman.jpg
- File:Le-thi-minh-thu-founder-188-beauty.jpg
- File:Riddhima Pandey.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. The 1st and 3rd are spam. The 2nd needs permission from the photographer Barry Druxman. The 4th is a personal file of a non-contributor. Marbletan (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Marbletan. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beauty
[edit]Spam, OOS (keystrokes)
- File:Key Ingredients of Best Sunscreen.jpg
- File:Major Ingredients in Whipped Sunscreen for Healty skin.jpg
- File:Sofia castañeda.png
Dronebogus (talk) 10:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: blatantly not uploader's own work. No provenance given. von Canal died in 1927, the photographer could plausibly have lived into the 1960s or even 1970s. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Even if unpublished, the image would be taken prior to 1901 and be public domain, my best judgement puts him less than age 50 in the image. --RAN (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: not dated by uploader, no source, nothing backing up the later claim that the author is anonymous, subject died in 1927 -> no real clue beyond a guess that this actually from ca. 1900 (which would be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}), and not enough information to determine the copyright status of this photo, so deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
File:+Sebnitz in Sachsen - Form und Farbe - Bilderreise eines Fotografen - Das OOOH Plakat - Bild 002.jpg
[edit]
COM:POSTER in Verbindung mit COM:TOO, COM:DM und COM:FOP. See:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Plakate_Bundestagswahl_in_Deutschland_-_&_Werbeplakate_in_Deutschland Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hochhaus ist ganz offensichtlich nicht der Urheber. Und ob dieser schon 70 Jahre tot ist, darf man bezweifeln, wenn das Bild 1945 aufgenommen wurde, wie in der Beschreibung steht. Der Titel lässt allerdings eher auf 1910 schließen. Was stimmt denn hier überhaupt??? Xocolatl (talk) 19:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This is said to be a photo of another photo inside a museum in Germany, so there is no FOP. The original photo was taken in 1945, which is not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}, and I don't have enough other information to determine the copyright status of this photo. So I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Das Schiff wurde 1966 gebaut, kann also nicht früher fotografiert worden sein. Der Urheber der Ansichtskarte ist also sicher noch keine 70 Jahre tot. Xocolatl (talk) 19:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Wenn das aus einem Zeitschriftenartikel herausfotografiert ist, dann ist es damit kein eigenes Werk. Und der Urheber kann noch keine 70 Jahre tot sein. Xocolatl (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also, the ship was built in 1967, so this photo is definitely not older than that. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Alfons Åberg
[edit]
See COM:BAD#Mynewsdesk.com. Mynewsdesk is unlikely to have permission to publish these images under a Creative Commons licence. The artist sv:Gunilla Bergström died in 2021. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Why hasn't admin deleted all pictures from Mynewsdesk already? It says "Consensus is to avoid using the site". – GeMet [talk] 09:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
I created the cropped PNG from the same source as the TIFF (File:Alfons Åberg 01.tiff). I have no objections to deleting the PNG, if the original source doesn't hold the rights, which seems more than likely, even though I'm sad to see it go. --Kim Bach (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Dubious to be an image created by Farsnews Agency Rohalamin (talk) 10:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Mistake, the photo does not show the subject object. Strumyczek (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Możesz zmienić nazwę pliku: Special:MovePage/File:Ratusz w Zamościu01.jpg --Achim (talk) 13:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Andreas Lattmann (talk) 13:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion; was first requested for speedy deletion back in 2017. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- My intention with this picture was to show the composition of the altar, where of course the painting will play am important role. If you separate the image and will use it for printing in for instance a book, the image will be more or less 1x2 inch. Not any important use I think. But if it is regarded as a copyvio, I accept your verdict. --Xauxa (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sundayservice2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images from [1], maybe Flickrwashing?
- File:K2台灣隊基地帳.jpg
- File:Gondogoro Pass 2019.jpg
- File:張元植、呂忠翰在巴托羅冰河.jpg
- File:巴托羅冰河.jpg
- File:K2 Peak.jpg
- File:呂忠翰、陳德政、張元植在Concordia.jpg
shizhao (talk) 02:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: I've contacted the user Sonic Velvet of that Flickr account, and he is indeed the authentic photographer of those images, and he is willing to share those images on Wiki Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. This is definitely not a Flickrwashing. Should I show you my messages exchange with him as the proof? Thanks! --Sundayservice2021 (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Sundayservice2021, these photos can be kept imho. --Ellywa (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of a free license (unless there is a mention in Korean), too complex for PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 08:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
진짜 평양의 상징물이 아닙니다. / This is not the emblem of pyongyang. https://arca.live/b/city/35834370
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
The images from Svenskt konstnärslexikon were uploaded under PD-Sweden-photo, which applies only to non-artistic works. This photo is of sculptures by Ingel Fallstedt (volume II, "Dahlbeck - Hagstrom", published 1953), and a solid argument can be made that it is an artistic photo. As such, I submit that it is not subject to PD-Sweden-photo and, barring photographer credits (which may or may not be available within the physical book), this image cannot be considered subject to PD-Sweden-photo until January 1 2024. DS (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Same issue for File:Aftonbön x Sten Dahlström.jpg, and... in fact, I'll just pick through them all and section them out.
From volume I, "Abbe - Dahlander", published 1952, and therefore not PD until January 1, 2048
[edit]
- File:Eldermonument Locke kyrgå x Olof Ahlberg.jpg
- File:Angela utförd i brons x Carl-Oskar Aven.jpg
- Derivative of non-free sculpture by Arvid Backlund, undelete in 2055. De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Anna Regina Kehvenhuller x Nicolas Cordier.jpg
- File:Axel Fridell brons x Arvid Backlund.jpg
- Derivative of non-free sculpture by Carl-Olof Avén, undelete in 2056. De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Bebådelsen x SIgrid Blomberg.jpg
- File:Beväringsmöntringen 1909 x Döderhultaren 1.jpg
- File:Beväringsmöntringen 1909 x Döderhultaren 2.jpg
- File:Beväringsmöntringen 1909 x Döderhultaren 3.jpg
- File:Dansande backanter brons x Alexander Carlsson.jpg
- File:Danserska trä x Bror Chroander.jpg
Derivative of non-free sculpture by Bror Chronander, undelete in 2035.De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Djungelträde x Knut Anderson.jpg
- File:Dopfunt Guldsmedshyttans kyrka X Knut Anderson.jpg
Derivative of non-free sculpture by Knut Anderson, undelete in 2025.De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Dr Karl Stålberg x Carl Christensen.jpg
Derivative of non-free sculpture by Carl Christensen (skulptör), undelete in 2024.De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Extas x Bernhard Anderson.jpg
- Derivative of non-free sculpture by Ben Anderson, undelete in 2055. De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Flora marmor x Alexander Carlsson.jpg
- File:Gosse som modellerar x Oscar Berg.jpg
- File:Karl X Gustaf brons x John Börjeson.jpg
- File:Konsol i Lunds Domkyrka x Adam van Düren.jpg
- File:Kornmalning relief på m-s Stockholm x Stig Blomber.jpg
Derivative of non-free sculpture by Stig Blomberg, undelete in 2041.De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Kvinnotorso1 mässing x Christian Berg.jpg
- File:Kvinnotorso2 mässing x Christian Berg.jpg
Derivatives of non-free sculpture by Christian Berg, undelete in 2047.De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:Kägelspelaren marmor x John Börjeson.jpg
- File:Lektor Malte Eurenius x Sven Anderson.jpg
- File:Madonna träskulptur Appuna kyrka x Appunamästaren.jpg
- File:Oskulden marmor x Johan Niklas Byström.jpg
- File:Pastotal x Conrad Carlman.jpg
- File:Professor CJ Ask x Sven Anderson.jpg
- File:Professor OE Lundholm x Sven Anderson.jpg
- File:Sportflickan x Runa Bulow-Hube.jpg,
- Derivative of non-free sculpture by Runa Bülow-Hübe, undelete in 2054. De728631 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:St Erik Roslagsbro kyrka x Étienne de Bonneuil.jpg
- File:Stukarbeten i Drottningholms slott x Carlo Carove.jpg
- File:Stukarbeten i Mälsåker x Carlo Carove.jpg
- File:Un gamin napolitain x Edvard Brabeck.jpg
From volume II, "Dahlbeck - Hagstrom", published 1953, and therefore not PD until January 1, 2049
[edit]
- File:Axel Ebbe självporträtt brons.jpg artwork by Axel Ebbe (1868–1941)
- File:Aftonbön x Sten Dahlström.jpg artwork by Sten Dahlström (1899–1967)
- File:All vår början brons x Jonas Fröding.jpg artwork by Jonas Fröding (1905–1959)
- File:Altarskulptur Sättna kyrka x Carl Elmberg.jpg artwork by Carl Elmberg (1889–1955)
- File:August Strindberg brons x Carl Eldh.jpg artwork by Carl Eldh (1873–1954)
- File:Ungdom brons x Carl Eldh.jpg artwork by Carl Eldh (1873–1954)
- File:Carl von Linne x Christian Eriksson.jpg artwork by Christian Eriksson (1858–1935)
- File:Den dövstumme negern x Liss Eriksson.jpg artwork by Liss Eriksson (1919–2000) do not restore before 2071
- File:Djävulen sticker offret Gammelgarns kyrka x Fabula.jpg
- File:Entomologiskt kvinnorov x Eric Grate.jpg artwork by Eric Grate (1896–1983) do not restore before 2054
- File:Epitafium Vinbergs kyrka x Sven Dahlin.jpg artwork by Sven Dahlin (1906–1965)
- File:Eva brunnsfigur x Karl Ede.jpg artwork by Karl Ede (1894–1918)
- File:Flicka med harlekin - Erik Grate.jpg artwork by Eric Grate (1896–1983) do not restore before 2054
- File:Flickhuvud svensk marmor x Sten Ericson.jpg artwork by Sten Ericson (1909–2011) do not restore before 2082
- File:Fontänen Musslan x Hildur Haggård.jpg artwork by Hildur Haggård (1885–1958)
- File:Gustaf II Adolfs död x Bengt Fogelberg.jpg artwork by Bengt Erland Fogelberg (1786–1854)
- File:Idyll brons x Carl Fagerberg.jpg artwork by Carl Fagerberg (1878–1948)
- File:Konstnärens latinska skrift Ysanek x Nicholaus Ha.jpg artwork by Nils Håkansson (15th century)
- File:Kurragömma brons x Johan Ericson.jpg artwork by Johan Ericson (1849–1925)
- File:Professor G Westin brons x Wilhelm Gieseke.jpg artwork by Wilhelm Gieseke (1910–1992) do not restore before 2063
- File:Leda med svanen x Karl Ede.jpg artwork by Karl Ede (1894–1918)
- File:Mannen som bryter sig ur klippan Lund x Axel Ebbe.jpg, artwork by Axel Ebbe (1868–1941)
- File:Mask (Le Penseur) x Carl Frisendahl.jpg, artwork by Carl Frisendahl (1886–1948)
- File:Monument över Hjalmar Branting x Carl Eldh.jpg artwork by Carl Eldh (1873–1954)
- File:Oden carraramarmor x Bengt Fogelberg.jpg, artwork by Bengt Erland Fogelberg (1786–1854)
- File:Parispokalen 1922 Orrefors bruk skapad av Simon Gate.jpg, artwork by Simon Gate (1883–1945)
- File:Pelle Molin x Charles Friberg.jpg, artwork by Charles Friberg (1886–1953)
- File:Professor Gösta Häggqvist x V Gustafson.jpg artwork by Vitalis Gustafson (1888–1952)
- File:Professor Herbert Olivecrona x V Gustafson.jpg, artwork by Vitalis Gustafson (1888–1952)
- File:Salomo och drott av Saba 1937 Orrefors Simon Gate.jpg, artwork by Simon Gate (1883–1945)
- File:Skriskoåkare X Carl Fagerberg.jpg, artwork by Carl Fagerberg (1878–1948)
- File:Skrattande ansikte x Egypticus.jpg
- File:Skulpturgrupp i porfyr x Vitalis Gustafson.jpg, artwork by Vitalis Gustafson (1888–1952)
- File:Slulpturen Våren x Eric Grate.jpg artwork by Eric Grate (1896–1983) do not restore before 2054
- File:Sphinx x David Edström.jpg, artwork by David Edström (1873–1938)
- File:St Anna, Maria o Jesus Enångers k x Håkan Gulleson.jpg, artwork by Haaken Gulleson (16th century)
- File:Stående modell x Wilhelm Gieseke.jpg, artwork by Wilhelm Gieseke (1910–1992) do not restore before 2063
- File:Ylva brons x Torolf Engström.jpg artwork by Torolf Engström (1909–1987) do not restore before 2058
_x_Carl_Frisendahl.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
From volume III, "Hahn - Lunderberg", published 1957 and therefore not PD until January 1, 2053
[edit]
- File:Flicka med krus x Gottfrid Larsson.jpg
- File:Konstslöjd x Theodor Lundberg.jpg
- File:Kristusbild 1200 Lunds unhmx Ignabergamästaren.jpg
- File:Madonnan o barnet Skånska k x Immaculatmästaren.jpg
- File:Stående flicka Museum för Kunst x G Henning.jpg
- File:Anna Hierta x Frithiof Kjellberg.jpg
From volume IV, "Lundgren - Sahlberg", published 1961 and therefore not PD until January 1, 2057
[edit]
- File:Bertil Lybeck självporträtt i skulptur.jpg
- File:Dolce far niente marmor x Ida Matton.jpg
- File:Duva, Himingläga och Unn x Johan Peter Molin.jpg
- File:Dödsdansen Norrk stadteater x Tyr Martin.jpg (not actually a sculpture - it's a stage set, photographed during the performance of a play)
- File:Epitafium Revsunds kyrka x Gregorius Raaf.jpg
- File:Främling brons Lund x Allan Runefelt.jpg
- File:Herkules från Wasa 1628 x Martin Redtmer.jpg
- File:Hyllning till Ling GHI Sthm x Gustaf Nordahl.jpg
- File:Kopparmatte 1647 x Martin Redtmer.jpg
- File:Modell av Engelbrekt x Carl Gustaf Qvarnström.jpg
- File:Porträttbyst Peter Adolf Håll x A Pajou.jpg
- File:Sankt Göran och draken x Bernt Notke.jpg
- File:Triumfkrucifix Rasbo kyrka x Rasbomästaren.jpg
- File:Utvandrare brons Karlshamn x Axel Olsson.jpg
From volume V, published 1967 and therefore not PD until January 1, 2063
[edit]
- File:Charlotte von Fersen född Sparre x JT Sergel.jpg
- File:Galjonsbild Dristigheten 1785 x Johan Törnström dä.jpg
- File:Lurblåsaren x Erik Sand.jpg
There we go. DS (talk) 17:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The first list can be undeleted 70 years after 1952 so in 2023. Please note the other sections should be undeleted later, as indicated! Please add a new category when undeleting the first part, etc. --Ellywa (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment When undeleting the 2024 section and onwards, please be aware of derivative photos of 3d artworks which themselves are probably not yet out of copyright. Such images are typically titled in the style of "File:Description x Artist.jpg". The "brons" (bronze) term in the name string does also indicate a sculpture. These photos need extra inspection for the lifetime of the original artist before undeletion. De728631 (talk)
- Comment The original undeletion years did not account for URAA restoration of copyrights in the US, so I have reset these. —holly {chat} 17:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
I initially tagged this image as no permission (No permission since), but the uploader pointed out that the source site allows sharing via Creative Commons. However, original file name, "1617650_301117043630696_3460576384576790017_n.jpg" makes me think it was downloaded from the web. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed, that is the file format used on Facebook and Instagram. If it's a Facebook image, the original should be https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=301117043630696 but there's nothing there (unfortunately I don't know of a similar trick for Instagram). I couldn't find an original with reverse image search either. --AntiCompositeNumber talk 03:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any reverse images for this either. I assume the reason it's hard to find the original image or whether or not it was stolen might be due to fact its from an non-english country.CycoMa1 (talk) 03:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Too many unwanted categories are added. Categories pop-up all over the place. There is a lot wrong with this template. It makes categories pop-up in al sorts of unwanted places. It messes up clean category structures. Take a look at Category:Rotterdam and Category:Waalhaven (Rotterdam) categories shouldn't be in there in the place there are (if at all). As an example in Category:Waalhaven (Rotterdam) the year cats are superfluous, they are already present under another (unneeded!?) subcategory. There should be better control and less categories automatically added. Categories made be made HIDDENCAT. It is way too prominent for a few pictures in otherwise clearly defined category structure. I think we should stop adding this template at once and rethink the whole mechanism before moving forward. . ErickAgain 19:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Nearly eight thousand inclusions, to organise several hundred thousand files. A deletion request out of nowhere, so where's your contribution to this and how to do anything better? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- But the problem should be solved anyway! I found this request after trying to reorganize Category:Photographs_by_Willem_van_de_Poll_in_Ascona_(1960) to a more appropriate daughter category. Impossible. Or has anything been done about this? Fransvannes (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- But what problem? You haven't edited Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ascona (1960), nor can I see any members of that category which you've edited. You didn't raise any issue on the template discussion page, nor ask me about it. What even is a "daughter category"? (we talk about categories being members of parent categories, Ascona doesn't have any child categories). So what's the issue you want addressed? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- I can't edit the category Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ascona (1960), because it has just code. But it should be in Category:Historical photographs of Ascona, which is a subcategory (if not daughter category) of Category:Historical images of Ascona, which in turn is one of the many subcategories of Category:Ascona. And not in Category:Ascona directly.
- The problem is that Category:Ascona (and others) are overloaded due to the way this template works. And people won't find the photographs in Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ascona (1960) when they come from e.g. Category:Historical images of the canton of Ticino. Fransvannes (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- So let's see this as three issues:
- it should be in Category:Historical photographs of Ascona No, it shouldn't be. Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ascona should be, and it is (automatically). But this category is only for the 1960 subset. That shouldn't be in such a broad overall historical category (or at least, not if the overall Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ascona already exists).
- Category:Ascona is overloaded. Agreed (although it's less than a page of entries, so 'overloaded' is stretching things). But this template doesn't want to be in Ascona, for just that reason. The category should still be in something related to Ascona and the root problem here is that there's nothing better available, so it's defaulting back to Ascona. Category:1960 in Ascona is the favoured alternative, so much so that it even redlinks it as a hint to create it. But that doesn't exist, because there's not that much Ascona content. If Category:Ascona by year was to be created, then the template would automatically use that rather than either. For many smaller locations with a modest amount of content, that's the best solution. This is all clearly stated on the template doc page.
- As to Ticino, then my Swiss geography isn't great and so I haven't done this yet. But it's trivial (the template does all this with the least effort) to create canton-level navigation in it (just look at the Dutch provinces, such as Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Gelderland). Andy Dingley (talk) 17:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ascona is already in Category:Historical photographs of Ascona. That's ok, of course. But I don't get why it should remain in its parent category Category:Ascona as well. The category already is in "something related to Ascona" (i.e. the Category:Historical photographs of Ascona). It should therefore be removed from Category:Ascona. But how? Fransvannes (talk) 10:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)But if there is no other way, I will make a Category:Ascona by year, of course
- But the problem should be solved anyway! I found this request after trying to reorganize Category:Photographs_by_Willem_van_de_Poll_in_Ascona_(1960) to a more appropriate daughter category. Impossible. Or has anything been done about this? Fransvannes (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The mentioned problems should be solved in some other way, not by deleting the template imho. --Ellywa (talk) 18:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)