Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-_Fonds_Ancely_-_B315556101_A_LEVASSEUR_041.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_Zoology_(1989-90)_(19826782563).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![218 File:Памятник Якову Пункину в парке "Трудовой славы" в Запорожье.jpg](#File:Памятник_Якову_Пункину_в_парке_"Трудовой_славы"_в_Запорожье.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![231 File:Небоскрёб "Парус", Минск.jpg](#File:Небоскрёб_"Парус",_Минск.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Not a Valid Image. 223.255.225.226 05:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Invalid nomination. No reason given. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
_-_Fonds_Ancely_-_B315556101_A_LEVASSEUR_041.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Fonds_Ancely_-_B315556101_A_LEVASSEUR_041.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Just an Old Map. 223.255.225.69 07:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Nonsense nomination: Old Maps R Us. ;)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, frivolous nomination speedy-closed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. 223.255.225.69 07:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Nonsensical rationale.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, frivolous nomination speedy-closed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
The source credits this image to "The Hindu Photo Library" which is like Getty Images. While this may qualify as PD-India based on when/where the image was taken, there's no information available to say if it actually qualifies. —SpacemanSpiff 08:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Utterly Messed Coat of arms. 223.255.225.224 09:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, invalid nomination. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Messed Up Logo: Only for Advertisement. 223.255.225.224 09:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. 223.255.225.224 09:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Used only in the Thai Wikipedia. 223.255.225.235 04:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unquestionable: Impossible Map. 223.255.225.235 04:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Impossible Map. 223.255.225.235 04:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Impossible Map. 223.255.225.235 04:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Not a Valid Image: Impossible Map. 223.255.225.226 05:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Only used in 1 Wikimedia Project. 223.255.225.226 05:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Black is the Colour of Darkness. 223.255.225.226 05:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Invalid Request. 223.255.225.226 05:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Indonesia.svg. 223.255.225.226 06:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This map is too Large to Viewed. 223.255.225.69 07:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertisement. 223.255.225.224 09:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
COM:SELFIE. 223.255.225.224 09:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55-aux (talk) 11:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This Coat of arms is Utterly Messed Up. 223.255.225.224 09:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Messed Up Coat of arms. 223.255.225.224 09:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Bulk nom of sports-logos, presumed to be owned by their respective clubs or leagues (dubious {{Own}} tag on some, others cited to facebook or similar sources) and therefore non-free. Some already had been tagged individually, and uploader has already had many other logo uploads deleted. Some are tagged PD-textlogo, but they appear above TOO. This is partial list; I wanted to centralize the request (other admins already deleted some).
- File:Kit shorts chrobryglogow21h.png
- File:Logo LNF.png
- File:International Handball Federation.png
- File:Pakistan Hockey Super League.png
- File:PGNiG Superliga.png
- File:Pogoń Szczecin handball.png
- File:Mmts kwidzyn 1998.png
- File:Unia tarnów logo.png
- File:Mks zaglebie lubin.png
- File:MKS Piotrkowianin 1997.png
- File:Piotrkowianin 97.jpg
- File:TORUS Wybrzeże Gdańsk.jpg
- File:KS Azoty-Puławy.png
- File:KS Azoty-Puławy logo.jpg
- File:SPR Chrobry Głogów.png
- File:Energa MKS Kalisz.png
- File:KPR Gwardia Opole.png
DMacks (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Listed missing file: File:PlusLiga logo.png in above list. Ellywa (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except a few which are {{PD-textlogo}}. --Yann (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by 4nn1l2 at 11:06, 11 September 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammad reza azadi image 2020.jpg: Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history --Krdbot 20:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
wrong copyright info. KristianTomic (talk) 13:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:03, 11 September 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo photo --Krdbot 20:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Erroneously created with plural form "busts" Ysogo (talk) 10:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no license, no permission. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Distortion suggests this is a photograph of a third-party image How old is this? Yann (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete There are multiple conflicting claims on the date of this image, but none before 1990. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: English Wikipedia article says it was taken after the fire of 2000. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused Map on all Wikimedia Projects. 223.255.225.235 03:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep. File in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept because picture is used as a main thing in the Australisch-Turkse_betrekkingen article. Nomination rationale incorrect. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
only ekslusive Mirwanto Muda (talk) 07:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate DR. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
only for me Mirwanto Muda (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Unclear rationale for deletion. Creative Commons licenses are not revokable. Image clearly has potential educational use and is within scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept per IronGargoyle --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
I want to save in my pic Mirwanto Muda (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep no valid reason for deletion, again. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, claimed PD-US-no notice, but the image resolution is too low to determine if there is a copyright notice on the poster FASTILY 08:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I tried to find a higher resolution version of the image and found this. It is a higher resolution version of the same poster (which should probably replace this one if the DR is kept). Most of the text is now legible (except the text at the lower left) and there are no obvious copyright notices. Could the text at the lower left be a copyright notice? It doesn't look like a copyright notice. There is far too much text there and the size of the text indicates a lack of numbers (i.e., 1955, which would be larger in size than lowercase text). This is strongly supported when comparing a different poster for the same movie. This second poster does have a copyright notice (at lower left) and a much smaller text statement at the lower right. This text statement looks very similar to the text statement at the lower left on the first poster. The second poster's statement is barely readable, but says "Property of National Screen Service Corp. Licenced for display only in connection with the exhibition of this picture of theatre. Must be returned immediately thereafter". This is standard boilerplate language on posters provided by National Screen Service of this era. It it worth emphasizing that this is not intended as a copyright notice and does not even indirectly satisfy the requirements of one. Examining the first poster, you'll see that the statement at the lower left is the exact same length as the National Screen Service boilerplate. I think this demonstrates pretty definitively that there is no copyright notice on the first poster. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept, Withdrawn, thanks for the confirmation -FASTILY 11:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Flickr washing seems to be taken from here [1]. Flickr account new with no followers. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- No no no @Fitindia: , this pictures are taken from my relative. My relative asked to upload it to Flickr and Commons both. If you see the display name is Contributers2020. If needed, I'll send the RAW version as well. I didn't upload the RAW version because it contained a OnePlus logo. I cropped it up. If you say I'll also submit OTRS. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 17:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Contributers2020: Was your relative at the same spot/time and same angle the above YouTube video was taken? Please have a look at it once. --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please tell me how I screen grab a YouTube video at a maximum of 1080 resolution, then turn it into a bitmap 4k wide. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - C2020s image appears to have been taken a few railings up - If you compare the video and image side by side you'll see what I mean, I also found another Youtube video at the same destination so at present this all points to a legit image
- Also if you were to crop the video image you wouldn't have a 3,999 × 2,419 resolution (because you'd have railings etc and if zoomed in atleast on my camera zooming in in video mode tends to make said video blurry .... Anyway I'm not seeing a copyvio here. –Davey2010Talk 21:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Larger resolution than the Youtube video, and does not have the telltale signs of upsampling (it's kind of "I know it when I see it" - it's very different from lens blur which is present in this photo). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Kept - Nominator has withdrawn. –Davey2010Talk 10:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a Destroyed Building Because Fire. 223.255.225.235 03:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Used only in 1 Wikimedia Project. 223.255.225.235 03:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio - Réutilisation d'un ticket OTRS de 2008 qui a été utilisé par l'entreprise Spot Image (aujourd'hui Airbus DS Geo SA) pour importer des images satellites SPOT. Ici c'est une unique image Pléiades, qui a été importée en 2013, sans l'utilisation d'un compte officiel de l'entreprise, et sans confirmation d'un administrateur OTRS dans l'historique des changements du fichier. L'image est encore aujourd'hui commercialement utilisée par Airbus à cette adresse https://www.intelligence-airbusds.com/en/5751-image-gallery-details?img=20016 et n'a pas sa place sur Wikimedia Commons (Copyright: CNES 2012, Distribution Airbus DS / Distribution: This image is for personal use only. It cannot be sold or distributed to any third party.) vip (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Thibaut120094: @Lomita: @Ruthven: L'un de vous peut-il s'il vous plaît confirmer qu'il n'y a pas eu de vérification OTRS et que la réutilisation du ticket est abusive ? Si besoin de vérification de mon identité pour obtenir cette information, je viens d'envoyer un mail à permissions-commons-fr depuis mon adresse Airbus. cc @Pyb: vip (talk) 20:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- This ticket-id was added by a non-OTRS user in this revision. So there is no room for discussion about this, this file should be deleted and preferably speedy-deleted because this is a violation. :) DutchTina
(talk) 07:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- This ticket-id was added by a non-OTRS user in this revision. So there is no room for discussion about this, this file should be deleted and preferably speedy-deleted because this is a violation. :) DutchTina
Deleted: per nomination. The SPOT photos are permitted for User:Spot_Image (maybe we should create a tailored copyright template). This file was uploaded without permission by Mouh2jijel in 2013. Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! vip (talk) 09:26, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:School for Professional Advancement and Continuing Education (SPACE), Manuel L. Quezon University, Quezon City Campus (Victoria Sports Tower, Diliman, Quezon City)
[edit]Nuking the entire category. All images just show banners promoting the school. COM:ADVERT, for promotion purposes, not educational = out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 01.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 02.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 03.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 04.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 05.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 06.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 07.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 08.jpg
- File:1199South Triangle College GMA Kamuning MRT Station 09.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 01.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 02.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 18.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 26.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure in wrong file format. Have File:1,3,5-Triheptylbenzene-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no reason to keep the jpg when there is a high quality svg alternative depicting the same thing. Marbletan (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
It has been stolen from my webpage https://www.ethnomusicscape.de/sltam1.htm and is not an "own work" by user nelliwinne; the photo is taken in my living room with my carpet underneath which is all still existing. It is a cheeky theft of media and thereby I would like to ask for deletion. I am a professional ethnomusicologist and my photos are my cultural capital. Kuveni44 (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
No objection
[edit]
I have mistakenly put this as my work and I changed it as the source from the internet. So I not not have any objection to deleting it as real copyright owner requests. Sorry for the inconvenience made by my mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelliwinne (talk • contribs) 09:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Achim (talk) 17:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted blatant copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Not educational and not encyclopedic. Out of Commons' COM:SCOPE. COM:WEBHOSTing. Only contribution by Kenze13 (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 04:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
not own work Lesless (talk) 04:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no potential educational use—low quality and unclear rights to image. czar 04:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
not own work Lesless (talk) 04:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no potential educational use—low quality and unclear rights to image. czar 04:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
—MdsShakil (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @MdsShakil, the first photo is in use in zh.wp. If the subject is not notable, then yes, would agree with your rationale. czar 04:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Czar Ah! I didn't notice the matter. The files can be kept —MdsShakil (talk) 04:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. czar 06:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 07:39, 20 September 2021 UTC: No license since 11 September 2021 --Krdbot 13:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 07:40, 20 September 2021 UTC: No license since 11 September 2021 --Krdbot 13:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 07:39, 20 September 2021 UTC: No license since 11 September 2021 --Krdbot 13:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Non-free at English Wikipedia. - Film poster art. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no fair use on Commons. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Selfie, small, not in use, from user with 2 edits. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
usless image, out of scope Bestalex (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism (article deleted on fr.wp) Hyméros-(talk) 22:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Parliamentary footage is not routinely released under OGL3 as claimed. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Looks to me that {{OPL}} would be the correct licence.[2] Thincat (talk) 08:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as {{OPL}} per Thincat. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --clpo13(talk) 16:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Parliamentary footage is not routinely released under OGL3 as claimed. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as {{OPL}} per Thincat in this related discussion. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --clpo13(talk) 16:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
El logo de esta institución a sido renovado y este ya no se utiliza, además, el que hizo subió este archivo fui yo y quiero eliminarlo David Bolaños Corrales (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be freely licensed. Source is described as "Google" and author listed as "Don't know". Uploader has no other contributions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Copied from www.harvard.edu, the image is just cropped. harvard.edu claims © 2021 The President and Fellows of Harvard College on their website, meaning the picture is copyrighted. A
Speedy delete from me. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
_Zoology_(1989-90)_(19826782563).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Zoology_(1989-90)_(19826782563).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ShakespeareFan00 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source work Contains Statement "(C) British Museum (Natural History) , 1989" and "(C) British Museum (Natural History) , 1990" King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No copyright as it shows mere text without any creativity and the graphics are to much simple to have any copyright, so {{PD-Text}} and {{PD-Shape}}. Tm (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm. Below COM:TOO even in the UK. --clpo13(talk) 16:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This animation is linked in various articles about machine learning, but never in the actual article itself. It is merely used on the bottom in the overview for "Differentiable computing", but it is too small for it to be useful and it does not serve a purpose there. 88.75.8.48 19:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- I see no reason to delete this, but nor can I see any use of it on WP that adds anything. Deleting it would certainly stop that. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Why not remove it from the template? I made it specifically for the differentiable neural computer article and someone decided to add it to a template. Kjerish (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. Besides the template, it's used in en:Differentiable neural computer per Kjerish. --clpo13(talk) 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Used wrong name and wrong person. Need to be delete 17 Feb (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
This is creative text written by Amy Whinehouse and imho not in PD. As she died in 2011, this file can be undeleted in 2082. Elly (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
humoristic description, image is useless for wiki Bestalex (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
useless image for wiki, out of scope Bestalex (talk) 21:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
{Delete} Cagaruflo (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, it's an ESA image, not public domain, see https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/g/goce vip (talk) 22:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Did i overstress the TOO-Thing? I don't know. --Itu (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, definitely not below COM:TOO. --clpo13(talk) 16:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Lower resolution version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan_smoke_plume_on_September_11,_2001_from_International_Space_Station_(Expedition_3_crew).jpg vip (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:September_11_attack_seen_from_space_by_nasa.jpg vip (talk) 23:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Student essay document, outside of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: the presence of the background image (the fish and the reef) is not de minimis, and we have no reason to believe that the backdrop is freely usable. Mysterymanblue 06:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:DW. --clpo13(talk) 18:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, not educationally useful. No legal or moral issues, and the image quality is fine, but what Wikipedia article would this photo aptly illustrate? The description also creates the appearance of self-indulgent self-promotion, although it may have simply been lifted verbatim from Flickr by someone other than the photographer. P.T. Aufrette (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not this again. Why do some people always try to have this images deleted and so try to find any reason, for most invalid that it can be, be it in good faith or more nefarious and secret intents (prude censorship, etc). The deletiona requester is an old user in here but has at most a little more than 100 edits, so it should had made a prior research, even more when on the discussion page of this file is cleary stated that this file was already submited to deletion and was kept.
- The educational use and usefulness as already been pretty well established in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Lies Thru a Lens Flickr stream, on an undeletion request, Village Pump. First Commons does not exist only to serve Wikipedia(S). But it can also be used in article like en:Boudoir phootography, en:Erotic photography, en:Model (person), en:Undergarment, etc, etc, etc. Tm (talk) 16:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per the possible use suggestions raised by Tm. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I can see where nom's coming from however it's currently in Category:Files from Lies Thru a Lens Flickr stream, female model photos and Boudoir photography so that's enough for me to keep - If it was uncategorised then I would've suggested a model-related category. Like I said I can see where the nom's coming from however it's not enough to delete, the image isn't bad quality nor is it entirely useless. –Davey2010Talk 16:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --clpo13(talk) 18:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Subham Kr Official (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Out of scope also. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Subham Kr Official (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Could be F10'd. Pahunkat (talk) 16:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete.--Yaakoub45 (talk) 00:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Google Map screenshot. Qurren (talk) 18:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victoria Sports Tower, Station 2 (EDSA, South Triangle, Diliman, Quezon City)
[edit]A 2014 building by New San Jose Builders - https://businessmirror.com.ph/2014/10/05/victoria-sports-tower-where-the-urban-lifestyle-finds-a-health-and-fitness-fix/ No freedom of panorama in the philippines. The sculpture too no permission from sculptor
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 06.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 07.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 08.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 09.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 10.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 12.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 13.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 14.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 15.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 16.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 17.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 19.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 20.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 21.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 22.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 23.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 24.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 25.jpg
- File:577Victoria Sports Tower 01.jpg
- File:577Victoria Sports Tower 02.jpg
- File:577Victoria Sports Tower 04.jpg
- File:577Victoria Sports Tower 05.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 11:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all unfortunately. I cannot find immediate references as to when the sculpture was erected or who was its creator. Those having "577Victoria Sports Tower...", while under construction, one of the twin buildings is already completed. For File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 25.jpg, delete as a derivative work of an advertising board containing an underlying image. Restore all except "File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 25.jpg" when FOP is officially and formally introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victoria Sports Tower, Station 2 (EDSA, South Triangle, Diliman, Quezon City)
[edit]COM:ADVERT. One illustrated ad also violates COM:Derivative works rule.
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 03.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 04.jpg
- File:2623Manuel L. Quezon University Victoria Sports Tower Diliman Quezon City 05.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Drkimsd1980 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree logos, book covers, and low resolution photos which are unlikely to be own work. Possibly promotional for sports massage/chiropractic services.
- File:김태영의 발건강관리교본 도서출판 미래.jpg
- File:Drk profile picture..jpg
- File:KSIPMA 02.jpg
- File:KSIPMA 01.jpg
- File:Anatoly Biryukov wsm 01.jpg
- File:Association Logo 02.jpg
- File:Sportsmassage wsm 02.jpg
- File:01 Dr. Anatoly Biryukov.jpg
- File:04 Image of Massage Association.jpg
- File:03 Image of Massage Association.jpg
- File:02 Image of Massage Association.jpg
- File:01 Image of Massage Association.jpg
- File:Sportsmassage wsm 01.jpg
- File:Association Logoktca 01.jpg
- File:Association Logo 01.jpg
- File:01 Kim Taeyoung's citation ceremony..jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Drkimsd1980 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images that appear to be of uploader which were not taken by uploader. No evidence of permission from photographer.
- File:Professor Kim Taeyoung picture20215677777.jpg
- File:Professor Kim Taeyoung picture2021030314.jpg
- File:Jifhdafadh001.jpg
- File:04 스포츠Massage&체어Massage 도서출판 리더스.jpg
- File:02 정통스포츠사지 교본 삼호미디어.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE used only on vanity user page. User has no constructive global contributions to a Wikimedia project. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE used only on vanity user page. User has no constructive global contributions to a Wikimedia project. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/11/13/governor-newsom-appoints-19-superior-court-judges-11-13-20/. Should be discussed whether this is a work of the State of California. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- DeleteKing of Hearts It's clearly not a state of CA image, it comes from his former law firm's website. See here: https://web.archive.org/web/20200812145126/https://www.birdmarella.com/attorneys/hernan-d-vera/ Direct link to image is here: [3] BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- King of Hearts Wanted to ping you on this, it's clearly a copyvio, see https://web.archive.org/web/20200812145126/https://www.birdmarella.com/attorneys/hernan-d-vera/, someone just stripped out the background. Thx. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
![[3]](https://web.archive.org/web/20201019045134im_/https://www.birdmarella.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/HDV_650x650.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Judgefloro DW files - Set 01
[edit]1. Barangay Ginebra San Miguel advertising boards/posters in San Nicolas, Manila
- File:08684jfSan Nicolas Binondo Del Pan Roxas Bridges Tondo Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:08684jfSan Nicolas Binondo Del Pan Roxas Bridges Tondo Manilafvf 05.jpg
-JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
2. DW-problematic images of Pandacan, Manila
- File:08965jfSanto Niño de Pandacan Parish Church Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 01.jpg
- File:09560jfPandacan Manila Streets Landmarks Caritas Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:09560jfPandacan Manila Streets Landmarks Caritas Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:09948jfPandacan Manila Streets Landmarks Buildings Bridges Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:09948jfPandacan Manila Streets Landmarks Buildings Bridges Manilafvf 03.jpg (while cropping may solve, it will become another unused redundant image)
_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
3. Tarpaulins with illustrations (pictures of people) at Baliwag's parish church, from Category:St. Augustine Parish Church of Baliuag
- File:0072Poblacion Baliuag Bulacan during the Pandemic 30.jpg
- File:0612Baliuag, Bulacan Town Poblacion 32.jpg
- File:9568Baliuag, Bulacan Town Poblacion 01.jpg
- File:9609St. Augustine Parish Church of Baliuag 05.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominations. --Wdwd (talk) 08:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Judgefloro DW files - Set 02
[edit]1. From Category:Manuel L. Quezon University
- File:0001jfNazarene Catholic School Hidalgo Street Quiapo Manilafvf 05.jpg - illustrated tarp
- File:09977jfManuel Quezon University Hidalgo Street Nazarene School Quiapo Manilafvf 04.jpg - portraits of students + tarp
- File:09977jfManuel Quezon University Hidalgo Street Nazarene School Quiapo Manilafvf 05.jpg - portraits of students
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
2. From Category:GMA Network, Inc.
COM:Derivative works of literary pieces. Frames that show texts of speeches of gratitude from Kapuso figures
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log) - two frames of speeches by Atty. w:Felipe Gozon and Mr. w:Gilberto Duavit Jr. and by w:Mike Enriquez
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 03.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log) - speech by Mike Enriquez
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 04.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log) - joint speech by Gozon and Duavit
Undated photo in the frame, but the description on the lower-left has an attribution: Photo taken from GMA Gold 50 Years of Broadcast History.
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 21.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 22.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
3. All four files under Category:Robert Stewart (entrepreneur)
Image files are derivative works of a picture frame of an old photo of GMA Network's founding father, w:Robert Stewart (entrepreneur), who ventured into the radio business in 50s (most likely the old photo came from this period). But it is not sure on who was the photographer and when did he/she died. May either be OK or not per {{PD-Philippines}} or COM:URAA (U.S. copyright restoration on all eligible international works). The only attribution on the description plate found on top of the old photo, is essentially: "Photo taken from GMA Gold 50 Years of Broadcast History".
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 17.jpg
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 18.jpg
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 19.jpg
- File:09087jfEscolta Museum Exhibit Hall Edificio Calvo Binondo, Manilafvf 20.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative works of a tarpaulin with portraits. Several seems to be eligible for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} as these are reproductions of official portraits of judges etc., but it is difficult to determine which as these are mixed with portraits which I suspect are not government-sourced images.
- File:0145jfVigils demonstrations Media coverages Ferdinand Edralin Marcos Burial Cases Judgmentfvf 17.jpg
- File:0145jfVigils demonstrations Media coverages Ferdinand Edralin Marcos Burial Cases Judgmentfvf 18.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
5. Advertising/promotion board and photographs from Category:Amana Waterpark (Pandi, Bulacan)
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 32.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 33.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 36.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 13.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
6. From Category:Isdaan Floating Restaurant-Fun Park (Salapungan, Gerona, Tarlac)
COM:Derivative works. Main / intended subject is a marquee/sign containing copyrighted ads and Mickey Mouse character.
- File:01053jfParsolingan Floating Restaurant Fishes Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:01053jfParsolingan Floating Restaurant Fishes Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 07.JPG
- File:01053jfParsolingan Floating Restaurant Fishes Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 08.JPG
- File:01053jfParsolingan Floating Restaurant Fishes Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 10.JPG
- File:01053jfParsolingan Floating Restaurant Fishes Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 11.JPG
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 02:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Judgefloro DW files - Set 03
[edit]1. Banner tarpaulins under Category:Bocaue, Bulacan Pagoda
- File:09887ajfBocaue Church Martin Boat Parish Diocese Bulacanjf 30.jpg
- File:09923jfBocaue Church Martin Boat Parish Diocese Bulacanjf 02.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: These requests have been split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro. However, all numeric disambiguations have been retained. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 1
- File:FvfBulacan9999 16.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 14.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 13.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 15.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 11.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 12.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 10.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 07.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 09.JPG
- File:FvfBulacan9999 08.JPG
LGA talkedits 04:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- I was in the midst of the Bustos town fiesta festival when I chanced to discover this almost hidden or by the side Monument; Thanks for the message; in Commons:Derivative works, I ponder that the logo and seal is part of the Cultural heritage, monuments and memorials in Bulacan or in the Philippines emanating from the Tourism aspect for the site is 100 years marker and landmark of the town. No objection to the deletion, though.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 2
no FoP in Philippines. Though maybe some can be considered DM
- File:0407jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 03.jpg
- File:0407jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 02.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 13.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 11.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 10.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 08.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 07.jpg
- File:0392jfPedro Gil Street Plaza Calderon Santa Ana Manila Market Landmarksfvf 09.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and good morning; I looked at the photos of the Wikipedia Takes Manila for example this 2012 Image of the Public Market 6 photos taken by this Project in the Category; this market which is now reconstructed, hence, I presume that the photos of the facade and interior are well within the Philippine projects; I just passed by this place to hear mass at the Church near this market; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, Category:Santa Ana Public Market, Manila includes 6 photos of the same facade by the the Wikipedia Takes Manila
sincerely --Judgefloro 19:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC) (talk)
Deleted: most, kept two as DM. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 4
No COM:FOP in the Philippines, artists' permission needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)\
- Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
- With all due respect, I am submitting here the legal ramifications on the matter, to wit:
- Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Rizal Park was granted to herein photographer editor by the Head of the Visitor Centre of Rizal Park, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the said Visitor Office of the Park including the Tourist Map Category:Tourist map of Rizal Park;
- Category:Rizal Park Visitor's Center the head explained to me each and every numbers corresponding to the places of the tourist spots of the park, including the subject Sentinel of Freedom or Lapu-Lapu monument which is now the property of the Government; b) she assisted me in the photography of the Park's Tourism information center and even pointed to the bust of Jose Rizal for me to take photo of;
- All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx Category:Colossal brass statue-monument of Lapu-Lapu (Sentinel of Freedom), Rizal Park Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
- In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark sport; Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 02:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: First they are works of the respective sculptors even if commissionned (which remains to be proved). Concerning the Sentinel of Freedom monument it has been founded by the Korea Freedom League so it can hardly be a Pinoy Government work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment If all of the above files are deleted, deleting admin should consider nuking all of the uploads under COM:FOP Philippines as they are taken by the same person within the same area. 大诺史 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Good morning and thanks for your notes as I respectfully submit my Rejoinder Buildings and sculptures as works of art; However,
- I would like to differ in the application, interpretation of the cited Article Sec. 172 of the IP Code of the Philippines, and other related provisions, for the following reasons: in Statutory construction, the spirit and intent of the Copyright law in its related provisions should be looked into so as not to make absurd the Section; in this case the Rizal Park administration, that is Rizal Parks Develoment Committed through the Head of the Visitors Office, paid all the labors and works of the architect or sculptors, and all the foreman and manual laborers to build in in Agrifinal Circle; the same can be said of all thousands works now owned or transferred to the Government of the Philippines; as in our Government, the Rizal Park Board owns as Corporate entity all the properties of the Park irrespective of who crafted or built the church; in fact a Park cannot be created and the Attractions or Tourist spots thereat cannot be exposed to Public domain if the architect, laborers and lot owner will not transfer title to the Park and Government; this is the difference between the moral rights of the Copyright holder and one who lost all his rights when he is paid his job or works by Board or Committed of the Park; hence, the Visitors Center and Committee has control and jurisdiction over the Park and sculptures; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, for this is a National Cultural Treasure as declared by Law and even evidence by the Historical Markers, and by the Declaration List of National Cultural Treasures in the Philippines Rizal Monument declared a National Cultural Treasure Under Philippine Law, to wit, REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10066 should be read with the Philippine Copyright Law; and all the Tourist spots in the Tourist Map of Rizal Park including the Category:Soul Waves - Filipino-Korean Soldier Monumentincluded in the given Map by the Visitor's Center fall within the Express Exception to FOP, hence the Lost Rights of Sculptors, inter alia, that is all now of the Public Domain, because of being Government Property; here with Express Permission of the Head of the Visitors Center; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, References
- Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) and Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro very sincerely Judgefloro 04:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Sculptor is Filipino Juan Sajid Imao who was paid, and lost all his rights since this work is upon Bilateral Relations of Korea and Philippines; The hard evidence to Donations or Full transfer to Rizal Park, National Government are the 2 Historical Markers Monuments that state so and the name of the Sculptor Juan Sajid Imao is engraved therein; for this matters, I respectfully submit that the same 3 Sculptures including Lapu-lapu monument are of the Public Domain of the Government of the Philippines expressly falling with the Exceptions of the Copyrright Law as I respectfully underscore the Express Assistance and Permission to photo by the Management of Rizal Park Tourist Visitor Center, very sincerely Judgefloro 04:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- References of the Filipino Sculptor and Donation are the marker and marker 2 very sincerely Judgefloro 04:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Agree with the deletion of the rest of the images given rule on FOP and that most, if not all, of these artwork's authors (esp. Jose M. Mendoza, author of Bisig) are still living which means not suitable for PD-Philippines. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep the following images since the artwork is not the main focus of the image but the surrounding Agrifina Circle Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama unfortunately. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 5
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 17.jpg
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 15.jpg
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 14.jpg
- File:1400Malinta, Los Baños, Laguna 12.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and Good Afternoon from hereat Cloudy Bulacan Philippines due to LPA; please allow me to let the researchers consider that Laborers or Paid Workers and not artist, work per piece or per day with minimum daily wages paid by Employers, here, the University Board; Love arts are scattered all over the Philippines; and here in my country, no artist will execute a work in the streets or outside the Schools; I ♥ love Landmark are manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist, hence outside the scope of Copyrights law; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter; Very very sincerelyJudgefloro 09:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- It isn't up to you to say "manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist", it is the copyright law of the country (Philippines) which follows the law of the U.S.. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Unsure With regards to current standing of the Philippines on FOP, I agree yet the subject of the image is a mass-produced generic work and does not violate the Commons:Threshold_of_originality rule, thus the subject having no copyright. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
{{Pd-ineligible}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markoolio97 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear TOO in the Philippines. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 6
No FOP in Philippines for sculptures
- File:624The White House Events Place 21.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 20.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 19.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 17.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 18.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 16.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 14.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 13.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 12.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 11.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 09.jpg
- File:624The White House Events Place 08.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This might apply for PD-Philippines tag given that the subject of the images are examples of old-style of architecture (around early 1900 to late 1960) Markoolio97 (talk) 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC) {{PD-Philippines}}
- Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Looks to be rather generic mass-produced garden fountain and decoration figures. Many of the photos don't even show the "sculptures". How old is the building? If old enough to not be a FOP concern, I don't think a fresh coat of paint changes the status. (I'd lean keep but I'm not familiar with the history of the building nor details of Philippines copyright.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here are a few examples of similar architecture reference 1, reference 2. I have been looking on the subject and references.
and there are some hints that point to the subject being a recently-built structure that was designed to look similar to the old style of houses.This image shows a set of glass doors in the upper level of the house which continues through the windowed portion of the house, an uncanny and not period-correct design. The stone design on the left also looks artificial and attached only and not period-correct. Apart from these, there are not enough information available to correctly date the structure. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)- I have done a quick look in Google Earth and the structure is visible as of the earliest satellite image, April 25, 2004. It also shows that the place had been renovated sometime between March and October 2015 which might explain the uncanny and out-of-period design of the place. I'm going for keep (see above). Markoolio97 (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: kept most, deleted a few where the sculpture or fountain were a clear focus. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 15
COM:Derivative work of a model of the city. There is no freedom of panorama for 3D model works in the Philippines, and also as per User:Elcobbola/Models.
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 42.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 41.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 40.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 39.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 38.jpg
- File:08205jfSunsets Carmona Circuit Makati Ayala Mallsfvf 37.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 17
COM:Derivative works: of a map and various photographs. There is no freedom of panorama for such works. The map is undated but I suspect the map dates to 90s or 2000s considering the print and age of map degradation. For others, the photos look as if they are recent and the photographers must be still alive. COM:VRT correspondence of permissions from the heirs of the map's author and photographers of the photos are required.
- Map
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 43.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 44.jpg
- Photographs
- File:5977Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 01.jpg
- File:5977Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 02.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 47.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 48.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 25.jpg - this and the rest below might be dismissed as COM:DM, but by cropping out the photos leaves behind mere useless images of plain walls that are inferior to other files here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 24.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 23.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 22.jpg
- File:5928Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 15.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 19
Derivative work violation. Billboards, no COM:FOP Philippines, and missing COM:VRT correspondence of authorization for Judgefloro's use of commercial license from the graphic artists.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 22
[edit]Modern-looking statue. But there is no freedom of panorama here. Google Street View imagery shows this statue is no longer existing in public space. Hence it can be questioned its eligibility for future FOP as proposed (House Bill 799 and House Bill 2672).
- File:05529jfIvatan Halls House Capilla San Martin Bustos Bulacanfvf 19.JPG
- File:05529jfIvatan Halls House Capilla San Martin Bustos Bulacanfvf 20.JPG
- File:05529jfIvatan Halls House Capilla San Martin Bustos Bulacanfvf 23.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom — BriefEdits (talk) 06:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely copyrighted product manual. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fred.rallo
[edit]- File:Wims-2AES-CC1-Sem2-2016-2017-Ex10.png
- File:Wims-2AES-CC1-Sem2-2016-2017-Ex9.png
- File:Wims-2AES-CC1-Sem2-2016-2017-Ex4.png
- File:Wims-2AES-CC1-Sem2-2016-2017-Ex8.png
- File:Wims-2AES-CC1-Sem2-2016-2017-Ex2.png
Files stated as own work missing helpful descriptions. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
no permission is given by the author who is stated in the metadata Hoyanova (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Luamssuk (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo used on page biographical page on marked for deletion on es.wiki Askeuhd (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Cross-wiki promotion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 15juillet2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Centered on copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
The picture is probably copied from here and it's unlikely own work. Puppe100 (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sheikhnurruddin969 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart/diagram of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sheikhnurruddin969 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:OTRS permission or cited source stated Angryjoe1111 (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sekularni Humanist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio. tournament poster. source- https://www.facebook.com/thedurandcup ArnabSaha (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Almost duplicate/identical to File:8114Balete Drive Quezon City Landmarks 18.jpg. Redundant and COM:WEBHOSTing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
No longer used Ysogo (talk) 16:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
File claimed to be own work but has no EXIF. Same file with slightly different colors and higher resolution can be found here: https://wiki.wargaming.net/ru/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Plane_Yak38_engine.png
Other uploads by the user also needed to be checked. Some of them looks like real photos and have EXIF. Others are the same as this one - low-res pictures probably downloaded from the web. - Nockson (talk) 17:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahul yadav laxiwas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
- File:Rahul Yadav Behror.jpg
- File:Rahul Yadav Laxiwas0.jpg
- File:Rahul Yadav Laxiwas.png
- File:RahulYadavLaxiwas.jpg
- File:RahulYadavLaxiwas2.jpg
- File:Rahul Yadav Laxiwas.jpg
—MdsShakil (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo, personality rights Xocolatl (talk) 17:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Xocolatl: Please read COM:MDR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personality rights Xocolatl (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo Xocolatl (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo Xocolatl (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo Xocolatl (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private celebration, personal photo Xocolatl (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private photo, personal rights Xocolatl (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation; artist died in 1954; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader claims CC license, but the source is a website with no author information for any of the photos. All of the media on the page appears to be press photos or entertainment press photos without attribution. Likely some kind of copyright violation. William Graham (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Source given doesn't state anything about the license, and the only thing I could find about copyright was "Copyright © 2021 Pathfinder Publishing Pvt Ltd." SHB2000 (talk) 23:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused text only diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Caroline simmons
[edit]Crop of a photo originating from the subject’s Twitter account: https://twitter.com/CSimmonsCT/status/969352939587465216?s=20. No credible evidence of permission.
Ytoyoda (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative of package artwork. Should be discussed for COM:DM. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, significant DW by Flickr photographer, nothing significant seen in rest of photo (seems OOS) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doubtful own work, Logo for w:File:The logo of Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA).gif is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Doutbful own work, (see w:File:Turkish Brigade Kunuri.jpg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false claims, false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doutbful own work, Sports club logo ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, Logo for w:US Ouakam ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work and puiblication date for an image from the 1940's or earlier. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doutbful own work claim, official logo of Municipality of Urmia city, w:File:Urmia government logo.svg is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license. Could it be PD-old? Yann (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. Hard to tell. I can't find a date for the image, but it's attributed to the Australian News and Information Bureau, which ceased to exist after 1972. With {{PD-AustraliaGov}} (of which ANIB was part), anything created by the Australia Government is PD 50 years after creation. That gives a 2 year window where this could still be copyrighted. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted copyright status uncertain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Centered on copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Mainly copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license; actual license uncertain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Insignia/logo under NZ Crown Copyright, not under CC-BY-SA-4.0 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, Wikipedia gives "http://www.icocregister.org/ " as source. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; low res personal photo by uploader with no other contributions. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, English Wikipedia attributes "Gallerie de Laocoon" ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, English Wikipedia attributes - Arab Pharmaceutical Manufacturing. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo from the WWE CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of CC-BY license at source. the wub "?!" 12:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
no permission, picture taken from a twitter account https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2lN12fWEAgCdgg?format=jpg&name=medium Vacant0 (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
possible copyvio, unclear if this is above TOO in its country of origin (Ghana) FASTILY 00:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://suburbanodigital.blogspot.com/2020/12/questao-pet-observe-imagem-abaixo-e.html. Has EXIF and is larger than any copy I could find on the Internet. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unreliable upload, image doesn't match other uploads by this user, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fotosdocassio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.codevasf.gov.br/noticias/2021/codevasf-investiu-aproximadamente-r-350-milhoes-em-pernambuco-em-2020/pernambuco.jpg/view. Has EXIF and is larger than any copy I could find on the Internet. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I really do not know why I still worry about this. Yanguas (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unreliable upload, image doesn't match other uploads by this user, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fotosdocassio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.codevasf.gov.br/noticias/2017-1/frutas-e-legumes-estao-entre-possiveis-culturas-do-baixio-de-irece-inaugurado-nesta-sexta-23-na-bahia. Has EXIF and is larger than any copy I could find on the Internet. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unreliable upload, image doesn't match other uploads by this user, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fotosdocassio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Published at https://www.britishcanoeing.org.uk/news/2021/gold-medals-for-henshaw-and-sugar-as-gb-top-paracanoe-medal-table, doesn’t appear to be free work. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- (copied and pasted from Commons talk) This picture was taken at Tokyo paralympics medal ceremony and is of my son. Taken by GB team photographer - aka JJ - instagram handle is jjsmithuk111. Whom I have contacted as personal friend and says he does not want or need accreditation - he's a sports psychologist not a photographer.
- I'll, add his instagram handle to the file - for credits.
- Note - just because a picture is good doesn't mean it needs to be professional - — Preceding unsigned comment added by NTWCheshire (talk • contribs) 08:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @NTWCheshire: Hi, thank you for responding. It’s fine that the photographer does not want accreditation, but we still need evidence of permission from him directly. Please have him follow the steps described at COM:VRT/CONSENT so we can verify that he is the photographer and he consents to releasing the photograph under a free license. Please note that I didn’t say anything about the photograph being professional. Every piece of work is copyrighted by default and amateur creators have rights too. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever VRT permission has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
no metadata found, copyright violation, found on the web. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Also these files
- File:Emmy Williams.jpg
- File:Emmy Williams in Traditional Attire.jpg
- File:Emmy Williams Photo Section.jpg
- File:Emmy Williams in an event.jpg
--C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.--Nanahuatl (talk) 00:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Image appears to have been published first at https://scvillars.ch/news/tag/Coupe+du+Monde Ytoyoda (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed @Ytoyoda: . As scvillars.ch doesn't claim their files copyrighted, we can maybe consider putting them in the PD? --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You don't have to claim copyright for an image to be copyrighted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Munib kyiv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader has history of copyright violations. Image metadata does not match. Unlikely to be own work.
IronGargoyle (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This is out of scope, as an original textual work Prosfilaes (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Yes, this is an original textual work, but why does that make it out of scope? Many items in Wikimedia are original photographs, for exmaple. John Sauter (talk) 13:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avoid Using POSIX time t for Telling Time.pdf.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This is out of scope, as an original textual work Prosfilaes (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Yes, this is an original textual work, but why does that make it out of scope? There are many original works on Wikimedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Sauter (talk • contribs) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- It's part of the project scope's excluded educational content. We want people to putting their text documents on Wikibooks or some other project, not locked away in binary formats like PDF. Most PDF files on Commons are scans of historical documents or public domain books, for use primarily on Wikisource, or sometimes on Wikipedia in a use that could be replaced by a JPEG of the cover. These documents would be out of scope on the English Wikisource.
- Specifically, the Wikimedia Foundation encourages communal works. Photographs don't work that way, but text does. Original texts on WMF Wikis generally are stored as Wiki text, to be edited by everyone and be functionally anonymous. This is your private work, with your name on the cover, and only really editable by you.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- The PDF includes its sources as embedded files, and contains instructions for rebuilding the PDF from those sources. Nevertheless, reading over the descriptions you pointed me to, I agree that this work belongs in WikiBooks rather than in Wikimedia Commons. However, when I went to WikiBooks and did an upload, it uploaded the work into Wikimedia Commons! Is this an acceptable use of Wikimedia Commons, or have I encountered a catch-22: Wikimedia Commons wants me to move my work to WkkiBooks, but WikiBooks puts uploads on Wikimedia Commons? John Sauter (talk) 01:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is really original work, it's probably out of scope. But between the noor-book.com in the name, and a quick look inside, it looks like a professionally published book, possibly in 1998, which would be copyright infringment. Prosfilaes (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This is actually a very complicated issue, because I believe that this photo is actually faked. Here I have found original image, it's 4th from the top. After the deliberation and comparing with the other ZK-AMA photos, for example this one, and carefully comparing with other G-ADUT photos, I'm convinced that this one is faked. I'm actually sure that it's maybe not the condition for a deletion, but I'm sure that the photo needs to be clearly maked as manipulated and not legit. What should we do here? Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 07:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You may be right. In particular, the image the subject of this nomination appears to have the "ZK-AMA" registration in a different place on the side of the fuselage from where it is depicted in the Flickr photo from 1947. However, the real photo of G-ADUT was taken in 1937, and the subject image is from the early 1940s. The most likely explanation for the apparent manipulation of the G-ADUT photo is that the subject image is a publicity image created by someone unknown for TEAL in the early 1940s, using an altered version of the photo of G-ADUT superimposed on a contemporary photograph of Auckland Harbour. As such, it would be public domain in New Zealand on the basis that it is, in effect, a drawing / painting / photograph created or published in New Zealand before 1971 - see the "permission" section of the description box - and therefore suitable for uploading to Commons. Additionally, I think it would be a bit of a stretch to describe the subject image as a "fake"; it's probably more accurately described as an example of a 1940s-style publicity image. I would suggest that the "permission" section simply be altered a little to indicate that the image was likely created in the early 1940s as a publicity image, using a combination of two photographs and some retouching. Bahnfrend (talk) 07:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. You can mark the file with {{Hoax}} or similar template. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, unclear if this is below TOO in country of origin (Andorra) FASTILY 07:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, Justice scales and sword tip those over threshold of Originality. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Mozamaniac (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: needless redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
parce que je n'arrive pas à modifier l'image car je me suis apperçue que c'était pas la bonne version Mf-memoire (talk) 13:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio, clearly an Italian advertising shot. Many of John Lloyd's uploads are brochure scans. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 13:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 14:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of Public Domain. ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of Public Domain. ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of Public Domain. ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of Public Domain. ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of Public Domain. ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality and many other photographs of that building Olybrius (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo used on declined draft on en.wiki Askeuhd (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo used on declined draft on en.wiki Askeuhd (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No indication that this is indeed a work by {{Tasnim}}. A link to the webpage containing the image, as opposed to a direct link to the image itself, should be provided. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: new source provided, passes COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This image in not an original work of {{Tasnim}}. Per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Agree with nom's assessment. This image is all over Google Images and it appers shady that it is an original work of the source provided. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Photograph by "Alfonso". COM:PRP, not it the public domain yet in Spain (80 p. m. a.), since it was taken by the photographer Alfonso Sánchez García «Alfonso» (1880-1953). Undelete in 2034. Strakhov (talk) 14:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- At the time I was not able to ascertain the author, and thus clasified it as pseudonymous. If the author has been found, and it is not in public domain, please delete. --ecelan (talk) 14:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It illustrates en:polymerase chain reaction, but it's essentially the same as the first cycle portion of File:Polymerase chain reaction-en.svg, which is already in wide use. clpo13(talk) 18:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot, centered on copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:AA Savers Mart
[edit]Generic establishment with unremarkable mark or notability, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:7270Coronavirus pandemic checkpoints in Baliuag 38.jpg
- File:9703Town Centre Bulacan Baliuag 04.jpg
- File:9703Town Centre Bulacan Baliuag 05.jpg
- File:9896Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 21.jpg
- File:9896Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 27.jpg
- File:9896Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 28.jpg
- File:9896Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 29.jpg
- File:9896Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 30.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Sure, unremarkable building but still, general scenery is always in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Plain fence wall of an unremarkable residential property. Out of COM:SCOPE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Mainly centered on copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor file, redundant to File:Flag of Romania (1948–1952).svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 10:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor file, redundant to File:Flag of Romania (1952–1965).svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor file, redundant to File:Flag of Romania (1965–1989).svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Poor file, redundant to File:Flag of Romania (1965–1989).svg, turn this into a redirect of File:Flag of Romania (1965–1989).svg. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: do you think File:Flag of Romania (1965-1989).png should be redirected to File:Flag of Romania (1965–1989).svg, it's the same name and description. Instead of deleting it, redirect the png file to the svg file.
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: No opposition to this one. Deleting. Please replace accordingly. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
doubtful own work - Logo owned by hilip Morris International according to Wikipedia ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear colleague, due to the fact that I am a new member of the wiki project, it is possible that sometimes I do something wrong. And in this case, I just wanted to upload the Philip Morris logo. That's all. But the file didn't load until I checked the "my work" box. Naturally, I do not claim the authorship of this logo. And if you know and tell me how to solve this problem, I will only be glad.--NR SHENER (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, logo above COM:TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mattbr as no permission (No permission since) It seems this could be PD-US government. Yann (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't comprehend why this file was tagged. My understanding is that images on US government websites are PD unless they are specifically asserted as having independent copyright status. It is also quite common for these websites to give credit to the authors of images. That does not affect the PD status of the image unless an independent copyright status is also asserted. What the presence of the author credit does mean is that the credit should be included in the documentation for the image. That has happened here, so I don't see any problem. — Epipelagic (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unfortunately, the website of this department is more complicated. The legal notice regarding reuse of images says:
- Except for NSF logos, permission to use NSF visual media (graphics, photos and illustrations) is granted on a case-by-case basis. Some assets are public domain, some are created by NSF contractors, and some are used by NSF with specific permission granted by the owner. Therefore, visual media found on the NSF web site should not be reused without permission.
This particular image is likely under copyright. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
no metadata, found elsewhere https://tineye.com/search/b95182d2d7b3d9ed87e6fa496a1f6b01d8442cc9?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 Mjrmtg (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence for CC-BY-SA license at given source. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
No CC-BY-SA license mentioned at source. 1962 is not old enough to have fallen into public domain according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom. the wub "?!" 11:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Why is this being deleted? It documents a public square in a working class part of tower hamlets, when this page was set up there has even been a campaign to save the square and people have been made aware of lost art for the estate. In a council meeting about this future of the square this history page was even referenced.
https://inspiringcity.com/2020/07/11/woman-and-fish-frank-dobsons-destroyed-sculpture/
https://spitalfieldslife.com/2017/01/13/frank-dobsons-sculpture-in-whitechapel/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taraehudson (talk • contribs) 08:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The comments by the uploader have no relation to the licensing. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Photo clearly captured from laptop screen. Uploaded by Lý Ngọc Đạt's sock. LX | Talk 11:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Photograph by "Alfonso". COM:PRP, not it the public domain yet in Spain (80 p. m. a.), since it was taken by the photographer Alfonso Sánchez García «Alfonso» (1880-1953). Undelete in 2034. Strakhov (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- At the time I was not able to ascertain the author, and thus clasified it as pseudonymous. If the author has been found, and it is not in public domain, please delete. --ecelan (talk) 14:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS
- File:Mp- Ssegrinya Muhammad Uganda.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits.png
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits.jpg
- File:Jevi .jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits 01.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 13:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda 06.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda 05.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda 04.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda 03.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda 02.jpg
- File:Shammah Benefits Uganda 01.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know whether this man is a well-known writer, but neither do I find similar images of young men of Uganda – and we do want some. –LPfi (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. While we may "need some pictures" we only need pictures which are in scope, Random pictures of people are just random pictures of people Timtrent (talk) 20:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation: original file https://www.bz-berlin.de/berlin/mitte/charite-bekennt-sich-zu-graeueltaten-ihrer-aerzte-in-der-ns-zeit Luamssuk (talk) 13:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted for the photographer Patricia Figueiras; the uploader claimed that she herself provided this photo for Galisian wiki but no proves are provided. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Hycan Ownership
[edit]
I created this (along with an accidental duplicate) for a Wikipedia article, however they're now dated aside from being unnecessary in the first place. I no longer want these files and would like them to be deleted. WaddlesJP13 (talk) 20:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (can be kept as historical data) and still in use actually. Deleted one as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
possible copyvio, somewhat complex 3D logo, unclear if this is above TOO FASTILY 00:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Closing as Kept; seems OK for COM:TOO Germany (though if others more familiar with how German law has been applied in such cases differ, I would not object to renomination on more specific grounds). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, for an image from the 1920's or 1930's or earlier. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and re-tag as {{PD-Spain-photo}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept; license problem seems resolved (though lack of source for small web-resolution photo is still undesirable) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work and publication date. Logo for w: United Grand Lodge of England. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It's the same position as the Mon Mikomo file. This gamon has no origin from Japan. Something similar has a line in the middle. It appears to be copyrighted and requests deletion. Gameposo (talk) 09:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unused, dubious; apparently OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maxinvestigator as Dw no source since (dw no source since) License probably not OK. Yann (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- This file shouldn't be deleted. It has been the logo of Acción Democrática since its fundation in 1941, as depicted, for example in this photo from the legislative campaign of 1946, so the file is already on public domain according to Venezuelan legislaton (if it was created in 1961 or before).--LuisZ9 (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept per LuisZ9; apparently OK Venezuela license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) I added the source, date and author. Could it be PD-US-no notice or no renewal? Yann (talk) 13:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Low resolution does not allow determination of license notice; uploaded under false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) I added the source, date and author. Could it be PD-US-no notice or no renewal? Yann (talk) 14:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted lacking evidence of free license status (As not English language, cannot be assumed to be US printing)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) I added the source, date and author. Could it be PD-US-no notice or no renewal? Yann (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license; lacking info to establish if it is free licensed for any other reason. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Christ the Redeemer is the work of Paul Landowski (1875-1961), and is still in copyright in Brazil. FoP doesn't apply to 3D copies of the work. Prosfilaes (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Query own work claim, english wikipedia lists https://www.business-standard.com/ as source ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
clearly violating Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy policy Uttarpradeshi (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- What do you mean, Uttarpradeshi? Uanfala (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Uanfala, there is consensus regarding india-pakistan related topics see here, in past there were many cases of disruptive editing in india-pakistan related topics, so there is a mutual consensus that no one can do any kind of edit which doesn't strictly apply to wikipedia policies, so this map which is a part of a disputed territory of Kashmir, there is a consensus that only full maps with dotted boundary showing regions administered by both countried should only be used, see Jammu and Kashmir (union territory), this article is about the indian-administrated territory, there is not even a single map which doesn't show the rest of the territory with dotted line. so this map is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy and should not be used. Uttarpradeshi (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, the consensus for only using maps of the whole Kashmir region applies to the broad locator maps used in the infoboxes of the highest-level administrative divisions of the region (like Azad Kashmir or Ladakh). When it comes to maps for lower-level entities, displaying the whole Kashmir region is not necessary, and may actually be undesirable or even impossible. The map that's nominated for deletion was correctly used at en:List of districts in Azad Kashmir and in the relevant section of en:Azad Kashmir. I don't see any issues with the accuracy; whether or not the boundaries of the neighbouring areas are shown is a stylistic choice, and if you believe the map would be better if it had them, you're welcome to go ahead and add them. Uanfala (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Uanfala, there is consensus regarding india-pakistan related topics see here, in past there were many cases of disruptive editing in india-pakistan related topics, so there is a mutual consensus that no one can do any kind of edit which doesn't strictly apply to wikipedia policies, so this map which is a part of a disputed territory of Kashmir, there is a consensus that only full maps with dotted boundary showing regions administered by both countried should only be used, see Jammu and Kashmir (union territory), this article is about the indian-administrated territory, there is not even a single map which doesn't show the rest of the territory with dotted line. so this map is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy and should not be used. Uttarpradeshi (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Strong keep - The map is factual and accurate. There is no such thing called "Neutral point of view policy" for Wikimedia Commons. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'll take Kautilya's word on factual and accuracy. -- DaxServer (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per K3, Dax and explanation by Uanfala. Fowler&fowler (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1970. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Shows the very same building as those at COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:GMA Network Center. The architect, Roger Villarosa, is still living. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Per COM:FOP Philippines only buildings completed prior to December 15, 1972 fall in a freedom of panorama. This building is probably built later, therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
problemi di cropyright Beaest (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Ho proposto la cancellazione di questa foto che avevo caricato perché è sovrascritta per errore su una precedente foto i cui diritti decisamente non sono scaduti, dunque va assolutamente cancellata. Tuttavia io propongo di ricaricarla per il seguente motivo: sebbene l'autore della fotografia sia sconosciuta, la cartolina è in circolazione almeno sin dal 1903, come si deduce da questa vendita datata a quell'anno. Inoltre essendo io in possesso di una di queste cartoline, posso fotografarla di mia mano.--Beaest (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Non ho capito onestamente, quella caricata su commons che dici essere una cortolina di che hanno è? --ZioNicco (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @ZioNicco quella che ho caricato per ultima risale ai primi del 1900, ma quella che avevo caricato precedentemente era moderna. Adesso vedo che è sparita, forse un amministratore l'ha rimossa? Beaest (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Comunque non c'è né fonte, né data. Non possiamo tenere un file così. Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in France, the author died in 1985. Gzen92 [discuter] 11:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in France, the author died in 1985. Gzen92 [discuter] 11:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in France, the author died in 1985. Gzen92 [discuter] 11:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1971. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Should be dated and checked for PD status. Subject died in 1916. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep PD-1996 for foreign publications. --RAN (talk) 05:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per community decision of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained, because it is assumed the photographer died more than 70 years ago. This photo dates from around 1885 and can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 19:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely not own works: disparate collection of images, missing or inconsistent EXIF data; File:Boys and girls at Goa beach.jpg is a screenshot of unknown source (note the border and distortion). Unreliable uploader.
- File:Woman bites penis.jpg
File:Boys and girls at Goa beach.jpg- File:Indian women's hockey team.jpg
- File:Indian Women's Hockey team players.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have uploaded the original version of Goa beach pic, which was clicked by me only - you can check it on this link. It does not have any border or distortion issues. The last pic was was a scaled down version having minor editing, I hadn't thought while uploading it on Wiki that questions can be raised over its ownership/authenticity. The last time I had uploaded smaller size pic just to save my internet data, hope you understand.Goa4goa (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I found no earlier uploads of first photo in reverse image search. @Goa4goa: Do you have any other photos you took at Folsom Street Fair 2018? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- You're not fooling me. The new version of File:Boys and girls at Goa beach.jpg is not the original. It is clearly an upscaled version of the old one! And slightly cropped to remove the faint border on the right. 3 images with 3 different cameras, one without. I stand by the nomination. COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Gosh! Searched folders of my last laptop to find completely uncropped version of Goa pic. Have now uploaded that on this link. I have still increased pic's brightness somewhat and I believe I am within my rights to do so if the original pic clicked by me had low brightness. Regarding Folsom Fair, I did take few more pics there but I was also present in those pics and I don't want that to get leaked. I was not wearing proper clothes in them and so cant share them. Goa4goa (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- OK, I'll give you that one - struck Goa beach from nomination. But none of the concerns with the other pics have been addressed. I leave it up to closing admin to decide. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Gosh! Searched folders of my last laptop to find completely uncropped version of Goa pic. Have now uploaded that on this link. I have still increased pic's brightness somewhat and I believe I am within my rights to do so if the original pic clicked by me had low brightness. Regarding Folsom Fair, I did take few more pics there but I was also present in those pics and I don't want that to get leaked. I was not wearing proper clothes in them and so cant share them. Goa4goa (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted 3 files, kept the Boys and girls at Goa. --Ellywa (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for 2D art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, but a text logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please change licencing to PD if you agree. --Ellywa (talk) 19:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
UK cover for The Little Drummer Girl, possible copyvio, may exceed UK TOO FASTILY 07:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Is kept at en:WP with a fair use rationale. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim , "Logo for the Amazon Video series Upload. " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Seems above threshold due to the shading in de letters per COM:TOO. --Ellywa (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
File:AS Denguélé.png is non-free - The TOO issue is the football graphic (centre). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - The center football/soccer graphic is not copyrighted. See File:Soccer ball.svg --Sreejith K (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Sreejith. imho below threshold. --Ellywa (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, unclear if this is below TOO in country of origin (Kazakhstan) FASTILY 08:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Kazakhstan this country does not have guidelines for threshold of originality. Therefore it must be supposed that the threshold is low, so this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, unclear if this is below TOO in country of origin (France) FASTILY 08:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Threshold of originality is low in France, per COM:TOO France, so the photo of the book cover must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Possibly copyrighted work, no information about the author TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition, only FOP for buildings in Japan, and this is not a building, per COM:FOP Japan. --Ellywa (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
This is the Parus building, in Minsk. Apparently, there isn't Freedom of Panorama (FoP) in Belarus:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:ParusInMinsk10-2011.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:ParusMinsk2014.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parus.jpg.
—capmo (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
![16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/11#c-Capmo-2021-09-11T16:17:00.000Z-File:Небоскрёб_"Парус",_Минск.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Это изображение здания не имеющего историко-культурной ценности, и не является искусством произведения. Что нарушено? SamGold (talk) 20:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
![20:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/11#c-SamGold-2021-09-12T20:33:00.000Z-File:Небоскрёб_"Парус",_Минск.jpg){kind=link}
- Пожалуйста, прочтите эту статью: Commons:Свобода панорамы. —capmo (talk) 01:28, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment In fact, I'm not sure I fully understand how this FoP thing works. In Category:Minsk there are several other pictures in which the primary subject is a (modern) building, like this, and this one. According to the FoP rule should all these pictures be deleted? —capmo (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![13:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/11#c-Capmo-2021-09-15T13:37:00.000Z-File:Небоскрёб_"Парус",_Минск.jpg){kind=link}
- OK, I found the banner bellow in Category:Buildings in Minsk which seems to cover most of my doubts. —capmo (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
|
Attention: Upload only photographs taken of buildings whose architect died before 1974.
Photographs taken of buildings located in Belarus can only be uploaded to Commons if the copyright on the building has expired, because the Copyright Law of Belarus forbids the publication or commercial use of photographs taken of copyrighted buildings. The copyright term in Belarus for buildings is the lifetime of the architect + 50 years + the end of the calendar year. See COM:CRT/Belarus#Freedom of panorama for more information. Photographs taken of other buildings will be deleted if unfree. |
|
Deleted: per nomination, no Freedom of Panorama per COM:FOP Belarus. --Ellywa (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
![20:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/11#c-Ellywa-2022-03-27T20:10:00.000Z-File:Небоскрёб_"Парус",_Минск.jpg){kind=link}
1972 Publication for NSF/SI but work is a translation by a third party. Not necessarily under PD-US-Gov terms.
_(20579604542).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Adolf Naef, the author, died more than 70 years ago. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- The issue is not the copyright in the original, but in the translation.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Can someone provide more information about the listed translator, and if they qualify for 'US-GOV' status ?
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted the PDF file because the translation is probably copyrighted. The image could be kept imho. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2014. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Олександр Гончарук. FoP issues should always have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
File:CoA of the Ecumenical Patriarchate Constantinople (St. George's Cathedral of Istanbul version).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have found some derivative images used in this image, and have added them in the description. However, it is possible other works were used as DW and were not credited. The user was asked one year ago by me to give his/her sources for this image, and has not responded since. Veverve (talk) 18:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
By the way, I feel Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies here. Veverve (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)