User talk:Bahnfrend

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bahnfrend!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

TUSC token 3721ce4fd00d7357e0e670f14f2dbfad

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Bahnfrend!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wagi schlieren lisbethli.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alpha Millennium departs Port Hedland, 2012 (1).JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Rooey II, 2012.JPG

Hi Bahnfrend, could you add the name of the sculpture to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MV Sydney 2000, Sydney Cove, 2013.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:YarraTramsLogoNew.svg

File:YarraTramsLogoNew.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bhopal Shatabdi Express, New Delhi, 2008 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect, but I like it.--ArildV 16:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Z3.215 + B2.2028 swanston.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG

Hi, I've uploaded a brightened version; if you don't like it please revert to original version. Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rrsimpson.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rrsimpson.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rrsimpson.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- TLSuda (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regent Street Bus Cavalcade

Hello Bahnfrend. I just noticed your photo of Q1 trolleybus - very nice. Did you happen to take any more images of that event? Ultra7 (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for uploading what you had. I was just concerned you might have taken more but hadn't uploaded them yet for lack of time or info. After a walk like that though, I can fully understand why you didn't - I hope you all had fun anyway, definitely one of those happy coincidences (especially if you like buses and/or have kids to occupy). Ultra7 (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR18 + IP East Perth, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 00:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR18 + IP Stratton, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Re 460 058-1 + IC 2000 St. Gallen, 2014 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Re 460 058-1 + IC 2000 St. Gallen, 2014 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.endlich mal "bunte" Bahnbilder ;) --Ralf Roletschek 12:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNV 3288 Theodor-Heuss-Brücke, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but yet tilted slightly cw. --Cccefalon 13:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Tilt fixed -- Bahnfrend 15:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Very good photo with a blemish: Unfortunately, the target screen is unreadable by the short exposure time. --Steindy 20:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but still quality good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 22:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The destination screen may have been changing to a different message at the time I took the photo. -- Bahnfrend 01:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FC 2 test, surfers paradise boulevard, March 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B 2727 + train, B Midi-Zuid, 2014 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak Support Good quality. Background a little bit noisy. --XRay 08:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B 2727, B Midi-Zuid, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D1.3509 swanston, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C.3008 collins, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gordon Street, Kondinin, 2014(1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankies' Diner, Trayning, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roche Street, Kalannie, 2014(2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Sports

Hello, Bahnfrend! Please join the WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 22:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crop Photos

Hello! I really liked your photographs a lot! I have a suggestion - It would be great if you crop some photos and upload it separately. Like this photo, we can take the wicket keeper, Swapnil Patil or the fielder and so on. It would be great and help Wikipedia in these articles a lot. I don't know if I can do this, you being copyright holder. Please think on this. Thanks!--Kashish Arora (talk) 06:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Overseas Passenger Terminal

Please see Category talk:Overseas Passenger Terminal#Contents. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Australia photo requests

I have some photo requests for Australia. What region do you live in? WhisperToMe (talk) 09:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I have photo requests for Perth and Melbourne! First I'll list Perth:

The Japanese School in Perth/パース日本人学校 - 20 KALINDA DR, CITY BEACH WA, 6015
International School of Western Australia - 22 Kalinda Drive CITY BEACH 6015 WESTERN AUSTRALIA
City Beach Residential College (former City Beach Senior High School) 22 Kalinda Drive City Beach
Head office of the Western Australia Department of Education 151 Royal Street, East Perth 6004 Entry off Hill Street
Former The Japanese School in Perth/旧パース日本人学校 - 157 Deanmore Rd. Scarborough W.A.6019

Then, if/when you visit, Melbourne:

The Japanese School of Melbourne (メルボルン日本人学校), 6 ELLINGTON STREET CAULFIELD SOUTH VIC.3162
Caulfield Junior College (has French section): 186 Balaclava Rd, Caulfield North VIC 3161, Australia
Deutsche Schule Melbourne: 96 Barkly Street (corner Dean Street) North Fitzroy, VIC 3068, AUSTRALIA
Jetstar Airways headquarters: 473 Bourke St, Melbourne Vic 3000
Oakleigh South Primary School (site of the Japanese Saturday school) - Riley Street, Oakleigh South VIC3167
Former campuses of the Melbourne Japanese weekend school:
- Brighton Grammar School,90 Outer Crescent,BRIGHTON,Victoria 3079 AUSTRALIA
- Kilvington Girls' Grammar School (Melway:P68E7) 2　Leila Road, Ormond, Vic 3204
- Sandringham East Primary School, 9 Holloway Rd. Sandringham, Vic 3191 (Melway P77 A-11),AUSTRALIA

Thanks in advance! WhisperToMe (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I really appreciate it! WhisperToMe (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if the Japanese cultural center (described in http://www.perthwalkabout.com/Arts-Culture/hyogo-prefectural.html) is in a building separate from the Japanese school? I know they are on the same property but I am not sure if they share the same building? I didn't know about the center's existence until now. It's cool that Perth has it! WhisperToMe (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Those are excellent photos! I'll add one to the article on Japanese Australians WhisperToMe (talk) 07:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:610_mm_track_gauge_locomotives

610 mm track gauge locomotives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 11:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wasnt sure

how to alert you to item on aust noticeboard on wp en... tried fb.. and have left msg there JarrahTree (talk) 01:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawn Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (08).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 08:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radiance of the Seas, Fremantle, 2015 (03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some chroma noise, probably slight motion blur, but still acceptable for QI --Smial 12:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SuperStar Virgo, Fremantle, 2015 (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing boats, Probolinggo, 2016 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shagang Haili at Port Hedland, 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 16:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pacific Eden, Fremantle, 2015 (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emerald Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

gutentag=

I thought I had got the IMO stuff as I had at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Port_of_Albany_early_evening_April_2016.jpg - but hey

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maersk_Detroit_(ship,_2005) - supposedly is IMO 9297864
yet https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MSC_Anya_in_Fremantle_January_2017.jpg

- ?? so senility on my part, ?? or demented... JarrahTree (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your your reassurance - now you say that, I should have taken more shots.. the thing was I couldnt find evidence of the name change.. JarrahTree (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sheesh

dont tell me there is a january 2017 in freo cat? gotta re do all my mass of items of today :) JarrahTree (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HMS_St_George_and_HMS_Juno_in_Albany_Harbour_1901.jpg to be coarse about it the bugger at the back looks like neither the names the local albanians call them - the one a the right could be either of the named ones - any thoughts? JarrahTree (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you're on

please take a look at my recent edits and the new set of items at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Duplicate - the german photos of part of a building seem to me to be the same - no machine readable for either - it seems one version is not better than the other - any concuring on that? JarrahTree (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

oops - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stra%C3%9Fenseite_32.jpg - is designated as duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:W%C3%BCrzburg-Altstadt-Sanderstra%C3%9Fe_7-Stra%C3%9Fenseite_32.jpg

And as I check them as dupes, the dupe tag/ aspect says that opne has to go, and, when I look - they seem exactly the same - because of my zilch in the language, I wondered if anything on either of the images suggest to you there is anything between the descrips that might offer clues as to how the dupes happened, or not... JarrahTree (talk) 13:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bugger I think I have been deleting the ones with the good titles JarrahTree (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But I think the full detail is in the category anyways JarrahTree (talk) 13:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your responding and checking, appreciated to have another set of eyes on it - cheers JarrahTree (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hmm

stuck with this one - File:HMS St George and HMS Juno in Albany Harbour 1901.jpg have checked the net and the mix doesnt seem right - hope you might have some suggestions... cheers JarrahTree (talk) 14:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - as I suspected - a very deceptive title and description - the one on the right we agree - and the funnels and colour you are right - nothing like dicky sources ... JarrahTree (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at my edits

I have created a few extra categories for when we upload photos from the trip - hope they make sense! JarrahTree (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

so...

been doing the nullarbor then eh? cannot believe my crossing dates on commons go back to 2008! (In reality they go back to 1970s but thats another story....) JarrahTree (talk) 09:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Passenger ships in Wilhelmshaven

Moin Bahnfrend, du hast diese Kategorie angelegt und einige Segelschiffe dahin verschoben. Erlaube mir den Hinweis, dass diese recats nicht korrekt sind. Die Mir ist gemäß Russian Maritime Register of Shipping ein Sailing/Training ship und kein Passenger ship. Vor diesem Hintergrund werde ich die recats rückgängig machen. Beste Grüße --Ein Dahmer (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR45 + NR10 + Ghan Alice Springs, 2015 (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR110 + train Yunta, 2017 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New empty categories

Hello, Bahnfrend. I noticed that you created quite a few categories, including Category:2011 in water transport by country, Category:1927 in rail transport by country, and similar ones, and that many of them are empty. On Commons, we are asked to create categories only when there is something to put into them. Do you have something to put into all these categories? If not, then they can be deleted for now. --Auntof6 (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the new categories are not really empty. They're populated with sub-categories that are operated by templates, and unfortunately the templates take a little while to update themselves. If you wait a few days, the templates should all have updated, and from then onwards, the new categories will then be automatically populated, in some cases with quite a lot of sub-categories. Bahnfrend (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I will check again in a few days. By the way, I moved your reply here to keep the conversation thread together. If you have another reply, you can leave it here and I will see it. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've just checked and the templates are still not working yet. I've encountered this problem before - they're sometimes really slow to update the way they operate, and I suspect that it's a bug in the Commons software (there isn't a similar problem on English Wikipedia). As I'm only an editor, not a Wikimedia employee, there isn't really anything I can do about the problem, other than encourage people to be patient - the templates will update automatically in the end. Bahnfrend (talk) 06:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aircraft by year of photographing

What is your intention for this new category? There is already the category Category:Aircraft by year which seems to do the same thing, but captures all media. Josh (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International trucks

There is a discussion on this page whether images should be categorised as International trucks or International Harvester trucks. Not many wikipedia contributors have contributed to the discussion or voted with their preference, but you have contributed to material on International Harvester. I would be grateful, if you have the time, if you would share your own opinion on the page name. And thank you. Eddaido (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorising

You seem to be quite a serial over-categoriser and I'm not quite sure fo the purpose of some of your new categories. For example, what is the purpose of Category:Oil tankers by country of location‎ and how is it different from Category:Oil tankers by country? Unless you're planning to create Category:Oil tankers by country of origin‎ or something similar (for example), then creating these additional layers simply makes it harder to navigate through the category system. Sionk (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is far better to create categories that actually have content (more than one or two items) rather than unnecessary additional steps. The purpose of categorisation is to be a finding aid, not to have small numbers of items buried deep in a category chain. Sionk (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating stupid unnecessary categories such as "Police of Foo" since for example Tasmania Police isn't known as Police of Tasmania. Police of Foo may work in the US where there is a large number of police agencies and departments but in Australia, really? Also redirect template is for redirecting. So just stop creating a mess. Bidgee (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ships in Milford Haven

Ships in Milford Haven has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Sionk (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tried messaging recently

trust all is well - keep in contact !! JarrahTree (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider adding iw-links here on Commons

Dear Bahnrend,

Thanks for creating new categories here on Commons as you did recently for Category:Ashleigh Gardner. It would be great if you could as well add the interwiki-link to the corresponding page on en-wikipedia by clicking here on commons in the sidebar menu under 'In Wikipedia' on 'Add links' and then putting in the appearing pop-up box the link to the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. This will add a link to commons to all language versions of the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. Moreover this will avoid the corresponding article to be included in the maintenance category en:Category:Commons category template with no category set.

Many thanks if you could consider to do so, indeed this would reduce my efforts on adding these iw links later through patrolling the pages listed on the pre-mentioned category on en-wikipedia. I would like to thank you for all the great work you are realizing on en-wikipedia and here on commons.

If you have any further questions on this do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards and already now my very best wishes for you for the New Year.Robby (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome pic

Thanks for taking that photo of the Sea Princess sailing under the Sydney Harbour Bridge - I loved it.--Commander Keane (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Apartment_hotels

Apartment hotels has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 12:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! California Highway, Fremantle, 2018 (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Public Art - Copyright?

As discussed can you provide some clarification as to whether Freedom of Panorama applies to cases such as this Commons:Deletion requests/File:Howard Lane artworks1.jpg. Dan arndt (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Guten Morgen, Bahnfrend!

Betreffs Deines Edits: Verstehe ich das richtig, dass Fotos und Logos der Regierung Osttimors gemeinfrei sind? Schönen Gruß, --JPF (talk) 05:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soweit ich weiß, sind Fotos von Gebäuden oder Skulpturen usw., die der Regierung von Osttimor gehören, in Ordnung. Es gibt jedoch ein Gesetz, das die Ost-Timor-Flagge schützt - aber ich bin mir nicht sicher, wie dieser Schutz aussieht - ich bin gerade in Ost-Timor und die Internetverbindung ist zu langsam, um es heute herauszufinden ... Bahnfrend (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Pacific at Cook

Hey look, we took the same photo! :-)

1986
2002

— Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 01:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Sperl, front, 2006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stirling Terrace, Toodyay, 2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality photo. --Acabashi 10:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christ Church, Jerusalem, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OSY 8082, Vasilissis Amalias Avenue, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TLV from LY542, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St David's Anglican Church, Morawa, 2018 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul's Lutheran Church, Morawa, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Majestic, Singapore, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cristo Rei beach, Dili, 2018 (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Anzac Centre, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Procuradoria Geral da República (East Timor) (building), 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Nakroma, Dili, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dog Rock, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross Catholic Church, Morawa, 2018 (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 12:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bahnfrend,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bahnfrend,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Carnley, Perth, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kay Goldsworthy, Perth, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Portrait in the darkish style of old oil paintings. --Axel Tschentscher 08:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bahnfrend,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Amelia Kerr & Belinda Clark

Can you please provide some images of these two players from Australia, Amelia Kerr & Belinda Clark? Will be thankful to you. Drat8sub (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sailing yachts of Germany

Please realise that the sailing yachts of Germany in many cases (yacht, that means that you can sleep on board) are travelling internationally. So they are not alway IN Germany. Difference in categories IN and OF. So the sailing yachts of Germany are not always sailboats in Germany. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:28, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bahay Tsinoy, 2018 (01).jpg

And also:

File:Bahay Tsinoy, 2018 (02).jpg

Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Rizal statue, Fort Santiago, 2018 (01).jpg

And also:

File:Rizal statue, Fort Santiago, 2018 (02).jpg

Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Philip II of Spain statue in Plaza de España (Intramuros, Manila), 2018 (01).jpg

Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (01).jpg

Looking at the background of File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (01).jpg, looks like the Modi R. What do you think? Calistemon (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The same ship is also in the background of File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (02).jpg - Bahnfrend (talk) 05:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sunday 15th

was hoping i might get there, unable to do so... have sent an emile as well, trust all is well JarrahTree (talk) 05:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

gesundheit! YGM - and it is not to do with the suez canal!! JarrahTree (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hitching Post outside National Bank in Wagin

Hi Bahnfred, a bit of an unusual request here. Two of your images, File:National Australia Bank building, Wagin, 2018 (02).jpg and File:National Australia Bank building, Wagin, 2018 (01).jpg show a little white post on the footpath. Turns out the little post is quite unique, a bit of a last of its kind in Wagin, and state heritage listed, see here and here. You wouldn't have a close up of that post or an image where you could extract a good enough image? I would use the image for an upcoming List of State Register of Heritage Places in the Shire of Wagin article. Calistemon (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I have used one of your two images that show the post for now. It is arguably the smallest state heritage listed item that I have come across, this little post! I can see how its significance can easily be missed. If you get a picture one day, let me know or just add it to the article. If, on the way, you can fill any gaps on en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia/State Register of Heritage Places requiring photos/Country WA‎, that would also be appreciated. And, finally, the reason there aren't as many gaps as they could be is down to a handful of dedicated photographers like yourself who's work helped to fill these gaps. Calistemon (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to get a few images of the post while passing through Wagin on the way to a camping trip to Katanning, but feel free to add to the collection of images if you are happen to get there one day. Calistemon (talk) 05:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#East_Timor_and_FOP

Fyi, your edit to Category:Buildings in East Timor is currently a subject of this discussion thread, do you have time to leave an input? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZK-AMA flying.jpg

File:ZK-AMA flying.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 07:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:John Harmer (bishop) (01).jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Johanne Dybwad in Oslo, 2019 (01).jpg

File:Statue of Johanne Dybwad in Oslo, 2019 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

4ing (talk) 17:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ferry ports, etc.

You may want to look in on Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/12/Category:Ferry ports, since you edited one of the affected categories. - Jmabel ! talk 23:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Commons Photographers!

Hi Bahnfrend, thanks for joining the Commons Photographers User Group as our newest member! You'll find information about our group's activities under "Events and activities" and we're always happy about new people joining our virtual meetings on Zoom. I hope you'll continue having a great time sharing your works with others in 2023. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I wish you a Happy New Year! As it has been our tradition at the beginning of the new year for a while, we're sharing our most memorable shots of the past year with each other. I invite you to share a picture that is particular meaningful to you and to describe why that's the case. Also, as Wikimania 2023 will be here before we know it (August 16 to 19), please consider adding your thoughts on our planning page, where we gather ideas for how we can make Commons photography more visible than in the years before.

All the best to you, your family, and friends! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023

and provide feedback.

The timeline for the 2023 election will be

September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee
October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members)
October 10: Election committee starts work
October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies
November 10 – December 10: Elections
December 15: Results announced

In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

the 2023 board election of our group is run at

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.

The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are

October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
November 17 – December 10: Elections
December 16: Results announced

If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Hello Bahnfrend !,

Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AirAsia X Airbus A330 9M-XXV Perth 2024 (01).jpg

File:AirAsia X Airbus A330 9M-XXV Perth 2024 (01).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AirAsia X Airbus A330 9M-XXV Perth 2024 (01).jpg

File:AirAsia X Airbus A330 9M-XXV Perth 2024 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bidgee (talk) 10:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pizza Hut, Datong District, Taipei City, 2023 (01).jpg

File:Pizza Hut, Datong District, Taipei City, 2023 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 11:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Section 2, Wuchang Street, Wanha District, Taipei, 2023 (02).jpg

File:Section 2, Wuchang Street, Wanha District, Taipei, 2023 (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vehicles_by_color_by_country

Vehicles by color by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Adamant1 (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rest area Monument?

Dear Bahnfrend, the photo's in the Category:Rest area Monument do not always show the monument and the name "Rest area Monument" does not exist. Overhere you can clearly see what is meant with it: it is the Category:Standbeeld Cornelis Lely (Afsluitdijk). Can you please have deleted your category? Because this is not good. Ymnes (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymnes: There is no duplication, and therefore no problem. Category:Standbeeld Cornelis Lely (Afsluitdijk) is a category for a statue. Category:Monument Afsluitdijk is a category for a monument. The category I created, Category:Rest area Monument, is a category for a Motorway rest area where both the statue and the monument are located. To minimise any confusion, I have now added the first two categories to the third category. "Rest area Monument" is the English translation for "Verzorgingsplaats Monument", about which there is a Dutch Wikipedia article here, so the rest area really does exist and has a name. I have now linked the category and the article via Wikidata. I named the new category "Rest area Monument", because that is the standard (English language) form for names of such articles on Wikimedia Commons - see Category:Rest areas in the Netherlands, which includes dozens of such articles named in that form. The images I added to the new category all depict at least part of the rest area and are therefore properly included in that category. Bahnfrend (talk) 02:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, I see now that you're right and that the "Verzorgingsplaats" (rest area) is really called "Monument" (w:nl:Verzorgingsplaats Monument). I didn't imagine one could have called it like this. Including the Wikidata Infobox it's very well like this. Ymnes (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:BVG xxxx

Hi Bahnfrend, first I want to apologize for my bad English. I saw, that you created some categories for BVG vehicles in Berlin. Please note, the Category:BVG xxxx (unit number) is ambigous. BVG 5001 e.g. is the number of a bus, a tram but also an underground train. Also there were several other BVG vehicles with this number, at least three more tram cars. Could you please move these categories to a clearly name? Thanks in advance. -- Platte ^{∪∩∨∃∪} 06:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Platte: . There's no need to apologise. Your English seems fine to me. But if it's a concern to you, I can also speak German and you can write in German if you wish. I had already noticed that there was a problem with the BVG vehicles categories, but wasn't sure how to deal with it. The problem appears to be similar to one that affects aircraft. For example, the Category:VH-EBA (aircraft) is ambiguous because several aircraft have had that registration, so the sub-categories Category:VH-EBA (Boeing 707), Category:VH-EBA (Boeing 747) and Category:VH-EBA (Airbus A330) have been created to deal with that problem. How about we deal with the BVG problem similarly, by creating, eg, Category:BVG xxxx (bus) and Category:BVG xxxx (tram) sub-categories? Would Category:BVG xxxx (U-Bahn) also be a suitable schema? Once we have decided how to name the sub-categories, we can then create suitable sub-category templates, as Template:BVG number is intended for the Category:BVG xxxx schema only (and needs some amendment, as it is partially focused on trams rather than vehicles in general). Bahnfrend (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für das Angebot, ich werde daher mal auf deutsch antworten. Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass man die Vorlage um einen weiteren Parameter für die Baureihe ergänzt und anhand dieser dann automatisch die Kategorisierung als Bus, Straßenbahn- oder U-Bahn-Fahrzeug vorgenommen wird. Also das ganze sähe dann etwa so aus:

Das Fahrzeug 9001 vom Typ Flexity Berlin F8Z wäre in eine Category:BVG 9001 (F8Z) zu kategorisieren. Die Vorlage {{BVG number|9001|F8Z}} würde dann aufgrund des Parameters F8Z automatisch auf eine Category:Trams of Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe by number verweisen, die eine sub-category von Category:Vehicles of Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe by number ist. Ohne den Parameter könnte die Vorlage ja weiterhin wie bisher direkt auf die Category:Vehicles of the Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe by number verweisen. Eine Zwischenebene wie z.B. Category:BVG 9001 (tram) kann man anlegen, wäre aber nicht zwingend erforderlich. -- Platte ^{∪∩∨∃∪} 07:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Malaysiachurchphotoyear

Hi, Bahnfrend. You created Category:Malaysiachurchphotoyear in September 2023. Was it meant to be a template? It's currently an empty category with nothing linking to it. There is a template Template:Malaysiachurchphotoyear that is used. If the category can be deleted, please let me know or nominate it for speedy deletion. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bahnfrend

TUSC token 3721ce4fd00d7357e0e670f14f2dbfad

Tip: Categorizing images

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rrsimpson.jpg

Regent Street Bus Cavalcade

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Crop Photos

Category: Overseas Passenger Terminal

Australia photo requests

wasnt sure

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

gutentag=

sheesh

you're on

hmm

Have a look at my edits

so...

Passenger ships in Wilhelmshaven

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

New empty categories

International trucks

Overcategorising

tried messaging recently

Please consider adding iw-links here on Commons

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Awesome pic

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Quality Image Promotion

Public Art - Copyright?

Copyright

Indian Pacific at Cook

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Quality Image Promotion

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Picture of Amelia Kerr & Belinda Clark

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (01).jpg

sunday 15th

Hitching Post outside National Bank in Wagin

Notification about possible deletion

Ferry ports, etc.

Welcome to the Commons Photographers!

Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Rest area Monument?

Category:BVG xxxx

Navigation menu

Search