Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![9 File:Ngày 19.3 tại Sứ quán, Thế Tử nhà Trần hỏi Lập Đạo đi đường chắc mệt nhọc lắm, Nguyên sứ trả lời "天子不以越南為逺何以驅馳".jpg](#File:Ngày_19.3_tại_Sứ_quán,_Thế_Tử_nhà_Trần_hỏi_Lập_Đạo_đi_đường_chắc_mệt_nhọc_lắm,_Nguyên_sứ_trả_lời_"天子不以越南為逺何以驅馳".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_이준기_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Mary_Alden_Hopkins_(R)_-_Evening_Journal,_Delaware_-_1930-02-17_-_page_15.png){kind=link}
(376)120px-Reform_UK_Logo.png){kind=link}
Title.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as no permission FMM-1992 (talk) 06:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I withdraw my nomination -- FMM-1992 (talk) 06:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as retracted by nominator. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
likely copyright violation; proshot image uplaoded by user with only this (and a cropped variant) upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 10:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Matayyab Ali (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Test request by another Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake SAHANAJ BIBI (talk) 03:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake SAHANAJ BIBI (talk) 03:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
رفعته عن طريق الخطأ Marsel Ziad (talk) 18:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & F10. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Un-copyright. (Uaileann (talk) 06:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC))
Speedy keep, this is Musée Annam throwing yet another tamper tantrum. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Tricher. (Uaileann (talk) 06:11, 1 September 2021 (UTC))
- Speedy keep, this is just another Musée Annam-type sock throwing yet another tamper tantrum. Best to ignore them and go on. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Ngày 19.3 tại Sứ quán, Thế Tử nhà Trần hỏi Lập Đạo đi đường chắc mệt nhọc lắm, Nguyên sứ trả lời "天子不以越南為逺何以驅馳".jpg
[edit]
- Tricher. (Uaileann (talk) 06:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC))
- Speedy keep, this is Musée Annam throwing another tamper tantrum, the file contains ancient texts and the parts of the website its from are PD-ineligible. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Cancel "Donald Trung" for the fool fake. (2405:4802:277:9C10:934:A930:BE66:F0AF 04:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC))
.png){kind=link}
- Speedy keep, the nominator is Musée Annam who nominated it as "a revenge nomination". Note that this flag is literally created by him and they provided some second (2nd hand) accounts of the flag but not enough to prove it, but it's in scope as plausible. Will have to deal with their other bad faith nominations. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Council for the Socio-Cultural Development of Champa (Different picture of the flower).svg" for precedent. There is enough evidence to vouch for this flag'a authenticity. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
"(non-admin closure)" Kept: Vandalism. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake SAHANAJ BIBI (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Qiarring31 (talk) 00:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Achyuta.das1 (talk) 07:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Picture depicts boats on the lake. Quite useful. A09090091 (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.deviantart.com/shahabbas1571/art/Sultanate-of-Aceh-Conquest-of-Iskandar-Muda-831701590 Hidayatsrf (talk) 09:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Deleted by Yann. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Erroneously created with singular "File" Ysogo (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Erroneously created with singular "File" Ysogo (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Image of Skapaltata found elsewhere on the internet, no clear permission. TherasTaneel (talk) 22:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:26, 5 September 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Album cover --Krdbot 08:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
voir/see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue André Darrigade Narrosse.jpg - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 15:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no Freedom of Panorama in France. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Identique aux procédures précédentes sur le même sujet / same as previous :
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rond-point André Darrigade, Narrosse 40180.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rond-point André Darrigade.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Northrider640
Néanmoins, la photographie a été rapatriée sous fr.wiki, où elle peut être importée sous condition de l'exception des bâtiments récents à la liberté de panorama de France : fr:Fichier:Rond-point André Darrigade, Narrosse.jpg.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 08:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Français : Après correction et clarification sur fr.wiki, l'exception à la liberté de panorama s'applique uniquement aux bâtiments et non aux œuvres sculpturales. La conclusion reste sur Commons la même : à supprimer, pas de liberté de panorama en France.
- English: After clarification and correction done on fr.wiki, the exception can be applied only for buildings and not to sculpural works. The conclusion stays the same : to delete, no freedom of panorama in France.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 17:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hello Dear Friend, Duplicate photos and poor quality, Thanks a lot. Arenasky (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: SD: Unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hello Dear Friend, Duplicate photos and poor quality, Thanks a lot. Arenasky (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: SD: Unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Dear Friend, Duplicate photos and poor quality, Thanks a lot. Arenasky (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: SD: Unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Peninsula Manila. Recent architecture that needs COM:VRT licensing permission from the architect. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Tippfehler im Lemma. Idenzische Kopie mit korrektem Lemma existiert schon. LeoDavid (talk) 18:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Info New file is File:Bernhard III. Anhalt-Bernburg 1344.jpg GeorgHH • talk 21:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 02:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep Per {{FoP-Taiwan}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Liuxinyu970226. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per {{FoP-Taiwan}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Liuxinyu970226. --Yann (talk) 08:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 14:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Per {{FoP-Taiwan}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Liuxinyu970226. --Yann (talk) 08:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This picture is released under a free license. Theastitva (talk) 07:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by GreenMeansGo at 11:55, 10 September 2021 UTC: No permission since 4 September 2021 --Krdbot 20:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Najmulhussen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Najmul hussen.jpg
- File:England and tx.jpg
- File:Ami koi.jpg
- File:Sky will.jpg
- File:German shepherd baby dog.jpg
- File:My car in m.jpg
- File:Vhwplh.jpg
- File:Traing.jpg
- File:Ami jani na.jpg
- File:Mkkkkkkkkkkkkk.jpg
- File:Najmul hussen artist of Sylhet Bangladesh.jpg
- File:2021-08-25 19 38 58.569+0600nnnnnnn.jpg
- File:2021-09-03 04 14 28.655+0600 Bhai striker o.jpg
Achim (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Najmulhussen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Fan follower Very much love me.jpg
- File:Najmul hussen artist of Bangladesh has.jpg
- File:Tarek and nahz.jpg
- File:Jubel llipon najul.jpg
- File:Najmul hussen and tarek.jpg
- File:Lipon and najmul.jpg
- File:Ami o ni amar loge.jpg
- File:U aslo na ni ba jst fun and.jpg
- File:Najmul hussen available On.jpg
Achim (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Najmulhussen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Najmul Hussen A Bangladeshi musical artist of Bangladesh and.jpg
- File:Najmul Hussen musical artist of Sylhet Bangladesh and.jpg
- File:Najmul Hussen musical artist of Sylhet Bangladesh.jpg
- File:I'm a musical artist of Sylhet Bangladesh and tx.jpg
— Haseeb (talk) 09:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused redundant file, near-duplicate of File:0068jfSacred Heart Parish Shrine Kamuning Mass Quezon Cityfvf 12.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
See COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia. The mall complex is the central focus here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Karna temple in Bhagalpur; Arjuna and Krishna used to worship Karna in this temple after performing the Chhath puja.jpg
[edit]
I don't know who created this page. This page is totally fake. Shree Krishna never worshipped Karna. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1234567 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is a photo collage. A09090091 (talk) 12:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Yann. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Not free image, belong the nacion.com https://www.nacion.com/el-pais/politica/organizador-de-bloqueos-planea-fundar-partido/4YVI67B6CVFC5HB4WPTS2ULDLM/story/
Deleted: by Taivo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Not really free image, belong to La República newspaper https://www.larepublica.net/noticia/federico-malavassi-sera-el-candidato-de-union-liberal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linconi (talk • contribs) 15:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Small files, no metadata, most probably copied from elsewhere. Yann (talk) 11:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by French boy Montana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Collection of personal images.
- File:Visible from centre 05.jpg
- File:Visible from centre 04.jpg
- File:Visible from centre 01.jpg
- File:Visible from centre 03.jpg
- File:Visible from centre 02.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Very very very sorry for my wrong editing. It should be Commons:Categories for discussion/2021/09/Category:韓文漢字. Cangjie6 (talk) 10:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - author's request as a wrong page name. The correct pagename is Commons:Categories for discussion/2021/09/Category:韓文漢字. --miya (talk) 15:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is a fake, not true. (2405:4802:277:9C10:934:A930:BE66:F0AF 04:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC))
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep, for context the nominator is the Globally Locked Sockmaster Troll user "Musée Annam" who is known for uploading fake flags without sources, I questioned their unsourced flag editing a couple of times and their only response was condescending insults and arrogance (as they seem to be mentally incapable of having an actual discussion about content and are de facto Globally Banned because of such content), unlike "Musée Annam" who also seems physically incapable of ever providing sources for any of his claims with the assumption that he's an authority (he's obviously not) I actually did provide sources.
- If I genuinely had faith in Wikimedia Commons' deletion system I wouldn't have had to write this, but having seen admins deleted sourced images that are 100% (one-hundred percent) accurate with simple nominations like "Fake, please delete" or "Out of scope" for actual in-use or other educational images. This flag was attributed to be authentic on Vietnamese monarchist websites and the above nomination is just "a revenge nomination". If an admin actually is willing to delete this and would genuinely want to know more of a reasoning than "Deleted: per nomination" as I usually see in such bad nominations, especially since undeletion is essentially impossible or takes months on a deliberately broken page because of apathy and a blind trust in admin decisions. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Council for the Socio-Cultural Development of Champa (Different picture of the flower).svg" for precedent. There is enough evidence to vouch for this flag'a authenticity. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept, fake or not, but per COM:INUSE in scope. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is a fake in reality. (2405:4802:277:9C10:934:A930:BE66:F0AF 04:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC))
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep, for context the nominator is the Globally Locked Sockmaster Troll user "Musée Annam" who is known for uploading fake flags without sources, I questioned their unsourced flag editing a couple of times and their only response was condescending insults and arrogance (as they seem to be mentally incapable of having an actual discussion about content and are de facto Globally Banned because of such content), unlike "Musée Annam" who also seems physically incapable of ever providing sources for any of his claims with the assumption that he's an authority (he's obviously not) I actually did provide sources.
- If I genuinely had faith in Wikimedia Commons' deletion system I wouldn't have had to write this, but having seen admins deleted sourced images that are 100% (one-hundred percent) accurate with simple nominations like "Fake, please delete" or "Out of scope" for actual in-use or other educational images. This flag was attributed to be authentic on Vietnamese monarchist websites and the above nomination is just "a revenge nomination". If an admin actually is willing to delete this and would genuinely want to know more of a reasoning than "Deleted: per nomination" as I usually see in such bad nominations, especially since undeletion is essentially impossible or takes months on a deliberately broken page because of apathy and a blind trust in admin decisions. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Council for the Socio-Cultural Development of Champa (Different picture of the flower).svg" for precedent. There is enough evidence to vouch for this flag'a authenticity. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept, fake or not, but per COM:INUSE in our scope. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Delete for the fake. (2405:4802:277:9C10:934:A930:BE66:F0AF 04:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC))
- Keep, for context the nominator is the Globally Locked Sockmaster Troll user "Musée Annam" who is known for uploading fake flags without sources, I questioned their unsourced flag editing a couple of times and their only response was condescending insults and arrogance (as they seem to be mentally incapable of having an actual discussion about content and are de facto Globally Banned because of such content), unlike "Musée Annam" who also seems physically incapable of ever providing sources for any of his claims with the assumption that he's an authority (he's obviously not) I actually did provide sources.
- If I genuinely had faith in Wikimedia Commons' deletion system I wouldn't have had to write this, but having seen admins deleted sourced images that are 100% (one-hundred percent) accurate with simple nominations like "Fake, please delete" or "Out of scope" for actual in-use or other educational images. This flag was attributed to be authentic on Vietnamese monarchist websites and the above nomination is just "a revenge nomination". If an admin actually is willing to delete this and would genuinely want to know more of a reasoning than "Deleted: per nomination" as I usually see in such bad nominations, especially since undeletion is essentially impossible or takes months on a deliberately broken page because of apathy and a blind trust in admin decisions. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Council for the Socio-Cultural Development of Champa (Different picture of the flower).svg" for precedent. There is enough evidence to vouch for this flag'a authenticity. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept, fake or not, but per COM:INUSE in scope. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete for the fake. (2405:4802:277:9C10:934:A930:BE66:F0AF 04:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC))
- Keep, for context the nominator is the Globally Locked Sockmaster Troll user "Musée Annam" who is known for uploading fake flags without sources, I questioned their unsourced flag editing a couple of times and their only response was condescending insults and arrogance (as they seem to be mentally incapable of having an actual discussion about content and are de facto Globally Banned because of such content), unlike "Musée Annam" who also seems physically incapable of ever providing sources for any of his claims with the assumption that he's an authority (he's obviously not) I actually did provide sources.
- If I genuinely had faith in Wikimedia Commons' deletion system I wouldn't have had to write this, but having seen admins deleted sourced images that are 100% (one-hundred percent) accurate with simple nominations like "Fake, please delete" or "Out of scope" for actual in-use or other educational images. This flag was attributed to be authentic on Vietnamese monarchist websites and the above nomination is just "a revenge nomination". If an admin actually is willing to delete this and would genuinely want to know more of a reasoning than "Deleted: per nomination" as I usually see in such bad nominations, especially since undeletion is essentially impossible or takes months on a deliberately broken page because of apathy and a blind trust in admin decisions. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, pleass see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Council for the Socio-Cultural Development of Champa (Different picture of the flower).svg" for precedent. There is enough evidence to vouch for this flag'a authenticity. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept, fake or not, but per COM:INUSE in scope. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bovineboy2008 as Copyvio (copyvio). It seems like a PD-textlogo to me, if only in reference to File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg, which has more complex graphical effects and was denied copyright registration in the United States for lacking originality. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with the nomination that it's not more complex than File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg and therefore is below COM:TOO US. -M.nelson (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bovineboy2008 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10838180/mediaviewer/rm2419186689/ Deleted out of process. Probably too simple to have a copyright. Yann (talk) 14:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep is below COM:TOO per earlier discussion (above). —Locke Cole • t • c 06:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Textbook case of below TOO in the US. -FASTILY 09:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted posters/social media pics
- File:Ceres Negros FC 2018 PFL Champions.jpg
- File:Ceres Negros FC is 2018 Philippines Football League Champions.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. Better still, have the original images overwrite these FB-derived images.
- File:Negrense wears Yellow for Ceres Negros.jpg
- File:Stadium View.jpg
- File:Fans of Ceres Negros FC.jpg
- File:Fans Watching Ceres Negros FC.jpg
- File:Panaad Park.jpg
- File:Panaad Stadium view.jpg
- File:Panaad Stadium Grandstand bleachers.jpg
- File:Panaad sa Negros Opening.jpg
- File:Rondalla Competition during the 25th Panaad sa Negros Festival.jpg
- File:Panaad @ 25.jpg
- File:LIn ay sang Negros 2018 during the 25th Panaad sa Negros Festival.jpg
- File:Ayala Corporate Center.jpg
- File:O Residences Condominium.jpg
- File:Ayala Corporate Center Bacolod.jpg
- File:Panaad Stadium Football Field.jpg
- File:Panaad Stadium Grandstand.jpg
- File:Panaad Stadium VIP Area.jpg
- File:Ceres Negros FC Tunnel entrance.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Small files, no metadata, most probably copied from elsewhere.
Yann (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
I need to delete this page, because it violates the rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlos y jasmin (talk • contribs) 07:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Which page do you wish to delete? Note that I tagged your file uploads for deletion due to lack of licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: not a valid deletion request, unclear. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
copyright Polo9191 (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please, stop nominating templates for DR because of such nonsense reasons, the world's most strongly keep. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Closed: Unclear deletion request. The nominator might have tried to nominate some page for deletion but misunderstood how to do this. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto senza significato, sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Redundant and lower quality than File:City of Como in 2018.104.jpg. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Foto sfuocata, e simile alla precedente. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Weak keep, not the greatest quality. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 19:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader seems to be subject in a number of the images, which makes it unlikely that they are the copyright holder. Indeed, one of the images lists a different copyright holder in EXIF data. All uploaded images have different EXIF data.
- File:Georges Urwald.jpg
- File:Georges Urwald & FLOTT.jpg
- File:Rhäifränsch.JPG
- File:Muselfénkelcher.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Foto senza significato e sottoesposta. Tremej (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: There are better photos of trees in Como than this one. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Badly framed and/or poor quality with no educational value, and unused anywhere. Out of scope
Timtrent (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Immagine senza valore educativo Tremej (talk) 20:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Foto poco significativa, e molto simile ad altre due foto con lo stesso soggetto. Tremej (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Foto senza fine educativo e senza un soggetto particolare. Tremej (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - I see nothing wrong with the file. No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 20:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Dark, low quality. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Foto simile alla precedente, senza soggetto particolare e con un controluce errato. Tremej (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious claim of own work as they changed this from an earlier claim of owner's permission [1] but no evidence is provided. Sourced to a defunct LinkedIn page. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMichelle_Binas.jpg&type=revision&diff=588687653&oldid=588605512){kind=link}
- Ah! Dubious claim? How? No such is intended, please! Why would I do that? I am new around here; it's purely a misunderstanding of how things work. I will appreciate your help on how to fix this. Thank you! Mikhail Adeoye (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unfree Youtube Vogue video of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx4jFKt2kII No Free license. Leoboudv (talk) 20:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'm the uploader. Vogue (magazine) has multiple channels on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/c/Vogue, https://www.youtube.com/c/vogueitaliamagazine, https://www.youtube.com/c/VogueParis, https://www.youtube.com/c/voguetvtaiwan, https://www.youtube.com/user/VogueEspana, https://www.youtube.com/c/britishvogue ...) and they share some content, though not all. This image is actually from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmhr5_RZWHg (looks like I didn't close a }, which hid the source), which is Vogue Taiwan, and there it is properly marked Creative Commons Attribution. --GRuban (talk) 22:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I withdraw my nomination and have passed the image based on the uploader's new source. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. User has no constructive global contributions to a Wikimedia project, so I believe this also fails COM:CSD criteria F10. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as a valid user page image, INUSE on en:WP. "User has no constructive global contributions to a Wikimedia project" sounds like a damning indictment of the image, but they've only been here two weeks! Give them a chance. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Two weeks is plenty of time to make a handful of constructive edits. The username certainly has a promotional sound to it and Commons is not a free webhost. They can certainly re-upload any images if they decide to stick around and edit productively somewhere on a Wikimedia site. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. I should note too that this image looks to have been taken by a photographer other than himself so it is questionable if he has the rights to release it. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Too many times new users upload an image and put it on WP only to disappear. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorick2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Uploader has history of copyright violations.
- File:Francisco Javier Sardo Olmedo.jpg
- File:Olimpiadas Francisco Sardo 4.jpg
- File:Olimpiadas Francisco Sardo 3.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 22:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Today's Mass Extinction and Holocene-Anthropocene Thermal Maximum are being caused by the Super Rich (50803755077).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Description is wrong Darrelljon (talk) 22:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Book cover, not necessarily own work. Non-free at English Wikipedia (w:File:BOStrategy.jpg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work , album cover art - Non free at English Wikipedia w:File:Bankrobber-clash.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
English Wikipedia w:File:Beryl McBurnie.jpg attributes the photo to "Carl Van Vechten in 1950" , Doubtful own work claim ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
English Wikipedia considers this , w:File:Bjspflag.GIF a non-free logo or symbol. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:Flickr washing. It was suspiciously uploaded to Flickr and uploaded to Commons the same day. Frodar (talk) 23:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- What's so suspicious? I really don't understand what's wrong with the picture. Sargen220 (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused redundant logo, superseded by File:Palawan Plebiscite 2021 Logo.png P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Howhontanozaz (talk) 02:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Noncommercial (cc-by-nc-nd-3.0) — billinghurst sDrewth 04:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:UK#Known author (Walter Stoneman). ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete requested by uploader --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 06:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete A09090091 (talk) 12:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep out of scope of the "Monuments competition" but still documenting human condition in the late 2010-ties --Oo91 (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly out of Commons scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araucochinchon (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these paintings are attributed to Guillermo Muñoz Vera, a living painter. We need an OTRS permission sent by the author in order to keep them in Commons.
- File:Jeronimo muñoz.jpg
- File:Cesares.jpg
- File:Cartografo.jpg
- File:Ibn Yubair.jpg
- File:Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa.jpg
- File:TerraNova.jpg
Strakhov (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- [traducción] Todas estas pinturas son obra de Guillermo Muñoz Vera, un pintor contemporáneo. Hace falta un permiso OTRS enviado por el autor (el pintor) para mantener estas imágenes en Commons. Strakhov (talk) 13:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Jeronimo_muñoz.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101910006371. --Superzerocool (talk) 12:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission answered but currently not sufficient. Ruthven (msg) 09:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araucochinchon (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to file description these are works by Guillermo Muñoz Vera (1956-), a living artist. Permission sent by copyright owner (the painter) to COM:VRT is needed.
- File:Cuesta Salobre, Chinchón.jpg
- File:Cueva en Chinchón.jpg
- File:Casa de la Cadena en Chinchón, 2003.jpg
- File:El Aconcagua desde el aire al atardecer.jpg
- File:Volcanes Payachatas.jpg
Strakhov (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work - Equivalent w:File:Amik-SummerOlympics1976.svg is Non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This image might be deleted, as there is a copyright sign on it. --Green fr (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Commercial book cover, unlikely to be under a free license Kusma (talk) 09:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Or alternatively, hoax. Kusma (talk) 09:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Book cover used for advertisement on enwiki, unlikely to be own work (in which case it would not have an in-scope use). Probably copyvio. Kusma (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Parce qu’elle est Non-sens Abakar Abdramane (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep because the nomination is nonsensical. The file could certainly use a descriptive name, but that‘s no reason to delete it.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
No EXIF data, No discription out of scope and maybe a Copyvio Reda Kerbouche (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
No EXIF data maybe copyvio from Facebook and small Reda Kerbouche (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
My own upload - low quality personal photo with no educational value. Redundant with File:Canpotex train in BC.JPG. -M.nelson (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a better svg-version of the exact same logo and the jpg-version has bad quality. Welkend (talk) 10:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not seeing the svg version. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
All photos are credited to Sergiy Marynchuk of the Tornado Plumbing website and appear there (such as https://tornado-plumbing.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Sump-pump-installation-2-1024x768.jpg), but the website has no obvious disclaimer that its photos are public domain. Uploader is not explicitly claiming to be Sergiy Marynchuk.
- File:Sump pump installation.jpg
- File:Drain.png
- File:Interior drain replacement.jpg
- File:Interior back water valve with alarm system.jpg
- File:Basement waterproofing Toronto.jpg
- File:Plumbing Toronto.jpg
- File:French drain Toronto.jpg
- File:Sump-Pump-Installation-23-min.png
- File:Sump-pump-installation-8-1024x768.jpg
- File:Sump-pump-installation-6-1024x768.jpg
- File:Sump-pump-installation-5-1024x768.jpg
- File:Sump-pump-installation-1-1024x768.jpg
- File:Sump-pump-installation-4-1024x768.jpg
- File:Kubota 123.jpg
- File:Kubota mini excavator operation.jpg
- File:Kubota excavator operation.jpg
- File:Kubotamini.jpg
- File:Kubota Mini-Excavator.jpg
- File:O (78).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucile Gautier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Œuvres d'un artiste mort en 2012 donc sous droits d'auteurs. Autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr
- File:Signature de Georges Camille Petetin.jpg
- File:"Nature morte au poisson" Huile sur toile 92x73cm.jpg
- File:Port d'Ostende dans la brume, tableau de Georges Petetin, photo prise par Vincent Gautier.jpg
- File:Photo de la remise du Diplôme d'Arts Sciences et Lettres à Georges Petetin.jpg
- File:Photo de la remise du Diplôme d'Arts Sciences et Lettres 1974.jpg
- File:Georges Camille Petetin portait du 16 mars1978.jpg
- File:Pont Battant .jpg
- File:Buisson sous la neige.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work and needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: We need OTRS from photographer and the artist. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have chatted with Andrew before about his page here and can confirm that he loaded the pic. Robman94 (talk) 20:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. He might have uploaded them but who took them? Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Netora (talk) 15:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT and out of COM:SCOPE. Fails COM:EDUSE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Bundle also here two files from Category:Barangay South Triangle, Quezon City over similar reason
- File:04011jfChurches Buildings West North Avenue Roads Edsa Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 04.JPG
- File:04011jfChurches Buildings West North Avenue Roads Edsa Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 05.JPG
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 15:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Duh even writes the half of the flag as own work. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:49, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
One image already deleted. Popular persons in Estonia. Unlike that own work. Unfinished EXIF-data
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Portion of image appears from predated TeamNL twitter post (https://twitter.com/TeamNLtweets/status/1432900840839389185). Close examination of the image makes it looks like this may be a scan/photo of a printed picture. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable organization, out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. User has no constructive global contributions to a Wikimedia project, so I believe this also fails COM:CSD criteria F10. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. User has no constructive global contributions to a Wikimedia project, so I believe this also fails COM:CSD criteria F10. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the potential to be educationally useful to illustrate neighborhoods of Como. A better file name would be helpful though. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Oakwood Hotel panoramio
[edit]The building shown here seems to be Joy~Nostalg Hotel and Suites. Likely the same building as those deleted via COM:Deletion requests/File:Oakwood Ortigas.JPG and COM:Deletion requests/File:Joy-Nostalg Center.jpg. Architects' free license authorization via COM:VRT correspondence is required.
- File:Oakwood Hotel from Emerald - panoramio.jpg
- File:Oakwood Hotel from Emerald - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Oakwood Hotel driveway and facade (Joy~Nostalg Center - Manila) - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete. Personal pic, no enciclopedic value. Coltsfan (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
File copied from Facebook, see metadata. Yann (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Facebook file. Do we accept Facebook files, yes or no? E4024 (talk) 18:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion : authorship not challenged. — Racconish 💬 11:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
File copied from Facebook, see metadata. Yann (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Comentário: infelimente, postei essa e outras fotos na plataforma facebook. Usei o download da foto na plataforma para fazer o upload no wikimedia commons.
- Vou tentar achar o original nos meus arquivos e imagino poder resolver o problema. Lgjunior (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Lgjunior
- @Lgjunior: Se achar o original, é melhor, mas alternativamente basta colocar na fonte o FB, e na postagem do FB colocar na descrição a licença da imagem. Não é nada de problemático.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Sim... pensei que a plataforma fosse o obstáculo! Vou ver se consigo resolver nos novos casos. Lgjunior (talk)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
File copied from Facebook, see metadata. Yann (talk) 12:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Recent unfree Flickr images
[edit]These files are marked as "all rights reserved" on Flickr, but the photos should be {{PD-Art}} (except possibly for the frames). The question is then only the copyright of the underlying paintings. Reading the messy article w:Sardine & Tobleroni, it seems that the artists are still alive, making the images unfree.
Stefan4 (talk) 22:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Recent unfree Flickr images
The Flickr user does not seem to be the copyright holder. Additionally, the files are listed as unfree on Flickr.
Stefan4 (talk) 17:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Clearly Delete, copyright violations ruin everything --Saviour1981 (talk) 07:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Recent unfree Flickr images
[edit]Derivative of work that has a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) license, incompatible with Commons.
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Sealle (talk) 16:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Recent unfree Flickr images
[edit]These are listed as "all rights reserved" on Flickr, but the Commons uploader claims to be the copyright holder. If the Commons uploader owns the Flickr account, then I suggest that he either changes the licence on Flickr to a free licence (such as {{Cc-zero}} as on Commons) or follows the instructions at w:WP:IOWN.
Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Files posted to Flickr by Randolph Black
[edit]These 102 files were uploaded to Flickr by Randolph Black prior to January 2021. They currently read "all rights reserved", but, for each of these photos, that was not always the case. Looking at the license history for each photo, these had all been previously uploaded under the Creative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0 before the user revoked that mark and changed the label to all rights reserved in 2021. In May 2023, these were all tagged by A1Cafel for license review, which came back as "failed license review" because the bot checks only the license on the images at the time of the review, but the previous mark complicates things. I've posted previously on the copyright village pump, but I only received one response. Previous community discussion that led to the affirmation of {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} doesn't seem to have intensely discussed whether or not this public domain mark is (ir)revocable, so I want to bring these files up for community discussion rather than either simply remove the speedy tag on all of these as clearly OK or simply delete all of these as clearly not OK to have on Commons.
- File:Adamite r002 (36188455994).jpg
- File:Adamite r003 (36835759636).jpg
- File:Amethyst 0110x (24659805717).jpg
- File:Amphibole var Hornblende 01 10x (27828886009).jpg
- File:Andesite 01 10x (38760554815).jpg
- File:Anthracite Coal 01 10x (38960276634).jpg
- File:Apatite 01 (39387641762).jpg
- File:Aragonite 01 (38709602084).jpg
- File:Arkose 01 10x (38960269444).jpg
- File:Azurite 01 (38709594494).jpg
- File:Barite 01 (39387618402).jpg
- File:Basalt 01 10x (25785496958).jpg
- File:Bauxite 01 (38709592564).jpg
- File:Beryl 01 (27640579649).jpg
- File:Bituminous Coal 01 10x (24800381637).jpg
- File:Breccia 01 10x (38771994985).jpg
- File:Calcite 01 (27640575159).jpg
- File:Celestite 01 (39417640681).jpg
- File:Chalcopyrite 01 10x (27640566949).jpg
- File:Chalcopyrite 01 25x (24569521887).jpg
- File:Chalcopyrite 01 40x (27658570939).jpg
- File:Chalcopyrite 02 10x (24699497767).jpg
- File:Chalcopyrite 02 20x (39537328582).jpg
- File:Chalcopyrite 02 35x (24699485147).jpg
- File:Chalk 01 10x (27890898319).jpg
- File:Chert 01 10x (38771990585).jpg
- File:Conglomerate 01 10x (27890711949).jpg
- File:Copper 01 (27640561599).jpg
- File:Coquina 01 10x (39638698042).jpg
- File:Corundum 10x (25697319188).jpg
- File:Crocoite on Goethite r001 (36835767036).jpg
- File:Crocoite on Goethite r004 (36188449804).jpg
- File:Crocoite on Goethite r005 (36188445424).jpg
- File:Diatomite 01 10x (27890912589).jpg
- File:Diorite 01 10x (27879456709).jpg
- File:Dolomite 01 10x (24800504967).jpg
- File:Dolomite 10x (25697311428).jpg
- File:Epidote 10x (39537975912).jpg
- File:Feldspar var Microcline 01 10x (27808836979).jpg
- File:Fluorite 01 10x (38689611335).jpg
- File:Fossiliferous Limestone 01 10x (38772120595).jpg
- File:Gabbro 01 10x (39627405202).jpg
- File:Galena 01 10x (39585277441).jpg
- File:Garnet-mica Schist 01 10x (25785512598).jpg
- File:Geothite 01 10x (38689600985).jpg
- File:Gneiss 01 10x (39617697201).jpg
- File:Granite 01 10x (39627399402).jpg
- File:Granite 01 25x (27879448259).jpg
- File:Graphite 01 10x (39585268001).jpg
- File:Gypsum var Alabaster 01 10x (39585261351).jpg
- File:Gypsum var Satin Spar 01 10x (39585257941).jpg
- File:Gypsum var Selenite 01 10x (25730738078).jpg
- File:Halite 01 10x (38893026044).jpg
- File:Hematite 01 10x (25730727838).jpg
- File:Kaolin 01 10x (27828878529).jpg
- File:Lepidolite 01 10x (39576790652).jpg
- File:Limestone 01 10x (25797425298).jpg
- File:Magnetite 01 10x (39576785452).jpg
- File:Malachite 01 10x (27751434159).jpg
- File:Malachite 01 30x (39527836241).jpg
- File:Malachite 01 40x (27751430799).jpg
- File:Malachite 03 10x (38897877974).jpg
- File:Marble 01 10x (39617691701).jpg
- File:Mica Schist 01 10x (25785506398).jpg
- File:Mica var Biotite 01 (39417644811).jpg
- File:Mica var Muscovite 01 10x (38897871414).jpg
- File:Obsidian 01 10x (39658228821).jpg
- File:Olivine 01 10x (38897865194).jpg
- File:Oolitic Limestone 01 10x (25797412728).jpg
- File:Oolitic Limestone 01 25x (38772110325).jpg
- File:Opal 01 10x (25735474408).jpg
- File:Pegmatite 01 15x (39658225611).jpg
- File:Pegmatite r006 (37024004355).jpg
- File:Phylite 01 10x (39617687121).jpg
- File:Pumice 01 10x (39669405931).jpg
- File:Pyrite 03 10x (38897851704).jpg
- File:Pyroxene var Augite 01 (39387632832).jpg
- File:Quartz var Amethyst 01 10x (27828839269).jpg
- File:Quartz var Chalcedony 01 10x (27828833069).jpg
- File:Quartz var Chrysoprase 01 10x (39588029562).jpg
- File:Quartz var Crystal 01 10x (25746485088).jpg
- File:Quartz var Jasper 01 10x (39588023032).jpg
- File:Quartz var Milky 01 10x (39588019452).jpg
- File:Quartz var Rose 01 10x (39588015162).jpg
- File:Quartzite 01 10x (27840457419).jpg
- File:Rhodonite 01 10x (38909443254).jpg
- File:Rhyolite 01 10x (39669396151).jpg
- File:Sandstone 01 10x (27890851649).jpg
- File:Scoria 01 10x (39669390031).jpg
- File:Shale 01 10x (39669903991).jpg
- File:Slate 01 10x (38760564895).jpg
- File:Sodalite 01 10x (24749330467).jpg
- File:Sphalerite 01 10x (38721271245).jpg
- File:Spodumene 01 10x (24749333557).jpg
- File:Staurolite 01 10x (24749321417).jpg
- File:Sulfur 01 10x (39617721511).jpg
- File:Talc 01 10x (25746722478).jpg
- File:Topaz 01 10x (25746718698).jpg
- File:Tourmaline 01 10x (25746714948).jpg
- File:Travertine 01 10x (27890859209).jpg
- File:Tremolite 01 10x (25746708778).jpg
- File:Ulexite 01 10x (27840469989).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- If a concrete example would be more helpful in understanding the situation: let's use File:Amphibole var Hornblende 01 10x (27828886009).jpg as an example (Flickr link). On January 10, 2018 at 10:10:20 PM EST, according to the license history, the uploader changed the license from "all rights reserved" to "public domain work". The image was uploaded to Commons by Meisam on 22 June 2018. However, on January 24, 2021 at 6:24:10 PM EST, the uploader changed the license on the file back from "public domain work" to "all rights reserved". Was this revocation of the labeling of this file as a "public domain work" valid? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think it's revocable. At least in the United States, the PD declaration by Carol Highsmith was pretty final in the lawsuit she filed, and lost. If you don't specify revocable in a license, there is some argument, but if there was any consideration involved I think it's generally considered irrevocable. And in this case, it's a waiver of rights which is a more substantial step. Whether we want to respect the license change, not as sure, but sounds like it was two or three years left that way. Granted the treatment of this sort of thing may differ depending on country, which is why CC0 is a license as a fallback, so I can understand some differing opinions. But in places which allow you to waive the economic right, my guess is that it's not revocable. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:14, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep all. My experience is that Commons considers such declarations irrevocable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Recent unfree Flickr images
[edit]Not freely licensed, and {{PD-Guatemala-exempt}} does not seem to apply.
- File:Declarations from President Colom regarding the Rosenberg case - 12 January 2010.jpg
- File:Garifuna people.jpg
- File:Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales and Mrs. Marroquín Morales during Inauguration Day - 2016Jan14.jpg
- File:Guatemalan students - 21 February 2011.jpg
- File:President Colom with Mexican president Felipe Calderón.jpg
- File:President Álvaro Colom and Vice President Rafael Espada - 13 August 2009.jpg
- File:President Álvaro Colom with Chilean president Michelle Bachelet - 28 September 2009 (a).jpg
- File:President Álvaro Colom with Chilean president Michelle Bachelet - 28 September 2009 (b).jpg
- File:President Álvaro Colom with Jacobo Árbenz Vilanova.jpg
- File:President Álvaro Colom with Pope Benedict XVI.jpg
- File:Presidente Álvaro Colom - Rosa de la Paz.jpg
- File:Roberto Alcalde Rodriguez.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Marcus Cyron. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Author of the book died in 1997, so this would not yet be in the public domain per {{PD-Iraq}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
I feel that the focus of this image is a copyrighted poster, which is a two-dimensional work of art temporarily displayed inside a public building in Hong Kong. As I understand it, those mean that it is not covered by Freedom of Panorama, but I'm open to being told thatI'm wrong on this. DS (talk) 00:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
With this pretty strange angle of shooting, I cannot believe this picture can be reasonably use with educational purpose. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Carlosarielbaez
[edit]
Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder in the metadata. Need permission to license the files. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
_%EC%9D%B4%EC%A4%80%EA%B8%B0_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%EC%9D%B4%EC%A4%80%EA%B8%B0_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Noisy derivative, low quality version of File:(Marie Claire Korea) 이준기.jpg that is currently not in use. I'm not entirely sure what was changed and don't intend to upload a new version at a higher resolution because I don't envision a blown-out version would be more useful, Per COM:Redundant and COM:NOTUSED. BriefEdits (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
_%EC%9D%B4%EC%A4%80%EA%B8%B0.jpg){kind=link}
_이준기_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
_이준기_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Other reason Polo9191 (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Which reason? Logo contains complicated shapes, so it may be COM:TOO A09090091 (talk) 12:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This act is not licensed with CC BY-SA. It is either copyrighted or PD-IDGov. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 05:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a serious infographic bears educational use. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: low-res screengrab, likely not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
College & model railway project files
[edit]- File:College & model railway project.sch.svg
- File:College & model railway project-brd.svg
- File:College & model railway project-brd rev 2.svg
Schematics stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:13, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batool Qaba (talk • contribs) 18:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ضحى الحيالي.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
ฉันอัปโหลดโดยไม่ได้ตั้งใจ Promma12 (talk) 02:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
ฉันอัปโหลดโดยไม่ได้ตั้งใจ Promma12 (talk) 02:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete. I'm not sure how this slipped through the cracks, but this photo of Ving Rhames is owned and copyrighted by WireImage (http://www.wireimage.com/celebrity-pictures/Actor-Ving-Rhames-arrives-at-the-I-Now-Pronounce-You-Chuck-and-Larry/75388947). As the info indicates on the website, it was taken by photographer Steve Granitz. This has not gone through OTRS, the uploader (Marend93) does not appear to be or represent the copyright holder, and the name of this file is wrong, as this was not taken in 2014. It was taken in 2007 at the I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry premiere. Because of all of this, it looks like a copyright violation. It's quite impressive how this managed to slip through the cracks. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 13:12, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a better quality png-version of the exact same logo. Welkend (talk) 09:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is a better svg-version of the exact same logo. Welkend (talk) 09:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is a better svg-version of the exact same logo and this png-version has a bad quality. Welkend (talk) 10:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
My own upload - this low quality montage (low resolution, stretched photos) has no reasonable educational purpose. -M.nelson (talk) 10:36, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternative montages available. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own file was modified Albert Magnus (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is a better svg-version of this logo and the png-version has bad quality. Welkend (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Altered version an older joke image: https://www.dpairless.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/airless-painting-evolution.jpg is from 2014. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
He can't be the photographer as he is himself in the picture. Dajasj (talk) 11:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Comparatively poor quality image of an unidentified location. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Comparatively poor quality image of an unremarkable commercial space. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image copied from Google. See the metadata The metadata here doesn't mean anything. I can't find an earlier copy outside Commons. Yann (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I have a hard time accepting this as own work: image was clearly cropped and upsized from an unknown source or taken from a video. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
non-free, taken from https://www.espncricinfo.com/player/sabbir-hossain-932405 Lugnuts (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
lo sostituisco con un file di risoluzione maggiore Graziano Cannoletta (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, replaced with File:Lucca Piazza dell'anfiteatro seppiato.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
File copied from Facebook, see metadata. Yann (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- it is an authorial image, I took it and because it is from an important event in Brazil, I posted it on my professional photographer instagram. I lost my camera in a robbery and the images I have of the day are just the ones I had posted on instagram, which I downloaded and reposted on wikipedia. It has facebook metadata because I downloaded it to avoid losing resolution. Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 18:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Otávio Astor Vaz Costa, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Doris Webster (L) - Mary Alden Hopkins (R) - Evening Journal, Delaware - 1930-02-17 - page 15.png
[edit]_-_Mary_Alden_Hopkins_(R)_-_Evening_Journal,_Delaware_-_1930-02-17_-_page_15.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Mary_Alden_Hopkins_(R)_-_Evening_Journal,_Delaware_-_1930-02-17_-_page_15.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Undelete in 2025 Yann (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Why was this nominated, given that in the very act of uploading it I tagged it with {{speedydelete|1=Undelete in 2025}} and then immediately added it to the relevant category? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Files claimed to be uploaded from tokopedia.com or the user's own work, and likely not under listed licenses. I started this request after seeing an IP ask that File:Pie susu.png be taken down.
- File:Baju barong.jpg
- File:Udeng.png
- File:Bros emas.png
- File:Ukiran bali.jpg
- File:Kipas cendana.jpg
- File:Tas anyam.png
- File:Pie susu.png
- File:Lukisan.jpg
- File:Gantungan bambu.jpg
Aranya (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a better png-version of this logo without white background. This version didn't even have a correct file name. Welkend (talk) 14:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a better svg version of the exact same logo and this jpg version has a low resolution. Welkend (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
(376)120px-Reform_UK_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(376)120px-Reform_UK_Logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is a better svg version of the logo and the png version has a low resolution. Welkend (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
(376)120px-Reform_UK_Logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
(376)120px-Reform_UK_Logo.png){kind=link}
There is a better svg version without the white border and better quality. Welkend (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aneudyinternacional28 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files without educational content, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 15:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, unlikely to be own work, too complex for COM:TOO. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
False date. Probably a false license and authorship. The date in the file description does not match the date in the image data. The actress in the photo died in 2001. This is probably a photo of the 1960s - 1970s. GAndy (talk) 18:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
False date. False license and authorship. The actress died in 2001. Judging by the age in the photo, this image was taken in the 1930s-1950s. GAndy (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Picture of framed photograph. Unlikely to be own work. Also appears to be out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Small file without metadata, last remaining file, others deleted as copyvios and forgery, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravan Mehdiyev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Without actual date and authorship, it is not possible to determine if these could be in the public domain per COM:AZERBAIJAN.
- File:"IMG-20210529-WA0025Fərrux Mehdiyev övladları ilə.jpg".jpg
- File:"Mehdiyev Fərrux mayor rütbısində.jpg".jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Work by an unknown creator from the 1970s, but claimed to be under Creative Commons licence, which is highly unlikely. Lack of original source means it is impossible to determine if work complied with copyright formalities. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
There is no stated owner of the photo and if an error was made at submission, it was not intentional. It is in the public domain based on what I researched. Peabodyb (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo missing essential info. Not possible to determine if indeed PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Maybe, this license is not correct. This appears to be taken from https://brainscale.net/dual-n-back/training . Copyrightable objects may include arrangement and sequence, but this depends on the country. The CC license is (probably) wrong because I've checked it with archive.org . ParticipantOTE (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I edited the file in 2017, but I didn't notice the issue at the time. It's clearly a capture from https://brainscale.net/dual-n-back/training, notably including the keyboard input instructions (A for position match and L for audio match). Alsee (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution, dubious claim of own work. Uploader has history of copyright issues. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement: "Enter the surprise chat, enter the Arab chat astonishment" No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
at least the filename and metadata are wrong. Probably copyrighted. Syced (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unusable due to watermarks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Decided to use a JPG - I'm the creator; please delete; this had old info, too Eewilson (talk) 22:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This map is wrong. The right one is File:Kumpula-Gumtäckt.sijainti-läge.svg Pullaharakka (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own wok: scaled fom this file retrived here:https://www.teatro.it/spettacoli/roma/ghione/2018-2019/carmen Bradipo Lento (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Again, these are all radio station logos that, despite being "found online", are also CC-licensed "own works". The "Arkansas Rocks" logo, at least, seems to be above TOO (with the stylized guitar); at least some of the others may also be, though the KLPW logo might be below TOO.
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Querying own work claim, This is a logo, and the graphical element use ( The trefoil shamrock) may tip it over Threshold of Originality. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Ireland#Threshold_of_originality does not apply for Ireland (I wasn't aware at the time, sorry). Hence I, the uploader of this file, agree this file to be deleted. I am sorry for this incovenience caused. SpaceMeteor (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom and agreement of uploader (Commons info on TOO for Ireland is rather lacking, meanwhile better to be cautious.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Russia for text. Done reverse image searched but didn't find any source that states this is older than 75 years or above. Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep -- might be considered a close call, but from what I read, this text is not a creative work, there are some data about nearby lakes and tributaries, and otherwise IMO still too short to be above the TOO. --A.Savin 13:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Not really complex imho, though judging TOO in Russia might be hard. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks to be trivial enough. --rubin16 (talk) 14:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a radio station logo that is simultaneously asserted to be "found online" and is somehow still "own work" with a CC license. That combination seems a bit incorrect. As for the logo itself, the stylization within the text might be enough to put this above TOO. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of ownership or permission to release under given free license. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The Graphical elements right are not necessarily simple. This logo is considered non-free on English Wikipedia (w:File:Almaz Capital Logo.png) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- The logo is used solely for information purposes. It can be moved to local language sections where there are articles.--Birulik (talk) 12:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art in the United States. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Summary_table. The statue here depicted is not de minimis to the image. Though off center, it is the focus of the image. The statue was gifted to the park in 1996, as shown in the image. This means the statue automatically attracted copyright due to its date of creation. The park is a city park, not a state park. The City of Los Angeles appears to be able to and does copyright its works, as seen at the footer of https://www.lacity.org/. As such, it is likely this statue is protected under copyright. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above; DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely above the ToO for a British logo, no indication of a free license on official website. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, source likely from this website, remark with illustrator. Also, Italy has a high TOO threshold. Stang★ 22:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Leyo 08:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep A circle and three letters cannot constitute copyright infringement. --Glorious 93 (talk) 09:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: As simple as other logos on COM:TOO Italy, especially the Inter Milan logo. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 20:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama for 2D works in the UK. The info board is too "In yer face" to be de minimis, and I don't see a way of sensibly cropping it out. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Photo from a magazine. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:F44D:D09:AFF1:C808 09:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is public domain per Italian law, the template explains it. A09090091 (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep clueless, time wasting nom, no valid reason for deletion whatsoever. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Catherine Spaak 75.jpg. --Cavarrone (talk) 13:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This non-artistic photo is in the public domain by the PD-Italy licence... what would be the (hypothetical and alleged) problem with its source? — danyele 17:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Riped from italian magazine Radiocorriere. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:F44D:D09:AFF1:C808 09:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is public domain per Italian law, the template explains it A09090091 (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep clueless, time wasting nom, no valid reason for deletion whatsoever. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Catherine Spaak, 1962.jpg. --Cavarrone (talk) 13:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). At the same time its licence is shown at the file page. Красный wanna talk? 12:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Source is valid, so is the Kremlin.ru attribution tag. Keep A09090091 (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Comparatively low resolution image seemingly from a professional photoshoot / photographer. The uploader has numerous notices on their talk page regarding missing permissions and copyright violations, and it is questionable as to whether this file is their own work. mattbr 15:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Is this a valid ticket? The metadata of image have the gps info with year 2021 while the photo was taken in 2017 ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim. Looks like a low-res reproduction of a much higher res original Andy Dingley (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Title.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Title.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The animated short film is in the public domain but portrays a trademarked character appearance of Bugs Bunny from "A Wild Hare" (1940) on the title card sequence. It should be deleted or transferred as fair use to English Wikipedia immediately and not restored until the first day of January 2036. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/06#Copyright status of PD-not renewed videos containing characters under copyright for more. HarvettFox96 (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Title.jpg){kind=link}
- For real, I hate having patience with this when I decide to vote to delete it.
- HarvettFox96 (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I think you mean Bugs Bunny character is copyrighted, not trademarked. Those are different protections. Still, I don't think you are representing this correctly. Either the A Wild Hare short film copyright expired (e.g. for not being renewed), including the Bugs Bunny character as depicted there, or the character is still copyrighted, in which case the rest of the film would be copyrighted as well for practical purposes (it would be hard to keep a meaningful film after removing Bugs Bunny from a Bugs Bunny film). It's probably the later, though. ☹
- I see on The Wacky Wabbit that the copyright of the film itself was not renewed, but yes, as Kaldari mentioned, it will probably depend on whether w:A Wild Hare entered in PD or not.
- As for treating it as fair use, I think the title card could be replaced with a slide not containing any meaningful character.
- Platonides (talk) 01:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The cartoon is in the public domain? Then that Bugs Bunny portrayal is in the public domain. Period. --Bedivere (talk) 02:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment The DR rationale raises the issue of an existing trademark on the Bugs Bunny visual character. This can be addressed with the ad hoc template {{Trademarked}}. — Racconish 💬 17:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Although The Wacky Wabbit may be public domain, Warner Bros still has a valid character copyright on Bugs Bunny due to their renewal of the copyright on A Wild Hare (Bugs Bunny's first appearance). All depictions of Bugs Bunny are thus covered by copyright until 2036. See COM:CHARACTER for more information. (The trademark is irrelevant to this particular case.) --Kaldari (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Title.jpg){kind=link}
The stylised graphic symbol (left) tips this over threshold of originality for me (Non-free on English Wikipedia w:File:Bloober Team.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete – This is more than a "wordmark" or text logo. I can support deletion, especially since it is already on enwiki. Senator2029 13:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Invalid OTRS? ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No argument for why OTRS is invalid. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- + File:Созина.jpg Added similar image by same uploader -M.nelson (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Similar image to File:Созина С.А. фотография на удостоверение Института Всеобщей истории.jpg by same uploader, which COM:VRT determined did not have sufficient permission/rights. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be a scan of a photo, quite possibly not the uploader's own work. If they have permission they should provide it to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
No permission Francians (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- {{FoP-Italy}} ? Yann (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann: That tag is currently contesting due to the uncertain COM:FOP Italy section contents. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- If can be helpful the author is Umberto Mastroianni, deceased in 1998 --Francians (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, by this information we could remain this file be deleted until 2069. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello,
- This property have been added to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, up to you if go ahead with deletion and wait for a new picture in September or preserve the file since now there is the permission from the comune.
- Cheers
- Francesco Francians (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Yann, Liuxinyu970226 as participants in the previous discussion. Francians (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Better to ask WMIT members: wmit:Personale. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Yann, Liuxinyu970226 as participants in the previous discussion. Francians (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, by this information we could remain this file be deleted until 2069. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- If can be helpful the author is Umberto Mastroianni, deceased in 1998 --Francians (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Italy. --Ellywa (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Old photos, unsure if these are really in public domain or not. The only indicated source states that these come from Jopson Family Collection. But without evidence or information on who took these images, copyright statuses become questionable. These may also have come from photographers who may have no relation to Jopson family and that the family just acquired them. These may also be COM:URAA compliant as these just fell into public domain in the Philippines between last year (2020) and this year (2021), assuming the photographers are unknown and the indicated dates are the date of publications. This is because these were in copyright on January 1, 1996, the date the URAA took effect for the Philippines. URAA is a U.S. law for restoration of U.S. copyright for all eligible international works.
- File:Edjop in his campaign photo for the Ateneo student council elections, 1969.jpg
- File:Edjop speaks to a huge crowd at a multi-sectoral rally in Plaza Miranda,1970.jpg
- File:Riot police attacking rallyists after dispersal operations .jpg
- File:Edjop weds Joy.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. --Ellywa (talk) 14:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image copied from Google. See the metadata The metadata here doesn't mean anything. I can't find an earlier copy outside Commons. Yann (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Yann, I beleive this is a private image made by the uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image copied from Google. See the metadata This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image copied from Google. See the metadata The metadata here doesn't mean anything. I can't find an earlier copy outside Commons. Yann (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Yann, I believe this is a private image made by the uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image copied from Google. See the metadata This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image copied from Google. See the metadata The metadata here doesn't mean anything. I can't find an earlier copy outside Commons. Yann (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Yann, I believe this is a private image made by the uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucio Scatola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: cropped and deleted the versions with copyrighted part. --Ellywa (talk) 14:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
There is a better quality alternative file. Welkend (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Except this is the higher-resolution raster image and is heavily used. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a link to the better version and nominate this image again so it can be reassessed. --Ellywa (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MBH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo. Reupload after deletion of previous file Borderline. Let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 16:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think it is non-trivial: 3D figure, colors… rubin16 (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Even simple creative works are copyrighted and above threshold per COM:TOO Russia. --Ellywa (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Although this is an interesting photo, the depicted artwork (which relates to pandemic rules) is almost certainly not permanent enough to be covered by Austrian FOP. Tokfo (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: imho the artwork is only letters, and the photo is so creative in itself, that it does not interfere with the original copyright. Therefore decided to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Probably below COM:TOO Uruguay. Already kept in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero#Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs). I see no reason to question that decision.Jonteemil (talk) 20:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Uruguay do not show this country has a TOO. In previous request the source was fixed, but the source show the content is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
The logo used does not seem to be of a free logo, but a copyrighted one. On the Only in Japan youtube channel, it mentions that the name and logo are copyrighted. Tsugaru (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
According to the owner, the logo image used here is a new logo that isn't currently copyrighted. The previous version of the ONLY in JAPAN logo used from 2013 to 2019 is still trademarked in Japan until 2022. This version on Wikipedia is used for media requests and promotion according to the owner. I can contact him to let him there is concern about the use of this logo based on the YouTube channel disclaimer in his videos. --Ringoya (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ringoya Yes, if you could contact him to get him to verify if the logo can be used or not that would be great. I am not too fimilar with the process, but I think we would need to make a Commons:OTRS ticket to certify it here. Also for the other image of John Daub in the article, is that one also a non-copyrighted image? I nominated the logo for deletion, based on the disclaimer in his youtube channels. Thanks! --Tsugaru (talk) 23:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Tsugaru I spoke with John Daub. The logo used here is free from copyright. Thank you for following up. The other images are not copyrighted or owned by another entity, they are owned by John Daub. I originally asked him directly for images to help create this Wikipedia page so the assets came directly from the content owner for use here, but I am glad we can certify this. John said he is happy to make sure all images are free to use on Wikipedia and will verify. To avoid any public misinterpretations, I'll ask John Daub to send a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, will forward him the email template and will ask him to send this from the onlyinjapan.tv email address to verify the consent. --Ringoya (talk) 13:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ringoya Awesome, thanks for the clarification and co-operation, I really appreciate it. Once John Daub sends the permission via email and the OTRS ticket is created, we are all good! Also, I just have one more thing to ask you, are you being paid to edit here? If so per Our paid editing guidelines, you are required to disclose it. Thank you very much! ;-) --Tsugaru (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: May be below COM:TOO in its source country. However, this is a moot point if COM:OTRS permission is received from the copyright owner. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: @Ringoya: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
The graphic elements (being the abstract cup shape) tip this over threshold of originality for me. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. This is right on the edge for me, but I lean towards deletion. The shapes are just a bit unusual and seem unique enough to warrant copyright protection. That's in the U.S. at least; the AFC is based in Malaysia, and COM:TOO Malaysia doesn't have much information, so I don't know if this would be copyrighted in Malaysia or not. But, it has to be free in both countries, and it seems like it might not be free in the U.S., so it needs to be deleted in my opinion. –IagoQnsi (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The UEFA Champions League Logo can’t be copyrighted in North America, and it is much more elaborate than these generic abstract shapes. Pre-emptive deletion attempts based on assumptions are a no-go. -Herr chagall (talk) 05:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion and per COM:PRP. COM:TOO Malaysia shows no clear guidance. --Ellywa (talk) 14:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Arrastre de Caudas (2013) 4.jpg
- File:Arrastre de Caudas 2010.jpg
- File:Arrastre de Caudas (2013) 3.jpg
- File:Arrastre de Caudas (2013) 2.jpg
- File:Arrastre de Caudas (2013) 1.jpg
- File:Arrastre de Caudas (2013) 5.jpg
- File:Bertram Wick Enzler.jpg
- File:Francisco Pérez González.jpg
- File:René Coba Galarza.jpg
- File:Mons. Antonio Crameri.jpg
- File:Aníbal Nieto Guerra.jpg
- File:Patricio Bonilla Bonilla.jpg
- File:Adalberto Jiménez.jpg
- File:Faustino Armendáriz.jpg
- File:Interior de la Catedral de Ambato.jpg
- File:Luis Sánchez Armijos.jpg
- File:Celmo Lazzari.jpg
- File:Caudas canónigos - Catedral de Quito.jpg
- File:Andrés Carrascosa.jpg
- File:Lignum Crucis - Catedral de Quito.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 16.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 15.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 14.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 13.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 12.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 11.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 10.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 9.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 7.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 8.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 4.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 6.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 5.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 2.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri 3.jpg
- File:Posesión de Antonio Crameri.jpg
- File:Iván Minda.jpg
- File:Antonio Crameri.jpg
- File:Walter Heras Segarra.jpg
- File:Giacomo Ottonello.jpg
- File:Emil Lorenz Stehle.jpg
- File:Skiper Yánez Calvachi (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Mario Moronta.jpg
- File:Eugenio Arellano Fernández.jpg
- File:José Isidro Guerrero Macías.jpg
- File:Alfredo Espinoza (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Alfredo Espinoza (Misa) 1.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 16.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 15.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 14.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 13.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 12.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 11.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 10.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 9.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 8.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 7.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 6.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 5.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 4.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 3.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 2.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (San Pio X) 1.jpg
- File:Mario Aurelio Poli (sacerdote).jpg
- File:Raúl Omar Rossi (Misa Corpus).jpg
- File:David de la Torre Altamirano.jpg
- File:Skiper Yánez Calvachi.jpg
- File:Alfredo Espinoza.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli (cropped).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel Aguilar Miranda.jpg
- File:Eduardo Castillo Pino.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Piccioli.jpg
- File:Antonio Avendaño y Paz (cropped) 1.jpg
- File:José María Yerovi Pintado (cropped) 1.jpg
- File:Danilo Echeverría (cropped).jpg
- File:Alfonso Santillán y Fajardo (cropped).jpg
- File:José Luis Mollaghan (Te Deum) 3.jpg
- File:José Luis Mollaghan (Te Deum) 2.jpg
- File:Antonio Quarracino (recepción) 2.jpg
- File:Retrato de Antonio González Zumárraga (cropped).jpg
- File:Federico González Suárez (cropped) 1.jpg
- File:Retrato de Raúl Vela Chiriboga (cropped).jpg
- File:Mario Aurelio Cardinal Poli (cropped).jpg
- File:Pedro Rafael González y Calisto (cropped).jpg
- File:Leonardo Santander y Villavicencio (cropped).jpg
- File:Antonio González Zumárraga.jpg
- File:Luis Alberto Luna Tobar.jpg
- File:Gabriel Antonio Mestre.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Ares (Misa) 3.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Ares (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Ares (Misa) 1.jpg
- File:Gustavo Oscar Carrara (Misa) 4.jpg
- File:Gustavo Oscar Carrara (Misa) 3.jpg
- File:José María Baliña.jpg
- File:Joaquín Mariano Sucunza (Misa) 4.jpg
- File:José Luis Mollaghan (Te Deum) 1.jpg
- File:José María Yerovi Pintado (cropped) 2.jpg
- File:Joaquín Mariano Sucunza (Misa) 3.jpg
- File:Joaquín Mariano Sucunza (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Joaquín Mariano Sucunza (Misa) 1.jpg
- File:Alejandro Daniel Giorgi 2.jpg
- File:Ernesto Giobando (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Ernesto Giobando (Misa) 1.jpg
- File:Enrique Eguía Seguí (Misa) 3.jpg
- File:Enrique Eguía Seguí (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Enrique Eguía Seguí (Misa) 1.jpg
- File:Gustavo Oscar Carrara (Misa) 2.jpg
- File:Gustavo Oscar Carrara (Misa) 1.jpg
- File:Antonio Quarracino (creación).jpg
- File:Mario Aurelio Poli.jpg
- File:Alejandro Daniel Giorgi 1.jpg
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Non-trivial religious coats of arms. Obviously not designed by uploader.
- File:Coat of Arms of Blase Cupich.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Blase Cupich.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Joseph William Tobin (Indianapolis).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Dominique Mamberti (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Gualtiero Bassetti (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Orani João Tempesta (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Gérald Lacroix.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Vincent Nichols (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Leopoldo Brenes.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Eduardo Francisco Pironio (bishop).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Celmo Lazzari.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Adelio Pasqualotto.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Jorge Alberto Cavazos Arizpe.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Antonio Arregui Yarza (bishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Raúl Eduardo Vela Chiriboga (archbishop) 2.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Carlos Garfias Merlos (Acapulco).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Carlos Aguiar Retes (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Raúl Eduardo Vela Chiriboga (archbishop) 1.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Carlos Osoro Sierra (Valencia).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Carlos Osoro Sierra (Madrid).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Juan José Omella (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Alberto Suarez Inda (archbishop).svg
- File:Coat of arms of Luis Héctor Villalba (archbishop).svg
- File:Escudo de Antonio Caggiano (cropped).jpg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello... (EugeneZelenko - Macucal )
A large part of the files were copyrighted, and had to be removed. What I don't understand is why all my files were selected for deletion? Some images like the -Arrastre de Caudas, San Pio X, Posesión Antonio Crameri-
They are my property, for personal reasons, either as an image forwarding by another app or sharing an image - that's why some do not have (Metadata) - or I don't know if it's the same as - EXIF - .
Most of the shields have been loaded by me, based on other shields from SajoR, Ivan03 or Macucal. Nor do I understand the word "trivial", if it is based on the previous users.
To the cropped ones I put where it came from, the image from where they were cropped and the owner of the main copyright - which at first I put wrong -
I do not see a great need to remove images or shields that are my property and have been marked as my copyright.
URL [2] San Pio X / check, have I stolen someone else's copyright?
Have the urls from where you have stolen someone else's copyright?
This user stole copyright, but with information that supposed where it came from. But now, do you know where I get the images from? The last time I was in "delete requests" they did nothing. They just let time pass and with which, any older user was going to delete the file for having the deletion notification.
I also do not understand the deletion of other files that did not even have a url and say that I have stolen the copyright.
Greetings, Sebas RS Marium Alberto (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Veo que varios de los archivos están basados en mi trabajo y no me atribuye en nada. Descaradamente se esta apoderando del trabajo de otros y haciendolo pasar como suyo. (online translation. I see that several of the files are based on my work and do not attribute anything to me. He is blatantly taking over the work of others and passing it off as his own.) --SajoR (talk) 16:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
@Sebas RS: , please give attribution to the original authors for the files you used to make deriviative works, list their names behind "|author" on the file page, and indicate what changes you made to the original works. Then put the tags <s></s> around the file name listed above. Put the same tags around files which are really your own work and state that you are the only author of these files. After about week I will reconsider this DR again. If you do not respond, the files have regrettably to be deleted, because of copyright violations. Thanks. Ellywa (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not respond which files could be kept and did not give attribution to the original authors as required by the licencing. --Ellywa (talk) 10:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)