Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 22nd, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Citing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo taken from CAASie.co. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File is no longer in use on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaravedffej (talk • contribs) 05:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --King of ♥ 05:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Emma.karu (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test request by another Android app user. --Achim (talk) 06:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il y a une faute au titre. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:BCC0:D7C8:6236:642 00:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Errure d'orthographe. L'Élan canadien (talk) 01:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and moved to File:Jamioulx Vue générale.jpg. --Achim (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note request to replace 'speedy deletion' noting evidence of permission from publisher of image as per discussion page, note Longhair I10love9kangaroos84 (talk) 03:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@I10love9kangaroos84: Two issues here: 1) We need an explicit free license release (not merely permission to "use it anyway you wish" which is legally ambiguous) using this template: COM:CONSENT; 2) The permission must come from the photographer, not the subject. Once you get in touch with the photographer, just have the fill out the form and email us using the instructions given at Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator. -- King of ♥ 05:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: Request sent to publisher as per your recommendation of how to properly authorise this. Thank you for your help.I10love9kangaroos84 (talk) 11:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 19:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of the mentioned https://twitter.com/FabioAleRomero/status/1414052659678662656. See also ticket:2021072110009122. Krd 09:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I, the author of the file, agree with the deletion request. How can I do it? Gallimimus wikipedista 13:33, 22 July (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination & uploader request. --Ankry (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vroom42 as Fair use (Non-free use rationale) and the most recent rationale was: logo King of ♥ 02:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The uploader just emailed me, and it seems like all they want is to be able to use the photo on an English Wikipedia article with the least hassle. So I've transferred the file there. --King of ♥ 00:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niklas Preußner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-res Eurovision photos with no credible claims of ownership.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change of mind from Blixt and the photographer after second reading of the license agreement. No OTRS will show up. Haxpett (talk) 21:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and Permission field both say "CC-BY-NC-ND-SA." Ixfd64 (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Not free for commercial, etc.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: SD, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que ce fichier contien le nom d'un site intérnet. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 23:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file contains the name of a website, indeed, but displaying a name of a website is permitted on Wikimedia Commons, unless it is done for promotional purposes. If you follow the link, you will see that, actually, no promotion was intended by me. Please keep the file. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a l'adresse du site internet sur le fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 12:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@L'Élan Wallon: Could you tell me, please, if there exists any rule that files on Wikimedia Commons should not contain any URLs? Do you think that this is a case of Commons:Watermarks#Unacceptable_watermarks? Do you think that cutting off the watermark would resolve the case? It would have been very easy for you to cut off the URL, yourself, but now I have done it, just in case that you don't know, how to do this yourself. There is absolutely no need at all, for you to run around and request that all files with URLs should be deleted. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept no valid reason for deletion presented, and original reason not valid. Elli (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental duplicate of File:Gelendzhik. Cathedral of Saint Andrew P5010302 2350.jpg RoanokeVirginia (talk) 11:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no associated page; it is for self engrandesment only; neither the image nor the person to whom they belong is in any notable. Kiltpin (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Who nominated this file for deletion and why? For what reason? I disagree with whomever requested deletion. Sounds petty when many coat of arms are contained here. Who is Kiltpin autotrollers? I do not feel such a request is warranted from whomever Autotrollers is.[reply]


If there a specific requirement not being met, please advice immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:6C5A:147F:D6F2:8820:6EB:E1B2:DC43 (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know or provide your legal counsel contact information to discuss further.

I can be reached at ernie_anaya@yahoo.com

Thank you,

Cordially,

Ernesto Juan Anaya — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:6C5A:147F:D6F2:8820:6EB:E1B2:DC43 (talk) 13:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as copyvio. Per this page the uploader is not the author of the CoA as declared at upload and this may be a copyrighted rendering. Ankry (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedied as copyvio. --Ankry (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gibra191 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small resolution, no exif, new user, other files already deleted or marked for speedy because of COPYVIO, all marked "self" but different authors given (among these "Greta Thunberg" at a foto of Thunberg, that is clearly not a selfie). COPYVIO only account

C.Suthorn (talk) 07:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gibra191 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio as before

C.Suthorn (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gibra191 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as before copyvio

C.Suthorn (talk) 02:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 15:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.smpm.es/enrique-camacho/. Bringing up for discussion due to the age of the photo (1980 in Spain). King of ♥ 05:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Materialscientist at 15:37, 28 July 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gibra191 --Krdbot 02:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - poor quality image Headlock0225 (talk) 09:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misrepresented as own work. This seems to be from Pexels (see Commons:Bad_sources#Pexels.com). IronGargoyle (talk) 17:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely not own work, low resolution, no metadata, source - "archive" Lesless (talk) 19:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is used for self-promotion. It is claimed that this person, born in 2002, is a football player of various Russian teams, but Google does not confirm this, there are no sources even in social networks. GAndy (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture that appears in a few places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, easily findable on the Web, possible copyvio Rodm23 (talk) 23:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vincent Atienza Cifra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: non-notable personal and student group photos. Used only in abandoned since 2018 user's sandbox

George Chernilevsky talk 12:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jessica.Orotolan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AH FITness (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DanielAlba15 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: g11. No link provided for alleged copyvio. King of ♥ 00:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see google. --Minoraxtalk 13:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Panoramio Bot is not always known for the best content, and here is another example. A casual, personal photograph. Due to the quality, I do not see how this can be used for educational purpose on Commons, too. We have many other photographs of parking lots in Nevada, porches in Reno, and clouds in Nevada. Also COM:WEBHOST. Missvain (talk) 00:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 00:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Logo King of ♥ 01:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmhaha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images that appear to be either screenshots or promotional materials for TV/movies. Unlikely to be own work. Uploader has a history of copyright violations.

IronGargoyle (talk) 19:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmhaha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 10:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is not significant 94.45.0.106 10:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Estefania Segura Tobias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos, no category since 2018

George Chernilevsky talk 10:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo image, also probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private text image George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 10:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private image. Too small to be useful. No category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo image of non-notable company. No useful description, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused text only image George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom - uncategorised since 2018 and no details as to where this even is. I would love the area to the right of the female to be cropped and kept as it looks like a bridge with a waterfall infront of it but again no clue as to where this even is. Delete. –Davey2010Talk 11:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giovanni celeste carboni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos of user without any useful contributions

George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henri0001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private promo image George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PAULADVC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo image George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prosperartist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File EXIF shows "Author GEOVANIPHOTO 677822999 Copyright holder GEOVANI 677822999 Wim v". OTRS permission from the photographer / studio needed.

MKFI (talk) 12:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image, uploader is apparently the subject. OTRS permission from the photographer needed. MKFI (talk) 12:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of proto George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surfen2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos of non-notable persons

George Chernilevsky talk 12:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect this image is a TV screencap. MKFI (talk) 12:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 12:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StuffNZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable screenshots of a news site. Also copyvio

George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published in https://ninjaoutreach.com/bontoni_. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published: https://twitter.com/ashir_music?lang=en, OTRS verification needed. MKFI (talk) 12:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused logo of non-notable company

George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shayaanahmadnoori (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violates Creative Commons license. Although this image is from Flickr and is released to Creative Commons 2.0 by its respective photographer, it includes copyrighted promotional, and official Disney product packaging. A direct violation of COM:PACKAGING, I would like File:Disney Frozen 2 promotion brands.jpg, the image I uploaded, be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingwatchers (talk • contribs) 00:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment @Wingwatchers: Since you're the person who uploaded this file and you did so less than a week ago, you can probably just request that it be speedily deleted per COM:CSD#G7 by adding the syntax {{SDG7}} (Template:SDG7) to the top of the file's page. A DR discussion would only be really needed if you have concerns about a file uploaded by another person which doesn't clearly qualify for speedy deletion, or to request deletion of a file you uploaded more than a week ago. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#G7, and COM:PACKAGING.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused image of non-notable person (article for which it was intended, es:Alfonso Domingo, has been deleted for same) and copyvio (clearly from the same set as File:Alfonso Domingo Álvaro .jpg, which uploader claimed they got from subject)--own claim is a lie. Эlcobbola talk 18:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted by request because useful now due to missing submarine in the news. Ellywa (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inferior-resolution copy of File:Trinidad-Ruiz-Tellez.JPG Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo original modificado/no disponible. The original item is no longer available. Oleuhcomle (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Billinghurst. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:PACKAGING: the artistic reproduction is the main image, not "deminimis" applies here.Fma12 (talk) 20:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Meshari Alawfi (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just realized that this is actually a raster image in a wrapper and not an actual SVG file. We already have an identical vector image at File:Google logo (2010-2013).svg. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot with no indication of significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For years it's tagged as inaccurate. Yesterday a new version named File:Extensão do Leopardus braccatus.svg was made and all uses were substituted. Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 21:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as non educational content, out of scope.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of com:scope Vera (talk) 21:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: With all due respect, I think that this picture has a similar value as those shown on this category. --Fadesga (talk) 23:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use too. --Wdwd (talk) 16:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emmanuel okon269 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 22:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 22:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of an insignificant esports organization. It was created in the spring of 2021, it did not participate in any competitions, it exists virtually. GAndy (talk) 23:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, +no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 16:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false claim of CC-BY-SA as this is taken from a 1958 source. Not old enough to be {{PD-France}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ahmad252 as no permission. According EXIF the author is Adrian Mossakowski and not the uploader. JuTa 18:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added to the bundle. King of ♥ 06:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photos without exif. Likely used to come from this translation agency's website.

Vera (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Geagea as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.lilaron.com/mygallery?lightbox=dataItem-iyh5pge520. King of ♥ 00:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph appears on a book cover in Hebrew. -- Geagea (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigobaaz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/miteguz/?hl=es No metadata/low resolution/multiple copyvio (persistent violator) & No FoP in Honduras, see COM:FOP Honduras King of ♥ 01:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Screenshot. Source/Permission needed. --Minoraxtalk 13:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigobaaz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/miteguz/?hl=es No metadata/low resolution/multiple copyvio (persistent violator) & No FoP in Honduras, see COM:FOP Honduras King of ♥ 01:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Screenshot. Source/Permission needed. --Minoraxtalk 13:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://camaradellibro.cl/ferias/filsa/filsa-2016/mexicanos/. Cannot find image at link. King of ♥ 01:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry he's in this overview: http://camaradellibro.cl/ferias/filsa/filsa-2016/internacionales/ Vera (talk) 07:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by M.nelson as Logo (above threshold of originality|www.projectmanagement.ie - more complex than the example given at COM:TOO Ireland) King of ♥ 01:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tegel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/evajarnerudkonstnar/. COM:SCOPE: Personal photo of non-contributor. King of ♥ 01:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Copyvio -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo uploaded by vandal, almost exclusively used for vandalism. Necctaylor (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW, well above TOO for UK. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacity Agazabada (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RoodyAlien as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo downloaded from en.wiki (where is as fair use)|source=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ee/Amnesty_International_logo.svg King of ♥ 05:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per above, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by O revolucionário aliado as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo, and no evidence here that it can be freely re-used. And no evidence uploader is copyright holder, so able to release it under a free licence. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joseph2302, it seems that the General rule on the use of logos allow this kind of use. Antoinebore (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: COM:TOO --Achim (talk) 08:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted TOO, false license & authorship claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can't be used, due to missing / poor description; not sure about 'own work', due to small resolution Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:37, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photograph of Circus Circus Reno and Silver Legacy in Reno. We have WAY better, quality photographs of both of these subjects' exteriors. You can find the categories here and here and an entire category of Reno cityscapes here. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 19:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I'm not generally a great fan of quality-based deletions, but we have plenty similar and better. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stylized photograph without EXIF, low resolution. likely not own work Vera (talk) 19:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photographer & copyright holder = bernd brundel; so for clearly not an: "own work of Withenoto". @Withenoto: Please explain how you obtained this photo, and we can proceed from here. King of ♥ 00:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: Sorry, I am completely new to this so I have no clue where to comment or such... So trying it here ;) I received permission to use the photo on Wikipedia by Bernd Brundert himself (the photographer). How can I prove this? Withenoto 12:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC + 1)


Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 12:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netora as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.u-tokai.ac.jp/news-campus/18218/. Source lacks EXIF, needs further investigation. King of ♥ 01:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 01:13, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 22 July 2021 --Krdbot 08:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 01:01, 3 August 2021 UTC: No license since 22 July 2021 --Krdbot 08:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 06:59, 3 August 2021 UTC: No license since 25 July 2021 --Krdbot 14:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: private signature of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, although (possibly) uploaded by the person self, it's all over internet Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I requested to let the photographer send permission to OTRS, or the person self, if he is the owner. (although I think this is just a copy from another website) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is really my picture and I hold the rights — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjmvoermans (talk • contribs) 15:36, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On July 22 I gave advice about how to prove it's yours, etc.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(transl.+ aanvulling) Op 22 juli j.l. gaf ik advies (op uw overlegpagina) hoe te bewijzen dat de foto u toebehoort of hoe de toestemming naar VRTS (OTRS) te (laten) sturen. Gezien uw opmerking hier denk ik niet dat u verder iets gedaan heeft in die twee weken. In dat geval dient de foto verwijderd te worden op Wikimedia Commons. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, most likely cropped from https://op1npo.nl/content/uploads/2021/04/ws-rutte-1280x720.jpg. --Achim (talk) 08:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Textlogo file nominated by sockpuppet, and deleted on its premises. Restored.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Harold as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: live recording from cs:Těšínský jazzový festival King of ♥ 01:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://ck101.com/thread-5271027-1-1.html above "他們折磨的時候會錄影" King of ♥ 01:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://ck101.com/thread-5271027-1-1.html above "他們折磨的時候會錄影" King of ♥ 01:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, also watermarked George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shafiqul Huq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private and promo images, no category since 2018

George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image used only on a vanity page (nominated for speedy deletion) on Spanish Wikipedia. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CasparErko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user.

Estopedist1 (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Rodriseb (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 00:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly drawn Indian border Chidananda Kampa (talk) 01:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:NPOV, as long as an image is in use, being "incorrect" is not a valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 00:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Old image, needs more research. King of ♥ 01:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file has no author, it was correctly tagged by Krdbot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that it is in use on Russian Wikipedia, and of an age where it could plausibly be PD under some law. Therefore it is worth the effort of a DR to see if someone can come in and save it. -- King of ♥ 02:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The photo was taken in the 1960s - 1980s (the person was born in 1928). According to any Russian laws, it is protected by copyright - the author is known or the photo was published anonymously. GAndy (talk) 17:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 12:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 119.202.92.216 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file not CC King of ♥ 01:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete This is a Japanese indictment document. This document contains defendant's personal information such as name, address, occupation without mask. This media isn't suitable contents in commons by privacy policy.--Netora (talk) 11:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: strong concern over leakage of personal information. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Skazi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://vk.com/and_rey_13?z=photo357855856_457246828. Unable to verify source link. King of ♥ 00:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9   13:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused trivial logo of questionable notability.

Per COM:PACKAGE --Netora (talk) 00:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept one as per User:Ytoyoda. --P 1 9 9   13:48, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Arbor to SJ as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence this is an original work King of ♥ 01:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence also that it is a copyio, but it looks like a screenshot. Hence deleted as per COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   13:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigobaaz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/miteguz/?hl=es No metadata/low resolution/multiple copyvio (persistent violator) & No FoP in Honduras, see COM:FOP Honduras King of ♥ 01:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Screenshot. Source/Permission needed. --Minoraxtalk 13:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BilCat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found on other websites, including with a watermark of a media compmanw, so not likely to be an image created by the uploader as claimed King of ♥ 01:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted drawing. Questions to resolve: Who drew this? Is this in COM:SCOPE? King of ♥ 01:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dharmadhyaksha as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot from film King of ♥ 01:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same screenshot in different sizes and crops over here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Zoozaz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of CC license from source. Possibly from USGS? King of ♥ 01:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The map may be taken from https://gisreportsonline.com/, which is copyrighted, with the source of the information being from the US government. Zoozaz1 (talk) 04:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yeeno as Logo King of ♥ 01:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   13:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Harold as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: live recording from cs:Těšínský jazzový festival King of ♥ 01:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MKFI as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, image copyrighted to Thales 2008 here: https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/02.surv/karte016.en.html. The link is a WP mirror and thus invalid. However, the "Imagen de www.thalesgroup.com" in the description is worth examining. King of ♥ 01:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, all over the internet. --P 1 9 9   14:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:El general.jpg King of ♥ 01:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, although Google search is unreliable (many hits are from after 2013, meaning that it was likely taken from Commons). But the description indicates that it likely was a screen capture. Moreover the date could not have been 2013 since he was no longer active as a performer at that time. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Many google-images hits King of ♥ 01:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by فيصل as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://alkhabar-sy.com King of ♥ 05:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yeeno as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unofficial flickr account, license laundering. The overall set seems reasonable. Can you please provide evidence of license laundering? King of ♥ 05:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

King of Hearts The account is basically a collection of Trudeau images from the web. This image in particular is an upscaled version of this video; you can see the upscaling artifacts. As for the other images in the set, this image is credited here as Sean Kilpatrick/CP, while this image is also credited to Kilpatrick here. This flickr image is seen here, credited to Liam Richards/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo. I think the images coming from a variety of authors and sources should demonstrate that the account is license laundering. If so, I would also like to request it to be blacklisted at COM:QFI. Thanks. Yeeno (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. User:Yeeno is correct. Flickr account is a collection from other sources and was already blacklisted. --P 1 9 9   14:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afbs41 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is unreasonable that these diocesan seals are "own works" (own drawing graphics) by the uploader. These are likely taken from somewhere.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiarism file

[edit]

- This file is a low-resolution duplicate of w:File:Good Shepher Cathedral Parish Centre.jpg; see the file source field of the metadata. While that enwiki file (by w:User:Nasugbu batangas) is in a license that can also be accepted here, it cannot be moved here because of no COM:FOP Philippines. However, this low resolution upload, apparently grabbed by User:Afbs41 from English Wikipedia file, is a plagiarism as Afbs41 claims authorship. Do not restore this even if FOP is introduced here, as this file is an act of plagiarism (intellectual property infringement). Instead, please move that enwiki file by Nasugbu batangas when FOP is finally introduced here. Do not categorize this at Philippine FOP category to prevent accidental undeletion/restoration. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images replaced by SVG file: Zunyi Medical University name.svg RyanCray (talk) 06:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perche c'e un errore grafico Rossella Castellano (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I can't see any "error". Doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, license is irrevocable. --P 1 9 9   14:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 09:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is alive, and the book says "All right reserved". There is no evidence of the work being released with cc-by-sa-4.0 license. 3knolls (talk) 10:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helenaeglit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no author is given. If the author is unknown, please declare it

Estopedist1 (talk) 10:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   14:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A source (link to a page web that contains the image and the license) should be provided in order that we can verify the license of the image. Otherwise a permission should be sent to our permission system OTRS by the copyright holder(s) of the photo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: It isn't actually in the article that it gives as its permission, nor in any of the other weblinks on the description page. Gazamp (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie; unused, except at self-promotional wikidata entry, which should be delete, too Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep because it is not unused, it is used at someones namespace. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 08:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copvio, transmission code in EXIF dara. --P 1 9 9   14:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is me and I do not wish this photo of me to appear. Thank you! Colonel Sander's Agent (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page do not exist and and owner do not want this image uploaded. Sanatkverma (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhvefer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Estherlaprofesora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Afsarnayakkan (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, license is irrevocable. --P 1 9 9   14:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asdfarash6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from billboard. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: image on billboard is clearly DM. --P 1 9 9   14:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Relatively low-res image with no useful source info or metadata, doubtful that it's the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per uploader's talk page: "I entered the wrong picture, and there is no problem if you delete it.". --P 1 9 9   14:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is factually incorrect. The north most site of Indus Valley civilization is "Manda" situated on the foothills of Himalayas, while this image includes places way beyond "Manda" and some Himalayan portion including inhabitable places Ladakh. LearnIndology (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LearnIndology It's obviously a schematic map, it surely wasn't meant to be a precise representation of the culture extension. The image is in use. Feel free to fix it bugs you - if you do that, please state your resources to add credibility to the image. Thanks. Kind regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is factually incorrect. It includes literally more than half of Afghanistan while Afghanistan had few colony sites on eastern Afghanistan. It even includes Himalayas, while Himalayas has no IVC sites. LearnIndology (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9   14:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty file Ecummenic (talk) 16:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reliable source is available for such a map. This map was probably produced by Pakistani nationalists. LearnIndology (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused fantasy map, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots from YouTube videos without a Creative Commons license

[edit]

--Sanslogique (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free, taken from the BBC website, as per the watermark on the image Lugnuts (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per User:Lymantria. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Copyright violation; a sufficiently original logo, a product of original intellectual/artistic creation. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 22:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Harold as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: live recording from cs:Těšínský jazzový festival King of ♥ 01:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Je to moje vlastní skladba, kterou jsem sám nahrál, takže žádná autorská práva neporušuji.--Alfi51 (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gimnazists123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

it is said that " All copyright goes to Ivans Milovs."

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tomfool. Jckowal (talk) 16:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tomfool. Jckowal (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2017/05/26/quezon-city-batasan-hills/ - QCPU was opened in 2010. No freedom of panorama in the philippines

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/commonwealth-avenue-quezon-city-commission-on-audit-complex-part-i/ - COA headquarters finished in 1977. Same year artwork "COA Monument" by NAPOLEON ABUEVA, 1930-2018 installed here. No freedom of panorama.

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


@Patrickroque01: The Commission on Audit is currently headlining in Philippine news, and removing these images and other photos flagged by Mcrl Lxmna may deprive media creators' useful resources. Once again I remind Mcrl Lxmna to please stop from sending any more petitions to wipe out sceneries of Manila and the Philippines just because of the claim that there is no freedom of panorama in the country. I'm also challenging the owner of Mcrl Lxmna account to tell if he/she has also requested removal of what he/she called unauthorized photos of Philippine places in other platforms outside Wikimedia Foundation and demand for any proof of approved written consent or license to take pictures and post online, and if he/she consulted to the IPOPHIL, law experts, architect associations and building/property managements. For almost a year I have already observed that Mcrl Lxmna's only purpose is to overpolice intellectual property law by deleting "unauthorized" pictures of most Philippine landmarks, and this censorship attack may pose legal threat and chilling effect to lots of content creators, photographers, tourists, vloggers, students and other people. Photographers and contributors have been also working hard to provide free-to-use alternatives of copyright-restriced or watermarked content and make Philippine sceneries accessible to everyone. Patrickroque01 (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/03/10/quezon-city-saint-paul-the-apostle-parish-church/ - church from 1986 completed. No freedom of panorama in the philippines

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/quezon-city-barangay-bagong-silang/ - 2009 artwork by UP sculptor JOSE GIROY, born 1962. No freedom of panorama in the philippines

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted agency logo, not Own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Unused, uncat, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information, shield, coat of arms or institution logo O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is the correct shield used in 1948 by the Ríver Atlético Clube of Piauí, Brazil. Allforrous (talk) 03:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
After 70 years, the license is free. Allforrous (talk) 03:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, It is a club from Teresina, state of Piaui in Brazil. Allforrous (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Change the source and license information then. Current claims are blatantly fraudulent. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. Whatever arguments re true source copyright, file is unused and on Commons under a false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:MURAL, but not sure if FOP applies in the source country or not A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep - I'm not having a go A1Cafel but could you really not have applied some common sense and cropped the file as I have done now?,
I've cropped the file although admittedly some of the mural is still in it but not enough to identify it or infringe on the artists rights (photoshopping it entirely would render the image useless),
We don't have many images of San Telmo, Buenos Aires and either way the image is still in scope and can still be used. –Davey2010Talk 17:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've added cats and once closed I'll move to a better name. –Davey2010Talk 17:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as cropped per Davey2010.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per Jeff G. and Davey2010. SHB2000 (talk) 01:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The cropped version is now pointless. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: We have other photos of these cars and this car park in San Telmo, Buenos Aires?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Andy Dingley, Why is it pointless ?, Worth noting that image has also captured vehicles that may or may not be in San Telm or, Buenos Aires anymore. All's I've done is changed the main subject from the mural to the car park and cars .... If the image only inlcuded the mural without anything below then sure you'd have a point however that isnt the case here. –Davey2010Talk 17:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • As per the title, the subject here was the artwork. Without the artwork, it's a dull photo which could be anywhere urban in almost the whole world, some time in recent decades. I've no objection to keeping it if someone loves it, but I see no value to it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did state above once the DR's closed I'd move the file to something better. Without the artwork it's a photo of a car park which includes cars (cars that are no longer manufactured and don't exist today so it's a part of history.
" which could be anywhere urban in almost the whole world," well no it was taken in San Telmo because the image includes coords.....
You may see dull and boring, others see history, potential and something worth keeping, worth saving and worth using. –Davey2010Talk 18:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Cropped version Kept (mundane but unobjectionable subject); original Deleted (DW of mural) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Organizational logo (not owned by the UN, appears to be owned by happinessday.org). Above TOO, claim of "own work" is non-credible, so this is likely copyvio. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Sources 86.212.182.247 22:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Either description or license must be false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for info. FunkMonk (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source is listed as the 2010 Brazilian census conducted by the IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics). Nsophiay (talk) 01:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above; seems not to be a problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted from source wiki because source has not been provided after the file had been marked as no-source in 2016. Gikü (talk) 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as no permission (No permission since)
Converted to regular deletion request per comments by MGA73 on this deletion request and on my talk page for more time allowed. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Uploader is a train enthousiast regarding their uploads, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/%EC%B6%A9%EB%B6%81%EC%84%A0_%EB%AC%B4%EA%B6%81%ED%99%94%ED%98%B8&ilshowall=1. I have no reason to think this photo is not their own. It is not a professional image taken from a company website. Therefore decided to keep this image;. --Ellywa (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chainwit. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo. However published under "own". COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure, if it's TOO, too. If it does, maybe need to rename the file and give it a more "official" look (like cropping), I guess? --Chainwit. (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines it is not described Philippines copyright laws have a threshold of originality. Therefore it must be assumed this logo is copyrighted and it has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This logo is from a Kazahstan company according to ru:Nur.kzon. On guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Kazakhstan it is not described this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality. Therefore it must be assumed this logo is copyrighted and it has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mysterymanblue as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Although the performance may be in the public domain, it is a derivative work of the composition, which (according to the source) was authored by Harold Darke. As Darke was British, the composition will enter the public domain 70 years after his death. This file may be undeleted on January 1, 2047. King of ♥ 02:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you got me me. Well spotted, Harold Darke died in 1976. I'll try for a 30-second extract under fair use rules instead. Cnbrb (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark. Can be undeleted in 71 years after 1976 so in 2047 .. --Ellywa (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Whpq as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Recording if a Volmet broadcast. copyright is still held by broadcaster. In my opinion, nothing is intelligible so the original broadcast (whatever it was meant to be) does not meet COM:TOO. However, is this in COM:SCOPE? King of ♥ 05:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - If the audio is so distorted that the argument is that copyright no longer applies , then the audio has no useful purpose and is out of scope for Commons. If on the other hand, it is deemed to be sufficient to be useful, then I'd argue that the original broadcast copyright is applicable. In either circumstance, the outcome would be delete although for differing reasons. -- Whpq (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When i tuned in to the frequency (i know it has diffrent frequencies at seprate times) i heard a voice, and i thought it was a voice message. But no, it was another station two frequencies away, but i say we move it insted. Because original recordings of shortwave stations (UVB-76 for example) are allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeWhatLife (talk • contribs) 13:21, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. imho due to bad quality not of educational value and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 09:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 06:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Keep.
The law starts with:
Article 1
The purpose of this law is, by providing for the rights of author, and the right
related thereon with respect to works and the protection of cultural products,
performance, phonogram, and the transmission of broadcasting organization in order to
secure a just and legitimate exploitation on those cultural products, and thereby
contribute to the development of culture.
This photo seems to contribute.
Zezen (talk) 03:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Update: cf. also the Article 25 c, ff.
c- The use of work for the purposes of education, which is not for financial gain. Zezen (talk) 14:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. There is no freedom of panorama in Cambodia per COM:FOP Cambodia. --Ellywa (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this is pre-1900 as claimed, and its style argues for 20th century. The website given as source no longer exists. Public domain cannot be demnstrated. Smerus (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who is arguing? Could we have a an analysis of a trained art-historian please! This good faith upload with a source valid at the time should not be deleted on the basis of a self-styled art-analysis. --Wuselig (talk) 11:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The auction house seeling it 15 years ago claimed it to be 19th century watercolor, and there's no reason to not believe that. Even if it's from, say, 1920 (which seems much too late), it still is PD-Anon-70. In 15 years no one cared, but now the self-appointed Commons police is coming. Good grief. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to doubt the claim of the uploader this is a 19th century watercolor. Therefore decided to keep this image. --Ellywa (talk) 09:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Di (they-them) as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uses horse asset from wappenwiki.org, which uses a noncommercial license, incompatible with Commons Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this images is a derivative work of File:Kingdom of Georgia coat of arms.svg, which is not nominated for deletion. I do not see a source link to wappenwiki, so I decided to keep the image. Perhaps both files should be nominated for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. [24Cr][talk] 17:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. [24Cr][talk] 17:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Artist Antonino Perrotta is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 17:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Artist Antonino Perrotta is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 17:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 17:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was previously published on other internet sites in February 2021. Permission to use via OTRS is required. Examples: https://charter97.org/ru/news/2021/2/8/410532/ https://thinktanks.by/publication/2021/02/08/za-granitsey-naschitali-103-aktivnosti-priurochennyh-ko-dnyu-solidarnosti-s-belarusyu-chto-eto-bylo.html Kursant504 (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This photo belongs to Matvey Lozinsky, editors of Charter indicated the name of the author, you can check it now. Please don't be so hard. The author of the photo is really Matvey Lozinsky and he uploaded this photo to the RAZAM page. Это фото Матвея Лозинского, в феврале я отправила его в редакцию Хартии, указав имя автора, но, к сожалению, они не указали имя, но уже добавили, проверьте. Просьба не будьте столь придирчивы!!! Автор фото - действительно Матвей Лозинский и он это фото загрузил на страницу RAZAM. Ирина Гуревич (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 17:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear [24Cr], you deleted the photo belongs to Matvey Lozinsky, he apploded this pic here. In the link which gave above Kursant504 you can see the name of Matvey Lozinsky below the picture: https://charter97.org/ru/news/2021/2/8/410532/ and here https://thinktanks.by/publication/2021/02/08/za-granitsey-naschitali-103-aktivnosti-priurochennyh-ko-dnyu-solidarnosti-s-belarusyu-chto-eto-bylo.html there are no this picture. I ask you to cancel deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniri1007 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a screenshot of the official broadcast, copyright of which would be owned by Joe Biden or his office; as this was pre-inauguration, it wouldn't be covered under PD US GOV Mcrsftdog (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 17:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not seem to fall within the date range where works of the French government are acceptable (see Template:Gouvernement.fr). IronGargoyle (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Source website does not show a free licencing. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image probably qualifies for {{Pd-india}} if the year of publication is 1948, but I do not see any proof supporting this claim in the Summary. Sreejith K (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lucien Vieillard is born in 1923. No OTRS. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:602D:160F:BE20:E403 19:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no permission + no FoP in Ukraine. Lesless (talk) 19:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only two photographs the uploader has contributed that were made with a NIKON D3200. Very different in quality than the typical uploads. Has uploaded other work suspected to not be his own work, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pontis - Prácticas de Traducción.

Vera (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it's not you who can license these photos but only the copyright holder. Please credit the photos properly and verify the license through the release generator. Vera (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Permission is not listed on the file pages. --Ellywa (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright per its source. Even if PD in Iran, it is not necessarily so in the USA. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is clearly an official photograph of the Iranian shah, it must have been somehow presented to the public back then, so it is PD in Iran now. And there is no copyright relation between the USA and Iran and that means that all Iranian works are PD in the USA. --Botev (talk) 10:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment OK, I agree on the PD-USA point, but where is the evidence that this image ever was, or now is, PD in Iran? "Must have been" isn't good enough here, and the source link goes to the website of the former Shah's wife, which is clearly marked (possibly optimistically) as Copyright. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Actually, the website of the former Shah's wife contains only a low resolution version of this picture. The high resolution was taken from another place (I don't know from where, though - it wasn't stated by the uploader GTVM92). Anyway, this is not just a private family photograph kept by the Shah's wife in a drawer. It is bound to be one of the official portrait photographs of the former Shah, which is now circulating over the Internet. The copyright status on Farah Pahlavi's website doesn't change that fact (and it probably refers to the website as whole, anyway). I don't have more evidence, though. Let the admins judge it, then. --Botev (talk) 12:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per botev the images is of high quality and the license states its in public domain in iran the country of its origin. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The problem we have it this: how do we verify that? If we can't, it should go per COM:PRP. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Copyright status is not clear, therefore image has to be deleted per COM:PRP. In addition, per COM:EVID the uploader should proof the image can be used with a free licence. The source website given is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources 86.212.182.247 22:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete fake flag. RZuo (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remarks. --Ellywa (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]