Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Commons:Derivative work of copyrighted newspaper article. MKFI (talk) 07:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Copied from talk page: Hello, I am Glem Glenallan and I uploaded that picture, this is a picture I personally took from real news paper using my phone, it has no copyright associated with it and can be used freely. I hope this helps. Kind regards, Glem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glemglenallan (talk • contribs) 09:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Glemglenallan: the problem is that this is a derivative work with two copyrights: your picture, and the article text by Jim Gellatly and Sun newspaper. You would also need the permission from the Sun to upload this image. MKFI (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of copyrighted newspaper article. MKFI (talk) 07:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense, A selfie, Blurry Twinsdevs (talk) 08:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of dolls - see COM:TOYS
- File:Милена из Якутянска.jpg
- File:Сирена из Якутянска.jpg
- File:Лёня из Якутянска.jpg
- File:Ника из Якутянска.jpg
- File:Мисиписи.jpg
- File:Андрей Кривогубш.jpg
- File:Лариса.jpg
- File:Тоисия.jpg
- File:Вася из Якутянска.jpg
- File:Петя Жиробасов.jpg
- File:Боб.jpg
- File:Анона.jpg
- File:Нюша Жиробасова.jpg
- File:Нона.jpg
- File:Пуси.jpg
- File:Писяня.jpg
- File:Масяня.jpg
- File:Ёлка Вайт.jpg
- File:Ёлка Эпл.jpg
- File:Яна Левчик.jpg
- File:Ксюша1.jpg
- File:Дед Сурикат.jpg
- File:Эмилия1.jpg
- File:Изабель.jpg
- File:Питеська.jpg
- File:Нелла.jpg
- File:Блум.jpg
- File:Варя Шутова.jpg
- File:Лошадь Писька.jpg
- File:Эмилия.jpg
- File:Алла в жёлтом платье.jpg
- File:Якутиха в красном платье.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. Also file names and descriptions are ironic and offensive in Russian, not useful for education, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Niaz Mahmud Joy (talk) 06:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Niaz Mahmud Joy: Selfie ?, very interesting requisite of delation.--Reda Kerbouche (talk) 06:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 05:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Niaz Mahmud Joy (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is my file with the paint.net software. Watch it here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Football_kit_socks/Nike_specific_patterns https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Football_kit_socks/manufacturer_specific_patterns User:Jajadelacouleuvrine : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Jajadelacouleuvrine, le 20 juillet 2021 à 10:11
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 06:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|1=File:Natalya Agre.jpg}} [[User:Institut2021|Institut2021]] ([[User talk:Institut2021|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded at my official acount I don’t want share here Tolla.tolla (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Details abuot this file worng 95.159.82.55 23:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 05:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
duplicate MaxEmanuel (talk) 12:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 07:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
duplicate MaxEmanuel (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 07:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license. taken from social media - https://twitter.com/hoodykim?lang=en Evaders99 (talk) 22:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --matanya • talk 21:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Je souhaite le télécharger de nouveau en utilisant l'URL HTTPS et non en insérant une image. Giledjo (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license. --JuTa 23:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
I want to add this to Adebesin Folarin's wikipedia page. It is not letting me because it says it has been duplicated. GATA0495 (talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license. --JuTa 00:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I want to add this to Adebesin Folarin's wikipedia page. It is not letting me because it says it has been duplicated. GATA0495 (talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license. --JuTa 00:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I want to add this to Adebesin Folarin's wikipedia page. It is not letting me because it says it has been duplicated. GATA0495 (talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 00:03, 26 July 2021 UTC: No license since 2021-07-16. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 14:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
VDA / copy https://ballast.com.br/sensores-industriais/sensores-fotoeletricos-aplicados-na-melhoria-continua-na-industria/ Bozs (talk) 18:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertisement. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:13, 26 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jordavi Watermill
[edit]بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 10 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 10.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 11.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 12.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 13.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 14.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 15.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 16.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 17.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 18.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 19.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 2.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 20.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 21.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 22.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 23.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 24.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 25 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 25.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 26 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 26.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 27 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 27.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 28.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 29.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 3.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 30.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 31.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 32.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 33.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 34.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 35 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 35.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 36.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 37.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 38.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 39.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 4.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 40.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 41.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 42.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 43 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 43.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 44.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 45.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 46.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 47.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 48.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 49.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 5 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 5.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 50.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 6.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 7.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 8.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021 9.jpg
- File:Jordavi Watermill2021.jpg
POS78 (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Rezhaldie (talk) 16:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete FYI, COM:SELFIE that don't have enough education useful. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Copy https://www.amazon.com.br/Nelson-Gon%C3%A7alves-tempo-Gabriel-Chalita/dp/8504021114 Lentoster (talk) 02:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete This is an obvious use case of the {{Copyvio}} template Born2bgratis (talk) 08:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
advertisement, no permission given Julius Senegal (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 06:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused and unusable photo. heavy watermarked, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused non-notable diagram. Low quality George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Previously published (https://clapnumber.com/celebrity/biography/sharad-chaudhary), OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Fabien Pinardon". OTRS permission from Fabien Pinardon needed. MKFI (talk) 07:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused self-promotion of non-notable person. Sole upload since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos
George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo. No category since 2018, sole upload George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo. No category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable draw of book cover (project?). No category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused and unusable heavy photoshoped low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused and unusable heavy photoshoped low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused photo of non-notable person. Also probaby coyvio George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo. Promotional George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo of non-notable artist George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo of non-notable band George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private artwork. Also probably copyvio sources George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Probably an official mayoral potrait. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: private photo of user without any useful contribution George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable personal screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jullianadealmada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos, no category since 2018. No other useful contributions
George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
以前とは考えが変わりました。今後は公衆の場で自分の画像を公開したくありません Jpgmgdtpm (talk) 11:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohsen2023 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non wikipedian.
- File:Behnam khedri 2.jpg
- File:Dr. Enrique.jpg
- File:Ahmadrezanori1.jpg
- File:Ahmadreza nori.jpg
- File:1603037683-shilajavidbeauty.jpg
- File:Ahmad molania jelodar.jpg
- File:Masror sheidai.jpg
- File:Rasol salehi.jpg
- File:Parisa nasri.jpg
- File:Bardia sadeghi.jpg
- File:Amenehnaderi63.jpg
- File:Shahriarshahiri.jpg
- File:Alirezakoliai50.jpg
- File:Molania.jpg
- File:Ahmadali.jpg
- File:AMENEH NADERI.jpg
Faisal talk 11:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly not own work. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable low quality images
George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablo giraldo a (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo and logo of user without useful contributions
George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo, promotional only George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Keithwinslow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable screenshots
George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos on non-notable person. Self-promotion only
George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 12:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of non-notable photographer George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 12:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 13:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 13:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 13:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 13:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: non-notable promo image. Used in abandoned since 2018 sanbox only George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image. Also probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: private photo. Self-promotion of user without any useful contributions George Chernilevsky talk 13:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 13:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 13:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
File created by accident Meeepmep (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo, no category since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 13:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nazimbnrpk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Agarai Buner.jpg
- File:Nazimullah Buner.jpg
- File:Pakhtun Nazimullah agarai buner.jpg
- File:Pakhton Nazimullah buner.jpg
- File:Pakhtunkhattak.jpg
- File:Nazimullah Chamla Agarai Buner. (2).jpg
- File:Nazimullah Chamla Agarai Buner.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KiKijessup (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of Minecraft characters
- File:Thumbnail processed (4).jpg
- File:Thumbnail processed (3).jpg
- File:Thumbnail processed (2).jpg
- File:Thumbnail processed (1).jpg
- File:Thumbnail Sans titre 34.png
- File:Thumbnail Golem de fer.png
- File:Thumbnail Sans titre 30.png
Эlcobbola talk 17:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
All files claimed as own work, none have EXIF, all have different resolutions and some (like File:Zuma Orania 2010.jpg) are clearly snapshots from a video.
- File:Orania2.jpg
- File:Fence less.jpg
- File:FF+ Conference.jpg
- File:Small giant statue in Orania.jpg
- File:Orania Apartments.jpg
- File:Industrial Park.jpg
- File:Zuma Orania 2010.jpg
- File:Orania.jpg
- File:Building Orania.jpg
- File:Water works ditch.jpg
- File:Bavaria Bier.jpg
- File:Pecan Nuts.jpg
- File:Orania Stats.jpg
- File:Malema Orania.jpg
- File:Securiteit.jpg
- File:Street festival.jpg
- File:Orania students.jpg
- File:CVO Skool Nuut.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
a) These photos provide valuable information on the article
b) There have been zero copyright complaints about my photos
c) I lived 143 km from Orania in Kimberley and have visited the town numerous times over the past 23 years. During that time I have gone through about +/- 6 different cameras.
d) As for the Zuma photo, it is legal to take a photo of a TV program in South Africa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmars3 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jahid Islam7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope.
--Alaa :)..! 06:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
The products of this reaction should involve addition of allyl groups, not vinyl groups. The file has been corrected by the same uploader, but the correction has a different file name: File:Tsuji 1965 2.jpg. This incorrect file is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 03:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
This image is missing the addition of a nucleophile in the lower left. It has already been corrected by the same uploader, but given a different file name: File:Tsuji-Trost CC.jpg. This incorrect version is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
This image is missing a positive charge on the structure at the bottom of the image. It has already been corrected by the same uploader, but given a different file name: File:Tsuji-Trost CC.jpg. This incorrect version is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 03:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot of wiki-table; orphaned. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jude Kobina Mensah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.
- File:Kobina Thaddeus in a Ghana Secondary Technical School uniform.jpg
- File:Kobina Thaddeus in a cartoon for.png
- File:Kobina Thaddeus at 2019.jpg
Minoraxtalk 01:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused non-notable diagrams. No description, no category since 2018
George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person. Low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private heavy distorted photo George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BeatBoss Tims (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos, no category since 2018
George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JaseemkhanCG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: photos and logo of non-notable Dota 2 team. Used in abandoned since 2018 vanity sandbox
- File:CG Manila Masters.jpg
- File:Clutch-Gamers.jpg
- File:Clutch Gamers 2017.jpg
- File:Clutch Gamers.png
George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felicia Romanescu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scans of old photos from 1967 and onwards plus an image taken from FB. Not own work
- File:Eleonora in costum national.jpg
- File:Eleonora in varsta.jpg
- File:Eleonora cu pensulele 1967 septembrie 1.jpg
- File:Eleonora cu pictura.jpg
- File:Eleonora la oglinda1980.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Excuse me, I don't understand - which part of the picture is the non-notable logo - and what is a non-notable logo? --MScharwies (talk) 15:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable diagrams
- File:Spinal memory mapped uart.png
- File:FlowSpinalHDL.png
- File:LogoSpinal.png
- File:StrucutreSpinal.png
George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo logo George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos of user without any useful contributions
George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Delle Donne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos of user without any useful contributions. Self promotion only
George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: private photo of user without any useful contributions. Used only in old abandoned sandbox George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image. Also watermarked, probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable text image George Chernilevsky talk 12:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 12:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
unused poor duplicate of file:Dušan Medzihradský.jpg George Chernilevsky talk 12:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergio Conejo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logos
- File:Logo DeoxGames.png
- File:Logo SewdoStudios.png
- File:IconoWorksible.png
- File:LogoBlackWorksible.png
- File:DeoxGames.png
George Chernilevsky talk 13:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergio Conejo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos
George Chernilevsky talk 13:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nisheethzio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo images
George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private drawing George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 13:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Before 2000s plane collection (talk · contribs)
[edit]It looks like this user is taking images from the web, putting on some kind of retro filter and claiming them as their own. I did reverse image searches on a few:
- File:FAT Boeing 737 2603.jpg from https://www.flickr.com/photos/firstgen737/15763167614
- File:CAL Boeing 737 180.jpg from From https://www.baaa-acro.com/crash/crash-boeing-737-209-hualien-54-killed (and a re-upload of File:Photo of Boeing 737-209 B-180.jpg
- File:CAL Boeing 737 1870.jpg from https://www.airliners.net/photo/China-Airlines/Boeing-737-281/0410973/L
I'm not going to bother doing more searches because I don't think the uploader is reliable.
- File:Kin Avia Let L-410UVP-E at NLO.jpg
- File:Aeronav Air Services Cessna 208B Grand Caravan.jpg
- File:Aeronav Air Services Cargo Cessna 208B Grand Caravan.jpg
- File:CAL Boeing 707 1834.jpg
- File:Beechcraft 95-B55 Baron PT-LYG.jpg
- File:SVA Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.jpg
- File:SVA Lockheed L-1011 TriStar ORY.jpg
- File:CAL Boeing 707 1826 at QPG.jpg
- File:CAL Boeing 707 1826.jpg
- File:GCA DHC-8 15229.jpg
- File:FAT DC-9 28003 TSA.jpg
- File:FAT DC-9 28003.jpg
- File:FAT Boeing 737 2603 TSA.jpg
- File:GCA DC-9 15301.jpg
- File:FAT Boeing 737 2603 at at TSA.jpg
- File:CAL Boeing 737 1870.jpg
- File:CAL Boeing 737 180.jpg
- File:FAT Boeing 737 2603.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CoolJWR100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photos, no category since 2018
- File:Stephen with Glasses 2.jpg
- File:Stephen with Glasses 3.jpg
- File:Stephen with Glasses 1.jpg
- File:Sister Margie with Microphone 2.jpg
- File:Sister Margie with Microphone 1.jpg
- File:Sister Margie (ALTAR Lookbook).jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo. Possible personal attack / harassment George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused text only image. Unusable low quality George Chernilevsky talk 14:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused text only image George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo image, no category and no description since 2018 George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promotional image of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 14:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erickasofiablanco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused logo / image of non-notable event
George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused self-promotion of non-notable blogger George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Methodenforschung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MCF DE.png
- File:Easy Rider Study design DE.png
- File:TR Stages DE.png
- File:Agents of the New DE.png
- File:Ride into the Fog Deutsch.png
- File:Customer Foresight Territory.png
- File:Easy Rider study design.png
- File:TR stages.png
- File:Ride into the Fog.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davidovallos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CorneliaKiel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Agile project sprint rollout plan framework slide01.jpg
- File:Blockchain powerpoint presentation slides Slide03.jpg
- File:Blockchain powerpoint presentation slides Slide02.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Minoraxtalk 01:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE, COM:SELFIE Ytoyoda (talk) 16:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright file should be on Commons — NZFC(talk) 06:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 06:55, 3 August 2021 UTC: No license since 25 July 2021 --Krdbot 14:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The photo was uploaded by me as work of an authority. After I got some comments about it, I am not sure any longer that it is an aloowed usage. I therefore want to have it deleted. Pascal Reuer (talk) 20:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Sadly in Germany even works made by Authorities are copyrighted. We're working ot it. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the Philippines. Subject is a 1998 building designed by Yolanda Reyes per the Registry of Intramuros Cultural and Historical Properties (page 29).
- File:0400jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
- File:0401jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
- File:0402jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
- File:0403jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
- File:0404jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
- File:0405jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
- File:0406jfColegio de San Juan de Letran Boy Scouts Monument Puerta de Isabelafvf.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the Philippines. Despite the Spanish-era style design, subject is a 1996 building designed by Manuel Fernando.[1][2] As of now, I have no information on the architect's death but the images can be deleted 70 years after his death.
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:08841jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 15.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Would be 50 years after death, but Delete per nom anyway. Sennecaster (talk) 04:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Agree with @Sennecaster: on p.m.a., as buildings are not subject to COM:URAA in the United States (since there is FOP for buildings in the U.S.). But, agree too to @Howhontanozaz: that there is no FOP here. Delete, until either proposed FOP amendment becomes a reality or (worst case) 50+1 years after the architect's death. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Undelete for 50+1 would be 2047. Am curious as to why so many Philippine NoFoP DRs are going on right now honestly. Sennecaster (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Sennecaster: probably this started around early September 2020. If you would look at 2-month long discussions at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines, spanning a couple of threads, you may find out why. It seems so unfortunate and sometimes disturbing to know that our IP law has no wording that resembles a freedom of panorama provision. What is only allowed there are reproductions of artistic works for purposes of reporting of current events, and inclusion of works for teaching purposes as long as compatible with fair use. See also w:Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive46#FOP Updates for the latest updates on proposed amendments to our IP law, which now includes an FOP provision similar to Australian FOP wording. But 'til that amendments become law and an accompanying Implementing Rules and Regulations that will serve as a guide for future Philippine FOP, the no-FOP status still prevails which means a licensing negotiation from the artists or architects for use of free culture licensing is a must, that is according to the IPOPHL-Bureau of Copyright and Related Rights in an online meeting with some Filipino Wikipedians last February 10, 2021. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Undelete for 50+1 would be 2047. Am curious as to why so many Philippine NoFoP DRs are going on right now honestly. Sennecaster (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palacio Grande, Intramuros
[edit]No COM:FOP in the Philippines. Subject is a 1990 building designed by Leoncio Tabayay, Jr. per the Registry of Intramuros Cultural and Historical Properties (page 68).
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 16.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 17.jpg
- File:09281jfIntramuros Landmarks Churches Manilafvf 18.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
This photo is from printed material, probably. There is a crease in the middle. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
File:神戶港, 神戶, 日本, こうべこう, こうべし, にっぽん, にほん, Port of Kobe, Kobe, Japan, Nippon, Nihon (25074023212).jpg
[edit]Derivative work from Urtra Man(1966), created by Tsuburaya Production. Copyright violation of art. Categorizing (talk) 02:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Miyamoto Musashi
[edit]The Gorinbo statue is an artwork of ja:富永直樹(1913 - 2006). No FOP in Japan.
Nightingale (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Miyamoto Musashi
[edit]The statue of en:Miyamoto Musashi (ja:宮本武蔵) at the Hachidai Jinja (ja:八大神社) in Kyoto was created by Atsuo Shibata (ja:柴田篤男) (alias, Bunya Tanaka (ja:田中文彌)) in 平成14年 (=2002). [3] The year of his death is 2018. [4] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2089. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Miyamoto Musashi
[edit]The statue of en:Miyamoto Musashi (ja:宮本武蔵) at en:Ganryū-jima (ja:巌流島) was designed by Naoki Hirose (ja:広瀬直樹) in 平成15年 (=2003). [5] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
COM is no repository for cute cat pictures 62.216.207.224 16:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Invalid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Low res non decript mage of storefront of a branch of chain restaurant. 62.216.207.224 16:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Het is gebruikt in een Wikipedia-artikel sinds december 2015. --トトト (talk) 20:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
COM is no repository for cute cat pictures. 62.216.207.224 16:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Mooie foto met op de achtergrond de Sakurajima. --トトト (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Invalid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Bad, hardly readable, factual not correct (for instance the benzene rings) Julius Senegal (talk) 06:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope and purpose material. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use on user page. — Racconish 💬 09:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism, created by LTA and socks user HitomiAkane (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Only used on userpage of user with zero meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Own work by uploader with little or no encyclopedic value. Bangalamania (talk) 02:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete. Extremely obscure, possibly made-up Neo-Nazi flags do not have any realistic educational use and should not be freely provided and promoted for potential use by extremists. Dronebogus (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of free license as claimed. Renata3 (talk) 03:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Also nominated other uploads by the same user:
- File:Elektros tinklas.png
- File:HarmonyLink.jpg
- File:Robertas Dačkus, LR Prezidento kanceliarija.jpg
- File:Valdymo centras.jpg
- File:Lietuvos energetikos ministerija.jpg
- File:Litgird valdymo centras.png
- File:LITGRID centras.png
- File:Energetikos ministras Rokas Masiulis.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo, not used in any articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Previously copyrighted album cover (most certainly not a poster). Unless we can change the license, the file should be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Previously copyrighted album cover (most certainly not a poster). Unless we can change the license, the file should be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
F1:- copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unikely to be own work [6] C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this looks like an extract from another uncredited image; no evidence that this is the user's own photograph rubin16 (talk) 05:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not uploader's own work - Tineye shows versions of this image circulating online as far back as 5 years before its upload here rubin16 (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope. --Alaa :)..! 06:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. A slightly larger (320x210), slightly less cropped version can be found in the Photo Gallery tab on this page. ✗plicit 06:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Explicit. The website where Explicit found the photo being used has only one archived version from back in 2017 (at least that's the only one I could find), but the same image can be seen here being used as early as 2004 (with a watermark nonetheless) which predates the file's upload to Wikipedia by three years. So, at the very least, I think COM:VRT verification would be needed for this; the uploader, however, hasn't edit Commons since they uploaded the file in 2008 or English Wikipedia since November 2020 for whatever reason; so, it seems unlikely that a COM:CONSENT email would be sent in while this discussion is still ongoing. If the uploader does send in such an email, the file can always be restored via COM:REFUND once VRT has verified copyright authorship. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Need ticket OTRS Caulfield (talk) 06:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- My mistake. Author death in 1930 --Caulfield (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah and it is also in use so the low res should not be a problem. --MGA73 (talk) 11:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
This is clearly a scan or photograph of an original photo and there is no information about the original source. The uploader has edited the subjects en.wiki biography in a promotional manner and it is very likely that it is not their own work as they have claimed. Smartse (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused text document. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
bad spelling of surname in filename hibas vezeteknev a fajlban Miksaszerk (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
bad spelling of surname in filename hibas vezeteknev a fajlban Miksaszerk (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
I will reupload it, Ujra fel fogom tolteni, Error in Surname spelling in file, Hiba a csaladnev - fajlnevben Miksaszerk (talk) 10:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. No explanation of what it is and not used in any articles. JPxG (talk) 09:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. For accountability, I originally found this and brought it up on the Wikimedia Discord and was advised to DR this, but JPxG beat me to nominating. Sennecaster (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not identified by uploader and not used in any articles. Image description is "who cares". Not poggers! JPxG (talk) 09:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. For accountability, I originally found this and brought it up on the Wikimedia Discord and was advised to DR this, but JPxG beat me to nominating. Sennecaster (talk) 22:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
The image is not an actual scanned page from a book, but is recreated in photo editing software, and has no connection at all to reality. MisalovStepha (talk) 11:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a corporate mug shot. Unless the uploaded is the photographer this is likely to be a copyvio. Ownership proof via COM:OTRS will resolve this easily enough Timtrent (talk) 11:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
No metadata and the fact that the image also appears at https://411mania.com/wrestling/nikki-a-s-h-cashes-in-money-in-the-bank-wins-wwe-raw-womens-title-clips/ suggests it has simply been downloaded from that or a similar site and posted as user's own work. Uploader has a history of uploading copyvio images..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyvio. User should be banned from uploading anything with their track record. oknazevad (talk) 19:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio taken from WWE's Instagram account. Oakster 18:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly, the picture has copyright--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unambiguous copyright infringement. LM2000 (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of CC BY SA licence – looks to be a scan from a publication or something. MIDI (talk) 12:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private drawing George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable promo image George Chernilevsky talk 13:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Cette image comporte une erreur EnzoC7139 (talk) 13:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused non-notable text image George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
It is being used as part of a copyright scam, and the Creative Commons license is not being honored. HatBucketBalls (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see COM:ENFORCE. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private logo George Chernilevsky talk 14:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Xb;jd (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. Likely copyvio anyway based on metadata. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Unusably small and low-res GPinkerton (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm not entirely convinced this is the users own work - no meta data included and IMHO I don't believe it's INSOPE either, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted (© AyaYay Records) : http://www.spla.pro/en/file.person.gregory-pierre-kadda-sheekoff.50857.html Hyméros-(talk) 15:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Copy from https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/212839-rahama-sadau-gets-hollywood-invite-kannywood-ban.html, which states "All content is Copyrighted © 2020 The Premium Times, Nigeria" 108.56.139.120 15:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.182.247 16:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Don't just cast doubt, provide stronger proof. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.34.180 07:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Small photo without metadata, probably not own work as claimed. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Promotional art, no obvious use on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Logos with bogus self claims by serial copyvio uploader. Discussion of whether above or below TOO in origin country needed.
Эlcobbola talk 16:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
unused promotional selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company. Also not a real SVG file. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete most likely out of scope, extracted file from File:BusinessRalliart logo.svg; original SVG from @B.renges: — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
unused promotional image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an actual SVG file. We already have a vector logo at File:Cadence-Logo.svg. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable business. Also not an actual SVG file. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
self-promotional image; unused, except for self-promotional wikidate entry, which should be deleted, too Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an actual SVG file. Duplicate of File:Nintendo-Switch-Dock-Front.jpg and not used in any articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mariel chr (talk · contribs)
[edit]images taken from 1960-2008. Unlike that own work
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
No authorization from the owner (a private school) link : eicar.fr Hyméros-(talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominationl And out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
The subject of this photo is "GianMarco Tognazzi" and the photo was uploaded in 2015 by User:GianMarco Tognazzi who claims to own the copyright.
This is the Italian actor Gianmarco Tognazzi at the 69th Venice film festival on September 5, 2012, promoting the movie "Dormant Beuaty".
Photo published [7] here on September 6, 2012. According to EXIF the photographer is Daniel Dal Zennaro (instagram page) and copyright owner is news agency Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata ANSA. Dal Zennaro was also credited for this photo here. Dal Zennaro is a professional photographer and many of his photos can be found at gettyimages, apimages and other commercial image banks.
Daniel Dal Zennaro's permission to publish this photo under a Creative Commons license should be verified through OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company. Not used in any articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work" by user. EXIF data indicates "author/copyright holder: Thomas Santos / Mowa Press" Fma12 (talk) 18:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Obvious copyvio. Should be deleted without discussion. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 01:11, 12 August 2021, by Elcobbola. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Missing permission via VRTS from copyright holder; See EXIF data. Wdwd (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in this case, the credit in the EXIF data clearly matches the uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Missing permission via VRTS from copyright holder; Image from Facebook, see EXIF data. Wdwd (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution of a moth used for a hoax article. Scientific name falsum inventum. No enducational use WereSpielChequers (talk) 21:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Prego eliminare il File:Dott.Basilio_Paolo_Colucci.jpg poiché la pagina di Basilio Paolo Colucci è stata eliminata 5 anni fa spiegazione del motivo nel mio account e al momento questo file non rilevante. Grazie. Nicholas04 (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: a person of no notability, per COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Dw no source since (dw no source since). We should retain a record of this discussion to file into our COM:TOO US casebook and for DR categorization purposes. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. See COM:VPC#RE/MAX: starting life in another logo variant:. The source given is copyrighted by RE/MAX or learninglibrary.com. The USCO wrote that the logo is COM:DW of existing work still copyrighted, thus we can't accept it without permission per COM:L. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, as Jeff G. explained it's a DW of a copyrighted work. Even though the DW doesn't exceed the threshold of originality (similar to making a photocopy), the underlying source is still copyrighted. -M.nelson (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Link to the original discussion. My concern was not that this is a derivative work of a copyrighted work, as it's totally possible to strip down a work to something minimalist (compare File:Mickey Mouse head and ears.svg). My concern was that the uploader of the RE/MAX logo did not understand what the Copyright Office's letter meant; given the confusing nature of the document, I think I understand how it would be confusing. But here, I guess I should determine whether this stripped-down variant would be original if it were not a derivative work of previous 2D designs. I think the shapes and shading just barely push it over the edge. A thin copyright that's only enforceable against virtually identical copies, to be sure, but a valid one nonetheless. Delete, but I guess we can undelete this when the originals expire 200 years from now. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: THe USCO refused registration of this logo on the grounds that it was too similar from the previous copyrighted logo from which it is derived. Therefore this logo and this image are derivative of the previous logo. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Tanzanian freedom of panorama is insufficient for Commons: it is restricted to audiovisual works ("moving images or videos") only, not photographic works like still images that form majority of files on Commons. This one is a still image of an artistic work (colored stones). Thus this image is a derivative work of underlying artwork, and permission from the person who created this artwork is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The file says these are natural colors, but I don't think that's correct. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I searched this image on the web and I found the original picture [8]. I can't determine when or where it was published, but certainly the image at Commons was taken from there and it was later photoshopped. Tbhotch™ 01:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I forget to change licence, this is not my own property Salomo Wicaksono (talk) 02:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi A1Cafel, thank you for your message and sorry for the bad license. This picture was taken by Alfred Dubonnet who died in 1949. His works are now in the public domain according to a PD-old-70 license. All the best -- Machkram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machkram (talk • contribs) 13:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States." --A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The subject was French -- the uploader assumes a 70 tear copyright. That would not be before the 1996 URAA date, so this is not PD in the USA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Not old enough to be in PD, due to URAA restriction A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
it's not own work it's copy Lentoster (talk) 03:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
it's not own work it's copy Lentoster (talk) 03:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
it's not own work it's copy Lentoster (talk) 03:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
it's not own work it's copy Lentoster (talk) 03:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
it's not own work it's copy Lentoster (talk) 03:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
it's not own work it's copy Lentoster (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- It seems there is freedom of panorama in Andorra. Andorra is not part of France. Traumrune (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Inferior to File:CHCH2010.png, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work rubin16 (talk) 05:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
The files are images of the Three Dikgosi Monument in Gaborone, Botswana, which is built in 2005. According to COM:FOP Botswana, there is no provisions regarding free freedom of panorama in Botswana. As a result, the files are likely to be locally copyrightable and unfree.
- File:3 Dikgosi.jpg
- File:Three chiefs with lady justice at the back, Gaborone, Botswana.jpg
- File:Three Dikgosi Monument - March 2010.jpg
廣九直通車 (talk) 05:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- 廣九直通車, question: Photographs by the U.S. Military are free to use. Botswanan FoP rules override that? Will they complain to the U.S. Military about File:Three Dikgosi Monument - March 2010.jpg, taken 11 years ago by U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa? The file has been on Flickr since 2010, with 2,492 views, and evidently, the Botswanan government hasn't asked the U.S. Army to take the photo down. It was also uploaded from Flickr to Commons in 2010. Why would you think they would ask Commons to take it down? Shall Wiki projects from now on use Flickr, rather than Commons, as our repository of images? There are rules, and then there is common sense. I therefore
Oppose the deletion of at least that photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- 廣九直通車, question: Photographs by the U.S. Military are free to use. Botswanan FoP rules override that? Will they complain to the U.S. Military about File:Three Dikgosi Monument - March 2010.jpg, taken 11 years ago by U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa? The file has been on Flickr since 2010, with 2,492 views, and evidently, the Botswanan government hasn't asked the U.S. Army to take the photo down. It was also uploaded from Flickr to Commons in 2010. Why would you think they would ask Commons to take it down? Shall Wiki projects from now on use Flickr, rather than Commons, as our repository of images? There are rules, and then there is common sense. I therefore
- I'll add that I don't think my argument will win, though it should. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Firstly, the claim that the Botswanan government hasn't asked the U.S. Army to take the photo down is invalid due to COM:PCP. Secondly, COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law mandated that a work must be free in both the U.S. and in the origin country. And to clarify, the monument is actually built by Mansudae Overseas Project Group of Companies, a North Korean company. While I agree that the last file may be sent to various Wikipedia projects locally (due to their lower requirement on copyright, like the case of Burj Khalifa), I think it still not meets the copyright requirement for Wikimedia Commons, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- I knew my argument wouldn't win here. I compliment you on your good arguing skills. I still think this deletionism is excessive and bad for Wikimedia. I really didn't volunteer to be an admin on Wikivoyage with the aspiration of having to upload files locally over and over again. Maybe some of you deletionists would like to take a break sometimes to upload some of these files that are in use on other wikis locally to those wikis before you nominate them for deletion here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Firstly, the claim that the Botswanan government hasn't asked the U.S. Army to take the photo down is invalid due to COM:PCP. Secondly, COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law mandated that a work must be free in both the U.S. and in the origin country. And to clarify, the monument is actually built by Mansudae Overseas Project Group of Companies, a North Korean company. While I agree that the last file may be sent to various Wikipedia projects locally (due to their lower requirement on copyright, like the case of Burj Khalifa), I think it still not meets the copyright requirement for Wikimedia Commons, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'll add that I don't think my argument will win, though it should. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan Kekek. SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunatelly @Ikan Kekek and SHB2000: I found Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/04#Which_country's_copyright_laws_apply_to_the_United_States_military_bases_in_South_Korea?, where some users stated that PD-USGov-XXXs don't work under laws of other countries, this is the reason files related to US military bases in South Korea should be deleted, since they are not free under S. Korean laws. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment But the photo is by the U.S. Army, not by an individual soldier! Truthfully, I think that a strict reading of Commons' take on Botswanan law lacking provisions for FoP would apply to this photo, but I would argue that common sense dictates that if the government of Botswana hasn't objected in 11 years and it's remained visible and often viewed on the U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa's official Flickr page for that long, they're unlikely to ask this site to take down the photo. If they ever do, we should take it down. Until then, I think the precautionary principle is being applied needlessly in this old and official a case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Liuxinyu970226, though it could be clearer, it looks to me like you misread the thread you linked. Please read the thread again. Here are the last two posts:
- We can define "source country" however we'd like, because it is not a legal requirement, merely a policy one. When there are multiple competing claims for being the source country, there is precedent for using the more permissive one. For example, if a novel is published by a British author simultaneously in the UK and US in 1925 and the author dies in 1975, we accept US as the source country, even if the author has no ties to the US and has never even set foot in the US. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- I am OK with using the most permissive one when there are multiple competing claims. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Note that there are two copyrights at issue here -- one for the photograph and one for the monument. The photograph is probably free, but it is a derivative work of the monument and infringes on the sculptor's copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rastoguacogac (talk · contribs)
[edit]The files are various mosaic artworks in Mong Kok East Station Public Transport Interchange, Hong Kong, presumably created in 2009 (wrt. the 60th anniversary of PRC foundation in one of the artworks). As there are no freedom of panorama for 2D works in Hong Kong per COM:FOP HK, the files are therefore locally copyrightable by the creators, and can be unfree.
- File:HK 旺角東 Mong Kok East 平台車站 terrace 夜晚 night Mosaic air space plane China Sept-2013.JPG
- File:HK 旺角東 Mong Kok East 平台車站 terrace 夜晚 night Mosaic hill mountain China Sept-2013.JPG
- File:HK 旺角東 Mong Kok East 平台車站 terrace 夜晚 night Mosaic 60th anniversary of China Sept-2013.JPG
- File:HK 旺角東 Mong Kok East 平台車站 terrace 夜晚 night Mosaic 5-stars flag n children 60th anniversary of China Sept-2013.JPG
- File:HK 旺角東 Mong Kok East 平台車站 terrace 夜晚 night Mosaic 60th anniversary of China Sept-2013 Yellow Dragon.JPG
廣九直通車 (talk) 06:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Greece, this is no freedom of panorama in Greece. This appears to be a contemporary statue. ✗plicit 06:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
This architecture was designed by Vann Molyvann, who died in 2017 according to enwiki. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Cambodia has no Commons-acceptable FoP. Images of this work of architecture will not be free until 50 years after Molyvann's death, or until Cambodia amends/reforms their copyright law to remove restrictions to "incidental inclusion only" and allow free pictorial reproductions and free, commercial distribution and publication of pictorial representations of their copyrighted architecture and sculptures without the need of authorizations of their creators and/or their heirs. There is also an old DR concerning this copyrighted architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Illegally re-uploaded, uploader should be warned. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Note that the deleted version is not the same photo. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:NoFoP-Greece
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Greece, permission from the copyright holder is needed.
- File:Plan of the ancient wall of Athens on the modern map of the city on 29 September 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker about the first restorations of the monuments on the Athenian acropolis on September 13, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker about the project Scattered Architectural Members on the Acropolis of Athens, 13 September 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker about the restoration of the Acropolis Walls on September 13, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker about the surface conservation of the Acropolis Monuments on September 13, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker of the Sacred Springs of the Dion (Archaeological Park) on October 10, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker of the Villa of Dionysos (Dion) on October 10, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker on the Acropolis about the restoration of the Erechtheion on September 13, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker on the Acropolis about the restoration of the Propylaea on September 13, 2020.jpg
- File:The site marker on the Acropolis about the restoration of the Temple of Athena Nike on September 13, 2020.jpg
- File:Πινακίδα στον Ορχομενό με πληροφορίες σχετικά με τα αποστραγγιστικά έργα της Λίμνης Κωπαϊδας από τους Μινύες, 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2020.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. {{NoFoP-Greece}} is not a magic tag to permit here images that infringe artists' (e.g. graphic artists, sculptors, or architects) copyrights. Moreover, it is just a problem tag and not a license tag (like {{FoP-Serbia}}) because there is no FOP license in the first place. COM:VRT method (correspondence from the authors of the underlying works like engravings and photographs) is a must as Greek copyright law does not allow FOP to digital/new media (Greek FOP is only permitted on mass media which are: TV, radio, newspaper, and other media of pre-Internet age). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Publicity photograph, widely published (https://denisehunterbooks.com/about.html), suspicious own work claim. MKFI (talk) 07:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Love Land
[edit]No freedom of panorama in South Korea, permission from the artist is required.
- File:Jeju Love Land Sign Board.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 25777786724.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 25777786744.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 25777788194.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 25777789254.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 25779885463.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26109792530.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26109792790.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26109796340.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26109796780.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26290281772.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26316418131.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26356736256.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26382617065.jpg
- File:Love Land at Jeju Island - 26382618365.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Jeju Love Land - 40627045404.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Jeju Love Land DSC09143.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Jeju Love Land DSC09144.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Love Land at Jeju Island - 26316423171.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Love Land at Jeju Island - 26356738626.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Love Land, Jeju Island - 25777791204.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Love Land, Jeju Island - 25779886643.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Love Land, Jeju Island - 26356737486.jpg
- File:Sclpture at Love Land, Jeju Island.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- I just imported from flickr. If there is no FOP then it is OK to delete. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is apparently the subject, photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 07:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mohammed VI Bridge
[edit]The bridge was completed in 2016. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Morocco, thus permission from the architect is required.
- File:Bridge M6 and dam.jpg
- File:Bridge M6 night.jpg
- File:Bridge M6 road.jpg
- File:Bridge M6 roadview.jpg
- File:Bridge M6 sideview.jpg
- File:Bridge M6.jpg
- File:Cantarat Salla 02.jpg
- File:Mohammed 6th Bridge.jpg
- File:Mohammed VI bridge.jpg
- File:Pont Mohammed VI 01.jpg
- File:Pont Mohammed VI 02.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep "It shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless (...) it is used for commercial purposes".[1-05-192/2006 Art.20] --Flaspec (talk) 10:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Flaspec, Commons requires that images be licensed for free use anywhere by anybody for any purpose including commercial use, so the Morocco FoP is not helpful. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Official video containing the bridge was published in Youtube by the Ministry of Equipment and Transport [9] under creative commons licence, thus it must be permitted by Moroccan copyright law. --Flaspec (talk) 08:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep It is not clear if the definition of architectural work in Moroccan law is covering non-building structures. Jklamo (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- This may or may not be true. We treat bridges in France as architecture. That may or may not be right, as they certainly are not architecture in most countries. However, if it is true, then it is possible that Morocco, a former French colony, treats them the same. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- The only assumption that bridge may be treated as architectural work per Morrocan copyright law because it is treated as architectural work per French copyright law and Morocco was a French colony is a pretty weak rationale for deletion. Moroccan copyright law does not define architectural work. Jklamo (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per Flaspec and Jklamo above; lack of recent discussion. (Note: Not intended to prejudge potential future renomination if additional information is found regarding Morocco copyright law concerning this bridge.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Previously published (https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/brand-connect/bhupesh-bansal-entrepreneur-shaping-the-digital-world-248961), apparently Facebook image (https://www.facebook.com/bhupesh.bansal210/). OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Previously published (https://stayhappening.com/e/masonboroorg-july-4th-island-clean-up-2021-E3LUSGPOEX56), OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a copyrighted video game. MKFI (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader has stated by email that he/she is the author of the game. @CaffeineWithdrawalGames: please send an OTRS verification of this, or have the screenshot on the game webpage with a free license and give that as a source. MKFI (talk) 17:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much MKFI for your assistance. I have uploaded a free license to the game webpage: https://web.archive.org/web/20210721160221/http://caffeinewithdrawalgames.com/presskit/index.php . Please let me know if there's anything else required to close this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaffeineWithdrawalGames (talk • contribs) 16:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep CC source provided. MKFI (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
'Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
These files were all found elsewhere on the internet, generally having Source populated wuth a URL, and Author set to "Unknown". They have CFreeUse or CC-BY-SA licenses, which do not appear on the source websites; many of the source websites are explicitly copyrighted and all would be presumed copyrighted. Some might be valid for PD-Old but each would require investigation into author and original publication, which were not provided by the uploader.
- File:John Behan IRISH.jpg
- File:Emanuel-swedenborg.jpg
- File:Swedenborg 20210704.png
File:Emigrants leaving Queenstown Ireland for New York 1874.jpg- File:NYC St. Patrick's Day Parade.jpg
- File:George Gordon & Paul Bogle.jpg
- File:Clip image002 0000-197x300-1.jpg
- File:Paul Bogle.jpg
- File:Paul Bogle Currency.jpg
File:Cotton famine 202105.jpg- File:Charles Heidsieck 20210509.jpeg
- File:Champagne Charlie 20210507.jpg
File:Trent-affair-large-56a61b353df78cf7728b5e1f.jpgFile:Trent affair 20210416.jpgFile:Antonov Aleksey 20210320.jpgFile:Ambrose Dudley Mann 20210317.jpg- File:Last Monglian Prince.jpg
- File:V2-2e7cfc8993807d6e4b045f3ef1af13ac b.jpg
File:Alexander Hamilton 2020.jpg- File:DW 1963.jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 20:42, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have deleted some which are clear copyright violations &/or false license claims. Others as mentioned may be PD for some reason or another; if actual source and proper free license information can be provided ok, but if not, Delete -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I've struck through 7 files which Broichmore has kindly investigated and properly tagged; they can be kept. -M.nelson (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Images copied from the internet with invalid claims of CC license. No original author or date provided so unable to determine if they're yet in the public domain.
-M.nelson (talk) 08:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep
- The first picture is now qualified as published in 1867.
- The second picture is family\company owned, it's featured as a genuine likeness on the cover of an upcoming book to be published on 1 Nov. 2021. Provenance is unknown although its been around the net for years. Perhaps the book will give more in it's credits. Its painted from life and the sitter died 3 February 1893. Broichmore (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Files found to be free-licensed, and source and license information corrected, Kept; the rest Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all smilies on commons? - No. --Itu (talk) 07:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done, there needs to be a more tangible evidence that there is a problem with five smilies in various costumes. Thuresson (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Derived from a file that was deleted due to copyright violation A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; relevant CV deleted file was File:"Village People" smiley (animated).gif -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Pope Francis Papal Visit - with Mercury LED Billboard (Plaza Miranda, Quiapo, Manila; 2015-01-16).jpg
[edit]Sought for second opinion at COM:Administrators' noticeboard regarding this file, I finally decide that this is a problematic image after all. The audiovisual work at electronic billboard (w:Balitanghali broadcast of Pope Francis during his papal visit here in 2015) is the intended element of this image. Though I was the one who transferred this from enwiki, it is time to set things straight. This is a COM:DW of the electronic billboard audiovisual content. This may not pass at enwiki too as it will be a useless file that won't pass w:Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that the copyrighted TV broadcast of the Pope is the main element of this image, exceeding de minimis use. -M.nelson (talk) 08:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 02:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Under copyright - 2019 © Archidiocèse de Kisangani Hyméros-(talk) 13:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Same reason than Antoine Alexis de Perier : this file is a photo of a family portrait that has been posted without my consent. I am the sole owner of this file and therefore request its immediate removal from Wikipedia / Wikicommons. François870 (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- François870: As noted on the Antoine Alexis Perier de Salvert request to delete, Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#MUSEUM seems to apply, so unless there is a valid claim that the painting was made by someone who was still alive in 1951 (depending upon the country where the painting was made) PD-art and PD-old-70 would apply. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I agree with Tcr25 - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: a) no valid reason for deletion, b) depicted is probably not Perier but Pierre de Rigaud, see tp. --Achim55 (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the Philippines. Subject is a building constructed from 1993-1999 and designed by Yolanda Reyes per the Registry of Intramuros Cultural and Historical Properties. Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Per COM:FOP Philippines only buildings completed prior to December 15, 1972 can be freely published. Photos of more recent buildings cannot be published because there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The building on this photo is built after mentioned date and therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 08:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no realistic source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as below COM:TOO Italy. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 08:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
"The screenshots are proof the photo is not copyrighted. I asked the eBay seller whether it has copyright marks on its back. He said it hasn't any." - sorry but we need a release from the photographer who took the photo or evidence that this is PD
- File:Radames Pera Grasshopper Aut.1.jpg
- File:Radames Pera Grasshopper (Pinterest) 576x781.jpg
- File:Radames Pera Grasshopper (Amazon).jpg
- File:Radames Pera Grasshopper (ICollector).jpg
- File:Radames Pera Grasshopper (Pinterest) 221x300.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: The photographs have no marks of copyright whatsoever nor any way to identify the author. They are from the same set of photos that included the Keye Luke and Philip Ahn's ones:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Keye_Luke_Master_Po_Kung_Fu.JPG
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phillip_ahn_as_kan.JPG
The only difference is that I didn't crop the Radames Pera's ones.
In these other files, the uploader explained the whole situation, which you can read there in all its extension; here I copy some excerpts:
"Publicity photos (star headshots) have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."
"There is a vast body of photographs, including but not limited to publicity stills, that have no notice as to who may have created them."
(The Professional Photographer's Legal Handbook By Nancy E. Wolff, Allworth Communications, 2007, p. 55.)
"Publicity Photos (star headshots) older publicity stills have usually not been copyrighted and since they have been disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain and therefore there is no necessity to clear them with the studio that produced them (if you can even determine who did)."
And the proof that they are publicity photos and not copyrighted are the copies that have autographs; it means the actor gave them freely at events. Even more, the actor uses that photo in one of his Twitter accounts:
https://twitter.com/_radames?lang=en
which has not been stricken with a copyright lawsuit, neither the multiple websites/magazines that have published the same photo. Maykiwi (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Maybe soms would consider publicity photos out of copyright. But the CC-BY-SA licence which is used on Commons is more then just free of charges. It means photos can be editted as anybody would like, and they can be used for commercial purposes. In general this is not allowed for publicity photos. Therefore these photos have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Restored version by Chowder ftw PB&J Otter ftl Talk 172.197.56.72 10:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
This video contains a typo of the word "Ghanaian", and a corrected version is online here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Who_will_be_the_Wikimedian_of_the_Year_2021--.webm I tried replacing the file but every time i tried the servers gave me an error. I filed a phabricator ticket request about this issue here https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T286976 Victorgrigas (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. Not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Under the Cuban copyright law, works are placed into the public domain after 70 years. The party was formed in 1965, so it has not been 70 years yet. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
There is no free Creative Commons license in Cuba that says that this image is in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence that the underlying copyright holder (Communist Party of Cuba) released it under a free license. It doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria at {{PD-Cuba}}. -M.nelson (talk) 19:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Well that’s not very in the spirit of communism. Dronebogus (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per M.nelson. Mysterymanblue 08:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per M.nelson. Even if the SVG file itself was created under cc-zero, the logo itself is still under full copyright by the government of Cuba under their copyright law (Law No. 14 of December 28, 1977 as amended up to 1994). If it is classified as the work of a legal entity such as the party itself (which is likely, as whomever created the logo probably signed those rights over), the copyright is held for an "unlimited duration" (and thus never runs out), unless the entity dissolves, in which case the copyright reverts to the state. Just as an addendum, however, I would recommend that:
- Any instances of the file on wikis be uploaded on those allowing local uploads and replaced on the articles involved (as the file is currently used on over 100 pages across multiple wikis) prior to deletion or immediately thereafter. I have already uploaded the file locally on enwiki for this purpose.
- File:Flag of the Communist Party of Cuba.jpg also be deleted, as it contains the copyrighted logo image. -HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 03:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
This file is a photo of a family portrait that has been posted without my consent (the photo was taken at my home!). I am the sole owner of this file and therefore request its immediate removal from Wikipedia / Wikicommons. François870 (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- François870: Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#MUSEUM this matter is between you and your guest. Since the subject of the painting lived in the 18th century and the art style is old, I'm assuming it's in the public domain. The photograph can only be deleted if the painting is copyrighted. Buidhe (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, image is in PD, per remark and link given by Buidhe. --Ellywa (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Extended metadata says that the file is not licensed under the OGL but instead under the MoD News License. File is tagged as licensed under the OGL but this is not correct. File at the MoD website says it is under the MoD News License. The MoD News license only allows the image to be used for "the reporting of current news only", so this image cannot be on commons. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 16:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The metadata refer to https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/crown-copyright-mod-news-licence . The terms show the image can only be used for current news, as described by Dreamy. --Ellywa (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a close copy of the obituary photo at https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/14746676.obituary---kenneth-fearon-professor-surgical-oncology/. It superimposes perfectly with the pose and head angle, the only differences I can see being squarer lenses on the glasses, and the artist giving Fearon a different (closed, thicker-lipped) mouth, either from a portrait of a different person, or added freehand. As a work based very closely on a single specific photograph, it's a COM:DERIV work which does not respect that photographer's copyright.
This was previously raised for deletion at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Stephencdickson in 2018, which was closed with "Kept: the ones based on a clearly PD picture, deleted the rest." - it may have been an oversight that this one wasn't deleted, given that no source was identified for it at the time. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Noting that the user has disputed this request on their user page saying I don't see the problem and To my opinion my drawing is sufficiently detached as to have no copyright issues and legal opinion I have received is that your own actions could be interpreted as open to breach of my rights to my intellectual property, but hasn't responded to a request to clarify at this deletion discussion how much of a copy it is. --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Not own work. The file has already been deleted twice Lesless (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, discussion and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Violation, source not CC HartmutWeb (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The video, from which this picture was taken, is private now but the Wayback Machine has an archived version. If you then open the HTML source by pressing Ctrl+U it says "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". —Dexxor (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Dexxor - the archive shows that it was once licensed under {{YouTube}} on Nov 30 2019. CC licenses are non-revokable. -M.nelson (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
O.Koslowski tagged this for speedy deletion: Screenshot reported as copyvio via ticket:2022031710006184. Dexxor (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above discussion. Dexxor (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
I know, this has been discused before, but was closed prematurely. In ticket:2022031710006184, this screenshort is reported as copyvio. In the previous discussion, a Wayback version of the youtube page was used as an argument to keep th video. However, since the video is no longer available, we cannot verify that this screenshot is from (CC-licensed) the video. This is not about revoking a license, it is about a license not having been given in the first place. O.Koslowski (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - per Dexxor above, we can verify that the Youtube video in the Internet Archive https://web.archive.org/web/20191130134445/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8Qfalh2GS4 was licensed with {{Youtube}} (specifically, the archived license [10]) by looking in the website's HTML source (in Firefox, right click on the page and click View Page Source), then CTRL+F for "Commons":
{"metadataRowRenderer":{"title":{"simpleText":"License"},"contents":[{"runs":[{"text":"Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)","navigationEndpoint":{"clickTrackingParams":"CKoBEM2rARgBIhMI1_-C5YiS5gIVpUBMCB1gZgmG","commandMetadata":{"webCommandMetadata":{"url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20191130134445/https://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons","rootVe":83769}},"urlEndpoint":{"url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20191130134445/https://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons"}}}]}]
- One can verify that this is how a CC license appears in a page's HTML by checking the same on a video which is currently CC licensed, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8tz1de-Cbg (only difference being that the URLs in the archive are appeneded with archived links), and by looking at any non-CC licensed Youtube video and verifying that the Creative Commons HTML does not exist. -M.nelson (talk) 10:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is not about the video itself being CC-licensed. It's about being able to verify that the image in question is from this CC-licensed video. You have explained how to verify that the video is CC licensed but failed to address the actual problem with this file. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Question @Q1q2q3qwertz, @Brackenheim, @Túrelio: In the file history it looks like you confirmed that the license was valid. Do you recall if, when doing so, you confirmed if the image came from the video? -M.nelson (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
- It's been a few days, but as far as I can remember, the image is from the video and it was released under an appropriate CC-license. That's why I once undid my deletion request. -- Brackenheim (talk) 23:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, of course it’s from that video, which was under an appropriate CC license. That’s why I uploaded it. We should definitely Keep it. -Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 04:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Well, Rezo says it isn't and will go the DMCA route instead. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be in a situation with your words against the words of a content creator (who fully understands and supports the CC). -- O.Koslowski (talk) 09:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- The same channel has other videos that were released under {{Youtube}} license which was later removed, e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20190619004155/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAaL5ZUI26E. I don't see any reason to believe the subject over our trusted contributors. -M.nelson (talk) 23:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Well, Rezo says it isn't and will go the DMCA route instead. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be in a situation with your words against the words of a content creator (who fully understands and supports the CC). -- O.Koslowski (talk) 09:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is not about the video itself being CC-licensed. It's about being able to verify that the image in question is from this CC-licensed video. You have explained how to verify that the video is CC licensed but failed to address the actual problem with this file. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022033010006373 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no OTRS for 30 days, can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Most likely copied from her LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sirisha-bandla/detail/photo/. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:NETCOPYVIO. I'm not able to access the linkedin page but the photo can be found on Tineye since 2018. -M.nelson (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, discussion and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
User-generated fake flag, not supported by any Lithuanian source. Such design of the horse rider (coat of arms) was never used officially by the Republic of Lithuania, especially with a red shield. Thus this file violates Wikipedia:HOAX, Wikipedia:OR, COM:NOTHOST.
Only these designs were officially used by the state, thus are legitimate coat of arms of Lithuania:
-
Coat of arms of Lithuania, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius -
Coat of arms of Lithuania, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius -
Coat of arms of Lithuania, created by Juozas Zikaras (used on Lithuanian coins)
,_coat_of_arms_of_Lithuania,_designed_by_Antanas_%C5%BDmuidzinavi%C4%8Dius.jpg)
.png)
-- Pofka (talk) 17:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Here is the source of the image. Is there an exact regulated image of the flag from 1918 to 1940? And was the flag always and everywhere the same? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- That source mentions "I have a photocopy of the text written by Wim Schuurman", which is not a proper source according to any judgement. For the flag to be sourced, find the actual article, not a mention of it - who knows what the article says if someone does not double-check it? That is the basis for verifiability. Due to the imposibility of verifiability, I advocate to delete this file. -- Itzhak Rosenberg (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- I believe that the very fact of publishing on the flag on such a well-known resource as crwflags.com already deserves to have this image on Wikimedia Commons. But whether it is correct or not - this should be reflected in the Wikipedia articles, and not here. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- That source mentions "I have a photocopy of the text written by Wim Schuurman", which is not a proper source according to any judgement. For the flag to be sourced, find the actual article, not a mention of it - who knows what the article says if someone does not double-check it? That is the basis for verifiability. Due to the imposibility of verifiability, I advocate to delete this file. -- Itzhak Rosenberg (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
See Stamp Lithuanian Vytis on Flags 1929. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- See Banknote 1000 litas. 1924. Nearby modern drawing. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- See also photo (the website of the Lithuanian Parliament). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Red shield in 1930-1940. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Although Liebert applies the Creative Commons license to open access journals, I don't think this one of them. At least it's not listed on this page: https://home.liebertpub.com/publications/by-type/journals-open-access/892 Ixfd64 (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete None of the articles from that volume/issue are tagged with a CC notice for DNA and Cell Biology. Open Access ones like Androgens specify that CC license. DNA and Cell Biology has a copyright notice. So, I agree this is not one of the journals released under a CC license. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:20, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment. --Ellywa (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure Kermit the Frog is above the threshold of originality. However, the original version of the file is fine. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Revert to original version - current version clearly reaches COM:TOO. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Revert to original and delete the versions with the beloved and copyrighted character Kermit. -M.nelson (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to original version, deleted copyrighted versions. --Ellywa (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Quite unclear who the original uploader or creator of the file is. Can be found elsewhere while at the same time I think that the file talk page should be taken into consideration too regarding the copyrights status of this photo. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The uploader commented at Undeletion Requests that they are not the photographer or copyright holder. If the uploader has permission to upload the photo, they should provide it to COM:VRT; if it happens after deletion, undeletion can be requested at COM:Undeletion requests. -M.nelson (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
As usual, user Лобачев Владимир continues to create/upload fake, historically inaccurate flags and coat of arms. This time he took a random illustration from a random website and uploaded it. It should be deleted to avoid confusion as it is historically inaccurate (colors were modified). Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.
-
The original image, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius
-
The original image, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius
-- Pofka (talk) 19:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Do you personally decide what is accurate and what is inaccurate? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Technically, all of these images are inaccurate, as the rider must be just white. The 1928 Constitution had the following description: "Article 8. State emblem: white horseman in a red field." The same description is preserved in the 1938 Constitution. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Do not try to escape from the fact that you uploaded a modified image, which was originally created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius (provided above). In addition to violation of COM:NOTHOST rule, it might also be a copyright violation because modified colors of a PD coat of arms doesn't automatically make the new version PD as well. Colorful images created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius were used officially as well and the original image is colorful, not white. Constitution of Lithuania states different things because you cite 1928 and 1938 Constitutions, while the coat of arms was created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius in 1918, so 10 years before the earliest constitution you cite. -- Pofka (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Until 1928, colors were not regulated at all. It is only known that the background is red and the rider is white. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Do not try to escape from the fact that you uploaded a modified image, which was originally created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius (provided above). In addition to violation of COM:NOTHOST rule, it might also be a copyright violation because modified colors of a PD coat of arms doesn't automatically make the new version PD as well. Colorful images created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius were used officially as well and the original image is colorful, not white. Constitution of Lithuania states different things because you cite 1928 and 1938 Constitutions, while the coat of arms was created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius in 1918, so 10 years before the earliest constitution you cite. -- Pofka (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Author uploaded this file with license:
|
According to the Republic of Lithuania Law on Copyright and Related Rights (passed on May 18, 1999 and amended 2010) Chapter II, Section 1:
Article 5. Works not Attributed to the Subject Matter of Copyright Copyright shall not apply to:
|
 |
|
| ||
However, this design of horse rider never was used officially by Lithuania, therefore it is just a random artwork which cannot be licensed with this PD license.
These horse riders are the only interwar period designs which were used officially by the state, thus can be licensed with this PD license:
-
The original image, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius
-
The original image, created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius
-- Pofka (talk) 19:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. This is an image of the coat of arms of the Republic of Lithuania. See {{PD-LT-exempt}}. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- See Lithuanian railways sign (geraldika.ru). Here is the state use of this coat of arms. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment Uploader attempts to deny a clear violation of PD-LT-exempt license tag in a Lithuanian topic with a Russian source. Seems like a very, very desperate move, which proves nothing. Deletion of this is a must because it is not covered under the PD-LT-exempt license. -- Pofka (talk) 15:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is not just a drawing. This is an image of the country's coat of arms. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Why are you constantly trying to discuss me and not the file? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There is a legal fallacy known as "riding two horses". Which horse do you claim the uploader is riding? If they're uploading official symbols of Lithuania, then these are (by statute) not copyrighted. If they're not such symbols, then they're the uploader's own creation, and they can license them how they like, with no copyvio. You can't have it both ways. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![278 File:"Village People" smiley.png](#File:"Village_People"_smiley.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Droneship.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_.png){kind=link}
_.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_October_10,_2020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_October_10,_2020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![18:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/07/20#c-BlinxTheKitty-2020-06-27T18:41:00.000Z-File:"Village_People"_smiley.png){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_576x781.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_221x300.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation; artist Erhardt Klonk died in 1984; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (01).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (02).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (03).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (04).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (05).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (06).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (07).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (08).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (09).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (10).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (11).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (12).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Fenster (13).jpg
- File:Gießen Johanneskirche Orgel.JPG
- File:Johanneskirche (Gießen) 19.JPG
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen (1).jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen (2).jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen, Fenster mit Orgel.jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen, großes Fenster1.jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen, großes Fenster2.jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen, kleines Fenster1.jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Gießen, kleines Fenster2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_19.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Martin Sg.: Could you please identify the artist? --AFBorchert (talk) 05:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per COM:EVID the uploader should proof the image can be used without copyright infringement. --Ellywa (talk) 18:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erhardt Klonk
[edit]Copyright violation; artist died in 1984; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Herforder Muenster Suedfenster.jpg
- File:Martinskirche Dautphe 026.JPG
- File:Martinskirche Dautphe 027.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No COM:FOP Germany; work will be PD in 2055. -M.nelson (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Can be undeleted in 71 years after 1984 so in 2055 .. --Ellywa (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Other version existed on the web 3 years prior to uploading on Commons. Seems to be an official photo, unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. If the uploader has permission, they should provide it to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
_Droneship.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Droneship.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that this version, or any of the other versions previously uploaded, are released under a free license by SpaceX. They are all recent images of the vehicle, too late for the CC-Zero-SpaceX template to be applicable. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
_Droneship.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
_Droneship.gif){kind=link}
I'm pretty sure the background image puts this above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- The background is of water and an indiscernible person. I don't think that goes above the threshold of originality. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- It's my understanding that photographs are "creative" enough to be copyrighted. But I could be wrong. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, imho this is above TOO, not a pure text logo, which could be in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
If you read this, the claimed source of that image, it does not seem to be free enough for Wiki Commons. Otherwisely, an OTRS-permission is needed, see COM:OTRS. Mosbatho (talk) 20:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of free license at the source -M.nelson (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark, no trace of free licence at https://www.presseportal.de/nutzungsrechte. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo was uploaded by me as work of an authority. After I got some comments about it, I am not sure any longer that it is an aloowed usage. I therefore want to have it deleted. Pascal Reuer (talk) 20:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The photo was uploaded by me as work of an authority. After I got some comments about it, I am not sure any longer that it is an aloowed usage. I therefore want to have it deleted. Pascal Reuer (talk) 20:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
artist died in 1957 COPYVIO Martin Sg. (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Artist died in 1957; undelete in 2028 per COM:GERMANY. -M.nelson (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. Can be undeleted in 71 years after 1957 so in 2028 .. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Superseded by File:2019 JTWC 29W forecast map.wp2919.gif, is not own work as claimed so questionably licensed and probably no-permission, any potential sources have not been found. Sennecaster (talk) 21:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. This is an image of ATCF (see logo bottom right) . the Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System, a website of US Navy. The image falls in PD of US gov. --Ellywa (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Coaching at Kitchee SC, of the Hong Kong Premier League.jpg
- File:Judan Ali while studying 'Coaching Philosophy' at Die Mannschaft.jpg
Didym (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not explain copyright situation or authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
No data for the creator nor the creation date. It's not produced in the USA, we can't apply that license as well. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Neither the original creator nor the creation date is known. We can't say if it's a public domain or not. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I have just uloaded a new version of this file which is more accurate. Conty (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Conty, can you please provide a link to the newer version, thanks, Ellywa (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator did not show the new version. If this can be shown, please nominate this file again for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
I have just uloaded a new version of this file which is more accurate. Conty (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Conty, can you please provide a link to the newer version, thanks, Ellywa (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator did not show the new version. If this can be shown, please nominate this file again for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
I have just uloaded a new version of this file which is more accurate (see it HERE) Conty (talk) 12:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: file is in use on the Swedish wikipedia. --Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 31 July 2022 (UTC)