Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 12th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious size, no exif information. Seems not uploader's own work. (^・ェ・^) (talk) 00:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted (non-sysop closed): Deleted by Magog the Ogre. --(^・ェ・^) (talk) 00:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me being publicly displayed 157.48.166.236 05:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Press photo Victuallers (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Spam. --Achim (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has no content and was a test run Southern Rural Development Center (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is not valid. this file is outdated 89.81.216.8 13:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nonsense. Keep as a historical image. Upload a more recent image if you have a properly-licensed one. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this picture was taken and published without authorization of lcl DURAN. There is not any historical interest of any kind since the post has been canceled. 2001:861:4D80:DFE0:B0E5:8F6E:524:4867 18:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری فارس گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 오대경 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Raw text without educational use.

SCP-2000 06:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The uploader has been locked because of spam-only account. SCP-2000 11:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 오대경 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

SCP-2000 03:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 오대경 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

SCP-2000 11:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kkkkkkkkkkkkk Augusto de' Villa (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte, finde die Negative nicht, bin mir nun nicht sicher ob sie vonmir sind! Daher bitte Löschen Bybbisch94 (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urheberverstoß - Bitte sofort löschen! --Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte, finde die Negative nicht, bin mir nun nicht sicher ob sie vonmir sind! Daher bitte Löschen Bybbisch94 (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urheberverstoß - Bitte sofort löschen! --Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte, finde die Negative nicht, bin mir nun nicht sicher ob sie vonmir sind! Daher bitte Löschen Bybbisch94 (talk) 19:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urheberverstoß - Bitte sofort löschen! --Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte, finde die Negative nicht, bin mir nun nicht sicher ob sie vonmir sind! Daher bitte Löschen Bybbisch94 (talk) 19:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urheberverstoß - Bitte sofort löschen! --Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ClickTyphoon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User appears to be using Commons as a COM:WEBHOST.

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Private photo, not in used A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Private photo, not in use A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dienmattroi96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

used for x-wiki spam

Minoraxtalk 04:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational value is not shown. The file can be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 06:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating all files of "Category:Shadow of Judgefloro" as possibly out of COM:SCOPE (and the manner of categorization means these are leaning towards COM:WEBHOST). I also sought for second opinion here before conducting this deletion request. Other than that these are images of random street scenes that are already redundant to numerous ones found in categories of roads / streets. All are unused too.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ancsav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, all need permission

Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement Velma (talk) 10:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement, out of scope. Velma (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eknapress (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but most have author details in EXIF - incl Author THILL Arthur ATP, © A1GP Team Switzerland - Copyri etc. All need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete Prakhar1336 (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfpromotion Lotje (talk) 13:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Unused private photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joba Ojelabi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files are legitimate brand identity materials shared by the literary organization; Agbowo under CreativeCommons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joba Ojelabi (talk • contribs) 21:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope, non-notable for education. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a non-free album cover (enwiki has it as such: en:File:How You Like That CD.jpg) only question would be if it falls under COM:TOO Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZO TYB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The metadata credit Nathalie Guyon/FTV. The uploader does not appear to be the copyright owner.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZO TYB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - all from the same set, some (all?) elsewhere before up (e.g., File:Oui-4176.jpg is here) and uploader has significant copyvio history related to this subject

Эlcobbola talk 18:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 06:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author hamza bhatti Copyright holder hamza bhatti". Attributed to APP in https://tribune.com.pk/story/2277646/amazing-pakistan-a-safe-place-for-foreign-tourists-eu-envoy. MKFI (talk) 06:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious own work claim: small resolution, cropped version available in https://www.wordsandworldsmagazine.com/archive-1/fall-issue-2016-herbst-ausgabe-2016/basir-sultan-kazmi/. MKFI (talk) 06:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a Facebook image, but I could not confirm without an account. Lower resolution uncropped version available in https://www.tapology.com/fightcenter/fighters/211919-elise-pone-the-peace MKFI (talk) 06:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope trivial screenshot, unused since 2013 George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LinkedIn image: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-briggs-jr-4a0088142 MKFI (talk) 06:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available in https://www.ethanlustig.com/contact.html. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 06:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rabin machinery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: promotional, advertisement

4nn1l2 (talk) 22:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 00:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Blackcat. --Minoraxtalk 10:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark indicates a copyrighted image Bozs (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark indicates a copyrighted image Bozs (talk) 01:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painfully low quality photograph of chocolate truffles at the French Laundry. We have a lot better photographs of quality regarding this specific subject - chocolate truffles at the French Laundry - here. This one is so blurry it's hard to see it being of educational value. Missvain (talk) 04:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is sourced from the Tasnim news agency, but that licence explicitly says the image must be watermarked, or a CC licence declared at the source page, neither of which is true. Amakuru (talk) 10:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Blackcat. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mobile web screen capture, apparently uploaded by mistake. -- Tuválkin 19:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a holiday album of unknown people - same for File:2005 11 06 Prága 064 (51080482423).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 062 (51081272212).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 050 (51081272227).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 103 (51081178961).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 277 (51080482263).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 304 (51081272012).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 475 (51080482143).jpg, File:2005 11 06 Prága 474 (51011994930).jpg. There are thousands of other good quality photos from Prague. Pibwl (talk) 19:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [1]

G I Chandor (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. [2]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an original work by {{Mehr}} SsMmNn (talk) 14:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری مهر گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Ahmadtalk 23:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an original work by {{Mehr}} SsMmNn (talk) 14:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری مهر گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Ahmadtalk 23:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری مهر گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not a work by Mehr. --Ahmadtalk 00:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. --Ahmadtalk 00:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری موج گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Moj News is not the copyright holder of the photo. --Ahmadtalk 00:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. --Ahmadtalk 00:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری مهر گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Mehr News is not the copyright holder of the photo. --Ahmadtalk 00:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری مهر گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Mehr News is not likely to be the copyright holder of the photo. --Ahmadtalk 00:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. --Ahmadtalk 00:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. --Ahmadtalk 00:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. --Ahmadtalk 00:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. --Ahmadtalk 00:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 00:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 00:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

練習用だと思って、適当に選んでしまいました 153.125.120.159 17:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 01:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear this was self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chronus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chronus (talk) 01:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Chronus (talk) 01:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://m.cifraclub.com.br/ultramen/ .   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by JuTa. --Minoraxtalk 08:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baumwurzel123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author www.rammler.com Copyright holder foto@rammler.com per exif, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work of a banner containing the image of Jorge Allan Rodriguez Tengco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is overexposed, better version is available in same category Sardaka (talk) 09:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These tarpaulins are derivative works as these incorporate underlying images. Missing COM:OTRS permissions from either the production companies of these 2D works or the photographer of the underlying image (as in the case of the funeral tarpaulin of Joselito Tengco). Also these are out of COM:SCOPE.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue (standing statue of Uesugi Kenshin in Joetsu) was erected in 1969. [3]

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Japan. The statue (statue of Uesugi Kenshin on a horse in Joetsu) was erected in 1990. [4]

G I Chandor (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Japan. The statue (sitting statue of Uesugi Kenshin in Uesugi Shrine) was erected in 1974. [5] [6]

G I Chandor (talk) 05:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Uesugi Kenshin (ja:上杉謙信) at en:Jōetsumyōkō Station (ja:上越妙高駅) was created by Toshiro Mineta (ja:峯田敏郎). [7] He is alive. [8] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from a printed material. We can see dots. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. http://davmidnapore.org/ ArnabSaha (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kolforn as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope Kolforn (talk) 07:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC) However, this file is used on the user page of the uploader. AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --JuTa 20:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 17:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. https://www.facebook.com/AmarMedinipur/photos/469731566433595 ArnabSaha (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

source matches uploaders username so I think we can AGF. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hope then please remove the Deletion requests for the image.. Shall be good Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 06:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It will be removed when the discussion here is closed, but a link will be put on the talk page, so that the same request isn't made by somebody else. –LPfi (talk) 12:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, shall wait. But shall be good if resolved soon. As this is a photograph of a very important place. Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 17:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you suggest when this deletion nomination will close Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 16:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. I highly doubt we'd be seeing black and white photography in 2020 so delete. The uploader also has a history with copyvios too. SHB2000 (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedia relies on facts. Please visit the Facebook post where the photo credit has been given to me by mentioning Photographer- Mainak Chatterjee, Who is the same person who has uploaded the image on Wikipedia.
    Also your statement of whether you doubt seeing black and white photography in 2020 is not relevant with this deletion request.
    I would also like to bring attention to the people commenting here that the user @SHB2000 has history of unnecessary file move and misuse of privileges. Majority of which gets rejected and several gets reported. I would like to bring to notice of one such incident of the user which is reported to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems [9] Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 15:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Those file moves are wholly irrelevant to copyvios. And it seems you still don't understand that copyvios land you in legal trouble. SHB2000 (talk) 22:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    And although I don't need to be defending myself against those file move (singular), I'll do it anyway. That was only one move, and I did have a good reason to move the file. None of those were rejected because I am the one moving them, meaning I don't need to ask anyone in the first place to move them, I can just move them myself, and only that one file was frowned upon by Ymblanter.
    But that's wholly irrelevant to copyvios and this is getting off topic. Copyvios can land you in legal trouble since it is theft of someone else's photo. File moves don't. SHB2000 (talk) 03:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Copyright violations are not theft, as no thing is taken away from the owner. It is a question on how the benefits of a work shall be distributed between author, contracting partners and the public.
    But to the point: you wouldn't have "Airtel Internet" on a photo taken in the days of black and white film. You can change settings on modern cameras to get black and white and you cab still buy black and white film for your old camera, and you can change the colours afterwards. –LPfi (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Technically you've still stole the image off the owner, just a copy of it. But the uploader has a long history of copyvios though. SHB2000 (talk) 00:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per remarks of uploader Mainakchatterjee.tech. --Ellywa (talk) 16:48, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The quality of this photograph if so bad that I can't even tell what it is. We have tons of high quality photographs of desserts, including those from the French Laundry. I can't feasibly see how this can be used in a project for educational purposes. Missvain (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, blurry photograph of ice cream? at the French Laundry. We have many, high quality, photographs of ice cream from the French Laundry and in general, including the same shape. I cannot see how this photograph, of such poor quality, can be used for educational purposes in our projects. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality recreation of File:Acre rio Branco (133).jpg with bogus authorship claim Эlcobbola talk 17:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, blurry image of macarons. We have tons of high quality photographs of this subject - including those at the French Laundry. The low quality aspect of this image makes it hard for me to see its value in our projects when it is superceded by way better images of the subject. Missvain (talk) 17:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete quality Andy Dingley (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:2020-21 Eleven Football Pro vs Safa 01.jpg Nehme1499 (talk) 20:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of potentially non-free artwork. VRT permission required. Ahmadtalk 20:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Special:PermaLink/574807753#File:48Victoria Santiago Tengco.jpg. Ahmadtalk 21:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nomination and per the discussion at COM:VP/C. Also, we in the Philippines have no any applicable freedom of panorama of any sort. And while the amendment containing FOP provision is now pending in the Congress, the wording implies it is applicable only to permanent works. Banners are not permanent artworks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G1 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find the declared CC-BY-SA 3.0 license on the source page. Ankry (talk) 23:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission received and verified. --Minoraxtalk 08:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical mistake (extraneous negative charge), low quality. A high quality alternative is File:Methyl lauryl sulfate.svg. Marbletan (talk) 15:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Looks like this file was copied from an uncited source since the uploader tried to remove the background. The geometry around the sulfate group is incorrect as well. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 11:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری مهر گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Mehr News is not likely to be the copyright holder of the photo. --Ahmadtalk 23:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نسخه بهتری از آن به صورت جداگانه بارگذاری شده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear non-Persian speakers: "A better version of it is uploaded separately." and "The photo was not taken by Tasnim News Agency.". --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم گرفته نشده است. SsMmNn (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". --Ahmadtalk 23:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像が暗かった為 153.125.120.159 17:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 05:48, 21 July 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 14:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rangkan Ju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official portrait type photos claimed as own work. Unlikely, one may be own work but who knows

Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license plate!! and not the old landmarked building!! es ist weder das Denkmalgeschützte Haus abgebildet, noch ist das rechtens, dass das Nummernschild von dem Auto auf dem Bild zu sehen ist!!! Chiara010396 (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

license plate!! and not the old landmarked building!! es ist weder das Denkmalgeschützte Haus abgebildet, noch ist das rechtens, dass das Nummernschild von dem Auto auf dem Bild zu sehen ist!!! Darüberhinaus bin ich auf dem Fot zu sehen!! Unbedingt löschen!!! Ich habe NICHT zugestimmt, mein Foto auf Wikipedia zu haben!!

Infrigment of personality rights; no consent of dipicted person!!

DELETION Chiara010396 (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Habe Chiara gerade eine mail geschrieben. Jetzt warten wir erst mal ab, was die anderen Wikipedianer dazu meinen. Ansonsten muß das Bild halt gelöscht werden. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DAS IST UNS ZIEMLICH EGAL WAS ANDERE WIKIPEDIANER DAZU SAGEN!!! DAS BILD GEHÖRT GELÖSCHT. ICH SETZE EINE LETZTE FRIST BIS ZUM 10. AUGUST 2021. DANACH GEHE ICH ZU MEINEM RECHTSANWALT!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiara010396 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiara010396, die ursprüngliche Fassung des Fotos wurde gelöscht. In der nun verbliebenen Fassung ist weder das Auto noch die Silhouette eines Menschen zu sehen. Für den Rest gilt die Panoramafreiheit. --Túrelio (talk) 16:34, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I declined speedy deletion request. The regular DR is needed here. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have now cropped away the section with the car (license plate) and retouched the section where one could, with a lot of effort, possibly recognize the silhouette of a person. IMO, with the current version of the image there shouldn't be any even remote problems. --Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't show the landmark. The other foto shows the landmark, but this ist mostly our house, so I don't accept this! Das zeigt nicht das Baudenkmal, sondern ein anderes Haus. Das andere Foto ist völlig ausreichend! Das ist eine Frechheit und völlig irreführend. Wenn das 2. Foto nicht bis zum 10. gelöscht ist, gehe ich zu meinem Rechtsanwalt. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:C2:3700:E59F:D178:1250:3FF2:2C3A (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chiara, geh bitte zu deinem Rechtsanwalt und lass dir die Rechtslage erklären. Wir hatten schon zig solche Löschanträge und sehen deswegen die Angelegenheit ganz gelassen. Im Übrigen ist eine derart massive Androhung irgendwelcher juristischer Konsequenzen sogar ein hinreichender Grund, dein Benutzerkonto zu sperren. Mach ich jetzt aber nicht. Gruß, Achim (talk) 14:53, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Original version complained about has been revision-deleted, a cropped & edited version is online now. --Achim (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These signboards have artworks. No FoP in Japan for 2D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears multiple places on Google, no indication that this is the uploader's own work 100.15.116.223 00:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The above IP is me, I didn't realize I wasn't logged in. Etzedek24 (but on Commons!) (talk) 00:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif show the origin source is Facebook, seems not uploder's own work. (^・ェ・^) (talk) 00:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my image. The source is https://vladimirnovosselov.com, who gave me permission to upload this. (Weylan) (talk) 00:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Weylan: You can send emial to COM:VRT to verify this. (^・ェ・^) (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~I have sent the email. Please remove your request. (talk) 00:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

perCOM:VRT, we need VRT members to confirm that the authorization is valid before removing. (^・ェ・^) (talk) 00:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: VRTS accepted. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is User:Kantilang the same person as Dino Eleazar of Cantilan Historical Preservation Movement (as indicated in the watermark), or not? Note that copyright remains with the person who actually took the image, and not the person owning the image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the real Alex Holmes. The person in the existing picture has no affiliation with Alex Holmes. I can produce you with his real picture. He is a close friend of mine and he saw this page and seriously like to change the photo. 77elexise (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per User:Schwede66's great work. --Missvain (talk) 18:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (photograph) of a flag that is inexplicably copyrighted in the origin country, Australia. Not de minimis as the flag takes up the entire photo and is clear focus of the image. See Category:Australian_Aboriginal_flag_related_deletion_requests. Thespoondragon (talk) 02:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of these images is the post-renovation (post-2005) south side of the building, which is radically different from the former south side that dates to 50s (see w:Government Palace (Mongolia)). Regrettably, there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Mongolia which legalizes commercial licensing and reuses of images of works by still living or recently dead artists, architects, etc..

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has commericial FOP for buildings and 3D art. Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept as per community and can be used in User Namespaces in any way. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 16:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of these images is the post-renovation (post-2005) south side of the building, which is radically different from the former south side that dates to 50s (see w:Government Palace (Mongolia)). Regrettably, there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Mongolia which legalizes commercial licensing and reuses of images of works by still living or recently dead artists, architects, etc.. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 03:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of these images is the post-renovation (post-2005) south side of the building, which is radically different from the former south side that dates to 50s (see w:Government Palace (Mongolia)). Regrettably, there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Mongolia which legalizes commercial licensing and reuses of images of works by still living or recently dead artists, architects, etc.. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D art and buildings. Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. Note that this is part of the new south side (2005) of the Government Palace which is radically different from the original south side that is lacking of public art (w:Government Palace (Mongolia)). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Government Palace, Ulan Bator.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 18:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Mongolia. 84.61.139.62 19:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DM SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see it as de minimis. Nearly everything on this photo are works of living or recently-deceased authors: the new (post-renovation or post-2005) south side of the Government Palace and the statues of Genghis Khan and his generals, which were not existing in the older (50s era) façade. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete @Blackcat: Please note that De minimis can't work in Mongolia, even it's small and not topic, reproduction of that thing can only be limited to non-profit purposes, which against our COM:L. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: whether Mongolian DM is ok or not, that is out of the topic now, as almost all of objects here - the 2005 south face and the statue of Genghis Khan within - are copyrighted. Perhaps the equestrian statue is also copyrighted too - it is absent in the older photo that I linked in my rationale. What was only there was the former mausoleum from 50s that was demolished in 2005 during the extensive renovation of the palace. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's a RfD that backs 9 years from now, I'm pretty sure you'll excuse me if I don't remember why I called it DM. If there are new facts that justify the deletion, I won't oppose. -- Blackcat 09:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for buildings and 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. No FoP in Japan.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are these minimal? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept one as per User:Benzoyl. P 1 9 9   17:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in Japan for artistic works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia for commercial uses of depictions of protected works. This sculpture is part of the post-2005 (post-renovation) south side of the Government Palace. Compare with the 50s-era south side, which is lacking of such sculptures. See also information at w:Government Palace (Mongolia). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia for commercial uses of depictions of protected works. This sculpture is part of the post-2005 (post-renovation) south side of the Government Palace. Compare with the 50s-era south side, which is lacking of such sculptures. See also information at w:Government Palace (Mongolia). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 02:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Botchan and Madonna (ja:坊ちゃんマドンナの像) in Matsuyama was created by Isao Tabata (ja:田畑功). [10] He is alive. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still within the 50 p.m.a. of China. No indication of a free license release. Lackland123 (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is from Associated Press. No indication of its free license and release to public domain. 122.178.229.34 03:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry AmanChetry08 (talk) 03:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Este archivo cumple una función descriptiva utilizada en artículos y/o anexos en Wikimedia, pensado para plantillas como Plantilla:Camisetas en Wikipedia. Sugiero que revises bien la imagen ya que lo que pueden parecer figuras borrosas, son más bien bordes así como se ve en gráficos similares. Gracias. Manuel Balarezo (talk) 04:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Christ was sculpted by artist José Antonio Hernández Navarro in 2006. Unfortunately, Spanish freedom of panorama only covers outdoors, and this image under a commercial license may infringe sculptor's exclusive rights over his 3D religious artwork. There is no tangible evidence that Luiselche1989 obtained COM:OTRS permission of correspondence from the sculptor. It is also unlikely that Luiselche1989 is the artist José Antonio Hernández Navarro himself. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. The author, architect Jørn Utzon, died in 2008, and this work of architecture is still under his posthumous copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruff tuff cream puff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is highly likely that this is a screenshot taken from a TBV show either presented by the subject or having them as a guest. It has a similar studio background to YouTube videos of the subject, and is thus of doubtful provenance. A correct assertion of ownership of copyright and permission to use this picture is required at COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:30, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal Baratiiman (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,
It would be highly appreciated if you could provide me the reason of your request for deletion of this file.
For your information, I am the originator/creator of this Artwork based on my own feeling of the simplicity of the past vs. dark complexity of the present.
درود بر شما دوست گرامی
بسیار سپاسگزار خواهم بود اگر لطف فرموده و دلیل درخواست حذف این عکس را بفرمایید
جهت اطلاع، این تابلو اثر خودم میباشد بر اساس احساس شخصی خودم اذ سادگی های گذشته در مقایسه با پیچیدگیهای تاریک امروزه Aria Moayerian (talk) 16:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal Baratiiman (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,
It would be highly appreciated if you could provide me the reason of your request for deletion of this file.
For your information, I am the originator/creator of this Artwork based on my own interpretation of the poem "Ey Sareban" on the copper sheet which is adapted of a picture of an old man captured by an unknown photographer.
درود بر شما دوست گرامی
بسیار سپاسگزار خواهم بود اگر لطف فرموده و دلیل درخواست حذف این عکس را بفرمایید
جهت اطلاع، این تابلو اثر خودم میباشد بر اساس برداشت شخصی خودم از شعر ای ساربان بر روی صفحه مسی با الهام گرفتن از عکس یک پیرمرد که عکاس آن ناشناس میباشد Aria Moayerian (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal Baratiiman (talk) 06:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,
It would be highly appreciated if you could provide me the reason of your request for deletion of this file.
For your information, I am the originator/creator of this Artwork based on my own vision of the general architecture of cities located in deserts of Iran.
درود بر شما دوست گرامی
بسیار سپاسگزار خواهم بود اگر لطف فرموده و دلیل درخواست حذف این عکس را بفرمایید
جهت اطلاع، این تابلو اثر خودم میباشد بر اساس نوع نگاه شخصی خودم از معماری شهرهای واقع شده در کویرهای ایران Aria Moayerian (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of a U.S, Federal Government employee: merely being posted to a Library of Congress web page does not magically make things public domain. This is the book jacket photograph seen on his 2004 book On Paradise Drive, credited to James Hamilton, copyright Simon & Schuster. Also seen at Brooks' Simon & Schuster author page --Animalparty (talk) 07:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. See same request Микола Василечко (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. See same request Микола Василечко (talk) 09:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. See same request Микола Василечко (talk) 09:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. See same request Микола Василечко (talk) 09:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the file was only used to illustrate an issue on a template talk page Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 09:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The large white fox statue named "Yuta" (ja:ゆう太) at en:Yudaonsen Station (ja:湯田温泉駅) was built in 平成2年 (=1990). [11] [12] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Jofuku (en:Xu Fu, ja:徐福) at the Jofuku Park (ja:徐福公園) in Wakayama Prefecture was erected in 1997. [13] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source Malvoört (talk) 12:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source / no permission Malvoört (talk) 12:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source / no permission Malvoört (talk) 12:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source / no permission Malvoört (talk) 12:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced picture. It's even dubious if this is Kösem. Beshogur (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miguelsancheziiiii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promotional usage, real state stores, no repository, no relevant

Triplecaña (talk) 13:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copied from here and it's unlikely licenced for free use. Puppe100 (talk) 13:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SS, please see the word "Live" at the top left A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this picture because I uploaded this same picture in my previous account in Wikipedia Blackgate2003 (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree game avatar screenshot Darubrub (Inform me) 14:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PCP I decided to nominate this image for deletion. This image seems not to be the uploader's own work; it comes from any "news" site. In addition there is a clear "watermark" on the bottom of the image. Mosbatho (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering. YouTube channel is "an educational project of an encyclopedic character" ("projeto de educacional de caráter enciclopédico") relationed to national cinema, not the film's production company (Querosene Filmes). YouTube uploader does not own the underlying copyright to the film or trailer, and thus cannot license it freely or otherwise. Эlcobbola talk 15:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BUT, this picture from the same channel was not been deleted
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Giovanna_Lancellotti.jpg#mw-jump-to-license — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrunoHomble (talk • contribs) 16:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is OTHERSTUFF. Feel free to nominate other problematic images for deletion. Эlcobbola talk 16:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering. YouTube source merely reuploaded an ad of which it is not the author. The video was, for example, here in 2014, well before source channel's 2020 upload. Эlcobbola talk 15:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The channel from YouTube, Costa Rebelo, he is the director from those vídeos. That's why he posted. https://br.linkedin.com/in/costarebelo — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrunoHomble (talk • contribs) 16:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Being the director has nothing to do with being the copyright holder. By way of example, do you believe Steven Spielberg holds the copyright to Jaws? Эlcobbola talk 16:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering. YouTube source merely reuploaded an ad of which it is not the author. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mayana Neiva.jpg for same issue from this channel. Эlcobbola talk 15:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The channel from YouTube, Costa Rebelo, he is the director from those vídeos, the scenes. That's why he posted. https://br.linkedin.com/in/costarebelo — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrunoHomble (talk • contribs) 16:10, 12 July 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]
Being the director has nothing to do with being the copyright holder. By way of example, do you believe Steven Spielberg holds the copyright to Jaws? Эlcobbola talk 16:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. And COM:DW of copyrighted video. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image by mistake. Nitesh003 (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo too blurred too be useful, there are a lot of photos of Luc Abalo that are better LeFnake (talk) 16:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that yesican.gov is a website under US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This "drawing" is clearly based on the photography "The Jimi Hendrix Experience performing at London’s Marquee Club in 1967 Photograph" by Marc Sharrat/Rex Shutterstock (see https://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/oct/27/jimi-hendrix-forms-double-act-handel-london-museum).

It is a derivative work of a protected picture, therefore, it a copyright violation. Remember that Re-drawing does not avoid copyright infringement.

See Copyright rules by subject matter: Photographs can be copyrighted. A drawing made from a copyrighted photograph is a derivative work; such a drawing can be published only if the copyright owner of the underlying photograph has given his express consent.. Gusama Romero </talk> 16:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not personal work : copyrighted (by Liza Monet - twitter) Hyméros-(talk) 16:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for statues. Created in 2003 by 田中文彌 (1944–2018). MGA73 (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyvio (from https://www.nickjamesphotography.co.uk/info/ ) BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is Eduard Selleke, still copyrighted WikedKentaur (talk) 17:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. https://www.edufever.com/midnapore-homoeopathic-medical-college/ ArnabSaha (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. ArnabSaha (talk) 17:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. https://directory.edugorilla.com/school/serampore-girls-high-school-serampore-hooghly-fee-structure-syllabus-address-admission-form-contact-number/ ArnabSaha (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is named as such (named after the public domain monument), but the image shows a copyrighted building (a mall or supermarket that was established during early 2010s). See also COM:FOP Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim & out of project scope: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history, COM:PENIS 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems unlikely to be the uploader's "own work", and is more probably an image found somewhere else (Tineye: https://tineye.com/search/a848f1f78e99e51b43fd1399b532cee0f3b6b620?sort=score&order=desc&page=1) At the very least proof of ownership should be required. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has "SOURCE" watermark in top-left corner, likely a screenshot from TV/video rather than the uploader's own photo. -M.nelson (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nanning Metro Logo.svg; put back before the community  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted map. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not realistically useful for an educational purpose Rojelio (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted map. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dr.Wiki54 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All uploads of this user are taken by mobile telephone and with some effects/ Also have bad qualities. I think they are not useful for Wikipedia. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violence. He died in 2018 so this photo is not in PD Mạnh An (talk) 23:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful to be own work, clearly a scan a printing (probably from a book) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. And some are clearly not own work, because uploader is subject of the photo.

P 1 9 9   15:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These seem to be of a notable roller skater, e.g., [15] and [16], could be used in an article in the future. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these photos don't appear to be own work so permission for these should be send to Commons:OTRS. If that doesn't happen, these photos should be deleted. Multichill (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That hasn't been asked for from the uploader in the last decade - and still doesn't seem to have been requested on their talk page. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close: I will redo the DR's to give more specific deletion rationales for individual files. --P 1 9 9   20:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work, because uploader is subject of the photo and transmission code in some EXIF data. Needs COM:OTRS.

P 1 9 9   20:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and @P199: please keep the discussion in one place, splitting it across multiple pages (particularly without pinging those that participated above) really doesn't help. Mike Peel (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Professional photos of the uploader, presumably copyrighted. Would need OTRS proof from the copyright owner. -M.nelson (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note that no-one has asked the uploader for OTRS for the last *decade*, let alone during this deletion debate... Mike Peel (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Irrelevant. An image with copyright concern will get nominated for deletion irrespective of how long ago it was uploaded. The uploader has now received notification of this DR on his talk page and now has an opportunity to reply or submit an OTRS. No different than all the other DR's that require OTRS. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I would normally let images of this age with no conclusive proof either way slide, but the problem here is that the uploader appears to be the subject and the photos do not appear to be selfies. --King of ♥ 03:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per above, the subject of the photo is the uploader. Since the photo isn't a selfie, it must have been taken by someone other than the subject/uploader, and the Own Work claim is invalid. We need permission from the photographer through COM:VRT.

-M.nelson (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Variious railway categories

[edit]

This deletion request relates the following categories that were nominated to speedy deletion under wrong reasons like being wrong names or too long and that might cause confusion and error, but were reverted by me as being wrong: So  Keep for the followng reasons.



You cannot just create a redirecting category for every name you find on the Internet. You will find a lot. Are you going to create 40 categories? Please, just be sensible. Neither Commons is the place nor redirecting categories are the way to explain that there are several references with several names.

I now list all the redirecting categories that this user has created and that have been already deleted after. This way, everyone can see this subject just responds to the obsessive behaviour of the user Tm. When an admin deletes one category, he just creates another useless and redundant one.

This user has a long history of disruptive, arrogant and obsessive behaviour. He brings good value here, but his behaviour sometimes is not normal. I was told by other user: "I assure you, it is not something personal against you. User TM has a... particular vision of Wikipedia, which he seeks to maintain at all costs, and unfortunately his behavior has been disrespectful of the wishes and collaborations of others. He considers large portions of Commons and some Wikipedia articles as his personal property, and only some users with a higher rank (administrators, supervisors and bureaucrats) or a similar volume of contributions can stand up to him". I don't think this is aceptable.

--Lojwe (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Comment Again you make several claims with zero sources to back you up.
First, saying that a "name was discouraged in Spanish Wikipedia cause it may lead readers to error", maybe its better for you to say that to the spanish state as in their laws they call this line as línea férrea La Fuente de San Esteban-La Fregeneda-Barca de Alba or used by the European Federation of Associations of Industrial and Technical Heritage in spanish.
"Linha Internacional de Barca d’Alva a La Fregeneda e a Salamanca" is cited in portuguese article with 2 sources, per above, so the "argument" that this name is used because i showed it down other users yhroats is fully erroneous, as you know pretty well it was talked in the discussion page, but facts dont stop you saying that kind of things. If this names are so confusing then why did you add, a month ago, the names "Línea Barca de Alba-Salamanca" and "Línea Oporto-Salamanca", the last one, using your arguments, a even worst as it compreends the portuguese "Linha do Douro"? Why your double standards? If its me that add a name to the portuguese Wikipedia can be, by your standards, bullying, what are your addictions of similar names to spanish wikipedia?is what.
The other names were discussed in the portuguese article and are equally valid, but again, even after i opened this deletion request merely stating facts, you again attack my character, i feel free to point out why you should not be much trusted about your actions, but what can be expected from someone that
1- Fails to quote properly the locations of the train station even when presented with a source
2- Made the claim that the builders and operators of this line were also spanish repeting the same claim and making confusion between en:Subsidy:government incentive with en:share capital only stopping your actions after i pointed the minutes of constitution of the railway line operator where was clearly specified that the shareholders were all portuguese.
3-used a blog to quote the newspaper of the wrong year, instead of the correct one and when, after correcting this glaring mistake, i pointed this amateur mistake, you called me ridiculous.
And now if correcting your mistakes, pointing your double standards and actions is being disruptive, arrogant and obsessive behaviour, so be it.
But remember, it was not you that started the original discussion on the portuguese Wikipedia, it was not you that wrote and sourced all the material present in that article but instead was me and other users that made use of that page to discuss the article instead of, like you, make constant complains, but it is you that tries to, for whatever reason, to delete this sourced and valid names, be it in the portuguese Wikipedia claiming that this names lead to confusion (but it seems that you adding that same names to spanish wikipedia causes no confusion, trying to supress valid names in Wikidata and now here. Tm (talk) 03:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lojwe, your sneaky attitude of moving a name that was created by a third user, after all what was discussed and when this DR is open, speaks volumes about your attitudes. Tm (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close, wrong venue. Please renominate if desired at COM:CFD. --King of ♥ 03:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion of 5 Files in this category, Roblox.

KamranBhatti4013 (talk) 03:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ 03:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photograph of sugar and chocolate covered macademia nuts from the French Laundry. We have a WAY better version of this food here and here. Missvain (talk) 04:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Koavf as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Hoax? Nonsense? Named SVG and PNG? We can discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 07:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:SCOPE: Appears to be made up, no such region called "Eastern Sahara" in that location. --King of ♥ 03:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

COM:FOP violation in all of the images, with Burj Khalifa either being too prominent or referenced in the file name or both. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 13:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and rename, but see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Burj Khalifa.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But  Delete File:Burj Khalifa from the sea, Dubai.jpg per Ras67 below.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep -- general skyline shots are usually OK. It's only photos which really focus on the one building, not photos where the building is part of a wider scene. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Under construction or de minimis, except Burj Khalifa from the sea  Delete IMHO this is not a "general skyline", every building is explicitly visible and naturally copyright protected. --Ras67 (talk) 13:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They are all, individually, a small part of a larger scene. No building or architect gets a copyright on a city skyline. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a remote blurred "city skyline", but an accumulation of distinctive imaged buildings. This is never ever a "free" skyline! --Ras67 (talk) 11:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: General skylines. File:Burj Khalifa from the sea, Dubai.jpg doesn't appear to be significantly different from the others. --King of ♥ 03:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Far too low resolution in order to be considered as own work. No proper metadata (?) and no real information regarding the photo ID. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --King of ♥ 03:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image without clear purpose, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Romanabrate. --King of ♥ 03:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, individual images are not attributed. Needs COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9   20:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Romanabrate. --King of ♥ 03:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nanjing metro logo.svg put back before the community  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as a DR already decided this image exceeded COM:TOO China and still does given the current information in COM:TOO China, while no new evidence is presented indicating otherwise. --Wcam (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete. Note that the author is not correct. Per [17], the author of the logo is not Nanjing Metro but an anonymous person.--Njzjz (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I don't think whether the author is Nanjing Metro or an anonymous person is relevant in our discussion here. You could easily change the "author" in the file information table. --Tomchen1989 (talk) 21:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to support  Keep, because the image is really simple, it's just like some commonly used turn on / off icon, in a five-petal flower you can find everywhere [18] [19] [20] [21].
Note that it's never a "speedy delete" here. Even if the result is delete, it's a "delete", not a "speedy delete". If it was an American company's logo, it would probably be speedy kept.
It's also possible that COM:TOO China is a little biased, it has too few "OK" cases (only one actually) and could include more "OK" cases such as this one.
Also, File:Nanjing Metro Logo.svg could be discussed along with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of rail transport companies of China (where some previously kept, really simple logos have been also nominated for deletion).
IMNAL. It's really confusing. I'm reading this 85-page paper to try to understand trademark right and prior copyright in Chinese legal system and how it differs from the other country. But I've got a feeling that Chinese courts often cite copyright law to prevent trademark copycats' registration (while maybe the courts in other countries use trademark law to do that?), and the trademark issue is exactly what the template {{Trademark}} has already warned. --Tomchen1989 (talk) 21:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of rail transport companies of China. --King of ♥ 04:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie jest chronione prawem autorskim, nie wiem jak się znalazło na Wikipedii, ale trzeba je usunąć. Autorem fotografii jest Leszek Łożyński, którego zdjęcia są przechowywane w agencji fotograficznej Reporter. Fotografia przejdzie do domeny publicznej w 2088 r. Choćby tutaj jedna z publikacji tej fotografii podpisana nazwiskiem autora: https://www.newsweek.pl/wiedza/historia/newsweek-historia-kalendarium-wrzesien/46dj0sp#articleGallery Lothrain (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

De beschrijving van de afbeelding op Commons zegt dat het om een beeld uit een nieuwsfilm van het Staatspersbureau gaat. De link verwijst naar een site waar dit beeld (misschien door een betaalmuur) niet te zien is. Hoe is nu vast te stellen wat de waarheid is? --MarcoSwart (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Leszek Łożyński pracował wówczas w Polskiej Agencji Prasowej. Jego zdjęcia są tam do dziś obecne na mocy umowy ze spadkobiercami: foto.pap.pl - szukaj: Lozynski and Siwiec. Obecnie prawa do zdjęć reprezentuje agencja Reporter. Tak, czy inaczej zdjęcie jest chronione prawem autorskim i nie powinno widnieć w Wikipedii. Lothrain (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree De genoemde zoekactie levert inderdaad de indruk op dat het niet om een beeld uit een film, maar om een foto gaat, waarop volgens deze pagina geen vrije licentie van toepassing is. --MarcoSwart (talk) 22:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alte Ansicht PHA 1446 (talk) 13:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep So what? --Leyo 22:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV https://www.novostream.de/infos-service/faq/ keine freigabe ersichtlich Conan174 (talk) 09:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work (text and stamp). Original authors not mentioned. Discostu (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, authors are mentioned on the objekt itself. Official german stamp/doc. Greetz --KarleHorn (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, yes, my arguing is incomplete. There is no indication that the permission of the author of the text and the copyright holder of the stamp have been obtained. Stamps are not public domain in Germany. -- Discostu (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above and Commons:Stamps#Germany. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work claimed as self with no evidence of release in public domain Andy Dingley (talk) 11:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also File:Châssis de base avec courroie longitudinale av. 1900.jpg

  • The original speedy deletion is unclear. Also there are two images with the same issue which ought to be considered together. See also Mimiche14 for a whole lot more.
Speedy deletions should not be unclear. They are only there for deletions that are considered unarguable and so do not need the time and effort of a DR. If they can't manage that - and anything which isn't clear fails immediately - then they need to be a DR.
What is the issue here? Image quality is poor, but I presume that's not the issue (here at least, maybe on some others). The images appear to be reproductions of old photos (to PD age) reproduced via a more recent book. Yet does that book create a new and protectable copyright, by simple mechanical reproduction of an old PD photo?
Or is the issue merely lack of sourcing? The book is credited with an inline watermark. If that were more clearly placed in the text metadata, would that resolve the issue without deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted; false license claim, unclear what the copyright status is of the underlying "Jean Maillard 2008". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dr.Wiki54 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as this 2014-upload IMO is well in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept, no indication why it requires deleting; considered in scope above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW. These explanation boards are copyrighted works.

史跡訪問して帰って画像UPでヘトヘトなので特に異議は唱えませんが 天野遠景は墓と離れていてい背景化は不可、北条時頼は俳句追加、子之神社は本文1473に対応、影隠地蔵は背景とし地蔵の方が本体とか 他のFileも説明があればより理解が深まりますが、最近日本語版も本文の参考文献出典範囲注釈が厳しいので画像なら問題ないかですが 権利関係で問題があれば削除はやむをえません I can speak english a little.Visiter walking monument easy、But copyright rules of Japan must protect。 --C2revenge (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)C2revenge会話[reply]

(日本語で失礼します)File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpgですが、「説明板付近の遺跡風景」が写真の主題であって、「説明板の内容」が写真の主題ではないのは画角の通りです。解像度の都合上で説明板が読めてしまってダメだというのであれば、異議は唱えません。--Saigen Jiro (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpg - I uploaded a redacted version. whym (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW. Photos and text are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I cropped one more picture. If you do not like it, you can re-nominate it for deletion due to out of scope, but at moment it is used. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination except File:Ooe mine Station Ruins Information signboard 20200331.jpg. ƏXPLICIT 02:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can speak English a little, so I'm writing in Japanese. 以前議論になったものも含め、私のUPした画像が含まれています。すべてあまり気にせずUPしてしまったものですので、削除もやむを得ないと考えています。ただ、File:Ruin of Chōfuku-ji Temple 20201119 02.jpgのように、看板そのものを映したわけではないものについては、カットしてあげなおしたほうが良いかなと思います。--先従隗始 (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Includes my uploaded images, including those that were previously discussed. I have uploaded everything without worrying too much, so I think it is unavoidable to delete it. However, for things that do not show the signboard itself, such as File:Ruin of Chōfuku-ji Temple 20201119 02.jpg, I think it is better to cut it again.
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Export to other image repository?

[edit]

As C2revenge wrote above, these texts are important references, they are often the only written source of information about a local event or place. I totally understand that they can't be kept on Commons unless the text is blurred. Ideally, how about copying these pictures to a more lenient repository (such as Flickr or other) before deleting? That would prevent the loss of information, as these boards often fall apart or get removed to make place for urban development. This would also allow the pictures to be re-imported into Commons once copyright expires. Cheers! Syced (talk) 01:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is easier to undelete on Commons than re-import from an external repository. Anyone who wants to see the text for reference may ask an admin for a copy. --King of ♥ 23:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in PD due to URAA restriction A1Cafel (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Please note that URAA isn't a good "the only" deletion rationale, we need more discussions on its other problems. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Keep: the speedy deletion tag is based on a false idea that Southern Rhodesia produced it own stamps and held their copyright. They are covered correctly by crown copyright as are all British Empire and colony country's stamps and this crown copyright has expired. Ww2censor (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The reason for the tag is that the property of the colony passes to the successor state. Hence, this is not UK Crown property, but that of Zimbabwe: see s.11 "Property and assets." The Zimbabwe Constitution (Transitional, Supplementary and Consequential Provisions) Order 1980--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination = Copyright is held by Zimbabwe. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

저작권 정책에 위배된다고 함 Comoelto (talk) 15:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"단, 자유이용이 가능한 자료는 “공공저작물 자유이용허락 표시 기준(공공누리,KOGL) 제1유형 ”공공누리 을 부착하여 개방하고 있으므로 공공누리 표시가 부착된 저작물인지를 확인한 이후에 자유 이용하시기 바랍니다."을 위반했습니다.
English : However, freely available materials are open by attaching "Korea Open Government License (KOGL) Type 1", so please use them freely after checking whether they are works marked with KOGL. In other words, it's a copyright violation because KOGL is not attached. (https://www.nec.go.kr/site/nec/07/10702030000002020040802.jsp)--고려 (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark. Source website is not avialable, but shows a conventional copyright sign, which supports the decision. --Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

저작권 정책에 위배된다고 함 Comoelto (talk) 15:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Says it violates the copyright policy
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube license review failed imho: there is no evidence that the Youtube channel "Firaabeek Entertainment" is a official channel of the Ethiapion Oromo Media Netwerk (OMN) and therefore can use this free license. Ciell (talk) 18:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Thanks. You are right in pointing out that I used the wrong link. The link to the original film at the YouTube channel of the official Oromo Media Network (OMN) can be found here. I will change the link immediately. Timestamp is identical. Vysotsky (talk) 19:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Vysotsky, thanks for adding the source at the OMN! But did they also release the video under CC-BY...? I think it is not mentioned on the page with the video? Ciell (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to contact OMN, which is not easy with the war going on in Ethiopia and several people now in jail. The death of Hachalu Hundessa sparked off some of the protests ... Vysotsky (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Image can be undeleted as soon as an answer from OMN has been received. --Ellywa (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]