Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Romanabrate

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. And some are clearly not own work, because uploader is subject of the photo.

P 1 9 9   15:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These seem to be of a notable roller skater, e.g., [1] and [2], could be used in an article in the future. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these photos don't appear to be own work so permission for these should be send to Commons:OTRS. If that doesn't happen, these photos should be deleted. Multichill (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That hasn't been asked for from the uploader in the last decade - and still doesn't seem to have been requested on their talk page. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close: I will redo the DR's to give more specific deletion rationales for individual files. --P 1 9 9   20:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work, because uploader is subject of the photo and transmission code in some EXIF data. Needs COM:OTRS.

P 1 9 9   20:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and @P199: please keep the discussion in one place, splitting it across multiple pages (particularly without pinging those that participated above) really doesn't help. Mike Peel (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Professional photos of the uploader, presumably copyrighted. Would need OTRS proof from the copyright owner. -M.nelson (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note that no-one has asked the uploader for OTRS for the last *decade*, let alone during this deletion debate... Mike Peel (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Irrelevant. An image with copyright concern will get nominated for deletion irrespective of how long ago it was uploaded. The uploader has now received notification of this DR on his talk page and now has an opportunity to reply or submit an OTRS. No different than all the other DR's that require OTRS. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I would normally let images of this age with no conclusive proof either way slide, but the problem here is that the uploader appears to be the subject and the photos do not appear to be selfies. --King of ♥ 03:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per above, the subject of the photo is the uploader. Since the photo isn't a selfie, it must have been taken by someone other than the subject/uploader, and the Own Work claim is invalid. We need permission from the photographer through COM:VRT.

-M.nelson (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]