Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/13
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Pls Delete it - it is just a Test Shahab Ahmadi Seyedkhani (talk) 08:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
{{SD|1=G7}} Hans Kyoto (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
No Permission since Malayah 69 (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
No permission 2600:8807:80:C70:C1C9:5A5E:E637:B78A 16:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-textlogo}} --Minoraxtalk 13:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - passes US TOO. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted video game cover. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm copyright owner of the game. And I'm allowed to use it. --Gökhan Ogul
- No, I think you do not own the copyright of the cover. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Delete unless an OTRS mail by bhv provides confidence. --Achim (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
The Hunter and the background on the cover and the company logo is from my game and from my company. The cover is made by bhv with license agreement. --Gökhan Ogul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaspedal74 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader seems indeed to be the creator of the game, OTRS pending, ticket:2021021310006766. --Achim (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]No FoP in Japan
- File:9 Matsuyamamachi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken 852-8118, Japan - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:9 Matsuyamamachi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken 852-8118, Japan - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:9 Matsuyamamachi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken 852-8118, Japan - panoramio.jpg
- File:Nagasaki (4695494581).jpg
- File:Nagasaki (4696129236).jpg
- File:Nagasaki Peace Park (31310088571).jpg
- File:Peac park symbol - panoramio.jpg
- File:Peace ceremony - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Peace ceremony - panoramio.jpg
- File:Peace Statue (Nagasaki) 01.jpg
- File:Peace Statue (Nagasaki) 02.jpg
- File:Peace Statue (Nagasaki) 03.jpg
- File:Peace statue - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Peace statue - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Peace statue - panoramio.jpg
- File:Peace statue side view..jpg
- File:The Statue of Peace 平和祈念像 - panoramio.jpg
- File:平和祈念像 - panoramio.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nagasaki Statue and above DR.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]This statue was created by ja:北村西望 (Seibō Kitamura) (1884 - 1987). No FoP in Japan for statues.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Japan for non-architectural works
- File:Bức tượng hòa bình.jpg
- File:Nagasaki Friedenspark Denkmal.jpg
- File:Nagasaki Peace Statue - panoramio.jpg
- File:長崎平和公園・平和祈念像.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, if this statue has no freedom of panorama in Japan then the photo can be deleted. -Artanisen (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
This photo is taken from wikicommons but I don’t know why i got this notification kf deletion therefore i want to void it since i respect the rules Kyassin75 (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have tagged this for speedy deletion as a duplicate of File:Ommek Tango.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
لم اعد اريده محمد بشير ابراهيم محمد فودة (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
لم اعد اريده محمد بشير ابراهيم محمد فودة (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Flominator. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 05:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Oh, I confirmed that Sarang added the "보기" notation. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see COM:CUR South Korea. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): User withdrawn. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
User request Paper9oll (talk) 08:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Túrelio. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
User request Paper9oll (talk) 08:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Túrelio. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
User request Paper9oll (talk) 08:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Túrelio. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
User request Paper9oll (talk) 08:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Túrelio. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Wrong file name. Nuklear (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie JessicaRathmann (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
ronorng title Delatron2000 (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Move to correct title Timtrent (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Copy from other sources Malayah 69 (talk) 23:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request, user warned. --Achim (talk) 10:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
hkjhjkfvgtxrt 103.83.189.197 07:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
I can’t put license on it so i want to delete it so I won’t break the rules Kyassin75 (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, nominated by the uploader who appears to acknowledge that they are not the photographer. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
This is caption from youtube video in the the official channel of the producer but I don’t want to break the rules since I can’t get the license so i want to delete it Kyassin75 (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete nominated by uploader. This appears to be a still from a documentary video whose copyright status is unclear. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Cristina messa
[edit]Photo was previously published at https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2018/06/09/foto/milano_20_anni_universita_bicocca-198490444/1/ and requires an COM:OTRS ticket verifying its authorship.
Ytoyoda (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete no proof of authorship and free license --Jaqen (talk) 08:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted image Threecharlie (talk) 17:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils and no permission from the heirs of architects to host photos of copyrighted phil buildings and artistic works under free non-trad licensing. This is a 1983 architecture by Leandro Locsin, dead in 1994. https://news.abs-cbn.com/life/04/13/17/monastery-of-the-transfiguration-a-place-for-reflection-in-bukidnon
- File:Benedictine Monastery.JPG
- File:Interior of Monastery of Configuration Chapel (Black and white).jpg
- File:Interior of Monastery of Configuration Chapel.jpg
- File:Malaybalay Monastery of Transfiguration (J. Nicdao pic) - Flickr.jpg
- File:Monastery of Configuration Chapel, Bukidnon.jpg
- File:Monastery of the Configuration, Malaybalay Bukidnon.jpg
- File:Monastery of Transfiguration chapel (N. Nichols pic) - Flickr.jpg
- File:Monastery of Transfiguration.jpg
- File:Sideview of Monastery of Configuration Chapel.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 07:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator was blocked temporarily in September due to mass nomination of images from PH. Someone else can review and nominate if they see fit? Thanks. --Missvain (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this building fails public domain criteria for Philippine buildings (built in 1983 and designed by w:Leandro Locsin). As there is still no freedom of panorama in the Philippines (when will the amendment to the copyright law containing the FOP provision be passed), the regular rules apply: permission and consent to the uploaders' choice of licensing from the heirs of Architect Locsin is required. Since I don't have such authorization, I will nominate also the images I sourced from Flickr through Flickr2Commons (undelete only if FOP becomes part of our copyright law).
- File:Benedictine Monastery.JPG
- File:Malaybalay Monastery of Transfiguration (J. Nicdao pic) - Flickr.jpg
- File:Monastery of Configuration Chapel, Bukidnon.jpg
- File:Monastery of Transfiguration chapel (N. Nichols pic) - Flickr.jpg
- File:Monastery of Transfiguration.jpg
- File:Sideview of Monastery of Configuration Chapel.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Based on EXIF data this looks like professional photo, possibly copyvio Eran (talk) 11:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - per EXIF "Copyright holder Leoni Marie Hübner" and here prior to Commons upload. (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Info: Restored per ticket:2021022010003326, permission now available. --Nagy (talk) 09:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Based on EXIF data this looks like professional photo, possibly copyvio Eran (talk) 11:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - per EXIF "Copyright holder Stage Entertainment/Morris Mac Matzen" and here prior to Commons upload. (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a photo taken from a website i did provide the URL but I don’t know how to license it and as I don’t want to break the rules i want to delete it Kyassin75 (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, nominated by the uploader who acknowledges that they are not the author. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted by Regasterios. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
This photo is from a radio station i did mentioned the URl the publisher but I don’t know how to license it so i want to delete it because I don’t want to break the rules Kyassin75 (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, nominated by the uploader who appears to acknowledge that they are not the author. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted by Regasterios. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Wrong structure drawn in. Wrong structure. Not needed. Nuklear (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Wrong structure drawn in. was a joke. not serious efforted. Nuklear (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
- File:Journal.pone.0105956.t001.png
- File:Journal.pone.0052528.t004.png
- File:Journal.pone.0093660.t003.png
- File:Journal.pone.0093660.t005.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?
- File:Micropenis limp ejaculation.jpg
- File:Penis in condom.gif
- File:Penis.webm
- File:Penis in condom.webm
- File:Masturbating in cindom.jpg
- File:Micro penis ejaculation into condom.jpg
- File:Old limp penis.jpg
- File:Micro penis in condom.jpg
- File:57 years micropenis.jpg
- File:Micropenis in condom.jpg
- File:Penis shrinkage.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fabrice Kevin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Enoch & Elijah Died Physically (Solid Exegetical Proof) Evt. Fabrice Iram.pdf
- File:ANGELS NEVER HAD SEX WITH WOMEN TO PRODUCE THE NEPHILIMS (HUMAN-DEMON HYBRIDS) By Evt. Fabrice Iram.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Георгий Молодцов (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files by this user are suspect copyright violations. Several are posters, photographs have been taken with multiple cameras and many have low resolution.
- File:Danfung Dennis at MIFF.jpg
- File:Festival team MIFF doc.jpg
- File:Miroshnichenko Libergal Lerner.jpg
- File:Mike Lerner at MIFF.jpg
- File:Erick Steel.jpg
- File:Miroshnichenko2.jpg
- File:Kover mmkf.JPG
- File:Svobodnaya misl 2007.jpg
- File:Svobodnaya misl 2006.jpg
- File:Mmkf 2008.JPG
- File:Mihalkov Miroshnichenko.JPG
- File:Cover mmkf2009.jpg
- File:Poster MMKF.jpg
- File:MMKF 31 curv.jpg
- File:Miroshnichenko Libergal.jpg
- File:Miroshnichenko.jpg
MKFI (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teräsreikä Yhtye (talk · contribs)
[edit]Based on username these appear to be uploaded by the band themselves, but OTRS permission is needed. Additionally the username is for the band but does not identify a person or photographer.
- File:Daniel Lendvay Teräsreikä 2020.jpg
- File:Live Show Poster Tours.jpg
- File:Republica Yhtye.png
- File:Band Wallpaper.jpg
- File:TERÄSREIKÄ.jpg
- File:Taistele joka päivä.jpg
- File:Teräsreikä Matkalla Vietnamiin Cd cover.jpg
- File:20200512 201650.jpg.jpg
- File:Teräsreikä Yhtye.jpg
- File:The Band Members.jpg
MKFI (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rudrakarmakar2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josyjoel009 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in sandbox.
- File:Joel Joseph photo.jpg
- File:Joel Joseph image.png
- File:Jorl joseph (001).jpg
- File:Me-ConvertImage.jpg
- File:Mr. Joel U. Joseph.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robertorosdiaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:I Love Borivali 06.jpg
- File:I Love Borivali 04.jpg
- File:I Love Borivali 01.jpg
- File:I Love Borivali 03.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supradip Jana (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supradip Jana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- also file:Leeds United Kit.jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Bellair Plug (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:BV$KO - DOPE KID.jpg
- File:Parafyn Instrumental by Busko.png
- File:Mazap Dash by Busko.png
- File:BV$KO.jpg
- File:The Bellair Plug Music.jpg
- File:BV$KO - The Bellair Plug Music.wav
Achim (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 00:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:SELFIE. Used in en.wiki sandbox by editor with 1 edit since 2018. BriefEdits (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:SELFIE. By editor on bn.wiki who has <10 edits. And the only time he didn't edit his user page, he blanked an existing article. BriefEdits (talk) 03:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:SELFIE. Used in user page by editor with 1 edit. BriefEdits (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Credited to Milad Esmaeli/photoaman.com Ytoyoda (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
It is of low quality: the main subject is out of focus and obstructs the background. No realistic educational purpose (COM:EDUSE). Роман Рябенко (talk) 07:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Si Gam (talk) 08:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused fictitious election results of, presumably, the 2024 US presidential elections.
- File:2024ELECTIONMAPTHEORYIDK.png
- File:2024 map theory.png
- File:Testtetstestsfgds.png
- File:Ellectsfdsfdsgbdvs2024.png
- File:2024electionmaptheory.png
HyperGaruda (talk) 08:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, somebody's random selfie, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imtiyaz Rasool.jpg Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, somebody's random selfie, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imtiyaz Rasool2.jpg Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, somebody's random selfie, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imtiyaz Rasool3.jpg Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
self promotional ZabeMath (talk) 17:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, book covers are normally not freely licensed. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
self promotional ZabeMath (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, book covers are normally copyrighted. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, appears to be an advertisement, needs licence confirmation through COM:OTRS Verbcatcher (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:SCOPE Andy Dingley (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded by mistake Kyassin75 (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, nominated by uploader shortly after upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 11:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
I want to delete it because I can’t get the license I don’t want to break the rules Kyassin75 (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, nominated by uploader who appears to acknowledge that they are not the photographer. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 11:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
File:A giant rabbit statue wearing a medical face mask in Minneapolis, Minnesota (49692426881).jpg
[edit]2002 sculpture Cottontail on the Trail in Minneapolis; no FoP for public artworks in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Freely-licensed image without the sculptor's permission or permission from the sculptor's heirs is a violation to the sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
File:A giant rabbit statue wearing a medical face mask in Minneapolis, Minnesota (49692426881).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 3D works in the United States Andy Dingley (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Redeleted (same image as previously); DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Living people https://arab22.net/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86%D9%89-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%B9%D9%89-%D9%84%D9%83%D9%84-%D9%84%D9%88%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D9%82%D8%B5%D8%A9/ Nehaoua (talk) 10:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Non free picture for alive person. Dr-Taher (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Non free picture for alive person. Dr-Taher (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
exact duplicate of File:Sega-dreamcast-set.png, see versions and upload date Gunnar💬 11:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason actuel de Bernay.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 12:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:User:ValisonLo/sandbox with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image.
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
--WIKImaniac 18:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in zh:薗頭耦合反應 with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Barbados.svg SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Small file with tr code by a newcomer; probably taken from social media. E4024 (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private gif, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Metadata says “ Copyright© 2013 Gospel for Asia, all rights reserved” Ytoyoda (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
I consider that this photo is the same one that was once deleted. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki). There is a log that a file with the same name was deleted by Y.haruo on 4 August 2019. The date this photo was uploaded is 24 November 2020. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Matlin (talk) 15:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
image that should not be an image, used on user pages only WIKImaniac 19:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
image that should not be an image, used on user pages only WIKImaniac 19:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Map is listed as author's own work, but appears to come from Colby's website. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Probably, copyrighted newspaper. Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in cs:Měrné skupenské teplo tání and cs:Měrné skupenské teplo varu with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
The source file has been deleted as copyright violation. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pl:Splot (analiza matematyczna) with table equivalent:
Dyskretny splot dwóch macierzy 1 2 3 1 0 1 x 4 5 6 ✱ h 0 1 0 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 2 4 2 3 4 6 12 8 6 = y 8 14 25 16 12 4 12 18 14 6 7 8 16 8 9
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DHN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not created by uploader who has history of copyright infringement AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
grabbed from the web https://historija.info/bosnjaci-u-albaniji/ Albinfo (talk) 12:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
grabbed from the web https://historija.info/bosnjaci-u-albaniji/ Albinfo (talk) 12:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Author wants deleting of this file. Kizule (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, please. Zslavo 17:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no source. --JuTa 02:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
wrong picture Vera.andries (talk) 14:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (rotated dupe). --Lymantria (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-existant Paper9oll (talk) 08:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
non-existent user Paper9oll (talk) 08:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-existent user Paper9oll (talk) 08:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
non-existent user Paper9oll (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
non-existent user Paper9oll (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 12:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
non-existent user Paper9oll (talk) 08:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 02:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Even if a copyright-protected tower occupies a small area of the image, the image will become unusable if you blacken or exclude that tower. So, I think it is right to delete. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Paul University Manila
[edit]The tableau consisting of sculptures was unveiled in 2012 and designed by Julie Lluch. As no freedom of panorama still remains while the bill for amending copyright law is still pending, regular rules are still in effect: a need of permission and consent of the uploader's choice of licensing from sculptor Julie Lluch.
- File:FvfStPaulBuffetSP8988 02.JPG
- File:FvfStPaulChapeljdg8959 29.JPG
- File:FvfStPaulChapeljdg8959 30.JPG
- File:FvfStPaulManila8929 24.JPG
- File:FvfStPaulManila8929 25.JPG
- File:FvfStPaulManila8929 26.JPG
- File:FvfStPaulManila8929 27.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I went to this University Event, since Dr. Nilo L. Tolentino at Category:Tolentino Clinic, Baliuag whom I healed asked me to heal her sister the Head or Provincial Superior Category:Sr. Lilia Thérèse L. Tolentino, SPC who in turn, at the birthday of their niece, asked me to heal all of them top St. Paul Sisters about 30 of them; and Category:9th President, Sr. Evangeline L. Anastacio, SPC, Solemn Investiture asked me to heal her of a certain Cancer (withheld); she even asked me to take her picture and mine in her Office of the President but I politely denied her;
- Both the President Anastacio and Head or Provincial Superior Category:Sr. Lilia Thérèse L. Tolentino, SPC even assisted me in taking photographs of the sculptures and all there, sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. A huge chunk of the lower part of this skyscraper, designed by Gabriel Formoso & Partners Architects and Gozar Planners Philippines and finished in 2001, is seen here 120.29.107.9 14:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Coat of arms of Slovakia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Coat of arms of Slovakia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
One of the sources, ja:ファイル:Peace Statue of Nagasaki 20150926.jpeg, is a photo that is not accepted by Wikimedia Commons. (Reason: No FoP in Japan for statues.) See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki). Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. "Collateral damage" due to no commercial freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art (sculptures etc) in Japan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:0367jfAurora Boulevard Immaaculate Mariana Kaunlaran Balete Drive Quezon Cityfvf 05.jpg. COM:NOTUSED JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete mainly for COM:NOTUSED and redundancy. Will argue against the nomination of this image over the alternative as this image has the plant as the substantial subject of the image; might possibly be of use somewhat compared to alternative provided which does not have a clear subject. Markoolio97 (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Not exact duplicates. --MB-one (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
This is my own photo taken by my phone but I can’t get the license so I don’t want to break the rules i want to delete it Kyassin75 (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since), the uploader has added a deletion nomination. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep, the uploader claims to have taken this photograph, and this appears to be credible. The uploader has acknowledged non-authorship of other uploads which strengthens the claim to have taken this photograph. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Who is Saima? --E4024 (talk) 19:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Possibly the actress Saima Noor. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think so. She is tagged with Q105248604 (non-existent WD item) and is in Category:Writers. Perhaps the WD item was deleted for not notable. E4024 (talk) 22:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- I found her here. She appears to be the author of a blog posting on a Tunisian news website. It is unclear whether she is a regular contributor or is an established journalist, but I think this is sufficient for COM:SCOPE. The posting uses a crop of our image, but as it is dated a few hours after our upload it is not clear evidence of a copyright problem. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think so. She is tagged with Q105248604 (non-existent WD item) and is in Category:Writers. Perhaps the WD item was deleted for not notable. E4024 (talk) 22:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Possibly the actress Saima Noor. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Commercial use of Commons. E4024 (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Please see {{Pixabay}} — this photograph was uploaded to Pixabay after January 2019, when the site switched to a more restrictive license. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 14:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 14:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
South Korean banknotes must be marked with "보기" or "SPECIMEN". (COM:CUR#South Korea), However, there is no "보기" or "SPECIMEN" notation in the image. This is a violation of the Terms of Use. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I added 보기 mark. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; taken from Facebook and the DR has been open for almost a month now. --E4024 (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Whatever it is, it does not make any sense. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Its description says it is a profile image (avatar) of the user who uploaded it. However, the picture is not in use. --Роман Рябенко (talk) 07:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, unused personal image from uploader not active since 2016. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license, uploader not the copyright holder, this file issued by Indonesian Goverment. 36.72.216.63 01:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
I have just deleted 2 other uploads from this user as copyright violation. I am pretty sure this one is not an own work too. The user with almost no contribution and with Russian wiki as a home probably had no chance to portray the American movie star; besides, I have found a cropped version of the same picture uploaded to the site of a certain American newspaper several months earlier: https://naples.floridaweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/images/2015-07-30/62p1.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete clearly a copyright violation of a professional photograph. Laplorfill (talk) 05:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above (too bad, was in fairly wide use.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Emil Cerda has been the subject of self-promotion on the English Wikipedia and now articles on him have been tagged as cross-wiki spam on other language WIkipedias. Other images uploaded by him have been deleted as promotional Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Emilthebest06. Liz (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unused personal image OOS-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Another supposed image of Emil Cerda uploaded by the subject or a paid editing service. Other images were deleted at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Emilthebest06. Liz (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The cross-wiki spam has been cared of; today the last standing article on rowiki has been deleted. The Wikidata item is also about to be deleted. Gikü (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This meets speedy deletion criteria G10 and F10. Born2bgratis (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Another Emil Cerda image uploaded by sockpuppet or paid editing services . See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Emilthebest06. Liz (talk) 02:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The cross-wiki spam has been cared of; today the last standing article on rowiki has been deleted. The Wikidata item is also about to be deleted. Gikü (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Evidently out of scope. Born2bgratis (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Final remaining Emil Cerda image uploaded by sockpuppet or paid editing service. See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Emilthebest06. Liz (talk) 02:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The cross-wiki spam has been cared of; today the last standing article on rowiki has been deleted. The Wikidata item is also about to be deleted. Gikü (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete IMHO this meets both the criteria for speedy deletion G10 and F10. Born2bgratis (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a COM:SS A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The authorship and date are false. It is claimed that the portrait was created and published before 1926; however, this claim looks highly unlikely as long as the singer had only started his career about 1924, so that probably this picture is of the 1930-ies. But it is difficult to judge if it might be in PD or not because we don't know its country of origin: it might be Ukraine or Poland or any other country of his guest starring. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Lacks sufficient info on source to establish copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Very small, blurred and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The image quality is poor. A good quality image is separated, so I think this can be deleted.笹目ヤヤ 03:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Author. I provided this photo when no other photo for the situation (a train of 731 electric multiple unit series connected with 201 diesel multiple unit series) was not provided in Wikipedia/Wikimedia commons. Since some other photos are available now, it is alright for me to delete it. --Sinryow (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Very small low quality photo without compensating uniqueness/importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:SELFIE. Image used in a sandbox by a non-contributor in en.wiki. BriefEdits (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS personal photo. No other contributions on Commons by uploader; user's only contribution on en:w was displaying this photo, both back in 2017. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Non-free logo. Belongs to an organization BrazilianDude70 (talk) 04:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
A low quility picture captured by unsteady camera. No realistic educational purpose (COM:EDUSE). Роман Рябенко (talk) 07:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
A low resolution photo made with unsteady camera. No realistic educational purpose (COM:EDUSE). Роман Рябенко (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted uncat, very low res, blurry, no evident compensating uniqueness nor importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
A low resolution picture taken with unsteady camera. No realistic educational purpose (COM:EDUSE). Роман Рябенко (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; uncat, unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
self constructed flag for rejected en WP draft. Out of scope for Commons having no discernible educational purpose Timtrent (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Created to illustrate rejected en WP draft. There is no discernible educational purpose for this illustration. Out of scope for Commons Timtrent (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Photomontage of Edouard Philippe Government (France) with some well known people fr:Eric Zemmour , fr:JoeyStarr and some unknown people => Not usefullfor the project Drongou (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, montage of unsourced photos. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
A low quality picture lacking realistic educational purpose (COM:EDUSE). Роман Рябенко (talk) 09:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Very blurry low res photo without evident compensating uniqueness nor importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Flag for fun "Sport peace fr:Ricard (Alcohol)" but it's a pure creation. Not useful for the project Drongou (talk) 09:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, possible DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Please, delete this PNG file I uploaded here few hours ago. I've made a more personal file. I think is better, so. Because this is from a file circulating in social media, and the new one is entirely mine. Pla y Grande Covián (talk) 12:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Brasao-Valinhos.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Oxford - Coat of Arms.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason ville fr BourbonLancy (SaoneLoire).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason Chalon Ville.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work, as the logo is already used here. Might be copyvio. The Banner (talk) 13:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason Chalon Ville.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason ville fr Chatelleraut (Vienne).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason ville fr Châtellerault (Vienne).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Looks to be Flickrwashing. Image (both the background and the event with Jobs standing in front) is available all over the internet before the Flickr upload date. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Very suspicious Flickr account. 100% license washed and should consider blacklisting this Flickr account. — BriefEdits (talk) 05:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license on flickr; "photo from internet" per Flickr user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
No proof that uploader has the rights to this photo found on a website. Binksternet (talk) 15:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
work by Jon Marten (1934-), missing permission Velocitas (talk) 16:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW, work by living artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
work by Jon Marten (1934-), missing permission Velocitas (talk) 16:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW, work by living artist -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
work by Jon Marten (1934-), missing permission Velocitas (talk) 16:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio / wrong creator mentioned. Copy from https://www.nockert.de/bilddatenbank/bildergalerien/401_b%C3%BCrgermeister_heiligenrode/single-image/003_pfannkuch_wilhelm_001-photo.html#anchor . Karsten11 (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unused, false claim, no actual source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Dubious if really own work. More like some scanned materials (see image quality and the white "leftovers" on the right). Also, the original uploader's past copyrights infringements don't help the case. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Misleading image of no educational value. Something is very wrong with this photo, as a comparison with the real exhibit at the Ioannina Archaiological Museum shows [12]. No doubt one more of the infamous photo manipulations of user Harrygouvas. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Zeichen 334.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
SVG version available and not in use. 185.209.238.238 11:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:RWB Stadion.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amkgp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/1137061179650337/photos/a.1137711086252013/1141839669172488/)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. External hit predates our upload for 4 year, butt has far lower resolution (<1000 x 1000). -- Túrelio (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above, unused.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
I can't fix the page split and a duplicate of the djvu file anyway Darrelljon (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted glitch upload, uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Delatron2000 (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- The image is not superb quality (it is based on a video frame), but I think it is OK for the purpose. At the moment there is no image with a better quality, with this image content on Wikimedia. MikeRun (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's not really that blurry. An image does not have to be 100% crystal sharp to be included on Commons. JIP (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's isn't even slightly blurry, it's pin sharp, and being blurry isn't a valid reason for deletion anyway. I suggest that someone explain to Delatron2000 how Wikimedia works and kindly ask him/her to stop wasting other people's time. nagualdesign 04:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Heavily blurred, unremarkable animal or image. Noeducative value Richard Avery (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Badly blurred image without evident compensating uniqueness nor importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
wrong to attribute license in this fashion, misguided. SecretName101 (talk) 22:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unused, uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
I don’t know how to put a license on it even though it is mu own photo but I don’t want to to break the rules so please delete it Kyassin75 (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dyolf77 as no source (No source since), the uploader has added a deletion nomination. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep, the uploader claims to have taken this photograph, and this appears to be credible. The uploader has acknowledged non-authorship of other uploads which strengthens the claim to have taken this photograph. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, small resolution and no EXIF data with the file. A source will be much helpful to decide. Regards --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted uploader request, unused, questionable license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Historical drawing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the style indicates that this probably dates from before 1900, which would be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Possibly old, but unused and unsourced. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted logo; not a free or CreativeCommons licence file, not an "own" work — danyele 23:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Unsure, the logo includes the date 1905, when the football club A.C. Perugia Calcio was founded. If the logo is substantially unchanged from the club's 1905 logo then it would probably be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- The griffin symbol in the logo was used in the team's 1933-34 shirts, see File:Associazione Calcio Perugia 1933-34.jpg. The other parts of the logo are sufficiently simple to be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, COM:Italy says
- For anonymous or pseudonymous works, apart from those where the real author is widely known, the duration of economic rights is 70 years from date of first publication, whatever the form in which it was carried out, as long as the author does not become known in this period.
- The copyrightable component of the logo dates from 1934 or earlier, so the logo is public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: 1905... 1933... ?! This version of AC Perugia logo was designed and introduced only in the 1997-98 season... — danyele 15:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Danyele: my assessment is that the only potentially-copyrightable component of the logo is the design of the griffin (the mythological creature in the middle of the shield). This appears to be identical to the logo on the 1933–1934 shirts. Moreover, the griffin design is very similar to the carvings of griffins in the Palazzo dei Priori in Perugia, which was built in 1293–1443.[13],File:Perugia, palazzo dei Priori (59).jpg Verbcatcher (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: 1905... 1933... ?! This version of AC Perugia logo was designed and introduced only in the 1997-98 season... — danyele 15:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Whatever the case, this image on Commons has false source and license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
István Csók is dead in 1961. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
István Csók is dead in 1961. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Please delete as I wish to replace this file in another place (I am the uploader) also it has no copyrights attached C1MM (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:05, 15 September 2021 UTC: Please delete as I wish to replace this file in another place (I am the uploader) also it has no copyrights attached --Krdbot 18:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. The only contribution from this user. Uploader has used several other accounts, which are now blocked. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Now used in Wikimania2014. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- He added himself and the image to that page and the entry is mostly spam. If I were active on Wikimania, I would remove it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Its in use. JuTa 09:34, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
I know that this file was kept before. However, the user has been indeffed as an "SPA for personal promotion only" at their WP. (Look at the "definition" of this file, their only contribution to Commons.) Under these conditions we should better remove this file. E4024 (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- "Source: i took kundan yadav image from my camera mobile phone" is another issue... --E4024 (talk) 04:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the image is small but for now the only licensed usable on wiki. It is used on the wiki since it represents a newly appointed minister. --ZioNicco (talk) 14:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the image accidentally StarBoyX (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Do you still think you wanna keep it because Idk since the senate is using this photo has his offical portait now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phillypaboy123 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
100% delete This is the same photo that has been uploaded a ton of times and deleted DemonDays64 (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep source https://www.senate.gov/senators/117thCongress/ossoff-jon.htm what is the problem? If there is a reason i do not jet see these images have to go too: --Jahobr (talk) 09:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: all already deleted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yilku1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright © Tribunal Electoral del Chubut. DRing due to age. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This looks like a web-sourced image with a bogus licence added. To convince me otherwise, the uploader would hae to show a URL, or an archived URL, indicating that licence. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In 2011, the date this image was uploaded, the webpage in question had a CC-BY 2.5 license as can be seen in the Wayback Machine history (See:)). They later switched to a more restrictive license, but everything that was published with the previous license remains under the same terms and conditions, since CC is not a revocable license. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: CC-BY-2.5 confirmed. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Alleged clam that WLM has permission did not provide any evidence. No permission from author. Doctor Architect (talk) 02:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
To administrators: see reguest - kept by Ruthven. --Микола Василечко (talk) 08:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Violation of withdrawal request rules User:Doctor Architect - repeat request without discussion with administrator Ruthven.
- To administrators: There was no proof given that the image can be used. There is no permission of the author and there is no FoP in Ukraine. Without author's permission this must be deleted.
- Regarding alleged violation during the second nomination Mykola has failed to see that there was a discussion and administrator didn't provide the permission ([14]). Then he was also notified of this second nomination ([15]). And he did see this message as we had a follow-up discussion on it on his and my talk page. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Doctor Architect and COM:FOP Ukraine (no commercial FOP in Ukraine). "Wiki Loves Monuments" indication doesn't mean that there is permission from the authors (e.g. architects/sculptors) of the work or their heirs. This is similar to dozens of WLM-marked images from no-FOP countries, like ours (the Philippines), that were later deleted because a) no FOP in the first place, and b) no proper permission from the architects/sculptors of the works or their heirs. Such permission is not required if the country has freedom of panorama for architecture, sculptures, etc.. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Redundant against File:Lucid Games Logo.svg; unused. IceWelder [✉] 11:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced and ameliorated by File:TT Assen.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Coat of arms of Bayamón, Puerto Rico.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 12:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Bandera de Berango.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Ho caricato una nuova versione Andrea Papaccio (talk) 12:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:ZarboPeppe.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Brasao de Minde cop.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Armoiries Orléans Moderne.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason de la ville de Château-Salins (Moselle).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Originally uploaded on Japanese Wikipedia, the file states its author as 郡上市観光課 (City of Gujo Tourism Division). Original uploader on Wikipedia claims own work, but the same image of much higher resolution can be found on the web [16] (and also note the image has no EXIF). OTRS permission will be needed if the authorship info is correct. Yasu (talk) 15:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @サウンドセッション: Perhaps the original uploader can give an answer? --MGA73 (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Holiday snap with persons of no obvious relevance. Page use can be easily replaced by better images from category 62.216.207.61 16:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Small size holiday snap. No person of rrelevance pictured. 62.216.207.61 17:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Wrong licence; any proof on source page, that this work was created during subject's life or that pd-anon licence is suitable etc. Matlin (talk) 17:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Zeichen 336.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without camera data, uploader is globally locked as sockpuppet. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
I, the uploader, wished to overwrite a different file but ended up creating a new one, please delete this so I can upload it to the correct file C1MM (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Zeichen 331.1 - Kraftfahrstraße, StVO 2013.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:RWBA Flughafen(R).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:RWB Industriegebiet.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:RWBA Fähre(R).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Bad quality drawing, not used in articles since 2010. We have many high-quality images of this topic. Also this file gives fake impression about stars Юрий Д.К. (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP Philippines. The current no freedom of panorama status remains until the amendment to the copyright law is passed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I took the Photo, because I asked the folks to tell me the limits and bounds of Balete Drive and when I saw No. 14 Balete Drive, it is still so, and I wanted this Trucks in the Philippines, Category:Delivery trucks in the Philippines Sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination. COM:FOP architecture. Markoolio97 (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep the building is largely covered by other objects, could thus be considered deminimis. --MB-one (talk) 10:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- @MB-one: I doubt it is de minimis as it is the chief motif of the image. In other words, it is the intended focus/object of the image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Add new category on de minimis. Also ping A1Cafel whom I asked on DM cases before. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per COM:FOP Philippines, modern building unlikely to be old enough to enter PD. No de minimis since the building is the main subject of the photo, the truck and the power lines don't cover much of the building. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The template is by itself erroneus. COM:CRT/Bulgaria#Freedom of panorama is clear that the country has no Commons-applicable freedom of panorama that complies with Commons:Licensing (that is, images of copyrighted buildings and sculptures can also be reused commercially). FOP is a general exception to the copyright law, not a determiner on public domain by way of copyright term of a work (as the template now stands). The best substitite to this erroneus template is the generic {{PD-old-70}}. And to note, the existence of this may lead into misconception that there is Commons-compatible FOP in Bulgaria. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Let's delete this and create a new {{NoFoP-Bulgaria}} template. However, Deletion discussions are ongoing for NoFoP templates. Please check here. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I made {{NoFoP-Bulgaria}}. See it. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Technically, the template just gives regular copyright rules, meaning the only way to use it is if the building/sculpture/whatever has passed into the public domain (70pma has passed). That... is technically correct, if using it for very old buildings to indicate there is no longer a copyright on it, as an explanation as to why the photo is OK. But I guess someone might get the wrong impression just seeing the name, and indeed the two usages that I see don't conform to that (they are picturing modern works). Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Redundant template. Content solely refers to the terms of PD. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: it is redirected to NoFoP-Bulgaria, there was a general consensus to keep NoFoP templates. --rubin16 (talk) 07:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:FoP-Bulgaria
[edit]There is no Commons-applicable freedom of panorama in Bulgaria. The iron sculpture in the first image appears modern, while the second one shows a floor plan of a church thar is recent (a year 2001 can be seen at the left side of the floor plan).
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted the photo but not a floor plan: it looks pretty trivial. --rubin16 (talk) 08:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:CoA Empire of Brazil (1870-1889).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It seem to be the historical source. It should be kept. Kathisma (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as unused and superseded. --rubin16 (talk) 15:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This statue was built in 2005. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This statue was built in 2005. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This statue was built in 2005. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This statue was built in 2005. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Buidhe as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Contrary to the license tag, Boylan was not a FBI employee. The copyright status of the sketch would depend on the contract between her and the FBI. This news article states that the sketch is copyrighted[17] so it should be deleted on COM:PRP.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image was uploaded in 2005 and is heavily used. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I've submitted a FOIA request for the contract. This will probably take a while; I will report back either way. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If User:Mdaniels5757 is succesfull, the image can be undeleted. A month has passed now since their remark. --Ellywa (talk) 02:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
When I uploaded, I thought these files were in PD because the author had died more than 70 years ago, but I have realized I needed old publications that proves that the term of protection has really expired in Hungary and the US. Unfortunately I have not found. Nor did I find any evidence that the images were published after January 1, 2003.
- File:Ady Endre portréja Székely Aladár felvételén.jpg
- File:Ady Endre ülő portréja 1915-ben (Székely Aladár felvétele).jpg
- File:Ady Endre ülő portréja profilból (Székely Aladár, 1908).jpg
Regasterios (talk) 10:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Regasterios I reviewed COM:Hungary and I think the same way as you that copyright protections is 70 years pma, here it would be 1940+70, free since 2011. Why do you think that it is not free? rubin16 (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of rubin16 and COM:Hungary. The photographer died 1940 so images are in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 03:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 13:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment or explain. --Ellywa (talk) 03:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
This monument was built in 2005. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Short Note due to time constraints:
I do not know what FOP stands for. Thanx for any explanation in advance.
If location of image or image taker (which happen's to be me) is disputed: this image is from Lingiades as indicated.
Year of construction of monument: I cannot confirm or deny the date given by you (2005). Anyway, image was taken 2008.
Sincerely Christaras A (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Christaras A: , according COM:FOP Greece photos of artwork in public spaces cannot be published freely. You would need permission of the artist to do so. --Ellywa (talk) 03:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
The gmi.org site is not live, but checking the IA versions, the map this is from at http://web.archive.org/web/20091229145829/http://www.gmi.org/wlms/users/huffman/Huffman-World_Langs-wlms32-100dpi.pdf was itself derived from other sources. The ethnologue.com site is all rights reserved, making the claim that this is Huffman's unrealistic. Further the archived source page for gmi.org has no apparent copyright statement, so again all rights reserved must be presumed unless verified otherwise. Fæ (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition to the research of Fae, authorship is very confusing on the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 03:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Restored per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Languages of Africa map.svg with Ellywa's consent [18]. --Rosenzweig τ 21:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.picuki.com/media/2163899209594434295´
COnverted to regular DR to allow for discussion as external hit has far lower resolution (<1000 x 600) than our upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: appears own upload noting exif data of camera. --Ellywa (talk) 03:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dr. Coal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No source specified. Quite possible to be a copyright violation regarding resolutions and the absence of metadata. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As author is mentioned the subject himself, but is uploaded by another person it seems. Uploader did not comment or explain. --Ellywa (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Still under copyright as artist Germain Bonel died in 2002. 2A01:CB1D:8B7A:5400:7030:7915:D7C6:FA62 22:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Bonjour, ce portrait fait par le peintre Bonel qui était le voisin et un ami de ma famille, alors que j'étais enfant, n'est pas signé par lui mais par ma mère... le mot <Bonel> c'est l'écriture de ma mère...Guy6631 (talk) 12:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Guy6631: , please try to obtain permission by the heirs of mr Bonel and follow the procedure outlined in VRT. If successful the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 03:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Photograph with a license and false origin on Flickr. The person in the photo died in 1982, so the author of the photo is not the same person who uploaded the file in Flickr in 2011, indicating that it is a flickrwashing. Taichi (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 03:44, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Il y a erreur suir l'attribution de cette photographie qui n'est pas celle de Jeanne de Villeneuve-Esclapon mais celle de sa cousine germaine :Marie Bonaparte fille de Roland 2A01:E0A:26A:FD30:B097:CF15:A8EE:CB2E 23:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User who nominated for deletion might be right, but all images i found on the web say it is Jeanne, for instance Alamy]. I put a note on the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
This is my own photo i shoot it myself but I can’t put or get my own license on it therefore I don’t want to break the rules i want to delete it Kyassin75 (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as no source (No source since), the uploader has added a deletion nomination. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep, the uploader claims to have taken this photograph, and this appears to be credible. The uploader has acknowledged non-authorship of other uploads which strengthens the claim to have taken this photograph. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY. Image is not used on the projects today. --Ellywa (talk) 04:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a part of File:WUL-bunko11 d0260 竹書紀年.pdf
Please delete some other duplicate uploads by this user:
because they are duplicates of file:白雪遺音(一).djvu and others.
because they are duplicates of file:霓裳續譜(一).djvu and others.
because they are duplicates of File:汲冢紀年存真(一).djvu and others. 維基小霸王 (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: placed redirects from duplicate files. --rubin16 (talk) 07:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Converted speedy deletion. As this is too complex an issue, and a file history, to handle by summary deletion.
Original rationale by Fae was:
- The underpinning source of this map, after navigating the history of the deleted huffman website, is ethnologue.com. The maps there are copyrighted (Copyright © 2020 SIL International
The history of this file is complicated and has been the scene of substantial edit-warring and socking. It's not clear what the correct version is. Nor is the rationale clear: it references what is clearly a complex off-wiki history and would be much clearer if it linked to the claimed sources and evidence for that. Looking through the history of the linked site myself, it's far from obvious. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Going to the first versions of the image page, just refers to the Huffman website as the source. Go to Internet Archive, to the year the file was first uploaded, and check the Huffman website. There is no copyright release for anything, based on my review on the page. The map this map is based on, available inside a pdf, refers out to ethnologue.com, which is all copyrighted. So far there's no evidence to support that the copyright of this work can meet COM:L. We don't have to prove a negative here, there's just no apparent way of demonstrating that the underpinning works are not all rights reserved. --Fæ (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, I have seen this world map before on Wikimedia Commons, a lot, isn't the Huffman map derived from something already here or are all those maps problematic too? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:41, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly, I believe they are all copyvios. It's an awkward fact, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing to bury it. --Fæ (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- This map is even masquerading as "Own work" here and it clearly uses a Huffman made map. (the gray background, not the colours added later). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly, I believe they are all copyvios. It's an awkward fact, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing to bury it. --Fæ (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: factual issues are not the sufficient reason for deletion while the file is widely used in Wikimedia projects. It seems that the underlying borders of the map are used from some other image here as there are lots of maps based on that. The facts used to create a map aren't copyrighted, just an implementation of them is copyrighted. So, when the user takes some external sources about language areas and uses these facts to draw own map using some free underlying background map, it is not a copyvio. --rubin16 (talk) 07:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/do knot disturb bollywood hungama
[edit]Relatively low resolution images without the Bollywood Hungama watermark, that I'm mostly sure are specific copyright violations from Hamara Photos. You can see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dutta at a press meet for Do Knot Disturb 2009.jpg for the details about that image, for File:Sushmita_at_a_press_meet.jpg, please compare that image (https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/press-meet-of-the-film-do-knot-disturb/press-meet-of-the-film-do-knot-disturb-11/#) with https://hamaraphotos.com/bollywood_photos_search_results_-_sushmita_sen_do_knot_disturb_search_0_44.html - again, same image, same moustached bystander in the background, except the Bollywood Hungama image is cut off a bit above the Hamara Photos watermark. I didn't look very hard for the other images, but they're from the same photo set, so should probably be assumed to have similar issues.
- File:Sen on the sets of Do Knot Disturb 2009.jpg
- File:Sen on the sets of Do Knot Disturb 2009 (cropped).jpg
- File:Dutta at a press meet for Do Knot Disturb 2009.jpg
- File:Photo Of Vashu Bhagnani,Govinda,David Dhawan,Sushmita Sen,Lara Dutta,Ritesh Deshmukh From Press meet of the film 'Do Knot Disturb'.jpg
- File:Sushmita at a press meet.jpg
GRuban (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @GRuban: The hamaraphotos.com link you provided above is not working. Please share again. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: Ah, it's a search result. Try this one https://hamaraphotos.com/photo_-259337.html --GRuban (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- @GRuban: The hamaraphotos.com link you provided above is not working. Please share again. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Three websites are quoted as sources, all have maps, all have all rights reserved statements. DRing due to age. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: All three sources have different maps. The facts used to create a map aren't copyrighted, just an implementation of them is copyrighted. So, when the user takes some external sources about language areas and uses these facts to draw own map using some free underlying background map, it is not a copyvio. --rubin16 (talk) 07:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)