Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![268 File:"Paris, le Point du Jour".jpg](#File:"Paris,_le_Point_du_Jour".jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry Alfrieak (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Android user who coudn't resist when they saw the delete button. --Achim (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:民主陣線議員石景澄出席元朗區議會會議.jpg Cypp0847 (talk) 04:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 05:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Misidentification. The image shows Dmitry Pozharsky, but here he is listed as Zarutsky Каракорум (talk) 07:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per request. That was a lot of work. Themightyquill (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 13:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
56r6474744746 2601:581:C100:C610:E18F:6D8C:2F37:B947 15:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Portraying the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is an insult to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 01:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close as a bad-faith nomination. The image is not intended to be insulting, the Wikimedia Foundation is not bound by the rules of Islam, and we don't censor content for the benefit of any particular group. The fact that some (not all) Muslims are insulted is their choice, and not the WMF's problem. You may want to look at Wikipedia:Talk:Muhammad/FAQ for more information about why these images are kept. Anachronist (talk) 07:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Потому что это оскорбляет мою религию и всех мусульман планеты земля 5.76.224.248 17:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Desperado61 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Random internet images.
- File:Rihanna, İngiliz Moda Ödülleri 2019.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Grammy 2017.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Met Gala 2018.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Met Gala 2017.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Valerian ve Bin Gezegen İmparatorluğu Film Galası.jpg
- File:Rihanna, CFDA Moda Ödülleri 2014.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Met Gala 2015.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Diamond Ball 2014.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Met Gala 2014.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Cannes Film Festivali 2017.jpg
- File:Rihanna, Diamond Ball 2015.jpg
- File:Zeki Tüfekçioğlu.gif
Smooth O (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 22:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
This Is My Personal Picture I want to delete it 182.191.49.83 06:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
this is my own picture i want to delete it 182.191.23.141 10:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
This Is My Personal Picture I want to delete it 182.191.23.141 11:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete - F10. E4024 (talk) 11:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
delete it 182.191.23.141 11:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- We will. Just wait a minute please. E4024 (talk) 11:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Identifiable kid. Admin Taivo, got a minute to take care of this, please? --E4024 (talk) 13:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, usually such anonymous requests are not fulfilled, regular deletion request lasts whole week. I'll make an exception, because this is unused personal photo and the uploader's only contribution. "This Is My Personal Picture" is not an argument for anonymous users, "my own picture" is not sure. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|WrongSize}} Etnok79 (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
low resolution Etnok79 (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Нет разрешения художника на авторскую печатную форму Dogad75 (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
отпечаток с этой формы передан художником -- автором в общее пользованием. Creator-AP photo (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Я являюсь автором иображенной на фотографии формы. Я совершенно не возражаю против использования его (изображения) в Википедии.
Напишите, если о тменя нужно что-то еще. Владимир Качальский. Kachalsky Vladimir Stanislavovich (talk) 12:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь автором-художником изображенного на данной фотографии материала (обладателем авторских прав на него) и разрешаю его использование в проекте Викимедиа.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_City_as_an_Artist%E2%80%99s_Subjective_In_Work-11.jpg Я согласен опубликовать это произведение на условиях свободной лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Я понимаю, что тем самым даю право любому лицу распространять и использовать произведение в любых законных целях (в том числе связанных с извлечением коммерческой выгоды) при условии соблюдения указанных лицензий. Я осознаю, что такое использование может не ограничиваться проектами Викимедиа и связанными с ними сайтами, и разрешаю это. Я уведомлён, что я сохраняю исключительные авторские права на это произведение вне условий указанных лицензий и что я всегда сохраняю право на упоминание меня как автора в соответствии с выбранными лицензиями. Модификации, которые сделают другие люди, не будут приписаны мне. Данное разрешение затрагивает только мои исключительные авторские права, и я оставляю за собой право предпринимать действия против использования моей работы с нарушением закона — в частности, для клеветы, унижения чести и достоинства, нарушения правил использования торговых марок, нарушения права на охрану изображения гражданина и т. д. Я понимаю, что я не могу отозвать данное разрешение и что моя работа может размещаться в проектах Фонда Викимедиа в течение неограниченного времени либо быть удалённой оттуда.
Качальский Владимир Станиславович/ Kachalsky Vladimir.Kachalsky Vladimir Stanislavovich (talk) 12:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:A_City_as_an_Artist’s_Subjective_In_Work-11.jpg” under ticket:2020121710009757. --Dogad75 (talk) 17:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: accepted permission. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: this is a copyright violation. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
moved from File talk:Arra-beba.jpg: Please remove this image because it was uploaded accidentally, I hope to hear from you. Sincere, Planeti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planeti (talk • contribs) 20:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
It was uploaded by mistake. Liridon (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- User that uploaded doesn't know procedures of nominating it for deletion, but he contacted me and has added a comment in talk page.
It was uploaded by mistake. Ardianazizi (talk) 17:32, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Because the Wohle islamic world has declared them as non muslims. So they are Not muslims and howcome they Couleur be the caliphs of Islam..... 80.187.109.228 01:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David.politzer (talk · contribs)
[edit]We need OTRS - no FOP in the US for artworks (which is what these installations are) I also deleted others by this uploader that were marked (c) by someone else
- File:Detail of "Harry Fenn is in the BathroomAgain," a multimedia installation by David Politzer. 02.jpg
- File:Detail of "Harry Fenn is in the BathroomAgain," a multimedia installation by David Politzer. 01.jpg
- File:"Harry Fenn is in the Bathroom Again" by David Politzer at Artspace, NC. August 2017.jpg
- File:HCP Heavyweights 5.jpg
- File:HCP Heavyweights 4.jpg
- File:HCP Heavyweights 6.jpg
- File:HCP Heavyweights 2.jpg
- File:HCP Heavyweights 3.jpg
- File:HCP Heavyweights 1.jpg
- File:David Politzer's video installation titled, "Observation Station, From the Rim." Installed at Artsapce, Cleveland. 4 of 6.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There was also that one deleted by Minorax. 2simple (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankit Rj Photography (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, commons is not a webhost
- File:Uiu copy.jpg
- File:Wepic.jpg
- File:Weimage.jpg
- File:Hdsds.jpg
- File:Dfgsssdsd.jpg
- File:Dffff.jpg
- File:Hhdfhded.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Poor-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & not drawn in ACS style. Have File:Isopropyl-acrylate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
copie d'écran d'un message entre deux contributeurs sur une Page de Discussion. Image inutile. Arroser (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Translation Screenshot of a conversation between two editors on a talk page. Useless image.
Note: image is in use. --Thibaut (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 02:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Good faith upload by Commons user, but I don't think the YouTube channel this comes from owns the rights to this video. This is an advertisement for ... something ... tooth whitening? Skin whitening? That's going to be owned by some kind of beauty products company. The YouTube user in this case shows no evidence of being a representative of a beauty products company, and has other videos of all sorts of different advertisements, including Burger King, Sprite, Game of Thrones... I don't think this YouTube user respects copyright, and just uploads whatever they find. GRuban (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomintor. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator, support image deletion facts. Thanks GRuban, --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 02:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Dino Trailer
[edit]These are screenshots from a YouTube channel that specializes in film trailers. I don't think that channel owns the rights to these trailers. Besides this Indonesian film, and many other Indonesian films, it also has Maleficent, which is a Disney film, and Top Gun: Maverick which is from Paramount. Those are highly unlikely to have had their copyright released.
- File:Elvira Devinamira Wirayanti Dilarang Menyanyi di Kamar Mandi.jpg
- File:Elvira Devinamira Wirayanti Dilarang Menyanyi di Kamar Mandi Film (2019).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GRuban (talk) 00:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Thanks GRuban Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator, support image deletion facts. Thanks GRuban, --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 02:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
The trophies are probably copyrighted and there is the small issue of copyvio - Author Jan Pohribny Copyright holder WWW.POHRIBNY.CZ per exif so not own work
- File:Almanach Asociace profesionálních fotografů České republiky.jpg
- File:Cena Osobnost české fotografie.jpg
- File:Cena za nejlepší fotografickou Kniha roku.jpg
- File:Cena Nejlepší fotografický kalendář roku.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/austereraj
[edit]Suspected flickrwashing. Flickr account has 0 followers, 1 following. This flickr account can't be trusted
- File:Kosi, Mathura, Sani Mandir, Shiv Ling.JPG
- File:Kosi, Mathura, Sani Mandir Shani dev.JPG
- File:Vigyan Bhawan, 12th January 2013 Dr. Raj Kumar Smt. Shanti Devi Law College, Rewari.jpg
- File:Vigyan Bhawan, 12th January 2013 Dr. Raj Kumar, Assistant Professor, Smt. Shanti Devi Law College, Rewari with Arpit Sharma.jpg
- File:Rewari Nursing Student.JPG
- File:Kosi, Mathura, Sani Mandir Giri Raj dev.JPG
- File:Jhoomar, Kosi Mandir Mathura.JPG
- File:Kosi, Mathura, Sani Mandir.JPG
- File:Kosi, Mathura, Sani Mandir dev.JPG
- File:Royal Corp Travel (RCT) Gurgaon, Sushil Yadav, Director of Travel Company, 9416725362.jpg
- File:Rangoli by Mamta Yadav, Smt. Shanti Devi School of Nursing, Saharanwas, Rewari.jpg
- File:Smt. Shanti Devi School of Nursing, Saharanwas, Rewari rangoli by Mamta Yadav.JPG
- File:Minister of Law & Justice, Devaragunda Venkappa Sadananda Gowda with Mahant Chandnath at inaugral function of Faculty of Law, Baba Mast Nath University, Asthal Bohar, Rohtak on 07 January 2015 (Wednesday).jpg
- File:Dr. Raj Kumar delivering lecture at Legal Awareness Camp.jpg
- File:Dr. Surender Yadav, Botany, MDU.jpg
- File:Dr. Raj Kumar Yadav with Dr. Surender Yadav, Scientist MDU.jpg
- File:Dr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Mamta Yadav an evening in IMT park.jpg
- File:Dr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Ms. Mamta Yadav an evening in IMT park Rohtak.jpg
- File:Dr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Ms. Mamta Yadav.jpg
- File:Devaragunda Venkappa Sadananda Gowda with Mahant Chandnath at inaugral function of Faculty of Law, Baba Mast Nath University, Asthal Bohar, Rohtak on 07 January 2015 (Wednesday).jpg
- File:Dr. Raj kumar Yadav.jpg
- File:Dr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Mamta Yadav.jpg
- File:Professor Surender Yadav, Faculty of Science, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak.jpg
- File:Minister of Law & Justice, Devaragunda Venkappa Sadananda Gowda with Mahant Chandnath at inaugural function of Faculty of Law, Baba Mast Nath University, Asthal Bohar, Rohtak on 07 January 2015.jpg
_Gurgaon,_Sushil_Yadav,_Director_of_Travel_Company,_9416725362.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ján Hronský (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some found here - https://twitter.com/zlty_dodo?lang=en - I think we need OTRS confirmation that the uploader is Hronsky
- File:Floating Core.jpg
- File:Housewife's Struggle.jpg
- File:Shower Sadness.jpg
- File:Hot Summer Situation.jpg
- File:Balcony Situation.jpg
- File:Pouring Down.jpg
- File:Stairway To Heaven,.jpg
- File:Levitant, 2020.jpg
- File:Hanging Smoker by Ján Hronský, 2019.jpg
- File:Thorny Entrance by Ján Hronský,.jpg
- File:Dicks Here by Jan Hronsky, 2014.jpg
- File:Delicious Waste.jpg
- File:Ján Hronský, 2009.jpg
- File:Feeble Flow.jpg
- File:Touch Me Oh Evil.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Ticket#2020121810009371. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Why??? OTRS was send.--Svajcr (talk) 14:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC);
Not own work, old photos etc
- File:Hombre en 1940.jpg
- File:EgSpGb.jpg
- File:CantBolRaq56.jpg
- File:Jacobo Zabludovsky.png
- File:Jacobo3.0.png
- File:Jacobo Zabludovsky y Lolita Ayala.png
- File:Telefono de disco.jpg
- File:Jacobo y Lolita.jpg
- File:JACzab.jpg
- File:Jacobo-zabludovsky.jpg
- File:Jacob192876.jpg
- File:Jacobogde1.jpg
- File:Jacobo4.jpg
- File:24 Horas 1973.webp
Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bohemanowasztuka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright holder AIART Adam Luczak www.aiart.pl and others per exif, needs OTRS
- File:Optical vibes, 2019.jpg
- File:Konfluencja 3a, 2018, akryl, płótno, 100 x 100 cm.jpg
- File:Kaplica Neosakralna.jpg
- File:Kaplica neosakralna.jpg
- File:Obraz "Pulsar".jpg
- File:Paweł Wąsowski.jpg
- File:ICXC, 2015.jpg
- File:Alfa i Omega, 2017.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karen Lile (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karen Lile (talk · contribs)
[edit]Stamps are copyrighted in USA since 1978. Same should go for other USPS works.
- File:USPS BB Lady Washington 21 Apr 2019.jpg
- File:USPS BB Envelope Cache Fantasy Studios 23 Feb 2019.jpg
- File:USPS BB PICYA BYC 27 Apr 2014.jpg
- File:USPS BB Cancellation Oct 26 1996.jpg
- File:USPS BB Cancellation 23 February 2019.jpg
- File:USPS BB Cancellation 17 Nov 2018.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Proposal that these images not be deleted or they should be resubmitted in the recommended way
[edit]Copyright is an important issue.
I would propose that these images not be deleted, but rather be preserved, or that other third party sources be found for them. They are part of a new article USPS Building Bridges Special Postal Cancellation Series and enhance the article and also give important reference for the descriptions of the content of the article.
Here are some things to consider, and some knowledge:
- Copyrights for cancellations are different than for stamps. Stamps are created by USPS, and thus are a USPS copyright. Cancellations are created by Postmasters and an independent art director (if the art director is not an employee of USPS) signs contracts with USPS giving permission for USPS to use the illustration for the one time cancellation, but the copyright for the cancellation remains with the original copyright owner and is only used by USPS with permission in connection with one event, for a period of 30 days. Since Karen Lile is the copyright owner, she has the ability to grant permission to Wikipedia to use these images. (I obtained this information from two retired postmasters, who are familiar with the process and have been involved in issuing postal cancellations.)
- USPS has published a Press Release for the media for these, which is still online, which has copies of the images of the cancellations for the media to use, and the press release is published permanently for the public to view. If it is not appropriate for Karen Lile to contribute the images, could I take a section from the USPS Press Release and submit it to Wikipedia?
- On the US Copyright law. Another approach would be to take a photo of a cancellation and stamp that was issued at the Special Postal Cancellation Station. This would be the same as taking a photo of a letter someone received through the mail. The photograph is the copyrightable intellectual property, in this case, so the photographer could contribute to Wikipedia because they own the copyright?
- Can we use an image of from a published newspaper?. There are some newspaper articles that published the image of the cancellation.
- Creative Common License? What if we asked Karen Lile to publish the images online with a Creative Commons license? Would that be a better approach? And then the images could be brought from Creative Commons to wikipedia. We as authors, would want to respect the right of Karen Lile, the copyright owner, to determine how this image is used, since it is something that she licenses actively to USPS. And I would not suggest violating any US Copyright.
Thoughts? SoundNotater (talk) 14:25 EST, Dec 17, 2020
License and Copyright Comments
[edit] Delete any files that include USPS stamps are copyright and should be deleted without question. For the other images we would need evidence that the postmarks, which are certainly not COM:TOO, have been released under a free licence by the copyright holder, who mostly likely be the USPS. I have never seen an instance where they have released anything under a free licence. On the other hand, perhaps the designer retained the copyright but we would need to see the contact to verify that and then be given a release permission statement per OTRS. Also it appears the uploader is only the art director and not the actual designer. Ww2censor (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Ownership
[edit]The copyright owner of the Building Bridges image common to all the images is Karen Earle Lile, not USPS (Building Bridges Website reveals designer). Lile is both Art Director and designer. In the rectangle to the right of each concept, illustrators vary. USPS requires that the designer/illustrator signs a release that she/he has permission to use illustrations included in the cancellation. See my comments above. What is the best way to approach this, to cause the least problem, but still include all the images we can, to enhance the article? (SoundNotater (talk) 14:34 EST, Dec 17, 2020
From Copyright Owner: Please remove the images for now, but continue the discussion
[edit]I am the original and current copyright owner, designer for the Building Bridges logo and I have given permission to USPS to use it for cancellations over the years. However, since there is an ongoing discussion on this topic on this page, I suggest that we remove the images for now, but let the discussion continue. I need time to evaluate the issues that are brought up by the above discussion and to understand how Wikipedia does things. If there is a way that you can include these images through third parties, and allowable use, that would be best. I partner with USPS on this series and I completely comply with all their policies and patterns of behavior, in the interest of good relations. I prefer to err on the side of caution. And out of respect for USPS, I don't discuss the private conversations or processes that I have with them in the process of collaboration. (Karen Lile (talk) Dec 17, 2020 12:05PM PDT
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agostina Marchesini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 02:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 05:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused logo, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 06:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Gayrard died in 2014, not own work in 2020 Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:DW. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Photos from Instagram profile of the singer, as it can be seen in EXIF and like previously deleted photos. No permission.
Smooth O (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Same copyrighted files uploaded, now from different, also copyrighted source (http://www.domaci.de/).
Smooth O (talk) 08:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
file in copyviol, no indication in Donnaglamour.it about a free release or under a Commons-compatible licence — danyele 18:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 02:42, 23 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 15 December 2020 --Krdbot 08:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
This YouTube channel does not own this image. First, it's a still photo in a video, that's already a bad sign. But second, they come right out and say on the YouTube video page:
Sumber Foto : https://www.instagram.com/officialput...
(that ... turns into https://www.instagram.com/officialputeriindonesia/?hl=id)
and even though I don't read Bahasa Indonesia, I'm willing to bet that means "Source of Photo: the official Puteri Indonesia Instagram account", so unless that account has released the photo under a free license, which I doubt, the YouTube channel doesn't have the right to release it either. GRuban (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator, support image deletion facts. Thanks GRuban, --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 02:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florencio~tetwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (more like personal files) - used at w:tetwiki article tet:Florencio Barreto for self-advertising/promotion purposes. However, I consider the user (Florencio~tetwiki) as having good faith and excluded 3 of his personal files from this nomination (he even uploaded a good photo of a school building)
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Presidential Transition website is not part of the US Federal Government, files from this are not in Public Domain A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Presidential Transition website is not part of the US Federal Government, files from this are not in Public Domain A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Terms of Use of the Presidential Transition website disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Presidential Transition website is not part of the US Federal Government, files from this are not in Public Domain A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Terms of Use of the Presidential Transition website disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Introduction video from Biden-Harris transition about cabinet and administration picks 12-11-20.ogv
[edit]Presidential Transition website is not part of the US Federal Government, files from this are not in Public Domain A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Presidential Transition website is not part of the US Federal Government, files from this are not in Public Domain A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Presidential Transition website is not part of the US Federal Government, files from this are not in Public Domain A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used, probably because of the wrong Turkish text. "No free image" was translated to Turkish with the wrong word, "özgür" instead of the correct word "serbest". The latter one means free to use, while the wrongly used "özgür" means someone (I mean a "person", not an image or a placeholder) who enjoys liberty/freedom. We can use this word only if we are talking about an "emancipated woman", but not for a "free image" of hers. Sorry for the rather long lecture on Turkish language. E4024 (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used, probably because of the wrong Turkish text. "No free image" was translated to Turkish with the wrong word, "özgür" instead of the correct word "serbest". The latter one means free to use, while the wrongly used "özgür" means someone (I mean a "person", not an image or a placeholder) who enjoys liberty/freedom. E4024 (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Not OK I think 'özgür' is the proper translation. you can think like in the 'free software'.--sayz'ınusu 09:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- No, I cannot. I know Turkish very well. I also know my people quite well. Never accepting our mistakes is a common attitude among us, Turks. (Me included. :) If there is also a file with "özgür software" or whatsoever, we could also delete it. --E4024 (talk) 11:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unused unnecessary file with personal info. E4024 (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Voreiliges Hochladen. Bild muss bearbeitet werden, Fahrzeugnummer muss verpixelt werden. Bitte entsprechend löschen! DadaRacer (talk) 04:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Looks like CD cover, low res, no metadata, no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and promotional, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Link19830831 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR, as image (uploaded in 2012!) does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: original. I can only assume that G7 applied to the 2nd version that overrode the original. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
所有者が許可していないため Tokugawayuki (talk) 08:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep The artwork is public domain, we don’t need permission from anyone. --Thibaut (talk) 08:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)- Keep per all. Tokugawayuki please stop doing these foolish and unexplained nominations. Johnbod (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
所有者が許可していないため Tokugawayuki (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The artwork is public domain, we don’t need permission from anyone. --Thibaut (talk) 08:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per all. Tokugawayuki please stop doing these foolish and unexplained nominations. Johnbod (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
所有者が許可していないため Tokugawayuki (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Artwork is public domain, we don’t need permission from anyone. --Thibaut (talk) 08:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Thibault. Tokugawayuki please stop doing these foolish and unexplained nominations. Johnbod (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
所有者が許可していないため Tokugawayuki (talk) 08:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The emaki is public domain, we don’t need permission from anyone. --Thibaut (talk) 08:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. The owner would have to own copyright to prevent publication, and there is no copyright in this image for the owner to own. Bahnfrend (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: 12th century artwork. These images from the "Tale of Gengi" have been, probably, uploaded and can be downloaded from the Tokyo University of the Arts [1]. I don't think there is any ban on putting this 12th century image on Commons. (Ismoon (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC))
- Keep per all. Tokugawayuki please stop doing these foolish and unexplained nominations. 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by သိုက်လွဳ ဟံသာဝတဳ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 09:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
small files with low resolution. can be founded on some Thai websites via Google image search. ([2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], etc)
- File:000WQ449A17035A0F3A482j.jpg
- File:20171122441954d29ad2a375cef8ea524a2c7e73132928 ဖ.jpg
- File:Images (3)ဖ.jpg
- File:HCtHFA7ele6Q2dULVcMRWaMtpQlDzjEFwMPbsbOGQ2m4wpT5o68mQZiKeCyAXc8lmx.jpg
- File:Images (4)သဇိုၚ်.jpg
- File:ทำไมต้องพอเพียง.jpg
- File:2019-08-01-21 31 17-ถ้าคุณเป็นคนหนึ่ง-ที่กำลังอยากใช้ชีวิตพอเพียง.png
- File:နဲကဲတဵုလွဳပရာ.jpg
- File:ပရေၚ်တဵုလွဳ.jpg
- File:ပရေၚ်လွဳဂတာပ်အခေတ်.jpg
- File:ပရေၚ်တဵုဂတာပ်အခေတ်.jpg
- File:ပရေၚ်တဵုလွဳဂတာပ်အခေတ်.jpg
- File:Drying krill နဲကဲစဲကောန်ၚာကၠာဟွံဂွံဒှ်ခရံက်.jpg
- File:1413143276-image-o.jpg
- File:Images (2)ခရံက်.jpg
- File:Unnamed (1) ခၞက်ခရံက်ကၠာဟွံဂွံလုပ်ဟရဳဏီ.jpg
- File:711388-01 နဲကဲစဲကောန်ၚာကြပ်ဒှ်ခရံက်.jpg
- File:Images (2) နဲကဲစဲကောန်ၚာကၠာဟွံဂွံဒှ်ခရံက်.jpg
- File:Images (3) ကောန်ၚာကၠာဟွံဂွံဒှ်ခရံက်.jpg
- File:11-13 ကောန်ၚာကၠောန်ခရံက်.jpg
- File:000WQ23CCB66CAAE171861j ရုဲကောန်ၚာကျေဝ်ကျေဝ်သွက်သ္ဂောံကၠောန်ခရံက်(ဟရံက်).jpg
%E1%80%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E1%80%9E%E1%80%87%E1%80%AD%E1%80%AF%E1%81%9A%E1%80%BA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E1%80%81%E1%80%9B%E1%80%B6%E1%80%80%E1%80%BA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E1%80%81%E1%81%9E%E1%80%80%E1%80%BA%E1%80%81%E1%80%9B%E1%80%B6%E1%80%80%E1%80%BA%E1%80%80%E1%81%A0%E1%80%AC%E1%80%9F%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B6%E1%80%82%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B6%E1%80%9C%E1%80%AF%E1%80%95%E1%80%BA%E1%80%9F%E1%80%9B%E1%80%B3%E1%80%8F%E1%80%AE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E1%80%94%E1%80%B2%E1%80%80%E1%80%B2%E1%80%85%E1%80%B2%E1%80%80%E1%80%B1%E1%80%AC%E1%80%94%E1%80%BA%E1%81%9A%E1%80%AC%E1%80%80%E1%81%A0%E1%80%AC%E1%80%9F%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B6%E1%80%82%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B6%E1%80%92%E1%80%BE%E1%80%BA%E1%80%81%E1%80%9B%E1%80%B6%E1%80%80%E1%80%BA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E1%80%80%E1%80%B1%E1%80%AC%E1%80%94%E1%80%BA%E1%81%9A%E1%80%AC%E1%80%80%E1%81%A0%E1%80%AC%E1%80%9F%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B6%E1%80%82%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B6%E1%80%92%E1%80%BE%E1%80%BA%E1%80%81%E1%80%9B%E1%80%B6%E1%80%80%E1%80%BA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 14:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
small files with low resolution. can be founded on some Thai websites via Google image search. ([8], [9])
_%E1%80%85%E1%80%B2%E1%80%90%E1%80%AF%E1%80%B2%E1%80%90%E1%80%BE%E1%80%BA%E1%80%B1%E1%80%81%E1%81%9E%E1%80%80%E1%80%BA%E1%80%9C%E1%81%9F%E1%80%B1%E1%81%9A%E1%80%BA%E1%80%99%E1%80%BD%E1%80%B2%E1%80%8A%E1%80%AD%E1%81%8A.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 05:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
small file size and resolution, exif display seems to be the original source is google image.
- File:Raikamnanchul06သတ်လဴ.jpg
- File:4-36-1024x683 သတ်လဴ.jpg
- File:1.สวนส้มอองตอง-ผลผลิตส้มจำนวนมากจากต้มแม่พันธุ์คุณภาพ-696x392 သတ်လိမဴ.jpg
- File:15 သတ်လိမဴ.jpg
- File:ส้มเป็นผลไม้ยอดนิยมของคนไทย သတ်လိမဴ.jpg
- File:ส้มโอ သတ်လဴ.jpg
- File:6e ပၞဴတဵုစုတ်ကဵုန.jpg
- File:3 တၞံပၞဴ.jpg
- File:20170930 015830 ပၞဴ.jpg
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 13:14, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF
- File:မန်လရိုအ်ယာံ.png
- File:တၞံသတ်လၚ်္ကာ.jpg
- File:တၞံသတ်ကြုက်.jpg
- File:သတ်ကြုက်.jpg
- File:သတ်ပၞဴ.jpg
- File:ပၞဴ.jpg
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 09:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: part of a series, clearly taken at the same time by same photographer, not found elsewhere using Google Images, undue suspicion. Delete one screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
screenshots of copyrighted software Google Maps/Earth
- File:ပြၚ်ဂြးဗ္တဳ (ပြၚ်ၜဳပါၚ်မ္ၚဵု).png
- File:ပြၚ်ဟလိၚ် (ပြၚ်ဗ္တဳဇမၠိၚ်).png
- File:ပြၚ်ဟလိၚ် (ပြၚ်ၜဳဇမၠိၚ်ရေဝ်သၠုၚ်ကျာ ဂကောံကွာန်ပါၚ်ယၚ်ဒိန်).png
- File:ပြၚ်ဍောတ် (ပြၚ်ဗ္တဳဍောတ် ကွာန်ပါၚ်ယၚ်ဒိန် ရေဝ်သၠုၚ်ကျာ).png
- File:ကျာ်စေတဳလဒေါဝ်သာသနာ ကွာန်ယၚ်ဒိန်.png
- File:ကျာ်စေတဳဒဵုထဝ် (ကွာန်ပါၚ်ယၚ်ဒိန်).png
- File:Tkotklaw.png
- File:ပါၚ်ၜဳ (ဇီးဖြူသောၚ်).png
- File:ကလအ်ကွာန်.png
- File:ကွာန်ကလအ်.png
- File:ကွာန်ကအ်လှိုၚ်.png
- File:ကွာန်တၟိတဴတက်.png
- File:ကွာန်ပါၚ်မ္ၚဵု.png
- File:ကွာန်တၟိၜိုပ်ထဝ်.png
- File:ကွာန်မ္ၚဵုဇၞော်.png
- File:ကွာန်ယၚ်ရေဝ်.png
- File:ကွာန်တၟိယၚ်ဒိန်.png
- File:ကွာန်ယၚ်ဒိန်.png
- File:ကွာန်ပါၚ်ယၚ်ဒိန်.png
- File:တ္ကံဇၞော်.png
- File:တ္ကံ.png
- File:တ္ကံကၠဵု.png
- File:ကျာ်စေတဳကြုၚ်စၠန်.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 16:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Cannot believe this is own work from 1945. Needs a proper source. Kissa21782 (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing author, source, permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
This logo is outdated and no longer used by the company. 2A02:A212:92A4:C280:4DB:C5B7:A84C:601E 10:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Died in 1977 can't be own work Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Clearly an old photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Found here - http://hopesilver.com/about/ - i think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Undoubtly, CristobalGunckel is not the author of this picture. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 10:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing author, source, date, permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Not "own work", pas d'autorisation, pas d'indication qu'il s'agit réeellement d'une image sous licence libre ou dans le domaine public 2A01:E35:2F0F:8080:F476:B35F:83B:6D07 11:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing author, source, date, permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence the uploader is the the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p (talk) 11:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
1955 work, need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing author, source, date, permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder per EXIF is professional photographer (http://www.desibeerichardson.com/). So this is probably flickrwashing. Smooth O (talk) 11:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Blur, unusable photo. Smooth O (talk) 11:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
*OK. do it!--Quahadi Añtó 12:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Lexy iris (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
My children's and wife privacy have been breached. 208.44.170.126 12:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Lexy iris (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
From Moura's FaceBook page, lacking any copyright statements over there. Jlevi (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot from TV show, no permission. Smooth O (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per smooth Lexy iris (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
On closer inspection I am not sure if I can post this photo on Wikimedia Commons. Industrees (talk) 12:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
On closer inspection I am not sure if I can post this photo on Wikimedia Commons. Industrees (talk) 12:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Fantasy flag, no enyclopedic use thinkable. As per the basic priciples of Commons, there is no need for this here. Anticopyrightviolator (talk) 12:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Fantasy flag, no enyclopedic use thinkable. As per the basic priciples of Commons, there is no need for this here. Anticopyrightviolator (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The image on wikipedia:zh did not have a source. Contested tagging of "{{dw no source since|month=December|day=6|year=2020}}". — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Question @Jeff G.: Do you have a link to the file on zh.wikipedia? --MGA73 (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: Same name, see log at https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97&page=File%3AKanagawa-ch-map.png . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you. Yes it just say own work. My guess is the map is made after a file from Japanese Wikipedia per below. --MGA73 (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you. Yes it just say own work. My guess is the map is made after a file from Japanese Wikipedia per below. --MGA73 (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: Same name, see log at https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97&page=File%3AKanagawa-ch-map.png . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- My best guess is that the map is based on one of the many maps from Japanese Wikipedia. There are many maps like File:Map kanagawa shiroyama town p01-01.png. --MGA73 (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: very simple map, no proprietary info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo. Smooth O (talk) 13:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Viewfromtheriva (talk · contribs)
[edit]OOS biography.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:EV/COM:NOTUSED. Only prior usage was to vandalise Wikipedia:Tip of the day/December 15. Opalzukor (talk) 13:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete if: does not have a specific date. Lexy iris (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence this is an official flag of anywhere, let alone Speke. Vandalism. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted: I have gone through other available versions of this photo and I could find this older one with same resolutions as those of the Flickr. I should say it's indeed a PRP case and should be deleted. (P199 for your attention. Persia please check other RFDs, probably same thing would apply there.) Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 13:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I have gone through other available versions of this photo and I could find this older one.I should say it's indeed a PRP case and should be deleted.--Mhhossein talk 14:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation Persia ☘ 14:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We have the exact source, date and license here. There are also super good categories. Also due to the lack of users interested in the Middle East, I have linked here so more users can participate in DonyaJahanbakht and Elnaz RFDs. Lexy iris (talk) 19:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: passed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
No obvious educative use so outside the scope of the project to me. Herby talk thyme 14:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete outside the scope Lexy iris (talk) 19:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Pd complex logo 
Aurelio de Sandoval 
(talk) 14:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Pd complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Catoon Netowork copyright Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found elsewhere using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
some advert spam, along with its copy File:Affiche infosup.jpg and Wikipedia screenshoot File:Imprim écran.png - all uploads. Pibwl (talk) 17:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The file is an old openstreetmap screenshot from January 2014 and the area has changed since. We can now use mapframe instead. katpatuka (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of book cover Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
artwork (album cover), not a free work — danyele 18:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No model release Palnatoke (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The child in the picture has not consented to wider dissemination of the picture. --Palnatoke (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Many alternatives available in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Lexy iris (talk) 19:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Not de minimis, intent of image is to show stand containing copyrighted media works. ViperSnake151 (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: yes, DM. Individual images are so small and distorted, cannot be reused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
unused logos of an uploader blocked on wiki for vandalism
Pippobuono (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
One-time-visitor with the same surname left this image. (Only two global edits BTW.) I looked for the name and found a few people but doubt is any of them. If no-one can find out who he is better to delete. No use, no meaningful cats. Probably out of scope. A week or more to find out... E4024 (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of File:L'homme à la guitare, G. Maury.jpg. Uploader, a sockpuppet, has doodled/traced over the existing image (see File:Georges Maury Portrait 2.png), which is a "midpoint" of the process). Although the doodle may also have a new copyright, it does not extinguish the copyright of the underlying work on which it is based and from which it is copying expression. Эlcobbola talk 20:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Doodle copied from the painting L'homme à la guitare by artist George Maury, who died less than 70 years ago. --Titlutin (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination.--DDupard (talk) 10:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Georges Maury Portrait.png which relates to similar upload by a sockpuppet of this user. These appear to be stylistic tracings/doodles based on existing images (compare File:Guy Debord.png to this.) Although the doodles my also generate a new copyright, they do not extinguish the copyright of the underlying works and thus are COM:DWs requiring evidence of permission. COM:PRP issue.
Эlcobbola talk 20:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:Tom Brier.png seems copied from this and the 2 Feldup from this (same pose, same expression, even the hair on the forehead look the same) --Titlutin (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Pd complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 20:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
image with copyright Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: No educational. Selfie of a non notable person. Headlock0225 (talk) 22:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GiuseppeFerraro90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ostensoriomontestella.jpg
- File:Aldoferraroedieni.jpg
- File:Calicepissideeremosanta.jpg
- File:Aldoferraroorafo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emilio Luque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bogus PD claims. Date of creation is not the same as date of author death. If author is truly unknown, we use 120 years (the oldest of these is 1934, i.e., 1934+120+1=01.01.2055)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ilaniwahed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO - various cameras, resolutions, EXIF (and lack thereof); appeared elsewhere (e.g., File:Gambar nikah.jpg is here: File:AmaizLanie.jpg is here; etc.), File:JPAM Amai Kamarudin.jpg is a selfie and others are not (i.e., by definition, cannot all be same author); File:Temuan Takdir.jpg is a movie poster; etc. Quack!
- File:Gambar nikah.jpg
- File:Elanie dan Amai di majlis.jpg
- File:Elanie Aidid dan Elisya Sandha.jpg
- File:Elanie Aidid.jpg
- File:JPAM Amai Kamarudin.jpg
- File:Amai Kamarudin dalam Udara Batik.jpg
- File:Amai Kamarudin memakai Udara Batik.jpg
- File:Amai Kamarudin, filem Showtime 1958.jpg
- File:Temuan Takdir.jpg
- File:AmaizLanie.jpg
- File:Amai Kamarudin, Abpbh 2017.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ilaniwahed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Amaizlanie kahwin.jpg
- File:Elani 2019.jpg
- File:AMAIZLANIE.jpg
- File:Amai k.jpg
- File:Amai fighting.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by G.F.2.G.F.G.F.G.F.2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]license laundering. All images appeared elsewhere prior to upload at source. E.g., File:Spearhead-class.02.jpg is 09.2020 at the source but here 02.2020; File:Spearhead-class.04.jpg is 09.2020 at the source but here 10.2019, etc.
- File:Spearhead-class.04.jpg
- File:Spearhead-class.03.jpg
- File:Spearhead-class.01.jpg
- File:Spearhead-class.02.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
image with copyright Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
PD complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Page 4 gives a 1966 publication date, but otherwise there isn't a clear notice. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- PD-US-no notice added. --Fæ (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
See corner watermarks: Nello Photography. Uploader is serial copyright violator (see talk/deleted contribs.) COM:PRP issue.
Эlcobbola talk 22:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Because this image has already been used elsewhere(in other file), actually where it is needed. When searching for the needed file, this image file appears in the first place. That's really disturbing. Nilufər Abdullayeva (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
PD complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by USA-albania (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kadrushi,.jpg
- File:Kadrush.jpg
- File:Kadrushi.png
- File:Kadrush Radogoshi 1.jpg
- File:Kadrush Radogoshi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, derivative work of a protected design h-stt !? 13:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Sorry ... kann nur dem "Deletion request" zustimmen, nachdem ich das gelesen habe: „Wenn du ein Foto von einem geschützten Original machst, erschaffst du damit ein neues, urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk (die Fotografie). Gleichzeitig existiert jedoch weiterhin der urheberrechtliche Schutz am Original - er verschwindet nicht dadurch, dass die Rechte am Foto dir gehören. Wenn du dieses Foto machst und veröffentlichst, tust du etwas, was nur der ursprüngliche Rechteinhaber darf. Du darfst deine Fotografie also nicht verwenden, es sei denn, der Schöpfer des Originals hat dir dafür die Erlaubnis gegeben.“ Jula2812 (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as it was invented only in 1959 by Werner Schöppner, it's not in the PD. --Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
droit d auteur Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). Les licences CC sont irrévocables. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Quelles sont les raisons de la probable suppression prochaine de cette image ?--Anthospace (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 23:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mont travail est injustement supprimé par lefringant Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est systematiquement supprimé par Lefringant Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est régulierement supprimer par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Yvesdebxl (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DERIV photo of a poster, where the poster includes an uncredited (presumably publicity shot) image of Annie Lennox. Belbury (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Conserver Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion).Matpib (talk) 19:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Contre. Je ne vois aucune raison de supprimer ce fichier, si la licence est en bonne ordre. / Against. I don't see any reason to delete this file as long as the licence is in order. --Schlosser67 (talk) 14:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
mon travail est regulierement supprimé par lefringant en fonction de ce qu il juge bon ou pas Je ne perds plus mon temps a faire du travail de recherche pour qu il soit ensuite supprimé Yvesdebxl (talk) 16:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable pour la suppression (No valid reason for deletion). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The architecture here cannot be considered de minimis as the main intention is the tower right at the center. Not incidental, and cropping will just make this file unusable (because it won't be consistent with the file name and the principal category). Designed by Foster and Partners and completed in 2000. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Saudi Arabia has no Commons-applicable FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
PD complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 04:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
PD complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 04:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
PD complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 04:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, there is no Commons-compatible Freedom of Panorama provision in Latvia per COM:FOP Latvia. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Image shows a screen copy from Facebook which cannot be released under a free license. Mussklprozz (talk) 09:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Disagree. I'm not only an author of the screen. Also I'm the alone administrator of the group and the author of the screened post. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://head.adm44.ru/ © 2009–2020 Администрация Костромской области. OTRS request would be sent. Kaganer (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 09:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 02:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I would like to suggest that we discuss the relevant content in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gocheok Sky Dome WBSC Premier 12 2019.jpg. --Trainholic (talk) 03:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yousrialghoul (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, crosses COM:TOO Gikü (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Please also see File:SPUMANTE FC LOGO.png; it is a new upload of the same file, supposedly published on Flickr with a CC license – but the Flickr account has only this image, recently uploaded by the same uploader, meaning that perhaps they uploaded it without permission there and now try to justify the permission here. Gikü (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
No evidence this is an official flag of anywhere, let alone Speke Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Simple cock photo, no value to project (COM:NUDE). Matlin (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
It was malformed to begin with. Therefore, I have, since, replaced it. BoringJim (talk) 18:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete scans as noted - "User reported error: This books only has the first 20 pages. " in metadata ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
File:A Short History Of English Printing 1476-1898 (IA AShortHistoryOfEnglishPrinting14761898).pdf
[edit]Failed scan? Only 10 pages of book present. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
artwork (picture disc), not a free work — danyele 23:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
screenshot from a videoclip, not a free work — danyele 23:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
account made to upload this one picture, low quality, not own work (assuming from filename), most likely not in scope, the list goes on Nutshinou Talk! 22:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Seems like some kind of advertising. Not own work, text is too small to be readable. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
The user who uploaded this photo is NOT the author. This photo was taken from the internet! Nurtenge (talk) 09:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Nurtenge: don't just cast a vague claim, please provide link where it was taken from. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS from original photographer required. --✗plicit 03:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of file: Aerial view of the Province of Chiriqui, Republic of Panama 02.jpg. Images are identical apart from the metadata, which is more complete in the other image. —capmo (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF, uploaded less than an hour after a blatant copyvio of this subject (File:Heckmannimage2020.png) was deleted (i.e., if they had this image that was genuinely their own work, they would not have resorted to that copyvio in the first place). See also File:Heckmann.png for another copyvio of this subject by this uploader. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 21:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
ce fichier n'est pas libre, il appartient à l'ONISEP : https://www.orientation-pour-tous.fr/etudier-se-former/s-orienter-dans-ses-etudes/article/apres-le-bac Tiraden (talk) 18:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Tiraden: Euh, c'est pas du tout le même schéma, je crois que vous faites erreur, mais bon si vous insistez. --Menthe 555 (talk) 11:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour, vous n'êtes pas administrateur, et quand bien même dès lors que vous êtes impliqués, vous n'avez pas le droit de clôturer cette discussion. Ce n'est pas la même image et alors ? vous allez prendre les gens pour des imbéciles longtemps ? vous allez prétendre que vous avez dessiné cette image dans Paint à partir d'une feuille blanche ? si vous persistez je vous signale aux administrateurs. Tiraden (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Tiraden: Ce n'est toujours pas la même image donc toujours irrecevable... Mais je vois que vous êtes un grand spécialiste des joutes verbales, surtout quand je vois vos contributions et vos problèmes avec d'autres utilisateurs. Vu la force que vous mettez contre toutes mes contributions alors que l'encyclopédie ne vous appartient pas, je pense que je vais faire une demande de médiation entre nous deux. Entre la délation et la dialogue, je préfère toujours le dialogue, malheureusement ce n'est pas votre cas. Menthe 555 (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bonjour, vous n'êtes pas administrateur, et quand bien même dès lors que vous êtes impliqués, vous n'avez pas le droit de clôturer cette discussion. Ce n'est pas la même image et alors ? vous allez prendre les gens pour des imbéciles longtemps ? vous allez prétendre que vous avez dessiné cette image dans Paint à partir d'une feuille blanche ? si vous persistez je vous signale aux administrateurs. Tiraden (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Ce n'est effectivement pas du tout la même illustration : pas les mêmes informations, pas la même organisation de l'information, et pas la même esthétique. --Léna (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jose Ignacio Paua Monument
[edit]No freedom of pano in the phils and no permission from the heirs of sculptor ANASTACIO CAEDO - 1990 died - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anastacio_Caedo
- File:7604Foods landmarks Roads 01.jpg
- File:General Jose Ignacio Paua.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 02.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 03.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 05.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 06.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 07.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 08.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 09.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 11.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 12.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 08:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Keep Because the Tourism Office of Silang, Cavite expressly gave me permission to take photos of their monuments and memorials, like this and Rizal monuments; only the heirs of the sculptor may question any FOP infringement in the Special Courts, as strictly provided by the 2019 New S.C. Circular, implementing the Copyright and Intellectual Property laws in the Civil Code; with more reason, any editor here has no Legal rights whatsoever to question any Uploading; besides, the Pua Monument like Rizal Monuments in the Philippines and Cavite are owned by the National or here the Local Government Code; hence, under this Special Law, the Artists alleged creators have no Copyright rights since they were paid by the Municipal Goverment; in addition the façade or exterior is unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of National or Local Government which granted me express permission to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantage in the future elections, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; In support of my stance, opposition to the delition and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons administrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment According to this article extracted from a Tulay newsmagazine article written by Teresita Ang-See: "On Independence Day on June 12, 1989, General Paua was fittingly honored when Kaisa Para Sa Kaunlaran, Inc., an organization of young Chinese Filipinos, in cooperation with the National Historical Institute, unveiled his bust at the Aguinaldo Shrine in Kawit, Cavite and a nine-foot monument of this hero in Silang, Cavite. Funds for the monument were raised from all sectors of the Chinese Filipino community as a tribute to this unknown and hitherto unsung hero of the Philippine revolution." No mention who exactly sculpted this monument, but should it had cooperation with Silang LGU, might {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} apply or, as a voluntary project by Tsinoy community, should this fall outside Philippine copyright law or just an uncopyrighted statue? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. Going to keep this for now. Someone else can nominat eif they see fit. --Missvain (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jose Ignacio Paua Monument
[edit]While I initially thought that works by Tsinoys may not be eligible for copyright because of their citizenships (some may be Filipinos, others Chinese), the fact that both the Philippines (1951) and China (1992) are members of the Berne Convention seems to invalidate my previous claim. While the statue in question was erected in 1989 by the Filipino-Chinese community, the location is in the Philippines hence Philippine copyright law applies. Also as their countries are signatories to Berne, the Filipinos and Chinese cannot be deprived of copyright over their works. Should this statue be made in China, per COM:CHINA their copyright law is retroactive. Hence this statue is not free and cannot be hosted here. Delete all until a full Freedom of Panorama is introduced in the Philippines, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
- File:7604Foods landmarks Roads 01.jpg
- File:General Jose Ignacio Paua.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 02.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 03.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 05.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 06.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 07.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 08.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 09.JPG
- File:Silang,Cavitejf9881 11.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- 4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter
- a Legal Bar to delete my photos User:Ramon FVelasquez
- Keep I object to the deletion on the ground that our Copyright law expressly contains the Extinctive prescription of 4 years unlike 3 years in American Jurisprudence; so from 2016 uploading, any and all photos of Commons can no longer be deleted much less be brought to the Special Court even by the creator artist or assigns of the artist sculptor, Dura lex sed lex; the IPO, DOJ and the Special Court will forthwith throw the case by Motion to Dismiss or Motion to Quash due to Prescription; even Commons lawyers will agree with our Copyright Law proviso on Extinctive prescription read in connection with the Implementing 2019 Circular on Special Courts' creation and jurisdiction over Copyright cases including FOP here; with this I register a very strong Legal objection to the Deletion regards Judgefloro (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Paging @Clindberg: over the supposed "prescription period" of R.A. 8293 claimed by Judgefloro (he also made such claims over various other pending Philippine FOP cases). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions in My Talk Pages by Herein Mass Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited a) Legal, b) Moral Reasons and in the c) LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia
- CONSOLIDATED Strongest CONTINUING Legal Objection Ever to the Non-Stop Mass Deletions Requests by herein Nominator: Counter-argument: the Supreme Court’s Revised Rules on IP Cases which aimed for Litigation, Driving Innovation and Creativity December 23, 2020: "The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) said the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases is testament to the whole-of-society work in ensuring an effective and speedy adjudication of IP rights cases – essential in creating an environment that fosters innovation, investments and entrepreneurship; it was participated and signed by "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
- The Supreme Court solely interprets the law when a ripe case reaches it via Stare Decision or Obiter Dictum;
- However, its S.C. Circulars and Memoranda especially En Banc is Law; it is not mere interpretation but obeying its Constitutional Mandate on its Judicial Supremacy; now, the MOMENT has come, UNPRECEDENTED that it was joined by Great Minds including the "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
- Your statement that "SC circular you're pertaining to cannot overwrite Sec. 172.2, xxx is highly misplaced and without any legal support; for the cited 2019 Circular never erased or even interpreted the law but it IMPLEMENTS it enumerating the Formal and Substantive Requirement;
- On your statement that my "your interpretation of the burden of evidence xxx", I submitted to the Commons Community my Legal Treatise, as User with One Vote, like anyone here, even if I am a Wikimedia Lawyer and Judge; for I hold that I leave the legal policies to foreign Wikimedia Lawyers to vote on Deletion and Non-Deletion;
- When a Nominator tags for Deletion, even say he or she is an administrator or mere user, as such, he or she cannot be the Prosecutor, the Arbiter, the Trial Judge and Justice who will decide on deletion or keeping; it would turn Commons to “Juez de Cuchillo” - “Law of the Knife”, a Juez de Cuchillo or moral farce, Censorship so to speak;
- I am 6 of Commons most active editor and uploader; but in my totalt al edit count: 1,700,373+ user has been on Wikimedia Commons for 13 years, 8 months and 2 days, I do Upload and few edits but ZERO tagging of Deletions; I leave that matter to Commons Community;
- It is a sad day for Commons if a) the Smart One b) a Check user previously on hold c) and now, a Starter of Mass Deletion Requests, flooding my talk pages with Mass Deletions on FOP:
- If you argue via discussion that I am legally wrong, my fish vendor and hired Trike Drivers joined many open mouths and told me this or that, but they do not have Evidence;
- Any one can cherry pick Commons Policies to tailormade their stance, however, the Supreme Court and the IPO et Bureau of Copyright already Spoke fully implementing the FOP rules on Copyright Infringement;
- As Legal Challenge, I demand you to Email the IPO and Bureau of Copyrights and submit all my Legal Contradictions to your Stance, put your cards on the table, since in the Webinar and Communications I had, they are open to Reply as Mandated by the Strict provisions of R.A. 6713, and then let the IPO and Bureau of Copyrights Rule as to Whose Legal Stance on FOP on Commons Uploading is Correct Mine or Yours; then and there, if it will say Delete, then I will appeal the matter to the IBP and or DOJ Secretary for final ruling; Commons is not in a hurry to Grant or Deny your Mass Deletions Request; Commons administrators do Balance the Rights of Commons, the benefits to the Cultural Heritage of Filipinos and the Commons Policies;
- I respectfully quote the following Verba and Important Notes of Commons Administrators on the matter:
- " Are photos of "request letter and letter of receipt" by Judgefloro within scope of Commons?
- Vide: Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines. Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts Very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 08:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- The Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator, I underscore, for clarity's sake - Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator are NULL and VOID ab Initio as they are a) Unlawful under Philippine Laws, and b) contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia;
- The Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator is a Virtual and Desperate Attempt to Erase Valued Images or Most Important Cultural Heritage Treasures of the Philippines from Commons Ownership without any Valid Legal Basis, but just mere copy paste citations or Provisos of Laws, without any Jurisprudential Support - to be specific - rather trying so hard to get the uploads of what seems a fellow countryman deleted, but anyhow I don't think these files should be deleted ...
- In-scope. Any files that are used by the projects for their own functioning can be in-scope. This extends to useful information that supports Commons deletion discussions;
- WHEREFORE, premises considered, your Mass Nominations for Deletions, including your legal sayings without any Jurisprudential either Phil or US are hereby DENIED with finality for utter lack of merit in Philippines Law and Fact;
- In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions of Herein Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited Legal, Moral Reasons and in the LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia;
- Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or delete; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
- Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objections EVER to the Requested Mass Non-Stop Deletions of herein Nominator and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- a) Your opinion - like that of my b) fish vendor which had tons of wisdom not only in Fish but in Commerce, of my c) Trike Driver who is expert in Transportation - may be believed by the onlookers or Voters in Elections Periods; but without Citation of Philippine Jurisprudence, without basing you argument on any USA or Federal ruling, and worst, without supporting your above Repeated opinions-comments-mirror replies, whatever you may term them - is not worth a Lawyer's salt, or here, a Commons Community Policy on keeping or deleting; rest assured that if you are believed, I never filed or would ever file any Undeletions Requests, for I know my limitations in time and effort; I would rather go inside the corridors of the DOJ, the IPO and or Bureau of Copyright for Official Statements, PROMISE Judgefloro (talk) 11:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
plus à jour et harmonisation vers ficher plus récent Menthe 555 (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep qu'est ce qui n'est "plus à jour" exactement ?
Dans tous les cas ce n'est pas un motif de suppression, il suffit de ne plus utiliser l'image. Tiraden (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the nominator's reason to delete the file is "it's not up to date", which is not a valid reason to delete a file. Please use {{Update}} {{Current}} or {{Recent}} instead. --Tomchen1989 (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:ডাক্তার - বাংলা চলচ্চিত্র (১৯৪০).webm Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Mistakenly identified as public domain by me the uploader. I have been unable to adequately identify the copyright status Ewingdo (talk) 05:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to mentioned source on the file page "This item may be under copyright protection. Please ask copyright owner for permission before publishing.". --Elly (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Mistakenly identified as public domain by me the uploader. I have been unable to adequately identify the copyright status Ewingdo (talk) 05:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to mentioned source on the file page "This item may be under copyright protection. Please ask copyright owner for permission before publishing.". --Elly (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Mistakenly identified as public domain by me the uploader. I have been unable to adequately identify the copyright status Ewingdo (talk) 05:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to mentioned source on the file page "This item may be under copyright protection. Please ask copyright owner for permission before publishing.". --Elly (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Mistakenly identified as public domain by me the uploader. I have been unable to adequately identify the copyright status Ewingdo (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to mentioned source on the file page "This item may be under copyright protection. Please ask copyright owner for permission before publishing.". --Elly (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Mistakenly identified as public domain by me the uploader. I have been unable to adequately identify the copyright status Ewingdo (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to mentioned source on the file page "This item may be under copyright protection. Please ask copyright owner for permission before publishing.". --Elly (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Found on the web before upload and watermarked, I think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not react, no permission for use of this photo, consequently copyrighted without free license. --Elly (talk) 22:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Some photos can be found on FB (https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.377718689089247&type=3), none of them has EXIF data.
- File:Novi Most u Priboju.jpg
- File:Novi most Priboj Lim.jpg
- File:Novi Most Priboj.jpg
- File:Novi most Priboj.jpg
- File:Novi most priboj.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader states on my talk page that these are his works, and FB page is his also. --Smooth O (talk) 11:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It is higly probable the uploader made these images. Older software for editting or cropping photos removes the EXIF data. In addition per COM:AGF. --Elly (talk) 22:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Superfluous with File:EuroGales.svg Olou (talk) 10:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose. File:EuroGales.svg was created for unknown reasons today, when File:EuroWales.svg exist and used in articles (till this moment) already since 2014. I don't know why you maked new duplicate, Olou. But you can use or overwright existed File:EuroWales.svg instead of creating new separated file. To admins: Delete File:EuroGales.svg as duplicate. ← Alex Great talkrus? 12:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)- Oppose As per Alex Great. I think Olou did a better job positioning the dragon, but that's no reason to make a duplicate. Also, if following the usual Spanish-language naming scheme that we have for most of Category:SVG Heart-flags of Eurovision is a concern, then moving File:EuroWales.svg to File:EuroGales.svg is also an option. That way, we can keep the edit history of the file. For now, I am voting to Delete File:EuroGales.svg, but I invite Olou to overwrite File:EuroWales.svg if he likes. — Andreyyshore (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept - Regarding copyright no reason to delete. Currently, both images are used on many articles of the projects. Anybody of you, @Alex Great: , @Andreyyshore: or @Olou: can overwrite the oldest image with the newer version and delete the nominated image on the projects. But please consider the guidelines of Commons:Overwriting existing files. Elly (talk) 22:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:EuroGales.svg Sims2aholic8 (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- False. Read the discussion above. Andreyyshore 🆃︎ 🅲︎ 17:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Juandev as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no freedom of interier in the Czech legislative. For this artwork, we would need permission form the holder of the art work, which we obviously doesnt have.
Sending this to DR because FOP cases are not strictly within SPEEDY. COM:FOP Czech Republic notes there are uncertainties in CZ. Key aspects of this image are that it is a 2D reproduction of a 3D sculpture that is fundamentally part of the architecture work that is permanently installed inside en:Old Town Hall (Prague). DMacks (talk) 11:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Rekonstrukce Staroměstské radnice 1AAN5138-HDR.jpg and File:Praha, Staroměstská radnice, sklo (1).jpg are of the same sculpture. An OTRS agent told me that the ticket for the former one is a release from the photographer, not the original artist. If this nom here is closed to delete, then that image should be also. Conversely, the latter one was speedy-deleted as copyvio (tagged by User:Juandev "In the Czech Republic you cannot freely distribute photographs of artwork from interiors, without a permision from licence holder of the artwork."). If this nom here is closed to keep, that image should be undeleted. DMacks (talk) 12:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- delete we dont have an agreement from licence holder to distribute it. Czech legislature writes about exclusion for public spaces. Interior is not a public space. PS is a space accessible by public with an open sky. Yup all of them violates the local legislative. --Juandev (talk) 14:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion and on basis of the interpretation of COM:FOP Czech Republic. I will nominate the other image for deletion. --Elly (talk) 08:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fantasy flag, no enyclopedic use thinkable. As per the basic priciples of Commons, there is no need for this here. Anticopyrightviolator (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no educational value. Also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arendelle Flag 1.jpg. --Elly (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
plus à jour Menthe 555 (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep c'est une schéma intitulé 2008, c'était vrai en 2008 et n'a pas vocation à être vrai en 2020. Tiraden (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Per discussion. We can keep older images for historic purposes. --Elly (talk) 16:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
plus à jour Menthe 555 (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep qu'est ce qui n'est "plus à jour" exactement ?
Dans tous les cas ce n'est pas un motif de suppression, il suffit de ne plus utiliser l'image. Tiraden (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep Le but de cette image est de fournir une représentation simple du système. Elle doit évoluer avec les changements, mais doit conserver cette simplicité. @Menthe, l'image proposée en remplacement est trop complexe, mais si une image représentant le système de manière aussi détaillée n'existe pas encore, la création de cette nouvelle image sera bienvenue. Attention toutefois, l'image uploadée par le passé est copyright Onisep...
Kept: we can keep images for historical reasons. Per discussion. --Elly (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No comment from the uploader. Per Com:PRP. --Elly (talk) 16:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muksina1090 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Hasan Hamid poet.jpg
- File:Hasan Hamid with Poet Al Mahmud.jpg
- File:Hasan Hamid with Helal Hafiz.jpg
- File:Hasan Hamid with Asaduzzaman Noor.jpg
- File:Hasan Hamid with Reader.jpg
- File:Hasan Hamid with Zafor Iqbal.jpg
- File:Hasan Hamid Image.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
I upload this image for use with an article. I am a new user. but all This images are captured by me. and I know all images already used any other work. but I think there is no copy right issue with this images.
Deleted: per nomination, images imho without educational use, not used on any article and not correctly categorized. --Elly (talk) 16:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by محمد باسم فرحات (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 23:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of CC-licencing. The blog this was taken from says "It was too delicious to pause and photograph it (so I’m borrowing the one from the recipe’s site)" and doesn't say which site they're talking about. https://web.archive.org/web/20090423021026/https://lifeasawife.wordpress.com/ Lord Belbury (talk) 17:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Looking again at this, the blog credit was added by an IP in 2009, and makes no sense for a file originally uploaded in 2006. The original upload credits http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f1/PatsCheesesteak.jpg instead (a Wikipedia-hosted image, which is now a dead link?) but has never credited an author. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The original file was uploaded on the English Wikipedia with the same name. The author is Msc44 who uploaded it on January 21, 2006, (UTC) as {{GFDL-self}} with the caption, "Photographed January 21, 2005. A delicious cheesesteak from Pat's Steaks." The above blog link shows an upload date from 2009/02, three years after the Wikipedia upload, so it seems that the blog downloaded the image from us. The blog did not provide adequate attribution. The local version of File:PatsCheesesteak.jpg needs to be restored and have its history merged here, since both revisions here are edited from the original that didn't make it to Commons. ✗plicit 03:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. SHB2000 (talk) 04:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion and later comments of nominator. --Elly (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
This is not an own work. Photographer name and publishing date are needed to determine copyright or PD status, E4024 (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete not own work Lexy iris (talk) 19:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted - This image is a smaller and less sharp version of File:Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (c. 1897, transparent background).gif. Deleted per COM:DUPE. Replaced use on projects. Elly (talk) 23:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Delete, files have been moved — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joris (talk • contribs) 15:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Joris: Are there any churches named after St. Luke in Vlaardingen? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Lucaskerk Rob K. aka pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 17:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, there is a modern one, though small and apparantly included in another building on the site of the demolished Johannes de Doperkerk. I was there last Sunday and I didn't see it. There are also no other photo's of this church on Commons. I do know Rob and Reliwiki, where I also have an account. Joris (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- http://reliwiki.nl/index.php/Vlaardingen,_Hoogstraat_26_-_Johannes_de_Doper_(1869_-_1956) The remaining tower belongs to this church. It's still near the new Lucas church, but as far as I know isn't directly related to the new church. I moved the pics to Category:Johannes de Doperkerk, Vlaardingen, where they belong. Joris (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, there is a modern one, though small and apparantly included in another building on the site of the demolished Johannes de Doperkerk. I was there last Sunday and I didn't see it. There are also no other photo's of this church on Commons. I do know Rob and Reliwiki, where I also have an account. Joris (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Lucaskerk Rob K. aka pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 17:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, we will need this cat in 2129 when the copyright on http://reliwiki.nl/index.php/Bestand:ID_3590_-_Vlaardingen_RK_Joh_de_Doper_Hoogstraat_Rol_097_(1).JPG will presumably have expired. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- De afbeeldingen uit 2020 die bij de categorie Joh. de Doperkerk staan,staan n.m.m. in de verkeerde categorie, die Joh. de Doperkerk is rond 2004 gesloopt op de toren na. De toren is sinds 2005 onderdeel van de Lucaskerk. Rob K. aka pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 20:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hoi Rob, ik heb die foto's verplaatst want ik had niet het idee dat die toren nu nog bij de Lucaskerk hoort. Wel tot 2004 bij de vorige Johanneskerk. Ik zag ook pas gisteren dat op reliwiki die foto bij de lucaskerk stond. De toren is nu het Stiltecentrum De Driepas, dat bordje zit ook op de muur. Maar ik zie op de website van de parochie nu wel dat zij ook vinden dat de toren nog bij de Lucaskerk hoort. Dan houden we deze categorie wel. Ik zal hem weer toevoegen aan de relevante foto's.
- Jeff, we'll keep this category, we can use some of the pics in both the old and the new cat. Joris (talk) 14:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: category is not empty today, so keep. --Elly (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
image from wappenwiki, website which creates and publishes files under cc-by-NC-SA. Not compatible with com:license. 80.215.178.232 17:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. The image could be below threshold, but it is not used on projects. --Elly (talk) 23:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
image from wappenwiki, website which creates and publishes files under cc-by-NC-SA. Not compatible with com:license. 80.215.178.232 17:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Raymond Renefer died in 1957. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:FD1C:26C4:1928:10FA 19:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
![19:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/12/15#c-2A01:CB00:A05:D100:FD1C:26C4:1928:10FA-2020-12-15T19:54:00.000Z-File:"Paris,_le_Point_du_Jour".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Source website, http://www.renefer.org/, does not show the paintings of this artist with a free licence, so the standard protection is valid. Can be undeleted in 1957+71=2028. . --Elly (talk) 23:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
![23:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/12/15#c-Ellywa-2021-08-31T23:47:00.000Z-File:"Paris,_le_Point_du_Jour".jpg){kind=link}
Not a work of US gov 1985 publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences , although some images titled 1971 in error? I fail to see how this could "free from restrictions" or in the public domain. The publication date metadata issue is a known for some IA sourced journal material.
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19802012873).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20234904700).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20235007348).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20396745966).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20414340642).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20422969105).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin8403sout).pdf
_(19802012873).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20234904700).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235007348).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20396745966).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20414340642).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20422969105).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov. 2000 publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences , I fail to see how this could be "free from restrictions" or in the public domain..
- File:Bulletin (2000) (19800482534).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2000) (20236398439).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2000) (20423099515).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2000) (20429206431).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin8219sout).pdf
_(19800482534).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20236398439).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20423099515).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20429206431).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov, 2003 publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences. I fail to see how this could be "free from restrictions" or in the public domain.
- File:Bulletin (2003) (19800440794).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2003) (20235034970).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2003) (20396823266).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2003) (20414472392).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2003) (20414474042).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin8529sout).pdf
_(19800440794).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235034970).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20396823266).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20414472392).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20414474042).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov, 2004 publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences. I fail to see how this could be "free from restrictions" or in the public domain.
- File:Bulletin (2004) (20235149090).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2004) (20236553319).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2004) (20236574309).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2004) (20396972816).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2004) (20397037696).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2004) (20414584052).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin8628sout).pdf
_(20235149090).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20236553319).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20236574309).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20396972816).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20397037696).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20414584052).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
This was first published in London, so the copyright term depends on the lifetime of the authors (70 years pma). A. Landsborough Thomson died in 1977, so this collective work is not yet free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Related Category: Category:Britain's birds and their nests (1910) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- The illustrator died in 1937, so these individual files are out of copyright. De728631 (talk) 21:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be restored in 2048. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not the 1899 version but the 1949 revised version.. I am not sure this is PD in the US or UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete It's unclear to me when R.L. Mackie, who added the new material to the book, died, but unless he bit the dust almost immediately after publication, it's not been 70 years since his death. Consensus has dubiously found that 120 years is a reasonable assumption for 70 p.m.a., and this falls well below the bar to qualify. Delete under COM:PCP. Mysterymanblue 08:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Accd. to the preface of https://books.google.de/books?id=fQ5aAAAAMAAJ (found via a Google Books search), R. L. Mackie lived 1885–1960, so I'll put it up for restoration in 2031. --Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Addresses delivered at the convention of the National Shellfisheries Association (IA addressesdeliver49nati).pdf
[edit]This is not expired - 1949 publication. Where was this meant to be harmonized with? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There is no notice, and it is thus in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: per remark. --Elly (talk) 07:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Although this is PD-US, it not a US originated work, Principal author is Karel Domin (1882–1953) , Undelete in 2024?
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (IA beitrgezurflorau12domi).pdf
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (19740527714).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (19742266123).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (19742269403).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (19742270973).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (19742272633).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20175137930).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20175185578).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20176517539).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20336945856).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20363134565).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20363137765).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20363186885).jpg
- File:Beiträge zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens (1914) (20369302271).jpg
_(19740527714).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19742266123).jpg){kind=link}
_(19742269403).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19742270973).jpg){kind=link}
_(19742272633).jpg){kind=link}
_(20175137930).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20175185578).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20176517539).jpg){kind=link}
_(20336945856).jpg){kind=link}
_(20363134565).jpg){kind=link}
_(20363137765).jpg){kind=link}
_(20363186885).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20369302271).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not yet 70 years since author's life (COM:Germany); undelete in 2024. -M.nelson (talk) 22:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark Nelson, ]]. Can be undeleted in 2024.. --Elly (talk) 07:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov, 1971 publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences. Was there a notice or renewal?
- File:Bulletin (2007) (19800603794).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2007) (20235162550).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2007) (20235283428).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2007) (20235290738).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2007) (20236577259).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2007) (20423244825).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2007) (20429493251).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin8937sout).pdf
_(19800603794).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235162550).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235283428).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235290738).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20236577259).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20423244825).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20429493251).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- This is a 2007 publication. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: too recent to be in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 14:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov, 2008 publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences. I fail to see how this could be "free from restrictions" or in the public domain.
- File:Bulletin (2008) (19800557694).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2008) (20235147110).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2008) (20235225408).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2008) (20236586079).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2008) (20396976276).jpg
- File:Bulletin (2008) (20396980006).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin9036sout).pdf
_(19800557694).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235147110).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20235225408).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20236586079).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20396976276).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20396980006).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: too recent to be in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US gov. 1982 publication by a US museum. I fail to see how this could be "free from restrictions" or PD
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (19792733464).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (19794395893).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (19794441843).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20227322830).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20227327020).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20228675969).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20228679429).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20228681059).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20228686539).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20389101406).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20415322125).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20421532171).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1982) (20421544501).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (IA brimleyana19nort 2).pdf
_(19792733464).jpg){kind=link}
_(19794395893).jpg){kind=link}
_(19794441843).jpg){kind=link}
_(20227322830).jpg){kind=link}
_(20227327020).jpg){kind=link}
_(20228675969).jpg){kind=link}
_(20228679429).jpg){kind=link}
_(20228681059).jpg){kind=link}
_(20228686539).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389101406).jpg){kind=link}
_(20415322125).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421532171).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421544501).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- This work does not have a notice, nor was it timely registered; thus, it is likely in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: I didn't see a notice nor could I find a registration, so kept with {{PD-US-1978-89}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov, 1985 publication by US musuem. I fail to see how this could be "free from restrictions" or PD.
- File:Brimleyana (1985) (20406733012).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1985) (20421557111).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (1985) (20421587961).jpg
- File:Brimleyana (IA brimleyana19nort 5).pdf
_(20406733012).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421557111).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421587961).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There is no notice nor was there timely registration; thus, this work is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: I didn't see a notice nor could I find a registration, so kept with {{PD-US-1978-89}}. --Rosenzweig τ 20:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US gov, 1948 publication by Illinois State orgainsation or entity ?
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (19760556754).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (19762262703).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (19762290953).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195171670).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195182310).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195193170).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195196840).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195236038).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195237658).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20195270278).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20196593169).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20356921516).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20356949046).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20356982696).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20356989796).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20356993466).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20383188175).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20383243655).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389334501).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389347321).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389351071).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389356901).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389360631).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389382771).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389405291).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389408881).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (1948) (20389414331).jpg
- File:Bird dogs in sport and conservation (IA birddogsinsportc42yeat).pdf
_(19760556754).jpg){kind=link}
_(19762262703).jpg){kind=link}
_(19762290953).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195171670).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195182310).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195193170).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195196840).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195236038).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195237658).jpg){kind=link}
_(20195270278).jpg){kind=link}
_(20196593169).jpg){kind=link}
_(20356921516).jpg){kind=link}
_(20356949046).jpg){kind=link}
_(20356982696).jpg){kind=link}
_(20356989796).jpg){kind=link}
_(20356993466).jpg){kind=link}
_(20383188175).jpg){kind=link}
_(20383243655).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389334501).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389347321).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389351071).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389356901).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389360631).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389382771).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389405291).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389408881).jpg){kind=link}
_(20389414331).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There is no clear notice, and no apparent renewal. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Rosenzweig τ 22:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
This is not a work of US-Gov. Author - Peabody Museum of Natural History and 1970 publication Was there a renewal?
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19798709094).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19798733654).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19798775654).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19798805674).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19798903764).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19800417103).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19800479203).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19800538003).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19803857964).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19803868134).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19803870094).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19803901724).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19803991374).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19804043584).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19804051714).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19804101174).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19804171034).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19804280834).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805560723).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805564533).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805604713).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805662843).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805710853).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805734313).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (19805750343).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233294170).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233295800).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233301190).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233304820).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233308220).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233328710).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233336230).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233367728).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233402288).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233412700).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233455478).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233474098).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20233493710).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234708389).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234717309).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234748279).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234789399).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234794639).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234811009).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234812799).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234848729).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20234863699).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238478508).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238480430).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238504468).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238526298).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238605870).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238677580).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238741340).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238855618).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238863170).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238872070).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20238904698).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20239954229).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20240033919).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20240272939).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20395056876).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20395094276).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20395122466).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20395181196).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20395291726).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20400477036).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20412696292).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20412713552).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20412894742).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20412921032).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20417929322).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20418001582).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20418048142).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20418053662).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20418061692).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20421366845).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20421439985).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20421465715).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20421466895).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20421540015).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20426595455).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20426642945).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20426695055).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20426708845).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20426862275).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20427565081).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20427578621).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20427639241).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20427702341).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20427719491).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20427750121).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20432728931).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20432743301).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20432745191).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20432776661).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20432923251).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1970) (20432996801).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin34peab).pdf
_(19798709094).jpg){kind=link}
_(19798733654).jpg){kind=link}
_(19798775654).jpg){kind=link}
_(19798805674).jpg){kind=link}
_(19798903764).jpg){kind=link}
_(19800417103).jpg){kind=link}
_(19800479203).jpg){kind=link}
_(19800538003).jpg){kind=link}
_(19803857964).jpg){kind=link}
_(19803868134).jpg){kind=link}
_(19803870094).jpg){kind=link}
_(19803901724).jpg){kind=link}
_(19803991374).jpg){kind=link}
_(19804043584).jpg){kind=link}
_(19804051714).jpg){kind=link}
_(19804101174).jpg){kind=link}
_(19804171034).jpg){kind=link}
_(19804280834).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805560723).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805564533).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805604713).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805662843).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805710853).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805734313).jpg){kind=link}
_(19805750343).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233294170).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233295800).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233301190).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233304820).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233308220).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233328710).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233336230).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233367728).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233402288).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233412700).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233455478).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233474098).jpg){kind=link}
_(20233493710).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234708389).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234717309).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234748279).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234789399).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234794639).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234811009).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234812799).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234848729).jpg){kind=link}
_(20234863699).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238478508).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238480430).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238504468).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238526298).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238605870).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238677580).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238741340).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238855618).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238863170).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238872070).jpg){kind=link}
_(20238904698).jpg){kind=link}
_(20239954229).jpg){kind=link}
_(20240033919).jpg){kind=link}
_(20240272939).jpg){kind=link}
_(20395056876).jpg){kind=link}
_(20395094276).jpg){kind=link}
_(20395122466).jpg){kind=link}
_(20395181196).jpg){kind=link}
_(20395291726).jpg){kind=link}
_(20400477036).jpg){kind=link}
_(20412696292).jpg){kind=link}
_(20412713552).jpg){kind=link}
_(20412894742).jpg){kind=link}
_(20412921032).jpg){kind=link}
_(20417929322).jpg){kind=link}
_(20418001582).jpg){kind=link}
_(20418048142).jpg){kind=link}
_(20418053662).jpg){kind=link}
_(20418061692).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421366845).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421439985).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421465715).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421466895).jpg){kind=link}
_(20421540015).jpg){kind=link}
_(20426595455).jpg){kind=link}
_(20426642945).jpg){kind=link}
_(20426695055).jpg){kind=link}
_(20426708845).jpg){kind=link}
_(20426862275).jpg){kind=link}
_(20427565081).jpg){kind=link}
_(20427578621).jpg){kind=link}
_(20427639241).jpg){kind=link}
_(20427702341).jpg){kind=link}
_(20427719491).jpg){kind=link}
_(20427750121).jpg){kind=link}
_(20432728931).jpg){kind=link}
_(20432743301).jpg){kind=link}
_(20432745191).jpg){kind=link}
_(20432776661).jpg){kind=link}
_(20432923251).jpg){kind=link}
_(20432996801).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There is no notice, and neither the series nor the article were registered. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov. 1971-5? publication by Southern California Academy of Sciences. Was there a notice or renewal?
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19800366574).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19800714004).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19802314773).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19802480053).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19802501613).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (19802522333).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20235066328).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20235316758).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20236483089).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20236798189).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20397322456).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20414356552).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20414463532).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20414948922).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20423235775).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20423311705).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20429175531).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20429549861).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20429614421).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20429657321).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin7073sout).pdf
_(19800366574).jpg){kind=link}
_(19800714004).jpg){kind=link}
_(19802314773).jpg){kind=link}
_(19802480053).jpg){kind=link}
_(19802501613).jpg){kind=link}
_(19802522333).jpg){kind=link}
_(20235066328).jpg){kind=link}
_(20235316758).jpg){kind=link}
_(20236483089).jpg){kind=link}
_(20236798189).jpg){kind=link}
_(20397322456).jpg){kind=link}
_(20414356552).jpg){kind=link}
_(20414463532).jpg){kind=link}
_(20414948922).jpg){kind=link}
_(20423235775).jpg){kind=link}
_(20423311705).jpg){kind=link}
_(20429175531).jpg){kind=link}
_(20429549861).jpg){kind=link}
_(20429614421).jpg){kind=link}
_(20429657321).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There is not apparent notice or timely registration. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: no notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Chinese publication of 1958, Not a work of US gov. Notice, registration or renewal in respect of US publication?
- File:Dong bei qu zi ran di li (1958) (20804984858).jpg
- File:Dong bei qu zi ran di li (1958) (20806083629).jpg
- File:Dong bei qu zi ran di li (1958) (20966629606).jpg
- File:Dong bei qu zi ran di li (IA dongbeiquzirandi00liup).pdf
_(20804984858).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20806083629).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20966629606).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- This may have been uploaded by the copyright holder, but that is unclear, as I cannot read the Chinese. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
- Delete 1958 is not likely 50 years pma needed per COM:CHINA. -M.nelson (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be free per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
1958 Chinese publication, Not a work of US gov, Was there registration , notice or renewal in respect of the US?
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20373491003).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20373546933).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20373564753).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20373637793).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20373657073).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20806479120).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20806490060).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20806593760).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20806674978).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20806749058).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20807768049).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20968290766).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20968318846).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20968335396).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20968395466).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20968421946).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20984783722).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20984786652).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20984789742).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20994598765).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20994660575).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20994685825).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (1958) (20994724065).jpg
- File:Dong bei zi yuan zhi wu shou ce (IA dongbeiziyuanzhi00wang).pdf
_(20373491003).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20373546933).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20373564753).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20373637793).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20373657073).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20806479120).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20806490060).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20806593760).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20806674978).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20806749058).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20807768049).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20968290766).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20968318846).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20968335396).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20968395466).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20968421946).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20984783722).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20984786652).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20984789742).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20994598765).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20994660575).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20994685825).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20994724065).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- This may have been uploaded by the copyright holder, but that is unclear, as I cannot read the Chinese. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
- Delete Not likely 50 years pma needed per COM:CHINA. -M.nelson (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion unlikely to be free. --rubin16 (talk) 07:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
1959 Chinese publication, Not a work of US Gov. Was there a registration, notice or renewal in respect of the US?
- File:Dong zhi wu sheng huo zhong de wei liang yuan su he tian ran fang she xing yuan su (1959) (20372521834).jpg
- File:Dong zhi wu sheng huo zhong de wei liang yuan su he tian ran fang she xing yuan su (1959) (20374043593).jpg
- File:Dong zhi wu sheng huo zhong de wei liang yuan su he tian ran fang she xing yuan su (1959) (20807208358).jpg
- File:Dong zhi wu sheng huo zhong de wei liang yuan su he tian ran fang she xing yuan su (1959) (20985298162).jpg
- File:Dong zhi wu sheng huo zhong de wei liang yuan su he tian ran fang she xing yuan su (IA dongzhiwushenghu00liuz).pdf
_(20372521834).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20374043593).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20807208358).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20985298162).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- This may have been uploaded by the copyright holder, but that is unclear, as I cannot read the Chinese. This appears to be a translation of a Soviet work, but I do not know the copyright status of that work either. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
- Delete Not likely 50 years pma needed per COM:CHINA. -M.nelson (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: even the underlying soviet work doesn't look to be in PD yet, the translation itself is likely to be non-free, too. --rubin16 (talk) 07:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Not necessarily , US Gov, Was the experimental station concerned Federal? Or was it run by a University. Contractor work isn't necessarily automatically under PD-US-Gov terms.
_(20235641819).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There is no apparent notice nor registration. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Kept: {{PD-US-no notice}}. --rubin16 (talk) 07:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)