Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 9th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file exists TongaTui (talk) 00:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


No action done: That's because the page was supposed to be a redirect. Will fix. pandakekok9 05:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jpegデータでアップし直されて Wkoubnv (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright unclear. Source says Instagram which can mean a violation. RXerself (talk) 10:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a personal image of mine and it doesn't help with any educational purpose Abdul Latif Bin Hassan (talk) 14:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

den moaresis Mamengeorgos (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion "I do not like you". --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Θέλει ξανα δουλεμα Varriemai (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "he wants to work again" --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ghthtyj gdfh Georgios Gianno (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armegeddon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web (e.g., File:Xanım Əliyeva.jpg is here) and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il ne s'agit pas de François Massieu, mais de Simon Sirodot selon ce site. Patrick.Delbecq (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 23:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright. Uploader wrote to OTRS that he is not the photographer and that he cannot get the permissions from the photographers. See OTRS ticket#2020102510004811.

Mussklprozz (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why is the first image about the meetup of wikipedians listed here. I took that image (as is clearly written on the image page) and therefor Ulf Larsen could indeed not be the photographer there, but that is irrelevant. About the other images I don't know anything. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mistake. I removed the delete request from that one. --Mussklprozz (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

in attesa di licenza Creative Commons Orista.marianna (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, "© 2020 CHILI – Tutti i diritti riservati". --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violación de derechos de autor. Sin relevancia enciclopedica. P Cesar Maldonado | Tapuykuna? Quellqayǃ 19:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Below COM:TOO. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lavado de imagenes. P Cesar Maldonado | Tapuykuna? Quellqayǃ 19:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot or copy from a website hardly visible. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS release set by uploader and non-OTRS-member. Compare deleted version under Special:Undelete/File:20Flandri.jpg (admin link only) JuTa 15:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Ankry, you confimred OTRS for File:50Flandri.jpg. Can you check this one please too. --JuTa 15:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I uploaded the image. The designer (Frank Verkerk) gave the permission for all 3 designs so I assumed it was part of the same ticket. My apologies for any confusion --Delle89 (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the OTRS permission is OK also for this image. Ankry (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 7stars b7 (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 10:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of female masturbation; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

does not meet project scope, see also COM:PEOPLE smial (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Erklärt mir mal einer warum wir diese Bild brauchen? Tschüß --Ra Boe (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Damit ist meine Frage ja beantwortet ;-)) --Ra Boe (talk) 00:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Image made with a top of the line camera. Shutter time 0.4 second, but no blurring due to camera movement, so not hand-held. The model is posing, for a photographer who is making a living of selling his work, so COM:PEOPLE does not apply. Subject not recognizable anyway. Sexual content is not automatically out of scope, and it would be preferable to have images by a professional and notable photographer rather than the stuff submitted from anonymous single-use accounts. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. work by a notable artist, therefore within scope Abigor talk 05:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dadurch dass der Hochlader ein anderes Foto unter demselben Namen hochgeladen hat, das in Hochformat ist, wird das ursprüngliche Foto, auf das es zurückgesetzt wurde, auf den Wikipedia-Seiten jetzt stark verzerrt dargestellt. Das sieht unmöglich aus. Ich habe das gute Querformat-Foto mit neuem Namen neu hochgeladen und in die Kategorien eingefügt. Bitte dieses löschen. Der alte Bildnahme ist auch nicht angemessen. Sciencia58 (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because the uploader has uploaded another photo under the same name, which is in portrait format, the original photo to which it was reset is now displayed in a very distorted way on the Wikipedia pages. I have re-uploaded the good original photo with a new name and added it to the categories. Please delete the old one. The name of the old photo is also not appropriate. Sciencia58 (talk) 12:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: User blocked and edits reverted. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used to vadalize the English Wikipedia. Most likely this is LTA Willy on Wheels or possibly an imitator. Guy Macon (talk) 01:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by AntiCompositeNumber. --Minoraxtalk 01:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|image is accidently uploaded for creative common directory as this image is represent a known Registered NGO}} Abhayudaan (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 01:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 01:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 01:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 01:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 01:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

автор этого файла требует удаления данного изображения САНЯГДЗ (talk) 07:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Minorax. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background and improper font style. Have File:Ethylbenzene-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement based on cited literature. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eyes Roger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS - COM:DW of action figures/copyrighted characters

Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 00:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eyes Roger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

com:dw.

RZuo (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valentidp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 00:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varun Kumal Mukhiya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in unapproved draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 00:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zedimaneli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Response for the EugeneZelenko (talk) deletion proposal

[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, you proposed deletion for some uploads I made, pictures that I took. I was surprised by the notification "Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF" and I come to clarify that these works are mine. If the resolution is low and some EXIF data is lost, it is because these files are old and have gone through quite traumatic processes in data recovery. Although the suspicion you raised makes some sense, the photos were taken by me some years ago and are the last pieces capable of telling the stories they propose.

I would like you to tell me how we can get around this situation.

Sincerely, Zedimaneli (talk · contribs) ===


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 00:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md Tarek Gentleman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of non-contributor. Out of project scope‎.

~Moheen (keep talking) 04:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ishtiaquebioinfo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal event photos. Out of project scope‎.

~Moheen (keep talking) 04:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted graphic advertisements.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kitkalix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in April and October 2018 as non-notable. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 06:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

作品所有者に無断で Tokugawayuki (talk) 06:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. --Achim (talk) 09:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale for deletion given. Johnbod (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

無断掲載のため、 Tokugawayuki (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. --Achim (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale given. The nominator's only edits are similar hopeless deletion proposals. A Japanese-speaker should probably warn or block them. Johnbod (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: 12th century artwork. These images from Tale of Genghi have been, probably, uploaded and can be downloaded from Google Arts & Culture. I don't think there is any ban on putting this 12th century image on Commons. (Ismoon (talk) 14:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

無断掲載のため、 Tokugawayuki (talk) 07:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale given. The nominator's only edits are similar hopeless deletion proposals. A Japanese-speaker should probably warn or block them. Johnbod (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: 12th century artwork. These images from the "Tale of Gengi" have been, probably, uploaded and can be downloaded from Google Arts & Culture. I don't think there is any ban on putting this 12th century image on Commons.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

無断掲載のため、 Tokugawayuki (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. --Achim (talk) 09:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale given. The nominator's only edits are similar hopeless deletion proposals. A Japanese-speaker should probably warn or block them. Johnbod (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: 12th century artwork. This image from the "Tale of Gengi" have been, probably, uploaded and can be downloaded from Google Arts & Culture. I don't think there is any ban on putting this 12th century image on Commons.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

無断掲載のため、 Tokugawayuki (talk) 07:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. --Achim (talk) 10:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale given. The nominator's only edits are similar hopeless deletion proposals. A Japanese-speaker should probably warn or block them. Johnbod (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

無断掲載のため、 Tokugawayuki (talk) 07:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale given Johnbod (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: 12th century artwork. These images from the "Tale of Gengi" have been, probably, uploaded and can be downloaded from the Tokyo University of the Arts [1]. I don't think there is any ban on putting this 12th century image on Commons. (Ismoon (talk) 14:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

無断掲載のため、 Tokugawayuki (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 12th century artwork. --Achim (talk) 10:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: 12th century artwork. No rationale given Johnbod (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ventled93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Book? covers and DW of them. And a 1987 photo claimed as own work in 2020

Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alex Ivko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Single uploads. No EXIF data.

Smooth O (talk) 11:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File is already used here w:pl:Mapa metra w Londynie. 37.47.72.57 09:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mremjayofficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. No contribs to any wm project. en:Draft:SBBTMUSIC has been deleted.

Achim (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonioomatas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Africa. This is a modern bust, and the creator is unlikely to have died for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, not for commercial use, Fritz Joubert (talk) 09:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Per Commons:Licensing, photos on Commons must be capable for commercial use and allow derivative works to be created. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Africa. This is a modern bust, and the creator is unlikely to have died for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a personal image of mine and it doesn't help with any educational purpose Abdul Latif Bin Hassan (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a personal image of mine and it doesn't help with any educational purpose Abdul Latif Bin Hassan (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my own work and it doesn't help with any educational purpose. Abdul Latif Bin Hassan (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Abdul Latif Bin Hassan as Speedy (Db) and the most recent rationale was: -u1|This is a personal image of mine and it doesn't help with any educational purpose. There exists en:Nouman Ali Khan, the photo is in scope. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Cropped from a youtube video - a version found here before upload - https://www.islamiqate.com/451/whats-opinion-given-nouman-regarding-shootings-charlie-hebdo - needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and possibly outside the project scope. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Ytoyoda[reply]

No need for deletion. The portrayed person is a professional basketball player in Macedonia, and this image will be used in his respective articles.Dandarmkd (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dandarmkd: Though it looks like the photo is a web download or a screenshot, not an original photograph. Additional source information would probably help. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ytoyoda: The uploader is the author, and he did it in collaboration with Edis Nuri himself. Nuri later asked me to place the image on the English Wikipedia.Dandarmkd (talk) 19:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP - professional photo with no exif. Please upload the original. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZeroConditio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Used in unapproved draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope, no idea what does it show, nothing found in Google, categorization seems random Mormegil (talk) 16:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-resolution proffessional photo, sole upload - dobtful own work. Pibwl (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no cat, doesn't seem to be in a scope. Pibwl (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope conversation screenshoot. Same for [[:File:I am English Royalty But Live In a Camper.jpg]. Pibwl (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover - no proof, that anonymous uploader is the author of original photograph. Pibwl (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 16:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be in scope. Pibwl (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope - text. Pibwl (talk) 16:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope robot drawing, unused, one of 3 uploads. Pibwl (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

technically bad photograph, doesn't seem to be in a scope, no useful description, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 18:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ttoensing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings of Charles Radoff (died 1986). No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution and most likely professional work. needs licensing. Coderzombie (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low size image without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.50.8 19:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low size image without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.50.8 19:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.50.8 19:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not pubic domain. It is not owned by the Booth Museum or the Smithsonian and is copyright by the Artist, Don Troiani 75.133.108.221 19:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Appears to be taken from https://www.pinterest.de/pin/862017184898928645/. --Achim (talk) 20:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False licensing: Frank Reynolds died in 1953, date of first publication required to clarify the copyright status. Sealle (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, one of few uploads. Pibwl (talk) 20:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, used only in sandbox, one of 2 uploads. Pibwl (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free picture (https://www.dassaultfalcon.com/en/Aircraft/Models/6X/Pages/overview.aspx) Tiraden (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, one of 2 uploads - the second is also out of scope File:Kapucnis.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, one of 2 uploads. Pibwl (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope, as well as remaining 2 uploads File:Iklan7.jpg, File:BackgroundBackground.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|WrongSize}} Etnok79 (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

low resolution Etnok79 (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Lou6977 (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergio Eduardo Valencia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, COM:HOST.

Kissa21782 (talk) 11:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some podcast promotion, doubtful notability unused, one of two uploads. Pibwl (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the original author/photographer of the photo, as well as the uploader and am requesting deletion of this file. It's unused and not used to illustrate any articles, there are several other high quality photos of the subject in the photo available for use if necessary. The content is older than 7 days, so I've filed a formal deletion request. -Gage (talk) 03:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   04:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Het bestand is beschadigd en kan niet worden gebruikt. トトト (talk) 03:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Per Syced. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fixed. --P 1 9 9   04:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of portraits of Pope Francis. Assuming the photographer or copyright holder is in Vatican, then these are not copyright-free. It is a common misconception that Vatican (Holy See) works can be freely used. No, they don't allow commercial reuses like postcards, calendars, commercial YouTube vlogs (for profit videos than pure educational videos), and commercial T-shirt prints. Per COM:VATICAN, the Holy See has the exclusive copyright over the pope's image (and also voice), and no one has the right to exploit these for any purposes other than educational, cultural, and religious reuses. No indication that papal images can be used on commercial media like the ones I enumerated above. Unfree for Wikimedia Commons.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vatican City states "The main points of the Papal copyright: Exclusive right on the use of the Pope’s image and voice for purposes other than religious, cultural and educational (art. 3)" - the words and phrases "other than religious, cultural and educational" word - may be interpreted using tools of Statutory interpretation : the Pope's image can be used - for a) religious - this case, the exhibit is not any art, flowers or cars but invites visitors of SM to pray and meditate, inter alia; it is not art for arts sake; b) cultural - in this case, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Malolos Museo Diocesano de Malolos, 2017 has exactly the same cultural and religious purposes - here, using the Pope's or all these relics by devout Catholics; c) educational - here, students were invited to take notes especially by St. Mary's College of Baliuag for their Catechism subjects; Pope Francis, as a Jesuit, is a scientist and wants to be very close to the poorest of the poor as in Buenos Aires'
More importantly, the very Lis mota or crux of the matter in the case at bar, that is, at the very heart of the Exhibit - is Devotion and Piety, not art for Catholic; they are invited to touch the relics and to take photos of the pictures so that in their homes they can pray over with Rosary and be with God; as a Roman Catholic, Jesuit and Vincentian Seminarian from 1965-1974, I personally consider these photos as deeply "religious, cultural and educational" in the very sense and within the spirit or letter or the Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vatican City; the deepest meaning of the photos vis-à-vis Letter and spirit of the law (a tool of Statutory interpretation - "Intentionally following the letter of the law but not the spirit may be accomplished through exploiting technicalities, loopholes, and ambiguous language." very truly yours Judgefloro (talk) 06:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: still that's unfree enough for Commons. Please look at Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. Files must be free enough to be reused by anyone, for any purpose including commercial exploitations. By the papal copyright, I cannot print your files on my post cards to be sold commercially, without reasonable permission from the Holy See who holds papal copyright over their portraits of Pope Francis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of this image, and I wish for this image to be deleted. Matthew.weller (talk) 04:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   04:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of this image, and I wish for this image to be deleted. Matthew.weller (talk) 04:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   04:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo uploaded in error; new author ChicoBernie (whom I am helping to get started) asks me to request deletion on his behalf as this is not a preferred photo of that cross, another one has already been uploaded -- Jwikip (talk) 11:00, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, we can have both.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy delete @Jeff G. and ChicoBernie: yes Jeff: I agree we could have both; I suggested that to him, yesterday, before making the Deletion Request on his behalf - but he prefers deletion because he made an error selecting and loading it.
      This was a good faith error made on the day he started (Fri 5-Dec-2020, three days ago) by the author who is learning (and regarding the arcana of Wikimedia image management, so am I) - now that I am looking deeper into the details, I realise that I probably ought to have made a Speedy Deletion request, but having started this DR discussion I don't want to muddy the waters. Please can you delete the file - or do you prefer me to make a G7 Speedy Deletion request instead ? -- Jwikip (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • ChicoBernie: je te mets également en destinataire de la discussion qui a été entamée suite à ma demande de suppression par Jeff G. ;
        il suggère que ce n'est pas grave de laisser cette photo que tu as téléchargé suite à une erreur de manipulation - voir ci-dessus ;
        et j'ai répondu en votant pour une suppression rapide comme tu as demandé. Désolé si j'ai démarré en anglais, peut-être que Jeff G. peut continuer en français ... merci de ta patience -- Jwikip (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ChicoBernie: I am also sending you to the discussion which was started by Jeff G., following my request for deletion;
  he suggests that it's okay to leave this photo you uploaded due to a handling error - see above;
  and I responded by voting for a quick removal as you requested. Sorry if I started in English, maybe Jeff G. can continue in French ... thank you for your patience
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jwikip and ChicoBernie: Je ne peux pas supprimer le fichier, car je ne suis pas encore administrateur ici. Je ne vois pas assez de preuves directement de ChicoBernie pour G7. Je ne peux ni lire ni écrire le français, mais je peux utiliser Google Traduction. Quel fichier est "une photo préférée de cette croix ... [qui] a déjà été téléchargée"?
I cannot delete the file, as I am not an Admin here yet. I do not see enough evidence directly from ChicoBernie for G7. I cannot read or write French, but I can use Google Translate. What file is "a preferred photo of that cross ... [that] has already been uploaded"?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G. and ChicoBernie: The image file that ChicoBernie prefers is [[2]]. Jeff G. pls note I have made one minor modification (clarification) to your Google translation above. -- Jwikip (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jwikip: Thanks for both. The internal link is File:La Mouche.jpg.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   04:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is the subject depicted in these photos. Requires COM:OTRS permission from original photographer.


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, along with rest of uploads File:Trova da determinação.jpg, File:Ao meu papai.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some book cover of uknown notability and copyright, unused, possibly autopromo. Pibwl (talk) 08:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copying uploader's request on their tp. Achim (talk) 08:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC):[reply]

Hallo könnte jemand bitte mein Foto löschen lassen? Das Foto ist schon sehr alt. Ich weiss nicht wie man es selbst löschen kann. Danke Pellolein (talk) 04:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 08:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   04:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-res duplicate of File:Salon chateau AE COSTILHES.jpg. Ich (talk) 10:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A BW version found here https://esprit.presse.fr/article/jacques-darras/la-fin-de-l-absolu-poetique-la-poesie-francaise-1950-2000-14792 in 2009 - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: actually the image in the link is credited to "Wikipédia Commons". --P 1 9 9   04:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by María Fernanda Noguera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No categories, no real information about who the subject is. Most probably COM:HOST, no realistic educational value.

Kissa21782 (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

collage without educational use Drakosh (talk) 11:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising Lotje (talk) 12:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   04:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising Lotje (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   04:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF redundant to File:CGI Design Image of Eternal Wall of Answered Prayer .jpg. Achim (talk) 12:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, non-notable individual, failed promo attempt at ro:Barbaroși Maxim. Gikü (talk) 13:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber doch nicht einverstanden Schnecke17 (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No permission. --Regasterios (talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Architect I.M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 50 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Architect I.M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 50 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Despite the museum is de minimis, the artwork in front of it are also copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Despite the museum is de minimis, the artwork in front of it are also copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Despite the museum is de minimis, the artwork in front of it are also copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete en:Richard Serra is still alive. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - lifted from Večer newspaperYerpo Eh? 14:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since this is a selfie, unlikely that a third party is the copyright owner Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation property of Anton Zaitsev https://www.soccer.ru/galery/1040533/photo/716990 Brgesto (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor Renato Carvillani died in 1972 and is still under copyright until 2042 in France. Culex (talk) 21:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor Camil Fabregas died in 2003 and is still under copyright until 2073 in France. Culex (talk) 21:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Guinea. This is a modern bust, and the creator is unlikely to have died for 80 years A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 11:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As pointed out in enwiki, this file has a tiny copyright notice (Link to full version) in the bottom left corner and is thus not "no notice" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion referred to is at w:en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 December 7#File:Gorgo 1961.jpg, which discusses the non-free file w:File:Gorgo 1961.jpg. The 'Link to full version' above links to a different version of the poster which might have a different copyright status. The file on EnWiki has a border that has been cropped from the Commons file, with text that might well have a copyright declaration. The film Gorgo was released in the US and UK in 1961; if this is the UK version of the poster then it is definitely not public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For the U.S., the only item with "Gorgo" in the title from 1960 or 1961 which was renewed was the film itself, so the U.S. posters would seem to be {{PD-US-not renewed}} (i.e., just a change of tag). Getty appears to have a copy of this version of the poster (and the text at the bottom was a copyright notice, saying among other things "Country of origin U.S.A"). That means Getty isn't too concerned that the studio might still own copyright. So, this would seem to be a U.S. poster and public domain by virtue of not being renewed (but definitely did have a notice).  Keep Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-US-not renewed}}. --ƏXPLICIT 01:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality screenshot. not own work Gbawden (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete GeorgHHtalk   19:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No possible educational use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Africa. This is a modern bust, and the creator is unlikely to have died for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from a professional photo shoot. See this news article which uses a version of the image that predates the upload to Commons. COM:OTRS confirmation of license would be needed. Whpq (talk) 13:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. More likely some webgrab since there are dozens of findings of the same image that were available on the internet before this image was uploaded on Commons, see here. Mosbatho (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work is by - Roger-Ducasse, (1873-1954.) So this is not necessarily PD outside the US, Undelete in 2035?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is a copyright notice in the English present, which may indicate simultaneous publication in another country; however, this would likely be in the U.K., which has the copyright situation. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama in Denmark for 3D sculptural works. This statue was unveiled only in 2012 and was created by Kim Michael who is still alive. (source) Thus, photos of this statue are COM:DW & need the permission of the artist before its publication here in Commons.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder Monsuru Tiamiyu Photography, not own work Gbawden (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden Thank you for your update, the copyright was a mistake from my end, and the same has been corrected. thank you


Deleted: COM:OTRS permission required. --ƏXPLICIT 01:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same pic as their album cover https://www.saltlilymag.com/home/the-midnight-nuns-fun-in-the-sun. Think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image 2603:8081:160A:BE2A:E933:FCFF:4DD5:D093 14:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a dupe but a crop. --Achim (talk) 14:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single upload, probably scan, no original author or permission. Promo photo. Smooth O (talk) 11:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader suggests he is one of the people in the photo, need information about the photographer and license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file format error (pdf). Bikesrcool (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no cat, doesn't seem to be in a scope, along with File:Area modifica di Wiki Maffei.png. Pibwl (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work, quite proffessional photo, one of 3 uploads, description "automob". Same low-res second photo File:Рип.png. Pibwl (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See here. Wouter (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source appears to be a blog. Needs permission from photographer Gbawden (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is very unlikely the photopgrapher, so the source of the image is unknown. The object may be free, the image is it probably not. To make it worse: there is not one more usable meta data information. what is this? A cylinder seal? Something else? Found where? Where is it today? Which time it was made? Not even a culture is named. This image may be used often in the projects, but to be honest: it is useless. It is at least unclear under this conditions if the discription is true. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtsverletzung EinEngener (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirection de fichier inutile Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

useless redirect

Deleted: per nomination, unused redirect. --Pitke (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Serves no educational purpose. Aasim 07:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of GA and FA quality articles include images of promotional content related to the game. I don't see how this is any different.NightFire19 (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@NightFire19: All the promotional images are uploaded not on Commons but on the wiki where the promotional images are located because of copyright reasons.
Speaking of copyright, I noticed a second problem, and I would like you to think of this: if you take a picture or include someone else's literary or artistic work in your photo, whether you added it in or not add it in, does it make the entire photo your own work? The short answer: no. The (slightly longer but not so terribly) long answer: because there is content from ambiguous sources, there are multiple copyrights that may prevent you from using the work as you'd like. Take a song. A song has a few different copyrights: the music as detailed on paper, the live performance, and a recording of that live performance are all copyrighted. Since that image you took was at a train station or airport station, you may own the copyright to the photo of the station, but not the photo of the (clearly readable) adverts that were hand-drawn, printed, and painted onto the station's walls. Of course, some adverts clearly are too simple to be copyrighted, but I don't think this advert is. Because of both the questionable copyright and the lack of purpose that this image serves in the article Genshin Impact, I nominated this file for deletion. Aasim 09:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Of course useful, one of the few free images illustrating Genshin Impact (or advertising in games). De minimise too, given the focus. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I disagree. Copyright is an issue here. The primary focus of the work is the advert. If this was a smaller advert and the focus was something else, like the moving walkways, then it probably would be De minimis. Better to play it safe. Aasim 05:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    No, the primary focus is the wall, the advertisements are just a background element. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I think It's {{Copyvio}}. In this photo, main subject is copyrighted game commercial. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The nomination is false. Of course it is inside the project's scope and it can be used for educational purpose. The subject of the photo are the adverts but not the artworks. The station also occupy the large majority of the image. It is De minimis. Enjoyer of World (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Enjoyer of World you may want to take a look at COM:DM#6 or COM:DM#7. This image could still be used to illustrate something else, like the moving walkway (provided that the background is blurred), but not the advertisement.
    How I understand de minimis is whether removing the copyrighted part of the image would make any difference into the use of the image. In this case, whether the copyrighted part is the artwork or the advertisement, removing it would mean that it could not be used to illustrate Genshin Impact marketing, so it cannot be used on Commons.
    To specifically quote the policy: "Variations in laws and in uses of works mean that firm rules are not possible. As a general guideline, however, a file containing copyrighted work X is less likely to satisfy de minimis the more of these it meets...the file is in use to illustrate X...X is referenced in the filename...X is referenced in the description...X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless." Also, "Significant cropping to focus on the copyrighted work can very easily turn a 'probably OK' into a 'probably not OK'." I know this may sound like rules lawyering here but in terms of copyright it is extremely important to err on the side of caution, as the other option would be the copyright holder (miHoYo) sending a DMCA notice asking the file be removed for containing their advert (which is unlikely, but still possible). Aasim 07:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment FoP in Singapore does not extend to 2D works such as billboards. The entirety of the advert can be considered a work of commercial art, not simnply the drawings/paintings used in the advert. The photo clearly focuses on the adverts as its subject, de minimis is not applicable here. --Pitke (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio: derivative work of the adverts that are not covered by Singapore FoP, and are too substantial to the image to satisfy de minimis. --Pitke (talk) 19:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free video game: cc-by-nc-sa. The images are borderline TOO though. The designer appears to be Dutch.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 02:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even as PD photo, the photo by VOA contains a copyrighted photo of a politician as part of a banner carried by a protester. Cropping the photo out would change the meaning of the photo. George Ho (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 02:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art work by an artist who died in 1969, not yet in the public domain and no evidence of the CC license assigned by the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 02:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original post was deleted by the original user in flickr due to copyright 201.234.75.121 17:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The original author of this photograph is unknown and the person pictured, Pedro Justo Berrío, died in 1875. This photo should obviously be in Public Domain. Culex (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Question The picture was uploaded on Flickr by the Bank of the Republic official account, with a suitable license for Wikimedia Commons as reviewed by Flickr upload bot. @201.234.75.121: How do you actually know the file has some kind of copyright issue? --·×ald·es 23:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-old-assumed based on death date of 1875. --King of ♥ 02:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree logo if we go to the alleged source (website is all rights reserved). However it might qualify as as simple enough per COM:TOO (in which case the Licensing tag may need to be adjusted to an appropriate PD one). —MarcoAurelio 21:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ 02:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original post was deleted by the original user in flickr due copyright 201.234.75.121 17:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question The picture was uploaded on Flickr by the Bank of the Republic official account, with a suitable license for Wikimedia Commons as reviewed by Flickr upload bot. @201.234.75.121: How do you actually know the file has some kind of copyright issue? --·×ald·es 23:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Answer Central Bank of Colombia, institution i work for and owner of flicker account has decided to erase all those portraits because of copyright doubts. Please erase it as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.234.75.121 (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Removed from the Banco de la República's Flickr account due to copyright concerns. Columbian copyright expires 80 years from death of the photographer or 80 years from date of publication if anonymous (note that this is not unknown). We don't know the date of creation, publication, or the date of death of the photographer. However, given that Eduardo Santos Montejo died in 1974 I don't think we can reasonably apply {{PD-old-80}} or {{PD-old-assumed}}. Undelete in 2105 at the latest. —RP88 (talk) 03:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original image was deleted from flickr account due copyright. 201.234.75.121 17:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question The picture was uploaded on Flickr by the Bank of the Republic official account, with a suitable license for Wikimedia Commons as reviewed by Flickr upload bot. @201.234.75.121: How do you actually know the file has some kind of copyright issue? --·×ald·es 23:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Removed from the Banco de la República's Flickr account due to copyright concerns. Columbian copyright expires 80 years from death of the photographer or 80 years from date of publication if anonymous (note that this is not unknown). We don't know the date of creation, publication, or the date of death of the photographer. However, given that Julio Flórez died in 1923 at the age of 55, I don't think we can reasonably apply {{PD-old-assumed}}. Undelete in 2054. —RP88 (talk) 03:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original post was deleted by the original user in flickr due to copyright 201.234.75.121 17:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question The picture was uploaded on Flickr by the Bank of the Republic official account, with a suitable license for Wikimedia Commons as reviewed by Flickr upload bot. @201.234.75.121: How do you actually know the file has some kind of copyright issue? --·×ald·es 23:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because inside the central bank, institutions who owns the flickr account, we analized this issue and decided to erase those images from flickr. So, all copies must be deleted as well. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsiza (talk • contribs) 14:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Removed from the Banco de la República's Flickr account due to copyright concerns. Columbian copyright expires 80 years from death of the photographer or 80 years from date of publication if anonymous (note that this is not unknown). We don't know the date of creation, publication, or the date of death of the photographer. However, given that Ismael Enrique Arciniegas died in 1938 I don't think we can reasonably apply {{PD-old-assumed}}. Undelete in 2069. —RP88 (talk) 03:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original post was deleted by the original user in flickr due to copyright 201.234.75.121 17:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question The picture was uploaded on Flickr by the Bank of the Republic official account, with a suitable license for Wikimedia Commons as reviewed by Flickr upload bot. @201.234.75.121: How do you actually know the file has some kind of copyright issue? --·×ald·es 23:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Removed from the Banco de la República's Flickr account due to copyright concerns. Columbian copyright expires 80 years from death of the photographer or 80 years from date of publication if anonymous (note that this is not unknown). We don't know the date of creation, publication, or the date of death of the photographer. However, given that Diego Euclides de Angulo Lemos died in 1917 and this photograph was likely created circa 1908, I don't think we can reasonably apply {{PD-old-assumed}}. Undelete in 2039. —RP88 (talk) 04:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite photo's PD status, the photo by VOA contains a banner written in Chinese calligraphy and may be copyrighted per Hong Kong's low original standards (COM:TOO HK). George Ho (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep i disagree. it's a very basic banner of handwritten text.--RZuo (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RZuo: I appreciate your reasons. However, Hong Kong is now part of China, even with autonomy given. Maybe COM:TOO China can apply; China considers calligraphic works copyrighted. So does Taiwan per COM:TOO Taiwan. Well, Hong Kong's originality standards might apply to calligraphic works; I said this because "sweat of the brow" means very low standards. --George Ho (talk) 21:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Almost forgot: If not TOO HK, then COM:FOP HK may not apply to 2D works, like banner in the picture. --George Ho (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
neither TOO China nor TOO Taiwan is relevant.
TOO UK is more relevant.
now imagine if some protestors hold a sign of written English text of similar style in England, would such a photo be considered infringement of the copyright of that sign? it's too simple to talk of any copyright, not to mention fop.--RZuo (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You mean "TOO HK"? George Ho (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep at least partially. The content of the banner is not the only thing the photograph depicts. I pixelized the banner. If the closing admin thinks it's not copyrightable they can revert my change and keep it. Otherwise they can revision-delete the first and second versions and keep the third one. whym (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: After reading the discussion and looking at the original image I do not consider the text as calligraphy, but as normal handwriting in Chinese. Therefore I restored the original version (thank you @Whym: for blurring. --Elly (talk) 19:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD UK - Principal author - Charles Henry Curtis (1869–1958), Undelete in 2039?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • From the foreword on page 4: The coloured illustrations are from photographs in colour taken by Mr T. E. Waltham, of Upper Tulse Hill, London, S.W.; while the half-tone illustrations are reproduced from photographs taken by Mr A. J. Campbell, of 55 and 56 Chancery Lane, London, E.C. The plants and flowers represented are from various sources, but chiefly from the private collections of Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford, K.C.V.O., C.I.E., etc., Westonbirt, Tetbury, Gloucester; Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bt., Gatton Park, Reigate; H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney; and R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Christchurch Road, Streatham; and from the famous trade collections of Messrs Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath; Messrs Sander & Sons, St Albans, and Bruges; Messrs J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham; Messrs Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, Enfield; Messrs Jas. Veitch & Sons, Chelsea; and Messrs J. & A. Macbean, Cooksbridge. Mutter Erde (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This work was simultaneously published in the U.S., where it is in public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The list of photographers does not give information on the copyright status. Public domain in US is not sufficient, as the images are not in PD in the UK (or Europe). Therefore all images/files deleted, perhaps it is safe to undelete in 2039, 121 years after publication. --Elly (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Muñoz, Antonio, 1884-1960 - Europe uses 70 pma, and so this may not necessarily be PD in Italy. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Italy#General_rules: "Economic rights in a work last for the author's life and until the end of the 70th solar year after his death". This file contains also 405 images so very unsure if the file can be undeleted in 2031, this should be investigated at that time. . --Elly (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Can be undeleted in 2029. . --Elly (talk) 22:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Can be undeleted in 2054. --Elly (talk) 22:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC) .[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a FAKE SVG; now a real raster image "3d-radar fr.jpg" has been generated. -- sarang사랑 13:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK from original uploader Pierre cb (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The jpg is in use on the projects, so no reason to delete. Kept the svg as well, from discussion. --Elly (talk) 22:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BGSberlin as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Vektorisierte Version unter https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bund_Deutscher_Kriminalbeamter_Logo.svg verfügbar --BGSberlin (talk) 07:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to regular DR, as image is in use and per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates.-- Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's correct that this file is in use, but the image can be easily changed to the most current vectorized version mentioned in the deletion request so this is not really an issue. Isn't it? --BGSberlin (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File is not in use anymore so can be deleted according to Com:Redundant. --Elly (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: none of these stamps issued between 1952 and 1959 were in the public domain in the country of origin when the URAA took effect in that country on January 1, 1996, so PCP applies even though the normal copyright term for anonymous work is 50 years after creation.

Ww2censor (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: These stamps are PD in China as they were issued by legal entity (state-owned China Post) and their 50 year copyright term had expired. As I understand, nominator actually claims, that due to URAA all stamps of the People's Republic of China (the country was created in 1949) are still copyrighted in the U.S. and none of them could be uploaded to Commons. This looks very strange to me.

We already had a controversial URAA-related mass deletions in the past and subsequent Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, where is stated, that all affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}, instead of immediate deletion. And according to Commons:URAA-restored copyrights all such files should be treated very carefully. Hoping for justice, Одуванчик Одуванчикович Одуванчиков (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete @Одуванчик Одуванчикович Одуванчиков: Please, read COM:Stamps China, those stamps are still copyrighted by China Post and their actual authors, to which some may still alive. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just also note that all pages of China Post official website are not having any copyright marks at all, so per this GNU.org page they should be considered as copyrighted. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I find statements at COM:Stamps China doubtful, for example this one:
in most cases, the authors of those stamps are not publicly known (the Civil Code of PRC doesn't allow announcing of them in principle)
Because in the Stamp Catalogue of the People's Republic of China ((in Chinese) (2013) 中华人民共和国邮票目录。2013, 北京: 人民邮电出版社 ISBN: 978-7-115-32332-3. ) stamp designers (under [D] tag) are denoted for most (if not all) of the stamps. Одуванчик Одуванчикович Одуванчиков (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, "Civil Code of PRC" is s:zh:中华人民共和国民法典, still lack of an official, or at least a free English translation, and not yet, it's to be affected by 1 Jan 2021, but its privacy-related terms may possible to grandfathered-in force. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Its "Part IV Personality rights - Chapter VI Privacy and personal information protection" may be related to this case. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But I agree that the texts of COM:Stamps China is, except the already-PD Manchukuo and {{PD-anon-expired}} cases, bogus to everyone, any suggestions on improving it? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. It is not shown that COM:Stamps China, which states that the stamps are copyrighted is not valid in this case. --Elly (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Banknote released in 2017. Per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1970 are copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coin released in 2016. Per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1970 are copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope - some notes. The same for File:Le funzioni di αὐτός in greco antico.jpg, File:I valori αὐτός come aggettivo.jpg, file:I valori di αὐτός in posizione attributiva.jpg, file:I valori di αὐτός in posizione predicativa.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Although perhaps these images have some educational value on the school of the uploader, I consider them out of scope. They are not used on any project. The uploader stated they would delete the images when converted into Wikicode, see diff. That was in April 2021. I consider uploader has had enough time to realize their plans. Therefore these images can be deleted. --Elly (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of so low quality and so blurried that it is about impossible to see who it is supposed de depict. Per that, it is out of COM:SCOPE as it doesn't have any educational use. Myloufa (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep INUSE Removing it from an article minutes before tagging it for deletion is one thing, but not even mentioning that in the deletion request is another.
This is a poor image. But it's also the only image we have for a presumably notable subject at fr:Peter MacLeod. The reasons for deletion would be much stronger if we had others. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: There are limits on how poor quality pictures can be. When we can't even be sure that it's the good person on the piture or a lookalike (or even someone that doesn't even look alike, as we can't really see anything clear on the picture), there is no reason to keep it. Also, the picture IS NOT in use, as I removed it from the said article and no one on frWiki, even the author, would put it back where it was. --Myloufa (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I partially agree with you Andy. I agree with the part that we should keep it because “...it's also the only image we have for a presumably notable subject at fr:Peter MacLeod.” But at the same time Andy, look at the qualityǃ People might think it's just another man impersonated as Peter MacLeodǃ So I suggest we should delete the image. --ILoveCocomelon Ho Ho Hoǃ 13:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. A better image is available from May 2021, File:Peter MacLeod.png. So there is no need to keep the bad quality image. In addition there are two similar bad images in the same category which I will nominate for deletion as well. --Elly (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor Camil Fàbregas died in 2003 and is still under copyright until 2073 (no FoP in France). Culex (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Culex:  : This is not an original from Camil Fàbregas, but a copy from Manolo Hugué, witch is in the Ceret's museum. Vatekor (talk) 10:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per COM:FOP France. This is the case for both mentioned sculpturers, Camil Fabregas or Manolo Hugué. --Elly (talk) 13:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of medals created by a made-up order of knights (the "Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog," whose existence is only supported by Facebook, blogs, and the website of the equally-made-up "Royal House of Mim"). Not used in any articles and I don't see any educational purpose in keeping the photo. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No educational value and out of scope. --Elly (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eine Einwilligung der abgebildeten Personen ist nicht zu vermuten; bloßes Beiwerk sind die Personen hier nicht, da ja gerade die Cafészenerie mit den Menschen dargestellt sein soll. Haster2 (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept in cropped version. Deleted the version with people who could be recognized. --Elly (talk) 13:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I copied this file from de:WP, but acc. to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GFDL_1.3_Kriterien_zur_Neulizenzierung this is not allowed for GFDL 2.0 or later uploaded after August 1st, 2009. So the file should be deleted. Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:Redundant, various alternative versions are available. --Elly (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1927 publicatio0n, Not expired as claimed - IA Publication date metadata issue ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: PD-US-no notice. --Yann (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1939 Publication - Not necessarily as expired as claimed. IA Publication date - metadata issue ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: PD-US-no notice. --Yann (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1934 publication - Not necessarily expired as claimed , IA publication date metadata issue ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: PD-US-no notice. --Yann (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear notice for 1945 publication, was it renewed? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: haven't found info about renewal. --rubin16 (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" unlikely. Not simple enough either to be free of copyright restrictions per COM:TOO US (Disney logos are explicitly mentioned in the NotOK section as not free; with w:File:Disney Junior.svg as an example of files not allowed on Commons making this file a Copyright infringement). —MarcoAurelio 21:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per King of Hearts. --rubin16 (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]