Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/08/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
wrong file 180.251.1.153 01:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you are User:Christotanu please login and confirm. --Achim (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
My name is Christotanu and hereby I agree to delete the file that I request to {{speedy|wrong file}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christotanu (talk • contribs) 13:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Marks & Spencer Food stores
[edit]COM:PACKAGING. The labels shown on these products are non-free and displayed prominently, so blurring them would render the photograph useless.
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 03.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 14.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 15.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 16.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 17.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 18.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 20.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 22.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 23.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 24.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 25.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 26.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 27.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 28.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 29.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 30.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 31.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 32.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 33.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 34.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 35.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 36.jpg
De728631 (talk) 17:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Redundant due to previous overcategorisation. Deletion request is now at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Marks and Spencer Food, No.32 Hollywood Road. --De728631 (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Qamarkhan92 (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not at all. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Possibly coryright violation EitanBor2001 (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). -- Geagea (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Possibly copyright violation EitanBor2001 (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). -- Geagea (talk) 20:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Possibly copyright violation EitanBor2001 (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). -- Geagea (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Possibly copyright violation EitanBor2001 (talk) 19:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). -- Geagea (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Possibly copyright violation EitanBor2001 (talk) 19:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). -- Geagea (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Possibly copyright violation EitanBor2001 (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). -- Geagea (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of the copyright work.
SCP-2000 05:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Outdated logo 89.20.163.134 08:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Invalid rationale for deletion. Outdated material is usually kept for various reasons, including as historical information. (non-admin closure) JalenFolf (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ritika.times (talk · contribs)
[edit]No camera details and very highly polished professional shits either need permission and true source, or are copyvios
Timtrent (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Cette image, recadrée à partir de de cette photo, n'est pas sous licence libre Bounè rodzo (talk) 10:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 07:29, 15 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 14:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Photo provenant de Google Map Poudou99 (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 07:29, 15 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 14:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Photo provenant de Google Map Poudou99 (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Simple copyvio so speedy. --Herby talk thyme 15:05, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 09:31, 15 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 14:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this image is the uploaders own work Hangman'sDeath (talk) 10:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I apologise for this, I let my niece use my PC and I suspected she'd done something fishy. She has told me that it's her in the image and I am looking closely to if it really is. Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:PRP, especially per this. --Эlcobbola talk 17:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.
- File:Palaw sign.jpg
- File:Phoeshanbeach palaw.jpg
- File:ပါဒစက်တော်ရာဘုရား.jpg
- File:ပလောက်မြို့အညွှန်းပြမြေပုံ.jpg
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 06:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IsisNathaly (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. Should be replace with web links. /
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Professional portraits, requires COM:OTRS permission by the original photographer.
ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harry hernandez clown (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 09:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yograj sharma(Raju) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 09:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Agree delete to both of these per nomination. These are personal vanity selfies of someone with no indication of any importance, describing himself as a "Cool and honest boy". Acabashi (talk) 10:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files taken from different sources on internet without source and permission.
- File:Krsto-Djurovic-kao-pomornicar.jpg
- File:Fibrosis.jpg
- File:PrimjerNZGTrnsko.png
- File:TrnskoPlan.png
- File:Richter Skyscrapers.jpg
- File:New Zagreb in the 80's.jpg
- File:Miljenka Ćurković fullsize.jpg
- File:Mate Kapović.jpg
- File:Miljenka Ćurković - Baković.jpg
- File:Miljenka Ćurković - Markov Trg.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 11:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete Theoretically COM:OTRS can solve this, but in this case I would be very sceptical that it will be forthcoming. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Historical photo. Regasterios (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned user photo, out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 11:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lhordhyh18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work, photos of old photos mainly
- File:Norberto Kalaw Calingasan.png
- File:NK Calingasan.png
- File:Jockey Norberto Kalaw Calingasan.png
- File:Cherokee Chase.jpg
- File:Jade Avenue.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Low quality, no exif, and out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karloloflovblad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos, not own work
- File:John smwia talk309.tif
- File:John ingvar carlsson311.tif
- File:Löfblad och Palme.jpg
- File:John at work.jpg
- File:Löfblad and Carlough.jpg
- File:John at Brunnsvik.jpg
- File:John as a lumberjack.jpg
- File:Löfblad and Hans Ericson.jpg
- File:Lofblad palme.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, clearly photoshopped from something Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
By mistaking upload please delete Nileshsinghmandloi (talk) 12:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy: Dispensable, unused, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Serious doubts that these images are the uploader's own work. The contributor has a history of uploading copyright violations, none of the EXIF data match, and one file actually cites an external link in the permission field. COM:PCP applies.
ƏXPLICIT 12:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, PCP
- File:TubosDaAdutoradoRiodoPeixe.jpg
- File:BondinhoCamarao.jpg
- File:Prefeito Biava Foto.png
- File:JornalDiarioDeMarilia CronistaPauloCorreaDeLara.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
This collection of pictures, with the exception of File:Ian Jensen.jpg which has a set of camera details and a named photographer likely not the uploader, appear to either require permission or to be copyright violations. A number of these are in wide use in various language versions of Wikipedia
- File:Josh Junior11.jpg
- File:Josh Junior.jpg
- File:Mat and malcolm.jpg
- File:Kovalenko..jpg
- File:Giles scott.webp
- File:Tom Burton..jpg
- File:John Bertrand.jpg
- File:Rbyc.jpg
- File:Mat and will.jpg
- File:Matthew Wearn..png
- File:Matthew Wearn.png
- File:Mathew Belcher.webp
- File:Ian Jensen.jpg
- File:Nathan Outteridge.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 14:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Any metadata, false dates, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Doubtful claim of authorship.
- File:Thelma Tixou.jpg
- File:Princesa Yamal.jpg
- File:Wanda Seux.jpg
- File:Lyn May.jpg
- File:Olga Breeskin.jpg
- File:Silvia Pinal (1970).jpg
- File:Silvia Pinal 1.jpg
- File:The Devil's Playground poster.jpg
- File:Accused film poster.jpg
- File:I Live for Love film poster.jpg
- File:Dolores del Río in Evangeline.jpg
- File:Dolores del Río1.jpg
- File:Dolores del Río in 1933.jpg
- File:Dolores Del Río.jpg
- File:María Félix & Dolores del Río, jpg.jpg
- File:Elsa Aguirre.jpg
— Racconish 💬 17:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Alejandra Bogue 2020.jpg
- File:Alejandra Bogue 1.jpg
- File:Alejandra Bogue.jpg
- File:Wanda Seux.png
- File:Azela Robinson.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own work: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, many previous DR's.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manu Mojito 6.jpg is waiting since January (2021). Close both DRs as delete; only having a look at the uploader's TP tells us to do so. We could even send them to rest some time. --E4024 (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Outdated logo 89.20.163.134 08:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep no reason to delete, file is in use.--Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. --CptViraj (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Monsieur slow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davide Battaglia 90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from toy.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment the image shows up frequently elsewhere online and is likely the studio creation. @Davide Battaglia 90: if you represent the studio, can you please follow the instructions here: Commons:Modello richiesta di permesso? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)- Delete Unless we receive COM:OTRS from the creators of the toy. If the ticket is received, I would ask the admin to wait on deleting a file until the ticket is processed. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikiquote page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 15:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope. And likely not own work: taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Antoine Andary is needed. No evidence, that uploader Apollo Results is the same person. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Decription in Youtube is: © BEE Entertainment/Giải trí được quản lý bởi Công ty TNHH Truyền thông Bee (BEE COMM). Copy and reup is not allowed. 08:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the license is reviewed and even twice: by bot and by admin. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:54, 21 August 2020 UTC: No license since 13 August 2020 --Krdbot 02:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:55, 21 August 2020 UTC: No license since 13 August 2020 --Krdbot 02:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:55, 21 August 2020 UTC: No license since 13 August 2020 --Krdbot 02:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:55, 21 August 2020 UTC: No license since 13 August 2020 --Krdbot 02:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:55, 21 August 2020 UTC: No license since 13 August 2020 --Krdbot 02:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Looks OoS to me. Anybody knows the chap? E4024 (talk) 01:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: This is someone Daniel Guaragna, self-proclaimed sales guru. No sufficient proves of notability. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
30 KB "own work" w/o EXIF by a one-timer. Also not used BTW. E4024 (talk) 01:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: cropped from https://i.mycdn.me/i?r=AyH4iRPQ2q0otWIFepML2LxRoqSkZLN_dfyOnjJXG7_9MA placed earlier in Russian social network ok.ru; OTRS needed. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 09:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
this is a photo of Maj.-Gen. John C. Frémont. see https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47da-f1d0-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99 Wvdp (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: We also have it uncropped as File:John C. Fremont, Major General (Union).jpg. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Professional portraits, requires COM:OTRS permission by the original photographer.
ƏXPLICIT 01:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative of a photograph. Unfortunately we do not know who the photographer is, so it is difficult to known when to restore. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Cette image, recadrée depuis cette image n'est pas sous licence libre cf les mentions légales du site: "Tous les droits des auteurs des Œuvres protégées reproduites et communiquées sur ce site, sont réservés. Sauf autorisation, toute utilisation des Œuvres autres que la reproduction et la consultation individuelles et privées sont interdites." Bounè rodzo (talk) 12:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Self Promotional image used on promotional userpage ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sänger as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot from a copyrighted webpage |source=https://www.babakzanjani.com/gallery-%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%DB%8C Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 07:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ich wurde von der Vorlage getäuscht, die mir vorgegaukelt hat, es gäbe schon einen Einspruch, und daher müsse ich jetzt darauf reagieren. Lag latürnich an meinem etwas kursorischen Lesen und zu schnellem klicken, aber da war es schon zu spät, und die Seite war angelegt. Ich habe zwar die Änderung an der Dateiseite rückgängig gemacht, weil das imho ein klarer Fall von Copyvio ist, aber hier belasse ich es mal bei diesem Kommentar, ohne SLA. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 07:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Sealle. --Minoraxtalk 07:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
personal image of a non-contributer. This user has 3 edits in total on all wikimedia projects. One edit is this upload, the other two are on wikipedia done for self promotion Hangman'sDeath (talk) 10:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder Karen Bornhoft 2012 per exif, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyvio[1]. –Davey2010Talk 16:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
for my Metawiki page to appear باسم (talk) 15:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by علاء. --Minoraxtalk 08:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image Cjp24 (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-free, screenshot from the TV show Black Sails (Anne Bonney played by Clara Paget) • 
• hugarheimur 22:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
derivative work, not truely own work, year of publication of this book unclear for determining copyright status PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- The book (vol. 5 of “Great Soviet Encyclopedia”, 2nd edition) was published in 1950. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: The second edition of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia appears to have been published in 1950–8, this is too late to apply currently for {{PD-Russia}}. Unfortunately, the author has not been named and no information has been provided about possible author information within the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Very small and blurred logo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
If a larger version of this is available, maybe delete this one. But I haven't seen a larger version. SecretName101 (talk) 03:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
I've found a larger version, should I overwrite or make a new file? Eiim (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- A re-read of COM:OVERWRITE suggests that it's acceptable to overwrite in this case (in fact, a higher resolution version is the first item under "Do overwrite"), so I've gone ahead and overwritten. Hopefully, this means everyone's fine with a Keep. Eiim (talk) 18:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion any longer. Why not use {{withdraw}}? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 04:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted photos A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete and restore at an appropriate date to show the existence of such collection of photographs as a cultural phenomenon. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
no location given, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; dubious name, uncat since Oct 2015. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Connecticut Senate Republicans' website makes no mention of anything being licensed under the Creative Commons. Woko Sapien (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; false license claim, no reason evident to think it is free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Work of the US government is in the public domain. Uploader cannot claim to be the copyright holder. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
License corrected (to {{PD-US-Gov}} ) and Kept. (False authorship claim removed as well. Image in use in multiple projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
This photo I want to delete Pitpisit (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request (unused, uncat photo) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
If it's in scope we need OTRS, if not we do not need it. E4024 (talk) 01:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete I have attempted to find this person, but was unable to do so. If this person is reasonably well known we should keep, but for now it is not very useful. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kutu Debbarma(Joshooul) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.
- File:Kutu Debbarma signature.jpg
- File:Kutu Deb barma.jpg
- File:Kutu Debbarma & his friend David Debbarma.jpg
- File:Kutu Deb Barma.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 09:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CSD#F10. --Achim (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Close again. Page not archiving properly --Minoraxtalk 08:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 14:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 14:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thesazarconfidential (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: private image, only in use on the user page of a user without useful contribution to the project Cjp24 (talk) 17:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. The labels shown on these products are non-free and displayed prominently, so blurring them would render the photograph useless.
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 03.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 07.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 13.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 14.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 15.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 16.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 17.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 18.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 20.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 22.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 23.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 24.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 25.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 26.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 27.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 28.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 29.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 30.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 31.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 32.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 33.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 34.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 35.jpg
- File:HK Central 荷李活道 32 Hollywood Road 些利街 Shelley Street 建業榮基中心 Kinwick Centre shop M&S Food Marks and Spencer store bottled wines August 2020 SS2 36.jpg
De728631 (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It is very much possible to blur the parts of the packing that are not simple text, which will make them useful. Regardless of if we delete only the specific version or the file completely undelete at an appropriate date. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see how any blurred image would remain useful. There is no purpose for such altered photos other than to illustrate the offerings of a particular store which is borderline spammy. Anything related to the particular packaging of the affected brand would be lost though, and this should be the main purpose of these images. Some images might be cropped though to keep the "textlogo" parts, but in my book this whole collection is also more promotional than useful. De728631 (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Wrong! Only copyrighted aspects need to be removed. Text only portions of the labels are not copyrightable. Your book does not make Commons policy or the law.℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)- "Text only portions of the labels are not copyrightable." That's why I wrote that "textlogo" parts might be saved where it makes sense. De728631 (talk) 19:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Misread. I am striking my prev statement. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- "Text only portions of the labels are not copyrightable." That's why I wrote that "textlogo" parts might be saved where it makes sense. De728631 (talk) 19:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see how any blurred image would remain useful. There is no purpose for such altered photos other than to illustrate the offerings of a particular store which is borderline spammy. Anything related to the particular packaging of the affected brand would be lost though, and this should be the main purpose of these images. Some images might be cropped though to keep the "textlogo" parts, but in my book this whole collection is also more promotional than useful. De728631 (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. The labels shown on these products are non-free and displayed prominently, so blurring them would render the photograph useless.
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food July 2020 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 08.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 09.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 10.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 11.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 12.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 14.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 皇室堡 Windsor House Plaza mall shop Marks & Spencer Food 酒 bottled wine July 2020 SS2 17.jpg
De728631 (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Uploader says own work, MD says screenshot. E4024 (talk) 02:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Various pics without license for each one. E4024 (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like an unused personal image. E4024 (talk) 02:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Cannot find any evidence author released image to the public domain. Nv8200p (talk) 08:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate from File:Cigogne_à_Eguisheim.jpg Gzen92 [discuter] 08:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained diagram. No educational use.. Malcolma (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Image in use on a site created for the sole purpose of self promotion Hangman'sDeath (talk) 10:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
artist Karl Schmidt-Rottluff died in 1976, therefore still copyrighted Magnus (talk) 10:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
artist Karl Schmidt-Rottluff died in 1976, therefore still copyrighted Magnus (talk) 10:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Rocky Masum (talk) 10:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Rocky Masum (talk) 10:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Uploader request. Yogwi21 (talk) 13:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
unused, unreferenced Estopedist1 (talk) 13:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logos of questionable notability. Used in promotional Wikidata items.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arfaoui Nada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, p.e. [2] Munf (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Copyright holder Maria Panze. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not an "own" or free-licence work, cf. Serietivu.com — danyele 16:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete Obvious copyright violation --Mosbatho (talk) 13:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I want to delete this image uploaded by me Hola mundo (talk) 16:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Rocky Masum (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I mistake to uproaded wrong picture from blog of copyright holder of this pic Reiro (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Rocky Masum (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Rocky Masum (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NOVOnapolitica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Using Commons to political propaganda. Article deleted at pt.wiki, not notable.
- File:Mesinha da previdência Av Paulista 1.jpg
- File:Kombi Margaret NOVO 1.jpg
- File:André Bolini Perfil 1.jpg
Stanglavine (talk) 17:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I cannot see any OTRS permission from the artist Avsharyan but yes I see various deletion notifications on the TP of the uploader. E4024 (talk) 17:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded a better svg-version, here: File:NAD oxidatie reductie.svg TheBartgry (talk) 18:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Needed for use in some other place / Not possible to use where needed Veli-pekka.kemppainen (talk) 13:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of File:Pälkäne uusi.svg Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a posed PR shot, it seems unlikely that it's a self-taken photo as it is currently indicated as. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, very low resolution and no exif data. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 18:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
no location given. unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
No educational use. Unused. The link at sv:Mediawiki-diskussion:Noimage is to when it was a redlink. ”Hej” means ”hello” in Swedish, hence the example chosen as a redlink in 2005. Jonteemil (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trem_da_s%C3%A9rie_1100,_em_Vila_Clarice.jpg Sorocabano 32 (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Metropolis_-_Linha_5.JPG Sorocabano 32 (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE so processed as a dup. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Rather than an "own work" looks like a photo of photo to me. E4024 (talk) 19:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
no location given, unused, uncategorized. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep it is no better or worse than other images in Category:Boats in India or Category:People with boats. Keep --ProfessorX (talk) 06:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- @ProfessorX: it is weak argument for keeping. Every file should be evaluated separately. And many container categories (eg cat:Houses, cat:People, cat:Music) indeed consist of many out of scope files--Estopedist1 (talk) 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
--ProfessorX (talk) 10:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
no location given, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Photo not shown in source given. Under tl.net's terms of use, non-commercial personal use is only permitted for information and software produced on tl.net, not images produced and owned by Team Liquid or their partners. CentreLeftRight ✉ 23:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like photo of photo. BTW the Prime Minister of one of the largest democracies of our world cannot be classified as "unidentified people". E4024 (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
If the wm at the bottom left means copyright, please delete all THREE files by this uploader. E4024 (talk) 23:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
58 KB small file w/o camera EXIF, some uploads of the user show their camera EXIF. E4024 (talk) 23:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; looks like a screenshot. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gerardomgallo (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused, personal files
Estopedist1 (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by a banned en-wiki user. No indication from source URL that this image is licensed under a Creative Commons license. Aoi (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of a photo. E4024 (talk) 00:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
52 KB with tr code, dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 01:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Is it free to upload IMDb profile pics? E4024 (talk) 01:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
20 KB false ow w/o EXIF, from a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 01:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF, not an own work as declared and dubious scope. (Categories are quite interesting BTW.) E4024 (talk) 01:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
33 KB photo of a photo presented as "own work". There are other files like this from the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 01:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
I went back to the press release and there is no ownership of the photo or watermark listed. mwlola (talk) 10:19, 13 August 2020 (EST)
- While a DR is continuing, if you make alterations of the file info, as you did, you must inform those changes here so as not to confuse the admin who will decide to delete or keep the file. Please. --E4024 (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm pretty sure that this photo can be deleted as it looks like the page itself was taken into other contributors' hands at some point. Glad to have clarified and learned more about the process. mwlola (talk) 12:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
28 KB photo of a photo presented as "own work". There are other files like this from the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 01:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
This one can be deleted. It is indeed my own work but the page it was uploaded for is no longer in existence. mwlola (talk) 10:27, 13 August 2020 (EST)
- Now you uploaded another pic as if it were an "update". Delete both. --E4024 (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Small size photo of a photo presented as "own work". There are other files like this from the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 01:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
This one can be deleted. It is indeed my own work but the page it was uploaded for is no longer in existence. mwlola (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2020 (EST)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Small size photo of a photo presented as "own work". There are other files like this from the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 01:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm the uploader of this file. If it's up for deletion because of a conflict of interest, that's not necessary because I've never met this person. I took it from a press release many years ago, though back then I am not sure I grasped Wikipedia's policies as well as I do these days which is moderately well -- to be more specific re:this photo I am not sure labeling it as "own work" was entirely accurate but I also do not think (?) it quite violates copyright as it was on a press release. I won't fight too hard to keep this photo on the page, though I do think it makes for a better page about this journalist and essayist who I consider an influential person regardless of whether or not there's a photo attached to the page even though I think this photo probably adds to the page. Maybe it can remain there without being tagged as my own work when it was on a press release. mwlola (talk) 10:06, 13 August 2020 (EST)
I went back to the press release and there is no ownership of the photo or watermark listed. mwlola (talk) 10:10, 13 August 2020 (EST)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 23:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Please read the TP of the file. There the uploader says it is not own work. PD? E4024 (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; from a newspaper. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in US for works of art. Artist is Barry Flanagan (11 January 1941 – 31 August 2009) Dumelow (talk) 04:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in US for works of art. Artist is Barry Flanagan (11 January 1941 – 31 August 2009) Dumelow (talk) 04:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Grand Rounds Scenic Byway - Rabbit On Bell Sculpture in Sculpture Garden - NARA - 7718710.jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama in US for works of art. Artist is Barry Flanagan (11 January 1941 – 31 August 2009) Dumelow (talk) 04:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in US for works of art. Artist is Barry Flanagan (11 January 1941 – 31 August 2009) Dumelow (talk) 04:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused, same thing as Kit body liverpool1415h.png. Aʀvєδuι + 05:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused double of Kit body liverpool1415h.png. Aʀvєδuι + 05:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused double of Kit body liverpool1415h.png. Aʀvєδuι + 05:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused double of Kit body liverpool0405h.png. Aʀvєδuι + 05:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of Wikipedia page; It is screenshot of a version diff. Herobrine303 (talk) 08:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete com:ps keep local.--Larryasou (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
droits non détenus Cgu29 (talk) 10:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Artist died in 1970, still copyrighted. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
No FOP for 2D graphic works in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
obvious non-free, uploader even states were they stole it from - https://www.somersetcountycc.co.uk/players/tom-banton/ Lugnuts (talk) 07:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Lugnuts (talk), Thanks for pointing this out. I wasn't quite sure whether this image can be shared here or not. I thought providing the source url would be ok for the image to be uploaded. I didn't go through the terms and conditions, that's why I don't know much about what to upload and what not. If it is violating any rules, I'll appreciate it's deletion.
কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 07:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Basic rule of thumb, unless you took the picture yourself, it's probably not free to use. Lugnuts (talk) 07:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Will it be deleted by the admins or I'll have to delete it? I don't know how to remove files from commons. কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 07:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Painting of Serbian painter sr:Kosta Bradić (died 2014). No permission. Smooth O (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Also to delete:
- File:Jimit Trivedi for Navratna Hair Oil.jpg
HIghly unlikely that this image is the uploaders own work. see https://www.google.at/search?hl=de-AT&tbs=sbi:AMhZZivKTsRrI1oCJmwej9hM90WBtDkMNv8fhs5zSIIzR7CsHXyDSn-JOGHvNCeogvi0P7I9cjpFMsRHJAt4CL8qV_1Rasxko9Tx1Q5V-sl5SBTIxqysIqUIdwynKJUjSFZYgeiImbS52g_1e-tnJ5PgLADzszIwzryGu9I7feAvGfuMUibWdpDcYsFPlOmnOju5swKPsFT6sbf_1jTCkIFFq9T5gkaMH3kFSKhRGCIa_1Fi9btkh7pI9bhjYax4zIEEx893Hq9N8hfDJyYaiWG46qqXGz8UW8ZG_1U6rsp23n-RrlMn-ZXpaASx6ih5DnTqVrz_1MLEVVLO7Oksz7ksRZwQEmawP3zsdGNw&ei=Dw81X5enNoWx8gLEsZbQAw&start=0&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjX6tDo9ZfrAhWFmFwKHcSYBTo4ChDx0wN6BAgKEDI&biw=1920&bih=895 --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 10:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution and lack of camera details or permissions pointing to probable copyvio Timtrent (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
This file is a copyright violation as the uploader claimed this is their own work when it is clearly not their own work. No permission. YoungForever (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Seems like photo from a book or magazine. We can see dots in it. Is Gasha123 (the user who uploaded this photo) really the author of it taken 43 years ago? Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete May consider undeletion in 2070?! . --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
If it is th euoloader;s own work, where are the camera details. Pure vanity pic in rejected draft Timtrent (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
It's when there are two different authors (or at least two different copyright owners) where there is a problem -- we need a license for both works, but one copyright owner cannot provide both.--Kai3952 (talk) 15:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
professional portrait of (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 02:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- He has an article and the file has camera EXIF. Donno more. --E4024 (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Found here in 2014 http://static.peabodyawards.com/user_images/John_Huey_for_Web_02_%281%29.jpg - needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this is the uploaders own work. looking at all his other uploads it is highly unlikely that this upload is not a copyvio seeing that all other images are Hangman'sDeath (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Edited version of File:East Bloc military advisors in Angola, 1980s.JPEG, no educatonal use, vandalism Drakosh (talk) 13:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused + looks nothing like the original one (compare with Kit body liverpool1718H.png). Aʀvєδuι + 05:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Not public domain unless uploader took the image themselves. SecretName101 (talk) 06:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader did not take the image. Jonathan Schilling (talk) 18:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Think this falls below TOO Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: maybe below ToO, however the photo is unlikely to be own work, and this is a 3D object. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, cropped from this image found in 2014 https://www.fibis.org/john-keay-speaking-indo-british-relationship/ Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
incomplete; several complete versions exist JiriMatejicek (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Higgins died in 1984, not own work Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work for a photo uploaded 10yrs after his death Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
not own work. From Internet. Same problem may exists with other this uploader's files. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It would be great to have this here, but we would first need to figure out who was it that made it, and by now I am afraid that it is not even possible. I remember seeing it a long time ago, perhaps in 1990s, therefore about 20 years has passed since the creation date, so we can undelete around 2120. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Mispelling of an ethnic group, a new corrected updated version can be created instead 73.237.208.246 14:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
This map was created using the 270towin.com template (which is copyrighted) instead of Wikimedia's in-house electoral college template (which is released to the public domain). Woko Sapien (talk) 17:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status—current claim of 70 years since author death is incompatible with the claim of unknown author. We would need to know whether the photograph is anonymous, when it was published (before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}). If not anonymous, would need to know when the author died to determine if PD. Publication right applies if the photograph was previously unpublished. Buidhe (talk) 20:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Erreur de ma part faite il y a des années, je suis la personne sur la photo et j'aurais aimé quel soit supprimée, merci pour votre retour 2A01:CB05:8B30:2D00:1453:93BB:E9DB:1AE9 20:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused image of not(never) active user. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate file File:Pacific Venus 16.jpg Gillfoto 21:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request of unused file. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Ordinary Shia imam described as "mmnmm". IMHO OoS. Two years without use or categorization... E4024 (talk) 01:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
professional portrait of (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 02:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion (uploader matches credit in EXIF data). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Duplicated File:香港各界聲援蘋果日報及10名被捕人士 市民指愈打壓新聞自由愈支持 01.jpg Miaulian (talk) 03:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Near 1:1 duplicate of File:Homeless Crisis 21.JPG. Per COM:Redundant. BriefEdits (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep For me the fact that two images 12 seconds apart are so similar actually adds to the usefulness of both images in understanding that the person is laying completely motionless and it is not a photograph when a person was caught in a strange moment. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Gone_Postal, the nominated file is a part of a larger set of photos. e.g. File:Homeless Crisis 19.JPG shows the subject from a different vantage point. Therefore, the nominated file provides nothing new and is COM:Redundant. — BriefEdits (talk) 19:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, yes, I did understand that. I still think that we can keep. I personally have no interest in this file, but I still feel that we can keep. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Near 1:1 duplicate of File:Homeless Crisis 41.JPG BriefEdits (talk) 05:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- They are slighty different. Because we are talking about inanimate objects we do not need several images. I actually would prefer to Keep this one and Delete 41, because the angle is slightly better in this one. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- I personally don't have a strong preference, so I'm ok with switching the nomination if that's preferred. — BriefEdits (talk) 20:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Near 1:1 duplicate of File:Homeless Crisis 39.JPG. Per COM:Redundant. BriefEdits (talk) 05:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep In this case I find it useful to have two photographs taken a few seconds apart. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- How so, Gone_Postal? — BriefEdits (talk) 19:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- For the same reason why a video would be better than a still image, it provides time flow. If we would only have inanimate objects in the frame, then this would not be the case. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Gone_Postal, I guess I disagree as the marginal utility of keeping it is rather small. Per COM:SPAM, the nominated photo adds nothing distinctively unique to the conversation as the time frame between them are slim and the composition is very similar. (if not identical) And per COM:NOTUSED, you don't need to keep every single photo to flesh out a theoretical usage or categorization. Meaning we don't need proof that he is sleeping when the subtext of the photo implies that much. — BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is not the area where I contribute, but I simply attempted to voice my opinion trying to see things from the point of a potential reuser. But I suppose that it is ok to have a respectful disagreement. I will have no harsh feelings even if the file is deleted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Bild Bearbeitungsfehler, korrektes Bild wird nach Löschung hochgeladen. Hewiha (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 21:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I own the content but there's a copyright issue on the file. need to reupload with the correct licence. 89.20.163.134 08:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- You can change the license to a correct one. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
After 2 years since the last deletion request on this file, the proper license has not been applied. Unlikely to be own work. JalenFolf (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Looks simple enough to me. PD-textlogo? Bedivere (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's a PNG file that has multiple vector graphic SVG alternatives, including File:Armada Music Logo.svg. JalenFolf (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The color is different on the linked SVG. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of Flag_of_Laos_(1952-1975).svg. Will update the other file instead. Nawdsign (talk) 22:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The two files are different, and it appears that there's some disagreement over which version is correct. In particular, FDRMRZUSA reverted File:Flag of Laos (1952-1975).svg to its current version from ove very similar to File:3-head-elephant-laos-flag.svg. --bjh21 (talk) 14:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Not a duplicate. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of early enough publication to be PD, 21st century website and 1987 encyclopedia not early enough PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
It does not match the original version and the details are imprecise Poya-P (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep Taking a look at these two images and the source image, I don't understand the problem here. The source image is low-quality and does not seem to have any details that this lacks, with the possible exception of the text on the top. The SVG images here do show the southern border of Iran, which the source images do not, but that should be easily correctable and is not a reason for deletion as far as I am aware. The wheat leaf may be slightly simplified as compared to the actual version, but the low resolution source image makes that nearly impossible to determine. The only other potential issue I see is the aspect ratio, but the reason for that seems to be that the source image is simply of the logo, while this depicts a flag which contains the logo. It's also worth noting that the quality seems to be high enough that both images have broad usage across many wikis. Eiim (talk) 00:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- After compare you can see the date of establishment is 22 years apart and Persian words are also wrong and different. Poya-P (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep That is something that is hardly worthy of deletion, a simple correction of the date should suffice, I can do this for you now. I do not see how the Persian words are any different between the two images. They look exactly the same to me, but I am no Farsi expert. - Wiz9999 (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@Eiim and Wiz9999: Thanks for your concern, The main color of the logo's background is white and the writing is red. As I explained before this image is completely wrong and different from the original one also it is similar to Hezbollah's logo. I am sure removing this fake logo will not cause any problems. Also you can find the correct one in here. thank you. Poya-P (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Paya-P: I compared this flag with the logo you gave from iran-pedia.org. The most obvious difference is that a background of yellow is used here, but it is not uncommon for flags to add a background color to logos that they would not otherwise have. The next most obvious difference is that the red is a different shade, but ambigous shades of color are more than common in vexillology. (For example, I recently did a flag which was based off a coat of arms which specified azure, or a deep blue, but all real-world versions of the flag used a light blue.) I am hesitant to correct the color unless there is a real-world picture of the flag which clearly shows the red as lighter than it is in the version here, as it the flag may use a different color than the logo. The date uses slightly different shapes for the last two numerals, but my research suggests that these are both variations on "۴". Is that correct? Finally, I went character-by-character as best I could for the rest of the text, and the only difference I could find was in the rightmost character at the top on the iran-pedia version seemed to be فَ instead of قَ, or some variation thereof. Is this the error which you were referring to? Regardless, this does not seem to be worthwhile of deletion, please read through COM:D to familiarize yourself with valid deletion reasons. As for not causing any problems, deleting a file which is widely in use (this image in 13 pages, 10 of which appear to be mainspace, and the other image in 116 pages, 106 of which appear to be mainspace) is very likely to cause issues on those wikis. As for Hezbollah, one flag being similar to a different logo by no means transcludes it from being on Commons (for example, the flags of Chad and Romania are extremely similar, but it is important to keep both available), and the Hezbollah's flag here looks substantially different anyways. If a file has minor issues, those are better suited to its talk page. Eiim (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Eiim: this logo is correct one. I think the file size is enough to use. regards Déjà vu • ✉ 23:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I've now fixed the date on this file, the other file had the correct date as far as I know. Eiim (talk) 23:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I was able to find the following reference for both the white background flag, and the yellow variant that is being used on this file here: [3]. Note that the existence of this yellow background flag as a variant negates the last statement by Poya-P that the file is to be deleted based on background colour. Also note that the date is not present on the white variant flag in the reference for unknown reasons. - Wiz9999 (talk) 23:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment As per User:Poya-P request in my Talk Page. file has been correct and updated. Déjà vu • ✉ 16:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
It does not match the original version and the details are imprecise Poya-P (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep Taking a look at these two images and the source image, I don't understand the problem here. The source image is low-quality and does not seem to have any details that this lacks, with the possible exception of the text on the top. The SVG images here do show the southern border of Iran, which the source images do not, but that should be easily correctable and is not a reason for deletion as far as I am aware. The wheat leaf may be slightly simplified as compared to the actual version, but the low resolution source image makes that nearly impossible to determine. The only other potential issue I see is the aspect ratio, but the reason for that seems to be that the source image is simply of the logo, while this depicts a flag which contains the logo. It's also worth noting that the quality seems to be high enough that both images have broad usage across many wikis. Eiim (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- After compare you can see the date of establishment is 22 years apart and Persian words are also wrong and different. Poya-P (talk) 00:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- (Just writing here for simplicity) Which source image are you comparing to, the Flicker image or the PNG? I'm not familiar with Persian so I can't easily compare the text precisely, but the PNG does show a difference in what I assume is the year (small 4 characters beneath the anvil), but I'm tempted to defer to the Flicker source on this one as it seems more official. If you know of an error in the text otherwise, or have evidence of the correct date, I'd be happy to try to fix it. Eiim (talk) 01:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Eiim: Thank you for your help, The main color of the logo's background is white and the writing is red. As I explained before, the texts are wrong and different from the original one. you can find the correct one in here. thank you. Poya-P (talk) 15:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Poya-P: I compared this flag with the logo you gave from iran-pedia.org, which appears to be licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0. The most obvious difference is that the red is a different shade, but ambigous shades of color are more than common in vexillology. (For example, I recently did a flag which was based off a coat of arms which specified azure, or a deep blue, but all real-world versions of the flag used a light blue.) I am hesitant to correct the color unless there is a real-world picture of the flag which clearly shows the red as lighter than it is in the version here, as it the flag may use a different color than the logo. The date uses slightly different shapes for the last two numerals, but my research suggests that these are both variations on "۴". Is that correct? Finally, I went character-by-character as best I could for the rest of the text, and the only difference I could find was in the rightmost character at the top on the iran-pedia version seemed to be فَ instead of قَ, or some variation thereof. Is this the error which you were referring to? Regardless, this does not seem to be worthwhile of deletion, please read through COM:D to familiarize yourself with valid deletion reasons. If a file has minor issues, those are better suited to its talk page. Eiim (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Eiim: Thank you for your help, The main color of the logo's background is white and the writing is red. As I explained before, the texts are wrong and different from the original one. you can find the correct one in here. thank you. Poya-P (talk) 15:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- (Just writing here for simplicity) Which source image are you comparing to, the Flicker image or the PNG? I'm not familiar with Persian so I can't easily compare the text precisely, but the PNG does show a difference in what I assume is the year (small 4 characters beneath the anvil), but I'm tempted to defer to the Flicker source on this one as it seems more official. If you know of an error in the text otherwise, or have evidence of the correct date, I'd be happy to try to fix it. Eiim (talk) 01:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment As per User:Poya-P request in my Talk Page. file has been correct and updated.Déjà vu • ✉ 16:54, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of the Coat of arms of Albania image found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Albania.svg. It serves no purpose and it is rather confusing by being bracketed in the time period of 1998-2002 since Albania's coat of arms has never changed ever since it was instituted in 1998. Kj1595 (talk) 04:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the files are not identical. No problem having multiple versions. Multichill (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The design is identical. The only change is a slight hue of the color red. And when you consider the title of the image on top of that, it creates the confusion that Albania has two coats of arms which are identical in design but with a slight hue of red difference. The country's coat of arms has never changed since 1998. There is no need to have an identical image with an almost identical title (years overlap). It's confusing and it serves no purpose. Kj1595 (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Move /Merge We can add a paragraph in the description that explains that from 1998-2002 the same Coat of Arms was used with some minor changes if there are any. Keeping both emblems for sure does create confusion, regardless of the fact that this emblem was created lately and based entirely on the other emblem without providing a source or references. The borders are identical to the version uploaded by me since before that they were non-linear from left to right at the bottom part.Bes-ARTTalk 20:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)- Move /Merge I've updated this coa last time since the current one is blocked and only admins can make changes on it. This file needs to be merged into the current one so the eagle in the coa shouldn't be different from the flag. AceDouble (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Move /Merge description can be added if possible. Just saying _Satrar (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![69 File:Biden 2020 "B".png](#File:Biden_2020_"B".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![142 File:Barry Flanagan's "Thinker on a Rock" (31067009).jpg](#File:Barry_Flanagan's_"Thinker_on_a_Rock"_(31067009).jpg){kind=link}
_(31368057378).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![02:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/13#c-A1Cafel-2020-08-13T02:55:00.000Z-File:Biden_2020_"B".png){kind=link}
![03:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/13#c-SecretName101-2020-08-13T03:43:00.000Z-File:Biden_2020_"B".png){kind=link}
![15:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/13#c-Eiim-2020-08-13T15:40:00.000Z-File:Biden_2020_"B".png){kind=link}
![14:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/13#c-Infrogmation-2020-09-05T14:40:00.000Z-File:Biden_2020_"B".png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[2]](https://excitingedu.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/bob-business-9.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![04:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/13#c-Dumelow-2020-08-13T04:44:00.000Z-File:Barry_Flanagan's_"Thinker_on_a_Rock"_(31067009).jpg){kind=link}
![09:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/13#c-Gbawden-2020-10-01T09:50:00.000Z-File:Barry_Flanagan's_"Thinker_on_a_Rock"_(31067009).jpg){kind=link}
_(31368057378).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(31368057378).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(31368057378).jpg){kind=link}
_(31368057378).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: I agree they are different in terms of color (tone of red) and the size of the eagle (it is little shorter here). But the CoA is unchanged since 1998, so, we need to keep one correct version. Placed a redirect here. --rubin16 (talk) 10:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Die BIF
[edit]Thanks for uploading this work. However, you also have to consider the underlying copyright of the work you are reproducing. Since these were created by Selli Engler (died 1972), the work is probably under copyright until 70+1 years after her death, that is 2043 (COM:GERMANY). (I doubt that these works are genuinely anonymous because their authorship was known before 70 years elapsed after their publication.) They can also be uploaded locally to enwiki when they come out of copyright in the US, which is 1 January 2021 for works published in 1925, 1 January 2022 for works published 1926, and so forth.
Buidhe (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Buidhe, thank you very much for your efforts. Please allow me to slightly correct you: the contents of "Die BIF" have not been completely written, drawn and designed by Engler (which would establish her copyright), but by various different persons (which makes them eligible to a copyright, depending on the date of death of the person) or they bear no name at all, which makes them anonymous editorial contributions (how to cope with that??). Furthermore there are some elements, which are different again: the cover pages do not contain texts eligible for copyright. Concerning layout and illustrations: simple magazines as "Die BIF" have been printed in a way, which has been called "Akzidenzdruck" in Germany. It means that the printer himself uses a selection from a large set of standard elements (fonts, pageframes, decorative elements for front pages, ads and the like) to produce a simple "layout" along standard rules. This includes illustrations, where a customer could choose from a selection of given illustrations. All these layout elements are not eligible for copyright. So I propose: I will upload a new version of the PDFs, where every copyrighted content (text mostly) is widely blurred (as I did here with Die Freundin many years ago: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Freundin83632-Titel.jpg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Freundin83632-1.jpg). This helps the reader to gain an impression of the magazine without getting in copyright issues. How about that? As BIF-cover pages are not containing content eligible for copyright, I would spare File:BIF Titelblatt 192x.jpg. Best regards and thanks for your help! Denis Barthel (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- What of these works are not anonymous (and are thus under copyright) may be redacted from a new version of the documents uploaded. The burden lies on you, Buidhe, to provide proof of non-anonymity, to show what works are under copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: I have opened BIF 1, Selli Engler is stated on page 3. The same for others. So, it is not PD-Old yet. --rubin16 (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)