Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/16

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive June 16^th, 2020

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MotoGP20.jpg

wrong licence Peter39c (talk) 02:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"The Roses of Heliogabalus" by Alma-Tadema.jpg

{{duplicate|File:The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg}} Alsakan (talk) 09:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Catullus at Lesbia's by Sir Laurence Alma Tadema.jpg

{{duplicate|File:Catullus-at-Lesbia's-large.jpg}} Alsakan (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lawrence Alma-Tadema A Favourite Custom.jpg

{{duplicate|File:Alma-Tadema A Favourite Custom 1909 Tate Britain.jpg}} Alsakan (talk) 09:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Roman Emperor AD41 detail1byAlmaTadema1871.jpg

{{duplicate|File:A Roman Emperor AD41 detail.jpg}} Alsakan (talk) 09:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file does appear to be an exact duplicate of another detail image from Alma Tadema's larger original painting. I agree that it should be deleted. Mharrsch (talk) 12:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:In2thats12

Việt Nam 123.16.75.208 03:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any particular reason that you want to delete my user page? In2thats12 (talk) 03:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex_1.jpg

No use, we're not a porn depository Fry1989 (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Commons is full of these type photos already. No educational need for this one. --Hold and wave (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I tell you what Commons is: COM:NOTCENSORED. Thanks. --Saibo (Δ) 00:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per COM:NOTCENSORED. MKFI (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. Leyo 15:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex_1.jpg

Likely copvio, no EXIF-date (in contrast to other uploads) Yikrazuul (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per nom. --Hold and wave (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Request to closing admin -- I am very disturbed by the comment pattern of this contributor. Many of this contributor's comments are identical to the above "as per nom", as in these examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The deletion discussions are not the venue for votes. Contributors have an obligation to give reason(s) for the deletion, or keep opinions they offer. For this reason I suggest the closing admin discount this contributor's votes. Geo Swan (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Proofs that this image is a copyright violation????? Also opening a deletion request on the same image 25 hours later of this same image being kepted (albeit for a diferent reason)??? Tm (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't noticed that there has been already a DR. But we have now an uploaded image of very poor quality (grabbed somewhere?) with no EXIF-data, whereas other pictures are provided with (very odd). And 2nd, taken all pictures of this uploader I doubt that he is interested in commons as educational platform, rather depositing his private stuff. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - out of scope - Jcb (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored - [6] -mattbuck (Talk) 09:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex 1.jpg, File:Puppensex 2.jpg and File:Puppensex 3.jpg ===

Home-made pornographic material of low quality. It may also be a screenshot from an unknown pornographic movie that was not made by the uploader. This was previously deleted, but recently overturned. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I combined the 3 DRs into one. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - These are our only images of sex dolls being used as sex aids, which is, after all, their intended purpose. That they are low quality images is therefore immaterial as they are within scope. Deleting these images would leave us with something similar to a category full of pens, but no pictures of them being used to write with. It would be ridiculous. Your statement that "It may also be a screenshot from an unknown pornographic movie that was not made by the uploader" was debunked at the UDEL - From what I was able to see of the images, it looks like it was taken out of a video webcam. This is not out of the ordinary for this user; every thing else that was uploaded by this user is a webcam shot from the same model. I know he has other images that are of a similar quality, so any issues of copyvios is moot, in my opinion (User:Zscout370). In summary: in scope, freely licensed. Therefore we keep it. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No new information is provided for deletion. I do agree that there's much copyvio stuff happening, but i doubt that there's some sort of cabal that is working behind the scenes trying very hard to find "unknown pornographic movie" from which to upload images which are all too likely to have been created by the uploader. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 15:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's still not in the project's scope. And even if these were taken from some self-made webcam video, the Commons should not be keeping some exhibitionist's poor quality homemade porn. It should get some homemade porn with higher production quality. These "photos" were previously deleted until mattbuck sought to restore them. I should not need to come up with new reasons to get these photos redeleted when the old reasons are just as suitable.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sex dolls are in scope, would you agree? They have an en.wp article. Now, what is the primary purpose of such a doll? So would it not make sense for us to have images of that? I'm sorry you find the quality substandard, perhaps you could make some yourself? -mattbuck (Talk) 21:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They may be in scope, but there is no reason to keep these photos just because we have no other photos that depict the same thing. It should also not be up to the onus of the user requesting deletion to make a better version of a photo just because it is claimed to be of poor quality. The Commons does not need Xiri's homemade porn of any type.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You admit they may be in scope but you do not want to keep them? That is self-contradicting. Because of what do you not want to keep them? COM:NOTCENSORED if you still did not understand it. Your last sentence is not really appropriate and useful, too. --Saibo (Δ) 22:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is in scope, but these particular photos of said subject are not. And I stand by the fact that we should not be keeping the homemade pornography of people who have only ever contributed homemade pornography to the Commons.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:26, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As last time: likely copvio, no EXIF-date (in contrast to other uploads); and out of scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See comment by Zscout at UDEL - no evidence of copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, educational, informative, and encyclopedic. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How are the photos those things, exactly?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:20, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the whole thread before picking on a single vote. These images are the only ones of any use of sex dolls in any way. They definitely add value to the categories they are in, and removing them without providing an alternative does Commons a great disservice. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 23:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although it is low quality, it is not replaceable at the moment. Handcuffed (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept On the basis of arguments presented by mattbuck, Beta M and Handcuffed. I will say that all 3 images are perhaps not required, but I will leave that for discussion amongst Commonists in appropriate fora. russavia (talk) 22:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex 1.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept per previous discussions. File is in use, no new reason for deletion offered, nominator seems simply to object to human sexuality related content existing on Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex 1.jpg

explicit pornography 82.120.229.176 14:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Kept: Multiple previous keeps. No new reason for deletion offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Liza Del Sierra having anal sex.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 12:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete copyvio.--Roy17 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Roy17 - copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaginal penetration with anal stimulation.jpg

not used, no encyclopaedic use imaginable, bad quality, explicit 79.226.54.191 13:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not in use on Wikimedia maybe, we don't know about elsewhere, and it's not a reason for deletion. I accept it wouldn't be used on en.wp, but our scope is not limited to en.wp. Not great quality, but that's not a reason for deletion; and explicit certainly isn't a valid deletion reason. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly out of scope, no educational purpose. See COM:CENSOR: "Photographs of nudity including male and female genitalia are sometimes uploaded for non-educational motives, and such images are not exempt from the requirement to comply with the rules of Commons' scope. If the images are of demonstrably inferior quality, or add nothing educationally distinct to the stock of such images we hold already, they may fail the test of being realistically useful for an educational purpose." --Ed. J. 13:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's our only photo of vaginal sex with digital anal penetration. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is not much to see of anal penetration. There is a finger at the anus, not more.--Ed. J. 13:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, unique image, only picture which is a photograph of the act of vaginal sex whilst engaged in digital anal penetration at the same time. -- Cirt (talk) 13:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete disgusting. --Claritas (talk) 21:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your disgust is not a valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Cirt, although I find fingers in bums disgusting. --Claritas (talk) 21:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept; categories show in scope usefulness; as Mattbuck says, "Your disgust is not a valid reason for deletion"; no consensus to delete for any other reason. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaginal penetration with anal stimulation.jpg

{{speedydelete|this file is uploaded with an intention of personal attack}} Raji Majji (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then write to OTRS, in confidence.

Claims about what might be porn outing are not a matter to be decided in a public deletion request. Note the prior "keep" deletion request. --Fæ (talk) 10:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept. No privacy concern; no faces visible. Image is in use, showing in scope relevance. Apparent nomination from simple prudery. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaginal penetration with anal stimulation.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per previous, in use, human sexuality is within project scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It was literally kept ten hours ago. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:One of my buttplugs.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete copyvio, can be found by google.--Roy17 (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Tineye found several matches from years ago. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cover issue "In Press".png

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since). However, I see nothing copyrightable in this logo: it is {{PD-textlogo}}, IMO. Ankry (talk) 16:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 16:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blue Springs Methodist Church (1890 Wedding Chapel).jpg

This is no longer a wedding chapel 12.181.18.36 17:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Efecto Elisa.png

it was an error Alejonippon23 (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delation Alejonippon23 (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy|reason}} Alejonippon23 (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Honeywell JetWave Fuselage Mount Antenna Airline Cargo and Defense Aircraft.png

Mistakenly uploaded Mcheung90 (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:明台高中女生冬季制服.JPG

This file was initially tagged by SVz9BVvLeQ as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://uniform.wingzero.tw/school/photo/tw/75612
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as our version has far higher resolution and external hit is undated. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Another school uniform photo. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:五權國中女生舊版夏季制服.jpg

This file was initially tagged by SVz9BVvLeQ as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://uniform.wingzero.tw/school/photo/jr/75603
Converted to regular DR, as our version has far higher resolution and as external image is undated. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a habit by user with different accounts to upload schoolgirl photos. I have COM:PRP deleted the photos, I am collecting all the names. This has been going on for a couple of weeks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:DRRP-1992-2016

Out of project scope: The content is essentially raw text; such files are not considered media files. Additional government works are copyrighted for 25 years per {{PD-Costa Rica}}--This document was published in 2016. As such, in addition to being out of scope, these files are copyright violations.

Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it might be indeed a case of just text. My reason to upload them is in order to allow users to read the important resolution about copyright regarding political flags in Costa Rica as discussed here. --Daioshin (talk) 18:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Daioshin: Please do not upload something just to make a point. Additionally, looking further, the upload of Costa Rican government works published in 2016 is a copyright violation as government works are protected for a term of 25 years in Costa Rica. I have amended my nomination as such, and the images are now subject to speedy deletion under Commons' criterion for speedy deletion F1 (Copyright violation). Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't trying to "make a point" I was trying to make available a judicial sentence (the TSE is a court). Anyway, I will try to upload the PDF doc to Mega and leave the link, but if it feels that is unnecesesary and that my word that the TSE document says what I say it says is enough fine for me. --Daioshin (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Files are copyright due to Costa Rica law. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:高雄女中同學間的生日慶生會.jpg

This file was initially tagged by SVz9BVvLeQ as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://uniform.wingzero.tw/school/photo/tw/75604
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external version is undated. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is another in the school girl series. COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:道明中學女生冬季制服.jpg

This file was initially tagged by SVz9BVvLeQ as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://uniform.wingzero.tw/school/photo/tw/75677
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as our version has far higher resolution and as external hit is undated. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 01:45, 17 Juni 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 08:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SQ NSwitchDS JumpRopeChallenge.jpg

non-free file L ke (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by DMacks at 03:41, 17 Juni 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: This is an image owned by Nintendo. --Krdbot 08:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contract.pdf

Text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope.

It says that the file is used on betawikiversity:User talk:Crochet.david/2012-2015. However, looking at the page, it seems that the page tries to use a locally uploaded file, betawikiversity:File:Contract.pdf, which was deleted in 2012. Deleting our file shouldn't cause any disruption to that talk page. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Catalogue-noi-that-hoa-phat.pdf

Appears to be a document created by a company. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Advertisement. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lars Agréus Wiki Svenska.pdf

Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:José Rodolfo Calvo Fonseca.pdf

Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brown Rice 48879555076.jpg

Uploaded to Flickr by a suspected copyright troll. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & used for spamming purposes. --Achim (talk) 13:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imageedit 3 5254008562.jpg

No evidence that this is the person named. The use of this image in en.wikipedia all seem to be hoaxes - eminent botanist, inventor of the lemon meringue pie, buried at Horton - none of this appears to have any truth and appears to be an elaborate hoax Velella (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete hoax - The image is George Henry Williams, a U.S. judge and politician. See existing similar photos at Category:George Henry Williams. —Hyperik (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as this hoax is also playing out on the English Wikipedia, with all sorts of stuff being made up about this botanist. I've just filed a sockpuppet report about editors actively engaged in this, including the editor who uploaded this photo. Schwede66 21:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, false information about image as part of deliberate hoax; false license, false authorship claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Average East-Eurasian ancestry (Mongoloid).png

No source given, obviously original research. The claim "Own work; Xuzhou Medical University" has a reference to a page about admissions to that university. Rsk6400 (talk) 18:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep Its own work, thus there is no public source. I am at the university which I linked with an English language link. I do not see a reason to delete my map.-華夏1000 (talk) 00:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Sockpuppet !vote struck.[reply]

* Keep no valid reason for deletion.——YaKu19 (talk) 00:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Sockpuppet !vote struck.[reply]

* Keep per creator. Map appears to be reliable and useful.ReiwaawieR (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Sockpuppet !naturevote struck.[reply]

Comment: How can a file that doesn't even give a source be reliable ? Being original research, it may not be included in Wikipedia, since "No original research" is a core policy of Wikipedia. It is explained at en:WP:OR. If it may not be included in Wikipedia, it is not in the scope of Commons, see COM:EDUSE.

Another problem: User:華夏1000 claims that he is the creator of the file. But more than half of it is obviously identical with

File:Mongoloid (East Asian-related) ancestry per total population.png

Mongoloid (East Asian-related) ancestry per total population.png

Mongoloid (East Asian-related) ancestry per total population.png. That file is claimed by User:VivekAdivasi. Since "attribution" is part of the license of both files, one of the users made a COM:COPYVIO. --Rsk6400 (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that without a related reference, the map may not be included in Wikipedia articles. But the reference must anyway be independently included into the article text, so it is not a serious problem for Wikimedia Commons. It seems that both maps are created with the same program, but I see certain differen[]ces of the proposed distribution. It would be interesting to learn more about it. I still think a deletion is unnecessary and the map should be kept. (No comment to the other map).ReiwaawieR (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched a bit and found other similar maps on various hobby-geneticist forums. They use "combination of study results using ADMIXTURE and STRUCTURE". I am not exactly sure but they use samples and comparison points such as the "G25 datasheets" to create these maps. That means they use DNA samples of published studies for a modeled component and calculate its distribution with the help of comparison of alleles. Something like that. There are tons of various ancestry maps. I think it is really interesting, but I am far from being an expert. A deletion is not necessary in my opinion.ReiwaawieR (talk) 10:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This doesn't even explain where this information is coming from. How do we know this isn't just made up or cherry-picked? We've certainly seen that before with racialism. At a bare minimum, the image itself would need to clearly indicate what these studies are actually saying, and where this info is coming from. As a reminder, all humans have 100% African ancestry, if one goes back far enough, so presenting "East-Eurasian ancestry" as a simple scale, without any context or support, is either deeply misleading or outright pseudoscience. Grayfell (talk) 22:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by VivekAdivasi. This image is derived from one uploaded by a globally blocked account. Since sock puppetry has already been confirmed for this set of images, this should be considered here, as well. Specifically, the two additional 'keep' votes have extremely similar histories. Grayfell (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to delete the files of VivekAdivasi who apparently copyed data of my map. He was confirmed to be a sock player of another user. My map is my own creation and based on relevant data which can be confirmed by checking the data of East-Eurasian ancestry. I do not understand the sudden hype about that. This is a well referenced type of ancestry also used on several ancestry programs personally ancestry tests. There is no plausible reason to delete this map here. I am not connected to any of these fringe sock players as confirmed by the check user. This map is my own personal work and a legitimate map on Wikimedia Commons.華夏1000 (talk) 00:17, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. This image was uploaded 7 June. The "copyed" image was uploaded 14 March, several months before it was supposedly copied. There is still no satisfactory explanation for where this data originally comes from, either. The only source provided is a link to a school profile at an unaffiliated commercial admissions portal. This is a waste of time. Grayfell (talk) 05:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV. The file is still in use in various Wikipedia language versions. Per COM:INUSE, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose", and per COM:NPOV, "it is not the role of Commons to adjudicate on subject-matter disputes". So, even if the image is considered utterly wrong or original research, this is a matter that must be discussed in the projects that have decided to use the map; deletion on Commons could be considered if it's not in use anymore. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Average East-Eurasian ancestry (Mongoloid).png

The underlying map has no verifiable source and is likely to be copyrighted. The mapping of the claimed generic ancestry as "Mongoloid" may also be copyrighted, as any map is creative enough to be copyrighted. The original uploading account is highly problematic as discussed in the prior deletion request. The onus is on the asserted map creator to provide the evidence, such as verifiable source publications rather than generic links to a university website as is currently used, which gives an illusion that a source might have been published without actually giving a meaningful reference.

The claim in the prior DR of "This is a well referenced type of ancestry also used on several ancestry programs personally ancestry tests." has not been demonstrated, and in any factual meaningful sense never can be, as there is no modern science that promotes these racist theories of a "Mongoloid" race, for precisely the same reasons as there is no "Negroid" race of humans. Fæ (talk) 12:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

🤣 there is no Department of genetics and human biology at XZMU http://www.xzhmu.edu.cn/xiaoyuandaohang/dangqunjianshe2.htm . the uploader might not even speak chinese but just try to spoof.--Roy17 (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Again, it is own work, thus there is no public source. Nevertheless, I can link several studies which I have read before making the map. Note that my map is older than the upload date here on Wikimedia. Secondly, this department: "Department of Genetics, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, China" does exist, and you are free to visit. You can even find it on a fast goodle search. There is no single reason to delet my map. Also it is not "racist" as claimed by some which are not well-read in this matter. The map shows the distribution of ancestry which is officially and widely described as "East-Eurasian". (This can also be easely looked up). "East-Eurasian" is often used as synonymous for the historical term "Mongoloid". There is nothing racist or fringe about that, but a normal genetic fact. This does not promote racism or any of these ideologies. As example see this Nature study from 2016, which used exactly these terms to describe East Asian ancestry in Europe (from migrations of Avars, Huns, ...). (https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30197). I do not understand the problem here at all. This map is my own work and based on scientific facts. It has nothing to do with race or racism. The term Mongoloid is used on several population studies to refer to the people of certain regions, a summary term, not about races or such topics, but about population history of humans and regions. Such maps are used to show human migration of populations which are close to each other. Compare it to haplogroup maps (such as File:Haplogrupo O (ADN-Y).PNG). My map does use autosomal DNA data instead of only haplogroups. I hope this clarifies it now once and for all.華夏1000 (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Scientific racism or biological racism is by definition racist pseudo-science or simply racist propaganda. This is why the Nature article (all rights reserved by the publisher) you mention makes no mention of "Mongoloid" and does not mention "race" in any way. Neither have you addressed the copyright of this map in a way that can be verified by anyone. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 16:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Examining the file further,

it has a time stamp of 29 February but uploaded three months later on 2 June.
The image is png format, with the underlying world map based on what may be a commercial svg original based on its smooth nature at high resolution. The exception is the Africa time zone area, where the map is unexpectedly lower resolution with visible blockiness.
There is no explanation as to why there is a large white bar at the bottom of the png image, along with a think black line demarcating the bottom of the map which is missing from the other sides. This most likely indicates a rough crop from an original that has not been provided.

Fæ (talk) 16:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this map was made by myself. I made it in Paint, a free program. I used two free blank world maps and modeld the specific ancestry distribution. Nothing special about that. Secondly, it has nothing to do with scientific racism, race or biological racism at all. It shows the distributon of East-Eurasian ancestry. I linked the Nature study as example to show exactly this. East-Eurasian is a completelly uncontroversial term used in human genetics and history. I made the white end below the map for further changes (to write in version number, date and other information, if I make changes or update the map (which did appearently not happen yet, thus nothing is written in)). As I said, the map is older than my upload what you did confirm. The black line should divide the white area from the actual map. (I think this should be obvious, additionaly it looks better with the line in my opinion.) It is my own work, I am the creator and I am the copyright holder. Thus Wikimedia has own work as option. Do you know the "communication square" or "four-ears model"? It seems to apply here. You hear/read what you want to and not what I actually mean. I did never talk about race or racial theories, but about the uncontroversial East-Eurasian ancestry. The reason why I also included the term "Mongoloid", which appears to be the main reason why you so hardly want to delete the map is that Mongoloid is used in some studies instead of East-Eurasian. But this is not my fault, it is simple the term used by some (mostly older) studies. This is my personal map, made by myself. Thats it. I can not see a single valid reason for a deletion.華夏1000 (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mongoloid is used in some studies instead of East-Eurasian" please provide a link to one relevant data source for genetic markers that does this and can be verified as a scientific publication (i.e. peer reviewed).
Please provide the source for the data used to generate the coloured zones on the map.
Please provide the verifiable evidence that "I used two free blank world maps". To know they are free, there must have been a license stating this.
"I made it in Paint"? No human would start with a pure large data set of genetic sample data that spans research across the entire planet, and then both analyse these and draw out a detailed high resolution map using Paint. --Fæ (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, here as example a study by Matsumoto, published in the journal Nature: "Mongoloid populations from the viewpoints of Gm patterns" (https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg198225). I used several studies: ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5], ^[6], and so on. Third point, I used partially the blank version which is from "Masaman", a hobby geneticist and map maker. He has free maps and also similar ancestry estimation maps but used different studies than I did. I got the svg map from him. He said all his maps are free to use and edit: "My map is NOT copyrighted. Free to all to download for viewing, editing, commentating or sharing. Thank you!" (https://www.reddit.com/r/Masastan/comments/arkxy8/masamans_ultimate_ethnoracial_map_of_2019/) You can contact him if you want. (Note: the original blank file used by him (and me) is already on Commons in varying versions: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SVG_maps_of_the_world) The other free blank map is this one: https://worldmapwithcountries.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/map1.jpg. I painted the ancestry areas in paint. What is wrong with that? As I said, it is my own work and I did use paint to make the shades of red. What is now the problem? Do you want to say I am not a human or what because I used paint? (If you mean that it is serious much work, than yes, but during the COVID-19 lock-down, there was not much to do anyway.) I have read some studies, looked at similar other maps of ancestry distribution and made one myself. Thats it. I think you are non-neutral here. This is personal attack against me. You have not provided a singel reason for a deletion of my map. It is very easy to make such maps in paint. You take the blank world map and start makeing the overall distribution and start with the lowest percentage. Than you go on until the distribution is finished. This is how I made the map (the distribution). If there is any problem, I simply can make a new version with a different free blank world map, so do not expect that I will accept this attack against me. There is no reason, other a personal misunderstanding, to delete this map. It was already discussed and closed, and you do appearntly not accept the result. Once and for all: This is my personal map made by myself and there is no single reason to delete it.華夏1000 (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re. "Mongoloid": The use of "Mongoloid" is suggested to be justified based on an article in the Japanese journal of human genetics from 1982 (i.e. 39 years old, and not published in the journal "Nature" as claimed, but an archive version is accessible at nature.com). This in turn cites Carleton S. Coon's 1969 publication "The Living Races of Man", now famously recognized as debunked racist pseudoscience. The word "Mongoloid" is a racist offensive word, and using on this map is promotion of scientific racism. The use of "Mongoloid" appears unconnected entirely with sources which contain modern genetic study data that might have been relevant, and appears a personal choice made by the uploader, not on any scientific grounds.
Re. source data to create the zones on the map. Lots of all rights reserved articles are vaguely waived at. No verifiable source has been provided. If the zones are derived works of maps published in all rights reserved works, they are copyrighted.
Re. two underpinning maps. This response has now been changed to pointing to Category:SVG maps of the world (containing 1,692 files), which is a vague response that does not explain precisely which of the maps appears in this diagram and therefore is not verifiable. In addition a Reddit forum is pointed to, and the relevant map being suggested is a different world projection, so can be counter-verified as not being the underpinning first map. The second map used is proposed as https://worldmapwithcountries.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/map1.jpg. Unfortunately the site worldmapwithcountries.net appears to be a wordpress blog that someone has collated various maps, some of which are suggested as free, but with no credible attribution. For example one of the medium resolution world maps appears to be downscaled from a professional map and has a logo as being published by mapsoftheworld.com which is a domain for sale. A visual check of the jpg hosted at worldmapwithcountries shows a poor quality line drawing that fails to match to the features of the file up for deletion, including the fundamental projection of the world which is different. This map does not underpin this diagram and the copyright of the file linked to cannot be verified either. There is no verification here as far as I can work out.
Re. use of Paint. Anyone that has use Paint to create diagrams knows it is one of the most basic drawing tools available. The zone maps in this diagram would have been generated using analytical tools that can take a spreadsheet of numbers indexed by city locations and draw a contour chart based on that geographic spread. Using Paint to create these is unlikely unless one were creating a derivative work based on an existing contour style map.

Thanks for the responses. Reviewing the responses is complex as many of the responses were opaque, pointing to long forum threads, entire websites or multiple publications without being specific. The verification needed for someone to be able to assess the underlying copyright and credible ownership of added creative work to create this diagram has not been supplied. Others are welcome to try. --Fæ (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*There are other studies using this term:^[7], ^[8], ^[9]. I readed them and thus included the term "Mongoloid".

*Secondly, the studies I linked are not the source of the map. I have read these linked studies and made a map on my own, interpreting the data which I have readed in the studies mentioned before. So it is not copyrighted. These studies do not even have such a map.

*Third, you again misunderstood. I used these two blank world map versions and cut out the American continents and included it into the first one on the right position because to save space (if it would be on the left position, all of Europe and the Atlantic Ocean would be on the map and this would be a waste of space). The reddit user Masaman14 has send me the blank version of the map linked. It is a free svg version, which is also present in Commons, as linked before. As example: Use this svg:(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Accord_d%27Agadir.svg), delete the red colour, and start modeling the ancestry percentage.

*But I used paint. Why is this so hard to understand. I know that this is a basic tool and it makes it more hard, nevetheless I used paint. At first you model the lowest percentage area and paint every area with East-Eurasian ancestry in the lowest colour and that go on with the next colour and so on,... until the highest percentage is completed. There are maps which have a similar distribution, as example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Distribution_of_Indigenous_Peoples_in_the_Americas.svg . I did not use this map but orientated upon them, or better, on the sources which are provided in the info box. I simply used paint to make the American distribution based on the distribution of modern Native Americans and Mestizo populations using the cited references.

The map is under my copyright, all material I used is free, it is own work and the distribution of the ancestry is made by myself using paint. (I do not understand what is so hard to understand using paint.) I simply painted the first lowest percentage colour over all areas which are not in a shade of red. That painted the next higher shade and so on and on. I did not need a special tool for that. As I said, if neccesary I will take one of the free svg maps on Commons and remake the map, again with paint. I always use paint. Also this discussion is not about what tool I sould use or not. Should I make a video where you can see that I use paint creating this map? If necessary I could do that. It is my decision to use paint and it is my map. There is no reason to delete my personal map. It seems this discussion is a waste of time... I have not the time and the nerve to say again and again the same. This is my last comment: It is my own map. I made the distribution based on my interpretation of the studies. My work, my copyright. There is no reason to delete this map from Commons. Thats it.華夏1000 (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mongoloid. Sources being quoted include terms like "Japanese race" (2014 source), which is as bizarre as claiming that a "British race" is a scientific fact. I am not familiar with the named journals, but if their editorial boards still allow rubbish like this to get published, they are not legitimate "science". The continued debate that "Mongoloid" is a genetic research term is factually incorrect. One might continue to promote offensive historical race theories about Nordic, Negroid, Mongoloid by disguising them as being about genetic ancestry, this does not make them correct to promote, anywhere, in the modern age.
Data source. The uploader has now confirmed that they have not used any reliable data set, but instead has in some unexplained way re-imagined ten or more genetic research publications to draw their version by hand, which can therefore never be verified by anyone. If this is correct, it fails to meet COM:Scope and should not be used on any Wikipedia article about genetics, just as a user diagram mapping COVID19 infections would have negative educational value, if they stated they had typed numbers into a spreadsheet that were inspired by several days of live news reports and could not point to any published data sets.
Underpinning maps. On the third attempt the map File:Accord_d'Agadir.svg has been provided as a source. However anyone examining the detail of Africa at high resolution, can see several lakes appear in this PNG "Mongoloid" map that do not appear in the svg file. Consequently this is not a verifiable claim for copyright purposes.

Per the policy of Commons:Assume_good_faith#Good_faith_and_copyright, this file should be deleted as documentation is both incorrect and inadequate.

Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a procedural comment as the closing admin of the previous deletion request: I would like to confirm that this is a valid new request, as a new reason (copyright concerns) was brought forward. If there is significant doubt about the freedom of this file, it can be deleted per COM:PCP even if it's in use. But I will leave this new request to another admin to process. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@華夏1000: 少来叽叽歪歪了你口口声声根据别人数居那就把数居来源论文标题作者性名全部写出来很多国家都保护实验数居版权你不写出来谁晓得你侵没侵权。写吧。--Roy17 (talk) 20:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

我非常忙，我现在没有时间 EOD華夏1000 (talk) 21:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@華夏1000: 你說「這份報告」指的是哪份報告？--Roy17 (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info @Berean Hunter: , or anyone else that may have examined the sockpuppetry manipulating the previous DR vote, has there been any sockpuppetry activity inserting this image into multiple language Wikipedias? It is a pragmatic concern as I have been contacted by email about sock puppets that appear to be targeting race related articles in non-English languages.

In particular within minutes of upload of this file, an anon IP account inserted the file into 14 different language Wikipedias, and multiple articles on each Wikipedia, within 40 minutes. Which is a sophisticated user going out of their way to promote this image (and the title "Mongoloid"). All global usage of this file is down to the manipulation by this IP account.

This remains relevant to this DR as the file is consequently widely used, which is highly unusual for a file only uploaded two weeks ago, was first raised for deletion just 5 days after upload, and this may be designed to deliberately manipulate COM:INUSE policies against the interest of this project, and against the interest of Wikimedia projects more generally due to the disruptive nature of the topic of Scientific racism. It also instantly makes the file much harder to delete due to the nature of Commons deletion policy.

Per this new evidence, the file never was legitimately in use and believe this is serious enough that it factually invalidates the "kept" closure of the previous DR. @Gestumblindi: as closing admin. It is proposed that that closure is voided and the template at File talk:Average East-Eurasian ancestry (Mongoloid).png removed.

Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admin please note Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/華夏1000. The account for the uploader of this file has been blocked for (global) sockpuppetry. --Fæ (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fæ, while I cannot comment on specific IPs that might belong to accounts, I can attest that this is normal behavior for this sockmaster. He is trying to propagate his theories/works to many projects. Coincidentally, 5.188.0.0/24 is a G-Core Labs webhost (proxy) and hardblocked on en.wiki.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 17:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: My original decision was based on the apparent use in many projects (Wikipedia language versions). If it now turns out that the image wasn't actually added based on local community members' decisions in these projects, but through a single "man on a mission"'s campaign and sockpuppetry, I agree that the file was not legitimately in use in the sense of COM:INUSE, and would personally recommend to

Delete this image to the closing admin. However, I do not think that the original closure needs to be "voided" as it was based on the information I had then, but a new closure with a different decision is entirely possible now, based on the new information. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info We have had a response from one of the above cited journals (Human Biology), published by the AAAG, when asked about one of the articles which actively promotes scientific racism. In 2018 the AAAG cosigned the policy of the AAPA (American Association of Physical Anthropologists). The full document is here, and includes We acknowledge that outdated and inaccurate ideas about race, and racism, still inform scientific research today, and are sometimes embedded in what otherwise appears to be “modern,” technologically-advanced science. We stand against such practices. This seems a useful modern and official response to the continued misuse of "racial" terminology in old sources about genetic research, so leaving this as a marker for future discussions that start referencing genetic research articles. --Fæ (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Content based on harmful fringe theory, no sources given, copyright concerns, sockpuppetry. --Rsk6400 (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Commons' precautionary principle (copyright issues) and per Gestumblindi: "...the file was not legitimately in use in the sense of COM:INUSE." (i.e. COM:SCOPE issues). Please note that this image was deleted not because of the objectionable nature of the file (Per COM:NPOV, neutral point of view or original research cannot be considered as factors), or because of sockpuppetry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Detikol15 (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romello Brooks (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romello Brooks (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Folkradio (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Partha Paul Cool (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juniorcasalino (talk · contribs)

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quyen7899 (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EnissayJafy (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EnissayJafy (talk · contribs)

Out of scope? Each image is a crop of a larger one and they are useless IMO.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of this seems to comply with COM:EDUSE — BriefEdits (talk) 07:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akash kolap (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per COM:SELFIE - BriefEdits (talk) 08:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Satish sharma adhmi (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kartik mandothiya (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tagadasurprise (talk · contribs)

Uploaded images, logos, drawings, etc. are unlikely creation of uploader. Even something simple like the color bars contain ghostly overprinting showing they were copied from websites. Others, such as "LEGO" are obviously trademarks. One or two look like TV logos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/jackylim

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carbon-tetrabromide-2D.png

Unused chemical structure with opaque (white) background. Have File:Tetrabrommethan.svg as high-quality vector replacement with transparent background. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aale Raool Ahmad Katihari (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 07:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pavlovich007 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two of them have FBMD at MD, we do not accept Facebook images. E4024 (talk) 23:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tobyjakewright (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samson sekanyana (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ukashayusufkundi1 (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 24ckr1a (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MELLETOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitaly Zdanevich (talk · contribs)

Scanned old photos, unlikely to be own works

VLu (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my photos, from my family album. On most photos - my grandfather. Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No matter who’s on them, the thing is who made them, see ru:ВП:СЕМАРХИВ. --VLu (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This photo I did on my phone Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok, about old scanned photos - I do not know who is the author, sorry :( Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nozomimous (talk · contribs)

The source pages for these Ubuntu wallpapers are all marked (C).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sureshdesom (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sureshdesom (talk · contribs)

I do not see any indication of own work on the images in this gallery. Captions, metadata, file sizes, file ?quality, and so on suggest these were harvested from the internet and not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zxhwfan (talk · contribs)

No indication of free license at sources given (when they work).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Velonaut303 (talk · contribs)

Scans of advertisements and other documents. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Velonaut303 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melaniemeek (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChaseChappell123 (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Osmena Peak.jpg

Possible copyvio: EXIF data says "Copyright holder @galaerotravels". Uploader needs to prove that they are the copyright holder or have the rights, see COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, other uploads by the same user says this in the EXIF:

Author BillyPalatino

Copyright holder @galaerotravels

So it appears that uploader may be same as galaero travels. Would be nice if uploader confirms that here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: AGF - googling the tag takes me to his flick stream so likely the same person. Not found with google image search so prob not a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MAGICAL THINKING.jpg

Amateur art, OoS, and most probably a DW. (Read the previous discussion, these files should have been examined more.) E4024 (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SHOUHB3HIJD5RF26XXQVCIG5XM.jpg

Esta foto ha sido publicada en otros sitios web y redes sociales. Quien la subió debe de mostrar que tiene una licencia libre compatible con Wikimedia Commons. Luisalvaz (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thum 200 150 TopicParagraph21imageja bigger.jpg

unused thumbnail, too small to have value Estopedist1 (talk) 20:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination. — BriefEdits (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fuente de neptuno en la Macroplaza en Monterrey.jpg

Imagen publicada en Alamy en 2018. No posee la licencia adecuada. Luisalvaz (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Watermark is still present. Copyvio. — BriefEdits (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1915 ethnographic map of the Adriatic Coast of Austria-Hungary.jpg

Paul Langhans died 1952, his work will be in PD in 2023 Goesseln (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goesseln, you are right, his work will be in public domain in Europe in 2023. I didn't know that he died in 1952. This file shoud be deleted then!

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Surakmatov in Gucci and LV on June 16, 2020.jpg

this is not my copyright and needs to be deleted KyrgyzBeaver (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Q96337348.jpg

there are faces in it that I forgot to blur before publishing So9q (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Uploader request on day of upload; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Heinrich-Grüber-Haus

copyright violation, contemporary artwork and texts, no freedom of panorama

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muhammed Suhail C R in the sets of Her Secret (2017).jpg

Not important SuhailCR (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stuart Davis, Nightlife, 1962 (1992448951).jpg

Copyvio. Painting from 1962. Probably image taken in museum. BriefEdits (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Breastfeeding vs Formula.pdf

Unused PDF file of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Benefits of Breastfeeding.pdf

Unused PDF of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files on User:OgreBot/Notable uploads/2020 June 16

Unused PDFs of unclear notability. Out of project scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lake San Marcos Dam.jpg

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 23:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jsp file.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per COM:SELFIE — BriefEdits (talk) 07:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:City of delhi .jpg.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per COM:SELFIE — BriefEdits (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Havardia.jpg

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 23:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter Hurd, A Ranch on the Plains, 1954 (1993208052).jpg

copyvio. Painting from 1954 reproduced in its entirety BriefEdits (talk) 00:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IDanuFX (talk · contribs)

Unused personal logos of a user with no valid contributions.

Gikü (talk) 07:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Egpdm (talk · contribs)

probably taken from internet. all no camera metadata. AlinaMoine2015.jpg taken from facebook. uploader has a long history of copyvio.

Roy17 (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:شرحی بر آوای هستی.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My Free Clip.jpg

Unused (copyrighted) logo. Gikü (talk) 08:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 20:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shreya Chawla.jpg

She is not mentioned in en.wiki. Out of project scope. Uploader is locked as sockpuppet and creator of promotional articles. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 20:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salek67 (talk · contribs)

Paintings of Mirjana Čiplić Kuruzović (died 2000). No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 20:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elsa1.jpg

Elsa1.jpg Gabriela Ayres Ferreira Terrada (talk) 02:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No rationale, valid or otherwise. But unclear source and no metadata => possible copyvio? Brianjd (talk) 04:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the image description indicates that the photo was taken in the 1940s. If that is true, it is already in the public domain.Leon saudanha (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Leon. It is being used. I see no problem. --E4024 (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:الأمير محمد بن الملك فيصل الأول.png

Date: 20 April 2027 Hmmm. I doubt this can be an "own work". E4024 (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:October 2019 - Placide Jr.png

copie de http://africultures.com/murmures/?no=21340 Habertix (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Regasterios at 06:34, 24 Juni 2020 UTC: No permission since 16 June 2020 --Krdbot 14:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imam Ali Safar's Picture .jpg

The gent is here to hang his personal pictures only. I marked his userpage image also for deletion. E4024 (talk) 00:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Realistic Halloween Decorations (5120660742).jpg

out of scope - personal photo/selfie Mind matrix 01:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lovely faces.jpg

Unused personal artwork. Oujt of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:سيف العمصي Fotor.jpg

out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal ^talk 09:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The God 2013-07-03 19-41.jpg

Thumbnail, unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Maybe copyvio per TinEye search Estopedist1 (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Younes khalis.jpg

unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Co so vat chat benh vien da khoa Hong Ha.jpg

Unused personal image, uncategorized/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal sex male on female.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Human sexuality is within scope; no reason other than personal notion of "obscenity" offered by nominator. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal sex 65 (7161487681).jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Image is also in use in sv.wikipedia.org Samlag. Tm (talk) 12:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We don't have much images related to this subject to illustrate anal sex. Technical quality looks ok. Seems a bit a taboo topic? --Hannolans (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Hannolans, Ecritures (talk) 12:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chastity inside.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Tm -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal sex02.JPG

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Infrogmation: Currently in use in the incubator and in the kowiki userspace. Do these count? Brianjd (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I do not speak those languages. Thanks for the details. Article space usage is better indicator of in scope usefulness. My vote on this particular image is unchanged however. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - I do not speak those languages either. I look for the colon, then manually translate the namespace name if necessary. It would be nice if there was an automatic check for standard namespaces. Brianjd (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. In use in incubator.wikimedia.org Wp/rej/Skitut and ko.wikipedia.org 사용자:Dolicom/성생활/성교 이해. Tm (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Different to the other images in Category:Penile-anal intercourse (female and male), except for the other images in the same series as this image. Brianjd (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal penetration.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion so long as the content is legal in the US. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal penetration.jpg

Although sexual intercourse in scope, this image is in low quality and unused, and can be replaced by many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We don't aggressively prune any other types of images. This one was uploaded eight years ago; we should assume that it was in use at some point (or is in use on some Mediawiki wiki that uses Commons images) and deleting it will hurt the history.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being old isn’t an excuse to keep low quality unused images. Nudity and sexuality are aggressively pruned to keep exhibitionism and vandalism to a minimum Dronebogus (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Kept before! no better reasoning provided --Zenwort (talk) 23:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are better educational pictures. Low quality. --LevandeMänniska (talk), 21:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, there are very few photos in this position. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal penetration.jpg

Можливо, це порнографія Yurechkonazarii (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Replace it with a picture of Zenwort and Prosfilaes if so much needed. 186.175.9.148 11:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Filing user was blocked before for this type of deletion requests[7]. They seem to specifically target male gay sex only. Nakonana (talk) 01:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Two men engaging in sexual activity.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep In use in multiple projects; human sexuality is within project scope. Personal notions of "obscenity" are not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. In use in he.wikipedia.org החדרת אצבעות, hr.wikipedia.org Prstenjačenje, ia.wikipedia.org Coito, www.wikidata.org Q5873 and Lexeme:L222607 and zh-yue.wikipedia.org 指交. Tm (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Per above. Brianjd (talk) 04:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AN-active-1A.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. In use in fa.wikipedia.org

آمیزش جنسی مقعدی. Tm (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Per above. Brianjd (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AN-passive-1.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion so long as the content is legal in the US. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fucked and wanked.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion so long as the content is legal in the US. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex_2.jpg

This is not the right place for this kind of pics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muschio Di Quercia (talk • contribs) 13:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No use, we're not a porn depository Fry1989 (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Commons is full of these type photos already. No educational need for this one. --Hold and wave (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I tell you what Commons is: COM:NOTCENSORED. Thanks. --Saibo (Δ) 00:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could be in scope, but likely copyvio (EXIF-data a joke, not own work): seems to be grabbed from internet or from a video. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:SCOPE, very low quality Aude (talk) 00:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored - [8] -mattbuck (Talk) 09:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex 2.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's in use. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex 2.jpg

explicit pornography 82.120.229.176 14:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous, no new reason offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chastity get fucked.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not a valid reason --Hannolans (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion so long as the content is legal in the US. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex_3.jpg

No use, we're not a porn dispository Fry1989 (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Commons is full of these type photos already. No educational need for this one. --Hold and wave (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I tell you what Commons is: COM:NOTCENSORED. Thanks. --Saibo (Δ) 00:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could be in scope, but likly copyvio (EXIF-data a joke, not own work): seems to be grabbed from internet or from a video. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: very low quality, per COM:SCOPE Aude (talk) 00:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored - [9] -mattbuck (Talk) 09:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppensex 3.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TinyDawn anal and vaginal fingering.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not a valid reason --Hannolans (talk) 13:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion so long as the content is legal in the US. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AN-passive-4A.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion so long as the content is legal in the US. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johan Neyts.jpg

although Johan Neyts himself provided this photograph, the uploader is not the actual photographer 2A02:2C40:100:B214:0:0:1:DAE8 06:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hopsin in Thailand.jpg

Previously published files require COM:OTRS verification. See: https://twitter.com/hopsin/status/1254948911409590274 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdiz12 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 14:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John edward rojas b (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 14:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Testfiledaisenryaku.jpg

screenshot from unidentified game (probably not same as en:Daisenryaku) Estopedist1 (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as likely copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Animation "Sayben".ogv

I want to delete it Nabil Sayben (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uploaded in 2016, so I would lean towards keeping. Except pretty much everything is wrong with this file:
1. I can’t tell how the file is in scope.
2. There is a description labelled as English, but it is not in English.
3. The file is credited to another user (not the uploader), yet labelled as “Own work”.
4. It lacks a suitable licence.

Brianjd (talk) 04:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It used to have a suitable licence tag, but even that is dubious. Brianjd (talk) 04:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it used to have an English description and be credited to the uploader. Perhaps we need to have a closer look at this file’s history. Or perhaps we can delete it straight away as being out of scope. Brianjd (talk) 04:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. --jdx ^Re: 20:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Animation "Sayben".ogv

Out of scope -- animation of the uploader's last name. Borderline COM:CSD#F10, but re-DR-ing due to previous DR. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, personal image and the creator want it to be deleted and it is unused, I'm unable to esee a reason to keep it. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maxime Chabroud dit Amixem.jpg

No autorization from the Author Tyseria (d) 09:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diana Flores.jpg

This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 04:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (self-portrait of non-user, no educational value). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jorge del Castillo, Peru.png

AP Image, https://josealejandrogodoy.wordpress.com/category/jorge-del-castillo/page/3/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and AP watermark on source. JGHowes ^talk 13:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaydenhayward1 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaggeliskal (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bislanolgamax (talk · contribs)

Scanned olp photos - not own works but derivatives, no photographer's permission.

VLu (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frasigan - Logotype (2020).png

This is self-promotion campaign of sockpuppeteer. Frasigan is not mentioned in en.wiki, the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Fitindia at 05:26, 8 Juli 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Frasigan Logos --Krdbot 14:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karina Fernandez.jpg

This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden at 18:29, 8 Juli 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 02:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akshay Makadiya.jpg

unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akshay Makadiya.jpg

cross wiki spam. previously deleted Quakewoody (talk) 00:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason previous image was deleted was missing the EXIF data. I guess the image is having perfect details and represent the notable person. How could you mark as cross-wiki spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilanemak (talk • contribs) 14:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason previous image was deleted was "as above". --E4024 (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akshay Makadiya.jpg

Cross wiki self promotion. Image used on other wiki projects for self promotion. Non Notable person. Out of projects educational scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 10:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now we have two DRs. Can some admin take care of closing this discussion, please? --E4024 (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- We also have a speedy tag... which wouldn't happen if the uploader didn't keep removing the tags.

and just to give an update - the wikipedia articles (in multiple languages) have all been deleted AGAIN. Quakewoody (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I didn't lie. I just wasn't up to speed. The article was deleted, but the spammer created another article on AWA shortly after it was deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 17:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexis Torres.jpg

Two nominations:

This is a very personal picture, and I don't want it to be viewable to the public. Thanks. 187.173.217.241 01:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like this removed because it's a personal picture. Jatl8 (talk) 01:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Responses:

@Jatl8: I am confused. You uploaded this picture yourself in 2019. Are you the subject? Brianjd (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OoS. E4024 (talk) 00:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Potato ice cream.png

copyright violation https://moneyinc.com/most-expensive-ice-creams/ 86.141.99.140 12:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baileo Ihamahu 3.png

Bahasa Indonesia: Gambar ini berasal dari jurnal berjudul "Kapata Arkeologi" oleh Balai Arkeologi Maluku. Saya baru melihat laman hak cipta jurnal yang menyatakan bahwa seluruh isi jurnal berada di bawah hak cipta Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Saya memohon maaf.

English: This picture comes from a journal called "Kapata Arkeologi" by Maluku Archaeology Office. I just saw the copyright notice page of the journal which states that all of the contents of the journal is under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Sorry for that.

Elbert Ziv Hitipeuw (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baileo Ihamahu 4.png

Bahasa Indonesia: Gambar ini berasal dari jurnal berjudul "Kapata Arkeologi" oleh Balai Arkeologi Maluku. Saya baru melihat laman hak cipta jurnal yang menyatakan bahwa seluruh isi jurnal berada di bawah hak cipta Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Saya memohon maaf.

English: This picture comes from a journal called "Kapata Arkeologi" by Maluku Archaeology Office. I just saw the copyright notice page of the journal which states that all of the contents of the journal is under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Sorry for that.

Elbert Ziv Hitipeuw (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baileo Ihamahu 1.png

Bahasa Indonesia: Gambar ini berasal dari jurnal berjudul "Kapata Arkeologi" oleh Balai Arkeologi Maluku. Saya baru melihat laman hak cipta jurnal yang menyatakan bahwa seluruh isi jurnal berada di bawah hak cipta Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Saya memohon maaf.

English: This picture comes from a journal called "Kapata Arkeologi" by Maluku Archaeology Office. I just saw the copyright notice page of the journal which states that all of the contents of the journal is under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Sorry for that.

Elbert Ziv Hitipeuw (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nekara Heger I Dullah Kei Kecil 2013.jpg

Bahasa Indonesia: Gambar ini berasal dari jurnal berjudul "Kapata Arkeologi" oleh Balai Arkeologi Maluku. Saya baru melihat laman hak cipta jurnal yang menyatakan bahwa seluruh isi jurnal berada di bawah hak cipta Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Saya memohon maaf.

English: This picture comes from a journal called "Kapata Arkeologi" by Maluku Archaeology Office. I just saw the copyright notice page of the journal which states that all of the contents of the journal is under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Sorry for that.

Elbert Ziv Hitipeuw (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baileo Ihamahu 2.png

Bahasa Indonesia: Gambar ini berasal dari jurnal berjudul "Kapata Arkeologi" oleh Balai Arkeologi Maluku. Saya baru melihat laman hak cipta jurnal yang menyatakan bahwa seluruh isi jurnal berada di bawah hak cipta Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Saya memohon maaf.

English: This picture comes from a journal called "Kapata Arkeologi" by Maluku Archaeology Office. I just saw the copyright notice page of the journal which states that all of the contents of the journal is under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Sorry for that.

Elbert Ziv Hitipeuw (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Munnyx (talk · contribs)

All files uploaded by the user (all concerning the Nobel-awarded physicist Lev Landau) are marked as CC-BY-SA-licensed own work by uploader. Unfortunately, this is obviously not the case. Most are historical photographs from very different circumstances and in low resolution. One is a post stamp from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The only possible exception is a picture of the Nobel Prize diploma, which is a derivative work.

Mormegil (talk) 07:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - very unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SuM-foto 015291.jpg

Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sukrani12345678 2.jpg

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sunsetload.jpg

copyvio per TinEye search Estopedist1 (talk) 07:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Methoni castle.jpg

Unlikely own work. All other user's uploads are files copied from the internet. Gikü (talk) 07:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santiago2412pe (talk · contribs)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The original source is the Congress of the Republic of Peru as confirmed by this newspaper: https://rpp.pe/politica/congreso/congresista-glider-ushnahua-renuncio-a-la-bancada-de-fuerza-popular-noticia-1174352 --Vareloco (talk) 03:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sup bro 2014-06-18 10-19.jpg

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sur13 Gangland 2014-05-27 18-19.jpg

thumbnail, per TinEye search probably copyvio Estopedist1 (talk) 07:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brownside 2014-05-27 18-52.jpg

per TinEye search probably copyvio Estopedist1 (talk) 07:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vijaydhanush.jpg

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE applies. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vijaydhanush.jpg

In my opinion this is Flickrwashing. Flickr user Andrew Dinesh has only 2 uploads and uploader Asqbhan has also only 2 uploads remaining. Asqbhan has tried to flickrwash images in the past. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - likely flickrwashing. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:외점애매미충.jpg

copyvio. non free image ChongDae (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Artfactory.png

Out of scope. Non-notable organization (ro:Utilizator:Sibiu International STREET ART FESTIVAL). Gikü (talk) 07:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:짚신깍지벌레 약충.png

non free image ChongDae (talk) 07:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:짚신깍지벌레 성충.png

non free image ChongDae (talk) 07:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Conferinta de lansare a proiectului "Coeziune socială prin practicarea meseriilor tradiționale în întreprinderi de economie socială (SESRom)".jpg

Unused out of scope photo. Was only used for promoting ro:Asociația ASURA. Gikü (talk) 08:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination+ DW issues. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Talal alzhrani.JPG

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Syifa.jpg

from Facebook and probably falls into: "Commons is not private media repository." Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creator:Frany Dejota

Re-created vanity spam. Achim (talk) 14:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, in the meantime blanked by author. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:赤羽台東小学校.jpg

同じ構図の新しい画像「赤羽台東小学校正門」を追加したため Makochan12.9 (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:赤羽台西小学校.jpg

Wikipediaの記事用に新しい画像「赤羽台西小学校正門」を追加したため、画質が悪く今後使われないため Makochan12.9 (talk) 09:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:アトラスタワー歯科.jpg

Copyright violation. Non-free material. This file copied from Japanese dental clinic's official website. See google webcache Batholith (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juan Obando.jpg

The source site did not specifically license the photo under CC 4.0 Infogapp1 (talk) 10:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quakewoody (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مركز يافا الثقلفي.jpg

Low EXIF, unlikely to be own work --Alaa :)..! 13:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and uploader's record. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 00:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sadabat paktı.png

The en:Treaty of Saadabad existed 1937–48, but state borders are modern. Out of project scope. Commons has file:Near Eastern Entente.TIF. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, by 1989 as copyright violation on 11th of August. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:100% coupé décale logo.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola _talk 14:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Балтийская Конфедерация (без России).png

Out of scope - map of a fictional entity; unlikely to be used for educational purposes. Duplicate of Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Baltic_Confederation.png A5b (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 00:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:吳承晏

Excessive biography without realistic purpose of contributing to Wikimedia projects. Mys_721tx (talk) 00:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 20:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gay anal sex.jpg

Bad quality picture, selfie. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NSFW (obviously)

Keep clearly shows.. well.. what the filename said, while not perfectly sharp it's properly framed. Now, I don't really want to go and see if Commons already has similarly properly framed images of this that are sharper. Because.. do I have to explain that? If it turns out we have plenty of similar and properly licensed but sharper images, I may reconsider. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ I had doubts when I uploaded this image that I found on Flickr. I do agree with Patrick Rogel that the image is blurry, thus why my doubts. The intention was adding a different angle. But on a second thought, not much can be added with this image. I believe that Alexis Jazz (sorry) was talking about a photo like this other image.--Jim Bangs (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Keep Since everyone sees this image useful.--Jim Bangs (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim Bangs: that's a better photo, but not properly licensed beyond doubt. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a closer look and this one is. High resolution (not found on the web. yes, not fully sharp, but not downscaled), EXIF, date in EXIF checks out with the upload date on Flickr (uploaded the next day), Flickr pro account, about page of the Flickr user doesn't raise any suspicion either (openly gay). I prefer a somewhat blurry image with virtually no doubt it was published and licensed with consent over a super-sharp but questionable image any day. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While it is true that the quality can be better, the question that should be asked is: Is it useful for an educational purpose. The answer is yes, because the quality does not prevent one from using it. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This image was also included in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jim Bangs (nomination for all files uploaded by Jim Bangs). - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It has educational value, and as Alexis Jazz says, no doubt about it being properly licensed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion. Strakhov (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gay anal sex.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per previous discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It used to be that when somebody nominated a file for deletion, when it was already kept before they were advised to read the prevous discussion. Has this feature been disabled? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gone Postal: Certainly this feature was active within the last month or so, and not only refers to previous nominations of the file, but any deletion discussion that links to the file being nominated. Of course, some users can’t (or won’t) read these warnings. Brianjd (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There was a previous DR for this file specifically, which links to a mass DR that also includes this file. Both DRs were closed as keep. Brianjd (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reading the previous DR I understand two things: 1. The quality is law and we have better pics for the same. 2. It has "educational value". As long as a conclusive expert opinion is not given on what this picture has as per educational value that the other files cannot satisfy, my vote (opinion) is delete. I think the anti-porn DR reflection is almost as strong as the deletion crusaders. We must stop "giving reactions" and look at the images before rejecting or defending them. (An admin told me so, m/l. :) --E4024 (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Saying "we have better pics" is meaningless unless we clarify what we mean by better. I would consider "better" to mean "more fitting for a specific educatinally purpose". So we need to think of educational purposes and find better images. But in all honesty I do not want to go through all the images and consider different educational useage and which one is better. The point is that we do not demand this for anything other than "Gay Anal Sex". Please see how many images of houses we have, why do we have so many houses? We can just have one house and then assume that all the other houses are the same. Why do we have so many birds? They are also all the same, and we can just find a good image and delete all the rest, right? In other words this is dishonest to start this deletion, and it is also dishonest to say "We have a better image" unless you specify the criteria. In both cases as soon as you are proven wrong, you simply repeat and shift the goal post. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - As I have not started the DR and only used words from the previous discussion I do not blame you for trying to insinuate "dishonesty" towards a very honest person. However I have noted your name in my list of users to avoid interaction, and I have to inform this to you before that list is activated in your case. Before going away, I kindly request you to try not to insult people who are working voluntarily here. Thanks for not directing any words to me again, ever, anywhere. E4024 (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - There was no insult. I do not care about the drama. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:06, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I closed this DR with the comment “No valid reason for deletion.” But @E4024 reverted it with the edit summary “No CONSENSUS. LET AN ADMIN CLOSE IT.” Let me respond to this briefly:
1. Consensus. Of course there is consensus. There were no votes other than some “keep” votes and @E4024’s “delete” vote; there were no good arguments for deletion, remembering that this file has survived two previous DRs.
2. Closure by non-admins. Commons:Deletion requests#Closing discussions:
  Non-admins may close a deletion request as keep if they have a good understanding of the process, and provided the closure is not controversial.
I believe I have a good understanding of the process and this closure is not controversial. (By the way, @E4024 did suggest in another DR that I become an admin to help clear the backlog of admin tasks. Perhaps they were just being sarcastic.)

There you have it. Another bunch of crap that our overworked admins have to deal with. Brianjd (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I understand the process better than @E4024, who undid my closure here but failed to undo the corresponding edits on the file and its talk page. I have now undone those edits as well. Brianjd (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @E4024: This DR has been archived. It no longer appears on the daily DR list. Can you suggest a way of bringing more attention to this DR? Brianjd (talk) 14:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: I see that you have closed similar DRs and have not contributed to this one (so you could be an independent voice here); could you take a look at this one? Brianjd (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unused image of questionable education value. Simply saying it could be used doesn't place it automatically within scope:

An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph...For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we should keep all photographs of unknown people. The fact that an unused pornographic image could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on pornography does not mean that we should keep low quality pornographic images...

Direct quote from Project Scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment If we had another better image, or were likely to have a better image, I would probably agree with you. I think you have significaantly misunderstood every keep vote here. I do not think that people argue that this photograph is impossible to replace, but rather that we have nothing to replace it with. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Survived previous DRs. No new substantial reasons for deletion given. @E4024, who reopened this DR last time I closed it, has not explained why this was necessary. Brianjd (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:李熙凝头像.jpg

copyvio: [10]. flickr photo upload at 2020-06-15. shizhao (talk) 00:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

add:

File:李熙凝头像（大）.png--shizhao (talk) 00:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Flickr-washing. --Minorax^talk 12:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karina Fernandez Al.jpg

Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Gbawden. --Minorax^talk 12:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/www.flickr.com/photos/govjustice

Flickr's PDM 1.0 is not allowed on Commons per RfC. Note that West Virginia Governor is not part of the federal government, thus {{PD-USGov}} is not applicable. Files from individual US state are copyrighted

A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:David Yong.jpg

Copyvio from website indicated in Other versions Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 04:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, cross-wiki spam. Bencemac (talk) 07:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Petit Fancy 20 (14021125314).jpg

Not certain how this fits within our scope. What is its educative purpose? — billinghurst sDrewth 06:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OoS. --E4024 (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mr-Darbandi.jpg

Unnecessary picture, used only for promotion on Wikipedia article BSMIsEditing (talk) 10:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding deletion recommendation; spam-only use. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Patrizia Gattaceca.jpg

Not a selfie. photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arin.jpg

"Sunny's wife"? E4024 (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abu Sayed Sunny.jpg

Sunny in his younger days, from his Facebook account. E4024 (talk) 16:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Íomhanna ar an léaráid .jpg

A clearly copyrighted book cover. Andrew Gray (talk) 16:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hopsin in Thailand 2.jpg

Image appears to be a screenshot, not an original photograph. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a screenshot of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE7AmqT0E80 at around 0:39 — BriefEdits (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020 Summer Olympics logo new.svg.png

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mongoloid ancestry distribution.png

No source of basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by VivekAdivasi from different uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ref Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/華夏1000. --Fæ (talk) 13:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Let us not make Commons a place where people can diffuse their theories without proper sourcing (reliable sources). --E4024 (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Confirmed LTA, ref Category:Sockpuppets of WorldCreaterFighter. --Fæ (talk) 16:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unsure as to the copyright status of the map is, I am looking at the checkuser page, and if CU will be done we can make a determination. However, in this case this map is out of COM:SCOPE, since it is not even clear what it is suppose to show. If this map was used to illustrate the old view of the scientific racism, it would be useful, but then it would need to be "This is how the scientific community saw the world at that time", but this appears to be "This is what the scientific community at that time would see the world as if they were magically transported to today's world, but still attempt to analise it with the tools of the old". How are these percentages arrived at? How are mixed ethnic individuals counted? Now if the map would be akin to "The study of the beginning of 20th century has identified these countries as having more than some percentage of population as 'mongoloid'" That would be in scope and should remain, but this is not such a map. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaginal fisting with gaping anus and dripping body fluids admixed with feces by Dr. Toboggan.png

low quality 85.221.142.3 17:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. Tm (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaginal fisting with gaping anus and dripping body fluids admixed with feces by Dr. Toboggan.png

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Protesters storm the headquarters of MBC Iraq.jpg

FBMD. We do not accept FB files. E4024 (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Sreejithk2000 at 04:43, 14 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: FBMD0f000770010000f41e0000d2670000796e00002b740000c3c1000029270100ea310100 --Krdbot 01:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Telka.jpg

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. No help by Google search. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haj Khyoun Al Obeid.jpg

It looks line none of the three uploads of this visitor are "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 00:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test01.jpeg

random office desk, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test 5.jpg

unused, uncategorized, probably from Internet (see TinEye Search). The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test 4.jpg

seems to be a photoshopped file, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zveroboy-tea.jpg

COM:PACKAGING VLu (talk) 19:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Theme 2.png

unused diagram, no description Estopedist1 (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal play with feces and urine by Dr. Toboggan.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 12:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Obscenity is not a reason for deletion, however I believe this is a copyvio. It has JPEG artifacts which make me think it's a still from a video, and tineye finds a match dating from 2019. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as above. --E4024 (talk) 01:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, dubious own-work claim. --Ə XPLICIT 01:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal sex.JPG

Lousy quality image offering nothing that we do not already have available on Commons. Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal sex.JPG

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - deleted file re-uploaded. --E4024 (talk) 01:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Reupload of what file? Tm (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ə XPLICIT 01:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gay Penile-anal intercourse Male Michael Karacson.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk)

Delete - Looks like a copyvio to me. [11] -mattbuck (Talk) 17:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Gives personal info without consent (i suppose), ir doesnt apport anything and has nothins special for us to conserve. Miguu (talk) 05:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --E4024 (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, dubious own-work claim. --Ə XPLICIT 01:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AN-riding-2.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ə XPLICIT 01:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anal sex03.JPG

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. And in use in ko.wikipedia.org 사용자:Dolicom/성생활/성교 자세 Tm (talk)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ə XPLICIT 01:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erkin Ergin.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - taken from FB. E4024 (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:OTRS permission required. --Ə XPLICIT 01:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jane Austen en DVD.JPG

Copyrighted DVD Covers Clodion (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Même problème que les autres, le copyright de la BBC sur les DVD en anglais. Je ne crois pas qu'il y en ait un sur ceux édités par KOBA Films, en tout cas je n'ai rien vu sur les jaquettes. J'en serais quitte pour refaire une photo plus respectueuse des règles du Ⓒ ! Sinon tant pis, l'article sur Wikipédia n'est pas modifié par l'absence d'illustrations ! Eymery (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem as the others, I think, the copyright of the BBC on DVDs in English. I do not believe there is one on the publications by KOBA Films, in any case I saw nothing on the covers. I would be left to redo a photo more respectful of the rules of Ⓒ! Otherwise the article on Wikipedia exists without illustrations! Eymery (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P&P 1940-1995.JPG

Copyrighted DVD Covers Clodion (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC) OK ! Question : est-ce qu'une photo où n'apparaitrait pas BBC (parce que le cadrage serait plus serré) serait acceptable ? Eymery (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: would a picture where BBC would not appear (because the framing would be tighter) be acceptable? Eymery (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PD James-Suite P&P.JPG

Copyrighted DVD Covers Clodion (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Si je comprends bien c'est seulement la couverture du DVD qui fait problème (alors qu'elle serait acceptée sur un wiki en langue anglaise, je crois). OK. Est-ce que la couverture de la version française serait acceptable à la place ? Eymery (talk) 13:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 04.jpg

Derivative work of copyrighted postcards A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prepairing.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ə XPLICIT 01:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020年3月4日战“疫”Vlog：90后ICU护士的一天.webm

footage belongs to the nurses instead of CNSTV. Roy17 (talk) 13:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rawa Mazowiecka Castle (3).jpg

Çünkü o Bulanık Genç imam (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ə XPLICIT 01:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Quotation Mark.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indian Shooter vijendra parmar (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Ə XPLICIT 01:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:عەبدولوەهاب شوانی.jpg

Sorry, we do not accept Facebook images. E4024 (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: We do accept Facebook images, if they meet our other policies. Brianjd (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Possible copyvio, possibly out of scope (I can’t read this language so I can’t be sure). Brianjd (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Brian, I thought I had already made you understand that I do not need your lectures but I understand you need conversation. If you are so keen on following my contributions you might have seen that in such DRs I used to use only the formula "FBMD at MD" and leave the conclusion to our admins who know things -like yourself- better than me. However I was asked on my TP not to use these abbreviations, therefore I am trying to quit the formula. BTW you should become an admin and let us profit from your experience. (I mean you should be able to simply close the discussion with a button.) Please do help with not adding -and making others add, like in this case- more and more comments on a simple DR. The deletion requests are already backlogged, think about our admins who have to read all this. My last word: Become and admin and close DRs, do not make them "larger". Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - @E4024: It is simple. Your nomination was incorrect. I corrected it. (What’s wrong with something like “Facebook metadata. Possible copyright violation.”?) Now you are the one giving a lecture. (By the way, I already close and merge DRs when possible.) Brianjd (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:عه‌بدولوه‌هاب شوانی.jpg

Sorry, we do not accept Facebook images. Better keep them there. E4024 (talk) 16:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rosa republicana.jpg

Uploader claims that this is public domain since the author has been dead for more than 70 years; at the same time there is no information about the author. Thuresson (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Мікола Ткачоў.jpg

Coppivo coppivo Politik998 (talk) 09:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. --Sealle (talk) 13:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalim Ajeem (talk · contribs)

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyvios: inconsistent sizes and styles, web size, and no EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalim Ajeem (talk · contribs)

Historical photo and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Precise Pangolin by Vlad Gerasimov.jpg

Source does not provide a link to Copyright statement for this drawing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BLM protest art in Raleigh, NC on June 14, 2020 (50009118842).jpg

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ayumi hamasaki Countdown Live 2007 2008 teamayumembers.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 01.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 06.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pearl entrance (2020).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 03:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 07.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 01:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 08.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 01:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 19.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 02:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar 22.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 02:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Museum of Qatar.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 03:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dubai Marina 001.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dubai Marina 02.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:United Arab Emirates Pavilion of Expo 2010 - 01.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 07:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:United Arab Emirates Pavilion of Expo 2010 - 02.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 07:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Founder memorial .jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Founders Memorial.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a public monument. 5.107.250.218 15:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@5.107.250.218 and Alexandermcnabb: the no FOP matter is not about physical ownership or accessibility (for UAE's case). It's about if you obtained the permission from the artist (the one who created and/or designed this monument) to photograph the monument under free licensing, or if you obtained permissiom form him/her to published your photo on Commons which mandates photos to be used for any purposes, including commercial. No freedom of panorama in UAE means that the side of the authors (architects, designers, sculptors, painters, or their heirs if they are already deceased) have the full and exclusive rights for reproductions of their artworks, even buildings, and the UAE copyright law on copyrighted works (including architecture, sculptures, etc.) only allows unrestricted and commercial reproductions by means of broadcasting (not photographic reproductions). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Founders Memorial in front of the Ethiad Towers.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Founders Memorial, Abu Dhabi.jpg

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 07:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Robert Kaddouch HELSINKI.jpg

Very poor quality photo. Impossible to view. Bastien65 (talk) 10:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Bastien, je m'aperçois que toutes mes photos sont supprimées, que se passe t-il ? Faut-il que je valide de nouveau mes autorisations et si oui, de quelle manière ? Cdt --Quiop (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE: not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2005 Ford Tran Connect L 200 TD SWB (GP05 FXR).jpg

Blurry/fuzzy image - We have a better image here, Unfortunately this is the only picture that shows the different bumper but IMHO that's a minor detail) –Davey2010^Talk 00:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vishwajeet Kumar.jpg

Image of a "self-centered" user. See CentralAuth. E4024 (talk) 01:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 12:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Quackity.jpg

Rejected draft, OoS, dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 04:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 12:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magda Bello Premio Internacional de Poesia, Rubén Darío, 2018.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 12:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cryptocash fiat.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Spencer as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. I am not sure. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I guess this was tagged mostly given the circumstantial evidence: the user on en.wiki was creating a spam article to promote an unremarkable cryptocurrency, and some of the user's other contributions here (e.g. resume upload, edits here have been similarly promotional.) Some of the user's uploads didn't seem ostentationally promotional so I didn't tag those (File:Common key system.jpg), but the nominated image was specifically promoting the product being advertised. Spencer (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Taivo: I wanted to follow up since it's been a couple weeks. Spencer (talk) 19:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not advertising but not own work either. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Routine - Cover.png

We have OTRS-permission, but the cover is out of project scope – neither author Frasigan nor the album is mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Frasigan is a well-known cross wiki spammer. Bencemac (talk) 11:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giuramento Mattarella Montecitorio.jpg

AFP (Agence Frane Presse) is copyrightholder of this picture. The usage of this picture was not licenced via AFP. Pls. delete it immedaiately or licence it via AFP. 37.4.250.184 09:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the picture was published in the official webiste of the President of the Republic, so it can be used on Commons with the license "Presidenza della Repubblica". -- Nick.mon (talk) 10:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info: ticket:2006111410007364. --Achim (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Perko Matovic with party leader Vojislav Seselj in party HQ.png

Unlikely to be own work. Single upload, no EXIF data, photo has watermark of en:Serbian Radical Party, so it's probably official party photo. Same photo is also uploaded by different user here: File:Matovic with Vojislav Seselj president of SRS in party headquarters.png Smooth O (talk) 10:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo of Serveri ry.svg

Comples logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bob Mikhailov MG 9130.jpg

it was a mistake Vita Mikhailov (talk) 10:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Uploader request on day of upload; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 04:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TeamMKT.png

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BikeFo Logo.png

en:BikeFo was deleted as spam. The logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Olena Chervonik

Personal, unused photos of a non-notable person.

Ankry (talk) 11:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep prolific commons user's photos. Subject is seemingly notable. Searching Olena Chervonik or Олена Червоник on google and youtube finds some public talks and tv programmes on Ukrainian art and literature?--Roy17 (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About person - https://m.krytyka.com/ua/users/olena-chervonyk --Butko (talk) 17:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020-05-23 11-59-33 CM-Valdoie.jpg

someone wants don't appear on it ComputerHotline (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ComputerHotline: I can’t read French, but these appear to be public figures performing public functions? According to Commons:Country specific consent requirements#France, this does not require consent. If my understanding is correct, I would say keep. Brianjd (talk) 04:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)-709x521-038126.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The filename makes me dubious abouts its provenance, and there's no metadata. Suggest deletion as a potential copyvio per COM:PRP. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FB smet logo HQ.jpg

Deleted: per nomination; scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Run- on Sentences.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by משה200 (talk · contribs)

Unused duplicates of File:ארי יצחקוב-converted.pdf r.pdf.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused duplicates of File:ארי יצחקוב.docx ,-converted.pdf hp.pdf. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by משה200 (talk · contribs)

Images with online sources unlikely to be own work, at least one has FBMD and was included here to show scope of effort.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escudo de Xicohtzinco.png

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kenya - Uhuru, Raila, Ruto.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotografía de Jorge Escardó.jpg

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Su Mon.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tejas Wakade 123 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trinity College Aerial Shot.jpg

I made a mistake uploading this file. I thought the copyright holder had given permission, when in fact they had not. I apologize, and request that this file be deleted expeditiously TrinityStudentArchivist (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lynx-Logo-BLK-SML-crop.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dtype-rear-view-DSC 3189-400x284.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Small Green Plants.jpg

I named the file wrong. Rafidh Hasan Arnab (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rafidh Hasan Arnab: Because you uploaded the file less than 7 days ago and it’s not in use, it’s eligible for speedy deletion. But do you want it deleted? You can rename it without deleting. Brianjd (talk) 11:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; can be renamed. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Landarbeiter.jpg

Urheberrechtsverletzung? Siehe [12] XoMEoX (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nagware Transport & General Services Logo 01.jpg

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:تابلو معرفی سبزه میدان بجنورد.jpg

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

این عکس رو خودم از تابلو معرفی مجموعه گرفتم، مشکلش چی هست؟ قطعا خود تابلو هم مشمول قانون کپی رایت نمیشه و صرفا جهت معرفی مجموعه نصب شده — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sazeshahr (talk • contribs) 09:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sazeshahr: بر چه اساس می‌فرمایید این متن چند ده کلمه‌ای مشمول قانون کپی‌رایت نمی‌شود؟ در ایران اصلاً آزادی پانوراما نداریم، چه برای آثار دو بعدی، چه برای آثار سه‌بعدی. این اثر دوبعدی است و تقریباً می‌شود گفت که حوالی سال ۱۳۸۴ آنجا نصب شده است. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

شما ظاهرا ایران زندگی نمیکنید، در ایران هیچ ممنوعیت برای تصویر برداری از آثار معماری و هنری وجود نداره مگر در مواردی که با نصب تابلو بخاطر مسائل امنیتی ممنوع کرده باشن، در ضمن این تابلو اثر حساب میشه به نظر شما؟ من این تصاویر رو تو کتابم چاپ کردم با همکاری میراث بجنورد، وزارت ارشاد و خود میراث ادعایی نداشتن شما غیر قانونی تشخیص میدی؟ لطفا اگه ماده قانونی در خصوص ممنوعیت تصویر برداری از آثار دو بعدی و آثار سه‌بعدی در ایران وجود دارد اینجا ارسال کنید با ذکر منبع — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sazeshahr (talk • contribs) 12:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

محل زندگی من ربطی به این بحث ندارد. نهایت لطفم این است که این لینک‌ها را در اختیارتان بگذارم: COM:FOP و COM:CARES و COM:PRP. والسلام 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Volker Klimmer (talk · contribs)

No indication of own work on Band promotional material. Very small size photo, two newspaper clippings, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malnaş Aqua Telluris (talk · contribs)

Two published items, one photo of product packaging, and one image dated from 1909, all unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:אבא.png

Dubious own work claim, appears to be two photos and words superimposed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nedelcu ovidiu (talk · contribs)

These documents need copyright review. They are probably not the own work of the uploader, but the creator may be Stan Greavu who died in 1929. Accurate information from the uploader is needed for all uploads, per COM:EVID.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taisaochon-600x400.png

Metadata includes transmission data such as is found on Facebook or Instagram files. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avni-gandotra.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Quakewoody as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
she is on a feimal red link list. Maybe we need her. Pls chekc first if she is realy not relevant in any WP. Sanandros (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That list was automatically created due to a Wikidata item in her name. The Wikidata item has since been deleted and her name no longer appears on that list. Quakewoody (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1897 administrative map of the Marshall Islands, Pacific Ocean.jpg

Paul Langhans died 1952, his work will be in PD in 2023 Goesseln (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-US}} gilt auf jeden Fall, da 1897 veröffentlicht. Somit muss die Datei nicht gelöscht werden, sondern sie darf nur bis zum 1. Januar 2023 nicht in der de-WP verwendet werden.--Ratzer (talk) 06:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen Bis dahin können wir sie hier leider nicht behalten, da alle Uploads auf Commons auch im Ursprungsland frei bzw. gemeinfrei sein müssen. De728631 (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:30º Fiesta Nacional del Chamamé y 16º Fiesta del Chamamé del Mercosur.jpg

Copyrighted poster of a festival Frodar (talk) 21:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Demjanjuk 3.jpg

Image cannot be found on USHMM website by searching alleged index or Demjanjuk's name. Unclear if it was actually released by the copyright holder. It would not automatically be free under {{PD-IsraelGov}} even assuming this is actually an Israeli government work. Buidhe (talk) 21:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe, I found the image here [13]. How would one determine its copyright status? I know that the USHMM allows you to use photos with permission.--Ermenrich (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ermenrich The source doesn't say it's free. USHMM almost always hosts free images in the "collections" part of its website ( https://collections.ushmm.org/search/ ), with a clear statement that it is public domain ( https://collections.ushmm.org/search/?f%5Bavailability%5D%5B%5D=public_domain ). Buidhe (talk) 00:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jon Champion.jpg

No metadata, looks like a screen grab. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You say that it looks like a screen grab. Well , I can assure you that it is not. It is a photo taken with an iPhone by me. My opinion is that this should not be deleted. --Nigelnu (talk) 05:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If you could provide context of the photo, that would be appreciated. Otherwise, there is no way to verify your claim. Champion is literally holding a mic while looking into the camera at a packed sports stadium, therefore it is much likelier that he is being recorded during a sports event while working as a commentator. (It's vd for me if the claim is unsubstantiated.) — BriefEdits (talk) 07:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I asked Champion and to do a preview of the game as if he was on TV. The whole thing was video taped on my phone. --Nigelnu

Delete: This is quite implausible – according to the EXIF data, this phone was not even near a stadium when the picture was taken. --Telford (talk) 09:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obvious screenshot. Dubious claim, especially in view of this similar copyvio: File:Ian Darke.jpg and other screenshot copyvios. JGHowes ^talk 16:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mobile Cell towers manufacturing plant.jpg

I am the uploader i wish it to be removed. Eclypes2008 (talk) 22:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Uploaded in 2012. Doesn’t seem to include anything private. Seems educational. Brianjd (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. PCP. No exif, likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TypesofTesting1.pdf

Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Child labour boat man in sylhet.jpg

This file was initially tagged by ZI Jony as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: please see our project scope
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. If the image shows what its filename suggests, it would be well in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not child labour. Someone's kid so OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Edifici de Correus, València.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Helenina as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Ús de filtres
Converted to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy. IMO, this image is well in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Túrelio. --E4024 (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avocado, alvocat.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Helenina as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contingut innecessari
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Contingut és necessari. Beautiful. --E4024 (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escif-Greenpeace.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Helenina as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contingut redundant
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image does not qualify for speedy and is well in scope, IMO. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imam Ali Safari .jpg

This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ +/−

See the following DR also. E4024 (talk) 00:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kumar Kartik.jpg

This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 01:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ignacio Rodriguez en KAVLIN.jpg

Lo subí por error SilvinaCarcano (talk) 01:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christian Jamett.jpg

User invented himself kind of an article in userspace at ES:WP. Also this is a CR'ed pic and requires OTRS process. E4024 (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: What does CR mean? Brianjd (talk) 04:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Proyecto “Efecto Linterna“.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Junior Eurovision 2014 slogan.svg

Though it is in deed composed of simple, geometric shapes, the overall composition is far beyond simple and includes both originality and complexity; therefore PD shouldn't be applied. Masur (talk) 05:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TOI 20TH DECEMBER 1961.jpg

The file is an image of a newspaper of India, published in 1961. Per Template:PD-India, post-1960 Indian corporate works enter local public domain after 60 years from the publishing date, which means the newspaper is still copyrighted in India. Meanwhile, there are no FOP for 2D works per COM:FOP India. As a result, the file is copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Creativitat, creativity, arts education.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Helenina as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Privacitat
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the depicted girl is hardly identifiable. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No hi-ha cap privacitat en aquesta imatge. Beautiful. --E4024 (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In Scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Алымов Жанарбек Жапарович.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Reoner as Speedy (Speedydelete)
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Verniquet1790.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Paris 16 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: small, unused, useless file. The file has been 10 years in Commons, so it deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hlasatel Zdeněk Mančal a technik František Werner.jpg

WWII era photograph,[14] not own work Buidhe (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- I would plead for keeping the photo, as the photo is more then 70 years old by now. It is about Czech hero of Prague Uprising, whose memory owe to be held. So I see no sound reason for deleting the file. And nobody hold the interest in owner rights. So we cannot hurt anybody by keeping the photograph.

Xerostomus (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Mancal was a great guy but that doesn't affect the copyright status. Also there is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago as required by {{PD-anon-70-CZ}}... Buidhe (talk) 21:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless a valid source/author/copyright info is provided. I do not believe that User:Xerostomus is the photographer who made this photo during WWII as they declared. For {{PD-anon-70-CZ}} an evidence of pre-1950 publication is needed. Ankry (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Embleem LBB.jpg

The design of this patch is at least ten years old, see e.g. [15] "Own work" is claimed by the uploader but no evidence is given that that is the case, nor that the uploader holds the rights to this design.The picture may have been taken by the uploader, but that would still make it a derivative work of the underlying work. / (NL) Het ontwerp van deze patch is al zeker tien jaar oud, zie bijv. [16]. De uploader claimt dat het 'eigen werk' is, maar geeft daar geen bewijs voor. Er is ook geen duidelijkheid dat de uploader de rechten op dit ontwerp bezit. De foto is mogelijk wel door de uploader genomen, maar het is dan nog steeds een afgeleid werk van het onderliggende werk. Paul B (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Het ontwerp en de daarbij geldende rechten zijn in het bezit van de DV&O en als medewerker mag ik daar gebruik van maken. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.46.196.20 (talk) 12:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader needs to provide permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stan Greavu Dunare.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Gikü as no permission (No permission since), which is absolutely correct. However the subject died a long time ago, and it is possible that this image may be old enough to be retained. I request a full deletion nomination to give the uploader time and space to reply to the nomination to attempt to keep this historic image in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DBP 1983 1174 IGA München.jpg

According to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Antonia Graschberger, author of this work has not been dead for 70 years as required by German copyright law. Buidhe (talk) 23:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1950 DDR-Propagandaplakat Amikäfer.jpg

copyvio, magazine from 2020 Markscheider (talk) 05:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

entnommen der Monatszeitschrift G/Geschichte, 6/2020, S. 13, Artikel: Eine gefräßige Biowaffe des Westens", ISSN 1617-9412, B7276 --Richard Huber (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aber eigentlich doch DDR-Propaganda-Poster oder -Heft → PD-GermanGov oder PD-Germany-§134? -- burts ∞ 12:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mal angenommen, in einer aktuellen Zeitschrift erscheint ein Abdruck eines alten Gemäldes - darf man den dann scannen und unter PD stellen? Und ist nachgewiesen, daß dieses Bild ein DDR-Plakat ist und nicht eine künstlerische Impression davon, wie ein DDR-Plakat ausgesehen haben könnte? --Markscheider (talk) 20:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not enough information about this illustration to determine its copyright status, so deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 20:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coat of Arms of Konotop (1782).svg

Uploader’s request. This image contains raster graphics, and a newer, better version was created by user Лобачев Владимир  Gzhegozh _talk 00:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Put redirection to file Coat of arms of Konotop 1782.svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 18:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: processed as duplicate. --rubin16 (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Konotop.jpg

This depiction of the flag of Konotop has a really poor quality and is in .jpg format. There also exist both .svg and .png versions of the flag. This image is really bad and was used before the alternative, better versions of flag of Konotop were uploaded.  Gzhegozh _talk 00:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: processed as duplicate. --rubin16 (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pomáhej s Igráčkem figurky.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep According to Igráček's page the company didn't succeed in claiming copyright for their toys. These figurines are representation of everyday workers with everyday tools which is too common to be considered as original creation. Aloxe (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Culturally and historically significant. I would posit "fair use" were it necessary. This image does not reflect strictly "artistic design", as would be, for example, the art in the box, but just the objects. Yamaplos (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Kubura

Fictional currency of fictional micronation. No original author and no permission.

Smooth O (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional currency doesn't fall under Commons:Currency, which means it's some kind a propaganda leaflet/poster image or something like that. I am curious about possibility of keeping low-resolution image, which serves as an illustration - for instance, the file File:5Kubura (cropped).jpg is just 134px low-res image, which is also used as a logo in advertising posters. So, what is acceptable under Commons:Licensing#Simple_design and Commons:De minimis may include low-res, small size img's.--Santasa99 (talk) 19:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This cropped file is also just a very small part of the original image, so I am thinking, that should also count for something vis-a-vis copy rights.--Santasa99 (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coupon with an explicit advertisement of a motel ("Bon voyage from the Hajducke vrleti motel. Please come back again"). This was no currency, there was no micronation. Article was created by well-known POV pusher User:Kubura. Ponor (talk) 20:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića (as well as fictional currency) became well known micronation. Not just in the area.

Article was indeed created by well-known POV pusher User:Kubura. But deleting it just because of similarity to his nick as well as his engagement regardnig this article is pure revanchism and (new)populism. (see [17]. --Mark7747 (talk) 13:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It should be deleted only because there is no permission from original author (creator) of artwork of this fictional banknotes or advertisement leaflets, however you called it. I presume restaurant is copyright owner, and their website is copyrighted. --Smooth O (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would point out hrwiki has obtained permission from the author to use these images. This permission does not apply to Commons, but only to hrwiki. I have made local duplicates of these files here. When these images are deleted on Commons, I would ask that the duplicates listed in the category not be deleted. Thank you! --Ivi104 (talk) 12:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sylvester Stallone Brigitte Nielsen.jpg

Also cropped version: File:Sylvester Stallone Brigitte Nielsen (cropped).jpg

Image appears highly doctored - e.g. head sizes, tan lines on neck, hand sizes. Darren-M (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. "Doctored", you say? I don't see it. The foreground figures (Nancy and Stallone) are somewhat enlarged because it was obviously shot at close range with a wide-angle lens. In reality, Nancy and Sly are both rather diminutive people while Ron and Nielsen are tall, but the foreshortening caused by the wide lens makes Nancy and Sly (and the closer-to-the-camera heads and hands) look big. It's a straight shot with a less than optimal lens, used, no doubt, because it's hard to shoot with a normal or tele lens in a crowded room. -- WikiPedant (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I really don't know what does mean "doctored"! but if your claim is that it is edited or manipulated then you have to provide its original version so that we can compare them and make decision. Current image looks very normal to my eyes.--Editor-1 (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nancy Reagan's head appears abnormally large and is unrealistic. If, as WikiPedant says above, it is due to geometric distortion because of the lens used, then it should be labelled as such to indicate it is an example of distortion and does not display proportionality accurately. TimothyPilgrim (talk) 03:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As far as I can tell, this is exactly the same photo as in the United States National Archive (which probably should be listed as the source, since the utexas.edu link does not work). https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75854347 All lenses, and indeed all photography, introduce "distortions" compared to the human eye. This photograph looks unremarkable and unedited to me. MarkWKidd (talk) 03:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tracking down the original. I have updated the source on the file pages. This clearly shows that nothing has been "doctored". -- WikiPedant (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No proof of doctoring and file from two good sources. Tm (talk) 05:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 09:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KimitoHorie SekiShugou 001.jpg

unused poor-resolution image of formula that should better be typeset in LaTeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lithuania Minor.png

Paul Langhans died 1952, his work will be in PD in 2023 Goesseln (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a derivative work of File:Ethnic map East Prussia 1907.jpeg. Apparently, the legend in the lower right corner of the original picture was cropped, some parts (such as the name of Paul Langhans) removed and then pasted in the top left corner of this excerpt. So, if this file is deleted, the source file should be deleted too, for the same reason. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason58.PNG

fichier inutile car non-vectorisé, et pluseiurs vections vectorielles existent Jean-Mahmoud (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:37, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jin Zhong, HK Chinese editor.png

Photo appears to be an archive photo not created by VOA (from video at 1:00 timestamp on the souce). Wcam (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This photo belongs to VOA. VOA always marks third party photos explicitly, whether they are Reuters/AFP/Internet image/Courtesy of Copyright Owner etc.--Roy17 (talk) 13:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VOA often times fails to accurately credit third party contents (see for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital (Medical treatment Center)-VOA.jpg), and this image is taken from a show clip which looks like a file photo (VOA is known to mix third party contents with their own without proper indication in videos). It is also rare for VOA to create headshot photos of this style, and this photo is more likely created by Jin Zhong's photographer rather than VOA.--Wcam (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wcam has presented no evidence that this photo is not VOA's own archive photo.

The linked example is not comparable. In that example, it's easy to confirm that VOA had no personnel in Wuhan, China, at that particular time, so that photo must have come from a third party.--Roy17 (talk) 14:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Roy17: To avoid all the uncertainties you can take a snapshot of this video for an image of Jin Zhong created by VOA. --Wcam (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The VOA has a poor track record of using externally-sourced images without attribution. Generally, VOA images without a specific VOA photographer attributed are problematic. This situation is a bit more complex because of the nature of the source, but I feel this general rule still applies. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anti-Polish poster published by Volksbund für das Deutschtum im Ausland (Association for 'Germanness' abroad) Gauverband Danzig Westpreußen (Association of the “shire or county”, Gdansk, West Prussia).png

Not own work, unclear copyright status. It looks like it might have a named author in the lower left corner but I can't read it. w:Verein für Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen im Ausland was not a government organization so PD-GermanGov would not apply. Buidhe (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a scan of a WWII document with no copyrightable elements, just text, and non-copyrightable or public domain logos. Template:Anonymous-EU is likely relevant. The text in the lower left does not look like a named author, anyway, it's not an art poster, just text. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 09:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The graphics are certainly above threshold of originality, and this much text is also copyrightable. I don't see how we can determine it is anonymous without being able to read the text in question and also checking the back to see if the author is named there. (Also missing PD-US rationale). Buidhe (talk) 09:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Which of the two graphics present do you consider infringing? Also, the scan is poor and the text is not legible IMHO, which further makes the issue of copyright of text moot. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 13:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Certainly the top left one is above threshold of originality. Much of the text is legible if you can read fraktur type. Furthermore, the work is not eligible for {{PD-US-alien property}} (as it is not a government work) and was almost certainly recopyrighted by URAA making it unsuitable for use in enwiki. Buidhe (talk) 21:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - The quality of the logo is abysmal, but it seems like a copy or a derivative of one of the older (pre-1939) logos at Category:VDA Abzeichen, and some date to before 1923. As for the text, the copyright should have expired per Anonymous-EU and I don't see why it would be re-copyrighted. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 04:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        The logo is still copyrighted in the US, unless it was first published before 1924. (Perhaps File:VDA T116, Kornblume.JPG should also be deleted, but objects might have different copyright rules.) The text would be copyrighted in the US because it has not been 95 years since publication. Buidhe (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I am again not convinced that the logo raises above threshold or originality, particularly as it is clearly derivative of PD logos form the 19th century. As for the 95 years on text, where is that date from? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I consider this to be PD, for at least two reasons: first, the authorship of the document should be assigned to an organization (and not to a single person!!!) that ceased to exist over 70 years ago; second, because the document is still illegible (except for the title and signature), therefore, even if the rights belonged to a single person, by publishing this image they could not be violated, because it is impossible to copy this text - by therefore cannot infringe the copyright of any author's heirs (assuming they had any). Julo (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The organization still exists, and the document is not illegible... Buidhe (talk) 21:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info The name in bottom-left corner is definitely printer's name, not author's name. Also, to check URAA status, we need to define what is the country of origin here. IMO, it was Free City of Danzig. And it is disputable whether it has a legal successor, and, if it has, which country is the successor. So we may have problem defining the URAA date and whether it was copyrighted in the country of origin at URAA date. And I per https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/URAA_Statement#Guidance we should not delete files per URAA until the doubts whether URAA applies or not in this particular case is resolved. I suggest Keep as PD-anon. Ankry (talk) 21:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per keep comments - --GizzyCatBella (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ankry. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://phys.org/news/2018-01-ancient-eurasian-dna-sequencing-revealing.html

[2] ttps://eurasiandna.com/detailed-look-east-north-eurasian-gene-flow-south-west-asians/

[3] ttps://www.harappadna.org/2011/05/east-asian-admixture/

[4] ttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039498/

[5] ttps://www.pnas.org/content/early/2017/07/11/1704906114

[6] ttps://academic.oup.com/mbe/advance-article/doi/10.1093/molbev/msaa099/5821431

[7] ttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3524296/

[8] ttps://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol85/iss1/5/

[9] ttps://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/6/3/466/576141

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]