Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/05/29

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive May 29^th, 2020

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaik mohammed irfan.jpg

wrongly uploaded 106.208.60.190 07:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader User:Smdirfan361's request. --Achim (talk) 12:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:اسامة الجبوري.jpg

Reupload of previously deleted copyvio. Uploader is the subject -- see this acagastya 14:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:SPEEDY. — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 03:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:اسامة الجبوري.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Hamish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. (acagastya's comments) Please see this; uploader is the subject -- and it is not their own work -- clearly a copyvio. acagastya 03:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:SPEEDY. — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 03:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Hochladen/Bildschirmfotos

sagt mir nichts 2003:C4:8F08:3367:B556:19DD:8E7:E286 13:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michael Schmucker (talk · contribs)

Appears to be Flickr washing - images uploaded to Flickr 29 May, moments before 29 May Commons upload and includes unambiguous copyvios (e.g., File:Gaborone Botswana Development Corporation 2.jpg and File:Gaborone Botswana Development Corporation 1.jpg metadata both identify copyright holder as "dalton@dingelstadphoto.co.za") All other images appeared elsewhere before Flickr upload (e.g., here) and some do credit "Michael Schmucker," but COM:OTRS requires evidence that uploader is indeed Michael Schmucker, as previously published images.

Эlcobbola _talk 14:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedying - sock of Ophir Mizrah, et al, known for copyvios as impersonator (see, for example, Hilda Lieberman). --Эlcobbola _talk 17:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MC Motivation47 10.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Mcmotivation4 (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Uploader request on day of upload. Not in use. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:F-80CMissANG (4612235583).jpg

Duplicate of File:MissANGRF80C (4476661264).jpg 190.167.50.178 17:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image changed to link to image ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC) [reply]

{{Duplicate}} tags applied to smaller copy of image. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File:MissANGRF80C (4476661264).jpg has been deleted and redirected to this image. --clpo13_(talk) 18:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:David Meckler Monarchs.jpg

I would like to replace with a more appropriate picture 68.196.164.66 19:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep you can do that without the deletion of the old image. Just upload a better picture, then change the articles to use that picture. We are fine with having multiple images of the same subject. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 19:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plage Tropicana de Libreville .jpg

Copyright violation AviaWiki (talk) 00:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: According with our Deletion policy, obvious cases of copyright violations must be eliminated by the speedy elimination process. Thus, it is unnecessary to wait the seven days period. --Érico (talk) 23:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bombolobalongya.jpg

User:Victoire Perdican uploaded several copyrigthed photos of sportspeople along with his one, so it's very unlikely this one is free. Seems like an official photo (also, not the best quality, since it's quite small) Titlutin (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 19:47, 29 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unique Workshop and Motors.jpg

Out of scope logo. Not a notable company at all. Previously used in promotional spam. Hiàn (talk) 18:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (replaced DR content with speedy deletion template). Taivo (talk) 07:16, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New platform shelter, Kilburn High Road Station - geograph.org.uk - 745232.jpg

smaller version of File:Platform shelter at Kilburn High Road.jpg, do we need both? Benjen (talk) 22:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Lower-quality duplicate. Benjen, FYI you can tag things with {{Duplicate}} as these don't have to go through the whole deletion request process. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Castle nectar fireball 2.jpg

unlikely to be own work; source otherwise unconfirmed — billinghurst sDrewth 06:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 21:21, 30 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deanhansen.png.jpg

unused personal image; we are not facebook — billinghurst sDrewth 06:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 21:21, 30 Mai 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 01:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lucchetti 2020 .jpg.png

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 21:14, 30 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Башта арка.png

Third photo to right in slideshow at http://www.redeveloper.ru/redeveloperskie-proekty/realise_actual/bts-bashnya-5/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 21:12, 30 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PhotoCollage 20200430 133914303.jpg

The center image is 3rd image to right in slideshow at http://www.redeveloper.ru/redeveloperskie-proekty/realise_actual/bts-bashnya-5/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 21:12, 30 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Propaganda poster .png

Watermarked poster, world war era, not own work Kissa21782 (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ivonne Mehesz.jpg

Please, I need you delete my image from your site, you don´t have my consent for this image. Can you do it today? 181.101.149.232 00:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We have received the same request by email at . It would be helpful to know the country where the photograph was taken, as consent requirements do differ by country (re CSCR). The file does have the {{Personality}} tag. JGHowes ^talk 01:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the problem is the name of the image, I suggest to rename it to something like "Girl in blue bikini"; but as the image description is declared to be in Spanish, I assume the image name also should be in Spanish. Ankry (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If we can delete File:Leica M4 with film.jpg based solely on a courtesy request, despite that file being in use in the mainspace of two other projects, then we can probably delete this file. I should stress that I am opposed to these kind of courtesy requests, but I am trying to work out what the rest of the community thinks and reflect that in my comments. Brianjd (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per information from OTRS, the photo was made in Argentina, and per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Argentina the subject permission is needed to publish the image. As there is a clear declaration that this has never been granted and the author is not participating in this discussion. Ankry (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Espectro IR.jpg

Unused, undescribed, uncategorized. Educational value is unclear. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's an Infrared spectroscopy correlation table, which would be a viable COM:EDUSE. However, it's a copyvio (page from a book, presumably a copyrighted textbook or similar reference). DMacks (talk) 16:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --DMacks (talk) 16:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PCAMP0004 Classics Tile BrightLight.png

Copyright violation. See: [1] Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; copyright violation of [2]. --clpo13_(talk) 23:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BJP Election Symbol.svg

Nominated for speedy deletion by User:LifetimeWiki with rationale: Missing license.

File is tagged as PD. Converted to regular DR for discussion. Brianjd (talk) 13:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Taivo at 07:35, 4 Juni 2020 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2): Commons:Deletion requests/File:BJP Election Symbol.png --Krdbot 14:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Golha complex (talk · contribs)

copyrighted and out of project scope.

Hanooz 02:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichiers de l'utilisateur: Tux-Man

Could you delete the ".jpg" files which have become useless:

I replaced them with new versions in the following ".svg" format:

Thank you. --Tux-Man (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariaRamosSerrano (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 10:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariaRamosSerrano (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariaRamosSerrano (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariaRamosSerrano (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Draxiler54 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Moslemul Hakim.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Berkay Bayram (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hussain86 (talk · contribs)

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cfreyb (talk · contribs)

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom - Fma12 (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fergus Ustianowski.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paydaqoqos (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shantoft (talk · contribs)

Self promo on wikidata.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sirajul Hoque (Siraj) (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:35, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saadafian (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alamin Khan BD (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bibekghosh7478 (talk · contribs)

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arthuro Ruizz (talk · contribs)

No source/permission.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iphone display.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NilsSIREN (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NilsSIREN (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisdres (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mduzzal Hossain.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KHANASLAMSHAHRAN (talk · contribs)

Unused, seemingly personal files, COM:HOST.

Kissa21782 (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suza93 (talk · contribs)

Some historical images and two artworks. None are actually own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antonescu Vincentiu Daniel.jpg

Out of scope. Unused personal photo of a user with no valid contributions. Gikü (talk) 00:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:عادل تقی پور.jpg

not notable. out of project scope. Hanooz 01:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michael on the Rocks (5673104877).jpg

out of scope - personal photo Mind matrix 16:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Am bright fit sum alex and am IT specialist at Abi Adi Tigray.jpg

Personal photo, clearly not Own work. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: F10 very unlikely to be of educational use, negligible global contribs. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:صورة للدكتور أحمد درويش.jpg

Appears to be a screenshot, not an original image Ytoyoda (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Libreville-by-night.png

Copyright violation AviaWiki (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; the license on the source is not free. --Ahmad^talk 20:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akbarparmah (talk · contribs)

not notable. out of project scope.

Hanooz 01:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmad^talk 20:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jon-favreau.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Nat at 15:48, 6 Juni 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 19:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EDUARDO CÁRDENAS BARAJAS.jpg

The item is for promotional use and it is not useful, so does not comply the Commons requirements. The item in Wikidata in which it is used has been proposed to deletion. Ivanhercaz (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is complete information, it does not do any information, please accept it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardo Cárdenas Barajas (talk • contribs) 14:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Blatant self-promotion & very poor quality. Commons is not your personal free web host. --Achim (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Why not speedy delete it per COM:CSD#U3? -- CptViraj (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

U3 refers to user pages. --Achim (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Ah apologize, I'm on the wrong DR, It was for different DR. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ville de Libreville .png

Copyright violation AviaWiki (talk) 00:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 17:49, 7 Juni 2020 UTC: Broken redirect --Krdbot 01:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayushjioff (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayushjioff (talk · contribs)

Previously nominated as F10 by Patrick Rogel, not selfies but definitely OoS, used in a promotional article on WP

Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Umm. In which article? There's no such indication in the file description pages and all have been deleted yet. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:42, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bestemsu Özdemir.jpg

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7754254/mediaviewer/rm3192875776 E4024 (talk) 15:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bestemsu Özdemir.jpg

The only image of this actress, but regrettably taken from the net. E4024 (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo GIF.gif

probably copyfraud Pamputt (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: taken from FB, missing permission, and above COM:TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parle Patel.jpg

This work is Parle's own work. He uploaded this photo on Instagram Gaurav vaviya (talk) 06:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info - while the uploader states they are Mr. Parle, they here discuss Mr. Parle in the third person - making it likely that the user is not Mr. Parle or the account is being used by multiple people. This deletion request was a malformed response to a speedy nomination, which I've now removed to give the user the 7 day period to submit proof of ownership and licensing to OTRS. Berchanhimez (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 01:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ខ្ញុំចង់ដឹង (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ខ្ញុំចង់ដឹង (talk · contribs)

Historical photos and book cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ខ្ញុំចង់ដឹង (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oleificio impianto continuo g1.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Doesn't look like ad, in use. --Achim (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:License is ok. No commercial propaganda. Stupid request made by an anonymous contributor whose only contributions are requests of deletions about olive oil topics.--Channer (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olive 40 C 0798.JPG

This is unfair advertising as the brand is clearly visible 217.57.51.36 14:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What a BS, Speedy close please. --Denniss (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion- speedily kept. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olive 40 C 0798.JPG

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Another ridiculous nomination, and duplicated. We don't have to be neutral here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:17-jarige naakte jongen.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kmthu.ytu (talk · contribs)

Came via a Facebook page, their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from the original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.

Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 08:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bachtiar Djanan (talk · contribs)

Historical photos and logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bachtiar Djanan (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Self Disconnect (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phusitmahing26 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own work, Most are Facebook sized, one has transmission data in meta. Others are sports shot, and two group shots.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nana87654321 (talk · contribs)

Highly unlikely own work on this gallery. It looks more like a fan gallery, or a scrapbook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Üsame Gelir (talk · contribs)

Some logos and two copies of same groupshot, all unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SimoC (talk · contribs)

Fan gallery of Luis Falcon (?) unlikely own work. Look at file sizes, lack of metadata other than "google" and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 13:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oleificio control g2.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oleificio control g2.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gramolatrice g2.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gramolatrice g2.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Centrifuga orizzontale g1.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Centrifuga orizzontale g3.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marokko-162.JPG

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creater and uploader of this picture. I don't see how this picture is commercial content or not neutral. China Crisis (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The centrifuge for separatingthe liquid from the dried pulp.JPG

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep! Nonsense deletion request! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View from the centrifuge head.jpg

Commercial content. Not neutral item 217.57.51.106 13:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yara Shahidi in 2018.png

Missing permission from copyright holder for one year. Sundayclose (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License review done. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:France A.N. 2020.svg

Fantasy diagram. The Bonapartists are not currently a major force in French politics. Slashme (talk) 08:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lar39 (talk · contribs)

Small images, low quality, no useful metadata - unlikely own work - possibly screenshots or harvested from internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:14, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lar39 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own work on these artworks.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lyda Krewson Portrait.jpg

The website shows no proof of free use 47.223.78.205 16:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 19:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rdac.jpg

Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rh 2013-10-17 18-43.jpg

unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rj capdevila.jpg

unused (only in user gallery) and uncategorised file. By blocked user. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Per Google, not notable person Estopedist1 (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SANPA.jpg

unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kkhosa (talk · contribs)

Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sayed Liaqat ul mulk 2014-04-23 01-08.jpg

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Operation bekpa in CAR,CAR,January 2018.jpeg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Elcobbola at 15:14, 22 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 19:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Turkish tuzlama.jpg

I have to request the deletion of one of my pictures because after uploading it (a couple of years ago) I noticed that I had also photographed the -sorry- ugly fingers of someone, probably the waiter, to whom I asked help to show the ingredients. We have several other images of the dish at the Category:Tuzlama, made and filled in by the same user. Indeed the soup is, IMHO, best photographed in this image. Maybe someone can kindly crop it and we can get deleted the "ugly fingers" version. Any kind volunteers? (I have no such technical abilities.) Thanks a lot. E4024 (talk) 17:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On hold: I asked a colleague to crop it for me. Let's please wait a couple of days and then if possible we will delete the original file, keeping the crop. --E4024 (talk) 02:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept and closed by the initiator. The update solves the issue and the place is a bit backlogged. Thanks for the crop. --E4024 (talk) 20:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gwalior fort - panoramio - Gyanendrasinghchauha… (12).jpg

It is clear from the Exif data – viz. (C)2008 Satheesh Nair, all rights reserved – that this pic was taken on 23 December 2008 and is copyrighted to Satheesh Nair – see Nair's profile at here. Some user named Gyanendrasinghchauhan uploaded it to Panoramio in 2010, and from there, it was uploaded to the Commons in 2016. In fact, this seems like a photoshopped version of this pic which was posted at this blog in 2009. NitinMlk (talk) 20:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom, so tagged. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 08:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989_talk 18:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WOK BABY BOSS DEL POPPING.png

Copyright violation. Still from YouTube video. No Cc licence on Youtube Headlock0225 (talk) 16:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this appears to be a still from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogD4tfUbOoE, thus a copyvio (there's my youtube recomendations messed up) ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hsufidhsvwvwu va cagar eok — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.34.147.250 (talk) 09:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, in addition OOS (F10). --Achim (talk) 08:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rfhj.jpg

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rfhj.jpg

Out of scope. I don't see any potential for COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hong-que-me-sang-vi-ve-dep-cua-lee-min-ho-em-se-cho-truoc-cua-nha-anh-85250a-1588003308.jpg

Copyright violation 27.71.94.48 03:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quakewoody (talk) 11:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wuhan Xibeihu Area Panorama(2017).jpg

unknown license information Heeheemalu (talk) 01:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Regasterios at 15:53, 5 September 2020 UTC: No permission since 28 August 2020 --Krdbot 19:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Desperate man.png

Non-official artwork created by the uploader to try and replace the original. Ə XPLICIT 23:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You say so, as if it were something bad in it. The nomination for removal must be based on Commons:Deletion policy. It is normal to have redrawn free logo on Commons, see File:The Ren & Stimpy Show Logo.png for example. The nomination should be quickly closed as not based on rules or rule-based removal arguments should be presented. The file is used in one language section.·Ɔ (talk) 10:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If we refer to this not as logo, but as artwork, then it must be deleted only if it is "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.", but if this picture has no educational use, then the unfree image should be deleted too, but you, Explicit, completely removed the removal request, as it was an obvious case. I thought this file meets "Criteria for speedy deletion" per en:WP:FREER, you think another way around. It would be great to formulate a solution based on a wider consensus. Perhaps the practice of replacing logos with free ones is not suitable for albums. Perhaps this redraw is of too low quality to replace original (yet it is obliviously free). There must be some clear criteria, because ideally non-free images should be replaced with free ones, of course.·Ɔ (talk) 12:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To begin with, this is a derivative work of copyrighted cover art. AS COM:FAN#Re-drawing does not avoid copyright infringement states, "It is important to understand that you do not avoid copyright infringement merely by re-drawing an existing copyright work, even if you introduce artistic additions or embellishments of your own." You are still potentially infringing on the original artist's rights. Second, although Commons does not have a policy against original research, the Wikipedias do. You introduce original research onto the projects by adding self-created cover art like this. This image should not be used on any articles as a result, which would ultimately leave it unused. This is both a scope issue, and more importantly, a copyright issue. The case of File:The Ren & Stimpy Show Logo.png is not remotely the same, as that is an official logo; it is too simple to meet the threshold of originality and can be hosted on Commons. Ə XPLICIT 00:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the detailed comment, but it seems to me that you contradict yourself - on the one hand, you call my work original, and on the other, say that since it is derived from the work of the artist of the album cover, it may violate his rights. Choose one thing.

As can be seen in this examples, the following are quite acceptable as something that don't meet "threshold of originality": original color combinations (File:Aria Awards.jpg), gradients (File:Alcorn.png), curved lines (File:Flag of Ottawa, Ontario.svg, File:Santa Cruz Futebol Clube (1915-99).png), position of small elements (File:ALRA Roy Moore 2017.jpg File:7 Up Logo Pepsi.svg). On this side, I do not see the fundamental differences in the discussed image and, accordingly, any problems (unless, of course, the other examples I have listed do actually violate the rights of copyright holders, it's just that everyone is used to turning a blind eye to this, which is also possible).

The part where you talk about original research does not seem valid to me since the rule you specified on one side says "Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research, so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments" (en:WP:OI) and on the other side my work is en:WP:Based upon the original image. I simplified it, but did not added any "artistic additions". The example that I cited and you qualified as suitable is cut out by clipping from a picture. Anyone who knows something about fonts copyright would not say that such an image is in general case not protected by copyright laws.

What fundamentally differs the artist’s work in compiling a flag, coat of arms, or logo from compiling an album cover? All of these images are designed to be on display as widely as possible. I do not understand why in this case other requirements are made.·Ɔ (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a contradiction. As COM:DW states, derivative works consists of two separate copyrights; the original work (belonging to the artist of the cover art) and the derivative work (your own creation). Additionally, "...unless the underlying work is in the public domain or there is evidence that the underlying work has been freely licensed for reuse (for example, under an appropriate Creative Commons license), the original creator of the work must explicitly authorize the copy/ derivative work before it can be uploaded to Commons." If the original work is not released under a free license, any derivatives released under a free licensed infringe on the author's copyright.

As previously mentioned, and as stated at COM:L#Simple design, simple logos are generally not eligible for copyright. What constitutes as "simple" depends on the country of origin. It is easier to register a copyright for logos originating from the UK, for example, and they are more commonly deleted per COM:TOO UK. It is less stringent in the U.S. (COM:TOO US), so those files tend to have a higher retention rate, and why most of those examples you listed exist. The only one among them that's a cause for concern is File:ALRA Roy Moore 2017.jpg because of the elephant design. It's not uncommon to find a plethora of copyright violations on Commons, as it hosts over 61 million files after all against an active userbase of 52,000, a vast majority of which don't deal with deletion.

WP:OR requires published, reliable sources to verify all of the material on Wikipedia. By using File:Desperate man.png in articles about the album, you are introducing the claim that it is the official album cover, which it is not. Ə XPLICIT 06:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for helping me figure this out. As I understand it, there is some special legal regulation of logos (trademarks).

What I wanted to achieve was that in those sections of Wikipedia where there is no locally downloaded non-free image there would be some kind of replacement, placeholder, if you will.

Now I uploaded a new version of the image, please see - it only contains the semi-free font I specified earlier (free for images but must be paid for to use embedded in websites), without any redrawn elements. This image surely is not trying to pass itself off as an album cover. If this is not enough, then the image will need to be deleted. ·Ɔ (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: it seems that no one is in a hurry to deal with this issue, how do you evaluate file change ([3] -> [4]) - does is make everything OK?·Ɔ (talk) 10:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The current version is fine for Commons, but the initial upload requires deletion by an uninvolved administrator. Ə XPLICIT 11:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the second version, deleted: the first one as per COM:DW. --Sealle (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michel WARNERY.jpg

copie photo profil facebook https://fr-fr.facebook.com/people/Michel-Warnery/100009781320998 Habertix (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lancer mitsu (talk · contribs)

Disparate metadata, unlikely to all be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer(s) should confirm licenses via OTRS.

Storkk (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. I used OTRS and sent an e-mail. Lancer mitsu (talk) 09:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS Ticket:2020060110003615. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete File:XADO MS Tchmych.JPG. Keep the others, they have OTRS permission ticket:2020060110003615.--Andriy.v (talk) 08:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: all except File:XADO MS Tchmych.JPG, which I deleted. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sergey Eylanbekov-Eisenhower Memorial-Group of 4 D-Day soldiers-clay edited-1.jpg

Copyvio: see mark on print and metadata Alanscottwalker (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Libreville Plages.jpg

Copyright violation (https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/0f/b3/4e/c1/libreville.jpg) AviaWiki (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Room.jpeg

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roralty 2013-04-18 20-55.jpg

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rd 2013-04-30 00-31.jpg

no EXIF-data, no description. Unused, uncategorized. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seks.jpg

unused, uncategorized, no useful description Estopedist1 (talk) 20:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iustina irimia.jpg

Out of scope. Failed Self-promo attempt at ro:Utilizator:Iustina Irimia. Could be used to illustrate Romanian traditional clothes, though. Gikü (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asim Abbas Photo.jpg

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Itsgianni.jpg

out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 05:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gianni.jpg

NE individual /out of scope Tekstman (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, out of scope. Podzemnik (talk) 10:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gianni.jpg

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gianni.jpg

out of scope - previously deleted Quakewoody (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Edgar Singui.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ZamElBuhoRm.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional WIkidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cropped-create thumb-2.png

Unidentified trivial logo, out of scope Kissa21782 (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mawlana Ataullah Faizani.jpg

not own work 175.106.52.90 17:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Very unlikely to be own work, thus presumed copyvio. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Crystal clear. --E4024 (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mawlana Ataullah Faizani002.jpg

not own work 175.106.52.90 17:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The uploader has a habit of uploading pictures as "own work" while they clearly are not. --E4024 (talk) 19:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ExHotligans.jpg

Unused trivial logo, out of scope Kissa21782 (talk) 17:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mimico Station (24143252648).jpg

low quality photo Mind matrix 18:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 15:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blazonul familiei Mărgărit.jpg

This is obviously a photo of a screen. Source needed, and proof of permission. Gikü (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:21b7frns78-87371a-9968b5a-b7-27d-050av859gh0376a1d8668666900.jpg

Unused, out of scope photoshop, used only for vandalism (ro:Viitor Milionar, ro:Proiect:Viitor Milionar, etc.) Gikü (talk) 00:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adventure Time And Relative Dimension In Space.jpg

Please see COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yasəmən Ramazanova.jpg

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adelfrank seems to have a hurry to delete this file. Can some admin look into this case please? --E4024 (talk) 00:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juan Arabia en el Shanghai Minsheng Art Museum, 2019.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sentinel-1 composites for entire Bangladesh show blue in colour inundation areas of (a) March, (b) April, (c) June, and (d) August 2017.jpg

Satellite photos claimed to be own works Thuresson (talk) 07:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Памятник Хо Ши Мину (Москва).jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for scultpure per COM:FOP Russia The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Памятник Хо Ши Мину (Москва) (tight crop).jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for scultpure per COM:FOP Russia The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Junaid afzal kamboh.jpg

Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete out of scope Saayeeh (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AROK ASIN KOLOR 00.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Retrato21515.jpg

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Williams Sarmiento en el Chologol.jpg

Image credit says "Luis Salinas" and "SalinasPhotogfraphy ©". The uploader appears to be the subject of the photograph, not the creator.. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gonzalezwiki3.png

unused and uncategorised file. Looks like not notable organization/company. Advertisement? Estopedist1 (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PRC Goldway WILDS May 2020.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fear in the Amygdala.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pickaboo.png

This file was initially tagged by Moheen as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.pickaboo.com/ Before we go further, do we know what the Bangladeshi threshold of originality is? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Relicensed as {{PD-textlogo}}. --Minorax^talk 05:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Галина Зальцман.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Piñu.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Terézia Hulínová - profil.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+ FBMD. --E4024 (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MaNweDarliHtun.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Found here, no permission. --Minorax^talk 05:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonesdc76 (talk · contribs)

Unused, uncategorized, unreferenced graphs, not realistic to ever have a proper educational use.

Kissa21782 (talk) 17:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter Eyerer.jpg

COM:DW - clearly a photograph of a screen (moiré patterns and visibile pixel array) - image of this. COM:OTRS permission from genuine author needed. Эlcobbola _talk 19:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voice of Nepalese women... NGO Nepal.png

Out of scope. Advertisement for a Facebook page. Till (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfree screenshot. --Minorax^talk 05:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reshuconsultant.jpg

Out of scope. Advertisement. Till (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Europe-atheism-2005 2.png

I'm the original uploader of this file. This file isn't used on any Wiki page. It was just a bad recolouring of the orignal vectorial map into a png format. It was kind of a test. I think it's better to improve and work on the original file than on this one. Nicryc (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Nominator is uploader of this file, but not uploader of the source file, which is not attributed. So it appears to be a copyvio as well. Brianjd (talk) 08:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:إسلام محمد.jpg

Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Very Large Telescope Ready for Action (wallpaper).jpg

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Very Large Telescope Ready for Action (ESO).jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IC 2944, the Running Chicken Nebula.jpg

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:IC 2944, Nicknamed the Running Chicken Nebula.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Active telescopes at La Silla Observatory.jpg

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Telescopes at La Silla.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:15, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wallpaper of Telescope Domes Clustered at La Silla.jpg

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Telescope Domes Clustered at La Silla.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused. BevinKacon (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ULAS J1120+0641 quasar.jpg

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Wide-field view of the sky around the most remote quasar.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, unused BevinKacon (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:All-New Toyota Yaris (LEAKED; PHOTO 1).jpg

Dubious claim of own work based on Description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TUW2008.png

Highly unlikely that this logo is freely licensed or the work of the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GTFletch300x291.png

Highly unlikely that this logo is freely licensed or the work of the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miguel Bernardeau during an interview in December 2019.png

Seems like screenshot or copied from interview Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No permission at source. --Minorax^talk 05:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Itzan Escamilla and Ester Exposito during an interview in March 2020 02.png

Seems like photo from interview, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miguel Bernardeau during an interview in October 2018 13.png

Seems like an interview photo, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GTFLETCHJacobson-Hamlin.jpg

No evidence that the image is freely licensed or the work of the uploader (who has a history of falsely making both claims); the image was also used by Touro College on a press release (https://tineye.com/search/35b687a704bcdd932d90754081c91971aa521d73?page=1) ElKevbo (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: In 2015 @ https://www.touro.edu/media/touro-college/communications/images/press-releases/2015/resizedJacobson-Hamlin.jpg, OTRS required. --Achim (talk) 09:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Itzan Escamilla during an interview in March 2020 02.png

Seems like an interview photo, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asgardia-la-nación-espacial.jpg

Does not appear to be own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luxon.jpg

By size and lack of quality it's unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maite cara.jpg

Small size, low quality, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Decide66 (talk · contribs)

Bok cover : see https://livre.fnac.com/a14240898/Michel-Warnery-Le-Roi-du-Monde#ficheResume

File:Maquette RoiduMonde-okokV4-14jan2020.jpg

Habertix (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmitrovicni (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own wor, all but one of them appear to have been published, the other appears to be facebook sized and not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmitrovicni (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own work on head shots of man. Very small, low quality.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vrontarsito hogeschool voor tovnarij en zo.png

Seems to be from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La55L6dyBRQ at 1:09 Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rbhojayya (talk · contribs)

Unlilkely own work. Same photo, one color, one black and white.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adventure Time!.png

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Закон разнообразия Литвиненко в Комс правде.jpg

Нарушение АП -- Tomasina (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: pretty clear copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Правда 1962-09-30 добрая традиция.png

Нарушение АП -- Tomasina (talk) 07:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: pretty clear copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chenspec (talk · contribs)

Need to mute the audio and revdel.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not understand what the problem was and how it could be solved... Chenspec (talk) 12:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chenspec: the audio (music presumably under copyright) needs to be removed. The video can stay without sound. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: I do not know how to get the sound out of the file. Can you do it for me? Chenspec (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chenspec: you can download your videos from https://openload.co/f/BJQEa6z3sRk/Yermi.zip and upload them using COM:Video2commons. Mp4 files were never supposed to be allowed in the first place, so the files nominated here probably won't be kept anyway. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: Is this OK?

File:Yermi Kaplan (1) V.webm

? Chenspec (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chenspec: Clearly something went wrong there.. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 13:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: Well, that's already too complicated for me. If there is no simpler way to fix it, it is better to delete the files.Chenspec (talk) 14:27, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chenspec: But the short bit I do see isn't even from the videos you had uploaded. I have no idea where it is from. Did you download the .zip from openload, unpack it and upload the contents to Video2commons? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: I used the original file I uploaded - it is still on my computer Chenspec (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chenspec: and you removed the audio from that? Because that's what I did with your videos before uploading them to openload.. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: YES Chenspec (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MP4 files, muted videos now available: File:Yermi Kaplan 2018 1.webm, File:Yermi Kaplan 2018 2.webm, File:Yermi Kaplan 2018 3.webm. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chenspec (talk · contribs)

Recent wallpaper uploads of this user contain artwork not produced by them. File:Blue urban night (1).jpg and File:Blue urban night (2).jpg contains [5]. I kindly asked the uploader to provide all sources or tag them for deletion, instead they're claiming they are own works.

BevinKacon (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is because they are my own works. Why do you claim they are not mine? Chenspec (talk) 06:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, sorry - I saw the link now. Is it because I used this silhouette? It is Free for commercial use - No attribution required, So I didn't think it would be a problem. Whether Elmets should not be used with such a license - I'm sorry, I didn't know. In this case, you can delete them. But it is important for me to emphasize that the design of the image is mine. I would love to have an explanation on the issue and follow your guidelines for future uploads. Chenspec (talk) 07:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BevinKacon The files have not been deleted yet. Given that the elements I have used for some of the works have no copyright and are not required to attribute them - can I continue uploading my works? Chenspec (talk) 13:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Regarding the discussed silhoutte in the discussion above, on 9 January 2019, Pixabay switched the old sitewide license for all uploads from Creative Commons CC0 to the Pixabay license which does not meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons. Therefore, media published on Pixabay from 9 January 2019 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons (their license of "free for commerical use" is according to current consensus not comaptible with COM:L. Given that the user has used unknown elements in their derivatives at hand here, we need to err on the side of caution. If you can list the elements used and their sources, and they are compatible with COM:L you can linst the file(s) for undeletion, following COM:EVIDENCE. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kamil Özdemir Tolon.jpg

copyright possibly wrong --ToprakM ^✉ 00:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it is "public domain" you can change it instead of nominating for deletion.--88.230.156.103 07:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is no source or taken date information to prove it's PD. Also on what basis did you change the copyright information? --ToprakM ^✉ 23:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It hasn't been 70 years since he died. So this file isn't PD in Turkey. --ToprakM ^✉ 09:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Death date is not important. This photo was taken 70 years ago. We understand it from his young face. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.131.77.80 (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait photographs in Turkey are treated based on the person's death year. --ToprakM ^✉ 20:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, no source (except incorrect "own work"), no publication data. Such files cannot be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kamil Tolon ve Müzik Kutusu İcadı.jpg

Wrong copyright. Source book is not CC-BY-SA-4.0. --ToprakM ^✉ 00:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ToprakM: What were you trying to do here and here? Brianjd (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ToprakM reported this file as a copyright violation with rationale:
  http://www.kuterpr.com/e-kitaplar/bursada-bir-mucit
This edit also removed the DR tag. I have reverted it. Brianjd (talk) 07:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was wanted to delete the request and report it as "copyright violation". I'm not used to here. --ToprakM ^✉ 18:16, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright replaced with PD-TR. But it hasn't been 70 years since he died. So this file isn't PD in Turkey. --ToprakM ^✉ 09:41, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the source. It was wrong.--Kadıköylü (talk) 16:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, photographer and his death year are unknown, so we have no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yasar-Universitesi-Logo-AlternatifDikeyOrtali.jpg

wrong copyright --ToprakM ^✉ 12:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: complex logo. Ə XPLICIT 06:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The first traffic light ever.jpg

Unlikely own work, looks historical Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 06:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20130610-DSC 8984 (9102501371) (2).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Guinea-Bissau A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 12:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ophir Mizrah (talk · contribs)

COM:DW of statue/monument - no FoP in South Africa per COM:FOP South Africa

Эlcobbola _talk 18:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 04:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Capital Pride Festival 2015 (18958646551).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 06:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GTFletch.png

It's highly unlikely that this university's logo is free licensed or the work of the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 22:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.trident.edu/ shows the logo & seal... What I posted was not..... This Logo is unofficial and being used on linkedin, https://www.linkedin.com/school/trident-university-international/ & Trident at AIU youtube shows the official Seal at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmjjAAHwghtz3hvYmmp6vow.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by GTFletch (talk • contribs) 22:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 06:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MgMgTar.jpg

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 03:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Андрианов Анатолий, российский футболист.png

Screenshot, not the uploader's original work Ytoyoda (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 03:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pig in a bin (10884724).jpg

really really not relevant Benjen (talk) 19:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep illustration of what is apparently a child's artwork being disposed of rather casually, with date and rough location. It's not a great photo but it's by no means useless. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 15:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 03:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Whatever Happened to Tinky Winky? (9088224).jpg

not relevant at all Benjen (talk) 19:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No apparent educational purpose unless you really don't know what a black plastic bag looks like. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: humor photo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Ə XPLICIT 03:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mischa Janiec (2019).jpg

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 22:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 03:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Algoritmus - Gráfbejárás.gif

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as names in author-entry are not the same as uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CHRISTOPHER B De centaures.jpg

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khelo India objectives.png

This file was initially tagged by Explicit as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portrait von Alois Paikert, gemalt von Dr. Szokol Willibald.jpg

According to the FamilySearch the painter Willibald Szokol died in 1963. Regasterios (talk) 11:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Western semi-Western World–Clash of Civilizations.svg

I got it wrong as I didn't know the author had written an expansion to his first work three years later 2A02:C7F:982E:7900:7CE0:B667:2667:1A74 12:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean that the file is correct as regards the original version of the book? If so, this is not a valid reason to delete this file: just change the description accordingly.

If you can prove you are the uploader (for example, by logging in and writing a comment to that effect), then this file would be eligible for speedy deletion. Brianjd (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It means I got it completely wrong between the version of the source file and the fact that I only consulted the first work by the author (wrote in 1993), not the one in 1996 (which is actually the one the source file is based on). I am sorry. MedicalWorker (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Basically the source file is entirely based on a map the author published in his 1996's work, and so I thought it was incomprehensible without depicting what the author pointed as torn, semi-Western countries. I trusted the source file but I should have known what it was based on. Indeed I didn't go through the whole 1993's work neither. Thus all wrong, and no point in fixing it. 2A02:C7F:982E:7900:3DAC:6116:ADCD:A31F 01:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the sake of it, I'm adding that I now think Hungtinton's map should be uploaded in its original form (he's dead afterall thus there should be no copyright violation... I just checked and unfortunately copyright is inherited after death) to communicate it comes from a quite old publication. MedicalWorker (talk) 01:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, unfortunately copyright continues after death. Since we now have confirmation the uploader wants the file deleted, within a day of upload, and the file is not in use: Speedy delete Brianjd (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this file be deleted by now? It's been more than 30 weeks on a nomination. 2A02:C7F:982E:7900:7087:523E:76D7:2D13 11:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bremen Neues Museum Weserburg.jpg

copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Térfy Gyula jogtudós.jpg

According to the FamilySearch the painter Willibald Szokol died in 1963. Regasterios (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Borsalino.jpg

copyvio, contemp. artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T.Bednarz (talk · contribs)

Prominent depiction of Nazi attribution without obvious educational and/or critical background, hence probably a violation of the laws of the country where the pictures were taken. Out of COM:SCOPE too.

A.Savin 12:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There is an entire category of swastika graffiti by country, and "probably a violation" is not a violation yet. --Andrei (talk) 12:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It is primarily intended as the documentation of the devastation of spa areal (including the church). The usage of Nazi symbols is punishable only if intended to promote Nazism.--Qasinka (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T.Bednarz (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from advertisement.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The first two, since they are utilitarian objects you cannot make them copyrighted just by putting advert on them. Weak delete File:Protective masks vending machine in Karviná (April 2020) 02.jpg since the advert is way too prominent part of that photo (alternatively apply blur/mosaic to protectable elements) and undelete at an appropriate date. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. All three featured the Advertisement, regardless of what was inside the machine. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cameltoe and anatomy.jpg

Collage without source information for every image used:

One of the female images is under copyright and is not attributed correctly.
The male images have no sources at all. Brianjd (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Claims not true. File is in use. Already kept in an earlier nomination. Inappropriate deletion request. Richiex (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - My claims are true. They are facts, not opinions, and anyone can verify them by going to the file description.
  Being in use is irrelevant if the file has a copyright issue.
  
  The earlier nomination did not address the issues I raised in this nomination, so it doesn’t count.
  
  Brianjd (talk) 04:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Richiex: As the uploader, you can fix this issue by editing the file description page. But it would appear that you have made no attempt to do so. Brianjd (talk) 04:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - The male images are own, that's the source. What copyrights you are talking about? There are no images in the Wikimedia Commons with copyrights. If there would be a problem, it probably would've been noticed a decade ago. If there's a copyright violation in one of the images, you should address the issue somewhere else. Richiex (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Despite nomination open for 5/6th of a year, none of these images has been property attributed and licensed. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Domingo C. Abella-.jpg

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The source indicates "Archiviniana magazine. Okt. 1975. p. 28, Official publication of the Philippine National Archives." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guillaume1784 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fulber (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steven Corliss, Kanbar Hossein-Bor, Noman Robin, Proshun Rahman and Mrittika Kamal.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Romaine Brooks

Romaine Brooks died in 1970. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The last one is a picture of a fake street sign using Romaine Brooks’ name. It’s not a work by Brooks and should thus not be deleted here. -- Okhjon (talk) 15:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: MIXED CLOSE: Kept the street sign, DELETED the artworks per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cincinnati & Westwood Railroad 'Mogul' No 1 'Wm. E. Davis' narrow-gauge 2-6-0 locomotive built by Brooks in 1876 for the Ohio suburban line and featured 11in by 16in cylinders and 36in drivers.jpg

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being vigilant. The licence has now been changed to {{PD-old-1923}} --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Changing the license doesn't alter the lack of information about the source, either in the Commons template or at the Facebook page provided. There is no way to know the image is the age it is claimed to be. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:မြိုအမျိုးသား သုံးဦး.jpg

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heinrich Johann Kreil.jpeg

duplicate of File:Heinrich Johann Kreil.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Serina Demarck (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexandremidias (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miss tourism bikini 2017.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ClausMatzke15 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jean Massiet.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2018 Armenian Revolution 02.05.2018 010.jpg

Derivative work of copyrighted posters A1Cafel (talk) 16:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per above. SCP-2000 07:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Babys.png

Out of scope: no educational value. As it stands it is meaningless. With a bit more explanation like a title and labels on the axes, then it has potential to be useful. Headlock0225 (talk) 16:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably true for the uploader’s other uploads as well. Brianjd (talk) 07:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Surely there is a gadget/userscript to easily create a nomination for the other uploads, but I can’t see one in Preferences/Gadgets. So I’ll leave it up to someone else. Brianjd (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  @Brianjd You can use Help:VisualFileChange.js next time. Anyway I nominated files which uploaded by that user Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Rodrigo.gomes29. SCP-2000 09:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above. SCP-2000 09:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1st Gen Honda Ridgeline closed-box unibody frame.svg

This graphic was my first attempt to draw the unique frame of the first Honda Ridgeline pickup truck ever made. I created a newer and more detailed version at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First_Generation_Honda_Ridgeline_closed-box_four-bone_unibody_frame.png. Although the newer version is a PNG (due to how I needed to draw it with the tools I have), this early SVG version is inferior and not used. Thus I request it be deleted in lieu of the better PNG version that is being used today. McChizzle (talk) 16:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep “Inferior” is a matter of opinion. This version has a bigger preview than the PNG, can be made even bigger if necessary, and has a different layout. It also has a lot of history in the file description and upload history that may be useful. Brianjd (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IBM PC-RT 6151.png

It's the non-free image here - https://sites.google.com/site/dalbydatormuseum/computers/ibm/ibm-rt-pc - with a screen display and LCD crudely matted onto it to make it look as if it's working. Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete derivative of a image presumed copyrighted per NETCOPYVIO. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unbelievable. Image is exactly a derivative, and the screen font was nothing like that.

This picture https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/crummy-computers/images/c/ca/IBM_6150_System_1.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/310?cb=20190629041150 More reflects the actual color, but its also a bit dark. The picture in the article is just bad. I had just added a link to the PC Tech journal "A Significant Departure" which has a bunch of pictures.:

https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21ADBcL3ZsaADRnB0&cid=7D567B5161FE0EB7&id=7D567B5161FE0EB7%219521&parId=7D567B5161FE0EB7%219513&o=OneUp — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.75.140.124 (talk) 01:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FRANCIS-GULICK MILL, LOUDOUN COUNTY, VA.jpg

Unencyclopedic: this is not a photo of Francis Gulick Mill. It is a photo of a spring house on and taken from private property. The spring house is located at 39°02'06.82" N 77°33'09.31" W , over half a mile away from the actual Gulick Mill. Both uses of this file on the "Francis-Gulick Mill" and "National Register of Historic Places listings in Loudoun County, Virginia" pages have been removed Jfmach (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed Being "Unencyclopedic" is not a reason to delete a photo. There are numerous photos on the Commons that are not used on Wikipedia or similar and never will be. We're not deleting them. The image may not be what the uploader intended and so its description and/or name may need to be changed, but it's a fine photo. Farragutful (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This doesn't make any sense there is no much complete useless things on Commons, random logos, pictures of floor etc... Trying to single out this image is utterly strange, the image isn't special. We allow this to encourage more to upload, it can be used and that's all. Vallee01 (talk) 05:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per COM:INUSE. SCP-2000 07:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gaborone Panorama.jpg

COM:PRP - uploaded by LTA/serial sock with focus on Gaborone buildings - see Category:Sockpuppets of Bobojane Spanere and socks' deleted contribs. This users sole other upload was a blatant copyvio. User has no credibility and purported license cannot be trusted. Эlcobbola _talk 18:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per above. SCP-2000 12:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vochernyshenko (talk · contribs)

Обложки защищены авторским правом, необходимо разрешение на свободную лицензию от художника обложки или правообладателя. Необходимо обращение в OTRS

Dogad75 (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steve Carlton Statue.jpg

Per COM:FOP US and COM:DW, statues and photographs of statues in the US are copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charlie Ward's Heisman trophy.jpg

Photo focuses on the Heisman statuette. Per COM:FOP US and COM:DW, 2D representations of copyrighted 3D works are also copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Albert-Akpomudje-SAN-FCIArb.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alex Kushakov playing tennis.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ambasciatore d'Ucraina nella Repubblica Italiana.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baner Tabla 600.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CARLOS DANIEL MALAVÉ.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fazekas István.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grin as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giada.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Farhad Soleimani.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ortel je fuj smdri jako hnuj.png

imagevio, the mosque from [6] (probably unfree), portrait of Osama bin Laden is OK imo; Tomáš Ortel unknown — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yana Pet (talk · contribs)

Обложки защищены авторским правом, нет разрешения от создателя.

Dogad75 (talk) 18:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leica M4.jpg

I am the original author of this photograph, and I don't want it to be used on the Wikimedia Commons anymore. Thank you! Gueorgui (talk) 07:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be merged into Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leica M4 with film.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Used; courtesy deletion not applicable until a replacement photo is pointed out. --Ankry (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Recti- nevit 028.svg

unused (only in a personal gallery) and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork Estopedist1 (talk) 07:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: out of scope. --Ankry (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Имена и память.jpg

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: обложки защищены авторским правом, необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted book, OTRS needed. --Ankry (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foto Nevzad Kryeziu.jpg

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 12:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elizabeth Holmes 2016.jpeg

File:Elizabeth Holmes 2016 (cropped).jpeg

License was never verified. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who transferred the image from en.wiki to commons. I didn't see anything on the description page to raise a red flag, when I considered transferring it.
w:User:Tali Mackay, the uploader, seems to have only edited two articles, both related to Elizabeth Holmes. So I googled her name. She seems to be a public relations executive, at Holmes firm. I am not a big twitter user, and find that requests for clarification I send to people I have never met generally go unanswered. Nevertheless, I sent the following tweet:

@TaliMackay An individual named Tali Mackay uploaded an image of Elizabeth Holmes to the wikipedia several years ago. Its licensing has been challenged. If you took it, or had the authority to upload it, could you weigh in at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2020_March_25#File:Elizabeth_Holmes_2016.jpeg

If she works at Holmes's firm, working on Holmes's article may have lapsed from w:WP:COI. Since she didn't make any attempt to obfuscate her identity, and those edits seem innocuous minor updates, not attempts at sanitization, I suggest letting sleeping dogs lie... However, if she works at Holmes's firm, and uploading the image of Holmes was part of her duties, I ask whether it is carrying COM:PCP too far to question whether she had the authority to upload this image.

Any real twitter experts, who think they can send a more effective tweet, should, of course, go ahead and do so. Geo Swan (talk) 04:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, full stop. This woman was in a huge scandal, and she's been all over the American newspapers. That's part of the reason I found this upload to be suspicious. Please do not contact her. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even people in scandals have friends, employees, and friends who are employees, who might take pictures of them, and upload them under completely valid free licenses. I am going to assume you did not look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tali_Mackay to confirm or reject my suggestion that, while it seems to be a lapse from COI, none of the edits were disruptive, or attempts to sanitize either article.
So, if I am interpreting your comments correctly, you are not challenging whether the uploader was a friend, employee, or friend who was also an employee of Ms Holmes, you still suggest the image was not one she took herself, but that she went to the additional trouble to pick a photo not owned by herself, or Theranos, to upload to the wikipedia? Geo Swan (talk) 18:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre:

Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elizabeth Holmes 2016.jpeg

Professional photo from a Theranos Press Kit. No evidence Tali Mackay owns this photograph or the owner (whoever it is) would release it CC. Theranos the company is defunct, Holmes is facing criminal charges in court, she is the subject of books, TV and movies, it is a hot topic with broad interest. We need to get it right.

Claimed source of the image: https://web.archive.org/web/20171202212810/https://news.theranos.com/press-kit/
At page bottom it says "Copyright © 2016 Theranos Inc. All rights reserved". Click the image a "Terms" pop-up box appears and the terms are not compatible with Commons. The uploader claims the source of the image is this press kit page. It is not compatible with Commons, and the uploader can not willy nilly decide to change the license on the fly just to get the image onto Commons. And according to the press kit the owner is Theranos, which is now a defunct company with property ownership currently tied up in court with creditors.

-- GreenC (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
edit conflict

Release of rights in a license is non-revocable. So it is irrelevant as to whether Theranos is now "defunct", whatever that means.
Tali Mackay, the image's uploader, was the executive at Theranos responsible for public relations.
If, as GreenC suggests, this image was, technically, owned by Theranos Corporation, not by Ms Mackay personally, and could only be used if the executive at Theranos responsible for public relations released it, that would have been Ms Mackay herself.
As I wrote the first time this was brought up, theorizing on scenarios where we should not take Ms Mackay's initial release at face value, that this image has been released under a free license, strikes me as an instance of taking the precautionary principle to frankly bizarre extremes.
How, exactly, does GreenC know Ms Mackay didn't take this photo herself?
Good, modern, expensive, cell phones are so powerful, that people who aren't professional photographers routinely take pictures that are indistinguishable from those taken by professional photographers. Here is my scenario. Ms Holmes usually did her own hair and makeup. But the day of this photo had a particularly important appearance, like a television interview, so she got help, possibly from Ms Mackay, her public relations executive, or a makeup person, overseen by Ms Mackay. I suspect Ms Mackay said, "Elizabeth, you look perfect now, let me whip out my cell phone and snap a picture of you." Geo Swan (talk) 19:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Greenc links points to an archived page with this image and "all rights reserved". I think I need hardly remind an experienced contributor that any owner of IP rights is free to release their intellectual property under multiple distinct licenses. As above, as the executive responsible for public relations, and press relations, Ms Mackay would have had the authority to release this image under cc-sa-4, when she uploaded it, while leaving it as "all rights reserved" on the press-kit page. Geo Swan (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting stories and speculations. Anyway, it is not merely a "suggestion" that it is owned by Theranos Corporation, it is verifiable. This image is taken from the page linked above that says Copyright Theranos. The uploader states this page is the source of the image. The page has a license agreement not compatible with Commons. Tali Mackay has not verified she is owner of the photograph, nor has anyone verified the account is even the same person. -- GreenC (talk) 20:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted the first time this image was challenged, the only other edits to the WMF projects by contributor User:Tali Mackay were to Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes. Her edits to those articles were not strictly compliant with WP:COI. But, after reviewing them, I found them innocuous, so there was no need to remove or rewrite those passages.

Your suggestion that User:Tali Mackay was an impostor, not the actual real life director of public relations is, no other word for it, bizarre. Are you really trying to suggest we seriously consider that a vandal, who had enough insider knowledge of Theranos to make the edits to those articles, was imitating the real-world Tali Mackay, solely to trick us into accepting an image only Ms Mackay was authorized to release?

Here is their global contribution history.

their very first edit
HI i'm an employee of Theranos and would like to request an update. The sentence : "In 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services banned Holmes from owning, operating, or directing a diagnostic lab for a period of two years.[8] That decision is under appeal.[9]" can be updated to reflect the company's resolution with CMS announced in April: https://news.theranos.com/2017/04/17/theranos-reaches-resolution-centers-medicare-medicaid-services/ thank you, Tali Mackay Tali Mackay (talk) 19:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

I am sure if you were to review her other edits yourself, you would abandon the theory she was an impostor.

Yes, a few vandals have gone to bizarre lengths in causing chaos here, but always with a payoff in mind. There was the guy who got away with inserting weird yet inspired derogatory stories into the articles about a group of writers who had attended one particular Writers Workshop. It was a lot of work, for him, over many years. But his nutty motivation was clear. He had also attended that workshop, and the feedback from those other writers had crushed his dreams, and embittered him to the extent that he spent years trying to get even and ruin their careers.

Let's be serious here and not take PCP to bizarre extremes. Geo Swan (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theranos and Holmes are by-words for corruption, scandal and crime - they lied and cheated on a massive scale. You know all this right? If not, there are multiple movies and books about it with more to come. This case more than any other needs to be held to the highest standards. Your arguments are based on ignoring the evidence we have in front of us while rationalizing good faith of a fraudulent operation, based on your fabricated stories of what might have happened (personal cell-phone snapshots for a multi-billonaire's official publicity photo??). Look, we have mechanisms for this - get them to respond via email and verify the license, and then it is no problem. Until then I wouldn't trust anything concerning this company. And yes, there are many people trolling this company/Holmes and out to cause them/her damage, spend some time on the Wikipedia article fending off the editors trying to mess with it/her. Whoever the uploader is, there is no factual evidence to verify the uploader had the authority to release it under that license which is in direct contradiction to the license on the website which is where the photo originated according to the uploader. -- GreenC (talk) 02:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instances of Holmes demonstrable dishonesty are irrelevant.
I have done my share of fighting vandals, thank you. You and I both know your suggestions that the uploading of this image was vandalism does not pass the smell test.
You didn't check Tali Mackay's contribution history, did you? Please don't tell me I am ignoring evidence until you review that history.

Tali Mackay's Global Contribution History
Short version - no evidence of vandalism
date	notes
2017-06-23	a request, at User_talk:Tali_Mackay, identifies her as a Theranos employee, who has a list of minor correction. So, there is no attempt to deceive
2017-09-28	three edits to Theranos. They are innocuous updates.
2017-10-06	an innocuous update to Elizabeth Holmes five more edits to Theranos.
2018-01-25	five edits to Elizabeth Holmes one more edit to Elizabeth Holmes This is the date she uploaded File:Elizabeth Holmes 2016.jpeg. The record of this upload was administratively deleted when I ported it from en.wiki to commons.

On what basis are you asserting we don't know who the uploader was? We have the contribution history, above, of Tali Mackay. Google Tali Mackay and you will find out she was previously an executive at Theranos, responsible for public relations - so, precisely the executive who would have had the authority to release the image.

I've uploaded about 60,000 images to flickr. I opened an OTRS ticket to use when I uploaded one of my own images, from flickr to the commons. But, after years of using it, someone decided only administrators could add an OTRS ticket in commons. Then I had someone accused me of repeated copyright violations, for copying images from the flickr contributor booledozer, and claimingI owned the IP rights to those images.

I was furious. If I had retired from the commons, or dropped dead, this call for deletion could have resulted in deleting thousands of images I spent considerable time uploading.

Uploading images is hard work. Uploaders want to think that the effort they put into the upload will pay off by having those images available forever. Or at least available forever barring policy changes, or other genuine legitimate administrative reasons.

I question the legitimacy of demanding the credentials of an uploader years after they stopped participating here, when their contribution history shows no record of vandalism or deceit. Geo Swan (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument that OTRS should not be used after a 4 years of uploader inactivity is unsupported in policy and without consensus. OTRS works fine in most cases, I and many others use it successfully, there is no grandfathering of images making them immune to OTRS requirements. Even if we were to assume to know who the uploader is, you then have to assume they had legal authority to release the image under a license that contradicts what the source page says. It is making assumption on top of assumption. This for a company known for fraudulent activity and lack of ethics, who do not merit a blind assumption of good faith. The image is not legal or appropriate, the license on the source document clearly states full copyright and without something (OTRS) to the contrary it is what we legally should be following. -- GreenC (talk) 21:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You criticize me for suggesting scenarios, without recognizing that you are also advancing your own scenarios. The scenarios you suggest are very far-fetched ones.

One scenario you seem to be suggesting is that the image was not taken by Tali Mackay, Theranos's public relations director, it was not taken by an employee of Theranos, it was taken by a third party photographer, and Theranos, even though it was a billion dollar company, did not arrange for the photographer to sign over the IP rights to the photo. So, in your scenario, Mackay, the public relations director, committed fraud in claiming she had the authorization to release the image.
Your other scenario is that WMF contributor Tali Mackay was an impostor, who made three sets of edits, over 8 months, all in order to trick us into accepting an image she wasn't authorized to release.

I never suggested legitimate reasonable calls for OTRS should be out of bounds, even years afterwards. But your call is unreasonable. You are carrying PCP to unreasonable extremes.
As above, your personal disgust with Ms Holmes honesty should be completely irrelevant here. Geo Swan (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your assertion that I have a "personal disgust with Ms Holmes" is bad faith and uncivil, I never said that nor believe that, in fact I have defended her on Wikipedia to create a fair and balanced article. The facts and policies are clear: The company is fraudulent (according to a Federal judge) they do not deserve Wikipedia assumption of good faith on matters of uncertainty. We stick to the hard fact we know for certain: the image source says full copyright, and there is no OTRS ticket to verity any differently .. this is one reason OTRS exists for disputed cases. A massively fraudulent company can't be blindly trusted for a host of reasons. -- GreenC (talk) 02:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GreenC, prior to the comment above you asserted that "Theranos and Holmes are by-words for corruption, scandal and crime - they lied and cheated on a massive scale..."
Even after the comment above you wrote "the company Theranos is one of most corrupt and fraudulant in the history of American finances..." followed by a comparison with Enron.
So, no, I do not agree my own comments were in bad faith, or uncivil. I call on you to stop referring to Ms Holmes using emotionally inflammatory terms.
If you defended neutral coverage of Ms Holmes and Theranos, on the wikipedia, you can congratulate yourself. AGF, that is probably what you meant. What you wrote, however, was that you defended HER. WMF coverage of her should aim for neutrality, which precludes either attacking her, or defending her. Geo Swan (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It seems to have been properly licensed at the time it was uploaded. Ruslik (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not. See https://web.archive.org/web/20171202212810/https://news.theranos.com/press-kit/ -- GreenC (talk)

Sorry GreenC, here you repeat a serious misconception over IP rights that I already addressed. Nothing bars the legitimate owner of intellectual property rights to release that intellectual property under multiple licenses. Software authors could, for instance, have one license for paying customers, and another for those sampling their products. This is a key point, and I strongly encourage you to inform yourself on this facet of intellectual property. Geo Swan (talk) 02:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep OTRS serves two main purposes: 1) to accept permissions where the copyright holder is not the uploader; and 2) to verify the identity of the uploader for previously published material. While 2 technically applies here, I just find it so unlikely that someone would try to impersonate a Theranos employee and make COI edits to the Theranos/Holmes articles for the sole purpose of getting a press photo accepted. Remember, if they simply wanted to edit the Wikipedia article they would have a much easier time not disclosing who they are (in violation of WP:PAID); there is no reason for them to pretend to be an employee and make life more difficult for themselves. Then there is the question of whether Mackay really took the photo. If she really did, there is no way for her to prove it in a way that quashes all doubt. Sending an email from a Theranos domain would only serve to verify her identity (which I already concluded there was no reasonable doubt about), and would not address the concerns about the company's reputation. Uploading the original with EXIF would help only slightly; if it were taken by a third party, it's very possible they would have provided the originals to Theranos as well, so we still wouldn't really know for sure. In short, there is literally nothing the uploader can do to prove that they took the photos, just as there's nothing I can do (for my own uploads) to prove that I didn't lend my camera to a friend and claim their photos as my own, so in such cases we should not require more proof than can reasonably be provided. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but that misses the point: the company Theranos is one of most corrupt and fraudulant in the history of American finances, it is comparable to Enron for its fame and outright fraud. Many books, TV shows, AAA Hollywood films - we can not trust the corporate heads. We can not extend them good faith. Your assumption of good faith is not backed by the evidence. Even if you believe she is who she says she is, there is no evidence she had ownership of the picture and could released it under a license that contradicts what the source image says: https://web.archive.org/web/20171202212810/https://news.theranos.com/press-kit/ .. why would Theranos do that? Why would they release it under one license on their website that is restrictive, but under an unrestricted license here, it makes no sense and there is no evidence she had the rights to do so. -- GreenC (talk) 00:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They didn't explicitly release it under any license on their website at all; they posted the images without any mention of their copyright status, and the copyright notice at the bottom is simply applied to all pages. Legally it makes no difference since images are copyrighted by default, but it matters for intent; it disproves your assertion that they intentionally released it all rights reserved on their website. Again, we cannot demand "evidence she had the rights to do so" because the kind of evidence we might receive is she is truly the photographer can easily be faked if she is not the photographer, given that there is no public information on the authorship of the image. The flip side to COM:PCP is that if someone is the copyright holder, we can only ask of them what is reasonable and necessary to prove their authorship. Reasonable meaning evidence that the true copyright holder is likely to possess, and necessary meaning that it serves a useful distinguishing purpose (i.e. it is easy for the copyright holder and difficult for a different person to furnish). Again my argument is: 1) it is implausible for the user account to be an imposter, based on its behavior on enwiki; 2) if she is (or is authorized to represent Theranos who is) in fact the copyright holder, there is no real evidence she could submit that would help prove her case. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is a lot of discussion above about the reputation of the lady in the photo, or speculation about identity of the uploader. All those aspects are irrelevant here. The uploader does not claim to be the photographer of this photo, which comes from https://web.archive.org/web/20171202212810/https://news.theranos.com/press-kit/ which has "Copyright © 2016 Theranos Inc. All rights reserved. " copyright statement. So the only way to keep this photo would be to have permission sent to OTRS. --Jarekt (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Jarekt GreenC has chosen to dispute that we know Ms Mackay was the executive at Theranos who had the authority to release Theranos' images under free licenses. Google her name and you will see this for yourself. Her resume is online. We see it says this. Her linkedIn profile says this. Trade publications covered her hiring. GreenC seems to be suggesting that the multiple sessions where the User:Tali Mackay ID edited en.wiki, and the online resume, and the LinkedIn profile and coverage of her hiring in the trade publications, were all part of a devious con-job, by a fiendish impostor, to trick us into using an image that belonged to Theranos, without authorization.
  I told GreenC I thought this theory was bizarre. I told them I thought this was carrying PCP to a wildly wasteful extreme. I repeat that here.
  You wrote "The uploader does not claim to be the photographer of this photo." Well, actually, when she clicked on the [upload] button, on en.wiki, in January 18, 2018, wasn't that exactly what she did do?
  Suppose you, or GreenC, had contacted her, on January 18, 2018, and asked her if it was an image she personally took herself, or if it was an image for hire, and the IP rights belonged to Theranos, and she confirmed she did not take it herself? I imagine you might have told her "Please get the executive at Theranos responsible for public relations and press releases to confirm that Theranos has released this image under that free license." And, Tali Mackay would have told us "That's me. I am the director of public relations."
  Occam's razor man. I am not an expert on con artistry, but I imagine GreenC is correct, that a master of fake news could spoof LinkedIn, and all the other sources that confirm Ms Mackay was the executive with the authority to release this image. I am sure this would be a time-consuming, and expensive exercise. If you are going to concur in GreenC's wild scenario, please suggest a motivation for a con-artist to go to this effort? Geo Swan (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Geo Swan, I do believe Ms Mackay is who you say she is, but I do not belive she is the photographer who took the photo, which was previously released on the company website. In such a case the standard procedure is to request a permission from the photographer to be send to OTRS. I do not see any reason to abandon out standard practice for this image. --Jarekt (talk) 02:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Okay, you accept she is who she said she was. So, if she is who she said she was, aren't you accepting she had the authority to release the image, if she had not taken it herself? Geo Swan (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - I accept that very likely she has such authority if she is or represents the copyright owners. There is a lot of assumptions here, traditionally resolved through some questions and answers in conversation with OTRS. Who are the copyright owners? What is your position which qualifies you to represent them? Where the copyright acquired from the photographer and if not than can we have permission from the photographer? etc. OTRS agents have those conversation all the time, and than the legal situation is clear and documented. --Jarekt (talk) 15:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        @Jarekt: , I never claimed I "represented" Ms Mackay. Simple uses of google produce numerous hits that confirm that Ms Mackay was the executive at Theranos responsible for the firm's public image. Sometimes OTRS is necessary to establish someone had the authority to release an image under a free license. In Ms Mackay's case industry publications that explicitly describe her accepting this position establish she would have had the authority to release the image, if the IP rights were owned by Theranos, not by her, personally.
        
        Are you on the OTRS team? Let's be frank here. It is the OTRS team that would be the weak link here. When a routine image is uploaded, when OTRS communicates with someone who claims to be the owner of its intellectual property rights, the checks to confirm their identity are not sufficient to defeat deep hackery. I recently uploaded File:Lynika Strozier 2011.jpg, an image of a promising young scientist who succumbed to Covid in June. I saw a newspaper article illustrated with a lower resolution version of that image, credited to Corrie Moreau. In 2011 Dr Moreau was the Deputy Curator at the Field Museum where Strovier worked. More recently she was appointed a named chair at Cornell. Dr Moreau graciously agreed to release the original resolution image under cc-by-sa. I was carbon-copied on her correspondence with OTRS. The OTRS team members who dealt with this ticket seemed to accept an email from Dr Moreau, from a Cornell mailserver, as sufficient to establish she was the IP rights holder.
        
        I think that is the right level of checking for non-controversial images. However, ten years ago, an administrator who had recently joined the OTRS team wrote about something that had alarmed them, and which alarmed me. They wrote that some of their OTRS colleagues were very poorly informed on basic security, and were accepting email addresses as proof OTRS correspondents were who they said they were, when those email addresses were from services where being john.smith@hotmail.com or john.smith@yahoo.com, provides zero assurance that you are John Smith. If you are on the OTRS team, and you have extra energy to make sure we aren't fooled by fraud artists, could you please confirm your colleagues are no longer accepting emails from hotmail, yahoo or gmail mailservers as proof of identity? Geo Swan (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While the arguments above are both good, I take the Precautionary Principle seriously. A challenge has been made here, and without proof this editor has the right to release said image, an OTRS ticket is necessary. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Huntster: What would an OTRS ticket accomplish though? Theranos email domains may very well be offline at this point, so we're just going to get a random email from a random email address that we have no way of verifying. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as User:King of Hearts said "Theranos email domains may very well be offline at this point, so we're just going to get a random email from a random email address that we have no way of verifying" and it is very unlikely that keeping this file causes problems for Wikimedia Commons or others.--Editor-1 (talk) 15:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and call for closure, as the individual who transferred the image from en.wiki, and given my arguments for keep, my keep is implied. But I state it explicitly here.
Nominator's nomination is marred in several ways, including a serious misunderstanding of IP rights holder's rights to license their IP under multiple licenses.
This discussion has been open for over eight weeks, and it has been over four weeks since the last !vote. My explicit keep leaves us with 4 keeps and 2 deletes.
So I call for closure. Geo Swan (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Geo Swan. Jeff5102 (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Call for closure Geo Swan (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GreenC, you last weighed in here over four months ago. If you have reconsidered your opinion would you please withdraw your nomination? If you haven't reconsidered, but have nothing more to say, would you join me in calling for closure? Geo Swan (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another call for closure Geo Swan (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC) {{Ping}}ing GreenC, as above, if you have reconsidered your opinion would you please withdraw your nomination? If you haven't reconsidered, but have nothing more to say, would you join me in calling for closure? Geo Swan (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete. --Ankry (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

update

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Elizabeth Holmes 2016 Geo Swan (talk) 00:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yara Shahidi Entertainment Weekly 2017.png

Missing permission from copyright holder for one year. Sundayclose (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Where they were asked for permission a year ago? Ankry (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankry: Sorry, I don't understand your message. Are you asking whether someone asked permission? Are you asking where that request for permission is located? Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Permissions are not required unless somebody requests for them. If you claim that it is missing for one year, I am asking: one year since which action? Ankry (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankry: I want to be sure I'm not misunderstanding you. Are you saying that permission from the copyright holder is not needed to use copyrighted images on Wikimedia and sister projects? In other words, are you saying that a copyrighted image of Yara Shahidi can be used at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yara_Shahidi (where it was removed because of copyright infringement) without permission from the copyright holder? Maybe I'm missing something. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chvrches-16.jpg

Judging by MD, this and all other uploads of the user must be documented through OTRS. E4024 (talk) 00:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Courtneyblush, if you are the photographer, you must show that fact through OTRS; if not we cannot keep here a picture with a CR note on it. You are lucky that they did not delete it until now... --E4024 (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Published elsewhere beforhand[7]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notice on the back of a paper drug bag CSMUH.jpg

Not PD-ROC-exempt shizhao (talk) 01:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. SCP-2000 10:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asep Rohimat.jpg

Not a contributing user. Abusing the project to show his face. IMHO. E4024 (talk) 02:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adventure Time characters.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rolando Sr. 2005.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images breached the tems of Photobucket: https://photobucket.com/terms(See terms: Indemenity)
Not obvious enough to speedy, especially for a file that we've hosted for 12 years. What exactly is the issue? Storkk (talk) 08:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Courtney Love Live 2014.png

This file was initially tagged by Drown Soda as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Error upload; when reviewing timestamp data on this, I realized this was an accidental upload from my iPhoto that was not my own, but resembled one I had taken at a Seattle date I attended the same month.
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy IMO, as it was uploaded 5 years ago. However, as I found no external uses and it has no internal uses, it could be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A rose ink.jpg

Small photo, the uploader's only contribution. Uploader's name does not match author's name AMLAK. There are two villages in the world named Amlak, both in Iran, and camera location points also Iran, but uploader says: "Saudi Arabia - Qassim". I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bu vs univ of alta 163.jpg

A Google Images search shows this file in use on two gaiters.ca pages: https://gaiters.ca/news/2015/2/5/MBB_0205154157.aspx and https://gaiters.ca/sports/mens-basketball/roster/jamil-abiad/645. Neither page has a Creative Commons release. The footer of both pages states "Copyright © 2017 Bishop's University". userdude (t) 11:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quakewoody (talk) 16:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have finally gotten around to nominating the other images of Jamil Abiad. Quakewoody (talk) 08:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And they have all been deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ARCHIVIAZIONE ANTITRUST.pdf

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish ^💬 11:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate document of some kind. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:CSD#G11. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur2018 (111).JPG

copyvio, artist died in 1956, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Es ist zu prüfen, ob §51 Urheberschutzgesetz zur Anwendung kommen sollte. Es verwundert, dass die Datei immer noch zur Diskussion steht, obwohl der Löschantrag bereits am 29.Mai 2020 gestellt wurde. In der deutschen WK geht das Löschen bei User:Martin immer sehr schnell. Vermutlich wurde das Bild über die spanische WK hochgeladen und von dort sorgfältig bewertet. --Dguendel 14:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BLOG General-1.png

Highly unlikely that this logo is freely licensed or the work of the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish ^💬 10:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Claudia Salas and Georgina Amorós during an interview in March 2020 02.png

Says it's from a movie trailer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish ^💬 10:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Report reception in State Flight Test Centre, Aktubinsk, Russia.jpg

Авторство и лицензия сомнительны: Скан фотографии из видео неизвестного оператора. Dogad75 (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grim Reaper on a break? (28992569).jpg

not relevant or useful Benjen (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editoraaabelgium (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One file deleted as it looked like a film still. I cannot find any evidence that the second one is copyvio, @EugeneZelenko: any hint where can it be found "on other web sites"? Ankry (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martisha (talk · contribs)

No FoP for sculptures in Russia. These plaques are with reliefs. All of them were designed in the second half of the 20th century, so 70 years since the authors' death has not yet passed.

Stolbovsky (talk) 22:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:London Buses route 415 Streatham.jpg

blurry, not well framed and not particularly relevant... Benjen (talk) 22:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I know bus enthusiasts are keen on their topic, as I am on railways, Lucy boxes, post boxes, OS benchmarks and listed buildings, but as a usable image of this bus in this particular place it severely fails COM:EDUSE. It could only succeed on that basis if it were the ONLY such available image, and I don't believe it is. We've put up with far too many poor images for too long, and it's about time we started looking to quality rather than quantity. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the ONLY such available image That’s a very high bar to meet. Why do we need to be so picky? We already have systems for highlighting high-quality files. Brianjd (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in 2010. Should not be deleted without substantial discussion. Brianjd (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only three images in Category:DLA class London buses on route 415. Brianjd (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It records what was running on a particular rote on a particular date, no real reason for deletion given other then an I don't like it nomination. Oxyman (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as per Oxyman and Brianjd (Brianjd forgot to vote?). Unfortunately, deletionists attract other deletionists, and may end up attracting a deletionist admin to close this thread. And we need to keep voting to keep, while a single successful delete-vote does the deletionist’s handywork, one file at the time. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tuvalkin: I did not forget to vote. I thought there were reasonable arguments on both sides and, being unfamiliar with the topic, I decided to remain Neutral.
However, I do think that, especially for old files like this, the burden should be on those voting delete to explain why the file should be deleted and, in the absence of substantial discussion supporting deletion, the closing admin should default to keep. Do we have relevant policies or guidelines? Brianjd (talk) 05:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo branco invertido 04.png

logo do meu time de futebol criado por mim mesmo Source meu proprio trabalho ( logo of my football team created by myself Source my own work) Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Projeto logo1.png

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo 120px.png

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo branco invertido 01.png

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo branco invertido 02.png

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo branco invertido 03.png

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GTFLETCHTouroLA.png

Highly unlikely that this logo is freely licensed or the work of the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GTFLETCHTCLA.png

Highly unlikely that this logo is freely licensed or the work of the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Official TCLA logo is Blue, not black... — Preceding unsigned comment added by GTFletch (talk • contribs) 23:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DocPastorcongresosevilla.jpg

Supongo que José Antonio Pastor Pradera no es el alter ego de la usuaria "Marta Beren"... E4024 (talk) 23:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, no es mi alterego, es el nombre del propietario de la cámara (que no el fotógrafo de la imagen). En vista de que finalmente no hay una página sobre Doc Pastor, ruego a los responsables de Wikimedia que borren esta fotografía y todas las que subí sobre el citado autor al no tener sentido que permanezcan. Gracias de antemano a todos por vuestra ayuda :)

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christopher James Swift (talk · contribs)

Appears to be artwork and drawings by a living artist as well as a portrait of the artist. No OTRS on the artworks, no clue who the photographers are. Multiple camera, some with no useful metadata. Unlikely work of a single individual.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Chris, we appreciate your willingness to share your work here. A quick look at Google suggests that you have a considerable reputation. There is, though, a hoop you must jump through. This is done entirely to protect your copyrights from imposters.

There are two problems here. First, these are all works of a living artist and while the uploader's username is the same as the artist, we do get imposters here, so policy requires that the uploader confirm that he actually is the same person. This can be done once using OTRS. The OTRS volunteer will put a note on User:Christopher James Swift to confirm it for all time.

Second, it is not clear who the photographer(s) is. For the 2d works that is not a problem, see Bridgeman. However, given the variety of cameras and EXIF/NO-EXIF this also needs to be addressed using OTRS. Any of the photos of 3D works that are not by Swift himself will need a license from the actual photographer.

Nothing is ever actually removed from Commons permanently, Files that are "deleted" are simply tagged so that only Administrators can see them. Therefore, once the issues above are settled, the five deleted files listed at Special:DeletedContributions/Christopher James Swift can be easily restored. If you act fast with OTRS it is possible that all of this can happen before this DR closes. Rules prevent its closing before June 5, but our backlog suggests that it will be several weeks after that.

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doc Pastor firmando libros.jpg

Firmar libros sin duda es un acto "in scope", especialmente cuando el autor es notable; pero aqui vemos un caballero sentado en un banco mirando al cielo. Scope? E4024 (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

La fotografía se tomó justo antes de la firma de libros, delante del lugar de la misma. Ruego a los responsables de Wikimedia que borren esta fotografía y todas las que subí sobre el citado autor, Doc Pastor, al no tener sentido que permanezcan. Gracias de antemano a todos por vuestra ayuda :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartaBeren (talk • contribs) 09:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wolf Rock Lord Howe Island On Chart.jpg

Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yinxinybyq (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own work by size and descriptions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JOHN LARS ZWERENZ.png

netcopyvio - found at [8], uploaded to Facebook about a month before uploading here so reverse copyvio is unlikely creffett (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rio Ivinhema.jpg

Essa foto é minha e essa pessoa retirou ela de algum lugar e postou aqui. Posso provar pois tenho a original. Quero os créditos pela imagem. Lucianageo (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No valid reason. SCP-2000 11:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucianageo: Where the image was copied from? Ankry (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Old photo from 2008. User:Lucianageo has not been active since 14 June 2020. They may file another deletion request, but this time they should substantiate their claim by providing a link to the original image. It may not be prudent to wait for them more in this DR. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Arthur Fiedler Memorial

No FoP in the US for sculptures. This artwork was made by Ralph Helmick in 1984, see Arthur Fiedler Memorial.

Regasterios (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created and uploaded one of the three photos above. I got a note about this deletion on my talk page. To help me respond to this, could you explain what "FoP" means? I did some searching and found nothing explaining that term. --Krelnik (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It means "Freedom of Panorama". Many countries allow you to take pictures of anything in public view and use them without violating the rights of the owner of any copyrighted works shown, such as the sculptors of recent sculptures. Unfortunately, the US does not allow this, hence there's "No FoP in the US for scultpures." (But this only goes for copyrighted sculptures, not for ones created before sculptures could be copyrighted, or sculptures without copyright notices created when visual artworks needed to have a copyright notices.)

Maybe when the US government is in the hands of reasonable people, and there's not a pandemic to be dealt with, Wikipedia's photographer/editors can spearhead an effort to provide FoP for the US. It's incredible that thousand of people can look at a sculpture daily, and yet one cannot take a photograph of it without technically violating copyright. It's especially annoying when the sculpture has been paid for with public funds and sits on public property.

Of course, the same effect would come about if busy-body editors would just stop nominating essentially innnocuous images for deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. What if we got a release from the artist, or if the artist has assigned copyright ownership to a public entity, would that make a difference under Wikimedia policy? Simple googling would tend to indicate that there are lots of photos of this sculpture available commercially and I seriously doubt they are all paying the artist a royalty. --Krelnik (talk)

I wrote the artist who created this sculpture, and he responded as follows:

Thanks for the inquiry.
It’s been 30+ years, but I do believe I have copyright of the Fiedler Memorial under VARA.
That said, I’ve never pursued anything related to others using it, as I view working in the public realm to be a different playing field.

I hereby grant permission to Wikipedia to publish photos of the sculpture, including yours!

And thanks for volunteering for Wikipedia. It’s a beautiful resource.

Regards,

Ralph

Ralph Helmick
Helmick Sculpture

@Regasterios and Beyond My Ken: On the assumption that this is sufficient to allow the photos to stay, I'm going to have him email his permission to OTRS directly so it can be recorded properly. I hope this is sufficient. --Krelnik (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! Thanks for taking the extra step. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Krelnik: I doubt the permission is sufficient. Is there an indication that he is also willing to have images of his work used in commercial media, like post cards and advertising materials? Commons doesn't accept images of works if the condition of use is limited only to noncommercial purposes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no OTRS tickets. Please follow COM:OTRS/CONSENT. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chafic Jacob (1979).jpg

Magazine cover: copyrighted. Permission of the designer or publisher needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nossa Estrada" was an official magazine of Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana and Fepasa, companies belonging to the state of São Paulo, it was used for institutional dissemination of the work of these public companies, being material published by the state of São Paulo, it does not have copyright. According to a internal page of the magazine Nossa Estrada found on the Internet, its address was "Praça Julio Prestes, 148". This is the address of Julio Prestes station, former headquarters of the state-owned railway companies Sorocabana (1919-1971) and Fepasa (1971-1998), according to these official documents from 1978 (bottom right) and 1998 (side marking on pages 6 to 9). Despite being printed by Abril publishing house, the magazine was prepared and edited by employees of the state of São Paulo.This magazine closed before 1990's, when the Fepasa (Ferrovia Paulista) was privatized. According to this Fepasa announcement in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper, the editor of the magazine Yvette Amelia Girardi was an advisor to the president of Fepasa. According to this obituary from the Folha de S.Paulo newspaper, she died on July 5, 2000.Sorocabano 32 (talk) 18:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. While there is {{PD-BrazilGov}}, I don't see that this applies to state-owned companies. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuznetsov N.V. (talk · contribs)

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

File:KuznetsovNG-withcolleagues.jpg

I took this photo from a photo from my family archive (I am the heir), the original photo is more than 70 year old, was taken in Russia (Kuznetsov N.G. died 1942). Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KuznetsovNG-students.jpg

I took this photo from a photo from my family archive (I am the heir), the original photo is more than 70 year old, was taken in Russia (Kuznetsov N.G. who is on the photo died 1942). Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:КузнецовНГ-автобиография.jpg

I took a photo from a document from my family archive (I am the heir). Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:RuzanovaElenaAlekseevna.jpg

I took this photo from a photo from my family archive (I am the heir), the original photo was taken before the revolution in Russia.

File:DurdinaKsenia.jpg

I took this photo from a photo from my family archive (I am the heir), the original photo was taken before the revolution in Russia. Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KuznetsovON-Hermitage.jpg

I took this photo from a photo from my family archive (I am the heir), I do not information about original photo. Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tereshkova-Zvezdny.jpg

I took this photo from a photo from my family archive (I am the heir), the original photo was taken by my grandmother in Russia. Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Also the original photo was published (with my consent) in the book: "О.Н. Кузнецов. К 80-летию со дня рождения. Часть I,II". СПб.: ВМедА, 2006(составители В. К. Шамрей, А. Г. Чудиновских). Kuznetsov N.V. (talk) 08:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Apart from File:KuznetsovON-Hermitage.jpg, the status of other files have been determined. The uploader is encouraged to use {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]