Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/05/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 5th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So what? Did someone who has access to OTRS check permisision. I sent email years ago, Media Center agreeed to Creative Commonse terms. -- Bojan  Talk  02:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BokicaK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid

A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So what? Did someone who has access to OTRS check permisision. I sent email years ago, Media Center agreed to Creative Commons terms. -- Bojan  Talk  02:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since)  Bojan  Talk  03:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiNameBaks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid

A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiNameBaks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Coats of arms of Serbian Orthodox Church eparchies don't fall into PD-SerbiaGov, and therefore they are copyrighted by Serbian Orthodox Church and there is no permission.

Smooth O (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since), but it has OTRS permission  Bojan  Talk  03:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy Kept OTRS permission is valid. A non-OTRS agent adding an OTRS ticket to a file is not, itself, grounds for deletion - the editor may (and in this case, does) have knowledge of the ticket and what it covers. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - - - I am an OTRS agent. (Verify)

OTRS permission tag was not added by an OTRS member. The tag thus is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Commons (usurped)}} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 180.191.139.117 (talk) 05:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: & blanked & protected. --Achim (talk) 07:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name, it is not the Coymanshuis on Keizersgracht 177, but the town hall on Markt in Delft 77.172.149.222 08:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file renamed. --Achim (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's problem Jogindra krishnaMajhi (talk) 11:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was a mistake... Sorry. LGResearch (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file will be deletd seven days. 2605:A000:F68D:8600:88BB:7090:8ED9:5088 01:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

greeicy ramdo 200.121.149.71 17:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously no own work. The video is copyrighted by Dubai Health Authority. axel (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:02, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free digital display. There is no COM:FOP in Japan per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Japan#Freedom_of_panorama The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is taken in China, not Japan, where FoP is valid, and the design is below the threshold of originality. - Siyuwj (talk) 08:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by the nominator. Made a careless error here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chemical structure; superseded by File:Natta projection of dichlorodifluoromethane.svg to fix some layout & SVG issues Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je l'ai téléversé par erreur Loco Agamagico (talk) 22:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 22:39, 5 Mai 2020 UTC: File page with no file uploaded (F7) --Krdbot 01:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, unused picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 06:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 09:18, 6 Mai 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

press review under copyright Culex (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Regasterios at 07:53, 6 Mai 2020 UTC: No permission since 28 April 2020 --Krdbot 13:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The File:PAUNDRAKA.png was recently deleted. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the image for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 11:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False / fake image which is not real person ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the image for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 11:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a commercial stock image: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/beautiful-pin-fashion-model-vector-illustration-730028398 Ytoyoda (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 22:56, 6 Mai 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 13:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless pdf 67.184.0.138 19:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/862509766124369458/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Левшапровша

[edit]

Out of scope, derivirative work of meme man (unknown copyright status), and the source images are unknown and unlikely to be own work either. --67.184.0.138 14:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file will be deleted. 2605:A000:F68D:8600:88BB:7090:8ED9:5088 19:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ad. --Sealle (talk) 15:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a lower resolution version of File:Tram at East Croydon Station (geograph 2658196).jpg, which was already on commons when this version was uploaded. Chris j wood (talk) 16:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for speedy deletion with {{Duplicate}} ~~ Alex Noble - talk 11:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sirazulmondol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muamalla76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mapa sandhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr.Tonmoy.BD27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by F1dg12a (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source/permission

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SATYAM KUMAR SHARMA 74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahaboob Rock Basha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Only used on userpage of non-contributing user. P 1 9 9   16:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Only used on userpage of non-contributing user. P 1 9 9   16:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ntmyhue (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused simple geometric graphics without clear educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jelocalise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos of non-notable event, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of non-notable event, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Corlesmet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Do not need penis photos, have enough.

Mjrmtg (talk) 17:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maurogrossi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mtstroud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal drawings, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph without context, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TSMelodics (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable band, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot of logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cocowei12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text tables, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo/promotional image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nihalakicdesign (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO upload - all low res, lacking camera EXIF, most (all?) appeared elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Edito SL.jpg is here; File:Venturi-Antarctica SL.jpg is here; File:Venturi astrolab SL.jpg is here; etc.) Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 18:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pranabkrnath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; apparently, the main subject of the photo is the billboard. --Ahmadtalk 10:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what one can tell, the additional hardware on top the vehicle is more artistic than utilitarian.

Gazebo (talk) 06:05, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Ghostbusters

Derivative works of copyrighted toys and models.

Gazebo (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Ghostbusters

Copyrighted "Ghostbusters" logo and similar logos prominently displayed

Gazebo (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Ghostbusters

From what one can tell, the "power packs" are along the same lines as nonfunctional movie props and therefore are more likely to be artistic than utilitarian.

Gazebo (talk) 06:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename File:Ghostbusters-logo.jpg -- this poorly named file is actually a FDNY logo, which is by no means an exact or close copy of the official film logo. AnonMoos (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: And the No Ghosts logo is copyrighted as well. As for the firehouse shots, the firehouse logo shown is clearly derivative of the Ghostbusters logo. It may be that the firehouse has permission, but we would need evidence of that. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 11:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bookcover from 1991. Obviously unfree. Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Не вижу в оформлении обложки творческого вклада, шрифт также тривиален. С уважением, Dogad75 (talk) 09:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: simple enough, below COM:TOO. --VLu (talk) 09:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comments; the cover is below COM:TOO. --Ahmadtalk 11:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 04:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Domartin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused and uncategorised files. Looks like not notable organization/company. An advertisement.

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 17:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and it needs OTRS permission. --Ahmadtalk 18:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused redirect Vidariv (talk) 12:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vidariv: what makes you think this redirect is unused? Did you check every MediaWiki instance out there to see that they're not using this image? Please don't ever nominate redirects like this. Multichill (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Multichill: Sorry, made a mistake. Vidariv (talk) 21:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic 187.143.42.165 00:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Funny deletion request by another "brave" and vanishing IP. Entering in a whataboutism, is funny that this IP found this image by "accident" and embodied of a mystical and fanatical zeal enters on crusade to cleanse and purge this world of the world of this virus of moral wickedness and desinfect its malicious corruption of youth and family values, even when all of the sane people have better things to do, from trying to keep or erect their lifes and\or trying to do actual things to purge of an virus that is actually destroying lifes, families, societies and countries. It seems that some have not taken their respective vacine last November and still appear to be infected with moral panic.
About this image and similar, was not enough what happened last November on the Wikiconference 2019 or other attempts at censorship? Another debacle in the making? Tm (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment@AshFriday: Again nothing more to say them the same old words in the same old tone of, by your own words, "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright infringements, administrative corruption and scope violations."? Why is this file "Educationally worthless"? Please, explain your rationale.
And by the way, knowing that, for some months now, you want me to be blocked at every oportunity i´am still waiting for you to ask for forgiveness for wanting me to be blocked indefinitely and support a now proven sockpuppeter and sockpuppet. Your silence or a false and\or spinning apologetic answer will show that you lack moral fiber. Tm (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • AshFriday, be aware that by voting for deletion in this DR initiated by 187.143.42.165 (talk · contribs) you expose yourself to a possible CU investigation. One may be a troll for years and escape sanctions if that trolling is felt advantageous by/to someone powerful but those friends will distance themselves fast if/when one objectively infringes a rule. -- Tuválkin 10:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment@Tuvalkin: I dont follow in your assertion of possible sockpuppetry, either because i dont believe that this IP and AshFriday are related and even if i believed i have no evidence. Given the seriousness of an case of sockpuppetry, do you have any solid evidence? If, on the contrary, you have none please abstain of making this serious accusations, on the contrary of what happen a few years ago when one administrator accused both of us of being the sockpuppet\sockmaster of each other without any evidence and as a revenge for being squished by a whale for abuse of power. Sorry for whacking you with a wet trout but it had to be done and thanks for your work. Tm (talk) 11:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your concern, Tm. To be clear, I don’t think that AshFriday is the same as 187.143.42.165 — I saw nothing, this time and in others, that would make me think AshFriday complements his anti-pron «battle» with DRs filed while unlogged. Indeed AshFriday showed in the past ethical behaviour (such as voting keep in DRs against “artistic nudity”) that puts them, in my view, well above the level of someone doing it just for the lulz.
Voting in agreement of something is not cause for suspicion of sockpupettery with the OP (as in that past accusation concerning you and me) — that much is clear to me, although some might be mislead to see it as a proof of “duckness”, and that was the motivation of my comment: After all I would rather see AshFriday grow mellow and lay back than to see AshFriday blocked for some technicality.
In general, this is an additional problem caused by the ability of IPs to initiate DRs: It becomes too easy to suspect extra delete-votes are being cast in the hat (same for keep-votes but the nomination itself usually counts as a vote for deletion). That contrasts with the ortherwise benign view given to “unlogged editing” done by established users, compared with the use of multiple accounts — which gets tighter scrutiny, and rightly so. DR filing and voting is an important right and enabling that ability to IPs not only wastes everybody’s time with frivolous DRs but also disagrees with the practice of disregarding IP participation in other, not less important, discussions and votings.
-- Tuválkin 12:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Easy, it is a symbol as can be seen on the filename and Category:Project "Geekography" by Exey Panteleev (portrayals of computer technology), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - z-index.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Binary prefixes (41983361972).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - before.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:HTML output - Exey Panteleev.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erlang (9690003046).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - display.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Full Stack (Exey Panteleev).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:RSS feed icons painted on a naked woman (by Exey Panteleev).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - QR code.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - Proxy.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - MongoDB's "WHERE".jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Radio button and female nude.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - float left right.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:SQL - DROP TABLE.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology. But in particular Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2019/11#Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology where you can see how the Wikiconference 2019 was hijacked by persons with an hidden agenda and how manipulation was uncovered. Tm (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And read the text in Category:Project "Geekography" by Exey Panteleev (nude portrayals of computer technology):
Project by Exey Panteleev, as an artistic project that connects technology and nude photography. This project has been a Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, and has been nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
This project that have been covered by several newspapers, magazines and technolgy websites, like the The Next Web , GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération, that have made articles about this project, besides being interviewed to an interview to the tech page of Mail.Ru where he talks about his project. Besides these newspapers and tech sites, other covered this same project, like being news in Reflex, was the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012.
Because of the subjects of this projects, Violet Blue, "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator" covered this same project and had photos published in "nude art photography" book.
In this you see the educational value. Tm (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural closing, already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless, therefore no educational scope, not useful, unnecessary, i.e. OoS. E4024 (talk) 05:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per MB-one. --Strakhov (talk) 22:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I No longer wan this photo on this site Br0ski 96 (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion: requested by uploader within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 22:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I No longer want this photo on this site. Br0ski 96 (talk) 05:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion: requested by uploader within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 22:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I No longer want this photo on this site. Br0ski 96 (talk) 05:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion: requested by uploader within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I No longer want this photo on this site. Br0ski 96 (talk) 05:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion: requested by uploader within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I No longer want this photo on this site. Br0ski 96 (talk) 05:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion: requested by uploader within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Mayurakrish (talk) 06:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Mayurakrish (talk) 06:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Mayurakrish (talk) 06:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems very photoshopped and not realistic. Archiesarg (talk) 06:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low quality, probably an attack image, photoshopped. --Strakhov (talk) 22:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es repugnante y mal gusto esto es vandalismo contra la municipalidad Rujomar (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image doesn't lie, it existed at the time the picture was taken, It doesn't matter if you find it repugnant, I cannot take this request seriously --ErickAgain 07:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Commons is not censored, IMHO not disgusting at all, in scope. --Strakhov (talk) 22:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No existe este tipo de contenedor en el lugar, es falso y repugnante Rujomar (talk) 07:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image doesn't lie, it existed at the time the picture was taken, It doesn't matter if you find it repugnant, I cannot take this request seriously --ErickAgain 07:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC).

Kept: per ErickAgain. --Strakhov (talk) 22:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version found here - https://www.parcocaserta.com/francesco-scagliola-al-parco-caserta-io-dentro-e-fuori-dallacqua/ - unlikely to be own work - you can just see the top of a watermark bottom right Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i'm the webmaster of Mr. Ingroia and i have better picture. Valeriomancuso (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid reason and you shouldn't be overwriting existing images. Multichill (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

desde la propiedad del hotel , esta es una foto erronea. Por favor eliminar. Jefereservasalamos (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, soy el usuario que subió la foto ¿Podría explicar exactamente en qué reside el error de la fotografía? Gracias Zarateman (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to overexposed 76.208.162.37 13:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, dubious nomination, photo in use in multiple projects; the photographic quality is more than adequate. Infrogmation (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated for deletion by Tbiw: doesn't look like Lucy pinder De728631 (talk) 10:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This picture doesn't look like the real owner other images of this person have been checked only this look different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbiw (talk • contribs) 10:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is an old file, so it should be given more room. Sometimes some images do look different. I do think that it is of a strange resolution, and that is strike against it, but at this moment we have little reason to delete. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 12:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is clearly Lucy Pinder as this is the look that Lucy Pinder had in the middle 2000´s, this is in heavy use and besides and mainly this file has OTRS clearence and the source is pretty clear as Neon Models. Tm (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tm and Gone Postal. --Strakhov (talk) 22:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope if own creation, OTRS needed if real logo. --Strakhov (talk) 22:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry insects Salix (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "blurry something", unused, unidentifiable, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I have to agree. Shame as it could be useful historic photo. --Headlock0225 (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kreeder13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All Rights Reserved images: https://www.flickr.com/photos/goodwynmillscawood/sets/72157623455448329/

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kreeder13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kreeder13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no camera EXIF, uploader serial copyvio uploader (see talk/deleted contribs), etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue (File:Dallas GA Historical Marker.png is also COM:DW of marker - no FoP in US)

Эlcobbola talk 18:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KenethFS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KenethFS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anybody speaks Italian here? "Diritti riservatiwww.andreadomeniconi.com"? E4024 (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean it is possibly non-free? Also, your link is dead. --67.184.0.138 14:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP - unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gunrideradi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas d'information légale Msbbb (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 19:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image in use - added {{User page image}}. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameszambranachacon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    20:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Achim (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameszambranachacon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameszambranachacon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a copyright violation. Till (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Shehrazxcvbnm123 (talk) 14:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1998lulua (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope 67.184.0.138 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brooklyn11234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

students, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partners and students, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

students no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

students, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here. Permission from jgrenes needed via OTRS Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

students, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

students, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC) please delete the file as no personal agreement was made before the upload of the photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by EUSMAT (talk • contribs) 10:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external partner, no personal agreement, curtesy deletion EUSMAT (talk) 15:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist (cross) died in 1974, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist (cross) died in 1974, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible flickr washing Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadhana Shivdasani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabio zuffanti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phwikimaker12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published, permission needed Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dobrode valera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahlemmuezzez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can a dead painter upload his paintings? Balû (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia and Balu, I uploaded this image. I am the son of Norman Carton who bequeathed this artwork to me and I photographed the image uploaded to wikipedia. Sincerely, Jacob Carton--JaCaw (talk) 07:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JawCaw: Please can you confirm this via our COM:OTRS process and we can undelete it for you. Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph not taken by Stabenow's office SecretName101 (talk) 16:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Lotje (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file by mistake, I was supposed to overwrite the old file Paranaja (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Self-promotion. Edslov (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Self-promotion. Edslov (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Self-promotion. Edslov (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused math text, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request WikiMrsP (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request WikiMrsP (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M2dct Fac2droit Nantes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images issues de document officiel et donc sous droits d'auteurs. Autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr.

Shev123 (talk) 18:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The EstherS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duck COM:NETCOPYVIOs from subject's social media (e.g., File:Esther applunius.jpg is here; File:Esther Applunius Clas13.jpg is here; etc.) File:Esther applunius UN.jpg even retains a watermark with an author credit. Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 18:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 67.184.0.138 18:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no foreseeable usage Rojelio (talk) 18:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source for this photo is listed as "Pinterest" (no link provided) and the author listed as "Students". It is highly doubtful this really has a Creative Commons license. Indy beetle (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file and it has personal information. Rantceck (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry insect and unknon leaves Salix (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images uploaded by CELA AVNI

[edit]

Very low resolution, too low for educational value. --67.184.0.138 19:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, uploaded by a SPA suggesting that this is a selfie. Also a copyvio claim in ticket:2020050510009748. Ankry (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and ticket --DannyS712 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the source: "Digital Image ©2011, Memphis Public Library & Information Center. All rights reserved." — Fourthords | =Λ= | 20:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and no botanical interest Salix (talk) 20:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no camera EXIF, professionally staged, Facebook metadata, all other user contribs copyvios (including of this subject matter) - Duck copyvio/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this picture and no copyright is intended. Please remove the flag and do not delete the picture. It's my own picture which was once uploaded to Facebook.


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and no botanical interest Salix (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and no subject of interest Salix (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfocused and no botanical interest Salix (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the original work of VOA, AP photo: https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/stars-x-rated-grammys-red-carpet-stunt/3929979/

Ytoyoda (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can some admin please have a look at the uploader's talk page? Copyvio notifications there form a massive mountain range by now. Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 06:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry & no botanical interest Salix (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry & no botanical interest Salix (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wateraray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tuto Ananas - more of the same by sock

Эlcobbola talk 21:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfocussed Salix (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Well-Informed Optimist as no license (No license since) Eddaido (talk) 23:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I might have accidentally created this page.
I have written to the Flickr uploader and asked for the licence to be changed to to Public Domain Dedication CC0. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 23:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, not in public domain. this logo is obviously owned by CGS Medical College TLSuda (talk) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private usage. This picture is used in jawp for advertisement. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 14:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo may be eligible for copyright 67.184.0.138 14:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

Small images, no EXIF. Other uploads by this editor have been blatant copyright violations.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

answer
(Jameslwoodward) I took all of photoes. all of them is for me.

--Sepidnoor (talk) 06:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; please provide proof via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

I think it is extremely unlikely that these are all {{Own work}} as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

answer
(Jameslwoodward) all of photoes are in my collections and I took them.
But These photoes are for me and I took them with my camera!:

Deleted: Works of fa:امین الله رضایی (d. 2004). The permision of his heir is needed and should be submitted through COM:OTRS. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

Dubious cliam of own work, portrait photo, group shot and very close detailed image, smaller than Facebook size with no metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

answer

Ellin Beltz:

Yours sincerely, Sepidnoor (talk) 06:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Yavarehamedan.jpg - If you took it, why did you cut the person's head out of the background ?
Regarding File:Amin allah rezayi photo.jpg - If you took it, why are the fingertips and the copyright statement found at https://seemorgh.com/culture/visual-arts/91049-91049/ gone?
Regarding File:AnjomanIran Khordad1325.jpg - if you took it, why is it incorrectly dated? It can't be 2020 because in the description, "Ghasemi (Minister of Culture at the time)" - no such minister of culture now, and it is not "at that time." On the Farsi Wiki page where it is in use "Iranian Literary Association, June 1961, Journey to Hamedan." It appears to date from the 1960s, not the 2020s and it's doubtful that it's your own work, even if you have a copy in some album. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP. If your are indeed the copyright holder of these images, further evidence should be submitted through COM:OTRS. Considering your history of uploading, your own-work claims cannot be taken at face value. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own works, no source and no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

protected calligraphy work by living person Pouya Latifian (b. 2001)

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

three more calligraphy works

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low-quality file without metadata. Given the user's record, own work claim cannot be trusted

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality file w/o metadata, uploaded by a user with a bad record of uploading copyvio

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sepidnoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Re-upload of previously deleted files (please see above).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They made by AI
I don't know why deletions? Wikipedia allows to upload AI's pictures. Doesn't it?
I told that which AI apps I used for them. So in which reason these pictures became deletions candidates?
Sepidnoor (talk) 11:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as either AI-upscaled photos with no source, or AI-generated images of a real historical figure who may not have looked like this. --Belbury (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal promotion. No contributions. E4024 (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete user talk pages. Reverted and left a note on the user's tp. --Achim (talk) 13:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With overprinting and etc., this appears to not be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blatant COM:NETCOPYVIO - here, etc. --Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Translation of Too Late the Phalarope in Persian. The photo may not be first published in Iran. The file may not be eligible for {{PD-Iran}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 21:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Shivsaifai (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. and no. this is not a selfie. --Hanooz 00:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'because it is a selfie'??!!!! Excellent reason. Do you think it was taken by an iphone or samsung? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehrdad2021 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Korean spelling guidebook published by Court Library of South Korea. It is eligible for copyright protection. – Kwj2772 (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

その指摘は正しいです。削除が妥当であると考えます。--Gminky (talk) 02:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
By the way. Copyright Act of South Korea, Article 24-2 (1)
says that "A work produced as part of official duties and already made public by the State or a local government, or a work of which the author's economic right is owned in its entirety by the State or a local government under a contract, may be used without permission..."
--Gminky (talk) 02:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
삭제 요청 작성자님이 한국 분이신것 같아서, 조선말로 쓰렵니다.
말씀이 맞습니다.
솔직히 그 때 왜 이 서류를 올리적재하였는지 기억이 아니 나는데, 지금 요 삭재요청을 봐밨더니 올리적재는 적절치 않았던것 같습니다.
그런데, 저작권법 24조의2 1항을 보면 자유리용의 요건에는 해당하는것 같은데요, 미국 저작권법상 같은 조에도 불구하고 - 원저작국의 법률규정과 상관없이 - 저작권 등이 인정되기때문에 게재가 아니된다는 말씀이 되시겠지요?--Gminky (talk) 03:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
공공저작물 자유이용이라는 규정이 있긴 하지만 비영리 조건이 붙을 수도 있고, 변경금지 조건이 붙을 수도 있어서 위키미디어 공용에 올리기에 적절하지 않습니다. – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
답변 감사합니다^^ 잘 리해가 되얐읍니다. 그러고보니 비영리조건이랑 변경금지조건 문제가 있는걸 잊고있었읍니다.
어차피 업로드자 동의 안건으로 취급해주시면 좋을것 같읍니다.--Gminky (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though uploaded to Flickr with no know restrictions as its tag, which is standard for the NC archives, the caption on the photo reads: "Photos taken by The News & Observer, COPYRIGHT N&O. Illegal to use or public without expressed permission from The News & Observer newspaper, Raleigh, NC." Indy beetle (talk) 21:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright notice was copied over from flickr; this photo is owned by The News & Observer Indy beetle (talk) 00:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Indy beetle: consider withdrawing please, you appear to have forgotten the last DR you raised. -- (talk) 07:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure)--Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. (non-admin closure)--Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Killarnee as no source (No source since) Smirkybec (talk) 11:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I moved this from speedy delete to a deletion request, as in the Terms & Conditions of the Hunt Museum website, it states that all of the images they hold the rights over (including images such as this) are under CC-0/Public Domain by default: 2. Intellectual Property Rights https://www.huntmuseum.com/terms-and-conditions/ Smirkybec (talk) 11:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The picture was not tagged with speedy delete and still has no source. --Killarnee (T12) 11:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Killarnee: Would this link suffice for source, and move the link with the terms and conditions to the permission field? Unfortunately the museum's website cannot facilitate individual rights statements on object records at the moment, but they have a general policy of using PD/CC-0 licences and these images are part of a Europeana Project in particular. Can you advise how best to proceed to make sure they don't get deleted? Smirkybec (talk) 10:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Killarnee: I have just heard from the Hunt that they have found a way to add a rights statement to each object record, and they will be adding these links to the source field for all the files in this category by the end of this week, resolving the any outstanding issues. Thanks, Smirkybec (talk) 11:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the link to the picture should be in the “source” section and the link to the conditions in the “permission” section. --Killarnee (T12) 12:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That has been done for all the images in the category now :) Smirkybec (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very old photo - hated by the witer Whaurelie (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Same. No good reason.--LPLT (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Author Arno per exif and a cropped version of her Amazon profile pic.

Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Ray Johnson pix from Liz Cheney's Facebook feed)

[edit]

Dubious claim of PD-congress. Taken from Liz Cheney's Facebook feed. We have no idea if the photographer was an official photographer or if this was a courtesy pic taken by someone else

Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Douglas A. Munro sculptures in the US)

[edit]

No FOP for sculptures in the US

Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Mauro)

[edit]

Photos of some computer screen display. OoS

Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. These appear to be (successively better) photos of a memorial web page for Alexander L. Mauro of the US Army, a Purple Heart recipient, as honored by his daughters Ms. Bettina Maloney and Ms. Loretta Adams. The logo on the right is PD-US-Military-Army. Mauro could be the subject of a biography on Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) Kept: 13:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC) by Fitindia, thanks!   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp 4

[edit]

Photos of copyrighted works

Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 17:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (logos)

[edit]

Complex logos, need permission. Others are unused personal logos and OoS

Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp 6

[edit]

Out of scope images, no EDUSE

Gbawden (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (more logos)

[edit]

Unused logos, some OoS and some too complex too keep without permission

Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp posters

[edit]

Out of scope "posters"

Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by George Chernilevsky. --Minoraxtalk 06:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp from Facebook

[edit]

Facebook Grubu (public sharing) - just because its shared on FB doesn't mean its freely licensed

Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The villages belongs to Turkey's Şarkışla District. These pictures were taken from people for a survey/research booklet about villages. There are permits for public use within the survey. The permits have been taken separately from persons those who have the pictures. I can make the necessary corrections in upload pages. (I thought the facebok reference was sufficient.) And I can send the image of the joint permissions in the book.

For example: The correct permission of this [image] is: "Şarkışla ve Köyleri Kitapçığı (Booklet of Şarkışla and its Villages)" (Kızılırmak Matbaası, 2020) Görsel ve Fotoğraflar Listesi (List of Images and Photos) in the list:

"...
24....
25. Ebubekir Çelik - Yapaltın Sulama Birliği - 18 May 2014, ilk yayın (first publish): "Gümüştepe (Yapaltın)" Facebook Grubu
26....
...."

end of list: görseller önceden izin almaksızın kaynak göstermek kaydıyla serbestçe paylaşılabilir. sahiplerinin açık izni bulunmaktadır (images can be freely shared without prior permission, provided that the source is indicated. It has the permission given by its owners). Given a few days, I'll fix it all.

And sometimes I have original images different the Facebook Groups. Example:

1. Image that I have froom booklet: [1] (unspoilt)

2. Image in the Facebook Group: [2] (torn off)

Exuce for my English, You can ask if anything is not understood --Buzancar (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buzancar: Please read COM:L - the person who took the photograph needs to release it - not whoever has it. Please send permission for each photo via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: Thanks for explanations. If I knew it would be like this, I wouldn't waste time uploading photos. It's too complicated for me to do what you say; understanding and applying the explanations on the COM:L and COM:OTRS pages and getting separate permission for each image. Very difficult. These are things that can be bought simply with a request in here. Very simple. We want and people give. Nobody even knows about copyright. On the contrary, they are proud that their photos were posted here. Images about villages. Most of the owners of the photos living in villages.
First I can send the list I have (The permission of the owners of the images is clearly written in the booklet). It will take time to deal with each photo one by one. However, some photos are different. I don't think they will need permission. Selçuk Anatolian High School photographs are the product of a joint work we did with two people. Actually it does not belong to a single person. Eventually I will have to go and take new photos. It will be a waste of time again. I am sorry. Thanks again. --Buzancar (talk) 07:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: I will ensure that the list is mailed to noon tomorrow. Thanks --Buzancar (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: A mail has been sent. But it doesn't matter if you reject, don't accept it. That's all I can do to recover photos. Although most likely not enough.
At least I learned situation, before uploading a lot more photos: Now I will only upload the photos, that I took myself. I have been writing on Wikipedia for over 10 years. But it has only been 3 months since I started adding photos.
Although I have paid attention to the copyright issue and followed the booklet I have, I understand that there is still a risk.
Thank you for your early intervention. Otherwise I could have wasted more time... --Buzancar (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --- FitIndia Talk 14:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Howard H. Baker Jr.)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, found here https://www.bakerdonelson.com/Howard-H-Baker-Jr-1925-2014

Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp Flickrwashing

[edit]

Flickrwashing - account has 1 follower and was created in 2021 for flickrwashing

Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Loz Moore, also seen at https://soccafederation.com/isf-2019-the-day-in-pictures/ Ytoyoda (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work; also available at, eg, https://bikroy.com/en/shops/thepropertypark?page=2 DannyS712 (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded for spam/advertisement in kowiki *Youngjin (talk) 07:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is a strange "image hosting service" the author is unknown, this it the only image of the uploader. I think the copyright-situation is unclear. Avron (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is taken by me and it's a selfie. I no longer want to provide it on Wikimedia Commons. DGideas (talk) 07:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, no permission Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo pic c1990 - not own work Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 08:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nishikanthprabhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two are found here before upload, https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/telangana-bjp-writes-centre-seeks-nia-probe-rowdy-sheeter-trs-mla-95483 - others have source as From the owner - needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Found at https://reasonandmeaning.com/2015/12/06/raymond-martin-the-meaning-of-life-is-a-fast-car-and-a-good-woman/ since 2015. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has a sketching-error, and therefore a more updated version of "alternative 101" was added. Dvirlanger (talk) 11:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image also seen at https://soccafederation.com/mark-clattenburg-exclusive-socca-is-more-enjoyable-than-football/ Ytoyoda (talk) 11:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube channel logo: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_D0dkD-dirDPEU4iolEKvA At the time of writing, the channel has 17 subscribers, so it is not and will not be notable for quite some time. As such, there will be no foreseeable use for this file on Wikipedia, nor will there be any reason to keep it on Commons. Lentokonefani (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EFE photo: https://es.besoccer.com/noticia/amp/la-reaccion-de-un-ex-del-madrid-tras-un-balonazo Ytoyoda (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shot of copyrighted book covers, no permission Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata = Facebook photo Ytoyoda (talk) 11:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Pibwl (talk) 11:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsplash photos published after 2017 have an incompatible licensed (see Template:Unsplash). This photo was published in October 2019. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it. There is another photo I can use in its place on Wikipedia. Thanks for letting me know.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is replaced now on Wikipedia.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a screenshot from the movie, therefore neither the uploader nor the owner of the family archive is the copyright holder. Mormegil (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's plenty of family stuff like that. -kan-fan- (talk) 13:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US for sculptures and artworks Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 12:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright-protected screenshot? Taivo (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FOP in Russia for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image. Too blurred to be of use. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. The photograph was taken in 1958, so even if the photographer died the same year, it would still be copyrighted in France for 70 years afterwards (until 2028). De728631 (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2029, actually. There is another, larger photo on the source page from the same session. There also seems to be a name at the bottom left. There is another copy of the photo here, along with a photo of her husband from presumably the same time, both with the same signature at the bottom left. André Frument? André Froment? Not sure. If that is the photographer, it would not be anonymous. Either way, it would not be PD in France until at least 2029 and probably much much later, and would likely be under US copyright until 2054.  Delete Unfortunately. The small profile photo from the identity card on the source page may be more possible, if that is from 1942 -- if that was from an anonymous government photographer, it would be PD in France, and the URAA status may not be OK but is at least fuzzier (unsure if government got the wartime extensions on copyright which would have pushed it over the URAA date, etc.) Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yahoo! JAPAN owns the license. no free lisence. (yahoo!ニュースヘルプ リンク、二次利用、著作権について) アルトクール (talk) 13:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says copyrighted in the corner. No proof it was made by a US government employee just because it's on a gov site. FunkMonk (talk) 13:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nomination. I've used to upload these files back then and the result is that a lot of these files were removed because it's a copyright violation. This is pretty identical to what i have used to upload in the past, and i would like people to not repeat these actions again.--SMB99thx (talk) 23:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Getty Images photo Ytoyoda (talk) 13:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, meant to tag this as a {{Copyvio}}, was not trying to start a deletion request. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Storkk. --1989 16:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very old photo - hated by the witer Whaurelie (talk) 14:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As the photographer, I don't see any valid reason not to detele any photo that is not in usage. If the subject of the photo does not appreciate his/her photo then we should allow it to be deleted, as courtesy, I believe we are not here to oppress the people we photograph. If we are going to delete all of the photo, a replacement under a public licence would be welcome. Esby (talk) 02:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 16:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very old photo - hated by the witer Whaurelie (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very old photo - hated by the witer Whaurelie (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 16:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jpliu168 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response: all art works were done by myself — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1700:B01:30:1D92:8816:251C:25CD (talk) 14:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 16:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Claims to be "own work", but different photographer is named in the metadata. 217.239.14.113 10:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMMONS:SCOPE, flag apparently created by user, with no official use Jamez42 (talk) 11:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMMONS:SCOPE, flag apparently created by user, with no official use Jamez42 (talk) 11:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMMONS:SCOPE, flag apparently created by user, with no official use Jamez42 (talk) 11:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMMONS:SCOPE, coat of arms of disputed territory apparently created by user, with no official use Jamez42 (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMMONS:SCOPE, coat of arms of disputed territory apparently created by user, with no official use Jamez42 (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2010, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2010 no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemp. artworks (altar by Erwin Holzbaur), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist (altar) died in 2010, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very old photo - hated by the writer Whaurelie (talk) 14:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason for deletion. However, might be deleted by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chatsam as Copyvio (copyvio).
Likely situated in France, which has no COM:FOP for statues. Storkk (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Androsal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS forn over 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reply2ryan2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giansy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - "Un photographe du Raja dans les années 80 from Internet with UploadWizard". "Source: Internet" Mirer (talk) 22:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Missvain as no permission (No permission since).
Not seeing evidence of permission being needed here. Seems like it was first published here on Commons. ƏXPLICIT 02:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP, taken at a video shoot and uploaded by a new user. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission needed; small, no EXIF, isn't likely to be a selfie. Ahmadtalk 04:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Sculpture by Ryoko Kawasaki according to enwiki, a sculptor I have been unable to find information about, except that they were likely still alive enough to be awarded a prize in 1997. Better Japanese-language search skills may render better results. In any case, Japan has no Freedom of Panorama for sculptures, and Commons requires media to be free both in their source country and in the US. This file can be hosted on English language Wikipedia, as well as other sister projects who do not require media to be free in their source country. Storkk (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested en:File:PeeingBoy.JPG's restoration on enwiki here. Storkk (talk) 12:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC) brain fart on my part - US has no FOP for statues either... Storkk (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a note for original uploader at en:User talk:CES~enwiki. -- Deadstar (msg) 13:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as has been mentioned, there is little on the internet, at least in English, about the creator of this sculpture. I actually obtained his name from the travel site below and included it in my description of the photograph to acknowledge his work.

https://japantravel.navitime.com/en/area/jp/spot/02301-13200074/

Concerning Freedom of Panorama laws in Japan, the wiki entry indicates that this is "not OK" for artistic works except in cases governed by Article 46. I searched for Article 46 here (https://www.cric.or.jp/english/clj/cl2.html) and this is what it actually says:

(Exploitation of an Artistic work on Public Display)  Article 46 It is permissible to exploit an artistic work the original copy of which is permanently installed in an outdoor location as provided for in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article or an architectural work, in any way whatsoever except the follow-ing:

  (i) producing additional copies of a sculpture or making those additional cop-ies of the sculpture available to the public by transferring them;

  (ii) reproducing an architectural work by means of construction, or making copies of an architectural work so reproduced available to the public by transfer-ring them;

  (iii) reproducing a work in order to permanently install it in an outdoor location as provided for in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article;

   (iv) reproducing an artistic work for the purpose of selling copies of it, or sell-ing those copies.

My layman interpretation of Article 46 is that producing additional copies of a sculpture, i.e. making 3-dimensional replicas, is not acceptable but taking a photograph of same would be (permissible "in any way whatsoever"). I do not see how taking a photo of a statue can be equated to "producing additional copies" or "reproducing an architectural work by means of construction". Indeed, there is hardly any commercial Japanese travel site dedicated to the Iya Valley that does not include a photo of this statue which is a local landmark. Having said that, since I have no way of locating and/or contacting Mr. Kawasaki to obtain permission to use the image in question, I'll simply defer to the judgement of the Wiki Commons moderators. Thank you. OKJaguar (talk) 08:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Source does not state copyright or author. Copyright tag (author deceased) is incompatible with author unknown. Buidhe (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Replaced {{PD-old}} by {{PD-UK-unknown}}. Now the copyright tag is compatable. -- Mdd (talk) 00:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • That doesn't fix things as the photograph was previously published, meaning that condition #1 does not apply, and there's no evidence that the photograph was made before 1950, so #2 does not apply either. Buidhe (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • What about the photo itself? A.C. Pigou was born in 1877 and over 70 years old in 1950. He died seven years later and online there are a bunch of images that show how A.C. Pigou actually looked like at old age. If you still have your doubs, I propose we go look for some expert opinion on this matter. -- Mdd (talk) 22:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Pigou lived from 1877 to 1959. This photo is clearly over 70 years old, most likely from the 1930s. Vysotsky (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --King of ♥ 08:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image needs some editing in the labels Rajneesh kumar Thakur (talk) 07:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 08:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The riff notation was taken from "Creep" by Radiohead, one of copyrighted songs. Even when the notation might be ineligible for copyright in the US, Radiohead is a British band. The riff is subject to copyright in the UK, especially per COM:TOO UK. Speaking of US copyright, I think the musical note has potential for US copyright protection. George Ho (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you're concerned about copyright you should check the licensing given on a file's page. Hyacinth (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unconvinced that the notation is automatically PD just because it looks less original or something. George Ho (talk) 10:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Abstraction without context. Note that it is also not the actual riff, so one can't complain that it "steals" the riff from the song and, thus, the potential ability to copyright musical notation isn't an issue. Delete things when we have real problems, not potentialities and possibilities and delete things when we have answers, not questions. Hyacinth (talk) 23:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --King of ♥ 08:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isabel Wiedenroth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A bunch of out of scope certificates etc

Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am afraid but we will have to delete these photos showing copyrighted works of art and we do not have the necessary permission from the authors.

Gnom (talk) 08:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also this:

--Gnom (talk) 08:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image 78 and 79 clearly show a person who is clearly agreeing to the picture. There are millions of pictures with circumstantial Beiwerk in the background on Commons, if we delete all of them, there is nothing left. This would require a much larger scale decision. --Ailura (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And Mark Benecke does not belong in this group request. The uploader claims that the image was given away "for free", this may be verified, but it's a different case. --Ailura (talk) 09:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but Ines Korth (the author depicted in images 078 and 079) does not hold the rights to the images visible in the background – they are held by the respective publishing houses (Carlsen and Schwarzer Turm). Also, under German copyright law, these images do not pass the threshold for Beiwerk (de minimis).
For the Mark Benecke image, we have no reason to believe that the author (Steff Murschetz) released his work under a Creative Commons license. Gnom (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das Urheberrecht ist nicht übertragbar. Auch wenn Carlsen hier umfassende Nutzungsrechte hat, bleibt Frau Korth weiterhin die Urheberin (das hilft uns nur nicht). Aber ernsthaft: Carlsen wird nicht uns oder den Fotografen verklagen, wenn er auf einem offiziellen Fototermin mit Einverständnis der Autorin und vermutlich auch unter den Augen von anderem Personal ein Bild macht und dann eben auch veröffentlicht. Oder glaubst Du, die Autorin hat hier ohne das Wissen des Verlages heimlich Poster aufgehängt?
Mark Benecke hat mit dieser Angelegenheit und auch mit dieser Veranstaltung null komma nichts zu tun und verdient einen eigenen Löschantrag (oder eine Chance, eine Freigabe vorzulegen).
ist es so besser?
--Ailura (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ailura: Danke für den Hinweis, dass das Urheberrecht, anders als das angelsächsische Copyright, nicht übertragbar ist und dass man genauer von "die urheberrechtlichen Nutzungsrechte" sprechen muss. Für die hiesige Diskussion ist diese sprachliche Vereinfachung, die ich mir erlaubt habe, wohl unerheblich und ich denke, dass wir uns ohnehin verstehen.
Ob uns Carlsen verklagen wird oder nicht, ist unerheblich. Wir wollen hier auf Commons nur Inhalte hosten, die ohne urheberrechtliche Probleme weitergenutzt werden können. Alle Dateien, die diesen Ansprüchen nicht genügen, sind zu löschen. Und, wie schon anderswo angemerkt: Urheberin des linken Covers ist nicht Ines Korth, sondern Sabrina Schmatz.
Mark Beneckes Bild können wir hier gern abspalten, wenn du möchtest. Auf seiner Disk habe ich dazu schon einen Thread angefangen. Gnom (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moin zusammen,ist es so besser und ich hatte eine akkritierung und habe sie auch gefragt. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 15:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Raboe001: Die Akkreditierung und die Frage bei der abgebildeten Person lösen die urheberrechtliche Problematik bezüglich der im Hintergrund klar erkennbaren Werke leider nicht. Einzig eine Verpixelung (oder eben eine Freigabe der beiden Verlage) würde das Bild für uns "retten". --Gnom (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Es kann nicht sein, dass ein Veranstalter Fotografen akkreditiert, damit die genau solche Fotos machen und der Verlag dort einen Stand aufbaut, damit genau solche Fotos gemacht werden und die Veröffentlichung ist dann illegal. Wie soll man so arbeiten? --Ailura (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Frag ich mich auch die ganze Zeit, ich hab das Bild abgeschnitten, so das die Bilder im Hintergrund nicht mehr zu gebrauchen sind und somit in meinen Augen wirklich nur Beiwerk sind. Aber egal, die Autoren sitzen immer vor ihren Bildern oder ihren Büchern. Ich bin deshalb auch letztes Wochenende nicht zur Messe gegangen, sollte die Firmen doch Fotos machen und selber hochladen. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 18:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich halte es eher für problematisch, die Werbung im Hintergrund zu manipulieren, wenn man akkreditiert wird, um genau die zu verbreiten. --Ailura (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich hab mir mal viele Messefotos angesehen, also das wir ja genug Jäger haben, werden sie alle Bilder finden, wo Werbung im Hintergrund ist. Ich denke ich mache es so, ich lade einfach nach einer Messe Bilder hoch und die Jäger löschen sie wieder. Was hab ich davon, ich bin sicher, das wird meine Motivation steigern :) Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 19:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eine Akkreditierung ist keine bedingungslose Freikarte. Ich muss mich als Fotograf darauf verlassen können, dass ich das, war mir der Veranstalter hier zubilligt, unter Normalbedingungen auch legal tun kann. --Ailura (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Die Akkreditierung erteilt der Veranstalter, nicht die Verlage. Unter "Normalbedingungen" wird die Akkreditierung für Pressefotografen erteilt, die die Fotos dann in der Presse verwenden, für die andere Regeln gelten als für Fotos auf Commons. Ich finde es ehrlich gesagt uncool, wie ich hier als Buhmann dargestellt werde. Es ist doch ein Commons-Grundprinzip, dass wir hier nur Material erlauben, das unter den angegebenen Lizenzen weitergenutzt werden kann, ohne dass ein Nachnutzer sich vor einer Abmahnung durch einen Rechteinhaber fürchten muss. Gnom (talk) 07:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dann erkläre mir bitte endlich mal schlüssig diese anderen Regeln. Die Verlage stellen auf solchen Messen aus, damit das gezeigte veröffentlicht wird. Die werden nicht vom Veranstalter hinters Licht geführt, der dann böswillig Fotografen reinlässt. --Ailura (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moin Gnom, Du bist nicht der Buhmann, sondern der Jäger, Du jagst nach strengen Maßregeln Verstöße, was ich als Beiwerk sehe, siehst Du als Grund einer Löschung an, okay so verschwinden halt meine Fotos wieder, ist okay, habe gelernt damit zu leben und das Fotografen immer zwischen den Stühlen sitzen. Ich mache trotzdem weiter, wenn meine Kamera wieder funktioniert und ich Zeit und Lust verspüre. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 13:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich "jage" nicht. Die Sache wurde auf de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen angesprochen. Die Beiwerk-Schranke nach deutschem Urheberrecht ist enger, als man denkt (siehe Möbelkatalog-Urteil). Gnom (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Danke, muss gestehen das ich das Möbelkatalog-Urteil nicht kenne. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 15:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Der Fall ist in meinen Augen nicht vergleichbar. Wenn ich jemanden in seinem Wohnzimmer vor seinem Roy-Lichtenstein-Poster fotografiere, dann mag das zutreffen. Aber in dem Fall richtet ein Verlag seinen Messestand mit der Absicht ein, dass er fotografiert wird. Da hängt nicht irgendwas an der Wand. --Ailura (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aber trotzdem bleiben die Rechte an den Bildern beim Künstler. Qwertzu111111 (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Irgendwo weiter oben steht, dass die Rechte beim Verlag liegen, der meiner Meinung nach (IANAL) mit dem Messestand und der Möglichkeit, dort Fotos zu machen und zu veröffentlichen, einer Veröffentlichung (jedenfalls als Motivhintergrund/Beiwerk) schlüssig zugestimmt hat. -- Ailura (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Richtig, die Rechte liegen bei den Verlagen. Eine "schlüssige Zustimmung einer Veröffentlichung als Beiwerk" können wir leider nicht verargumentieren. Gnom (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gnom, bitte erkläre mir (gern auch auf meiner Diskussionsseite), warum für meine Fotos auf Commons andere Regeln gelten als anderswo (ob ich Geld oder nur die Namensnennung bekomme, hat ja mit diesem Fall nicht viel zu tun). --Ailura (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Es gelten dieselben Regeln überall. Gnom (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unter "Normalbedingungen" wird die Akkreditierung für Pressefotografen erteilt, die die Fotos dann in der Presse verwenden, für die andere Regeln gelten als für Fotos auf Commons. - Bitte erkläre mir, was das für Regeln sein sollen, die kenne ich nicht. --Ailura (talk) 17:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, klar doch: § 50 UrhG gilt für die Presse, aber nicht für Wikipedia. Gnom (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Und das ist wirklich in dem Medienarchiv, aus dem sich der Nachnutzer (z.B. die Tagespresse) bedient, ein Problem? --Ailura (talk) 18:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, weil diese Vorschrift nicht auf Commons anwendbar ist. Gnom (talk) 05:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Die Vorschrift ist aber auf Gettyimages.com auch nicht anwendbar. Abgesehen davon sind Veranstaltungsbilder hier grundsätzlich auch über die Kategorie und in der Regel auch im Text auf die Veranstaltung bezogen. Ailura (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weder die Kategorie noch der Text helfen uns hier – § 50 UrhG greift auf Commons einfach nicht. Gnom (talk) 16:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the Benecke file (which has a VRT permission now); there's a replacement file for the Korth portrait already uploaded. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Barangay of Marikina, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 10:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural closing, already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the facade of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Billboards are COM:DM - not close, and there are three of them. The mall itself has low COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free billboard. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from hereat Lockdown Baliuag, Bulacan and Enhanced Community Quarantine due to CONVID-19 pandemic, our Lockdown is still until May 15; actually the Advertisements in the Philippines subject of the deletion is just part of the Mall, hence I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons on the matter and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 01:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

absolutely useless map that does not delineate population or proper borders, drawn on MSPaint in 5 minutes Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image that looks like some kind of tomb in limestone, but without permission for the pictures separately. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The plaque doesn't have FOP in Japan. It looks made in the late- or mid-20th century or 21st-century. The design around the silver plaque looks complex. George Ho (talk) 02:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorect license for artistic work - a concert poster Deanlaw (talk) 02:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused meaningless image. OoS. Still I corrected the categorization. E4024 (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stifle as no permission (No permission since). Changing to deletion request so that more attention is given to this file, which is very widely used (in various Wikipedias and beyond). Ariadacapo (talk) 07:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

̇* Delete, I originally nominated this file speedy deletion as a copyright violation. I continue to support its deletion under other terms as well. --A loose necktie (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see no educational value in this "red" night sky! Why is the night so colored and bright? Ras67 (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2010, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die Deckenfresken stammen von Anfang 18 Jh. und lediglich zwei Medaillons (St. Franziskus und St. Martin) wurden 1948 von Erwin Holzbaur neu gemalt. Wäre der Sache gedient, wenn ich eine Version der Datei mit unscharfen/unkenntlichen Medaillons hochlade? Falls nicht, habe ich auch mit dem Entfernen dieser Datei kein Problem. -- Flussar (talk) 19:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laut Bildlegende sind es die vier Medaillons....
Tatsächlich könnte die Datei behalten werden, falls die noch urheberrechtlich geschützten Details unkenntlich gemacht würden. --Martin Sg. (talk) 10:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong image file was uploaded. A jpeg should have been uploaded (and was), instead of this tif. It was uploaded correctly at : File:Map of the Township of London, Canada West, 1863.jpg Wikidaforever (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1994, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 19:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a sculpture, a three-dimensional object. The rights to a photo of a sculpture are always the photographer's, not the artist's (sculptor's). No copyright violation possible. --Neitram (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In Germany there's no freedom of panorama in the interior of curches, that concerns any artworks there. --Martin Sg. (

talk) 12:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that is irrelevant. This is not a freedom of panorama claim. Your claim "copyvio" is wrong. The image is legal because it is not a copyright violoation. I am the photographer, I license it. --Neitram (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry compared to associated files Salix (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Implausible that this would be a personal work as indicated Rama (talk) 21:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful. There are many low-resolution images of Usnea lichens on trees on Wikimedia Commons. Imedeiros (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The rationale for uploading this appears to be that all the paritcipants in the video were US Marines, as was (one assumes) the cameraman. However, that would only make the video PD if it were being produced as part of their official duties (sections 101 and 105 of the copyright act of 1976 https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html). which 'watching super icky gross porn videos HAHAHA look how awful it is!!!' is not. Many videos uploaded to Youtube these days are released as Creative Commons; however, this particular video was uploaded before that was an option, and the uploader never changed that.

Oh, and the 2G1C soundtrack audible throughout the video is copyrighted too. DS (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The background music is Herve Roy's "Lover's Theme" from the album Romantic Themes, 1992, which was previously published somewhere in France as a part of a production music library. As far as the video, there isn't enough information to indicate it was part of an official duty. When in doubt, delete; there are some better ways to make a freely licenced reaction video than to cull stuff from YouTube in order to depict a visual representation of "reaction video". --Misterpither (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture of the imagined Lucy lacks FOP in Japan. Cropping out the Lucy sculpture would mean renaming the file and rewriting the file description. Furthermore, the meaning of the image and the conveyance would change. Best to delete it if cropping the Lucy part out is not suitable. George Ho (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Оскільки Розмито, Безглуздя Pig1995z (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:SCOPE: COM:NOTUSED. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of the A. H. Tammsaare Memorial

[edit]

The following photographs are derivative works of A. H. Tammsaare Memorial (Q12357982), a 1978 sculpture by Jaak Soans (b. 1943, Q16405011) and Rein Luup (1943–2007, Q24545855), located in Tallinn, Estonia:

The statue is still under copyright and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia. ––Apalsola tc 09:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC) –– (added two more files) Apalsola tc 10:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look if I can get into contact with the sculptor. Kruusamägi (talk) 08:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! If we could get an OTRS permission from Jaak Soans and the heirs of Rein Luup, that would solve the problem and the photographs would not need to be deleted. ––Apalsola tc 10:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A now got a contact with mr Soans and he promised look into this question and answer soon.
In this case I'm actually not even sure, that permission from Rein Luup heirs is needed. Definitely from the sculptor, but architects part is significantly less noticeable and deals likely more about where the sculpture should be placed and what should be the dimensions of it. It could be treated as de minimis, or am I wrong? Kruusamägi (talk) 18:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It took some time, but there is now confirmation from Jaak Soans, that photos from his sculptures may be shared under CC BY-SA. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Files "Writer Anton Hansen-Tammsaare 1878-1940 - panoramio.jpg" and "Writer Anton Hansen-Tammsaare 1878-1940 - panoramio (1).jpg" have been published under CC BY 3.0. So technically sculptors permission doesn't apply to them. But at the same time it is supper easy to get some new photos, as this sculpture is in the middle of Tallinn city center. So deleting those two would not be a problem. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pbique de copyright 2A01:E0A:41:7360:2420:19C2:9CD8:1792 10:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Proper source needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemp. artwork (for example: altar by E. Holzbaur who died in 2010), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The building as a whole seems to be the main subject. I think Commons:De minimis applies here. Multichill (talk) 19:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I believe that COM:DM applies here. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist (cross) died in 1974, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Es ging mir um den herrlichen Innenraum der Kirche, die Betitelung der Kreuzigungsgruppe und des Künstlers entsprechen nicht dem Ursprung. Also vielen Dank für die Vernichtung meiner Arbeit!!! Und Bild umgehend löschen!!!--Bybbisch94 (talk) 18:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3D-artwork photos uploaded by Momotarou2012

[edit]

The images uploaded by Momotarou2012 (talk · contribs) depict three-dimensional artworks, especially sculptures, made by others. COM:FOP Japan says that such artworks have no FOP, making derivative works of the artworks (e.g. photos) unsuitable for Commons. --George Ho (talk) 02:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NTD banknotes

[edit]

Per COM:CUR Taiwan, Taiwan Central Bank doesn't allow free use of NTD banknotes. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • As COM:CUR Taiwan stated, the NTD banknotes are protected by copyright according to the OTRS ticket in 2014. However, the "Government Website Open Information Announcement" which allowed its data to be used by the public (i.e. {{GWOIA}}) was legislated in 2017. Maybe we have to check again to make sure if they are still copyrighted after 2017? -Peacearthtalk12:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@和平奮鬥救地球: As I remember you are an OTRS member so do you think you can follow up on that ticket and ask them for an update? --Wcam (talk) 13:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have permission to view that ticket. In fact, I was only given the permission to access the 'info' queue. -Peacearthtalk05:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I have sent another email to the institution above to make an enquiry. However, that ticket was created in 2014 and their Government Website Open Data Announcement is available before it, I'm assuming these files deserve to be deleted based on current information. Sorry for the new files. --Hamish (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Based on what information? I see no reason given. Ythlev (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the information in the ticket mentioned above. I can see it. --Hamish (talk) 11:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

--Wcam (talk) 13:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the following files:

--Wcam (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wcam: Can I also nominate Taiwanese coins here? (e.g. File:TWD50 Taiwan 台灣 中華民國 50元 硬幣 Republic of China June 2018 Lnv2 01.jpg) Or I should file another DR? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is OTRS? The central bank explicitly states that its published material can be freely used. Ythlev (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ythlev: What is OTRS? See this link. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't get it. What does an email conversation have to do with copyright? Ythlev (talk) 14:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
COM:CUR Taiwan. --Wcam (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The information in the email indicated files here should be deleted. --Hamish (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Which is what? Ythlev (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this piece of information. In short, these bank notes themselves are PD, but they may be derivative works of non-free works (because of e.g. the photographs used). In absence of free licenses for the underlying works, per COM:PRP we should not keep these files. --Wcam (talk) 17:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And Taiwanese copyright law professor 章忠信 offers mostly the same interpretation: [3]. --Wcam (talk) 17:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is a professor while the above is an official interpretation. Neither pertain to the these images however because they are licensed for free use by the central bank. Any copyrighted images they may contain are assumed to be given permission by the original creator, otherwise the central bank would have broken the law. Ythlev (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the central bank obtained permission only for them to use the contents on the money, but not for us Wikimedia Commons and our downstream reusers especially for commercial purposes. COM:DW says derivative works of non-free content are not allowed here on Commons. --Wcam (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, the central bank gave permission for them (the notes) to be used freely per the Government Website Open Data Announcement. COM:DW says derivative works of non-free content are not allowed here on Commons. Whether the "content" is free or not is unknown but it is assumed to be free. This kind of assumption has to be made otherwise nothing can be uploaded. File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg is PD because it is from NASA, but how do we know the person who took the photo actually works from NASA and took it as part of the job? We have to assume that's how NASA got it instead of hacking the Soviets or something. Ythlev (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
According to [4], photos used for the bank notes are taken by third parties like a staff member from a biological conservative agency and a newspaper photographer. These are licensed works and not "work for hire". --Wcam (talk) 22:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think you misunderstand my analogy. They are licensed work yes, but they are licensed under a free license on the reasonable assumption that the central bank does not violate copyright laws. Ythlev (talk) 05:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev: Citation needed for your they are licensed under a free license on the reasonable assumption that the central bank does not violate copyright laws. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 16:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment@Wcam, Ythlev, and だ*ぜ: So the problem is that if they are "partly copyrighted", are those copyrighted parts meet our De minimis policy? It seems unclear that how De minimis rules are defined in Chinese-speaking areas. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is not the issue. Refer to my comment above. If something is legitimately in PD or under free license, everything it contains is reasonably assumed to be free. Ythlev (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ythlev (talk) 06:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. According to Taiwan copyright laws Art. 6, “A creation adapted from one or more pre-existing works is a derivative work and shall be protected as an independent work. Protection of a derivative work shall not affect the copyright in the pre-existing work.”, The copyright of derivative work shall not affect the copyright of original work. Furthermore, the Government Website Open Information Announcement just covers the image of NTD banknotes on their website but doesn't cover the NTD banknotes itself. Thank you. --SCP-2000 06:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the Government Website Open Information Announcement just covers the image of NTD banknotes on their website but doesn't cover the NTD banknotes itself. The files in question are images of banknotes, not the banknotes themselves. The copyright of derivative work shall not affect the copyright of original work. This means the copyright status of the original work is not affected by the status of the derivative work. However the original work is free itself, not affected. Ythlev (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the original work is free itself you need to show evidence for that otherwise according to COM:PRP and COM:EVID we cannot accept it. Your NASA image example does not draw analogy because it is entirely created by NASA employee on their official duty (work for hire) and is not a derivative work. --Wcam (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
it is entirely created by NASA employee How do you know that? Evidence? Ythlev (talk) 14:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev: That's per CFR Title 14, especially § 1203.202:
(b) All NASA employees are responsible for bringing to the attention of the Chairperson of the NISPC any information security problems in need of resolution, any areas of interest wherein information security guidance is lacking, and any other matters likely to impede achievement of the objectives prescribed in this section.

By the way, NASA isn't really a good comparable example on this topic, you need to give us *Non-United States* example, to which a government institution's work can be itself Public Domain around the world, even without attributions, signatures and/or other hints of potential authors. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: How do you know the earth photo is actually created by NASA? Maybe NASA stole it from the soviets. How about you provide citation saying that's impossible instead of constantly pinging me. Ythlev (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev: Ec. Well, if you can tell me where are examples of non-NASA employees created earth images but are even licensed as {{PD-USGov-NASA}}, tell me here, I need investigations one-per-one for them. That said, only files that are entirely created, published and licensed by NASA employees can use PD-USGov-NASA, foreign space authorities/companies should always refrain from that template unless for barely-seen special cases. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
files that are entirely created, published and licensed by NASA employees. How do I know the file satisfies? There is no signature of a NASA employee. Is it uploaded from a NASA IP? Ythlev (talk) 03:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev: This question should better ask users that edited it, not here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let me ask you this then: what is the point of the open data announcement? Ythlev (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hamish: I think this question is what you should answer now, as you said above that you sent another email to the institution. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev: Also, please withdraw your unfair {{Keep}} by <s></s>, since another OTRS ticket already judged all NTDs as not suitable for GWOIA and/or GWODA. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what OTRS is, and until I see the relevant arguments, it has no bearing on my stance. I am muting you, so stop pinging me. Ythlev (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is simply wrong. If you go to a movie theater and record a movie with your phone and release the recording under CC-BY (you can legitimately do that), it does not make the movie free. Read COM:DW. --Wcam (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you go to a movie theatre and record a movie with your phone and release the recording without permission, you've violated copyright law, which is not legitimate. If the theatre announces that you are allowed to, and the rights owner does not contest it, then it is reasonable to assume you are allowed to. For an agency like NASA or a central bank, the assumption is even more reasonable. Ythlev (talk) 14:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
From COM:DW: By taking a picture with a copyrighted cartoon character on a t-shirt as its main subject, for example, the photographer creates a new, copyrighted work (the photograph), but the rights of the cartoon character's creator still affect the resulting photograph. Such a photograph could not be published without the consent of both copyright holders: the photographer and the cartoonist. --Wcam (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. To make the point again, the bank notes contain photographs created by third party creators, and there is no evidence that the are released under a free license. According to various Common policies such as COM:DW, COM:PRP and COM:EVID, we should not keep these images. --Wcam (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    How do you know they are created by third party creators? Ythlev (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ythlev: And how do you believe that they are created by staffs of Taiwanese Governments? Without evidences on either ways, we have to judge if those images are suitable under {{PD-anon-expired}}, otherwise they can't be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, maybe they're in the Public Domain in Taiwan, but not in the United States. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Without evidence we have to judge that the creators allow they work to be freely used, otherwise an agency like a central bank would not have release it under a free licence. Ythlev (talk) 04:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ythlev: So under opinion, contents that are having no indicates of e.g. "© XXX All rights reserved" should by default be judged as public domain, instead of copyrighted by authors? If yes then I will continue related topics at COM:VP. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course not. The assumption has to be reasonable. Assuming central banks don't break laws is reasonable. Ythlev (talk) 09:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The assumption by Ythlev is not the only assumption. It could also be seen as -
    1. Officials created all/some of the works, where such works shall be seen as official documents and are in PD; or/and
    2. The government requested some artists to create all/some of the works, and in the contract of creation, the copyrights belong to the government, where also are in PD; or/and,
    3. Artists created all/some of the works with or without a contract, and later on, granted the government to use the works (no matter it is merely allowed to use on banknotes or not), where artists still held the copyright except for the condition of artists passed away for at least 50 years and the copyrights expired.
    Without more detailed information, I would like to ask to temporarily delete, in order not to infringe, and check the copyright information from either the ROC government or the artists. --だ*ぜ (talk) 09:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you going to do the check? The file has been uploaded for four years. I see no issue of infringing. Ythlev (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ythlev: Unless if you read [5] and [6] carefully, I will not answer any of your additional "why" anymore. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete They aren't public domain, they are copyrighted by Central bank of Taiwan. --117.136.54.39 00:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I endorse the nominator @Liuxinyu970226: said, they aren't free licensed, Ythlev, just to let you know that zhwiki discussion already pointed you as someone's sockpuppet, or at least meatpuppet, pleade don't be a jerk. --117.136.54.25 00:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
117.136.54.39 and 117.136.54.25 huh? Who is the sockpuppet? I have a legitimate alternate account. Go jerk off elsewhere. Ythlev (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To above all: an officer from the Department of Issuing in Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan) told me the GWODA DOES NOT apply to the use of all the pictures of the NTD banknotes and coins. I'm very sorry that I bring this here late. --Hamish (talk) 11:07, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: As above. --Hamish (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Details for that email is available at ticket:2020051710002624. --Hamish (talk) 11:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The email is not available. Ythlev (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because that's only available for the OTRS members. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Central Bank is not in charge of interpreting the law, only courts have the authority. Ythlev (talk) 11:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev: You're wrong, they have rights to interpret it, at least Zhang Zhongxin is what I must likely familiar, a famous Taiwanese copyright professor that lead all WMF's OTRS mailing lists to not have ways to veto him. regards. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:07, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These files were found on the central bank's website. From Government Website Open Data Announcement:

I. In order to facilitate better utilization by the general public of the information on this website, all of the Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan)(herein known as CBC)’s publicly posted information and materials that are protected under copyright provisions may be utilized by the public without cost in a non-exclusive, reauthorization-available manner. The users may, without restriction on time and place, reproduce, adapt, edit, publicly transmit, or utilize in other ways, and develop various products or services (herein known as derivations). This authorization will not be retracted hereafter, and the users do not have to acquire any written or other types of authorization from the CBC. However, when using it, the users should acknowledge the source.
I consider this is a reasonable use. --Yisinc (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ythlev and Yisinc: Just note: There are files listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:New Taiwan Dollar which are successfully deleted. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yisinc: It had just been told that GWODA does not apply in these works, in this case, pursuant to the aforementioned text per an officer from Central Bank of the ROC, given from Hamish. Regards, (Dasze) 14:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what Ythlev must know, if he has oppose comments to the second case, welcome to send his 3rd OTRS e-mail to contest it, by just saying "I oppose your opinion because I don't know OTRS", this user is clearly-than-god doing things that are out of our project scope. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Hamish. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even when the photo was created on 27 October 1916, a publication proving the photo's public release is needed. We can't assume the photo is automatically PD just because it was created prior to 1925. One example is a discussion about a photo from c. 1900 whose earliest publication is known to be probably early 1980s. George Ho (talk) 23:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bassano Ltd served as the Royal Photographers, who took pictures of members of the military which were used by the military, meaning it was almost certainly "published" the same year. However, I will contact the National Portrait Gallery to confirm. --MrClog (talk) 09:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have sent an email to the NPG, who will get back to me within 20 days. --MrClog (talk) 10:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, courtesy ping to Eddie891. --MrClog (talk) 10:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additionally, even if it was never published (very unlikely), then it is still in the PD, because works created more than 70 yeaars ago which were never published within 70 years after creation (and it was acquired by the NPG 80 years after creation) are in the PD as well. --MrClog (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    However, if it were first published within the 70th year (I don't mean 70 years), i.e. 1986, then the photo may still be copyrighted. George Ho (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @George Ho: I do believe it was likely immediately used in a public setting, because it is an official portrait of a general of the British Army taken by Royal Photographers. However, even if it wasn't used in that setting, then I don't see any evidence it was used in a different setting between 1916 and 1986. Do you have any? (Of course, if it was unpublished, it would be impossible to definitively proof it wasn't published - as there is naturally no published evidence of such - so the nominator should provide some indication it was published.) --MrClog (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    What about COM:PCP, which I should have cited earlier? Besides, I'm not the one who uploaded this image. George Ho (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file". Either this was an official portrait used by the British Army, meaning it is now in the PD, or it was somehow a private family image or the like, in which case there is no evidence it was ever published. COM:PCP does clearly not apply here. Under your standard, no unpublished works would ever be uploaded to Commons, because it is nearly impossible to proof it has never been published - as there obviously is no published evidence of such. --MrClog (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, let's wait for others to reply, and you don't have to ping Eddie891, do you? George Ho (talk) 21:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I did, because Eddie asked me about the image's copyright status and whether it would be in the PD over at en.wiki, and then I uploaded this file for him. Seems like a discussion he should be notified about. --MrClog (talk) 21:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Re: "works created more than 70 yeaars ago which were never published within 70 years after creation [...] are in the PD", I don't think that's necessarily true in the United States. See commons:Hirtle chart. Never published anonymous works from 70–120 years ago are still copyrighted. Wikiacc (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair. I was talking about the UK's copyright law, but indeed this would only be in the PD in the US if the work was published (because it'd have been published before 1925). Still awaiting the NPG's response. --MrClog (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, I'm not an expert by any means on image copyright issues of any kind, which is why I always ask at the media copyright help desk when I'm unsure-- It just doesn't make much sense to me compared to the copyright of texts. Thanks for the ping, and I will follow this discussion, but cannot weigh in towards either side. I will note that MrClog's assumptions seem reasonable (pending the NPG's response, of course). It makes the same assumptions that many of the 205 images in Category:Bassano Ltd make. The only thing to do is await the NPG's response to clarify. Eddie891 (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]