Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 31st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not usefull due to heavy noice and EXIF not valid for ownership A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 07:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont like it Maans1511 (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, uploader requested deletion on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect & broken SVG file; "CH3" is splitted into "CH" and "3" whereas the "CH" part is misplaced, also opaque (white background). File is not in use anymore. Superseded by File:Structural formula of (RS)-Citronellal.svg as correct, high-quality replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 13:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Stephen Hall, Bad Flickr account, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 15:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from https://www.greateranglia.co.uk/about-us/news-desk/news-articles/full-speed-ahead-greater-anglias-bombardier-trains and no evidence that it has been released under the stated licence. David Biddulph (talk) 12:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Biddulph: I have reported it as a copyvio. THere is currently a 3-4 month backlog for deletions at the moment, so reporting is quicker. Nightfury (talk) 13:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stephanie Geng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - external source - no license - no permission - not likely to exist here on Commons. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 14:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nakul Chandra Barman (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 17:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadSVG}}...wrapper around PNG. Have File:(R)-Citronellal Structural Formula V.1 1.svg as equivalent actual SVG (albeit without transparent BG) DMacks (talk) 07:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - see EXIF: copyright holder, www.joshhillphotography.com - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 14:36, 31 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stephanie Geng --Krdbot 19:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious error, Caulfield instead of Caulfeild, correct category is Category:James Caulfeild, 1st Earl of Charlemont. --Emeritus (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was actually taken by a Reuters photographer, not VOA – GeneralAdmiralAladeen (Talk) 05:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, Metadata confirms Reuters copyrighted status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

proshot photo with no clear license, uploaded by user with few uploads, likely a copyvio. Ringerfan23 (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in EXIF indicates this was downloaded from Facebook. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytoyoda: Cannot be deleted. The page is dedicated to the public person - Denis Sergovskiy. Athlete, participant and winner of the competition, actor. Photos File:Denis Sergovskiy on training.jpg uploaded from his official instagram account. The photo belongs to him. Artsidorov (talk) 31 July 201
@Artsidorov: Copyright generally belongs to a photograph’s creator or publisher, not the person pictured. In any case, if what you’re saying is true, that the photograph belongs to Denis Sergovskiy, then you cannot claim to be the copyright owner. Mr. Sergovskiy has to contact the OTRS board following the steps described at COM:OTRS and release the photo from copyright. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Artsidorov: your upload claims that YOU are the photographer and the copyright holder of the photo - by your own admission this is false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded the wrong file Larspeeters (talk) 13:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted Upload mistake; prompt deletion request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:4nn1l2 this is a historical palace just like File:Kakh-e-sabz.JPG or File:Sabetpasal.jpg. May you please explain for me why these files can stay in commons but mine can’t? Sincerely Aammiinn11 (talk) 00:10, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn: fixed the date of construction [1]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a copyrighted film Escudero (talk) 09:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Deleted by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 06:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable faces, it violates the privacy and it has a minor in its content, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother, It was not a self-portrait and would be violating intellectual property rights Alexcocopro (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable faces, it violates the privacy and it has a minor in its content, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother, It was not a self-portrait and would be violating intellectual property rights Alexcocopro (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & buggy SVG file; opaque (white) background. Superseded by File:(R)-(+)-Citronellal V.3.svg by the same author. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amazsara10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three of the user's uploads (marked as own) have been nominated for speedy deletion because of copyright violation. Some of these are a duplicate of another and deserve speedy, but I can't decide which one to keep and which to delete. All files need OTRS permission.

Ahmadtalk 19:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO (e.g., File:EverbrightCentre.jpg is here; File:ChinaPlazaCentral3.jpg is here, etc.). --Эlcobbola talk 18:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amazsara10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious attempted Flickrwashing is obvious. Mass uploaded to Commons immediately after being uploaded to https://www.flickr.com/photos/183298279@N08/. Several of the photos are the same as the ones listed in the previous deletion discussion. Would not be surprised if they are all out of process recreations of previously deleted content.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:Santiago2023.png Sfs90 (talk) 21:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 08:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadSVG}} wrapper around bitmap. Have File:2-Acetylpyridine.svg as real SVG of it DMacks (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plakat z błędem, doślę poprawioną wersję M2017 05 (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:38, 4 August 2019 UTC: Commons:Licensing: movie poster --Krdbot 19:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plakat z błędem, doślę poprawną wersję jak tylko będzie usuniety ten plik M2017 05 (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:38, 4 August 2019 UTC: Commons:Licensing: movie poster --Krdbot 19:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arthur bigdog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Delete along with Category:The Bigdog MuscleBuilding

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment more files in cat. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

copied from cat tp --Achim (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete my stuff please this is motivation others to start gym and live healthy fitness lifestyle. Arthur bigdog (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arthur bigdog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.Please delete all images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhardwajumesh256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhardwajumesh256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:advertisement. Hanooz 00:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invented logo, out of COM:SCOPE. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tristancorso232 ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invented logo, out of COM:SCOPE. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tristancorso232 ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invented logo, out of COM:SCOPE. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tristancorso232 ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invented logo, out of COM:SCOPE (didn't they already introduce a new logo lately?) See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tristancorso232 ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collections SCP-2000 (talk) 04:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph with no meaningful description. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 08:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pie chart with no meaningful description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 08:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valeriefarias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valeriefarias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful Photos

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope subject to COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magician ameen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asdfugil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

useless drawings with unexplicit legend

Pippobuono (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masvalemc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images of another famous rapper, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 12:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Averev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website screenshot uploaded only for the purpose of advertising, has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Verjacky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Verjacky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality and not of any obvious use to the project.

Herby talk thyme 13:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:35, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перенаправление в никуда 79.126.56.215 15:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, wrong redirect. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be taken from Facebook, per EXIF. No permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 大诺史, Thanks for enquiring about this photo. This photo is my own work (selfie), I own the rights to it, and it is true that it has been published on Facebook but it is my own Facebook page and it was published by me. I added a note in the photo description indicating that I'm offering it in Free Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0).

See original post and added note here: https://www.facebook.com/monique.richardalpiniste/photos/a.563374057029076/1524043920962080/?type=3&theater

Thanks again, I hope this clarifies your question.

Best regards,

Breithorn--Breithorn (talk) 00:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Per Breithorn. I was going to write that it was rather safe to say that the uploader is the photographer because this other photo is the large original version with EXIF of a photo taken during a solo climb of mount Logan. The addition directly in the facebook account for File:Plaque hommage Arvid Lahti Rainier.jpg makes the identity of the uploader even clearer. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much to both of you.

Breithorn--Breithorn (talk) 01:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ijsurya29 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion spam, same guy as of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 0lesson.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). See also the other DR that was open since 20/7/19. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto promocional, de esta misma sesión 1. Aparte no tiene datos EXIF MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made "Artwork" of dubious value, out of project scope. Uploader's other contribs to our projects look mazy as well... Achim (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private picture Superpilot123456 (talk) 20:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope personal doodling by the uploader. Commons is not a webhost. De728631 (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, better alternatives in Category:Sinalbin. Leyo 21:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, orphaned/replaced by File:CurcuminKeto.svg. Leyo 21:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ainda Invest S.R.L. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax : pseudo-ancient scan created with a photoshop-like (metadata says) pretending to be from 1924 but using coat of arms elements created in the 21th century. User banned from fr:wiki for being a sockpupet of a notorious hoaxing user. No potential use of such a dellusive file and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. 80.215.72.250 21:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, fake. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS , self promo (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO: own work declaration dubious, given that the photo can be found online from well before the stated date https://rojavareport.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/interview-with-ypj-commander-in-kobane-kobane-will-not-fall/ Thespoondragon (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:DW Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Request from the author] Jackson.nilson21 (talk) 19:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is not free, because it is similar to another previous one, where no such license is indicated. On the website it just says in the footer "© 2019 - Lucidez.pe" : http://lucidez.pe/politica/entrevista-peruana-por-el-kambio/ Ovruni (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small and bad quality to be useable. Looks like a screenshot from a video. Also, there seems to be a watermark on the bottom right. No proof it is free. Titlutin (talk) 21:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of a bigger picture (see on this website). No proof it's free. Titlutin (talk) 21:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See watermark (@aZaDaX) 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely professional/studio portrait. No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 09:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is, If you log to www.harryahluwalia.com ( Hope you will get full info who upload this photo and who contained this photo copyrights) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎14.202.174.148 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 speedy delete as nominator - source indicated "All rights for images reserved", so this is now a clear copyright violation. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Low res, and per previous norms (if image is the same) (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GSPassoni20042019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Everything by this user is copyvio, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GSPassoni20042019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by GSPassoni20042019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res. No metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GSPassoni20042019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 19:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GSPassoni20042019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not found at URL or still from an unfree video.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image, unlikely to be own work, (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlainFaragou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a new release of the video without the sound (which was the cause of the copyright issue). AntoinePeartree


Kept: version deleted. --Didym (talk) 12:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Feeriya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lexa.Dixon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taljansen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. No metadata, low res. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isabelwt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. It seems to me that they are derivative work (screenshot), as there are "borders" for 2 files. While other (File:Caolan Montague.jpg has a caption that states that it was taken at a concert, however, it seems like the subject is posing for the camera.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Photos are my own work! I took them with my own camera. Firstly, well done for noticing that there are borders. That was very observant of you. I placed those borders on there while editing the photos. As far as I am aware, there is no rule against editing my photos before upload. Secondly I would like you to revisit your comment about the File:Caolan Montague.jpg. Again, you are absolutely right, the caption does state it was taken at a concert. It was indeed taken at a concert and Caolan was in fact looking at the camera. I did not state in the caption that this was Caolan on the performing stage. Merely that it was taken at a concert. I do not believe that you have any reason to dispute these photographs.

@Isabelwt: Please send your permission via OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to me that this is a derivative work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock photo used on many websites, such as here and here. No way to tell the original source. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock photo used on many websites, such as here and here. No way to tell the original source. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable face of my son who violates the privacy of being a minor, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable face of my son who violates the privacy of being a minor, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph was uploaded by my mistake, It contains my recognizable face violating my own privacy, it is not within the scope of the wikimedia project, it can represent self-promotion, it does not have editable purposes and It was not a self-portrait and would be violating intellectual property rights. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable face of my son who violates the privacy of being a minor, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable face of my son who violates the privacy of being a minor, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was loaded by mistake, it contains the recognizable face of my son who violates the privacy of being a minor, submitting it to the public exhibition, whose license should not be free because its publication does not have the consent of the baby and his mother. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph was uploaded by my mistake, It contains my recognizable face violating my own privacy, there are other recognizable faces, it is not within the scope of the wikimedia project, it can represent self-promotion, it does not have editable purposes and It was not a self-portrait and would be violating intellectual property rights. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, no metadata, low res. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph was uploaded by my mistake, It contains my recognizable face violating my own privacy, it is not within the scope of the wikimedia project, it can represent self-promotion, it does not have editable purposes and It was not a self-portrait and would be violating intellectual property rights. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph was uploaded by my mistake, It contains my recognizable face violating my own privacy, it is not within the scope of the wikimedia project, it can represent self-promotion, it does not have editable purposes and It was not a self-portrait and would be violating intellectual property rights. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph was uploaded by my mistake, It contains my recognizable face violating my own privacy, it is not within the scope of the wikimedia project, it can represent self-promotion, it does not have editable purposes and it can violate the license of intellectual property, since the shirt used in the photograph belongs to a designer. Alexcocopro (talk) 15:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image, unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus {{PD-textlogo}} claim. Letter is not only not a text logo, but well above TOO. Эlcobbola talk 15:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://m.facebook.com/461982160535387/photos/a.528831697183766/2244338022299783/?type=3&source=54&ref=page_internal, needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 12:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohsen ghasabian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, mostly screenshots

Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly from WhatsApp, no permission to reuse. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BNA-BAA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from music, photos, TV broadcasts, diplomas.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD shows came from Facebook Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another copyright violation from this serial offender despite final warning. Time for a block, it appears. David Biddulph (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file from facebook, copyrighted? Threecharlie (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[edit] The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk) 12:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[edit] The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah definitely out of scope, only used on a (semi) promotional draft at enwiki. --Redalert2fan (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misspelled Jamestown site RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 19:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomUserGuy1738: You can use the "Edit" link at the top of File:President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush get a first-hand look as archaeologists work at the historic Jamestown site.jpg to correct this. --bjh21 (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hope no one minds me commenting post close - Just some background information:
The editor wanted it renamed and DR'd it, Few days later they found the rename template and replaced the DR with that[2] (obviously I renamed it). –Davey2010Talk 13:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ian Ghys would like it to be deleted Superpilot123456 (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apparently, Ian was not asked, and this content is currently hosted here against his will, so this constitutes a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. As the subject of the photo wishes the photo removed for privacy reasons, it specifically does not accord "respect for his private and family life...". User44654 (talk) 20:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We got a deletion request under ticket:2019073110011079. I believe that we can delete the picture. Bencemac (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So let's do it already! 77.172.140.90 14:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All these photos depict a protected building in Germany and unfortunately the publication of these photos appear to be in violation of German law as the photos were taken on private ground and, according to the uploader, the owner objected. This is in particular problematic since the infamous “Schloss Tegel” BGH decision from 17 December 2010 (see de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache#Rechtslage in Deutschland). This does not appear to be a problem of copyright but a violation of private property (the original building is old enough and the most recent refurbishments seem to be de minimis) which makes the publication and the reuse of these photographs problematic. This falls into the category of non-copyright restrictions. I request a deletion for two reasons. Firstly, we should do this out of courtesy for the uploader even if this is way beyond the usual 7 day period. But we should consider that (probably unforseen) legal issues deserve more generosity than simple change of heart issues. Secondly, we put reusers into possible peril. The uploader had opened a DR for each of these files before. In these cases, the DRs were denied. Others were executed (examples: 1, 2). Similar requests were also executed before (example) – but always without any thorough discussion. I think that issues like this one are serious and deserve a more elaborate discussion.

AFBorchert (talk) 19:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Two discussions regarding this set were opened at COM:AN by T&S: [3], [4]. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope/Precautionary_principle. Peli (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also i have to correct this: None of these images actually depict the protected historic monument. The historic monument is an ancient brickwall depicted elsewhere in this category plus the preserved canals and earthworks. Also I may repeat that the refurbishing of this private house, a former farmhouse on the estate, took place under achitecture in the 1980's. Peli (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Images were taken from private property. Protect uploader from sueing by the property owner. Raymond 17:16, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See request on Pelikana's talkPage @nlwiki  Klaas `Z4␟` V15:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KlaasZ4usV, your link points to en:wp, not nl:wp. Here is the correct link: nl:Overleg gebruiker:Pelikana#Meningen gevraagd: FOP privétuinen Duitsland. BTW, we do not need minstens tien meningen (they are not counted here at Commons) but helpful rationales. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, changed. Is there a way to get the files removed sooner? Klaas `Z4␟` V16:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Seven days have passed since the DR has been opened, hence it can be closed by an admin anytime now. However, Commons has a huge backlog. We have still open deletion requests from November 2018. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Much has been said already but it's plain and simple. Keeping those files puts an editor at risk and puts re-users at risk. Keeping those files would be dickish. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from FB — Bukhari (Talk!) 06:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [5] DaizY (talk) 08:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation [6] DaizY (talk) 08:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [7] DaizY (talk) 08:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [8] DaizY (talk) 08:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [9] DaizY (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [10] DaizY (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [11] DaizY (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [12] DaizY (talk) 08:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hoseinrahmanimanesh77785 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). I already requested for deletion for the wikidata item linked to h55.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Ahmadtalk 16:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Derivative work of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:DW Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:TOYS Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:DW Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment ongoing discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/Media in Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked for now by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Also a breach of privacy laws. Superpilot123456 (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apparently, Ian was not asked, and this content is currently hosted here against his will, so this constitutes a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. As the subject of the photo wishes the photo removed for privacy reasons, it specifically does not accord "respect for his private and family life...". And yes, this is the same reasoning I used for the other two pictures. User44654 (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We got a deletion request under ticket:2019073110011079. I believe that we can delete the picture. Bencemac (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Breach of privacy. Ian Ghys would like it removed Superpilot123456 (talk) 20:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apparently, Ian was not asked, and this content is currently hosted here against his will, so this constitutes a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. As the subject of the photo wishes the photo removed for privacy reasons, it specifically does not accord "respect for his private and family life...". User44654 (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We got a deletion request under ticket:2019073110011079. I believe that we can delete the picture. Bencemac (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop for 2d graphic works such as engraving or maps

Roy17 (talk) 00:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep speedy keep
<Sigh> So many problem with this. This is another of the automated and inappropriate runs by Roy17 (see VP shortly), along with Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "Pierre Holtz", Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 創造未來,迎接康莊 and perhaps others.
Secondly, Roy has now admitted to running an unauthorised 'bot, User_talk:Roy17#Bot?, which explains why so many of these are obviously based on search strings (and claiming to not even realise they needed approval).
Thirdly, having another editor raise issues about your bulk deletions and then the next thing you tag for deletion is one of their uploads? AGF only goes so far...
Finally, see COM:FOP UK. There is FOP covering both of these. The first, in particular, is a topographic relief map, i.e. crucially three-dimensional. As a fictional map, it's also a "work of artistic craftsmanship". The second is a ceramic plaque, with a case for both "works of artistic craftsmanship" and also not being two-dimensional either. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: stop your personal accusations. Counter argue by analysing the files rather than personal attacks and forumshopping.
COM:FOP UK is applicable to buildings, sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship only. 2D graphic works are not covered.
Graphic works are defined as any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work.
File:Wilbert Awdry's map of Sodor, Talyllyn Railway museum.jpg is no different from other relief maps. Only works of artistic craftsmanship can qualify for fop.
File:Wilbert Vere Awdry - plaque detail.jpg is a 2d drawing on a plaque. It is different from a 3d model like File:Rev W Awdry and Peter Sam - 1988-05-14.jpg.--Roy17 (talk) 10:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"You are running an unauthorised 'bot" and "You are making bulk DRs with no valid nomination" are not personal attacks. Nor is it forumshopping to make one post to COM:VP.
Clearly you have run some sort of 'bot across various files, searching (I know not why) for the Reverend Wilbert Awdry. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jamiespilsbury as well.
As to FOP on the topo map, then "FOP does not apply to 2D works such as maps" does not mean "Anything with the text string 'map' in it may be deleted." I know your 'bot can't see this, but look at the image. It is a 3-dimensional topographic relief map. It has lumps in it. It was, rather famously, the map in Awdry's study by which he created the whole scenery of Sodor. It it pretty much the opposite of "2D", even though it's still a map. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot to clarify, File:Wilbert Awdry's map of Sodor, Talyllyn Railway museum.jpg is a map not covered by FOP UK, and is not artistic and not covered by FOP UK again.
It is similar to for example these relief maps https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/shop/dorrigo-3d-british-isles.html , rather than Great Polish Map of Scotland. Can any user take a picture of these relief maps, upload it to Commons and declare s/he's not infringing copyright because of FOP?
@Andy Dingley: linking unrelated DRs together and copy-pasting the same irrelevant passages on multiple pages are forumshopping.--Roy17 (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are those maps "2D graphic works" ? If not, then work it out for yourself.
Also Awdry's map of Sodor was a creative work (and thus under UK FOP), being the origin of a fictional island. This map is actually how he invented the place, by squeezing papier mache and plaster into shape. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting from Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988:
Article 62 Representation of certain artistic works on public display. (1)This section applies to— (a)buildings, and (b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public...
Article 4 Artistic works. (1)In this Part “artistic work” means— (a)a graphic work, photograph, sculpture or collage, irrespective of artistic quality, (b)a work of architecture being a building or a model for a building, or (c)a work of artistic craftsmanship. (2)In this Part—... “graphic work” includes— (a)any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, and (b)any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work...--Roy17 (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Notice the law categorises any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan and any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work as graphic work. Graphic work is specifically separate from work of artistic craftsmanship. The law makes no mention of 2d or 3d.--Roy17 (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: These are ceramics or papier mache sculpture, which are works of artistic craftsmanship and therefore benefit from FOP. As it happens they also have enough depth to be 3D, and also qualify under that head. Both kept. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC). --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since), but it seems to be derived from a Commons file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

proshot photo with no clear license, uploaded by user with few uploads, likely a copyvio. Ringerfan23 (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - images taken from copyrighted website https://sluganarodu.ua TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 18:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer "JUSTO RODRÍGUEZ", not Ihuer, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement: use of FL Studio Épine (talk) 00:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete + File:با پروتكل FTP.pdf which is out of Com:PS. Hanooz 05:15, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://twitter.com/StGeorgesChoirs/status/1154109324865789954 where it's likely to be original. Notice upload dates, at twitter is 24th ... here is later. Also affected File:StGeorgesCathedralSouthwarkJune2019.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"from archive" is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"from archive" not ownw ork Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"from archive" is not own work "Photo from the personal archive of the family of Edgar Elbakyan" Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Packaging, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date, no source, wrong license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page was set as a practice and I did not know that it would publish my photo. Please delete it. Thank you! Berikbarna (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

proshot photo with no clear license, uploaded by user with few uploads, likely a copyvio. Ringerfan23 (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CptViraj: Your link proves nothing other than the photo has been replicated... Here is the source, with the photographer credited as J.A. If the original uploader Slappyjo12 is J.A. and has the rights for the photo, I believe we should keep. Nice4What (talk) 15:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would doubt the person who took the photo is who uploaded it on Commons; as usually professional photographers would have some form of metadata or description or tag on their uploads or some indication as to who they are.Ringerfan23 (talk) 03:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Highest res seems to be here. --Achim (talk) 13:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The original source is the article I linked above which contains the high-res file. Nice4What (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person on the picture does not want me to have this picture on wikipedia. Adelacelie54 (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious claim of own work, no exif. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. In addition, File:NimaShaeri IranianEditor.jpg and File:NimaShaeri 12MFF.jpg need OTRS permission, see [13] (the content on the website seems to be editable, so I think it can't be speedy deleted).

Ahmadtalk 13:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Might be in scope as I see on Wikidata that he has won some awards. However likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Discasto talk 21:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - found here in 2013 http://descubriendopaisajes.blogspot.com/2013/11/el-bosque-centenario-de-munain-okariz.html. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 21:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 21:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 21:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload file name, meant to update existing photo instead Norman.seibert (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be derivative work. Stating "PDF, Book cover" is not a valid source. File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड ५ - कृषी, पशुसंवर्धन.pdf, which wasn't nominated, has a pending OTRS ticket.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史 and Jayantanth: , the OTRS pending template was not added to permission. I have added now. The OTRS communication is in process. The User:कोकणकन्या will upload complete books as new versions using chunk upload tool. I request OTRS Volunteer User:Jayantanth to do the needful as he is handling the ticket. Please remove the deletion tag.

Thanks, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 06:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Can you kindly check if the ticket really exists? Seems dubious to me. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the ticket exists, and the copyright holder seems willing to release these books under a free license. There are some technical details remaining. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission OK, see ticket:2019072510006846. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamiespilsbury (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These two images are somewhat dubious when claimed to be the author's "own work".

1) The Afraid of Mice image is quite clearly a derivative of this colour one, to the point of even featuring the same (apparent) scanner dust and JPEG compression artifacts of the original. It looks like a professionally-shot studio image.

2) The Robert Holmes image *has* to be almost 30 years old at the very least- since he's been dead that long- and the crisp text has quite clearly been superimposed upon a pre-existing less sharp image. Note also that the image exhibits some apparent residual moire patterning around the mouth, suggesting it was taken from a commercially-printed source. I can't find an obvious source image that this one has been taken from, but it's very questionable. Without further evidence (which we would normally expect an author to have provided in cases like these where it was their own work), I would advise deleting on the basis of PCP.

The author has already had a lot of his uploads deleted. My strong suspicion is that the other six of the eight remaining *are* his own work, if only because they look similar, have been taken in similar contexts and the EXIF data matches on five out of six of them. That doesn't extend to the two images mentioned here, however.

Ubcule (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamiespilsbury (talk · contribs)

[edit]

old photos recaptured using a digital camera. permission from the original photographers is missing.

Roy17 (talk) 00:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Yes, those are all obvious reproductions of existing material that are unlikely to be uploader's own (all subjects were dead before the camera listed in the EXIF even existed, and the first and third show obvious halftoning from a printed source).
In fact the Michael Sheard one clearly points out that it's a photo of him in the film "Escape to Athena" yet claims to have been taken by the uploader (incredibly unlikely). The Fred Dibnah one gives the author as "anonymous" but has no permission.
If anything they're obviously dubious enough to be pushing "speedy delete as copyvio" territory. Ubcule (talk) 10:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop for sculpture in US Roy17 (talk) 01:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this image is free to license as presented. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - bogus license. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"山东师范大学" inscription, author is Mao Zedong, see[14], not PD. This is a calligraphy art work, not PD textlogo. shizhao (talk) 02:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author or source given; unable to determine copyright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is finger print original? Yann (talk) 04:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation per COM:CUR Vietnam Numizmatyk123 (talk) 19:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soligo Stefano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Danilo Soligo (d. 2016), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALIBEHZADPOUR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: pure text.

4nn1l2 (talk) 23:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is copyrighted by a university.
Not "laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of State organs; other documents of a legislative, administrative or judicial nature; and their official translations" AlexLeeCN (talk) 12:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: (Edited) In former precedent of Seal of Peking University, the seal of a public university in China, which is a kind of so-called pubilc institution, is belonging to public domain. So I amended the permission to PD-ineligible, identical to Seal of Peking University. Now this picture can be properly kept. --Indigo Luo/ 02:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appealing the previous decision, since we never discussed the fact that China has a low threshold of originality. This is higher than the Gang Heng logo mentioned at Commons:CRT/China#Threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google StreetView screenshot, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

questionable source. if Jim Marshall was the photographer and this photo was taken from SFU archives, verifiable evidence of Marshall's actual year of death should be provided. Roy17 (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on image old enough to be kept with proper source and license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is dated 1907 and taken in Headingley, Leeds, so it is PD in the United Kingdom. No reasons to be deleted IMO, just a simple change to {{PD-UK-unknown}}. - Fma12 (talk) 01:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no indication why the photographer is unknown. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No fair use at Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-Iran does not apply as painting are not covered by the exemption. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the 3D effect not original? Yann (talk) 05:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is a question best left to an expert in threshold-of-originality matters. At least to me, the 3D effect follows a regular pattern followed by many other logos out there. ‐⁠‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100💬 09:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the TOO is fairly high in the US, and I'm not sure a simple gradient is enough to grant copyright. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the 3D effect not original? Yann (talk) 05:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy colors/user art . See the source file here or another real copy as File:Otto Julius Bierbaum. Gugeline. Ein Bühnenspiel. Mit Buchschmuck von E. R. Weiß, 1899.jpg. Mutter Erde (talk) 06:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way to reconstruct the real colors from a scan or photographical copy of an old book. Your examples are most probably not closer to the original. So, yes, they are „fantasy“ colors. They should give a first impression what the cover might have looked like. That's why I included the original source as first version. Everybody can compare the colors. --Rodomonte (talk) 08:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just compare both scans. You will notice, that they differ very much. This comes from ageing, different scanner settings, image compression and so on. That this reconstruction does not have the original colors is also noted in the description. I still believe I shows the intents of the artist much better than these ugly scans. The image is also not intended as historical document but as illustration. --Rodomonte (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your imagination of an original colour (in fact: two colors) is a fake and should not be allowed to use in a serious article. By the way: This is a famous and expensive book [15] Mutter Erde (talk) 08:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, it has four colors, and there are at least two different versions of this cover, as you can see in you own google query. There is no reason to delete reconstructions here. You would have to delete many thousand images if that was the case. --Rodomonte (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The colours of this version are indeed distasteful: the green is pale and the yellow hurts the eye. But strictly speaking that is no reason for deletion. However: the filename is misleading (with the word "original" and with the year 1899 in it, while it is in fact a "modern version") and that should at least be adjusted. Vysotsky (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I will rename it after the case is closed. The file name still represents the first version. I should have renamed it after uploading the reconstruction. --Rodomonte (talk) 10:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal for renaming: Gugeline - A yellow fantasy by Rodomonte.jpg. Next problem: Why do you have put your artwork into https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gugeline ? Mutter Erde (talk) 12:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is obviously a troll request from a user that has already been banned by the community for similar reasons in the german wikipedia 14 years ago. He/she doesn't seem to have learned anything in that time. --Rodomonte (talk) 12:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Treat each other with respect and civility" & assume good faith. Serious proposal for renaming: Gugeline cover. Retouched version 2018.jpg. The usage of the image in the German Wikipedia should be addressed there -not in Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have found this in the Out of scope area: (= https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Examples): Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills. Mutter Erde (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The colours of the coat of arms are all wrong (see discussion and here: http://www.europeanheraldry.org/italy/mirandola/ ) Holapaco77 (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The colours of the coat of arms are all wrong (see: Category:Coats of arms of the House of Pico della Mirandola. It have been universally replaced by a valid one (File:Coat of arms of Duchy of Mirandola.svg). Holapaco77 (talk) 08:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom : no longer not in use. Kathisma (talk) 17:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright© 2019 Ministry of Culture, Government of India, All Rights Reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 delete this ASAP because GODL is Bullshit, can anyone please inform these jokers(admins of that government website) about GODL license. GODL is crap. -- Eatcha (talk) 09:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep GODL was passed in 2017, old website template. Anything produced by GOI, is automatically GODL licensed. You can check this in the new Drupal based sites, they clearly mention this. -- Eatcha (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
also see https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf -- Eatcha (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oliver Francis Huang-Hsu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:HOST. Some are attributed to a studio and hence also {{No permission}}.

Mys_721tx (talk) 10:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The only edits of the uploader on Chinese and English Wikipedia are to predominately display the name of the cosplayer in the articles despite the fact that the articles already have several files on display. Those files should be considered a case of COM:SPAM and do not automatically have any educational value. -Mys_721tx (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All images have OTRS permission now. Maybe scope questions remain. --Krd 12:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it should be deleted because it is the only image of a male cosplaying a female character on the cosplay article page. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.79.225.131 (talk) 20:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, only kept the in-use files. P 1 9 9   13:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meant to overwrite the original I had uploaded earlier today Broichmore (talk) 12:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image with no matching source, instead claiming own work. Not found elsewhere online, but no original meta data, and everything the user has uploaded that I've gone through so far has been taken from facebook. GMGtalk 13:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly for File:Mountain Pagoda.jpg and File:Namsang Car Street .jpg. GMGtalk 13:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in error I had already put up a better version of the same image: CONTINENT Clipper ship sailing card.jpg Broichmore (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   13:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A number of reasons. First I uploaded a more accurate image File:QUICKSTEP Clipper ship sailing card.jpg. Second: I uploaded both images. Third: this image is less defined, over cropped and more importantly the colour was changed from the original. That could be argued as an artistic difference from the original version. The website I got this from did the colouring in error as he maintains he got the image from where I got the one I want to keep. Broichmore (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   13:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo: File:Martin van Meytens d. J. - Erzherzogin Marie Christine - 3702 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 17:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   13:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File said All rights reserved, Attribution/CC/GJSTU license may not be appliable A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--тнояsтеn 16:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "The Terms of Use herein does not apply to the following: [...] Content where other terms of use apply with rational and concrete reason." Clearly marked as "All rights reserved.". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File said All rights reserved, Attribution/CC/GJSTU license may not be appliable A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--тнояsтеn 16:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "The Terms of Use herein does not apply to the following: [...] Content where other terms of use apply with rational and concrete reason." Clearly marked as "All rights reserved.". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File said All rights reserved, Attribution/CC/GJSTU license may not be appliable

A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Please read the legal notice from JMA first. 🐱💬 02:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No. 4: Content where other terms of use apply with rational and concrete reason. I believe marked as ARR is a strong reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: per the legal notice from the JMA. Hurricane Noah (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "The Terms of Use herein does not apply to the following: [...] Content where other terms of use apply with rational and concrete reason." Clearly marked as "All rights reserved.". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File said All rights reserved, Attribution/CC/GJSTU license may not be appliable

A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject is recent artwork. No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published online http://www.tiedotuspalvelu.fi/677-2/ (predates the upload). Can't be hosted on Commons without a license sent via OTRS. kyykaarme (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding: The image on the website is cropped a bit, I don't know if that matters. There is an exact copy of this image on another website, though it's not dated. -kyykaarme (talk) 11:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is claimed to be "Copyrighted free use", but I don't see any proof whatsoever for this claim. We should have some kind of OTRS permission or similar, else the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Poland for temporary displays. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author dead in 1975 Père Igor (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remplacé par un autre portrait ALCATRAZ FILMS (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyrighted logo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: considering the fairly high standard for TOO in the US. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure which LTA master this belongs to or if someone just made it up, but DENY guidelines apply. 199.94.94.12 16:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept w:en:WP:DENY is an English Wikipedia guideline and it doesn't apply here. Also the nomination statement itself is not a valid reason for deletion. Masum Reza📞 15:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il sito difesa.it concede l'utilizzo del file con limitazione "non uso comerciale" quindi fuori dagli standard wiki. Qui la pagina con le condizioni d'uso: https://www.difesa.it/Info/Pagine/Copyright.aspx PippoBers (talk) 17:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибочный редирект 79.126.56.215 18:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: moved on upload day. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (Contents of this website may not be reproduced partially or fully, without due permission from the Department of Posts (represented by Centre of excellence in Postal Technology), Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India. The contents of this website cannot be used in any misleading or objectionable context. )

Eatcha (talk) 10:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see http://postagestamps.gov.in/Copyrightpolicy.aspx (copyrighted work)

Eatcha (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't delete we must wait. see this edit by User Materialscientist -- Eatcha (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please re-nominate any files once other discussions have concluded. --Green Giant (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.civilaviation.gov.in/en/website-policies Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Old website template, GODL was passed in 2017. Also see https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ambedkar_2015_cover_of_India.jpg&diff=357568198&oldid=357562570 -- Eatcha (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
also see https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf -- Eatcha (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Eatcha. License was confirmed at time of upload. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright 2012, all rights reserved with National Museum, New Delhi (India) Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GODL was passed in 2017, it's just the old website template. Also see https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ambedkar_2015_cover_of_India.jpg&diff=357568198&oldid=357562570 -- Eatcha (talk) 15:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
also see https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf -- Eatcha (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Eatcha. License was confirmed at time of upload. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright©Delhi Police 2019 All Right Reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

see https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ambedkar_2015_cover_of_India.jpg&diff=357568198&oldid=357562570 -- Eatcha (talk) 15:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
also see https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf -- Eatcha (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Eatcha. License was confirmed at time of upload. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Content Owned by Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Old website template, it's changed in newer Drupal based sites. GODL was passed in 2017. Also seehttps://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ambedkar_2015_cover_of_India.jpg&diff=357568198&oldid=357562570 -- Eatcha (talk) 15:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
also see https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf -- Eatcha (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Eatcha. License was confirmed at time of upload. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]