Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/01
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Bedonarsor (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted upload mistake, prompt request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Reverse image search confirms copyviol. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 09:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Watermarked. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is the watermark of Photoshop Express. — Racconish 💬 14:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 09:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Watermarked. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is the watermark of Photoshop Express. — Racconish 💬 14:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by আফতাবুজ্জামান as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 09:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- I found 1 hit here publish date 19/11/2018 --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
I dont want this image to be on the internet Emilndakidoti (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
I would not like this photo of me to be available to the public Giltwizy (talk) 10:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Frederick Douglas Miller died in 1961. Yann (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Яшел Үзән шәһәре, 10 нчы гимназия (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical images with bogus licenses. If any, the relevant public domain tags have to be added otherwise the files deleted.
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Яшел Үзән шәһәре, 10 нчы гимназия (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claims of own work on very small size images, which appear to be book or media covers and some rephotographs.
- File:Cаттаров Гомәр.jpg
- File:Зәйнуллина Рәйхана китабы.jpg
- File:Китап Зәйнуллина.jpg
- File:Рәйхана Зәйнуллина китабы.webp
- File:Китап.webp
- File:Бүләк алу.jpg
- File:Бүләк.jpg
- File:Күгеш чишмәсе.jpg
- File:Фазлуллин Илгизәр .jpg
- File:Наҗия Шәйхелисламова.jpg
- File:Мәктәп музее 02.jpg
- File:Рәйхана Зәйнуллина.jpg
- File:Мәктәп музее 01.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Previously published at https://dinromerohistory.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/pharaoh-khufu/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, apparent false info from uploader -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Content moved to Category:Topper (sports) - Fma12 (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Perhaps the category should be turned into redirect or disambiguation rather than deleted. (Wikimedia-specific parenthetical neologisms are not obvious to newer users, and if deleted category at common use names are likely to be recreated.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as disambiguation. --Achim (talk) 20:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Artsy pictures designed to promote uploader's website and work (some watermarked to them, all named and described as such).
- File:Decaption7.jpg
- File:Decaption8.jpg
- File:Decaption6.jpg
- File:Decaption5.jpg
- File:Decaption3.jpg
- File:Decaption4.jpg
- File:Decaption2.JPG
- File:Decaption1.jpg
- File:Decaption.jpg
DMacks (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvios for most, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 18:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is obviously not own work, and no valid source is provided. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 07:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
This image comes from Google maps, similar to: [1] Imzadi 1979 → 23:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 02:26, 2 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
author request Bbdyn (talk) 10:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bbdyn (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Can the deleting admin please remove the 1 July DR as it is redundant (previous not even closed yet). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; doubtful claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
author request Bbdyn (talk) 10:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Image seems in project scope with no obvious problem. Why the wait almost 2 years to request deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bbdyn (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Can the deleting admin please remove the 1 July DR as it is redundant (previous not even closed yet). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep My concern expressed earlier has not been addressed; seems in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bbdyn (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Closed as Speedy Kept; previous DR closed less than a week ago; no additional info or reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- User:Thoughtful and Considerate tagged this for speedy deletion as a copyright violation with the following text: "The intellectual property that is the subject of this correspondence consists of two original works owned and authored by The Nicholas Alahverdian Trust (hereafter referred to as "The NA Trust" or "The Trust) in the form of photographs. This is one of those photographs. The photographs are not in the public domain in any country, nor are they freely licensed and are therefore illegally uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons platform by users who do not have the requisite permission or license. The Wikimedia users who uploaded these images intentionally misrepresented any permission or license from The NA Trust as none was given. The NA Trust is left to resolve that internet users who may be the Wikimedia users themselves or users associated with them downloaded the photographs from the Trust website, Flickr account, or through another website, and uploaded the photographs with a falsified copyright tag and made false representations about ownership and copyright. This allowed the photographs, which are the intellectual property of The NA Trust, to be used across Wikimedia projects without license or permission from The NA Trust. The uploads were processed deceptively and violated applicable copyright laws. Patently false information about the license, copyright, and ownership status was given on the file description pages accompanying the photographs. The two photographs that are relevant to this correspondence are the work product of workers, contractors, freelancers, or volunteers of The NA Trust who, as part of their work-related responsibilities and duties outlined in their contract, assisted in the taking of photographs of officers and trustees of The NA Trust along with other guests and people at events that were Trust-sponsored or attended by officers or trustees of The NA Trust. At no time did any Trust employee, contractor, or volunteer violate their contractual obligation regarding the ownership of these two or any other photographs. As a result of the unauthorized uploading of these two photographs, The Trust, as described earlier, is sufficiently confident that they were downloaded as unlicensed copies of photographs published on website(s) owned or contracted with The Trust to host intellectual property on the basis that Trust property would be viewed solely in context with the articles or photographic essays or albums published by The Trust, which would include works authored by the Trust such as essays, photographs, videos, and other media. At no point did The Trust grant permission, license, or otherwise allow in any way for the Wikipedia Commons users to upload original works considered copyrighted intellectual property in the form of photographs authored by The NA Trust under a contractual basis with Trust employees, interns, and volunteers. To conclude, under the Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter section COM:NETCOPYVIO it unequivocally states that “[t]he vast majority of images found on the internet are copyright-protected and may not be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here. Many websites are silent on copyright issues, but images on those sites are just as off-limits as those on sites which explicitly say “Copyright, all rights reserved.” Works are copyrighted by default; a copyright notice or a © sign is not needed.” On The Trust website, and on any website or platform where The Trust contracted for exhibition of any intellectual property, a detailed copyright notice informing the viewer that the intellectual property was copyrighted by The NA Trust was published along with a © sign and the message “Copyright (year). All rights reserved” when those safeguards are not necessary only as an abundance of caution. As a result of the copyrighted photographs owned by The NA Trust which were downloaded from the Internet by Wikimedia Commons users who were not given permission or license to upload the original works owned by The Trust to Wikimedia Commons and later intentionally misrepresented the copyright and actual ownership of the works, we respectfully ask that this photograph and the other photograph tagged as a copyright violation that are the subject of this correspondence, as well as the cropped version of one of the photographs located on the same page, be deleted and permanently removed from Wikimedia servers in accordance with copyright law of the United States and Wikimedia Commons policies, guidelines, regulations, and procedures. Thoughtful and Considerate (talk) 14:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)" I have converted the "speedy" tag to a deletion request. Note: This would also apply to the derivative work File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III (cropped).jpg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per info from User:Thoughtful and Considerate at User_talk:Infrogmation#Hello. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Deletion overturned following DRV at [2]. These files are subject to repeated attempts at deletion by one or more users abusing multiple accounts, please ensure future deletion requests are filed by editors in good standing and not single purpose accounts or accounts blocked for sockpuppetry on other projects. Nick (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Obvious photoshop of face, authorship claim obviousy false, date obviously false DuncanHill (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- The original, unvandalized, image is File:MoyaleEastAfrica1941.JPG. DuncanHill (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Agreed - If it looks like a duck... Shearonink (talk) 21:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete Obvious vandalism. — MusikAnimal talk 22:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, all of the above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; vandalism. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GreenMeansGo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how this is a work of the Canadian government. It seems to be a picture provided by a family member or friend for the purpose of identifying her. GMGtalk 01:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: I intended to nominate this for a DR initially, but just hit the wrong button. GMGtalk 01:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as a copyright violation. OGL is a specific license which the Canadian government proactively grants to some of its own works. We don't just slap it on any image they ever publish willy nilly. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Michael Moates Post Game interview with Secretary of the US Navy Ray Mabus and Vice Admiral Walter Carter.png
[edit]Copy of recently deleted image see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former Arizona State Senator and Senate Candidate Dr. Kelli Ward, D.O. and Michael Moates.jpg and Michael Moates and Former Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus.jpg 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 04:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Se encuentra anticuado y obsoleto Sxtgj (talk) 04:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Se encuentra anticuado y obsoleto Sxtgj (talk) 04:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Se encuentra anticuado y obsoleto Sxtgj (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Se encuentra anticuado y obsoleto Sxtgj (talk) 04:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Se encuentra anticuado y obsoleto Sxtgj (talk) 04:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Se encuentra anticuado y obsoleto Sxtgj (talk) 04:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:OOS promotional materials. FYI es:Los Jcr has been deleted many times. All pages created by this user should be deleted.
Roy17 (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted--Roy17 (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
cause i uploaded this. Itsnamina (talk) 22:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: upload is recent enough that COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Reactant structure is chemically incorrect (tagged for almost two years). It's needlessly confusing for the two analogous structures to be in different orientations and colorings (obscures the key chemical change it's trying to illustrate), and it's got a ton of generally low quality graphics and text. Replaced by File:Hydrodesulfurization of benzothiophene.png--many catalysts are known, so I left it generalized. DMacks (talk) 14:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The nomination describes the file's problems well. The replacement file fixes the problems. Ed (Edgar181) 12:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; poor-quality chemical reaction equation with useless colour usage, opaque & superseded by File:Hydrodesulfurization of benzothiophene.png. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 23:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anandap891 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused screenshot. I can't find any evidence thet DebPlanet actually exists. Only upload and no other activity by this user Malcolma (talk) 09:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Non-informative, low quality image Olgerts V (talk) 10:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Non-informative, low quality image Olgerts V (talk) 10:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; orphan, uncat since 2016 -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos
- File:Selfie at dayara peak.jpg
- File:IMG-20190520-WA0032.jpg
- File:IMG-20190520-WA0035.jpg
- File:IMG-20190521-WA0164.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vasif Vahab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope -- Asclepias (talk) 14:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope and derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gimbalpapua (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Some from Facebook (i.e. no permission).
- File:FB IMG 15519996964592900a.jpg
- File:20190407 055104a.jpg
- File:20190517 194641 0000a.png
- File:FB IMG 1545762570264302a.jpg
- File:20190613 152902a.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
SonyEricsson T630 62.202.180.188 10:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Could you state your point a bit more explicitly? "This file should be deleted because of SonyEricsson T630" does not sound like any convincing evidence to me. --Kreuzschnabel 11:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
© udn.com All Rights Reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
2019. © Dunaújvárosi Kohász Kézilabda Akadémia Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
no permission, alos published at https://www.standard.co.uk/tech/stormzy-glastonbury-set-tim-routledge-lightning-designer-a4176361.html Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; glitch incomplete upload -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely commercial pornography.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 00:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sajjadabro (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by George Chernilevsky. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DheerajDani (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Author request Bbdyn (talk) 10:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bbdyn (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Can the deleting admin please remove the 1 July DR as it is redundant (previous not even closed yet). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: SCREENSHOT not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bbdyn (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is in use on Nicholas Alahverdian (Q59974163). --bjh21 (talk) 17:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious claim of own work, very similar to photos on https://www.nicholasalahverdian.com/author/simon/. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bbdyn (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Incorrectly-attributed upscaled version of File:Nicholas Alahverdian.jpg. --bjh21 (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Licensing Issue Lodeaver (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Licensing Issue Lodeaver (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Racconish. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by wikitexteditclan (talk · contribs)
[edit]The first two are on the model's Instagram profile [3], [4] and the last one on her Facebook page credited to Anna Koniaeva. The photographs are in high resolution but user:Wikitexteditclan's authorship is questionable.
- File:Fotografie pořízená během soustředění s Miss Czech Republic.jpg
- File:Andrea Prchalová těsně po vítězství.jpg
- File:Miss Czech International Republic.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
No indication this was posted to instagram with a free license. Masem (talk) 19:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Editor has been photoshopping himself or another person into Commons images multiple times today and relabeling the new/edited images. I doubt this particular low-quality image is encyclopedic or will end up being of any value to the project. Shearonink (talk) 21:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader is simply trolling. This image has no educational value, even if the toes are "severely diseased". — MusikAnimal talk 22:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Musik. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Rodhullandemu. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Núria Rion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Roy17 (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: INSCOPE as it is artwork by someone notable enough but needs permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
I just want to deleted it. Qëndrim Bllata (talk) 22:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom, https://www.magazinci.com/pic_lib/bigSize/2006-11-01_saruhan_hunel_002.jpg — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
partial upload of image; already have full image at File:Landscape by Sesshu (Ohara).jpg so no need to have this partial image; uncategorized Deanlaw (talk) 22:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
partial upload; portion so small that it likely has no use Deanlaw (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
308A9CB2-5DA6-4D8A-B0A4-207F11CB72A.jpg MissyouDS (talk) 23:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted poster, no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?from=yandex.ru%3Bimages%2Fsearch%3Bimages%3B%3B&text=&etext=2199.H0Nfr3ORiG9c57d7uZif1Yi74tVHzvL6gXj1yKxtWPM.d3fddf875849199a29646c09aa46e627acded16b&uuid=&state=tid_Wvm4RM35w_KF6_gYfMtmgS4f5d81OW-g6ZRMBJsI3GF_Hm08bQ,,&data=UlNrNmk5WktYejR0eWJFYk1LdmtxbUEzU2ZGZ0o1eWdwTFBQSWd2SDhJc2l0dWRrcXNNSFZEVXZJUGhrREFoMjF3WDRwYW9xblNpREp3MGpRZng2MVRMUHpia2ZqQmFmUnd0aFZSb0h3OWtjcGdpQlBVbnRYdyws&sign=c568fa3f2b366affa265307e8a65bc49&keyno=0&b64e=2&l10n=ru копиво 82.208.115.220 08:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious claim of own work, found on http://www.lorilori.me/lorilori, OTRS permission needed. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP; Dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
zu alt, soll in mit einem aktuellen Bild ausgetauscht werden Frydling (talk) 10:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep no valid reason for deletion --Stepro (talk) 13:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep kein Löschgrund --Ralf Roletschek 15:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
the reason of wikipedia existance is that information are up to date. this picture ist not up to date (5 years old) and therefore need to be deleted or changed. so change the picture to an up to date one, but to write just no is stupid and unlogic. Frydling (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is Commons, not Wikipedia. It's no problem to change the picture on the Wikipedia article to a newer one. But Commons is a repository, and that's why all pictures will be kept for historical reasons.
- btw: To call others stupid just because of the own lack of understanding is rude and unlogic, too. --Stepro (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
On the right hand side there is a picture which is 5 years old above the description which need to be changed. I cant change it to an actual picture. This has nothing to do with lack of understanding on my side, its just wrong!!! I dont understand that you insist to leave a picture which not represent the person how she is today out of a not logic principle. Frydling (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- "Alte" Bilder werden nicht gelöscht oder überspeichert. Neue werden zusätzlich hochgeladen. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- OK, dann schreibe ich auch auf Deutsch, da Sie es tatsächlich nicht verstehen: Das hier ist Wikimedia Commons, ein Datei-Repositorium. Hier werden Dateien (hauptsächlich Fotos) verfügbar gehalten, die in Wikipedia, anderen Wikimedia-Projekten oder ganz woanders genutzt werden können.
- Sie möchten ein Foto in einem Wikipedia-Artikel ausgetauscht haben. Das ist völlig in Ordnung, aber hier der falsche Ort dafür. Das lässt sich in Wikipedia selbst bewerkstelligen, so ein aktuelleres Porträtfoto unter freier Lizenz hier hochgeladen wurde. Das ist momentan jedoch nicht der Fall.
- Die Lösung für Sie wäre also, ein aktuelles Porträtfoto unter freier Lizenz (bzw. mit schriftlicher Einwilligung des Fotografen) hier hochzuladen, und danach das Foto im Wikipedia-Artikel auszutauschen.
- Eine Löschung dieses älteren Fotos ist dafür weder notwendig noch zweckmäßig, und wird auch nicht passieren. --Stepro (talk) 17:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ergänzumg/Korrektur: Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass Sie das Foto im Artikel ja bereits vor einigen Tagen ausgetauscht haben. Es war hier nicht in der Personenkategorie zu finden, da es unkategorisiert war. Das habe ich soeben nachgeholt. Daher ist Ihr Löschbegehren mit obiger Argumentation um so unverständlicher. --Stepro (talk) 17:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Im Artikel von Angela Merkel können wir ein Bild von 1990 zeigen. Hätten wir ein früheres, wäre es vielleicht auch im Artikel. Frau Hiller ist nun nicht Bundeskanzlerin aber wir wissen nicht, ob sie nicht vielleicht noch sehr viel bedeutender wird als heute, dann sind ältere Fotos wertvoll. Außerdem ist Commons nicht nur für Wikipedia da, es ist ein Pool freier Fotos. Wenn aus irgendeinem Grund ein Bild von 2014 gebraucht wird, dann haben wir es. Das neue Bild ist übrigens hübsch, nur das Herunterrechnen ist unvorteilhaft. Ist nur ein Foto im Artikel, ist ein Porträt erste Wahl, hier kann man aber nicht mehr sinnvoll zuschneiden. --Ralf Roletschek 19:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Mit der Argumentation müsste man z. B.
, löschen, da es veraltet ist. Nach der gleichen Logik müsste man jedes Personenbild nach ein paar Jahren löschen, da sie veraltet sind. Völlig abwegige Vorstellung. --ST ○ 19:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Ich habe es versucht, das Ausgangsmaterial ist einfach zu schlecht. Deshalb sollte vorerst das Bild von 2014 wieder in den Artikel. --Ralf Roletschek 20:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhisheqmishra (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Blurred photo of unidentified building possibly in Argentina. With no further info it's of no educational value Malcolma (talk) 17:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Not a original file - possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, was uploaded by mistake by self, was meant to be placed with artist’s bio page but that page was deleted 2001:48F8:9004:2FA:752C:3F90:BA1F:DF58 04:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lúcio André de Andrade Ferreira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 17:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Printed material does not appear to be own work, see COM:DW Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused file with no meaningful description. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Out of scope, orphan, uncat since Jan 2015. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KALARATNA DR.K.V.SATYANARAYANA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos/movie screenshots. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:KVS Satyabhama Photos .jpg
- File:K.V.Satyanarayan played Bhamakalapam at Balaji Temple Chicago USA.jpg
- File:K.V.Satyanarayan presented Bhamakalapam with Guru Sri Korada.jpg
- File:K.V.Satyanarayan presented Bhamakalapam with Guru Sri Korada narashimha rao.jpg
- File:K V Satyanarayana film Sruthilayalu .jpg
- File:Nandi award received by K.V.Satyanarayana.jpg
- File:Srikrishna Devaraya role by K V Satyanarayana.jpg
- File:KVS Cover page.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcalejruiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]screenshots
- File:YangLiyu2717.png
- File:YangLiyuU22.png
- File:YangLiyuGZE14318.png
- File:Yang Liyu.png
- File:Maxime Leverbe.png
- File:Leverbe28217.png
- File:Kunty Caicedo in allenamento con il Cruzeiro.png
- File:Marcel Ruiz with Queretaro.png
- File:Marcel Ruiz in training.png
Roy17 (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
partially uploaded image; review of image does not indicate that it is otherwise useful Deanlaw (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 16:39, 21 Juli 2019 UTC: File is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format (F7) --Krdbot 01:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a map of very poor quality. Delete, per COM:Redundant (bad quality). Vercelas 00:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This looks more artistic than factual. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
No metadata found. Derivated file found in Twitter Taichi (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
copy by mistake of [5] Протогер (talk) 02:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
duplicado falso Profesionalperuano (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, the file is used in 6 projects. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Taivo. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No Existe esta imagen Rujomar (talk) 03:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the redirect if nothing wrong with the name. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Real person, per COM:BLP TooMuchSalt1488 (talk) 03:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Given reason above for DR is BS although the image was originally tagged with no permission as the uploader seem to be a throw-away account claiming to be the person in the image. --Denniss (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 06:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, probably copyvio. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Masumrezarock100 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 06:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete @Racconish: Thanks for notifying me. The uploader tried to create an autobiography and advertising herself on English Wikipedia and she is now blocked. Masum Reza📞 06:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Csc.rishabh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely false "own work" claim, uploader is depicted (per username). Insufficient EXIF, one EXIF has "ANUPAM" as file author. Missing correct author and source info, and no evidence of permission from otiginal copyright owner(s).
GermanJoe (talk) 06:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. B dash (talk) 06:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kagaoua as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 06:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement.
- File:Moon and Kim on Mt. Paektu.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 01.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 02.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 03.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 04.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 05.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 06.jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit 07.jpg
- File:September 2018 inter-Korean summit day2 (1).jpg
- File:September 2018 inter-Korean summit day2 (3).jpg
B dash (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
The Korea Summit changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 30 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. B dash (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't meet the criteria of PD North Korea A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/koreasummit.kr
[edit]The Korea Summit changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 30 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement.
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (1).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (2).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (3).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (4).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (5).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (6).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (7).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (8).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (9).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (10).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (11).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (12).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (13).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (14).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (15).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (16).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (17).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (18).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (19).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (20).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (21).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (22).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (23).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (23) (cropped).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (24).jpg
- File:Sept. 2018 Inter-Korea Summit Gallery (25).jpg
B dash (talk) 07:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olaniyan Olushola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olaniyan Olushola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely flickrwashing -flickr account has these and one or two others. Unlikely to be taken by the flickr user
- File:Chukwuemeka Agbata Fred Jnr.jpg
- File:Chukwuemeka Agbata.jpg
- File:Chukwuemeka Agbata and Mark Zuckerberg.jpg
- File:Chukwuemeka Agbata and Ingo Herbert, Former Consul General, Germany to Nigeria.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. All the files had different camera in EXIF, so own work is doubtful. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, last remaining images, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 07:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos and Dubious claim of own work when the subject is the uploader and no exif
Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: The original DR rationale was «Out of scope personal photos»; now it was changed from a scope matter to a copyright issue. Why? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Uploader claims that the own work statement is correct and that this photo was never uploaded elsewhere, and Google Images concurs. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment:@Tuvalkin: One of the photos was in use after my DR so possibly in scope but thats now changed and I have reverted back to my originals suspicion that these are out of scope selfies, although the uploader appears to be in the photo Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Since there are no copyright issues on these two (Google images draw a blank also from this one), then I vote to keep both: The first photo shows an interesting combo of pork pie hat and three piece suit (jacket and waistcoat apparent, trousers presumed) yet with absent necktie, and it is also a unique photograph showing palmar dermatoglyphs (on the left hand) in context of an everyday situation and yet very clearly even at small sizes. The second photo shows one of the only three different Rwandese singers we have categorized in Commons — that should be scope enough. (Oh, and he’s not really a serious, professional singer? — better check this.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Tuvalkin makes a strong case Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Tuválkin Gbawden Thank you very much Tuvalkin! Ben Kayiranga is a popular singer, well known in Rwanda but unprofessional. Conclusion: Can I use these photos or not? Best regards, benugouma✉ 17:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Benugouma, just curious: Except the few bits in English, what’s the language Only You is in? Google translator “autodetects” it as Xhosa, but I’m sure that’s wrong. Swahilli or Kinyarwanda, maybe? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin,You're right, it's Kinyarwanda. Ben Kayiranga sings in English, Kinyarwanda and French.benugouma 09:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Tuvalkin. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Tuvalkin.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept. The request is withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 08:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 08:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, probably copyright violation. In addition, this is unused personal photo and out of project scope. The uploader was indefinitely blocked in en.wiki as self-promotion-only account. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 08:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
https://yandex.ru/images/search?cbir_id=1598966%2Fi61y0H7EhV8EhhIqyj5xzw&cbird=5&rpt=imageview&redircnt=1561969303.1 копирайт 82.208.115.220 08:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating my own upload because I just noticed that the author died in 1950, so It's not in public domain in his country (Spain) Escudero (talk) 09:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 09:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 09:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted sign. FunkMonk (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted sign. FunkMonk (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 09:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- But why? It's a nice image and others might already use it under the free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion, educational value does not seem so big. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is big and beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted logo fails COM:FAIRUSE its wiki page DBigXrayᗙ 09:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo due to crown. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
The uploader claimed this selfie was granted permission in the description field, yet failed to provide any proof (such as OTRS or declarations that could be image-reviewed). Also, the description said this picture is only available for Wikipedia, which against CC licensing. Techyan（Talk） 09:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
president standard appears to violate COM:FAIRUSE DBigXrayᗙ 09:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, protected 70 years from creation. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 09:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is big and beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- But why? It's a nice image and others might already use it under the free license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion; educational value isn't so big. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per EXIF, author is Chirath Senadeera. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- that's no reason. Kersti (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion, quality seems quite bad. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here whole month has passed. This is beautiful photo, it is big and has camera data. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
because i uploaded this so i want to delete Itsnamina (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion, educational value seems not so big. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Trademarked image Veracious (talk) 10:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Being trademarked is not valid grounds for deletion, but does this meet TOO in the United States or Indonesia? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, Commons does not care about trademarks. Copyright is what we care about. Threshold of originality is unclear for Indonesia. As Indonesia is former colony of Netherlands, I used TOO of Netherlands, which is hopefully similar. Seems like Netherlands has quite high TOO, so I consider the logo simple and will keep it. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Don't see why the "no permission" tag was added originally, as the file had a license from the start, and it is plausible as such (fairly high resolution, EXIF data). However, it has neither a meaningful file name nor description ("khnu gkkhn"). Supposedly, per categories, it's an Ukrainian politician and a member of Holos Party. But who is he? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, unused photo about unidentified person. He is called a politician, but I feel inside, that nobody knows such politician. I'll delete also file:Dfjfhfdpoirt.jpg: small unused personal photo without metadata. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, own work seems somehow unlikely. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 17:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Arthur Crbz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 10:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I believe own work. Deleted as out of scope. Santosh Kapar (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only in the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:2019 Sudanese protests
[edit]Possible copyright violation. The Exif data of the original suggest that the photo has been copied from Facebook and the author is Ala Kheir.
- File:Sudanese protestors greeting sudanese army (cropped).jpg
- File:Sudanese protestors greeting sudanese army.jpg
jdx Re: 10:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete most uploads of M.Saleh (talk · contribs) as copyright violation from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
derivative work issue with the poster in background Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, crop was possible, but as the photo had no camera data and it was user's last remaining upload, I decided to delete it as likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:How-To-Fill-Invalid-Clicks-Contact-Form-Your-Suspended-Adsense-Account-Invalid-Traffic-Appeal.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:CharlesPowell.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, scaled-down duplicate. Taivo (talk) 18:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomasantony123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The copyright to a photograph almost always belongs to the photographer, not the subject. These photos are pretty clearly the work of multiple different photographers, who should all confirm that their work is freely licensed by contacting OTRS.
- File:Aby Tom Cyriac copy.jpg
- File:Afzal New 1.jpg
- File:Aby Tom Cyriac new.jpg
- File:Pavada-Audio-Launch-Aby Tom Cyriac10.jpg
- File:Pavada-Audio-Launch-Aby tom Cyriac.jpg
- File:Aby-tom-cyriac.jpg
- File:Aby-tom-cyriac-69990.jpg
- File:Aby Tom Cyriac (profile photo).jpg
Storkk (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomasantony123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work
Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. The uploader's last remaining contributions, camera data is different. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Emmanuelle Amsellem, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Emmanuelle et Brouillon.jpg: small photo without metadata, seems like not own work. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Still from an unfree YouTube video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Logyk-4wY40 Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This is not a picture of Latheefa Koya. Fandi89 (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation: small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This is not a picture of Latheefa Koya Fandi89 (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation: source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Bitmap render of File:Blue Lives Matter flag.svg, pointless. TFerenczy (talk) 12:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
There is possibility that the picture is copied by this file. I asked to User:LDukoff, who submitted this file, but he/she did not answered. To be honest, it is still doubt but anyway I thought we need to make sure this picture is violating copyrights or not. 遡雨祈胡 (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Huronevict as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Files and pages created as advertisements - This is the only photo uploaded by LDukoff. And LDukoff only edits the page of the person in the picture many hundreds times[6]. LDukoff is likely to have uploaded this photo for self-advertisements. miya (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I think this file is within COM:SCOPE, as it illustrates a Wikipedia article ja:Sputniko!.--miya (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete It is true that this photo was taken by the uploader. But advertising and self-promotion are clearly out of the COM:SCOPE in project.--Huronevict (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I'm still wondering which side I should vote (or not), but I know the picture is absolutely clear about having no problem with copyright and the right to refuse to been photographed, which is easy to become a cause of trouble in these kind of pictures. However, I agree to the idea that the picture is not like portrait photography which is nice to be used in encyclopedia's article, and it is also I understand it is much seem like self-promotion. The article itself seem like self-promotion, but also the article is satisfying criterion to be written as one's article in Japanese Wikipedia, and this time it will make a digression in this deletion request, so I'm not going to write about this problem furthermore.--遡雨祈胡 (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Wikipedia prohibits the creation of autobiography, but allows editing of their own pages. Contributing material or making suggestions on the article's talk page is considered proper. But LDukoff didn’t. This is a problem. However, Wikimedia Commons prohibits self-promotion. This portrait should be deleted.--Huronevict (talk) 20:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment As far as I know, people in Japanese Wikipedia seems dislike to let them write articles about themselves, which rely on ja:WP:AB. It sometimes rejects those people. Here are some examples about these kinds of matters. However, most of the people who are written in Wikipedia probably does not know these rules, or even they know these rules, I don't know how many people really cares about. In addition, in many cases they don't put (or don't know to put) references which satisfy ja:WP:NOR, ja:WP:NPOV, ja:WP:V. In this discussion, I personally wish miya to tell us how did you explain these kind of matters to User:LDukoff. I know it is important to discuss about the picture is going to be deleted or not, but I also personally believe that this case will be one of the examples for how do we treat similar kinds of matters in the future.--遡雨祈胡 (talk) 13:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- 遡雨祈胡 さん、（personally wish とのことですが、英語で細かいことを書くのは困難なので日本語で失礼します）OTRSの2017年のTicket:2017102310005624では、祈胡遡雨さんご自身の依頼により著作権的に問題がないことを確認しました。日本語版の方針ja:WP:NOR, ja:WP:NPOV, ja:WP:Vを説明するのはOTRS/Permissionsの守備範囲ではありません。もちろん必要と感じれば説明しますが、ja:WP:ABについては祈胡遡雨さんご自身がメールでUser:LDukoffさんに紹介済みでしたし、jawpの記事ja:Sputniko!は何年も前に立項されたもので、「存命人物の出典明記」タグは貼られていたものの「特筆性」を問題としたタグは貼られていませんでしたから。◇コモンズの方針はOTRS/Permissionsの守備範囲ですが、Commons:Project scopeによれば、コモンズのファイルはeducationalであることが大前提（Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose）で、その点、この画像は主題の記事に有用(COM:INUSE)なので問題はないと考えました。"Advertising or self-promotion"は"Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose”のone of examplesでしかないので、優先順位は低いです。記事の主題の人や組織から提供された画像がCOM:INUSEであれば、受け入れられてきたはずです。--miya (talk) 14:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Okay, I also checked e-mail about 2017's thing, and I just decided I'm going to vote for keep this time.--遡雨祈胡 (talk) 15:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Promotional photo is not educational. Another photo, such as File:Hiromi Ozaki by Joi Ito.jpg is enough to explain this person.--Huronevict (talk) 10:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment You misunderstand the expression "educational" on Commons. If you read Commons:Project scope carefully, you will find the passages saying:
- >Commons:Project scope/en#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose:The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".
- >>Commons:Project scope/ja#教育的な目的に具体的に有用であること:ここでは「教育的」という表現は、「知識を提供する」「指南する」「情報を与える」のような広い意味で解釈してください。
- >Commons:Project scope/en#File in use in another Wikimedia project:A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose,
- >>Commons:Project scope/ja#別のウィキメディア プロジェクトで使用されているファイル:>ウィキメディア財団の他のプロジェクトの一つで使用されているメディアファイルは、自動的に、教育的な目的のために有用であるとみなされます。
- Please understand how we use the expression "educational" on Commons.--miya (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It is clearly stated in COM:PARTYPICS that advertising or self-promotion are not legally used files. Your theory that any image used in a project is educational is inconsistent with the guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huronevict (talk • contribs) 02:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I replaced a self-promotional image that was not properly used with another image.--Huronevict (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I think it is not fair to replace an image so as to make your point. --miya (talk) 00:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I think that it is lacking in fairness not to touch that this image is advertisement. This is an obvious advertising photo.--Huronevict (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept. The photo is potentially in scope. Self-promotion is not totally prohibited in Commons, because sometimes advertizers give away good photos about their products or themselves. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
No indoor COM:FoP in Mainland China. WQL (talk) 13:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Missvain (talk) 19:20, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
No indoor COM:FoP（全景自由）in Mainland of China. WQL (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose subjects are simple stick-man diagrams, which a Chinese high court has ruled ineligible for copyright in a similar case. Read COM:TOO China for more.--Roy17 (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- If it is not Supreme High Court, then it will have no value for reference, since Chinese law is not case law.--WQL (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Commons community makes decisions by drawing comparison between real-life cases and Commons files. Whether or not a country practises common law is not relevant to the discussion on copyright of an actual work.
- In this case, the figures are simple geometric shapes or doodles, or stick-man figures. They are similar to an example in COM:TOO China which decided a figure like 黑棍小人 (头部为黑色圆球体，没有面孔；身体的躯干、四肢和足部均由黑色线条构成；小人的头和身体呈分离状；小人的四肢呈拉长状) was ineligible for copyright.--Roy17 (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- You can make such a comparison, but as I said before, due to the fact that Chinese law is not case law, the example given is not ruling by Supreme High Court, and the case is not listed in the Typical Case published by Supreme High Court, your comparison is meaningless. --WQL (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- If it is not Supreme High Court, then it will have no value for reference, since Chinese law is not case law.--WQL (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. David290 (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per discussion, especially per Roy. Taivo (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
The previous DR was closed as kept because the figures on the image are considered below the relatively low TOO of the People's Republic of China. I don't see any new arguments for deletion here. Keep pandakekok9 05:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 13:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Mission patch obtained at NASA Kennedy Space Center on mission launch date. Mission patches are not copyrighted. O'Dea (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @O'Dea: "Mission patches are not copyrighted". Could you explain such a statement? It's an obvious creative work and Arabsat is not a NASA satellite... --Discasto talk 21:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's a SpaceX patch. SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license. O'Dea (talk) 03:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- First it was a NASA patch. Now it's SpaceX's, which happens to release things under a "Creative Commons" license. It's all we need
--Discasto talk 07:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- First it was a NASA patch. Now it's SpaceX's, which happens to release things under a "Creative Commons" license. It's all we need
- It's a SpaceX patch. SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license. O'Dea (talk) 03:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
The patch is copyrighted and not free to use! You have not the right to reproduce the patch here with your own (ineffective) licence. Ras67 (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- No "ineffective licence" is being used. Both NASA (where the patch was obtained in person as already described) and SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons licence.
- Also, please note the notice at the top of this page: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." This is an archive and you have edited it in contravention of the notice. O'Dea (talk) 23:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The DR was reopened correctly. Your prior statements are not correct. Either NASA nor SpaceX release this patch under a free licence, thats only your allegation! And why your name must attributed if it is a work of NASA/SpaceX? You are not the copyright holder. --Ras67 (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- 1. The issue was resolved on 23 July 2019.
- 2. Please consult NASA and SpaceX Creative Commons policies.
- 3. Please do not use this page again. It is an archive. I repeat what I quoted before from the notice at the top of the page: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." You are incorrect to say that " The DR was reopened correctly." THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF AN OLD DISCUSSION.
- O'Dea (talk) 00:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also when you shout, the closen archiv is the blue area above! And here is the correct new discussion. And no, the issue was not resolved. It is not a NASA patch and SpaceX releases patches not under a free licence. You have licenced it without the authorship. --Ras67 (talk) 13:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also, please note the notice at the top of this page: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." This is an archive and you have edited it in contravention of the notice. O'Dea (talk) 23:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- I did not shout: The interpretation of capitals as shouting is a convention which does not apply in all cases. I used capital letters to draw your attention to something already said, but which you ignored – twice – so I decided to use justified emphasis to see if I could capture your attention that way.
- This discussion was closed and the archive should not have been edited after the debate was closed (see rules above). See COMMONS:DEL for further instructions if you wish to re-nominate, as mandated above.
- Elon Musk announced SpaceX's adoption of the Creative Commons licence in 2015. O'Dea (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- SpaceX's logos were not licenced by the company under free conditions. Please provide a link for your contrary allegation and add the correct licence to the image page. At this time there is your license not SpaceX's. BTW, currently all new images from SpaceX are CC BY-NC 2.0 and not eligible for Commons. --Ras67 (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Elon Musk announced SpaceX's adoption of the Creative Commons licence in 2015. O'Dea (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- O'Dea, I really cannot fathom where you get the idea that SpaceX releases their patches under any kind of free license. They do not now, and have never done so. Let me be absolutely blunt: unless this physical product and design can be proven to be released by SpaceX under terms laid out under their OTRS agreement with Wikimedia, then it is not permissible. This is a photograph of a patch, and while you can release the photograph, you cannot release the design. It remains copyrighted. — Huntster (t @ c) 11:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- I already explained this last July, almost a year ago: "SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license." SpaceX announced their adoption of the Creative Commons licence, and Elon Musk confirmed this in a personal tweet. O'Dea (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- We can only operate under what the OTRS release gives us. That encompasses specific imagery released through the SpaceX website and the material (at the time) that was available through the SpaceX Flickr page. Since SpaceX changed their license on Flickr, that avenue is no longer applicable. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I already explained this last July, almost a year ago: "SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license." SpaceX announced their adoption of the Creative Commons licence, and Elon Musk confirmed this in a personal tweet. O'Dea (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Huntster. To clarify, the discussion can be reopened if there is a new reason to delete or restore. The blue area should not be disturbed by non-admins unless there is something urgent. --Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
likely copyvio, seems to be a professionally shot photo with no licensing. Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
appears to be a low-res screengrab of a video Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, unused crop from file:Billy Sherwood.jpg. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
No indoor Com:FOP（全景自由）in mainland of China. WQL (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- @WQL: It's mostly text,should under public domain.Sunyiming steven (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Text too short to have a copyright. Yann (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, such kind of short texts are not copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of poster. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of... something. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Japan for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no 2d fop.--Roy17 (talk) 00:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
C'est mon logo, mais je ne veux pas qu'il soit en licence commune La Mesure de l'Excellence (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It's en error. This is my logo, not for common 's licence La Mesure de l'Excellence (talk) 14:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted as CSD G7 by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 03:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Giannino Castiglioni
[edit]See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Problem with dozens and dozens of uploads and edits by socks of globally banned User:Alec Smithson. Though there might be uploads from other users in here. Giannino Castiglioni died in 1971.
- File:Antenna Portabandiera e Scalinate scolpite da Castiglioni.png
- File:Art work Castiglioni Antenna of Lierna Lake of Como with flagpole on the long lake of Lierna, Via Roma.jpg
- File:Castiglioni with the backdrop of the Bellagio promontory seen from Lierna.jpg
- File:Cover of the original project of the Village of Lierna Lake Como realized as a living sculpture by the artist Giannino Castiglioni, Italy.png
- File:Dipinto di Giannino Castiglioni, Chiesetta di Lierna Lago di Como, 1910.jpg
- File:Doppia Scalinata monumentale scolpita da Giannino Castiglioni, Lierna Lago di Como, 1984.jpg
- File:Fontana Castiglioni Piazzetta di Lierna Lago di Como.jpg
- File:Fontana San Francesco di Milano Castiglioni.jpg
- File:Fountain Sculpture by Castiglioni Piazzetta di Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, A family in the wind, Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, Al Parco della Villa di Lierna, Borgo Villa, Lierna Lago di Como.png
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, Expo1906, Official Medal.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, L'arte del fare, Ed. Skira.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, La Bandiera, Lierna Lago di Como.png
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, La Battaglia di Parabiago, Sala del Consiglio di Parabiago.png
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, La Vittoria, Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, Painting of the sculpture of the Fountain of San Francesco, Piazza San Angelo Via Moscova Milan, Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, The girl from the Lierna villa, Borgo Villa, Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Giannino Castiglioni, The terrace of a Lierna villa, Borgo Villa, via Roma, 1919, Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Lampioni di Piazza Duomo di Milano, scolpiti da Giannino Castiglioni.jpg
- File:Piazza San Marco, Venice, Giannino Castiglioni, 1905.jpg
- File:Project of the stairways sculpted by Castiglioni.jpg
- File:Sculpture on Lamplamps of Piazza Duomo in Milan sculpted by Giannino Castiglioni, Museum of Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Sculptures on Lamplamps of Piazza Duomo in Milan sculpted by Giannino Castiglioni, Museum of Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Sedia Lierna by Castiglioni.jpg
- File:Self-portrait of Castiglioni at Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:The Art director Giacomo Castiglioni, father of Giannino Castiglioni, Milano, 1910.jpg
- File:The tip of Bellagio, View from Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:The white umbrella in a Lierna villa, Via Roma, Lierna Lake Como, 1905.jpg
- File:The project of the Piazzetta di Lierna, facing the lake, via Roma, by Castiglioni as if it were a sculpture in which to live, Lierna Lake Como.png
- File:The project section of the Village of Lierna realized by Castiglioni as if it were a sculpture in which to live, Lierna Lake Como.png
- File:The sculpture of the Porta del Duomo in Milan, realized at Lierna Lake Como by Giannino Castiglioni, with the stories of Sant'Ambrogio.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all
except File:Giannino Castiglioni, La Bandiera, Lierna Lago di Como.png, the only wotk by Castiglioni that has been verifiably published pre-1923.However, if that is kept, it needs to be moved to File:Giannino Castiglioni, La Bandiera, 1918.png and the documentation needs to be changed completely. The date of publication, source, and the label "Lierna Lago di Como" are all spurious. I've checked each of the remaining images. They are all quite blatant copyvios with completely spurious documentation which always gives a random day in January 1922 for publication and a generic source of "X Archive", when it is blindingly false. He even used that description for the cover of a book published in 2016! Many of these works were not created until after 1923. For the ones that were (some of the paintings), there is no evidence that they were published prior to that date. In fact, Castiglioni did not exhibit his paintings and very rarely sold them. The 3D sculpture images are all stolen from other internet sites. Voceditenore (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Updated by Voceditenore (talk) 15:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Voceditenore: for Commons, a work also needs to be PD in the source country. (country of first publication, typically) I assume File:Giannino Castiglioni, La Bandiera, Lierna Lago di Como.png was first published in Italy, in which case it won't be PD in the source country until 2042. Some Wikipedias accept PD-USonly. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Interesting, I didn't know that. In that case, I've changed my !vote to simply "Delete all". Voceditenore (talk) 15:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, *Delete all-- Adri08 (talk) 18:32, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Giannino Castiglioni
[edit]No valid source.
- File:Giannino Castiglioni Antenna (40 mt.), designed in Lierna Lake Como, installed in Buenos Aires, Avenida de los italianos, Boulevard Guemes, Puerto Madero district.jpg
- File:Sculpture of the Acqua Ferruginosa Fountain by Giannino Castiglioni, Lierna Lake Como.png
- File:Sculpture of the monumental Antenna of Castiglioni in Buenos Aires, 1926, with the artisans of the Fonderia Artistica Battaglia of Milan on a project realized by Giannino Castiglioni at Lierna Lake Como, commissioned by the King of Ital.jpg
- File:Signature of Giannino Castiglioni.jpg Comment could be {{PD-signature}}, but without a source authenticity can't be verified - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- File:Studio Castiglioni a Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:Studio Castiglioni, Via Roma Borgo Villa Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:The artwork of the Lierna Antenna designed and the sculpture of the grand staircase by Giannino Castiglioni at Lierna Lake Como.png
- File:The Italian sculptor Giannino Castiglioni at Lierna Lake Como.jpg
- File:The sculptor Giannino Castiglioni and the sons Achille Castiglioni, Pier Giacomo Castiglioni and Livio Castiglioni in the art studio in Via Roma (strada Napoleonica) in Lierna Lake Como.png
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Apart from possibly the 3 cases below, Delete all. They are all for projects, buildings, etc. post 1923 and the sources and dates are bogus. Many of them are obvious copyvios. None of the "documentatation" can be trusted.
- File:Signature of Giannino Castiglioni.jpg This is pretty much what Castiglioni's signature looks like. Here is an example from a reliable source (see p. 43). However, I have seen nothing like the Commons image anywhere. Given the past record of this user's fakery, it may well be a forgery based on a real signature. Is this OK per PD-signature?
- The following two are simple portrait photographs. But we don't know the real sources or the real dates because this user and his myriad socks always fake that information. The first looks to be c. 1930, the second circa 1920 given the ages of the children. We also don't know the name of the photographer(s). I'm not sure what the policy is here re PD-Italy. It is also highly unlikely these were taken in Lierna and highly likely they were taken in Milan. This user obsessively attempts to tie Lierna to anything and everything regardless of the truth.
- Voceditenore (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all, Regards--Adri08 (talk) 18:33, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is a beer brand in Quebec. I don't believe this runs afoul of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Canada? Also see related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shawinigan Handshake - Le Trou du Diable (23646794199).jpg. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why would there be a special situation about beer labels in Canada? -- Asclepias (talk) 23:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- I guess I'm having trouble understanding why this wouldn't be a valid member of Category:Beer labels, or why images of all such active labels aren't non-free, at least for Canadian brands. So I'll watch this Xfd and learn something. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- In the "category:Beer labels", isolated labels (shown without the whole bottles) are labels that are free, because they are old enough to have entered the public domain, or because they are simple enough to be under the threshold of originality. For images of other labels, there are exceptions in particular situations. See for example this recent deletion request. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- I'll just add that COM:TOO Canada states that it is "OK for most logos." Is a product label a logo? I'd say so. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- The logo of Le trou du diable is at the top left of this page. On the rest of the page are the artworks used for the labels of the beers. The logo is also on the ring on the bottleneck. Anyway, it's not a matter of the definition of logo, it's a matter of being an original creative work. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- I see. And yes COM:PACKAGING does support what you say. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- So delete per nom. Yes, COM:PACKAGING specifically states that en:Wikipedia:Other stuff exists applies as much here as at enwiki. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heshamkadry2908 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs Photos from television series.
- File:4هشام قدري.jpg
- File:3هشام قدري.jpg
- File:2هشام قدري.jpg
- File:1هشام قدري.jpg
- File:هشام قدري.jpg
- File:شخصية نعيم الحلاق .jpg
- File:هشام قدري .jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Dw no source since (dw no source since) — Racconish 💬 18:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
very low res, no meta data, claimed as own work, based on users upload history, unlikely own work BevinKacon (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Photo of text. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
KeepI don't understand why this would be a rationale for deletion. The "text" in question is a label on a bottle that explains that the beer is named for en:Shawinigan Handshake. It is in fact the reverse of the label seen at File:Poutine Park Jarry.jpg, used on that very article. This image is useful in explaining the origin of the name -- and is within project scope, it seems to me. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's a rationale because the text is a non-free work. The "File:Poutine Park Jarry.jpg" should probably be deleted also because of the prominence of the artwork in the photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- I'm striking through !vote as I can't find a counterargument in COM:PACKAGING. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's a rationale because the text is a non-free work. The "File:Poutine Park Jarry.jpg" should probably be deleted also because of the prominence of the artwork in the photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Also see related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shawinigan Handshake - Le Trou du Diable (23386446784).jpg. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PACKAGING. --Storkk (talk) 08:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Same documents from https://www.flickr.com/photos/92121218@N08/8524853211/in/photostream/ and similar copyright violation behavior form the user. No evidence of permissions. Yangfl (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Same documents from https://www.flickr.com/photos/92121218@N08/8524853211/in/photostream/ and similar copyright violation behavior form the user. No evidence of permissions. Yangfl (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
See COM:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_74#Problem_with_dozens_and_dozens_of_uploads_and_edits_by_socks_of_globally_banned_User:Alec_Smithson. Authentic? Source? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a 1961 copyrighted poster [7].
- File:Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (Milano, 1962) - BEIC 6328470 (flopped back).jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (Milano, 1962) - BEIC 6328470.jpg
— Racconish 💬 14:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep
as never copyrighted in the first place. @Racconish: where is the copyright notice? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Paolo Monti photographed these posters in Italy where the copyright of collective works is 70 years from the publication year, regardless of the presence of a copyright notice. — Racconish 💬 14:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Racconish: There are multiple levels here. The original ad you linked was created by or on behalf of ARCHER MILLS, INC., Columbus, Georgia (USA) without a copyright notice and published by them as an ad on page 33 of the February 15, 1961 issue of a magazine in the USA (where it entered the Public Domain 5 years later due to not having a copyright notice and not being registered with the USCO, qualifying for {{PD-US-no notice}}). A different ad (with a different drawing, different headline ending "ilted", and different text "you insist on absolutely ... t colours, choose archer!") evidently was published as a poster in Milan, Italy in 1962. Why it was not translated for use in Italy escapes me. The ad in Milan was figurative art, protected for 20 years after creation (through 1981 or maybe 1982). Monti's photo is a "non-creative" reproduction of figurative art, in that it is a full-on reproduction of a 2D work, which qualifies on Commons for {{PD-art}}. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jeff G., please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy#General rules: 70 years (and not 20) from publication for the Archer poster published in Italy. The analysis is more complex for Monti's work. Yes, in general a non-creative photographic reproduction is entitled to a limited 20 years protection. But this is not any photograph: Monti's work is highly respected in Italy and his reframing might be considered by an Italian court creative enough to entitle his work to full artistic protection [8] [9]. On the other hand, if we wish to consider this photograph as merely documentary, we need to ascertain its first publication date to compute the copyright term. I initially had in mind the protection entitled to Archer's poster, but you are right, the status of Monti's derivative work needs to be assessed.
In any case, the current CC-BY-SA license is weird.— Racconish 💬 12:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jeff G., please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy#General rules: 70 years (and not 20) from publication for the Archer poster published in Italy. The analysis is more complex for Monti's work. Yes, in general a non-creative photographic reproduction is entitled to a limited 20 years protection. But this is not any photograph: Monti's work is highly respected in Italy and his reframing might be considered by an Italian court creative enough to entitle his work to full artistic protection [8] [9]. On the other hand, if we wish to consider this photograph as merely documentary, we need to ascertain its first publication date to compute the copyright term. I initially had in mind the protection entitled to Archer's poster, but you are right, the status of Monti's derivative work needs to be assessed.
- @Racconish: There are multiple levels here. The original ad you linked was created by or on behalf of ARCHER MILLS, INC., Columbus, Georgia (USA) without a copyright notice and published by them as an ad on page 33 of the February 15, 1961 issue of a magazine in the USA (where it entered the Public Domain 5 years later due to not having a copyright notice and not being registered with the USCO, qualifying for {{PD-US-no notice}}). A different ad (with a different drawing, different headline ending "ilted", and different text "you insist on absolutely ... t colours, choose archer!") evidently was published as a poster in Milan, Italy in 1962. Why it was not translated for use in Italy escapes me. The ad in Milan was figurative art, protected for 20 years after creation (through 1981 or maybe 1982). Monti's photo is a "non-creative" reproduction of figurative art, in that it is a full-on reproduction of a 2D work, which qualifies on Commons for {{PD-art}}. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Paolo Monti photographed these posters in Italy where the copyright of collective works is 70 years from the publication year, regardless of the presence of a copyright notice. — Racconish 💬 14:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't consider this a valid deletion request, because the reasoning provided blatantly doesn't apply to many or even most of the files in this category. For instance, there is no copyright in random straps of unreadable pieces of paper on a wall like
. (More technically, the photo of some straps of papers which used to carry a copy of an image cannot be considered an act of reproduction of that image, whose authors have no rights whatsoever on the photo, just as they don't have an exclusive right to prohibit someone from reusing that paper in a fireplace or paper pulp factory. The photo is not a derivative of the original image in copyright sense.) I suggest that the creator withdraws the deletion request and files a new one for each file, or for small groups of files having exactly the same characteristics (e.g. same degree of reproduction of an original image, same author and copyright status of said image). Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Federico Leva (BEIC), there is a misunderstanding: this deletion request is only about the two above files. — Racconish 💬 13:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- As for the specific image mentioned, File:Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (Milano, 1962) - BEIC 6328470 (flopped back).jpg, the only work visible here is the sentence extract "insist on absolutely / colours, choose archer": I consider it doubtful that such a set of 6 words would be a copyrightable work, and at any rate this photo does not embody the manifestation of the original work. Additionally, even considering the principle of precaution I think there should be at least an explanation on why the ad is suspected to not be in the public domain (cf. what Jeff G. wrote above). Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- With reference to the underlying artwork published by Archer, I agree the text is below the threshold of originality, but not the drawing.
In any case: why the CC-BY-SA?— Racconish 💬 13:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)- @Racconish: Please see COM:BEIC. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jeff G., the license granted here applies to what BEIC has made available on their web site [10], Monti's work in so far as it is entitled to an autonomous protection, not to Archer's. — Racconish 💬 16:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Racconish: My response concerned your specific statement "the current CC-BY-SA license is weird" and later question "why the CC-BY-SA?" above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Right, thanks. — Racconish 💬 07:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Racconish: My response concerned your specific statement "the current CC-BY-SA license is weird" and later question "why the CC-BY-SA?" above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jeff G., the license granted here applies to what BEIC has made available on their web site [10], Monti's work in so far as it is entitled to an autonomous protection, not to Archer's. — Racconish 💬 16:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Please see COM:BEIC. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- With reference to the underlying artwork published by Archer, I agree the text is below the threshold of originality, but not the drawing.
_-_BEIC_6330931.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_and_his_Wife,_MARICA_(Maria)._(Love_and_Devotion).jpg){kind=link}
_and_his_Wife,_MARICA_(Maria).(_Love_and_Devotion)_(detail).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=524886037#File:Nicholas_Alahverdian_and_Andre_Dubus_III_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tane_Stoychev.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_designed_in_Lierna_Lake_Como,_installed_in_Buenos_Aires,_Avenida_de_los_italianos,_Boulevard_Guemes,_Puerto_Madero_district.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Lierna_Lake_Como.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6328470_(flopped_back).jpg){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6328470.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, every photo must be free in two countries: USA and source country. As the photo is made and apparently first published in Italy, source country is Italy. We must consider artist's rights and photographer's rights.
- photographer's rights in source country: {{PD-Italy}} since 1983 as non-creative photograph, 20+1 years from creation.
- photographer's rights in USA: {{PD-1996}}, because the photo was in PD in source country on URAA date 1996.
- artist's rights in USA: {{PD-US-no notice}} since 1967 (5+1 years from publication without copyright message).
- artist's rights in source country: Italy would require 70 years from publication, but European Union recognizes en:rule of the shorter term towards USA, so it's free in Italy, because it's free in USA. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, source country is Philippines. No evidence for government work and no evidence for copyright expiring. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
"Yes you can" in a comment does not give any specific CC licence. FunkMonk (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC) I will ask him through email as well just to make sure, anyways he is quite happy with it --Bubblesorg (talk) 15:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- It has to go through Commons:OTRS. Or you cna ask him to display the license directly in Deviantart. FunkMonk (talk) 16:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
He is doing right now--Bubblesorg (talk) 02:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, still no OTRS. Permission is given only for Wikipedia articles, not for Commons. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This is my original work, and I want to remove it from wikimedia commons Hexandcube (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused logo. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of mural. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, no freedom of panorama for murals in Canada. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is an old logo for Apache SINGA. Moazreyad (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, Commons hosts old and changed logos to show history. In addition, the logo is even used. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, possibly copyright violation 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep and relicense. Simple enough to be {{PD-Textlogo}} Ytoyoda (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, per COM:FOP Canada. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Autor ionut. See metadata — Racconish 💬 15:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
user request Bubbasax (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See COM:Courtesy deletions. File appears to be correctly licensed and within scope. No reasonable rationale for deletion presented. --Storkk (talk) 08:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bubbasax (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Why requesting deletion now, more than 2 years after uploading? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- I am the author of this file and I am respectfully requesting deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubbasax (talk • contribs) 18:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
I am the author of this file and I am respectfully requesting immediate deletion. Bubbasax (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Repeating the same request over and over while your initial request is still open will not do anything to speed up the request. Giving more information on why you want the photo deleted might. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would like the file deleted because it is not linked to any wikipedia articles and I have the right to delete my own photo that I uploaded. Bubbasax (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation if you could please delete this photo in accordance with my request that would be appreciated. Bubbasax (talk) 08:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would like the file deleted because it is not linked to any wikipedia articles and I have the right to delete my own photo that I uploaded. Bubbasax (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. No source link, work of US government is not sure. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
user request Bubbasax (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bubbasax (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you want it deleted, and why the more than 2 year wait after it was uploaded? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bubbasax: I see you uploaded many pictures of Nicholas Alahverdian, of widely disparate qualities. Could you please confirm whether you were, as you claimed at upload, the photographer of these files? If so, we probably cannot delete them, since they are correctly licensed. If you are actually the subject, then you likely never had the authority to upload them in the first place, and they can (where they are not US Government works) be deleted as copyright violations. Storkk (talk) 08:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept, this is selfie as claimed. No acceptable reason for deletion is presented. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after upload; here 2 years have passed. Educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
As the owner of the photo I am Bubbasax (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Closing this one since the user has opened two different deletion requests, and this one restates an earlier closed one. (The other deletion request which I've left open has a different statement of reason.) Bubbasax - please only open one deletion request for a particular image at a time. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Stolen from Facebook and other personal websites Bubbasax (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Clarify please - so you are not the actual creator of this photo, but took it off someone else's facebook page? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - image has EXIF from iPhone -- no evidence of FB at all. Bubbasax, if you nominate this again, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
The uploader has a history of uploading copyvios related to this same Nicholas Alahverdian subject. This is just as likely to be a copyvio lifted from Facebook or similar as his other uploads were. EnPassant (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- There's been a mostly successful attempt at deleting all the real photos of Nicholas Alahverdian, while a fake photo of Nicholas Alahverdian was promoted as truth. I think we need firmer proof to delete this. Starship.paint (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as likely copyright violation given the uploader's other files. People who perpetuate a hoax and upload copyvios should not be trusted. PanAndScan (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per the previous rationales. Note that the above user has been globally locked as an xwiki sock. Praxidicae (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The exif data looks fine, and reverse image search via TinEye and Google Images doesn't reveal any evidence of copyright violation. Dylsss (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Since there was an attempt to introduce a phony image of this person, I think it is worth having a legitimate image of Alahverdian in case there is another case of identity hoaxing. Liz (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
The intellectual property that is the subject of this correspondence consists of two original works owned and authored by The Nicholas Alahverdian Trust (hereafter referred to as "The NA Trust" or "The Trust) in the form of photographs. This is one of those photographs. The photographs are not in the public domain in any country, nor are they freely licensed and are therefore illegally uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons platform by users who do not have the requisite permission or license. The Wikimedia users who uploaded these images intentionally misrepresented any permission or license from The NA Trust as none was given. The NA Trust is left to resolve that internet users who may be the Wikimedia users themselves or users associated with them downloaded the photographs from the Trust website, Flickr account, or through another website, and uploaded the photographs with a falsified copyright tag and made false representations about ownership and copyright. This allowed the photographs, which are the intellectual property of The NA Trust, to be used across Wikimedia projects without license or permission from The NA Trust. The uploads were processed deceptively and violated applicable copyright laws. Patently false information about the license, copyright, and ownership status was given on the file description pages accompanying the photographs. The two photographs that are relevant to this correspondence are the work product of workers, contractors, freelancers, or volunteers of The NA Trust who, as part of their work-related responsibilities and duties outlined in their contract, assisted in the taking of photographs of officers and trustees of The NA Trust along with other guests and people at events that were Trust-sponsored or attended by officers or trustees of The NA Trust. At no time did any Trust employee, contractor, or volunteer violate their contractual obligation regarding the ownership of these two or any other photographs. As a result of the unauthorized uploading of these two photographs, The Trust, as described earlier, is sufficiently confident that they were downloaded as unlicensed copies of photographs published on website(s) owned or contracted with The Trust to host intellectual property on the basis that Trust property would be viewed solely in context with the articles or photographic essays or albums published by The Trust, which would include works authored by the Trust such as essays, photographs, videos, and other media. At no point did The Trust grant permission, license, or otherwise allow in any way for the Wikipedia Commons users to upload original works considered copyrighted intellectual property in the form of photographs authored by The NA Trust under a contractual basis with Trust employees, interns, and volunteers. To conclude, under the Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter section COM:NETCOPYVIO it unequivocally states that “[t]he vast majority of images found on the internet are copyright-protected and may not be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here. Many websites are silent on copyright issues, but images on those sites are just as off-limits as those on sites which explicitly say “Copyright, all rights reserved.” Works are copyrighted by default; a copyright notice or a © sign is not needed.” On The Trust website, and on any website or platform where The Trust contracted for exhibition of any intellectual property, a detailed copyright notice informing the viewer that the intellectual property was copyrighted by The NA Trust was published along with a © sign and the message “Copyright (year). All rights reserved” when those safeguards are not necessary only as an abundance of caution. As a result of the copyrighted photographs owned by The NA Trust which were downloaded from the Internet by Wikimedia Commons users who were not given permission or license to upload the original works owned by The Trust to Wikimedia Commons and later intentionally misrepresented the copyright and actual ownership of the works, we respectfully ask that this photograph and the other photograph tagged as a copyright violation that are the subject of this correspondence, as well as the cropped version of one of the photographs located on the same page, be deleted and permanently removed from Wikimedia servers in accordance with copyright law of the United States and Wikimedia Commons policies, guidelines, regulations, and procedures. Thoughtful and Considerate (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- So it's the intellectual property of an unregistered trust of a dead guy? How curious. This was uploaded by the subject themselves with full meta data many years ago. This legal screed has no basis in reality and this should be kept. Praxidicae (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: https://www.nicholasalahverdian.com/surviving-torture/ keeps exactly the same photo File:Vice President Mike Pence and Nicholas Alahverdian.jpg, but that's no proof because it was uploaded to Commons in 2017. The domain nicholasalahverdian.com has been created in 2018 according to domaintools.com. --Achim (talk) 22:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The image and Exif data are consistent with a selfie and not at all with being copied from Facebook, which strips Exif data from images. Noting also what Dylsss and Achim say and that there is no indication that the image is improperly licensed. On the screed above, the so-called 'Nicholas Alahverdian Trust' does not appear to exist outside a few blog posts, and the writer is now glocked as 'Long-term abuse' with multiple sockpuppets (quelle surprise!) including the 'delete' voter above, PanAndScan. The sockpuppetry can be disregarded. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no evidence of copyright issues, per comments above. sock puppetry nominations. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator is a patroller at EN:WP, FYI. E4024 (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was referring to the tagging/nominations by Thoughtful and Considerate amongst others, eg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg and the now closed ones above. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, as always it's me who is mistaken. I hope I did not hurt your feelings. I apologize. E4024 (talk) 04:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nah, reading it over my comment was understandably ambiguous/unclear. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, as always it's me who is mistaken. I hope I did not hurt your feelings. I apologize. E4024 (talk) 04:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was referring to the tagging/nominations by Thoughtful and Considerate amongst others, eg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg and the now closed ones above. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator is a patroller at EN:WP, FYI. E4024 (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The file seems to be in order, an "own work" with EXIF, and in scope; what else do we need? E4024 (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "PanAndScan" and "Thoughtful and Considerate" ignored as some sort of LTA; otherwise there is consensus as usual for keep. --DMacks (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
user request Bubbasax (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is selfie, but not Nicholas Alahverdian's selfie. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bubbasax (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Not own work as claimed, probably copyright violation. I'll delete crop file:Michael Chippendale.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright situation. The uploader claimed that this was their own work and asserted that they personally hold the copyright, which seems unlikely. After I requested confirmation of that, Racconish changed the uploader's copyright claim to a {{PD-textlogo}} claim (while leaving the uploader's authorship and own work claims intact). However, the logotype does not just consist of simple geometric shapes and text. It has complex shadings to create a three-dimensional/impossible object effect, which would likely constitute original authorship in many jurisdictions. Since we don't have any information on the threshold of originality in Thailand, the assertion that the logotype does not exceed that threshold appears to be unfounded. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. I did hesitate. Other opinions will be welcome. — Racconish 💬 16:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll be bold today and will delete the image. If you have any knowledge about threshold of originality in Thailand, please present it and the logo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, dubious claim of own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Emblem of university of sulaimani.png due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Bucharest, Romania. CONSTANTIN BRANCOVEANU (Prince of Wallachia) and his Wife, MARICA (Maria). (Love and Devotion).jpg
[edit]_and_his_Wife,_MARICA_(Maria)._(Love_and_Devotion).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_his_Wife,_MARICA_(Maria)._(Love_and_Devotion).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Romania. This mural is post 1992. Mihai (talk) 16:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Nu sunt de acord sa se stearga aceasta imagine. Care este motivul pentru care vreti sa o stergeti? Imaginea este foarte buna si comentariul este foarte bun.
Britchi Iulia Mirela --Britchi Mirela (talk) 05:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Aceasta pictura a familiei Domnitorului Constantin Brancoveanu se afla in Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe Nou Bucuresti. Este o pictura foarte frumoasa si sugestiva. Am fotografiat-o pentru Concursul Wiki Loves Love 2019 si a fost acceptata. Subiectul Concursului, Dragostea. Ori o dragoste mai mare pana la sacrificiu ca in cazul Familiei Domnitorului Constantin Brancoveanu nu cunosc. Daca imi scoateti aceste poze eu va voi da in judecata pentru hartuire si rea credinta.
Britchi Iulia Mirela --Britchi Mirela (talk) 11:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per COM:FOP Romania. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Bucharest, Romania. CONSTANTIN BRANCOVEANU (Prince of Wallachia) and his Wife, MARICA (Maria).( Love and Devotion) (detail).jpg
[edit]_and_his_Wife,_MARICA_(Maria).(_Love_and_Devotion)_(detail).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_his_Wife,_MARICA_(Maria).(_Love_and_Devotion)_(detail).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Romania. This mural is post 1992. Mihai (talk) 16:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Nu sunt de acord sa se stearga aceasta imagine. Care este motivul pentru care vreti sa o stergeti? Imaginea este foarte buna si comentariul este foarte bun.
Britchi Iulia Mirela--Britchi Mirela (talk) 05:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Aceasta pictura a familiei Domnitorului Constantin Brancoveanu se afla in Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe Nou Bucuresti. Este o pictura foarte frumoasa si sugestiva. Am fotografiat-o pentru Concursul Wiki Loves Love 2019 si a fost acceptata. Subiectul Concursului, Dragostea. Ori o dragoste mai mare pana la sacrificiu ca in cazul Familiei Domnitorului Constantin Brancoveanu nu cunosc. Daca imi scoateti aceste poze eu va voi da in judecata pentru hartuire si rea credinta.
Britchi Iulia Mirela --Britchi Mirela (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per COM:FOP Romania. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Mihai (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Post 1989 mural. Mihai (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
The photographer likely was Károly Ráth (1913–1991). See this very similar photo. According to the description this picture taken by Ráth ("Ráth felvétele"). Károly Ráth was a known photographer in Hungary died in 1991 (see here).These photos probably was taken by the same photographer. Regasterios (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Cropped file: File:Dayka Margit-Szerelmi láz-no watermark.jpeg. --Regasterios (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Magyar: A fotós általában nem egyéni véleményalkotás alapján alapján szokott megállapításra kerülni. Ezt egy hozzáértőnek, aki kínosan ragaszkodik a forrásokkal alátámasztott tényekhez illene tudni. Nem tartom lehetetlennek, hogy tényleg Ő volt a fotós. Ezt azonban tényekkel kellene alátámasztani.Tambo (talk) 09:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ott a forrás, nem látod? Szerinted a két kép nem ugyanakkor és ugyanott készült? Legfeljebb néhány pillanat telhetett el a két fotó elkészülte között, az arckifejezést (és persze a tükrözést) leszámítva lényegében semmi különbség nincs a kettő között. Vagy talán úgy képzeled a körülményeket, hogy egymást lökdösték a fényképészek a műteremben, hogy fotót készíthessenek Dayka Margitról? Amikor teljesen világos és egyértelmű forrást mutattam a szerzőre vonatkozóan, akkor is jajveszékeltél, szóval inkább ne írjál nekem olyanokat, hogy ezt vagy azt tényekkel kellene alátámasztanom. Neked az sem lenne elég, ha száz forrást idehoznék, mert szerinted mindig az a gonosz, aki törlésre jelöl egy képet, és véletlenül sem az, aki belesz.r a szerzői jogokba. --Regasterios (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, can be undeleted in 2062 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Post 1989 mural. Mihai (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Post 1989 mural. Mihai (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Post 1989 mural. Mihai (talk) 16:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Post 1989 mural. Mihai (talk) 17:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeNumber as no source (No source since) - which is correct. Converting to DN to contact uploader to find actual source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, still no source. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) - which is correct. Google searching turned up a poorer quality of this image but its sourced to the 1700s. https://www.mutualart.com/Artwork/Portrait-of-Thomas-Levingstone/1EBF40FB91604DFB Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Per [11] it is 17th century and thus PD, so image should be PD-Art / PD-Old. Can be kept if the false license and embarrassing lies by the uploader claiming it to be his own work from 2019 are removed and replaced with factual information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, per Infrogmation. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) - which is absolutely correct, but the ost recently uploaded image - by JuTa is on top of one by Danny Gulliver which was from MutualArt. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the painting is very old. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The first revision of this file is from en:File:Flag of Edmonton.svg which is a non-free image. It is not PD-Canada because it was created in 1986. The later revisions of the file should not be deleted. Svgalbertian (talk) 18:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Same with File:Flag of Edmonton (1966–1986).png. --Svgalbertian (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Then delete the prior versions. Don't have the current ones deleted just because the old ones are copyrighted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, that is what I am asking for. See my first comment, "The later revisions of the file should not be deleted". This seemed like the appropriate form to handle this.--Svgalbertian (talk) 20:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Then delete the prior versions. Don't have the current ones deleted just because the old ones are copyrighted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted, I'll delete the first version. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
https://actorlist.ru/xfsearch/rodilsya/13+%EE%EA%F2%FF%E1%F0%FF+1963/ копирайт 82.208.115.220 18:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Internet. I'll delete also file:Елена12011988.jpg as small photo without metadata, probably copyright violation, depicted Yelena is unidentified, maybe out of scope as well. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Está mal cargado e indexado Jorge Rivera Dgo (talk) 19:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: This file was uploaded by the nominater. -- CptViraj (📧) 07:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ming Pao logo.svg Chinese calligraphy is not simple geometric shapes Matthew hk (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, what a stupid idea. Every child in China writes these letters. It's a newspaper logo, like we have hundreds, if not thousands, of them on Wikipedia. Just because you're unable to read it, is it art all of a sudden? Do what you want. I think my part.--Bestoernesto (talk) 05:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- A is A in English. But In Chinese calligraphy you can have two horizontal line instead of one or missing one or two (from three horizontal line to one for example). Also using the Latin characters terminology , there is way more optional "serifs" elements of Chinese characters. If it is a simple stock computer font it may be judged as borderline simple shape (but in fact most Chinese computer font including windows font are copyrighted and owneed by DynaComware), but in this logo in specific , it is clearly a Chinese calligraphy. Such logo should be upload to local wiki as fair use logo, but not simple shape PD logo. Matthew hk (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- http://www.cidianwang.com/shufa/ming2246_xs.htm Here is some example of the Chinese characters 明. Some of them are in public domain only because the author / artist are dead for centuries. Unless you can prove the two Chinese characters are exactly the same as these public domain fonts or very very large part of it as derived work , it is copyrighted. Matthew hk (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, in China, calligraphy is copyrightable. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Not pd-ineligible image is complex enough. Direct copy of non-free file en:File:Halifax Flag.svg but not sourced. Svgalbertian (talk) 20:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, en.wiki does not say, how old the flag is. 50 years from creation is needed for public domain. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This does not qualify as pd-ineligible, the image is complex enough. Direct copy of non-free file en:File:Saskatoon_Flag.svg but not sourced. Svgalbertian (talk) 20:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, en.wiki does not say, how old the flag is. 50 years from creation is needed for public domain. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This does not qualify as pd-ineligible, the image is complex enough to carry copyright. Direct copy of non-free file en:File:Flag of Yellowknife, NWT.svg but not sourced. Svgalbertian (talk) 20:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, en.wiki does not say, how old the flag is. 50 years from creation is needed for public domain. Taivo (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This does not qualify as pd-ineligible, the image is complex enough to carry copyright. Direct copy of non-free file en:File:Flag of Iqaluit, Nunavut.svg but not sourced. Svgalbertian (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Proprietary software's screenshot with no-free license, which don't comply with EDP Baldaeg00 (talk) 22:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Copie d'affiches (voir https://www.rockinevreux.org/historique/) , a priori non libres.
- File:Affiche rie by ghf 2019.png
- File:Affiche rie 2018.png
- File:Affiche rie 2017.png
- File:Affiche green horse festival.png
Hab'rtix (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:27, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This image is an exact PNG conversion of a file already hosted on Commons. Svgalbertian (talk) 18:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Svgalbertian Exactly, it is a PNG version. There is no reason to delete the file just because there is an SVG version. − Allice Hunter (Inbox) 20:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- This PNG version was made from the SVG that already existed on Commons. All SVGs images are automatically converted to PNG for Wikipedia so this file adds nothing. In fact I can generate your exact image with the thumbnail tool like this. Your attribution of the image also poor, you are not the author, you just copied my version. The license of PD-ineligible does not stand either, the image is complex enough to carry copyright. --Svgalbertian (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
копирайт копиво 82.208.115.220 08:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nom withdrawn by removing DR tag. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Post 1989 mural. Mihai (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a "post 1989 mural", it exists at least since the 19th century. Restoration ist not original work protected by copyriht.--Chianti (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, OK, I believe you. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2600:1700:8B60:CA00:411D:43F7:3174:8853 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: City seal on the flag is copyrighted.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. Not sure whether nomination might be frivolous. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- "frivolous" - why it would be? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Proof? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment City seal doesn't look copyrighted, see this file. BTW: flag image is used 778x on Wiki. Vysotsky (talk) 09:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per seal file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted seal plus silver copyright, illegal per USA Law, as I am part ofthe U.S. Government Phubber (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Seal is copyrighted per, https://www.123rf.com/photo_85340202_stock-illustration-3d-seal-of-las-vegas-nevada-usa-3d-illustration-.html, and at least 8 more sites. Phubber (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The link is not to a government website stating the copyright status, but rather a private image repository. I must also question what you mean by "plus silver copyright", you can not copyright a colour. Fry1989 eh? 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Fry -- MaxxL - talk 19:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I can't see an argument for this being copryrighted. Perhaps the submitter may be able to add a more coherent explanation.Shajure (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, nominator has been confirmed as a sockpuppet. PyroFloe (talk) 02:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: apart from the sockpuppet nomination, my reasoning to keep the file is as follows: The website of Las Vegas, https://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/, has a copyright sign, so their opinion is, all work is copyrighted, including the seal. However, the notice on File:Seal of Las Vegas, Nevada.svg, says it is in PD. This flag is a simple derivative work of the seal. If the seal is in PD, the flag will also fall in PD. So the image of the flag can be kept. --Elly (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Maybe it's somewhere else on the site and I'm just not seeing it, but the disclaimer on the source page for the blog is not an explicit release into the public domain. Unfortunately, there is no "public-domain-adjacent" license. Either it's PD or it isn't for our purposes. GMGtalk 23:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I was under the impression that Latuff's free license was established more than once here years ago. (quick look...) Carlos Latuff states on his webpage, "All of my artworks published in this blog are COPYLEFT." " All the artworks can be freely reproduced, without my formal permission." [12]; See also User:555/Latuff. I'l add a link to those on the discussion for the parent Carlos Latuff cat (anyone who recalls where previous discussion was may wish to place a link to it there as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hopefully you're right. In my experience on OTRS, this is the kind of thing where we would send a message back saying that we need them to specify a license explicitly. Copyleft definitely isn't the same thing as public domain, and he can't require attribution as he does under PD. GMGtalk 10:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: license does not allow modification. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
