Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/05/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Margarete_Sorg-Rose,_Prof._Petr._Eben_aus_Prag_und_Prof._Peter_Richter_de_Rangenier_aus_Österreich.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Holzschnitt,_Homburgertal,_1956.jpg){kind=link}
_Künstler.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_Gebiet,_Nummer_4624-301,_in_dem_europäisch_vernetzten_Schutzgebietssystem.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![193 File:Moomin exhibition in Roppongi Hills- "Moomin The art and The story".jpg](#File:Moomin_exhibition_in_Roppongi_Hills-_"Moomin_The_art_and_The_story".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
website mentioned in image bharatstatus.in QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, just like their other uploads. --Majora (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
yes Delete by mistake ದೇವಾಂಗ ಲೋಕ (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
speedydelete: Did not mean to upload the file, was testing something and it uploaded. ದೇವಾಂಗ ಲೋಕ (talk) 01:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio as uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
speedy: Did not mean to upload it, was testing something and uploaded it by mistake. ದೇವಾಂಗ ಲೋಕ (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, per nomination, as uploader requested on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 06:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not "Own work": https://ria.ru/20180123/1513125465.html Gyrostat (talk) 08:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Geagea as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The file description says: "photo from his own Instagram page" ("תמונה מהאינסטגרם שלו"). Permission is needed. -- Geagea (talk) 17:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Please delete both files of Kamagames logo.png. I uploaded the wrong files and can't understand how to delete them KamaGames (talk) 12:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geagea as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The file description says: "photo by Avishag Shaar-Yashuv" ("צילום: אבישג שאר ישוב"). Permission is needed. -- Geagea (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
speedydelete: author/uploader request. Julianruizp (talk) 12:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 13:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST 大诺史 (talk) 14:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Green Giant as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Scaled down version of File:French Indochina subdivisions.svg. I’m not sure why I didn’t delete it as a copy violation - I may have been tired at the time. Green Giant (talk) 19:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per comment above. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Green Giant as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Copied from unilalia.com/info, which is "all rights reserved" but no sign of a license. Green Giant (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Magazine cover: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 21:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
uploaded to wikimedia instead of wikipedia Matthelb (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:21, 29 Mai 2019 UTC: Fair use is not allowed on Commons --Krdbot 01:32, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
copyvio. non free screenshot ChongDae (talk) 00:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete as above & deriviative work. 大诺史 (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, fair use is prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
No evidence shows it is in PD 94rain Talk 04:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, this is textlogo and ineligible for copyright. The file is also used and so in project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replaced by file:190528 GLB-PE3 WaldRickmannskamp .jpg M.J. (talk) 06:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C0222-0007-005, Berlin, Müggelturm, Eisschnellläuferinnen, Ashworth, Smith (cropped).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
request of uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
The image is highly manipulated with a lot of (visible) cloning, and doesn't represent the subject in a truthful manner. 217.78.204.94 08:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, author and copyright holder www.sindonen.com, source link is dead. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Didn't give all the information about the picture. So, I want upload same picture with all the description Michael Handler Ruby (talk) 11:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. 大诺史 (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geagea as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 18:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- This phot is known photograph of Avraham Yosef Shapira. The same photo can be seen in he.wiki: קובץ:Avraham Sahpira MK D125-050.jpg. it was taken in 1981 by the Israeli Government Press Office (GPO). -- Geagea (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Geagea. — Racconish 💬 14:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geagea as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
There is a consent from the subject of the person that is photographed including the photographer
- a. In the source it says: "The photograph was sent to me by Eliaz Reuven-Dandecker himself (photographed in the picture) and free to use" (התמונה נשלחה אליי מאליעז ראובן-דנדקר בעצמו (המצולם בתמונה) וחופשיה לשימוש).
- b. The description says: "Photograph by Eliaz Reuven-Dandker (Eliaz Reuven-Dandecker) speaking at the first Carmelica (Cultural Conference) I in 2018 by Niva Ben-Ami"
- The uploader is not the photographer. Nothing her says that mail was sent to OTRS. Permissin is needed. -- Geagea (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Geagea. — Racconish 💬 14:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Did you see it? It's the bottom right. here --Yilku1 (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Here is the URL: https://ciudaddemendoza.gob.ar/2019/04/29/masiva-convocatoria-de-duki-en-la-ciudad-de-mendoza/unnamed12/ -- Bauty Aguirre (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, the nomination is withdrawn, the license is reviewed. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal images, commons is not a photo album, only uploads of user and in 2017
- File:River Working, Old Hickory Lake.jpg
- File:Lead singer with The Lemonade Charade.tif
- File:Reginal Basketball Tournament.tif
- File:Sophomore at Hendersonville High School.tif
- File:1st Grade.tif
- File:Senior Picture.tif
- File:Birthday 6 years old.tif
- File:The Baby Boy.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, the photos are not own work, probably different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, valid permission missing. 217.118.90.186 11:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, although all Ukrainian logos are in public domain, Ukrainian Mineral Company isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, uk.wiki nor in ru.wiki. en:Draft:UKRAINIAN MINERAL COMPANY was speedily deleted as spam. Therefore I'll delete the file as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, as a pdf file containing merely text. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 11:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
no proper indication that this is a free photo; user is single-interest uploader with only 2 photos Ringerfan23 (talk) 11:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, "In press release for worldwide usage" is not a free license. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
no proper indication that this is a free photo or taken by user; user is single-interest uploader with only 2 photos Ringerfan23 (talk) 11:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright holder Chris Tuite. Taivo (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Beautiful image. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Beautiful image. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Taivo (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Taivo (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung / Zurückziehung der Genehmigung zur Nutzung Tinti127 (talk) 11:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: In use & given license is not revocable. Bitte tagge jetzt nicht alle deine Uploads, das wird so nix. Du kannst die einmal gegebene Lizenz nicht widerrufen, auch nicht wenn du aus den wp-Projekten aussteigst. --Achim (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Freie Lizenzen sind unwiderruflich! Nach so langer Zeit könnten die auch schon längst außerhalb der Wikimedia-Projekte irgendwo verwendet werden. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are not revocable. Beautiful image. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr Hassan Rasheed (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyright violation, see [1]
- File:Majlis-ibrahim-shihab.png
- File:Majlis-ibrahim-fareed-didi.png
- File:Majlis-ahmed-zahir.png
- File:Majlis-ahmed-shathir.png
- File:Majlis-muhanmadu-naseeru-maniku.png
- File:Majlis-mohamed-shihab.png
- File:Majlis-malin-musa-maafai-kaleygefaanu.png
- File:Majlis-ibrahim-ali-didi.png
- File:Majlis-ali-kuda-rannabandeyri-kilegefaanu.png
- File:Majlis-ahmed-zaki.png
- File:Majlis-abdulla-shahid.png
- File:Majlis-abdulla-hameed.png
- File:Majlis-ahmed-kamil-didi.png
- File:Majlis-muhammad-fareed-didi.png
大诺史 (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- speedy delete copyvio. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DarinColucci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal images, only uploads of the user and probably copyvios as claimed as own work but he is in them
- File:20130516 122446 resized.jpg
- File:Darin Colucci.jpg
- File:Everything I Never Learned in School A Guide to Success Book Cover.jpg
- File:Coaching at Bentley.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violations. Two small photos without metadata, one is credited to author and copyright holder Alan Grant, one book cover. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Förderpreisträgerin (Komposition) Margarete Sorg-Rose, Prof. Petr. Eben aus Prag und Prof. Peter Richter de Rangenier aus Österreich.jpg
[edit]_Margarete_Sorg-Rose,_Prof._Petr._Eben_aus_Prag_und_Prof._Peter_Richter_de_Rangenier_aus_%C3%96sterreich.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Margarete_Sorg-Rose,_Prof._Petr._Eben_aus_Prag_und_Prof._Peter_Richter_de_Rangenier_aus_%C3%96sterreich.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, only 219×160 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation of https://twitter.com/yukiyofujii0508/status/1079694077128404992 そらみみ (talk) 10:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:00, 1 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation of https://twitter.com/yukiyofujii0508/status/1079694077128404992 --Krdbot 13:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
EM Boglino died in 2002, so her artwork is still copyrighted. Derivative photo that can't be kept. De728631 (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. You have deleted the file : Donna e Bimbo. I have tried before to get a photo of this painting into the article about the artist Elisa Maria Boglino. Before I used a photo found on Flickr, and I have not been able to find the photografer...meanwhile the photo has dissapeared from Flickr and the internet, it was there for at least 10 years.. I have discussed this with Jcb at OTRS, he asked me to find the URL , and that has not been possible. This photo is taken by my uncle , who is the son to Elisa Maria Boglino. He, and I and my sister own the copyright together to the works of Elisa Maria Boglino, and this photo was taken by ourselves. I would have liked very much to use the photo found on Flickr, because it is better, but I have not until now been able to find the photographer/URL. I have written to Flickr about it and they cannot help me. The guys at OTRS (Arthur Crbz) who have helped me , with all the other photos in the article , knows about the copyright, papers and all that stuff. Hope you can help me get this photo into the article, I would be very thankfull. Thank youCiopone. (diskussion) 20:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This is my qustion to Jcb (OTRS) about the other photo: Permission to use a picture, found on Flickr , but is not on Flickr anymore? Hi Jcb. I have once before tried to get permission to use this picture , in the article about the Danish painter Elisa Maria Boglino. The painting is at museo GAM in Palermo. Somebody had made a photo from it and put it on Flickr......but some month ago it dissapeared, I think because Flickr wanted people to pay more. We the family to Elisa Maria Boglino, who have written the article, and have copyright, have taken a photo ourselves of the painting, but its not half as good as this one. Now, when it is no longer on Flickr , is there any possibility to use it in the article? I think your answer is no....is there any way to find out who has taken the photo.? :https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Donna_e_Bimbo._Museo_Gam_Palermo._Elisa_Maria_Boglino.Olie_p%C3%A5_l%C3%A6rred._1930.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1. Thank you Ciopone. (diskussion) 15:08, 2 May 2019 (UT You uploaded the file with 'source=Internettet' and did not include a Flickr link, so that we could never verify the file. You did not add a name of a photographer either, so I am affraid I cannot tell you anything more. Jcb (diskussion) 16:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
So now I am asking you to accept this photo , which was taken by my uncle, at the museo GAM at Palermo. We own the copyright together...please ping Arthur Crbz (OTRS)he knows.Ciopone. (talk) 01:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
At last I will try to lay up the photo the museum has put on the internet...it is very dark, and I know from people who have been there,the painting is not that dark , so I have ligthtened it up a little. All this to ask you , what is possible, and if the photo from the museum has the right license.? If ...I think I would like to use that one, even if they have cut the top of her head. Thank you,..and sorry for making trouble.Ciopone. (talk) 10:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Arthur Crbz: Do we have a ticket for works painted by Elisa Maria Boglino? If so, we could keep this one. Cipione, I'm afraid the image posted at the museum's website does not have a free licence, so we cannot use it over here. De728631 (talk) 18:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- PS: I found ticket:2018092610005076 at other such files, so we just need to know if it is a general permission for paintings by Boglino and not just for the current uploads. De728631 (talk) 18:32, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
I understand, thank you both....think he is going to answer yes:)Ciopone. (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019060210001172 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality copy of File:L'Estaque, neige fondante, par Paul Cézanne.jpg. Yann (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- [as uploader] Delete - the new version is far superior. Ceoil (talk) 13:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Poorly positioned H on N, compare to File:Corey-Reagenz.svg DMacks (talk) 21:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Stubid reason – have you no other problems? --Codc (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Inferior images are inferior, and by standard we don’t keep them when there are superior replacements. It’s fine if you don’t wish to make an actual counterargument or dispute that The detail I noted is a point of inferiority. DMacks (talk) 01:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per DMacks point. 大诺史 (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; very small and hardly visible charges. Proposed replacement is much better. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 08:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knight of honor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical newspapers, coat of arms and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Blason Chlef 2.png
- File:Blason Chlef.png
- File:Hebdomadaire Régional du Chélif 1961.jpg
- File:Le régional du Chelif.jpg
- File:Source Cheliff MT Oued.jpg
- File:Boumaza.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knight of honor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no exif.
— Racconish 💬 11:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
First files also deleted per nomination — Racconish 💬 18:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knight of honor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Image by the Soviet Mars 3 spacecraft, not produced by NASA. Images by the Russian space agency, both former and current, are not released under a free license by default, and there is no evidence this image is any exception.
Further, I see no evidence at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Soviet Union or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia (the governmental successor state) that this image has fallen out of copyright. The relevant rule would be "Publish date + 70 years", thus this image will lose its copyright protection around 2042. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
^ The deletion request above is unfortunate and, yes, I do appreciate that only freely licensed, public domain or fair use rationale justified media ought to be used on Wikipedia.
Under the circumstances, I propose to seek further specialist advice on this matter but that might take a few weeks to do that. In the meantime, and until I have received that specialist advice, I would consider it wholly inappropriate for this particular file deletion request to be enacted.
DigitalTim, Thursday, 30 May 2019
- What kind of specialist advice are you looking for? — Huntster (t @ c) 20:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I give further specialist advice: Soviet Union photos are not work of NASA, don't license them as such. Taivo (talk) 06:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
^ I take a very dim view indeed of the above discourteous deletion. Such poor conduct is deeply unhelpful because I am trying to research actual and relevant Soviet information on Soviet copyright rules but that does take time since it can only be done in my spare time in the evenings and at weekends.
DigitalTim, Friday 7 June 2019
De foto is eerder gepubliceerd op https://ameblo.jp/. Toestemming van de oorspronkelijke auteur dient gestuurd te worden naar OTRS. トトト (talk) 01:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete As above.--そらみみ (talk) 01:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think these accounts who uploaded this kind of photos are the same person.--そらみみ (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- 夢見りあむ役の声優はミリナノですね (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 早見沙織こと松尾沙織は東急大井町線二子玉川駅ですね (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 東山奈央は小田急小田原線成城学園前駅ですね (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 本田未央ちゃんシンデレラガールおめでとう (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- みんなのアイドル富士見野男をよろしくね (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Deleted, every upload of every of the users listed here is copyvio. Taivo (talk) 06:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
The actual photographer is not given, since the supposed photographer is visible, with her hands, in the image. Multiple images coming from same FlickR account have same issue, so it's unlikely the "author" managed to setup a camera stand and timer in each case. Rob (talk) 03:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio. There is no proof that the author permits a publishing under a free license: "was send by Author via e-mail" . Ies (talk) 04:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, after receiving and processing OTRS-permission from photographer the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Logo probably exceeds COM:TOO B dash (talk) 04:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Logo probably exceeds COM:TOO B dash (talk) 04:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Undelete in 2070 as architect died this year and Qatar is Life + 50. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Undelete in 2070 as architect died this year and Qatar is Life + 50. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No evidence these were actually published in the 1950s, nor that they were published without a copyright notice.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Synchronist
[edit]- File:G. W. Smith comment on Inceptionism post.jpg
- File:Blast flyer 450x225.jpg
- File:BLAST software flyer circa 1983.jpg
Illegitimate Commons:derivative works. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal photos + out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: There is vaguely creative commons mentionned somewhere on the website, but not on this picture. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 08:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Image originates from the official site of the Municipality de Mendoza which is CC-BY-SA 4.0 licensed. Ankry (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- No it doesn't: https://jornadaonline.com/tiempo_libre/205318-duki-el-fenomeno-del-trap-argentino-que-convoco-a-una-multitud-en-la-ciudad-de-mendoza. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- There is also higher resolution image available as https://ciudaddemendoza.gob.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/unnameddsf1.jpg
- And this file is higher resolution (2500 × 1668) than the image at jornadaonline.com (1280 × 854). Ankry (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept, per Ankry. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gegen das Vergessen
[edit]Temporary exhibition, i.e. a derivative work not covered by freedom of panorama. (Also, some of these show mainly text, which is not covered by Austrian FOP even if it is permanent.)
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen - Ehrenschutz Alexander Van der Bellen (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen - Esther Kampler Biografie (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen - Magda Brown Biografie (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen 2 (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen 3 (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen 4 (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen 5 (Wien).jpg
- File:Ausstellung Gegen das Vergessen 7 (Wien).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Tokfo (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- biographical data only (data cannot be protected), below Commons:Threshold of originality. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- I think the selection and wording of that biographical data is by far long and complex enough to meet TOO. This isn't just birth and death dates, but biographies that would be complex enough to be Wikipedia stubs. But let the admins decide. Tokfo (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- met the artist yesterday, he will give the permissions to me. but wil need a little time.--Donna Gedenk (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- I think the selection and wording of that biographical data is by far long and complex enough to meet TOO. This isn't just birth and death dates, but biographies that would be complex enough to be Wikipedia stubs. But let the admins decide. Tokfo (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, but two files are kept as de minimis. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
The file is a movie poster published in 1963 in Czechoslovakia. However, who created the portrait inside the poster remains unknown even with OTRS ticket. Meanwhile, Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure is far from application, as there are still 14 years to go if the template is applicable. As authorship information is unclear, the file has a chance to be unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
© Statutární město Brno Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I question the own work. A higher resolution can be found here. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no metadata Wouter (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr-Pradeep Asopa(Prince) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
- File:Pradeep Asopa 18.jpg
- File:Pradeep Asopa 16.jpg
- File:Pradeep Asopa.jpg
- File:Pradeep Asopa 15.jpg
- File:Pradeep Asopa 17.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Needs OTRS released permission. I think it can be some kind of copyright violation right now. AhmadTalk 09:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
and File:Green Eye of the Pyramid..png
No COM:FOP in Azerbaïdjan, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuan Liang Lynn (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.graphicdesigndegreehub.com/30-most-amazing-glass-artists-alive-today/
- File:Sergio-Redegalli-glass-artist.jpg
- File:Carole-milne-glass-artist.jpg
- File:Harry-Pollitt-glass-artist.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2015 MAROC DIPLOMATIQUE Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181839).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181331).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181477).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181329).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181182083).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181835).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181229).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181181017).jpeg
- File:The Wedding Candid (181180787).jpeg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ies: Hmm.. Cant the advertisement be cropped out and they still be useful to illustrate marriage clothing/uses in India?-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Darvin: The images were clearly created and published for advertising reasons as you can learn from their descriptions. This is a perfect reason for a speedy delition. See Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#General reasons#10. -- Ies (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- It seems to me that pertains to content uploaded to promote goods and services. I see no reason to delete these images. Chico Venancio (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ies: I believe that what matters to Commons is the usefulness of the files, not the motive why they were created. If they are useful and educative, the files should be kept indeed (with the adv. cropped out, of course).-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:04, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Changing description and cropping seems to be enough.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- The delition rule (linked above) says "This includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services, outside our project scope". So it's the motivation to promote goods and services that here counts primarily, not the usefullness. The current case doesn't differ from the advertisement for drugs and other stuff that is uploaded to Commons again and again. Also these images were useful - if the images were cropped and if the advertising watermarks were retouched and if the advertising texts were removed etc. However, this never happens. The advertising images always get deleted acc. to the Commons policies and so the story ends. I really can't understand why you now make a big difference between advertisement and advertisement. -- Ies (talk) 06:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- That is why we can upload a cropped version with no promotional content or motivation. If we remove the watermarks - which are the promotional content -, the promotion claim doesn't prevail. We can't remove valid content only because someone wanted to make a promotion of it at first place, even though there is no promotion anymore.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- The rule speaks to content uploaded to promote. DarwIn certainly did not upload these to promote an Indian photographer. Neither did I create a tool to import photos from 500px to promote that. The rule is there as a proxy for out of scope images, and I don't see how you're citing a speedy deletion rule in a deletion request, it seems not even you believe the rule applies.
- It is better if we crop the promotion and edit the descriptions, but deleting these seem counter productive to our mission. Chico Venancio (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios -- they come from 500pix.com where there is no free license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- 4 files restored as per [2]. Yann (talk) 18:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Those photos are transferred from flickr. Almost every photo is already uploaded by active editor User:NahidHossain Those photos are duplicate.
- File:Nilkhet Mor In Dhaka (189568367).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173160015).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Railway Station Rajshahi (206410065).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Green Foeld Under The Blue Sky (174454487).jpeg
- File:Streetside Handmade Foods (179104179).jpeg
- File:Old Sign At Varendra Research Museum (179621577).jpeg
- File:Old Sign At Varendra Research Museum (179621575).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173160007).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173159995).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173159971).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173159965).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173159969).jpeg - (Duplicate)
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103631).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103629).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103609).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103627).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Octagonal Tomb (173159959).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103603).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103607).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103601).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103605).jpeg
- File:Dr Kaisar Rahman Chowdhury Auditorium Rajshahi (171741231).jpeg
- File:Dr Kaisar Rahman Chowdhury Auditorium Rajshahi (171741237).jpeg
- File:Dr Kaisar Rahman Chowdhury Auditorium Rajshahi (171741239).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103599).jpeg
- File:Dr Kaisar Rahman Chowdhury Auditorium Rajshahi (171741229).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur Janata High School (173103597).jpeg
- File:Dr Kaisar Rahman Chowdhury Auditorium Rajshahi (171741213).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734145).jpeg
- File:Dhaka University Of Engineering Technology (171734291).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734149).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733731).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733595).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733605).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734135).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734127).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734133).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734125).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734129).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734131).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734123).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734121).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734119).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734111).jpeg
- File:Institute Of Health Technology Rajshahi (171734113).jpeg
- File:Infectional Diseas Hospital Laxmipur Rajshahi (171733943).jpeg
- File:Infectional Diseas Hospital Laxmipur Rajshahi (171733941).jpeg
- File:Infectional Diseas Hospital Laxmipur Rajshahi (171733937).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733767).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733761).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733765).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733749).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733745).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733757).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733751).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733755).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733739).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733737).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733611).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733599).jpeg
- File:Bangabari Rajshahi Bangladesh (171733733).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733615).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733613).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733609).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733601).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733597).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733603).jpeg
- File:Rohanpur (171733591).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733417).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733413).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733401).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733411).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733399).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733409).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733403).jpeg
- File:Womens In Wikipedia Event In Rajshahi (171733075).jpeg
- File:Womens In Wikipedia Event In Rajshahi (171733077).jpeg
- File:Womens In Wikipedia Event In Rajshahi (171733079).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733397).jpeg
- File:Womens In Wikipedia Event In Rajshahi (171733071).jpeg
- File:Womens In Wikipedia Event In Rajshahi (171733073).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732893).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732883).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732885).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732891).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732887).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732881).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732879).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732877).jpeg
- File:Wikipedia Stall At Rajshahi Collegiate School (171732875).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732075).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732057).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732059).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732073).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732047).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732041).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732039).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732037).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733429).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733419).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733415).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733393).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733407).jpeg
- File:Teachers In Wikipedia Workshop At Rajshahi (171733405).jpeg
- File:Wikipedian At Iftar Rajshahi (171733239).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732019).jpeg
- File:Wikipedian At Iftar Rajshahi (171733233).jpeg
- File:Womens In Wikipedia Event In Rajshahi (171733081).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732035).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732033).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732031).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732015).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732025).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732021).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732017).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732013).jpeg
- File:Shaheed Kamruzzaman Stadium Rajshahi (171732011).jpeg
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion was presented. @Afifa Afrin: Please use {{Dupe}} where appropriate.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Please @Afifa Afrin: , use {{Dupe}} when appropiate. COM:DR is not the proper venue for managing duplicates. --Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Dw no source since (dw no source since) — Racconish 💬 11:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- I tagged the file as "DW no source", as it's a montage of photographs that does not cite its sources. If they're photographs that are already on Commons, the uploader should provide wiki links for the source images. If not, the uploader needs to provide more detailed source information for the montage itself or the component photographs to verify that the license is correct. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Editing to add, the only image that came up on a reverse image search was at http://www.hotelserradejundiai.com.br/jundiai-e-seus-parques-municipais/ and sourced to www.jundiai.sp.gov.br. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, still no sources. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 11:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by علاء as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Materialscientist as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajmal payami (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
大诺史 (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Crop with horrific quality Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, 63×110 pixels is not enough big for photos. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Aharon Cohen Tapiero
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of Aharon Cohen Tapiero (talk · contribs):
- File:Cena de Shabat en la Asociación de Hebreos Católicos de Tradición Hebrea Mashiaj.png (1500×1034)
- File:EL EL KOTEL HAMAARAVI.png (894×587)
- File:Hermano Hebreo Católico de la Asociación Mashiaj en oración ante la cruz de Yeshúa.jpg (780×1040)
- File:Janucá en la Asociación de Hebreos Católicos de Tradición Hebrea Mashiaj de Hispanoamérica.jpg (1113×835)
- File:La fiesta de Sinjá Torah en la Asociación de Católicos de Tradición hebrea Mashiaj de Hispanoamérica. Venezuela.png (1300×596)
- File:Liturgia Oratorio Hebreo Católico.png (1075×960)
- File:PESAJ en la Asociación de Hebreos Católicos de Tradición Hebrea Mashiaj de Hispanoamérica.png (1500×923)
- File:Sukot en la Asociación de Hebreos Católicos de Tradición Hebrea Mashiaj.png (1500×1020)
- File:TEFILÁ, Hebreos Católicos de Tradición Hebrea Mashiaj.png (932×625)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Anasuyas
[edit]Anasuyas (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Alicia Garza at AWID.jpg
- File:Arelis Uriana.jpg
- File:Awino Okech.jpg
- File:Coumba Toure.jpg
- File:Feminists from the global South.jpg
- File:Lena Meari.jpg
- File:Nidhi Goyal.jpg
- File:Opening plenary of the AWID Forum 2016.jpg
- File:Sonia Correa.jpg
- File:Yara Sallam.jpg
- File:Yara Sallam AWID.jpg
- File:Yasmin Thayná.jpg
Screenshots from video with unknown copyright status, maybe copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Sika cbsua
[edit]Sika cbsua (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Baao Municipal Library.JPG
- File:Bishop Barlin Marker.JPG (sculpture)
- File:Chapel in Del Rosario, Baao.JPG (chapel)
- File:Dr. Robosa Hospital.JPG (house)
- File:Local Government Unit of Baao Rehabilitation and Therapy Center.JPG (map)
- File:Saint Teresa of Avila Church.JPG (church)
- File:Statue of Bishop Jorge Barlin.JPG (statue)
- File:St. Bartholomew the Apostle Church.JPG (church)
- File:The House of the former Senator Joker Arroyo.JPG (gate)
- File:Welcome Arc in Santa Cruz.JPG (sign)
There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines and the photos violate authors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Sydneykt
[edit]Sydneykt (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:1-390x258.jpg (390×258)
- File:1.-NMMU BS.jpg (815×545)
- File:2nd Avenue campus.png (268×296)
- File:48 edited.jpg (600×465)
- File:312 Bed Residence.jpg (700×467, camera NIKON D800)
- File:Bird street campus2.png (200×241)
- File:Bird street campus main.png (256×298)
- File:George campus.jpg (1170×400)
- File:George campus3.png (384×177)
- File:George campus aerial view.jpg (800×451)
- File:Ghnw20151023-085142-779.jpg (600×338)
- File:Ghnw20161031-095515-495.jpg (1000×562)
- File:Lebombo resident.jpg (1170×499, camera Canon EOS 1200D)
- File:Letaba-Diningroom-SQ.jpg (500×500, camera NIKON D2Xs)
- File:Letaba resident.jpg (399×177)
- File:Melody residence.jpg (1170×499, camera Canon EOS 1200D)
- File:Missionvale campus.png (264×298)
- File:Nelson-Mandela-University-Ocean-Sciences-Campus-696x462.jpg (696×462)
- File:NMMU george campus 470.jpg (768×470)
- File:Nmmu-you-tube-2.jpg (1122×743)
- File:NMU's North campus at night..png (260×295)
- File:North campus.png (260×300)
- File:North campus front entrance .png (212×245)
- File:Project-194-1037-dsc 7114-edit.jpg (811×540)
- File:South campus.png (260×297)
- File:South campus beach view.png (408×337)
- File:South campus north view.png (412×311)
- File:SSV-Ikamva Residence .jpg (1170×499, camera NIKON D3)
Small photos. If metadata exist, then usually different. Probably different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio (different sources on google). --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of SurelockHolmes
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of SurelockHolmes (talk · contribs):
- File:3 Dice 'Cello' Craps.png
- File:Airless Automobile Tire (AAT).jpg
- File:AMEGA 1.png
- File:AMEGA 1NNOVATIONS.jpg
- File:AMEGA 2.png
- File:AMEGA 3.png
- File:DS logo with quote in black.png
- File:GET diagram for application.png
- File:Hollow Point Putter Blueprint.png
- File:JD.png
- File:JD view for inspection.png
- File:Jersey Works.jpg
- File:John Doe Movie.png
- File:Monster prints.jpg
- File:Posterior Defibrilliation.png
- File:Pully Chain Suspension Bridge Design.png
- File:Structure-2-Rise Lift.png
- File:The Enclosed Hollywood Greenscreen (EHG).png
- File:The Pedal Guitar.jpg
- File:The Recycled Gasoline Project.png
- File:UFO Wavelength Conunter Weight Design.png
- File:Worm Hole Productions.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
All unused. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 07:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; All unused, some are copyright violations too. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Dimitris Aretakis
[edit]Here are last remaining uploaded photos of Dimitris Aretakis (talk · contribs):
- File:Αυτοκολλητα τοιχου.jpg (160×160)
- File:Αυτοκολλητα εκπτωσεων.jpg (300×300)
- File:From-the-empire.jpg (300×300)
- File:Αυτοκολλητο-τοιχου-ηλιος.jpg (300×300)
- File:Αυτοκόλλητο Τοίχου Ώρα για καφέ.jpg (300×300)
- File:Παιδικο δεντρο.jpg (160×160)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
The file has two problems. At first I do not see educational value, out of project scope. At second, this is small photo without metadata and the uploder's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused private/pesonal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Hnouri
[edit]Hnouri (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Unused personal photos. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Gauravmv
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Gauravmv (talk · contribs):
- File:Sahil Khattar .png (683×1024)
- File:Sayani Gupta.jpg (680×1020)
Small photos without metadata. Probably copyright violations like his/her other uploads. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Ravel putra
[edit]Here are all uploads of Ravel putra (talk · contribs):
- File:Bedugul.jpg (639×960, Facebook file)
- File:Bedugul bali.jpg (1364×2048)
- File:Bedugul bali-.jpg (1364×2048, Facebook file)
- File:Ceking.jpg (4128×3096, camera Samsung SM-G610F)
- File:Tegenungan.jpg (3096×4128, camera Samsung SM-G610F)
- File:Tegenungan .jpg (3096×4128, camera Samsung SM-G610F)
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Lion10
[edit]Lion10~commonswiki (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Тверь. Памятник Афанасию Никитину 01.jpg
- File:Тверь. Памятник Афанасию Никитину 02.jpg
- File:Тверь. Памятник Афанасию Никитину 03.jpg
1955 sculpture, authors are sculptor Sergei Orlov (1911–1971) and architect Grigory Zakharov (1910–1982). There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Russia and the photos violate their copyright. The files can be restored in 2053 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of AlfonsoM2002
[edit]Here are all contributions of AlfonsoM2002 (talk · contribs):
- File:Cambural en palo negro.jpg (214×320)
- File:Cancha de beisból.jpg (500×375)
- File:Canchafutbolpn.jpg (1024×768)
- File:Iglesia de Palo Negro.jpg (500×400)
- File:Palo negro.jpg (400×300)
- File:Plazabolivarpalogenroarbol.jpg (657×438)
- File:Tanque de Palo Negro.jpg (500×333)
- File:VEGETACIONAUTOPISTA.jpg (1024×768)
- File:Vegetacionpn.jpg (1024×768)
- File:VEGETACIONSSS.jpg (1024×768)
Small photos without metadata, different resolution. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 2016worldc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed as uploads by a user whose sole uploads are these, found easily via google image search
- File:2016 The Nod (13).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (14).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (11).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (10).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod fashion show.png
- File:2016 The Nod, fashion show (2).png
- File:2016 The Nod.jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (7).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (6).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (5).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (4).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (3).jpg
- File:2016 The Nod (2).jpg
- File:The Nod at VELD 2015.jpg
- File:The Nod @ VELD 2015.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately, on June 5, 2017, Unsplash changed from CC0 to a custom license considered non-free by our standards (see Template:Unsplash). This photo was published on Unsplash on April 23, 2019 [3], so it was never released under CC0. clpo13(talk) 19:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Racconish: What is the problem? The file has a watermark at its lower-left corner, which means the file probably came from an external source, and no permission was applied.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Would lean to agree but preferred to ask for third opinions. — Racconish 💬 13:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small size, no metadata, watermark "zone 01" on bottom left corner. Does not look like own work. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JJMC89 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
File:IMG-20190521-WA0049 foto feita de um trabalho social , na ajuda a moradores de rua do bairro de Santa Cruz Rio de janeiro.jpg
[edit]
per COM:BLP 大诺史 (talk) 12:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal file, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
dubious claim of own work 大诺史 (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST 大诺史 (talk) 12:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Asato55
[edit]Asato55 (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:
- File:BELESBAT No.1.jpg
- File:DOMAINE DE BELESBAT-JPG.jpg
- File:Hitachi No.1.jpg
- File:Konika No.1.jpg
- File:MINOLTA-1.jpg
- File:Minolta2.jpg
- File:Nihongakko.jpg
There's no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates architect's copyright. Architect fr:Reiko Hayama is still living. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Kasutaneda
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Kasutaneda (talk · contribs):
- File:Gral ponce.JPG (245×338, camera FinePix Viewer 1.1)
- File:Junta directiva.jpg (600×416)
- File:Juramentacion.jpeg (630×417, author Jorge Reyes)
Small photos and mostly without camera data, one photo is credited to another person. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files of Rabbimasinter
[edit]Here are all uploads of Rabbimasinter (talk · contribs):
- File:Rabbi Masinter and Mayor Herman Mashaba.jpg (768×1024)
- File:Rabbi Masinter with President .jpg (768×1024)
Uploader is always himself depicted. I suspect not own work, but different photogaphers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Photos of copyrighted material
- File:Image7poem.png
- File:Image5poem.png
- File:Image6poem.png
- File:Papel de color 3.jpg
- File:Image4poem.png
- File:Image3poem.png
- File:Papel de color 2.jpg
- File:Image1poem.jpg
- File:Image2poem.png
- File:Papel de Color.png
Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dayan.Rodriguez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope and likely copyvio as he is in them
- File:Inedit .jpg
- File:Inedit komplement .jpg
- File:Inedit Komplement .jpg
- File:Inedit Kompelement .jpg
- File:Canal de Youtube Inedit Komplement .jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
All sourced to Invytech corp. No permission
- File:Invy ultra 3P 16.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 15.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 14.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 13.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 12.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 11.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 10.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 9.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 8.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 6.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 5.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 4.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 2.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 3.jpg
- File:Invy ultra 3P 1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete COM:BLP and copyright issues. 大诺史 (talk) 15:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Photo of a photo Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete COM:BLP issues. 大诺史 (talk) 15:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdulminkid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
(c)All rights reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
(c)All rights reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
non notable person, Out of Scope, personal photo
Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
non notable person, Out of Scope, personal photo
Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro (cropped).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality crop; not in use anymore; no longer useful because of now better pic in category Stepro (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment It's DRs like this that make me think the custom UEFA template has a de facto "no derivatives" clause. If this gets deleted, then we might as well delete all of the UEFA template photos. As far as this photo goes though, Keep since nominator has not presented a valid reason for deletion. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- There is no connection between template and the DR. This is picture is simply blurred. It has a bad quality. Wikimedia Commons is not the place where we need crops from every image. There are (also here on Wikimedia Commons) much better pictures of the player, this picture is not used. Delete --DCB (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- There is no connection between template and the DR. This is picture is simply blurred. It has a bad quality. Wikimedia Commons is not the place where we need crops from every image. There are (also here on Wikimedia Commons) much better pictures of the player, this picture is not used.
- Delete I take no issue with "blurred", this image isn't bad enough for that to be a reason for deletion. The arm and hand though, do not belong to Andrea, even though in this crop at first glance they would appear to. Once you know the arm and hand belong to another player, this crop starts looking really weird. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: perhaps better to overwrite with another (wider) crop? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- … although in light of Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA this narrow dispute gradually becomes moot. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: We already have File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro (cropped) 2.jpg as a crop of the action and another image for infobox usage. Do we need another crop? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
{{Vk}}, the original uploader has no right to control dws. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)- He's not saying that. --DCB (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @DCB: Have you read COM:ANU#User:Tm_is_deleting_my_DRs_again? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't open a sideshow. There is nothing about "the original uploader has the right to control dws" in this DR. EOD. And btw: Please stop this personal fight against Stepro. It's getting really awkward. --DCB (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @DCB: Have you read COM:ANU#User:Tm_is_deleting_my_DRs_again? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- He's not saying that. --DCB (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason to delete. The fact that the file is not in use anymore (not a valid reason to delete), is due to it being removed by Stepro (albeit by a better image). He also opened an deletion request on the original image. So how is this not an attempt to create a de facto no derivative clause? If this file is deleted, this is a recognition of an de facto no derivative clause by Stepro as argued in Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA. Tm (talk) 18:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The thing is, Tm, the file wasn't simply "removed by Stepro" but was, as noted above by Stepro, it was replaced by a much better one uploaded today. It's like you are punishing Stepro for improving the article and improving Commons repository by uploading better images. Your comment on the other DR, where you claimed it shouldn't be deleted because it is "in use" on a couple of Commons galleries, one of which is Stepro's, represents the lowest form of argument possible on a DR. Commons is a repository and any galleries on this site do not constitute "in use". -- Colin (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Colin: The fact is that one of the arguments to delete this image, as said by Stepro, is that "not in use anymore", is not a reason to delete. And it was him that removed the image from its use, so, besides being not in use not invalid reason to delete, it was his actions that took this image out of use. Or will we start to delete images of persons that are replaced every day?
- And about your said that ir seems that i´am trying to "punish" Stepro does not hold water. Guess who two months ago voted to keep his images? Me. So your comment is funny, but nothing else.
- Also it was Stepro actions that took us here : 1- He nominate to speedy deletion this and other files, but was reverted by me, 2- He then went to the Administrator Noticeboard, accusing me of making bad reversions, but was told that his actions and speedy deletion requests were invalid 3- He opened an deletion request the source image of this image, 4- He opened this deletion request. Taking into account Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA, nominating this derivative works to speedy deletion are an de facto no derivative restriction (and yes "motives of the DR creator" are relevant in this case), contrary to Commons policies and to what CC-BY_SA 4.0. If Stepro wanted to control the creations, he should have licensed this images as CC-BY-ND, license not allowed in Commons. Tm (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Tm, the file is no longer in use. This fact is due to a photographer improving Commons by uploading a better one. The fact that Stepro substituted it is raised here by you as though that was some underhand action to permit deletion by devious means, rather than the totally desirable situation that occurred. Of course we could have editors who deliberately remove an image from an article to make it not "in use" just as I have seen editors who deliberately gratuitously insert an image somewhere to make it "in use". We've even seen your ridiculous claim elsewhere that being in a personal Commons gallery counts as "in use". You seem rather concerned about history and actions and not at all concerned about the image here. Could you, for once, consider the image here, and whether Commons has any purpose in holding onto this bad crop. Nobody can use the crop -- it has someone else's arm pretending to be the player's arm. Once you've seen that mistake, you can't unsee it. Different crops could be made of the source image if desired. We have a better close up of the player's face now, so don't need to be desperate to use this. I think you are voting keep simply because you edit warred and now have bad faith with the nominator, rather than out of any actual concern about "reasonable expectation of educational use", which there is none. -- Colin (talk) 07:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Alexis. The arm is someone else's and this crop image has no conceivable educational use on any project (we other better photos of the player). Motives of the DR creator aren't relevant. -- Colin (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Because of the facial expression you can't actually see what the subject looks like and the image is not flattering. The original image is an action shot and in those the players can have weird facial expressions and it's fine, but a close-up is not useful when you can't see the subject that well. I have done some crops myself and I would not crop an image like this because of these issues. -kyykaarme (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'll add that the crop was made very recently and the photographer replaced it soon with a better image, so losing the cropped version is not really a loss. At first I was concerned about the original photographer wanting to delete a cropped version because I have started making crops and I wouldn't want to be targeted by the original author for making them, but in this case I believe the photographer has a valid point and the image can be deleted as a courtesy and because the image is not useful in a positive way. -kyykaarme (talk) 23:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete, no reasonable possibility of use left. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and no usage. Should the crop become necessary for an article, it can easily be re-done. --A.Savin 14:17, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Delete There are some here that argue that Personality Rights are of no issue within our community and should only be applied by users outside our community, while we hold ourselves exempt from such outside infringements by a general disclaimer. Than why should we add a personality rights tag in the first place, if we as a community don't even give a shit about it?
"Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence."
What is so difficult to understand in this wording, that we, within our system can't contact the uploader before we make such a crop, if he might have a better image, or have contact with the person depicted, or if even a bad crop is even needed to illustrate an article, or a list, or whatever, or if the original will do as well? Such a civil approach was not taken. Stepro tried to divert the damage with his right to ask for speedy deletion within our time limit. That right was denied to him, he was even accused of being disruptive. The only disruptiveness I see is the uncivility I see within our Commons Community towards the Concept of Personality Rights. Ideally we should move this discussion to a Meta-level, but for now we have to fix the damage locally. --Wuselig (talk) 10:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by علاء as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Scan of a book, no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence that the uploader took the photo. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geniac as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- How does this file not qualify for speedy deletion? --Geniac (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 20:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image funplussmart (talk) 20:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mariomaximilianogon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright © 2003/2016 - Todos los derechos reservados.
- File:Alexis Elsener.jpg
- File:Ignacio Alessio.jpg
- File:FedericoMarin.jpg
- File:Coron Williams.jpg
- File:Jonathan Flowers.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2003/2016 - Todos los derechos reservados. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Sep 12, 2018, 262 views). Looks to be a scan of copyrighted matterial. Dispenser (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal foto, out of scope, bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photos. 大诺史 (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
By filename, this is supposed to be "Corey–Schmidt" conditions, which is pyridinium dichromate, but that reagent is not included in the image. File:Corey-Schmidt Übersicht1 V5.svg is the correct equivalent image for the intended topic. DMacks (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Similarly:
- File:Corey-Schmidt Übersicht2 V4.svg is missing the reagent, which is present in the analogous File:Corey-Schmidt Übersicht2 V5.svg replacement.
DMacks (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete both per nomination; obviously wrong chemical equation with missing information. File were already replaced by the same author. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
No tengo licencia. Fernandohcordoba (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Verbosmithie
[edit]- File:Agnes Magpale.jpg
- File:Cebu Provincial Seal.png
- File:Manuel Cuenco.jpg
- File:Pablo P Garcia.png
- File:Emilio Manuel Renner Osmeña.png
- File:Pedro Lopez.png
- File:Maximino Noel.png
- File:Nicolas Escario.png
- File:Santiago Lucero.png
- File:Isidro Kintanar.png
While these are public documents, may be indicated public domain, and may be ineligible for copyright as provided by pertinent law, it's uncertain whether these are released to the public domain. Please delete these images uploaded. --Verbosmithie (talk) 02:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I deleted speedily two files. The others have usually no exact source and should be deleted on that basis. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Taivo Anything else that I need to do to delete the rest of the images? Verbosmithie (talk) 03:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, a week has passed and no objections were given. Taivo (talk) 06:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced photograph, no OTRS. 86.249.1.158 21:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HISTORICO24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Acording to this, the images have been provided by es:Por Ávila, a political party. Proper permission will be needed
- File:Jesús Manuel Sánchez Cabrera, presidente Diputación de Ávila.jpg
- File:Jesús Manuel Sánchez Cabrera.jpg
Discasto talk 22:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
because i took this photo in Portugal and want to nominate it for the Portuguese Wiki Loves Earth 2019, not the Spanish one.. DE Penny (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
presumed copyright violation of https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/320177854751668309/?lp=true --User:Patrick_Rogel
I would like to appeal the speedy deletion request. The image is a scan of a photograph taken with a black-and-white film camera that was mounted on a tripod, and framed and snapped by the subject of the photograph, James Mastin. It was never copyrighted, and the work's author has passed away. This work is in the public domain, and any publicatoin of it on the Internet is using it as such. --Sethumme (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no indication/source that this work from 1986 is public domain/cc0. --Wdwd (talk) 09:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
File did not upload correctly. Reuploaded as a .jpg file (deletion nominated by creator) DavidCane (talk) 23:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 09:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Small/low-res; Category:Pyridinium chlorochromate has several higher-res PNG and also SVG options DMacks (talk) 21:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; I suggest File:Corey-Reagenz.svg as high-quality replacement. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abd1997nabil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out od COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 14:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality copy of File:L'Estaque, neige fondante, par Paul Cézanne.jpg. Yann (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
created on trial basis Pranavbaliga (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (test image). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
find no evidence of that him deliverables. eien20 (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- they under pretense copyright holder. the file from graduation album that published in 1970. the file protect under 31st Dec. 2039 by Japanese copyright law. --eien20 (talk) 18:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
In Japan, the copyright has expired due to the expiration of the protection period./Keita.Honda (talk) 00:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
It has already been demolished and is not extant. There is no clue because the author is unknown. Please understand./Keita.Honda (talk) 05:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Keita.Honda: 日本語: 無名ないし団体名義の著作物は「公表後」70年間に渡って保護されます。当該建築物が実在しようがしまいが関係ありません。ご理解ください。また, COM:JAPANもご覧ください。--eien20 (talk) 07:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Keita.Honda:
著作物の出所を明示しているのですが、それでも要件を満たされないのでしょうか？/Keita.Honda (talk) 02:38, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this work is not in the public domain. OTRS-permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Focused on recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The image is a book cover written by Prof.Juan Rosai. However, according to Ticket:2019032510010151, the writer (who likely owns copyright of the microscope image) is unable to give out a permission statement. As a derivative work, the file has a chance to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
porn isnt allowe on commons Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Speedy keep not pornographic. Illustrative in-use photograph of naked adult man at a nudist beach. @Alexis Jazz: Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)- Keep @Buckaroo bob 91: COM:NOTCENSORED - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per both "COM:NOTCENSORED" and "COM:INUSE". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect license 71.175.84.215 03:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- What should be the correct one? --E4024 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- File has metadata, and I don't see any reason to doubt the uploader was the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
It’s copyrighted under a different publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snh999 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not currently in mainspace use. The collection already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete If the above statement is true. I try to avoid looking at exhibitionist images. If someone wishes to keep this kind of images in their personal space, we have (I have been told :) too many of them. --E4024 (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment In mainspace use again. However, the file should still be deleted since there are better examples available. AshFriday (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Snh999: if you can point out where it was published prior to upload to Commons, then the image should be deleted speedily as copyvio. Otherwise Keep while it is used. Ankry (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing has changed since the last request. There should be a policy that discourages people from nominating the same files depicting nudity again and again for deletion, this is not the first time and this won't be the last. Also no reason has been presented why this file is incorrectly licensed. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: An otherwise unacceptable file does not become "in use" if the uploader simply inserts it into an article. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Restored per UnDR.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
My photo, should be deleted 65.202.39.131 15:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not used. One of too many. --E4024 (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as per the last 2 DRs and Undel. SPA & 2 IPs, raises an eyebrow. --Fæ (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- North American IPs, anybody can say this person could be an American? (Maybe judging by his eyebrows? :) --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per the previous DR. Not currently in mainspace use and Commons already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Survived DR's and was undeleted and kept. No valid reason - depicts nudity at a nudist beach so could be used. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
It's mine and I want it down Snh999 (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per creator's request. Not currently in mainspace use and Commons already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 22:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Free licenses are irrevocable. The file is big and has EXIF data; it has educational value. Especially good is "entering clothed area" sign. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Free licenses may be irrevocable, but we allow for courtesy deletions. In this case, we should honor the author's wishes. Doing otherwise could discourage photographers from contributing their work for fear that their requests will be dismissed out of hand. AshFriday (talk) 23:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Of course such requests should be generally dismissed, that's the idea of free licenses. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- No, as I said, we allow for courtesy deletions. We don't want to drive away our contributors by appearing too pedantic. AshFriday (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC).
- Of course such requests should be generally dismissed, that's the idea of free licenses. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is a good depiction of nudism or naturism. Why take it down? It should be on a nudist mainspace. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.244.215.196 (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Commons already contains a large number of nude male images, and this one is not in use on any mainspace. AshFriday (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Taivo and the above sections 1 and 3. 68.194.210.136 11:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per creator's request as AshFriday mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5editorph (talk • contribs) 19:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per multiple previous discussions. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
OP requests it 5editorph (talk) 00:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and AshFriday. Actually not a selfie, so permission from photographer is needed. --Yann (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
not educational Alek01913 (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Alek01913: ..that begs the question why you uploaded it in the first place. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden. Reason for deletion: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope nude person (dressed up would still be out of scope). E4024 (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- If my memory serves me correctly, this is the same image as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: It appears the uploader of both mistakenly assumed they couldn't fix their licensing mistake. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Confusing, this file was (or maybe several different-but-same-name files were) nominated several times and successfully deleted as per above, however in 2019 an undeletion request of this file was also successful, maybe @Jeff G., De728631, Ankry, Yann, and Fæ: should explain why their undeletion rationales are still valid for keeping this file, otherwise I would {{Vd}} this per COM:NOPENIS. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: At least one of the discussions refers to a different-but-same-name file, as it refers to a sign that is not shown in this file. What about the others? It’s too hard to read through all these discussions without knowing what they are referring to. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: What undeletion rationales? This appears to be a different photo than the ones discussed in DRs 1-5 above, and should be considered on it's own merits. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unless there are clear copyvio reasons to delete, this is deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity. In the Beach nudity category, there are just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera, this is one. Therefore COM:NUDE does not apply because we don't have loads of existing alternatives. For exactly the same reasons this photograph is in scope --Fæ (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Fæ. OTOH, the uploader's willingness to ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved." is suspect. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- No. "this is not deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity" nor it should be keep "because someone does like nudity". It is a DR asking the deletion of the image of an out-of-scope person, nude or dressed up, just like those hundreds of young men and women smiling at a camera that I proposed for deletion. Most, or almost none of those previous DRs have not attracted any keep votes; therefore I would be right in suspecting that these votes are because some people like nude images, IOW exactly the same subjectivity (personal PoV) that has been tried to accuse me of. Best regards. E4024 (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There are applications for this photo including on the nudity page for simple English. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.90.167.143 (talk) 12:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- (Question to the anonymous:) Who are you? The uploader? The photographed? Wife, girl friend, any friend of him? Why do we need this exact pic and not use the other hundreds we already have? E4024 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: The anonymous has every right to remain anonymous. You should not be asking them who they are or how they are related to the subject. @Fæ has explained why this image is in scope and you have not responded. Brianjd (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: I am the photographer. I own the original files. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024 and Brianjd: The anonymous user may be uploader Rumblerumble33 per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Hopefully not, since the uploader has since voted under their new name. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024 and Brianjd: The anonymous user may be uploader Rumblerumble33 per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- (Question to the anonymous:) Who are you? The uploader? The photographed? Wife, girl friend, any friend of him? Why do we need this exact pic and not use the other hundreds we already have? E4024 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- simple:Nudity already has plenty of photos, and there are even more photos available that probably do a better job of demonstrating nudity, like File:Both together fully nude.jpg, File:Cambridge WNBR 2016 (27847182306).jpg or File:Nudes a Poppin 2014 (14535427688).jpg. Although a crop of this photo could do a good job too. Brianjd (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- @E4024: Please strike your question. Hassling folx in public, in order to out their identities is not just uncivil, it's against the terms of use of this website. Refer to "violation of privacy" at wmf:Terms of use. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Notes: 1. I wrote my previous comment above the last one, because although that argument sounds like "delete" it could be seen as a part of the "keep" by an IP. 2. It is not necessary nor correct to add a "number" to the DR pages, because they are not related to the same file, they simply use a "previous file name". 3. An occasional visitor comes and adds an image of an out-of-scope person and we make a fuss around it. They must be happy for this welcome. My suggestion: Let us change our guidelines and not delete anything from now on, on scope basis. Everybody has a right to want to see his/her image on the internet; not only those that dare to expose their genitals in public... --E4024 (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with number 3. We waste too much time arguing over what is in scope or not. Brianjd (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: Re 2: It is necessary and correct to add a "number" to the DR sections because they are on the same page with each other and browsers will only see the first one if they all have the same exact name. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- WRT guidelines; this is a pointless straw man argument. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Any user whose name I hear from time to time as probable candidates to adminship may strike (bolded my consent to make life easier) whatever I have done that deserves being censured in this DR. I do not care. What I am most curious about is, when and if they are elected to the said post, how will they be able to close any deletion request regarding naked people images as I see they -IMHO of course- have a favourable approach to almost all of these without paying attention to the considerations of regular users like myself.
- (BTW bravo, newcomer; you have been received as a hero. You even made me repent having opened this discussion, although I still believe your valuable contribution must be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: Strike your own question. If you are writing about me, I cite policies and guidelines directly or indirectly. To be clear, this is 1 of just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera on this project, and thus is in scope. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- (BTW bravo, newcomer; you have been received as a hero. You even made me repent having opened this discussion, although I still believe your valuable contribution must be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Image's potential in-scope usefulness would be improved if there was more information. Eg what country/place is this? Is this a beach or park where clothing is optional or nudity is the norm? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment My memory was almost correct: This appears to be a retouched copy of the image in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. I know this because I saved the latter image at the time. There was more information available on the latter image’s description and talk page, but I did not save this. @Infrogmation: As an admin, you can see this; is it useful? Brianjd (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I can fill it in if you give me access to see the info. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Signatures in discussions should include timestamps. I have added timestamps to your signatures. Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically include a timestamp. Brianjd (talk) 08:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: If you are referring to the info in the deleted file File:Naked man on the beach.jpg, I cannot give you access as I do not have access myself. This is why I asked an admin to check. Brianjd (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Photo coordinates are (40.4585670, -73.9925572), I just don’t know how to list them. I also have the original unedited photo if that helps with EXIF. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Thanks, I added the location for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you! Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: You're welcome! What's the name of that beach or area, and what did you retouch? Also, please do not ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved" again. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: It’s Gunnison Beach in Sandy Hook, NJ. That particular area is a service road and he wasn’t supposed to be there :*) ... I made the photo brighter and colorful as it came out dark due to limited exposure. I’ll make sure to rename if I get that warning again. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I have other photos of him from that same day. Is it valuable to post them and should I post them raw and unedited? Also should I rename the file given your original message and if so how do I do that? Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Please consider how the photos fit into COM:PS before doing so. If you do so, please post the highest resolution raw and unedited version with metadata per COM:HR, and then the edited version with overwrite or a separate name. What new name would you choose for this file? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I am not very creative with names. Perhaps “male nakedness on beach?” Or should it be more precise? I am open to suggestions.
- @Jeff G.: I suggested “File:Naked and barefoot man on Gunnison Beach.jpg” as a file name replacement.
- @Jeff G.: @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Rename request rejected because this is still up for deletion nomination. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I am not very creative with names. Perhaps “male nakedness on beach?” Or should it be more precise? I am open to suggestions.
- @Rumblerumble33: Please consider how the photos fit into COM:PS before doing so. If you do so, please post the highest resolution raw and unedited version with metadata per COM:HR, and then the edited version with overwrite or a separate name. What new name would you choose for this file? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: You're welcome! What's the name of that beach or area, and what did you retouch? Also, please do not ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved" again. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Should this be in Category:Beaches at Sandy Hook, New Jersey? This seems like a surprising result (which we are told to avoid, though I cannot find a relevant policy). Brianjd (talk) 10:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Would you prefer Category:Sandy Hook, New Jersey or Category:Gateway National Recreation Area, as the location isn't exactly on Gunnison Beach? Perhaps we need a Gunnison Beach cat that isn't surprising? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: @Jeff G.: You need a Gunnison Beach cat. There are about 12 separate beaches in the Gateway National Recreation Area. Gunnison is the only nude beach of the 12. It’s the furthest from the old military equipment and will be the only one where you will find nudist people and signs about nudity. It has a life and aura of its own. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I was using the phrase "surprising result" in the same sense as User talk:Etsidun#Avoid surprising results, that is, nudity in a non-nudity category. Apparently you are not supposed to do this. Brianjd (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: @Brianjd: I agree we should create the Gunnison Beach cat. How can I help do that? NudistPhotographer (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @NudistPhotographer: See Commons:Categories. This page contains a quick guide to categorisation, followed by details. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: @Brianjd: I agree we should create the Gunnison Beach cat. How can I help do that? NudistPhotographer (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Would you prefer Category:Sandy Hook, New Jersey or Category:Gateway National Recreation Area, as the location isn't exactly on Gunnison Beach? Perhaps we need a Gunnison Beach cat that isn't surprising? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you! Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rumblerumble33: Thanks, I added the location for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Photo coordinates are (40.4585670, -73.9925572), I just don’t know how to list them. I also have the original unedited photo if that helps with EXIF. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unobjectionable, potentially useful. Location identified as Beach at Sandy Hook New Jersey - seems to be the only media of beach nudity in that state. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: @Infrogmation: EXIF data for the photo. I don’t know how to transfer it. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
<Exif Metadata> Aperture: f/6.3
Aperture (APEX): 5.375
Aspect Ratio: 3 × 2
Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Camera Lens Model: 8.8-36.8 mm
Color Model: RGB
Color Space: sRGB
Components Configuration: 1, 2, 3, 0
Custom Rendered: Normal
Date Taken: Jun 7, 2020 02:50:33 PM
Depth: 8
Digital Zoom: 1
DPI Width: 72
DPI Height: 72
EXIF Version: 2.3.1
Exposure Bias Value: 0 ev
Exposure Mode: Auto
Exposure Program: Program AE
Exposure Time: 1/1600s
File Name: IMG_0011.JPG
File Size: 9.9 MB
Flash: No Flash
Flash Pix Version: 1.0
FNumber: f/6.3
Focal Length: 8.800000000000001 mm
ISO: 125
Metering Mode: Multi-segment
Orientation: Normal
Profile Name: sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Resolution: 20 MegaPixels
Scene Capture Type: Standard
Shutter Speed Value: 1/1579s
White Balance: Auto
Author: Emily Claire Braston
- Comment Hoping we can vote on this soon. If we aim to keep I want to change the name and then upload the other raw files. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- @NudistPhotographer: It is not actually a vote. The “votes” (sometimes people call them “!votes”) are just there to make the discussion easier to read. The person who closes the discussion uses their own judgement, guided by the entire discussion. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep I never got to vote on my own deletion request. I vote to keep of course. NudistPhotographer (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 10:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Note: The file discussed in this section was renamed to File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg 11:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) and then deleted 12:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC) per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg. The filename was salted 14:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
If the author died in 1966, then he isn't 70 years daed yet. Taivo (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete till 2037 – Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Hungary #Durations. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Taivo and Incnis Mrsi: why do you think it's a selfie? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Source says: "Károly Escher (late 1920s) My Father". Depicted person is probably Escher's father. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Right. huwiki used this image in the infobox. I removed it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Source says: "Károly Escher (late 1920s) My Father". Depicted person is probably Escher's father. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, created in 2019 Sodacan (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This file also has not any reliable source. --Xiengyod~commonswiki (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, created in 2019 Sodacan (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This file also has not any reliable source. --Xiengyod~commonswiki (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete screencap.--Roy17 (talk) 15:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
_Holzschnitt,_Homburgertal,_1956.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Holzschnitt,_Homburgertal,_1956.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, artist died in 1966 Martin Sg. (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
_Holzschnitt,_Homburgertal,_1956.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
_Holzschnitt,_Homburgertal,_1956.jpg){kind=link}
_K%C3%BCnstler.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_K%C3%BCnstler.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio https://www.kaenerkinden.ch/var/m_a/a2/a26/8493/232219-Walter%20Eglin%20.jpg Martin Sg. (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
_Künstler.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
_Künstler.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio, see https://www.kaenerkinden.ch/var/m_a/a2/a26/8493/232217-Sphinx%20Mosaik,%201961.jpg Martin Sg. (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Very poor quality copy of File:Paul Cezanne, The Gulf of Marseilles Seen from L'Estaque, c1885.jpg. Yann (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Picasso means not free. Tohma (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parrêsia-paerrësia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, artist died in 1981, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1981, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Some doubt that this image is own work, as there are several hits in the web for an un-cropped version of the same image: (here, Google-dated 2014),(here markedly higher resolution). -- Túrelio (talk) 18:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 18:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 18:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 18:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Redundant file. Exactly the same as AS11-42-6271. Jstuby (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geniac as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- How does this file not qualify for speedy deletion? --Geniac (talk) 23:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
No metadata, no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Ermschwerder Heegen als Flora – Fauna – Habitat (FFH) Gebiet, Nummer 4624-301, in dem europäisch vernetzten Schutzgebietssystem.jpg
[edit]_Gebiet,_Nummer_4624-301,_in_dem_europ%C3%A4isch_vernetzten_Schutzgebietssystem.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Gebiet,_Nummer_4624-301,_in_dem_europ%C3%A4isch_vernetzten_Schutzgebietssystem.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
doppelt vorhanden Hannelore Kloiber (talk) 19:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 19:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Résolution de 6 ko : semble une copie. L’auteure doit indiquer la provenance Pierrette13 (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Photo of a photo Gbawden (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Need to fix the file title Fortheripchad (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Very small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Afkomstig van deze site. Toestemming van de oorspronkelijke auteur dient gestuurd te worden naar OTRS. トトト (talk) 19:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 21:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 21:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 21:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 21:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 21:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Source page does not indicate a Creative Commons license: https://www.deviantart.com/mintmovi3/art/Avengers-Endgame-2019-Avengers-logo-png-793337436 Ixfd64 (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm the autor of this picture and I don't want to expose it anymore. Pfurtado (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Files of Mackiechan
[edit]Here are all contributions of Mackiechan (talk · contribs):
- File:Bailadores, Merida.jpg (720×540)
- File:Ciudad de Maracay.jpg (612×612)
- File:El Valle en Merida.jpg (800×600)
Small photos without metadata, resolution is always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Files of Officina11
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Officina11 (talk · contribs):
- File:Baluardo sangiorgio MuraSabbioneta.jpg (1477×981)
- File:Baluardo San Giovanni, Sabbioneta.jpg (1609×1073)
- File:Porta Imperiale, Sabbioneta.jpg (1474×1103)
- File:Vista da Porta Vittoria verso Baluardo Santa Maria, Sabbioneta.jpg (1471×1104)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Files of Yerarinet
[edit]Here are all photos, uploaded by Yerarinet (talk · contribs):
- File:Carpico.png (391×516)
- File:Juan Carlos Cárpico2.jpg (718×718)
- File:Miguel Cocchiola.jpg (3216×1592, camera Canon EOS 6D)
- File:Rubén D. Villegas.jpg (356×400)
Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Seems like the text is not own work. That case OTRS-permission from text author is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Sole uploads of this user and claimed as own work but found all over the web, likely copyvio
Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment All the photos are big and have the same camera data in EXIF. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Spending too much time on Commons makes one overly suspicious. This is a new user who uploaded some high quality photos in 2016 and then disappeared. Makes me suspect copyvio Gbawden (talk) 16:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as User:Taivo, there is much consistency in all uploads by this user. Any photo used in WP and on Commons for a few years is copied and can be found all over the web. We'll need concrete evidence that it is published prior to upload here. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST 大诺史 (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This user has no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
This is my picture. He was publicated without my permission. 83.79.139.43 13:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Info We got a take-down request from the subject via mail by this site; “Ich verlange die sofortige Löschung meines Fotos und diesen Beitrages über mich”. Bencemac (talk) 11:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. Unused and doesn't appear to be notable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Should be re-uploaded as separate photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from https://www.mjunction.in/. PD-text ineligible?. I have converted to DR as I think it is a text-logo with insufficient originality. Stifle (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A screenshot from NBC, not the same with the one on the WH website 219.78.191.250 16:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D artwork in Japan B dash (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
![16:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/05/29#c-B_dash-2019-05-29T16:44:00.000Z-File:Moomin_exhibition_in_Roppongi_Hills-_"Moomin_The_art_and_The_story".jpg){kind=link}
- B dash: OK, I pixelized the artwork heavily. I guess it is acceptable now? An admin should remove the original image from the history of the file. Cheers! Syced (talk) 00:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. Original deleted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
![16:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/05/29#c-P199-2019-07-16T16:14:00.000Z-File:Moomin_exhibition_in_Roppongi_Hills-_"Moomin_The_art_and_The_story".jpg){kind=link}
The fourth image was previously published at https://www.vespasiano.mg.gov.br/administracao/a-prefeitura/ Py4nf (talk) 17:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
quality is so poor that I think there is no educational value. Amada44 talk to me 19:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Purupurucat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Afkomstig van deze site. Geen toestemming voor vrij gebruik.
トトト (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ik heb nog een beeld toegevoegd aan de lijst.--トトト (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I've requested a global lock of this and 2 other users for other reasons here. ーŒ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ 【🅱alk】 15:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Sin licencia Fernandohcordoba (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files of Анатолий Максимов
[edit]Анатолий Максимов (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Памятник Афанасию Никитину в городе Тверь.JPG
- File:Памятник Афанасию Никитину на набережной Афанасия Никитина.JPG
- File:Памятник Первому русскому путешественнику в Индию Афанасию Никитину.JPG
- File:Памятник русскому путешественнику Афанасию Никитину.JPG
- File:Памятник русскому путешественнику Афанасию Никитину в городе Твери.Вид сбоку.JPG
- File:Памятник русскому путешественнику Афанасию Никитину.Город Тверь.JPG
1955 sculpture, authors are sculptor Sergei Orlov (1911–1971) and architect Grigory Zakharov (1910–1982). There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Russia and the photos violate their copyright. The files can be restored in 2053 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Afanasiy Nikitin Monument by Ghirlandajo
[edit]Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
1955 sculpture, authors are sculptor Sergei Orlov (1911–1971) and architect Grigory Zakharov (1910–1982). There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Russia and the photos violate their copyright. The files can be restored in 2053 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:FOP Russia
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-19.jpg
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-20.jpg
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-9.jpg
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-7.jpg
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-8.jpg
- File:Maxim Gorky sculpture in Izhevsk.jpg
- File:Памятная табличка Трапезникову В. А.jpg
- File:P. I. Shuvalov monument in Izhevsk-2.jpg
- File:Memorial of the Soviet war in Afghanistan (Izhevsk).jpg
- File:Izhevsk Zoo-3.jpg
- File:Axion holding-5.jpg
- File:Axion holding-4.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk Steelmakers-9.jpg
- File:Axion holding-3.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk Steelmakers-8.jpg
- File:Metallurg monument in Izhevsk-2.jpg
- File:Metallurg monument in Izhevsk.jpg
- File:Izhick.jpg
- File:P. I. Shuvalov monument in Izhevsk.jpg
- File:Elizabeth of Russia monument in Izhevsk.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk Steelmakers-7.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk Steelmakers-6.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk Steelmakers-5.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk Steelmakers-4.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk gunsmiths-3.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk gunsmiths-4.jpg
- File:Hannover-Messe 2018-7.jpg
- File:Monument to Kuzebay Gerd-1.jpg
- File:Monument to Kuzebay Gerd-3.jpg
- File:Monument to Kuzebay Gerd-2.jpg
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-4.jpg
- File:Kalashnikov Museum-3.jpg
- File:Bessemer converter of Nizhnesaldinsky steel plant.jpg
- File:Bust of Peter I in Ekaterinburg.jpg
- File:Yeltsin Center-7.jpg
- File:Izhevsk Arsenal-13.jpg
- File:Памятник электромонтёру (Ижевск).jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk gunsmiths-2.jpg
- File:Monument to Izhevsk gunsmiths.jpg
- File:Bust of Andrey Deryabin in Izhevsk-3.jpg
- File:Bust of Andrey Deryabin in Izhevsk-2.jpg
- File:Bust of Andrey Deryabin in Izhevsk-1.jpg
- File:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky-1.jpg
- File:Victory Square (Izhevsk)-3.jpg
- File:Victory Square (Izhevsk)-1.jpg
- File:Victory Square (Izhevsk)-2.jpg
- File:Forever with Russia monument, Izhevsk 3.jpg
- File:Forever with Russia monument, Izhevsk 2.jpg
- File:Forever with Russia monument, Izhevsk 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
大诺史 (talk) 12:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Axion holding-3.jpg — it's de minimis (the main objects are white-yellow buildings). --Brateevsky {talk} 14:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Kalashnikov Museum-9.jpg; File:Bessemer converter of Nizhnesaldinsky steel plant.jpg — there's no any autor's creations. Only museum installations. Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 05:55, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except the three highlighted for keeping. --Green Giant (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
PD-AR-Photo doesn't apply to videos. It's still copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from toys. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Argentine for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Flickr user is the "colorizer", but most likely not the photographer. Additional data about original publication is needed in order to verify copyright status. Strakhov (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:58, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
https://toursenmouvement.fr/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel Bonjour, pourquoi avoir demandé la suppression de cette image ? Cette image m'appartient et ne figure que seulement sur le site Web de mon association. Merci par avance de votre réponse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhilippeLacaïle (talk • contribs) 10:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 12:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
dubious claim of own work 大诺史 (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment The logo is very simple and ineligible for copyright. The other problem: it is used in a declined draft, maybe the logo is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Multiple songs would be copyrighted for much longer. For example, both the lyricist w:He Jingzhi and the singer w:Guo Lanying of the song at 1h22m are still alive. To keep this file on Commons, audio has to be muted and subtitles removed. Or, simply delete it. Roy17 (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Singer Deng Yuhua 鄧玉華 born 1942 is probably the youngest major co-author.--Roy17 (talk) 23:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep What the nominator of this deletion was trying to say is, for this video which was recorded and published more than 50 years ago, several segments of it contains materials that are still not yet expired because although this video has past 50 years, the singers and musicians creating those pieces of music used in this video have not yet passed away 50 years ago. Let's take a look at China's copyright law. Note the underlined part in Article 39.
Article 38 A performer shall, in relation to his performance, enjoy the rights:
- (1) to show his/her identity;
- (2) to protect the character in his performance from distortion;
- (3) to authorize others to make live broadcasts or to publicly transmit his live performance, and to receive remuneration for it;
- (4) to authorize others to make sound recordings and video recordings, and to receive remuneration for it;
- (5) to permit others to reproduce and distribute the sound recordings or video recordings which record his performance, and to receive remuneration for it;
- (6) to permit others to disseminate his performance to the public through information network, and to receive remuneration for it.
Anyone who is permitted to exploit the works in the ways provided in Items (3) through (6) of the preceding paragraph shall also obtain permission from and pay remuneration to the copyright owner.
Article 39 The term of protection of the rights provided in Items (1) and (2) of Paragraph 1 of article 37 of this Law shall not be limited.
The term of protection of the rights provided in Items (3) through (6) of Paragraph 1 of article 37 of this Law shall be fifty years, expiring on December 31 of the fiftieth year after the performance is made.
Side note: the "information network" mentioned in Article 38#6 basically means the internet.
So it is not hard to tell, the performance, which is the video we are discussing, has its copyright expired although those songs haven't yet. That means if someone tries to recreate the whole video today, they need to contact the copyright owners of those songs; however, as a video released 50 years ago with proper agreements from the original copyright owners, segments of this video containing those songs have expired.
Note for admins: Several independent segments of this video have already nominated speedy deletion by Roy17. Please revert this file to its original state and close its deletion request, as well as this segment which has already been deleted.
--Techyan（Talk） 17:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Techyan: could you please explain why copyright of segments of this video containing those songs have expired?
- As a hint, please read Articles 15, 37 and 38.--Roy17 (talk) 17:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
why copyright of segments of this video containing those songs have expired?
Because the copyright of the video itself expired. Refer to my comment above and Article 42 for the reason why the copyright of the video expired.
As a hint, please read Articles 15, 37 and 38.
You are saying because Article 1 of all copyright laws around the world guarantees someone's work is protected, so there are no exemptions. However, articles I quoted above are exactly where those exemptions laid.
There is something called "neighboring right", which means the producer of this video also enjoys dedicated copyright apart from the copyright protecting those musicians whom the video consists of their works. If I play Ode to Joy and record it, it will still be protected (instead of being in public domain immediately) even though Beethoven's original melody has been in public domain long ago; if I have dead for 50 years but Beethoven haven't, the melody will still be protected while my own performance of Beethoven's work expires. If I further expand Roy17's point, shall I make sure every actor and actress involved in performing this video died for 50 years before assuming this video got in PD? Of course not. If I sing a song used in this video which its lyricist hasn't died for 50 years, then record and upload it, I will be infringing copyright; but using songs recorded in this video does not - that's the point I am trying to make. I All derivative works have their own dedicated copyright, and there is no need to even attribute as long as the creator of the derivative work is granted permission from all copyright owners, while China does NOT protect the neighboring right in this case for laws named above, although it's worth mentioning there might be some differences depends on jurisdictions. This is just a simple problem on derivative works and I don't want to go any further.
--Techyan（Talk） 18:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Techyan: could you please provide the legal ground of your claim if [you] sing a song used in this video which its lyricist hasn't died for 50 years, then record and upload it, [you] will be infringing copyright; but using songs recorded in this video does not? --Roy17 (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Just a few facts:
- Article 15: The copyright in a cinematographic work and any work created by an analogous method of fl1m production shall be enjoyed by the producer of the work, but the scriptwriter, director, cameraman, lyricist, composer, and other authors thereof shall enjoy the right of authorship in the work, and have the right to receive remuneration pursuant to the contract concluded with the producer. The authors of the screenplay, musical works and other works that are incorporated in a cinematographic work and work created by virtue of an analogous method of film production and can be exploited separately shall be entitled to exercise their copyright independently.
- Copyright generally lasts for 50 years pma in PRC.
- URAA restoration date is 1996-01-01. (PRC was establish in 1949, so basically all works created in PRC or whose authors died in PRC are subject to URAA restoration.)
- Some composers/lyricists/singers are still alive. They can exercise their copyright independently.--Roy17 (talk) 01:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It's a record of one's performance. As a recording of a performance by three official studios, the use of music and lyrics could be treated as authorized, and at that time there is no copyright law in China at all, so there is no copyright violation at all.
- And, we can easily find out the fact that the video is completely in public domain.
- Roy17 seems to have made a mistake on Article 15. The recording, or film, with all elements together, is treated a whole piece of work, not audio and video seprately. The music included would not affect the copyright status of the film.
Article 15 The copyright of a cinematographic work or a work created in a way similar to cinematography shall be enjoyed by the producer, while any of the playwright, director, cameraman, words-writer, composer and other authors of the work shall enjoy the right of authorship, and shall be entitled to obtain remuneration as agreed upon in the contract between him and the producer.
--WQL (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The copyright of the video itself has expired. Moreover, this video is a whole, with independent copyright, and is not affected by the copyright of the music and lyrics it contains.——Soaring swallow (talk) 08:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep:鱼头炮 (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
This film is not public domain in China, if Wang Ping died in 1990. Also URAA-restored files are ineligible for upload after 1 March 2012. 2001:4452:152:2600:549A:7BE:31C5:B6B0 01:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete FYI, the copyright holder would be the production company, August First Film Studio, not the filmmaker―and regardless, copyright extends from publication date, rather than death date for Chinese films. Anyways, this film is copyrighted in the US, but not China, because it was published in 1964, meaning it would not have been public domain by the URAA cutoff date of 1 January 1996 (although it did become public domain in China in 2014, does Chinese Wikipedia allow local uploads?). Freedom4U (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Notifying the previous commentors about this re-nomination for deletion of the same work 5 years later by an IP user. @Ellin Beltz, @Roy17, @Soaring swallow, @Techyan, @鱼头炮. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 21:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- As I had explained in #c-Roy17-2019-06-05T01:46:00.000Z-Techyan-2019-05-31T18:29:00.000Z, "authors of... musical works and other works that are incorporated in a cinematographic work and work created by virtue of an analogous method of film production and can be exploited separately shall be entitled to exercise their copyright independently." The audio is therefore not in public domain in China. It is questionable on what basis did User:Ellin Beltz keep this file. Roy17 (talk) 01:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Five years later, I do not remember why I did this and await another administrator to please come and delete it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
1926 Swedish book cover. Drawing on cover is not credited, named author died in 1949 but that may not be relevent here. Abzeronow (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in category:Arcul de Triumf
[edit]These files are in category:Arcul de Triumf:
- File:1976 Street in Bucuresti, Romania.jpg
- File:20140820 București 049.jpg
- File:500px photo (212913427).jpeg
- File:Arco de Triunfo, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 24.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf (24396923048).jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf - Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf - Vedere Fisheye.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf Bucuresti 2012.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf Bucuresti.JPG
- File:Arcul de Triumf din București.JPG
- File:Arcul de Triumf la zilele Bucurestiului.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf municipiul București.JPG
- File:Arcul de Triumf noaptea 2019 (40641768203).jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf Noaptea.jpg
- File:Arcul de triumf panorama 1.1.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf zilele Bucurestiului 2.jpg
- File:Arcul de Triumf, Bucuresti.JPG
- File:Arcul de Triumf-Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Arcul De Triumf.jpg
- File:Bucarest Romania.000.jpg
- File:Bucarest, arco di trionfo.JPG
- File:Nicolae Ionescu - Pretzel vendors in uniform in front of the Triumph Arch.jpg
- File:Romania-1210 - Arch of Triumph (7557786120).jpg
- File:Triumphal Arch Bucharest by Andrei Tosea.jpg
- File:Triumphal arch of Bucharest (3973693771).jpg
- File:Triumphbogen Bukarest Rumänien.jpg
- File:Triumphbogen Bukarest.jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The architect en:Petre Antonescu died in 1965 and the arc of triumph is protected with copyright until 2036 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 09:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep those kept in previous discussions. There is no point in reiterating the same arguments again and again every time someone decides to clean up the category. There has to be some equivalent of ro:Format:păstrat here, right?... Strainu (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- No. These files were kept due to formal reasons. Nevertheless they violate architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Not at all. I distinctly remember discussing at least File:1976 Street in Bucuresti, Romania.jpg and File:Nicolae Ionescu - Pretzel vendors in uniform in front of the Triumph Arch.jpg (and likely others which I don't remember by name) in depth in previous discussion, presenting why they don't break the copyright. It is your right to disagree with the arguments there, but you should present serious counter-arguments, not a generic no FoP in Romania. Doing so is a huge waste of everyone's time, not to mention rude.--Strainu (talk) 15:43, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- If you mean Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Accademia di Romania (Rome), then three users participated, De728631 (the nominator) suggested to delete all of them, Giku suggested to delete most of them and you suggested to keep all of them. The request was withdrawn, because some files were incorrectly listed and are not included into this request. File:1976 Street in Bucuresti, Romania.jpg was the only image thoroughly discussed and it was shown, that arc of triumph is the main object of the image. No file in current request was shown not to violate copyright. Pretzel vendors image was not discussed at all, but looking how the image is used (in 7 projects to illustrate arc of triumph, in no projects to illustrate street vendors), it's clear, that arc of triumph is main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- You misquote me: I asked for a certain number of images to be kept in addition to the ones mentioned by Giku and the nominator agreed with some of the requests. I call that a discussion.
- As to using the Wikipedia usages to determine the main subject of the image, your logic is deeply flawed: Wikipedia cannot use a fair usage image as long as a free one exists, which means we are forced to use whatever is on commons and depicts the arch. That does not mean that the arch is the main subject of the picture. Strainu (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- If you mean Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Accademia di Romania (Rome), then three users participated, De728631 (the nominator) suggested to delete all of them, Giku suggested to delete most of them and you suggested to keep all of them. The request was withdrawn, because some files were incorrectly listed and are not included into this request. File:1976 Street in Bucuresti, Romania.jpg was the only image thoroughly discussed and it was shown, that arc of triumph is the main object of the image. No file in current request was shown not to violate copyright. Pretzel vendors image was not discussed at all, but looking how the image is used (in 7 projects to illustrate arc of triumph, in no projects to illustrate street vendors), it's clear, that arc of triumph is main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Not at all. I distinctly remember discussing at least File:1976 Street in Bucuresti, Romania.jpg and File:Nicolae Ionescu - Pretzel vendors in uniform in front of the Triumph Arch.jpg (and likely others which I don't remember by name) in depth in previous discussion, presenting why they don't break the copyright. It is your right to disagree with the arguments there, but you should present serious counter-arguments, not a generic no FoP in Romania. Doing so is a huge waste of everyone's time, not to mention rude.--Strainu (talk) 15:43, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- No. These files were kept due to formal reasons. Nevertheless they violate architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Agree Stainu opinion --Sailko (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I think they are in the public domain.--MSClaudiu (talk) 06:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:FOP Romania. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Straniu and MSClaudiu. They are both administrators upon the roman language projects and they clearly know what they think. --Hazuala Finfin (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I can't see the reason for the discussion. Nobody has denied the lack of FoP in Romania. Thus, no more discussion is needed. --Discasto talk 14:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Accademia di Romania (Rome), only a few months ago. Johnbod (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination most, kept some per de minimis. — Racconish 💬 12:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
porque lo queria incluir en el concurso, y lo subi por la parte equivocada, deseo subir la foto nuevamente por el link que sugiere el concurso pero no es posible porque la subi por aqui Eyvindjg (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: song writer w:He Luting died in 1999
I'll mute it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: you would need to pixelise the lyrics too. But then the whole video is pointless.--Roy17 (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: The video wasn't seeking properly. I see, after 40 seconds the lyrics start.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep See Commons:Deletion_requests/File:The_East_Is_Red_(1964).webm. --Techyan（Talk） 17:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA, which was not discussed in the other DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2019 (UTC)