Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 11th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The photograph may be released under a free license from the photographer's point of view; Matisse's painting is copyrighted until 70 years PMA (ie, 2024). Huon (talk) 00:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The photographer may release their rights, but the painting itself is copyrighted in its country of origin (France) until 2024 (70 years PMA; Matisse died in 1954). Huon (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 星雨, not uploder shizhao (talk) 03:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 星雨, not uploder shizhao (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 星雨, not uploder shizhao (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 星雨, not uploder shizhao (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 星雨, not uploder shizhao (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 星雨, not uploder shizhao (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 03:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Explicit at 07:04, 11 Januar 2019 UTC: This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. --Krdbot 14:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 03:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Explicit at 07:04, 11 Januar 2019 UTC: This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. --Krdbot 14:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Explicit at 07:04, 11 Januar 2019 UTC: This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. --Krdbot 14:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Explicit at 07:04, 11 Januar 2019 UTC: This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. --Krdbot 14:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Explicit at 07:03, 11 Januar 2019 UTC: This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. --Krdbot 14:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this Raakuldeep (talk) 13:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain yet. Undelete in 2025. Yann (talk) 16:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Mis-tagged. Matisse died in 1954, which means that PD-70 (relevant for France, the country of origin) only starts applying in 2024. Yann (talk) 16:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Mis-tagged. Matisse died in 1954, which means that PD-70 (relevant for France, the country of origin) only starts applying in 2024. Yann (talk) 17:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axanina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3 other uploads from the same contributor and showing the same sitter were actually copyrighted to Aurelio Martínez Morenas.

— Racconish💬 14:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 19:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission; Kind of spam.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also see File:Search best restaurants on FINDGO.jpg. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE; Spam; Uncredited stock images

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Capture d'écran + sans source. FructidorAn3 (talk) 15:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo FaridStark (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:16, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the artist B dash (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know this subject is controversial. But this is only a historical fact. Thank you for stopping censoring all my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, image cropped. --B dash (talk) 04:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free pic of video game / image de jeu vidéo non libre de droit Supertoff (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 21:54, 11 Januar 2019 UTC: non free pic of video game / image de jeu vidéo non libre de droit --Krdbot 02:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The photographer may release their rights, but the painting itself is copyrighted in its country of origin (France) until 2024 (70 years PMA; Matisse died in 1954). Huon (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The photographer may release their rights, but the painting itself is copyrighted in its country of origin (France) until 2024 (70 years PMA; Matisse died in 1954). Huon (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The photographer may release their rights, but the painting itself is copyrighted in its country of origin (France) until 2024 (70 years PMA; Matisse died in 1954). Huon (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader here: I was intending to upload the logo for this school for use in an infobox on its Wikipedia article. However, I've realized that it would have been better to have uploaded the logo onto Wikipedia instead of Wikimedia, as I would be able to properly explain the non-free rationale licensing there. I've already uploaded the logo onto Wikipedia, so this media file can be removed. Seven Train (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:13, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de publication GraphyArchy (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 10:28, 12 Januar 2019 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 14:14, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:In_a_lonely_place_1950_poster.jpg due to copyright situation, not for commons Migebert (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resolution 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:1C27:2DAC:1271:BA2D 05:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose, really. It is quite difficult to take a sharp image of a moving animal below a rippling water surface, and of the Platypus images on Commons, this is arguably the most useful for a thumbnail (and why I chose it as an illustration some years ago). Perhaps it would be best to await the arrival of some images which illustrate a swimming Platypus like this one well contrasted with a light background; none have been created on Commons in the past few years. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: File is in use on many projects, from af:Eendbekdier to zh:鸭嘴兽科. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for us (COM:INUSE). --bjh21 (talk) 12:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep (COM:INUSE). AshFriday (talk) 23:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: It's actually pretty sharp as far as animal pictures go, I don't see much of a problem here Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use on many projects, no copyright issues. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per uploaders request and also COM:PENIS Migebert (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per uploaders request and also COM:PENIS Migebert (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its nasty and my husbands cheating 2604:2000:1104:C503:FDAD:B238:EBD9:4683 10:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 12:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 00:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Texas FM 1501.svg and similarly named files. The SVG versions were completely redrawn from the specifications. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Texas Farm to Market shields 2001-2500, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Texas Farm to Market shields 2501-3000, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Texas Farm to Market shields 3001-3500, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Texas Farm to Market shields 3501-4000, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Texas Farm to Market shields 4001-4500 and COM:HWY/P for similar deletions.

Rschen7754 02:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Archisman pal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michael Dunga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 17:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 17:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections (software created) DBigXray 17:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 17:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 17:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 18:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 18:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 18:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 18:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful : Private image collections DBigXray 18:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, only one upload, no real edits on fr.wp, inactive, out of scope Migebert (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ana Lozano FV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Jesús Lozano Bacaicoa).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - non notable artist, an OTRS permission does not change that. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Na4ya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.victoriamarchenkova.com/every-feeling-sent-by-god

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Na4ya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Victoria Marchenkova, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Na4ya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots from the copyrighted movie, missing permission.

Xunks (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted picture B dash (talk) 03:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hjeuruht179 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


File:HaQuynhNhu.jpg
Hình này do tôi tải lên, Do tôi mới hoạt động trên Wikipedia trong thời gian ngắn nên không nắm rõ cách tải lên, cách sử dụng hình ảnh và các quy định khác trên Wikipedia nên làm sai cách, qua tìm hiểu và các thành viên thảo nên tôi nắm rõ hơn các vấn đề, nhờ bạn quản trị viên nào đó xóa hộ tôi bức ảnh này. Xin cám ơn.
Hjeuruht179 (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 09:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 00:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per De728631. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can not see the people 73.151.132.179 04:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 11:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: source and license were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my photo. I don't want it on wikipedia. Pbx11 (talk) 12:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Godismygod226 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://twitter.com/MHTheGoat/media

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The site of origin informs that all the rights of the work belong to the bandai-namco companie Leon saudanha (talk) 13:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 19:01, 2 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Game artwork --Krdbot 01:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki (and probably copyviol, we need authorization for contents like this) Melquíades (msg) 20:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 20:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sword handles cannot be described as "simple shapes" Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted 1915 work by Giacomo de Andreis. Since French law apply, date of death of artist must be provided. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a selfie so not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of course, not uploader's own work. Le Petit Chat (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet image: https://www.chars-francais.net/2015/index.php/liste-chronologique/de-1945-a-1990?task=view&id=678 Le Petit Chat (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es mi propio archivo y me gustaria eliminarlo de la web porque ahora esta en venta en iStock ( https://www.istockphoto.com/es/foto/sunset-benidorm-gm637340136-113647611 ) y no querria publicar foto en ningun otro espacio. MaksimIvanov2 (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep the image was released under a free non-revokable license, so there is no justification to delete. The copyright holder can still release it under a different license elsewhere, as he has done. Ww2censor (talk) 23:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the publication here is anterior + there is no evidence that the nominator is the uploder + per Ww2censor. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free photo. The Flickr uploader obviously does not have the right to issue a free license to this photo. LX (talk, contribs) 23:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious attribution. No exif data. The author has presented several other copyrighted images as being his own work. Le Petit Chat (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious attribution. No exif data. The author has presented several other copyrighted images as being his own work. Le Petit Chat (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work od a copyrighted map B dash (talk) 06:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot B dash (talk) 06:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted map

B dash (talk) 06:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted map B dash (talk) 06:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from the Hong Kong Government in 2004, not in PD B dash (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李东涵, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is 李璧含, OTRS need shizhao (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, undetermined copyrighted status B dash (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am in contact with the department at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), that has removed the file from Flickr. So far, the answer is not quite clear, but most likely it has been moved to the department's new platform, Fotoware. Please do not delete until I have the answer/permission; probably next week. Kjersti L. 14:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I have now received an answer from copyright holder. You may – and should – delete the file. I will, hopefully, be able to upload another photo of Audrey van der Meer. Kjersti L. 08:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, undetermined copyrighted status B dash (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am in contact with the department at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), that has removed the file from Flickr. So far, the answer is not quite clear, but most likely it has been moved to the department's new platform, Fotoware. Please do not delete until I have the answer/permission; probably next week. Kjersti L. 14:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I have now received an answer from copyright holder. You may – and should – delete the file. I will, hopefully, be able to upload another photo of Audrey van der Meer. Kjersti L. 08:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a living artist, copyviol Bramfab (talk) 08:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panass74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Odd collection of images of the Ghana national flag taken from the web.

Ytoyoda (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panass74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panass74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused pictures wih no description.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also likely copyright violations. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panass74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various sizes and qualities, no EXIF data, likely copyright violations

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panass74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF data, copyright belongs to Getty Images, see similar case involving Yahoo News and Getty: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"Andrew H. Walker"

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Related DRs:
  1. Commons:Deletion requests/Getty Images photos from the TechCrunch Flickr account
  2. Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "getty images" techcrunch
  3. Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"Andrew H. Walker"
  4. Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "Getty Images for Yahoo News"
  5. Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:/Getty Images for Delta Air Lines/

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, all the previous DRs and two failed UDRs and a third one on its way to fail. --Jcb (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 05:31, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that file has no author or has been published without a clear copyright notice. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication on Artist's webs site that this is a CC licensed image; not uploaded or licensed through OTRS by artist ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication on Artist's web site that this is a CC licensed image; not uploaded or licensed through OTRS by artist ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Zhao Hui Wang

[edit]

These appear to be good faith uploads of an artist's work, by a user who has added a CC sharelike license. There is no indicaiton that they are actually really licensed CC, on the artist's web site or elsewhere.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the source site, http://aprilhickox.com/, has no notice, but also no CC license. It is silent on copyright and, therefore, cannot be used as a source here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo misrepresented as own work. [2] SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS B dash (talk) 03:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know this subject is controversial. But this is only a historical fact. Thank you for stopping censoring all my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing controversial about this deletion -- it is a copyrighted toy, so the image infringes. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the face of Macron B dash (talk) 03:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know this subject is controversial. But this is only a historical fact. Thank you for stopping censoring all my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the face of Macron B dash (talk) 03:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know this subject is controversial. But this is only a historical fact. Thank you for stopping censoring all my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the artist B dash (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know this subject is controversial. But this is only a historical fact. Thank you for stopping censoring all my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Need permission from sculptor. Copyright is the concern here, not politics. Abzeronow (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Unfortunately, I don't think there's a de minimis case to be made for this photo regarding the sculpture, as it's clearly identifiable and intended as the subject of the photo. However, I took the liberty of making a cropped version that avoids the FoP issue and may still be in scope for the activities of the yellow vests: File:2018-11-24 15-17-08 manif-GJ-Bavilliers (cropped).jpg. I had to up the brightness quite a bit and it looks a little unnatural, so I have no objection if the uploader wants to create his own cropped version from the original. clpo13(talk) 20:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep cropped version. Abzeronow (talk) 20:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept the crop. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the artist B dash (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know this subject is controversial. But this is only a historical fact. Thank you for stopping censoring all my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Until France allows FOP, this has to be deleted. Copyright matters here, not politics Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept the crop. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work by the uploader, so the licence is invalid. Unless the person in the photo is notable, this upload would also be out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 03:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. See COM:FOP United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. See COM:FOP Canada (doesn't apply to signs). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- That's not correct, B dash. Text was the first subject of copyright. This is clearly over the ToO, which is low (generally one unique sentence) in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeroth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

From what I can tell, all of these are non-free book covers. There may be a few that are simple enough to pass under COM:TOO, but there's not very many. These seem to simply have been grabbed from a Flickr account because they had the CCBYSA license, without regard to the fact that every single one of them are derivative of copyrighted works.

List of 456 files.

GMGtalk 14:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GreenMeansGo. The files are being transfered to commons from the flickr account of the publisher, that owns the copyright of the covers and has decided to release them under cc-by sa. --Zeroth (talk) 15:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well it looks like basically a brand new Flickr account, and maybe I'm missing it, but I don't see where it's verified, or even where they claim in prose to be affiliated with the company or in what way. Their website also doesn't seem to link back to the Flickr. Assuming the Flickr account is legitimate, the book covers themselves contain hundreds of photographs and works of art, and just because the publisher bought the rights to use them on their books, it's not clear that they own the exclusive rights to all the original media so that they could license them under CCBYSA. GMGtalk 15:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can send an email or follow other procedure with the publisher to verify the flickr account and receive assurances as to the ownership of the covers. What do you think?.--Zeroth (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I don't see why that wouldn't work. But we would need a verifiable statement saying that the Flickr account is legit, they intend to release these under the applicable license, and that they own the full rights to all of the works they use on their covers, meaning full ownership, and not just the right to use them on the cover. GMGtalk 15:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. I'll ask them to state that on the flickr account and some kind of link to it from their webpage. I think its is a good opportunity also to establish some kind of glam project with them. I'll keep this page updated with that matters and stop importing more covers until i have those reassurances.--Zeroth (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've received a reply from Ediciones Trilce. They will add the information to the flickr account and will link the flickr from the webpage. I'll give you updates as soon as they do any of those things.--Zeroth (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GreenMeansGo. The publisher has linked the official webpage of Trilce Ediciones with his Flickr account, that now has the text "Flickr de Ediciones Trilce. Creado para compartir libremente las portadas que son propiedad de Trilce y de las cuales posee todos los derechos y otros materiales gráficos. Las portadas pueden ser usadas en Wikipedia o cualquier otro proyecto, siempre que se respete la licencia CC BY SA 4.0 que implica uso para cualquier propósito citando autor y origen." (Flickr of Ediciones Trilce. Created to share freely the covers that are owned and copyrighted by Trilce and other graphic materials. The covers can be used in Wikipedia or any other project, provided that the CC BY SA 4.0 licence is respected, which allows use for any purpose citing author and origin.".--Zeroth (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me.  I withdraw my nomination GMGtalk 17:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a good shoot Wahiba100 (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jainnehaaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam photos deleted, one kept as its a good quality image of a bride in tradtional dress. --Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this my account i posted the photo and i want to remove it Wahiba100 (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this my account i posted the photo and i want to remove it Wahiba100 (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this my account i posted the photo and i want to remove it Wahiba100 (talk) 15:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this my account i posted the photo and i want to remove it Wahiba100 (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this my account i posted the photo and i want to remove it Wahiba100 (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Panaromic images too small to be any of use ThatBPengineer (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says this and other uploads of the same user need an OTRS process. E4024 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name and metadata are wrong, I'll upload a correct version. Norman.seibert (talk) 19:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2008 internet image: [3] Le Petit Chat (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image is the copy of an already published under CC-BY-SA file: c:File:ARL-44 at Mourmelon le Grand.JPG--Le Petit Chat (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; a free version is already on commons. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A selfie probably: not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Hi This picture is from my depiction Why will be deleted it? --علي أبو عمر (talk) 04:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A selfie probably: not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Off focus, difficult to distinguish its informative value N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 04:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 04:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. In the footer of site of origin there's a mark indicating that "all rights reserved for IOL.PT " Leon saudanha (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oliviervd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Yves Zurstrassen (b. 1956), artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Yves Zurstrassen (b. 1956), artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from non-trivial logo. Should blanked to keep. Anyway SVG is better format for diagrams. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rapsak22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vidéo copyrighted by Russia Today, uploaded (and deleted) on YT uder fair use. Copyvio. Gyrostat (talk) 16:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube Standard License is the licence that I see on this video. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 16:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photos of medals uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

The photos are not self-created. All files here have the only copyright tag {{PD-RU-exempt}}. This copyright tag may apply to the medal design, but it not applies to the photographic reproduction of the medal, except where the photographic work is included in an official document of administrative nature. For the photos we require a correct source and a written permission from the photographer.

Martin H. (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non. Unless it is your own photo you cant upload the files here. And many of this are not your own photos. --Martin H. (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, many pictures are not mine, but they are edited, transformed, changed colors and they are very different from the original.

Please leave pictures, otherwise I will have no incentive to continue the theme of regional medals.Георгий Долгопский (talk) 05:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and bas-relieves.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Violation COM:FOP Russia

Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; sadly. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

These are not drawings as uploader claimed, but photos of 3D objects. Even if the object itself is PD, the photos must be freely licensed. No sources provided to verify this. The uploader has blocks for mass copyright violations.

Quick1984 (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another set of derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture. Uploaded immediately after the pvevious ones were deleted.

Quick1984 (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another set of derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture. Uploaded immediately after the pvevious ones were deleted.

Quick1984 (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above COM:TOO John123521 (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & tiny, useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Editor-1 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Safety Last (1923).webm|Please delete this file, it has black borders in both side and its size is extremely high while its quality is equal with another file Huntster (t @ c) 01:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks evidence of permission, and seems to be taken from [4] without attribution or an indication of a fair-use release. SamHolt6 (talk) 04:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its is a well known brand? what evidence does it lack? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liam23029 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The source page has no free license -- this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Paule Bodilis per description, not author's work B dash (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work Frodar (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think so? Did you find this anywhere else with a different attribution or licence? De728631 (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep no proof, no reasonable doubt, no valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment this DR looks similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:David Bryan Jon Bon Jovi and Tico Torres-SPX-063654.jpg. (from the same nominator) The difference is, that image has Bon Jovi in it, which makes it a bit more suspicious. It's also similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Business district of Asuncion.jpg, but that image is upscaled, which is strange. The image in this DR however doesn't have such issues. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, maybe you're right. No, I didn't find it anywhere else. I reevaluated it and maybe I'm wrong. The file size is unusual and due to the quality, appears to be from a video, but having looked through all the files uploaded by the user, is more likely to be of his/her own. I request the closure of this deletion request. Regarding the other files that were mentioned, I will answer in each, but those are more likely a violation of copyright. Thanks for helping me. Frodar (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BOLUDO, LA SAQUÉ YO CON MI CELULAR A LA FOTO... DEJA DE FALTAR EL RESPETO Y AGREDIR — Preceding unsigned comment added by MertigOrbis (talk • contribs) 03:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same as B Flow in Lilanda 01.jpg Icem4k (talk) 05:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as B Flow in Lilanda 06.jpg Icem4k (talk) 05:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as B Flow in Lilanda 03.jpg Icem4k (talk) 05:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake image! It's a caption to the movie "Vendaval Maravilhoso" (this image shows the singer and actress "Amália Rodrigues"); This it's real image of Eugénia Infante da Câmara (now in File:Eugênia Infante da Câmara c 1860.png). André Koehne TALK TO ME 06:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Grabos website: [5]


Thank you André for looking after Wikipédia's improvements. I conquer your information by listing another important source file from this marvellous artist that has devoted her life to love and art. ( unfortunately we were mislead by other websites. But thanks to your good will we have now the correct image); This Image of Eugénia Infante da Câmara (now in Eugênia Infante da Câmara - portugal.jpg). BAS VH TALK TO ME 16:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bas VH (talk • contribs) 15:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No useful description, no categories, therefore it is useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced by lots of alternative images B dash (talk) 06:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep neither small files size nor unused are good reasons for deleting it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This poster was cut from this photo. It's a derivative work without permission. The poster was not by Tamás Urbán. Regasterios (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Magyar: Nagyon nem szép dolog, amikor valaki meghamisítja az eredeti feltöltést. Sajnos Regasterios is ezek közé tartozik. Ha a törlésre jelölés előtt megnézi az előzményeket, maga is rájöhetett volna erre. A feltöltésben ez szerepelt. Forrásː http://kindra.hu/?search=poszter Én nem hoztam létre semmiféle származékos művet, pusztán kivágtam a képből egy részt. Regasterios szerkesztőtárs volt az, aki meghamisította az eredeti feltöltést. Ez nem az első eset, már kezdem megszokni. Én nem hoztam létre származékos művet, pusztán egy szabad licenc alatt lévő képből kivágtam egy részt. A http://kindra.hu/?search=poszter felsorolja az adományozókat. Ezek között szerepel Urbán Tamás. Valótlan az az állítás, hogy nincs hozzá köze. Az sem lenne egy hátrány, ha nevezett szerkesztő nem törölne a wikidatából addig semmit, míg a megbeszélés le nem zárul. Tambo (talk) 14:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tambo: ha valaki hamisított, az te voltál, de ezt meg én szoktam meg. A http://kindra.hu/?search=poszter oldalon látható képek a Fortepanról származnak, csupán a felesleges forráskettőzés miatt vettem ki a linket, miután az eredeti forrást te magad is feltüntetted. Az égvilágon semmilyen jelentősége nincsen, hogy eltüntettem a másik linket. És hogy miért hamisítottál? Mert számodra, mint a képek nagy szakértője számára, világosnak kellett volna lennie, hogy ha Urbán Tamás készít egy fotót egy szobában, ahol a falon lóg egy poszter, attól Urbán Tamás még nem válik a poszter szerzőjévé, még akkor sem, ha belekomponálta a fotójába. Ezt hívják származékos műnek. Ja, hogy ezt nem tudtad? A lényeg, hogy amikor Urbán Tamást tüntetted fel a poszter szerzőjeként, meghamisítottad a kép valós szerzői adatait. Ilyen egyszerű. És hiába vágsz ki egy szabad licencű képből egy képrészletet, ha az a képrészlet jogvédett. Mert hogy ilyen is van: egy szabad licencű képen egy jogvédett részlet. Ezt hívják de minimisnek. És ilyenkor tilos kivágni a jogvédett részletet a képből. Ó, ezt sem tudtad? Roppant sajnálatos. --Regasterios (talk) 15:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Regasterios: Változatlanul fenntartom, hogy nem hamisítottam meg semmit. nlcafe. frisshirek Tambo (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete A belinkelt forrással ellentétben, Urbán Tamás nem szerzője a képnek. Mivel a Fortepanon nem megfelelően tüntették fel a szerzősséget (illetve nem foglalkoztak azzal, hogy a fényképen szereplő fényképnek nem a "nagy" fénykép szerzője a szerzője), így a mutatott forrás is hibásan vette át az információt. Szerencsére Urbán Tamás tudja, hogy a felvétel nem az övé, és -- a fián keresztül -- erről tájékoztatott is. Ezért szükségesek a megfelelő forráskritikai, és a megfelelő szerzői jogi ismeretek (pl. mi a származékos mű, valamint, hogy egy képen látható kép szerzője más is lehet, mint az, aki arról felvételt készített), amelyekkel, sajnálatos módon te nem rendelkezel. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tambo: én is fenntartom, hogy nem hamisítottam meg semmit. Csak tudod, az a baj ezzel az egésszel, hogy amíg az én törlésre jelölésem szövege teljesen semleges volt, addig a te felütésed kapásból személyeskedő volt, és nem a lényegre koncentráltál, hanem az én személyemre. Vitatkozni természetesen jogod van velem, nyilván én is tévedhetek, de ha azzal kezdesz valamit, hogy én azok közé tartozom, akik feltöltéseket hamisítgatnak, akkor az már régen rossz, és ez téged minősít, nem engem. Szóval egy szót sem szólhattál volna, ha elküldelek egy sokkal melegebb éghajlatra, de még így is nehezen fogtam vissza magam, mert amit te előadsz, az nem vitakultúra, hanem pocsolyában fetrengés. Ezen nem változtat sem az nlcafe.hu, sem a frisshirek.hu. Nem kell mindent elhinni, amit a neten látsz: ezt hívják forráskritikának. Nyilván számodra is teljesen világos, hogy ők is a Fortepanról szedték a képet, és ők is ugyanannyira nem törődtek azzal, hogy annak a poszternek legalábbis nem feltétlenül Urbán Tamás a szerzője. De a slusszpoént HuFi már lelőtte: nem, a Bíró Ica-posztert nem Urbán Tamás készítette, erről meg lett kérdezve őmaga. Szóval erről ennyit. --Regasterios (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rosszabb.. ők Tambo hamis infójának hittek, ami abból látszik, hogy a Commonsba 6-án töltötték fel, a NLC 7-én tette közzé, majd azt egy újabb újság is átvette (nem csak rossz szerzői infót, hanem azt is, hogy a plakát 1987-ben készült... pedig egyáltalán nem biztos, hogy amikor a Márianosztrai Fegyház és Börtön zárkájában elkészült a plakátot is ábrázoló kép, a Bíró Icáról készült plakátfotó is ugyanabban az évben került lencsevégre.... nem tudom, mennyire lehettek ott az elítéltek plakátban naprakészek... ráadásul igen, ott van a tény is a fiától...

Lényeg, ami lényeg. The poster is not from Tamás Urbán, there is no permission for that:  Delete Fauvirt (talk) 18:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Basszus, ezt nem is figyeltem. Tambo, hát ehhez a "művedhez" tényleg csak gratulálni tudok. Így kell egy jogsértő képfeltöltést széthinteni a neten. Így már duplán örülök, hogy nem engedtem tovább használni a képet a cikkben. --Regasterios (talk) 19:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

És még ezt próbáltad meg érvként nekem beadni. Tényleg nem térek napirendre felette... --Regasterios (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Időközben az nlcafe meg is változtatta a képaláírást, a kivágott részről levették, hogy Urbán Tamás a szerző. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OsvátA, tudod, hogy nagyon szeretlek, meg tisztellek, de kérlek, ne szólj hozzá szerzői jogi kérdéshez, ha nem vagy tisztában a helyzettel: nincs itt olyan, amiről Bíró Ica dönthetne. A képet nem Urbán Tamás készítette, ezen Bíró Icának semmilyen döntése sem változtatna semmit (még ha lenne is döntési joga bármiben is az ügyet illetően). Mit dönthetne el Bíró Ica Urbán Tamással szemben? Vagy mi másról kéne döntenie? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regasterios, Fauvirt csak jelzem, hogy User:Tambo mindenféle forrás és/vagy megjegyzés nélkül beírta szerzőnek Németh Andrea nevét. Először is ehhez nem ártana egy forrás, másrészt ettől még a kép ugyanúgy jogsértő marad, mert ennek Cc-by-sa licenc alatti használatára továbbra sincs engedély. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hungarikusz Firkász and Regasterios: :Tudom, hogy mindig jót akartok nekem. Ezért nem is fárasztom magam, a meggyőzéssel. Ha nem is írtam bele, azért dolgoztam a témán. Rettentően unalmas, hogy állandóan jogsértésekkel vádoltok. Pedig roppant egyszerűː Bíró Ica elérhető a netten. Rá lehet kérdezni, beszéltem-e vele, adott- e támpontot a kereséshez. Most minden attól függ, hogy Németh Andrea szabad licenc alá helyezi-e a képet. Ha nem, okafogyott a vita. Ha igen, feltöltök egy sokkal jobb minőségű képet, melyre ígéretet tett Bíró Ica. Sajnos a szakember Hungarikusz Firkász az "engedélykérés folyamatban" sablonnak nem érti a lényegét, ahogy sok másnak sem. Tény, hogy a sablon szövegét félre lehet érteni, és aki szeretné félre is érti. Ezért nem tettem rá. A képet nyugodtan törölhetitek, ha megkapom az engedélyt, valami normális OTRS kezelő visszaállíthatja. Tambo (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. És te nem akarsz személyeskedni. Röhej. Az még inkább, hogy ilyenkor jobbnak képzeled magad nálunk. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Két kérdés: ugyebár akkor mégsem Urbán Tamás készítette a fényképet Bíró Icáról? Ki is írta ki feltöltéskor, hogy ez Urbán Tamás képe? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sajnos minden kérdésre akadhat egy igaznak hitt, rossz válasz. Arra is válaszolhattál volna, hogy Amerikában üldözték-e a négereket. Abban is igazad lenne. Én nem tartom jobbnak magamat bárkinél (még nálad sem). (Esetleg, ha nem ismernélek személyesen, lehet, hogy komolyan vennélek). Így sajnos ez nem működik. Abban igazad volt, hogy a jogtulajdonos (kizárólag a Commons szabályai szerint) nem a kép alanya, hanem a fotóművész. Ez a két kérdés ugyanaz. Rá lehetett volna kérdezni, "Ezt a képet Urbán Tamás készítette?" "Csak nem Urbán Tamás képe ez?","Ki fotózhatta le Bíró Icát?" Mint leírtam a Képet Németh Andrea fotóművész készítette. Lehetőséged van rákérdezni, függetlenül attól, hogy hozzájárul-e a szabad licenchez. Nem egy névtelen fényképészről van szó, hanem egy neves, elismert fotóművészről, és grafikusról. Megkérlek, ne válaszolj, mert kezdem unni a tevékenységedet. Tambo (talk) 13:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nem vagy abban a helyzetben, hogy bármit is kérjél, azt pláne nem, hogy ne válaszoljak. Mégis mit képzelsz, ki vagy te? Százszámra töltöd fel a jogsértő képeket, de te vagy megsértődve, amikor ezeket jelöljük. Hidd el, mi is rohadtul unjuk a tevékenységedet. Főleg a folyamatos személyeskedéseidet, és a folyamatos mellébeszéléseidet, kamukázásaidat. Ebben az esetben feltöltöttél egy képet rossz szerzővel és váltig állítottad, hogy ő a szerző, mi pedig rosszindulatú szemétládák vagyunk, hogy ezt észrevettük és jelölni mertük jogsértőnek. Minek tettük volna fel a kérdéseket neked Urbán Tamásról, amikor sokkal relevánsabb személytől, Urbán Tamástól megkaptuk a választ, miszerint ezt nem ő fényképezte (és nahát, tényleg nem ő fényképezte). De amúgy neked is lehetőséged lett volna rákérdezni Urbán Tamásnál, nem egy névtelen fényképészről van szó, hanem egy neves, elismert fotóművészről.

Személyeskedések, támadgatások, vádaskodások helyett csak annyit kellett volna tenned, hogy beismered, "Bocsánat, tévedtem a feltöltésnél." Valamint észre kéne már végre venned, hogy szerzői jogi ismereti szempontból egy két lábon járó Dunning–Kruger-hatás vagy, ahogy anno Tgr nagyon pontosan megfogalmazta. És akármennyire eleged van, ha jogsértő vagy jogsértőgyanús feltöltést találok a feltöltéseid között azt jogsértőre fogom jelölni, a véleményed a személyemről pedig magasról nem érdekel, mert irreleváns egy jogsértőzési eljárásnál, hogy mennyire hánysz tőlem, mint ahogy az is, hogy nekem mennyire van elegem a viselkedésedből. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Imogen Cunningham trust, per Yale University Art Gallery. Creation date does equal publication date. Photographer died in 1976, no indication of public domain status or any publication info. --Animalparty (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - While it is entirely possible that this was published or sold in 1923 and is, therefore, PD, that must be proven. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of the Sibelius Monument 8

[edit]

The following photographs are derivative works of the Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402), located in Helsinki, Finland. The Sibelius Monument is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only.

Related cases:

––Apalsola tc 09:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC) –– (link fix) Apalsola tc 10:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the face of Macron B dash (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flint1972 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata contain something like 'permission for Wikipedia'. There are several issues: 'for Wikipedia' is not enough; permission must be from photographers instead of depicted person; one of these photos is a derivative of non-free posters. OTRS is highly recommended.

Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 11:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


(1) Лушников Владимир Александрович, прошу оказать мне помощ, я плохо разбираюсь в рецензиях. --Flint1972 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(2) «Разрешение должно быть от фотографов» — подскажите, как правильино должно быть оформлено рвзрешение от фотографов? --Flint1972 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(3) «Одна из этих фотографий является производной от несвободных постеров. OTRS настоятельно рекомендуется» — Еси я правилно понял то речь идёт о видных на заднем плане «афишах». --Flint1972 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(4) Пожалуйста дайте ссылку на правило которое говорит о «видных на заднем плане афишах». Пожалуйста дайте ссылку на правило про OTRS. Я хочу их росичать. --Flint1972 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • (1): COM:L/ru. (2): COM:OTRS/ru, (3), (4): COM:DW/ru. Разрешение должен давать правообладатель (фотограф), а не изображенное лицо. В случае производных работ разрешение должны дать все авторы всех работ, использованных для создания производной. Разрешение, данное только «для Википедии», не годится - в разрешении должна быть указана из совместимых лицензий без ограничений использования. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - In both cases the subject is named as the author, which is clearly not the case, and the uploader is a third person. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of U.S. publication before 1924. Source indicates © 2016 Imogen Cunningham Trust. Artist has been dead for less than 50 years. --Animalparty (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Clearly false copyright notices should just be ignored. As an active artist around the time of this photo's production, it can be reasonably assumed it was published in the artist's circles in the US circa 1910.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide direct or indirect evidence of publication before 1924, or that the copyright notice is "clearly false"? A mention of the image in a journal or magazine pre-1924? Cunningham is a very famous artist, and her work has been the subject of books and scholarly debate. I'd love to find reasons to keep this beyond "reasonable assumptions", but per COM:PCP, that doesn't cut it. --Animalparty (talk) 01:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I wish it were otherwise, but her WP biography mentions only one publication in the early years, before 1924. That's in Wilson's Photographic and this image is not in that article. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Zextremo

[edit]

All files uploaded by Zextremo (talk · contribs) are screenshots of game from https://yellowclub.net/ which has © tag at the bottom of page. --Smooth O (talk) 11:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zextremo is an author of https://yellowclub.net/. I will try to proff it here, or write something on the webpage.


Kept: Procedural close -- -- A DR must list and notify all the files involved. Use VFC for multiple files such as this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find any evidence that this game exists. I suspect a hoax unless anyone knows better Malcolma (talk) 11:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a good picture and I hope we can keep it, but we need a definite death date of the author or a definite date of publication that puts this in the public domain both in Germany and the US. GMGtalk 11:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

see http://www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/kue/70121894#%7Chome
Nearly nothing is known about Hanni Schwarz. And the last owner of this studio has gone to the United States in 1932. No more news about both women. Mutter Erde (talk) 08:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Unsplash. Oops, it is not prior to 5 June 2017. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 12:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- PD-ineligible. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter. Besides no COM:FOP in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Karon-photoz, the FlickR uploader, is part of Commons:Questionable Flickr images for "blatant flickrwash" and the CC0 license is suspicious. — Racconish💬 14:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I can't find this with TinEye nor with a Google search. According to the EXIF, it was photoshopped though so it doesn't seem to be an original file. He appears to be notable, however, since he is a professor at Emory University [6]. So unless there are significant copyright concerns, this should be kept. De728631 (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. This is all due to inexperience. I tried to add the photo without indicating any permissions, not realizing using Flickr was the preferred method. It was properly deleted and then we added it to Flickr. My understanding is much stronger now and hope the photo can be kept. Thank you for your consideration --Emp1220 (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- CC-0. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juudjethailand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juudjethailand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you say that these charts are "of questionable notability". These are charts from or based on statistics of the CBS, the national bureau of statistics of the Netherlands. I do not know a more reliable source of statistics for the Netherlands. And I do not understand why these charts should be deleted because they are unused. There are many unused charts AND I find these charts educational, an important goal of Wikimedia Commons. So I do not agree with this deletion request. JopkeB (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - with one or two word descriptions and no useful categories, they are useless, lost among our 50+ million images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jcneboit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and publication. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jcneboit

[edit]

Historical photo and publication. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. Jcneboit (talk) 18:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BibliotecaRJB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical illustrations. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, user blocked for uploading copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most of his/her uploads (except those taken with Canon EOS 1300D). Small photos, only one has camera data, multiple come from Facebook (deciding by FBMD...). This is not a trusted user, simply look his/her talkpage. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing by an artist who died in 1973 (Josef Schulz). Flickr source gives no indication of why this would be released under a CC license. Abzeronow (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work by Josef Schulz (d. 1973). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version on 12.01.2019: On this part of the photo, the painting is no longer recognizable. The first version of 11.01.2019 can be deleted. -- Walter Anton (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Deleted the problematic version. --DaB. (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in U.S. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well... I wasn't aware of that when I uploaded it. That's fine by me. —capmo (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No publication information, which is necessary to determine the copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://lit.ijs.si/razred.html (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 SI) See talk page. Yann (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As stated on http://lit.ijs.si/razred.html licenced CC BY SA NC, I am the photographer of the people presented on that page. Later I have been informed that NC-label is not appropriate for photos intended to enter Wikimedia Commons, so I have been licencing all my photos CC BY 4.0 international since (e. g. https://slov.si/mh/galerije/). http://lit.ijs.si/razred.html is an archive page. I've created it in February 1999 and changed for the last time in March 2002. Today I don't have access to it any more to adapt its licence. Please consider my new CC by licencing of this photo on Wikimedia Commons. --Hladnikm (Pogovor) 17:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
@Hladnikm: The last revision of the page https://slov.si/mh/galerije/ is 2012 and it'still under CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 SI. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The source-page has removed the “NC”, so it should be ok now. --DaB. (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is definitely not own work, being an image from a moon lander. Per [7], CNSA images are probably not available for commercial use, so the license too is invalid. Chris857 (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This easily falls under fair use, no other probe has ever landed on the far side of the moon so the only pictures of the far side available are ones taken by Change 4. Thus it would be fair use to utilize the panorama in question since it has great historical and scientific value and there is no other substitute available.XavierGreen (talk) 23:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It would need to be moved to a local Wikipedia. See COM:FAIRUSE. William Avery (talk) 15:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile this image has been released under Creative Commons Attribution (see: https://www.iau.org/public/images/detail/iau1901a/ and https://www.iau.org/copyright/ so I believe this solved the problem. Lars Lindberg Christensen (talk) 05:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and updated it with that and removed the original uploader's false attribution. --Cold Season (talk) 07:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks OK now. --DaB. (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality Snowdawg (talk) 19:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have news for you nobody is looking for a motion blurred picture of a Wright R-3350. Without its title you couldn't even identify what it is. The image has been out there uncategorized and unused since 2015. There are plenty of better pictures which are actually useful from an educational perspective.Snowdawg (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt this picture is from the Qing dynasty as claimed (no evidence or source specified). Illustrations from the Qing dynasty never emphasize the eyeballs like that. The 2 characters are machine-printed rather than handwritten. IMO this is at the earliest, from the Republican China period. Timmyshin (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://ru.slovoidilo.ua/2018/10/05/statja/politika/obeshhaniya-strany-chudes.-kak-rabotaet-narodnyj-deputat-oksana-syroid копирайт Панн (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Here in November 2015, well before 2016 upload. Also here in a more complete version (less bottom cropping), so image cannot have been first published on Commons. Per COM:OTRS, previously published images require additional evidence of permission. --Эlcobbola talk 18:48, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmediy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the Flickr license, if a third party contracts Getty Images to photograph an event, Getty owns the rights to the images.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was granted permission to use this image, but the author wants a level of anonymity that might be incompatable with wikimedia commons and OTRS. Steveoc 86 (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just an update, the Author has since created a Wiki Commons account. I've updated the image information to link to their account. Is that sufficient? Steveoc 86 (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be enough, but could we perhaps get the author to express their consent in this discussion? I also can't find where in the source this license is specified? FunkMonk (talk) 14:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I kinda messed this up. I first asked for permission to use these by leaving a comment on his blog and mentioned they'd be released on a CC license, he responded via email and gave his consent. However, I forgot to mention OTRS. I offered to upload them and asked him how he'd like to be credited, he asked for anonymity and seemed apprehensive. In his next email he changed his mind. I replied and I brought OTRS up and he later created an account, however, he never responded to my last email. I have since left it at that because I don't want to badger him. Steveoc 86 (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we can contact them here? FunkMonk (talk) 16:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just wrote a message on his talk page, but he hasn't been active since uploading the neck vertebrae photo. Steveoc 86 (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve, sorry for not replying last time, just slipped out of my mind. You have all the permission tu publish the image. Anything else I should do, just let me know.

Hi Sami, thanks for getting back in touch. Maybe if you could upload a higher res version over the top I'd imagine that would suffice? I'll tag in @FunkMonk: who's got more knowledge of this area. Steveoc 86 (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that would be nice, if possible. And thanks for the uploads! FunkMonk (talk) 10:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: external source needs OTRS. --JuTa 13:10, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses incorrect style per official government guideline as can be seen by the new svg which we created per the specifications. See File:ISR-HW-3527.svg as an example. Gonnym (talk) 15:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses incorrect style per official government guideline as can be seen by the new svg which we created per the specifications. See File:ISR-HW-77.svg as an example. Gonnym (talk) 15:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses incorrect style per official government guideline as can be seen by the new svg which we created per the specifications. See File:ISR-HW-423.svg as an example. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TeresaPelka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is/are translator(s)?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
All the above are my own work, first published on my website https://publicdomaintranslation.com/, under licenses 2.5, 4.0, and BY-SA 3.0. The posters come from website free portfolio https://publicdomaintranslation.com/portfolio/; I have made the content available also via my Internet Archive account, https://archive.org/details/@teresapelka. Upload to Wikimedia did not violate any rights or regulations, I marked the content as my own work, according to fact; it did not require contacting OTRS, as can be seen here, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS#When_contacting_OTRS_is_unnecessary TeresaPelka 01:37, 12 January 2019‎ (GMT)
I would gladly get rid of the poster file histories; they are not necessary: would there be a way to get around this? TeresaPelka 01:42, 12 January 2019‎ (GMT)

 Info this page states that all non-CC-licensed content is explicitely marked as copyrighted and published in an incomplete form only. And that most of the site content is available under a set of CC licenses. Ankry (talk) 08:28, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I have provided the following information on each of source pages, as you can see here, for US CONSTITUTION PAGE 2 POSTER.PNG:
https://publicdomaintranslation.com/portfolio/us-constitution-posters-plakaty-konstytucji-usa/
"The content may be used under any of the following licenses:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"
Every uploaded file provides a link to the source website, publicdomaintranslation.com. TeresaPelka 11:41, 12 January 2019‎ (GMT)
 Keep For me it is obvious that User:TeresaPelka account belongs to Teresa Pelka, who is the only translator of the works and published them on free licences. Electron   14:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --JuTa 14:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert P. Peters (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist permission via Commons:OTRS is needed.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permission was sent by Rob Møhlmann Robert P. Peters (talk) 11:46, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rob Møhlmann Mankes. Jan, Zelfportret, 1913, houtsnede (groenig), 15,4x11cm.jpg This is a self-portrait of Jan Mankes made in 1913. Mankes died on April 23, 1920, so {{PD-old-auto}}. Gouwenaar (talk) 20:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept 1. --JuTa 14:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jurita Kalite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems out of COM:SCOPE (ru:Участница:JuKa and en:User:Jurita Kalite).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of the thames and parliament in london watercolor by artist Jurita kalite.jpg seems in scope Oxyman (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all. This is artwork donated by the artist (COM:AGF) and in scope. Regardless of notoriety, each piece is an example of its technique, and the figurative realistic images have an even wider range of reuse possibilities. -- Tuválkin 20:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuvalkin: Seriously? I'll rather call it spam than "donation"... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seriously, yeah. You say your opinion, I say mine, imagine that. You feel free to call her art offtopic and her donation spam, others might consider your DR unenlighted curatorship, anything goes. -- Tuválkin 21:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuvalkin: Your definitive opinion on art is not especially needed since you are not an art critic (but perhaps I've missed something) and since a DR is not a vote. Besides I've given any opinion on Jurita Kalite's artistic value; I've just said her drafts have been deleted on two different Wikipedias. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Following Tuvalkin here. The files lack proper categorization, but this is not an issue requiring file deletion. — Speravir – 00:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Info This said, actually a valid deletion reason could be the possible licensing issue, because judging from their names some files have been earlier published in LadyJuGallery.co.uk – so at least for these a separate permission is needed, I think. — Speravir – 00:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hard to see the notice or its absence on such a low resolution image — Racconish💬 17:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impossible to check the absence of copyright on this cropped image — Racconish💬 17:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasqueIV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Any metadata, false dates, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasqueIV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasqueIV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, many previous DR's.

P 1 9 9   20:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inadvertent 'flickrwashing' license; photograph is copyrighted and unrestricted permission was granted only for AC Transit use. Mliu92 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inadvertent 'flickrwashing' license; photograph is copyrighted and unrestricted permission was granted only for AC Transit use. Mliu92 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inadvertent 'flickrwashing' license; photograph is copyrighted and unrestricted permission was granted only for AC Transit use. Mliu92 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This and all other uploads (historical photographs) by the same user need correct licences and not just "own work", as in the case of the photo of a photo. Probably these images are old enough to be PD but we must know the sources and see correct licensing. If not, please continue to use them in Armenian Wikipedia -if possible, I have no idea- under "fair use". E4024 (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - see watermark Otourly (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Academycanada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, one from Facebook, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marc Frier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As explained in the 2015 deletion request, Gunther von Hagens is very strict about copyright on images of the BodyWorlds exhibition, forbidding photographs. As such, this - and all the other images of the interior of the Body Worlds exhibitions - will have to come down. DS (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So that includes: file:Ballet Dancer (2968259389).jpg, File:Body Worlds 03.jpg, File:Body Worlds 04.jpg, File:Body Worlds 05.jpg, File:Body Worlds 06.jpg, File:Body Worlds 07.jpg, file:Gunther von Hagens mit einem Gorilla-Plastinat - 2010 crop.jpg, file:Gymnast (2968260843).jpg, file:Painter (2968256315).jpg, file:Phoenix (2968254397).jpg, file:Skin (2969103184).jpg, AND everything in Category:Body Worlds in Poznań 2017-2018 with the possible exception of the information cards (file:Tabliczka informacyjna o prostacie. Body Worlds w Poznaniu - styczeń 2018.jpg and File:Tabliczka informacyjna o żeńskich narządach rozrodczych. Body Worlds w Poznaniu - styczeń 2018.jpg), the barrels (File:Dzieny przepływ krwi w człowieku. Body Worlds w Poznaniu - styczeń 2018.jpg), and the intact skull (file:Czaszka dziecka. Body Worlds w Poznaniu - styczeń 2018.jpg). DS (talk) 18:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheseCelestialDays (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, two professional photographs, one Com:DW audio file without sources.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I, Nicholas Hatter (theNickHatter), hereby give permission for my photographs to be used (which I own the copyright for). Please do not delete these photographs. theNickHatter in London (mail?) 20:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNickHatter (talk • contribs) 20:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the avoidance of any doubt, I, Nicholas Hatter, license my photographs under the Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 license on Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. --TheNickHatter (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Updated copyright info for File:Nick Hatter Life Coach Profile.jpg --TheNickHatter (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely out of scope. --JuTa 14:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]