Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
In use on Commons only: Having picked a more suitable image for the only place that this (and the derivative / extracted files which were taken from it) were in use, and since Commons has a wide enough stock of these photographs, and alternative images, I nominate my own work to be deleted as a user request. DaneGeld (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note that a cropped version is being used on the Simple English Wikipedia, and that the work is in the public domain. I oppose deletion. Vermont (talk) 00:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- There shouldn't be any versions in use on the Simple English wikipedia. I changed the photo on Simple:Hearing aid for an alternative, removing my work from the project. DaneGeld (talk) 00:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I was right. This image and its extracted files are ONLY in use on commons, nowhere else. DaneGeld (talk) 00:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Keep AN thread on Simple - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- AN thread on simple is dealt with. I've resigned from simple, and this work is no longer present there or on any other project. Administrators, I pledge to continue this request to delete my OWN WORK as a user request, based on its presence only being here. DaneGeld (talk) 01:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. See Commons:Courtesy deletions. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- AN thread on simple is dealt with. I've resigned from simple, and this work is no longer present there or on any other project. Administrators, I pledge to continue this request to delete my OWN WORK as a user request, based on its presence only being here. DaneGeld (talk) 01:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- From COM:SCOPE - "A media file which is neither:realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above
falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.
- The emphasis here is on realistic utility, either for one of the Wikimedia projects or for some other educational use. Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose. An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph."
This file is only in use on commons, it is not realisticly educational given what we already have here, it falls out of project scope, as do the files extracted from it. I pledge that these images DO meet the requirement for deletion and I will PERSIST with their nomination. DaneGeld (talk) 01:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Nope. That rule allows deletion of blurry dick pics. It's not for this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Image is now in use on Simple (thanks to yours truly), Once images are uploaded here there's no going back (unless they're really REALLY crap ... which isn't the case here, No valid reason for deletion so easy keep. –Davey2010Talk 01:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This file has been here for over a year. A crop of it, File:Digital Behind-the-ear pair of Hearing Aids (cropped).jpg, is in use at simple:Hearing aid, and keeping this file preserves the sourcing for that file. The PD license is irrevocable. I see no compelling reason to delete. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
WITHDRAWN. Seems like I can't get shit done anywhere, even when I'm following the rules. Never mind. Carry on playing with your toys, I'm done here too. DaneGeld (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Majora (talk) 02:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete own work 75.63.168.9 03:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- You must prove that you are User:Lilly Talavera. --E4024 (talk) 14:18, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- There is a writer called Lilly Talavera; what about this "actress" and "model"? If not the same person, is she in scope? --E4024 (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal image, no discussion since November. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Wikidata object added. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Moheen: Done. In an other subject, I plan to contact you in the week to ask translations for Wikidata in two languages you are able to speak. I must leave my computer for today. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 10:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Wikidata object available. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 13:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Wikidata object added. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo porno faite pour vandalisme William Jexpire (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:45, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. Screenshot --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo montage porno faite pour vandalisme William Jexpire (talk) 07:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:45, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark: CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo porno faite pour vandalisme William Jexpire (talk) 07:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 10:14, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo détournée et porno William Jexpire (talk) 07:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:43, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. (C) CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo détournée porno William Jexpire (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:43, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. (C) CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo détournée porno William Jexpire (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:43, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. (C) CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo détournée porno William Jexpire (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:41, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. (C) CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo porno William Jexpire (talk) 07:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:41, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. (C) CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
photo détournée et porno William Jexpire (talk) 07:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:42, 5 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: All images have copyright info as watermark. (C) CelebrityFakes4u.com --Krdbot 13:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, not sure, because creator templates were older than wikidata, but as template creator nominate it for speedy deletion, I'll delete it anyway. Taivo (talk) 19:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- The Wikidata entry is available.--Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep --Ralf Roleček
20:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC) - Keep --ST ○ 21:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Wikidata item is available now. --~Moheen (keep talking) 03:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Wikidata item added. - Deletion request is not a good way how to inform people, that a Wikidata link should be added to a template. --Snek01 (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: fix now. Sorry for the inconvenience. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, promotional. Godric ki Kothritalk to me 18:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Obvious copyvio is obvious. --Majora (talk) 19:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
This should really be a DR that we can discuss rather than missing-permission template. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- The original uploader on their talk page stated the following: "The author gave me permission orally in 2008, when we were colleagues. Back then, there was no requirement of written evidence; why did the rules change after the fact? Both I and the author changed jobs in the meantime, so you're giving me quite a headache. But I'm trying to get in touch with her." I think that at the very least we should allow for time to contact the person after 10 years of file being here. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Though COM:GOF does not strictly apply, it is close. The context can be accepted in good faith. Keep --Fæ (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- (Original uploader here.) Fortunately, I could reach the author, who has now submitted a declaration of consent. Apparently, there was an auto-reply stating that due to a backlog, the processing of the declaration could take longer than the 7-day term for deletion - an un-deletion would be necessary. Hankwang (talk) 15:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Hankwang: Thank you very much. Perhaps you can add
{{subst:OP}}to the page, which is the appropriate way to use {{OTRS-pending}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Hankwang: Thank you very much. Perhaps you can add
DeleteAs it is now in its reverted state it is best to delete it, because it reveals a telephone number on the board, which might be privacy issue. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Jacob_Kistemaker_2008.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018110510003166. --Ww2censor (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Jacob_Kistemaker_2008.jpg” under ticket:2018110510003166. --Ww2censor (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Evidence of permission was provided. --4nn1l2 (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Personality rights Lotje (talk) 06:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A person in their office, the photo does not appear to have been taken candidly. I doubt that somebody has expectation of privacy at that time. The individual is also dead and is notable enough to have articles on 3 different Wikipedias. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Personality rights has never been a deletion rationale. Also please check for prior DRs, there have to be far better reasons than this to raise a DR two weeks after the last one. --Fæ (talk) 07:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @Lotje: If this is about the phone number, there is another version available. Or yet another could be made. (I can't overwrite anything from Arkesteijn without admin permission though) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, what personality rights are being infringed upon here? This seems like a person in a professional environment raising no objection towards the photographer. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: it's not the person that I am worried about, it is the mobile phone number written on the blackboard. Suppose it's mine, wouldn't like someone to call me...
Lotje (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Lotje: , a mobile telephone number is not personal and gets reused for new costumers after a certain period of inactivity, and who seriously would call a random telephone number included in a photograph they saw? I'm not saying that those people don't exist but unless there is a 4Chan'esque campaign to troll this person by contacting them they would have as much chance of being called by a random person who happened to have seen their mobile telephone number on Wikimedia Commons than by having someone accidentally dial them. This is pure speculation, but I'd almost ask you to dial the number and ask them how many random strangers from Wikimedia Commons or otherwise unidentified prank callers would call them (this is a joke, don't actually call them). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: most likely none, because the phone number was only visible in the current version of the photo from 6 August 2008 - 8 August 2008 and 4 November 2018 - present. But if you WhatsApp the number on this version, I won't stop you.
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: , is this some sort of sick joke? I got contact with Mind Korrelatie and they said that I sounded like a crazy person contacting a number from a random photograph I found on Imgur.
--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: when you put it like that, I admit it does sound kind of crazy. But isn't it helpful to direct people who contact phone numbers from photos to the proper authorities? Or am I confusing helpful and again.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: when you put it like that, I admit it does sound kind of crazy. But isn't it helpful to direct people who contact phone numbers from photos to the proper authorities? Or am I confusing helpful and
- @Alexis Jazz: , is this some sort of sick joke? I got contact with Mind Korrelatie and they said that I sounded like a crazy person contacting a number from a random photograph I found on Imgur.
- @Donald Trung: most likely none, because the phone number was only visible in the current version of the photo from 6 August 2008 - 8 August 2008 and 4 November 2018 - present. But if you WhatsApp the number on this version, I won't stop you.
- @Lotje: , a mobile telephone number is not personal and gets reused for new costumers after a certain period of inactivity, and who seriously would call a random telephone number included in a photograph they saw? I'm not saying that those people don't exist but unless there is a 4Chan'esque campaign to troll this person by contacting them they would have as much chance of being called by a random person who happened to have seen their mobile telephone number on Wikimedia Commons than by having someone accidentally dial them. This is pure speculation, but I'd almost ask you to dial the number and ask them how many random strangers from Wikimedia Commons or otherwise unidentified prank callers would call them (this is a joke, don't actually call them). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: it's not the person that I am worried about, it is the mobile phone number written on the blackboard. Suppose it's mine, wouldn't like someone to call me...
- Keep The mobile phone number can be blurred by the closing admin if necessary. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: blurring may actually draw unwanted attention to it. w:WP:BEANS. I think modifying or (partially) blanking the number is better. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: wikidata object created. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ufficiorotondo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:SANDY con il suo CANE.jpeg
- File:GIOCAJOUERcoverFronte.jpg
- File:GIOCAJOUERcoverRetro.jpg
- File:GIOCAJOUERcoverRetrox.jpg
- File:SMtastiera.jpg
- File:Sanremo80bn.jpg
- File:HIT CHANNEL festa.JPG
- File:Clo medley.jpg
- File:Claudio al maco.jpeg
- File:MaxCapitaRiccione.jpg
- File:Libro fiore ama.jpg
- File:Io canto cc.JPG
- File:Io cantoCLO.JPG
- File:SORRISI CLAUDIO a cavallo 1.jpg
- File:Matri800.png
- File:MatrimonioRICCIONEmapiC.jpg
- File:BopsCLO.png
- File:CloManifesto105-1.jpg
- File:MikeCloCorrado.jpg
- File:Jovaclo.jpg
- File:Sanremo-1981-alberto-sordi-e-claudio-cecchetto-253408.jpg
- File:SANREMO1980Benigni.jpg
- File:1976 RMI CLO.jpg
- File:CapitalNikkiVolo.png
- File:Mapi clo.jpg
- File:CLAUDIO telegatti.jpg
- File:Cecchetto pippo baudo.jpg
- File:Clodivina76.jpg
- File:1982 Nascita Radiodeejay.jpg
- File:Gerry Kay Sandy 1983.jpg
- File:DJTV 1983.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Ngao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
- File:D. wedding 36.jpg
- File:D. wedding 37.jpg
- File:D. wedding 35.jpg
- File:D. wedding 33.jpg
- File:D. wedding 34.jpg
- File:D. wedding 32.jpg
- File:D. wedding 31.jpg
- File:D. wedding 30.jpg
- File:D. wedding 28.jpg
- File:D. Wedding 27.jpg
- File:D. wedding 29.jpg
- File:D. wedding 26.jpg
- File:D. wedding 25.jpg
- File:D. wedding 24.jpg
- File:D.wedding 21.jpg
- File:D. wedding 23.jpg
- File:D. wedding 22.jpg
- File:D. wedding 20.jpg
- File:D. wedding 19.jpg
- File:D. wedding 18.jpg
- File:D. Wedding 17.jpg
- File:D. wedding 16.jpg
- File:D. wedding 15.jpg
- File:D. Wedding 14.jpg
- File:D. wedding 12.jpg
- File:D. wedding 10.jpg
- File:D. wedding 9.jpg
- File:D. wedding 8.jpg
- File:D. wedding 7.jpg
- File:D. wedding 6.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete useless without context.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Ngao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Olandos4.jpg
- File:Olandos3.jpg
- File:Olandos2.jpg
- File:Olandos5.jpg
- File:Olandos6.jpg
- File:Olandos8.jpg
- File:Olandos9.jpg
- File:Olandos7.jpg
- File:Olandos10.jpg
- File:Olandos13.jpg
- File:Olandos12.jpg
- File:Olandos16.jpg
- File:Olandos15.jpg
- File:Olandos14.jpg
- File:IDorcas w2.jpg
- File:Dorcas w1.jpg
- File:Dorcas wp.jpg
- File:Dorcas w7.jpg
- File:Dorcas w.jpg
- File:Dorcas w0.jpg
- File:Dorcas w11.jpg
- File:D. weddin.jpg
- File:Dorcas w12.jpg
- File:Dorcas w10.jpg
- File:Dorc wedding.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Ngao (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal files, no clear eduse. Out of project scope
- File:Girls in Sec 2018an.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18u.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18y.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18t.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18r.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18e.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18w.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18q.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18a.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18.jpg
- File:Mori SDA church.jpg
- File:Mori SDA.jpg
- File:Bass students.jpg
- File:Bass students 2.jpg
- File:Bass students 1.jpg
- File:Bass students3.jpg
- File:Bass students24.jpg
- File:Bass students4.jpg
- File:Bass students5.jpg
- File:Bass students6.jpg
- File:Bass students7.jpg
- File:Bass students8.jpg
- File:Bass students0.jpg
- File:Bass students9.jpg
- File:Bass students10.jpg
- File:Bass students11.jpg
- File:Bass students12.jpg
- File:Bass students13.jpg
- File:Bass students14.jpg
- File:Bass students15.jpg
- File:Bass students16.jpg
- File:Bass students17.jpg
- File:Bass students18.jpg
- File:Bass students19.jpg
- File:Bass students20.jpg
- File:Bass students21.jpg
- File:Bass students22.jpg
- File:Bass students23.jpg
- File:Bass students25.jpg
- File:Bass students27.jpg
- File:Bass students26.jpg
- File:Bass students28.jpg
- File:Bass students29.jpg
- File:Bass students30.jpg
- File:D. wedding 5.jpg
- File:D. wedding 4.jpg
- File:D. wedding1.jpg
- File:D. wedding 3.jpg
- File:D. wedding2.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
not hosting MisterXS (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 10:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
A photograph of a photograph, need information about the original author of the photograph. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.france24.com/fr/20180308-ps-ministre-affaires-etrangeres-jean-yves-drian-quitte-officiellement-parti-socialiste XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 08:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio, already on other websites like https://savoie-antinucleaire.fr/2017/09/19/iran-laccord-nucleaire-est-essentiel-pour-eviter-la-proliferation-le-drian/ or https://www.elwatannews.com/news/details/1908082 XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 08:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie,. the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. Jarash (talk) 11:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
http://www.dr6.cnrs.fr/centre-est/spip.php?rubrique52
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please delete this pictures, and as I saw that the user didn't know the guides of commons but now he requested to upload them under fair user (see here). Thanks--Alaa Najjar :)..! 20:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
These are not original works by {{Tasnim}}, as there are neither news agency watermark nor the usual black credit line at the bottom of images.
4nn1l2 (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the latter redirected. --Sealle (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate skeletal.svg. Leyo 10:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete the JPEG (COM:CSD #F8) and redirect to File:Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate.png. What the ru.Wikipedian Tokashi uploaded in 2011 as allegedly own work is evidently a degraded version of that Commons PNG image from 2010. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)- Delete both jpg (original nom) and png (Incnis Mrsi's proposed redir target) and replace by the svg. Per others, the jpg is inferior to the png; but both have slightly poor geometry (look at the the bond between the ring and the chain) compared to the svg. The jpg is already unused; if nobody objects in a few days, I'll handle the png->svg replacement. DMacks (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Of course, the SVG is better (it shows S–O bonds), the PNG is graphically illiterate and should be deprecated, but the PNG is a legitimate work by one Smokefoot (talk · contribs) and can be retained for historical record—e.g. browsing old Wikipedia revisions—whereas 4Додецилсульфонат_натрия.jpg was copyfraud and pollution since its inception. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- In light of Revision of File:Sodium_dodecylbenzenesulfonate.png – Keep .png, as SVG replacement does not entail deletion of PNG originals. By the way @DMacks: you must notify Smokefoot via their user_talk page. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Notified. But no, there has been no revision to that png, just my fixing the DR tag. We can retain lots of things, but we usually delete inferior ones and nor is "to make an old revision of an article satisfied" is not within COM:EDUSE. This is not just a format replacement, but the png is chemically/graphically inferior regardless of format (I added an image annotation to it to help everyone recognize this detail). COM:Redundant is format-agnostic. DMacks (talk) 17:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- “Revision of ” is a default text presented by {{Diff}}. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Notified. But no, there has been no revision to that png, just my fixing the DR tag. We can retain lots of things, but we usually delete inferior ones and nor is "to make an old revision of an article satisfied" is not within COM:EDUSE. This is not just a format replacement, but the png is chemically/graphically inferior regardless of format (I added an image annotation to it to help everyone recognize this detail). COM:Redundant is format-agnostic. DMacks (talk) 17:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:44, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Low quality (pixelated), replaced by File:Dodecylbenzene.png. Leyo 10:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Media missing permission Semenov.m7 (talk) 14:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 10:49, 12 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 13:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Media missing permission Semenov.m7 (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 10:49, 12 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 13:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Media missing permission Semenov.m7 (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 10:49, 12 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 13:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality; replaced by better alternatives (see categories). Leyo 15:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}; replaced by File:Aloe emodin.svg. Leyo 16:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Better drawing at File:Tetrachlormethan.svg Ronhjones (Talk) 19:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete but not per nom. Flat vs 3D are different enough and both/separately useful to keep. However, we also already have File:Carbon tetrachloride (flat).svg. DMacks (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Okay, delete. Best regards, --Jue (talk) 08:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernandonavarrete25 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sarkaria Honey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Ambarsaryia.jpg
- File:Honey03115harry.jpg
- File:Sarkaria03115.jpg
- File:Sarkariahoney3116.jpg
- File:Jatt3115.jpg
- File:Honey sarkaria3115.jpg
- File:3115honey.jpg
- File:Sarkaria.jpg
- File:Sarkaria3115.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, judging by the uploader's history. All the files that he claims to be "own work" actually were taken from somewhere else. See his talk page for notifications of deleted files. I haven't found the source for this one yet, but that might be because the file has been edited. Also, the uploader should be blocked. Sitacuisses (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Vandalism uploaded by Vandal Chuck Entz (talk) 00:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by vandal. At least description should be hidden Chuck Entz (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: useless. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Just a personel file )we don't use in wikipedia) علاء فحصي (talk) 01:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted artwork (and outside of project scope) B (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
The wrong file was uploaded. Warrior3005 (talk) 03:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hreed Xaac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope, images and signatures of non notable person.
- File:Hreed Sign.jpg
- File:Hreed Siganture.jpg
- File:Mysig.jpg
- File:Xaacfamily.jpg
- File:Xaac Is Here.jpg
- File:Hreed.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, promotional, Commons is not a host Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RajaSaheb PressMedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]OOS personal files, not used in mainspace, uploader is en:WP:NOTHERE.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RajaSaheb PressMedia (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:RajaSaheb PressMedia.jpg
- File:RajaSaheb.jpg
- File:Graphic1.jpg
- File:Graphic1n.jpg
- File:RajaSaheb.png
- File:Rifle 5.56mm, XM16E1, Operation and Cycle of Functioning TF9-3663.webm
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, previous DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:46, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
a false photo علاء فحصي (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Violotion علاء فحصي (talk) 01:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright Violation from facebook علاء فحصي (talk) 01:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright Violation علاء فحصي (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright Violation علاء فحصي (talk) 02:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright Violation from facebook علاء فحصي (talk) 02:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by سید سرور حسینی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Sayed Sarwar Hussaini.jpg
- File:Sayed Sarwar Hussaini.jpg
- File:Sayed Sarwar Hussaini.jpg
- File:Sayed Sarwar Hussaini.jpg
- File:Sayed Sarwar Hussaini.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. If the uploader is the copyright holder, we'll need confirmation via OTRS. Huon (talk) 06:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ayubmoalim (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promotion, out of project scope.
‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the second file, because it is used in main nameroom. But the article is nominated for deletion; we must wait outcome of the deletion request. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment That article it was linked to got deleted for promotion. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alxes Tanzil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alxes Tanzil (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Photo used for advertisment, out of scope. Check the description that describes the services Texniths (talk) 12:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArchieAndah8 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohit.smart (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Interpretación doctrinal comparativa entre el "Manuale dell' infermieri ossia istruzione sul di assisteri il malati" de Ernesto Rusca y "Notas sobre enfermería. qué es y qué no es" de Florence Nightingale.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahamdali100200300400500 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Historical documents and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Thought Leadership Theory of Zero Salary, Enterprise Calibration of Thoughts and Meditation.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo, map, sound recording. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sugar Bear~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SergioMolinagt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-trivial logos and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Callumreid3563 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:UWSSNA Logo.jpg
- File:SUSNA Logo.png
- File:EUSNA Logo new.png
- File:GUSNA Logo (FSN).png
- File:DUSNA Logo.png
- File:SNP Students logo 2018.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
As per COM:SELFIE, promotional image. Godric ki Kothritalk to me 17:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Random photo of ??? No educational value and not realistically useful. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Views from trains in Yilan
[edit]Random photo, no educational value and not realistically useful, out of scope.
- File:View of Gueishan Island from train 11.jpg
- File:View of Gueishan Island from train 18.jpg
- File:View of Gueishan Island from train 49.jpg
- File:View of Gueishan Island from train 51.jpg
- File:View of Gueishan Island from train 52.jpg
- File:View of Gueishan Island from train 53.jpg
- File:View of Gueishan Station from a passing train.jpg
- File:View of the Lanyang Plain from train on Yilan Line 02.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 02.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 04.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 07.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 11.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 14.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 15.jpg
- File:View of Toucheng from train 16.jpg
- File:View of trees from train in Toucheng 01.jpg
- File:View of trees from train in Toucheng.jpg
- File:View of weeds from train in Toucheng.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imelda Malig Baltazar Mayuyu (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of private photographs, notes and letters, likely intended to document a private legal issue.
- File:A Barangay protection order given to Ms. Imelda Malig Baltazar Mayuyu, from City Of Angeles,Pampanga !.jpg
- File:A Protection From A " PAO" Public Attorney's Office Of City Of Angeles City,Pampanga !.jpg
- File:A letter given, did,wrote by a public attorney to a complainant addressing to a vice mayor of said province or town where she lived legitimate !.jpg
- File:A letter given, did,wrote to a complainant from a vice mayor of said province or town where she lived legitimate !.jpg
- File:Macales ,Bautista,Mayuyu families!.jpg
- File:They Cheated Me!.jpg
- File:January14,1993 ! My Wedding Day !.jpg
- File:Rbm.jpg
- File:Mayuyu.jpg
- File:Bautista.jpg
- File:Macale.jpg
- File:Robert bautista mayuyu.jpg
Achim (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This channel was used for licence laundering. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thisuri Guruge (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.
Achim (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joncières39 (talk · contribs)
[edit]False date, scans of different pictures or brochures, unlikely to be own work.
- File:Michel Maunas Orchestre de Pau.jpg
- File:Michel Maunas 5.jpg
- File:Michel Maunas 4.jpg
- File:Michel Maunas 3.jpg
- File:Michel Maunas 2.jpg
- File:Michel Maunas 1.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NatanaelReyes1984 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Natanael Reyes predicador.jpg.jpg
- File:Natanael Reyes Predicador.png
- File:Natanael Reyes predicador.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation: professional logo, not too simple as claimed.
- File:Hong Kong International Business Channel.png
- File:Fantastic TV Channel No. 77.png
- File:Asia Television.png
- File:Asia Television Digital Media.png
- File:Asia Television Holdings.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, +copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Clearly in copyright based on the the information captured in the image. Sadads (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed, sorry for the goof. --Eunostos (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Msartistrynews (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in May 2017 as a copyright violation. The contributor was subsequently blocked for their promotional username. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 23:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I have upload a higher resolution .png version of this .jpg. The replacement is File:Farman F.211 3-view L'Aerophile April 1934.png Stuffy Carrot (talk) 20:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Publisher logo created by Louise Hanson-Dyer (d. 1962). In case logo is above COM:TOO Abzeronow (talk) 23:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not here not make a fuss but I don't understand the request: We mention the existence of an entire collection, with a complete index, and the question is whether or not we can display the logo of the "Editions de l'Oiseau-Lyre"?
- What about the Mc Donald's logo? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald%27s
- I have added a link and the author for this file, and I am currently fixing all my other uploads
- --Deputydroopy (talk) 09:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- French Wikipedia allows fair use. Commons does not. I filed the deletion request so restoration date (due to copyright) is clear. The other uploads just need fixing it looks like since they appear to be public domain. This might be the only upload that might need to be deleted. Book cover can be localized at fr.wiki though. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
ok thanks --Deputydroopy (talk) 18:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope for wikimedia projects Nahid Hossain (talk) 03:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Informazioni obsolete Maugrandi2 (talk) 12:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 07:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
No FOP for anything apart from buildings in the USA (contact your congressperson) ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Relevence??? This was uploaded/licensed by the organization that errected this display. SecretName101 (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, you seem to be correct. I see that https://www.cagreatamerica.com/ links to this Youtube channel.
I withdraw my nomination ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, you seem to be correct. I see that https://www.cagreatamerica.com/ links to this Youtube channel.
- Relevence??? This was uploaded/licensed by the organization that errected this display. SecretName101 (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope spam selfie image. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 09:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation Salsero35 (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Picture from a lookalike. Incorrect information. On purpose uploaded bij the son of the lookalike. Vdkdaan (talk) 11:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Luc Millecamps is also my neightbour and therefor i see that this is a false upload. You can see the differents if you put "Luc Millecamps" in google pictures. And compare with teh picture by newspapers and television. Vdkdaan (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Support appears a hoax. Uploader on the wikiportret website does not speak the truth it seems. Elly (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Probable fake letter, out of scope anyway. Permission should go to OTRS. Yann (talk) 11:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
GIF from http://www.teamjohnhill.com/ - seems to be advertising. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I think it's a screenshot from a television program, and not "own work". It has 16:9 proportion, no exif data and has the unsharpness of a video screenshot. It's probabbly taken from the TV program "Landstinget (TV-program)" Vera (talk) 13:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Clearly sufficiently creative to be copyrightable B (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Seems sufficiently creative so as to be copyrighted B (talk) 13:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
This image of David Gale (supposedly) in Paris may not be uploader's own work. It was previously used for a 2008 obituary about him (https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2008/03/18_galeobit.shtml; archive).
I contacted the university about the photo; I learned that Gale's family sent the photo to them for use. So far, no permission has yet been made. George Ho (talk) 14:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Pierre Jacques Smit works from Flickr
[edit]- File:The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma (1889) (14563130420).jpg
- File:The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma (1889) (14729391846).jpg
- File:The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma (1889) (14746648641).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (1893) (14598129328).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (6103358895).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (6103906972).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (6103906808).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (6103908006).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (Plate 1) (8077725300).jpg
- File:The royal natural history (Plate 2) (8077725864).jpg
These images were all taken from Flickr's The Commons, where they're marked as public domain by institutions, and they are public domain in the US. However, they're of artworks by Pierre Jacques Smit, who died in 1960, and were first published in the United Kingdom. (These all can be uploaded to English Wikipedia.) —innotata 14:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Good spot. They can also be undeleted in a few years. --Fæ (talk) 14:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Well in 2031. —innotata 03:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'll userfy it, would that satify you? — regards, Revi 05:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- After all, COM:Creator is not a policy or guideline whatsoever. — regards, Revi 05:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- That's not a question of anyone's satisfaction. There's a simple guideline. Please create a Wikidata item for itself. Thanks. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- The page Commons:Creator is NOT a guideline (click 'edit', you will see it is {{Proposed}}.), so where is the guideline you are saying? — regards, Revi 06:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- But there is a Scope. It says:
- The page Commons:Creator is NOT a guideline (click 'edit', you will see it is {{Proposed}}.), so where is the guideline you are saying? — regards, Revi 06:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Anybody who is an author or creator of works hosted on Commons and meets notability requirements for Wikidata items, Commons categories or for Wikipedia articles. In case of Wikidata notability requirements, in order to prevent circular dependence, an item should have sitelinks to projects other than Wikimedia Commons.
- Any known author (not anonymous) whose works are claiming public domain due to copyright expiration. Ideally all files of such authors should use {{Creator}} template to support their claims.
~Moheen (keep talking) 06:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I am saying that page is not a binding guideline. Where is the community consensus to make it guideline? — regards, Revi 06:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- The top of COM:Creator says "This page is a proposed Commons guideline, policy, or process. / The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. References or links to this page should not describe it as "policy".". — regards, Revi 06:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- As far i know, we allow such use cases. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Revi and Stein. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Insufficiently described photo of an uknown person - out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I read above that there is no consensus that this is not allowed !?
Antoine.01
overleg(Antoine) 23:07, 6 November 2018 (UTC) - Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_and_an_MHC_molecule_on_the_surface_of_an_antigen_presenting_cell_binding_to_T-cell_receptors_(right).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_1921.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(1845)_(20353708551).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_Anton_Raphael_Mengs.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14563130420).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14729391846).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14746648641).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14598129328).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8077725300).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8077725864).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:38, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per user revi's opinion on Commons:Deletion requests/Creator:Revi and d:Q58228649. Thanks. --Garam talk 08:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ooops! I did that after watching a creator page on your profile and author section. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 05:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- There is a Wikidata entry, and which also passed notability. Sorry, bro. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I don't like user creator templates regardless of whether of people who have pages on Wikidata or not, but there isn't consensus not to have them, see here and
|type=commons userof the template. --Marsupium (talk) 11:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC) - Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 13:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:46, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Nothing to say sorry about. It's okay. I have just created that in curiosity. Can I add my name in the Wikidata as social volunteer or something btw. :). Thanks, you are moderating this. I have also forgotten about it. --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 10:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 17:44, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don’t think that Wikidata should dictate us whether to have a creator entry for an engineer and graphics designer. But the current use of the template is not consistent. It may not be used for trivial derivative works, such as File:GPS Satellite.svg. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Where is Jarekt’s deletion request for Johannes Kalliauer then? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: : User:Moheen just starts deletion request for Creator-Templates who do not have a wikidata object, and Jarekt agreed on it. But since Franz Kalowski created the wikidata-object today, and according to Commons:Deletion_requests/Creator:Reinhard_Kraasch this might mean that this Template will be kept, as long the wikidata object is available. Making a DR on Johannes Kalliauer is a different story, which would be discussed on wikidata not on commons. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- We don’t know what exactly Jarekt denoted with “notability criteria”. If he deems that the entity shouldn’t exist neither on Commons nor Wikidata, then a deletion request should be started to make this position consistent. But it’s also possible that Jarekt tries to put certain “notability” ideas upon Commons itself. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:41, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: : User:Moheen just starts deletion request for Creator-Templates who do not have a wikidata object, and Jarekt agreed on it. But since Franz Kalowski created the wikidata-object today, and according to Commons:Deletion_requests/Creator:Reinhard_Kraasch this might mean that this Template will be kept, as long the wikidata object is available. Making a DR on Johannes Kalliauer is a different story, which would be discussed on wikidata not on commons. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Notability criteria are often tricky. Some can be found at Commons:Creator or at en:Wikipedia:Notability, but my personal test I like to employ is to see if image is autobiographical and if the data provided can be sourced to any sources which were not created by the subject. --Jarekt (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
It would be nice if {{Creator:Johannes Kalliauer}} could be replaced by {{Ud|JoKalliauer|Johannes Kalliauer}}. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Johannes Kalliauer Good idea. It is now
Done --Jarekt (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Johannes Kalliauer Good idea. It is now
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 12:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Franz Kalowski: what is the merit of it? It looks like fan-cruft without a single reference. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment i see, but i found it many wikimedia commons users created their {CREATOR} tags as you know and you requested the deletion of many users' {CREATOR} tags. if they are deleted, please modify the pages including {CREATOR} template by YOURSELF. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 13:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC) i created new one, and i replace my {CREATOR} tags. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 14:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I created the wikidata item to link her category on Wikimedia Commons to an identifier. I think the creator template is now irrelevant. thanks --iopensa (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 09:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Moheen: I just added a Wikidata item. // Martin K. (talk) 11:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with User:Moheen. I have not seen any indications that this page meets project's notability criteria. See Commons:Creator. --Jarekt (talk) 12:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: What kind of notability criteria are required here in your opinion? As far as I can know, template:creator does not say anything about notability, but explicitly lists a parameter
commons userfor creators directly contributing to Commons. And there are quite some Commons contributors using the Creator-Template (that's why iI started to use this template in the first place) as well as Creator templates without Wikidata link. - Besides the facts that I am publishing designs, photos and artworks outside of wikipedia too, I frankly do not understand the problem. // Martin K. (talk) 13:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- For biographical entries we are looking for published sources or authority control databases (like viaf.org, US Library of Congress, etc.) which were not created by the subject. --Jarekt (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: What kind of notability criteria are required here in your opinion? As far as I can know, template:creator does not say anything about notability, but explicitly lists a parameter
- Keep kein Löschgrund erkennbar. --Ralf Roleček 05:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- This template has existed since 2006, and Wikidata only since 2012. Why is this suddenly an issue. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 13:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 14:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:09, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page has to be kept, COM:Creator is not a policy, and thus, the deletion reason is invalid. See this discussion for precedent. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- It could be in Wikidata. --►Cekli829 12:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 15:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:15, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator templates should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not meeting notability criteria. --Jarekt (talk) 12:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A Wikidata object has been added. --Franz Kalowski (talk) 18:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Creator template should be created for people who have pages on Wikidata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Why? Btw: its not a creator template, it only lokks like one. --JuTa 04:18, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 11:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Disney owns the copyright to this image. Leoboudv (talk) 20:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: MTV did not create this intellectual property. Disney did. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Disney owns the copyright to this poster, I believe. Leoboudv (talk) 20:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: MTV does not own the rights to this 'The Nutcracker' poster since Disney created it. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 07:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 07:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused table with unclear importance, maybe out of project scope. If it is really useful, then should be replaced with wikitable. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erdiyanto bin ismanto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused and outside of Commons' project scope. Apparently uploaded for promotion in id:Prince Nice, which has been deleted for lack of notability.
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope - bad quality Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Image is to blurry to be of any use. –Davey2010Talk 20:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope - bad quality Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - The image is blurry to be of any use. –Davey2010Talk 20:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. Uploader claims as own work, but you can see FInancial Express written on top Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ping, any update? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Corresponsal de Univisión Noticias en Caracas es agredida por elementos de la Guardia Venezolana.webm
[edit]Video unavailable, account terminated. No way to verify the source. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
File:An MHC tetramer binding to T-cell receptors (left), and an MHC molecule on the surface of an antigen presenting cell binding to T-cell receptors (right).png
[edit],_and_an_MHC_molecule_on_the_surface_of_an_antigen_presenting_cell_binding_to_T-cell_receptors_(right).png){kind=link}
,_and_an_MHC_molecule_on_the_surface_of_an_antigen_presenting_cell_binding_to_T-cell_receptors_(right).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It is a good immunological illustration with proper description and categories, certainly in scope. Einstein2 (talk) 19:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi sorry I meant to add it to the Tetramer Assay page but I only just got to it. It's to help explain how MHC class I tetramers work, which is kind of hard to visualize. --Bethmkthomas (talk) 03:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded as an original file, but is the official picture of the MP at the National Assembly [1]. Maniacduhockey (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Photographie prise par mon cellulaire d'une pancarte de campagne électorale. N'est pas tiré du site de l'Assemblée Nationale (User talk:Autala01)
- Delete As admitted above by Autala01, this is a "derivative work": the original photo isn't the uploader's "own work". Without an explicite authorization of the original photographer, this image can't be used under a free licence, and the National Assembly's website where it appears isn't free.
- @Autala01: Bonjour. Les photos utilisées sur des pancartes sont aussi protégées par le droit d'auteur. Peu importe d'où la photo vient de toute façon : il faut l'autorisation du photographe original pour pouvoir la placer sous licence libre et l'utiliser légalement sur Wikipédia. Cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 03:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
claims to be "own work" but clearly is not Lugnuts (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - grabbed from facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Taivo: "Commissioned by Burning Man 2013"
- Who do you want me to ask for permission? I think I should ask Burning Man as this sounds like work for hire. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, seems like Burning Man is the copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. But I'm having second thoughts after looking at the full photo. It has way too much compression.. It's a beautiful photo, but overcompressed. Sadly not worth it for me, and Burning Man/Bryan perhaps wouldn't appreciate this photo to represent the work for the same reason. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, seems like Burning Man is the copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLSu_UjrcUA ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E55h2JCuCWk ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Better drawing at File:Tetrabrommethan.svg Ronhjones (Talk) 19:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't agree. The flat structures of the general formula CX4 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) are covered in ONE article the German Wikipedia (de:Wikipedia) in the same style. The drawing File:Tetrabrommethan.svg is okay, but not for the mentioned article Tetrahalogenmethane. The drawing File:Tetrabromomethane Structural Formula V1.svg fits much better. Best regards, --Jue (talk) 09:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Blurred photo of an unidentifiable box, insufficiently described. Out of project scope. ŠJů (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality of logo, another image is available: CAROM logo.png Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 20:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
|
This file has been superseded by Regelquerschnitt JoKa.png. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Who's the painter ? Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Unknown source and copyright status; cited source website describes itself as a Wikipedia mirror; no indication of original authorship and no evidence of public domain status Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved." ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Missing exif data, likely copyvio Jamez42 (talk) 23:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - The uploader has been blocked indefinitely [2]. STSC (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
w:Conrad Felixmüller (1897-1977), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep licensed CC BY 4.0 at [3]. Note: the website seems to be having problems with direct links right now, but if you go to https://wellcomecollection.org/works and search for "Conrad Felixmüller", it's the first result. clpo13(talk) 17:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious license laundering. The original artwork has not yet passed in PD. Felixmüller's heirs' permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
,_1921.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1921.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
w:Conrad Felixmüller (1897-1977), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 08:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
,_1921.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
,_1921.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio. Не известен автор, время создания, время публикации. Написано время создания 1930 год, при этом шаблон PD USA для произведений, созданных до 1923 года SealMan11 (talk) 10:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
possible copyvio Не известен автор, дата создания, дата публикации. Вероятно фото из семейного архива SealMan11 (talk) 10:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The file contains a very rude mistake. I have noticed that capitals are stated with a "star" sign or something resembling a star. Although, Nagornp-Karabakh is a territory occupied by Armenia and still under occupation, the map shows Stepanakert which is actually Khankendi as a capital.There is no Nagorno-Karabakh republic and there is no capital. Please delete this map, it is very obvious mistake. 134.19.218.206 10:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: There are two ways of mrking the capitals on this map:
- "star and name in bold" = capitals of recognized states (Tbilisi, Baku, Erevan)
- "star and name in normal" = capitals of un- or partially recognized states (Sukhum, Tskhinval and Stepanokert). --Koryakov Yuri (talk) 11:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on several Wikipedias, from azb:اینقوشتیا to uk:Колхидська низовина. Commons should not delete maps over territorial disputes. See COM:NPOV for details. --bjh21 (talk) 17:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
bad quality FinCorleone (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The artist died in 1966. This file will not be in the public domain in its home country until January 1, 2037 Coldcreation (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Dieses Werk des Künstlers ist bleibend öffentlich zugänglich. Die Arbeit wird durch eine gesetzliche Ausnahme der Panoramafreiheit Schweiz genehmigt:
Behalten Paebi (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC) {{FoP-Switzerland}} Paebi (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is FOP ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{FoP-Switzerland}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Does not appear to be under a free licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 21:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I think you are right. This one was uploaded in error. I uploaded a bunch of videos from this filmmaker on 1 May 2018 because they all illustrated these locations very well and I used a few of them (like 2-3 I think) in a video I made (link below). I made sure to capture them on Archive.org first, because he had set all of them to cc-by 3.0 then. It appears to me that he may have changed this now. If you want to check, feel free but I would make sure to check the licensing from archive.org for the URLs. Sometimes the archive.org historical page has trouble letting you click the 'more' button on Vimeo to show that it was freely licensed, so just do a 'view page source' to see what license it was under then. Here's a link to all the videos from the filmmaker that I uploaded: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns9=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1&search=yasin+ilcebay&searchToken=21q9ut8zybxokbzrulnpyez7z
Victorgrigas (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination I have checked and the licence does appear to be correct on the May 2018 pass of archive.org. I have already come across 'view source' trick of archive+vimeo combination, but thanks for pointing it out. At this time I have reviewed this video and also I will go through the other ones as well, but a bit later. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: the request has been withdrawn. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Veraltetes und qualitativ minderwertiges Foto #DigitalCleaning - Ich möchte vor meinem Ableben alle unnützen Spuren in Web tilgen. Fotoinfo.de - Redaktion Newsletter Fotografie (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Entspricht eingentlich nicht den Wikipedia-Konventionen. Trotzdem sollten wir solchen Wünschen Respekt zollen. Können wir denn sicher sein, dass es wirklich Rolf Nobel ist, der den Antrag gestellt hat? --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Ohje, können wir denn sicher sein, dass das veraltete und wenig schmeichelhafte Foto wirklich Rolf Nobel zeigt?
Im Ernst: Hier hat der Fotograf des Bildes = der Prodzent des Bildes den Löschantrag gestellt, nicht der Portraitierte. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.59.152.194 (talk) 18:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Foto bitte entfernen, es ist veraltet und minderwertig + #DigitalCleaning Fotoinfo.de - Redaktion Newsletter Fotografie (talk) 17:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
copyright violence: [4] RAL1028 (talk) 09:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Author request due to copyright Fvalocchi (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
author request due to copyright Fvalocchi (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
author request due to copyright Fvalocchi (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
author request due to copyright Fvalocchi (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
author request due to copyright Fvalocchi (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
bad copy of File:Restaurante PYL Y PAL by Alexander Plyushchev - IMG 1496.jpg Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - Not a copy of the image at all, Not the greatest image but certainly not the worst either, No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 20:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination--Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 20:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
There’s enough reason to discuss this in a DR. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC){{PD-old-70-1923} <!-- Adding the missing '}' does not seem to fix this, the only death date for a Ivor Robert Holmes that I could find is 1960. Jcb --><!-- Then again, who gives a shit about the guy who recorded it. Gershon Sirota died in 1943. -->
- Keep, per Alexis Jazz: «Gershon Sirota died in 1943», therefore indeed {{PD-old-70-1923}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This a traditional Hebrew cantillation. The text and music are PD as such. Sirota's performer and Gramophone's producer related rights lasted only 50 years from the publication. The record was therefore already in the public domain when the 2011 extension of copyright to 70 years came into force. I have added the related template {{PD-EU-audio}}. Concerning Ivor Robert Holmes and for the record - excuse the pun - I try to mention whenever I find them the names of the sound engineers of the Gramophone early recordings because the information of encyclopedic value. But the studio engineer is not the phonogram producer. Per the Rome Convention, the phonogram producer is "the person who, or the legal entity which first fixes the sounds of a performance or other sounds" [5], i.e. the entities or individuals who finance the creation of the sound recording and are therefore the owners of the recording exploitation rights, under whose name the phonogram is distributed, not the sound engineer who is their employee. — Racconish 💬 07:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment In view of an ancillary discussion, I have raised the topic at VPC. — Racconish 💬 21:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 09:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
request of own uploader, there are already a work of same sorce of better quality Ecummenic (talk) 06:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation + not hosting MisterXS (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no metadata, small size. Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
زیرا در تصویر مشکلی وجود دارد Mhtabaii (talk) 09:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
個人的な画像のため削除される必要があります Rebirth10 (talk) 10:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not a personal file. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- finally deleted: per 利用者‐会話:Ruthven#画像の削除取り消しについての疑問: uploader is banned for using Wikimedia projects for auto-promotion. --Ruthven (msg) 14:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
個人的なファイルのため削除の必要があります Rebirth10 (talk) 10:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not a personal file. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
I understand neither the title nor the description of this image. Nor do I begin to understand how you can know a building is listed but not know where it is. As Wikimedia Commons is not a pub-quiz site, I cannot see how this image adds any value. Chris j wood (talk) 10:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You can ask for the file to be renamed. Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If it was created in 1990, it cannot be published before 1989, so PD-Brazil-URAA licence is not applicable. RJFF (talk) 11:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @RJFF: {{PD-Brazil-URAA}} limit is 1996, not 1989 (no idea where you've got that year from). Keep As no valid reason was presented to deletion.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- According to the PD-Brazil-URAA template, the requirements are: it was first published in Brazil (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days) and it was first published before 1 March 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities, such as copyright notice and it is one of the following: ...
- This image was not published before 1 March 1989, so it lacks one of the requirements. --RJFF (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- @RJFF: I must thank you, as I've never noticed that incoherence, even if I've designed that template myself. However, the photos taken until 19 June 1998 were in PD at the time URAA came into effect, and remain PD till today, so there really was nothing to restore there in 1996. The template has to be fixed (and probably split in two, taking away the photos from there), but this photograph is indeed PD in Brazil.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Darwin. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
immagine da correggere Tafa85 (talk) 11:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
An .svg vectorised version of this logo has already been uploaded! MaroneLeone (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see the SVG file listed or in the categories this file belongs. Ruthven (msg) 09:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
An .svg vectorised version of this logo has already been uploaded! MaroneLeone (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: @MaroneLeone: I don't see the SVG file listed or in the categories this file belongs. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Photo used for advertisement Texniths (talk) 12:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + probable copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
bad quality FinCorleone (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: can be kept, just straighten it. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
_(1845)_(20353708551).jpg){kind=link}
_(1845)_(20353708551).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a scan of a folded page; File:Atti della Riunione, &c. I-VIII and XI. (11 Vol. in 10) (1845) (19726667633).jpg shows the unfolded page. Both images are present in the scan at https://archive.org/stream/attidellariunion06scie/#page/n657/mode/1up , but the first one is inherently incomplete. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
_(1845)_(19726667633).jpg){kind=link}
- We normally keep these. It's interesting from an archive point of view to see how a map or drawing was folded up or tucked away in the original book. BTW, as can be seen in this case, where a scan of the unfolded page is included, these often have different colours, possibly a different process was used from the rest of the scanning. --Fæ (talk) 14:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Jochen Burghardt clarification please. Have I understood your nomination properly? Are you asserting that two adjacent page, each of which would be in the public domain, on its own, can, nevertheless, not be in the public domain, when they are scanned together, due to an almost imperceptible artifact of the scanning? So:
- If the two pages were scanned separately, and then someone used a stitching program to seamlessly stitch them together, would the result be public domain?
- If the two pages were scanned separately, and then someone used a stitching program to stitch them together, but the stitching left an artifact noticeable by an expert, would the result be public domain?
- If this pages was cut in two, at the fold, and trimmed a couple of pixels, to trim the fold, and then stitched together, would the result be public domain?
- I have had a concern, for a long time, that, in our efforts to make a reasonable compliance with all laws, et cetera, we, in the wider WMF community, sometimes edge beyond the edge of reason. The WMF decision to extend copyright protection to images from countries, even before they join Berne-world? I think that went beyond reason. So did the lawyer we hired. I also think it was dangerously colonial, and showed a disrespect for the sovereignty of Afghanistan, and any other nations where we applied it.
- I cropped what you call the fold, and uploaded File:Atti della Riunione, &c. I-VIII and XI. (11 Vol. in 10) (1845) (20353708551) (cropped).jpg. If I have understood the concern you voiced, it is in public domain, where this image isn't merely because it doesn't show what you call a "fold", but which I think was actually an insignificant artifact of stitching. Geo Swan (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
_(1845)_(20353708551)_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- @Fæ: Ok, I didn't know that. I don't intend to deviate from the usual conventions. So I withdraw my deletion request. -
- (As a side remark: if Wikipedia is that much interested in the original book, I wonder why most often only its images are scanned and not all page, including text-only pages. I have often found that it would be interesting to read an original historical article, but only its illustrating images were present at commons. However, that may be another thread of discussion.)
- @Geo Swan: I didn't intend to claim anything about being, or not being, in the public domain. I'm far from being an expert in copyright laws. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Ruthven (msg) 09:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Although audio and picture are quite bad, this is still a DW of the underlying music and performance. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Editor-1 (talk) 05:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Esta foto es de mi propiedad Chinoesclavo (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2012 by the author of this request. Has publicado tu la foto aquì en 2012 con licencia libre. Es de tu propriedad, pero nosotros podemos usarla. Ruthven (msg) 09:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
This logo is not a free license according to this explanation[6]. Asgawaji (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Outside of project scope: photo of a non-notable child. (The image is not in use and the uploader is banned from Wikimedia.) B (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Note that the “banned” allegation is a willing deception – User:B can’t provide any evidence that OceanAtoll (talk • contribs • block log • filter log) belongs to a user who was banned Wikimedia-wide or from Commons specifically. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh good grief. The point is that whatever use the uploader might have had for this image, they are not coming back to see it through. Their account is globally locked. I'm not sure why you're picking a fight over this. --B (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Again, Winterysteppe is not banned and technically may request unblock at any time. He is our contributor and spreading stories that he is “banned” constitutes libel and harassment, even if he is a sock puppeteer. The time to stop treatment of our people like shit by some Wikipedians? We already lost Sonia over it and may lose several people more. Why do we permit such abomination to unfold on our own soil? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- In my time on Wikipedia/Commons, I have seen some weird discussions, but this takes the cake. WHO THE HELL CARES?????? The question here is whether an image should be deleted, not over the definition of "ban" vs "globally locked". I have no idea why you keep trying to pick a fight over it and there are plenty of people on this site who would love to fight with you over something, go find one of them. --B (talk) 13:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Again, Winterysteppe is not banned and technically may request unblock at any time. He is our contributor and spreading stories that he is “banned” constitutes libel and harassment, even if he is a sock puppeteer. The time to stop treatment of our people like shit by some Wikipedians? We already lost Sonia over it and may lose several people more. Why do we permit such abomination to unfold on our own soil? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh good grief. The point is that whatever use the uploader might have had for this image, they are not coming back to see it through. Their account is globally locked. I'm not sure why you're picking a fight over this. --B (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The photo is of good quality, usable for eduse, and PD, so it can be kept. Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_Anton_Raphael_Mengs.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_by_Anton_Raphael_Mengs.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This painting is effectively a work of fiction, it is a false-colour version of File:Mengs - Richard Wilson.jpg. The original version from the National Museum of Wales is in use on 22 other projects. This false colour derivative was in use on the French Wikipedia and English Wikipedia only because Jan Arkesteijn (talk · contribs) planted them in those projects diff1 diff2. Replacing the authentic official original image with fake colour versions on Wikipedia(s), without any notice or consensus to do so, appears to be a pure act of vandalism.
Deletion is necessary as the image actively misleads and misinforms. There is no reason for other Wikimedia projects or reusers off-wiki to use this false colour version and continuing to host it on Commons will leave the door open for future mistaken reuse or further deliberate misrepresentation. Fæ (talk) 17:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
,_by_Anton_Raphael_Mengs.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Jan Arkesteijn (talk · contribs), can you please explain your point of view ? In particular: what is, according to you, the educational value of this retouched picture? And why exactly did you replace the original image with this one in some wikis ? — Racconish 💬 18:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- See Jan Arkesteijn (talk · contribs) answer on his talk page here. His refusal to participate in the community discussion is regrettable. — Racconish 💬 12:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Never stopped me. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- See Jan Arkesteijn (talk · contribs) answer on his talk page here. His refusal to participate in the community discussion is regrettable. — Racconish 💬 12:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Racconish, I thought about that, but the ranting contains so much bad faith, that I think it will not make any difference. The image existed on Commons long before I uploaded this file. I uploaded it not to illustrate the work of Mengs, but to provide an image of Wilson. Whether it is good enough is a personal matter. Even if would have reduced all the colours it still has nothing to do with fake.
— Jan Arkesteijn, 11:03, 6 November 2018
Thanks, but please answer there: I will not comment here.
— Racconish, 11:08, 6 November 2018
No.
— Jan Arkesteijn, 11:11, 6 November 2018
- Delete Fake colours; dishonest upload that doesn't match source; warring with other users who upload correct version. -- Colin (talk) 20:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
{{Vd}}@Racconish: see Arkesteijns talk page, COM:ANU, COM:VPP, COM:VP, COM:De Kroeg.. actually where shouldn't you look.. I've loaded the image and the original, trying to figure out how Arkesteijn maimed it:
- Contrast was reduced by roughly 10%
- Automatic white balance correction was applied
- Arkesteijn has done more, but I'm unable to match the exact result. If Arkesteijn adjusted some regions individually (which may well be the case), I'll never be able to match it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I can use this to make Paul Fearn miserable. And Paul Fearn should be as miserable as possible. It will actually be educational! (I'll revert to the first version though, that's the version with educational value)- Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete essentially per nom. Even if someone will clarify how the correct unadulterated image will be designed for priority use on other wikiprojects the fact that this image lacks accurate sourcing is a major issue. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't want to be hurried, I have to rewrite a bunch of stuff, but I promise I have an educational use for the first revision. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:25, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- User:Alexis Jazz, if you are planning some POINTy disruptive pathetic essay/article in order to make the first revision "used", then please, just step away from the keyboard and go find another hobby. Your disruption will be noted and used as an example when it is your turn for an indef block discussion at AN/U. Be also aware that the first revision is not "Richard Wilson (1714-1782), by Anton Raphael Mengs" but an Arkesteijn amomination, and should not exist under this filename. We don't keep bad quality work on Commons, for example, to illustrate some schoolchild-level essay on bad quality work. -- Colin (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- If you don't like my essays, quit reading them! Several of them even warn certain people not to read them! But I really mean educational. At least initially I will use it to teach on an essay, indeed, but with a proper source (no original research..) it could also have a place on Wikipedia. And yes, I mean the first revision. The Arkesteijn abomination, the one that's actually worse than the current revision. It has to be specifically that version. And no, you won't like it. But that doesn't mean it won't be educational. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- User:Alexis Jazz, if you are planning some POINTy disruptive pathetic essay/article in order to make the first revision "used", then please, just step away from the keyboard and go find another hobby. Your disruption will be noted and used as an example when it is your turn for an indef block discussion at AN/U. Be also aware that the first revision is not "Richard Wilson (1714-1782), by Anton Raphael Mengs" but an Arkesteijn amomination, and should not exist under this filename. We don't keep bad quality work on Commons, for example, to illustrate some schoolchild-level essay on bad quality work. -- Colin (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't want to be hurried, I have to rewrite a bunch of stuff, but I promise I have an educational use for the first revision. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:25, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Nobody should be adjusting the colors of an oil painting as if it were a cheap snapshot. Binksternet (talk) 04:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Since User talk:Jan Arkesteijn isn't willing to participate in this discussion we have a major problem. Jan Arkesteijn's comments on their talk page are very confusing. Are they denying that they are actually the one who retouched this photo? If so, how do we know what the author was trying to achieve? If they were intending to improve the original artwork, rather than accurately reproduce it, then how do we know they haven't met the threshold for copyright? And if it isn't Jan Arkesteinjn, how do we know what, if any, licence this work is released under? Nil Einne (talk) 12:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC).
- Keep seems vindictive, given the large amount of yellow milkmaid around. File:The_Yellow_Milkmaid_Syndrome.PNG would prefer curation of colours with deprecation of bad balance rather than deletion. need to maintain sources of bad balance, for future tracking and image investigation purposes. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
,_by_Anton_Raphael_Mengs.jpg){kind=link}
Who owns the copyright over this projection of U2's Bono on a video screen? The photographer just took a photo of it but did not create it. Leoboudv (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Concert photography, concert photography should be permissible. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Y2kcrazyjoker4: that's about taking photos of the artists performing. Not about taking photos of displays that show artists performing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's most certainly not just about the musicians performing, since "artistic stages" are also mentioned. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 05:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Y2kcrazyjoker4: that's about taking photos of the artists performing. Not about taking photos of displays that show artists performing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
This plaque has a copyright notice on it so certainly they think it is sufficiently creative for copyright protection (and hence this photo is a derivative work of a copyrighted 3D object). Also, I don't see this personal photo as having any use in any educational project so I'm not overly inclined to expend very many brain cells trying to figure out if this meets Finland's TOO. B (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope: promotional. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Veraltetes und qualitativ minderwertiges Foto #DigitalCleaning - Ich möchte vor meinem Ableben alle unnützen Spuren in Web tilgen. Fotoinfo.de - Redaktion Newsletter Fotografie (talk) 17:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 02:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Veraltetes Portrait #DigitalCleaning - Ich möchte vor meinem Ableben alle unnützen Spuren in Web tilgen. Fotoinfo.de - Redaktion Newsletter Fotografie (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request for an unused file. --E4024 (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 02:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
The licence wasn't CC0 as the uploader to Commons claimed, but CC-PD. I changed that. But why is it CC-PD is uncleear. If the original author is US government, then everything is fine, but it is not clear here. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Created by the en:Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization which was under the Executive Office of the President at the time. {{PD-USGov}}. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
The exact duplicate of File:Clay Day.webm ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @Gone Postal: it's not an exact duplicate. File:Clay Day (Stop Motion Movie).webm has an audio track, while the older upload does not. clpo13(talk) 18:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are correct there. What is the music that is playing, does anybody know? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP - unclear copyright situtation wrt audio track,. --Эlcobbola talk 20:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)