User talk:Paebi
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Yann 16:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Peiden01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--Ikiwaner 23:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Orgullomoore 18:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Moskau Kosmos Pavillon Bilder
[edit]Hallo Paebi, schöne Bilder vom (ehemaligen) Kosmos Pavillon 1968. Gibt es noch mehr davon? (ich mache gerade eine 3D Rekonstruktion des Pavillons, anschaubar unter lostexhibitions.net und suche noch nach Bildern). Wenn Du helfen magst bitte melden (siehe website). Gruß Jens --Jens Mondry (talk) 03:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Gratulation
[edit]zur Veröffentlichung Deines Bildes: [1] Gruss --Pelz (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- … und wieder einmal Lizenzbestimmungen von der Presse missachtet! -- Хрюша ?? 09:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Attributierung Quartierspiegel
[edit]Hallo Paebi. die Statistik Stadt Zürich produziert nun neue Quartierspiegel. Ich habe dort erreicht, dass sie die gesamten Quartierspiegel unter CC-BY-SA stellen, da der Geschichtsteil für die Wikiepdia-Artikel sehr gut übernehmbar ist. Dafür brauchen sie aber im Gegenzug freie Bilder von uns. Sie haben nun für alle Quartierspiegel Bilder von Commons ausgesucht. Ein paar stammen nun von dir. Bsp. hier: de:Wikipedia:Schweiz/Quartierspiegel/Altstetten. Ich habe nun folgende Attributierung zu deinen Bilder im Abbildungsverzeichnis vorgesehen:
- Paebi, Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA-3.0 unportiert
Bitte gib mir doch hier kurz Bescheid, ob diese Attributierung für dich in Ordnung ist, oder ob was daran geändert werden soll. Vielleicht möchtest du ja eine Klarnamennennungs anstelle des Wikipedia-Benutzernamens. --Micha (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Micha, das ist so in Ordnung für mich. Paebi (talk) 09:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Deine Ableitung
[edit]Hallo Paebi, wenn du einen Auszug aus einem Werk eines anderen Autors machst, stell diesen bitte unter deinen eigenen Namen und nicht unter den des anderen Autors. Es ist schliesslich nicht dessen Intention. Um auf das Originalwerk zu verweisen, gibt es das Template «Extracted from». Im Übrigen entzieht sich meinem Verständnis, weshalb du diese Ableitung gemacht hast. --Хрюша ?? 10:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Expo 64 ....
[edit]Hallo Paebi
Ich hatte lang überlegt, welche der Flaggen von den Expo-Bildern seitenverkehrt sind - aber ich hatte nie das Gefühl, man hätte sie von innen angesehen. Dann war ich eigentlich sicher wegen dem Hintergrund meines Bildes, wo man nach Westen sieht, also stimmt mein Bild. Und die anderen Bilder kamen mir dann zuhilfe: Auf dem Monorail hat es auch eine Schrift, wenn du genau hin siehst und vom Hintergrund her muss das in Richtung Westen schauen, nicht nach Osten wie hochgeladen. Und jetzt bin ich eigentlich auch sicher, dass das Hauptbild auch seitenverkehrt ist. Schau dir zum Vergleich das Modell auf dem englischen Artikel an (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expo64#/media/File:Maquette_de_l%E2%80%99Exposition_nationale_suisse_de_1964_(Atelier_Maurice_Ruche).JPG), da ist alles zu sehen und es stimmt dort (aufgrund des Baches ganz sicher). Und auch das Bild Seegelände.
Sorry für die schlechten Nachrichten - eigentlich keine schlechte Nachricht, lässt sich ja korrigieren.
Ich werde vielleicht als "Belohnung" für meine Detektiv-Arbeit mein Flaggen-Bild in den Artikel stellen. :-) Für dich hab ich auch eine Belohnung, ein paar Bilder dazu - werde ich gleich hochladen. Viele Grüsse--Anidaat (talk) 19:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ja, Du bist wirklich ein guter Detektiv. Der Fehler passierte vermutlich bei der Digitalisierung der Dias. Welche Flaggen-Bilder sind seitenverkehrt? Paebi (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Verkehrt: Das Flaggen-Bild im Artikel. Das Hauptbild im Artikel ("Expogelände Lausanne-Ouchy"). Die Monorail in der Kategorie. Das Seegelände in der Kategorie. Die Musik von Hinten schauen auch Tiere nach rechts - die schauen auf Wappen nach links. (Beim Sousaphon-Bild sieht man zu wenig und ist nicht so wichtig). Der Rütlischwur? ziemlich schwierig mit dem Rütlischwur. Guet Nacht --Anidaat (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Jetzt habe ich alles gespiegelt. Den Rütlischwur habe ich mit demjenigen in Flüelen verglichen, war auch seitenverkehrt. Kannst Du noch einen prüfenden Blick auf alle werfen? Vielen Dank! Paebi (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Beim Rütlischwur war ich einfach zu faul, um genau hin zu sehen... (kam ja auch nicht auf den Hintergrund drauf an). Alles ok.--Anidaat (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Jetzt habe ich alles gespiegelt. Den Rütlischwur habe ich mit demjenigen in Flüelen verglichen, war auch seitenverkehrt. Kannst Du noch einen prüfenden Blick auf alle werfen? Vielen Dank! Paebi (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Sperrstellen in der Schweiz has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
=
Could I link this with full credit on the page on Swiss gun laws? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abatementyogin (talk • contribs) 04:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, you can. Paebi (talk) 07:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Basislinie Walperswil–Sugiez
[edit]Hallo Paebi, derzeit gibt es die Infotafeln auch «in sauber» und man sieht den tieferliegenden Stein in Walperswil → Glasplatte gereinigt. --Хрюша ?? 09:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Chriusha, sehr gut. Hoffentlich hast Du ein paar "saubere" Fotos gemacht :-) Paebi (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Natürlich, sieht man doch im verlinkten Artikel. --Хрюша ?? 09:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Wäre schön, wenn Du die Fotos auch bei Wikipedia hochladen könntest? Paebi (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nein, da bin ich schon seit 5 Jahren raus. Ist als Gedankenanstoss für dich gedacht, da du ja schon den Endpunkt Sugiez fotografiert hast. --Хрюша ?? 12:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ich habe volles Verständnis. Vielen Dank für die Info.Paebi (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nein, da bin ich schon seit 5 Jahren raus. Ist als Gedankenanstoss für dich gedacht, da du ja schon den Endpunkt Sugiez fotografiert hast. --Хрюша ?? 12:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Wäre schön, wenn Du die Fotos auch bei Wikipedia hochladen könntest? Paebi (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Natürlich, sieht man doch im verlinkten Artikel. --Хрюша ?? 09:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Sihlporte
[edit]Hallo Paebi
ich habe versucht, die Daten über dieses Bild: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fl%C3%B6sser_Sihlporte_1840_21986.jpg#metadata zu ergänzen - habe es aber nicht geschafft - ich weiss nicht, wie man das machen muss. Willst Du vielleicht die Daten ergänzen? Es handelt sich um einen Kupferstich von Franz Hegi, welcher die Situation um 1840 bei der Sihlporte zeigt. Ein Flösser leitet Holzstämme über die Kanalbrücke des Sihlkanals oder der Zahmen Sihl. Die Brücke führt über den Schanzengraben. Der Stich gehört zu einer Serie "Zürcher Stadttore und Porten", welches 14 Kupferstiche vereinigt und zuletzt 1975 wiederaufgelegt wurde. - Mir geht's einfach darum, dass Franz Hegi als Zeichner oder Stecher erwähnt wird. Ich habe diese Information auch an das Baugeschichtliche Archiv der Stadt Zürich geschickt, wo die Zeichnung auch ungenügend dokumentiert ist. - Vielen Dank! Werner
Oldtimer Schiffe
[edit]- Hallo, Paebi, ich möchte die Schiffe auf deinen wunderschönen Bildern aus dem Jahre 1971 richtig katalogisieren. Heißt dieses Schiff mit 3 Retungsbooten Lindos IMO 5215040? In der Beschreibung schon, aber da ist momentan dann falsche Kategorie, nämlich Helleanna (ship, 1954) statt Lindos (ship, 1952)
Es interessieren mich auch Schiffe auf diesen Bildern:
(rechts)
(links von Enotria, und das Schiff, wo die Kamera stand bzw. in den Händen war), danke, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 17:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- + richtige Cat Category:Achilleus (ship, 1952) für dieses Schiff, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Es ist die Lindos/Achilleus, sie hat ein spezielles Rettungsboot. Die Schiffe, bei denen man keinen Namen findet, kenne ich auch nicht. Man könnte die Reederei ausfindig machen und auf den Schiffsfahrplänen vom August 1971 nachsehen. Paebi (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Danke. Entschuldigung, Lindos IMO 5215040 und Achilleus IMO 5191892 sind verschiedene Schiffe. Lindos sah so aus:
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2744899
Nach 50 Jahren erinnert man sich an den Namen nicht mehr, klar. So wie ich verstehe, war die Kamera an Bord eines sehr hohen Schiffes. Das müsste eher die Lindos sein als die Achilleus. Leider gibt es keine weiteren Aufnahmen zum Vergleich, danke nochmals, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Man kann aber immer noch viel aus dem Internet holen: Hier ist ein Bild der Lindos:
Hier sind noch ein paar Angaben zur Achilleus:
KOLOKTRONIS: built 1952, initial name was GEORGIOS POTAMIANOS, delivered to The New Epirotiki Steamship Navigation "Petros Potamianos" at Piraeus. In 1971 renamed ACHILLEUS. Later (but before 1984) transferred to George Kousouniades Shipping S.A. at Piraeus. Laid-up since around 1978, probably scrapped locally. Der antike Held Achilles heisst bei den heutigen Griechenund diese Buchstabenfolge in lateinischen Buchstaben schreibt man “ACHILLEFS”. Auch das Bild des Schiffes von 1977 passt, nur war das Schiff ca. 1973 oder 1974 im unteren Teil blau gestrichen wie die anderen Schiffe von Kousouniadis. Epirotiki Lines Wikipedia M/V KOLOKOTRONIS – A war reparation vessel https://www.naviearmatori.net/eng/foto-175271-1.html Navi e Armatori - Approdi di Passione https://www.shipsnostalgia.com/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/157030/title/george-potamianos-kolokotronis/cat/518 https://issuu.com/maritimemedia/docs/baltic_summer_2012/18 Paebi (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Danke. Für jeden Namen des Schiffes muss man extra Seite schaffen, denn es wechselt oft normalerweise nicht nur Inhaber, sondern auch die Flagge, Rufzeichen, MMSI, Heimathafen, nur IMO-Nummer bleibt fast immer dieselbe, deswegen habe ich gestern IMO-Seite geschrieben, wo man alle wichtigsten Daten findet, die wichtigen und weniger wichtigen wie die Abmessungen, Antrieb und Besatzung sind weggelassen. Diese kann man später aus Wikipedia entnehmen, wenn das Schiff eine Bedeutung, z. B. wie Heleanna (Brand), hat. Ich spreche von dieser Seite Category:IMO 5191892, ich gebe auch immer originelle griechische Namen ein, soweit diese vorhanden sind, in der letzten Zeit, besonders bei Yachts, sind nur englische Namen vorhanden, z. B. Category:Escape (ship, 1980), Gruß,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 13:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich bin kein Schiffsspezialist, aber ich habe das mit der IMO auch bemerkt, als ich meine Fotos einordnen wollte. Die IMO-Nummer ist für uns wirklich wertvoll. Ich habe jetzt noch den Schiffsfahrplan File:Efthimiadis Lines Schiffe und Häfen 1971.jpg und den Schiffsplan der Kolokotronis. File:Potamianos Kolokotronis Achilleus.jpg platziert. Ich bin 2 Wochen vor dem Brand mit der Heleanna gereist. Paebi (talk) 07:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Du hast echt Glück gehabt, Paebi, das habe ich schon gemerkt, August 1971 im Dateinamen, kurz vor dem Disaster, da steht falsches Datum in der Zeile Date, 31 March 2020, 18:39:07, ich werde es korrigieren, danke nochmals für die hervorragenden Fotos, Gruß,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 19:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Albiswerk Kabelbaum 1950 hist 7344 102 42x42 ID 360.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
GPSLeo (talk) 16:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
File:ChrKaufmannFührerbuch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
HouseBlaster (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:ChrKaufmannFührerbuch.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ChrKaufmannFührerbuch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
HouseBlaster (talk) 22:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Dieses Bild stellt eine amtliche Bestätigung (Regierungsrat) nach Schweizer Gesetzgebung dar und ist nicht urheberrechtlich geschützt (Art. 5 URG)
This image is from or of:
|
File:Logo Hear Center 1954.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Animalparty (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
RIP
[edit]de:Benutzer:Paebi/Kondolenzliste Enhancing999 (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Hottingen Otto van Rees 1915.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vera (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
File:26. Eidg Tambouren- und Pfeiferfest Frauenfeld.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DCB (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
File:29. Eidg Jodlerfest Davos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DCB (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Appenzeller Sennentracht 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Logo Cabaret Cornichon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Reigoldswil02.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Reigoldswil02.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Reigoldswil02.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Logo Trachtenchorfest 2016.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |